WEBVTT - Disney Tops Estimates, Tariffs Latest 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Corplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get back to Disney. I'm told the

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 2>market can't make up its mind. I'm interested to see

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>what the experts think we got, Paul. Let's get Keitha

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>either wrong Nathan Boomberg, Intelligence, Senior analyst on US Media.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 3>All right, Keitha, what was your biggest takeaway here from Disney?

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 4>Really solid quarter for them, Alex and this is a

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 4>really strong start for them for fiscal twenty twenty five.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 4>So you know, the big numbers, of course that we

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 4>constantly look for when Disney reports is how did it

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 4>do on the streaming subscriber front? And we did expect

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 4>them to lose a good amount of subscribers, just kind

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of given the price increases that went in effect date

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 4>last year, almost fifteen to twenty five percent price increases,

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 4>but churn was very very limited, so came in much

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 4>better than they had expected, than we had expected. And

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 4>then again the parks numbers. Now, remember, you know we

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 4>have been seeing some demand moderation at the parks, but

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 4>they actually again held up better than expected. So all

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 4>of those you know, you put all of that together,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 4>including streaming profits, you had over a forty percent increase

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 4>in adjusted EPs. So financially, I think the company is

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 4>off on a solid footing and off to a very

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 4>good start for twenty twenty five.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 5>What could be a less than positive view of this

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 5>quarter here because I'm seeing the stock kind of all

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 5>over the place, gith it teams like maybe the market

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 5>can't really decide, So what are some of the concerns

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 5>out there? Maybe from this quarter?

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I think what was slightly disappointing, Paul, is that they

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 4>didn't raise guidance. So you know, they did deliver forty

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 4>percent increase in EPs, but they're still talking about fullier

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 4>EPs only growing in the high single digits. I think

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 4>that's where maybe the market is slightly disappointed again with

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 4>the parks, also, they didn't necessarily raise guidance. And remember

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 4>with the parks, there is a little bit of concern

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 4>about what competition can potentially do when a new theme

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 4>park from Comcast NBC Epic Universe opens this May, and

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 4>there's still like, you know, really conflicting views about this,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 4>although management seems to think that it's actually it's kind

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>of this rising tide that lifts all boats, so they've

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 4>downplayed it, but I think there is still some concern

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 4>about that. And then the other big thing that you know,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 4>everyone's kind of looking at or waiting for, is the

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>launch of what they call Flagship ESPN, which is the

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 4>first time that ESPN, the full blown product will be

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>available without a PATV subscription. So that's going to happen

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>sometime in the fall of this year, and so again

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>there are going to be some launch casts where that

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 4>product prices, what the subscriber outlook will be, so a

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>little bit of uncertainty there as well. But overall, really

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>really strong results and.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>The streaming operation in Film Studio look me in like

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a thirty percent thirty one percent gain and operating income.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 3>For the quarter. Was that really driven by price hikes

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for streaming.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 4>For streaming, yes, it was a lot of it was

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 4>driven by you know, we saw really solid our pool growth.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 4>What we're going to continue to see Alex through the

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 4>rest of the quarters is what you know, exactly what

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Netflix did. You know, Disney's kind of taking a page

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 4>out of that Netflix playbook with what they call page

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 4>sharing or cracking down on passwords sharing, and so we're

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>going to see that kind of really ramp up in

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 4>terms of the streaming profitability numbers. And then you pointed to,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, content, the box office has absolutely had a

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 4>marvelous run kind of reversing so many of you know,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 4>the misfires that we had in earlier years, and they're

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 4>going to continue to build on that. And as some

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 4>of those movies come on to the streaming platform again,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>they expect that to drive subscriber growth as well.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 5>So, Keith, what's the market thinking about profitability for streaming

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 5>at Disney? We kind of you look at the Netflix

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 5>margins and is there a belief that this isn't can

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 5>at least get approached. The Netflix profitabiliting absolutely, I think so.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's going to be immediate though, Paul.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean for this year they are guiding to about

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>a billion dollars in profit. They did say that they

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>will get to double digit margins in fiscal twenty twenty six. Now,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>remember Netflix is already close to thirty percent margins. So

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, you still do have that big delta ten

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 4>percent versus thirty percent. But I think that's where all

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>of the upside really is with Disney. I mean, this

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 4>is a complex story with many many different moving parts,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 4>but streaming is obviously one of the you know, huge

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 4>positive catalysts and I think we're going to see that

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>streaming profitability continue to build, especially as they have a

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of pricing power and all of these other different initiatives.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 4>And remember, for them, as opposed to Netflix, one area

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 4>where Disney is better than Netflix is advertising. They've got

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>all of those different you know, all of the plumbing

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 4>is in place. They are the biggest digital advertiser right

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>now out there in the market. They make even more

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 4>in connected TV advertising than YouTube does, so you know,

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 4>they obviously have you know, an advantage of first moved advantage,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I would say with respect advertising.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you mentioned how that flagship ESPN.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 6>Area will do.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>What's your biggest question now going forward?

