1
00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520
Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

3
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120
Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

5
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720
Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

6
00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:33,800
Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. As

7
00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,519
Speaker 1: we talk about potential tariffs and trade skirmishes, it's important

8
00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:40,720
Speaker 1: to take a look at the industries that are being affected,

9
00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:43,080
Speaker 1: and joining US now has pretty intimate looked at this

10
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:48,240
Speaker 1: with respect to the apparel and footwear industries. Rick Helfenvine

11
00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:50,760
Speaker 1: he joins US now. He's president chief executive of the

12
00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:54,040
Speaker 1: American Apparel and Footwear Association and he joins us here

13
00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:56,160
Speaker 1: in our eleven three oh studios. And just to give

14
00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:59,760
Speaker 1: people a sense of what the A A F A is,

15
00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,880
Speaker 1: UH is sort of the voice of the industry that

16
00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:05,880
Speaker 1: includes everyone from Levi to Ralph Lauren and Gap to

17
00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:10,840
Speaker 1: Target in Washington wearing clothes. If you're wearing clothes right,

18
00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:13,880
Speaker 1: this is this is the person who is representing your

19
00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:16,880
Speaker 1: clothes in Washington. Rix. I want to start with you

20
00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:20,479
Speaker 1: know what you're hearing from your members with respect to

21
00:01:21,160 --> 00:01:25,240
Speaker 1: the tariff talk and the trade tensions. Have any of

22
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,040
Speaker 1: their business has already been affected? All of our businesses

23
00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:30,399
Speaker 1: have been affected, and our members are talking to us,

24
00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:33,160
Speaker 1: I have to say, more than they've ever talked to

25
00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:35,440
Speaker 1: us before. A lot of it is trying to figure

26
00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:39,080
Speaker 1: out exactly what's going on in Washington, what's the policy?

27
00:01:39,120 --> 00:01:42,720
Speaker 1: What do they want to do? What is Washington trying

28
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:45,600
Speaker 1: to do to their business? They're having enough trouble just

29
00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:48,920
Speaker 1: running their own businesses. Do they really want to have

30
00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,680
Speaker 1: added burdens? Do they want to change their global supply?

31
00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:53,720
Speaker 1: Change weld? It's like this is important. I mean, how

32
00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:57,960
Speaker 1: much has the trade tension actually reduced from their bottom

33
00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:01,600
Speaker 1: line so far? I think that the reduction in bottom

34
00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:05,640
Speaker 1: line is is uh fast forward. It's coming. People are

35
00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:08,760
Speaker 1: aware of it. Prices will go up, sales will go down,

36
00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:13,679
Speaker 1: margins will be more difficult to attain. We don't understand

37
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,240
Speaker 1: why the administration is pushing so hard to take a

38
00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:19,840
Speaker 1: business that is it's still in recovery mode for the

39
00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:24,040
Speaker 1: whole his whole host of reasons, and trying to add

40
00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:28,000
Speaker 1: burden to it. They're not really helping us Rick, I

41
00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:30,079
Speaker 1: just want to give you the opportunity to share a

42
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:34,320
Speaker 1: little bit of your background, because, uh, this speaks to

43
00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:41,040
Speaker 1: your experience at USA textile mills, also working for an

44
00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:45,480
Speaker 1: overseas Hong Kong manufacturer of of apparel. Just give people

45
00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:47,840
Speaker 1: a little bit of your background so they understand that

46
00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:50,760
Speaker 1: you're coming to this not from a political point of view,

47
00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:55,440
Speaker 1: but you're coming to this from a real business perspective. Absolutely.

48
00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,200
Speaker 1: I mean, I grew up in the textile industry. My

49
00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:01,360
Speaker 1: father was in the textile industry. I worked for a

50
00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:05,680
Speaker 1: wonderful company out of Cleveland, Ohio called Campus Water and Sportswear,

51
00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:09,400
Speaker 1: which was owned by inter COO. They taught me everything.

52
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:13,680
Speaker 1: I was down in the mills. I was dying, finishing, weaving,

53
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:16,760
Speaker 1: you name it. I was involved in it from the

54
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:22,680
Speaker 1: ground floor. Later, we also had nineteen US UM manufacturing facilities,

55
00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:25,480
Speaker 1: so I know how to manufacture product in the US. However,

56
00:03:26,280 --> 00:03:30,359
Speaker 1: later on the industry morphed and more of it went overseas.

57
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:32,560
Speaker 1: That happened pretty much in the nineties. So I got

58
00:03:32,639 --> 00:03:35,440
Speaker 1: involved with a company who was based in Hong Kong.

59
00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:39,520
Speaker 1: We manufactured overseas and I got to see all aspects

60
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:43,320
Speaker 1: of the industry, which now as it relates to trade,

61
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,920
Speaker 1: I personally feel the pain. I understand what our members

62
00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:50,240
Speaker 1: are going through, and it is it is hurtful, we

63
00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:54,240
Speaker 1: believe it or not. In our industry, Um, we were

64
00:03:54,520 --> 00:04:01,600
Speaker 1: six percent of all imports. Keep in mindent of for well,

65
00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:06,200
Speaker 1: apparel is imported, so we're six percent of all the

66
00:04:06,320 --> 00:04:12,880
Speaker 1: US's imports. But we pay of all the duties collected consequently, Uh,

67
00:04:13,160 --> 00:04:16,159
Speaker 1: any additional burden to that, We've learned to live with

68
00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:20,520
Speaker 1: that burden. But any additional burden is downright painful. Well,

69
00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:22,520
Speaker 1: just to play Devil's advocate here, I mean you talk

70
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:25,800
Speaker 1: about the shift in the nineties where the manufacturing what overseas?

71
00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:29,280
Speaker 1: I mean President Trump is kind of responding to that.

72
00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:33,159
Speaker 1: Perhaps you know, a decade or so too late, but

73
00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:37,080
Speaker 1: I'm wondering, you know, what would happen if those jobs

74
00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:40,960
Speaker 1: did come back to the US and manufacturing could return. Well,

75
00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,240
Speaker 1: we always ask the question because we also represent all

76
00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:48,000
Speaker 1: the domestic manufacturers, which is quite frankly, about three percent

77
00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:51,760
Speaker 1: of the market and growing and growing, but still only

78
00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:55,040
Speaker 1: three percent of the market. Look, when you're making apparel,

79
00:04:55,080 --> 00:04:57,560
Speaker 1: there are two aspects of it. One is the raw material,

80
00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:04,080
Speaker 1: fabric raw material is capital intensive, not labor intensive. Assembling

81
00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:06,400
Speaker 1: a garment as labor intensive, takes a lot of people,

82
00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,160
Speaker 1: and that's why a lot of this has morphed overseas.

83
00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:12,919
Speaker 1: We can't really get enough people to assemble garments, and

84
00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:15,240
Speaker 1: we can't compete on a global scale, which is what

85
00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,919
Speaker 1: America is about now, trading and competing on a global scale.

86
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:20,840
Speaker 1: One thing I'm wondering, you know, you speak to a

87
00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:24,400
Speaker 1: lot of people in Washington, d C. Is there unanimated

88
00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:29,000
Speaker 1: unanimity in anything that you hear when you talk to Congressman. Yeah,

89
00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:35,599
Speaker 1: there's unanimity because people are really questioning why, in a sense,

90
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:39,960
Speaker 1: we're misusing these tariffs that you hear about. They're misdirected.

91
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,480
Speaker 1: They are directives of the White House. They are powers

92
00:05:43,480 --> 00:05:47,440
Speaker 1: that the White House can use without consulting Congress, and Congress,

93
00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:51,720
Speaker 1: by the Constitution, is in charge of trade. I'm starting

94
00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:55,240
Speaker 1: to think that maybe the FDA should get involved because

95
00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:58,960
Speaker 1: the White House. Think about this. The White House is

96
00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:02,640
Speaker 1: recommending metas in the form of tariffs for a disease

97
00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:06,799
Speaker 1: that it can't cure. Think about that these tariffs won't

98
00:06:06,839 --> 00:06:10,239
Speaker 1: cure our problems. They were wrong and they've been proven

99
00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:14,000
Speaker 1: wrong before. The whole history of tariffs is very interesting.

100
00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:18,400
Speaker 1: First time we heard about smooth holy precipitated the Great

101
00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:21,920
Speaker 1: Depression um President Bush tried it in two thousand two

102
00:06:21,920 --> 00:06:25,600
Speaker 1: lines steal with tariff, Remember that one lasted one year,

103
00:06:25,640 --> 00:06:28,440
Speaker 1: was supposed to be three years. And then President Obama

104
00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:33,000
Speaker 1: tried it with tires. It was a disaster, absolute disaster.

105
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,919
Speaker 1: Tariffs don't work. They're hidden tax on the American consumer.

106
00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:39,560
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for being with us. Rick Health

107
00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:42,400
Speaker 1: and Bind is the president and the chief executive of

108
00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:46,520
Speaker 1: the American Apparel and Footwear Association talking about tariffs, and

109
00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:48,919
Speaker 1: we look forward to having you on the program in

110
00:06:48,920 --> 00:07:06,040
Speaker 1: the future. Much appreciated. Warren Buffett, the chief executive of

111
00:07:06,120 --> 00:07:09,680
Speaker 1: Berkshire Hathaway, and Jamie Diamond, the chief executive of JP

112
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:12,760
Speaker 1: Morgan Chase, are looking for some radical changes to the

113
00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:17,320
Speaker 1: way public companies disclose financial information. They have said that

114
00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:22,120
Speaker 1: quarterly financial guidance encourages short term thinking and that it

115
00:07:22,280 --> 00:07:26,760
Speaker 1: stifles growth and limits innovation in the economy. Here to

116
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,640
Speaker 1: tell us more about this proposed change is Andrew Stoultman,

117
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:34,120
Speaker 1: securities fraud attorney at Stoutman Law Offices. Andrew, thank you

118
00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:37,760
Speaker 1: for being with us. What's your first reaction to these

119
00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:42,280
Speaker 1: comments by both the Jamie Diamond and Warren Buffett. Maybe

120
00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:44,560
Speaker 1: I'm a little biased, but to me, it kind of

121
00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:47,880
Speaker 1: sounds like the worst idea since the Kardashian credit card.

122
00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:50,600
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just a bad idea. It's kind of

123
00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:55,280
Speaker 1: an existential question. I mean, what information our investors entitled to,

124
00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:58,960
Speaker 1: and under the federal securities laws, they are all predicated

125
00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:02,280
Speaker 1: on full and complete disclosure. And if we go from

126
00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:05,800
Speaker 1: releasing this information four times a year to maybe only

127
00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:09,360
Speaker 1: two times or even one time a year, I just

128
00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:14,160
Speaker 1: don't see how that's good for investors, and especially the

129
00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,160
Speaker 1: retail investors, because large investors will still be able to

130
00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:21,280
Speaker 1: get access to this information, but smaller investors won't. So

131
00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,440
Speaker 1: I just think it's a prior a priority issue. Are

132
00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:29,360
Speaker 1: we placing corporate interests ahead of the interests of small investors? Well, Andrew,

133
00:08:29,480 --> 00:08:31,040
Speaker 1: just to push back a little bit, I mean, the

134
00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:34,520
Speaker 1: argument here is that these sort of short termism, or

135
00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:38,280
Speaker 1: the concept that the chief executives of these companies have

136
00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:40,720
Speaker 1: to play to their just the most immediate quarter and

137
00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:43,120
Speaker 1: giving the best guidance possible that they don't take some

138
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:45,960
Speaker 1: of the extra money that they have invested back in

139
00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:49,800
Speaker 1: their business, build more plans, take more risks. I mean

140
00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:52,000
Speaker 1: not only that, but you could argue, and this is

141
00:08:52,040 --> 00:08:54,600
Speaker 1: something else that Warren Buffett and James and Diamond were arguing,

142
00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:58,800
Speaker 1: which is that this requirement to continually forecast earnings is

143
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:00,800
Speaker 1: one reason why there are many are companies that have

144
00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:04,080
Speaker 1: gone public, which also isn't necessarily in the best interest

145
00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:07,200
Speaker 1: of retail investors. How do you respond to those issues, Well,

146
00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:10,400
Speaker 1: I think that's on companies. I mean, if companies are

147
00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:14,000
Speaker 1: spending an inordinate amount of time making certain that quarterly

148
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:17,280
Speaker 1: earnings are met instead of a year or two years

149
00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 1: or five years out, that's on them. I mean, there's

150
00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:25,920
Speaker 1: no obligation to to basically meet those quarterly numbers. And yes,

151
00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:29,320
Speaker 1: you can argue that volatility will be increased to the

152
00:09:29,360 --> 00:09:32,679
Speaker 1: extent companies have to release this information quarterly. But there

153
00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:35,680
Speaker 1: are plenty of companies out there, including Warren Buffett, that

154
00:09:35,760 --> 00:09:40,080
Speaker 1: basically remind investors, don't look at our quarterly information. We

155
00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:42,120
Speaker 1: are on a year to year or five or ten

156
00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:44,920
Speaker 1: year track. And I feel like the you know, the

157
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:49,360
Speaker 1: pressures it's self inflicted on CEOs to meet those quarterly numbers.

158
00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:52,000
Speaker 1: I just I don't get it. Well, you know, Andrew,

159
00:09:52,040 --> 00:09:55,000
Speaker 1: I wanted to follow up with the last point that

160
00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,400
Speaker 1: I was making, which is that many fewer companies have

161
00:09:57,440 --> 00:09:59,560
Speaker 1: been going public, and then part it is because of

162
00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:04,199
Speaker 1: these requirements to continually forecast data. And people are arguing

163
00:10:04,280 --> 00:10:06,920
Speaker 1: that this is also really bad for retail investors because

164
00:10:06,920 --> 00:10:10,320
Speaker 1: they have a fewer, smaller pool of companies to invest in.

165
00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:12,560
Speaker 1: What do you say to that. I think there are

166
00:10:12,559 --> 00:10:16,040
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of reasons why there are less companies listed.

167
00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,040
Speaker 1: I don't think that the you know, the pressure of

168
00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:24,320
Speaker 1: releasing quarterly earnings or quarterly revenue or that guidance is

169
00:10:24,360 --> 00:10:27,959
Speaker 1: the sort of thing that would cause UH companies to say,

170
00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 1: you know what, we're going to remain private, We're not

171
00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:32,360
Speaker 1: going to go public. I just, you know, I don't

172
00:10:32,400 --> 00:10:35,720
Speaker 1: buy it. And look, if companies are that concerned about

173
00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:39,160
Speaker 1: having to release information that I, you know, I've argued

174
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:42,000
Speaker 1: they have a finuciary duty to release and provide guidance on,

175
00:10:42,400 --> 00:10:46,000
Speaker 1: maybe they shouldn't be public companies. Alright, I'm just wonder

176
00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:50,040
Speaker 1: if we could just tease apart this idea that releasing

177
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,960
Speaker 1: information that is pertinent to public shareholders is one thing.

178
00:10:55,920 --> 00:11:00,400
Speaker 1: But then that three month ninety days cycle of having

179
00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:04,920
Speaker 1: to meet estimates that are put together based on the

180
00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:08,200
Speaker 1: limited information that you are legally allowed to offer the

181
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:14,439
Speaker 1: analyst community. Do you not see that there's a difference. No,

182
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,000
Speaker 1: I mean okay, So all right, No, all right, So

183
00:11:17,160 --> 00:11:18,880
Speaker 1: let me ask you then, Have you worked for a

184
00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:22,959
Speaker 1: public or a public company? No? I haven't. Okay, So

185
00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:27,160
Speaker 1: if someone came to you and said, working for a

186
00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:30,920
Speaker 1: publicly traded company is very different than working for a

187
00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:37,280
Speaker 1: privately held company, would you accept that? Well, yes, I

188
00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:40,080
Speaker 1: would accept that it is radically different. But once you

189
00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:45,400
Speaker 1: take public, public money, you have fiduciary duties to those investors. No. No,

190
00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:48,320
Speaker 1: I understand that, But I mean, but but but it

191
00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:50,480
Speaker 1: doesn't seem like people do because people are taking a

192
00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:53,160
Speaker 1: position that, g it's such a it's such a pain

193
00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:56,640
Speaker 1: for us to release information to the shareholders who have

194
00:11:56,720 --> 00:11:59,960
Speaker 1: placed their money with our company, and we all fiduciary

195
00:12:00,160 --> 00:12:03,679
Speaker 1: duties to those investors, and if it's burdensome, if it's

196
00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:07,200
Speaker 1: too difficult, then they probably shouldn't be publicly traded companies.

197
00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:10,120
Speaker 1: I guess i'd ask you this question in September two

198
00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:12,920
Speaker 1: thousand and eight, do you want to know whether Merrill

199
00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:18,000
Speaker 1: Lynch and Morgan Stanley's revenues are dramatically declining or increasing

200
00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:21,880
Speaker 1: or staying or basically staying neutral. I mean, that's important

201
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:24,160
Speaker 1: information for you to decide whether you want to keep

202
00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:27,600
Speaker 1: your money or invest your money in these companies. Yeah, Um,

203
00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:30,160
Speaker 1: and Andrew, I'm wondering. No one thing that struck me.

