WEBVTT - Surveillance: Critical Year For Climate, Says Carney

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. We welcome all

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of you on Bloomberg Radio, on Bloomberg Television worldwide. To

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the very unretired Mark Karney of Canada and the United Kingdom,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the former governor of the Bank of England went right

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>back to work after that tenure with the U n

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Special Envoy for Climate Action and of course his work

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in other areas of finance. Governor Karney, thank you so

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. The Paris Accord unraveled, t

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>p P unraveled. We now have she meeting with Biden

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>resum or whatever, uh and they're gonna talk climate. What

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of agreement can we get from Biden g on climate? Well, first, Tom,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. Biden g Uh, Suga, Trudeau, Johnson, uh,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>forty world leaders coming to this summit that the presidents

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>called for the next few days. I think we're gonna

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>see we are going to see some big announcements from

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the G seven economies. I'll let them unveil

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>those as they come. That's the first point. In the

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>second m it is encouraging that the President g is

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>part of this summit. It's also encouraging that the private

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>sector is leading the way. And Uh. Part of what's

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>coming out on the eve of the summit, as you know,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is is a big, big announcement from the core of

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector. Governor Curney, I'm gonna make it real simple.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You were born in the north northwest of the Northwest Territories.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm suggest none of our authorities have ever been as

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.919
<v Speaker 1>far to the Arctic Circle as you. The Arctic Circle

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is melting and arcticle as gladi is moving. What is

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the urgency to a northern guy like you to get

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this done? Well, there's an urgent. Yeah, absolutely. Uh. We

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>did drag the G seven up to a Callawood. You

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>might remember Tom about eight years ago, so that they

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got close um and they started to see some of

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the impacts. Look, there is an urgency to this. Um.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>We're tracking as a world. You said Paris didn't succeed

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it succeeded in the objective a goot people in. But

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the policies are still consistent with the world. It's north

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of three degrees warming north to three degrees. So this

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is a critical year for action. There's tremendous momentum. Now

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to reinforce that momentum. And again, having seventy

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion of private capital coming behind that zero, which is

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what's been announced today, is the type of momentum the

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>world needs. Let me ask a rude question, how do

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you convince the United States Senate? You can? Well, you first,

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's in the United States interests directly in terms of

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of climate chain. It's also fundamentally, and I'll

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>refer to the comments of Secretary Blincoln a couple of

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>days ago, this is fundamentally an issue becoming an issue

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of competitiveness, of economic competitiveness. The world is moving in

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this direction. UH. The firms that that are innovating, that

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>are lower carbon, that are part of the solution UH,

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the financial institutions that are getting behind those solutions

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are doing very well. They will do much much better.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>This is where the world's headed. The question is pace

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the US, as in many things, should be the leader,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>can be the leader, and those countries that are the

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>leader will reap reap the rewards as they should. I

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>love that Tom still referring to you as governor County.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark should continue doing that. Do you want me to

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>keep that up? That's an American thing. I haven't done that.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done that for CREWD Like you lads from Britain,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we always do that. We had to put up with

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that in the news conferences on threaten

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>NATO Street. I'll go with it, Governor Khanty. I remember

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a news conference at the back end you were fresh

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and your tenure the Bank of England, and everybody was

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>worried about bubbles our swhere and why we needed higher

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, and I remember a line from you, we

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>don't set a monetary policy for inside the circle line. Now,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>if you live in London or appreciate the underground system

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in London, you'll remember that quote and you'll know what

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it means. So Mark, I wanted you to help us

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>understand the moment we're in right now as well, the

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>financial instability, stability concerns that go with very low and

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>exceptionally low interest rates for a long long time two things, John,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for remembering that we do set financial stability policy

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for inside the circle line or the equivalent in the

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>US and Canada around the world. UM. So it is

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>very important that authorities are focused on pockets of excess,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>making sure that they don't spread more broadly within the

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>financial system UM and undermine the recovery, which well strong

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. UH, particularly the United States is

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really just getting going UH and needs to be followed through.

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>The word transitory keeps coming up again and again. You've

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>been in a scene where you've seen above target inflation,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not the three percent, think of turn a mark. How

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>different is this moment? Do you think you face downside

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>risk of growth at that time as well? Now we

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>face upside risk to growth. How different is this moment? Uh?