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's really going to be how exactly. So again

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>with with ESPN, we have a little bit of you know,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 4>questions in terms of where exactly the subscribers will trend

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 4>for that product. A lot of it I think will

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>depend on where the product prices. So that's a little

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 4>bit of a wait and watch story. And then with parks,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, yes, we do have confidence that they do

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of positive levers. We know that, you know,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 4>the international parks are performing extremely well. Cruise lines is

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 4>something that they're really expanding into. And if you just

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of look at the cruise line trajectory, I mean,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 4>this was a two billion dollar revenue business in twenty

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty four. We think this will potentially get to about

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 4>ten billion dollars by you know, twenty thirty. And at

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 4>that point, Paul, you know, we think it could make

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 4>well over three four billion dollars in ibade, which means

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 4>it's bigger than ESPN at that point. So, you know,

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>cruises is going to be a big portion of their

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 4>park story. So I think the diversification you know, story

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 4>is playing out really well for them with barks. But

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 4>again there's a little bit of weight and watch. I

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 4>think twenty twenty five is still a little bit of

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 4>a transition year for them.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 5>All right, Githa, let's back up. We you know, I

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 5>think there's a fair level of confidence in the Disney

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 5>story how about some of the other companies.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 7>I think about.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Warner Brothers Discovery, I think about Paramount. What are companies

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 5>like that do this in this world? How do you

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 5>think that plays out?

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So I think for Warner Brothers Discovery, Paul, I

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 4>think there is still going to be a lot of

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 4>focus on how the TV business is going to perform. Ironically,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 4>I think this year TV is actually in good shape.

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean why I say ironically is because they actually

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 4>lost the rights to the NBA, and so everybody was

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of very, very fearful of how exactly, you know,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Ibadah was going to be, how affiliate revenue was going

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to be for this year. But they actually got two

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 4>huge deals in place, one with Comcasts, the other one

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 4>with Charter, which basically kept their affiliate fees flat. So

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 4>the revenue trajectory looks decent. I would say for Warner

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Brothers Discovery, I think the problem really for them is

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 4>going out, you know, into the future, and what they

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 4>decide to do. Is consolidation going to be a big thing.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 4>It could be a big thing for them. I mean,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 4>we already know that Comcast is kind of spun out.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 4>It's cable networks. We don't know if Warner Brothers is

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of going to follow suit and you know, maybe

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 4>do some kind of transaction with Comcast. So that's a

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>little bit of a wait and watch. And again with

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Paramount again, we're kind of in limbo here because we

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 4>really don't know what sky Dance is going to do

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 4>in terms of strategy for the new company. I mean,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>they're already facing some regulatory hurdles, but assuming the transaction

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>goes through, we really have to kind of wait and

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>see exactly what sky Dance wants to do with the

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 4>assets again, whether they're going to let go of some

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 4>of those linear TV assets, what their real trust is

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Great stuff, Thank you so much. Gita really appreciated best analysis.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Along with Paul on the street. The two of you

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>like cannot get any better than that, Either wrong or

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>anthen a Bloomerg Intelligence Senior US media analyst.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern Applecarplay and Android Otto with

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 2>We're broadcasting to you live from Interactive Broker Studio right

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.119
<v Speaker 2>here in Midtown Manhattan. You can also check us out

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube dot com. I should point out like my

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>daughter still loved Mowana to and Mohana had a sister

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Mowana too, so cute, so that worked.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 8>Did you miss Tom singing the Moana song this morning?

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I did. That's sad for you. It's good for you.

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>That's all right, because I was to like this song.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I was also singing one of the Little mermaid songs

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and break, so we can all have a Disney sing fest.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Back to the markets and the question marks, the question

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>marks right now, coming very much from DC. I want

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to get more intake right now with Henry de Tris,

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Managing partner and director of Economic Policy at Beta Partner.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>She joins us from Louisiana. Henritta, Last time we talked,

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you said you're going to be looking for signals from

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>what happens to Trump's cabinet nominees. Who protests, who doesn't?

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Do they sail through? To me, everyone's sailing through. So

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>what does that tell you?

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, it tells me quite a few things actually, which

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 7>is really helpful and constructive. Number One the Senate Majority

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 7>Leader John Dune does not want to hear Trump reiterate

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 7>his calls for recess appointments, which takes quite a bit

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 7>of power away from the United States Senate to advising consent,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 7>which they take very seriously.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 6>So they're picking and choosing their battles.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>And why is that Because we have a massive legislative

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 7>agenda heading their way and they want to be able

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 7>to override the House Republican leadership. So this comes into

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 7>play with a one or two reconciliation bill strategy, and

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 7>as of this afternoon, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsay Graham

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 7>is going to start exerting his power to run over

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 7>the better legislative agenda intuitions of the House Republican leadership.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 7>So this to me signals that the Senate's trying to

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 7>keep Trump happy knowing that they're about to run rough

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 7>shot over the House, which is very normal, and that

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 7>they also want to avoid the idea of recess appointment

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 7>constructive guidance coming from just their actions here.

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 5>All right, from the White House. Henriette Tariff's on Tariff's off,

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 5>Tariff's delayed, is there? What's the sense in Washington, DC

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 5>about what the strategy is maybe a President Trump administration.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 7>I think a lot of members are sort of not

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 7>even bothering to pretend that they know strategy, but are

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 7>instead giving us also really important context clues about what

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 7>they're expecting to factor in from tariff revenue on the

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 7>next tax bill or the next immigration, military spending.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Energy package.

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 7>They are factoring in some level of revenue from tariffs,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 7>and the estimates are anywhere between seven hundred billion and

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 7>one trillion dollars. So it's not really a question of

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 7>how the President goes about landing on putting tariffs in place.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 7>There's obviously been fits and starts, thirty day delays with Canada, Mexico.

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 6>Maybe there will be a phone call with President she

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 6>and China. But they're really more.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Giving us the valuable guidance that they are going to

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 7>be being tariffs in their revenue scores, which means that

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 7>they expect tariffs to go on. However the President decides

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 7>to impose them, so again instructive just in their directionality

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 7>of incorporating tariff revenue into their forecast.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought we were going to get that g

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump call yesterday, So I don't know. I'll keep waiting

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>for that one. So actually, let's combine these two points then,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 2>because if we do expect to see some form of

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>tariffs because of that revenue estimate that you talked about,

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and we do see no one wanting to torpedo the

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Trump agenda on their Republican side, does this mean that

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 2>the tax bill has a significant chance of getting through

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and getting through quickly.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 6>No, definitely not.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 7>What's never reminds the Senate is about too, it's exactly

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 7>the opposite of that. I think the House Republican Conference

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 7>is effectively nowhere on a budget. They have a very

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 7>fractured conference and only one seat to spare in terms

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 7>of votes, so they don't have a path.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 6>Forward on one big bill or maybe even two.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 7>However, what the Senate is doing is they're trying to

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 7>give President Trump a legislative win, especially going into his

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 7>Joint Address to Congress on March fourth. They have an

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 7>ambitious online where they're going to try to get budget

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 7>reconciliation instructions done in February and early March. Tea up

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 7>actually writing the bill in April, but this would be

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 7>on the smaller immigration and military spend package the tax bill.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 6>In my opinion has been consistent. It's not going to

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 6>pass until December.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about five trillion dollars worth of negotiations that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 7>takes months, indeed almost a full year, and they've known

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 7>that this is coming since twenty seventeen when the tax

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 7>bill passed. So we still have a lot of work

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 7>to do, and in the intervening months we have to

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 7>deal with a government shutdown on March fourteenth, a debt

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 7>ceiling negotiation over the summer, another perspective, government shutdown September thirtieth.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of opportunities for Democrats to throw wrenches

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 7>in the gears of the Republican legislative agenda, and to me,

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 7>that point's a pretty clear experienced picture that the tax

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 7>bill won't happen until December.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 5>Henryette, I guess it's to be no surprise to observers

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 5>that President Trump sucks most of the air out of

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 5>the room most of the time. Are you surprised that

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 5>we don't hear more leadership from either congressional Republicans or Democrats.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 7>I think that they have been out of session, to

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 7>be fair, and now that they are back in session,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 7>they have to deal with things like Hey, are we

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 7>going to occupy Gaza. What's going on with DOJE, what's

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 7>going on with potentially the DOGE team being able to

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 7>access treasury payment systems. There's so much out there that

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 7>they're really just flying with it and negotiating behind the

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 7>scenes on those legislative agenda items. Especially on the Republican side.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 7>I think Democrats have not found their footing at all.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 7>I do see some opportunity for them to coalesce behind

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 7>that March fourteenth deadline for a government funding bill.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 6>If they can come together with the appropriators.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 7>And leadership and say we want one percent more in

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 7>federal spending in twenty five, we want aid to the

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 7>California wildfires, etc.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 6>They can get in a cohesive place. But right now

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 6>they're just letting Trump.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Have the show.

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 3>So what is up with doche.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 7>What's up with those That's a great question. I think

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 7>that is the question right now. They've implemented a number

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 7>of freezes and that is something that's obviously creating a

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.479
<v Speaker 7>lot of lawsuits, and two judges have stayed those actions.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 7>They are going through and combing through the trade repayment systems.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 7>There's reports that Elon Musk has been at the VA

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 7>going through some of those payment systems potentially, And the

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 7>question is, really, have they identified via their AI tech

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 7>savvy any duplicatus payments, any payments they.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 6>Are going to people who are no longer with us?

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 7>Is there any kind of abnormalities? Those are the areas

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 7>where they're trying to find savings. And then obviously you

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 7>have that idea of cutting the overall federal employee base.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 7>But all told, those are really small dollar amounts, less

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 7>than one percent of federal spending.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 6>And by the things that.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 7>I just listed a moment ago, aid to the wildfires,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 7>aid to farmers, as we prepare for the trade wars.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Continued spending on the tax side.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 7>And one percent increases in twenty twenty five, spending hundred

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars in military spending. Whatever Dude is able to find,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 7>Congress has already spent. So I'm not seeing a lot

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 7>in terms of functional deficit reduction or spending cuts that

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 7>will offset what Congress will do.

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Henriette, thank you so much for that great synopsis.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 5>There a lot of moving parts down there in Washington,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 5>DC in Congress with all those bills that Hendriyette was

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 5>laying out for us. Henrietta Tres, managing partner and director

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 5>of Economic Policy of Bervada Partners, kind of laying it

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>all out for us.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay and Android

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business Appum Listen on demand wherever

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 5>In the streets.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 8>You know what they impact stuff?

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 7>State business?

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, it does.

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 5>It's a real estate business. Lisa Need joins us, managing

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 5>partner and head of real Estate for Eisner a Forerd,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 5>joining us here in.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 5>Lisa, let's talk about that. I mean, it looks like

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 5>rates are coming down, but maybe not as fast as

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 5>people like.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 8>How's that impact?

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 5>I think just commercial real estate probably defined what are

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 5>you seeing out through with your clients?

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 8>What a great segue. Thank you for having me. So

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 8>it's exactly the perfect way to start talking about this

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 8>is that with interest rates being where they are and

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 8>the unknown of what's going to happen going forward, we're

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 8>sort of at a standstill and valuation however, the activity

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 8>in real estate for twenty twenty four was up, and

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 8>we do predict twenty twenty five having a lot more

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 8>trading people going back and forth and trying to figure

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 8>out some deal flow, which means that valuations have to come,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 8>which is tied to interest rates. It's not going to

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 8>get back up to where we were in twenty seventeen.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 8>But I think everyone's really optimistic for twenty twenty five

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 8>that there is going to be some things happening in there.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 8>When we talk about interest rates, and you know, we

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 8>just heard from Mike McKee where the settling is and

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 8>what the Feds are doing, it's interesting. Once rates are

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 8>still low for the people who have existing mortgages and things,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 8>it's not going to make us able to go out

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 8>and sell our houses because we still have very low

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 8>interest rates, and so all of that is going to

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 8>affect you know, multi family home buyers, it's going to

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 8>affect office to trickle through the rest of all the

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 8>sectors of real estate. So, yes, you're right, it's a

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 8>great segue into real estate is where we are on

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 8>interest rates, and that's the big unknown and waiting and

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 8>seeing with the inflation being where it is and the

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 8>economy doing well, it's a wait and see approach.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just how quickly like we've rerated really like

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at just over like forty basis points of

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>couz priced into world imply probability. Morgan Stanley sees just

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>one cut now in June, round than two in March

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and June.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 3>How quickly does that feed through to like prices?

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 8>It actually feeds through quicker than it's even announced. It's

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 8>almost like people know before and anticipate it. So the

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 8>valuation is already baked into it, and so it feeds

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 8>in immediately. And so when you think that FEDS are

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 8>going to announce it and things are going to move drastically,

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 8>it's already moved once the anticipation is there, and what

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 8>they think are going to do, what they think is

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 8>going to happen with those rates.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, office work, Yeah, are there any what are

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 5>the trends here in office? I guess the first question

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 5>is does anybody going to call a bottom? Has anybody

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 5>called a bottom? Is anybody think about that?

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 8>Do you want me to make a prediction right here?

