WEBVTT - BlackRock: More Bull on Wall Street?

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink of Black Rock, chairman and CEO, joins us

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, I truly believe the purposeful companies they're going

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to be focusing on the long term impact on climate

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>change and how it impacts their company. It's a total

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>philosophical shift of what a corporations for. Everybody's calling it grainwashing,

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I disagree. When you have actions that sound good

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but in effect they don't really amount to much in reality,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's actually more dangerous than we think. Welcome to calling

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>bullshit the podcast about purpose washing, the gap between what

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>companies say they stand for and what they actually do

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and what they would need to change to practice what

0:00:55.440 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they preach. I'm your host time onto you, and I've

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>spent over a decade helping companies define what they stand for,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>their purpose and then help them to use that purpose

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to drive transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately, at a lot

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of companies and organizations today, there's still a pretty wide

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>gap between word and deed. That gap has a name.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>We call it bullshit. But, and this is important, we

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that bullshit is a treatable disease. So when the

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bullshit detector lights up, we're going to explore things that

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>a company should do to fix it. In this episode,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look at black Rock, the largest investment

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>management company in the world. They manage over nine trillion

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets and their global influence is undeniable. In

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>his annual letter to the heads of the smpanies, Larry Finn,

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>black Rock CEO, has stated that their purpose is to

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>help build a more equitable, financially resilient future, not just

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>for their customers, but for the planet to That's an

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>admirable and lofty goal, but is it true. That's exactly

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to explore in this episode. To really

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>understand black Rock story, we need to understand how American

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>business has evolved over the last several decades. So we're

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go back in time, all the way back

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to the end of World War Two, when the US

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>economy began a period of rapid expansion. President Roosevelt approves

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>legislation to provide for America's war veterans in the Peace

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to Come by law, federal loans, pre schooling, job insurance,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and complete rehabilitation are among the benefits to short every

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>man and woman in the The g I Bill helped

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a generation of returning soldiers go to college, secure good jobs,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and buy homes. The manufacturing and services sector grew, and

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>companies were eager to sell to an expanding American middle class.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>How many dreams can your shape in a minute? As

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the people have done. There were a few other factors

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>behind that post war economic boom. First, many business leaders

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>believed that they had wider responsibilities to people and communities,

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not just their shareholders. And second, the effective tax rates

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on individuals and corporations were higher, which meant that all

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of that wealth was being redistributed more efficiently. In the

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>ds CEOs, we're only making about twenty times more than

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a typical worker, by that was three hundred and fifty

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>times more. And back in the fifties, union membership was

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>high and upward mobility was real for many Americans. And

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>then in it all came to a screeching halt. Gives

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>me the great pro pleasure to present to you today,

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Professor Milton Friedman, the world renowned economist Milton Friedman, published

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>an essay in The New York Times that had a

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>colossal impact on American business. He introduced the concept of

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>neoliberalism that rejected the idea that companies should have a

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>social conscience. In Ohio, an old man failed to pay

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>his electric billity you may be familiar with the case,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and the electric company turned off the electricity and he died.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Who was respons Let's suppose that the electric company or

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to follow the practice of never turning off anybody's electricity.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Who would pay the costs? The responsibility really lies not

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on the electric company for turning it off, but on

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>those of this man's neighbors and friends and associates who

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are not charitable enough to enable him as an individual

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to make the electric bill. Friedman believed that a business

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>had only one social responsibility to make money or its shareholders.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>To him, an executive that wanted their company to eliminate

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>discrimination or avoid pollution was and I quote, preaching pure

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>unadulterated socialism. Humanist capitalism, which said you had responsibilities to

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>your workers and your community was out predatory capitalism. The

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>dog eat dog short term approach to success was in

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed is good.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>In pursuit of ever larger profits, corporate leaders began to

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hack away at internal costs. Greed is right, Greed works

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>paying the lowest possible wages, providing less training, less paid

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>time off, or none at all. Greed clarifies cuts through

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and captions es of the evolutionary spirit. But the really

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior happened at the regulatory level. Corporations lobbied relentlessly

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to lower the corporate tax rate and weaken environmental protections,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>which is why humans are now facing the existential crisis

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of climate change. Okay, so where does black Rock fit

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>into all of this? More precisely, where does black Rock

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO Larry Fink fit into all of this? Back in

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the height of the predatory capitalism days of the late

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, Larry and seven other finance executives had an

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>idea to create a risk reduced asset management company, or

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in plain English, a safer place for rich people and

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>big institutions to park and grow their money. At first,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pursuing Freedman's doctrine, black Rock just wanted to get as

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>big as possible, and they did, eventually becoming the largest

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>investment manager in the world. But then Larry Fink did

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>something really freaking bizarre. He started talking about the responsibilities

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that business has had to help solve the big issues

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world. He was advocating that businesses become purpose led,

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an idea that was seemingly at odds with Freedman's philosophy

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that had taken the Western world by storm. Back in

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.679
<v Speaker 1>ninety seventy, black Rock chairman and CEO Larry Fink sending

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a letter to the CEOs of the SMP five companies,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>warning them not only about activism and short termism, but

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>also calling on them to focus more on long term growth.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And when Larry talks, CEOs listen. And suddenly he was

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>saying stuff that would make Milton Friedman sit up in

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>his grave. We are interested in long term results, not

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>short term results. Larry started talking about the need for

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>companies to take care of stakeholders and not just shareholders,

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and he began hammering c e o s to take

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>a role in actively addressing climate change. Big news from

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>black Rock this morning, the world's largest asset manager now

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>announcing the firm will make investment decisions with environmental sustainability

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>at its core. And finally, in Larry led a coalition

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of CEOs of nearly two hundred of the world's largest

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>corporations called the Business Roundtable, to publish a letter redefining

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the true purpose of a corporation. You've effectively suggested that

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not just profit that you're after as an investor,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but that to get to that profit, you think that

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>these companies need to have a social purpose, which is

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit stepping out. Well, no, I don't think

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's stepping out. I think I'm actually reconfirming what Milton

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Friedman said. If you read his whole essay that everyone

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talks about, he talks about that you need to be

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>connected in your community. I believe the companies that have

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>purpose are the best companies in the world because it

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>unites their employees, it connects the clients, it brings the

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>organization onto a common plane. Look, I love that Larry

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think is saying this stuff and putting videos like this

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>on the black Rock website. We contribute to a more

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>inclusive and resilient economy that benefits more people. This is

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>how we remain true to our purpose of helping more

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and more people experienced financial well being. But what we

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>need to get to the bottom of is does he

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>really mean it or is it just a bunch of bs.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's start digging for more context on how investors

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and investment managers like black Rock can push companies to

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>clean up their act. I called up Andrew Behar. He's

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of a nonprofit called As You Sow, which

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>supports shareholder advocacy. That's s ow, like the proverb as

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you sow, so show you reap. He's also written a

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>book called The Shareholders Action Guide, Unleash Your Hidden Powers

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to Hold Corporations Accountable. Andrew, thank you so much for

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>being here. My pleasure. We're here to talk about black Rock,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>but having read your book, I wanted to start out

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>today talking about the work you're doing at As You

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Sell Sure. So as You Say is at a five

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>O one C three nonprofit. We're found when you focus

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on corporate accountability from the viewpoint of shareholders. So we

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>engage major companies generally SMPI companies as shareholders and we

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bring to them a message around really around material risk

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and as shareholders we want to see them improve. We're

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>advocating on behalf of the company creating more environmental, social

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and governance policies and practices. So can you talk a

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about how shareholder advocacy works, like what

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the primary mechanism is SURE So the SEC has a

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>rule called fourteen A eight, which says that shareholders that

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have a certain amount of shares for a certain amount

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of time have legal standing to ask the companies certain things.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, as shareholders, as you so, approached Young Brands,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the parent company of Taco Bell, Long John Silver's, and

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Pizza Hut, to advocate for the reduction of plastic in

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>their restaurants that ultimately ended up in the ocean. So

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we went to the company and said, our brand, Young

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Brands is being associated with the destruction of the ocean ecosystem,

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and we have a solution. It's a really very simple

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>solution that's going to actually cost us a lot less

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>than this negative brand association. And we suggested this and

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the companies they said, okay, well think about it. We escalated,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We filed the shareholder resolution. If you're not familiar with

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that term. A shareholder resolution is a document a shareholder

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>can file six months before a company's annual meeting, which

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is then put to a vote. There's a whereas clause

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>which says, whereas the company continues to use styrofoam, and

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the styrofoam is finding its way into the ocean, and

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's causing this destruction, whereas we have all this evidence

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and there's footnotes about what this destruction is doing. Therefore,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>it's resolved that the company will write a report about

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:23.239
<v Speaker 1>how this plastic use is impacting the ocean and potentially

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>having a negative impact to our brand, which is a

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>material issue for shareholders. These resolutions for change can be

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a big pain in the butt for companies like young brands,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's a real incentive to settle the issue before

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a vote. So then what happens is the company then

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>has a conversation with you and they say we'd like

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you to withdraw, and you say, well, we'll withdraw if

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you will pledge to change this practice. And sometimes the

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>company says okay, and sometimes they say no. And if

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they say no, you talk to press about it, You

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to other investors about it to get a better

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the potential impact to the shareholder. Advocacy can

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>have in one alone, as you so met with a

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty eight companies to discuss pressing global issues

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>climate change, ocean plastics, toxins and the food system, antibiotics

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and meet racial justice, diversity, equity, inclusion, egregious CEO pay

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all these different issues, and one point seven trillion dollars

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of assets were voted yes. And as you so, resolutions right.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that you pointed out in

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>your book was that there was a time when it

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>was pretty rare for shareholder resolutions to even get ten

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote. Today you said that they routinely

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>get twenty thirty even of the vote. So it seems

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like this is picking up momentum. Would that be accurate?