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It is different. I mean we're in a unique situation

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>given the nature of the pandemic. I won't list all

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why it's different, but in essence, it's a

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>supply shock. It's hopefully a temporary supply shock. UM. Part

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of getting out of this whole is big fiscal much

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger than we saw two thousand eight nine, UM, and

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>also a monetary policy that is explicitly targeting some degree

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of overshooting responsible overshoot of inflation. So it is quite different.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But the combination of that mix is maximizing the prospects

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that we will get out of this. To loop back

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Biden summit, if I may, uh, it's important

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>where the hand what are we handing off too? Though

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll get this initial pop in the economy, we need

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>an investment driven recovery in order to really have traction,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really have high paying jobs, and that investment driven recovery

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be oriented. Part of it surround sustainability,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a much more efficient economy. We need a financial sector

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's there, and that's why having twenty eight trillion of

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet of banks led by you know, Morgan Stanley,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America, City, HSBC and others announced today that's

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the kind of capital we're going to need in the

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>US and globally to have a sustained recovery. So what

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>are the negative consequences mark of the incredible amount of

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>fiscal and monetary stimulus that have impumped into the economy

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>over the past thirteen months. Is this just without harm? Well, no,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean all these everything, I wouldn't say everything in moderation, Lisa,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But everything needs to be calibrated. Uh. You know, the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>FED and other central banks will have to make as

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they always do, um, timely decisions on the tapering of

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>stimulus tapering first and then uh in the fullest of

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>time with the recovery that we want and deserve, withdrawal

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of some of that stimulus. Fiscal stimulus, UM in all

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions needs to move more towards the type of support

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for private investment as opposed to sustaining individual consumption. I mean,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that after the measures that have been passed

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in the in the United States and elsewhere. So there

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is a pivot on both policies coming. But where policy

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>stances today needs to needs to be seen through. But

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely li So, Um, you know there are some tough

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>decisions ahead. Go to Karney if it is an inflation.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>When going back to your issue. As a special envoy

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for the United Nations, Secretary Treasury Janet Yellen said that

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>climate change was the biggest threat to markets. That was

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest threat, frankly, existential threat the way that we operate,

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen the FED taking more active role. Can

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you dovetail how monetary policy fits in with climate policy well.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>First and foremost defense actions are related to financial stability

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>risk what John was talking about earlier, um so making

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that as we're in this transition that lending investing

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with the industries of the future and not

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>those of the past, and we don't build up large

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>losses in the in the core of the system, monetary

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>policy is going to have to uh largely, I think largely.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in the United States. It's largely a question of

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the classics supply demand shifts in in the economy, so

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>more traditional monetary policy, I will say, in the UK

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and in Europe. Uh. The way monetary policy has operated,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of collateral that's used, the type of assets

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that are purchased, will be influenced by climate policy, and

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as a consequence, that will be yet another influence on

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the pricing of securities. Governor Karney, Christopher Friedland is making

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>really quite a splash in your Canada, and I want

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to take it globally certainly G seven and G eight,

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but actually globally do we see in Canada as we

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>come out of this pandemic a new interpretation of what

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>government will do? Christoph Friedland has made worldwide news with

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a more liberal approach. Is out a tone of the future. Uh,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. It's recognition aspects of the Canadian budget or

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>recognition of uh, the inequalities that still exists in this

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>economy and very important. I think the centerpiece element in

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>that budget was is around childcare and universal childcare. And

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to speak as an economist, I mean

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we're moments from you talking about ranger causality and the

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>time series analysis as speakers an economists. One of the things,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, what that's doing, it's issue of social justice.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It also is an issue of supply capacity of the economy.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, more women can work, UH, border participation in

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy. That's that's good and is right and its just.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But it also supports uh supports growth UM. But in Canada,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>as in the United States, what I was saying earlier,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>the shift from some board needs to come from immediate

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>support to households during the course of the pandemic, which

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is still raging here. Unfortunately, the moment to that type

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of longer term growth UM and and a responsible fiscal

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>policy that is consistent with longer term ARO. What's so

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>great about this folks in these conversations that John, Lisa

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have as you get little windows for a

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>split second, and how competent these people are. As Mark

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Kearney picks up on Granger causality and brings it right

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>over to the political theory of his Canada, Mark Arney,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think John Farrow would agree with me that you

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>are more qualified than any global thought leader. And I

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>hate that phrase, Mark, to talk about what you learned

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom. John Pharaoh is beat the table

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>throughout this entire pandemic that there is a social contract

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and indeed in Boris Johnson's United Kingdom that

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is different than America. Out of this pandemic, are we

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>shifting to a new social contract where we budget for

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they have not? I think we are. And the starting

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>place is different, and I think you summarize a well, Tom.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The starting place is different in Europe, it's different in Canada,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>different in the US, but the direction of travel is similar.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We've learned through this pandemic that we don't have as

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>resilient economies and societies. I mean, individuals have proven themselves

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>to be resilient, to their great credit, but we haven't

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>had the support, we haven't had the protections we need

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>UH and and I can extend that analogy not just

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>from financial stability to health and pandemics, but over to

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>cyber UH and other issues where government needs to play

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a role. UM also playing a role in the adjustment

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. Now in the end, and we the

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>economy needs to move to the future UM and the future,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to grossly simplify, is sustainable and digital UM. So whereas

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we have the support, we also need UM, the dynamism

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the openness in order to move forward, or else

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 1>we're supporting livelihoods of the past, not not not of

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the future. We could save these questions for the end

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the interview with that right now, So let's do it.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you miss central banking? Do you miss the world?

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>A central bankake? I'm gonna get to the Brexit question

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at a second. Don't worry, Tom, that's not a central banking.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you miss it? Mam? You already feeling Mark? You know, John, Tom,

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>at least I've been in this room for six months. Yes,

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I miss Mark. Are the are the maple leaves gonna

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>finally break the whole the curse? If you will back

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty seven. They haven't one cent your you.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Conor McDavid and the oilers, they're going to spoil it

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for him. You heard it here. I'm going there at

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the oilers, Tom, Tom, I've I've silenced you. I can't

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it. He has silence. That's unbelievable. I've never seen

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that before. Just to ask a Brexit question. You want

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>me to ask a Brexit question. I don't think Mark

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to answer a Brexit question. Mark Conney. Before you go,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>let's finish on the story in the UK. Things have

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>changed so much the relationship with Europe. Has this ended

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>up where you expected it to end up? Uh, it's

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're more or less at this stage, but

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still in the in the early innings, to use

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the US expression um of the of the post. Obviously,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the post Brexit relationship will take take a while to

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>re establish some of those relationships, including in the financial sector.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the interests are still very much aligned, and

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that over time the degree of openness

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>cooperation will will increase from this base, which is which

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is lower than it should be. Uh, in the interests

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of both Europe and the UK. Governor County. This is

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the world of central banking, and I'm sure you don't

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>miss those news conferences though, Mark County, you went Special

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Envoy for Climate Action FANCI, former banking and the Governor.

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We will reach the time at which we will taper

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>asset purchases when we've made substantial further progress toward our

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>goals from last December when we announced that guidance, and

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that would that would in all likelihood be before well

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>before at the time we consider raising interest rates. We

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't you know, voted on that order, but that is

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the sense of the guidance, is that it would work

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in that way. The Chairman of the Feller Reserve System

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Powell, and that is a different Jerome Powell than

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>when he was speaking early in his tenure. He has

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really grown into the conversation and the guidance forward. He

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>gives guidance of David Rubinstein peer to peer conversations. This

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is a piercing interview off of the Economic Club of Washington.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Look for tonight at nine pm and Mr Rubenstein joins

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>us right now. David, what did you learn from Chairman Powell?

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>He speaks a lot, he messages a lot. What was new.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>In your conversation, I think he made it very clear

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that interest rates are unlikely to go up until after.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But the standard really is whether inflation gets to two

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>percent or above and be can sustained at that level,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and secondly, whether the unemployment rate goes down to what's

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>called full employment. So if you get full employment, let's

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>say four percent or four and a half percent, inflation

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is at two percent and appears to be going above

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>two percent, then I think he would look at an

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rate increase, but he does not anticipate that happening

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>before is over. David Rubinstein, the arc of your career

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>from working for Carter Mondale years ago and and also

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the development with Carlyle of the allocation of capital. In

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>your conversation, did you speak about the distortions to our

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>capital incentives by negative real yields? Well, we didn't really

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about negative real yields because it just hasn't been

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>something that they have really focused on. The offender reserves

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>view is that negative yields is not a really good

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. Now we in effect have negative yields

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, But he's more focused on making certain

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy comes back to a full employment situation. That's

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>his main focus. And I would say he's very confident

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in his position now, he's obviously been doing it for

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a while. I think he's got the confidence of the

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve Board, and I think he's got

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the confidence of the Secretary of Treasury, and I would

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>say the President United States as well. I think he's

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>done a very good job. And as we talked about,

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't talk in what I called FED speak. He's

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not an economist, and therefore he talks like a normal

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>human being, and that's a good thing. So this is

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a hugely important deal. I really agree with David on that.

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And as I've said your own, Powell's really grown into

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>being comfortable not doing FED speak. There is a question

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of whether also highlights how the Federal Reserve has transformed

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>from controlling the monetary system or sort of setting rates

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to a much more popular body, basically trying to speak

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to a broader mandate. And I think about the meaning

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>behind full ployment was that the message, David, that you

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>got from share Powell. He is not in an ivory tower.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not an economist. He spends a lot more time

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up on Capitol hill talking to members or talking with

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>them on telephone than the normal FED chairman does. He

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>regards that as part of his job. His mandate is

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not to worry about climate change or to worry about

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>minority unemployment, but they do consider those factors, I think

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in an oblique way, and so I think he's much

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>more sensitive to these issues than maybe some of his predecessors.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he talked about in a prior interview and

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in this interview the fact that when he goes the

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>FED every day and he often bikes in um, he

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>drives past a kind of a homeless shelter or a

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>home set of homeless tense, and it affects him and

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he obviously talks about it because he recognizes the impact

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of the economy has not been very good on many

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people in the lower part of the economic strata, and

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he does worry about that, even though it's not technically

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>in his mandate. He also waited on cryptocurrencies, and this

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>comes as a coin base went public and he talked them.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>He talked about them being a speculative asset. What's your

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of his view, I mean, do you think that

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>that is the correct view right now? Or is this

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a future, not the future, but a future of an

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>entire investing class. I would be surprised if it disappears.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It seems to serve a purpose for some people, and

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think that, uh, it's likely to be around

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while. He did say that people aren't using

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it to pay bills and so forth, but actually, in

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>some places now I think you can actually use cryptocurrency

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for certain things. It's a small part of

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy, but I think they're watching it. They're monitoring it.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>His main job is to make certain that the economy

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>comes back in a reasonable way without a lot of inflation,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's very, very attentive to it. He

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>did work at my firm for a number of years.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I got to know him before he was in government,

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would say he's an incredibly hard working, very

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>articulate person. I think I think that the fact that

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>he has a close relationship with Janet Yellen is a plus. David,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I must digress in that you were familiar with the

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial spirit of the Glazer family of Rochester, New York,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the acuity and financial wisdom of Johnny Henry of the

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Fenway Group. All these people dabbled in English football. We

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have seen a complete debacle of people with a lot

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of money trying to impute a business plan on a

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>culture in society. What is your observation of the collapse

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of this soccer league across Europe? What is your observation

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>of how fancy guys got this so wrong? Well, a

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of American entrepreneurs did make a fair amount of

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>money investing in European soccer, typically uh British British soccer teams,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people were surprised when the Glazier

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>family originally bought Manchester United. It turned out to be

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a very good deal, and I think John Henry's investment

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be good too. Whether the new effort

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>will work or not, it's too early to say, but

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting how so many wealthy people today want

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to invest in sports franchises, not so much because they

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>love the sport, because they think it's a good investment.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, a hundred years ago, or maybe seventy five

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago, people often bought sports teams because they really

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>loved the sport. And while I wouldn't say these people

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>dislike the sport, it's basically an investment kind of process. Now,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>David's a slow day. I gotta make some news quick here.

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>How much do you love the Baltimore Orioles right now?

