WEBVTT - Matrix's Katz on Utilities: Declare Victory and Sell (Audio)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>dot Com the radio plus Globo l act and on

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your radio. This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>World Handquarters, assigned Charlie Palette. Stocks advance trading there a

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>record after a three days slide. We saw an increase

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in consumer spending that underscores the strength of the U.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>S economy. Traders meanwhile assessing the outlook for interest rates.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The tenure up nineteen thirty seconds, the yield there one

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>point five six percent, SMP five hundred, indecks up eleven

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to eighty, a gain of five tenths of one percent.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Nasdaq is up thirteen, a gain of three tenths of

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>one percent down Industrials up one hundred and two points,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a gain of six tenths up one percent. The gold

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>price of gold of twenty cents now thirteen eighty ounce,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a gain of less than point one percent. And crude

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>oil West Texas Intermediate down one point three percent, down

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty four cents of barrel to forty seven dollars. I'm

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Pelt, and that's a Bloomberg business flash. You're listening

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to taking stock with Kathleen Hayes and Pim Fox on

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, Taking stock now of the stock market. We've

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>got a market that is looking for a reason to

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>keep rallying today. A lot of volatility of course around

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed Reserve and comments it has made taking a

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>look at what companies are going to be doing well

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in the environment if the Fed does raise race this year,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and then what did it what if it doesn't. Very

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>happy to welcome back to the show. David Kats. He's

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>president and c i O, Chief Investment Officer of Matrix

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Asset Advisors right here in New York City. David, welcome, Hey,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>definitely nice to be here. So set back kind of

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the set the stage for us. Here we are,

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it's heading towards the end of August, We're going to

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>head into the autumn. How how have this these past

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>uh about eight months of the year kind of set

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>up the stock market for what's going to happen? Is

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we had to you know, we're almost going to be well.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The market has been a roller coaster this year. You

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>had a historically bad start to the market the first

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>six weeks for the worst six weeks in seventy years.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Then you had a great rally, then post breaks that

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you had a sharp sell off followed by a sharp rebound.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So lots of volatility, but quietly the market is up

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the high single digits already. In fact, we if

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we just look at the past couple of months, it's

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>certainly hasn't been too bad at this point. How big

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of a threat and how big of an opportunity is

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a FED or could the FED be requity investors? Well,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we think the Fed is going to get a lot

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of notice. People are becoming obsessed with it. But the

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>reality is the Fed once to raise rates. They need

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates. If they're gonna do it, it's gonna

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>be very slowly. So the market at some point is

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>going to calm down. If the FED raises in September

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>or December but doesn't say that they're going to do

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more raising next year, the equity markets should

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to digest it on a day daily basis,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>or the first week. They might sell off, but we

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>do believe they're going to settle down. We say you

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>probably have a little bit bigger risk in the next

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>few months in terms of the election rather than the FED. Well,

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>right now, the market is not focused a heck of

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot on the election. We think that the oddsmakers

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are putting a Clinton victory as the more likely outcome.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>We think if that were to happen, UH, the market

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would assume it's it's following a lot of the President

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Obama policies with a slightly better economy bias, So that

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would be a modest positive for the market. We think

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if Trump were to win the presidency, which is not

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>being factored in, there's a lot more concern and uncertainty.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Trump policies in terms of taxes, Uh,

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's actually fairly reasonable and a positive. Uh. In terms

0:03:54.280 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of lowering restrictions and laws for companies, also modest positive

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for business. But the big wild guard is something we're

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>very fearful of and that the economy should be very

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>fearful of is his comments about trade and starting a

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>trade war with China or Mexico in that case. Uh.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Some of the better economic forecasters say Trump's policies would

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>put us into a recession, and clearly that would be

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>real bad for the stock market. Yeah, it doesn't get

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>too much worse than a recession, so that's obviously a threat.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Now you're reasonably constructive, it seems on stocks, David uh

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>You say you'd use any weakness to add to stocks,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't change the rally, and it's not the

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>time to aggressively add new money to the market. Why, well,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So what happens is people always feel better after the

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>market goes up. So you've just had about a ten

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>percent rally in the last six or eight weeks, and

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, people are feeling more comfortable. You

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to buy high. What you want to do

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is say, Okay, I have a long term time horizon.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I like stocks over the next eighteen months, and rather

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>than buying after they've run up, wait for the next self.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Something's going to happen, whether it's out of Europe or China,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or people fearful about Trump doing better in the polls.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And when you have that three or five percent correction

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by companies you like but at prices that you like,

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that's what is our thinking all year.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So we've been buying on the dips and then not

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>chasing the rallies. You say value investing is coming back.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It's been lagging growth for nearly a decade. Do you

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>say this could be the the beginning of a new multi

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>year trend. Why and why, well, thank goodness, more value guys.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's not been fun for the last few years,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but generally the market trades between value and growth and

