WEBVTT - AWS Races to Address Widespread Outage

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Amazon says it's cloud

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>service is recovering after widespread outages affected customers like Zoom, Snapchat,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and Coinbase.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Plus US China trade talks resuming this week as President

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump lists Rare Earth among its top priorities.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And IBM and Grock partner up to provide greater access

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 2>to the full potential of enterprise AI. We'll discuss with

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>them later this hour.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 4>My first I's check in on these markets.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>D I'm sat in London this week, but I can

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>see from across the pond one point thirty percent on

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the nasat one hundred and a new record high. There's

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>a risk on tone throughout the markets. We're looking towards

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 3>those China US trade talks, but there are some notable

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>gainers underneath the head YEP.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Apple is a big points driver to the upside. At

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the index level, Apple has touched its first record high

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty five. That's the first record high since

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>December of twenty twenty four. We have an upgrade at

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Loop to buy, like many recently siting trends in the

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>iPhone upgrade cycle. We're gonna have a lot more on

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>this story throughout the hour, but clearly this is a

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 2>big jump for the company and it's really impacting markets

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to the macro level. We're also looking at Amazon, the

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>parent of cloud computing AWS. The sock's actually up a

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>percentage point. A massive outage overnight, principally around one US

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>data center in North Virginia, the US East One site,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>but it has had repercussions for the public sector, the

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>private sector, and technology companies of all types. Let's get

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>out to Bloomberg'syajo's son, who's been reporting on this throughout

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the incident, very simply a Joe, what happened and what

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of the ramifications beenah ed?

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 5>So this morning Amazon reported that they're experiencing operational failure

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 5>across multiple services and its data center hub in northern Virginia.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Even though the issue occurred in eastern the northeast of

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 5>the United States, the impact was really fell far and wide.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Some of the victims of this outage include trading platform

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Robin Hood Lloyd's the British Bank HMRC, the British Tax Authority,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 5>as well as Perplexity the AI platform. So the company

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 5>said that the issue has been largely fixed, but there

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 5>are residual effects. And this definitely gives me flashback of

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 5>the CrowdStrike outage last year, which you might remember, a

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 5>buggy update from CrowdStrike really paralyzed nearly half the world's

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 5>computers and left people scrambling at airports and sent bankers

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 5>home early because they simply couldn't turn out the computers.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Joe, it does remind us of the important of

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>a very few, very powerful players when it comes to

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>our tech infrastructure. It hasn't been that significant an incident

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>for Amazon in and of itself for many years.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Now is it twenty twenty one?

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 3>But tell us about the learnings that Amazon's going to

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 3>push forward for AWS.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think this really speaks to the fragility of

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 5>overdependence on the very few, you know, hyperscaler cloud operators

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.399
<v Speaker 5>that we have. AWS is the world's largest cloud provider.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Its business surpasses Google and Microsoft's and I believe AWS

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 5>analysts predict that this unit is going to brain about

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty six billion dollars to the company.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Amazon itself has said that the company is going to

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 5>invest around one hundred billion or so into building data

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>centers and model training. Given that you know, so much

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 5>of our AI training inference is run on these data

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 5>centers cloud computing services these days, I think Amazon will

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 5>really have to think about business continuity so that this

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 5>does not happen again.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Joe, Lots of our audience here on Bloomberg Tech

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>are highly technical. It might be their job to deal

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>with their cloud computing provider. Loads of people will be

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>watching and be like, I don't understand any of this.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand what happened. I spent a lot of

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 2>time reading about DNS and reading about DINAMODB, the data

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 2>center database that the AWS relies on. Have they actually

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>answered the why of what happened? How could they let

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>this happen?

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 6>They have not answered why.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 5>So DNS is a system that translates web addresses to

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 5>IP addresses so your apps and your websites can load.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 5>I think we will throughout the US day at the

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 5>company will say exactly what happened, will probably let us know.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 5>But I think it's very I think it's it's very

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 5>telling that a very small part of the digital infrastructure

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 5>can create such a ripple effect throughout the global economy.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 5>And I think we will see if the company will

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 5>say anything about how you know, if there will be

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 5>what they will do to satisfy their customers going forward.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sure you'll be the first one to help

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>us report it out. Ya just and we so appreciate

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 3>you jumping on today.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. Let's get to the wider impact look.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>On the tech sector written large today we're in riscon

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 3>mode and Rathmun's with us Grenadilla advisory founder and CEO

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and Anna, Look, we see these technical glitches and the

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 3>realization and well maybe just re memorizing the idea that

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>we do depend on a few very big players not

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>just for our infrastructure, but for the market to go

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>higher too.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 4>What do you make at the rally today?