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 8>Should we do it?

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Fun?

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 8>Okay? So prediction that I heard was twenty twenty six

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 8>New York city is going to have a shortage of

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 8>office available, a shortage because there's been a lot less construction.

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 8>We do have some conversions, not a lot, but there

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 8>will be some conversions to residential. The trophy buildings are occupied,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 8>which is going to help the a's and b's and

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 8>so you know, we know that tech is back, is

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 8>going back to work. We've heard those announcements today. This

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 8>place is the busiest it's been I think in a

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 8>long time. And media has made announcement that they need

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 8>to start coming back to work. So with everybody making

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 8>those announcements of back to work, there's been less office

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 8>coming on the market in the last two years or

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 8>three years because of construction costs. And so prediction that

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 8>New York City, you want another prediction, Yeah, sure, don't

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 8>write off San Francisco yet. And why I know we're

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 8>very bleak on that. But seventy two cents of every

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 8>AI dollar is going into San Francisco. And so with

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 8>all the money going into something that because people their

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 8>work there, eighty three point two and I think that's

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 8>the right statistic. Somebody will write, oh, it's not of

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 8>the talent is in San Francisco based and so the

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 8>VC venture capital firms that are funding the AI are

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 8>mandating that they want to see the people and they

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 8>want that in office experience. And so if eighty three

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 8>point two percent of our talent is in the San

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 8>Francisco Bay Area who are funding and working on the AI,

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 8>we see where the future is and so maybe not

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 8>to write off San Francisco. So a little bit of optimism.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 8>I think in office. We'll see in a year from

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 8>now how off I was, but we'll be optimistead have.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 5>We've seen many transactions of note in New York City

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 5>that gives you a sense of where valuations are.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's been a bunch of movement. I think there

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 8>was a fifty seventh Street there was a property that

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 8>just was acquired, and so people are moving and the

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 8>values are, strangely enough, they're holding up. And so the

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 8>whole thing is is the buyer and the seller is

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 8>willing to come up to where they think prices are.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 8>And I think yesterday there was a large transaction that

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 8>just happened on fifty seventh Street, which is which is noteworthy.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, definitely, what do you think the bottom

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>looks like?

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 8>I'm hoping we passed it. I think we're headed to

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 8>a really good direction from So, I.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Guess what the trajectory from now until twenty twenty six

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>does look like like?

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Is it bumpy? Is it a straight lineup?

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Is it a curve?

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 8>So everyone was hoping for a soft landing, and I

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 8>think we got the soft landing. And so when you're

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 8>looking for the future to where you know, people are

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 8>seeing where we're at, secondary markets are going to be

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 8>really really hot. So is the live work play environment

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 8>and that type of world. Now New York is live

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 8>work play, but look at the secondary markets that are

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 8>going to create that live work environment for them. And

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 8>so if you look at you know, we could go

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 8>into this another time, the history of the malls, but

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 8>that's really what was supposed to be created. It wasn't

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be a mall with two anchors with seventy

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 8>acres of parking. It was supposed to be houses, hospitals, schooling,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, businesses created around the malls. That's what people

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 8>want and that's what we're going to start creating. And

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 8>so once we give people that sort of environment, I

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 8>think it's going to really really work. And then looking

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 8>at operational real estate data, centers. Yeah. Right, So there

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 8>is a lot of optimism out there in real estate

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 8>as to what we're looking forward and then just watching

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 8>interest rates really closely.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, I have to admit when I'm still surprised

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 5>every day I walk out on Lectionington Avenue that retail

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 5>space has not solved.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 2>But they're doing it. It's now rented because that space

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the gap used to be, but.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 5>It still feels like there's so much unrented retail in

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 5>mid time men that and it really.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Surprised me and Upper West Side too.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but when you look at it that there was

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 8>so much more, and we know that retail was doing horribly,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, years ago, and it is making that comeback

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 8>of changing what's that retail experience for. I mean, I

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 8>know that we read the five five or four big

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 8>boxes that are closing stores, and so that scares everybody

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 8>a little. But again it's coming back to that live

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 8>work play and finding balance of what people want in

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 8>that area. This is still relatively commercial here, yeah, and

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 8>not as residential, so you're not really living where you're

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 8>working here, and so it'll be interesting to see and

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 8>without the bloomingills is still a very large anchor to

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 8>this area, so I think it's going to get least

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 8>up over time.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to live where I work anyway.

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Lisa, thanks a lot. Always great to get your perspective.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It's so fantastic. Lisaknee managing partner and head of real

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 2>estate for Eisner Amper, and she comes with predictions.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 8>Oh boy.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal