WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Backup Plan?

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, January twenty seven, twenty twenty one, Season sixteen,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 1>episode number ninety five. Welcome to the latest edition of

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The Break. We are live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>studios at the Star. We are presented by Geico. I

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>got Nick in here with me, I got Amber in

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>here with me. David's still remote, so he probably feels

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a little left out, but it's it's feeling a little

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.279
<v Speaker 1>more like like normal, having all three of us together

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and being able to talk a little Cowboys football. Here

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit of time with you guys today.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Today we're gonna focus in on the offense. We're gonna

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do a series here and over the next few shows,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna dive in a little deeper on each position. Today,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>starting with the offense, we'll get to the defense and

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a future show. But we'll go through each of the positions.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I have two or three questions in each category that

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we all will discuss and see what our thoughts are

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>on this offense and where it stands and how the

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys move forward going into twenty twenty two. How's everybody

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>doing today? Good? We're good, and we're good. Awesome. Okay,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so let's jump in. And as I looked at the offense,

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just to give it kind of a baseline, as bad

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as we thought this all was going at the moment

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that we saw Dak Prescott on the field at AT

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and T Stadium, they actually ended the season offensively right

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the pack. They were fourteenth in

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>total offense. Uh. The interesting part is they were eighth

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in passing offense. They ended up with averaging two hundred

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards per game, which pretty good to say you

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had a backup quarterback in some games where you had

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to back up to the backup. They finished seventeenth and

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>rushing seventeenth in points scored. This is the interesting part,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's probably no surprise to any of us.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>They were twenty seventh in turnovers lost. That was their

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>big akill. At least heill not just as the offense,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but as a team. Let's start first talking about the

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. Now, assuming Andy Dalton's value is too high

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for Dallas to keep him, what do you think they

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 1>should do at QB two? Keep Garrett Gilbert, develop him,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>look at Ben Jannucci, or go out in free agency.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you, Nick, No, I'm not doing it.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're thinking. But here's why we're not

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's why we're not going there. We talked about it

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>last show, we talked about it the show before that.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably take a whole show to talk about it

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>coming up. But we got to talk about the other

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>things around this quarterback position. I mean, it's just obviously

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>it's tough. It's tough when you're when you have so

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>many question marks at the first spot. You know, no

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>one ever really says, let's let's let's look at the

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>second game of this season. Yeah, and we'll worry about

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the first um, but we have to in this inter instance. Yeah,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think it was valuable to have.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously, so I mean I'm looking at that

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>type of quarterback. I think that that's kind of what

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you need. Um, I think you need to bring a

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>veteran in here, just because because of what we saw.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>We saw that Dak does get hurt and he does

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>miss games, and so when that happens, you want a

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>veteran in there. And then let's just say that it's

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Dak isn't the quarterback for whatever the reason. Even if

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they bring you, say the drafts and one, or they

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bring someone else in, I still think that veteran presence

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>was needed there. So yeah, I would try to get

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton back if that works, or somebody like that

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's had some starts. Amber that's just really tough to

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>answer right now because you don't really know exactly what's

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen with Dak, and then how much money

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are you going to invest there? And then at that point,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>how much would it cost to get Andy Dalton back

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or a veteran guy back. But if we were to

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>take the money aspect out of the equation and just

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it, obviously, yes, of course you want to

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have a guy with the experience that it's able to like.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy with Andy Dalton. I thought he did

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent job given the situation. But when you

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about Gary Gilbert, and also Bendy Nucci. It's tough

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't really get to see much of them,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and usually, you know, we go to practice and we

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>get to get a better idea, but this year it

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>was just so different. Even though there was still a

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>potion open to the media, it's still very hard to judge.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>The quarterbacks get out there later than the rest of

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the team. So it's like me, personally, I don't quite

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have a full idea of what these two guys could

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>possibly do for you. Obviously the Cowboys should have a

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>better idea, but we'll see what happens that I'm really curious.

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right now, with all these other veteran guys

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that all this trade talking that's starting to surface recently,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just getting really messy and it's just getting really interesting.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So the Cowboys got a better have a plan and

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>soon and start figuring out their moves and not wait

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to the last minute. Dave, I don't think it's hard

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. Like, regardless of what happens with Dak, I

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys hopefully learned a valuable lesson about the

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>benefits of having a capable backup quarterback. It's the first

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>time they've really spent the money on one in a

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>long time, and it paid off even better than it

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>has in the past. In my opinion, I would certainly

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>love to have Andy back, and honestly, it kind of

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.119
<v Speaker 1>works in the cowboys favor that the quarterback market looks

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so crazy right now. You know, there's rumors about half

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a dozen big time quarterbacks getting traded. There's guys hitting

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>free agency. So maybe Andy Dalton's market isn't as robust

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>as we think it is. So I would certainly try

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to bring him back. If he's too expensive, I would

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>look at other experience insoptions. Robert Griffin the third comes

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to mind. He was recently released by Baltimore Tyrod Taylor,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe looking for a new place to stay now that

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert's the man in Los Angeles. I would absolutely

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>try to get somebody like that. If that doesn't work,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>you can always sign Garrett Gilbert on the cheap, which

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is something actually you don't even need to sign him,

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you just hold onto him. That wouldn't surprise me at all.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Given this team's cap situation, the amount of money that

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they might have to spend on Dak, I would not

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be shocked if if they go forward with Garrett Gilbert

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's cheap. But I hope they don't. I hope

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they go spend some money and keep somebody experienced. Although

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from different people on the team that Dak's

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>recovery is on schedule and he's doing the things that

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>he should be doing at this point because he is

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>coming off a really, really huge injury. Do you think

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas should consider paying what would be I guess near

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>market value for an Andy Dalton on a one year

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>deal if he will willing to do it, Like, would

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you be willing to pay him twenty seven twenty eight

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for a one year deal knowing that Dak is coming

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>off this injury and you know, not to say that

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this is what they've said, but let's assume that he's

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not quite back right and you got to start the

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>season with someone else. Do you think it's worth it

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in a season like this to maybe pay that extra money? Nick,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. I mean, you're talking about signing Dak

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that, well, you'd have to do something, like

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do something with Dak. You got to give

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>him the franchise tag or you gotta pay him. I'm

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>saying in addition, to that. Is it that important knowing

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's coming off this injury. Is the quarterback position

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that important where you're saying, hey, for one year deal,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we might have to eat And even if it wasn't

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton, let's assume it was one of those other

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>guys that Dave just mentioned. Is it valuable? Is that

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>position so valuable? And are you would you be so

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned about where Dak is and how ready he will

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be at the beginning season that you say we got

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to go out and get a capable quarterback to give

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>us a little more insurance in a year like this.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can do that. I don't think

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you have the money to do that, and I don't

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think you need to, because we saw that when Dak

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>went down and Andy Dalton comes in, they're not as good.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So twenty seven million, twenty five million, whatever that number is,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think that's a lot of money

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for somebody that you know is going to be down.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think you you you know it's

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more about five million, you know, I mean, and that's

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the best that you that you really can probably

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do there. I mean, this is gonna be a tough situation.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>But from the cap, I mean it'll be tough for

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of positions. I mean they're probably they may

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not even keep their long time deep snapper because they

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can cut a salary in half. We're talking like a

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>half a million. It's gonna be that tough with dollars

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and cents. So I don't really see how you can really.