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the rally, I mean, especially for Amazon, it seems

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 7>like there was no glitch today because Amazon is also

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 7>up with the rest of the markets. As regards to Amazon,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 7>I do think that there is a concentration problem. Everyone

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 7>about the stock market concentration, I mean, this is sort

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 7>of the same thing. I think we have to start

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 7>looking at digital infrastructure almost as utilities.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 6>You really can't.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 7>Live without it, and so from that standpoint, I think

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 7>barriers it to entry are high, but we need to

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 7>start thinking about sort of diversifying our exposure.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 6>With regards to the rest of the market.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 7>I think there is a lot of excitement, certainly not

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 7>only in tech, but in other areas of the markets

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 7>as well. I mean, last week we learned about Walmart

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 7>and open Ai. Today we learned about Cleveland Cliffs and

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 7>Rare Earth's exploration. I feel like what's happening now is

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 7>something that investors have been waiting for for a long time,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 7>which is to see the expansion of the tentacles of

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 7>AI reaching the different parts of the economy and different

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 7>parts of the markets. And this makes us feel a

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 7>lot better about the AI play and AI development because

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 7>it's becoming stickier.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 6>We can't feel this off as easily.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 7>We can't just say, okay, those are the data centers

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 7>that are going to go dark and we may not

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 7>use it for ten years. This is becoming more of

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 7>a real thing in our daily lives.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>So interesting you're talking about the broadening out effector in

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>the markets. But let's just go back to the first

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>point about the over focus. There are basically an oligopoli

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to cloud provision. I'm here in Europe

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>because we've got our Tech summon in London, and one

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>of the key debates is to be had is Europe's

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>over dependence on other global players, the fact that they

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>don't make their own chips, but they also don't have

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>their own cloud providers. What do you make out her

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 3>of whether that might indeed change as we all think

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>about sovereign AI and sovereign cloud.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.239
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so I think the concentration risk we talked about earlier,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 7>it applies to everybody. This was a global event, right,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 7>and so you do need to think about diversifying your exposure.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 6>But we've had stuff.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 7>Like this in the past, maybe not as large as Amazon,

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 7>but I think the previous speaker talked about christ Strike, CrowdStrike.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 7>It really it requires a massive amount of investment and

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 7>a massive amount of effort to get that done, and

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 7>so far the effort has been coming from a select

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 7>few regions and countries. Certainly Europe probably needs to think

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 7>about having their own infrastructure as well, but it's not

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 7>as easy to do as it is to say.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And Apple's just touched four percent in the session again,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>hitting a record high for the first time this year.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a big factor at the index level. What do

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>you make of all of these upgrades on optimism around iPhone?

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, especially with regards to the negotiations with China,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 7>it is really nice to see sales up in the

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 7>United States because then it makes Apple look like less

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 7>dependent on some of this rhetoric between China and the US.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 7>But I would also say that there is a little

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 7>bit of a spending of pulling forward of thing. When

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 7>you think that iPhones or anything's going to cost four

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 7>or five percent more in a year, are you really

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 7>going to wait for iPhone eighteen? No, You're going to

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 7>buy it today, especially if you have an iPhone X

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 7>or iPhone nine. I can't even remember the numbers anymore,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 7>but a lot of people have been keeping them, and

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 7>if they're going to renew it, they're going to renew

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 7>it now rather than waiting until next year. So I

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>think we're seeing some of that pulling forward effect as well.

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>The optimism in technology markets today seems to be around

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>earnings in particular and what's to come this week, but

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 2>trade negotiations are also to come this week. Balance those

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>two risk factors for.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 7>US, well, earnings is fundamental and in my mind is

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 7>much much more important. And I do think that the

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 7>stock prices will react to earnings. With regards to trade talks,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I feel like the Marcus rising. Ever since

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 7>the first day when President Trump said that he may

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 7>not meet with President she.

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 6>It's been going it up.

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's the market basically calling bluff in

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>both countries. China is an export dependent country. It needs

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 7>to export rare earth minerals as much as we need

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 7>to buy them. Us is a consumer based economy. We

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 7>need to be able to import cheaper goods from China

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 7>as much as you know China needs to export them.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 6>We need each other.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 7>So I think the markets are saying, Okay, the deal

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 7>is probably going to get done.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 6>It's just a matter of time.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Anna Rabin of grena Dela Advisory, Thank you very much.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>So coming up Meta, TikTok, Snap and many more Under Pressure,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>We're going to discuss why social media giants are about

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 2>to face a mountain of litigation. That's next.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 4>This is bloobag Tech.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Social media giants are about to face a wave of

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>litigation matter, Snap Bite Downs Alphabet are set to a

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>pair in court over two consolidated lawsuits accusing them of

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>knowingly designing their platforms to addict users, resulting in depression, anxiety, insomnia,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 3>and self harm from all Bloomberg's Olivia Carvill it's been

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>following these lawsuits, joins us now, and in one of

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the key lines in your story about this, Olivia, you

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 3>talk about how one lawyer who's going to be representing

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the federal cases says, all told, this is a massive

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>legal siege on the social media industry. Why is it

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>all coming in this wave?

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we have been seeing these lawsuits filed in

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 8>state and federal court over a number of years now.

