WEBVTT - Special Episode: Dr. Carl Elliott & The Occasional Human Sacrifice

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and this is This Podcast Will

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Kill You. You're tuning in to the latest episode of

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the tp w k Y book Club, a series where

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I bring on authors of popular science and medicine books

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to chat about their latest work. Through this series, we've

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten to cover some fascinating and eye opening topics, from

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>animal senses to John Calhoun's rat experiments, the history of

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the pelvic exam to the story of refrigeration. These episodes

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>really run the gamut. To check out the full list

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of all the books we've covered on this series so far,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and to get a sneak peek for what's on the horizon,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>head over to our website This Podcast will Kill You

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, where you'll find a link to our bookshop

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Org affiliate page under the extras tab. Once you're

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on bookshop, you'll see a bunch of TPWKY related booklists,

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>including one for this book club as well as the

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Kids Book Club, put together by Aaron Updike and post

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it on our socials. So if you're not already following

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>us on socials, what are you waiting for? As always,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we love hearing from you all about these book club

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes about our other episodes, your thoughts, your.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Book or topic suggestions.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We love it all. The best way to get in

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>touch with us is through the contact us form or

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>through the submit your first hand account form. Both you

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can find on our website. Two final things before moving

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on to the book of the week, and that is

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to please rate, review, and subscribe. It really does help

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>us out. And second, you can now find full video

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>versions of most of our newer episodes on YouTube. Make

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're subscribed to the Exactly Right Media's YouTube

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>channel so you never miss a new episode. Drop the

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the Willowbrook Hepatitis study, medical experimentation at

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Holmesburg Prison. If you've ever taken a bioethics class, or

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're a regular listener of the podcast, these cases

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are no doubt familiar to you as just a handful

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most infamous examples of unethical medical experimentation. We

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>learn about these studies, the victims, the perpetrators, the circumstances

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that allowed them to happen. So as to prevent history

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>from repeating itself like this is why we have patient

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>protections such as informed consent. This is why we have

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>these rules and mechanisms such as institutional review boards. But

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>often missing in the telling of these stories is the

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>person or persons who fought to expose these wrongs and

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>bring them into the light, the whistleblower. What does it

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>take for someone to speak out, especially when speaking out

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>can lead to tremendous professional and personal costs In the

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>occasional human sacrifice, medical experimentation and the price of saying No,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Author and bioethicist at the University of Minnesota, doctor Carl Elliott,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>explores the moral dimensions of whistleblowing and how the resulting

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>fallout leads to a long term, almost existential crisis. For

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>doctor Elliott, this is a deeply personal topic, as he

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tried for years to uncover harms carried out in a

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>study at his own university that led to a patient

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>losing their life. His experience serves as backdrop and crucial

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>context for the other stories of whistleblowers that he shares

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>throughout this book, at the heart of which is a

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>question why do whistleblowers do what they do? It's tempting

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that if each of us were placed in

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a situation with on ethical medical experimentation, we would stand

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>up for what's right, but research shows that's rarely the case.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Whistleblowing is a complex action guided by moral concepts such

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>as shame and honor, and learning the stories of whistleblowers

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>alongside the abuses they sought to expose, adds tremendous value

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and insight into human nature itself. Through doctor Elliott's compassionate

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>storytelling and contemplative analysis of whistleblowing as a moral dilemma,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>The Occasional Human Sacrifice is truly a must read and

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it will stay with me for quite some time. I

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do want to mention that this discussion includes descriptions of

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>self harm, so please listen with discretion. We'll take a

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>short break here and then get started. Doctor Elliot, thank

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much for taking the time to chat with

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>In your book The Occasional Human Sacrifice, you seek to

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>answer how unethical experiments are carried out and why blowing

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the whistle is so difficult to do. And as you describe,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this is a personal issue for you, with you having

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>firsthand experience as a whistleblower. Would you mind sharing the

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>impetus for writing this book and how it led you

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>into a broader contemplation of whistle blowing in medical research.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Failure, basically how it led me into the book. So

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess for me, the story begins back in two

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, when I first learned about the suicide

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of a young man named Dan Markinson in a research

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>study in our Department of Psychiatry here at the University

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of Minnesota. The circumstances of that were so gruesome and

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>so horrific, and so sort of blatantly exploitative and unethical

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>that I felt as if it needed an external investigation,

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>partly because of the circumstances of his death, but also

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to ensure that the same thing had not happened to

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>others in our department of psychiatry. And so I spent

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 2>the better part of the next seven years basically trying

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to get that external investigation. So, Dan Markinson was a

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>young man in his twenties who had become psychotic and

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>delusional and dangerous as a result of a psychotic episode

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in the summer of two thousand and three, and his mother,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>after seeing him deteriorate over a period of months and

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing the kind of alarming things he had, called the

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>police and he was eventually brought to Fairview Hospital, which

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is the teaching hospital here at the University of Minnesota,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and he was seen by the head of our schizophrenia

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>program here, who thought he was psychotic, delusional, dangerous, admitted

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>him to a locked ward, had him placed under a

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>civil commitment order, and fairly soon began to recruit him