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>long seven to ten year cycles, growth is vastly outperformed value,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as you said, in the last seven eight years. Uh,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this year, value is doing better than growth. And right

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>now we think value represents much better opportunity, thank growth,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and better opportunity than it normally has. So as you

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have the growthier stock slowing down and the market coming

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>back to more economically sensitive and or energy and or financials,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.119
<v Speaker 1>we think value was due for a pretty good UH

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>period in the on. Okay, so values back a good

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>UH period of the sun. You are thinking that the

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dividend oriented investing trend has more upside, but you have

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to be more discerning, So tell us what you like

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in that trade and why. So right now you can

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>get zero in the banks and you can get one

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent on its tenure treasury. So people

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>are seeking yield. A lot of the market is paying

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>good dividends, but we be wary of things like utilities

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that are selling at twenty plus times earnings. The flip

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>side is you can get companies energy companies, financials, healthcare

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>industrials that are paying three and a half to four

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>yields that are growing over time at reasonable the evaluations.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So we think that's a great place to put money.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We think you get lower volatility and you still have

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some pretty good upside. Okay, okay uh. In terms of

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the companies that you're most fond of right now,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>let's just run through it and in the dividend arena.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>In terms of industries, who do you like the best?

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So we like financials the best. Financials have been the

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest lagger this year. We think that the businesses are

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>actually doing very well. Credit is very good, and if

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rates ever go up, they do even that much better.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But vote our investment thesis is they're going to do

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>well either way. Our favorites would be JP Morrigan, MetLife, Wells, Fargo,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all wonderful businesses uh and under ten eleven times earnings

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>paying a three and a half to four percent yield.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay uh. You also are have a couple of consumer

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>discretionary stocks you like. So consumer discretionary has been uh,

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty volatile this year, the retailers have gotten beaten up,

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and by and large, we are a little bit wary

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of retailers because of the effects on

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon. But one that we do like is Target.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>We think that the company is very well run. They

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>recently lowered guidance or the upper end of guidance for

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the balance of the year. The stocks hold off. They've

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>y the dividend for forty five years in a row.

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>They're paying a three and a half percent yields, it's

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen times earnings, and we think that there is

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a place for a Target, and they compete well against

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Um. The the other um you know, uh.

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>One that we like in that space is like a

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Harley Davidson. We think is a pretty good company there.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And we also like McDonald's which pays a rock solid dividend,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>growing nicely, low volatility. Okay, let's run quickly through a

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>couple more Cisco and CAALCLM in the tech space. So

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>technology is doing well this year. Some of the old

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>technology companies like the qal Comm and Cisco if something

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>finally started to perk up, but they still sell it

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>reasonable valuations, so we easily think they have another fifteen

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or twenty percent on the upside, and you're getting a

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent plus yield while you're waiting. Alrighty,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so how about what you like in the telegom space.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>So telecom is like utilities, but you're getting them in

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a much better price. So we like both Verizon and

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>A T and T. You're getting a four and a

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>half percent yield and you're buying the stocks of like

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen times earnings. So we compare that to like a

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Duke Energy, which is selling its twenty one times earnings.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>We think the prospects for the telecoms are good, but

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not paying a heck of a lot for that. Okay, Um,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you would be sellers, you'd be seller utilities? Why and

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is there anybody in particular that you'd say, please get

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out of this fast? So really, if you've been buying

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>utilities for the yield and you've they've been doing well,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're happy. We use this as an opportunity to

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>declare victory. If you look at utilities over the last

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, they fell between eight times earnings and sixteen

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. Today many of them are north of twenty

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. Uh, if they were a dynamic growth business,

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could rationalize that twenty times earnings. But utilities

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are not. They're going to grow their earnings a two

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>or three percent to yield their lowest levels that they've

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been in years. So we think that they've been marked

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>up because of people are just trying to chase dividends. Uh,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't get caught up in that. Take your profits read

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>deploy into some of the other names that we talked about.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So what is the biggest risk? What? What? What should

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I be watching very closely? If I'm in the market,

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to add stocks aggress so that could

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>turn that around. What would you say? Oops, So I

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta be a little care cautious in here. Well, the

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the our biggest concern, as you mentioned a little bit earlier,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is what's going on with the US election. Um, you know,

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>we just think that if Trump were to be looking

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>better in the police, he's been pretty erratic in his policy,

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's very difficult to handicaps. You know. While President

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Obama hasn't been the best in the world for the economy,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been pretty understandable. Uh. And we think Clinton

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>brings the same to the table with a little bit

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>more pro business bias or pro economy bias, not pro

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>business um. But that's our biggest concern right now. It

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>looks like the break that is going okay, so we're

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on up, but we think that's okay.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, David cats a green light on buying

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>some stocks and the dividend play. He likes the financials

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the death. So we're heading towards the market closed now,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>movers and shakers. Our stocks editor Dave Wilson will be

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us at the top of the hour. I'm Kathleen Hayes,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg