Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. More fallout after the
Speaker 1: arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, as some very powerful people are
Speaker 1: going to have some explaining to do. We will get
Speaker 1: into that. Plus a video goes viral of an exchange
Speaker 1: out in San Francisco where something that could be every day,
Speaker 1: well it might have ruined one person's reputation and then some.
Speaker 1: And we have all the latest on the border crisis
Speaker 1: and the insurgency from the Democratic Party that looks like
Speaker 1: it could overthrow Pelosi's power. That and more coming up
Speaker 1: on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show where the mission or mission is to decode what
Speaker 1: really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again, The Bucks Exton Show begins. Well, I
Speaker 1: knew him, like everybody in Palm Beach knew him, and
Speaker 1: people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture
Speaker 1: in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him
Speaker 1: a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to
Speaker 1: him for fifteen years. I wasn't a fan. I was
Speaker 1: not yeah, a long time ago, I'd say maybe fifteen years. Uh.
Speaker 1: I was not a fan of his. That I can
Speaker 1: tell you I was not a fan of his. Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. All this focus on Trump's
Speaker 1: relationship with Epstein, which is from what we know from
Speaker 1: the records, not just from what the President says minimal
Speaker 1: to nonexistent, and we'll talk more about some of those
Speaker 1: details later, And so little focus on Clinton, despite the
Speaker 1: fact that he released a statement saying that he only
Speaker 1: flew on the plane a few times, that his Secret
Speaker 1: Service detail was always with him. Well, that conflicts with
Speaker 1: other with other stories, with other investigations on this done
Speaker 1: by reporters. Some reporters the Miami Herald give credit where
Speaker 1: it's due. Local news organizations will still sometimes step up
Speaker 1: because the stories just too good and their professional pride
Speaker 1: maybe clouds a little bit of the usual whatever's best
Speaker 1: for the Democratic Party is what I will do mentality.
Speaker 1: So the Miami Herald gets credit here for doing some
Speaker 1: good investigative work on the Jeffrey Epstein case. But a
Speaker 1: lot of people are standing around saying, well, hold on
Speaker 1: a minute, Why did it take so long for us
Speaker 1: to get to this point. Why is it that people
Speaker 1: on the ride have been talking about this issue for
Speaker 1: years and they were treated like conspiracy theorists. I mean,
Speaker 1: here you have a billionaire who was engaged in some
Speaker 1: of the most egregious sexual conduct you can think of, illegal, immoral, illicit,
Speaker 1: and is tied to some of the most powerful people
Speaker 1: in the United States. Media didn't have more interest in this.
Speaker 1: This wasn't you know, there wasn't more of the same
Speaker 1: media that presents us with me too and that whole
Speaker 1: moment of feminist and women's rights revolution. We're all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, all these perpetrators had to be taken down,
Speaker 1: and finally were taken down, many of them absolutely rightfully so,
Speaker 1: most of them rightfully so. And yet the Epstein story
Speaker 1: just never really got that much attention, and we have
Speaker 1: to we have to think why that is, because what
Speaker 1: could have been a fatter target in so many ways
Speaker 1: for the Democrats. Then oh my gosh, President Trump is
Speaker 1: going to be you know, he knew this guy. I mean,
Speaker 1: we have had we had a woman come forward, what
Speaker 1: was it two weeks ago, saying that Trump raped her
Speaker 1: thirty years ago, who was clearly deranged, I mean, clearly
Speaker 1: has problems, has definite psychological issues. The media treated her
Speaker 1: like she was serious, incredible until she went on TV
Speaker 1: and talked about rape fantasies and quote rape as sexy
Speaker 1: on Arison Cooper's show, and he looked like he melted
Speaker 1: in real time on TV when she said it. Whatever
Speaker 1: credibility CNN has left, they seem to enjoy letting on
Speaker 1: fire in front of the American people. But that's what
Speaker 1: it is. It is what it is, as they say.
Speaker 1: But the Epstein store was always hanging around, always in
Speaker 1: the background, so much here. Where are the made for
Speaker 1: TV specials? Where's the major investigative pieces on this? Why
Speaker 1: wouldn't they have done? They have tied the such flim
Speaker 1: things to Trump from his past. Why wouldn't they make
Speaker 1: more of this? Now? I think it's because, one, they
Speaker 1: probably recognize that Trump would be able to say that
Speaker 1: this wasn't it wasn't somebody that was a close friend
Speaker 1: of his, It's not somebody had He wasn't involved in
Speaker 1: getting this guy out of criminal jeopardy in any way.
Speaker 1: So it's not Trump's problem. Oh but what about another
Speaker 1: really powerful important figure, one around whom the Democrats not
Speaker 1: only rallied when he was president for eight years, but
Speaker 1: then planned to foist upon the American people for another
Speaker 1: eight years the most odious, dishonest, disgusting political dynasty of
Speaker 1: my lifetime, the Clintons. That's right, Hey, I just thought
Speaker 1: I'll just take a whole bunch of rods on this
Speaker 1: guys they're playing It wouldn't be a big deal, and
Speaker 1: I didn't know nothing about it. Does anyone believe that
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton really knew nothing about this? Bill Clinton, really, nobody,
Speaker 1: nobody gave him a heads up. He and forget about
Speaker 1: what he knew from the papers in the press. He
Speaker 1: spent a lot of time with this individual, with this Epstein.
Speaker 1: People knew that he liked to hang out with young,
Speaker 1: in fact, very young, troublingly young and perhaps illegally young women,
Speaker 1: in amorous so to speak, situations where he would present
Speaker 1: himself as a boyfriend of theirs in public. This is
Speaker 1: written about the Vanity Fair article. You know that the
Speaker 1: people say, well, are they old enough to be his dates?
Speaker 1: So to speak? Now, this is separate from the human
Speaker 1: trafficking aspect of it. But you're going to tell me that, well,
Speaker 1: it's not totally separate, but it's a different specific charge,
Speaker 1: a different specific instance. You're going to tell me that
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton didn't know something was up here, something was
Speaker 1: wrong that this guy was engaging at least inappropriate, and
Speaker 1: now we find out deeply criminal and horrific conduct with
Speaker 1: young girls, exploitative human trafficking, paying young girl. I mean,
Speaker 1: just this guy should have spent the rest of his
Speaker 1: life in prison the first time around. And just as
Speaker 1: a as a guy, I look at this situation, I
Speaker 1: say myself, Bill Clinton was around him all this, all
Speaker 1: this time, and didn't pick up on any of this,
Speaker 1: didn't know about it. I find that very very hard
Speaker 1: to believe. And here's an investigative journalist who seems to
Speaker 1: somewhat agree with my thesis. Played twenty one. I have
Speaker 1: read too much information, and I have spoken to too
Speaker 1: many people on the inside. I actually attempted to interview Clinton,
Speaker 1: but he would not, he did not agree to do so.
Speaker 1: And I know from the pilot logs, and these are
Speaker 1: pilot logs that you know, were written by different pilots
Speaker 1: and at different times that Clinton went. He was a
Speaker 1: guest of Clint of Epstein's twenty seven Times, Now You
Speaker 1: Tell Me. Doug Banns was also on the plane many times.
Speaker 1: Many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him,
Speaker 1: and many times he did not. Almost every time that
Speaker 1: Clinton's name is on the pilot logs, there are underage girls,
Speaker 1: there are initials, and there are names of many, many
Speaker 1: girls on that private plane. So you have to ask yourself,
Speaker 1: and this is what I asked myself, why would anyone,
Speaker 1: not only a former president, fly on a plane twenty
Speaker 1: seven times that did not belong to him? Does anyone
Speaker 1: want to try to answer that one, because that's a
Speaker 1: tricky one, isn't it. Luna is plane twenty seven times.