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 8>This all started back in twenty twenty two after Francis

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 8>Hagen kind of blew the whistle on Facebook, releasing a

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 8>trove of documents about how the social media giant was

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 8>kind of impacting youth mental health. Following that, we saw

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 8>plaintiff's attorneys really focus in on that and start to

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 8>file lawsuits against these companies accusing them of harming children.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 8>And over the course of three years, all of those lawsuits,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>all the majority of them now have been consolidated into

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 8>two different litigation tracks, and state court and in federal court.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 8>We're going to see these cases come to the courtrooms

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 8>next year, and it's going to be, you know, as

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 8>he mentioned in the story, a massive legal siege on

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 8>the social media industry. We're expecting to see a number

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 8>of trials next year and possibly thousands of plaintiffs waiting

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 8>in the wings once those trials close.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Olivia. A part of the reason that this litigation has

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>been pending for quite a long time is that the

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>social media companies have had this liability shield right that

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>has protected them in some sense from user harm litigation.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Explain that shield and why it's now not preventing these

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>pieces of litigation moving forward.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's right. I mean the Communications Decency Act. This

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 8>is a federal law that has long protected social media

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 8>platforms and really any internet place platform from facing user

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 8>harm lawsuits.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 4>What that lawd does is it.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 8>Provides an immunity shield or a blanket that says you

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 8>cannot file a lawsuit against these companies for the content

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 8>that exists on their sites. What these cases are trying

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 8>to do is sidestep that immunity blanket by saying this

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 8>is not about the content that uses a posting to Facebook,

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 8>to Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok. This is about the design

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 8>of the platforms that these companies intentionally designed their platforms

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 8>to try and addict young users and resulting in many

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 8>harms to kids, from mental health harms like depression, anxiety

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 8>all the way through to self harm and suicidal issues.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Olivia.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Often the markets ignore potential legal threats for big tech companies.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>It has been notable that actually a lot of companies

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>have been trying to update the protections for children in particular.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I think of Insta just last week. How have they

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>set themselves up to really tackle this in a forward

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 3>going way.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, as these cases have been piling up in the courtrooms,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>we've seen almost every one of the defendants start to

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 8>update their policies to really try and get better, stronger

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 8>safeguards for kids. And you saw that recently with what

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 8>Meta announced on Instagram. And that's certainly true. But at

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 8>the same time, this litigation is not going away. These

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 8>allegations stand in court, and I think what's remarkable about

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 8>the kind of position that we're in right now is

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 8>that as of next year, we're going to see the

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 8>alleged victims of social media into the courtroom for the

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 8>first time in the US. So these cases are going

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 8>to be tried. Juries are going to hear testimony from teenagers,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 8>from experts, from company insiders as well about whether or

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 8>not social media has actually harmed the mental health of youth.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 8>A lot of people have been asking that question, but

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 8>a jury will have to face their question for the

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 8>first time next year.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Blom Ogs Olivia Carvill, We thank you very much for

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>bringing us the latest. Now we turn our attention to

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>talking tech.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 4>First up.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Sales of Apple's iPhone seventeen are off to a strong

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>start in the US and in China, but the latest

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>iPhone model has outsold its predecessor in their respective first

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>ten days by fourteen percent.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>It's all according to Counterpoint Research.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 3>The research firm atribute to the boost to an improved

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 3>display more storage than they upgraded a nineteen chen plus.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 3>London based fintech Revolute has been cleared to launch banking

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 3>operations in Mexico. It's the second regulatory green light in

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Latin America this month, after Columbia approved it to create

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a bank, so the region is central to Revolute's growth plans.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 3>And the company says it expects quote millions of people

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in Mexico, and China says it has irrefutable evidence of

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 3>a US cyber attack on its National Timekeeping Agency dating

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 3>back to twenty twenty two. Beijing accuses Washington of exploiting vulnerabilities,

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>and the mobile phones used by the agency's employee is

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 3>distilled sensitive data. The US National Security Agency didn't immediately

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>respond to request for comment.

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 9>One of the things I want is China's going to

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 9>buy so I means I want China to stop with evento,

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 9>nonald very, you know, normal things. I don't want them

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 9>to play the rare Earth game with US.

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 3>President Trump there aboard Air Force one, outlining his expectations

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>for upcoming trade talks of China, discussions that could have

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>major implications for the global tech supply chain and semiconductor industry.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Grim Vagsinia Tech editor Mike Shepperd joins US now in

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 3>the latest important conversations to strike up again in Malaysia

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 3>this week.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 10>They certainly are Cara, and we're going to be watching

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 10>exactly as you said, for what the US might be

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 10>willing to give up in return for those three key

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 10>areas that President Donald Trump outlined on Air Force One yesterday.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 10>One of them, of course, is rare earths. That matters

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 10>a lot for the tech industry, all those critical minerals

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 10>going into so many different products, but not just in tech,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 10>they go into autos, They even go into defense equipment.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 10>So this is something that is crucial for the US

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 10>to reach an agreement on. After China moved to start

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 10>to impose export controls on sales of those critical materials

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 10>to buyers here in the US, that really hit a

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 10>nerve with US negotiators. But another sore point, Carol, and

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 10>while it's not exactly tech, it is important, perhaps in

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 10>a connected way, and that is soybeans. The President has

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 10>been disgruntled, along with his advisors, that China is not

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 10>buying any soybeans from US producers this year, and that

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 10>is taking aim at a key source of political support

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 10>for the president here in the US, and he wants

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 10>China to start buying those soybeans again. That was twelve

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars in purchases in twenty twenty four. It has

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 10>zeroed out this year. So again it's on the table.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 10>But Carol, the question is what will the US give

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 10>up in return? And does that mean a relaxation of

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 10>some of those export controls on critical technology that Beijing

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 10>has chafed against for the past several years. Will it

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 10>meet a relaxation of limits on exports of AI chips

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 10>or perhaps semiconductor manufacturing equipment like what we see made

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 10>by ASML and Tokyo Electron. This will be all on

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 10>the table later this week when Scott Besse meets with

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 10>his Chinese counterpart in Malaysia later this week.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Mike Covid Night, a lot of headlines on Nespiria. Can

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you just help us understand what's happening in that case

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>study scenario, what the US government is aggrieved about relative

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 2>the Dutch.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, this is a fascinating sideshow really to the broader

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 10>conflict between the US and its allies and China over technology.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 10>But in this case it all boils down to one

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 10>company based in the Netherlands Nextperia, the US is concerned

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 10>that its parent company, Wingtech, has a plan to siphon

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 10>critical chip making technology out of European hands and into

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 10>China to bolster the domestic industry, and it put pressure

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 10>on Dutch authorities to seize control and replace the CEO,

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 10>which happened at the end of last month. We learned

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 10>about this all last week through court filings in the Netherlands,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 10>and China is responding forcefully. It has imposed restrictions on

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 10>exports of Nexperia products that were made in China, and

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 10>we've also seen messages in we chat to Nexperia employees

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 10>in China saying that they do not have to listen

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 10>to the new management running Nextperia based in the Netherlands.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 10>So this is something we will want to watch closely

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 10>as we see the Dutch taking on the world's second

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 10>largest economy over the fate of this companies, which also

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 10>I will say it provides a lot of semiconductors legacy chips,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 10>mind you, but still to the auto industry and consumer

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 10>electronics producers.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But Bess, Mike Shepard, thank you very much. Another story, advisor,

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Glass Lewis is urging Tesla shareholders to vote against Elon

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>musk potentially trillion dollar pay package, the second major proxy

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>firm to do so ahead of Tesla's November sixth and

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 2>your meeting. Let's get out to Bloomberg's Global Autos are

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Craig Trudel. I'm reading the Glass Lewis note, and they're

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>worried about, I think shareholder dilution. But just summarize why

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>they're proposing and recommending voting against this compackage.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think you put the nail on the head

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 11>there in terms of dilution being an issue, I think,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 11>and this goes back to, you know, sort of criticism

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 11>that you know, the judge in Delaware sort of level

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 11>that at the initial paid package that Tesla's border range

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 11>from USK back in twenty eighteen. This is a case

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 11>of a CEO who's already quite aligned with the future

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 11>of his company by virtue of the substantial stake that

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 11>he has in the company. And there is a q

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 11>on the part of of you know, the these proxy

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 11>advisors of just you know, to what degree is it

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 11>is it necessary or appropriate to hand over more control

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 11>of this company and issue so many shares that would

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 11>dilute the current shareholder base of Tesla.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, Tesla Craig has said that the Glass Lewis recommendation

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 3>is quote misguided in an ex post and they're talking

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 3>about the recommendations attempting to override the mandate of our

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>shareholders delivered to Elon and ignore the staggering financial results

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>that were delivered under Elon's leadership. Just what is the

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 3>argument coming from the business right now?

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 11>I think it's interesting because you know, you you sort

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 11>of at some points hear Tesla, you know, talk about

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 11>the idea that they're more than just a car company.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 11>And yet it's interesting that they sort of compare their

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 11>performance versus other car companies, and they're by virtue of

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 11>doing that comparison, you know, make them look, you know,

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 11>awfully different from from these companies that for a long

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 11>time they've said, you know, we shouldn't be compared with

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 11>those with those companies. So of course there is you know,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 11>some some some reason to sort of celebrate the returns

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 11>that this company has managed under Musk. We should acknowledge

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 11>that as well.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if that's celebrating Amazon Wednesday with their ownings.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Come Blie most Crowdridel, We thank.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>You, Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. The vibe in tech

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 2>markets right now is a lot of anticipation around earning season.

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Eighty five percent of the S and P five hundred

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>has already beaten profit expectations, and as that one hundred

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>is up one point four percent. A big factor is

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 2>good vibes around Apple and also other names pushing higher

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>despite negative news headlines. Let's get out so some of

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the top stories of the day with Bloomberg Equities reporter

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Nora Melinda. Let's start or with Amazon and AWS.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 12>Yes, lots to keep an on right now ed and

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 12>pertaining to Amazon here. Of course, we know this has

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 12>been a discussion all day long about the widespread outage

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 12>that was seen here, this disruption from AWS that affected

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 12>a lot of different companies including Roadblocks, Fortnite, Snapchat, a

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 12>few others here. So we are seeing shares currently rebounding,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 12>but we were seeing some weakness earlier in the trading

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 12>session as it was really falling behind, lagging a lot

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 12>of its mag seven peers. But if you look about

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 12>a year to date basis here looking at shares of

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 12>Amazon down about two percent here, So definitely something to

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 12>keep an eye on as we just think about the

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 12>broader landscape of this company.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's also notable that it's one of the key

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 3>points additions.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>But not the one but Apple.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's switch Gibbs to a company that's in a new

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 3>record high helping the index from an undona bocus today,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 3>no one.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Took us through Apple and why it is routing.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 12>Yes, Apple shares down just shy of five percent year

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 12>to date, but really seeing some green on this green today.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 12>Of course, this comes after the fact that we did

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 12>see over the first ten days of the sale of

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 12>the iPhone seven teen series, we are seeing that it

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 12>outsold the iPhone sixteen by about fourteen percent. So you

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 12>did see Luke Capital upgrading the stock to buy from hold,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 12>of course, underscoring the positive iPhone demand trends. But we

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 12>are seeing shares of Apple, as you mentioned Caroline rallying

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 12>for a record.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 4>High today, really strong today as well.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely starting to see that four percent add to now

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 3>a four percent rally on the here finally breaking into

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 3>positive territory bluevegs Normalinda, We thank you so much. Let's

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 3>shift gears to other areas that are rallying. In particular

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>crypto and crypto stocks are actually doing better this Monday

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 3>than underlying bitcoin is. We're looking at bitcoin miners in particular,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>they're outperforming in general the original cryptocurrency as they expand

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 3>further into AI data centers. I can tolches with us

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>August co CEO and co founder to discuss all things crypto,

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 3>but I just want to dwell on that for a moment.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>This desire for compute has seen companies pivot core Weave

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>once upon a time was a crypto minor, and now

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a key neo cloud. What are you making of

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>others trying to ride that wave and hiring key executives

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 3>to do so.

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 13>Look, at the end of the day, you're going to

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 13>go where you know, whoever pays you the most and

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 13>where you can sell the highest price. And to your point,

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 13>the bitcoin miners have a secured grid power. It gives

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 13>them that strategic advantage if you think about data center space,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 13>and so I think right now they're definitely coming out

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 13>as a favorite, and you're seeing that demand across the board.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 13>So it's going to be very interesting. You know, today

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 13>bitcoin isn't used Bitcoin blockchain isn't used for processing transactions,

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 13>but it'll be interesting to see if that has any

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 13>effect online.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>In recent weeks, it's been very interesting to track how

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin's behaved in the moment. Sometimes it can seem severe

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>in the context of risk headlines about trade, the president's

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 2>relationship with China, but I think you could give us

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>some historical context that things are actually more calm through

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the bitcoin lens than at least the headlines might suggest.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 13>On October tenth, we had our newest bitcoin block Friday,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 13>which saw nineteen billion and roughly liquidations across a number

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 13>of exchanges. You know, it was a very large move,

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 13>but relative to your point ed, you know, bitcoin only

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 13>moved the price moved twelve percent, and if we had

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 13>looked at you know, call it twenty twenty or twenty eighteen,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 13>we probably would have seen that move over forty percent.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 13>And so, you know, the maturation of the space is

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 13>definitely here. The liquidations were clearly isolated to a number

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 13>of exchanges, but it did show that while there was

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 13>price maturation in terms of the technology that actually exists

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 13>in the space, there's a lot of work that needs

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 13>to happen for it to reach the level of a

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 13>New York Stock Exchange or CEME. And so we're really

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 13>looking forward to that level of progress in the industry.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what has to happen.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's a number of things, I would say, you know,

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 13>first off, it's a level of coordination, and so if

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 13>you think about you know, what happens in circuit breakers,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 13>for example, when something happens in the market you don't

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 13>necessarily have, you know, an uncore native circuit breaker. You

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 13>have a number of different exchanges that are speaking to

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 13>one another. The second is also if you think about inventory,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 13>and so there's never really an instance, for example, where

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 13>you can't move from one exchange to another, which you

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 13>see very often happen in crypto. When an exchange goes down,

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 13>then someone can't necessarily send funds into the exchange to

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 13>top up on margin calls, and so you see this

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 13>level of cascading liquidations, which is exactly what we saw.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 13>Another thing that happens is, you know, even if you

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 13>think about margin calls or the standardized risk metrics typically

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 13>in traditional finance, that's completely standardized across all of these exchanges.

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 13>And today we think about institutional overseas exchanges as almost

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 13>isolated islands of risk. Each one has their own methodology,

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 13>and so when some of this happens in the market,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 13>when you get this level of volatility, it's very very

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 13>hard to track, you know, across all of the different

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 13>venues that you're trading, and so you get this level

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 13>of liquidations. I mean, nineteen billion is a number we

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 13>haven't seen historically before. But again bigcoin performed quite well

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 13>relative to that, as did you know some of the

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 13>other ETFs you know x orpth Encelona.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about those ETFs because you are definitely the

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>voice we want to hear about settlement about management of software.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 3>You're thinking about the ways in which the underlying infrastructure

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to support the growth here aire. But when

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>we think about regulation that could see the SEC. I

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 3>think it's got one hundred and thirty ETF applications on

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 3>its desk. If the government ever opens back up again,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>they'll be able to start allowing them to go through.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot of particularly leveraged versions or very

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 3>indiosyncratic old coins.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Is that the way you want to see the industry progressed?

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 13>Look at the end of the day, I think access

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 13>is the most important, but I agree with you there's

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 13>there's definitely a point where there's just a tension deficiency,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 13>and so you can't look at and underrate one hundred

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 13>of these different structures. And so the biggest thing when

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 13>I think about some of these structures and teams is

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 13>really who is in the management behind some of these

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 13>and what's the underlying risk in terms of the strategies.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 13>You know you're seeing some of the digital asset treasuries

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 13>or ETFs. They might just be buying the underline, they

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 13>may just be staking. But to your point, care line,

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 13>you're seeing some of these others that are taking on

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 13>leveraged looping and other levels of risk, and you know,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 13>you just want to make sure that you have some

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 13>level of understanding of the underlying structure. And so I

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 13>would say for some of these it is a little

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 13>bit gray. You know, we are pretty excited of this

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 13>level of access going into you know, whether it's Avalanche Athena,

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 13>you know, there's the access really opens it up to

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 13>a net new market where people are willing to pay

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 13>for that premium in order to get access. But you

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 13>are right, the underlying risk is not the same for

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 13>all of them.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>All Right, it's been a while since we've had you

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>on the show and we've spoken. I just wanted to

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>get your reflection on this administration's legislative efforts across crypto

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and the work that David Sachs has been doing and

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 2>how you feel it has or hasn't worked.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 13>Without a doubt, it has been night and day relative

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 13>to you know, previous conversations that we've had we have

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 13>been able to hire in the United States across the

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 13>board and tell people that we work in crypto and

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 13>you know, historically, if you think about a year ago,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 13>that was just not possible and we were thinking about,

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 13>you know, moving the company offshore, hiring overseas, and so

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 13>if you know, relative to conversations that we've had with

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 13>folks even in Asia, we're seeing a lot of focus

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 13>transition back to the United States. And that is just

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 13>incredibly compelling as someone who's building here in the US,

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 13>and we're really really excited about the communication and support

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 13>that we're getting from this administration.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Just very quick.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you support the dollarization thesis that David and others

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 2>are trying to put in place?

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 13>Yes, absolutely, And you're seeing a lot of that, you know,

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 13>happening with some of these stable coin legislation, where it

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 13>is going to strengthen the dollar by having a lot

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 13>of these global stable coins be back by the US

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 13>dollars the underlying and so you know, I do think it,

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 13>you know, leads to a stronger US dollar, but it

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 13>you know, it will see what the administration can do

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 13>within now in the next three years and whether they're

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 13>able to get everything over the finish.

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Line, Hya Cantorovich of August. Great to have you back

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>on the show, Thank you very much. IBM and GROC

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 2>are announcing a strategic partnership to give clients ultra high speed,

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 2>low latency AI capabilities via Grock's inference technology. For more

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 2>and how this partnership is going to provide greater access

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to the full potential of enterprise AI. We're joined by

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Rob Thomas, Senior Vice president of Software and Chief Commercial

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Officer at IBM, and Jonathan Ross, CEO and founder of GROC.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>And Jonathan, I want to start with you. You know, the

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>way that I look at this is it's a very

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>interesting go to market channel for you, a sales channel.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Think about all of the clients that IBM has and

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>how you've tried to grow the company. Explain how people

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 2>will access LPUS through this or through the cloud matrix.

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, it's an extraordinary opportunity for both of us. IBM

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 14>is going to have their sellers sell a Rock Skew

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 14>and so now you'll be able to directly access our

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 14>speed the advantages that we offer. You could think of

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 14>it a little bit like offering broadband in the era

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 14>where dial up wasn't fully rolled out and people were

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 14>still trying to connect to the internet. Our lpus are

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 14>just significantly faster, but we also keep the cost down.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 14>Just imagine if you were to offer broadband and you

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 14>charged more per bit of data that was sent over

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 14>the line, it would be on economical Broadband increases a demand.

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 14>With agentic use cases, it's particularly important to reduce the speed.

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 14>You don't want to ask a question, wait ten minutes

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 14>later and come back. You'd rather get the answer under

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 14>a minute.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Rob Under this arrangement with Jonathan, does IBM make any

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of financial investment into GROC or is there some

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of sales or revenue split? Explain the economics of

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>this deal for you guys.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Big pictures.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 15>We have a lot of momentum in AI with Watson X,

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 15>as we said on our earnings last quarter seven and

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 15>a half billion dollars as a book of business, and

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 15>we're trying to solve the client problem of how do

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 15>they deploy AI faster. So this partnership is all about

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 15>what Jonathan said, which is five x performance at twenty

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 15>percent of the cost. We've seen it with Watson X

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 15>running on GROC and so we will be distributing GROC

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 15>as part of our go to market, and there's a

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 15>revenue share as part of that. We are really excited

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 15>because we've seen clients already getting an impact to how

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 15>they're deploying AI because of the integration of our technology together.

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about that, Rob a little bit more.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Because you're the man who's in charge of the software business,

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 3>you're also really responsible for the world revenue and profitability

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 3>of your company. So help us understand why grow was

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>the obvious choice. How is it helping your clients get

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 3>outs as faster?

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 4>On the inference side of things.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 15>We looked at every possibility in the market, and the

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 15>clients are looking for significant performance, so some of that

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 15>changes how your call center operates or how your supply

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 15>chain runs. And then you combine that with a fraction

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 15>of the cost. Suddenly the economics make sense. AI does

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 15>have a cost problem, and we think this breaks through that.

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 15>And IBM we've said we're going to drive four and

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 15>a half billion of productivity by the end of this year.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 15>That's another example of AI truly having an impact. And

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 15>the number one question I get from clients now is

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 15>how are you doing that? At IBM and can you

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 15>help us do that? And we think the combination of

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 15>IBM and GROC can make this a reality for any company.

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's dig into that a little bit now with you, Jonathan.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Because the integration with what's the next orchestraate? What does

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that look like on your side? How does that happen

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and happen seamlessly?

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 14>So the wantsonex API is available for anyone to use today.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 14>It'll be invisible to most users. It'll simply work. We

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 14>have a compatible by API and this is something we've

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 14>been working on. We will also work on some lower

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 14>level integrations with VLM, which is a technology that IBM

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 14>is very deeply involved in. But it should just be transparent.

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 14>You should just get more speed. Just imagine one day

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 14>you come home, you had dialog and now you have

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 14>broadband in a cost less.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Rob where's the demand coming from on your side, like IBM,

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Granite or some other agentic workload that they want to

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.720
<v Speaker 2>run using the GROC lpus. Are these public sector names?

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Are they private sector SMEs? I'm trying to understand who

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 2>you're serving with it.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 15>As often happens, I would say financial services have been

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 15>early adopters. But the thing that has changed in the

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 15>market in the last six months is everything is moving

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 15>to multimodel. We have IBM models that we open source,

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 15>which are the Granite models. We announced the partnership with Anthropic,

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 15>We have a partnership with Mistraw and Lama, just.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 4>To name a few.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 15>What is incredible about what Jonathan and team have built

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 15>is any model can run and get instant improvement running on.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 4>The lpused from ROCK.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 15>So I think this is a combination of a multimodel

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 15>world accelerating inference with ROCK. I think this is a

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 15>great combination.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.959
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan, does this capacitority exist or are you supply constraints still?

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 2>You've got to go out and build it either in

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Finland here in the States.

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 14>So the entire world is supply constrained, and I would

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 14>actually expect that to continue for at least the next

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 14>five to ten years when it comes to AI. Our

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 14>advantage is that we have a supply chain that actually

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 14>ramps much faster, so customers will be able to come

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 14>to IBM put in an order and we will be

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 14>able to fulfill that faster than you would be able

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.439
<v Speaker 14>to with other technologies. But the supply constraints that are real,

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 14>and this is another reason to start working with IBM. Sooner,

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 14>the sooner you get access to that capacity, the sooner

0:36:58.080 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 14>you're going to have it. I can't tell you how

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 14>many stars come to us and other companies come to

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 14>us and they are looking for capacity because some of

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 14>them are actually growing ten, twenty, or even thirty percent

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 14>per week or per month, which is an astronomical growth rate.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 14>But by approaching us early, we can build to your needs.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 3>You were just mentioning Rob about all the partnerships you

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 3>have when it comes to llms and the offerings that

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 3>you're intertwining within yours. Will you go to others to

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 3>ensure that inference is as fast as possible or is

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it this exclusive with GROC.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 15>We are open to working with anybody in the ecosystem

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 15>of AI around what we're doing specifically on the acceleration

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 15>with GROC. We want to lean into this partnership. That's

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 15>why this is the one that we've announced today, because

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 15>we have confidence working together with GROC. As Jonathan mentioned,

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 15>we're also enabling some of the lower level technologies and

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 15>open source like VLM, so this is the right place

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 15>to be when it comes to inference. But when you

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 15>think oddly about what's happened in AI, we have many

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 15>companies working with us on agents. Last week we announced

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 15>SMP Global is now running on watsnext Orchestrate as an example.

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 15>So we're always open to new partnerships.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 3>And let's just talk about Jonathan the go to market strategy.

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Here of teaming with the age.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Old Juggernau, that is IBM, that has so many deep

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 3>relationships across global enterprises. But is that how you're going

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to work this going forward? It is teaming up with

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 3>companies that have those legacy relationships, or do you still

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 3>go out there and win the business yourself.

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 14>So I would say this is a peanut butter and

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 14>jelly sort of relationship in the sense that oftentimes when

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 14>we meet with sea level executives, those sea level executives

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 14>turn to their tech teams and ask them to evaluate GROC.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 14>And I've been in meetings where the CTO did that

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 14>and the response from the person is I already use GROC.

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 14>It's my default for everything. So we already have the

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 14>bottoms up. We have two point three million developers already

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 14>building on us. For comparison, Opening Eye has four million

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 14>now going to those deep relationships from IBM and the

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 14>fact that IBM is a trusted partner who's been delivering

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 14>for decades. You put those two together and that's an

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 14>amazing go to market motion.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's been great having you both on to talk

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>about the go to market strategy. Jonathan Ross, CEO Grock,

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 3>of course, Rob Thomas of Senior Vice president of Software

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>over at IBM. We thank you both very much. Indeed,

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 3>now coming up, we're going to be diving into Amazon's

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>souring relationship with its contract delivery firms. And also we've

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 3>got to remind you what's happening in the moment. President

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Trump planning critical minerals agreements with the Prime Minister of Australia.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Can catch more on Live Go. This is BLUEBGG Tech.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>President Trump, speaking in a bylap with Australian leaders, says

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 2>that China may pay a one hundred and fifty five

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>percent tariff if there is no deal made by November one.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>He's also saying that he is expecting to meet with

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>G in a couple of weeks. He will meet with

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 2>G in South Korea in a couple of weeks. The

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>headline's not doing much to move markets in the.

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Moment, Cara, Oh, we're not, but we'll keep everyone abreast

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 3>of it, and they can tune in on a live

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 3>go as well if you want to see it throughout.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 3>But right now, we're about to talk about how we're

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 3>taking a look inside Amazon's deteriorating relationship with its contract

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 3>delivery firms, which have tangled with Amazon for years, often

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 3>over what they consider unreasonable delivery target set and one

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 3>into twenty four to seven by AI now. Tensions flared

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 3>earlier this year when the company passed along some big

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 3>bills to repair aging delivery vans worgs. Amazon reporter Spencer

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Soper took this deep dive for us, and you really

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 3>hone in on certain individuals who decided to become entrepreneurial

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 3>in spirit teaming with Amazon, and then the profits just

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 3>fell away.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 4>Talk us through it.

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 16>Yes, So Amazon has what they call delivery service partners.

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 16>They've got forty five hundred of them globally. These are

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 16>basically small businesses that lease vans, hire drivers and get

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 16>those packages to your doorstep. And so it's almost like

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 16>a franchise, but it's technically not a franchise. And so

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 16>a lot of them are saying Hey, listen, the cost

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 16>of art of doing business are going up faster than

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 16>Amazon is paying us for these packages. They're in these

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 16>lapsided agreements, they don't have any negotiating power. They basically

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 16>have to take what Amazon offers them. And then so

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 16>some of them are taking the ultimate step of quitting.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 16>And when they do that, they realize, hey, I've been

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 16>doing the seven years that I don't really.

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Have anything, Spencer.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Amazon did recently hike the proportion that these guys get

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 2>on a per package basis. But on your reporting, what's

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the direction of travel here? Where are we headed?

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 16>The direction of travel is that logistics is a high

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 16>risk business. If you have a bunch of car collisions

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 16>or dog bites or anything that's going to push up

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 16>your vehicle insurance rates or your workers' compensation rates, you're

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 16>going to have a difficult time. And if you don't,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 16>you will, you will make money. And so some of

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 16>that is going to be your operational practices, and some

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 16>of that's going to be.

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Luck Bloomberg, Spenser Sopa, thank you very much. Just real

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 2>quick caring update on AWS. They're saying that the root

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>cause overnight was an internal subsystem, but they're not saying

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 2>any more than that, other than there are issues still remaining.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 2>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech and

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 2>what an addition it was.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 4>And so much more to come.

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm sat here in London because it's the Bloomberg

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Tech Summit. It's kicking off tonight. In fact, I'm hosting

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 3>a debate on Europe's future in the Chip Wars. But

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 3>then tomorrow we're going to be tuning into the summit

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.720
<v Speaker 3>as it goes live over in Moregate, conversations with leaders

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 3>in te kN Ai in VC. You don't want to

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 3>forget to check out all of that. Also on the podcast.

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 3>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart from San Francisco from London.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 3>From the next day or two, this is Bloomberg Tech