WEBVTT - Electrons will be central to the next era of geopolitical stability

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Zero. I am AKSHATARTI this week how to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>think about geopolitical chaos. I don't know if it's a

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>good thing, but I'm reading the news these days and

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it keeps reminding me of one of my favorite sci

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>fi novels, The Three Body Problem. At the heart of

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that story is an alien world that oscillates between a

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>stable era and a chaotic era no one can predict

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>when it happens. Here on Earth, it feels like we

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are entering one of those chaotic eras. So today on

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the show, I wanted to bring on a guest who

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thinks a lot about the chaos around us and has

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>through the decades advised world leaders and CEOs about how

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to manage in times of chaos. Gerald Buds is the

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy that

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he was the chief of staff for Canada's Prime Minister

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Justin Trudeau, and just last year he also ran the

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>campaign that successfully put mccarnie in as Trudeau's replacement. I

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>wanted to understand how he thinks about the energy shocks

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we are facing and how they will reshape the world

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>where the energy transition might falter where it might accelerate,

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and who will be the winners in a decade from now.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>These are questions that will decide where trillions of dollars

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I invested and thus where our climate future goes. As always,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>please send feedback or suggestions to zero Pod at Bloomberg

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Here's my conversation with Gerald Putts. Welcome to

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:44.639
<v Speaker 1>the show, Gerald Putts.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be here. Longtime listener, first time caller.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Ah, it's nice to have you on the pod. Finally,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on in the world, many many fronts.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about energy and climate, but before

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we get there, just tell the audience a little bit

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about yourself. How do you come to working on climate

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and energy issues.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've been working on energy transition, climate related issues

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>for most of my professional career in both well actually

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in all three sectors. My first exposure to it was

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>when I was running policy for the Premier of Ontario,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>which is Canada's largest province, and we I think we

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>were the first jurisdiction anywhere to voluntarily retire coal at scale.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 2>So we retired about seventy five hundred and fifty megawatts

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of coal and replaced it with rebuilt nuclear renewables gas,

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>a mix of a very broad mix of generation, and

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that got me interested in the topic. Dalton McGuinty was

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>that man's name. He was a three term Premier of Ontario,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 2>and I think, not coincidentally, he was a scientist, and

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe I think he's the one and only scientist to

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 2>have been Premier of Ontario. And because of that, he

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>had high conviction that climate would be the issue that

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>young whipper snappers like I was at the time would

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 2>be spending most of my career thinking about and trying

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>to solve the problems created by it.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you also were chief executive officer of the

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>World Wildlife Fund and then chief of staff do Justin

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Trudeau as Prime Minister of Canada. Tell us a little

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about those times.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Well the WWF, and I'm still a proud board member

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of the World Widlife Fund in the United States. I'm

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>speaking to you from Silicon Valley, where I'm here for

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a WWF board meeting later today. We are very much,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 2>as your listeners would know, a conservation organization in its

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>broadest possible form. Bit we're in the business of the

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 2>conservation of nature, and that is something that has attracted

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>me like I think it should attract all humans, because

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>ultimately it is the biosphere that we depend on. And

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>in Canadian politics, both for former Prime Minister Trudeau and

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>current Prime Minister Carney, I played a strategic in designing

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the campaigns, and in Prime Minister Trudeau's case, I ran

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>his office for the first four years of his tenure.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I left in twenty nineteen to join eurras Group.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The Eurasia Group is a political risk consultancy. That's sort

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the broadest way I could describe it, but it

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is still a vague phrase. Can you explain what does

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it involve day to day?

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's getting a lot less vague for people right.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>The way I tend to describe it is that ten

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>years ago Eurasia Group was called into a board dinner

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to give an interesting speech that people could think about

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>and then get down to their core businesses the next day.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 2>And as we're discovering and as investors in particular, and

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>our clients are in two classes. We advise large investors

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>who have to absorb these risks around the world as

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>they think about their asset allocation strategy, and also large

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 2>corporations who have to manage their supply chains, and for

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>most of my life if the stable equilibrium and policy

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that private sector actors enjoyed actually meant that this was

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 2>an afterthought. But now, obviously, in particular in this decade,

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 2>it's become a core business for everybody. So trying to

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 2>understand what's causing geopolitical disruption, how long it may last,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>where it's going to be regionally concentrated, in which industries

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>it's going to affect most approximately, is our core business.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about one slice of those risks, which comes

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>from the current energy shock. It's been more than seventy

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>days since the US and Israel attacked Iran, and there

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a virtual closure of the Strait of Hormuz,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>responsible for twenty percent of the world's oil and gas.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday, Iran replied to the latest US proposal, and

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>President Trump declared the response was totally unacceptable. We don't

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>know where this goes next. But when you are talking

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to companies and investors in this position, there are some

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things are pretty obvious the types of regions

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that are affected right now by the straight disclosure, But

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what are the kinds of things that they are worried

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about that are beyond the obvious that you talk to them.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 2>About well X energy. I think that a lot of

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>people are learning that there's a whole bunch of consequential

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's created on the other side of the strait

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of Wurmos, from the rudiments of the agricultural supply chain

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>to helium, which the healthcare system meant semiconductor industry is

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 2>very reliant upon. So not unlike what happened with both

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic and the Russia Ukraine crisis, which of course

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>also both happened this decade, and if everybody feels tired,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that's probably why. So we've learned a lot about the

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>complexity and the inter relatedness of supply chains through those crises.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>As we feel them come apart, it's less of a

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>surprise than it would have been before twenty twenty, but

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 2>it's still surprising to people that so much of what

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>their stuff is made of is originating in places that

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't really understand, and it can be disrupted by

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>forces that they have never reckoned with. So that's what's

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>happening here, and the energy side, if we kind of

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>telescope out and look at longer range. She'd recall we

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>spoke in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it was a big open question. You wrote about it.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Lots of thoughtful people were thinking about it at the time,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>whether or not it would accelerate or decelerate the energy

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>transition in Europe. I think five years later, six years later,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>we can pretty much declare that it accelerated the energy

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>transition in Europe. And I think in this particular case,

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>there are so many precarious, economically precarious countries and regions

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that are dependent upon the hydrocarbons that are on the

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>wrong side of the Strait of Hormuz right now that

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>other actors with supply chains and technologies that could replace

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>hydrocarbons are acting very aggressively to do just that in

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the aftermath of this crisis. So when you think about

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 2>growing economies like Vietnam, like the Philippine, Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>all of these countries are those that have already faced

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the shock of watching LNG tankers turn around in the Pacific,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>go back through the Suez Canal and sell contracted hydrocarbons,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>hydrocarbons that they had contracted for four or five, six,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>sometimes ten x the spot price in a region while

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>a crisis was underway, and they're going to think twice

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>about it now. So the Chinese, to be direct about it,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>have a larger pool of potential interested customers in their

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 2>own region because of this crisis. And I think that

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>have a long term impact on the global energy system

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>that people are not appreciating right now.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and let's take one of those things at a time.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at Europe, and Europe's transition has

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly accelerated. I think the biggest evidence I see is

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in Spain. So before the Russia Ukraine crisis, you know, gas,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>natural gas used to set the price of power in

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Spain something like sixty to sixty five percent of the time.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>In this first quarter it's down to nine percent of

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the time because of the sheer amount of solar, and

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>solar is the biggest contributor. There's been another contribution from

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>wind as well, and a little bit from batteries, but

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>really it's solar power and it can show you what

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a country has been. It's not a small country. It

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>can do within a small period of time, and not

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all other European countries have quite gone down that pace.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But even in those play like you're in the UK

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or in Germany, you are seeing much more muted price

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on electricity relative to the type of gas shock that

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>has come through because twenty percent of the energy is

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and stuck in the strait of foremost. One single energy

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tanker in the last seventy days has passed through, and

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that was just this past week, so you can start

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to see that change pretty quickly. The oil industry is

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of known for its boom and bus cycles. When

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the price is high, they invest a lot to find

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>more oil and then the price comes down rapidly. But

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there's something different that governments and even people do when

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a dual energy shock. You know, we talked

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about the twenty twenties, but like it's worth going back

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty years and thinking through the nineteen seventy three and

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine shocks. We know that there was a rapid

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>decline in the burning of oil for electricity, which at

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.359
<v Speaker 1>the time twenty or twenty five percent of global electricity

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>came from burning oil fell and it just continued to

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>fall even after the oil price really came back to

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>being normalized in the eighties. Governments invested heavily in nuclear power,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>France among them, but so many others, and you saw

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this rapid increase of nuclear power. You also saw increase

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in coal burning, which was on the decline for a

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>while with the oil being burned. But then you've got

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>much longer term investments, things like battery technology investments that

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Exonomobile made, for example, but also solar investments which are

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>bearing fruit today. There were energy efficiency measures, you know,

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>cars became just a lot more efficient and they've continued

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to increase their mileage steadily ever since the seventies. If

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you are now looking at this dual energy shock, you're

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing countries start to take on renewables, take on electrification.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>What kind of impact do we think we will see

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in ten twenty year's time.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's a great question. And what tends to happen

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 2>in the aftermath of all of these shocks. Local availability,

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>which is a policy objective to secure security of supply,

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>which has always been an issue with energy since we

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 2>were walking out of caves and cutting down trees so

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>that we could burn our evening meal. Local availability has

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 2>always been a prime directive when it comes to energy supply,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and in Placid geopolitical periods, it starts to feel like

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 2>everywhere is local, right, and policymakers feel that way, large

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>investors feel that way. People who operate local businesses feel

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that way. They have no idea and no reason to

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 2>have an idea where their feedstock comes from. And then

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 2>suddenly a disruption like this happens and people are wait

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 2>a second, my stuff comes from where, and my monthly

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 2>budget is dependent on what and how can I put

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>pressure on the people who control power in my local area,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 2>i e. The politicians, both power in the political sense

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and in the energy sense, so that we can insulate

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>ourselves against future shocks of this kind. And everything else

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 2>flows from that realization. So what happened in the post

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>seventy three period, And I was a child in the

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventies playing on a beach in Nova Scotia that

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>suddenly had a coal plant at the end of it.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And the reason we had a coal plant at the

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 2>end of our beach and all over the rest of

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Nova Scotia is because we mind coal in Nova Scotia

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 2>and it was the locally available resource to replace oil

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>fired electricity. In other places it was different things. So

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 2>I think that people in climate circles right now tend

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to believe, Aha, well, people will finally come around to

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 2>our way of thinking. And the evidence is the excitlerating

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.599
<v Speaker 2>adoption of evs, especially in markets outside of North America.

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It is the adoption of solar with battery as a

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>replacement for hydrocarbons like LNG. That's not what's happening on

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the ground, and I think that people need to appreciate that,

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>otherwise they make long term policy mistakes. The example you

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>used of Spain, which I think is a really important

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>one of upper middle class economy, let me put it

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that way, a G twenty country. They are proving to

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Europe that from an engineering perspective, renewables

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>a scale work. Now, lots of people will say Spain

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>is a sunny southern European country. There are others, by

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the way, But as you and I both know and

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>probably don't want to spend too much time explaining, that's

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 2>not the way physics works. And the biggest barriers for

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>any system planner or policymaker in a large economy is

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>whether or not the stuff is going to work at

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day. And now there's a whole

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>series of examples not only that it does work at scale,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>but that it is appreciably cheaper than the old system.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 2>So you put those two things together, and you have

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>an aggressively marketing global power like China that can arrive

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>at your policymaker's doorstep with the entire electric stack and

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>say we can do this for you, so you don't

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>have to worry the next time, or worry as much

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the next time there's a disruption in the global hydrocarbon industry.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Then it becomes a very You put those three things

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>together and it's a very attractive prospect. So my own

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>view is that people are under appreciating how much this

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>crisis will accelerate the energy transition.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The other fourth dimension, maybe i'll add in, is one

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that some experts are calling the hyper agency of consumer.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So typically the energy system has been these long dated,

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a large billion dollar assets that need to be invested

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in by governments and buy large private investors. And this

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>time around there is because of the modularization of some

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of these technologies like solar and batteries in particular, consumers

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>are able to act even before governments make changes in policy.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, again you talked about Spain being an

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>upper middle class economy. But you know, I'm reporting on

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Philippines right now, and I heard from a nurse

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>whose annual salaries less than ten thousand dollars, whose desire

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was to try and get solar on the roof because

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>eight will lower my bills, but also because I want

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>my own energy. And lots of people in the past

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>may have said I want my own energy but could

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not have done anything about it. Now they can.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is a critical point. I wouldn't overstate it,

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>but it is a critically new thing. It is a

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>bona fide new thing in the global energy system. I

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>would counterbalance that by saying, the most powerful and underappreciated

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 2>force in politics and arguably in nature is inertia, right,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 2>and incumbents will fight change tooth and nail. And it's

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>not an accident that the process you described in the

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirties wasn't really about replacing hydrocarbons. It was about

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 2>replacing one hydrocarbon with another and finding different use cases

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>for individual hydrocarbons. That meant that the transition, while important,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 2>was happening largely within the confines of the oil and

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>gas and coal industry. Itself right, and I suspect what

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you'll see, and you certainly have seen. It's disrupted politics

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>already in many places and especially including the United States.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>The oil and gas industry will not go quietly. They

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>will fight change. They will fight the transition every step

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 2>of the way. And as a consequences where we come

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>in as you raise your group, because that's an analytical

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 2>judgment from our perspective, not a normative one. It means

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 2>that while the direction of travel is set and the

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 2>trajectory is accelerating in the energy transition itself, it means

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that it will be a lot longer and bumpier than

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>the science on the climate side would dictate necessary and

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>on the technology side would allow, because the incumbents will

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 2>fight it every step of the way, just because of

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the amount of money that's at stake.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>After the break, more of my conversation with Gerald Buds.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying this episode of Zero, please take a

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>moment to read and review the show on Apple Podcasts, YouTube,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify. It makes the algorithms happy and helps more

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>people find this podcast. Picking up on your point about

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the disposition of the people and power in governments and

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the directions they may take as a result of a crisis.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You need to tell me why Canada is taking the

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>direction that it is because in power is Mark Carney,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a man who very well understands climate science and the

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>climate urgency better than I would say any world leader

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in power right now, maybe Claudia Scheinbaum would be the

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one who can compete with him on climate science knowledge.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet over the past twelve months fourteen months that

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been Prime Minister, that you helped in his campaign

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to put him into that position, he has not done

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that you would expect a predisposition to thinking

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on a clean energy dimension, do wanted in his campaign.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He wanted Canada to become a clean energy superpower. He

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted Canada to become an energy superpower of all kinds.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He has certainly worked on trying to get an oil

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>pipeline to the West, but has he done anything to

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>really accelerate the clean energy equation.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would say it's early days. And I will

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>say actually, one of the many, many, many reasons I

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>did not go back into active politics after the campaign

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 2>is that I never again want to be in the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 2>business of explaining the actions of policymakers to people. So

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm not going to offer to speak for Prime

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Minister Kearney, but I will say that as someone who

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>who cares a lot about my country and who has

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>observed it very closely, both as an analyst and as

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a key advisor to policymakers over time, that Canada is

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a more complicated place than it looks from the outside,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and its core psychosis is internal integration. When I was

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a grad student at McGill back in the nineteen nineties,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>we almost lost the country in a referendum by less

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 2>than one percentage point. There has been another secession referendum

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 2>in my lifetime in nineteen eighty which Prime Minister Pierre

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Trudeau won by twenty points. But it's always in the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 2>back of your mind that is there a set of

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>policy issues that is acting as a force to pull

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>the country apart. And I'm not making a normative judgment

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>on the actors who will use that as an excuse

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to promote their own interests, which of course always happens

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>in politics everywhere in Canada is no exception to that.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 2>But that coupled with the I was going to say

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 2>the unique, but you could argue that the McKinley administration

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 2>did the same thing in the latter last part of

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth century. The aggressive posture of the United States

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 2>to Canada means that policy choices that you would have

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 2>in peacetime look a lot less attractive if you're governing

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 2>the country at a time of unique crisis. So to

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 2>answer your question directly, I think that let's wait and

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>give Prime Minister Carney some time to adjust to this

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>new reality and see what the climate policy is that

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>he proposes to use to make progress in this context.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>But don't judge the actions and decisions that he's taken

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>as if those two other big things that I just

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>described are not happening, because they are. And if you're

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister of Canada, the relationship with the United States

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and the unity of the country itself in reverse order,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>are the two things that are on your desk every day,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 2>no matter whether you want them there or not.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing that he did do which sort of stood

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of minds was give the speech at the

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>World Economic Forum in Davos talking about the Middle Powers.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, Canada, India, Germany, France, the UK like these

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are now all middle powers and with what's happening at

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the very highest level between China and the US. There

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity, he said, for the Middle powers to

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>come together to work on challenges, including climate change, that

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they could do something about. Now he has been going

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>around the world talking to lots of countries, lots of

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Middle powers, trying to make treat deals happen. He's restored

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>relationships with India, for example. Specifically, how do you think

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that will come together? Are we seeing any place where

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>these middle powers are acting can act?

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely, I think it will come together. I don't

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>think it'll be in the traditional sense of an alliance.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't see the headquarters of the Middle Power alliance

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 2>in Madrid, where everybody where they're where there are five

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>thousand bureaucrats working there and everybody comes for a leader's

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 2>summit every year. I don't see it developing that way.

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that that's part the structural problem,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 2>is part of the problem with legacy alliances as well.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he described it in DeVos as he didn't

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 2>quite use these terms, but as a networked alliance that

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>exists to reinforce each other's values and strategic policy objectives.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the kind of thing that you

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 2>only notice it when you see it, and then when

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 2>you see it you say, oh, okay, that's what Mark

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Carney meant. A large investment agreement between the Golf Cooperation

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Council and Canada wouldn't have happened outside of this context.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 2>So I wouldn't see it as a replacement for NATO,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and I certainly wouldn't see it as a replacement for

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the European Union. But it is a viable, I think,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a practical response to a world in which neither of

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the two superpowers can be depended upon to set the

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 2>rules of the road and then more importantly obey them

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 2>themselves as they conduct global affairs. So I see it

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 2>as usual things get overblown in the media, but I

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>see it as a very practical response to roads being

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>closed off for the expansion of trade with traditional partners

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 2>and security partnerships that are being undermined by the leader

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 2>of the most important security partnership in the world, which

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 2>is NATO.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, one of the members I didn't mention, which you

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>can now count as a middle power is the United

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates, you know, as part of OPEK, which it

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was until last month. It acted as Opek did in

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in geopopolitics. Obviously, their main goal is to try and

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>keep oil prices not swinging as wildly as they could swing.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>They do swing wildly still, but at least try to

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>mute the swings on the most extremes they have. Now

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the United Arab Emirates is now left Opek, how do

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that plays for the energy transition?

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's super interesting and I think it

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>will be consequential over the long term. It depends, and

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 2>nobody really knows what the true motivation was for the

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Emoradis to do this. That you can speculate a lot

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>about the bilateral relationship with the Saudis, that they have

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a different forward view of oil in particular. My view

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>is it's a mix of both those things. That the

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Emaradis have become wealthy enough that they want to chart

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 2>their own course and they don't want to be bound

0:26:54.280 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>to a club that has an obvious permanent president. Right, So,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a chicken and egg argument, how many of

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 2>those relationship problems between the Saudis and the Amoradis are

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>generated by that strategic judgment versus the other way. Around.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 2>But in any case, I think you've got a really

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>significant oil producer, the most one of the most significant

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 2>gas producers now looking at the downslope of the hydrocarbon

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>era and saying we want to have more policy freedom

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to play it in our own interest. It was interesting

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to me to listen to you try to describe what

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 2>the preferred oil price outcome is for Opek, how you

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 2>would describe it, And in my view, it's the same.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Everybody has the same preferred outcome, which is a zone

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>of self interest. You want the oil price to be.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 2>If you're a Saudi, you want to be high enough

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>so that you make money, but not volatile so that

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 2>it takes up too much attention and elicits the kind

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>of policy responses that we're talking about on this podcast.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 2>If the United States, for most of my lifetime, you

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>wanted the old price to be low, period. But I

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 2>think this is one of the most underappreciated developments of

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the twenty first century, geopolitically or otherwise, certainly from a

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 2>climate perspective. When the United States went from producing about

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 2>three and a half three point eight million barrels in

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousand to thirteen and a half fourteen today. That

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is a fundamental change in the posture of the United States.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Our friend and colleague Jason Bordoff wrote a good piece

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>about this last week that it's probably unimaginable that this

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>crisis happens if the United States does not have what

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>it perceives to be energy independence is the holy grail

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 2>of presidential policy that every president since at least Eisenhower

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>has been chasing. Trump, Obama, and Biden have all had that.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>So they've interpreted and used that in very different ways.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>You can only understand Trump's decision making, his administration's decision

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>making if you foreground that growth in the oil and

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>gas industry domestically in the United States.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The last question, I would bring up China because you know,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in some form we've mentioned China here and there, but

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been sitting in the background for what is happening

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to the energy system now. There is an equivalence that

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people make about, well, you know, okay, we will move

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>away from fossil fuels, but when we end up just

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>depending on China because that's where all the non fossil

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>fuel technologies are coming from. And then you look at

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the sales figures and the country is that don't care

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>about whether stuff comes from China are very happily increasing

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>their purchases of Chinese electrotech. In the month of March,

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty three countries set a record for the amount of

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>solar panels, batteries and electric cars that they imported from China.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But then places like Europe and the US are still

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>very much oh China as a problem. How do you

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>see the China dependence And when you talk to investors

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and large corporations, how do you tell them about thinking

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of this new dependence.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's real, for one thing, and I think that

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. As someone who has advised policymakers

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>in a G seven country, you know there are two

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>kinds of people who advise heads of government on foreign policy.

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>There are people who look very much like you and me,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 2>who think about the types of things that we think about,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 2>who are trying to maximize the economic value of the

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 2>country's relationships around the world. And then there are people

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 2>who tend to be dressed in uniforms who are skeptical

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of commercial actors and say things to heads of governments like,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>look at what all of those and suits have done

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 2>for the country. They've exposed us to a massive security

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 2>risk that Chinese don't share our values. They just want

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to steal our stuff and replace us at the apex

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of the geopolitical food chain. And the trouble if you're

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a policy maker is that both sides are right. And

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:25.239
<v Speaker 2>I think that whether you're in public policy directly or

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>whether you're downstream of it in the investor class or

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the executive class, then you're trying to weigh these things

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that have no easy answer. Right, So it sounds like

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm avoiding your question, actuat, But this is what I

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>say to our clients, that you have to define for

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>yourself what your core interests are and where you're willing

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to absorb risk on in the aftermath of those big

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 2>strategic decisions. And I think that you know, normally, historically

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the best technological wins. And I'm in the long term,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in the long term, not necessarily in the short term.

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And if a lot of the people who are ideologically

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 2>complaining about the ascent of China in this era, in

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 2>this kind of micro era we're living through, are precisely

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the same people who fought the adoption of the technologies

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that would have made the United States a leader in

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 2>these technologies, because after all, the US had a multi

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>decade lead. They just surrendered it right and really without

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>a shot being fired. So I think that these decisions

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 2>are incredibly complex and they depend on what your specific

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>use case and problems set look like as an investor

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>or a corporate leader. But my sense is that the

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>prevailing winds are blowing in China's direction on the energy

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>system globally, and they of course could surrender that lead

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that the United States did. But

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>as we've written pretty extensively both of us, the most

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 2>important thing that's happened in the energy transition over the

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>past ten years is that it is broken in half, right,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>and it is accelerating in the part of the world

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>that looks to China as the technological apex predator, and

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it is decelerating in the part of the world that

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>looks to the United States. That way, geographies like Europe

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>are caught in the middle of it. But that's also

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>as we both know not where the growth is going

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to be. Maybe I can conclude with this big picture thought.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I often think about this when I think about these

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical trends. Over the course of my life, When I

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was born a million years ago, in the summer of

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy one in kperet Nova, Scotia, there were three

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>point eight billion people in the world and it was

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 2>controlled by the powers that won the Second World War. Right.

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I have two kids, one just turned twenty and the

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>other is eighteen. Their core gen z and there are

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>three point five billion people in their generation, and ninety

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 2>percent of those people were born in emerging markets. So

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 2>much of the disruption we're feeling in the world is

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 2>a consequence of what we as a firm called the

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>G zero many many years ago, that the institutional architecture

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 2>that was set up to govern the world multilaterally by

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the United States and its allies in nineteen forty six

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>from forty six to sixty has really dissolved because the

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 2>world that it was created to govern has dissolved. And

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 2>we're living in this interregnum where we don't know what

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the state the next staple equilibrium will look like. For

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 2>fans of science fiction, as you and I were joking,

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 2>we're living in a chaotic era, right, and we just

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know how long it will last and what will

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 2>replace it. But certain things are becoming pretty clear that is,

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 2>whatever energy drives the next stable equilibrium will be low

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>carbon and probably dependent upon electrons rather than high carbon

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and dependent upon hydrocarbon molecules.

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Jeredy Butts.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Great to be here, real thrill.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for listening to zero. Now for the

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>sound of.

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 2>The week Way Budd.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>That is the sound of the citizens of Trisolaris from

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix adaptation of The Three Body Problem, being told

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to rehydrate as their world enters a stable era, or

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>so they think. If you liked this episode, please take

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a moment to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts, YouTube,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and Spotify. This episode was produced by Oscar Boyd. A

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>theme music is composed by Wondering. Special thanks to Laura

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Milan and Sharan chan Aymakshatrati. Back soon.