Speaker 1: He's Bill Clinton, He's a public figure. I granted, I
Speaker 1: think that he also has a bit of a not
Speaker 1: just a malignant narcissism, but a kind of god complex
Speaker 1: where he was able to get away with such disgrace
Speaker 1: while president, while in office that he probably figured he
Speaker 1: could do a whole lot of things that anyone else
Speaker 1: would say, You've got to be kidding me. You can't
Speaker 1: you can't do that, you can't be around that. Maybe
Speaker 1: he's so delusional about his power and his influence that
Speaker 1: he thought it wouldn't really matter. Although look at how
Speaker 1: long it was able to Clinton was able to really
Speaker 1: not have this be a problem for him. But here's
Speaker 1: what was released. This is big folks. This is the
Speaker 1: story the Democrats haven't wanted to talk about. They haven't
Speaker 1: wanted to go here. A lot of us have known
Speaker 1: this for a long time on the right, and there
Speaker 1: was too much There was too much smoke. We knew
Speaker 1: there was a fire, and now we're going to figure
Speaker 1: out how big the fire really is. This is what
Speaker 1: the statement was released yesterday by Clinton by Clinton spokesperson,
Speaker 1: President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: pleaded guilty too in Florida some years ago, or those
Speaker 1: with which he has been recently charged in New York.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and two and two thousand and three,
Speaker 1: President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein's plane, one to Europe, one to eight, and two
Speaker 1: to Africa, which included stops in connection with the work
Speaker 1: of the Clinton Foundation. Okay, so meanwhile, it has been
Speaker 1: believed and reported on for years that Clinton flew dozens
Speaker 1: of times. And that's just exactly what that investigative reporter
Speaker 1: was saying there, that Clinton flew dozens of times on
Speaker 1: Epstein's jet, including when there were these young girls. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: did he ever think to ask what why young women
Speaker 1: were You know, how many parents out there would let
Speaker 1: their thirteen or fourteen year old girl fly on a
Speaker 1: plane with some weird old billionaire guys. I mean, think
Speaker 1: about this for a moment, and then how many of you,
Speaker 1: if you were in a situation where someone that you
Speaker 1: just kind of knew socially, as Bill Clinton pretends about Epstein,
Speaker 1: were on a plane and there was always this group
Speaker 1: of you know, a handful here or there, or of
Speaker 1: thirty fourteen fifteen year old girls, how many of you
Speaker 1: would have thought that that was normal, wouldn't have had questions,
Speaker 1: wouldn't have raised some eyebrows. You're not gonna private planes,
Speaker 1: aren't that big folks? Right? This is not like you're
Speaker 1: on a seven forty seven that's you know, got three
Speaker 1: hundred seats and you don't know who's on or whatever.
Speaker 1: You know, you're on a private plane. You know who
Speaker 1: else is on that plane. So Clinton never thought to
Speaker 1: ask about this, didn't find this shady? And what are
Speaker 1: we saying? What I really want to know is this
Speaker 1: is gonna be a he did or he didn't thing
Speaker 1: with the with the flights. What are they going to
Speaker 1: say if and when we find out that this statement
Speaker 1: is prepared official statement that you know, Bill Clinton had
Speaker 1: put out for him, that he knew nothing and only
Speaker 1: flew in his plane four times. What if it turns
Speaker 1: out he did fly what was it twenty seven times? Uh? Concheedah,
Speaker 1: Sarnoff said. Sarnoff is the executive director of Alliance to
Speaker 1: Rescue Victims of Trafficking and the author of her an
Speaker 1: author of a book, traffic King Mike is that who
Speaker 1: was or is there a different investigative journalists? I mean,
Speaker 1: there are many people who've been doing work on this
Speaker 1: for a long time. You know, there are journalists out
Speaker 1: there who were saying that this has been done dozens.
Speaker 1: What are they going to tell us that explains this?
Speaker 1: Here's what the Democrats have to fear is that after
Speaker 1: all their moralizing and oh Trump is so evil, Trump
Speaker 1: is a you know, grabbed them by the you know what,
Speaker 1: and all this stuff that, oh, he's so horrible and
Speaker 1: Trump's an abuser, an assault or all these things they've
Speaker 1: said about him, none of which have they've ever presented
Speaker 1: any evidence for. And they've always misconstrued what he said,
Speaker 1: pretended that what he said was worse than it was,
Speaker 1: or they've after all that, what are the Democrats going
Speaker 1: to say to the American people if it turns out
Speaker 1: that the founder of a political dynasty that was supposed
Speaker 1: to really haunt the American people for not just the
Speaker 1: eight years of Clinton, but then four years of Hillary
Speaker 1: as Secretary of State, and then eight years with Hillary
Speaker 1: as president and then probably eight years with incredibly unimpressive
Speaker 1: Chelsea as president, that that dynasty was founded by a
Speaker 1: guy who didn't think it was weird to fly not
Speaker 1: four times, but over twenty four times on a private
Speaker 1: plane with a peto who was trafficking and underaged girls.
Speaker 1: These are the facts, now, folks. This is what we're
Speaker 1: looking at. This is factual stuff. This is not oh,
Speaker 1: let's just theorize here. How are they going to explain
Speaker 1: that they still want to tell us about how Trump
Speaker 1: has coursened the discourse and anything. Tell you this. There's
Speaker 1: gonna be some explaining here, folks, And not just for Clinton,
Speaker 1: but for some others. I think, who are you know?
Speaker 1: Someone in this process at the Department of Justice there
Speaker 1: was influence brought to bear. You do not do with
Speaker 1: this guy, Epstein did and get an eighteen month, effectively
Speaker 1: suspended sentence I mean, it was the most sweetheart deal
Speaker 1: you could ever get from a prosecutor's office. That doesn't
Speaker 1: happen unless people make calls. People make calls on this
Speaker 1: guy's behalf. People went to bat for this serial abuser
Speaker 1: of women, this sicko, and people spend a lot of
Speaker 1: time around him, like Bill Clinton, who are trying to
Speaker 1: tell us now that they had no idea, no idea.
Speaker 1: I don't believe Bill Clinton, and I think if we're
Speaker 1: looking at somebody who would have no trouble lying about
Speaker 1: his prior sexual activity, Bill Clinton goes to the very
Speaker 1: top of the list. We will not let this go.
Speaker 1: We have much more coming stay women. While a federal prosecutor,
Speaker 1: Acosta signed a non prosecution agreement that allowed it Stein
Speaker 1: and his co conspirators to remain free and evade justice
Speaker 1: despite overwhelming evidence. Mister Acosta hid this agreement from Epstein's victims.
Speaker 1: I am calling on Secretary Acosta to resign. It is
Speaker 1: now impossible for anyone to have confidence in Secretary Acosta's
Speaker 1: ability to leave the Department of Labor. If he refuses
Speaker 1: to resign, President Trump should fire him. Instead of prosecuting
Speaker 1: a predator and serial sex trafficker of children. Acosta chose
Speaker 1: to let him off easy. Acosta has got to explain this,
Speaker 1: That's what has to happen here. There needs to be
Speaker 1: an explanation of a firm Acosta as to how he
Speaker 1: would have ever allowed this to occur in this way.
Speaker 1: He here, I'm trying to pull up right now what
Speaker 1: a Costa's version of the events are. But of course,
Speaker 1: right as I do it, my computer freezes. But I
Speaker 1: wanted to give you some of his sound bites because
Speaker 1: he looked. If he doesn't, if it's not compelling enough,
Speaker 1: he should go. We don't need we don't need a
Speaker 1: cost here. Here's what he says. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta
Speaker 1: defended his handling of a case involving a billionaire accused
Speaker 1: of exploiting underage girls on Twitter. Mister Costa said Tuesday,
Speaker 1: with the evidence available more than a decade ago, federal
Speaker 1: prosecutors insisted that Epstein go to jail, register as a
Speaker 1: sex offender, and put the world on notice that he
Speaker 1: was a sexual predator. He said he supported the fresh
Speaker 1: effort by prosecutors to more fully bring him to justice
Speaker 1: based on new evidence and testimony. The crimes created by
Speaker 1: committed by Epstein are horrific, and I am pleased the
Speaker 1: New York prosecutors and moving forward with the case based
Speaker 1: on new evidence. So here's what I think is something
Speaker 1: that you're going to have to get from people like
Speaker 1: me because the lib media is not going to tell
Speaker 1: you this. The real sweetheart end of this deal in
Speaker 1: some ways, based on the evidence as it was, and
Speaker 1: based on the Palm Palm Beach County Sheriff's office at
Speaker 1: the time, was the Democrat, Oh that's right, district attorney
Speaker 1: for Palm Beach County who created the super soft sweetheart
Speaker 1: deal for Epstein where he was able to be on
Speaker 1: i think the home six days of the week and
Speaker 1: had to just show up for eight hours a day
Speaker 1: to a facility that was like a county I mean,
Speaker 1: it just it was no real lock up prison situation
Speaker 1: at all. But that that was a district attorney in
Speaker 1: Palm Beach who was a Democrat by the way, and
Speaker 1: because it's a political position there, I believe, and he's
Speaker 1: the one that let him get away with all that stuff.
Speaker 1: The federal charges a cost at least did something, not
Speaker 1: nearly enough, but something. And I don't know if we
Speaker 1: have to look at what the federal charge evidence was.
Speaker 1: Most of the readily provable crimes against Epstein would have
Speaker 1: been state charge sex with a minor for example. I
Speaker 1: mean that's a state charge. The trafficking between these different places,
Speaker 1: I don't know whether a Costa would have been able
Speaker 1: to We have to see what the evidence was he
Speaker 1: had there. So I'm not gonna what a Costa did
Speaker 1: looks terrible. And if he can't really explain this better
Speaker 1: than what we had on Twitter, I think he does
Speaker 1: have to go. But it's not just a Costa, Folks.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to let them just allow Clinton and
Speaker 1: maybe some others too to skate away from their association
Speaker 1: with this guy. And someone was bringing influence to bear
Speaker 1: on Epstein's side of things. Do we think it was
Speaker 1: a Democrat? Folks? Who wants to bet right now that
Speaker 1: the person that made the call that got the DA
Speaker 1: and Palm Beach to back off was a Democrat? Who
Speaker 1: wants to make that call right talked to the President
Speaker 1: this morning. He hasn't talked to her, had contact with
Speaker 1: Epstein in years and years and years and over a
Speaker 1: decade at least, he said, And he met Alex Acosta,
Speaker 1: and Alex applied and got the job where he's doing
Speaker 1: a great job. And you look at the economy. So
Speaker 1: I know, everybody you want to revisit what happened in Florida.