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're gonna pay Dak the money, then

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you just have to expect that he's going to be

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really good and if he gets hurt, you know, it

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>is what it is like it was last year. Yeah, Amber,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. I mean you just cannot do that. You

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have so many other needs that you cannot just put

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all your money into the quarterback position. I mean, there

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are so many issues on defense, and I'm trying to

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>get not just draft. I mean, i know we keep

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at the draft right now, but we need some

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>veteran help on defense, and you need to go get

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>someone through free agency. Might not be a splashy name

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or like fancy name or anything, but at the same time,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to invest through free agency a veteran guy

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>on defense and not let it be a bust like

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the many free agency free agent guys that the Cowboys

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>got last year and then you got let go how many,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>like three or four of them? You had to let

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>go of them and it didn't work out for you.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So no, there's absolutely no way that I see them

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that and it no no, okay, Dave, I'd straight

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>up don't think it's possible. Like Nick said, I mean,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>assuming you're somehow paying Dak Prescott, whether tag or contract.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You know the cap. We all know the CAP's not

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going to grow, it might even shrink. We don't have

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the final number, but it's gonna be somewhere, like somewhere

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in the range of like one hundred and eighty million.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. So if you're talking about the going rate,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, twenty five twenty eight million for

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback, you're sinking forty percent of your cap into

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one position. As I don't think it's possible, not with

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>all the other things, not only the needs this team has,

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but the contracts they're already on the hook for. I

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can do it. And that's kind of

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>my point is if Andy's price is too high, then

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to go find the other Andy, Like the

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>other quarterback that's willing to pay for play for three

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, because I don't think you can afford that

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you want it to. Okay, So here's another question,

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of got brought up. I think last

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>week we started hearing that the Detroit Lions are looking

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at trading Matthew Stafford. They they're gonna mutually agree to

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>part ways, is the way the report's going. Is there

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where you would consider trading or trying to

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>acquire a veteran like Matthew Stafford and trading Deck because

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think to this point we've kind of all assumed

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Deck's going to be here. He will have either the

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag or he will have a long term deal.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there a scenario that could make you rethink that

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with someone like Matthew Stafford, who you would consider to

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be I think most of us would consider him to

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be a good quarterback in this league. Would you look

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at a scenario like that if you or what would

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that scenario be that would make you want to look

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>at that scenario? Amber Well, I'll let Dave and Nake

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>answer that, because I know that that has a lot

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with money in the cap and all that,

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know that's not my area of expertise, but

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I would try to do everything that I

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>could to get this whole deal done. I liked I

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like his projection, I like the way he was going.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the injury is necessarily going to

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>affect his future in the way that he performs. So

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that he has a really nice future and

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he could happen here in Dallas. But at one point

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to are you gonna be committed? Are you

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to commit or not? If not, then move go away,

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>live your life, separate ways, and move on, you know.

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's I think that the Cowboys and Dak are

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at that point where it cannot be just under the

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>franchise stack. You have to make a commitment, and if not,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>then then okay, let's just figure out a future now,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>even if that's parting ways and moving though, but preferably

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>stay with DAK. But with these other guys, I mean,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>those are great options, but again, you have to make

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a decision very very soon before you can't even explore

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>those options. Dave, I'll just say this, I think the idea,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be stupid. I think it would not.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it would be a good idea to

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>trade Dak for another quarterback. I made the point on

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter last week that Cowboy fans would hate Matt Stafford

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>if he had put together the resume that he has

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>right now with the Cowboys, no playoff wins, very rarely

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>making the playoffs. Don't come at me acting like he's

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>never had talent because he played with Calvin Johnson, So

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I really don't want to hear it point, being like,

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole heap of evidence that says Matt Stafford

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily as good as Dak Prescott, and he's

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on the way down in his career rather in the

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>way up. Having said all of that, the reason that

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I say this is I do think the Cowboys need

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision about whether or not Dak is

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback, like in the next eight weeks. It doesn't

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>benefit anybody to do another Tag season like jumping his

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>salary all the way up to thirty eight million dollars,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>crippling your cap. By the way, you can't keep him

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Tag next year, so you're in the same position.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So you either have to sign him for what will

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>likely be an even more absurd contract next year, or

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>let him walk for nothing but a cop pick sounds

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like a terrible idea in my opinion. So just make

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that decision right now, sign Dack to a long term

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>extension or yeah, I mean, if they decide they want

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to deal him to Detroit, I don't. I can't even

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>begin to imagine what that would look like. But I hope,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Dak is too good to just trade him

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in like a player for player or trade. I would

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hope i'd get some compensation coming my way. I really

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like that idea at all, but I would rather.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I would rather trade Dak and just try to start

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>this thing over with a new quarterback, then play this

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thing out again on the tag, because I don't think

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that benefits anybody. Nick, Yeah, take a pote load of money.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they what's the emoji where your head's exploding like that?

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where we are. I think so, because it's tough,

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the timing of all this is it's like,

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Dave said, I mean, you need to

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>make the decision. You know, they both said that, you know,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>make this decision sooner than later. But you know, I

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna try to get this thing done. You

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>try to get it done before you have to tag him.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But if they don't get it done and you do

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>tag him, then then what then that's when who's available?

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are some of these guys that you

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to maybe get I mean, are they are they

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>still going to be available? Do you throw your hat

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the ring for free agency? Do you start trading him?

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's just so many, so many options. I mean,

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>my preference would be to try to get to sign him,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I do get annoyed with the people,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and you see a lot in the media they're like,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Cowboys are just not signing him, like they

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to sign him, Like what are they

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>waiting for? Type of stuff, when in reality, it's just

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>two sides to this, And you know, it's it's kind

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of funny with that this whole fourth year, fifth year

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>thing has been a deal for two years. I mean,

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know two years ago that that kind of chance

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to sign a deal for thirty five million for he

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>could have done it for five years, but he wanted

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the four. Now here we are he would be he'd

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have three years left on that thing. If he would

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have done that, you know, and gotten a lot more

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>money out of it. So I get it that he's

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to you know, it's it's a pride thing, and

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to be you know, up there high bitum.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>If I'm talking in circles, it's because I am. I'm

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>getting dizzy just trying to figure this whole thing out.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it's cowboys had to come to,

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, down towards Dak. They realize they can't win

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>without him, and Dad should realize, Yeah, but you get hurt.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You get hurt sometimes, and well, but I don't I

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's that's I look at Dak. He

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>should I don't look at him as a guy that

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt like that. That was a one time thing.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been very, very healthy before that. So it again,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens on the tag? What happens if

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it happens again on the tag? Well, here's the deal.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>If he's on the tag, it's beside the point anyway,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna be a free agent next yeah, right,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And so you basically at that point got a market

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>value that and you're competing. Here's a question for everybody. Then,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that being said, would you rather a guy like would

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you rather have Dak Prescott for one year? A disgruntled

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Dak for one year? I mean, I don't think Dak

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would be disgruntled, to be honest with you, would be

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He would be a free agent after this year, so

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably looked at that assist. Okay, great,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>give me thirty eight for this year and I'll see

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens. What kind of team leader do you have

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>when you know he's out the door, you know he's

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out the door. I think Dak. I think Dak and

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the kind of person he is, I think he will

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>still be a great leader. There's nothing I've seen in

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>dat that suggests me any any otherwise. Okay, you got

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Dak for one year, or you or you have a

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford or somebody for two years. What would you

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>rather have? Yeah, that's that, and then I'd rather have

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>does Scott, I'd rather have I'd rather have Dak be

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>my quarterback. But that's my point is like that doesn't

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that does nothing for me? Like you can guarantee me

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna unless you can guarantee me they're gonna win

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. It's it's a waste of time. And

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that's like, I want Dak to be the quarterback of

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this team. But if you're telling me we're heading for

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>another tag year and then free agency after that, then

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just rip the band aid off and do the deal. Honestly,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, I think it would be a

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>stupid decision, but at least you have long term clarity. Yeah,

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, And I look at a guy

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>like Stafford, I agree with Dave. I don't think Stafford

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is I don't personally think he's as good as Dak.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Dak adds a third dimension that he doesn't have. Um.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this, if you're telling me I'm

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>only gonna get Dak for a year, um, then the

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>way I look at that is give me a guy

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that I know is at least capable, which I think

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford is capable. And I disagree with Dave a

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the talent he's played when yes, he's

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>played one of the greatest receivers of all time, but

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you start getting below that. They are on a lot

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of guys you will mentioned that'll be like, oh, yeah,

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he had a really great guy and this guy and

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy and this guy Stafford, right, and you look

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at this Cowboys offense. They got some talent. They got

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of skill position talent. So I think it's

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a different situation. And I think

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you could probably edit his age. I think he's thirty three.

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>You could probably expect you could get a few years

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>out of him and playing at a pretty good level.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you're telling me I can only have Dak

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for one year, I'm kind of with dave Man. Tear

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the band aid off and give me at least a

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>guy for the next few years, and let me start

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what I'm gonna do beyond that and start

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing if I can develop someone. Maybe I gotta go

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>draft somebody this year, Like I would just want to

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>know right now, you know, before it gets into the franchise, tach.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to know right now what I need to

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do a quarterback. That's the weird thing about goes all

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the way back to Andy Dalton situation. Let's say the

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Dack thing isn't gonna happen. He's gonna be on the tag,

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be here. Now you got to figure

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>out what you're gonna do. You don't know. If the

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>free agency, you know, say Stafford's not available or whatever. Now,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you do draft the guy number ten or trade

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up or whatever for seven eight and get one of

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>these three really good quarterbacks. That's when you call Andy

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Dalton back and go whoa, whoa wait wait wait, pay

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you three year deal to be that. You know, and

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that sucks. I hate that guy. I mean, I know,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate the guy. I hate it for the guy.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I hate it for the guy. I hate it for

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor when he sits there and holds the bag

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>and waits for this guy to get ready. Fitzpatrick's been

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>doing it for his whole career. You know, John Kitten

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and did it a little bit too. I hate it

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for them, but you know they get paid. So yeah,

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of it when you get to that

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>age in this league is you're gonna be a bridge

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>guy in a lot of instances because people want to

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have steady play at the quarterback position until they get

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy ready to be their long term future. We

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't figure out that position, by the way, we didn't

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out anything. And this last talk and there's nothing

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, and you know, again, the dominoes have

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to start with what are you going to do with

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>your starting quarterback? Right right? Everything else comes after that,

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and until you know what you're gonna do there, there

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>really is no good answer, Dave, what do YEA? I

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>will say that I think the one thing I've figured out,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it's not new, but I guess I've

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just been mulling it over a lot since since the

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Stafford news and since people have started talking about that is,

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, theoretically, this could all play out the same

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as last year, where they tag him and nothing happens,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and it goes all the way to July, and you know,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a deal gets done, maybe it doesn't. In my mind,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>if this team doesn't have this figured out by like

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>mid April, then it's just a catastrophic failure of organizational

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>direction for a lot of reasons. Because again, you got

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a top ten draft pick, You got a chance to

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>draft a future quarterback if that's what you need to do.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You got a chance to pursue more. There are more

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>quality quarterbacks available this year, whether through trade or free agency,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>than like any year I can think of. So whether

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's Dak Prescott or somebody else, they have a unique

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to set themselves up for the future, and if

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't make that decision in time to take advantage

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, then they're crazy. I mean, if you if

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you let this thing play out all the way to

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>July and don't get a deal done, and then you're

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>back here with a quarterback on a one year deal

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and this time he can enter free agency in twenty

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, that's a disaster. So I just I have

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to believe that this is all good and get resolved

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the next eight weeks. Yeah, it has to. I

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just can't. I can't see a logical reason why it

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be. Interesting. Thing there is that the leverage as

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this thing goes on diminishes for the Cowboys even more

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>because with every quarterback that's lost in free agency that

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>could have been someone they went after here, with every

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 1>pick that happens in the draft that could have been

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that they would have drafted, each one of

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys becoming unavailable makes it gives them less leverage

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in talking the deck, like they could always enter the

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiations right now saying, hey, if this doesn't work, we

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>got other options. When those options are gone, then it's

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to make that argument. R Right, March

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>ninth is the key, right there, you get it done,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and to you know, if you have to tag him,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you still tag him, right, But then you

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>know everybody knows the deal. At that point they get

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they may go and sign somebody else and try to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>trade him, and yeah, it's a it's a mess. All right.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take our first break when we come back.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna jump into the wide receiver position. And the

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>question I'll ask these guys is is it important to

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>keep the three wide receivers that you have together or

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>could you use one of them as potential bait to

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to upgrade your team in another area. We'll

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>do it and do that when we come back. This

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. There's nothing as unique

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as our eyes, which is why SLOR pioneers ways to

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>make lenses as unique as you. Very Lux for super

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection on Krisolve for freedom