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>into an industry funded study of any psychotic drugs that

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>he was doing. His mother objected. She didn't want him

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>in a study. She felt he could not consent to

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 2>the study, that he was psychotic and incompetent, and that

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the circumstances the civil commitment order, which essentially legally bound

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>him to do whatever his psychiatrist was telling him to do,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 2>prohibited him from being enrolled ethically. And she objected, but

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 2>she was told, you know, sorry, he's an adult. He

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>signed the consent form. He's in the study. She then

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>spent the next four months trying desperately to get him

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 2>out of the study. He had been discharged to a

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>halfway house. She could see him getting worse, becoming increasingly agitated,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and she was afraid violent. She called, she sent emails,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>She went to the Department of Psychiatry, She wrote to

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the chair of psychiatry again and again expressing her work

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>where he's eventually left a voicemail message for the study

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 2>coordinator saying does he have to kill himself or somebody

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>else before anybody is going to do anything? And three

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>weeks or so after she left that message, his body

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>was found in the shower of a halfway house where

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>he was staying, and next to his body was a

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>note that said, I went through this experience smiling.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>When did you learn about this and what happened after? Like,

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>when did this become public knowledge? When did this become

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>something that was a news story?

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Not for another four years? I read about it in

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, and I believe would have

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>been May of two thousand and eight. I was actually

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>on sabbatical at the time. I was in South Africa.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>A friend of mine who was one of the reporters

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>who did that, Paul Toasto, had sent me links to

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I found it so alarming that when I got home

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a few months after that, I started asking around and

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to find out what had happened, because it's actually

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 2>my area of work. I mean, I work on research ethics.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I work on psychiatric ethics. I had been on the

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.599
<v Speaker 2>institutional review board at the university for several years. I

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 2>knew people in the Department of psychiatry, and yet this

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>grizzly death I had heard nothing about it. And when

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 2>I started to ask around it, it just felt as

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>if no one was as alarmed by it as I was.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Not people in the Department of Psychiatry, not people in

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the bioethic Center, not administrators. And eventually it became clear

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to me that it was going to take some kind

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of pressure from the outside to get the university to act,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and so I got in touch with Mary Wis Dan

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Markinson's mom. She was not happy to hear from me, obviously,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>she had a lot of suspicions of the university. She

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>agreed to talk to me, and then after we talk

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>she agreed to let me have access to everything I wanted,

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>court records, medical records, Dan's diaries, anything that would be useful.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And so I wound up writing about it and a

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 2>sort of larger backdrop to it, which was a sort

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 2>of scandal about research integrity involving the sponsor of the study,

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Astra Zeneca, and eventually wrote about it in Mother Jones Magazine,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 2>sort of hoping that having exposure in a national publication

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>would shame the university into acting. But that again was

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>a complete failure. I mean, it really accomplished nothing at

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>all except to make the entire academic hialth Center very

0:11:59.120 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>angry with me.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>As you write, whistleblowing is incredibly isolating and disillusioning, and

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of flies in the face of a lot

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of popular media representations or stereotypes about whistleblowers or stories

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that feature whistleblowers. They might be brave and bold or

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>bitter and disgruntled, but they tend to follow this certain

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>narrative arc which you describe or you label as Vonna

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gets Man in a Whole narrative. Can you tell me

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>more about this narrative, what it fails to capture, and

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>what it's really like down in that hole.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Vonnegut described the Man in a Whole story as

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>somebody gets into trouble and gets out again, And he said,

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, we love this story. The Wizard of Oz

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Dorothy kills the Wicked Witch and returns to Kansas, the

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Prodigal Son, Robinson, Crusoe, David and Goliath. The reason we

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>like these stories is is that they sort of reassure

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>us that the world has a kind of moral sense

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to it, that the universe is a fair and just place.

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you watch, you know, whistleblower movies or TV

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 2>shows about whistleblowers, they usually follow some version of that

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 2>man in old story, the whistleblower takes down the corrupt organization.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>What I found when I started looking deeper into these stories,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>actual whistleblower stories, is that they usually don't follow that

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of narrative arc. I mean, they usually don't have

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 2>happy endings, and the whistleblowers themselves usually come out of

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the experience with these sort of very deep moral wounds.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 2>It's almost as if it's a kind of existential disorientation

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>because everything that they thought about how the world works

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>is upended. I mean, they just assume everybody just assumes

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>if they've gotten to the point where they feel like

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing else to do, they assume that the rest

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of the world is going to be as morally outraged

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>by what they have found. And what they're trying to

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>reveal is they were when they found it out, and

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>then when they blow the whistle, it turns out that

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that's not the case, they think the authorities are going

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to do something, that they're going to leap into action

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and rectify the injustice, and then that doesn't happen, and

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>they think their friends are going to stand by them,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and then that doesn't happen. Even if they have some

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>measure of success, they very often come out of it

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>with a kind of almost obsession with what they've been through,

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 2>an inability to get over it and put it behind them,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>because it's so disruptive to the way that they had

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>always seen the world.

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, they're never truly free of that hole, or of

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the feeling of what it was like down in that hole.

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, being the whole is a very is

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>a very dark place, and it tends to turn people inward,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and in the hole you can't really think about anything

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 2>other than yourself and what this is doing to you

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and how you get out of the hole. I mean,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I can remember talking to the whistleblowers in Sweden and

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the power of Machirini scandal and hearing, you know, from them,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 2>just how obsessed they became, you know, because they could

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>they could see it. They were surgeons, they could see

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>what was happening. They could see that things were going

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>very bad, and that people were dying and no one

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.239
<v Speaker 2>would believe them, and so there's a kind of desperation

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>to it, you know, this feeling that nothing else is

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 2>as important as making people aware of this, and yet

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>no one is paying attention.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break, and when we get back,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still so much to discuss. Welcome back everyone. I've

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>been chatting with doctor Carl Elliott about his book The

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Occasional Human Sacrifice, Medical Experimentation and the Price of saying No.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back into things. At the heart of your

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>book is the question of why not why do these

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>unethical medical experiments happen, but why does someone decide to

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>blow the whistle in the first place.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>What did you.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Discover in your quest to answer this question? And what

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>roles do honor and shame play in this decision that

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>people make.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is that very often it doesn't really

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>feel like a decision. It feels like there's no choice.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, people will say, really, I had no choice,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I had to do it. Fred Alford, who wrote a

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 2>terrific book on whistle blowers, said the question presents itself

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to whistleblowers not so much as what should I do?

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 2>But how did it happen that I found myself in

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a position where there is nothing else for me to

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>do but act? I had initially just sort of expected

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that when I began to ask people to explain how

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 2>it got to the point where they felt they had

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to act or to sort of justify themselves to me,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>that they would make a kind of moral argument, you know,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that they would explain the situation. And it turned out

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't really do that. Nobody talked about even

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the doctors. They didn't talk about the Hippocratic oath, and

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 2>they didn't talk about the Bible or some sort of

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>legal principle. They would say things like if I kept quiet,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 2>how could I hold my head up? Or if I

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>kept quiet, how could I look at myself in the mirror?

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>So they sort of turn this moral question about the

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>well being of other people into a moral question about themselves.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>They always talked about how it would reflect on them

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>if they said nothing. It seems really interesting me and

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 2>almost unexpected or counterintuitive. But the more I heard this

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 2>story and tried to think about it, the more it

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>seemed to me that they were speaking a kind of

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>language of honor and shame because the honor ethic, and

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>what distinguishes the honor ethic from many other sort of

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>ways of justifying actions morally is this idea of obligations

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 2>to yourself. That honor is essentially about respect. It's about

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>getting the respect of others, but it's also about self

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 2>respect and being able to respect yourself as a result

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of what you do, and the necessity of avoiding shaming

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 2>yourself in the eyes of other people and also in

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 2>your own eyes. And so when people say things like,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, how could I hold my head up, it's

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a very vivid sort of image of respect. How can

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I respect myself? That sort of explanatory frame runs through

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the book, and I have to say it fits some

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of the whistleblowers that I talked to much more than

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>it does others. But almost everybody that I spoke to

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 2>spoke of the choice as this sort of very personal,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>existential moment where they had to act in a way

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 2>that they felt they could live with afterwards.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, it's not even having a choice, it's

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what you are compelled to do because of

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>who you are, even if there is no whistleblower type personality.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, who you are. You know you're the kind

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>of person who has to act in this situation.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>A question that kept popping into my head as I

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was reading your book was do we all have the

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity to go along with unethical medical experimentation and or

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do we all have the capacity for whistle blowing? And

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's an answer to that, but

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it did make me think about what it is that

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>allows someone to blow the whistle, or requires them to

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>blow the whistle.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I think there has to be something to the circumstances

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in which people find themselves that makes it more or

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 2>less likely that they can blow the whistle, or that

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 2>they will blow the whistle and one of them. I

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 2>think if there is some sort of proximity, either as

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 2>a caregiver, someone who's taking care of patients, or personal knowledge,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that makes it harder for people to stay quiet. I'm thinking,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>for example, of John Pisondo, who was the oncologist at

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the Fred Hodge Cancer Center out in Seattle who blew

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 2>the whistle on these lethal bone marrit transplant trials. This

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>would have been eighties and nineties, and they eventually came

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>to light in two thousand and one. He learned about

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>them by virtue of being on the IRB there, so

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>he learned about them abstractly as a result of evaluating

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>them to try to ensure that they're ethical if the

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>IRB were working right, which wasn't and it was his specialty.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 2>He was an immunologist and oncologist, and so he understood

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the studies abstractly, but he also took care of subjects

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 2>in the study on the wards and that clearly was

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 2>incredibly difficult for seeing two women in particular with lymphoma

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 2>die as a result of being in these poorly designed,

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>poorly thought out studies. And you know, you could see

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>the same thing in New Zealand with Ron Jones and

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the Unfortunate Experiment cervical cancer trials there with the Willowbrook

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 2>hepatitis studies at on Staten Island. If you're up close

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>rather than at a distance, and particularly if you identify

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 2>with in some way the institution in which the studies

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 2>are happening, and you feel implicated, then that is a

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of predictor of whether or not you'll speak out.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you share the story of many different

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers throughout the decades, and there was one in particular

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that was surprising for me to learn about. I grew

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>up in northern Kentucky. I went to undergrad at the

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Universe City of Kentucky, did a masters at the University

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of Louisville, where I learned about medical ethics, you know,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>took a class on it. And still your book was

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the first that I had heard of the radiation experiments

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Cincinnati just up the road. Can

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you take me through the story of these experiments and

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower Martha Stevens and I especially was it really

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>struck me the comparison of the memorial of whistleblowing and

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.719
<v Speaker 1>hidden behind a bush in contrast with the you know,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the lab that bears the name of the person responsible

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for these unethical trials.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 2>One thing I should say about that before I start, though,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 2>is that that's one of the few places that has

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 2>in recent years started to try it to make amends

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 2>for the atrocities, not because of anything or anyone who

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 2>had anything to do with them at the time, but

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a result of students largely who have who've learned about

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>them and have essentially tried to shame the university in

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to make this right. But anyway, I'm getting ahead

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>of myself. So the radiation experiments were these Pentagon funded

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 2>studies done during the Vietnam War at the University of

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati to try to figure out how American soldiers would

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>respond to being irradiated from a nuclear weapon, and so

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to do that, they were exposing largely poor patients, about

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>sixty percent of them black. At the University of Cincinnati.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>These are patients with cancer to total body irradiation, without

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>telling them that it was for the military, without telling

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 2>them that it was not intended to cure their cancer,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and without telling them how dangerous it was and that

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 2>they might die as a result. These things were going

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>on in nineteen I guess Matha must have found out

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>about it in nineteen seventy two, so they'd been happening

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 2>for a decade or so at the University of Cincinnati

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>when an English professor, a very young English professor at

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the time, Martha Stevens, found out about them. It was

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>an article that was handed to her by someone in

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the political science department, and she got worked up about

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>it and started trying to dig into it, was rebuffed

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>at every turn by the Dean of Medicine. She was

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a very persistent woman. Eventually got a hold of those records,

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and despite having no medical background whatsoever, made her way

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 2>through them, understood right away what was wrong with them,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>why they were unethical, and wrote it up in a

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 2>kind of memorandum and held a press conference with her

0:25:55.640 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>junior faculty association to make it public. And there was

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a stringer for the Washington Post in town who happened

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to come to the press conference. And at the time,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>there were hearings being held by Senator Ted Kennedy at

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the time about unethical experiments, largely as a result of

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>the exposure of the Tuskegee Syphilist study at the time,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and so Ted Kennedy read this piece, got interested in it,

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 2>entered it into the Congressional record, and then started looking

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>into it. And as a result of that, it was

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 2>shut down. But it was kept very quiet. It was

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>not publicized in any way, and the victims of the

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 2>study were not notified. The families of the victims were

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>not notified that their family member had been in a

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 2>research study, or that it was funded by the Pentagon

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 2>or anything else. That had shut it down very quietly,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 2>and that was a kind of partial success. I think

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 2>for Martha Stevens and you know, her husband Jerome and

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the faculty members who were opposed to

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 2>this thing, but not really a full victory, and they

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>had no way of finding out who the victims were

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>or their families, and just sort of forgot about it.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>But then twenty years later the entire issue became a

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 2>live one again when during the Clinton administration, it became evident,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>as a result of some investigative work by Eileen Wilson,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>a reporter in New Mexico, that there was a whole

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 2>series of military fund and government funded radiation experiments happening

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 2>at universities all over the country, and so there was

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 2>an entire commission put forward to look into this, not

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 2>just at Cincinnati but all over the country, and that

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of gave new life to the story again. And

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>as a result of that, she and a graduate student

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of hers began tracking down the victims families, notifying them

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and putting them in touch with a lawyer, and there

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>was eventually a lawsuit against the University of Cincinnati as

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 2>a result, not a terribly successful lawsuit, but there was

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>a settlement.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break here. We'll be back before

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it. Welcome back everyone. I'm here chatting with

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>doctor Carl Elliott about his book The Occasional Human Sacrifice.

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into some more questions. So I was wondering

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>if you could describe to me your experience with going

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to the University of Cincinnati and visiting the Whistleblower memorial

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and what that was like.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, so I learned that as a result of litigation

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>against the University of Cincinnati, that the university had been

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>forced to put up a memorial to the victims of

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the study. This was decades ago, now, So I decided

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>when I went to visit Martha Stevens, that I should

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>find the memorial. I didn't imagine that it was going

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to be difficult to find, and so I just started

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 2>walking around looking for it, and I couldn't find anything.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So I went to the front desk and asked them,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>and they had no idea what was talking about. Nobody

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 2>in fact in the institution had any idea what I

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 2>was talking about when I said, you know, the radiation studies,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the Eugene Sanger's radiation studies, no idea, but they were

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>very helpful and they started calling around anything. Anyone in

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the hospital had anything to do with radiation. They eventually

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 2>found someone in the radio isotope lab and knew what

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about. She met me at the front

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 2>desk and took me on this very long journey and

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>we walked for what seemed like forever, and eventually I

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 2>emerged into this sort of courtyard next to heating equipment

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and a parking garage. You know, I'm looking around and

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not seeing anything but a parking ramp and you know,

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the heating equipment. And I said where, and she pointed

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to this big bush next to the hospital and she

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>said there. And I said that looks like shrubbery to me,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and she goes, no, no, no, no, I mean, oh,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess you can't see it. It's behind that bush.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>And so if you kind of squeeze around behind it

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and put your back to the wall of the hospital,

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>look outward. And so I did that, and there it was.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like a two foot by two foot plaque

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of names on it and it said

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>something like in Memoriam Radiation Study, whatever the dates were.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 2>When I came back out from behind the bush, the

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 2>woman said, would you like to see the Sanger Lab?

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, what is the Singer Lab? She goes

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the Eugene Sanger, you know, the radioisotope lab. And I'm

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>thinking Eugene Sanger, like the Eugene Sanger, the one, you know,

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the architect of the atrocities. But I didn't say that

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>out loud, and she said yeah. I was like, yeah, sure, yeah,

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I definitely want to see the Sanger Lab. And she

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 2>took me and there there was his name is on

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the on the door, and inside in the waiting room

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 2>was this little I mean, I don't know how to

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>describe it as say, it's like a little shrine to

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Eugene Sanger. It had like pictures and honors and awards

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and a bunch of old, like vintage medical instruments and

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>so on. I thought to myself, Yeah, this is the

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>way it usually works. To the architect of the atrocities,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a shrine to the victims of the atrocities, a plaque

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>hidden in the shrubbery.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the perfect illustration. This encapsulates it all, and a

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people might be able to recognize Tuskegee right.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the most infamous example of unethical medical experimentation.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It's far from the only example. But even if someone

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>has heard of Willowbrook or the Unfortunate Experiment or Protocol

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>one twenty six or the Cincinnati radiation experiments, they might

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>not know the name of Martha Stevens, for example. Can

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you contrast that with the recognition and honors that are

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>bestowed upon many of the perpetrators of these unethical human experiments,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like Saul Krugman or Albert Kligman.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that was another striking thing. So the background story

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to this. As a result, as you know, as a

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>consequence of my total and utter failure to accomplish anything

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 2>at the University of Minnesota, despite getting a state investigation

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know, being vindicated, I started to wonder how

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>these things played out at other institutions, and so I

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 2>started teaching this class on research scandals at the University

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of Minnesota. And the basic idea was, if we can

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 2>get a couple of dozen of the most egregious, the

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>most exploitative research studies that I can find the ones

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that I know about as a result of teaching bioethics,

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and put them side by side and examine them and

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>compare them, maybe some patterns will emerge. One pattern that

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>emerged was that whistleblowers are rare. In most of these cases,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 2>there are no whistleblowers. If they become public, it's the

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>result of family members or lawyers or investigative reporters, or

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>investigation by some sort of external body, not as a

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>result of whistleblowers. But the other thing I learned, to

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 2>my shock is that, or maybe I wasn't that shocked,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty cynical, but the researchers behind the studies were in

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 2>general not only not punished, not sanctioned by their institutions,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 2>they were rewarded in case after case. You know, Albert

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Kliegmann with the Holmesburg prison studies, Saul Krugman with the

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Willolbrook hepatitis studies, Eugene Sanger with the Cincinnati radiation studies.

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I could name a half dozen others. In

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>every case after the scandal, they were given honorary degrees,

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 2>They were made presidents of their medical subspecialty society. They

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>were given awards, lectureships were established in their name. It

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 2>was almost as if the institutions of academic medicine were

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 2>trying to fight back against any sort of accusation that

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>something bad had happened here by elevating the people behind

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the scandals.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>When you consider all of the ways that whistleblowing is disincentivized.

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about why people whistle blow, but

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>there are many different reasons to not blow the whistle.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you take me through some of those reasons to

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not blow the whistle, whether that's from institutional punishment or

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>social punishment, or the reasons that were given directly, you know,

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>quoted directly by people who were perpetrators or bystanders of

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>these experiments.

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 2>If you ask bystanders, not that I did this, but

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>sociologists have done this. If you go into institutions where

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>bad things have happened, institutions where they're corruptions or abuses

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>of some sort, and you talk to the people who

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 2>were there but just stayed quiet and asked them why

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't you say anything? You generally get one of three answers. One,

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I would have been punished, There would have been retaliation

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>against me. Two, it wouldn't have accomplished anything anyway. And three,

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't rat out my friends and colleagues, you know,

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 2>some version of loyalty to the institution. I think there's

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 2>also another one that may be especially important in academic

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 2>health centers that people don't mention, which is the kind

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of internalized subservience to authority that you get as a

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>result of maybe any any sort of hierarchical institution, but

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I think particularly an act academic medicine, which is extraordinarily

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 2>authority driven, extraordinarily hierarchical, very rigid in the sense of

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 2>what you should feel entitled to do. A lot of

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the doctor whistleblowers that I talked to mention some version

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of this, the almost sort of military like hierarchy that

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you get in academic medical centers, And I think a

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of people just feel as if it's not my

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>place to do this. There's a sort of reflexive obedience

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 2>to authority that I think almost everybody has or is

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 2>socialized into having, but it gets magnified in certain kinds

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of institutional settings.

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Those institutional settings are everything to this. That's these environments

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>where these things play out. And you opened your book

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with a quote that every whistleblower is an amateur playing

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>against professionals, and it got me wondering about those professionals.

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Who are they, What are they what are they doing

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>out they're honing their skills, what are those skills, and

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they're learning from the past how to avoid getting caught

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>or punished. You know, tell me more about those professionals

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that are defeating the amateur time after time after time.

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 2>That quote came from John Pissondo, the whistleblower in Seattle,

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and it came in the context of a conversation that

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 2>we had. I think it was our very first conversation,

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think he was trying to express something about

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 2>how little he knew when he began trying to expose

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the abuses. There a lot of whistleblowers that I talked

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to only come to think of themselves as whistleblowers after

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the fact. It's not as if many of them anyway

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 2>think of themselves as blowers or know anything at all

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 2>about blowing the whistle, or how to protect themselves, or

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 2>what to do, or what they can expect, or anything

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 2>at all about what they're trying to do. They're just

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 2>ordinary people who have seen something bad and are trying

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how to stop it or how to

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 2>expose it. But what they very soon find if they're

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 2>in an institution is that they might be amateurs, but

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the people at the institution who run the institution are

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 2>not amateurs at all. They've been through this many times before,

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 2>because any institution, at least any academic medical institution, will

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 2>have seen a lot of bad things happen over the years.

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of the nature of the institution. And they

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 2>know exactly what to do. And I'm talking here about

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the risk managers, the general Counsel's office, the crisis managers,

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the communications team, the deans, the vice presidents, everybody who

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 2>is there at the institut who has been through this,

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and their mission is to protect the financial interest in

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the reputation of the institution. And job one is discredit

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the whistle blower. That happens almost as a matter of routine,

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 2>because unless people think ahead, it can be a lone

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 2>whistleblower against this entire institution. And if the institution can

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 2>discredit the whistleblower, you know, Oh they have mental health problems.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh there's some sort of financial gain that they're going after.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh they've always been a problematic person. Oh they're carrying

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a grudge because their career is failing. Some way of

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 2>discrediting them and making their accusations sound hollow or empty

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 2>or unbelievable in some way. Then they have won, and

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that's something that it seems like every whistleblower has to

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 2>learn learn for themselves for the first.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Time when you learn about these situations, you learn about

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 1>these unethical experiments and whistleblowers. And it's tempting to think

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that if we were faced with a similar scenario, if

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.439
<v Speaker 1>each one of us was faced with the scenario, we

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would object and we would refuse to go along with things.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's true for someone and maybe it's not.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you talk about a couple of experiments

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and how that reflects on roles of obedience and social

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and power dynamics, specifically Milgram's nineteen sixties obedience experiments

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the twenty twelve Amsterdam whistleblowing experiment. What do

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>those show us about the difficulty in blowing the whistle

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and what people actually will do or some of the

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 1>barriers in place to prevent them from blowing the whistle.

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, what it shows is that most of us are

0:41:54.800 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 2>self deceived about our ability to resist the demands of obedience.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 2>The Amsterdam study, the twenty twelve study was modeled on

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the Milgram studies. The Milgram studies being those Yale studies

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 2>done by Stanley Milgram in the early sixties, in which

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 2>nearly sixty five percent of subjects were willing to obey

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 2>the commands of a man in a white coat who

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>was an actor but they thought was a legitimate scientist,

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to give what they thought were potentially lethal electrical shocks

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to an innocent victim. The new version was trying to

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 2>figure out how many people would blow the whistle on

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a study that was clearly unethical and dangerous given the chance.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And so what they did was this was a study

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>they did it. It was university students, Dutch university students,

0:42:55.560 --> 0:43:00.080
<v Speaker 2>and the setup was there was a distinguished scientist and

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 2>they were introduced to him, actually a man in a

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 2>white coat who's just an actor, and he explained to them,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I need some help recruiting subjects into a sensory deprivation

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 2>experiment that I'm doing, and I'd like your help. And

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>so he said, here's what we do. We take these subjects,

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 2>we put them in a sort of sensory deprivation chamber,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a kind of pod where they can't hear anything and

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>they can't see anything, and then we just keep them

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 2>there and measure their brain activity and see what happens,

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and he says, you know, we did this once. We

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>had a pilot's study and it was a little disturbing.

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 2>It didn't go well. You know, they started to become

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 2>psychotic and delusional and they panicked, and you know, they

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 2>were begging, please let me out, please let me out.

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Well we couldn't let them out, of course, because that

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 2>would have ruined the study. But you know, we've made

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>some adjustments and we're going to try it again, and

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 2>we'd like your help. And all we'll need for you

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:06.720
<v Speaker 2>to do is write an email to at least four

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:11.720
<v Speaker 2>friends and acquaintances telling them about this study, using words

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>like amazing, incredible, superb So the idea was how many

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 2>people would do this and how many would blow the whistle,

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And so they gave them the opportunity to blow the whistle.

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>They actually gave them every opportunity to resist. The man

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 2>in the white coat left the room, so they weren't

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>face to face with any sort of authority figure. They

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>were given a form that could be delivered to the

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.760
<v Speaker 2>university ethics committee. They said, the ethics committee hadn't approved

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>this yet. So if you have any concerns about this

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 2>study whatsoever, just write them down here anonymously, they'll be

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 2>delivered to the Ethics Committee and there'll be no way

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to trace it back to you. And they had two groups.

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 2>In the first group, they presented them with this scenario,

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 2>purely in theory, if you were in this situation, what

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>would you do? And in that situation, almost every one

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 2>of them something like ninety six percent said, you know,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I would resist, or I would blow the whistle or both.

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 2>But in the actual study, when they were actually confronted

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 2>with this fake scientist, seventy seven percent of them complied

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 2>with the experiment, and only nine percent blew the whistle.

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So like ninety six percent said they would blow the

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>whistle and only nine percent did blow the whistle. For me,

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>The interesting thing about this is that if you go

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>back to that those sociological studies that I mentioned before,

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 2>where people go in and ask bystanders who said nothing,

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>why did you say nothing? And they say, well, I

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 2>would have been punished, it would have been feudal. I

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>don't rent out my own group. In this case, there

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 2>was no punishment that it would not have been feudile,

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and there was no group to rat out, and still

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 2>almost nobody blew the whistle. The lesson that those researchers

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 2>drew from this is that it's all about obedience. It's

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 2>all about obedience to authority. My conclusion looking at that

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 2>one and looking what people say, is that people who

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 2>don't blow the whistle are in a lot of ways

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 2>self deceived about why they don't blow the whistle. They

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 2>think it's because they would be punished. In fact, even

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 2>if there were no chance of punishment, then most people

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 2>would not.

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is it's grim. It is a little

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>bit crushing, but it is also the reality, and it

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of begs the question of like, well, how can

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:52.439
<v Speaker 1>we make things better? And there have been occasions where

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>whistle blowing has led to reform, But it seems I

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>think naive, especially considering these experiments, to think that unethical

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>experimentation is a thing of the past. What do you

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>think are some of the biggest weaknesses in this system

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>that could be modified or improved to at least protect

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from these harms or support whistleblowers.

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 2>One of the big problems that's specific to blowing the

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 2>whistle on unethical research that could be fixed is that

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not clear to whistleblowers who they should blow the

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 2>whistle too. So the oversight system in this country is

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarily porous and is extraordinarily opaque. And so if someone

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 2>sees something bad happening in a research study and they

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 2>want to blow the whistle, typically where they would go

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 2>would be the IRB at their institution or whatever. IRB

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 2>has approved the study. That's where complaints are supposed to go.

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 2>But what you find if you actually try to do

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:07.439
<v Speaker 2>this is that the RB has approved the study, they

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 2>may even know about the abuses, and they are complicit

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in some way, so blowing the whistle to them does

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 2>no good. They've already approved the study, they have a

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 2>stake in the study, you know, going ahead as it is,

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and so very often they'll do nothing. And then the

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:31.479
<v Speaker 2>question is, well, who is overseeing the IRBs? And that's

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 2>a very complicated bureaucratic question, but let me just the

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 2>upshot is there is very little oversight of IRBs and

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 2>very little place to go outside of the IRB if

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you're getting nowhere with them. The other difficulty is that

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 2>any kind of IRB decision proceedings is secret, and so

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 2>just getting access to what the IRB has found or

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 2>what their decisions are is extraordinarily difficul called. It is

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 2>easier at public institutions like a public, state funded medical school,

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 2>but it's almost impossible at private universities and in any

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>university or research institution that's contracted with a for profit

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 2>IRB to review their trials.

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>For profit IRB. Is That's that not great? Not great

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. I'm curious about your thoughts on the role

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of whistleblowers in this administration. You know, you write that

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers need to believe that other people will stand up

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for what's right. But the Trump administration has shown repeatedly

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's not the case, that whistleblowing is consistently quashed,

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 1>even more and more in that standing up for what's

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>right doesn't seem to mean much these days. Do you

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>anticipate fewer whistleblowers because there's less or no hope of

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the information changing anything, or do you expect there to

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 1>be any impact on the rate of whistle blowing.

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 2>The fate of whistleblowers in this administration is very dark,

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean really dark. I mean it's interesting if you

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 2>go back and look at, for example, the one of

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the earliest books on whistleblowing from the early seventies by

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Branch and Charles Peters. This was the era in

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 2>which the term whistleblowing was being coined, and it was

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a new phenomenon. You had people like Daniel Elsberg and

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Frank Serpico at the time, but it was kind of new,

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and they were trying to figure out some way of

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 2>putting a positive moral valence on the language, because there

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem to be any sort of morally praiseworthy term

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 2>for someone who did this. There were terms like trader

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and judas and rat and snitch, but nothing that they

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 2>gave it a sort of positive spin. And one of

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the things they wondered was whether in the future there

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 2>would come a time when there would be so many

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 2>whistleblowers that it would do no good. I mean, the

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 2>whole idea, the whole hope for the whistle blower is

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 2>that someone's going to listen to the whistle. But if

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you have many, many whistleblowers blowing the whistle every day,

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 2>it's almost impossible to pay any attention to any single

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 2>one of them. And it feels like that is what

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 2>we have now. We've got a lot of whistleblowers and

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>also an administration that is intent on absolutely making their

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 2>lives miserable in every way. So I think in this

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of environment, it would take an extraordinary amount of

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 2>courage to speak out.

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and to trust that someone will hear that whistle

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>being blown and do something about it. I kind of

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>want to circle back to how we started off this conversation,

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>which was your personal experience with whistleblowing, and this whole

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 1>book seems like it must be it must have been

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>very deeply personal to write, and I'm curious what was

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that experience like for you, you know, did you find

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it to be painful, therapeutic, educational, discouraging, I mean, all

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the above. I'm wondering about your journey, your personal

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>journey in writing this book.

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Some of the easiest interviews I've ever done. I felt

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 2>like I had something in common with every one of

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 2>these people. I felt a kind of sense of solidarity

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 2>with them, you know. To be honest, I wished, you know,

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I wished that they had been able to meet one another.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Some of the whistleblowers, by the time that I talked

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to them, were in their eighties. Some of them have

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 2>died at this point. So Peter Buxton, the Tuskeiki whistleblower

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:00.800
<v Speaker 2>died two years ago, and ron Ja Owns the last

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Unfortunate Experiments whistleblowers died last year, and Jerome

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Stevens's Martha Stephen's husband died a couple of years ago.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:15.760
<v Speaker 2>And it sort of saddens me that it was impossible

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 2>not to get them all in a room together somehow,

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:22.760
<v Speaker 2>because I feel as if it would have been useful

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 2>for them in therapeutic and that they would have found

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 2>some sort of sense of solidarity by getting to know

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 2>other people who have been through similar experiences. The other

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:38.799
<v Speaker 2>thing that came of working on the book I think is,

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everybody I think it goes through these sorts

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 2>of experiences nis to come up with some sort of

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 2>story to tell themselves, to explain the episode to them,

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in order to be able to put it behind them.

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think what's very often troubling for people and why

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it becomes such a you know, such a deep wound,

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:05.839
<v Speaker 2>is that there is no good publicly available story that

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 2>their experience fits into. It all seems sort of unsatisfactory

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 2>in some way, and it doesn't fit into the David

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and Goliath narrative because very often they feel like they've

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:25.360
<v Speaker 2>lost they haven't slain Goliath. It's very easy, I think,

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 2>if you've really accomplished very little to come away from

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the experience feeling really demoralized, as if you were duped

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 2>in some way, that you're the chump. Right, everybody else

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 2>understood that trying to speak out about this was going

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to result in something terrible, that you're going to ruin

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 2>your career, that you were going to lose everything, and

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you were the only one dumb enough to go through

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:56.280
<v Speaker 2>it anyway. And so by trying to make some sense

0:54:56.280 --> 0:55:01.360
<v Speaker 2>of these stories and telling them within this larger framework

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of honor and shame, and honor stories or stories in

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 2>which you don't necessarily have to succeed. What's important in

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 2>stories of honor is that you be able to respect

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 2>yourself when it's over, not that you necessarily vanquish the enemy.

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>That that can possibly be on a sort of deeper level,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 2>a more satisfying story, a story that will help people

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 2>make sense of what they've done in a way that

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:30.799
<v Speaker 2>they can live with.

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you so very much, doctor Elliott.

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your work is truly enlightening, inspiring and so necessary,

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and I really appreciate you taking the time to chat

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>with me today.

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you, I appreciate it. Thanks for inviting me.

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:49.880
<v Speaker 2>These are terrific questions. I'm grateful for that.

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>A big thank you again to doctor Carl Elliott for

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to chat with me. If you enjoyed

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 1>today's episode and would like to learn more, check out

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.839
<v Speaker 1>our website this podcast will kill You dot com. We're

0:56:19.880 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll post a link to where you can find the

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>occasional human sacrifice, medical experimentation, and the Price of Saying No,

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>as well as a link to doctor Elliott's website where

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you can find his other great work. And don't forget

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you can check out our website for all sorts of

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:40.120
<v Speaker 1>other cool things, including but not limited to, transcripts, quarantine recipes,

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>show notes, and references for all of our episodes, links

0:56:43.600 --> 0:56:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to merch our bookshop dot org affiliate page, our Goodreads list,

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a first hand account form, and music by Bloodmobile. Speaking

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of which, thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for this episode and all of our episodes. Thank you

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to Leona Sculaci and Tom Bryfocal for our audio mixing,

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to you listeners for listening. I hope you

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:07.319
<v Speaker 1>liked this episode and our loving being part of the

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>TPWKY book Club. A special thank you, as always to

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>our fantastic patrons. We appreciate your support so very much. Well,

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>until next time, keep washing those hands.