Speaker 1: New York has applied fresh charges to Jeffrey Epstein because
Speaker 1: they haven't right to do that, and uh, and I
Speaker 1: hope we're all paying attention to who the true perpetrator
Speaker 1: is here. I was sitting at lunch today with a
Speaker 1: friend of mine, a conservative, fellow conservative warrior, and we're
Speaker 1: having we're having a great chat about all things, all
Speaker 1: things right wing media, life ladies, all this stuff. But
Speaker 1: we're in this. We're in this uh bistro, right and
Speaker 1: I wish, you know, a restaurant whatever. And there were
Speaker 1: some monitors, you know, are also known as television's buck
Speaker 1: come on speak English. There were some televisions that were
Speaker 1: up all with CNN on them. Of course CNN on them,
Speaker 1: and it was very obvious over the course of this,
Speaker 1: Uh you know, we sat there and probably had for
Speaker 1: about an hour that CNN is trying so hard, so
Speaker 1: very very hard to make the Epstein case, which is horrific.
Speaker 1: And now I saw that they said that they found
Speaker 1: not only was there the photos of apparently underage girls
Speaker 1: in a safe. So I mean, you don't keep photos
Speaker 1: in a safe unless you know their photos there can
Speaker 1: get you in a lot of trouble, right, or have
Speaker 1: some particular meeting. But in this case, you know, he's
Speaker 1: keeping photos of naked girls in a safe because he
Speaker 1: knows that it's that they're illegal, that those photos would
Speaker 1: under the law, be considered child pine child pornography. And
Speaker 1: there was also I think a blow up doll that
Speaker 1: was prucer. Mike, did you see the listing of all
Speaker 1: this stuff a little bit. I saw there was a
Speaker 1: there was a blow up doll hanging from a scandelier. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean this guy is a sicko, weirdo of a whole.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's just mind boggling. This guy
Speaker 1: was able to stay out of prison with all the
Speaker 1: stuff he's doing. He's it a seventy million plus dollar
Speaker 1: home in New York City that doesn't even include the
Speaker 1: island and the mansion of Palm Beach. And I mean
Speaker 1: this guy was fabulously wealthy, I mean wealthy behind people's
Speaker 1: wildest dreams and was a total purv and a sicko
Speaker 1: and a maniac and a predator, and now finally there's
Speaker 1: the possibility, it seems, of real justice being served. But
Speaker 1: does the media view it that way? Do they do
Speaker 1: any self reflection? This is another part of this that
Speaker 1: we have to focus on, because the media certainly won't
Speaker 1: do they do any self reflection on why is it
Speaker 1: that stretching back for years, stories about pedophile Island Lolita Express,
Speaker 1: it was the stuff of tabloids, but it was always
Speaker 1: considered a little bit for the mainstream media networks. It
Speaker 1: was always a little oh, we don't need to cover that,
Speaker 1: or that's just people are exaggerating, or it's conspiracy theories,
Speaker 1: or huh, none of it that we've seen right now,
Speaker 1: it appears to have been exaggerated at all. If anything,
Speaker 1: what we have found out is that Epstein was even
Speaker 1: more an egregious predator, was even more dangerous to these
Speaker 1: young girls and systematic in the way he exploited them,
Speaker 1: and even wealthier, more influential, and more connected than anyone
Speaker 1: had really realized. I do think that we're going to
Speaker 1: have to hear from Acosta. And that's why when Kelly
Speaker 1: and Conway talked about this, because people are saying that
Speaker 1: Acosta might have to might have to resign Alex Acosta,
Speaker 1: not Jim Acosta. That's a whole different Acosta, that he
Speaker 1: might have to resign because of this because he was
Speaker 1: the attorney for the Southern District, the US attorney for
Speaker 1: the Southern District of Florida when this went through and
Speaker 1: it was allowed that that the Southern Easter of Florida
Speaker 1: would not would have a non prosecution agreement if the
Speaker 1: state charges were agreed to. The state charges were and
Speaker 1: I think I said yesterday and my instinct was right
Speaker 1: on this. It wasn't solicitation of an underage prostitute, which
Speaker 1: would be a greatly enhanced penalty and I think would
Speaker 1: also trigger federal statutes in and of itself. It was
Speaker 1: just solicitation of a prostitute. Period. That's what he pled
Speaker 1: to or pleaded to. So he got a deal that
Speaker 1: was it was unthinkably lenient, and that just doesn't happen.
Speaker 1: Now we have to see where all the corruption is
Speaker 1: and all of the connections are, and they want to
Speaker 1: make this all about Trump. Meanwhile, here's what Kelly and
Speaker 1: Kamay said about this that I played of one. He
Speaker 1: doesn't think he's talked to him or seeing him in
Speaker 1: ten or fifteen years, and he, like everyone else, sees
Speaker 1: these charges. The description of these charges against Epstein is
Speaker 1: completely unconscionable and obviously criminal, disgusting. I really now. What
Speaker 1: gets left out by the mainstream media is that, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's some photos of Epstein with Trump and they knew
Speaker 1: each other. But Epstein was a billionaire in Palm Beach
Speaker 1: and in New York who was rubbing elbows with other
Speaker 1: billionaires all the time, other rich people all the time,
Speaker 1: and that doesn't necessarily mean that there was a close
Speaker 1: personal relationship. In fact, what gets left out is that
Speaker 1: Trump called this scum out long before other people did,
Speaker 1: because this guy, it's not clear, but allegedly put the
Speaker 1: moves on an underage which I think is totally believable
Speaker 1: given what we know about him. Put the moves on,
Speaker 1: you know, or I don't know if he put the
Speaker 1: moves on or if he actually assaulted. It's it's not
Speaker 1: clear he did something elicit with an underage girl, right,
Speaker 1: you know, tried to I've never read a detail of scripture,
Speaker 1: I've ever tried to do something. And Trump was like,
Speaker 1: get this scum out of here, and banned him from
Speaker 1: Mara Lago. So why is why is Trump the big
Speaker 1: I mean, Trump is like, this guy's a gross underage,
Speaker 1: you know, underage, chasing sicko and I don't want him
Speaker 1: in my club anymore. And he's banned. And this is
Speaker 1: this has been on the record. This has been a
Speaker 1: story for a long time. People have known this. And
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, every time I looked up from my
Speaker 1: table at CNN, from my table at lunch to see
Speaker 1: what was going on CNN, it was some you know,
Speaker 1: Trump administration says this about Trump's relationship with Epstein. I'm like,
Speaker 1: what relationship with Epstein? And you know, can they establish
Speaker 1: for us that this was closer? I've said this all along.
Speaker 1: They're doing this as a mean of running cover for
Speaker 1: Clinton's relationship with Epstein, because I do not believe for
Speaker 1: a second, I do not believe that Bill Clinton had
Speaker 1: no idea what was going on. And I think, my friends,
Speaker 1: it could be a whole lot worse than just what
Speaker 1: he knew. And you know, we got to find out
Speaker 1: more who helped cover this up, who made calls for him,
Speaker 1: who exerted pressure at the top of the DOJ to
Speaker 1: get this unconscionable deal for this PERV media doesn't want
Speaker 1: to find the real answers. They only want to find
Speaker 1: some answers. We're gonna have to keep the heat on.
Speaker 1: On Monday of last week, I was down at the
Speaker 1: border in the Rio Grand Valley. I've been down there many,
Speaker 1: many times, and we have a full blow crisis. I mean,
Speaker 1: it is horrific. In the month of May, over one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty four thousand people were apprehended coming into
Speaker 1: this country illegally. It is a crisis. And what we're
Speaker 1: seeing in particular is more and more kids, children who
Speaker 1: are being brutalized. They're being brutalized by human traffickers, They're
Speaker 1: being brutalized coming over. And the reason for the crisis
Speaker 1: is Congressional Democrats, in particular the loopholes and the laws. Yep,
Speaker 1: this could all be over in a matter of days
Speaker 1: if Democrats were willing to help end this crisis. But
Speaker 1: they benefit far too much politically to take any real
Speaker 1: action to make this thing stop. They don't want it
Speaker 1: to stop. In fact, I believe the Democrats think that
Speaker 1: the focus on treatment at our southern border has become
Speaker 1: so single minded, is certainly what the media's help that
Speaker 1: they're banking on a lot of American voters not even noticing.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have effectively kicked the doors open to this
Speaker 1: country and said we're more or less open borders. That's
Speaker 1: what we are, that's what we got people from all
Speaker 1: of the world, people from all of the world. Now
Speaker 1: we're showing up here with a kid, and they think
Speaker 1: that the kid because it basically is the magic you know,
Speaker 1: the magic doorway into America. And they're mad at us
Speaker 1: because when they're complaining and there's new stories about this
Speaker 1: because we don't have enough in terms of like comfort
Speaker 1: and facilities for them. Well, no one told them to
Speaker 1: do this. No one told them to just show up.
Speaker 1: There's a whole process. They're skipping this whole process. A
Speaker 1: lot of you who listen to the show who are
Speaker 1: legal immigrants know all about this. And if I were you,
Speaker 1: I gonna be honest, I'd be pretty steamed about this.
Speaker 1: I have friends who have had to go through, you know, thousands,
Speaker 1: sometimes tens of thousands of dollars of legal fees and
Speaker 1: all kinds of paperwork and all this stuff so they
Speaker 1: can be here legally, or they could just show up
Speaker 1: in the Southern border, be like, yeah, this is my nephew,
Speaker 1: I'm his guardian. Let me into America. That's it, and
Speaker 1: you never have to deal with anything ever again. You're
Speaker 1: never gonna get deported, you know. In fact, you'll probably
Speaker 1: get invited to a State of the Union address. These
Speaker 1: are the best among us the illegal Wow. Really, I
Speaker 1: think the American people are pretty great. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: that I would just make a sweeping statement about anybody
Speaker 1: being better than the American people. But those who cross
Speaker 1: into the country illegally, I just what are we basing
Speaker 1: that on. They're looking for a better life here. They
Speaker 1: could have had a better life in a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of countries. But they're coming to America. Why is that?
Speaker 1: And let's really think this one through. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of places where you can live a happy, normal,
Speaker 1: productive life all over the world. They're coming to America.
Speaker 1: Why is that? Because they're going to be able to
Speaker 1: compete so effectively in an increasingly information based economy. We
Speaker 1: have people that are showing up here from you know,
Speaker 1: name all corners of the world right now, showing up
Speaker 1: in the Southern border, exploiting the overwhelmed system and they're
Speaker 1: coming all the way to America. Why exactly, we're told
Speaker 1: it's because that they just want they just want a
Speaker 1: taste of freedom. Yeah, okay, but why not and respect
Speaker 1: the laws of the place that allow freedom to flourish.
Speaker 1: Without our laws, without our rule of law, freedom would
Speaker 1: not be in freedom would be in short supply, very quickly.
Speaker 1: It is, in fact, our rule of law. It is
Speaker 1: the framework of laws that we have that allows us
Speaker 1: to enjoy this country. And those who are undermining that
Speaker 1: whole system because they want to be here so badly
Speaker 1: and are also being told, minds you, by one political
Speaker 1: party and most of the media that they are owed
Speaker 1: this and that we're the bad guys and the reason
Speaker 1: their countries that they're coming from aren't better is because
Speaker 1: of us, which is just this is just lunacy. But
Speaker 1: this is what they keep saying. You know, some of
Speaker 1: these countries they don't lack electricity in whole regions and
Speaker 1: indoor plumbing, and have very poor literacy rates, particularly for
Speaker 1: you know, women who aren't allowed to go to school
Speaker 1: and all these things. That's not our fault. Some cultures
Speaker 1: are actually better than other cultures, and this it's very
Speaker 1: oh you can't say that, why not? It's true? Okay,
Speaker 1: this is where this is where you know, it would
Speaker 1: be fun if bucking the Libs could actually have a
Speaker 1: real debate. But the Libs never, They never really, you know,
Speaker 1: all they want to do is go on Twitter and
Speaker 1: make fun of my name, which anyone. I always like
Speaker 1: that though, because it at least establishes that someone's a moron,
Speaker 1: a total moron, you know. And I my name is weird.
Speaker 1: My parents gave me this name. I don't know why,
Speaker 1: but you know it is my name and I'm not
Speaker 1: changing it. So there you go. But here's here's the
Speaker 1: culture versus culture problem in a way that even Libs
Speaker 1: can understand. Okay, is American culture better than North Korean culture?
Speaker 1: They'd say, well, that's an extreme okay, yeah, but you know,
Speaker 1: they have to answer the question, and I think most
Speaker 1: of them would answer yeah, So though not all of them,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Would Rashida to Leeds say we're better
Speaker 1: than North Korea? Maybe it's got a lot of problems
Speaker 1: with this country. But okay, if we can establish that
Speaker 1: American culture is better than North Korean culture, then we've
Speaker 1: established that it is possible bowl to differentiate between the
Speaker 1: relative merits of different cultures, and therefore we can extrapolate
Speaker 1: beyond just North Korea and America in the comparison and
Speaker 1: look at other countries as well. Why are we in
Speaker 1: this country doing so much better in so many not
Speaker 1: always always, you know what I mean. I'm kind of
Speaker 1: jealous that Spaniards get to take three hours cestas every day.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's some cool stuff going on in Spain,
Speaker 1: but generally speaking, and I would love, Oh Cista, it's amazing,
Speaker 1: you know, take a long nap after all. Imagine, producer, Mike,
Speaker 1: Imagine if it was part of American culture that every day,
Speaker 1: after you have a big lunch you get to just
Speaker 1: chill for like two hours. Yeah, I can handle that
Speaker 1: right right there. Look, I'm all for cultural appropriation. Let's
Speaker 1: appropriate siesta. I think it's a great idea. Yeah. When
Speaker 1: I was in Greece, if you wanted to get anything
Speaker 1: done between the hours of noon and like four pm,
Speaker 1: too bad, Like too bad on your own. They're all
Speaker 1: napping and sleeping and drinking uzo and hanging out. That's
Speaker 1: part of it. Was not I mean they also their
Speaker 1: economy collapse, probably not in uh, you know, not completely
Speaker 1: unrelated issues. But I could build a George George Costanza
Speaker 1: bed right uneath of my desk. I think that would work.
Speaker 1: My hours that the hill were so long that I
Speaker 1: actually had a sleeping pad there for a while and
Speaker 1: a little pillow, a pillow from my giant cranium, and uh,
Speaker 1: I used it twice. I did take two naps there
Speaker 1: in the radio room on the ground because I've been
Speaker 1: working so long and I was so tired. So that's right,
Speaker 1: Buck is a buck is a working man hero. What
Speaker 1: can I say? Oh? But what do democks? So just
Speaker 1: bringing us back to immigration here for saying, what do
Speaker 1: democrats offer given this whole situation, given that there is
Speaker 1: a crisis the border ted cruise is right, what are
Speaker 1: the democrats? Uh tell us in response to all this?
Speaker 1: How how would they fix it? If they really intended
Speaker 1: to fix it, how would they fix it? And well,
Speaker 1: here's what they really focus in on thirteen. If you could,
Speaker 1: would you kick the wall down now here? Yes, like
Speaker 1: you have a wall, absolutely knock it down, offer a
Speaker 1: home to refugees. That is who we are, that's our values,
Speaker 1: that's part of what we do. So instead of building
Speaker 1: a wall or closing the border. We should choose compassion
Speaker 1: instead of cruelty, very welcome refugees and bring people out
Speaker 1: of the shadows. Immigration is not a security issue. It
Speaker 1: is an economic and a humanitarian and a family issue.
Speaker 1: I think undocumented people need to have a means by
Speaker 1: which they can be covered when they're sick. People need
Speaker 1: This is just common decency. M doesn't sound a lot
Speaker 1: like they want to enforce the law or they have
Speaker 1: any particular interest in preventing the continued mass migration in
Speaker 1: this country. Sounds a lot to me like they want
Speaker 1: this whole situation just continue on as is, like they
Speaker 1: got no problem with it whatsoever. There's certainly no focus
Speaker 1: on stopping this from happening. So I think we have
Speaker 1: to ask, well, maybe that's because they don't want it
Speaker 1: to stop. Isn't it possible that that's what's really going
Speaker 1: on here that they would like that they think that
Speaker 1: this system should continue on as is because this system
Speaker 1: benefits them politically in ways that they do not want
Speaker 1: to give up. So they don't answer. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is the real, the real, you know, conclusion we have
Speaker 1: to draw from all this is that this is what
Speaker 1: they want. This is what they want. They do not
Speaker 1: want this to change. They have no interest in making
Speaker 1: this situation better, because for them, a situation is just
Speaker 1: great and team We'll be right back. What, if anything,
Speaker 1: would you like to say about the Kamala Biden dustup
Speaker 1: he apologized today. You've been following that. Do you have
Speaker 1: any thoughts about that? I do not. Okay, let me
Speaker 1: ask this. Moving on, I've been moving on. I've been
Speaker 1: doing this rodeo far too long. Moving on, moving like
Speaker 1: and no comments. I'm sorry, that's not okay. I mean,
Speaker 1: she Michelle Obama has a right to say that, but
Speaker 1: we're not just gonna let that go. Let's just review, folks.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has been pilloried, has been getting crushed in public,
Speaker 1: dragged on social media, you know, annihilated in the press
Speaker 1: for effectively for being a little too cozy with segregationists
Speaker 1: who are true racists. Right, so, so Joe Biden likes
Speaker 1: racist too much because they're saying he's kind of a racist.
Speaker 1: And he opposed forced bussing, which is an issue that
Speaker 1: nobody has really thought about in many decades, but or
Speaker 1: at least generally doesn't come up in national political conversation.
Speaker 1: Has not for decades, and Joe Biden is getting called
Speaker 1: a racist. Now, put aside all the celebrity politics stuff
Speaker 1: that we know out there, and put aside all that
Speaker 1: for a few moments, if we can, and let's just
Speaker 1: look at what's gone on here. And a man who
Speaker 1: is in the twilight of his career, and let's be honest,
Speaker 1: he's getting up there in age in general across the board.
Speaker 1: This is the end of his career, and he is,
Speaker 1: being the right hand man to the first black president
Speaker 1: of the United States for eight years, is being called
Speaker 1: a racist. And neither that former President Barack Obama, first
Speaker 1: black president of the United States, nor the first lady
Speaker 1: his wife, Barack Obama's wife are willing to say a word,
Speaker 1: not one word in defense of Joe Biden. Not saying, oh,
Speaker 1: you should vote for Biden or he's a great candidate,
Speaker 1: just saying everyone needs to understand that Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: not a racist. And maybe he misspoke, but he's not
Speaker 1: a racist and that should not be Why won't they
Speaker 1: do that? Now? I know we've we've I've bandied this
Speaker 1: about with you what yesterday, probably maybe in the day before,
Speaker 1: because I mean, the press doesn't want to touch this,
Speaker 1: because ultimately, what you come away with is either Biden
Speaker 1: was a racist all that time and we just didn't
Speaker 1: know it, and that would be the end. The answer there,
Speaker 1: effectively being that Obama really thinks that Biden's getting what
Speaker 1: he deserves because this is who he really is. That
Speaker 1: that's a possible answer. I don't think that's the most likelier,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't think that's the most sorry former
Speaker 1: that that's a possible answer. Okay, what else is in
Speaker 1: the mix? Then that Obama is too narcissistic and too
Speaker 1: self satisfied to care what happens to his former vice president,
Speaker 1: or that he just isn't an honorable enough friend to
Speaker 1: want to stand up for somebody who had served him
Speaker 1: well as his vice president and been was with through
Speaker 1: a lot. You know, there are just some things in
Speaker 1: this business. And I'll tell you right now, if a
Speaker 1: friend of mine is ever in need in public, a
Speaker 1: real friend, somebody that you know, I have a real
Speaker 1: relationship with that I've built over time of trust and
Speaker 1: mutual affection and loyalty to each other, I'm not gonna
Speaker 1: let that person get crushed without me saying a word.
Speaker 1: If I believe that my saying a word would be helpful.
Speaker 1: Sometimes maybe it wouldn't be. But I'm not going to
Speaker 1: let them just dangle in the wind. And I just
Speaker 1: work in media. I'm not the former president of United States.
Speaker 1: But there are questions of honor that shouldn't be hard
Speaker 1: to answer When a friend of yours is being unfairly
Speaker 1: maligned and the reputation ruined in public, don't you have
Speaker 1: an obligation to say something if you are in a
Speaker 1: particularly powerful position to help. Who better to put down
Speaker 1: the to put an end to the Biden is a
Speaker 1: racist controversy, then Barack Obama, his former president that he
Speaker 1: served under, and the first president. You can't think of her.
Speaker 1: The only person who comes close is Michelle Obama, who
Speaker 1: also will not say a word in defense of Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: H with with you know, with friends with friends like
Speaker 1: the Obama's. I gotta tell you who not not exactly
Speaker 1: a profile and person to person courage here. But that's
Speaker 1: I suppose what we should come to expect from Democrats.
Speaker 1: It's all about It's all about the cause, and the
Speaker 1: individuals pushing the cause are really all about themselves. That's
Speaker 1: what it means to be a Democrat. These days. Oh also,
Speaker 1: I always love this one. CBS s Gaale King was
Speaker 1: speaking with Michelle Obama on the Obama administration and the
Speaker 1: no scandals talking point pliclibait all that I had sort
Speaker 1: of held on to for eight years watching my husband
Speaker 1: get raped over the coals, feeling like we had to
Speaker 1: do everything perfectly, you know, no scandal, no, no nothing,
Speaker 1: no nothing. Yeah, I think it was. It was a
Speaker 1: lot emotionally. Barack Obama's executive branch forced gun dealers to
Speaker 1: give guns to straw purchasers for Mexican cartels that killed
Speaker 1: hundreds of people with them. Barack Obama's administration, the IRS
Speaker 1: in his bureaucracy, decided to target conservatives for tax purposes
Speaker 1: in an election year. I mean, you know I could
Speaker 1: do it, Benghas, Yeah, we can do this. We can
Speaker 1: do this all day. Barack Obama wide about how you
Speaker 1: can keep your health insurance planned, the single biggest initiative
Speaker 1: of his entire presidency. Let me say say there's no scandals.
Speaker 1: We also all know this. If anything has been learned
Speaker 1: from the Epstein revelations of this week, it's at the press.
Speaker 1: The press almost acts with a hive mind. It's almost
Speaker 1: all Democrats. It's a very when you really look at
Speaker 1: by the numbers. Fox News has a lot of influence
Speaker 1: because Fox News has half the country more or less
Speaker 1: to itself politically on TV. But Fox News isn't that big,
Speaker 1: doesn't have that many people, It doesn't have an endless
Speaker 1: army of investigative journalists. And when you look at what
Speaker 1: conservative media has in terms of resources in reach compared
Speaker 1: to what the lib media has, it's a total David
Speaker 1: and Goliath story. I know that doesn't end well for Goliath,
Speaker 1: but you know what I'm saying, much much bigger way.
Speaker 1: We are way outgunned in the media marketplace still in
Speaker 1: terms of resources, investigative stories things like that, we got
Speaker 1: nothing that it comes close to what the Libs can
Speaker 1: throw at things. And that means that they can one
Speaker 1: go absolutely thermonuclear with their opposition research, and two they
Speaker 1: can serve they whether when they want to do a story,
Speaker 1: they do a story, When they don't want to do
Speaker 1: a story, it's all over with doesn't matter. So the
Speaker 1: no scandals point is one that tells us a lot
Speaker 1: more than they then they want us to know from
Speaker 1: it all right, because the no scandals thing is just essentially, Yeah,
Speaker 1: the media still looking for Obama's college transcripts. Folks. They're
Speaker 1: changing laws in the state of New York just to
Speaker 1: get Donald Trump's tax returns, which are already in the
Speaker 1: hands of the government, already have been audited. But no
Speaker 1: word on Barack Obama's college transcripts. I love how I
Speaker 1: still say that to lives and they go, oh, it's
Speaker 1: look true. Really, what does not does not true mean
Speaker 1: it is true because it is true. I suppose somebody
Speaker 1: would have to explain that, Well, there's there's a lot
Speaker 1: that you got to explain to lives. There's a lot
Speaker 1: that has to be explained to lives these days. Um,
Speaker 1: this is this was this was remarkable. Though, just before
Speaker 1: we before I move off this topic, I had something
Speaker 1: else that really it's it's hard to believe, folks, And
Speaker 1: I if I didn't have the tweet in front of me,
Speaker 1: I feel like meet the Press exclusive. This was a
Speaker 1: real story they ran yesterday. I mean this nails home
Speaker 1: brings home Nail's home, you know, Hammer's home. That's what
Speaker 1: I was looking for, Hammer's nails close enough, Hammer's home.
Speaker 1: The point I was trying to make Senate Majority Leader
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell's This is from This is an NBC News
Speaker 1: exclusive from yesterday, Folks, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's great
Speaker 1: great grandfathers owned fourteen slaves, bringing reparations issue close to home. No,
Speaker 1: does not bring the reparations issue close to home. That
Speaker 1: is false. I don't know what my great grate grandfather
Speaker 1: was up to, but I can tell you that if
Speaker 1: I found out that he was an axe murderer, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't feel like I had some moral stain on me.