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>from glam, three cutting ex solutions in a single unique lens.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So whatever your needs, insist on selor visit your local

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>SLOR experts and find a perfect lens for you Seemore

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>do Moore Slord. Since eighteen sixty five. Stetson hats are

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>American maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride two you

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all self

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day. I was the guy

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who always got the tough yards and that's why I

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>run with John Deer today. In fact, I have a

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>John Deer three zero twenty five E tractor that can

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>handle any yardwork I need to do, even the tough

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>yards way out back. So if you have one acre

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>or a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's just

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>right for you. Visit a John Deer dealer today and

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>run with us. We are the official tractor provider of

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>your Dallas Cowboys. Here it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think we should get electricity and stop using candles to

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>see it night? It's just electricity lights up the room fast.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to love it nationwide. Well candles, dear, did you just

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>run into the wall? May I have a new candle? Please? Historically,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure and nationwide.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Switch to AT and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Five G requires compatible plant may not be in your area.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break Are you looking for something to

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>change up your dinner routine? Helps support Laport local Frisco

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses by choosing one of over thirty restaurants Here at

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the Star District for our information on delivery, takeout, curbside,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>pickup and dine in options at the Star District dot com.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It is the second segment of the Break

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Life from the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star.

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>We are presented by Geico. We're going through the offense.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about specific positions and players. We talked about

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position. As Nick reminded us, we did nothing

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to clarify what should be happening at that position. We

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>will wait and have that discussion at a later date

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>when the Cowboys make some decisions at the quarterback position.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to move to the wide receiver position, though,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want to start with the top three wide receivers.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got Cooper, Gallop and Lamb. I want each of

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys to for me. I want you to rank

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the three based upon how they performed this year. One, two, three, Dave,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you, Cooper, Lamb, Gallop. That's not a

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>knock on Gallop. They were all pretty damn good, especially

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>considering they didn't have their starter starting quarterback for most

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of the year. You know, he wasn't perfect, but I

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can't say enough about how I impressed I was with Amari,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, setting a career high for catches, hitting a

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>thou and yards. Had very few down games, and one

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of them was the night that Ben Denucci was playing

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in a windstorm. So I just thought I thought he

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>had a great year. CD was awesome. Would have been

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>better if he'd had Dak consistency issues, drops and stuff

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, but so did Mike. Mike had a couple

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of really off games where he just couldn't seem to

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hang onto the ball um. But in general, they were

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>all really good. But that's the order i'd put him in. Nick,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I just keep it just like that. I don't I mean,

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep this thing moving. I wouldn't have disagree with

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 1>anything of that order. I don't disagree with CD. He

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit inconsistent at times. You expect that

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as a rookie a Mari. You know, it was MARII

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was good. I mean, he looked at the numbers of

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers show that it was good. It was sometimes

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you're like, wow, he did that. I mean, you know,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of unforgetta forgettable at times, but I mean the

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers were there. And so in that order there, all

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>three had their games, they had their moments. That would

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>be my order too, Yeah, same order. Was there a

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>game where the three of them were just bad a

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>single Yeah, I can't remember, but it's like the Nucci game.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That that's why they got any offense in that game.

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>That game, Yeah, and I don't know if cut like

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>six or seven passes because there was just a little quick,

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the Red Washington game whatever, the first

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>one went in the rain. It was Red, you know,

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the redhead quarterback player. But I thinking for the most

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>part for the whole season, I mean, they were pretty

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>h consistent wise, like even you guys mentioned Michael Gallup

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or even see the being a little inconsistent at times.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's where the other wide receiver pulled

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in and did their jobs, so that that was just

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>h a nice break in that aspect of the wide

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>receiver compared to the previous year, like where we were

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just all a wide receiver by comedie and trying to

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out what was happening there at the position. So

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just in general to how people that you can't rely

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on if someone is having a bad day, you still

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have two o their guys that can pull the weight

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and do their jobs. So yeah, same order. I think

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper did sneak up on me. He's so forgettable to me,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time he did such a nice job.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And then Cee Lamb flashy plays. Obviously you cannot he

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>cannot go unnotice unnoticed on the field. I did feel

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that at times they were trying to force the ball

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>on him, a little too much at certain games. I

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>can't remember. I have such a bad memory when it

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to specific games, but I remember there was one

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>game where it was just like they kept trying to

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>force it to him and it just wasn't working, and

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they just kept going to him. But I just think

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that the three of them create a very very nice

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>balance for this offense. Yeah, I think it's interesting, and

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you guys pointed out how good of season

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that Cooper had because everybody was talking last year about

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>his struggles, particularly on the road, and I thought the

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>best thing I could say about him this year was

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his consistency across the board. It seemed like every game

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or most games, he was showing up and providing productivity

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. I'll ask this next question, and I

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>want to put it in context. You look at the

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>two teams in the Super Bowl and you see that

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>they are offenses where they have multiple skill position players

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that are at the top, like really really great skill

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>position players. And so when you look at this Cowboys team,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of talk this season where people

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 1>are like, hey, can you take up, you know, Michael

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Gallop and trade him off because you already got great

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>other skill position players. Do you guys think it's important

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's working right now in the NFL, is

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it important to keep these three together and have that

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>number of really talented skill position players, or do you

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think that it would be a better decision for the

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys maybe to look to take one of these guys,

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and again, it doesn't have to be Michael Gallop, any

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of these guys and decide, hey, let's see if we

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>can move this guy and get some other pieces that

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>can help us on other parts of our teams where

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we may need some value. Nicholas start, well, you know,

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna if you're gonna judge the teams that

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>are in the Super Bowl and even in the final

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>four teams conversation. No, well, yeah, quarterback, you know, without

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a doubt. But also I hate to say it, you know,

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>because this this is the situation the Cowboys are in.

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, look at Buffalo's running back. Look at

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs running back. Look at the Bucks running back.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Look Chiefs got a running Who Hilaire was h Is

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he playing? He was the first round pick? Is he

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>played played last week? Okay? But he's not the difference

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>maker for them like he Yeah, but he's a good

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>running player, a good player, Aaron Jones, a good player

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay and all that. That's not right why

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they're winning though, So that particular case, so those four

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>teams are kind of showing it there they're going to

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you trying to say this, because we're going to

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get to that conversation. Are you saying the running back

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>here is the reason why they would be winning. Well,

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't win. I know what I'm saying. Do

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you think that when they get back to winning that

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he would be the reason. I'll answer your question, mat

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the question. I'm not I'm not messing up these three receivers.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I got these three. They're they're good. They open up

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>things for the title. Yeah, you got me confused. What

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are you trying to say with the running back versus

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the receivers that look like your face? Stop? I'm trying

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to say that the trying to say that the running

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>back position in those four teams, that's not really the

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>difference maker of them. Is that where the league is going?

