WEBVTT - Best NFL Week 1 Bets + Favorite Props (Ep. 7)

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everyone, and welcome back to another episode of

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros NFL podcast, brought to you by bet MGM.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Dan Harris and you can find me

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Dan Harris Adi. It is finally time

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>after months of waiting, Week one of the NFL is here.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So today, as we're going to be doing every Thursday

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>when we record, we're going to talk about some of

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>our best bets, either against the spread or over unders.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you a bet to avoid, and then we're

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you our favorite player prop bet for the week.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>And with me today to break it all down is

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Ian McMillan, a writer over at oddshark dot com. Now

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I try to butter up all of our guests just

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so they'll agree with me regardless of what I say,

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So make of this what you will. But Ian is crazy,

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that in a really good way. We're

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about Week one of the NFL on

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this show. But if I wanted him to handicap some

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>UFC matches, he'd be all over it. What did you

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want to bet on the Fortnite World Cup last month?

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Because he broke down all the betting odds So if

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling really good about your son's soccer matchup or

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>something this weekend like I am, then just reach out

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to Ian because he's probably gonna be able to give

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you some under the Raider player props. You can find

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter at Ian mac os That's IAI n

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mac os Ian.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 2>How's it going, man, it's going great things for having

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 2>me on, What a great intro. You are absolutely correct.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 2>If I can find a way to make some money

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>betting on anything, I will do it.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So I mean legitimately with my kid, Like the over

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>under for him is half a goal. I mean the

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>under is at minus one thirty, the overs at plus

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one oh five. Any insight there, I'm gonna bring you

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>over here.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Depends on the weather a couple other factors, but either way,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I think I like the over on that.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I've seen him play and that's a loser, all right, buddy.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He has been playing for two years. He has yet

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to score a goal. But we don't know. My expert

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>coaching may come into play, so look, before we get

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into it, I do want to announce the winner of

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>our August contest for the autographed Christian McCaffrey helmet. Congratulations

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to George from Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, and we've

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>already notified George by email, so he will be getting

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the helmet soon enough. Now, if you did not win,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty much everyone other than George, dry your

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eyes because we are running another contest for September. If

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you're sad about missing out on the McCaffrey helmet, not

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to worry because we've got an autographed Alvin Kamara helmet

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>giveaway for September. It's the same rules as before. Leave

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a review for the show on iTunes or Stitcher and

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>send a screenshot of that review to contest at bettingpros

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And if you have already screenshotted and sent

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in your review, then great, you are automatically entered into

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this month and all future months contests. It's a great

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>job way to support the show and potentially win prizes.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You're doing life right, all right. So, as I said,

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Ian and I are going to give our thoughts on

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>some bets for week one, but I will note at

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the outset that we are recording this shortly before kickoff

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Bears Packers game, so we aren't going to

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>be referencing it anyway, But just so you know, however,

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that is exactly how we would have

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>picked it had it been fair for us to do so.

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to take credit this and I'll force

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I into as well. So Ian, We're gonna get started

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with some of our favorite bets for Week one, but

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>before we do, I do want to talk to you

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>guys about one of the sponsors of today's show, bet MGM,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>and specifically the betmgm Sports App. There was a time

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>not so long ago where to place a bet on

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a sporting event you needed to head out to Las Vegas.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>But now, as you surely know, states are legalizing sports

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>betting at a rapid pace, and there are plenty of

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>spots to go to in the country where you can

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>just walk in and place a bet. But if you

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are in New Jersey, you can do that from the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>comfort of your home, because all you need to do

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to place a bet is to download the bet mgm

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Sports app right on your phone. You can bet on

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much any sporting event you want, including of course,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>any NFL game this week. Legitimately, on NFL Sunday, you

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>can be sitting on your couch eating some cheddar beer

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>battered bread, which is my favorite football food personally, and

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just place a bet with your fingertips. And here's the

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>best part. If you sign up to bet MGM sports

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and you use our offer code Harris, that is my

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>last name, then not only can you bet on sports

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>from your phone, but your first wager of up to

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars is risk free. Seriously, use our promo code.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Place a wager of twenty five dollars or more on

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your first bet, and if you lose, bet MGM is

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>going to credit your account up to one hundred dollars

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>in cash. Again, that's promo code Harris. To be able

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to place your risk free one hundred dollars bet, you

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>must be twenty one years or older, And although you

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you must

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be in the state of New Jersey to place a

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sports bet. Visit betmgm dot com for the full list

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of terms and conditions. And if you've got a gambling problem,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred gambler all right, And so we're

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>each going to be giving three picks here. And since

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this is our inaugural weekly pick show, I kind of

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come up with a catchy name for this

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>first segment. I was thinking something with six, you know,

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>since we're both doing three picks, and as my daughter

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>recently informed me, three plus three is in fact six,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So I was thinking maybe like six feet under. But

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's a bet omen right, I mean,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be better.