204
00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:32,240
Speaker 1: And some of the stories that were written about this,

205
00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:36,800
Speaker 1: uh many noted that the number of companies that actually

206
00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:41,520
Speaker 1: do give forecasts earning earnings per share forecasts has fallen

207
00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:45,240
Speaker 1: over the past eight years to less than a third

208
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:48,400
Speaker 1: from about thirty six in two thousand and ten. Have

209
00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:52,960
Speaker 1: you seen the companies that release less guidance get treated

210
00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:57,720
Speaker 1: better than the other companies are worse by investors? That's

211
00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:00,720
Speaker 1: a that's a really hard question, and I don't you know,

212
00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,160
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to it, and I'm afraid

213
00:13:03,200 --> 00:13:04,840
Speaker 1: to kind of go out on a limb and and

214
00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:08,720
Speaker 1: and give an opinion on that. But so I'm just

215
00:13:08,800 --> 00:13:11,360
Speaker 1: not comfortable going out on that branch because I haven't

216
00:13:11,400 --> 00:13:14,280
Speaker 1: studied that quite as intensely as I would need to

217
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:17,800
Speaker 1: in order to make an opinion on it. Okay, let's

218
00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:20,240
Speaker 1: just to go back to this idea of quarterly information.

219
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:24,319
Speaker 1: The idea of being not being that they would uh

220
00:13:24,640 --> 00:13:29,080
Speaker 1: decrease the amount of information that they would offer the

221
00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:36,440
Speaker 1: shareholding public, but this idea of offering guidance, and then

222
00:13:36,480 --> 00:13:40,559
Speaker 1: that guidance, as you well know, gets used by Wall

223
00:13:40,600 --> 00:13:47,600
Speaker 1: Street analysts in order to estimate what will or won't happen.

224
00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:50,720
Speaker 1: And I'm sure you're well aware of what happens on

225
00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:54,840
Speaker 1: those earnings days when the company meets estimates, when it

226
00:13:55,480 --> 00:13:59,959
Speaker 1: uh doesn't meet estimates? Do you believe that that increase

227
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:05,200
Speaker 1: east volatility is good for their business? Well, I guess

228
00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:08,600
Speaker 1: I would flip it and say the opposite of that is,

229
00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:13,480
Speaker 1: what if you're only uh disclosing numbers uh twice a

230
00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:18,840
Speaker 1: year or even once a year, disclosed them every quarter? Great?

231
00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,920
Speaker 1: Great disclosed, right, And that's what we're arguing that these

232
00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:25,400
Speaker 1: numbers should have to be disclosed every single quarter. And

233
00:14:25,440 --> 00:14:28,800
Speaker 1: the fact that Jamie Diamond and and and Warren Buffett

234
00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:31,600
Speaker 1: don't want to do it isn't a valid reason when

235
00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:34,360
Speaker 1: you're weighing the impact that that would have, especially on

236
00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:38,080
Speaker 1: small retail investors. Look, I personally think it's kind of

237
00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:41,320
Speaker 1: ironic that Warren Buffett is advocating for this position, given

238
00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:45,120
Speaker 1: he's the biggest shareholder in Wells Fargo. And if I'm

239
00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:49,120
Speaker 1: contemplating investing or staying invested in Wells Fargo, I want

240
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:52,000
Speaker 1: to know what sort of impact have all of these

241
00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:55,520
Speaker 1: scandals had on earnings and revenues for the company. And

242
00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:58,640
Speaker 1: if I'm not getting that in a timely fashioned four

243
00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:01,480
Speaker 1: times a year, I that kind of creates a vacuum

244
00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:05,320
Speaker 1: of information now, Andrew, Unfortunately we have to leave it there,

245
00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:07,560
Speaker 1: but thank you so much. A really good discussion and

246
00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:09,960
Speaker 1: hashing in a lot of the issues. Andrew Stoultman is

247
00:15:10,040 --> 00:15:29,960
Speaker 1: securities for an attorney at Stoultman Law Offices. The credibility

248
00:15:30,160 --> 00:15:34,160
Speaker 1: of central banks in emerging markets? Is it on the line? Well,

249
00:15:34,240 --> 00:15:37,119
Speaker 1: here to tell us more is Damian sass Our Bloomberg

250
00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:43,440
Speaker 1: Intelligence is fixed income strategist. All right, Damien, emerging markets.

251
00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:49,440
Speaker 1: There's a currency issue Turkey, Argentina, Brazil. Need I go on? Uh?

252
00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:53,120
Speaker 1: Is there going to be a moment where the central

253
00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:56,280
Speaker 1: banks of countries such as those realize that they're pushing

254
00:15:56,320 --> 00:15:59,200
Speaker 1: against the string? Yeah? No, I mean we are. We

255
00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:01,240
Speaker 1: are in the midst of a crisis of confidence here

256
00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:03,760
Speaker 1: PIM and so what what we were just talking about.

257
00:16:03,800 --> 00:16:07,040
Speaker 1: What's interesting is inflation is actually stable or declining in

258
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:10,040
Speaker 1: most emerging markets. Yet you know, it's it's I mean,

259
00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:14,360
Speaker 1: markets are rushing to price in considerable um rate hikes

260
00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:17,040
Speaker 1: in each of these markets, you know, over the next

261
00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:18,840
Speaker 1: three months. You know, we have a lot of central

262
00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:21,120
Speaker 1: bank meetings coming on the heels of the FED next week,

263
00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:24,840
Speaker 1: and Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, I mean, most of these

264
00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:28,480
Speaker 1: markets are are now pricing in additional tightening. Just you know,

265
00:16:28,760 --> 00:16:31,480
Speaker 1: it's it's it's pretty unbelievable just how quickly things have changed,

266
00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:34,400
Speaker 1: and only the last month. Well, um, first of all,

267
00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:36,240
Speaker 1: I mean it's it's hard to sort of speak about

268
00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:39,120
Speaker 1: emerging markets as and monolith because there is some, uh,

269
00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:42,160
Speaker 1: some spots where there is considerable inflation. I mean Turkey,

270
00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,760
Speaker 1: for example, being a poster child for that. But I

271
00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:49,480
Speaker 1: have to wonder whether this is all a byproduct of

272
00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,640
Speaker 1: the FEDS tightening and the fact that you're not seeing

273
00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:55,960
Speaker 1: the acceleration in stimulus from the e c B and

274
00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:57,560
Speaker 1: the b o J that you had in the past.

275
00:16:57,600 --> 00:16:59,480
Speaker 1: You're still seeing same of that's just not the acceleration.

276
00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:02,360
Speaker 1: So they can't offset the fact that the FED has

277
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,560
Speaker 1: started to shrink its balance sheet and that it is

278
00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:07,000
Speaker 1: raising rates. Well, it's a relative value game, right, I

279
00:17:07,000 --> 00:17:10,199
Speaker 1: mean you carry so well in the short end of

280
00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:12,600
Speaker 1: the U S. Treasury curve. Now, I mean money markets, right,

281
00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:14,160
Speaker 1: I mean it's an asset class all of a sudden,

282
00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:16,239
Speaker 1: all over again. Right, that's what everybody's talking about, and

283
00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,080
Speaker 1: so E M has to compete with that. And you know,

284
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:21,280
Speaker 1: there are easier ways, I guess, to make money than

285
00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:24,240
Speaker 1: investing in emerging markets with all of the currency volatility

286
00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:26,680
Speaker 1: to your point, and that's going on right now. Now.

287
00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:29,479
Speaker 1: It used to be that if you had an emergent,

288
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:32,399
Speaker 1: let's say you were a country that was export driven,

289
00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:36,840
Speaker 1: maybe commodity export driven, right, it was perfectly fine for

290
00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:39,720
Speaker 1: you to have your currency devalue against the US dollar

291
00:17:39,880 --> 00:17:45,040
Speaker 1: because that made you much more competitive. Cheaper exports, you

292
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:48,840
Speaker 1: take over markets. But now you've got trade barriers going

293
00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:51,720
Speaker 1: up around the world. Yeah yeah, now, I mean we

294
00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:53,560
Speaker 1: we we were just talking about that the other day.

295
00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:55,919
Speaker 1: So you know what's interesting is most people, you know,

296
00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:59,800
Speaker 1: ascribe all the pain to China. Right, the China has

297
00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:03,119
Speaker 1: BA basically, um, you know Chinese imports, right, or you

298
00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:04,800
Speaker 1: know the trade depths at the U S has with

299
00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:06,960
Speaker 1: China and how that kind of filters through into Mexico

300
00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:08,760
Speaker 1: and a lot of their you know, the U S

301
00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:11,840
Speaker 1: has other trade partners, etcetera. But what's really interesting here

302
00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:13,720
Speaker 1: is with these trade barriers coming up, and even you

303
00:18:13,720 --> 00:18:17,000
Speaker 1: know President Trump's kind of closet proposal to slap withcent

304
00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,520
Speaker 1: tax on auto imports, I mean this, I mean, think

305
00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:23,199
Speaker 1: about what that would do to Germany and to the

306
00:18:23,280 --> 00:18:26,880
Speaker 1: CE three, poland hungry check. I mean, people aren't really

307
00:18:26,880 --> 00:18:29,680
Speaker 1: talking about this, but you know, I mean those economies

308
00:18:29,720 --> 00:18:32,040
Speaker 1: would I mean, it would just be it would be devastating, right,

309
00:18:32,119 --> 00:18:33,800
Speaker 1: And you know, we look at so we were looking

310
00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:37,359
Speaker 1: at basically which emerging market countries are most at risk

311
00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:40,080
Speaker 1: given their bilateral trade and balances and the two that

312
00:18:40,160 --> 00:18:42,720
Speaker 1: kind of pop up if indeed China needs to concede

313
00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:46,160
Speaker 1: to to to US demands or South Korea and Brazil. Right,

314
00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:49,520
Speaker 1: Brazil is a huge exporter of soy and and and

315
00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:51,760
Speaker 1: soybeans and all that kind of stuff. Yet the US

316
00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:53,720
Speaker 1: is the leading producer of that globally. So where do

317
00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:57,240
Speaker 1: you think, you know, the twenty five billion dollars you

318
00:18:57,280 --> 00:18:59,280
Speaker 1: know that China's proposing to to kind of give to

319
00:18:59,359 --> 00:19:01,120
Speaker 1: the US is going to come from right and South

320
00:19:01,200 --> 00:19:04,800
Speaker 1: Korea's machine it's it's chips, it's semi conducting semiconductor chips.

321
00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:08,320
Speaker 1: So you can definitely see China begin to may begin

322
00:19:08,359 --> 00:19:11,080
Speaker 1: to kind of substitute away from you know, from from

323
00:19:11,119 --> 00:19:13,640
Speaker 1: dealing with those two countries and maybe you know, uh,

324
00:19:13,800 --> 00:19:15,680
Speaker 1: you know, spend a little bit more money in terms

325
00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 1: of importing from the US in those two areas. Are

326
00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:23,440
Speaker 1: we seeing contagion? I mean, contagions a dirty word, but yes,

327
00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:25,239
Speaker 1: this is exactly what we're seeing right now. I mean

328
00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:27,439
Speaker 1: we're seeing you know, we're seeing things spread. And I

329
00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:30,159
Speaker 1: think it's more a fact of the liquid currencies, you know,

330
00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:33,800
Speaker 1: the rand now and uh and the Mexican paste, which

331
00:19:33,800 --> 00:19:35,879
Speaker 1: are basically being used as a hedge for a lot

332
00:19:35,920 --> 00:19:37,679
Speaker 1: of macro players here to kind of all set their

333
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:40,199
Speaker 1: emerging market currency risks. So so yeah, I mean what

334
00:19:40,240 --> 00:19:42,720
Speaker 1: you're seeing is contagion only because people are in search

335
00:19:42,760 --> 00:19:46,080
Speaker 1: of a liquid hedge through which the kind of to

336
00:19:46,160 --> 00:19:48,200
Speaker 1: play what's going on now in a m The reason

337
00:19:48,280 --> 00:19:52,000
Speaker 1: why I ask is because you're not seeing massive flows

338
00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:55,960
Speaker 1: out of the broad based indexed emerging markets debt funds.

339
00:19:56,520 --> 00:19:59,960
Speaker 1: So if this is contagion, I just in wondering. You know,

340
00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:01,800
Speaker 1: also when you talk to people, they say, these are

341
00:20:01,840 --> 00:20:05,359
Speaker 1: idiosyncratic stories and they point to, uh, problems in the

342
00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:08,399
Speaker 1: underlying economies. But you know, is there a degree at

343
00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:10,440
Speaker 1: which you could always find issues and sort of a

344
00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:13,679
Speaker 1: tribute the moves to them. But really what we're seeing

345
00:20:13,960 --> 00:20:16,640
Speaker 1: is just macro plays that are that are playing out.

346
00:20:16,680 --> 00:20:19,199
Speaker 1: Well yeah, I mean, okay, so contagions there. I mean,

347
00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:21,280
Speaker 1: there are two ways of defining it. Right. There's you know,

348
00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:23,720
Speaker 1: financial market contagion, which is what we're seeing here, which

349
00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:26,359
Speaker 1: is merely you know, price action. Right, You're not really

350
00:20:26,359 --> 00:20:29,320
Speaker 1: seeing it affect the real economies yet to your point,

351
00:20:29,400 --> 00:20:32,639
Speaker 1: you know, you're not seeing you know, real economies, real

352
00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:35,879
Speaker 1: growth declining, you know, um, real inflation picking up in

353
00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:38,600
Speaker 1: a lot of these economies. Um, you know. But but

354
00:20:38,600 --> 00:20:41,280
Speaker 1: but I think you're definitely seeing financial market contagion, and

355
00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:43,200
Speaker 1: that is a function of the fact that, hey, people

356
00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,520
Speaker 1: are rushing to protect their interests in a lot of

357
00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:48,959
Speaker 1: these markets, and they're just aren't a lot of liquid

358
00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:51,959
Speaker 1: mechanisms out there, uh, to do it. So people are

359
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:54,000
Speaker 1: kind of going to the rand, they're going to the rail,

360
00:20:54,119 --> 00:20:56,160
Speaker 1: they're going to you know, they're going to the Lira

361
00:20:56,240 --> 00:20:58,239
Speaker 1: for example. I mean just to basically try and you know,

362
00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:01,480
Speaker 1: offset some of the weakness and um and so that

363
00:21:01,880 --> 00:21:04,440
Speaker 1: from that perspective, that's the type of contagion that we're seeing.

364
00:21:05,640 --> 00:21:08,200
Speaker 1: Do we need to also go visit places like Miami?

365
00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:15,800
Speaker 1: I mean talk about capital moving just look at home prices, yeah,

366
00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:18,760
Speaker 1: look at where look at where the money comes from. Yeah, no,

367
00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:20,520
Speaker 1: I mean there's a lot of I mean there's there's

368
00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:23,320
Speaker 1: a lot of I mean what we look at, I

369
00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:27,480
Speaker 1: guess in e m IS is remittances and repatriation of assets,

370
00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:29,720
Speaker 1: and a lot of that data, unfortunately is in real time.

371
00:21:29,760 --> 00:21:31,479
Speaker 1: It's hard to kind of get your arms around it.

372
00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:35,600
Speaker 1: But um, there are a lot of us um um

373
00:21:35,680 --> 00:21:39,400
Speaker 1: let's call it, you know, us vested interests in emerging

374
00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:41,800
Speaker 1: markets that are based in places like Florida and so yeah,

375
00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:43,040
Speaker 1: I know it's your point. You know, you see a

376
00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:45,720
Speaker 1: lot of Latin American kind of expats, you know, who

377
00:21:45,720 --> 00:21:48,880
Speaker 1: are who who might very well be looking at at

378
00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:51,040
Speaker 1: at at putting money to work there hopefully in the

379
00:21:51,119 --> 00:21:53,760
Speaker 1: NATI distant future. Davian Sassaur, thank you so much for

380
00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:55,680
Speaker 1: being with us. It's always enlightening to speak with you.

381
00:21:55,760 --> 00:21:59,359
Speaker 1: Damian Sasaur is a fixed income strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence,

382
00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:03,480
Speaker 1: focusing on emerging markets. He's great follow his research reports.

383
00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:20,560
Speaker 1: They're insightful and deep. You know him. A constant theme

384
00:22:20,920 --> 00:22:24,359
Speaker 1: is as we watch these headlines roll out about some

385
00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:28,239
Speaker 1: of the trade tensions, how much should investors care? And

386
00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:30,600
Speaker 1: I think it's an important question and I'm glad that

387
00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:33,000
Speaker 1: we have Eric Weakend here with us to answer it.

388
00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:36,159
Speaker 1: Eric weigand a senior portfolio manager at US Bank Private

389
00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:39,280
Speaker 1: Wealth Management overseeing about a hundred and fifty four billion dollars,

390
00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:42,400
Speaker 1: who joins us here in our eleven three oh studios. Eric,

391
00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:46,200
Speaker 1: you talk with a lot of wealthy individuals, business owners.

392
00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:50,040
Speaker 1: What's the main question they ask you? And what do

393
00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:53,320
Speaker 1: you tell them? You know, it's particularly regarding the you know,

394
00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:57,720
Speaker 1: the trade issues. Those individuals that are business owners are

395
00:22:58,600 --> 00:23:03,720
Speaker 1: are genuinely uh sensitive about the you know, the notion

396
00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:08,200
Speaker 1: that trade is not currently fair. Uh. They may be

397
00:23:08,600 --> 00:23:11,959
Speaker 1: troubled and have a lot of anxiety about how uh

398
00:23:12,640 --> 00:23:15,720
Speaker 1: uh you know. The discussion continues to you know, evolve,

399
00:23:15,800 --> 00:23:19,720
Speaker 1: particularly regarding you know, isolating what have been our major

400
00:23:19,760 --> 00:23:24,600
Speaker 1: trading partners and being somewhat antagonistic to to our allies.

401
00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:29,960
Speaker 1: But I think there's almost a complacency in some of

402
00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:35,320
Speaker 1: their concerns that that this is merely a negotiating tactic,

403
00:23:36,280 --> 00:23:40,400
Speaker 1: that the rhetoric, you know, doesn't necessarily represent reality. They're

404
00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:44,680
Speaker 1: waiting for greater clarity to really formalize their opinions. Eric,

405
00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:49,720
Speaker 1: what role does UH inflation play in the conversation right

406
00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:52,960
Speaker 1: now with clients about what to do with their money?

407
00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:56,520
Speaker 1: You know, it's it's you know, that is certainly one

408
00:23:56,520 --> 00:23:59,320
Speaker 1: of the key focal points for us, as it is

409
00:23:59,760 --> 00:24:02,879
Speaker 1: has been for everyone. Everyone's looking for the you know,

410
00:24:02,920 --> 00:24:05,600
Speaker 1: the emergence of inflation. We've continued to see a very

411
00:24:05,640 --> 00:24:10,400
Speaker 1: favorable labor backdrop wages. While we did see wages last

412
00:24:10,440 --> 00:24:14,920
Speaker 1: Friday increase UH perhaps a little bit ahead of expectations,

413
00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:18,199
Speaker 1: you know, the persistence of inflation just hasn't been present.

414
00:24:18,760 --> 00:24:20,280
Speaker 1: You know, we get a little bit of growth and

415
00:24:20,280 --> 00:24:24,040
Speaker 1: then we'd see a little bit of retreat even you know,

416
00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:26,720
Speaker 1: looking at the data points that we've had this week,

417
00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:30,080
Speaker 1: whether it's Delta airlines coming out talking about pricing pressures

418
00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:33,440
Speaker 1: because of the fuel increase. Even you know, uh, it

419
00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:37,160
Speaker 1: was reported today that you know, uh Smuckers was having

420
00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:41,640
Speaker 1: difficulties seeing significant increase in their logistics and transportation costs.

421
00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:45,040
Speaker 1: We're seeing some some feed through. It's just the persistence

422
00:24:45,080 --> 00:24:47,640
Speaker 1: that's necessary. To your point, Pim. One of the things

423
00:24:47,680 --> 00:24:51,679
Speaker 1: that they're uh, you know that they're finally uh, you know,

424
00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:54,080
Speaker 1: embracing if you will, is you know that there's an

425
00:24:54,080 --> 00:24:57,240
Speaker 1: alternative as a result of you know, more normalization on

426
00:24:57,320 --> 00:24:59,920
Speaker 1: monetary policy, that front end of the yield curve is

427
00:25:00,359 --> 00:25:03,879
Speaker 1: is finally providing a return at a lower risk point,

428
00:25:04,359 --> 00:25:06,960
Speaker 1: and and that's giving them a little bit of comfort

429
00:25:06,960 --> 00:25:11,600
Speaker 1: at a moderating some of their positioning. So I want

430
00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:14,080
Speaker 1: to bring in the emerging market sell off that we've

431
00:25:14,119 --> 00:25:17,560
Speaker 1: been watching, and I'm wondering how you're viewing that and

432
00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:20,879
Speaker 1: whether you're advising any of your clients to either withdraw

433
00:25:20,960 --> 00:25:24,520
Speaker 1: from some of these uh developing nations or to take

434
00:25:24,560 --> 00:25:27,280
Speaker 1: advantage of the sell off to capture extra yield. You know,

435
00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:30,080
Speaker 1: it's a great question. We had spent the last two years,

436
00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:33,399
Speaker 1: uh much more of a U with a risk on

437
00:25:33,520 --> 00:25:38,160
Speaker 1: posture across our asset allocation models for our clients. UM.

438
00:25:38,240 --> 00:25:41,040
Speaker 1: And then early this in the first quarter of this year,

439
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:44,399
Speaker 1: we thought the narrative was was changing, so we began

440
00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:47,639
Speaker 1: to to moderate that position, taking off some of that

441
00:25:48,400 --> 00:25:52,960
Speaker 1: really long equity exposure which was inclusive of international. Uh.

442
00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:57,240
Speaker 1: And while we still saw a favorable backdrop domestically, that

443
00:25:57,720 --> 00:26:00,480
Speaker 1: international was a little bit more problematic. What were you

444
00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:04,840
Speaker 1: buying instead, you know, uh, in a couple of different areas.

445
00:26:04,920 --> 00:26:07,879
Speaker 1: Number one, as I mentioned earlier, finding some attractiveness on

446
00:26:07,920 --> 00:26:10,640
Speaker 1: the front end of the of the curve, So going

447
00:26:10,760 --> 00:26:16,080
Speaker 1: from being more materially underweight fixed income to narrowing you

448
00:26:16,119 --> 00:26:19,200
Speaker 1: know that underweight, but also looking at things that were

449
00:26:19,240 --> 00:26:22,480
Speaker 1: you know, less correlated uh, you know, with with equities,

450
00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:27,080
Speaker 1: So exploring even things like insurance linked securities, uh, that

451
00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:30,880
Speaker 1: that don't have those same types of correlations you mentioned. Uh,

452
00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:35,320
Speaker 1: the sort of change in short term money rates. Are

453
00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:38,679
Speaker 1: you finding that more people are interested in that than

454
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:44,120
Speaker 1: they are in stocks? Uh? Not so much as yet. UH.

455
00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:46,239
Speaker 1: And I think part of that is because we've you know,

456
00:26:46,320 --> 00:26:50,480
Speaker 1: for all the uh, you know, the focus on volatility

457
00:26:50,560 --> 00:26:53,280
Speaker 1: that we've seen, you know, in the equity market on

458
00:26:53,320 --> 00:26:57,199
Speaker 1: a year today basis, we've still moved laterally, so you know,

459
00:26:57,240 --> 00:26:59,640
Speaker 1: for the most part, our clients are still seeing uh,

460
00:26:59,680 --> 00:27:02,360
Speaker 1: you know, appreciation in their portfolio, so it hasn't had

461
00:27:02,400 --> 00:27:07,399
Speaker 1: that type of a bite. They do understand, as you know,

462
00:27:07,480 --> 00:27:10,600
Speaker 1: we've we've been very proactive at discussing with them that

463
00:27:10,680 --> 00:27:13,600
Speaker 1: our expectations for returns this year are much more moderate

464
00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:15,560
Speaker 1: than what we had seen over you know, certainly two

465
00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:18,600
Speaker 1: thousand seventeen. Can you help me understand why you think

466
00:27:18,600 --> 00:27:22,000
Speaker 1: the narrative is changing, why you expect to see more

467
00:27:22,080 --> 00:27:26,120
Speaker 1: moderate returns if after we just saw earnings they were

468
00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:30,200
Speaker 1: really good. Yeah, it's it's absolutely a great point. And

469
00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:32,120
Speaker 1: there's two things that I really want to talk about. Their.

470
00:27:32,440 --> 00:27:35,199
Speaker 1: Number one from a narrative standpoint, Uh, you know, we

471
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:39,440
Speaker 1: really had the best of world's last year. Very low inflation,

472
00:27:39,880 --> 00:27:44,160
Speaker 1: very accommodative monetary policy. You had strong not only earnings growth,

473
00:27:44,160 --> 00:27:47,440
Speaker 1: but strong revenue growth. You had that in an environment

474
00:27:47,440 --> 00:27:52,119
Speaker 1: where there was just language or rhetoric around trade. You

475
00:27:52,160 --> 00:27:57,040
Speaker 1: weren't seeing any repercussions there. And importantly, there was synchronized

476
00:27:57,080 --> 00:27:59,840
Speaker 1: global growth. We've seen you know, some of the economic

477
00:27:59,880 --> 00:28:03,080
Speaker 1: day of more recently has shown some moderation to that

478
00:28:03,080 --> 00:28:06,720
Speaker 1: that growth it's not necessarily as strong or as broad.

479
00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:10,359
Speaker 1: So that's that's causing us, uh, you know, to increase

480
00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:13,680
Speaker 1: our our concerned. We are you know, from a monetary

481
00:28:13,720 --> 00:28:18,080
Speaker 1: accommodation standpoint, we're seeing that being withdrawn or the prospect

482
00:28:18,119 --> 00:28:22,080
Speaker 1: of it emerging. So we think that that's that's changed.

483
00:28:22,560 --> 00:28:26,280
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, importantly as we look at those

484
00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:29,520
Speaker 1: earnings growth. You know, I think that the quintessential example

485
00:28:29,560 --> 00:28:33,720
Speaker 1: of this was Caterpillars earnings. Uh, you know, the stock

486
00:28:33,840 --> 00:28:35,920
Speaker 1: was up during the you know, during the conference call,

487
00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:38,880
Speaker 1: and in the course of one sentence you know, suggesting

488
00:28:38,920 --> 00:28:41,880
Speaker 1: it's hard to imagine things getting any better. You know,

489
00:28:41,920 --> 00:28:45,480
Speaker 1: the stock you know, immediately reversed. You know, it's pricing.

490
00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:48,640
Speaker 1: So we agree, you know, looking at the first quarter

491
00:28:48,800 --> 00:28:51,680
Speaker 1: being you know, seeing revenue growth over eight percent, seeing

492
00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:57,040
Speaker 1: earnings growth, you know, approaching that's fantastic. But the market

493
00:28:57,120 --> 00:29:00,240
Speaker 1: is a forward indicator and looking at at that it

494
00:29:00,440 --> 00:29:03,480
Speaker 1: is difficult to imagine that that that pace is likely

495
00:29:03,520 --> 00:29:06,560
Speaker 1: to be sustained. So we do believe that earnings will

496
00:29:06,640 --> 00:29:10,480
Speaker 1: drive stock prices, but we also believe, because of that

497
00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:14,000
Speaker 1: changing narrative, will see the valuations of the multiples that

498
00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:18,640
Speaker 1: investors are willing to provide. Uh, you know, narrowing just briefly,

499
00:29:18,880 --> 00:29:23,840
Speaker 1: h muni bonds, Any interest on behalf of the clients

500
00:29:23,840 --> 00:29:27,200
Speaker 1: and investing in muni bonds now, you know very much.

501
00:29:27,240 --> 00:29:30,760
Speaker 1: So particularly from a you know, from a geographic perspective,

502
00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:33,640
Speaker 1: a lot of our clients live in some very high

503
00:29:33,680 --> 00:29:38,560
Speaker 1: tax states. So whether that be New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Illinois,

504
00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:42,320
Speaker 1: or California, you know, these are areas where high income earners,

505
00:29:42,560 --> 00:29:46,400
Speaker 1: you know, particularly with the reduction and the ability uh

506
00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:48,800
Speaker 1: or the reduction and the ability to duct state and

507
00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:53,520
Speaker 1: local taxes, you know, has made that clearly an interesting opportunity.

508
00:29:53,960 --> 00:29:56,800
Speaker 1: Thanks very much for being with us interesting topics. Eric

509
00:29:56,920 --> 00:30:01,440
Speaker 1: Wagan is the senior portfolio manager for US Bank Private

510
00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:04,520
Speaker 1: Wealth Management, helping to manage more than a hundred and

511
00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:13,400
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars of customer assets. And thanks for listening

512
00:30:13,440 --> 00:30:16,320
Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

513
00:30:16,320 --> 00:30:19,920
Speaker 1: and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

514
00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:23,479
Speaker 1: podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

515
00:30:23,760 --> 00:30:27,280
Speaker 1: at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

516
00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:30,360
Speaker 1: one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

517
00:30:30,360 --> 00:30:31,320
Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Radio