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that where the cowboys are going. If the cowboys

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna have to try to do something in

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>part ways with the running back. I'm not parting ways

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with these receivers. These receivers are good. They made my

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>tight end who somebody wanted to be cut off this team,

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a Pro Bowl candidate. So these three receivers opened

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>things up. I'm not cutting them, We're not trading them.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to the running back conversation later, probably

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the next next week show. But one thing I

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>will note, and I want you guys to go look

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at this. Go to look at the rushing numbers this

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>year across the NFL. There were only two running backs

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they have more than eleven hundred and sixty nine yards.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, eleven or six nine yards. It's not

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge number as far as rushers are concerned. This

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>year there were only two that had more than that.

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Because there eleven sixty four I mean, like, no, honestly,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>well that was because that was the highest one next

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to those other two. My point is, my point is

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think the NFL is changing, and I do

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think what you're starting to see more I think it

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>preached your point. I think is that this is becoming

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more and more and you hear it all the time,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but it really is starting to see you're starting to

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>see it in the numbers. This is a passing league,

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is also a league where it's very rare

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to find one running back on a team that's productive.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Most teams have a couple running backs that they use

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in tandem to be able to do what they want

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. Him Europe, I'm not ready to have that

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation. I still think that Zig is very

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>valuable and having a running back like him, and again

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and again, I get it he wasn't necessarily great last year,

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but that was just one year, and I'm still hoping

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that he can come back this year and go back

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to what he used to be prior to twenty twenty.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But I still think that this team, even though they

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have three great white receivers, they still need to be

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>able to run the ball effectively. And I don't think

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can just do that with Tony Polar, although

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>he showed that, but that's not really what you're asking.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You're asking him about these three wide receivers. I would

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>not trade them. It's just it's like one of those

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>scenarios where you finally have an area of the team

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's working, that it's good. Why mess with it,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and I get it. You're trying to add value at

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>other positions of need. But at the same time, it's like, men,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>let's just not create another unbalanced in there. You know,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you could technically trade them and get something for them

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that you could definitely use on defense, for sure, But

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I just I don't want to

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>touch them. They're doing good. You don't need to work

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on anyone's contract. No one's is going out of contract

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>next year, so let's just enjoy it for another year

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at least and just take advantage of them. Three Again, Dave,

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I hate what I'm about to say. I want to

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be clear. Michael Gallup is like one of my absolutely

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite people on this team. I love the guy. I

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's a really I think he's a really underrated

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>player and a really nice guy. But if you're you're

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Michael Gallop, I know you said it could

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be any of them. No, it can't Ceedee lamb Is.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>He has all pro potential on a rookie contract. You

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't trade that. And Amari Cooper not only is the

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>under contract, which makes him harder to trade. I don't

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>think you can underestimate the impact that he's had on

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this team. I mean, maybe Dak would have taken these

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>leaps without him, but it doesn't seem like a coincidence

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that he started taking these leaps when Amari showed up.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>He is uniquely positioned to be both a fantastic possession

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver as well as a home run threat. His separation

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ability is unique even among NFL receivers. I'm not trading him,

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so you're basically talking about Michael Gallop. I don't love

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of trading him because I agree with everything

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they said, but I think you at least need to

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be open to the possibility. Because he's only got one

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>year left on his deal, you probably can't keep him.

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to say that for sure. We'll see what happens,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know Dak. If Dak signs, he'll lead up

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the cap you got other guys to

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>worry about. It's not realistic to think you can pay

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>three of those guys big deals. So if somebody wanted

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer me something good for him, a third round pick, maybe,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would be I would I would jump

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to trade him for a second round pick. That would

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be fun. And you can I mean you can just

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>turn around and draft another one. Mike was pick number

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty one in the draft. We saw look at the

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at how many amazing receivers came out

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of this last draft, and this year's class looks to

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>be kind of similar. Like there's gonna be a bunch

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of stud receivers in this year's class. So if somebody

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>offered me something good for Michael Gallop, I would trade him.

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you have to by any means. Like,

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally fine letting him play out his contract. But

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>if somebody offered me something really good for him, I'm

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>here for it. Let me add to this port. The

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that's unique about these these three receivers is the

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, especially Gallop Gallop still they and

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Dave Gallops the one that would be

0:35:56.000 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>tradeable in this situation. He's the guy that's like the

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>least diva receiver on the team. Like he said the

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>other day, I had one hundred and thirty yards in

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the first half. Hey, it was about time for someone

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>else to get some Hey, we all can't get our

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers here. I mean, that's where it becomes a problem

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when you have three receivers and they all kind of

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>want theirs and there they act like their friends and

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>now they're cool, but really they you know, they wonder

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>who's getting the ball and all that. I don't really

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>since that happening at all on this team, and I

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good thing. When you have three guys

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're not really fighting over the ball and they

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>get along. I do. I want to trade them for

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick. The second round you'd have to listen,

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but a third round pick, I mean, if you just

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>throw in the way the Cowboys are drafting, you get

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rid of him. So now now you got to figure

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>something else out. And who did you get? You got

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a Neville Gallimore, a Michael Gallup, another, you know, a

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Connor McGovern, Jordan Lewis, Malie Collins, Jaz Green, Terence Williams,

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>J J. Wilcox. I mean, I'm just saying, you know,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you have something really good special here, and you're gonna

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>trade them so you can get this third round safety

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>or corner might be good. Maybe he's really gonna help you.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The second round we'll talk, you know,

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but third I'll probably just be good with, you know,

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because you won with the third rounder right, playing better

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>than a third round pick. Yeah, you know what I

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>would say about the wide receiver position, though, I do

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.879
<v Speaker 1>think that players are coming into the league a little

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>more accustomed to the idea that they don't have to

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be the only stud wide receiver on the team. You

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 1>look at you look at college now. And I saw

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a picture the other day of that Alabama wide receiver

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>group last year when they still had guys that went

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first round this year, and then all the

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gonna go in the first round, including

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, a Heisman Trophy winner, and they were

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>all in the same wide receiver room. Right. It's it's like,

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're getting used to the idea that, hey,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's okay if there are more than one of us,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>because that means we're all going to get a shot,

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and we're all gonna get a chance because they're gonna

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have to pay attention to somebody else at some point, right,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that probably is a little different

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>than what you and I grew up on when it

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to football, where you had one stud wide receiver

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and then everybody else is just there to compliment him. Right,

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not the game anymore credit thing. He came from

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Colorado State. I bet he was. He was right, Yeah,

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he was, he was. I would assume he's just got

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a good it's just a good mindset. It's it's you know,

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they're those guys. I mean we saw the clip. I

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>mean they're talking about. What were they talking about on

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the one of those clips we had on the sidelines

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>sound from the sideline they were talking about, Yeah, something,

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it was something. Yeah, it was just like it was

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like what kind of pie kind? Yeah? All right, oh yeah,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what favored pie? He goes And that's the problem you like,

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>PuF said, that's your problem. Oh thinks let's go right,

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, last question, half of you guys on the

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, Both Cedric Wilson and Noah Brown are free

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>agents after this At this point, Brown will be an

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>understricted free agent, Wilson a restricted free agent. Uh. They

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>both had some moments this year where I thought they

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>contributed to the team in very positive ways. If you

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>could only keep one, which one would you opt to

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep? Let's start with you Ample, I think I

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>would want to keep, uh Cedric, just you know, with

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Noah Brown, I mean he's been an interesting guy. He

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was someone that caught my attention ever since he stepped

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on the field. I think he has the ability, but

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 1>he just he likes that consistency. He hasn't been able

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to give you, at least what I expected him to

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.919
<v Speaker 1>give me. And I know they don't use him every

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>single time. But if let's say one of these wide

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>receivers gets hurt and you gotta put a guy out there,

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have Cedric Wilson just because of the

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>things that I've seen from him. And again, he hasn't

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 1>been the most consistent guy either, but his ability down

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the field and the him being longer just attracts me

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>more as to what I want from a wide receiver

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and the things that he can possibly do for you.

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Cedric Wilson is a guy that he made

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge leap last year. We saw it. He got

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>along and I got along. But I mean like he

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>had a good rapport with Dak he saw that was

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason that carried over to training camp, carried

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 1>over to the game. He does a lot of different things,

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>don't you know. As long as he's not running fake

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>punts on fourth and ten back there, I mean as

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not doing that. I mean he left

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the team in quarterback rating, in percentage, you know, I

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>mean he does other things. Uh yeah, he's the guy there.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Noah Brown. Listen, it's been it's a good experiment.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't work. And the very first minute of

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>free agency, he's going to be on a flight to

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>LaGuardia Airport in New York and he's gonna probably sign

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Giants. That's what's gonna happen because that coaching

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>staff loved him and that's probably where he's gonna go. Ye. Nick,

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Dave, I mean everything they said. But also

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just keep in mind Cedric's restricted, which means all you

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>have to do is put the You could put the

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>tender for the round, so it's first round, second round round.

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Originally drafted, Cedric was a sixth round. Oh yeah, keep

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>him on a one year. Keep keep him on a

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one year deal for very very cheap. And I think

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that just makes too much sense. The reason why I

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>say that is it never seems to be. Usually it's

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the original round, and it's it's not you didn't

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>draft them, Yeah right, it's usually an undrafted free agent,

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but he was a draft pick, which so you'll take

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a six. I mean if somebody wants to sign him

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and take him and he was like, well, you're probably

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna match that deal. So and by the way,

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you got three guys that we just finished talking about.

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So whatever happens beyond that is kind of just gravy. Right, Well,

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that's a question we could have asked. Two

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is okay, let's say that the let's say you did

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>part ways with Gallop. Are you you like Cedric Wilson

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>enough to slide him into that role? Let me ask

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you this, what you saw early in the year he

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was making a lot of those big plays when Dak

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>was here. Didn't seem to make a lot of those

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>once Dak was no longer here. So do you think

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that maybe that's the key? We go back to that

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>first go back into house, let's go and you make

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a decision on him based on the Q. Do you

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think Brandy Dalton's not invited him into his house to

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>go out there and throw a ball? I don't know.

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't seem like he was as explosive as

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>he was with sex. You know. All right, Let's let's

0:41:57.880 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>take our final break. When we come back, we're gonna

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>get some fan questions here in the final segment. Amber

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>has those lined up. We'll do that when we come

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>back in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's new Doctor pepper and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepeck and Cream Soda. Is he a newcombon. Let's

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>music to my ears? Okay, doctor Time a music to

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>my ears and mouth. New Doctor pepper and Cream Soda

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a delicious doe. There's nothing as unique as our eyes,

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>which is why SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>unique as you. Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for protection, and Crisolve for freedom from glare. Three cutting

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>edge solutions in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs,

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>insist on selor visit your localessel or experts and find

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 1>a perfect lens for you to see more, Do more.

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Esse Lore The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and five championships shows us what success looks like. Where

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>where we are all defined by one single thing, the star,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 1>where we as fans know it's our job to keep

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the quest of living life the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen o eight.

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>candles to see it night? It's just electricity lights up

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the room fast, It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, dear, did

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you just run into the wall? I have a new

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>candle please. Historically, switching to new technology is a no brainer.

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five Gee, it's

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five get requires compatible plan may not be

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See at dot com slash five G

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Back to the Break experience, the

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>most competitive and highest profile off road motorcycle racing championship

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. When Monster Energy am A Supercross returns

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to ATENC Stadium March thirteenth, sixteenth, and twentieth Tickets are

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>on sale. Now get yours before they sell it at

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sekgeek dot com. Let me reiterate March thirteenth, sixteenth, and twentieth.

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back into the final segment of the Break Life

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>from the s WBC Mortgage studios at the Star. We

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are presented by Geico. We're gonna get some fan questions.

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We've been trying to do this now for about two

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>months and now we finally have a little time so

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we can get some questions in here. Amber. What do

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you have? Well, I had a question about the defense

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the offense and how much money the Cowboys have

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>invested on one versus the other, which led me to

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think of this whole idea that I'm gonna propose to

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you guys and see what you think. I'm pretty sure

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys are going to disagree. But you know how

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago you used to say defenses one super Bowls

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and one championships, right, and now we're seeing a league

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>where it's more on the offense. And what those guys

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are doing with the Cowboys having invested so much money

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on offense, is this maybe a time where they should

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>be taking a turn and trying to invest more on

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>their defense instead and reconstructing that to where now their

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>power area is their defense. So that way, maybe maybe

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we start seeing them win more games than what we've

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>seen in what the past five over five years? What

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do you guys think? And we know history repeats itself,

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so you never know when the league is going to

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>turn back to going into having powerful defenses win championships.

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You could argue, I mean that these teams that are

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the championship game, I mean they have good quarterbacks

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and they have some really good defenses too. Those defenses

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>actually helped them. But I mean, I don't know if

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you could say that's the main reason of what they do.

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a cycle. I think the Cowboys

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>need to start drafting, I mean drafting for defense, drafting,

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, with their top pick, maybe the top couple

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of picks, you know, and the guys that they have

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>hit in the first round, if they picked in the

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>first round, haven't always connected, you know. Mo Claiborne didn't

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out, Taco didn't work out. The jury is

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>still out on Layton Vander It's I mean, it's worked

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out for a while, but if he if he continues

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to get hurt, then you're gonna say that it hasn't.

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So they need to not only draft I think defense,

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know they gotta they gotta hit a home

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>run with this pick. Yeah, you know, I'll say this.

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is something that's cyclical that it

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>will go back at some point to defense is unless

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the league makes out a priority. Because this is not

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>by happenstance that the league has become offensive become an

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive league. It's because the league wanted it to be

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>an offensive league, so they change the rules to make

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it more slanted in favor of the offense. And that's

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>why the offenses have become so explosive, and that's why

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>defenses don't. You cannot convince me that defensive players are

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just worse now than they were fifteen years ago. I

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>think what's happened is they just made all the rules

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to where it's very hard to be able to play

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>defense and not get a penalty. And so that all

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about the hits to the head

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. That's about player safety,

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but it affects the defense and their ability. Nick and

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you and I grew up on Ronnie Lott, right, it

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was a whole different brand of football going across the middle.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Every receiver couldn't do it because it took a certain

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>level of crazy to be able to want to run

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>across the middle and catch a ball because you knew

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you were going to get lit up. So the game

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>has changed and it favors the offense. I don't think

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that's going back anytime soon, So I think this is

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be an offensive league. I think

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you'll notice, Nick, and you're talking about

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>these defenses, defenses I think that are successful in today's game.

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>They're opportunistic. So you want to have yourself somebody in

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the secondary who can get you some turnovers when the

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunities present themselves. You want to have at least one

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>guy on your defensive line that can create problems for

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the offense. You're Aaron Donald's, you know, Chris Jones is

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy in Kansas City. You want to find that

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 1>one guy on your defensive front who can really disrupt

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 1>things when when there are opportunities to disrupt things and

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in critical moments in games. But by and large, you

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>want your defense is just basically hold the opponent to

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around twenty to twenty three points and have an

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>offense that can score more than that, Right, that's today's game.

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, yeah, the Cowboys gonna have to

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>add some some some pieces. But I also think it's

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely important. It's more important for them to make

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that they can maintain an offense I can put

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of points, because you just can't win

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>without it, in my opinion. I'll just also add to

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that that And I mean, this isn't a this is

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.479
<v Speaker 1>not a it's not a blanket statement. That's completely true.

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Like right off the top of my head. You know,

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay signed Preston Smith and Zadarius Smith and free

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>agency Kansas City, you know, Tyron Matthew was an amazing

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>free agent signing for the Chiefs. But for the most part,

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like good defenses are built through the draft anyway. You know,

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>people talk about that San Francisco defense that got to

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl last year. Yeah, they signed Richard Sherman,

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but the strength of that defense was that disgusting defensive line,

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which was all draft picks, you know, for the most part. Yeah,

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, you mentioned Chris Jones in Kansas City,

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>another draft pick. Like, I just think we spent a

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:29.320
<v Speaker 1>whole segment talking about the legion of Boom in Seattle.

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of that defense was just amazing draft picks.

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean, obviously the Cowboys defense needs to improve,

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to ignore the offense for the

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>sake of it. You got to have a good quarterback,

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, they just need a draft better on defense

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.839
<v Speaker 1>starting in April. Now, another question you talked to him

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about free agency, and this is on free agency. If

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you were to not look at the list of the

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys current free agent guys, because that's pretty long right now,

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but if you had to sign a free agent veteran

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>guy to the Cowboys from the outside, what a position

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would you be looking at the most? Right now that

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you're like, Okay, we definitely need a veteran guy that

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>can come in here and help instead of just draft

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, for me, I mean, age, you're gonna love this,

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say safety because they need they need them.

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't care about safety. They we know that. You

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>asked me. You ask me, you asked me what I

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, not what they would do. Um, they they

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 1>need one. I think it's kind of unrealistic to think

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna find one immediately in the draft. I

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>don't love the options that are available at safety, um

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the draft anyway. Obviously you can

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>find some better ones later on. But you know, you

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think I mean, right off the top of my head,

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>one that makes sense as Keane O'Neil, just because he's

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan Quinn's draft pick. Um. And and again, like we

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>gotta be realistic, like there, this isn't gonna be a

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>team that breaks the bank in free agency. They can't

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 1>afford it and they hate doing it anyway, So you know,

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>justin Simmons up in Denver would be fun, but I

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's realistic. Um. But yeah, like a guy

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like a Keyan O'Neil comes to mind, like I said,

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>mainly because he played with Quinn for so long careful

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:26.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know, um, Mike McCarthy's draft pick was uh haha,

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Dix, you know. And I'm just saying, and we

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that was kind of, oh, it would be a good, good,

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you know pick, and it just he just wasn't ready,

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, it just wasn't. He wasn't a guy,

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't never never played right. He ever he

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>played a game. He got cut before the season got here. Yeah,

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't make the team. Yeah, I want to throw

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a name to you guys. I want to I'd be

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see what you guys to think about this.

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw this name pop up and it made me think.

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And they were talking about him as though he's a

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>free agent, so excuse me if he's not. But what

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>would you think about a guy like Richard Sherman. Uh.

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>He obviously has played with with with with quinn in um.

0:52:01.040 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 1>He is, by all accounts one of the better cornerbacks

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in the league over the last ten years. Um. Obviously

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of his career. But you got a

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>young guy that's coming up that you may want to

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe have him around, A guy like a Richard Sherman.

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys think about something like that? If

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys had that opportunity to get a Richard Sherman,

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love it. I mean, I think

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>he uh and and in the media, we all would

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>love it. You know, he's amazing. He's one of the

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 1>smartest guys in the NFL. UM. You know, he's he

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.360
<v Speaker 1>really is. I mean, and and and I think that

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that savviness, that that those smarts has helped him become,

0:52:41.680 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a really good player for a long time. Um.

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't notice though, in that game that they played

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers, he wasn't. Oh no, he's not

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Richard Sherman. He's got the Richard Sherman. Yeah. But um,

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>if he's willing to do that, you know, not all

0:52:56.920 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the veteran players are willing to be that guy. Know

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that helps the other ones. But if he is, he's

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to do that, yeah, I think so. I think

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he could be a good player. I mean, you know,

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Carr was like that for a while, and he's

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a better He's way better than Brandon Carr. But I'm

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about he was kind of that player and helped

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>those younger guys as long as they treat it as

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a long term plan and rather than a solution, like

0:53:23.320 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>don't sign Richard Sherman and be like, Okay, we're we're

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 1>set at cornerback for the next two or three years.

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Like sign Richard Sherman and then go spend your first

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or second round pick on a cornerback and Richard Sherman

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:38.240
<v Speaker 1>can hopefully help him, you know, not just learn the defense,

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but learn how to be a pro. Yeah. I love that,

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's part of a larger plan. Yeah,

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>because they already had that. They had it last year

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with shan Lee, like they had that guy. Yeah, you

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>know that that isn't you know? He's a he's a

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>veteran guy, he's there for presidents. He's kind of a

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>coach on the field type of thing. So, but you

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about how how smart Richard Sherman is, and I

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's both on the field and off the field.

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting thing here is you got a

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>new defensive coordinator coming in. He will probably want somebody

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field who understands what they're trying to do.

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think Richard Sherman or a guy like that

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you talked about Kean O'Neil, same thing. You're bringing somebody

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like that into the mix. Is just somebody that can

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of reiterate what the coach is thinking that he

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>may not have time to say, so that the other

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>guys on the field kind of know what the defense

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do in a particular. And I wouldn't

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>say this about all cornerbacks because I know people think

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, but you have to be smart to

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:32.439
<v Speaker 1>do it, but I think he is a cornerback as

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of aging a little bit and he's still

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 1>got a good size to him. I think he could

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe rotate into a safety role. We've seen it, Rod

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Woodson type of guys. This guy, but you have to

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be smart enough to kind of understand people think because

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you've lost a step that you could just play safety.

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't work that way, but I think it could with

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy like him. So I'm curious if he you know,

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. I don't. I don't know if you

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know how he would feel about that, but that would

0:54:55.600 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting and interesting concept. I certainly would think

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be worth looking at, investigating if you think

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he could do it. Bring it in anyone, any veteran guy,

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>don't care, just come on over. We need you. The

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>next question we know with the changes in the changing

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the defensive coordinator, and we talked about the linebacker position

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Smith him possibly turning into a better player under

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Quinn. Who know, we'll see, but after that, higher

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:32.839
<v Speaker 1>has the priority of linebacker changed for you as far

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>as how much help you need their linebacker? Specifically looking

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>at how bad the run defense was this year and

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>even last year. In general, I don't know, Dave. I

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think I know more about the quarterback was just then

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>than I know about the linebacker position. I mean, linebackers.

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any clue of what they're going to do.

0:55:52.640 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>There is Sean Lee coming back? I saw, you know, Yeah,

0:55:56.400 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, we see things we're not always supposed

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to see. But whatever it was, it could mean. That

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 1>could mean one hundred different things. Yeah, exactly is Layton

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:10.359
<v Speaker 1>vander is going to come back? Is Jalen Smith even

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the team. I don't know anything about linebacker. Let's

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just assume that everybody that's under contract stays under contract.

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's only like, that's only two guys, one

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of whom Layton has had injury issues for two straight

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:29.359
<v Speaker 1>years and one of whom Jalen Smith had the worst

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>year of his career. No, I don't feel better about

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it at all. I don't. I wouldn't want to spend

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the tenth overall pick on a linebacker. But you know,

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>just getting into my draft study, I'm starting to find

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of intriguing guys that might be there in

0:56:43.600 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the second or third round that I'm like, hell, yeah,

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>sign me up. Even if he's not an immediate starter

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that say, okay with me, So no, I I feel

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's a very big priority. Maybe not a first

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>round priority, but definitely still a priority. Even like I said,

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Nick nixt totally right, we don't know for sure.

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Sean's gonna do. I don't know

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>what Jalen Smith's future is. But even if, even if

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they're all on the team, I'm still interested in upgrading

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a part of the Cowboys in

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:16.040
<v Speaker 1>some way, in some way, I'm I'm guessing that too.

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing he's going to be in this building in

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>some kind of the implier not not necessarily implying anything,

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but just I just I think they have a high

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>regard for him, and I think he has a high

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>regard for them, and I think typically we have those

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of situations. I think it tends to work out. Yeah,

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But but if he's not everything y'all are sorry, go ahead,

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Dad, Just everything y'all are saying is an implication.

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:44.959
<v Speaker 1>You're implying that he's going to either play or coach

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. Like I mean, it's not a very

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 1>subtle implication. It's an opinion implicate Okay, it's an opinion,

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not an implication. An opinion. That's not guessing the lottery.

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That's something that you could easily assume. That's not it's

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>not a hard thing. But what we do know about

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it is he's not gonna be a starter. Yeah, so

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. Then let's figure out who's you know,

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna play, Who's gonna start, you know. And I

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know I've seen I've seen the clips, and I know

0:58:12.840 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some baggage to it, but I know there's that

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>kid in Penn State looks like it looks pretty sam good,

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's some issues there with him. And

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>here's my thing. Like, I know, Dave, you said you

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily go with a tenth overall pick on linebacker.

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I look around the league and I'm like, man, think

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about like the really good defenses, they usually start with

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a really good linebacker. And so I just look at

0:58:37.840 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it personally and I say, if you've got a guy

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you think is that good, I think go ahead and

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>make the pick because I think right now one of

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that's holding this team, this defense back is

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their linebacker play. I think they got two guys out

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there right now that didn't play great this year, and

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think if you can get that one position fixed,

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes a lot of other positions look

0:58:56.680 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot better because if you can get a guy

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that can cover as well, you know, rush at times

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as run sideline the sidline. I know that's

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>not an easy thing to find, but you find that guy,

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it. You'll get more than the value back

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on that pick. What really sucks? Had I had a

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>great argument. I was sorry, Amber, what I was just

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that what really sucks is that you actually

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>recently spent the first round pick on a linebacker, and

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't necessarily behind you where you wanted to be

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the injuries and stuff. But it just sucks

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're still talking about the linebacker positions a few

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 1>years out of them drafting a first round pick on

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker. Yeah. True, which goes to my kind of

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>goes to my point. I got in an argument with

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Bucky Brooks on the Draft Show about this last week,

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which if you promise me you're getting if I am

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>getting Devin White, the Tampa Bay linebacker, who has one

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty tackles and ten sacks and three picks?

0:59:55.640 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But how many? But it's a good question, that's a

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>really good question. But I mean, go go back and

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>watch that game. Though, like, the reason the reason Green

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay struggled wasn't necessarily linebacker. It was because Shack Barrett

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and sapp were eating Aaron Rodgers. They were eating Rogers alive,

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, yes, good linebacker. They also couldn't run

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and that had a lot to do with

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the linebacker. Right, Hey, who's who's beasting in Kansas City?

1:00:24.520 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's their beast linebacker? Guy by the name of and

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the hygens who was found in the who's found in

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round? You can find good Bobby Wagner was

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the second round pick, Like you can find those guys

1:00:35.400 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all over the draft. I would just rather spend a

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>top ten pick on pass rush or coverage. That's just me.

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll appreciate you, guys, Jonas. That's a rap.

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week. We're gonna finish up the offense.

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the running back position, which I think

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of questions and a lot of

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:52.439
<v Speaker 1>conversations around that, we'll also get into the offensive line

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and the tight end position well that next week. Till

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>then for Nick Eaton, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia. I am

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Derek Heapelton. This has been The Break live on Dallas

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production of

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.