WEBVTT - The Diddy Trial: !!!BREAKING!!! DIDDY SPEAKS (Bonus Episode)

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>It is Tuesday, June twenty fourth, and the prosecution rests,

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the defense rests, and Diddy says thank you to the

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>judge in open court. Welcome to the second Diddy update

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of the day here on Amy and TJ and Robes.

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 2>It was a day of developments, which is why we're

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>hopping back on.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 1>A lot of.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>Stuff happened in the afternoon as we're recording this. It

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>is early evening here on the East Coast. But a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>day of developments, including hearing Diddy's voice in open court.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess just the we'll get into the exact quotes

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>in a second, but just the idea of hearing from

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>him seems like it's a big day, just that he spoke.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Did you just imagine he said it the way you

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>inflected it?

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Would take that? Take that take that.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 4>I was laughing. I was like, Wow, did he really

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 4>do it? Just like that thing?

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what if you did, maybe you want to

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>sound very sweet and very innocent today in court.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We know I cannot imagine.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Coming out it's probably Mike, thank you no, but this

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>is the first time that we have heard from Ditty

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>directly correct since the beginning of this trial.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think there had to be something where

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 2>he had to give a nod or a yes, or

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 2>maybe eighty little.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember it though.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 3>The only thing I have seen reported on from folks

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in the courtroom is his demeanor, his facial expressions, the

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 3>fact that he was nodding or nodding.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 4>Aggressively towards a juror.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 3>We've seen reports today that he was hunched over, reports

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 3>that he wouldn't look at the screen when some of

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the explicit videos were being shown, But no, those were

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>just descriptions of his behavior and his physical demeanor, but

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 3>nothing from him directly.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You know what.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>We've been following a lot of these coom these reporters,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and we were reading their note today about him speaking.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>None of them mentioned that he had spoken prior, so

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they would have.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 4>They would have pretty sure that would have been a

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 4>big deal.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So this might have been it to hear from him

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>We also had a cross examination that took longer than expected,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>which is now messing with the timeline.

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And also Diddy's team.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Is asking for an acquittal right now and they haven't

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 2>gotten an answer to that yet, So that's an afternoon

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>of developments. That's why we jumped on. But I guess,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 2>like we said, the big one here hearing Diddy's voice.

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a standard part of any trial. We talked

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>about it before it happened. We're going to hear from

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Diddy today because they always ask are.

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>You going to testify on your own defense?

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>But I thought it was interesting that the judge started

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>with asking Diddy how he was feeling that.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I've heard that before. I didn't either, but it.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Once in a while though, cordial, how are you feeling?

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>So the judge asked Diddy, how are you feeling?

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Comb says, I'm doing great, Thank you, your honor, and then.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 4>He added my favorite part. He tells the judge you're

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 4>doing an excellent job. Charming as ever.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I did like that, Okay, I did like it.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Look everybody likes to be complimented, and a judge in

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>his federal trial, I liked it. Who knows what it

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 2>came off. I wonder how it felt in the courtroom.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Was it actually a warm moment? Is it possible to

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>have a warm moment in that courtroom?

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Possibly, but it does seem it seems like there's a

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>motive behind a defendant telling a judge that he's.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Doing an excellent job.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, maybe he really felt that and thought that,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>but it just made me laugh a little, just because

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>so much of what we're hearing about Diddy and his

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>charming and uh, just he had a way with people.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>He knows how to make people do what he wants

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>them to do.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>That was my thing.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>What if this was a matter of control that yes,

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm the defend that my life was on the line,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>but I'm telling you you're doing a good job. I

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>still need my approval in this room. But what's going on?

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Using with confidence, ouzing with confidence, as is the defense.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You notice our our afternoon updates. We're a lot looser.

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>We're yeah, we are a punchy. We've been up since

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>two thirty three in the morning at this point, so

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>forgive us, but we're.

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Going to get through it.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, we weren't even expecting to do this episode,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>but a lot happened this afternoon, and it was certainly

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>worth noting, specifically because yes, did he did speak, so yes.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Combs also told the judge that he was not going

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>to testify. No one thought he was going to, and

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly the defense has told us over the last couple

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>of days they weren't bringing any witnesses on the stand,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>so there was zero expectation that Combs was going to

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>but we at least got to hear him formally tell

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the judge that and why and how he came to

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 3>that decision.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they always want them to know that they have

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 2>to tell the judge, and the judge has to be

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>satisfied because you don't want this issue on appeal. Frankly,

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>like you saying, definitely, I'm making this decision, making it

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>on my own. I do not want to testify in

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>my own defense. Look After he says that the prosecute

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>and again this what they call summary witnesses. These are

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily for one side or the other, but they're

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 2>essentially just to go through notes and to go through

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>data for the jury and help them piece connect the dots.

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 2>As you say, So, this is supposed to be a

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>boring witness for a lot of ways. This dude was

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 2>on from Friday through this afternoon early almost to the afternoon.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>He turned out to be very important, And I think

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>this ended up being a defense witness, did it not, Yes, So.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what I believe was going on. So yes, the

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>defense didn't technically call any witnesses, but this Homeland Security

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>special agent ended up being a conduit by which the

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 3>defense was able to present texts and videos, and so

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.559
<v Speaker 3>they were in a way able to present its case

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 3>through this prosecution witness, which is not what I don't

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>think any of us expected at least. So, yes, he

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>was only supposed to be on the stand for a while.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>He was on the stand for three days and much

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 3>longer today, as you pointed out, than he was expected to.

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 3>I believe the defense told the court they thought they'd

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 3>need about an hour and change with him. He was

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 3>up for what three hours made me more?

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he ended up being very important. I think those.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>We've obviously kept up with every single day of the

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 2>trial actually now to think about it, but some of

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the evidence, now, I guess some of the text messages

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>he was able to introduce, or the defense was able

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to introduce through him, they paint a picture of almost loving,

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>normal boyfriend girlfriend relationships. They paint a picture of women

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>who are enthusiastic and we use the word earlier giddy.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I think some of these text messages hit harder than

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 2>a lot of previous ones. We've seen, and that's why

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>this witness ended up being so valuable, possibly for the event.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 4>And you know, whoever goes last.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm wrong, but I would think leaves a bigger

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>impression because it's the freshest on your mind. It's the

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 3>thing that's closest to the decision you're going to end

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>up coming to, just before you deliberate. This is the

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>last bit of evidence you're hearing, so it tends to

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>have a lot of weight. And yeah, we heard texts

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>where we saw loving, consensual relationships, but we also saw

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 3>explicit texts that were describing sexual acts, but consensual sexual acts.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 4>So those were two very important things.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Not only did he have a loving, softer side, but

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 3>it very much seemed through these.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Techs that both Cassie and.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Jane were, as you say, enthusiastically participating in explicit sexual acts.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>And they said so through their texts, through their own words,

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>through their own written words in real time.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>That's powerful that they are initiating. There was not some

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>they're not being coursed, they're not being right. They initiate

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this stuff. And look, the defense did

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>its job.

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what they're supposed to do. Put a little

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of doubt. That's all you need. Reasonable doubts.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that what they say did the prosecution prove its

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>case beyond a reasonable doubt. Look, all we could do

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>is report on it from here and read transcripts in

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the courtroom. I don't know, piece by piece listening to

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>every single bit of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Hibar Yeah.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>One of the reporters in the courtroom pointed out this

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 3>text message that the defense was able to talk about

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 3>and present to the jury was a message from Cassie

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>even Too or Fine, who told Diddy in a text

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>in twenty seventeen, you you are my best friend, and

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>she said that there was no one that she.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Loves more than him.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>That's hard to imagine that you would write a text

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>to someone like that you are my best friend in

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a way that's even more powerful than any of this

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 3>sexually explicit acts, or that I love you.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>I love you is.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Because that's mutual admiration. That's that's a deeper bond in

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a way. I just thought that was really powerful.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I hadn't thought about it the way you're

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>speaking of it now. I think a lot of people

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 2>can relate to what those words mean, and it's tough

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to balance to that with this is a woman who

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>is being, according to the prosecution, almost held hostage by

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>this man because of threats of violence, because of threats

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 2>of taking away rent, because the threats of her career.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>That paints a much different.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Picture, right, Because if someone is obsessed with someone or

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>or sexually obsessed with someone, it might create a different

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 3>in a relationship. But a best friend sounds like a mutual, consensual, loving, friendly,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>respectable relationship.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>It's it's different than.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Some of these explicit texts we see, and that for me,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>that had a lot of.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Weight to it.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, we were questioning why it seems amazing. It's

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 2>remarkable that the defense, after all this and everything that's

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>on the line, that they would not present any witnesses,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 2>but having is weird. I just noticed it now that

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>over the past several days, all we've been talking about

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>as the prosecution is putting on.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Their case is the defense.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Ye, because on they are putting on their case, they

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>exactly have been doing that, and they've been making their

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>points and they have been making some headway and having

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>more Perry Mason and courtroom moments than we're used to.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>They are highlighting, and they have an highlighting over the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>past several days, but even specifically yesterday and today, massive

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>inconsistencies by the prosecution's star witnesses. And that's with all

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of these loving kind texts. They just fly in the

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 3>face of the direct testimony we heard from those two women.

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 3>And these texts are irrefutable. Even the prosecution had to

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge their authenticity. These are real texts that happened from

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 3>these women.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 2>So this is standard. They asked for an acquittal. That

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>was the other big yes moment today. It's called it

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>rule twenty nine I believe it's called a rule twenty

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>nine motion.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>This is standard.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>So they go through and you kind of get a

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>little insight into what their defense strategy is, what their

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>closing argument might be, and what they think a winning

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>strategy has been. But they laid out several things and

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>a key part of it was saying that domestic violence

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 2>is not sex trafficking. Yep, like we are copying to Yep,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>he absolutely put his hands on that woman. That is

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not him being violent forcing her to have sex, which

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>apparently is a key to proving sex trafficking.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It has to be the violence. That is a threat, and.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>They laid that out today as a part of the

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>motion to say, hey, the prosecution hasn't even made its case.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We don't even need to put a case on Absolutely.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>They also tried to dismantle the prosecution's claims that did

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 3>He was participating in racketeering acts. They were trying to

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 3>or at least they presented to the court that there

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 3>was zero evidence or they failed to show evidence the

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 3>prosecution did that did He tried to bribe anyone surrounding

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>that hotel attack, that video that we saw, So I

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know because they said there was no police involvement

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 3>because Cassie venture Fine didn't want any police involved, and

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>no charges were So they're trying to go through each

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>one of these charges against Didty and saying the prosecution

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>did not prove those points.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You just made the key you.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Just started with. I'm sorry, I'm racking my brain now. Yes, folks,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>we have been up a long time. You just started

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>with the racketeering as what you were talking about it hearing. Okay,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 2>this is maybe one of the biggest points that they made.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>They prove that Diddy and.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Others he tried to hide the freak offs from other

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 2>staff members. He tried to keep it a secret from

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>some people. He tried to say, hey, wait till the

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>coast is clear before you bring mister whoever cowboy.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>In to the room.

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 2>If you do that, then that means you are not

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 2>running a criminal enterprise in which you have fellow criminals

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 2>doing your bidding, because you're actually trying to keep what

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you're doing from them.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That is a big, big.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Point about running a criminal enterprise racketeering. He is not

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>a mob boss in this argument from the defense, because

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>what does a mob boss do. Everybody on the lower

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>level on the streets know what bidding they're doing. They're

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>doing the criminal bidding for the guy, and the money's

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>going right. It's not that kind of thing. They proved

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>through text messages. He was trying to not involve people.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>What did the defence attorney say, they did Errand's make

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 2>travel arrangements, They had anything to do with what went

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 2>on with him his girlfriends, and.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 4>They acknowledged like, yes, did.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>He may have created some difficult, even abusive working conditions,

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>grueling working conditions.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Staffers had little sleep.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>They had to do his bidding at all hours of

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the night, with very little notice. But they point out

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 3>they all could have left, and the reason why they

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>did all of these things was not because of any

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 3>threat or coercion or anything illegal. It was because they

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to lose their jobs. Much simpler, period, And

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>that actually makes sense what they were saying, at least,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 3>what the defense was presenting today was kind of common sense.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 3>And the dismantle is the best way. They really did

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>an effective job of trying to dismantle what the prosecution says.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 4>They've already proved well in.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>A simplistic way, in a way we can all digest.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense to me. Yes, I've done. Who hasn't

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 2>done something you didn't want to do because you want

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 2>to hold on.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>To your job.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Correct, I'm saying it didn't have to be illegal. Hell,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't even want to go get your coffee that

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of a thing. It's not my job. I'm a

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>junior partner here. Everybody has. But they put on their case.

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>They did not put on a case, but they put

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>one on as the prosecution was still having their own

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>witnesses up there. So this is what they're going into

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>now robes tomorrow. Wait, the timeline now is getting adjusted.

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so now, because this final witness for the prosecution

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>went longer than expected, and I don't know how this

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>shifts anything too much. The judge asked the jurors to

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 3>return on Thursday at nine am. But the issue now

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>is how long it's going to take and when they're

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 3>actually going to be able to start their closing arguments.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 3>They think closing arguments now might bleed over into Friday,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and so now there was the suggestion that the jury

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>might not even begin deliberating until Monday, possibly late Friday,

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 3>but possibly they won't even start until Monday.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we can probably rest assured we're not getting

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>a verdict this week.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that's highly likely and very probable.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how long, I don't think. I don't think.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel completely confident. The conference tomorrow for the jury

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>instructions is or is not an open court.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 3>We're not sure yet, and so obviously we're hoping it is.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>So the jury will for sure not be present for that, obviously,

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>because they're discussing what they tell the jurors and what

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the language is that they use for the jurors to

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 3>go and start their deliberation, if it's open quart or not.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if reporters will be allowed, if

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the public will be allowed into the courtroom to hear that.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I would think that they would be.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean it would just the whole point of a

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 3>court is to have it be transparent, to have it

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>be something that the public can witness and watch and

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 3>know that it's done ethically and correctly.

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 4>So it would fly in the face.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there are certain things obviously they don't want

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>to get out. They'll take a taken aside and the

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 3>judge's chambers or approach the bench that they don't want

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 3>people to know or hear. But in terms of getting

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the jurors instructions, I'm trying to remember in other court

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 3>cases that we have covered, whether or not we've been

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>privy to that discussion and that conversation.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I think so right now, I would say, yes, they're

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>not coming back until noon tomorrow, so there are, but

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they all are all expected to be there tomorrow now, hope.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think robes haven't seen.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Anywhere either that they expect the charge conference to go

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>any longer than tomorrow. I don't think that's going to

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>bleed into Thursday, right, They have to get that right.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 4>I think they have to get that wrapped up.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who knows anything's possible, But I just looked

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 3>it up and it says generally jury instructions are not

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 3>open to the public during the deliberation process, but they

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>are often part of the public court record after the trial.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>So I knew there had to be transparency. They're just

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 3>not going to be transparent in real time after the fact.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>If people want to go and look and see how

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 3>do they come to the decision to tell the jurors X, Y,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and Z, that will be.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Made public after the fact. And so.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 3>The actual deliberations, including the instructions right by the judge.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Obviously you know the jury deliberations are private, but that's

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>to protect the integrity of the process.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 5>So the jury instructions we'll see and those have been

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 5>and if they say what they need four hours each

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 5>for closing arguments on for Thursday.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 2>So even if we start at nine in the morning,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 2>whoever starts first is going to go in least until

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>after lunch, and then whoever's after that is going to

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 2>go through the rest of the day. So then you

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>can expect that the next day they're going to start

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>instructions to the jury. They do do this in open court,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 2>and he reads it word for word to them. They

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>get it to go back. I mean, they have the

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>instructures to go back with him a booklet, but he

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>reads every line. This takes a long time. Yeah, from

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 2>my experience.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So will it take a full day? Will it take

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a half a day? That? I don't know.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's anyone's guess. Something else that was We're told

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>it's standard. But I thought it was kind of interesting

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that the prosecution, once the defense rested today, they decided

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 3>not to present a rebuttal case, which they're allowed to do.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 3>They made the decision not to, So I don't know

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>how unusual that is, or if that's them trying to

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 3>show their own moment of confidence to reprove dark case.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>They had nothing to but because they didn't present much

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of anything. A few text messages that they acknowledge, yep,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that was part of the actual record.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ye, I don't know if there was much to.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Rebut that is that is actually fair? So I mean

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 3>who knows. But yes, everything that happened today was what

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 3>we were expecting to happen, including the defense asking for

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 3>that acquittal and the judge saying that he will consider

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>making a ruling on it, but not making a ruling

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>on it. That's also very standard, very common. I don't

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 3>know if he ends up actually having to make a

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>ruling on it, having to declare I am denying your

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>request for an acquittal. I'm guessing that has to happen.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps tomorrow he will, but it seems strang I'm told

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that's common for them to do that, but I was

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>still it seemed odd to me, like, of course, he's

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 2>not gonna do an acquittal. It's just they have to ask.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 2>The judge then denies. It's part of all these major trials.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't know why I didn't do it on

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 2>the spot. But I think I read somewhere from one

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>of the reporters that it's also common for the judge

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to handle it this way, just to kind of punt

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 2>it to it.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Let me think about it.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 3>It's like when you're a parent and your kid asks

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 3>you for something and you know you're not gonna let

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>them do it, but you just don't want to cause

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 3>a scene right there, and you say, I'll let you

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>know later, but you already know you're going to say, now,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>you know what we.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Can talk about this when we get home, exactly.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's basically what.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Happened today with the judge's decision. He's he already knows

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>what he's going to say, which is, yeah, we're gonna

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 3>give this to the jury.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that's obviously that's not gonna happen, But

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 2>just there's been I'm waiting for something else, right, I'm

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 2>waiting for another shoot to drop. I'm waiting for another

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 2>shocking moment. I'm waiting for something to become a headline

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>we weren't expecting. Don't know what that'll be, but I

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>just it's been that kind of trial.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 3>It certainly has almost every day, but certainly at least

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 3>once a week we get something that's actually we're not

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>just exaggerating, jaw dropping. I mean, that's been the case,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>it seems, at least from the beginning, at least something

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>each and every time.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, But thirty four witnesses down and just a few

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>more days to go before the jury starts deliberating folks.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>In this trial.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 2>We will continue to keep you updated, obviously well check

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>back in with our Diddy update tomorrow. Always you can

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 2>catch us on morning run with your news headlines. But

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>for now I am TJ. Holmes and for Amy Robot.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>We always appreciate you running with us. No, we're not

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 2>running today. This isn't run, This is the ditty run.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Just listening to us, This is the morning receipt.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know you're tired. Did we mentioned you didn't

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>sleep last night at all? Zero on your Aura score,

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 3>so yes, thanks for listening. Everyone, have a great one.