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, Well, I did grow up in Baltimore, and

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I am a big fan of the Baltimore Orioles and

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I am hopeful that they can live up to their

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>glory days when I was a young person. And I'm

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>sorry so how he stepped around that, Lisa, Yeah, the headlines, David.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I just think the entrepreneurial spirit you would bring to

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Orioles into an American league, it would be wonderful. Well,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'm focused on this interview and the J

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Pal which is being broadcast tonight on Bloomberg TV. I

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>spent an hour with him down well, and I wouldn't

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>say that the producer on the show. The producer on

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the show is done a wonderful job of edding it down.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>And I should say, Kelly, I want to congratulate her

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and just getting engaged this weekend, So thank you for

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there for that and for all the good job you're

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>doing and edding this interview down. I think it's look

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see j Pal and kind of

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>up close and personally a good way to do it,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>because he really does open up. He's fairly frank, and

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I would say I have a good relationship with him,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think he was fairly open about it. David,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for mentioning that, and of course,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with Kelly's been doing for you and all these interviews

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from Jeff Bezos and on his well, David Rubinstein with

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Paul and as Mr Rubinstein mentions, it is a

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>piercing and different interview than the usual that you hear

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from Jerom Poe. Abraham rock Berry joined this Now City

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Global head of FX Analysis. Now, Abrahim, the conversation that

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the debate is pretty simple. Has we just paused or

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are we set to reverse? What do you think it is?

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Abraham greater to me back on the show, Our view

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we're only pausing and that we are very

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>much in what you called this exhaustion phase where a

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>number of I think the more challenging trade that trends

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have exhausted just as much as maybe the stabilizing forces

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen over the last two weeks or so,

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, rates probably finding just about a bottom,

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but also actually some of the more positive sentiment about

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe peak pessimism about the third COVID wave in Europe

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>or maybe in a place like Brazil, even also already

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>being reflected to some degree in market prices. So we

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think this is probably no more than a period of consolidation,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but that that cyclical trade still has further to run

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the coming months. Every within your very sophisticated notes,

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of mathematics and correlations on the linkages

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of asset classes. How LinkedIn smooth are the dynamics working

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>right now or is it all this steph, is it

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all dis greed and separate? Well, they have been somewhat

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>unstable for for for for quite a while, and that's

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>in line with I think these uh if you like,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the most fundamental market trends changing. But I do think

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>there's one correlation that is both unstable but equally ultimately

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>very stabilizing for broader mark borod markets, and that's between

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>rates and risk acids, and the fact that we've seen

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the volatility of US rates top out here that

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>we are probably in the arrange for the US ten

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>year rate of between one fifty one seventy five for

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the time being. I think that puts US back into

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a world where equity prices and risk acids can resume

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>their ascent. So it is not quite maybe a negative

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>correlation that is re established there, but there is hope

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for the so called risk charity trade now that US

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>rates have have probably peaked in the short term. Ebra him.

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of analysts talk about the reflation

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>trade as a monolith, basically this idea that it has

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>been consistent throughout the past few months. It has not.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The nature has changed significantly over this period of time

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what's getting reflated. The US was the

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>dominant reflated trade based on the economic prowess of the nation.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Why is that not going to continue as the reflation

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>trade gains traction as you say it will. Yes, I

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>mean I would highlight two I think changing developments over

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months that are notable. One was,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as you said, US exceptionalism, and there our view is

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we've probably peaked out in the exceptional nature of that,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world does have hope of

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe catching up somewhat, not converging, but catching up somewhat.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>But the other is that even in the US, what's

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>happened over the last month or so is investors have

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>decided that they are not extrapolating that exceptionalism too much

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>further out. So if you look at the US rates,

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>US inflation expectations, if you go a couple of years out,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>when investors are telling you we're getting a big impulse

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to growth and inflation in the very short term, but

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>further out we might well be going back to where

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we were. And again, that was very important for where

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>US rates are, and it's very important for whether US

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's relative to the rest of the world. Our view

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is we're still in a more or less synchronous global

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>recovery environment. A few months from now. Give us a

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>conviction of the dynamics of the euro. We've got eight nine,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>ten houses for the most part, all looking for stronger euro.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But it is a path of one three even after

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>one thirty. I need to make some news here this morning.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Give us a City group conviction on that path. Well, well,

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we have been on the on the higher side for

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>euro dollar for the year. We came into the thinking

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he could go high as one thirty. Now we think

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's probably in the one to one twenty seven fifty range.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>As a as a target. I will note that's reinforced

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>by the more recent trends, reinforced by people moving back

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>into dollar funding, which boosts the value of the euro,

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>so cutting short positions in the Europe as a result.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But I will also tell you where our optimistic case

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on the euro will end, because we've already started to

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hear a few murmurs and noises around the French election.

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So later in the year, sometime in the second half

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the I think that will start to become a

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>market theme that will be a prime candidate to top

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the euro. Dollar is in Abraham, always good

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with you, sir, Thanks for faming with us.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Abraham ra Barery, the City clubal head of ex analysis.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh Berto Gallo with us, John, I want you to

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>go to Mr Gallo with with your wisdom here. But John,

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I first want to talk about in the Super League

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>blow up, we've been making jokes about leads, but this

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is not funny. I mean, leads has succeeded over the

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>last number of months and the toughest thing in Italy

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like leads is Gallows, Naples or Napoli. I believe it's

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>called I mean the fact is there's a real parallel here,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't there. And Napoli has been one of the clubs

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in Italy that has actually managed to challenge you've into

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>dominance over the last decade, coming close to winning the

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>title a couple of times. And they are a great

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>example tom of a club that would have been frozen

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>out of this European football league with little chance of

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>joining it, and the leads of this world, the Napolies

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of this world that have had in times at times

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of European heritage, wouldn't be able to get

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>back in and conquer those names. And I think that's

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of sport that even if you're a small club,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that somehow you can climb up the ranks and get

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it done. At some point, give us a give our

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>American audience a window winter this. We've got a guest

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>qualified to speak, Alberta Gallop, Algebras investment portfolio manager, was

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>hoping you'd talk about the credit markets and it's two

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent game year today in its credit fund.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So we've got to start with Napoli first. You'll take

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on the events of this week, Albert. So it was

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a Napoli fan that would have been frozen out of

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>all of this. What did you think? Well, I think

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the time for markets to an also society

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to fight inequalities or we don't want it at the

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>social level. We also don't want it at the sports level.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, even though they're a few teams that

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are wealthier, people want to have a game with despair

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and where also, you know, the less wealthy teams can compete.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Same with society right where we're definitely we don't want

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to go in that direction to encourage in equality. He

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>fights in zero right as a port filio manager is

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>well not better? How are you getting on? This is

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a much tougher year because we have seen that at

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the with the extreme crisis that we got last year.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've had central banks, emphisis of policy all

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing down the accelerator. The result is governments have more

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dead and central banks have had to do more. They

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to do more. What we see today is real

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>yields are negative everywhere and there is sixty percent of

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the bond market yielding below one percent. So before and

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last Mareny years was very easy to make

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>money bonds. Now it's much tougher, and that's where alpha

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>also surprises more and it's more needed by investors compared

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to where we were before. Uh, it's much topper, but

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we still find a few opportunities. However, I would say

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year we think would be

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more volatile than the first half. We got

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>some bigger risks on the horizon, and markets are very

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>complacent now, Alberto, where do you see a boom economy

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>outcome to see price up and yield down? I just

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated where you are in your head Q three,

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Q four, even the first quarter of next year. How

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>do you get there? So you know. In the first

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, especially Q one, the big news

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>was the US fiscal stimus, the new administration. The point

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this firepower not just to combat the virus, but also

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to create new growth. This news is gone now. We have, yes,

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>our government spending like Europe, but it's much slower and

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead of us. We have three big risks. The first

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>one in central banks might withdraw the paunch bowl. At

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>some point there's gonna be a discussion of tapering from

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, and it could in Q three Q four.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Already the second risk is geopolitics. Russia and China are

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>teaming up against the US in Ukraine and in Taiwan.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>There's also a shortage of semiconductors that's gonna affect you know,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they're testing the Biden administration. This risk is not really

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>priced in by markets. And then the third risk is

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that the vaccines are still going pretty slow in Europe

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and in a lot of emerging markets. You know, the

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>economy is the non US, non UK economies are going

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to take a lot longer to reopen. So it's it's

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a really key shaped recovery, and markets are have been

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pricing a B shaped recovery, so we're going to see

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more volatility in our view in Q three and Q

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>four today where the record low levels for credit spreads,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in high yield in investment grade, we have the one

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred year low wipe out buffer the lowest yield level

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 1>on US investment grade, so we're really really thin levels.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets are priced for perfection. It's time to take a

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>step back and focus on hedges and protection. So hedges

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in protection, can you elaborate on what protection means at

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a time when there's fear of rising rates of premier

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of early withdrawal of volnetary stimulus as you were talking about,

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as are we priced to perfection on the

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>risk your credit side, we're almost prised to perfection. One

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the protection that you want to have if you're

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fixed income investors exactly prevent a declining price from a

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>rise in rates from a rising inflation. And you know,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>so far treasuries were leading the widening. We have seen

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>also European bonds, you know, boons and and BTPs have

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>been widening more. And you know, the bar is much

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>lower for Europe because everyone has been verished. So for

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>boons to go to zero, for example, between and your end,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you just need a little bit of positive US, a

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of spending, and some agreements on the EU Recovery Fund.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's gonna drive boons a little bit higher. You

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>could wipe out all your carry if you have a

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>very high duration in credit. Similarly, we have a lot

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of firms that have not restructured and are pretty levered

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>trading at really low spreads. You know, US sill spreads

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are close to two and eighty basis points. There is

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>very little chance of um you know, making money during

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a cycle if you invest at that low level. At

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>some point you're gonna have a You're gonna have a problem.

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a matter of when. So the question

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there is how to engineer strategies that had your portfolio

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or to have enough liquidity to buy when other people

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are selling. That's that's exactly what we're doing. You have

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit patient, but you know, chasing the

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>market now is um is foolish in in fixing, you know,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>bonds are very negatively convex for investors, but it doesn't

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>mean you can't make money. You can make money when

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>volatility comes back. Here's the conundrum that, yes, this makes

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense based on historical investing principles, and yet every

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>time that we see a sell off in rates, if

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it gets a commensurate sell off in credit, you get

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a flight to safety. That flight to safety is bonds.

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The yield goes lower, and we get a reset of

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>where we were before. Put on repeat, play it again.

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>That is what we have seen. Why are we going

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>into a new regime where that perhaps is not the

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle that we're going into. There's two options for policymakers.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>One is to make the bond market reprice quickly. That

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>would also entail higher funding costs for different treasuries around

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Policy makers cannot afford that, So that's the

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>second option is to impose on investors and negative real return.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So having inflation at two and a half or three

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>percent in the US by interest rates of one and

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a half to two and that's probably what's going to happen,

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so essentially bond investors, but that means also insurance companies

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and pension funds will lose money slowly instead of losing

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>money quickly. It's a second best option, but it's still

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a very bad option. So as an active manager, as ventially,

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what we have to do is to trade these cycles,

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>these policy cycles of widening in rates which will not

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>go back to a positive level against inflation. You've also

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 1>got you You've got a trade Alberta as well off

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of what ECP does. I guess there's a La guard message.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you more interested in what she says? Are you

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>more interested in what she does not say? We're more

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in what she doesn't say. At the moment, there's

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of things the ECB can do. They're

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>basically running on all cylinders. But the question is when

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>will the discussion about the end of the emergency purchase

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>programs start, so tapering and UM. And also there's other

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>long term discussions about the strategic review of the CP,

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about average inflation targeting, which are going in play, you know,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>during the summer. And finally, there's another more important factor here,

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which is central bank digital currency. A lot of central

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>banks have walked about this, and ultimately this UM is

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>something that could unleash a lot more livers for Montreal policy.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, interest rates could become a lot more negative,

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or central banks could inject money to firms directly. So

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the ultimate frontier. It's not for today, it's not

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for this meeting, but it's a lot more interesting to

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>hear what they don't say now, Bets. So we've gotta

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. It's gonna hear from you said on football,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, and a little bit on credit, the markets

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and the CP coming up tomorrow, Bets. I've got to

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>catch up Bets again the Avoultebrisk Investments Portfilio Manager. This

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern and Bloomberg

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple, podcast, SoundCloud,

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom keene In. This is Bloomer