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that might be a bad open. I mean, the

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 2>classic go for betting, for anything betting related for the NFL,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>especially if it's six picks, would be the Pick six.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the pick six. That would be I'm not even kidding.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna come up with something totally lame. The

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>pick six it is. We're going with that for the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>pick six. You're I mean, look, I know all of

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>our former guests listen to this, but you're officially my

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>favorite guest because you you have done that. And just

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I mean, unless you know, we make

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of wager for you to be my co

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>host on this, like you're not going to be appearing

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>every single show, but I'm keeping that already. Pick six

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's our first part. You can, all right, So well done.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I digress a little bit, but let's get going with

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the first edition of Pick six. I love it. For

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>all odds, we're going to be using the consensus odds

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>at bettingpros dot com, which, as I've told you before,

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>aggregates the odds available in the market, so you might

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>see one or two different odds across the various sports

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>book But for our purposes, we're going to be using

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the consensus picks. So, Ian, why don't you go ahead

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>start us off? What's your what's your top bet? All right?

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>So, I yeah, the first pick. I do have to

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>put a little bit of an asterisk next because I'm

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>a little bit biased. I am a diehard Atlanta Falcons fan. Now,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the first rule in betting is don't follow your heart,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>don't be biased, but I can't really help it, especially

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to NFL. But also another little lastix.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>So Falcons right now are plus four against the Vikings.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>But I just read about a half an hour ago

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that Julio Jones may not play if he doesn't get

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that contract done before Sunday. So if he doesn't play,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I have the right to withdraw this bet, even though

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm sorry. No, we will not honor that.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>This is official. This is official to be fair. I

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>did see that as well. It read to me much

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more of a I don't know. I mean, I'm optimistic

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna get done. But if I can't, I

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>can't say for certain, then I'm gonna suit up. Sounded

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it didn't sound to me like there's a real risk

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of him missing. But I get it, you know, I

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>feel you, and in fact, I'll reverse course and if

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact he does miss the game, I'll let you out.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've already got my bet locked in, so

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm set either way. So they're plus four at the Vikings. Now.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 2>The Falcons obviously had an off year last year, but

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>their top two defensive players were out, got hurt and

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>put on ir the very first week in Ricardo Allen

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and and Dion Jones, so I expect them to have

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>a bounce back year this year. I'm a little bit

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>worried because kind of their strength on offense is obviously

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the passing, the Vikings strength on defense is their past defense,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>So that does worry me a little bit. But as

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a Falcons fan, I can see the classic thing happening

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of them losing on a last second field goal. But

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 2>if they do, if they do, the plus four covers it.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So I like Atlanta. I think I'm gonna back them

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit this year. I think this is a

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>big bounce back for them this year, and I love them.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Plus four at Minnesota.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, getting certainly getting past the key number of three.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Exact difference, Yeah, for sure. You know, I looked at it.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I was a little worried. It was a game that

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really feel comfortable either way. If I if

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I had to make a pick, it would be on

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. But you know that looking at the preseason,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I try not to take too much from it. The

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line just kind of seemed a little bit out

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of sync and on the road in this first game.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I like the Vikings too, I'm pretty high on them.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Generally I would go with the Falcons by I was

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a little less sure of it. Now you're a Falcons fan,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've got, you know, probably more insight into

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>even the team than I do. But it struck me

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as a little worse. We did know, we were talking

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about it before we recorded that. It moved. The line moved.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>They were originally getting three and a half, right, and

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you were going to take them there too as well, Right.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yeah, as soon as I saw anything over three,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of what I pounced on. It might have

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>moved before because of that Julio Jones news that just

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>came out today, but yeah, you said it. I mean,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>if one thing is gonna lose this bet, it's gonna

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>be the Falcons offensive line. That's that's their biggest week

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>point all seasons. So they got a couple of rookies

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 2>that will be starting. Hopefully they can pull through for them.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>But if it's overfield goal, I like the Falcons here.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>No, I think overfield goal is certainly you know, again

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that key number of three is certainly something they take

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>a look at. And in fact, you know I mentioned

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>betting pros dot Com. One of the things that we

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>do is we have a bunch of betting experts, sports

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>betting experts that make their picks, and right now, fifty

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>eight percent are with you. They're on the side they're

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going with the Falcons. So most likely that's gonna be

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a good pick. But for me, it's it's close enough

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where I is a little unsure. It is a game

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really interested to watch from an NFL perspective,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just because both of these teams I think have a

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>chance to be really interesting this year. So one way

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>or another, I'll be watching for me my number one pick.

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And I just feel like when I say this, I

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>almost I can't get off it because I've been trying

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to push myself off it. But I can't because I

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like it. You may not. It is the Chiefs at

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, and I like actually the Jaguars getting three.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I believe me. I am not in the

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>majority on this one, but I've been looking at this

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>game closely and kind of go through it, you know.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>For the record, By the way, I will say that

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>my boss basically told me that he really loves the

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>chief with the spread. So this may actually be my

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>last episode. And Ian, since you came up with the

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>last segment, you can probably just take over for me

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>if you're cool with that. But look, this is how

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I generally approach making my game picks. Okay. I do

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>my own projections for the game, and I come up

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with what I think the spread and the over under

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>ought to be, and when the numbers are off by

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>anything more than like a point or two, I then

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of start looking and how the game is being

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>bet Now I talked to about this on Monday. But

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the spread opened originally as the Chiefs laying five, so

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>it's moved about a point and a half since it

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>first opened months ago. Now, some of that is news

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>about Tyreek Hill, right, everybody thought that he was going

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to get suspended, and then once he wasn't, the spread

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>closed a little bit. But again, as we talked about,

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>players like wide receivers and running backs don't usually have

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that much of an impact on the spread. So you know,

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>when it went from five, you know, it never rebounded

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>when we knew that Hill was going to play. So