Speaker 1: I have no idea who my great great grandfather is
Speaker 1: or was. I mean, I'm sure I could look it
Speaker 1: up on ancestry or whatever. But this is so stupid,
Speaker 1: and this is NBC News, NBC News exclusive. They can
Speaker 1: dig into the great great grandfather of Mitch McConnell and
Speaker 1: find ople research there, find something with which they think
Speaker 1: that they can sully the reputation of Mitch McConnell. And yet,
Speaker 1: how many times did I have you seen mentioned? Really
Speaker 1: pay attention to this For those of you who watch
Speaker 1: TV news, which you really shouldn't. You should just listen
Speaker 1: to this show every day and you don't need TV news,
Speaker 1: But how many of you will see mention of Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton in the Epstein story, it may flash on the
Speaker 1: screen for a brief moment at the bottom. They may
Speaker 1: try to cover their cover their butts a little bit
Speaker 1: by showing you some by being able to you know this,
Speaker 1: This is the Taper routine. Ask one one real question
Speaker 1: a month and be like, look at this real question,
Speaker 1: I'm so brave. Well, yeah, but what about one hundred
Speaker 1: What about the hundred toty questions that you asked that
Speaker 1: were for Libs and Dems to feast on. But I
Speaker 1: asked the real question once you know, oh yeah, we
Speaker 1: ran in Clinton, We're in Clinton. No, the propaganda is clear.
Speaker 1: They're trying to make Epstein all about Trump, as we know.
Speaker 1: But think about how the resources that they're willing to
Speaker 1: devote at meet the press to find out about Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell's great great grandfather. Who the heck cares about Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell's great gat grandfather. Let me say. Mitch McConnell, in
Speaker 1: response to this, said that his position on reparations is
Speaker 1: the same. He's in the same position as Barack Obama
Speaker 1: because Barack Obama's white parentage on one side. You know,
Speaker 1: this is I'm sorry, does the white parentage on one
Speaker 1: side no longer is the stain of an ancestral slavery
Speaker 1: erased for that side if there's another side down the
Speaker 1: line that it has African American lineage, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: do you know are you still are you guilty of
Speaker 1: half of the vices of reparations of your of your
Speaker 1: elders if you are of both black and white ancestry.
Speaker 1: And this is this is what Mitch McConnell is saying
Speaker 1: in effect. But Mitch that his position on this is
Speaker 1: the same as Barack Obama's, and Barack Obama has white
Speaker 1: ancestors who also own slaves. I don't know that's what
Speaker 1: Mitch said. I don't know that was true. But also
Speaker 1: Barack Obama was a post of reparations. So basically cocaine,
Speaker 1: Mitch is like, say hello to my little friend. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back. The census citizenship questions should be there,
Speaker 1: so they kick the can and then the administration said, okay,
Speaker 1: we won't put it on there, and then the President
Speaker 1: injected himself into this. But this is about keeping you know,
Speaker 1: make America. You know this hat make America again. They
Speaker 1: want to make sure that people certain people are counted.
Speaker 1: It's really disgraceful and it's not what our founders had
Speaker 1: in mind. This is a lie, it's a smear. But
Speaker 1: Pelosi is very you know. One thing that gets lost
Speaker 1: in all this with Nancy Pelosi is she has been
Speaker 1: a lifelong super lib. She has been the lib of
Speaker 1: libs for decades. Man in. Pelosi is the classic limousine
Speaker 1: liberal from north of San Francisco, super rich herself, just
Speaker 1: you know, whatever, the most progressive position isn't any number
Speaker 1: of issues. Nancy Pelosi has been a warrior for that
Speaker 1: position for the left for a long time, and she
Speaker 1: is not progressive enough for the Democratic Party anymore. We'll
Speaker 1: get into that part of this in just a moment.
Speaker 1: But what she said here is so is so gross
Speaker 1: and it's a reminder though of what the left does
Speaker 1: whenever they can't win an argument. Is racist, which is
Speaker 1: what they always do. Oh you're a racist. Wait a second,
Speaker 1: I just we want data. Is data racist? Well? Actually,
Speaker 1: depending on the circumstances, some people will tell you that
Speaker 1: data can be racist. That's very interesting. Steveson High School?
Speaker 1: Why is Stevenson High School seventy five percent Asian? And
Speaker 1: other minority groups dramatically underrepresented. Racist. Well, that's just data,
Speaker 1: isn't it. This is the elite public high school in
Speaker 1: New York City where you just take a test to
Speaker 1: get in. Whatever your score is that determines whether you
Speaker 1: get in, doesn't matter what your skin color is. A
Speaker 1: lot of Asians other non white minorities, not a lot
Speaker 1: of them. This is the big problem that comes up.
Speaker 1: You'ren in year out of the school. Racist way. But
Speaker 1: I'm just these are just the numbers. That's just what
Speaker 1: it is. It is what it is. I'm not even
Speaker 1: taking a position on it. I'm just saying that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that sounds pretty racist. But Pelosi has been playing this
Speaker 1: card as a super rich white liberal, but she'll play
Speaker 1: this card against Republicans and she has been for a
Speaker 1: long time. And it's not enough. It's not enough for
Speaker 1: the left anymore. You see. This is this is what
Speaker 1: the left finds out. Biden's found this out the hard way,
Speaker 1: with having to apologize uh Pelosi and trying to deal
Speaker 1: with this left wing insurgency from within her own party.
Speaker 1: What they find out, sure enough, is that the that
Speaker 1: the ability to, without any justification or provocation, play the
Speaker 1: race card as a means of ruining someone's reputation, shutting
Speaker 1: down dissent, shutting down debate. That that is something that
Speaker 1: because they can do it whenever they want to whomever
Speaker 1: they want, they'll do it to each other too, the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party when they when they decide to. I mean
Speaker 1: here is Rashida to leib who's right there with with
Speaker 1: AOC and some of these others as the um the
Speaker 1: far left. I don't call them the fringe. They're not
Speaker 1: the fringe of the vanguard. They're at They're at the
Speaker 1: front of the modern Democratic Party right now. They are
Speaker 1: not some you know, outside element that just makes some
Speaker 1: noise here and there. They are pushing policy. They are
Speaker 1: making the Green New Deal, something that Democrats the stupidest
Speaker 1: idea I ever heard. They're making the Green New Deal
Speaker 1: something Democrats have to pay obedience to. They're making open
Speaker 1: borders the official policy, even though they won't call it
Speaker 1: that of the Democratic Party. That's coming from the far
Speaker 1: left vanguard of the party. They are pushing the party
Speaker 1: in this direction, and not even the Sandernista wing of
Speaker 1: the party is because because there must be a a
Speaker 1: clear identity politics componentable of this. That's absolutely the case
Speaker 1: with this element within the Democratic cock or the Democratic
Speaker 1: majority in the House for sure. Here's what Rashida Talib
Speaker 1: says about Nancy Pelosi, thir third in line for the presidents,
Speaker 1: most powerful Democrat politician in the country, at least officially speaking,
Speaker 1: and a lifelong superlib. Here's what Rashida Pelipe says about
Speaker 1: her blaked twelve. More people like us, people of color
Speaker 1: have been missing in the chamber because most of us,
Speaker 1: and Ayanna Presley says it more beautifully, people that are
Speaker 1: closest to the pain need to be at the table
Speaker 1: making these decisions. Guess what, we know what it feels
Speaker 1: like to be dehumanized. We know what it feels like
Speaker 1: to be brown and black in this country. What would
Speaker 1: you say to Nancy Pelosi? What would you say directly
Speaker 1: to Nancy Pelosi? Uplift the women, especially the women of
Speaker 1: color within your caucus that are out there, because I'll
Speaker 1: tell you, more people like us, more people like me
Speaker 1: that come out to vote, we win, All of us win.
Speaker 1: Feels like to be dehumanized. Pelosi has to uplift the
Speaker 1: people of color, hasn't Nancy Pelosi? She would think that
Speaker 1: her whole career was at some level devoted to that.
Speaker 1: I would think that's what Nancy Pelosi would argue. Not
Speaker 1: enough though, not enough people of color, she says, I've
Speaker 1: been missing in the chamber of the Democratic Party. It
Speaker 1: is never going to be enough, though, because the standard
Speaker 1: is not racism or unequal treatment that is rooted in
Speaker 1: race will be will be called out against individuals. The
Speaker 1: standard is they can call anyone the left can call
Speaker 1: anyone racist at any time, and it is damaging, and
Speaker 1: it's supposed to be damaging. And that's the way that
Speaker 1: they play the game. And even not even Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: is immune to this. That's that's what she finds out.
Speaker 1: That's that's the reality of her situation right now. Can
Speaker 1: she hold this progressive insurgency within her own party at Bay?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I think Pelosi is probably out what
Speaker 1: the old in with the new, my friends, that means
Speaker 1: AOC is going to be calling the shots and calling
Speaker 1: them real soon. I was disappointed to see him subpoenaed
Speaker 1: because I don't think that serves any purpose dragging Bob
Speaker 1: Muller up. If the in fact is going to stick
Speaker 1: to the report, it seems to me the only reason
Speaker 1: for doing that is to create some kind of public spectacle.
Speaker 1: And if Bob but decides that he doesn't want to
Speaker 1: be subject to that, then the Department of Justice would
Speaker 1: certainly back him. The hearing next week with Mueller will
Speaker 1: be a carnival. It'll be a freak show. Think back
Speaker 1: to March of twenty seventeen, Seawan when Devin Newnas had
Speaker 1: a public hearing. I love Devin, but public hearings don't
Speaker 1: turn out well no matter who calls him. Devin called
Speaker 1: a public hearing, had Jim Comey and Mike Rogers a
Speaker 1: hundred times. The witness said I cannot answer that question
Speaker 1: in this forum. You would think the media would say
Speaker 1: that was a waste of everybody's Tom don't ever do
Speaker 1: that again. They love it. They love it because what
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff and Swallowell and the others did is read
Speaker 1: newspaper articles that contain classified information only for the witness
Speaker 1: that didn't have to say I can't comment all that
Speaker 1: in this setting. That's what's going to happen next week.
Speaker 1: Mueller's reports out. He's not going to deviate from the
Speaker 1: four corners of that report, but that not keep House
Speaker 1: Democrats from asking The focus will be on the question
Speaker 1: not the answer. Oh boy, you know, this is one
Speaker 1: of the first times I gotta think more about ag
Speaker 1: Barr's position on this one, because I think Barr is
Speaker 1: an administration rock star. I think that he is as
Speaker 1: good as as good as you're gonna find anywhere. He
Speaker 1: didn't didn't bend the need all the pressure on the report.
Speaker 1: He's been rocks and his whole thing is, you know,
Speaker 1: is there a precedent for it? Well, then it's then
Speaker 1: it's unprecedented, isn't it. I mean, it's still one of
Speaker 1: the greatest press conference lines that I could think of.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's up there with your fake news. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just it was fantastic with Bar pulled off. But
Speaker 1: ag Barr not not agreeing with the subpoena of Muller,
Speaker 1: I will tell you, is a little bit of a
Speaker 1: surprise to me. Um, I don't really get why he would. Well,
Speaker 1: maybe he feels like we should just move past this
Speaker 1: as a country, and then he realizes and it effectively
Speaker 1: agrees with what Trey Gaudy you say in there, which
Speaker 1: is that it's going to be a spectacle without any
Speaker 1: real purpose beyond giving people on CNNs something to talk about,
Speaker 1: and I don't know all the to be fair, all
Speaker 1: the cable networks something to talk about that day, and
Speaker 1: people like me, you'll be like, wow, this is what
Speaker 1: we're said today. But I've always thought that Muller should
Speaker 1: be forced to answer questions about aspects, if not aspects,
Speaker 1: of the report. Also some of the process that went
Speaker 1: into the report, and his evasiveness will or his unwillingness
Speaker 1: to answer very straightforward questions that are not privileged, that
Speaker 1: are not about classified, that are not protected, will tell
Speaker 1: us a lot about what really went on. I think
Speaker 1: that Muller. So, so what I'm really saying is I
Speaker 1: disagree with the Attorney general if the Attorney General thinks
Speaker 1: that there's nothing to be gained from this one. Now,
Speaker 1: maybe the Attorney General he could be right and I
Speaker 1: could be wrong. He's one of the few people in
Speaker 1: this administration i'd say, you know, on certain matters on
Speaker 1: this matter, for example, his judgment and my judgment, I
Speaker 1: put them pretty close. Most of the people in this administration,
Speaker 1: I'd say, if it's between the buck says and what
Speaker 1: they say, you want to bet on Buck every time.
Speaker 1: This Attorney General, I don't know, he might see some
Speaker 1: aspects of this that I don't that I'm not seeing
Speaker 1: right now. I know, well, a radio host that thinks
Speaker 1: that he may not he may not have all the
Speaker 1: answers would be the smartest than everything. What a shock.
Speaker 1: But Attorney General Barr says he's not like, Okay, he
Speaker 1: doesn't like this because I want to see Muller in
Speaker 1: front of the American people just not answer very straightforward
Speaker 1: questions like why was the dossier basically not dealt with
Speaker 1: at all in your report? Why was that not a
Speaker 1: part of this in any meaningful way? And if he says,
Speaker 1: you know that he won't answer that, well, then I
Speaker 1: think people can draw their own conclusions because ultimately, see,
Speaker 1: here's the thing this is not. This is no longer
Speaker 1: really illegal matter. It's a political matter, and politics is
Speaker 1: all about optics. I'm here in this swamp. I'm swimming
Speaker 1: around with all these gaiters. There's always more gators in
Speaker 1: the swamp. Uh, I gotta work on my There was
Speaker 1: there was that congressman camera's name now, I really like
Speaker 1: that guy came on the Hill TV before I left.
Speaker 1: He's like, excuse me, madame, I'm a congressman from Louisiana,
Speaker 1: and I do not want He had that kind of
Speaker 1: Cajun accent thing going on. I can't remember the guy's name.
Speaker 1: He was great though, he could calling Crystal madame, excuse me, madame.
Speaker 1: But I said, I like this guy. That's a little
Speaker 1: bit of producer Mike. What was in the in the
Speaker 1: water boy? What was Adam Sandler's name? Do you know what? Talk? Oh?
Speaker 1: Did you Mark? Do you know what I'm talking to me?
Speaker 1: The water boy Adam Sandler? But I don't remember his name.
Speaker 1: Is it Bobby Bouche? Yes, Bobby Bouche. He was had
Speaker 1: a little bit of a little bit of shades of Bobby.
Speaker 1: I'm saying, I like the accent, Okay, I like the
Speaker 1: cagn accents. So to our to Louisiana listeners, I can't
Speaker 1: even say it properly. Buck, Maybe learn to say Louisiana first.
Speaker 1: I got nte see I start getting way too French.
Speaker 1: I start to sound like Lumier from Beauty and the Beast,
Speaker 1: or or maybe even the the chef from The Little
Speaker 1: Mermaid Les plais sans name plaison. You guys remember that?
Speaker 1: Come on, what just happened? Buck just had some kind
Speaker 1: of an episode on here, let's get back into the
Speaker 1: Mulla report on a Muller subpoena. So next week, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a circus. I don't know how much
Speaker 1: new stuff we're gonna learn. I don't know how much
Speaker 1: we'll be able to count on this as uh, you know,
Speaker 1: really to answer questions. But if nothing else, it'll give
Speaker 1: us all an opportunity to see if Muller can answer
Speaker 1: straightforward questions or not. Look what comey did comy to
Speaker 1: anyone who was being honest lit his credibility on fire
Speaker 1: in his last hearing, I don't remember. I don't recall.
Speaker 1: I don't remember, I don't recall. It doesn't remember anything.
Speaker 1: You know what floor of the FBI building were you
Speaker 1: on when you were director of comy. I do not recall.
Speaker 1: You know where was the bathroom near your office? So
Speaker 1: I don't remember. He just didn't know anything. Of course,
Speaker 1: he knew plenty. He didn't want to give answers because
Speaker 1: he doesn't want to be found out to have lied
Speaker 1: under oath. Although I'm still waiting for those charges against
Speaker 1: Andy McCabe. Former acting FBI Director Andy McCabe, we knew
Speaker 1: was an anti Trump partisan and a hack he lied
Speaker 1: under oath I think twice, if not three times according
Speaker 1: to Inspector General, So we should be finding out what's
Speaker 1: going on there pretty soon. That then also reminds me
Speaker 1: we got the Inspector General report that's supposed to come out,
Speaker 1: but I don't know how much this is from within
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice looking at the conduct of the
Speaker 1: FBI during and around the whole Russia collusion Muller probe
Speaker 1: thing after Trump's election. The issue I have is even
Speaker 1: if they find I think they'll provide good information, but
Speaker 1: the conclusions will be crap. Because if it's not Scottish
Speaker 1: it's crap. No, But if it's because the conclusions the
Speaker 1: first in the first Inspector General report were overwhelmingly overwhelmingly
Speaker 1: indicative of political bias or really just proved beyond any
Speaker 1: reasonable doubt political bias, and then the report and its
Speaker 1: conclusions DJ Inspector General's report says, oh no, there's no bias.
Speaker 1: What it was all bias. This would be like walking
Speaker 1: into a store that sells nuts, nothing but nuts, pistachio, almond,
Speaker 1: wal nut, and say, but there are no nuts in here.
Speaker 1: What would people call you if you did that I
Speaker 1: will not answer it because it's such a lame joke.
Speaker 1: We have more coming up, guys, listen up for a
Speaker 1: second first day camp. Something really important. Okay, we're not
Speaker 1: women's soccer, We're not the NFL. If there's anybody here
Speaker 1: it's going to be disrespectful to either the American or
Speaker 1: the Canadian national anthem, Grab your gear and get that
Speaker 1: out now, because you'll never see the ice in this arena.