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The institutional share owners are voting much more frequently and

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also much more for the resolutions and against management than

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>ever before. It kind of leads us into the a

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>black Rock conversation. Just this year, black Rock increased from

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a sevent voting against management to So when black Rock flexes,

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>its power really ripples through the system. And the question

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I always have is why don't you use it more often? Like,

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Larry Fink's letters points out that there is

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>every company should have a climate transition plan that is

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>aligned with Paris that is a five percent emissions reduction

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>every year for the next ten years. I mean, he

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>puts it in his letter, but then he stopped short

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and never says or will vote against your board or

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>will drop you from our managed funds. If he did that,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>every company would have a Paris compliant transition plan overnight.

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But why should any other CEO listen to what Larry

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Fink has to say? What's special about Larry Fink? They

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>owned about seven to twelve percent of every company. Uh.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>In case he didn't catch that, Andrew just said black

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Rock owns a out seven of every company. He also

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>goes on to say that historically black Rock doesn't share

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what they learn with other shareholder advocates. So on the

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it seems like there's problematic behavior on black

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Rock's part from a shareholder advocacy standpoint. On the other hand,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>there's also some good behavior, specifically what Larry Fink is

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>addressing in his letters. And I've read his letters going

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>back to and I guess it's a fascinating read to

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>read them in sequence, because it feels like you're watching

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the progression of Larry Fink's thinking. He starts out talking

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly about the need for ceo s to make the

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mental shift from thinking quarter to quarter to thinking longer term,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and that struck me as in itself a pretty unusual

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>stance for someone in finance. Would you call that accurate,

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>people truly understand finance, and they acknowledge that. They acknowledge

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's true that really this whole idea of short

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>termism is an antiquated myth that needs to be overturned.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>And when Larry Think says it, well, there's a lot

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of gravitasks behind when he puts it in a letter.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully that's starting to sink in that actually what

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>investors want to invest in his companies who disclose honestly,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us exactly where you are, layout a trajectory for

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>where you want to go, and then tell us as

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you're hitting your six month, one year to year milestones,

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't hit your milestones, tell us what

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>course corrections you're gonna make. Investors will reward that we're

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>tossing out Milton Freedom. Uncle Milton's going under the bus.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a total philosophical shift of what a corporations for now.

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>What's happened since then is everybody's calling it grainwashing, and

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I disagree. It's a philosophical shift that's going to take

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>some time to implement. And I believe that there we're

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing is the actual emergence of a new economy, A

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>regenerative economy based on justice and sustainability, that's replacing our

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>current economy that's based on extraction and destruction. We're right

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at this inflection point, right now, this minute, and that's

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>why people feel so much turbulence. They don't quite know

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>what to do with it. It's because we're just in

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>this birthing cycle and birth or messy. You actually wrote

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a I found incredibly smart and very entertaining letter as

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a response to Larry Fink's letters to c E O S.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Could you talk a little bit about what you said

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in that letter and why you said it? Sure, so

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I read his letters, and I in my mind,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if only Larry had sent this to me

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>before he published it, I would have marked it up

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for him and he would do much better. So I

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>took his letter. I literally put it into word. I

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>did exactly what I would have done if Larry had said, Hey, Andy,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>can you mark this up for me? I finished the

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>sentences when he says companies should have a climate transition plan,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to report against it every year and have emission reduction

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>by I added, or we'll vote against your board and

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get it done. In a year, we'll

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>remove you from our managed funds. Right. I just concluded

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>his sentences by adding action. I thought he brilliantly laid

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>out the problem, and so I just helped him a

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Oh, I thought it was great, Andrew. We

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have a thing on calling bullshit called the BS scale,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So on a scale of zero to one, zero being

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>zero bullshit, which means the company means everything it says,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and on being just complete BS. Where would you rate

0:19:52.359 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock getting better? Larry's letters have been instrumental in

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just awareness that climate change is this investing risk to

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire system. They've been instrumental in actually this whole

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of stakeholder capitalism. So I have to commend him

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for what he's done. My problem is he didn't finish

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the sentence with or we're going to vote against your board.

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>And if he did that, if he said and we're

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>going to use our power, then I would give him

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>square a zero. That's what we need. So I don't

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>have an exact number for you, but I'd say it's

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a work in process, and they could do a lot more,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and they have the power to really make incredible change.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So what is the one thing Andrew that Black Rock

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to do or change to better align its actions

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>with the purpose that Larry is talking about. They need

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>to stand with the other shareholders, stand with entire shareholder

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>advocacy community. Two vote with us. We spent a lot

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of time and energy on this, and yet generally black

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Rock says, well, we met with the company and we're cool.

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Trust the shareholder advacy community support us. That would be

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a shift in where we're heading and the speed at

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>which we could get there. Andrew, thank you so much

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for being here today. Thank you very much. Folks. It

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is time to make the call. Is black Rock really

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>taking action to contribute to a more equitable, financially resilient

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>future for all? Based on what I've heard so far,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling a qualified bs. I think there's some bullshit here,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but there are also some really positive signs. So what

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>should Larry do now? Up next, we'll hear some solutions

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>from some experts in in packed investing, including a black

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Rock insider and whistle blower. All Right, before the break,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I called a qualified bullshit. There's still a gap between

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what Larry think is saying Black Rock stands for and

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the actions they're taking. So what should Larry and his

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>leadership team do about that. In this podcast, we don't

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just curse the darkness. We also like to light a

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>few candles. So I've invited to impact investing experts to

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>propose some concrete things that black Rock could change to

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>actually do their story around sustainable investing. First up, I'd

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like to welcome Matthew weatherly White. Matthew is a co

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>founder and former managing director of the cap Rock Group,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a multi family office based in Boise, Idaho, advising over

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars, roughly a third of which has been

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>deployed with an eye toward impact investing, which they define

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>as pursuing positive financial return while simultaneously creating durable, measurable

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>social and environmental value. Welcome Matthew. It's great to have

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you here. Thanks for asking me to join this conversation.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally excited. We are also joined by Tarik Fancy.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Tarik has held multiple positions in finance at firms like

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Credit Suites, First Boston, MHR Fund Management, and the Canada

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Pension Plan Investment Board, and in seventeen, Tarik joined black Rock,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>where he was the Chief Investment Officer for Sustainable Investing.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I actually loved that he has this in his bio,

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just gonna read it. After trying to make

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street more green from the inside, he realized that

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>there was no real social impact happening, rather just a

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>bunch of marketing tak Thank you so much for joining

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>us today. Glad to be here. Okay, so let's get

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>right into some ideas for black Rock. Matthew in two

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>minutes or less. What's the number one thing black Rock

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>should do to better do their story? I think that

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you teetered up beautifully. There's this gap between what Larry

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Think is saying very publicly in his annual letters and

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what black Rock appears to be doing, and that really

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>begs the question. Is that gap structural, institutional, or operational?

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a little bit of all three. Right.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>If I were already think, I would do one really

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>simple thing. I would change the new client form to

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>require investors to opt out sustainable and impact investing and

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>instead opt in, because I think if you make it

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that explicit, rather than forcing people to opt into a

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>more inclusive, regenerative, equitable style of investing, if insaid, you

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>make people opt doubt, I think the proportion of people

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>who would choose to opt in to that sort of

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the negative shadow world of investing, which is now the

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous approach. Right, everybody does that because everybody is being

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>asked to opt into sustainable impact investing. I think the

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>messaging alone would give Larry Fink so much power, so

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>much sort of political capital to force change within the

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>organization that that institutional operational hesitation slash resistance slash intractability.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it would sort of collapse by on its

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>own weight. When you look at organ donation for example,

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and the percentage of people that opt into organisation donation

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>versus opt out of organization. It depends entirely upon how

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the form is structured. And if you have to opt in,

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like the people who are signing it opt into

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>how the organs donated. But if you make them opt out,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like eight. So just change the default setting. Essentially,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those really simple, really deceptive them guessing

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that teople will say totally not possible. But I feel

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like there's one thing I would do. Yeah, No, I

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's a super cool idea. Reframe the whole conversation. Matthew.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>That was great, Thank you, Okay, Taric, your turn in

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>two minutes or less. What's your idea to get black

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Rocks actions better aligned with their stated purpose? Well, I mean,

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I obviously know black Rock from the inside. I know

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Larry personally and worked firm, and I think he's extremely

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligent and talented. What I think he should do is

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>actually be honest about the limitations of what business and

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:37.239
<v Speaker 1>financial markets can do without government regulation. And what do

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that. I don't think that the financial

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>markets right now are structured in any kind of way

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>where they can address the climate threat because people are

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>still able to pollute and they don't pay the cost

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of that pollution. The biggest issues surround the fact that

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire system is structured to chase yield and profitability.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>That's not just black Rock, that's every single firm, including

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all the ones up worked at. And that's not a

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. I'm not disparaging it. I'm being realistic about

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a system that has been built with a chain of

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>legal and financial obligations that Larry himself can't intervene in,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're all around chasing profit. I think the most

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>important thing you can do is actually look and say, listen,

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, we business leaders will lead as much as

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we can, but we need referees. Just like a competitive

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sports game has competition and there are rules and people

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>compete on a playing field. Well, right now, the idea

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think that the players will figure it out

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all on their own through good sportsmanship is the idea

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he's peddling, and I think it's ridiculous, to be honest,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's burning valuable time. We clearly need

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>updated rules and referees for capitalism, and I worry that

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of doing that, we're beholden to a set of

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>neoliberal theses that emerge in the eighties and have convinced

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>us that we don't need regulation, that the free market

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>will figure it all out, and that is to a

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>large extent, would impact investing in E. S G is

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>all about. These are all based on free market self

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>correct theories. And I think that the sooner he accepts

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have time for that and the expert

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>they're telling us we need stomach reforms, the faster we

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can actually create some real change. Right. I love that idea. Also,

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Tarik. So it's my turn, and you know

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I approach this with some trepidation because you guys are

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the experts here. But my perspective is that black Rock

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>has done two important things. The first is the act

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of actually publishing the letters that call for CEOs to

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think longer term, to become purpose led to tackle specific

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>problems like climate change. The second important thing that black

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Rock has done is getting members of the Business round Table,

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which for our listeners is two CEOs from the world's

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>largest corporations, to basically publicly say that Milton Friedman was

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong and that the purpose of a corporation has to

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>change from you know, merely enriching shareholders to seeing to

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the needs of broader stakeholders. And I think the issue

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>right now is that nobody knows what to do next,

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and so Larry Fink, having started this conversation, now needs

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to lead it into action. And from my perspective, that

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>means using black Rocks money as a hammer to create change,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>forcing fund managers to get transparent about where they're invested,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for instance, and I think it means making sure that

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the entire financial industry has a set of measurements that

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are adopted as the final answer fore s G investments.

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think black Rock needs to lead this, and in

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a way, I think they need to designate themselves as

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sheriff and actually start policing some of those metrics, calling

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>folks out who don't measure up, calling some out who

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do measure up, and probably most importantly, calling themselves out

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>when black Rock itself doesn't measure up. I think that

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would go a long way toward building trust. Can I

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>jump in and disagree with that? Of course, yes, please.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that the worst thing possible for society is

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that black Rock place sheriff. Why is that? Because? I mean,

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>how would it have worked if we allowed in the

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>subprime crisis and the financial crisis, you know, ten fifteen

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago, if we had said, hey, let's let the

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>financial banks and all be their own sheriff's. We tried that.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's called self regulation. It doesn't work because when their incentives,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which are extraordinarily short term, right, their focus towards the

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>next few years and their bonuses, when those incentives don't

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>align with the long term public interest, for example, for

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>long term sustainability issues, you can be sure that a

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>system like that, it's going to put the capital where

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>their incentives are and not where we needed to go

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as a society. A hundred years ago, an economist called

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Pigou started coming up with the theory of externalities,

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and the idea was that if you're creating private profit

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way that hurts the public interest, you have

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to pay the cost of it. In other words, you're polluting,

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay a tax for that pollution or

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>fine or something. That is what changes in too that's

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a market based mechanism because now you just fix the

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>rules of the game, the players within that compete to

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>score as many points or profits as they can within

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 1>a new paradigm. Well, okay, I hear that, Turk, and

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to clarify because I'm not saying that

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>black Rock should be able to regulate the entire industry.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>What I am saying is that the industry needs a

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>set of metrics that everyone is aligned on to define

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what is meant by E s G. Investing and what

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the metrics are that the industry is going to align on.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And if black Rock took leadership in developing those metrics

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and then policed those metrics, they would be seen to

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be truly leading the action that needs to happen, as

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>opposed to saying it but not doing really anything about it.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point. The only thing I'd say, though,

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the issue isn't that Larry can do a

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of things to address climate change, but he's not.

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>The issue is that he can't do that, and he's

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>saying he can. That's the issue. What I saw inside

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the system was that all the portfolio managers and capital

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>allocators are doing exactly what they should be doing. They're

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>chasing the highest yield, they're chasing the most profitability. They

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>should be doing that because that's not Larry Finks money.

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>The Night and a Half trailing the Black Rock manages

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is on behalf of clients, most of his retirement money

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from average people, and so that money he can't do

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what he wants with it. That has to be invested

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to maximize return measured in dollar value, not social values.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a legal construct. It's the idea of fiduciary duty.

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no choice they have around that. Is there evidence

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that says by incorporating environmental or social consequences, we are

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>by definition generating below market returns. I can tell you,

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>as a trained investor who was integrating environmental and social

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>considerations into the largest pool of assets and capitalism that

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, the idea that E s G is beneficial

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to returns is for the most part of fantasy. Let

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>me give you an example, because this happened. I'm a

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager and I have to allocate capital and it

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>could be to renewable power, or it could be to

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. Now absent to carbon tax, and we know

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>no Belt Prizewinn in conference telling us we need a

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon it. We need something to correct the market failure.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Absent that the portfolio managers going to invest more in

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels and we need for them to write so

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we need a carbon tax. What Larry's out there saying is,

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which sounds similar to the sort of the broader thesis,

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is that E s G is good and if you

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have the right tools and you have the right data,

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to do the right thing and invest

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in it. And what I'm telling you is that when

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's more profitable for companies underpaid their workers to not

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>invest in renewable power, to not make long term sustainability investments,

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have the executives who's going to top that

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>system with very short term incentives they're not paid to

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>care about long term issues. They're just not going to

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's not because they're bad people, it's because

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the system is not built for them to do it.

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So they can consider E s G. But the issue

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is the E s G thesis at its course, as

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>E s G is good for returns, which is financial

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>jargon proxy for saying being a good responsible company is

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>better for your profits. The problem is that's not true.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>If the E s G data tells you that you

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>should invest in a company that's less responsible, they'll do

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that because their produceries they have to do that. Think

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of that sports analogy, right, You're on the field to

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>score as many points as you can. Now what we're

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>figured out is a dirty play actually scores more points.

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>You raise Milton Freeman, Right, We talked about Milton Freemen

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time. He wrote in a free Enterprise Private

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>property system. In corporate executive is an employee the owners

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of the business. So to your point, the FU share

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>responsibility comes in from that regard, etcetera. He has direct

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to his employers. That responsibility is to conduct the

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>business in accordance with their desires, which generally will be

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to make as much money as possible. And here's where

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it gets interesting. While conforming to the basic rules of

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in ethical custom. And I think that that little phrase

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like it undermines so much of what we say Milton

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Friedman said, because to your point earlier, if the government

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>changes the rules, imposes a carbon tax, enforces gender parity

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in c suite, like, whatever the rule is, capitalism will

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>adapt and reflect that immediately. That's what capitalism does really,

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>really well. But to say that in the absence to

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's not designed to do it, I totally call

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>bullshit on that. I think capitalism is an extraordinary optimization mechanism.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that the market will self correct itself

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on climate change, because that's effectively what we're saying, because

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you need a rule change. No. No, I'm saying

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that the market will reflect given the conformance the basic

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>rules to society, goes in bettered and law on those

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in bettered and ethical custom. And that's why I think

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that opt out idea is interesting, because the ethical custom

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>has no way of expressing itself in the markets right now.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>There is no way for the general public to say, hey,

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we think that corporations should be thinking more about climate

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>change absence selling some shares with you know whatever. That

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so they're not gonna work. But if there was this

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>way to message the ethical custom and back it up

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 1>with the standards embodied in law, suddenly I think Wall

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Street changes on a dime. I think that Harry. For

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you to say that that Larry thinks sort of can't

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>act in accordance with his values or his stated objectives

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in his letters because the regulatory framework doesn't let him,

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that is effectively inviting regulation or is writing

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>reregulations or something, because it seems like I really want

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this, but I can't. Therefore I need government

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to act so that I can do this. I don't

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>know if he's saying that, but that's sort of the

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>framework that I hear. He's not saying that, but I

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that's what even portfolio managers are told me. So

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>their point was, listen, I'll reduce my carbon footprint if

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>someone puts the tax on carbon. Everyone will, even if

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe in climate change. But asking them to

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>voluntarily do it when the reality of the economics is

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually profitable for them to do things we

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want them to do, as society just doesn't work.

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not because they're bad people, because the system is

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>built according to incentives and legal obligations and they're not

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.479
<v Speaker 1>set up to give us outcomes that we need. What's

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the idea though, of black Rock getting on

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>offense and spearheading a drive to change government regulation here

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>so he could say, listen, our experts and society tell

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>us we need systemic reforms, So they're going to have

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to come through government because that's the only way we'll

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>flatten the curve fast enough. And you know what we're

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is both come out and say that, which

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done. And again if he doesn't say that,

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it misleads the public, and number two say hey, we're

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna start using our lobbying efforts to actually say who

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we need a price on carbon. If he did that,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say, hey, you know what, I think he

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>actually wants to fight climate change. I want to pivot

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for just a second to a couple of other ideas.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>In his letters, Larry talks about net zero as being

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the goal that essentially getting our carbon production to zero

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>from producing more carbon than is absorbed to producing the

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>same amount of carbon that the planet absorbs currently, so

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>that net zero carbon is being added to the atmosphere.

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>What do either of you think about net zero as

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a concept. The average CEO gets paid three times the

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>worker in that industry, so that's the highest has been

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in decades. The average CEO also spends five years in

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>their role. That's the shortest it's been in decades. So

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is that the average CEO gets paid

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a hell of a lot of money in a very

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>short period of time in five years what they might

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>have gotten ten or fifteen or whatever years before when

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you have very short term incentives like that. And then

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, okay, the goal is net zero, by I mean,

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>call me a skeptic, but yeah, Matthew, you did a

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>TED talk a little while back in which you say

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that you believe that in the future all investing will

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be E S G investing. I'd love to hear you

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about where you think we are on that transition,

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's certainly grown in popularity since you made that statement. Yes,

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>and my optimists had goes back to what I would

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>have Larry Phint do, right, which is really a gigantic

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>public statement of values. When I put my pastant's hat

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on and say, well, if ten years ago you would

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have said to me, well, two, we're gonna

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>have trillions of dollars pointed towards e s G. We're

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have hundreds of billions of dollars towards pointing towards

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>climate resiliency. The issues of gender parity and pay equity

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and underrepresented minorities is all going to be sort of

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on the table. I would have said, holy sh it, like, well,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>if that's all there in ten years, we would have won.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>We're there, We're good. Quite to the contrary, the problems

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>are more acute now then they were a decade ago,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and so I think sort of pick up a thread

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that part laid down earlier. The failures are disorienting. I mean,

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>there's so persistent that it's dispiriting to me. So yes,

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think that eventually, particularly relative to climate resiliency,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it will simply be unacceptable to make investments at some

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>point with utter disregard to the environmental consequences and just

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pretended they don't exist. Like I think that will be

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>eventually just unacceptable behavior. In much the same way that

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>slavery was rendered unacceptable or colonialism was rendered unacceptable. Right,

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and yet the time frame is so compressed right now

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>around climate chains that I really worry whether or not

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the market response mechanism, blunted as it is by regulatory

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.919
<v Speaker 1>framework and an ethical framework on Wall Street, is even

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>remotely able to respond in the time frame that we

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>needed to write. But I also I was reading an

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>article in preparing for this discussion about an attempt to

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>classify investment green investing essentially in the EU, and they

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have three classifications, but it's essentially dark green, light green,

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else. They were saying, in the current

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>investing environment, everyone wants to position themselves as either light

0:40:55.600 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>green or dark green, and because of that, it raises

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the specter of just ongoing purpose washing. Absent any regulation

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>on what is a green fund or not, there's going

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a race to the bottom, because you'd be

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>insane not to call your fund green if everybody else

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is right. So the EU taxonomy does help in that sense,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>because at least you have some rules around what it

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>means to be green, because otherwise it's not just funds,

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it's anything, right. Imagine you go to the grocery store

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>anything else. If there's an environmentally green product that looks nice,

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>people will pay more fur it and prefer it. But

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the challenges no one's actually going and saying, but is

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this detergent truly sustainable? Right? I think one of the

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenges in the whole attempt to taxonomyze and categorize

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>impact is that everyone sort of competing for market share

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>based on their own new taxonomy, and so we have

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>these huge dispersion of frameworks and measurement systems and set

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to go back to tards idea that we need regulations,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>which it drives a lot is. I totally agree and

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like a huge fan of overregulating every but

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we it has to happen. I want to go back

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to black Rock. A little bit earlier in this episode,

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed a guy named Andrew Behar, who is the

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO of an organization called as You So, and he

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that at the black Rock General shareholder meeting,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he challenged Larry Fink to actually implement some of the

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>great ideas that he talks about in his letters, and

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Larry's response was, we are fully implemented and that that

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gave me pots. That's one of the reasons that I

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>decided to feature black Rock is that seems like bullshit

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to me, right, Tark, I assume you would agree with that.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily bullshit, because this is the

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>point I'm trying to make, is that there's limits on

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what he can do. You don't have a thesis to

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>say you should do it because it's good for the world.

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that. You have to do it in

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cheryl our interests. And if cheryl our interests is that

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you can make more profit in the next few years

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>dumping chemicals in the river, and there's no reason to

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>ever believe that anyone's going to make them pay the

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>cost of that. There's no referee coming in saying you

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.919
<v Speaker 1>can't do that and you're gonna pay a fine. Then

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>technically is a fiduciary you should be doing that. And

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to your point, that's actually where the bullshit was, that

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not giving the full context around his answer, going

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out there and implying that you can do lots of

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing things. I realized it wasn't gonna work, and I left.

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>This is like giving weak grass to a cancer patient. Right,

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's really nicely marketed. It sounds great, but there's no

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to think it's going to stop the cancer. And

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>if the rest of the world doesn't know that and

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take him a few years to figure

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it out, then it's much worse because we're burning time. Right,

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you're giving weak grass with cancer patient, and then you

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>can clean see clearly that the cancer patients delaying chemotherapy. Yep,

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Okay, gentlemen, this has been fantastic. I

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you both for being here today, and

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to wrap this discussion up, I want to ask each

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of you to give black Rock a BS score. So

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on a scale of zero two, one being the worst

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>total BS and zero being the best zero BS, what

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would you give black Rock? Matthew, why don't you start

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>During the course of this conversation, I have to admit

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that my perspective has shifted. That's good, that's what we're

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>here to do. Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna give Tarag

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a nod there, and it is a perspective has shifted

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.720
<v Speaker 1>along two axes. First, I feel like my bullshit rating

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>has gone up because what I see now is Larry

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Fink is actually exploiting his role as a perceived leader

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>while knowing full well without disclosing it, that he's he

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything right. And so on one level, my

0:44:56.400 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>bs meters panded Hunters right. On the other hand, I'm

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of more apathetic than I have been two structural impediments.

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't quite willing to give Larry Fink or the

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>leaders at black Rock a little bit of room, a

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of empathy. I guess to work within the

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>system that's simply intractable, and so I'm gonna split my

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 1>score and go hundred slash like, fair enough, we'll work

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>with that. What do you reckon? Ah? I would say

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's closer to a hundred dinners to zero. But

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I would also add that I don't think it's black

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Rock specific, right. If it's let's say it's for black Rock,

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>then I would argue the rest of the industry, and

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the financial service industry and Goldman Sachs list,

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>all of them, they're all in the same boat, right

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're all effectively saying the same things. I think

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're out singled amount is by saying that you're the

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>largest one. And if that voice is being used to

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:02.760
<v Speaker 1>pedal narratives that effectively just see your syrup to delay

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the taxes and regulation that none of us want. I mean,

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm a capitalis I don't love tax in regulation. But

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point even Milton Friedman, I'm certain, would have

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>said we need a carbon tax because he's not stupid, right, like,

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>watch the planet get destroyed? And I would challenge them

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to rethink what responsible business means through the lens of

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>your own younger employees. Are you serving their interests? I

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think capitalism can solve these issues, but I also think

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that capitalists themselves need to debate how that comes about

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and not let there be one sort of version of

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 1>it being peddled from a few people talk that could

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:38.280
<v Speaker 1>actually be endangering the entire system. The majority of millennials

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>today don't believe in capitalism. That concerns me, right that

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're all of us. That's right, that should concern

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody exactly, And I don't blame them, right unless they

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>see a system that is producing better social and environmental

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>outcomes and addressing the problems we have, they're going to

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>lose faith in the system and endangers the entire metaphice Okay, fancy,

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being here today. Really appreciate

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you taking the time. Thank you. I enjoyed this chat.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And Matthew Weatherley White, thank you for being here today.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate it. Really. Okay, it's time for my official

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>bullshit score, because there seems to be some intent to change,

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>but they definitely aren't there yet. I'm giving Black Rock

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a fifty nine. To weigh in with your own score,

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>visit our website Calling Bullshit podcast dot com. We'll track

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>their behavior over time and see if they can't bring

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that score down. You'll also be able to see where

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock ranks on bullshit compared to the other companies

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we feature on this show. So, if you're running a

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>purpose led business or you're thinking of beginning the journey

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of transformation to become one, here are three things that

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to take away from this episode. One. Defining

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a purpose is an important step, but it's the beginning,

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not the ending. Once you define it, it needs to

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>drive the actions you take, both internally and externally. Two.

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Those actions can take many forms. In black Rocks case,

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we've heard suggested actions like changing the default settings on

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendations to E s G. Compliant unless the client

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically opts out and actions like black Rock actually lobbying

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>for a carbon tax or partnering with shareholder advocates like

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Behar to drive real change in the governance of

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the companies and funds they invest in. The actions for

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 1>your company would undoubtedly be different, but the point is

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the actions that make your purpose real for people.

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>And three, Transparency is a key aspect of being purpose lad.

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>In Larry's case, being super clear about what black Rock

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>can and can't do is another key to building trust

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that he really means what he's saying. Larry, if you

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ever want to come on the show to discuss anything

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we've touched on in this episode, I want you to

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>know you have an open invitation. Thank you for joining

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>us today. Andrew Bhart, Matthew Weatherly White, and Taric Fancy.

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>You can find them all on social media. We've got

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all their handles on our website, Calling Bullshit Podcast dot com,

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and check out Andrew book The Shareholder Action Guide Unleash

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your hidden powers to hold corporations accountable. And if you

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have ideas for companies or organizations we should consider for

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.919
<v Speaker 1>future episodes, you can submit them on the site too.

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If our stock went up with you today. Subscribe to

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Calling Bullshit podcast on the I Heart Radio app,

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And thanks

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Susie Armitage, Hannah Beal, Amanda Ginsburg,

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Andy Kim, d s Moss, Mikaela Reid, Leena Beck Cilison,

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Venton and Basil Soaper. Calling Bullshit was created by

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>co Collective and is hosted by me Tie Montague. Thanks

0:50:52.120 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for listening, Ey,