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the amount of money that's being bet,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you can see that roughly seventy percent of the number

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of bets coming in here are being placed on the Chiefs,

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but the actual amount of money that's being bet is

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>relatively split down the middle. And so when something like

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens, that almost is always an indication that sharpetters

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are betting against the public. So even though the public

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>here is backing the Chiefs, the line has dropped and

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>has not rebounded from where it was now in week one.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little hard to read into that. As much

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as I'm trying to do here because the lines have

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>been out forever, so there's a lot of money that's

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>been coming in forever. But still the fact that the

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>line never rebounded suggests to me that there is some

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>smart money coming in on the Jags. And really, again,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as I talked about this with Sean Green on our

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>last show, and we just mentioned, actually there are key numbers, right,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>There's three is a key number. Seven is a key number.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Thirty percent of all games over the last fifteen years

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>or so have ended with exactly a three or seven

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>margin of victory. So when you get above or below

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those numbers, I get a little bit enticed.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And so here at three and a half, I'm kind

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of excited. I've been talking myself into the Jags all preseason.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the offense is gonna be much improved with

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>any quarterback not named Blake Bordoles, and with Fournette slimmer

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and looking motivated, I think the defense is still going

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to be strong. They match up pretty well with the Chiefs,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>given that they have one of the true shutdown corners

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in Jalen Ramsey when he's on at least, and I

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is gonna be a close game, So I'm

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna take it when you get that extra half a

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>point at minus one fourteen. So go ahead tell me

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>why I'm wrong.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>No, I actually don't hate that pick, but I mean so,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>like you said, the public's gonna be on the Chiefs,

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>because when you look at it, it almost seems like just

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>three and a half is too good to be true

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>to bet on the Chiefs dudging by how good they

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>were last season. But the points you made about the

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Jaguars were a lot of things that I've been thinking

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>as well. I think they are gonna have a bounce

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 2>back year similar to the Falcons. If you remember, hitting

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>into the last season, the Jaguars were a dark horse

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>pick for a lot of people to win the Super Bowl. Obviously,

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>they you know, didn't live up to those expectations. I

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>think they finished five and eleven, But I do think

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 2>they are gonna have a bounce back year this year.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think, just as a caveat for basically oli

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>our picks in Week one, this is Week one, so

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>we have no idea what we're gonna see from these teams.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>So there's certain games that there's teams that I'm interested.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I would need to see how they're looking and how

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna perform this year before I place any money

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 2>on it. So that's why I'm not picking the Jaguars myself.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 2>But I'm also not gonna pick the Chiefs because the

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Jaguars are just one of those teams that I want

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to see before I put my money on it. So

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate the bet, especially because I don't know

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the three and a half. It seems. I don't like

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>calling betting lines traps, but if there is a trap line,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 2>it would be this one. It Chiefs seem too.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Easy, right, and you know again, let's just make it clear, Okay.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I mentioned the percentage of experts that

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>were on your side in the last pick. Sixty six

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of experts are siding with the Chiefs here langing

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the three and a half. So I will put that

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. And of course, I mean, I'm gonna be honest.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm absolutely terrified to bet against Mahomes and Andy Reid's record,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, whenever you know his record off a bye

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is well known. He's usually good in first game, so

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of factors that make me nervous. But

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, I just think that this is gonna be

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a different Jaguars team. I think playing at home to

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>open the season, I think the spread, you know, once

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it got past once it stayed above three. Really, I

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just it's something where I feel like it's gonna be

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>enough that the Jaguars are gonna pull it out. But

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to be on an island here a little bit.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So all right, what's your second pick?

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so my second pick and actually my one of

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>my main points, but my second pick actually helps, oh,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 2>your Jaguars pick as well. So my second pick is

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be the Buccaneers minus one over the forty

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>nine ers. And that point is what it's like to

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>play in Florida in September. So the Jacksonville has that

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 2>advantage playing at home in Florida in September. Tampa Bay

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>has that advantage as well. It's just humid, it's grown.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Even teams like Miami. I'd like to see what they're

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna do in September because I don't have the exact

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>numbers in front of me, but something tells me that

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Florida teams have a good spread record in the month

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of September, and I think that just September's in Florida's

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>can can be tough, So Buccaneers it's because they're a

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Falcon divisional opponent, it's it could I die a little

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 2>inside every time I pick a different NFC South team.

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>But I think the Buccaneers are going to do better

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>than a lot of people think. And I think the

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers are going to do worse than a

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of people think. A lot of people are high

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>up on the forty nine ers this year, and they

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>were heading into last year as well. I think a

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of people just have high hopes for Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>But I don't see it. I mean, he had a

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>couple of good what was it might even just been

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>preseason when he was with the Patriots, had a couple

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of good games. Maybe it's regular season. I kind of

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>forget now, But.

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think he played a couple of games in

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the regular season that year where I remember then he

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>got injured and then Jacoby Brissett came in and they

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>won against the Texans or something like that. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>he played a few games, but nothing really substantial in

0:14:58.680 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the regular season.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And but I just think that most quarterbacks in

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the NFL are going to have at least some sort

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of success inside the Patriots system. So I'm just not

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>sold on him. Before he got hurt. Last year, he

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't look great. He didn't look great in the preseason.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 2>This year, I'm not high up on Jimmy Garoppolo at all.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the Buccaneers at home, and I think they're

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>improved from last year. I mean, they still have some

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>offensive weapons as well, like they of course they have

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans. I think Chris Godwin's gonna have a big year.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 2>They have a couple of good running backs in Peyton

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Barber and Ronald Jones. I just think Tampa Bay at

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>home against a West Coast forty nine ers team that

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not high on. I think I think that's a

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 2>game Tampa is gonna win.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Out of curiosity, you know, we know about the whole

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>West Coast teams playing on the East Coast. Do you

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think that that holds true even for Week one or

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that's more something for in the season.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it holds true, but not as much as

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>it does as would mid season and generally just road

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>teams as a whole. I'm betting on a lot of

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>road teams actually other than the Bucks. The Bucks are home,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>but I'm betting on a lot of road teams week

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>one because I just don't think it has as big

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of an effect as it does mid or late season,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 2>just because by then they're just they're they've been traveling

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>all year, they're tired, they're hurt. Week one, it doesn't

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>have as big an effect. But I would still say

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 2>it does have an effect that's at least worth mentioning.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think it's a good bed. Fifty

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of experts are with you. This was not

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a game I had a good feel for it, just because, look,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it before. Week one is really tough because

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know what we're gonna see, and and

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo looked horrific. You heard the practice reports, and then

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he looked passable in week three of the preseason, so

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know. This is one where if I

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was forced to make a pick, I would take the

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Bucks laying one. But it's a game that I really

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>as I tried to analyze, I just couldn't get a

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>good feel for it. It strikes me, you know, kind

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of a pick them maybe minus one is probably right,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would probably take the Bucks if I had to,

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>but overall, I think i'd probably stay away from But

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's certainly the Florida point, which also I

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think Sean brought up on our last show, and traveling

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>cross country certainly gives me hope there for the Bucks.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>For me, my second game is look, I mean, I

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>bet against Patrick Mahomes, so I feel like I've got

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep going and get a little crazy here and

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>bet against Drew Brees in primetime. I'm going to take

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the Texans plus seven at minus one fourteen. We did

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of shows earlier this preseason where we were

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>picking division winners and playoff teams and potential Super Bowl winners,

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and I was really really high on the Texans pretty

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>much even before the Andrew Luck news. They have a

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>very tough schedule and their offensive line was questionable, to

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be generous frankly, but I had enough optimism that there

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to be some growth here overall. Now they've

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had this crazy, crazy, crazy preseason where they've traded Clowney

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and they've lost Lamar Miller, but they've added Duke Johnson

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Carlos Hide and Kenny Stills and most importantly Laramie

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Tunsel and our last show, I agreed that, you know,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we just couldn't understand why the line was high. I

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of pegged at it more like five and a

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>half or something, if I was going to pick it

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>out of a hat. Now, if you want to hear

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>more of the reasons why I think that's too high,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned them on our last show. Do I think

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the Saints should be favorite? Of course, of course they

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>should not by seven, which again is one of those

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>key numbers. Even without Clowny. The Texans still love JJ Watt.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting Whitney Merciless to bounce back. I love the

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>addition of Duke Johnson, but really, most of all, it's

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Tunsil who's going to really solidify that line. Now the

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 1>betters slightly agree here, but not overwhelmingly.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>The number of bets is about fifty to fifty, with

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more like a sixty forty split in terms of the

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>actual money coming in in favor of the Texans. With

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>that spread, that's not really anything significant enough where I'm

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>going to draw any conclusions. Now, if it dropped to

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a half, I'd probably still like the Texans,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that there would be value there,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure I would be including them as

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>one of my best bets. As a touchdown though, I

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>will take that. And the experts are pretty split on this.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>On bettingpros dot Com, it's about fifty five percent siding

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Texans. So what do you think crazy to

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>go against Breeze in primetime or what?

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 2>No? I like that pick. You're picking against the eighths.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I hate that Saints are releast favorite team, but yeah.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you're letting your your Falcon fandom, you know color.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I even started the show saying you shouldn't

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>be biased when you're betting on sports, and then.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>You are breaking your own rule. Had you not come

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 1>up with a name for this segment, I would end

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this podcast right now.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 2>No, but I do like to pick, and a lot

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of the points that you made I agree with. A

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 2>big thing. The Saints can't stop the pass as well,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Texans have it a couple of

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 2>two of the best receivers in the league and DeAndre

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Hopkins will Fuller, who I think is extremely underrated. He

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>was having a great breakout year last year until he

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 2>got hurt yeah, I think seven points is just is

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>just too much.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just too much. It's just too much.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be below it's got to be below

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that key number. I I don't get it. It does

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>make me nervous, but you know, and you I could

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>say there is a scenario where, you know, the Saints

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>come out and just go bonkers. But really the Texans

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 1>are good. They're and you know, I'm not optimistic on

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>their future, you know, in future years, given what they've

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they've done this season, but overall, for what I like

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>coming into this game, I just it's it's got to

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be less than a touch.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think the Saints defense is good enough.

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 2>That's going to hinder them all year, I think, And

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you need a good defense to cover these

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>big spreads because there's always the chance of the back

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 2>door cover, which absolutely into one too many times. So yeah,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I definitely like the Texans there.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, who's your third pick?

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So my third pick, we're going to go to

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the AFC East. I'm taking the Bills at plus two

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>point five over the Jets. The Bills are on the road,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 2>so plus two point five's at minus one oh nine

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>right now. So when you're talking about the AFC East,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously have the Patriots at the top of the division

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins at the bottom. It's those two middle teams

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 2>that have a lot of questions about them. They both

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>have two second year quarterbacks. But I just like the

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Bills a little bit more. Actually think the Bills are

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 2>going to be a surprised team this year. I wouldn't

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 2>even be totally surprised if they snagged one of the

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>last wildcaret spots there. I like Josh Allen better than

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I like Sam Darnold. I just think they have a

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>few more weapons. I think they have a better defense.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 2>If you look at how they performed last year, neither

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 2>offense was great compared to the rest of the league.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The one big difference, though, is that the Bills defense

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>was actually half decent. They're they're just about middle of

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the pack and just about every defensive category, whereas the

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Jets defense was still one of the worst. So I

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>like the Bills. I think they have some weapons. I mean,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>they're on the road, but really from Buffalo, New York,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't even that's hardly even a road game whatsoever.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 2>I really like one edition that I haven't really heard

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>too many people talk with that I really like for

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>them this year is Cole Beasley. I think that he

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>was under used when he was in Dallas. I think

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be a big weapon for them this year.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna help Josh Allen ode a lot.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So I wish I could have got this number plus three,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 2>that key number, that field goal number, but I don't

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>hate them at the plus two point five numbers. So

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that's my third pick.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's an interesting game. First of all, the Jets

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>fan so I take great offense, kiss and you're it's

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>really hurting, But I have no problem for it. I

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a great feel for this one either. I'm surprised,

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me moving off three to two and

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>a half, that would have scared me. Here, do you

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think the Bills are gonna win? Outright? Out of curiosity?

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Would you, you know, go for a pick them and

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>take you know, the the plus money I do.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm actually gonna sprinkle their money line as well.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna win this game.

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I think it's fair. I think I

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what to expect again. Week one is

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>so difficult because we really don't know what to expect

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. You know, they have a pretty terrible secondary overall.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Jamal Adams is great, but you know,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>really other than that, they really kind of struggle back there.

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Tremaine Johnson has been a disappointment. They really didn't get

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>much depth there. So you know, Alan who may not

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be that accurate, but he's got a big arm. I

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>love your point about Beasley because you know, everybody's been

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, John Brown, who I also love,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but Beasley is really a guy who can kind of

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>open things up in the middle while Brown and Foster

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>are going deep. So it's an interesting pick for me.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't you get worried a little bit about division games?

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these teams. You know, it's new coaching staff

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of course for the Jets, but you know, these teams

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they see each other all the time, they meet all

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the time. Division games, to me, are always the toughest

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to pick against the spread.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>What I don't like doing in divisional games is taking

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 2>the favor. So okay, that's why that would kind of

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>scare me more away if I was picking the Jets.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>But because it's the divisional game. Anything can happen in

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 2>divisional games, so why not take the points?

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, that's a fair point for me. My

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>third one is going to be the Panthers getting two

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half from the Rams at minus one oh seven. Now,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I like this a lot more when it was at three.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Kind of like you, and I liked it a lot

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more before Cam Newton's injury. But it sounds like he's

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be good to go. In our Team Futures episode,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I picked the Panthers as the best bet to win

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl given the odds they were at plus

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hundred or something like that. I'm not one

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred convinced that they're going to be a good team,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think that if they are good, they have

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance to be really, really good. Remember they were

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>six and two before Cam suffered his injury. He adapted

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>well to Norb Turner's offense. I love what Dj Moore

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and Curtis Samuel can do. And again, the defense, which

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was pretty strong overall. They had some holes, certainly, but

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they remained strong and they've added some additional pieces like

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Jerald McCoy, so I think they're going to be solid

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>if cam can stay healthy. And so the Rams are

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>coming in and they get that cup, but they've lost

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>some Domkin sue. There are questions around Todd Gurley. I

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know the recent report that came out today that he's

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>apparently going to get a full workload, but that remains

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. Their offensive line is weaker than last year,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think the Panthers can get pressure on Jared Goff,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and you saw in the Super Bowl that he is

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not that great at handling pressure. We just talked about

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens when West Coast teams travel to the East Coast.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>They usually have issues. I agree, not as strong and

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>week one, but I do think it is going to

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>be something. And while I feel a little queasy about

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that number being under the key number of three, it's

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear that sharp betters are what's keeping the number here.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>About three quarters of the bets are on the Rams,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense with then coming off the Super Bowl,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But like with the Jaguars and the Chiefs, the money

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>coming in is actually split about evenly. And remember there

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>are questions on Newton and the money is still split

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>even So with that, that really tells me that sharp

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>betters are kind of looking at the Panthers here, and

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>with as good as the Rams were last year, remember

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first game they were losing at halftime to

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders at thirteen ten, I think it's fair that

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they may get off to a little bit of a

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>slow start type of beginning to their season. Now, I

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>would love it if that line crept back up to three.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I do not think it's going too based on the

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>money that's coming in, but I actually think that the

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Panthers can win this game outright, So I will gladly

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>take the two and a half. And I will point

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out that experts are not signing with me, well not overwhelmingly,

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but fifty eight percent of experts are signing with the

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Rams here. So what are your thoughts on that game?

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, we officially have the entire NFC South covered for

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Week one with the Panthers pick.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's why I didn't even know anything about the Panthers.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just picking it to get you riled up

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>This game is almost identical to your first pick as

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 2>far as it's one of the top teams from last

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 2>year with a small spread. You look at it, you

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 2>think the obvious pick is the Rams and you look

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>into it more and you find that the sharp money's

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>on the opposite side. This is a tough one. This

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 2>is that one's going to be a stay away for me. Actually,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I might go rams just because it

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 2>is under that number of three. But I mean, once again,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 2>all the points you made were good points. I don't

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>know what I'm gonna see with Cam Newton. Don't forget

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>last year, the Panthers at the very start of the

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>year were one of the best teams in the league,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and then they just kind of faltered down the stretch

0:25:59.359 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was really when Cam got injured. If he

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't injured, we'd be thinking completely differently about the Panthers than.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 2>We do at the moment because and he was injured too.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 2>By the end of the year, it was looking bad.

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 2>He could barely throw football ten yards. It was rough

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 2>to watch. And then another point is with Sean McVay

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously is one of the best coaches in the league,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>but in Week one, I think it's tough for a

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>really good coach to take advantage of that in Week

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>one because he just doesn't have any game film from

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the other team outside of preseason that they can really

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>use to judge and game play with so good coaches

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 2>actually get better as the season goes along. So if

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna pick a time for a Sean McVay led

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>team to lose, it'd be very early in the season,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 2>or even Week one.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>They were losing thirteen ten to the Raiders. I mean,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it really is something. I agree. If you're going to

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of these teams, I think this is the

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>time to do it. So let's just do a quick

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>summary here. You've got the Falcons getting four from the Vikings,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bills getting two and a half from the Jets,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Bucks laying one against the forty nine Ers.

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the Jaguars getting three and a half from

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, the Texans getting seven from the Saints, and

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers getting two and a half from the Rams.

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, good job, I love it. Pick six first

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>pick six in the book. Oh a good job. Yeah,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm really impressed. All right, So before we move on

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to our next segment, I do want to mention another

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>one of our sponsors. That's side Boss. Side Boss is

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a great sight to hone your skills as a sports

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>better with absolutely no risk because they are offering a

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>free to play, season long NFL handicapping contest with fifty

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars in cash prizes. Here's how it works. You

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>pick five games per week for all seventeen weeks of

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFL season, and you earn your title as the

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Boss with a fifteen thousand dollars grand prize. But the

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand dollars grand prize is hardly all that's up

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for grabs here. Side Boss is gonna be awarding quarterly

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and weekly prizes all season long, and if you go

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>five to zero in any week, you're gonna win some money.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>And even if you are the worst at this of

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>all time, that is okay because the last place finisher

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>earns the title of Donkey Boss and gets one thousand dollars.

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you're feeling a little more confident as the

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>season goes on, that is great because Sideboss offers pay

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to play games throughout the entire season. Just go to

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sideboss dot com, click to play the twenty nineteen Pro

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Pick Them contest and enter the promo code Betting

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Pros upon sign up. That's sideboss dot Com Promo Code

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros. All right, we're gonna move to our next

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>segment here, and I have an idea for the name

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of what this is. Now you're gonna have to tell

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>me whether or not you can hear this, okay, because

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm the least technologically proficient human in the world. Look,

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are you ready? It's did you get it?

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I did?

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a trap. Yeah that's good. That's good.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That's good. I did it like you have. You have

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no idea. How proud of myself I am for

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that because I completely expected not to do it. So

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 1>these are games that essentially we're looking at and we're avoiding,

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's a trap. It's gonna be the name of

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the segment, which I came up with by myself. So

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we can't give you know, the credit for everything over here,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but these are we're each gonna give one game that

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we are basically looking at the line and we're just

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not really having it because it's just not something we

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>feel good about. So why don't you start us off?

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your game to avoid?

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>So my game to avoid is probably the most obvious

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>one that a lot of people would think to avoid,

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and that would be the Colts and the Chargers. The Chargers,

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>right now are set as six point five point favorites,

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and I just I need to see what the Colts

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>are going to be looking like without Andrew Luck. I mean,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of obvious. Andrew Luck just left the team

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 2>two weeks ago. He retired the team as a whole

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 2>outside of obviously quarterback at this point, but the team

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>as a whole has got better. But just how much

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>is Andrew Luck worth. I don't hate the Chargers there

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 2>because the six and a half is that half a

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>point under that magic number of seven. But I need

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to avoid it because I need to see what Jacobe

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Prisett's going to be like. If he plays like he

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>did two years ago when he started for almost the

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>whole season, then I would take the Chargers all day long.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going to give him the bend of the

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 2>doubt that he hasn't proved over the past couple of years.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I need to see what the Colts look like as

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>a whole. Also, the Chargers, see they seem to cover

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>against teams you wouldn't think they're going to cover against

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>when they're like big point favorites. They like to allow

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the back door cover. So for those reasons, I will

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 2>be avoiding that game on Sunday.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fine. I don't know if you've been

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>following the line movements in this game. I mean, it

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was when Luck was healthy, it was at three and

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. As soon as the injury happened, it jumped

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to seven and a half, and then people hammered it

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and I fell to six and a half, and that's

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's kind of been staying. I'm more optimistic about

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Colts in this game, and if it was at seven,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or if it had stayed at seven and a half,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be all over it. At six and a half,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes me a little nervous. I'm you know, to

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>me the Brisset thing, I don't think Brisset's a great

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at all, but I mean, I'm certainly not looking

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at what happened a couple of years ago when he

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>had to parachute in and learn the offense which was

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not Frank Reich's offense, and figure it out. He's been

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>taking reps with the team the entire preseason. I think

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he knows the system. It's a better system. The Colts,

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other than at quarterback, are a really strong team. And

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for me, the Chargers, I mean, they're kind of decimated

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at offensive line, they've got some defensive injury. Melbyn Gordon

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is not there. So for me, it's a game that honestly,

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if I had to pick, I would take the Colts.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's just not something again, you said it at

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. It's really tough.

