WEBVTT - Fish Missile

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>advice leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul. Welcome to

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a COVID free version of Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Chargy and back in studio. Yes, I've never said it's

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>good to see you, but it's good to see yeah

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Thank you. It is so good to

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be back. And and for everybody who put up with

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>me sounding like I was doing my portion of the show,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>my third of the show from an outhouse in Albuquerque. Um,

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you for putting up with that. I really appreciate it.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's great to be back my coast today. Scott

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Fish and Brian Johnson, Hello, Hello and Scott. You haven't

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>even been on the show like a month. I love

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that we all have, yes, true, I love that we

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all have varying degrees of facial hair. Today I grew it.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I grew on a COVID beard. Yeah, I got the

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the mustache. I'm bringing awareness to men's health with the

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>awfulness of my mustache. And it's not for you know,

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not for looks. It's for it's for awareness that,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the show will answer three tough questions.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you a premature speculation. We'll give you nine

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>players upon whom you can take a chance, and of

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>course we'll break down every game fantasy style with letter grades.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You know how it works. We begin Scott with the

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Lions taking on the Browns. It looks like Jared Goff's

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna go on this one. And I don't think

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>there's hardly a Brown to start outside of maybe Swift,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's got to be it Browns or Lions. It's

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's bad on both sides. The passing game, I have,

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I have three starting grades. I have DeAndre Swift with

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. He's coming out, still get to night,

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>still help from the quarterback position, no help from the

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position, but he still gets all those those balls

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thrown to him. Who of his three backups are injured.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Two of his three other running backs in that backfield

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are injured running backs who have grabbed at least four

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>balls against the Browns, basically the dual threat backs. They

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have torched the Browns. Those four backs scored eight touchdowns

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>at averaged about a hundred yards, So I got an

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade on Swift. I have a C grade on

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson despite the disastrous goose egg. I think it might

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a squeaky wheel game. Maybe

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Boyle depends on Hockinson is a safe option I have.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a C grade on him. It's I'm not confum,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but the Browns have allowed six catches for sixty yards

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and a score two in each of the last three weeks,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends. That's the average stat line. So but

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game, I have everyone else on the bench,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly because of Boil but also the it's it's not

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a good spot. On the other side, I have the

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>whole passing game on the bench. Again, Baker's top two

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty yards just once in the last nine weeks

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and only two multiple score games. Most teams basically just

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>run on the Lions. They don't have to throw. I

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can't trust Baker, he's still banged up. I have Landry

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bench because his best game is seventy one

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and he hasn't scored all year. I've Donovan People's

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones on the bench, who came up with an injury

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this week and once he had that full job, they

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>were they were shifting the top coverage to him. So,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, yeah, rightfully so, But I don't I

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>don't trust him. But a grade on Nick Chubb, who

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will be back? Uh? Last time Chubb got twelve plus

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>touches and failed to get seventy five total yards was

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. He's gonna get twelve, He's gonna get sixteen.

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The six seven backs who had sixteen plus touches against

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, seven of those backs scored nine times, and

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>six of them had a hundred plus total yards. Now,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is there a chance that backup role demails? That I

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>knew you would go there? In the two games the

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Deanist Johnson played with Nick Chubb this year and Kareem

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Hunt out, he had thirty five total snaps, not touches snaps,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen touches for forty seven yards in those two games.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Even against the Lions, good matchup should get ahead. Tim

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Boyle could score easily zero points in this game. I

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's a Chub day. No, I would Alba argue

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Nick Chubb side of this, Yes, I I would.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I would not be flexing Deernest Johnson. But I can

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>see your arguments. So if you're really entire straights, let's

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>go over to the Tech. That was very brisk, thank you.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Texans taking on the Titans.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of great starters here, but there are

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>some Texans. Oh wait, we were not. What game are

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>we doing next? Jets, Dolphins, Jets, Dolphins Jets, you say

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go to all right, let's go to Dolphins Jets then,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Because Texans Titans is a take confest, we'll get to

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that a little later. So Dolphins at Jets, first meeting

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>between these two divisional rivals, so we can't reference recent

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>history in this matchup. Starting with the Miami side, the

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>road team in to a toungo. Viola was going to

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we might take a chance of the quarterback, but it's

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>too easy in this matchup. I'm giving him a B

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>here for to New York. New York has allowed multiple

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns in five straight games. Over those five games,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>opposing passers are averaging a whopping three five yards and

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>two point four passing touchdowns. Solid B for Tua uh,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Solid B for Jalen Waddle as well. It really doesn't

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>matter who's playing quarterback from Miami, Waddle produces consistently. Uh.

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>The one glaring difference though between Twa and Brissette is

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the touchdown receptions for Waddle worth thrown by Tua,

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Jets have surrendered five scores to wideouts over

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>their last four games. Love Waddle in this game. Now

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for Miami's wide receiver to Albert Wilson and Isaiah four

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>both had four catches and eighty plus yards in Week ten.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But not gonna throw any se darts or or harpoons

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>here both around the bench. But Mike Kisiki is not

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>who is really truly the wide receiver to for Miami.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Runs most of his routes from the slot or outside. Uh,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he gets a b was more like Mike goose Egg

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>last week like that, but finds himself I think I

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>someone tweeted me that, so I can't take full credit

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>for it. But use Kasecki finds himself in the perfect

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>bounce backspot against the Jets, who over the last five

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>games have streundered four touchdowns to the tight end position.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>During that same span, the very comparable Kyle Pitts posted

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a monster game with nine catches or nineteen yards in

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a score, and like Kasecki, Pits runs most of his

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>routes from the slaughter outside. So a great matchup for

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote tight end Mike Gisicki. And lastly for Miami.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Miles gascon to be only because it's an

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>odd numbered week. He only goes off in odd numbered weeks,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and the even numbered weeks he he wets the bed.

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But it is an amazing matchup that Jets are allowing

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>one and eighty nine combo yards and two point two

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to opposing running backs. I will say, though,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I will not be shocked if Salvin Akhmed how performs

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Miles gas Gas to me is the is the hardest

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>guy to start this week because you know, the opportunity

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so good, and he's flopped so hard so many times

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to get not an odd numbered weeks. So that scientific

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fact in a week eleven. Here over to the New

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>York side, shockingly a f you guys to talk about.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we'll start with Michael Carter, the most fantasy

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>relevant player on New York. Can give him a see though,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just to see very strong splits with Mike White at quarterback.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>But New York is going with Joe Flacco in this game,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and let's get it out of the way. Flacco was

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, by the way, so uh, just to

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>see for Carter. The Dolphins run defense has become very

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>stout against opposing backs, holding them to sixties scoreless yards

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>per game over the last several weeks. Uh, the Seas

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>continue with Corey Davis. The Dolphins have yielded the third

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>most red zone targets too wide receivers, and over their

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>last five games, they've surrendered five scores to the position.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins secondary has also surrendered to one yard receivers

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and five touchdowns to wide receivers over the last five

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So I do give Davis a starting grade with the

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sea and the once. I mean he'll likely be shadow

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>by Xavian Howard, who was once corner. He's allowed seven

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his coverage, the most among quarter cornerbacks this year.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And uh one more starting grade for Jets receiver. It's

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not Alijah More, it is Jamison Crowder. Miami has been

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>very generous you slot receivers. They've yielded the most targets

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and allowed the most receptions. Two receivers running from the

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>seams and I did mention Flacco earlier. He's on the

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>bench shock right now. You can't can't without saying Ravens

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>take on the Bears. And Lamar Jackson missed Wednesday and

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Thursday's practice. We came back Friday with whatever his mysterious

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>illness is. We don't know what the illness is. Um

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with um blumbago. He gets sick more

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>than a high schooler with a test. It's crazy. A

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>grade for Lamar Jackson. I like all receiving options as

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you're here in a minute, and I'll mention that Chicago

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>has allowed the third fewest quarterback rushing yards, just seven

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>per game, but they also haven't faced any mobile quarterbacks

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>all year. So still like Jackson with an A grade.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Brown missed Thursday, Thursday's practice, and Wednesday's practice with

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thigh injury, but came back Friday. He's expected to go now.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago could shadow Marquis Brown with their best cornerback, Jalen Johnson,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>but they tried that against Mike Evans a few games

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ago and Evans crushed him. So I think they're gonna

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the They're gonna keep Jalen Johnson on one side

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the field, and then that means that Marcus Brown

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get plenty of plays against Kendallville Door, a

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>frequent whipping boy on this show vild Or, giving up

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of one hundred forties six in his coverage.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>His Pro Football focuses ranked cornerback, and that's why Marcus

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown gets an A grade. Richade Bateman will also get

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>plenty of kindall Ville Door. He's getting increasingly involved each

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>week and just based on his normal deployment lots of

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>wildore in this game, only five teams have allowed more

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns than Chicago, and I think Bateman could

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>easily find the Enzo for the first time in his career.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Permission to throw out a nickname Preville Door. Oh please,

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ville door is a jar? Doors a jar? I mean,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>how about it? Can't he just be like an open book?

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, isn't that? Isn't that? You know?

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Is he bad at read coverage? I don't know. I

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There's I mean, I think there's I think

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a better angle on killed Kendallville Door. I'm gonna

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>go back to the lab. All right, thank you, yeah,

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>workshop that please Mark Andrews. If I didn't say Bateman's

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a B, he's a BAT. Mark Andrews also be uh

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>second in yards among all tight ends. He remains an

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a leite option, but it could be a tough matchup.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The Bears had only allowed one tight end touchdown until

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>their previous game before the bye, when Pat Fryarmouth scored twice. Uh.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Since Week two, they failed every opposing tight end under

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and that includes the like of Darren Waller

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and t J. Hockenson. So just the B grade on

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews, but I still like him enough here. Now

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the running backs is a it's a messy situation and

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll do my best here for the With Baltimore's running backs,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if Latavius Murray is healthy, presumably he returns to the

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>starting role, but he's shaping up as a game time decision,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet. And if so, he gets a

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>C grade, and then Devonte Freeman would probably get enough

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>touches where you've attempted to play and you probably shouldn't.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But if Murray is out, then will upgrade Freeman all

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the way up to a B grade. Since he would

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get the overwhelming Lions share of the touches. The Bears

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>are allowing one rushing yards per game on four point

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry to opposing running backs, both sixth most,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and as people probably know by now, uh, they have

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ruled out Khalil Mack for the rest of the year,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>so whatever run support he would have lent will not

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be there. Okay, so let's go to the bare side

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of the field. I like David Montgomery here B grade.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Last we saw him before the bye, he put up

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>an impressive game against a good Steelers defense, and he's

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>even healthier now after the bye. Baltimore's top five and

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards allowed, giving up only four yards per carry,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but they've given up eight rushing scores, which bodes wall

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for Montgomery as Chicago calls running plays at the highest

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>rate inside the five yard line. So I like Montgomery

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to score in this game, and so a B grade

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>for him. Let's go to the passing game. I originally

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>had a C grade on justin Fields, but I've lowered

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>him to a bench on news that Allen Robinson will

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>not play in this game or is not expected to

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>play in this game. Listed as doubtful. Baltimore is allowing

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the most passing yards almost three per game. Where Fields

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>kills you is he's only averaging twenty four passes a game.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the lowest among all starting quarterbacks. Now, Baltimore usually

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>sees thirty six a game, So maybe Fields gets into

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the low thirties on on attempts and that could get

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>him to an okay game here, but he's gonna have

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it on Darnell Mooney and Cole Commit and

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that those guys can carry a passing

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>offense um. And also, Baltimore has been very good against

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing quarterbacks to this point of the season, allowing the

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>second fewest quarterback rushing yards just seven per games. So

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the field is gonna help you there either,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he's on the bench. Mooney comes in

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade. Baltimore giving up one d eighty

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>four yards per game to opposing receivers, that is eighth most.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They've also allowed a receiver to post at least eighty

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>four yards or multiple touchdowns two receivers in four the

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>last five, so there are opportunities for Mooney here. Marlon

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey who used to be a great cornerback, has allowed

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>five scores in a passer rating of over one hundreds coverage,

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>which is not like it is. It is a little

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>bit odd. So an opportunity for Mooney there and then

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Cole Commet. I had him. I had him on the

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bench originally and then ultimately decided on a C grade

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>coming off a career best game eight targets, six catches,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven yards against Pittsburgh, And it's a good opportunity

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for defense that struggled against tight ends. Ravens are bottom

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>seven in receptions, yards and scores to tight ends, and

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens had really brutal Yeah, that's exactly what's gonna say. Yeah, there,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, at one point early on, I'm like, well,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like Travis else. Ye really even since then, exactly,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the way you think, Scott Fish. When we

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>come back, hopefully you'll like the way we think about

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>nine players not normally in your starting lineup. It's called

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me, find some guys off the

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire that can help you this week. When we

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>return Fantasy Football Weekly, it's take a chance on me.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in your starting lineup. I want

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention, by the way, shout out to the local

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis band I think I believe called Soap, the band

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that was nice enough to record the US for us,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty damn moss awesome. And I have not

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>given them a shout out by name yet this year,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and I apologize for that. We gotta go see him play.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We should help the band reach out, let us know,

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>let us know how we can support you, because you've

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>helped us and now we're gonna help you. At the

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position, Scott Fish, give us a player under the

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>radar that could be available for people to pick up

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and play. I'm not sure exactly how under the radar

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he is, but he's he's still under about owned, which

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is just ridiculous. And we've talked about this before that

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he needs to be more rostered more. Jimmy Garoppolo, Uh, yeah,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Jags held down Went and Allen recently, but before that,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they've given up five plus yr days, five multi touchdown scores.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Even Alan got a bunch of work done on the ground,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy g seems to be running it in now

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that he knows that Trey Lance is on his field

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on his heels. He's running scores in But Jimmy has

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in three straights and all his weapons are healthy. Now,

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so give me Jimmy. G Yeah, the fact that all

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the weapons are healthy. To me, it's a big part

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of that story. I should just at that and moved on.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>You got right. There was quarterback position Brian the Raiders

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr at home against the Bengals. It is carbage

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>time yet again, since he is coming off their BIS

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>so they've had some time to prepare for this one.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But still over the Bengals last two games, they surrendered

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>five passing touchdowns to Baker Mayfield and Mike White. Uh.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This game should be pretty high scoring is very simple

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Vegas things. Though. It has the second highest over under

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Sunday Slate at fifty point five points. I

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like the Raiders to rebound here at Derek Carr. I'm

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Cam Newton. You guys know, I've been

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>very skeptical of Newton in the past, but this is

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>such a fascinating matchup. He gets to go up against

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>arguably the worst past defense in the NFL. Washington ranks

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine and passing yards allowed and dead last in

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns allowed. Um. What makes this particularly fascinating is

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he's going up against his old coach. Ron Rivera knows

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>where all the bodies are buried with camwy All, the deficiencies,

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>all the problems in his game, and the good things

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in his game. So can the old coach scheme up

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>away to stop Cam Newton. I don't know that you

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>can stop him from running into touchdown, and I think

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance he does that. Here the last

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>mobile quarterback that Washington has seen, well, the only mobile

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that Watchington scene was Daniel Jones. And you maybe

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>remember earlier too he ran all over to yards in

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. So I think one way or another,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Camp finds his way to a good game. Well, two

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>snaps two touchdowns last week, that the first two. At

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one point he was two for two. That's right. Let's

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position, Scott, who you got?

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I have Jeff Wilson Jr. Which is starting to turn

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>into even better start. Now Mitchell is now doubtful. Of course,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>James Hasty is out. Hasty is out, and uh. The

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>only other backs are Trey Sermon, who has done nothing

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>all year and they don't. They seem to hate him

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and the doghouse. And then Trenton Cannon, who's a special

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>team's guy. This is a This is a four team

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that has had the run back touch of the ball

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven times per game over the last four and

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>every back that has had ten plus touches against the

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Jags has top sixty plus yards. I think Wilson gets

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>t touches easy. I could be first half if Mitchell plays.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't play, he could get twenty plus ye Mitch,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Mitchell goes if I don't need.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>He's doubtful at this point. He's been banged up for

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time. He just he needs a week off

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to heal. Let's go to your running back, Brian, who

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to go back to Vegas. So I'm gonna

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>do the same. Kenyan Drake of the Raiders tried all

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the second times the charm. I know I'm saying goes,

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but it will be this week. I like Drake against

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, who over the last two games have allowed

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>two thirty one combo yards and two touchdowns per game

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. I know Josh Jacobs is the

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lead back for Las Vegas, but there should be some

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>scraps left over for Drake Drake on the ground, But

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this is all about the receiving angle. Despite having their

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>by the Bengals have yielded these second most targets and

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the second most red zone targets running backs, and our

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>top three in the most catches and yards allowed to

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the position. Your lead running back for Tennessee is not

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson, it is Donte Foreman, and Foreman gets a

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity against the Texans, allowing the second most rushing

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>yards and the fourth most rushing touchdowns per game. And

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>basically this Texans defense, they've shut down half the defense

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>or traded away or otherwise or without half their defensive starters.

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>At this point, Foreman had seventy eight total yards last

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>week against a far tougher Saints defense, and he had

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>tripled the output of Adrian Peterson and Jeremy McNichols. And

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the icing on the cake. McNichols isn't playing this week

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and Adrian cat catch, so the passing work out of

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the backfield may very well go to Foreman as well,

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a delicious opportunity. He almost looked like Derrick Henry out there.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I was I forgot how big Foreman is, dudes, giant.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I forgot he was in the league too. Yeah, that too.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That's because the Achilles injury. Man, you guys don't come

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>back from that as all. It bodes well for cam

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Akers a little. But Formans, like three years off his

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>achilles has taken him a long time to get back.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out. Let's go to the receiving options, Scott,

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Adam Troutman. I can't believe I'm adding

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Adam Troutman in here. But the Eagles have been basically

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the seventeen Giants or the twenty nineteen Cardinals right now.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed the most yards, receptions, and touchdowns to tight ends.

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Seven different tight ends have tallied nine touchdowns, scored nine times.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Truman has six plus targets in three straight. He has

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>nine catches in the last two weeks. He's coming on.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't have all all of our fish sounds, are not, sorry,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not fishing all of our animal sounds that we've got.

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>You know that. You know we have a number of

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>them at our disposal here right. We don't have a fish.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't talk about trout anywhere, No trout to be.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>If we talked about kickers, we'd have to either bass

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to It makes total sense. Scott Fish going with Adam Trapp.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Go figure h Bryan, Who's gonna take a chance of

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the receiver. We said the Texans and Titans were a

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>take comfest on I'm going with Houston's Nico Collins at Tennessee. Now,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Houston's Danny Amendolas all the second most targets among Houston

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers last week and charged one of your favorite players,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Connolly is still getting some targets, but my gut

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is telling me to throw the harpoon at Collins. In

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a very plus matchup, opposing wide receivers are averaging more

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five targets, six team catches, and two hundred

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and twelve yards per game versus the Titans. Whiteouts are

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>also averaging one and a half touchdowns per game against

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and que up that peacock because might take a

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>chance of me wide receiver. Last week, Marquez Callaway scored

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans. Nico Collins is gonna do the same.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the same game opposite side of the field.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Johnson, the name many of you are not even

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. Your's. Your is your Julio Jones replacement for

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Titans. And he goes up against Houston like

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Don to Foreman does. And this is secondary that surrendered

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 1>six receiver scores in their last four games. And Johnson

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>has quietly been a favorite of Tannehills in the non

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones games, where he's garnered a target share percentage

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of six and pent for Marcus Johnson got him one

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>yard game last week. I think he has another good

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one here, Marcus Johnson. I was dumb enough to sit

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Johnson over Cole Beasley, Chris Godwin and Tyler Lock

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Dynasty League last week. But you but you left.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You still got him. I'm holding it. I'm gonna play

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. You're right. I like the call. Fantastic. Let's

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>go onto our next matchup, Scott, which is the Colts

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Bills. Colts passing offense went belly up

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>hard last week and a much tougher matchup this week.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say it's it's not getting much better here.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The Bills have only allowed six passing touchdowns this year

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>through nine games. That's it's amazing. That's ridiculous. So I

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>hope you're not counting on Carson Wentz. He did, he

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>had a nice streak in there, but it came to

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>an end last week. He's not getting anything this week.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm still giving Michael Pittman a B though, he's he

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just gets such a huge percentage of that team's volume.

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>It's not the best matchup of Pittman is almost a

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>lock for eight to nine targets, five to six catches weekly,

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and the players that have gotten that kind of volume

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills have done pretty decently. So there's hope there.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But don't hold for a score though, because that just

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. Jonathan Taylor, however, I have a B grade

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on I could be talked into an A bit it's

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>just such a tough matchup. The reason I could be

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>talked into an A I'm doing a B is that

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Hunt Derrick Henry crushed them for a hundred and

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty six yards and three scores. That's the only comparable

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jonathan Taylor that has played the Bills. Michael Carter

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>had eighty two and a score against the Bills. Um

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>easier to run on the Bills than past. Yeah, all

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the other runners are not even remotely like Michael Carter

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is probably maybe Antonio Gibson and had a hundred total

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>yards too, So there are backs that have done it

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills, and Taylor's right in that field, so

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I give him a beat. On the other side, there's

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of stuff that you just don't know

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>where the scoring is going. I like, I like Alan

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for an a grade Like once Alan struggled against the

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>jag two weeks ago, but he rebounded big last week.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>This game, he gets a cold steve that is bottom

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>tending almost every passing category, including allowing the most passing touchdowns.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So a grade on Allan Diggs gets an A because

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>he's coming back around. He has eight five plus yards

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and or score in four straight grabbing at least seven

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>balls in each of them, and he's top sixty sixty

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>yards in every single game, like he's got a super

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>safe floor. So this team is allowing the sixth most receptions,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>eight most yards, and second most touchdowns and wide receivers,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but I sadly just can't trust the other three wide

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers that you know every time you think you gotta

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>read on which receiver might have a good game turns

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>around and flops. Yeah, Sanders had a lot of touchdowns

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year. Um last week Sanders snaps went

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>down to Beasley had a couple of huge plays. I'm sorry,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Davis had a couple of huge plays. Beasley had a

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of good games. But now he's got the rib

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>injury that really took him out last week, and he

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>might be slowed this week. So I have them on

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I didn't believe me for that. One might

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>pop up. We just don't know who Dawson knocks. I

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have a C grade on last week. Dan Arnold had

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>had a decent five for sixty seven stat line. Earlier

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the year, Mark Andrews and Mike Gasecki had had

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>really good days against them. I view knocks closer to

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>those guys than all the mesh of tight ends that

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>did twenty to forty yards. Uh, so he's gonna see

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for me here. Hey, don't forget about the two point

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>conversion for dan Arnold touchdown, he touchdown. You need to

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>get every little bit in. Uh, I'm on the running game.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I have them on the bench too. Just like the

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Uh. Part of the reason the past game

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>should have a field day is because the Colts are

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>sneakily a top five run defense right now. Um and

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with Breta coming on last week stealing snaps and touches

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and touchdowns, it's a three way split. Last week it

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was six touches to seven touches to eight touches. I

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like that, so I have them on the bench. Yeah,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, it's not the Jets again. So

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>even though there were whatever four or five, you know,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was it four running back touchdowns for each of them

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>scored and Breda got two twice. I'm just like we

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>knew it was gonna happen. Who didn't call Matt Brita

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone first game that he hasn't been inactive since Week three,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>scoring twice. Let's let's squeeze in one more matchup, Brian,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because I think this one's gonna be pretty short, based

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the fact we've already talked about half of the

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>players in this game. Texans taking on the Titans. I

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>already told you two different Texans that I liked, including

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>starting running back down to foreman. Yeah, we'll started on

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the Texans side with the guys we haven't talked about.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cook's gonna give him a B. The move back

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to Taylor at quarterback did not affect Cook's massive targets share.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He saw thirteen targets last week at Miami. I said

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. Opposing wide receivers are averaging more than twenty

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>five targets, sixteen catches, and two twelve yards per game

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans. That's why Nico Collins was gonna take

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me wide receiver. It also makes Tarad

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Trod Taylor worthy of a Sea dart. The Titans have

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>surrendered the fifth most fantasy points to quarterbacks and mobile

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks like Kyler Murray and Trevor Lawrence both scored on

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground against Tennessee. But all the Texans running backs

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are not worthy of any darts unless they're like elephant tranquilizers. Uh,

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>they're all on the bench. Over to the Tennessee side,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown and easy a here. Brown has seen

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the Texans four times in his career and has totaled

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns against them, scoring in every game. He's also

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>topped one yards and three of those four games, So

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a smash spot for Brown and it could

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be a smash spot for Marcus Johnson. Charge here, take

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>a chance of me wide receiver. And I had a

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>great write up written for Jeff Swain night end but

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out. Unfortunately he had distance some distanced

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>himself from Anthony Ferkser and Michael Pruett. So I'm gonna

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>give ferks to receive though here kind of a sleeper

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end that has been a massive disappointment, but an

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>amazing matchup for the tight end uh for Tennessee, and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I will go with frokes Are again. Despite having their

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>by Houston has yielded the second most red zone touches

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and have allowed the third most touchdowns to tight ends

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with a sit with six, and five of those six

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end touchdowns have come over the last six games

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for Houston. We're opposing tight ends are also averaging nearly

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>five catches and sixty yards. So Anthony Brokeser could finally

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>come through for those that are probably draft him in

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>best Ball. But if you're desperate tight end, go out

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and grab ferks Er. Uh, Dante Foreman, Like you said,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>charge was yourna take a chance on me running back

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course, you have to mention Ryan Tannehill, who,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of Jacoby Brissette, Baker Mayfield and Mac Jones Houston

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has surrendered multiple passing touchdowns in every game. Tannehill has

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>been kind of a disappointment touchdown wise. The rushing touchdowns

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>have been saving him from Fantasy irrelevancy. But uh, and

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I should have mentioned this is the first meeting between

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>these divisional opponents. But the last time Tannehill saw the

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Texans at home last season, he went for passing yards

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and four passing touchdowns. Might do that again. I don't

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's got the receivers to do that at this point,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but you never know. He's got Marcus Johnson. What are

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? Well, there's that he doesn't have Jeff

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Swain though that hurts, That does hurt. Uh. Final chances

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to join a Guillotine league is this week. We've got

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>drafts over the weekend. If you still want to join

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's still what eight weeks of play left, plenty

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of time, plenty of fun. You can still join a

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine league at guillotine leagues dot com. When we come back.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>More matchup breakdowns, including Packers taking on the Vikings what

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to expect from Kirk Cousins, Justin Jefferson, and Adam Feeling

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in a tricky matchup when we returned to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul charchy and Scott Fish

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson. You can follow us on Twitter if

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd like. Scott Fish is at Scott Fish twenty four,

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson is at b t x J, and I

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>am at Paul Charchion. You're just gonna have to figure

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>out how to spell it, which honestly is not that easy.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers take on the Vikings in a in a matchup

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that has a number of fascinating angles. But let's start

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with A J. Dillon assuming the workhorse role with Aaron

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones out, and maybe more important than the rushing opportunities

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is he's proven himself to be a capable receiver with

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred receiving yards over the last two games, and

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if he can pick up Aaron Jones receiving duties, it

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>cements Dylan as a high floor, high upside play. This week,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings run stuffer Michael Pierce had a setback on

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>his injury and will miss several more games in the

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Minnesota's bottom ten in rushing ards and

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing scores allowed to running back, So a nice opportunity

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for a J. Dell. In fact, he's my number four

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ranked running back this week. Love him A grade for

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a J with him and he did not draft himself.

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Now he's got, he's got. Well, we gotta hope he

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>faces himself. He did last week, but he won. He

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted he himself. Let's go to the passing game for

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers a B grade. The Vikings really tattered defense

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>has overperformed for several weeks now, and they get Harrison

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith backs, their safety, they get their number one quarterback,

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson back, and since Week three, Minnesota's allowed just

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thirty five passing yards and one point one

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game. That's it, and that was largely

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>without those guys. Maybe the other shoe falls against a

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>familiar rival here, Aaron Rodgers and Rodgers was awesome against

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota last year, but that was a totally different Minnesota

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>defense than this year. Rodgers has thrown exactly two touchdowns

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in five of seven games, and I've I've got him

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on about two touchdowns of this game as well. Davante

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Adams is an obvious A and I don't even need

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to expand on that really. Um, but let's talk more

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>about Randall Cobb and MVS. That are they were flirting

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with CS, but I can't quite get there because they

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just have so many one, two and three catch games

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that even in even in favorable matchups where you look

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>going and go, oh, this looks like a good one

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the slot for Randall Cobb and then you get

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>two catches for twenty three yards. Jeez, no reliability for

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys. And mostly the Vikings are getting beat by

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>opposing number one receivers and not the not the other guys.

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've got bench grades on Cobb and MVS and

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lazard is not expected to go in this game.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to uh, let's go to the Viking side

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and Dalvin Cook. Five career games against the Packers, Cook

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>averaging nineteen touches for one D twenty six yards and

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>more than a touchdown per game. So I like Cooks here.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>He's an obvious A start and we'll we'll be watching

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>injuries here to uh. Whitney mer Mersey is out and

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Rashan Gary is shaping up as a game time decision

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that could really weaken the front end of a defense

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that allows four point one yards per carry but has

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>given up seven rushing scores. I still think the Vikings

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.959
<v Speaker 1>best path to victory lies through Dalvin Cook, and we're

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot of use from Dalvin Cook in

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this game A grade. It's a lot trickier for Kirk

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Cousins in this one. The Packers have become the league's

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>most hostile past defense over the past three weeks. They've

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>completely shut down Kyler Murray, Patrick Mahomes and Russell Wilson,

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>holding them two averages of one hundred passing yards and

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown between the three of them. The best way

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to shut down Kirk Cousins is to get pressure on Cousins,

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at which point he gets skittish and he started starts

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>throwing checkdowns and dump offs. And the Packers pass rush

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>has been phenominal of late. Even if for Shane Gary

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can't play, I worry that Cousins won't have time to

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get his receiver's open down field. Green Bay ranks number

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>one in completion percentage and number two in yards per attempt,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and this it's the yards pert tempt that worry me.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a lot of dump off

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff from Kirk, and I'm nervous about that. So I've

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>got just the C grade on Kirk Cousins. Let's talk

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>about his receivers. Justin Jefferson was great last week, but

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm dramatically tougher matchup against a team that has not

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed any receiver more than thirty seven yards in the

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks. Despite facing Patrick Mahomes and Russell Wilson,

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay hasn't given up a touchdown to a receiver

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in three weeks. Cornerback Kevin King is allowed just one

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and rookie Eric Stokes has a passer rating of

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>just seventy five against him. These are good. These cornerbacks

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are playing way over expectation. What a roller coaster ride

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for King went from like down's been good. Jefferson has

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>been super steady, and that's why he gets a B

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>grade here. At least eighty yards are a touchdown in

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>six of the last seven. Jefferson posted just twenties six

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>yards in each of his two matchups against Green Bay

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, though, so be great on Justin Jefferson. Ce

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>grade on feeling he's become somewhat touchdown dependent and the

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Packers having a lot of wide receiver touchdown in three

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>straight games. As I had mentioned earlier, there's just no

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>soft matchups in the Packers secondary, and as I said before,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I worry about dump off passes, which don't necessarily bode

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>well for feeling. Tyler Conklin gets a C grade coming

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>off a two touchdown game. Packers have only a lot

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of four touchdowns the tight ends, but they've surrendered the

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>second most red zone touches two tight ends, and they've

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>given up the ninth most targets and the six most

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>receptions to tight ends. So I think Conkling can get

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a little something done, So we'll give him a C grade.

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna blow into the conk shell. I don't have

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, but you should have that. If you're

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get the cock shell right there, that could

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be Adam Troutman right there. Thank you to Brett, to

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>your engineer. Do you know what Bob Harris calls him

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>football die hards? Bob Harris the fish missiles. That's pretty

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>good like that. I like it. What is your what

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is your wife nicknamed? The fish missile? This joke came

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>up when I found that out, I bet it did

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>come up. I am not that joke right now. The

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>stats take on the Eagles, Yes they do. Trevor Simeons

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>should be on your bench. I don't care that he

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>had that. He's average two seventy five yards and two

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>scores in his two full games last two weeks. The

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles have allowed multiple scores six times. But they were

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all really good quarterbacks Dak Mahomes, Brady Herbert types, the

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy G Donald Golf Bridgewater types, six or fewer yards

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for all of them, and I come bind two passing touchdowns.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>So they've held down the quarterbacks they should held hold down.

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I have seen me in on the bench. Same with

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>all of his wide receivers. Sorry, Noah, take on for

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>callaway this this week, Brian. Here's the fullest of wide

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>receivers to top just sixty yards against the Eagles. See

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>who am uh Tyreek Hill, A J. Brown, Keenan Allen

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh Deepo Samuel. Those are Those are all top

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>ten wide receivers in the league. And the Saints don't

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have anybody close to that under sixty yards against the Eagles,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So I have them on the bench and the run,

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and of course Adam the fish missile troutman was might

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me player. I have an A

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>grade on mark Ingram in somehow, somehow, I have an

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>A grade. But here's the thing. I'm neither starting tackle

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is in this game to down a whole letter grade.

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man kamares out. Tony Jones is designated to return,

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he gets returned for this game.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be all Ingram. He had eighteen touches last week.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This this Eagle's defense has allowed the seventh most rushing

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>yards and the seventh most strushing touchdowns, the sixth most receptions,

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>eleventh most receiving yards. And he's You're like, mark Ingram,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>why you mentioned receiving stuff. He's had nine catches in

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the two games with Trevor Simeon. He's actually catching passes

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from Trevor Simeon. He's getting the goal line work. Okay,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not the sexiest A grade out there, but

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an A grade alright, alright. On the other side,

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, Jalen Hurts is an obvious A

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. But if you if you didn't already know

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>he has finished as a top twelve twelve quarterback in

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>nine of ten weeks. No other quarterback has done that

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>six times this year. He's just always getting there with

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the rushing yards. Now he's added passing to that production.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Um and this is a This is a matchup against

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the team that's given up over nine yards and eight

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the last three weeks two quarterbacks uh in

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the passing game for all the wide receivers, DeVonta Smith.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>A grade for DeVonta Smith. The Saints of allowed a

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard receiver in three straight games, five wide receiver

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in that stretch. In just the last two weeks,

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith has nine catches for a hundred and eighty two

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.240
<v Speaker 1>yards and three scores. He's coming on right as Hurts.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>His passing is growing up. I do have Quess Watkins

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 1>on the badge, even though I admit he could break

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a big one. They're gonna get passing yards here. It's

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just tough to trust because he's only top three catches

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>once in in this this season. Dallas Goddard. He gets

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to see if he goes, which it should. It sounds

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna go, so I have a C grade.

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>He generally gats two to six balls um. In his

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 1>last three full games, he averaged over sixty yards per uh.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So I got him with a C grade, and I

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>have Jordan Howard and and Boston's got on the bench

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>because Miles Standers might come back. It sounds like he's

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna play. Yeah, but even if you didn't, it's a

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.479
<v Speaker 1>bad matchup against the Saints are on defense only really

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>only Christian McCaffrey did well against him, and it took

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>him twenty four attempts. Yeah. Yeah, nobody's gonna get twenty

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>four attempts. Although the Eagles have shockingly turned into a

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty run heavy team, very run heavy. Jalen Hurts. You

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>can't tell from the box score if you didn't watch

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>his game. He's coming up the best game of his career.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>He looks like the quarterbook game. Yeah. The poise, the

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>decision making, the accuracy all really remarkably improved for for

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts. He's his ascension could be starting right and

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they might have three top fifteen picks. If they don't

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>need a quarterback, that would be I don't mean a lot, Brian.

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got four minutes to work through. Bengals Raiders. I

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think you can do it. Let's give it a go.

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Starting on the Bengal side, Joe Mixon gets an A.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are allowing on forty three compoyards and more

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>than one total touchdown per game to oppose running backs.

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh mixing a rare breed of bell cow in these

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.839
<v Speaker 1>times meeting. He's also a very good receiver. Last week,

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas Cities Darryl Williams caught nine balls for one hundred

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>plus yards and a touchdown in Las Vegas. Easy A

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for Mixing, just to B for Jamaar Chase. Las Vegas

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is only allowed one receiver to top one hundred yards

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that came back in Week two, but they have allowed

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 1>six wide receiver touchdowns over their last four games, so

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, I'll give t Higgins a B as well.

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Over the last three weeks, Higgins has seen just three

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>fewer targets than Jamaar Chase and is averaging nearly eighty

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>yards per game during that span. Higgins has in scored

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>since Week two, but it's due for some positive touchdown

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>regression in my opinion, and Tyler Boyd can give him

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a C. Only in PPR leagues that we're not play

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>him in standard, but uh he will face Raider slot

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>corner Nate Hobbs, who owns an eighty eight percent catch

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.800
<v Speaker 1>rate in his coverage. So I like Boyd in PPR

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>with the C. I also like cj Uzoma enough to

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>give him a See. The Raiders have surrendered six touchdowns

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends, which is the third most, and all

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>those touchdowns have come over their last six games, and

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow gets a B. Not much explaining here when

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>all of his weapons got starting us so easy started

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for Burrow over to the Raiders side, and Darren Waller,

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who has been pretty much a disappointment disappointment this year,

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but still gets a B here. Over their last three games.

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Since then, Cincinnati has allowed nearly sixty yards per game

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends, as well as a touchdown to the

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>position in each of their last two hunter Renfro gets

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a B as well. The Bengal Bengals have allowed a

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdown and four of their last five games

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.919
<v Speaker 1>only the Detroit wide receivers had not scored during that span,

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which is totally understandable. And if the if a Raiders

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>wide out it's going to score, it's going most likely

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be renfro who, despite having his by, has seen

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most targets inside the ten yard line among

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all players this year, and Brian Edwards gonna give him

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a c uh. Edwards has seen the second most targets

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>among Raiders wide receivers since the Henry Ruggs incident, and

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he did have eighty eight yards in a touchdown last week,

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>so he's worth a harpoon toss or is it a heave?

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Would you throw a harpoon? You talk said you heave it.

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know I launched shoot. I mean it comes

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>out of some kind of a gun like mechanism. I

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think you shoot it, but hard I mentioned it earlier.

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a suspected shootout with a fifty point five

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 1>over under. So Edwards gets to see Josh Jacobs limited

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>with a knee injury all week, but he should play

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Gonna give him a b over. The

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>last two games, the Bengals have allowed two thirty one

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>compo yards and two touchdowns per game to running backs.

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Huge numbers, huge numbers. Kenyan Drake is the more more

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>of the receiving back for Las Vegas, but Jacobs has

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>average four targets. Over his last few games, and despite

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>having their by the Bengals have yielded these second most

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>targets and red zone targets running backs and our top

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>three in the most catches and yards allowed the position.

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 1>That is why Kenyan Drake was might take a chance

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of me running back, and I coupled that altogether with

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Derek carrs might take a chance on me quarterback. Nicely done,

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say there was a lot of talking in

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a very short time. Take us the water here, all right,

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you go, you go do that and we will prepare

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for our number two when we start our number two

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>In moments for three tough questions, including some insight onto

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, find out if you can go three and

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>oh as you play along with our co host three

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tough questions our number two Fantasy Football Weekly coming up next.

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly? Pult Charchi and

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you. This is a

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>game we like to call three tough questions. Tough question

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Number one? What Fantasy Football Weekly letter grade? Will Cam

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Newton most often get A, A, A, B, A C

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or A bench grade? Scott so, Cam Newton last year

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>finished as a top four team quarterback nine times, nine times,

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a top ten quarterback six times. And that's with almost

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>no repast weapons. Eight passing touchdowns last year, yep, and

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and twelve rushing. We gave him a C and a

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>ton of bench grades last year because we could never

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>tru trust the passing. That's that's what he was getting

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. Now, I think we can trust the passing

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more, even without Dan Arnold. Even

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>without even without Dan Arnold, He's got all these weapons

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>he's got, He's got McCaffrey, he's got Joe Brady, who

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I feel like truy well. I supposed

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh mcdown's okay over and he's done. He's done okay

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>for himself. But mostly his entire schedule is filled with

0:45:56.640 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bottom seven defenses. During the fantasy season, he plays the Ants, uh,

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>he plays the Bills. Those are maybe the only two

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 1>matchups that are tough. The rest are bottom seven pass defenses.

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with B grade. Okay, I'm gonna go high

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on this, Brian, which letter grade will cam Newton most

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>often get on this show the rest of the way. Yeah,

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>When I first saw this question, I was like it's

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>got to be a bench because he just can't trust

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton. But then you looked at the schedule which

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott just mentioned, and it's it's pretty soft at Buffalo

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and at Miami to two tough matchups remaining for him.

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But outside of that, he's got a very plus schedule.

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And I would have went B as well if if

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they held onto the the surging Dan Arnold. But since

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>he's he's in Jacksonville now, I'm just gonna go to

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.919
<v Speaker 1>see for the most part for Cam Newton. But he

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>is startable and who would who would have thunk it

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>cam Newton starting quarterback for the tail end of the season.

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I did not expect it either. I've got C grade

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is the correct answer. Tampa twice as a C grade,

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in part because they're getting that whole secondary back healthy.

0:46:56.920 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Finally Sean Murphy bunting coming back. And this is a

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a trickier Tampa defense to throw upon than

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. And nobody of any Gilk runs

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.959
<v Speaker 1>on Tampa very much. So the Tampa once Buffalo is tough,

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you say Miami is tough. I don't agree C grade

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>here this week he's got a C grade we already

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>give that. Do we do that matchup? No? Yes, we

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't done. Yeah, yeah, he was might take a chance

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on you guys. C grade for this week. Atlanta and

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans also C grades. I I was going a

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>little high. I think you were going to question number

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 1>two tread trade deadlines are approaching and you could turn

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel into almost any receiver in the league. Are

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you selling high or are you holding Brian? Yeah, Deebo

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty incredible. His worst receiving game was he

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>had three catches for fifty eight yards, but he ran

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in that game to salvage that stat line.

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He's all. He had another rushing touchdown last week on

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>top of a receiving touchdown. His worst UH statistical output

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was five catches for fifty two yards. That's still double

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>digit points in PPR. I'm there's only one wide receiver

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I would trade him for, and that's Cooper Cup, who

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just has a slightly higher floor and ceiling than Debo.

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, I don't know what my

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>answer would be, So I guess I would say, yes,

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I would trade him for Cooper Cup. But that's I

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's pretty much a no, I'm holding holding strong,

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Scott. What about you? Are you holding Samuel? Will

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you selling high? I'm holding Uh, he's doing it all.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>He's hard to guard all with kittl and are you

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>taking up taking up defenders? They can't pin him down

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>with the top receiver. The running back issues are somehow

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>giving him goal line carries inside the five as well.

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The fourty Niners have seven games left in our fantasy season,

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and only one of those teams ranks in the top

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>half of the league against wide receivers. More than that,

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the time of year where I start to

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like want to bolster my starting line up, and deepos

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the kind of guy i'd want to trade for. I'd

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>trade two pieces. I'm not going for depth, so I'd

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>rather I'd rather just keep neither of You mentioned the

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>injury issues that have haunted Deebo Samuel in the past,

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the only reason you to trade

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is you put your finger in the wind and

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you just go, you know what, I'm not. I'm not

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>rolling the dice on Samuel anymore. And it's it's a

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:23.879
<v Speaker 1>thing until it's not, it's right, and that's but that's

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's how I look at almost everybody with

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 1>injuries until you get to like a will Fuller level

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of injury history, I tend to say, I'm not going

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to bank on a guy getting hurt. Yeah, we care

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so a little about the injury thing. We didn't even

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>mention you, didn't even mention you guys hit on the

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule stuff. I looked through this. He's gonna have an

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>A grade in every game to week eighteen, and in

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>week eighteen you shouldn't be playing anyway, don't matter. So yeah,

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Cup would be the only guy that I

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>would exchange him for. And that's we're not saying. The

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>question was not phrased. Is there any player you would

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have you would possibly trade it for? So the answer

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on real Deebo Samuel is real quick. I went look

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 1>back at preseason ADP Brandon Auk wide receiver twenty three,

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel, wide receiver thirty five. Who Although, by the way,

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a quick side note, this easy, easy schedule for

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco also applies to Brandon, Are you yeah? You

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>know I mean by low and I you right now

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>while you're at it, maybe that should have been the

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>tough question. Question three, What is the appropriate level of

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>concern for Mike Williams None, some or a bowl loosening

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>level of eggsistential dread Scott. It depends on the manager

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>going with what Brian was just talking about. For the

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>manager who drafted Mike Williams a hundred and twenty overall

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on the ten eleven corner where his ADP was right

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>along guys with Callaway, Marvin Jones, John H. Smith, Curtis Samuel,

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallop, Sonny Michelle, Jamal Williams, Devin Singletary, Tyler Higbee.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 1>For the people that drafted him among those, they should

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 1>be fine. They understood over the last two years he's

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a thirty to sixty yard guy who occasionally has blow

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:12.359
<v Speaker 1>up games and touchdowns, so they there they should only

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>worry some because maybe they're concerned as his blow up

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>games were all of the earlier of the season and

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>now he's done for the year with the big blow

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 1>up games. For the manager who traded him after traded

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>for him after that hot start, they traded real, they

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>should be at woke up eights, some leftover Chipotle, dracob

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a pot of coffee and then they jumped out of

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>treadmill level of existential bow loosening dread. That's where those

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.320
<v Speaker 1>managers should be. But I think for most managers that

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.799
<v Speaker 1>should be some, because people realize what Mike Williams is.

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Some is your official answer to that in a very

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>roundabout circuitous way, Brian, what's the appropriate level of concern

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for Mike Williams? None, some or blowed? That's a very

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tough response to follow up to. I I gotta go

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with just some too, considering he had a hundred and

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen roughly PPR points Mike Williams in these first five

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>games and over his last four like twenty four total

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>PPR points and injury, always some sort of concern with

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams. Knock on wood, he won't get hurt uh

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for the remainder of this season. But like Fish said,

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he's under performing based on a super

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>high a DP, so you can't be blowed on him

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>unless he traded for him. But like Fish said as well,

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but just in a nutshell, just some. Uh, it's still

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a high poetent offense and uh, hopefully you can regain

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that early season magic. So where you drafted.

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams has nothing to do with your appropriate level

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of panic right now is you're staring into the gaping

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mall of the Fantasy playoffs. It doesn't make any difference.

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:54.280
<v Speaker 1>The correct answer is blowed. He said. Other than weeks

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one to three and five, which is a long time ago,

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>he's wide receiver nine nine zero. He has always been

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a bloom er bust player. And here's the key part

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that you guys missed. Can you count on Mike Williams

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to power you in three straight playoff games? Hell no,

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't hope for my tenth or eleventh. Jeff,

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you out spent a little off. I think he starts

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to come around too, and that should raise the bar

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>from make Washington takes on the Panthers, and for Antonio Gibson.

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What a freaking head scratcher this guy is. When you

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think you should bench him against the Saints and the Bucks,

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he scores twice in both games, and these other matchups

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that look highly exploitable, you get nothing out of Antonio Gibson.

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think against the Panthers. Let's take

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a look. He did look much healthier last week, and

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he got a lot of usage. Panthers um should continue

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as a plus opportunity for him. In the last three games,

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Caroline is allowed the eighth most yards per carry despite

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>seeing only the twenty first most carries. Caroline is very

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tough to pass upon, and the game script should favor

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Gibson here with plenty of work. I'm giving him a

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.919
<v Speaker 1>B grade in this game. Taylor Heineke in the passing game,

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench and a brutal matchup against the

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>league's number one past defense by yards. They're giving up

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just one hundred passing yards per game. That's Carolina over

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the past four games. That number drops even lower over

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the last month of games. Carolina is giving up one

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty eight passing yards per game. That's nothing. It's

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a disaster for opposing quarterbacks, and less than one touchdown

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>per game. The mid season acquisitions of Stephan Gilmour and c. J.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Henderson give the Panthers arguably the deepest set of cornerbacks

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Heineke is on the bench, Ricky Seals

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones is out with a hip injury. They might ask

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas to come back a week early, but they

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can't start him either. That just leaves Terry McLaurin just

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to c grade here, and it's just based on his

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>personal talent. Despite averaging nine targets in the last five games,

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>McLaren only has reached sixty yards once and scored once.

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Those aren't great stats. The Panthers are allowing the fewest

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>yards to receivers, just eighty per game. And I mean,

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if if McLaren and the rest of the receivers have

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to divvy up eighty yards, McLaren gets forty half of

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it himself, and that's it. It's tough. In fact, you

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:31.839
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm putting McLaren on the bench. Forget I've

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just talked about bench great Terry McLaurin. Let's go to

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and Christian McCaffrey is an obvious A. Let's move

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on to the passing game. We've already talked about Cam Newton.

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>He was my take a chance to the quarterback. If

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't make this clear though, Matt Rules come out

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and said that P. J. Walker is gonna get play

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game too. But I don't think it's gonna

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.399
<v Speaker 1>be translate into enough, especially obviously nothing on the ground.

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it won't take any rushing work away

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from Cam that I think you need necessarily downgrade Cam Newton,

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 1>so C grade there, and p J. Walker siphons off

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some but hopefully not too much work. D J. Moore

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. Washington's allowing two one yards per game

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to receivers that is second most, and is allowed multiple

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the position in five of the last seven games.

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Were should have no trouble exploiting Kendall Fuller giving up

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of ninety two and William Jackson, whose

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football focuses one rated cornerback. So I like DJ

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Moore here. I was tempted to let you throw a

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 1>dart on Robbie Anderson, but I just can't do it.

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That would have been great. Betch Terry McClard start Robby Yaders,

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it would It would have been tempting, but he's coming

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:45.399
<v Speaker 1>off a two yard game. In a zero yard game,

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it. I just it's all. But the

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup is clearly bent in Anderson's favor, and I'd like

0:56:52.480 --> 0:56:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell you to start him, but I can't do it.

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, and anything to the Cam and Robbie stood

0:56:59.160 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>next to each other for press conference, so that that

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>might be. That's maybe that's the case. Maybe that's the case. Hey,

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we're still forming new guillotine leagues at guillotine leagues dot com.

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 1>And of course the format is, you know, no head

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to head. Instead, the low scoring team gets cut every

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>week and all the players go to the waiver wire

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>where you get to feast on a whole draft's worth

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of players. All you have to do is not finished last,

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and the last team standing wins the whole thing. Still

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks of goodness left the guillotine season. You've never

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>experienced roster building like you have in a guillotine league.

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot Com. When we come back forty nine years,

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>take on the Jaguars will tell you what to expect

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:44.439
<v Speaker 1>from the passing attack of the forty nine years. When

0:57:44.440 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we returned Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back. Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.840
<v Speaker 1>pulled Charchi and Brian Johnson and Scott Fish with you.

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 1>We continue through the matchups fantasy style letter grades on

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>all the players who matter. Forty niners Take on the Jaguars. Scott,

0:58:13.280 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you already told us about the running game. We love

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wilson in this opportunity. Although the Jaguars run defense

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is better than people think by a sizeable margin, just

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>three point seven yards per Gary. But if you tell

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 1>me any one forty niners back is going to get

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of the work, I'm interested which they

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>run it. So let's sell's talky about the passing game.

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo, he was my ticket chance on the quarterback.

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I like him. Here his receiving options. Deebo Samuel,

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I have a I have a bench grade on. I

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's just obvious at this point he's an eight grade.

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna move on to Brandon Aiyuk, who have

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on. He has nineteen targets in the

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Fifteen wide receivers have topped sixty yards

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and or scored on the Jags this year, fifteen of them.

0:58:56.880 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's basically two week so are closer one and

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a half two a week. Whatever um the target volume

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he's getting, I think he's in for a decent day. Um.

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Most of those days were off of yards because the

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Jags have only allowed six touchdowns to wide receivers and

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's four different players, so only four wide receivers have

0:59:20.200 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>scored on the Jags, so you gotta hope for yards. Quietly,

0:59:22.920 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jiants defense is pretty good. It's not it's not terrible.

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not terrible. George Kittle, I have an A grade

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on he scored in back to back games for the

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>first time in his career, which is crazy. Uh, seventeen

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 1>targets in the last two games. Four tight ends have

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 1>seen six or more targets against the Jags. Their average

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that their average stet line five and a half catches

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for seventy five and a half yards. Yeah, and those

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 1>those four tight ends that did that, they scored three times.

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:56.360
<v Speaker 1>A better big day for Kittle over on the Jags side.

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Dan Arnold as the only player in the

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>passing game with a grade. Yes, that's it to not

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>even James Robinson passing game Trevor Lawrence bench grade because

1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the fours have allowed one multiple passing touchdown games since

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>week since Week four, and in those in those six

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>games of posing quarterbacks are averaging a hundred and fifty

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>nine yards per game. That's terrible. Dred fifty nine from

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and the wide receivers Marvin Jones hasn't top thirty five

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>yards in three straight nat hasn't top twenty five yards

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in three straight. Uh. Agnew is the wild card. If

1:00:33.280 --> 1:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you need a real dart throw. He's getting five plus targets,

1:00:36.280 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets runs, he can break off big places. He's

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>had a great, great game in four of the last five.

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He's the gadget player we thought Lavis was gonna be.

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the gadget player that Urban wanted Etn to be. Yeah,

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a tough matchup. But if you're I have

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>them on the bench. But a dart throw c is

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>okay too. Uh. Dan Arnold is the B grade I

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>gave here. You gotta buy in if you haven't yet.

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Sixty plus in four five, four plus catches in those

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>same four games. Um sure. Last week all of his

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>stats came in one drive. Who cares he got him?

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't care for fans. He was tagged with the

1:01:09.120 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one yard line too, don't leave that out. He should

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>add a touchdown. The forty Niners have a lot of

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end touchdown in three of the last four. Dan

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Arnold has no touchdowns on the year, but maybe he

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>gets it this week the one yard line and had

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the mini touchdown. James Robinson a B grade this is

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>my I don't care that he's got two injuries he's nursing.

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>He keeps playing through him, and he gets so much work.

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Three of the four six team plus touchbacks had a

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus yards and scored. So I think Robinson gets

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of volume and has a decent day. I'll

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>give him a beef because of his injuries. And don't

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't forget Dan Arnold in depth knowledge of the forty

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Niners from his time spend Cardinals last year Cardinals and

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they met twice a year, and yeah, huge advantage for

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>my man. Damn. Okay, speaking of Cardinals, Cardinals take on

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. We already know for shoe word that Hopkins

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is out of this one. There's stay say, Kyler Murray

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is a game time decision here, but with the looming

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>bye week, I don't think he's gonna go. We'll find out.

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading he's trending towards playing. This is a pretty

1:02:12.960 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>important game for it more important with last week's loss.

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give Murray the Sea assuming he plays.

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't play, he's on your bench, of course,

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would bench um Colton McCoy. Uh if McCoy

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gets the start because over Seattle's last six games they've

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed zero, one, one, one and one. I think I

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>left another one off their passing touchdowns. Let's give Seattle

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>some credit. They were a disaster in the opening four

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fitch weeks of the season and they've gotten a lot better.

1:02:40.120 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Not not quite back the legion of boom days, but

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that secondary is playing pretty well. But I will give

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Murray the see if he goes, but don't expect too

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>much running from Murray. He wasn't doing that before the

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury. And like you said, DeAndre Hopkins ruled out.

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That's uh. That doesn't bode well for Murray. So let's

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to or talk about the wide receivers that will

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>play and give Christian Kirk and A. J. Green both

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a sea. I'm gonna give Kirk the high Sea in

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>honor of the re release of Ecto Cooler for the

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the new Ghostbusters movie. So the high Sea for Christian Kirk.

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh tough matchup on paper for both just mentioned. The

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Seattle secondary has played well. They have surrendered just one

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdown over their last five games, and over

1:03:20.440 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>their last four games, only one wide receiver has topped

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>forty one yards and that was Davante Adams, who had

1:03:26.920 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight scoreless yards last week on eleven targets. So

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>don't expect too much from Christian Kirk or A J.

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Green in this one, and don't expect too much from

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Zach Ertz either, but I will give him a sea.

1:03:37.920 --> 1:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks have surrender just three touchdowns all season, but

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>fantasy relevant options like Tyler Conklin, Tyler Higbee, and Dan

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Arnold all had pretty good games against Seattle. Relevant absolutely,

1:03:51.440 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Dan are Old, very fantasy relevant. Gotta be from my

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>boy Scott Fish. They'll get more relevant than that. James Conner,

1:03:57.480 --> 1:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about fantasy relevant, leads all running backs with twelve

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns eleven rushing. What are the odds on James

1:04:05.080 --> 1:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Connor to lead the NFL and rushing touchdowns prior to

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the like, I'm sure something like that. Man, he's he's

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>been a league winner at this point. I'm gonna give

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>him the way. People that listen to the show in

1:04:16.080 --> 1:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the preseason, we talked about the red zone and the

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>inside the five usage, and we told you Chase Edmonds

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>never touches the ball, and we told you Kyler Murray

1:04:26.760 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run inside, so we identified that early on this show. Absolutely,

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and we expect Connor to touch the ball a lot

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in this one. The Seahawks are allowing plus combo yards

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown per game to opposing running back, So

1:04:41.160 --> 1:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>an a for Connor. No starting grade for backup running back,

1:04:44.480 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Benjamin, but he should be rostered in most

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>leagues because if something would happen to Connor. We got

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>starting running back on our hands with Chase Edmonds on

1:04:51.560 --> 1:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I R and should be for a couple more weeks. Um,

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:56.959
<v Speaker 1>that's it for the Arizona side over to Seattle DK.

1:04:57.120 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf gonna give him a b uh. Metcalf most of

1:05:00.600 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>his routes from the left side of the field. Three

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>has a strong matchup against Marco Wilson, who has allowed

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in five different games wide receiver touchdowns. That is,

1:05:09.360 --> 1:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in five different games this year. Metcalf did scored his

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>latest meeting with the Cardinals last year. I should have

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned again, I think every matchup has been like a

1:05:17.080 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>divisional matchup. It feels like in the show almost everyone

1:05:20.880 --> 1:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is uh. This is the first meeting between these two.

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But Metcalf did score his last meeting with the Cardinals,

1:05:25.880 --> 1:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our latest meeting with the Cardinals last year. But in

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>three career games against Arizona, d case total just six

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>catches and seventy five yards outside of that touchdown. Kind

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of a brutal history, but I will give him a

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>B here just to see. For Tyler Lockett, he has

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a tougher matchup in the slot against Byron Murphy, but

1:05:43.520 --> 1:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to ignore lockett stat lines against Arizona from

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>last season when he had nine catches, sixty seven yards

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown and then fifteen catches, two yards and

1:05:53.200 --> 1:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns, the one that really propped up his overall

1:05:56.560 --> 1:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers from last year. Uh. See for Lockett, Gerald Everett

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench. There are better tight end options

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, and Russell Wilson, uh gonna give him a B.

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Was shut out for the first time in his career

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, but that was somewhat excusable considering he was

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>practicing against invisible players for a few weeks, but he

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was coming back from finger surgery. Was a cold weather

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>game in Green Bay. The three best passers to face

1:06:19.760 --> 1:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, who were Kirk Cousins, Matthew Stafford and Aaron

1:06:22.520 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers all managed to toss multiple touchdowns, and Arizona could

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be without all pro safety Buddha Baker, which would obviously

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>bode well for Wilson. Wilson through for three and two

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his two games against Arizona last year. Uh.

1:06:37.760 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And now Chris Carson, UH was maybe gonna make it

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>make his return is most certainly not now. Uh season

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ending next surgery for him, wasn't gonna give him a

1:06:47.800 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>starting grade. Uh if he went, I'm not giving a

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>starting grade to any Seattle running back anyway. Even with

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Carson out, Arizona has allowed the eighth fewest fantasy points

1:06:57.160 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. Pete Carroll better let Russ cook in

1:07:00.920 --> 1:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this one, because if not, let's hope Russ's finger responds

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a little better than last Well, he was rehabbing for

1:07:07.280 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hours a day, see now and he got shut out?

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>What if he had rehabbed for twenty hours a day.

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Russell Alex cons has become like the game long lead

1:07:18.120 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>right hard Give him ten Carreys, He'll get your forty

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>something yards given it feels that way, doesn't it. I

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>like I would have given Collins a C grade just

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>based on the prospects of a rushing touchdown, but that's me.

1:07:29.600 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys take on the Chiefs, and let's mention Marie Cooper's

1:07:32.880 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>out for this game. He was a late week addition

1:07:35.560 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to the COVID list, so he's out. But I still

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like Dak Prescott with an A grade along with Ceedee

1:07:40.600 --> 1:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Lamb and Zeke is obviously in A grade as well.

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But let me just mention the return of left tackle

1:07:44.640 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Tyrone Smith helps everybody, so that's all good news there.

1:07:48.520 --> 1:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs secondary has gotten a lot better. First, from comparing

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the first five games the year to the second five

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>games the year, they're allowing ninety fewer passing yards and

1:07:59.840 --> 1:08:02.919
<v Speaker 1>almost half as many touchdowns, so this has turned into

1:08:02.960 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a trickier matchup. But they've also seen a lot of

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>wobbly quarterbacks in that span, so I still I still

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like Prescott in a level here, but it's not as

1:08:11.120 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>strong and a as it was when Cooper was playing.

1:08:13.800 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And filling in for Cooper will likely be Cedric Wilson,

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and he is a dart throw if you want to

1:08:18.960 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a try, and he had to fill in

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Gallup for long stretches of the season. Then

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he was getting you two and three catches a game,

1:08:25.800 --> 1:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he found the end zone once in a while, and

1:08:27.280 --> 1:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>favorable matchups. You could prespect Cooper. Cooper is gonna miss

1:08:31.760 --> 1:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Thursday's game against the Chiefs too, and that's a that's

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a good point to um. Michael Gallup bumps up. He

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>was a C grade. I bumped him up to a

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>B grade here. In his two games of work this year,

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he's print run predominantly from the left side of the field,

1:08:45.000 --> 1:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>where he sees chart various Ward, whose play is improved

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>enough that it makes it so that it's not a

1:08:50.840 --> 1:08:53.519
<v Speaker 1>slam dunk for Gallop. But I'm like Gallop pretty good,

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>and they threw to him plenty last week in his

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>first game back. So we'll give a B grade to

1:08:58.360 --> 1:09:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Gallop here. Dalton Shall gets a little bit more um

1:09:01.840 --> 1:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>likable as well. With Amari Cooper out. Sheltz quiet over

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, producing two of his lowest yardage

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>outputs of the season, but should bounce back against Kansas City.

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have surrendered the fifth most yards the third most

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to tight ends. Let's go over to the chief

1:09:19.439 --> 1:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. We're back to the point where

1:09:22.160 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>now all I have to do is just say Mahomes, Hill,

1:09:24.160 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey obvious. As I've been mailing in the chiefs conversations

1:09:29.640 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>most of the year, the last couple of weeks, I've

1:09:32.040 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 1>had to explain in more detail why Mahomes was a

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:38.919
<v Speaker 1>wobbly A or Mahomes was a B, or why Kelsey

1:09:39.000 --> 1:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>was a B instead of an A. But you know,

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>after last week, I think they're all right back here

1:09:42.960 --> 1:09:45.519
<v Speaker 1>to obvious A starts. Let me mention this about the

1:09:45.520 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys secondary for all to talk about Tavon Austin, and

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring this up a lot in the show. But

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Austin's eight interceptions, it's awesome, but he's giving up

1:09:53.960 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the second most yards of any cornerback, and opposite him,

1:09:57.200 --> 1:09:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown's giving up the fourth most yards of any cornerback.

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:03.599
<v Speaker 1>So Mahomes, Hill, Kelsey all obvious a's, and they remained

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>highly startable. Darryl Williams as we're probable starting running back

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>technically Clyde Edwards Hilayers a game time decision, but after

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>getting very light use during the week in practice, I

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna go, And even if he does,

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he gets a big workload here. So

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep Clyde Edwards layer on the bench, Darryl

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams with the C grade. Besides struggling against really run

1:10:27.400 --> 1:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy offenses in Denver and New England, Dallas has been

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very good against runners in all their other games. They're

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>giving up just sixty two rushing yards and a third

1:10:36.120 --> 1:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of a touchdown per game on the ground. That would

1:10:38.720 --> 1:10:41.479
<v Speaker 1>be third fewest and the fewest over the full season.

1:10:41.600 --> 1:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So just to see grade on Darryl Williams here and

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>all the other wide receivers, the random dart throw you

1:10:48.400 --> 1:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>can attempt on Josh Gordon, me, Coole Hardman, DeMarcus Robinson,

1:10:51.760 --> 1:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Byron Pringle. No way has Gordon even been playing. I

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's had I think he's got two catches as

1:10:57.240 --> 1:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a chief. That's it for Gordon, Well Pringles the guy,

1:11:02.240 --> 1:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>right guy. But the other guy, Hartman is the most

1:11:07.000 --> 1:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>active out of that group, I guess. But what you know,

1:11:09.920 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for everybody always tries to play any kind of guessing

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>game with those guys. Dah, forget about it. Forget about it.

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're gonna jump into the time

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>machine as we talk through some premature speculation players that

1:11:24.640 --> 1:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you will want to pick up this week that everybody

1:11:27.240 --> 1:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>else will be trying to pick up next week when

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:46.799
<v Speaker 1>we return to Fantasy Football Weekly. Fast segment. Fantasy Football

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Paul Charging, Scott Fish, and Brian Johnson with you.

1:11:50.320 --> 1:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a segment we like to call premature speculation.

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>We give you three players you want to pick up

1:11:57.880 --> 1:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this week that other people will be trying to pick

1:11:59.800 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>up next week, but they're already on your roster. Scott Fish, Yeah,

1:12:04.720 --> 1:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Lativus Murray, who somehow has only

1:12:08.000 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>rostered in of leagues. I think people just starting running

1:12:13.120 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>back on a run ahead of offense. He was starting

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>before he got injured. They just released Levian Bell. They're

1:12:18.760 --> 1:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not giving Tyson Williams any work. It's DeVonta Freeman had

1:12:22.400 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>took the role while he was out, but they seemed

1:12:24.240 --> 1:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to Latvia's look the best and they gave him the

1:12:26.680 --> 1:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>most work before he went out. He might be coming

1:12:29.360 --> 1:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>back this week, but you want to get him now

1:12:32.320 --> 1:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>before people realize. All right, your premature speculation player, Brian,

1:12:37.520 --> 1:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanna go with the Giants Sterling Shepherd, who's only

1:12:41.080 --> 1:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rostered in Yahoo leagues right now. Shepherd was a top

1:12:44.320 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty wide receiver to start the season has been been

1:12:46.640 --> 1:12:49.759
<v Speaker 1>dinged up. He might make his return this week against

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. We'll talk about that game in a little bit,

1:12:52.720 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's the best wide receiver on the Giants went

1:12:56.080 --> 1:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy and Daniel Jones looked looked his way early and

1:12:59.320 --> 1:13:01.599
<v Speaker 1>often early in the early in the year, he had

1:13:01.600 --> 1:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>target totals of nine, ten, fourteen, and it was it

1:13:05.000 --> 1:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was like three pretty much full games and uh, the

1:13:07.880 --> 1:13:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Giants usually playing from behind. I know se Kwan Barkley's

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>coming back, but Shepard could be a big time helper,

1:13:14.040 --> 1:13:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and he's available, and like I said, almost seventy percent

1:13:16.640 --> 1:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of leagues right now, he's gonna be my Antonio Brown

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>pivot this week. There you go, There you go. It

1:13:20.840 --> 1:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>does make sense. Yeah, for what possible reason in the

1:13:27.320 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end apocalypse that we are living in is Evan

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Ingram only rostered in twenty percent of fantasy leagues. That's absurd.

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>He's scored in back to back games. And here's your clincher.

1:13:42.640 --> 1:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Rest of the way schedule is second easiest for the

1:13:46.040 --> 1:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Giants for tight ends. The only stopper he's got left

1:13:49.600 --> 1:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to Chicago and deeply plus matchups against Philadelphia the Chargers

1:13:55.080 --> 1:13:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia again, along with a bunch of just generally positive

1:13:58.960 --> 1:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>matchups Damn Babay this week Miami, Dallas, Washington. There's a

1:14:03.960 --> 1:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunities for Evan Ingram. The Eagles isn't just

1:14:08.360 --> 1:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a good matchup. It's most yards, touchdowns and receptions to

1:14:14.200 --> 1:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>time and twice and normally like you get docked for

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>playing Travis Kelsey, which the Eagles did. Kelsey had four catches,

1:14:21.040 --> 1:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three yards, no touchdowns, and they're still putting or

1:14:24.080 --> 1:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>giving up insane numbers in that game. So, you know,

1:14:29.200 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a it's a go get Evan Ingram.

1:14:32.000 --> 1:14:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's go game on. Our last couple of matchups

1:14:36.000 --> 1:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>begin with the Steelers taking on the Chargers. Scott. We

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>still at this stage, as Lesa's we're talking right now,

1:14:43.000 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the starting quarterback is gonna be. We

1:14:45.160 --> 1:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>don't doesn't matter at this stage. Yeah, I don't think

1:14:49.720 --> 1:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it matters. They're preparing for Big Ben too to be

1:14:53.280 --> 1:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the starter, but they have not at this moment, they

1:14:55.960 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have not activated him. That could happen as latest you know,

1:14:59.240 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow or what ever. Uh I have either one on

1:15:03.479 --> 1:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the bench. It doesn't matter. I'm not surprised. The Chargers

1:15:07.360 --> 1:15:10.519
<v Speaker 1>allow the fuse completion second fewest attempts, third fewest yards,

1:15:10.560 --> 1:15:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and third fewest touchdowns, mostly because they give up everything

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. That's what happens. So I have Nase

1:15:17.640 --> 1:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris with an A grade and obvious A grade charges

1:15:21.120 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>run of the week are Is he your fantasy yard

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>park right here? I let's do it, fantasy yard Vark.

1:15:27.280 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Chargers have a bottom six Rundy in almost every single category,

1:15:32.160 --> 1:15:35.639
<v Speaker 1>including allowing the most rushing yards and second most rushing tds.

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>A grade on Harris. Let's go back to the passing game.

1:15:39.080 --> 1:15:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Though we're gonna bounce around a little. I'm still giving

1:15:41.520 --> 1:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Johnson a B grade. I can't help it. If

1:15:44.160 --> 1:15:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben's in, Big Ben targets him all the time,

1:15:47.960 --> 1:15:51.559
<v Speaker 1>and exactly Mason Rudolph. Mason Rodolph did too. I like

1:15:51.640 --> 1:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>him more with Ben, obviously, but he's a lock for

1:15:54.040 --> 1:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>five to nine catches no matter who's in. And every

1:15:57.040 --> 1:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver with five plus catches against the Chargers had sixty

1:16:00.040 --> 1:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>five plus yards and or scored um. The top target

1:16:03.240 --> 1:16:05.439
<v Speaker 1>against Chargers has gone over a hundred yards two weeks

1:16:05.479 --> 1:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in a row. It's I believe DeVonta Smith and Justin

1:16:07.840 --> 1:16:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson if I'm remembering correctly, UM, Chase Claypool, Raybary McCloud.

1:16:14.240 --> 1:16:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing either of them. Chase Claypool, I don't

1:16:16.520 --> 1:16:18.559
<v Speaker 1>trust him with his toe injury, I don't. I don't

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>trust him uh in a tough matchup. Yeah, and and

1:16:22.360 --> 1:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the second receiver usually does very little against the Chargers. Um.

1:16:26.360 --> 1:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They've only allowed four wide receiver touchdowns all year. That's so,

1:16:31.040 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if Deanta is gonna score, but

1:16:32.960 --> 1:16:36.439
<v Speaker 1>he should get the targets and yards. Pat Firemouth though

1:16:36.880 --> 1:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>B Grade twenty nine targets in the last four weeks,

1:16:40.040 --> 1:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>resulting in four plus catches in all four thirty to

1:16:43.840 --> 1:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards, and he scored thrice. Yes, Big Ben really

1:16:49.400 --> 1:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>targets him in the red zone. But guess what Mason

1:16:51.040 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph did two, three, three times last week. He's got

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>seven red zone targets in the last three weeks. If

1:16:56.560 --> 1:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to use him down there, I'm going to

1:16:58.320 --> 1:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>give him a b uh uh. Justin Herbert B Grade.

1:17:02.400 --> 1:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers d has been really stout in their last

1:17:04.520 --> 1:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>five games, barely allowing over two hundred yards and score

1:17:07.200 --> 1:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two checking notes here, let's two Teddy Gino Baker Fields

1:17:16.040 --> 1:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and golf. Before that, they got torched for two four

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>yards per game and two point to five touchdowns per

1:17:23.080 --> 1:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>game to Alan Carr, Burrow Rogers. Those types. I put Herbert,

1:17:30.360 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be missing t J. Watt. They're gonna

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be missing Joe Hayden. Uh make a fit. Patrick's probably

1:17:36.160 --> 1:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be activated in time. He's on the

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID list. He'll probably He's probably gonna be out. I

1:17:40.960 --> 1:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have no problem giving Herbert a B. I might even

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm teetering on an A honestly, with all those players out.

1:17:47.120 --> 1:17:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen's an obvious A for me. Eleven plus targets

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in three straight, five plus and catches and all of

1:17:52.240 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>them in all but one game this year, and seventy

1:17:54.960 --> 1:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>five plus yards and four of his last. He's back.

1:17:57.040 --> 1:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>He's back with Mike. When Mike Williams went down, Keenan

1:17:59.720 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Allen came back. Mike Williams c grade. If Hayden and

1:18:03.560 --> 1:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick don't go, I'm sorry, I know it's it's Mike's.

1:18:08.160 --> 1:18:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem. We've get We give se grades two

1:18:11.600 --> 1:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gonna get you yards a lot on this.

1:18:14.720 --> 1:18:17.559
<v Speaker 1>We think three four catches forty three four catches for

1:18:17.600 --> 1:18:19.599
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards. We will give him a C grade. Maybe

1:18:19.640 --> 1:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they Mike Williams has a better shot of blowing up

1:18:22.360 --> 1:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>than most of those guys. His ceiling is so much higher,

1:18:26.200 --> 1:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna give him the C grade on. He's

1:18:28.520 --> 1:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Plus he has a chance to be much

1:18:30.960 --> 1:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>with the battered secondary. I'm listening to that. Austin Ekeler

1:18:34.000 --> 1:18:36.559
<v Speaker 1>obviously a grade. The only downside is the Steelers don't

1:18:36.560 --> 1:18:38.799
<v Speaker 1>give up a lot of receiving work. But they've faced

1:18:38.840 --> 1:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like two to three good past they faced Swift, Aaron Jones,

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe Kenyan Drake. They haven't faced receiving backs, so that's

1:18:45.400 --> 1:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>why they haven't given up a lot. A grade on

1:18:47.400 --> 1:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler. All right, Giants take on the Bucks on

1:18:52.920 --> 1:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, Brian, this is a Giant's running game that's

1:18:56.720 --> 1:18:59.559
<v Speaker 1>expected to get Sae Kwon Barkley back. What do you

1:18:59.600 --> 1:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>think about him in his first game back against a

1:19:02.680 --> 1:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>usually tough Bucks defense that was a bit yielding last week?

1:19:07.000 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>They were a bit yieldly in terms of touchdowns. Antony

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Gibson at the two, but he's still only average two

1:19:11.280 --> 1:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>points six yards for carry. You got the like sixty

1:19:14.280 --> 1:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>five yards on twenty carries. A little flukey there. Tampa

1:19:18.000 --> 1:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Bay could be without defensive line invite eve A. That

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>would certainly bode well for Barkley either way. I'm giving

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Barkley a c uh if he comes back. But he

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is trending in the right direction. But as you're alluding to,

1:19:30.439 --> 1:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a brutal match up on the ground, but the Bucks

1:19:33.040 --> 1:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have yielded eight plus targets per game to running backs.

1:19:35.960 --> 1:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>We all know Barkley is a very able catcher, so

1:19:40.160 --> 1:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a c floor he does have be maybe even a

1:19:42.760 --> 1:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>upside in this one. But I play it cautious, um,

1:19:45.479 --> 1:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think you can trust that he will play.

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's like, as you said, it's a Monday

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>night game, so a little dicey. But if if he's

1:19:52.160 --> 1:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a scratch, I don't know if you can be a

1:19:53.720 --> 1:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>scratch if you haven't come back from injury yet, you

1:19:55.720 --> 1:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>probably can. They're being very, very cag with his status,

1:19:59.400 --> 1:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a lot of showmanship. There was

1:20:01.520 --> 1:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>talk that, you know, if they needed him last week

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a bye week, they could have started him potentially.

1:20:06.400 --> 1:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Barkley goes in this game, and I think

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>he's closer. People know the Giants don't need Barkley, they

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>need a new g think. But anyway, I don't even

1:20:14.040 --> 1:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even have a doubt. They've mentioned using two backs.

1:20:17.240 --> 1:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They mentioned that week one when Booker got four carries. Yeah,

1:20:20.600 --> 1:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think it's anymore. We're not

1:20:22.800 --> 1:20:24.519
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the the other backs though, but

1:20:25.000 --> 1:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>good point there. Um, it's not a brutal matchup for

1:20:28.240 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, but what a mess at the positions

1:20:32.320 --> 1:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants. We'll start with Kenny Golladay. I'll give

1:20:35.400 --> 1:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>him a c. I guess I had no idea that

1:20:38.400 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Golladay came back in week nine. Did Yeah, he did.

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The Giants are coming off there by they didn't play

1:20:43.200 --> 1:20:45.559
<v Speaker 1>in week ten, but Golly didn't make his return in

1:20:45.600 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 1>week nine. The Bucks are allowing more than one touchdown

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>per game to wide receivers. Richard Sherman just went on

1:20:50.960 --> 1:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I R I don't know if that's addition by subtraction.

1:20:53.680 --> 1:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It most likely it wasn't playing much for the last

1:20:56.040 --> 1:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>month or so. Anyway, it's a it's a banged up

1:20:58.520 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>secondary for Tampa Bay. But is it Sean Murphy Bunting

1:21:02.120 --> 1:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>probably comes back for this game. They've got both their

1:21:05.160 --> 1:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>starting outside corners. I think this. I think this secondary's

1:21:08.840 --> 1:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>rounding into form. Okay, Uh, just my way taking. So

1:21:12.439 --> 1:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I will still give Golliday the sea. We'll talk about

1:21:14.800 --> 1:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the other receivers in a minute. Just because he's healthy

1:21:16.800 --> 1:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and Gettleman, Dave Gettleman, that is probably gonna want to

1:21:19.880 --> 1:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>justify this horrific signing in primetime. I guess, so A

1:21:22.760 --> 1:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>see for Golladay as we expect, or at least I

1:21:25.360 --> 1:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>expect the Giants to be playing and catch up mode

1:21:27.760 --> 1:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Um Sterling Shepherd we talked about in

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>uh premature speculation might make his return from a quad injury.

1:21:35.200 --> 1:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>He did practice on Friday, so he's leaning towards playing.

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I still would pick him up right now either way,

1:21:41.200 --> 1:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>even if he doesn't play in this game. But if

1:21:42.760 --> 1:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he does play, he's still on the bench for me.

1:21:45.280 --> 1:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't trust him to play going into Monday night.

1:21:48.200 --> 1:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>You certainly can't trust him to finish the game coming

1:21:50.800 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>off a quad injury. So a bench great for Sterling Shepherd.

1:21:54.600 --> 1:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh can Darius Tony there's too many wide receivers to

1:21:58.000 --> 1:22:01.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about. On the Giants, they're also yogurt uh Tony.

1:22:01.880 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Tony can be special, but they've hardly targeted him since

1:22:05.400 --> 1:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>he's come back. He hasn't been special since popping off

1:22:08.000 --> 1:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in Week five when he went ham against the Cowboys

1:22:11.080 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>no other receivers were healthy, and since then he's been

1:22:14.280 --> 1:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>injured and when he has played, he's totaled eight catches

1:22:17.479 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 1>for sevent scoreless yards across three games. He's on the bench. Um,

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about Darius Slayton, but I don't really

1:22:25.720 --> 1:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>want to. Do you guys want to talk about Darius Slayton. Nope, Okay,

1:22:28.960 --> 1:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>he's on the bench too. We will talk about Evan

1:22:31.520 --> 1:22:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Engram again, who charged had as his premature speculation player.

1:22:35.520 --> 1:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that call, and I do like him enough

1:22:37.439 --> 1:22:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in this game to give him a see. The Bucks

1:22:39.439 --> 1:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>are allowing six and a half catches per game to

1:22:42.000 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends. Ingram could very well lead the team

1:22:45.080 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in targets if it's not se Kwon Barkley in this one.

1:22:47.560 --> 1:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, we'll go to Daniel Jones. Got him on

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the bench. UM. Over their last six games, Tampa Bay

1:22:53.680 --> 1:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is allowing less than two passing touchdowns per game. Uh,

1:22:56.840 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the competition at quarterback hasn't been great. We're talking Taylor High, Ninky,

1:23:00.680 --> 1:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Simeons, Slash, Jamis Winston, justin Fields, Jalen Hurts, Jacoby Brissette,

1:23:07.080 --> 1:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones. How did the defending Super Bowl chance kept

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a primrose path of Uh, pretty pathetic competition.

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But guess what, Daniel Jones pretty pretty So he's on

1:23:19.240 --> 1:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Jalen Hurts did rush for two touchdowns against

1:23:21.880 --> 1:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay's that's the angle for Jon But he's really

1:23:25.920 --> 1:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>only viable as a in super flex two quarterback formats,

1:23:29.640 --> 1:23:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and he's a deep breach even even in those kinds

1:23:32.479 --> 1:23:34.519
<v Speaker 1>of kinds of leagues. He's on the bench. All right,

1:23:34.640 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Enough about the Giants. Over to the buck side. I

1:23:37.040 --> 1:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wanna give Mike Evans and Chris Godwin, both of the

1:23:40.160 --> 1:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Godwin on the injury report again he was last week

1:23:42.800 --> 1:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>with the foot injury. I expect him to play. Evans

1:23:45.760 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>likely will be shadowed by James Bradberry, who is a

1:23:48.560 --> 1:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very good cornerback, but he doesn't cover guys like Mike

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Evans every week, who has scored seven times over his

1:23:54.240 --> 1:23:58.519
<v Speaker 1>last five games. Chris Godwin his second in red zone targets,

1:23:58.560 --> 1:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>behind only Cooper Cup. The Giants have surrendered seven wide

1:24:01.920 --> 1:24:05.479
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns over the last five so be for both

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Evans and Godwin. Antonio Brown pretty much hasn't been ruled out,

1:24:10.320 --> 1:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but most likely not going to play this week with

1:24:12.080 --> 1:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the ankle injury. Has not practiced all week. This personal

1:24:14.960 --> 1:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>chef going to play. We're not gonna get into any

1:24:18.200 --> 1:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. At least I don't want to. I've

1:24:20.439 --> 1:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>got I got enough flak about things I say. How

1:24:23.400 --> 1:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>about just pay your help exactly? Don't just pay your help?

1:24:26.760 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>That's all. Yeah, Antonio Brown, I have a defeated joke,

1:24:31.600 --> 1:24:36.599
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not gonna go there. Uh. Rob Gronkowski though,

1:24:36.720 --> 1:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't see him like he was gonna play earlier in

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the week, but he's practicing full on Thursday and Friday,

1:24:41.200 --> 1:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>looking like he will be a go on Monday night.

1:24:43.000 --> 1:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a see. If he does play, he'll

1:24:45.320 --> 1:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have a neutral matchup against the Giants who have surrendered,

1:24:48.479 --> 1:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who haven't surrendered a tight end touchdown since Week four,

1:24:51.280 --> 1:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but they are allowing five catches and fifty yards per

1:24:54.120 --> 1:24:57.839
<v Speaker 1>game to the position, So see for gronk Tom Brady

1:24:58.120 --> 1:25:00.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a beat. It's not the easiest matchup,

1:25:00.439 --> 1:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. The Giants have allowed just two

1:25:02.200 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns over their last three games, and that's with

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes and Derek Carr in the mix during that span.

1:25:08.600 --> 1:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have good cornerbacks and James Bradbury to Dorry Jackson.

1:25:11.479 --> 1:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So not a smash spot for Brady, but he's pretty

1:25:13.920 --> 1:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>tough to bench, borderline impossible to bench really, so a

1:25:16.640 --> 1:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>B for him. And lastly for Tampa Bay, Leonard Fournette

1:25:19.960 --> 1:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>going to give him a B. New York is top

1:25:22.439 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ten and the most touches and yards allowed to backs,

1:25:25.200 --> 1:25:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and this should be a positive game script for Lenny,

1:25:28.080 --> 1:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>who still dominated the backfield touches in a shockingly negative

1:25:31.360 --> 1:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>game script against Washington last week. Basically the bell cow

1:25:35.680 --> 1:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Bucks. So safe B for for net. We've

1:25:41.040 --> 1:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of minutes here at the end of

1:25:42.360 --> 1:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the show, guys, let's talk about some of the developments

1:25:44.680 --> 1:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>from Thursday night. Patriots backfield almost a dead even snap

1:25:49.439 --> 1:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>count for Damien Harris and Romandra Stevenson. Scott, do you

1:25:54.280 --> 1:25:56.799
<v Speaker 1>believe that this is going to be a roughly even

1:25:56.880 --> 1:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>split going forward. That's tough. So Damian Harris got in

1:26:04.160 --> 1:26:06.599
<v Speaker 1>a limited practice and then one full practice right before

1:26:06.640 --> 1:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that game, Like that's that's all he got in for

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a workload for a game plan for that game. I

1:26:11.479 --> 1:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's only a practice and a half more than

1:26:13.520 --> 1:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the other players. But week before that, Romandri Stevenson got

1:26:16.479 --> 1:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>zero and then came and dominated the snap count. What

1:26:21.040 --> 1:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is maybe that's why Harris was a little

1:26:23.479 --> 1:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more limited, is he he wasn't prepped for that

1:26:26.000 --> 1:26:29.439
<v Speaker 1>game plan. But that's a good point. Um, I think

1:26:29.439 --> 1:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a pretty decent split, and it

1:26:31.160 --> 1:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>puts us in a position where we don't know who

1:26:32.960 --> 1:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to start for any of the Patriots going forward because

1:26:37.120 --> 1:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry is so touchdown dependent, um, all the wide

1:26:40.120 --> 1:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>receivers or mishmash and if this is a split now,

1:26:42.840 --> 1:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just confusing his Heck, I would bank I would

1:26:45.920 --> 1:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>still bank on Harris, But man, Romandre Stevenson looks. It

1:26:49.280 --> 1:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>looks good, doesn't he looks? The thing about Stevenson why

1:26:51.960 --> 1:26:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I think he's not going away exactly. He's the better

1:26:54.640 --> 1:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher of the two. They're throwing to him. You know,

1:26:57.200 --> 1:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of college, we didn't necessarily expect Steve Ininsen

1:27:00.760 --> 1:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a pass catcher, and if James White were healthy,

1:27:03.479 --> 1:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he probably wouldn't be. But there they've decided they're going

1:27:07.040 --> 1:27:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to throw to him. And if he's gonna keep getting

1:27:09.200 --> 1:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>three four, five ish, you know, targets and receptions per

1:27:13.320 --> 1:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>game or Mondari Stevenson is going to be a guy

1:27:15.920 --> 1:27:18.479
<v Speaker 1>to contend well, if I recall correctly too. And he

1:27:18.920 --> 1:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>missed the second half of his last year in college

1:27:22.240 --> 1:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>due to injury, and if that hadn't happened, he would

1:27:24.240 --> 1:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have been a much higher traffic I do have a

1:27:26.640 --> 1:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>fun fact for you on that Roger Stevenson had five targets,

1:27:30.200 --> 1:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and we tend the full game he played, not this,

1:27:31.960 --> 1:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>not Thursday Night. Five targets. Damian Harris has never had

1:27:35.640 --> 1:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>five targets in NFL life, college or high school. That

1:27:40.320 --> 1:27:42.559
<v Speaker 1>does not surprise me. What do you think about Mac

1:27:42.640 --> 1:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones going forward? We love the fact that he's a

1:27:45.360 --> 1:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>high completion rate guy, but the downfield passing hasn't happened yet,

1:27:49.760 --> 1:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of the day, to get the

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>kinds of box scores we want from a passing game,

1:27:54.720 --> 1:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be able to complete some twenty yard passes. Yeah,

1:27:57.520 --> 1:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the most impressive weapons either. He's he's

1:27:59.880 --> 1:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a gay man draw. I mean, he's a great quarterback.

1:28:02.160 --> 1:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>You might be the best rookie quarterback in the class

1:28:05.360 --> 1:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Fields and Trevor Lawrence. But uh, it's gonna

1:28:07.680 --> 1:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>be tough for him to crap crap crack the top

1:28:10.520 --> 1:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve on a weekly basis. So he's kind of more

1:28:13.000 --> 1:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of a really yeah second quarterback. Feels like he had

1:28:16.720 --> 1:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those at Alabama, though. It feels like

1:28:19.080 --> 1:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount of hitting Jalen Wattleship that worked out okay,

1:28:23.560 --> 1:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it will come later. Absolutely, if you want

1:28:26.000 --> 1:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>all of my player rankings, you can get and if

1:28:27.840 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you miss any part of the show, you can get

1:28:29.240 --> 1:28:31.599
<v Speaker 1>all the player rankings at Guillotine leagues dot com at

1:28:31.600 --> 1:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>no cost. That is totally free for you. Guillotine leagues

1:28:34.000 --> 1:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Thank you for listening today. If you missed

1:28:36.400 --> 1:28:38.639
<v Speaker 1>any part of this broadcast. Over there, you can check

1:28:38.640 --> 1:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out the podcast version of Fantasy Football Weekly and vice versa.

1:28:41.320 --> 1:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening on the podcast, you may be able

1:28:43.200 --> 1:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to find us over the air on your local sports

1:28:45.920 --> 1:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>talk radio station, best of luck in week, love and

1:28:48.400 --> 1:28:53.479
<v Speaker 1>talk to you the week. Everybody but by Fantasy Football

1:28:53.560 --> 1:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of I heart Radio. For more

1:28:56.200 --> 1:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:28:59.080 --> 1:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.