WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Can This Be Fixed?

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday, October twenty six, twenty twenty, season sixteen,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>episode number fifty one. Welcome to the latest edition of

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The Break. We're live from this s WBC Mortgage studios

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Star. We are in a great mood this morning,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to get going, ready to talk about that Cowboys

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday. Was not a good outcome for the Cowboys.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>They lose twenty five five to three to the Washington

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>football team. But we're all here together and we're all

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>healthy and we get to talk football. So hey, there's

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a bright side to everything. Right, how's everybody doing this morning?

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering what that butt was for. I was like, please,

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't try to throw something positive at me right now. No,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, that's You're right. We're all healthy at this

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>healthy and fine, So that's nice. At this point. The

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>positives are not about the Cowboys. For me, the positives

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are not about football. My Texas long one to just

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as bad. So right now, like that's not the positive.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Positive in life is that we're all here, We're all alive.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>None of us have COVID. That's a great thing, right,

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>so we should be happy about that. And let's talk

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>some football, right right, let's go, Nick, you just got

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>off a right, Nick, you just got off a plane.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess not just but you you were on a

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>plane yesterday coming back from Washington. We're gonna start with

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>some big picture storylines, but like you just to talk

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what you saw from this team

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>postgame plane? Yeah, Like, because I think they're a lot

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of people that are looking at this team like, man,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what was that and what is this team at this point? Well,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I was happy to see was Andy

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Dalton able to just go go where's the bus? This way?

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Where we having to eat? And that's a good thing.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that that was good because he obviously

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>left the field and he needed help doing that, so

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was a good sign. Don't know what that

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>means as far as this week, but I know that

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't as bad as it is. It you know,

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously could have been. I was quiet flight back, you

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>know you I wasn't expecting, you know, a lot of

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>music or dancing or any of that stuff. I haven't

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>really heard that at all. Of course they have. They've

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>lost every road game this year, so maybe that Dave's

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>not on the plane anymore. So that helps. Why just

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have all the gambling and drinking and frivolous

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff that happened. Always call him back there. Um. Anyways,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it just it was a bad I mean, it was

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>just a bad vibe because it was a bad game,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was, you know, the worst game

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that I can ever I do sometime I don't remember

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>remember one like this where it was just so bad

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>green Bay. I don't know, No, that wasn't baby. It

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like it to me a little bit, like I

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, yeah that was that was kind of that way.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But green Bay was good. That's the thing. Green Bay

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>went super Bowl that you're yeah, yeah that so that

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was a good team. That was a good quarterback who

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>deserves to be a starting quarterback. Point So no, this

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was this was a really really really really bad game

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, Let's get some big picture storyline takes from

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Amber and Dave. Amber, I want to start with you.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I watched the game with you yesterday and with Dave,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and I could just see it the wheels turn into

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>your mind. I knew you had something for me, So

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bring it. Let's go what you got Amber? Bring it well?

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'm wearing black because I'm warning today

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and the season like, I am so over it, but

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we gotta keep going. Um No, the big picture is

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I look at it. Who do we

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>need to say bye too? Who are we saying bye

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to this week? Is it a player? Is it a coach?

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And there needs to be a major change or it's

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to make major changes right now, but

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be some type of change, some type

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of repercussion. If you could, like lower someone's salary based

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on their game performance, I wish you could do that,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but you can't. This is just terrible. It is absolutely terrible.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And the worst part of it is that after that game,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>there's absolutely nothing that makes me feel a little sign

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of hope, you know, like there's nothing whatsoever. The only

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>thing is maybe the kicker we haven't talked about Greg

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Sterling really missing a field goal or an extra point

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>except for that one long one a few weeks ago,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but other than that, there's nothing that seems very positive

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Dave big picture. The big picture for

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this team is that they are fundamentally broken. There is

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>something wrong in that building right now. I don't know

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>what it is. I wish we had better access. I

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>wish there wasn't a pandemic, so maybe we could get

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a better grasp. But you cannot look at that result

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and tell me that this is a cohesive team,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is a bought in team, that this is

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a team that cares about each other. Drastically, for lack

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>of a better way to put it, they got run

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the building by arguably the worst team in

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the league. Like they didn't lose. This wasn't like a scrappy,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>ugly game like I thought it was gonna be. You know,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was gonna be this terrible, scrappy, you know,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>seventeen sixteen game. It wasn't that at all. They got

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>run out of the building by arguably the worst team

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the league. They do not look like they care,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, like I don't know if the

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>players hate the coaches. I don't know if the players

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>hate each other. But there's something there's something wrong. You

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>cannot convince me otherwise. I pulled up the quote from

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Lawrence yesterday. He said we need more belief, which

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>shouts out to Nick for getting it. I really appreciate you, man,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>because that can't be fun. No, that cannot be fun

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>being down there with those guys. Um. He says, we

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>need more belief, more high spirits around this team, and

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really more fight. That's one of our weaknesses. We need

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to build a stronger backbone. I mean, is that not

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>just the most damning quote you've heard in a long

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>freaking time. Yeah, it's kind of interesting because we I'll

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>speak for myself. I made fun of happening to I

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>made fun of all of the you know, the fight

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>shirts and all that kind of stuff that we're a

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the Garrett era. But the one thing, and

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it was up until last year. Last year was the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>first time I ever saw at a Garrett led team

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys that didn't have that level of fighting him.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>You remember back to the season when he took off

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>halfway through the season, they were all but did. But

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they played didn't play like it like they played down

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the stretch as as good a football as you could

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>expect from a bad team, right and throughout throughout his

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>time here with the Cowboys, that's what we got accustomed

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to seeing with the Cowboys, even when they were bad,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you rarely left games saying, man, they just didn't feel it.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>They didn't feel like that team was was really in

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. It felt like yesterday and it felt like

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for a while now this team is just not in it.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys think that maybe what's happening here is

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you lose so many players that you just don't have

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that cohesion, You don't have that that real brotherhood for

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better word, that sometimes you need in

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>order to kind of go through what you have to

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>go through as a football team to be successful. Nick,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? Yeah, I mean that that's not

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>their guy dying down there, you know. And that's that's

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the sad part. Is it used to be I thought,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, put it on the uniform, in the star

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and the helmet and all that stuff, that was that

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was the team. But I mean, if DA got hit

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, do you think everybody do you think anybody

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>does anything. I don't know what we talked about just

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple weeks ago how this team acted. Yea, when

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Dak was laying on the field, it was very different. Right.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me also say this though, and I wrote this

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the column kind of down at the bottom. Maybe

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>should have led with it. They they did a video

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that said, let's win, let's win for Dak. Let's do

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it for Dak, d for Dak. God. I hope not.

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope this isn't doing it for Dak. This this really,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this is it, Like, this is what you like, We're

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it for him. He deserves more than that.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>The fans deserved more than that. All right, So let's

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>move on. Let's talk a little bit about some of

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the moments that mattered. And quite frankly, I think all

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>those moments happened in the first half. I think this

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>game was a game in the first half, and I

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think by halftime it was over. Yeah, can you just

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>start with me, because no one's play, nobody's play is

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be before mine. First play the game, first

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>play the game, handoff to Peyton Barber. I mean, who's

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that Peyton Barber against the ball, gets a one yard,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>gets hit for one yard, kept going, kept fighting, he's spuned.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>He got five yards on that play should have been

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>stopped for one. That was the tone of the entire game.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It was that. It was this, they're there, they're in

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the position, but they just can't make the play. And

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't give Washington better field position, I mean better situations.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You need to keep them in third and nine, third

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and eight. And it was just plays like that, that's

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just lack of effort, tackling, what technique whatever. It was

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>first play of the game that set the tone right there,

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they were able to do whatever they wanted

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to run in the ball. And but what was your

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>moment that mattered well? To me, it was okay, you

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>see the Washington offense moving along, then the defense he's

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>able to stop them from getting a touchdown right there,

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, okay, all right. Then the next way,

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Colways got the ball. First play, okay, a little rush

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>by um um, oh my god, Andy Dalton. I forgot

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his name for a second, for Dalton. Then the next

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one the Colways getting huh, I said, so did he

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but sorry, we're good. So he's good. Anyways, they get

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>pushed back and then they end up Washington gets up,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ends up getting the safety, and right there, it's like,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>right at the beginning of the game, basically you realize, man,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be one of those games just by

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that play. I mean, nothing else after that looked good whatsoever.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They just couldn't get anything moving. The defense could not

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>stop them at all. But it was that specific play

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's safety, that just told you what kind of game

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna be. Dave, what was the moment that

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>matter for you? I don't know what's more embarrassing. The

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are my internet connection, but I all one in

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the same, Dave, all one in the same. It's just

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's just that kind of year, man. Um.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The moment, the moment, honest, this is gonna sound this

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna sound revisionist. Um. But when they when when

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Pollard had that kick return, it ran three plays and

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>kicked the field goal and just looked completely flaccid doing so,

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this is gonna be bad. Like, yeah,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm sorry, poor choice of words, but like

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that that it was so so unimpressive, so uninspiring. They finally,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, an element of their team other than the

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>offense finally moved the ball and that was what they

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>came up with. Uh, and you just kind of made

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you think today's gonna be rough, and it was, Yeah,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of how the rest of this thing's

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll. I think is there's gonna be moments like

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that when where choice will probably be a little bit questionable. Um,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, day. What were you saying? I just I

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like y'all problem covered it while I was dealing

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with my WiFi. What I'm gonna say is all these

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>same problems year when they were slugging away to eight

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and eight, but you had your Dak Prescott's and your

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyron Smith's drownedgging you along the way, and those guys

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>aren't there now, and what's left is really uninspiring. And

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think they have it from a

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>mental standpoint, and that what concerns me is again, like

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I keep using twenty fifteen as an analogy, that was

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just that was a team that cared but didn't have

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the talent. You know, they lost a lot of games

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter because they didn't have a good quarterback.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know they really they never truly just got

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>their doors blown off. I think this is gonna get

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot worse somebody fixes whatever's going wrong. From

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an intangible standpoint, like this team is not together, and

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>until that changes, I would imagine they're gonna get their

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ass kicked like this a lot. Yep. And I don't

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they can solve the problems that

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they have right now. I don't know that they can

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>solve those problems this year. The way I look at

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, at this point, this coaching staff, this front office,

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to figure out what players they want

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep and what players they want to discard, and

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to start thinking about next year, because you're

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get better like right now. Big part of

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the problems is just not good. Like the players that

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>are out there are just not good. You can look

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at other years where you're like, Okay, well you miss

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback, but you still got your offensive line, you

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>still got your running game, you still got an average defense.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>If you play really hard, you might be able to

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>make yourself look average. Right right now, their players are bad,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's looking so poorly. I think right now,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think it's it's even worse when

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you put on top of that the fact that I

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>don't think the coaches are really doing them any favor.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll go to the poem at the moment that mattered

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for me, and it was Washington's up nine to three.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>It's ten forty eight left in the second quarter. Dallas

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as the ball fourth and one at the Washington forty

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>five fourth and one, and they decide they're gonna throw

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball down field. In completion, they give the ball

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>back to Washington with great field position, mind you, for

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a defense that hasn't been able to stop anyone. Two

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>plays later, fifty two yard touchdown to McLaren, and that

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to me was into the ballgame. Like when they when

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>they jumped up there at that point it was at

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to three. My thought was, there's no because they

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>don't have the power offensively to be able to come

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>back in those kinds of games, and and they're in

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that particular instance, that to me was about coaching. That

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is a bad decision. Knowing you have fourth and one,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a defense that can't stop anyone. If you

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>don't convert this, you got one or two options. You

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can use a punt it, or you do something that's

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a much higher percentage play than what you decided on.

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But they opted to go for a lower percentage play

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and put their defense in a horrible situation. To me,

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that's bad coaching. Yep, And I'd like to see that play.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to watch the game at all,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's the one player I would have liked to

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>see him again. In the third down, I thought he

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>got that first down. I did too. I thought it

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought he got over thinking maybe they should

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have challenged that. Yeah, but that just kind of shows

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this is why, like in high school football, the one

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>A two A teams don't play the six A teams

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>because as the offensive line, they don't have the big

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>guys to do it. This is what it felt like

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. That was the JV against the varsity. They

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>can't move the ball. They showed that because they were like, well, okay,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we can't run the ball if the middle was zeke.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've already drawn them off sides once. That won't

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>work again, let's just try it. I mean, like running

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that I would have punted. Now, who knows where that

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ball would have gone, but I would have would have

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would have tried to punt. I guess

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at that point, if you don't think you can get

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a yard, then I would take forty. Yeah, I would

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with the punt. But but the one thing you could

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>say in the scattering report, at least of this Washington

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>team is the one area up front where they tend

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a little more vulnerable was in stopping the

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>run and typically running right at them. So to me,

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you at least have to test it out and try

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it right. You have to at least test them if

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go for it on fourth and one,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a higher percentage play. Then deciding that

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna throw a ball down field trying to

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get a screen. I'm not saying yeah, and it didn't work,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't work, Go ahead, Dave. I'm not saying

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong, But those guys were getting ragged alled all day. Absolutely.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know. I don't know if charging up

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the gun on Jonathan Allen and Deron Payne's gonna work.

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not. I'm saying it is a higher percentage play.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You could do the exact same thing as what you

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>did the play before, and as Nick said, I thought

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they got the first down on the play before try

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it again. I think that is a higher percentage play

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>than anything else you could call in your playbook against

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that front on a fourth and one. Maybe I'm wrong.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna take our first break. When we

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>come back, we're gonna dive a little deeper into the offense,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the pass offense, the rush offense, and we also have

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this defense when we come right back.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. We're back in

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>new Doctor Pepper and creep Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Doctor bad Cream Soda. Is he a new Combonut's music

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to my ears? Okay? Doctor Baer time Glass music to

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>my ears and mouth, New Doctor Pepper and cream Soda. Delas.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Just do bay want to use what the pros use?

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites plus a full size intense therapy whip bomb.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys the Jack Black starter ten bucks

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Want

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to show your Texas and Team pride too? You can

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>by purchasing your own stepson. You can look just like

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Steps and Hats the official crown of all self respecting

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today at

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Shop Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as we travel places, often we find the

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>places we want to travel aren't really places at all.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and new nephews.

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 1>That's why at American Airlines we've been using enhanced cleaning

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>measures so you can feel confident every step until you

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>get to them. So as always, our people can't wait

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to take you to yours. American Airlines, you are why

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>we fly back to the break If you would like

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to see the Dallas Cowboys play at at and T

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Stadium this see there's home matchups against the Steelers, Washington

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers, and Eagles. A limited number of tickets

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>around sale Altkitchers today Dallas Cowboys dot com slash tickets

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It is the second segment of the Breakway

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Life from the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and let's jump into this Cowboys pass offense. Yesterday, Andy

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Dalton was nine of nineteen. That's a forty seven percent

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>completion rate. He had seventy five passing yards, He had

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdowns, he had one interception, a thirty six point

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback rating, and was sacked three times. Dad to that,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Ben Denucci came in and he went two of three

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and at thirty nine yards, zero touchdown, zero interceptions, and

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>he two was sacked three times. We talked all last

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>week about how good this Rossington front was, but did

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you expect the Cowboys to get dominated as much as

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>they were dominated yesterday? Nick? No, I mean, and there's

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>no excuses to anything, but the rain absolutely messed up

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>any chance that they had to do anything because of where,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of how they are built. I mean, it just they

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't run the ball. They're not physical enough affront to run.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The only way you're gonna be able to do that

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the quick passes get the ball out. Gallup didn't

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have a catch, CD didn't have a catch even though

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>he had plenty of chances. I mean, he had his

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>worst game of his career, and it just the passing

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>game needed to be there to offset that. So you

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, and now you have to run and

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not strong enough to run the middle. You know

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it's bad when you can't. You're not strong enough to

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>run up the middle, you're not fast enough to run

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to the outside, and the ball's not going to be caught.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>In the passing game, Well, you're gonna get three points

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>based off your long kickoff return and that's it. Amber.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I honestly didn't expect it to be this

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>bad the way that he ended up happening. But there's

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>such a lack of chemistry. I mean, we keep talking

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>about Andy Dalton trying to get rid of the ball

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>quicker and that's gonna help them offensively, but at the

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, the lack of chemistry I mean, you can't

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really do that when you don't have that connection with

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>your wide receivers as opposed to what we're used to

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing with Dad and the receivers that sometimes, I mean,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy just needs to turn around and then Dad

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>knows exactly where he's gonna be, where he's gonna get

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball, and then the guy's gonna catch it,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to Andy Dalton. I mean, they're really lacking that.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no flow or just connection there. There's no like, Okay,

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly where you're gonna run and where you're

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be, and I'm going to you like in this place.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm gonna throw it to you. So it's

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's bad because when there's not when you don't

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have that, there's no way that you can keep asking

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton to get rid of the ball faster so

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that the defensive players are just not like completely attacking

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>him and throwing him on the ground. Dave, I mean,

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I picked Dallas to win this game, so I can't.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't sit here and say I told you so

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>too much. But yeah, I mean I did think that

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Front was gonna really be tough for them,

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that it's the most important thing and it's their biggest

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>strength against the cowboy's biggest weakness. I had a feeling

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it might look kind of ugly, but the thing for

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>me is, and you know, I need to go back

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and watch it again. But I didn't get the sense

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that it looked the offense looked different, Like it didn't

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really look like they tried to change what they would

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>normally do, which is a mistake. Like you should be

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>going into that game thinking we're gonna really have to

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>pull some tricks out of the box and play a

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.239
<v Speaker 1>different style of offense than what we've been doing. Like

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't roll out there with the same core plays

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>from when you thought you had all your guys and

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>expected to work. You know, CD Dalton Dalton probably has

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>another fifty sixty passing yards if CD Lamb plays another

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>better game. I mean, that's neither here nor there. I

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that means they win, but certainly didn't

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>get any help from him. And then was Gallop even

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>targeted once? If he was targeted, it was like it

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.479
<v Speaker 1>was one time, one time. Actually it says on the

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>thing it says twice, but I remember once because I

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you when he when the one time when I

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>remember I asked you, Dave, I was like, as he

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the first time he's been targeted. I don't

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>remember him being targeted a second time, but yeah, it

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>says two. It just didn't feel like they were all

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in plays to offset the fact that they didn't have

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>an offensive line. In my opinion, like a lot of

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>slow developing stuff, a lot of the you know, a

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same stuff we've seen in the first

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, which is fine when everybody's healthy, but they're not.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Didn't feel like they adapted very well and they paid

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, you know. One of the challenges was,

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know even if it was slow developing stuff

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>as much as like over there on the right side,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>dared still. So many times I saw saw guys just

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>run right around him and literally it was almost as though,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, in practice they have those those big dummies.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>It looked like the weebele wobble you have when you

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>were a kid. You punch it and it kind of

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>pops back up. Like it looked like he was just

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that He's just like a stanchion that they just kind

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of put in a certain spot and the guy just

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to run around it to get to the quarterback

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and kind of hit the arm of the thing and

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then he's at the quarterback. That's what it looked like.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't even know if if the play

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>calling was necessarily the problem. And by the way, they

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>also had some plays yesterday where they had to tight

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>end stay into block and they got run around too.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>So I don't even know. And that's a question I

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have for you. And he got completely run over. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's I don't even know at this point,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but I have the question for you, guys, So figure

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it out. Um, what could Dallas do differently? Where could

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they maybe help themselves a little bit? Knowing that you're

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so completely overmatched between your offensive line and their defensive line,

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>what else could they do at this point? Dave, I mean,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. I'm not sure. I'm not sure

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a great answer, And and you know it's I

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>look back on a day like today and I'm I'm

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>mad at myself because I'm like, you saw the indicators

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that this was a bad matchup, and you went with

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys anyway, Maybe it was almost like blind hope

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but that, I mean, that's tough, Nick,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick said it, and I agree, Like you know, I've

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot of bad high school football in my life,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's what that looked like. Like when you're when

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you're overmatched like that, it's hard to even play what

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>resembles actual football, you know, And it's I mean, I'm

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not convinced there was a lot more they could have done,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Like like I said, you know, maybe maybe if CD

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>plays a better game, they move the ball a little

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>bit better and they kick another field goal. But I

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know that there's a lot they could have done

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to drastically improve what we saw. Nick, you know, I mean,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know I said, I said the stat in the pregame.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they Jordan Mills was on the practice squad.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>They brought him up. I mean, he's got eighty four starts.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I brought that up is because the

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>combined starts for the five guys was seventy seven. So

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>all I'm saying is is that combined for the five

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 1>five five forty two from camp, twenty seven for for

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the Connor too, for be honest, zero for McGovern and

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Steele has six and I just feel like they. I mean,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>why bring Jordan Mills here if he's not I mean

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he's He's faced some really good players in his career. Now,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not been pretty. People that have said

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Bears fans will tell you, man, he was not good.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But he's been in the league eight years. They said

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about Colombo willing to give it a shot.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's just see what happens, right, I mean, Kenny get

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>me worse, it will be my question. I mean, no

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>other than me and other than the four of us

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to play on the line. No, yeah, right, that could

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>get worse. It's bad. It was just it was bad.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, yeah, I wouldn't have put Andy Dalton

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.479
<v Speaker 1>in the in the under center so much. You know.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I tried to mention it in a meeting today. I

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>asked the question about Looney and like, oh we are

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're waiting on Joe Looney come back. Well, yeah, yeah,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather Joe Looney than be Oddish. And I don't

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think they'll do that because they, you know,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for the future. But I'm be honest, doesn't have

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it right now. He's not he's not ready. I mean,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get Zach Martin back, you get Looney back, you got

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Connor cam Irving, maybe you have a better right tackle.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Brandon I can come back at some point. I

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>know he's on ir I mean, they're gonna have to

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces together. You can't just look at next year. You

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. You can't Zack Martin. You have to

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>come back. He comes back, and then you know what

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I would do, And I'm the guy that

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm the guy that didn't want to do this when

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things were a little more normal. But when Zach and

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>when Zach and Joe are healthy, I'm putting Joe at

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>right guard and Zach at right tackle because that gives

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>me a chance to function at least, which is more

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>than we've been able to say for the last couple

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of games. You know, if you have a side, you

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can at least get some level of reliability with right

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>You know what I thought you were gonna say is

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>move Connor to write tackle. Would I would look at that.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>If they don't want to do that, that's fine, Yeah,

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I would look at that too, That's but they gotta

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>do something. I leaned towards Zach because I've seen him

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>do it. Yeah, man. That doesn't mean Connor can't do

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it though, but I would be happy if they take

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Connor and put him at one tackle and they take

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Zach and put him at the other tackle. You can

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out what you're gonna do. Maybe Looni's at guard,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you stick with McGovern at the other guard,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and you got be honest in the middle. I just

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like right now, right now, yesterday you saw a

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>turnstyle at both tackle spot, like there was there were

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there were times when it was like the two defensive

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ends were like, okay, I get to the quarterback before

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you can, and then they get there and like give

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>each other a high five at the quarterback. Like It's

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just you need to at least shore up that part

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. And if you can show up that part

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, then I think in the middle at least

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>there's some help because a lot of times that center

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>can kind of go one way or the other and

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of help out with a guy. You got a

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit more flexibility of how you can help in

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle than you can on the outside. Most of

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the times those guys are isolated. I take what at

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.239
<v Speaker 1>this point I guess we all would probably agree are

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your two best offensive linemen lineman they have both played

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tackle in college. Put about there and let's see what happens.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys think? I don't know. You look

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>at I don't disagree. Well, who's the quarterback? Well, it's

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to be Andy, Okay. How tall is he?

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Six one? Tall enough? Foot? Now? I know, I know,

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm asking is is that do you take

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the only six foot I don't know, six two sixty three. Really, yeah,

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know he's tall enough. You're right. The reason

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>why I'm asking is that do you take the Saints approach?

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, because Drew Brees has played there forever, he's

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>not the tall quarterback ever. They look at it like

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they protect the end side, you know, center a guard

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the outside of the tackles that they kind of rotated

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>them basically to give him a lane to throw the

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>ball and to look over. And I just kind of

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wonder maybe maybe they need to work on the middle,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and keep the outside because you can kind

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of help chip them in a little bit. I know.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you've been thinking about it, if you have

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>three guys on the interior that can't do anything, then

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't run you can't. I mean, I don't know.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's a good approach. I guess

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I just look at it like this. I think right now,

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, as far as performance is concerned, the guy

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that and this is saying a lot, the guy that

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is the worst of the bunch is Terrence Steel. I

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think you gotta get somebody different at right tackle. He's

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem for you right now. And and so I

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think you need to take either Connor or Zach and

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>put them over there. And then I look at the

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>other side, and I'm like, Okay, you could probably make

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that one a little bit better too. Maybe you're right.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you go ahead and stick with cam Irving just

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because he has experience and you and you keep him

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in that spot and hope that you know, with back

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at guard, maybe you get a little bit better. Who knows,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't get I don't know, but I just look

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I'm like, yesterday the tackles were a real,

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>real problem. Most of the past rush, in my opinion,

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was coming from the outside yesterday. And and so that's

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>where I feel like you kind of have to clean

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>this up a little bit. For no. I good, We'll

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>pick one. Sorry, I agree with what you said I

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I get Nick's point. I do like protecting the

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>front of the pocket is important. The Saints have a

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of really badass tackles though, so like they that

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>might not look as good if you didn't have Ron

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Armstead and Ryan Ramschick so I and oh it was

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they were just it was so bad. Yeah, like the

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure was on top of Dalton before he could do anything,

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and not from the interior. I mean it was the

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>game was long over, but like one of the last

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>snaps of the game, Ryan Kerrigan basically picked Terrence Steele

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>up and carried he carried him to the quarterback. It's

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's rough, and that's why I think I trust.

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I trust the backups on the interior to

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>hold their own more than what we're looking at at tackle.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe maybe it's not a season long thing, like

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe when Brandon Knight comes back, you can do that,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but at least until some more guys are available, Like

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if Zach Martin can play at this point, I would

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>try to play him at tackle. That's I just I

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>just maybe it's desperation, but it seems like it would

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>give you a better chance than what you're seeing right now.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Desperate times call for desperate measures. Amber, what do you think.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think if it was up to me, I would

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely want to move Connor Williams to tackle. I mean,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>this is something we've been talking about for a couple

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of years now. He's not necessarily the best guard, and

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the possibility of having him at tackle,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a position that not only is troublesome this year,

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be in the future as well.

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Even if your starters come back, we know they have

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with health issues and injury, so there's you

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>need to address the position regardless. So I would rather

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>use this year and right now, given the fact that

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the old line is just a mess right now, so

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not really gonna get a whole lot worse, So

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just try it. Move Connor to tackle, give him some

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in game experience. So let's trying him out, because it's

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>totally different giving him practice, like watching him at tackle

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>during practice, then giving him some actual in game experience.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I would rather go ahead and do that. Now. Let's

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get that out of the way and try to get

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a better feel of what that would look like or

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>could look like, and that will give you a better

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of whether that's the route you would want to

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>take for the future. And I'm not saying, oh, let's

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and start thinking about the future and tank

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the season or any of that, but I do think

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that this is a good chance for you to at

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>least try different things because it's not working out. Clearly

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not working out, So you're not gonna lose much

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>by actually giving him a tackle. Yeah, that's actually that's

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the point. Amber. I think you hit it on the

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>head that whatever they're doing right now isn't working, so

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>try some other things. If you keep doing the same thing,

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>expect different results. That's lunacy, right, So try something different.

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe he becomes a guy. And Nick, I

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.959
<v Speaker 1>think you mentioned this a couple weeks ago too, that

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you're gonna need a good swing tackle. You've

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>been needing a good swing tackle for a while. If

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you find out this year that he can play well

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>in relief at tackle, then maybe going into next year,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at this and you say, that's our swing tackle.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>And if one of those two guys that are the

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>starters are not ready to go for whatever reason or

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>get injured. We feel like we're in a really good

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>position with him as a guy that can that become

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a swing tackle and maybe that's a better fit for

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 1>him than guard. All Right, we're gonna take our final break.

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we do have to talk about

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the defense and what their day looked like. Yesterday. There

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>were some guys that played a little bit more and

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering did it make a difference. Maybe it did.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's hard to see through all the bad stuff

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw yesterday. We'll talk about that when we come

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio since

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American maid with pride

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to be

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Want to show your

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Texas and team pride too? You can by purchasing your

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>own stetson. You can look just like how the flag

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>guys do on field at every home game. Stetson Hats

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite football team. Get yours today at shop dot Dallas

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com. I'm Jay Novachek,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day,

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I was the guy who always got the tough yards,

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yardwork I need to do,

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you, Visit a John Dear

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Want to use what

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the pros use? How about the official men's skincare brand

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now you can

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of cowboys

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>The starter includes four Jack Clack skincare favorites, plus a

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>full size and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>word team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys the Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping. We're

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>backing the tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>It's new Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Bad Cream Soda. Is he a Newcombonut's music to

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>my ears? Okay, doctor time pull it in a glow.

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Music to my ears and mouths new Doctor Pepper and

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Cream Soda. Delet's just do bad. Back to the Break.

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Are you coming to a Cowboy game this season? Well,

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have fun and make sure you know before you go,

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you wear a mask, you keep distance, be prepared for

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>cash list transactions. Please be aware of all safe stadium

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>policies prior to arriving at AT and T Stadium. Visit

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com slash safe stadium for details. Welcome back.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It is the final segment of The Break, live from

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the s WBC Mortgage Studios. At the start, we're talking

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Cowboys loss yesterday twenty five three to the

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington football team and what we're dreary conditions and a

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>drearier if that's a word outcome. Let's talk about the

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 1>defense yesterday. They give up only twenty three points if

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't count the two points safety. Yeah, it's gave

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up and only gave up three points. In the second half.

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, that all being considered, can I'm gonna challenge

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>each of the three of you to Washington, to Washington,

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure you point that out to Washington, right yeah, yeah, Okay,

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna challenge each of the three of you

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>come up with at least one thing that maybe you

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>could glean from that game that was a positive about

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:23.959
<v Speaker 1>this defense. Nick, go first, Um, they had a goal

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>line stand. Ah, that's a good one. That's a really

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>good one. Okay. And the guy that did that was

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>there right in the middle, Dontarry Poe, which, by the way, folks,

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a really good video of Dontari Poe getting

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the team together and really kind of getting in their face.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, what do you say, I'm going to play better?

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but he he had that. And then

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a fumble. I guess they called it a fumble.

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Was it a fourth down stop or did they actually

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get a fumble because Worley got the ball? Yeah, it

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was Worley and Poe, those two right there. I'm not

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>sure if it was a turnover rundown or if it

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was it was actually a stand. It turned out to

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>be a five point stand. Because they gave up here

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of a safety. But yeah, let's go line stand that's positive? Okay,

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>uh Amber, give me something positive? Are you kidding me?

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Just anything? Question? Is that? Why are you being asking

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that work? Because because are you gonna get any posi?

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Here's the point. Here's the point. If you look at

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>how this defense has played all season, and you look

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>at the fact that yesterday they were able to at

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 1>least only give up twenty three, and they only gave

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>up three after halftime, is there anything that's positive about that?

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Is my question? Is there anything was better? No? No, no,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>cero Sato, Sato, Sato positive Sato. Now that you keep

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>talking as if this was like the Steelers, the the

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle you're playing against Seattle Wall when they stopped them

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to point. No, this was against Washington. There

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely nothing positive. I thought the first player, like

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first series, where they stopped that touch them,

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a positive if you want to

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>look at it positive. Okay, maybe they didn't give up

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in the first few seconds of the game. Good, great,

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>great for him for them, But no, there's absolutely nothing positive.

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The worst part to me is that I don't know

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>how you really try to change things around at this point.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do you actually do to make it better?

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you? And I know people keep talking about, oh,

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>come back this week fire, Mic Nolan, Are you gonna

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 1>do that? I mean, there's some blame on the players. Again,

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not just a coaching thing. It's also a

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about the players and the way that they're performing.

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>They just don't seem to care enough. And there's just

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a lack of chemistry, a lack of enthusiasm, a lack

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of desire of actually wanting to win because there's I

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.760
<v Speaker 1>don't see any energy. Little things that you keep talking about, Okay,

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe like for example, Jayleen and Smith, how do you

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>slip a tackle like that? Those things should not be happening.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So no, there's absolutely no positive from the defense side

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. So don't ask me again. I don't

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>want to hear any word positive along in the same

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sentence as the defense. You did see it up nicely though.

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>For tomorrow tomorrow show, I'm going to ask to ask you,

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask you the question of do you think that

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the players at the Cowboys lost

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this last year, do you think that those guys have

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>accounted for that much of a difference in the result

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing this year, or maybe, just maybe could

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it be the loss of one man end at being

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Rod Marinelli. We're gonna talk about that tomorrow because I

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's a very interesting conversation. Dave. Was there anything

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>positive that you glean from this defense yesterday? I know,

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>like you're asking this with your tongue firmly planted in

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.919
<v Speaker 1>your I'm still we do have shows we gotta get

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>through for the rest of this season. I'm just saying

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm still. I'm still a fin especially like, okay, they

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>allowed three points after halftime that Like that reminds me

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>in high school. I used to go out and play

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.879
<v Speaker 1>basketball with my dad in the driveway like every night

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>after dinner, and he would beat my ass until he

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>had a comfortable lead, and then he would just start

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.919
<v Speaker 1>chunking shots at the backboard so that it would stay

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>close and I wouldn't get discouraged, you know, Like that's

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what that looked like to me. Is Washington was like,

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>all right, you know, it's twenty five to three, Like

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we've done what we need to do. Like I don't

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't give them any credit for not allowing a

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdown after halftime because the touchdowns they allowed before halftime

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>three of them, by the way, which is more than

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington has scored all year, and one of them is

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.959
<v Speaker 1>a go ball where they just decided not to cover

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin for the fourth week in a row. And

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>then the other one is Logan Thomas scoring because Jalen

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith didn't couldn't tackle him. Well, it was it was atrocious. Um,

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm looking for positives, I thought Donovan Wilson made

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a really nice play to break up the two point conversion.

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was in the back of the end zone. Um,

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Layton Vanderesh played the whole game and he got hurt

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for a second, but I guess it wasn't serious, so

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you know that's nice, I guess. Um. I am befuddled

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>at how like why did why was Randy Gregory even

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>up if he only got six snaps? And why is

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>why is Bradley and I are going to be inactive

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if this is what you're getting from the defensive line,

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm not saying tank, but like, let's let's get

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these young guys some looks like because what

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what has what you've been doing hasn't been working anyway.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, though those are my positives, which is to say,

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really not any Yeah, and you entered you mentioned, you know,

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 1>get some of these young guys opportunities. Yesterday, what we

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>did see was Gallimore and Hamilton played more defensive tackle

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>than Poe or Wood or Crawford. They both played over

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of the defensive snap, both Hamilton and Gallimore.

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we saw a different result overall,

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>because they gave up obviously two uttered eight rushing yards,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge amount to give up to a

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>team that hadn't rushed very well. Antonio Gibson had one

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty eight yards on twenty carries. His previous

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>high before that was thirteen carriages for fifty five yards

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at Arizona. So I don't think the results necessarily showed

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 1>anything different. But did you as you watch those players play,

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>did you get a sense that maybe they were a

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>little better than the guys that they maybe were replacing Nick?

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Not really, I'm sorry, and I know where you're going

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with this, but I can't. I just can't. There's just

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing really to get excited about it at all I mean,

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I just said to Antonio Gibson's gonna rush for thirty

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>seven yards next week, and Carol Allen's gonna have a

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>rating of about sixty eight. I mean, like, I just

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.399
<v Speaker 1>think that those guys were getting tired of getting beat

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>up on, and they got to beat up on the Cowboys.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's the real embarrassing part of this is that

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a few nice plays here and there. No,

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there were like two plays here and there. Yeah, you

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>know what, Layton and Jalen had twelve tackles each. Cool

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>should have been nineteen each. I mean, like, I don't

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>think Layton played that well. I mean he had a

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>really costly penalty too that led to seven points. So

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, somebody told me a long

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>time ago about a play. Yeah, yeah, he led the

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and you know, tackling and they can't tackle, so

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to do it, you know, and it's Jalen

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Layton Well. I mean, I do think that

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as you as we go through the rest of the season,

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it really is and probably will be for the Cowboys

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff front office as well. It's really gonna be

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>about player evaluations. The results won't matter because I think

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the results are going to be similar to what you

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday. I think what they're looking at is is

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an individual player playing well enough that we want to

0:45:52.120 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>keep him around for next year? You know, I think

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that's where you start looking at it. And

0:45:57.239 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why I asked the question about Gallimore and

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton specifically, is because it really is going to be

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>about player evaluation for each of those individual guys. Were

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there any individual performances? Now I'm not gonna say that

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we're good, because in the twenty five to three loss,

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody was good. But were there any moments that you

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at and you said, Hey, I like what this

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>guy was doing here. This is the kind of thing

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna need a little bit more of Amber.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but I can't think of anyone. Honestly, I

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there was so much bad that it completely blinded my

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:34.240
<v Speaker 1>side for any slight of good that there could possibly

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>have been in that game. There was not a single

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>player that necessarily stood out to me for doing good.

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>So and I know that what we're looking at is

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a little bit better, Like, Okay, did this

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>players do a little a little better where maybe we

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a little something something, but that little something something just

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 1>got completely washed away from everything else. So I just

0:46:57.480 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I can't give you a better answer to that.

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But on his there was nothing that I really saw, Dave,

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm with her even you know, I mentioned a couple,

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned a couple like positives, and I don't know.

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's Donovan Wilson's fault that there

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was no safety help on the McLaurin play. I haven't

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 1>seen it back, so I don't want to blame him

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>for that. But my point is Donovan Wilson makes one

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>great play, but like you still see all of the

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>same systemic problems like that. That obviously what makes this

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating and terrible is like there is no growth

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>from week to week. Ye, there is none. They do

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the same awful stuff every time they go out, and

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this time they did it against literally the worst offense

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. So cool, Maybe a handful of guys

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>made some nice plays, but like who cares right now?

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just it is what it is, all right, That's

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a rap Tomorrow. What we will do is

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.359
<v Speaker 1>we will talk a little bit more about some of

0:47:56.400 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those bigger picture areas where maybe the Cowboys can identify

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>some issues that maybe they can tackle this year. Some

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are about tackling issues for next year. We're

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk specifically about coaching and what's happening right now

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with this coaching staff, both at the head coach as

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>well as the coordinators, and how much blame do you

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>put on those guys from what we're seeing right now

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to this team each and every Sunday.

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come back tomorrow to them.

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 1>For Nick Eatman, Dave helm and Amber Garcia. I'm Derek Hilton.

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>This has been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.479
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.