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>That's a tricky number.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a tricky number, and it's something where it makes

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to take the Chargers. But for me, if

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it was at seven or certainly seven and a half,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I would be all over the Colts. At six and

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a half, I'm fine with avoiding that. I've got no

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. But again, the line movement here, pay

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>attention to it, see how it's going to because right

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>now it's at six and a half. It has been

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all over the place, including moving down since the luck news.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty good one for me I am

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>going to take. And this kind of goes into what

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you said earlier when we were talking about division games.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to avoid the Cowboys laying seven and a

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>half against the Giants. Now, to be as transparent as possible,

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I took a look at the lines like eight hours

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>ago when I was trying to come out with the

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>bet that I was going to avoid, and the line

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was at seven, So now it's at seven and half,

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>which actually kind of makes me lean a little towards

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, but not enough to want to touch it.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>First of all, as a general rule, as we were

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about, division games are scary, and it's generally unusual

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for a division favorite in the first week of the

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>season to win a game in a blowout, and the

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys in particular were not great last year as home favorites.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>These teams know each other really, really well. It's unclear

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>what Zeke's workload is going to be. There's talk about

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty five reps. I don't know what that means.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper is still dealing with planter fasciitis, and yet

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Giants think I'm gonna admit that. But Sekwon Barkley,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram, Sterling Shepherd, there is enough there to score

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. The money coming in here is pretty

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>split down the middle. So it's just one of those where,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a division matchup, I've got to feel really

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>really comfortable with the number to make me want to

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>get involved, and this one just doesn't do it for me, Yeah,

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>There, I'm avoiding it as well. One big thing to

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 2>think about with the Cowboys too, is that they have

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>two different factors about their team that makes me nervous

0:32:58.400 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to take a big spread. Number one is that they

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>have they're very defensively oriented, so there's not a lot

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of points scored in Cowboys games. And they're a rushing offense.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>So when you run the ball more, the clock obviously

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>goes a bit quicker, and when that happens, you don't

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 2>have enough time to kind of win by more than

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>double digit points. So for that reason, I stay away

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 2>from Cowboys when they're favored by that kind of number.

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that, yeah, I agree with you. I'm not

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna better on that game either. Age if I would,

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I would lean Giants.

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's exactly right. And I think that that surprises

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>people because I think everybody's gonna look and be like, well,

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we love the Cowboys and stuff like that.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, I just I really can't do it.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Sixty three percent of experts are taking Dallas right now

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>at seven and a half, so you know that is

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>something to bear in mind. But for me, again, like you.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>If I was going to take it, I would take

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Giants getting the seven and a half, all right,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So for our it's a trap segment for our picks

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to avoid. You want no part of the Chargers laying

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a half to the Cults. I want no

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the Cowboys laying seven and a half to

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the Giant. All right, successful, first time we ever did.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's trapped.

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a try to go.

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you're crushing it right now. And there

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't even talk about the NFC South.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, we're here.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Finally we're able to get off it. All right, it's

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>time for our final segment, where we are going to

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>break down our favorite player props from this weekend's game.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to come up with something clever for this.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>It was like proper analysis or something like that. I've

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>got nothing. I'm just going to go conservative here and

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to go with top prop. So that

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's all it is. This is our top prop segment.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It's our one prop bet from this weekend that we

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot. And admittedly there aren't you know, the

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>full bevy of prop bets are not available in the market. Yet.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>There'll be a few more that will come out as

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we get closer to the game. But we've taken a

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>look at what is roughly available in the market. So

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>why don't we go ahead and start. You can what's

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>your top prop for the weekend?

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 2>So my top prop, and I'm realizing I'm contradicting myself.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 2>I just said I was going to stay away from

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the Giants Cowboys game, but not with my prop. There's

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a prop bet that I like in the game. I

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 2>couldn't find the exact number, but I'm assuming it's a

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be taking this Saquon Barkley under rushing yards

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>for that game. I'm gonna assume it's probably gonna be

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 2>around eighty four. Like I said, I don't quite see yet,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>but whatever the number is, I like the under. His

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 2>lowest rushing total in all of last year was against

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys in Week two, so it was early in

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the season as well. He only gained twenty eight yards

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 2>on eleven carries, and Cowboys gave up fifth fewest rushing

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>yards per game last season. So obviously there's a lot

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of hype bo Barkley. He is, rightfully so one of

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the best running backs in the league, especially one of

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the best young running backs in the league. So I

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 2>think because of that, the number is gonna be higher

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 2>than it should be against a Cowboys defense that can

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 2>stop their run. So in that game, I like a

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 2>prop bet. I like the under on Saquon Barkley's rushing yards.

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a good one because I just,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't see them being able to have

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that many opportunities to run. I think they'll try, and

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Saquon will be heavily involved. But if you're

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, that's what you're gonna stop. You're gonna make

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning try to beat you through the air. So

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that putting all your effort into stopping

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley on the ground is what the Cowboys are

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And I like it. I like it.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I feel bad because we've been in mostly

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an agreement here. You know, I could try to fake

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>it and be like, nah, dude, he's rushing for one

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty, but I think it would be disingenuous.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you can disagree with mine here. Okay, so

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>really really rev up dig deep for this. It's not

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the South. But I'm going to go with Chris Carson

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to go one hundred rushing yards or more against the Bengals.

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's at plus two thirty five. Now I would be

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>fine to take these seventy five or more rushing yards,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's at minus one thirteen. And for the difference

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that you'll get on your money, I think it's more

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>than worth it. The Seahawks are nine and a half

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>point favorites here at home on Sunday against the Bengals.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>They are the most run heavy team in the NFL.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They ran nearly fifty percent of the time last year.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>They appear to hate Rashad Penny, and I think they're

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Carson early, and I think they're

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Carson late once they're ahead and

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to put the game on ice. He had over

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards rushing in each of his life last

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>three games last year. I think the fact that you

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 1>can get nearly two and a half times your money

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>on this wager struck me as pretty crazy. So it

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is my top prop of the week by far. Go

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead and hate it, fake a disagreement, or do something.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't love it. I don't hate it, but I

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 2>don't love it.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Who whoa who? I was kidding. I mean, you've got

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to get on board, all right? Go ahead?

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>No, no, go ahead, go ahead bye.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess a couple of my biggest questions would be,

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, how are the Seahawks going to kind

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of divvy up their their carries? Is Chris Carson? Is

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 2>he going to be the workhorse for them? Is Penny

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna get any carries there?

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a mild risk, but given what they

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have said and given what they have shown in the preseason,

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>they appear to have no interest in getting Rashad Penny

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>overly involved. I think this is going to be a

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>game where Chris Carson, I think the whole season, as

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>long as he doesn't get injured, I think they are

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna heavily push Carson. And you know, I in addition

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to being a betting pros on the list, I'm also

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do fantasy workover at fantasypros dot Com.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>And Carson has been one of the biggest risers from

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective, and a lot of that is because

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>every indication coming out of Seattle is that they want

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>him to just be the bell cow back, and I mean,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Penny will get some, but I think, you know, as

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>they did at the end of last year, I think

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty carries for the game is well within reach, if

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not more so. I think, you know, just given this game,

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to go to him pretty much

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the entire game. I mean, the worry, honestly, in terms

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of the split, would be much more of once the

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>game is in hand, as you'd expect it to be.

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are nine and a half point favorites. As

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I said that, maybe they would say, Okay, let's save

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>our guy here, let's go to the backups. But other

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>than that, I really think that he is going to

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be He's going to get the vast majority of the carries.

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean the Bengals did give up the

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>fourth most rushing yards in the league per game last year,

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 2>so they can give up yards in the ground, and

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 2>like you said, Seahawks are probably gonna get up so

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 2>they will have to run the ball. So my only

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 2>concern would be just how they're going to split the carries.

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:53.800
<v Speaker 2>That would be my one concern. But other than that,

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I like it, especially at that price too.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You see, you see I pushed you in. Yeah, you

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>take it. And again a big thing is the price.

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, plus two thirty five seems crazy to me.

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Basically getting two and a half times on your money

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seems crazy to me. For a guy, it's not like

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards is this magical number. He did it

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>his last three games last season, and everything coming out

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of them is that they love him. I think he's

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>going to get all the work. I think they're going

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to run, run, run as much as possible. So I

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>do like that. So you like Saquon Barkley. Again, the

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>number is a little fuzzy. It's somewhere in the low eighties.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>We put it at eighty four, probably to be generous

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think it might be around right around there.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to be in the low eighties. And

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>you like under which I think is a good pick.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And I like Chris Carson a little more specific to

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 1>go one hundred rushing yards or more against the Bengals.

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>And that said, plus two thirty five, all right, man,

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that is going to do it for today's show. That

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>was really great. Ian. I remind everyone where they can

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>find you and your work.

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you can find me on Twitter. That's where

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 2>most my work is posted. There, we at least get

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 2>links to everything there, so my tag is AI Nmacos

0:39:58.040 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and then of course head over to odds Shark doc

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Off for any betting information there, and I do have

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:04.879
<v Speaker 2>some occasional articles up there, but for the most part,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.959
<v Speaker 2>you'll see everything I do, including all my written stuff

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 2>in videos over on Twitter.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You can also find him at my house this weekend

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>where he's going to be laying some betting odds on

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the kid's soccer game. As I said, well, that was

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyable. I thought your picks were solid. I really

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>did not disagree with many, if any of them at all.

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry about that. Next time I will definitely force

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>some disagreement, but I hope we can do it again

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>during the season.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, man, it's a lot of fun. Good luck

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 2>to both of us this weekend.

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so. I do want to remind everyone before we

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>go about bet MGM, where you can place your first

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>waiter of up to one hundred dollars risk free, and Sideboss,

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 1>where they're offering a free to play season long NFL

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>handicapping contest with fifty thousand dollars in cash prizes. Good

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>luck with your wagers this weekend, my friends. We'll be

0:40:48.200 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>back breaking down the early lines next week. That the

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that have not been not