WEBVTT - I Have Some Thoughts Minisode | Angel Reese, Brandy, & Latto

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, y'all, Welcome back to the next episode of I

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Have Some Thoughts, a weekly podcast minisolo series where we

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about all things pop culture, but of course from

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a mental health lens and I am joined today again

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>by Bria. Hey, Maria, Hi everyone.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of cool topics to get into today.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>The first let's talk about Angel Reese and the WNBA.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we can never get through a season

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>without something happening. But the Toronto Temple's head coach Sandy

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>has been suspended for one game without pay after making

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>an appropriate comment about the Atlanta Dreams Angel Reese. This

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>past Friday, the Atlanta dream and Toronto Tempo were playing

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>in a game. During the first quarter, Nayar, one of

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the players, got called for a personal foul against Angel Rees.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Ny are false to the ground in pain and the coach, Sandy,

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>was very upset about it and during her comments, I

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know if she forgot she was miked up, but

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>she called Angel Rees a protected species. Now, obviously there

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of racial undertones throughout that commentary. In

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>response to the WNBA suspended Sandy for one game, Sandy

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>did release an apology. Angel Rees has since made a

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>statement as well, thanking the WNBA for taking action too.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>As we all know, this is not the first and

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>definitely will not be the last instance of racism that

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 2>we see within the WNBA. This is honestly just a

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 2>very quick glimpse into it, but I think it opened

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a broader conversation of why black women athletes, especially in

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>these women leagues, that they're already kind of you would

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 2>almost think that they are having to go through the

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>struggle of being like a women only sports team, and

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they already kind of being compared against the men and

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>are getting the same resources as the male teams. But

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>black women specifically have to navigate this layer of excellence

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and bias at the same time. So, like, why are

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>black women's emotions, their confidence, their competitiveness, why is it

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>interpreted so differently from their peers and women in the league,

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>but also in men in the league as well.

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Ria, because you would think, like

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a league that is built by well and I won't

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily built by women, right, because we know that the

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA also has a large part in like all the

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>things that happen in the WNBA, because it kind of

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>came out of there but a league that is governed

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>by women, that is run by women, that is, you know,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>built on the backs of black women specifically, Like you

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would think that there would be more ground that has

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>been made in terms of like eliminating bias and really

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like centering the needs of the players all of the players,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and sadly that has not been the case. And I

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just think it is so unfortunate. Many people have heard

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>me talk about on the podcast before, I am a

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>newly converted WNBA fan. I just love all the women's basketball,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of that actually is dedicated or is

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in large part due to Angel Reee. So I really

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>started following women's basketball when she and the LSU team

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>won the national championship several years ago. And so Angel

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is definitely somebody who I have loved following her journey

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and is one of my favorite players. And I definitely

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>have paid attention to what it feels like just outsized

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ignorance and violence and like just racist kinds of behaviors

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and thoughts aimed her way, and it really is disgusting.

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think black women, no matter where we go,

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever space we show up in, it always feels and

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is accurate that there is this

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>intense dedication to paying attention to what we're doing and

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like policing our tone and our behavior. And we see

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>so many instances of it in the WNBA, where other

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>players are able to get away with shouting at reffs,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talking to their coaches any kind of way, like not

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>exhibiting sportsmanlike behavior, and it's not seen as the same way.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It is just seen as competitiveness, right, and like, oh,

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.119
<v Speaker 1>they're fiery. But when it's Angel Reese and other black

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>women players, there is this undertone of oh, this is

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of how we expect black women to be. And

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.679
<v Speaker 1>so I think, unfortunately, this is just another example of

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>black women not being able to kind of take up

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>space and be competitive and want to kind of compete

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at such a high level in the same way as

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>other people, and that not just being seen as what

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it is, right, like just a part of the game.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>There are all these other implications and insinuations that are

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>made that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual game.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Yeah. And I mentioned earlier that Sandy did get

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>suspended for one game. A lot of people are speaking

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>out saying that that honestly wasn't enough there's this balance

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of did you mean what you said, but also what

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you said did have implications that were like very racist,

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>So was that really a proper response to that? But

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>what do you think from your perspective that it will

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 2>take for organizations sports teams to move beyond support in

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>a way that might be interpreted as performative Because if

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA said nothing, then it would have been bad.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 2>But it's tricky to balance too.

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I am please, you know, I'm actually surprised that they

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>did act so quickly, but I agree with you that

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't like it definitely would have been probably

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for our worst. Yeah, not understanding that Sandy is Australian

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and so it sounds like there is this term protected

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>species maybe means something differently maybe culturally for her. But

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>of course we are in the US, right and especially

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when we're looking at the WBA and the fire that

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>has been led around like race relations, particularly related to

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like Caitlyn Clark and all of the other black players, like,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like things are boiling over at like

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>a speedy rate right now, and so I think timing

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in place is everything right, And so for her to

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>say something like that, even if culturally, it maybe has

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a different connotation for her. In this context, of course,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it is very racist, right, and Angel was offended, and

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>so I was very pleased that Sandy responded so quickly.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Angel accepted the apology. You know, it definitely feels like

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>she did the right thing and offered an apology that

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>was actually meaningful. And then the league did take action.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>But again I don't know whether that was right or wrong,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pleased that they did something and that it

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>was so swift. I think in order for us to

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>see more meaningful change, there needs to be more black

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>women in leadership roles. So another conversation that has been

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of percolating through the WNBA streets this season is

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>the lack of black women coaches. So there are no

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>black women head coaches in the WNBA again, and that

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is really difficult to see in a league that is

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.119
<v Speaker 1>on the backs of black women, right, like black women

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>built this right and so to see that there are

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there are no black women in leadership positions at the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>head coaching role, I think is something that adds to

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the nuance and what we're seeing in this situation.

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Nekka gum Lak is the WNBA president, So she's like

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the president of the players union. I guess it's what

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the WNBPA is, And so I think that that goes

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a long way. And I think she is a very

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>well spoken, like good advocate for the players and she's

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>still an active player, so her presence goes a long way.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But she really is the only one, right, And so

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that when we look at the leadership of

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the WNBA, there needs to be more black women who

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>strongly identify as black women, right because we know all

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Skinfok and kimbok, right, for people who actually understand like

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a black woman's ethic and what it means, especially like

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if we just use Angel Reese as an example, right,

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like what it might need for a young player to

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>come in with this level of scrutiny and criticism and

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how that impacts their development, Like somebody who really understands

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a black woman's plight. I think is really important and

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think is sorely missing in the WNBA right now,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that would actually go a long way

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think in navigating these situations better.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>That's so true. I think even like beyond sports, we

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>stayed often where there's one black person in corporate America

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>in the room that's like, hey, this won't be received

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a certain way, but it's on them that to like

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>call those things out and then to go against so

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>many other people whom I think differently. It's definitely something

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that I feel like we see kind of across the

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>board too.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you raise a good point there, Ria, because it's

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not enough to just have them there. People also have

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to listen. Ex Like, we don't just need black women

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in figureheads faces, we need black women in leadership in

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the WNBA who people will actually listen to and whose

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>voices will be heard for sure.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I agree well. For our next topic, Brandy R and B.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 2>Singer has been facing some body shaming comments. So Brandy

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>was at the center of an online conversation after a

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 2>video circulated of her looking noticeably slimmer, especially like within

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 2>her facial area. People began immediately commenting on her appearance,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>some of them in very negative ways. A lot of

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>people were like, oh, maybe there's something wrong with her medically,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>or she's been diagnosed with something, just kind of drawing

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>conclusions that weren't really for people to draw. It didn't

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>take long for people actually to reflect on a very

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 2>similar situation that took back in twenty twenty when people

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>made very similar comments about Chadwick Boseman he had lost

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of weight, especially in his face as well,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and then shortly after he revealed his colon cancer diagnosis,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>which we ultimately know is how he passed away. Brandy

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 2>has since responded, reminding everyone to remember that the person

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that they're commenting on is still a person and to

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>always leap with kindness. But I think there's a broader

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>question here of when commenting on people's.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Bodies just became so normalized.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like, you know, when you're growing up,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you maybe go to like your mom's house, at your

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 2>grandma's house and maybe like, oh, you're gaining weight, excising.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it was it's kind of normal and

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>like black households in a way. But I feel like

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the Internet is just so amplifying. So from your perspective,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 2>why do people feel so comfortable commenting on other people's

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>bodies even when they don't really know the person or

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 2>what it is that they could be going through.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You bring up a great point, Brian, I you know

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>fairly don't know that this is only a black household situation,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because I definitely have heard white women also talk about

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like the intense scrutiny they've had from family members in

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of weight. But it does feel like a familial

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that has developed that it is okay

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to kind of criticize one another, right, Like, so you

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are away at college and then you come back and

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>all the family is like, oh, that freshman facing really

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>got you, right, like all of those you know, And

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think many of us laughed it off and like

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of saw that as a normal part of kind

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of family interactions. But I think as we have grown

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in our understanding of like what it means to relate

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to one another and what kinds of things invoke shaming people,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we've realized now that it is not okay,

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>even with family members, like to make comments about that,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because you never know what people's relationship to their weight

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is in like those kinds of comments, and it's just

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>not okay, Like why is it okay to talk about

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>people's bodies in that way?

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So, if we know that we need to take a

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>step back, even with our family members and people we

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>know and have relationships with, it is far more not

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>okay for us to be doing it publicly online and

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know your question around like when did this

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>become normal? I think for a lot of us it

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is something that is kind of been normalized in our

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>families because people have comment it's about our weight and appearance,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we have also done that. And I think

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>now that we have the Internet and it feels like

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we are also connected though of course not really right,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we just had a conversation a couple of weeks

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ago about parasocial relationships, and so I think there is

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this fallacy that we are more connected and like we

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>know people online when we really don't. And so, you know,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is normal to notice differences in people, right,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if we saw somebody a year ago and now

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they look drastically different, I think it is just human

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>nature to register that difference, like, oh, something looks different.

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think instead of you know, jumping on X

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>or threads or Instagram and like sharing these dire tribes

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>around whatever it is, would that not be better sir?

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>For like, oh I'm wishing them well either privately or

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just in a small group chat, right like with people

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>who you know, and like, this is not information that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>will be shared publicly right, Because again, I don't think

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's anything wrong with noticing a difference. I think the

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>difficulty and the problematic behavior comes when we feel empowered

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and entitled, honestly to go online and like make these

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>conclusions and create these entire stories that have likely nothing

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with the reality of what's going on with

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>especially when people have come out and said I don't

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like this, right, like so many celebrities and public figures

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have said, like, I feel uncomfortable with this, Like this

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel good to me, And so we cannot feel

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>entitled and feel like just because we all can create

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a Threads account that it gives us permission to comment

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on people's buy bodies and things in ways that people

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>have said, this does not feel good to me, I'm

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not comfortable with this.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree, and I think that like a lot of

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>people forget And I've heard this conversation a lot around

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>for people who want to be like content creators and

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>all that, like if you might seem like only a

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand people watch your content, oh my gosh, that's less

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 2>than like what I want, per se. I feel like

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>if a thousand people were to come up to you

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>in person, like the comments on something, it would feel

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>so different. So like to think from a celebrities perspective

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>that they're getting this from like so many different angles,

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>thousands and thousand people commenting on their physical appearance, it

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>can't be easy to navigate at all. So just like

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 2>keeping that in mind too. But even in our personal lives,

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>like with our family, our friends, how can we be

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>more thoughtful about the language that we're using when we

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 2>do notice those changes and like way physical appearance. I'm

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>someone who's like, don't have for comment on way because

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you really just never know. It just doesn't feel appropriate

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to me personally. Other people might not feel that way.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 2>So how can we just be more thoughtful about the

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>language that we're you're seeing and when we do notice

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>these differences?

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm yeah, I think leading with care and consideration

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is a better way to approach these situations, right, So

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily calling attention to like hey, it looks like you,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like ore one hundred pounds smaller than when

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw you last year, but you know, like, hey,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is everything okay? I haven't seen you in a while,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Like what's going on? Catch me up kind of thing? Right,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And so really like leaning into the relationship that you

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have with the person, because hopefully whatever conversation that you're

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to spark with, whatever comment you're making, it's coming

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from a place of like well wished and like, is

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>there anything I need to do to support you in

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a different way, right, as opposed to like judgment and

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nosiness right right, Like you know, cause if it's that,

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>then you probably are better off just keeping the comment

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to yourself or you know, get chat without that person.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But if it is like, oh, is this something I

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about? Or I think leading with hey,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, is everything okay? Is there anything I can

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>do to support you? Will open up a space for

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if that person feels comfortable. Now again, they may not

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable already or whatever to share anything with you,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think you going on record kind of coming

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>from a place of care and concern goes a much

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>further way and maybe registers differently with the person than hey,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like you are one hundred pounds smaller. That

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>probably does not register as care.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree absolutely.

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>More from our conversation after the break.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 2>So for our last topic, we're actually going to go

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>back to lotto. I feel like we have brought her

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>up a couple of times on some thoughts, but she's

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>in the news again because she was recently captured pushing

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>her newborn and a stroller toward a private jet. Now,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the video quickly made its way to social media, and

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>people began questioning whether this was a safe way to

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>be traveling with the baby, whether it was safe for

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the baby at all, germs, all that kind of stuff.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Someone commented actually on the video, sharing that no matter

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>how much money they made in their life, they wouldn't

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>put their baby at risk like this, and a Loto

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>actually responded back to them saying, good thing, it's not

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 2>your baby. So I think it's kind of like a

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>double edged sort of like some people online were like

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>genuinely concerned for the child, but also have to navigate

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the fact that that's not your child. So, like, how

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and why does motherhood seem to invite so much public scrutiny,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>especially from celebrities who are in the public eye too.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have definitely talked about a lot of a

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, which I think is interesting. But I

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think given the nature of our podcast and like she's

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a new mom, I think there's just been a lot happening,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it does feel like motherhood is one

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things that like people just feel like they

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have commentary and opinions about either you are a mother,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you've had a mother, right Like, I think the rearing

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of children is something that people just feel like, oh,

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we all have opinions about, and you know, because it

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come with a manual, right like, there is no

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>no guidebook around, like how to raise healthy, happy kids. People,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, in some ways would think that they are

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>being helpful right now. Not everybody, right like, you know,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody does not have well good intentions. But I think

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, a lot of people are like

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>offering commentary in the hopes that like it will protect

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>your child, or like they are offering you something to

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of help you in your journey as a mother.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think for a lot of women, the idea

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of motherhood or the state of motherhood already comes with

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so much criticism, so much self criticism, that this unsolicited

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>advice and commentary often just makes moms feel much worse

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and shamed, right that, oh my gosh, I did something

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and put my baby at jeopardy. I didn't know this.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's so much pressure that is on

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>moms that any unsolicited advice just becomes the loud speaker

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>on some thoughts that are probably already very critical and

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so maybe some not helpful ways. And so I think

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>people think that it's like harmless to offer this commentary.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>You see this a lot, especially, I've noticed lots of

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>different places, but one of the places I've noticed in

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>most is like with seat belt commentary. Right, Like if

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you show your baby in a car seat, like, oh,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to run to the store, follow me on

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>my way to the store, there's guaranteed to be somebody

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the comments that says, oh, the baby's buckle needs

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be higher too, you know. And again I think

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that is well intentioned, right, because nobody wants to see,

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, something happening and a child is injured in

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a car accident. But again you have to think about,

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like how many thoughts moms are already having about am

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I doing this right? Am I getting it wrong? And

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>how you are maybe adding gasoline to the fire when

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you're offering this unsolicited commentary. Now, Bria, I also want

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to back up though, when you saw this commentary, what

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was the concern around the baby being on the private jet.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Was it like, oh, it's jermy, Like what the concern there?

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>It was more so about the ears popping. I think

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people were like, she's flying private, so

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 2>there's not people around xyz. But apparently it's think about

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the ear pressure. I have a lot of grace for

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 2>moms because I'm not a mom, and I feel like

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I learned something new every day, so I'm like, that

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>never would have even occurred to me. But something about

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 2>the ear pressure, got it and got it?

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense? That makes sense? Okay, Yeah, I mean

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that that would be a concern. Lots

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of babies fly, and you know, I think the best

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of advice that I've heard being a mom is like, oh,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you nurse them or you give them a battle while yeah,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you kind of reader atultitude and that typically helps. So

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of different ways to kind of manage

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>air pressure on flights if that was people's kind of

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>main concern, But I was confused as to like why

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there was so much. Yeah, I feel a concern about it.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 2>As far as a German perspective, flying private is probably

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 2>your best pens.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, right, right?

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 2>For new moms everywhere. How can parents decide whose advice

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is actually worth listening to protecting their own mental health

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>when it just feels like so many people have opinions

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 2>on what's right, what's wrong, all the different things.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think listening to your physician and your baby's

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>physician is probably where you should go in terms of

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>leading advice for your particular journey as a mom. Right

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>because even if we are all moms, everybody has a

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>different baby. We are different as moms, and so what

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>work for my kids may not work for your kids.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And so even if I'm offering well intentioned advice, it

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>may not actually work for you because your situation and

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>your children are very different. And so I think getting

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>advice from trained professionals, whether that is your pediatrician, your obgyn,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>your therapists, you know, your electation consultant, right like, people

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>who actually have a relationship with you and you know

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you and your baby, if that you know matters in

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the situation, I think that that is a better place

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to get advice than just kind of general strangers on

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Now. I do understand though, because sometimes you

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>will find yourself in like very weird predicaments with kids, right,

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, this random thing happened, Like has anybody

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>else dealt with this? Like what should I do? It

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is very easy to kind of just fire off, you know,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a random question while you are facing some kind of situation,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but that does didn't invite like all these opinions around

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of things might be happening. And I think

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>also then kind of put a microscope on like your parenting, right,

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and like allows judgments to be made about who you

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are as a parent. And so I think sometimes getting

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>advice on from people online is okay, but it is

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>far better like to keep your circle closer in the

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.959
<v Speaker 1>circle the most inner circle should be your like medical

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>professional support team and then maybe like moms in your

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>family or moms that you're connected to in some other ways,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes out from there.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I've seen a lot of conversation about like the mom

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Facebook groups where everyone like, oh, like a lot.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I definitely made that mistake very early in

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>my motherhood, and I was like, oh, this is okay,

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I got to get out of here.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 2>It's like a million opinions on one question.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That's funny, and not just opinions, it is judgment, right,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Like it would be one thing if it were like, oh,

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>here's something that worked for me, you may want to

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>try this. It instead often has the flavor of all

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>breastfeeding is best, and so if you don't do that,

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>then you're like dooming your child to like thousand here's

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>like it's often not just here's something that could be helpful,

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and it is often like I know best, and like if

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't do it the way I said or the

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>way I did, then you're not a good mother, right,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is often the flavor those comments.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, thank you so much. This was a great conversation.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>But that wraps up our topics for the week.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Perfect and that's a great list. Thank you so much

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for that, Brian. And if there are topics happening in

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>your pop culture circles that you would like us to weigh,

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, please send those to us at Therapy for

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Black Girls dot com slash mailbox. And until next time,

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>taking care of yourself.