Speaker 1: I like this coach. This is a This is a happy,
Speaker 1: well at least I think so, a happy social media
Speaker 1: viral story that's out there right now. You got this
Speaker 1: coach that's gone gone viral on social media for saying,
Speaker 1: you know, we're not women's soccer, not the NFL. If
Speaker 1: there's anybody here who's gonna be disrespectful to the American
Speaker 1: the Canadian national anthem, grab your gear and get the
Speaker 1: you know what out because you'll never see the ice
Speaker 1: in this arena. It was posted on Monday night, and
Speaker 1: it's just a nice, a nice antidote in a sense
Speaker 1: to the nonsense we've seen from the women's national soccer team.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're going to represent America on the
Speaker 1: world stage, try not to be a punk, trying to
Speaker 1: be an ingrate, to be disrespectful, try not to be
Speaker 1: somebody that shows that they think that there's something about
Speaker 1: them that's that's better than an above America. I think
Speaker 1: that there's there's just a kind of arrogance that's really
Speaker 1: hard to It's just hard to get past these people.
Speaker 1: They really do need to just get over themselves a
Speaker 1: little bit. I mean, you saw this with all the
Speaker 1: media attention, or you have this run up to Independence
Speaker 1: Day this year, that's a case in point. You know,
Speaker 1: it's not enough that they can't enjoy America over Fourth
Speaker 1: of July. They don't want anyone else having too much
Speaker 1: fun because you know, we the people are going to
Speaker 1: be out there doing our thing. But they don't like that,
Speaker 1: so they want to make things more difficult for us.
Speaker 1: You had a still just shockingly and dispiritingly influential Colin
Speaker 1: Kaepernick who was scuttling that Nike shoe, right, remember the
Speaker 1: Nike shoe with the Betsy Ross American flag on it.
Speaker 1: Oh oh, I love this. I checked earlier in the
Speaker 1: week Snopes did a fact check, so I checked on
Speaker 1: the fact check of whether the Betsy Ross flag was
Speaker 1: because I said this on the show, and I want
Speaker 1: to make sure that what I tell you is correct.
Speaker 1: Was the Betsy Ross flag in fact displayed at Obama's
Speaker 1: second inauguration? Guess what, folks? The answer was a big yes.
Speaker 1: But then Snopes did this whole dance. But things can
Speaker 1: change in time, and the meaning of the Betsy Ross
Speaker 1: flag has changed since twenty sixteen. Oh, I'm sorry. A flag,
Speaker 1: this is Snopes. This is how stupid lib media is
Speaker 1: a flag that has existed for two hundred years plus
Speaker 1: that never was racist in its depiction or tenth before,
Speaker 1: and clearly wasn't racist as of twenty sixteen. Folks. The flag, first,
Speaker 1: the Betsy Ross version, first made its debut at seventeen
Speaker 1: seventy seven. From seventeen seventy seven to twenty sixteen, the
Speaker 1: flag is not racist, and then all of a sudden
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, off it's a racist flag because Kappernick says so.
Speaker 1: But reality doesn't matter when social justice is an issue.
Speaker 1: You already know that, and we've already talked about how
Speaker 1: there are all those crazy before and after reactions to
Speaker 1: the Independence Day rally of the National Mall right, you
Speaker 1: had we played the audio we had these journalists who
Speaker 1: were comparing what was really a family friendly and patriotic
Speaker 1: celebration to the Soviet Union into North Korea. Larry Tribe
Speaker 1: over at Harvard Law School saying, quote resemblance to the
Speaker 1: days before Tianamen Square is chilling. Oh my gosh, there's
Speaker 1: gonna be a tank and like a parade. It's never
Speaker 1: happened before. Actually it's happened a bunch of times. Kennedy
Speaker 1: did at Eisenhower did at FDR Day. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: that's so scary. But here's what, here's what we need
Speaker 1: to not lose sign of it all. And I know
Speaker 1: that we've already gone through our Fourth or July, and
Speaker 1: we've already had our celebrated. I had a great I
Speaker 1: might have one of the best Fourth of julys I've
Speaker 1: ever had. True store, we're really one of the best
Speaker 1: fourth I just you know, I don't know, I can't
Speaker 1: you know. I could explain why, maybe will another time.
Speaker 1: But it was just a great Fourth of July. And
Speaker 1: here's the truth. America is just kicking butt right now.
Speaker 1: We are doing very well as a country. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: get it. I mean, we got all kinds of challenges
Speaker 1: still you know, no one cares about the twenty two
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in debt. You got debt. That's a ticking
Speaker 1: time bomb out there. Support for socialism is rising among
Speaker 1: people who are wildly ignorant, and that's very troubling in
Speaker 1: and of itself. Southern borders are mass. I mean, there's problems,
Speaker 1: and we talked about the problems, but America is kicking
Speaker 1: butt right now and we're not fighting some massive war.
Speaker 1: We're not about about to fight. I believe any any
Speaker 1: large scale war, which is really really great I'd love
Speaker 1: for my children's generation might yet to be born, but
Speaker 1: hopefully soon children's generate, not too soon, children's generate whoa
Speaker 1: that there won't be a war for their generation? Maybe
Speaker 1: the one after that too. I think that that's possible.
Speaker 1: I think we can live in a world where that's
Speaker 1: the case. Imagine the people. Sorry, it's that I felt
Speaker 1: a little. John Lennon liked there. If you did, if
Speaker 1: you youth knew woo, But just remember that most of us,
Speaker 1: and this coach I think, spoke to it, and that's
Speaker 1: why it's going viral. Most of us really do love
Speaker 1: this place and appreciate it and appreciate each other, because
Speaker 1: America really is the American people. When I talk about America,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about a land mass. Really, it's not
Speaker 1: a lot of dirt and rocks and rivers and lakes
Speaker 1: that just we happen to get plopped down on for
Speaker 1: no apparent reason. America is the American people. You know,
Speaker 1: Russia is a bigger a bigger country with comparable, if
Speaker 1: not better, natural resources. And guess what Russia and America. Now,
Speaker 1: I know that's a very obvious thing to say, but
Speaker 1: this is a unique place because of the American people.
Speaker 1: And so while we while we celebrate our country, what
Speaker 1: we really are during or celebrating our fellow Americans and
Speaker 1: in particular our fellow Americans who also celebrate their fellow Americans.
Speaker 1: So don't let the don't let the haters and the
Speaker 1: losers and the jerks out there who for their own reasons,
Speaker 1: for their own insecurities. And you know, tell you that
Speaker 1: you can't have a flag on the back of your truck.
Speaker 1: You know, you can't celebrate the stars and stripes, You
Speaker 1: can't be proud of America. You know that that's Oh,
Speaker 1: what's with all the jingoism and all that you know,
Speaker 1: don't don't listen to any of that nonsense. Oh, America's
Speaker 1: history is soaked in blood and racism and all this
Speaker 1: terrible stuff. The history of every country has all of that,
Speaker 1: because every group of people for all of history has
Speaker 1: had things that we're we're wrong, we're evil, we're bad,
Speaker 1: we're dark, we're we're foreboding, we're difficult, we're you know,
Speaker 1: this is our reality as human beings, as a human species.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't mean that America is not doing really
Speaker 1: well right now. I mean, this is this is a
Speaker 1: good time. I feel like after the first Trump year
Speaker 1: in office, I had a whole show where I said, look, guys,
Speaker 1: and some of you said, buck, come on, you're too
Speaker 1: exuberant right now. I'm I know we got problems. This
Speaker 1: could all end tomorrow. I'm just trying to tell you
Speaker 1: that while things are good, enjoy them, because I'm also
Speaker 1: here to tell you this is not going to last forever.
Speaker 1: And I hate to have to say that. Where it's
Speaker 1: not gonna last forever, we will look back at people
Speaker 1: like the Kaepernicks. We will look back at those who
Speaker 1: were dumping on America when things are pretty good and
Speaker 1: think what a bunch of just what a bunch of
Speaker 1: spoiled babies they were. But I also think we'll look
Speaker 1: at coaches like this guy. And I've told you before
Speaker 1: I coached high school soccer for a season and it
Speaker 1: was probably the most fun job I've ever had and
Speaker 1: very rewarding in a lot of ways too. This coach
Speaker 1: is just like, look, respect our flag, respect our anthem,
Speaker 1: respect this country. That that's actually what America is, That's
Speaker 1: who we are. Maybe some of us wouldn't use, but
Speaker 1: it's locker room talk, folks. He's literally in a locker room.
Speaker 1: So I give him. He's a coach that I use
Speaker 1: a bit of salty language as a coach behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: I believe I did sometimes, so I give him some
Speaker 1: leeway on that one. But I agree with the sentiment here.
Speaker 1: You know, love and appreciate this country just like we
Speaker 1: love and appreciate each other as Americans. Don't let the negative,
Speaker 1: the nonsense, the liars, the leftist, don't don't let them
Speaker 1: cloud your vision of what this country really is, what
Speaker 1: you know this country to be. That's something that only
Speaker 1: they cannot take it from you. You can only give
Speaker 1: that away. They cannot make you disrespect the flag, disrespect
Speaker 1: the anthem. Only each one of us individually could choose
Speaker 1: to do that, and other people listen to the show
Speaker 1: would never do that, because we love this country just
Speaker 1: like this coach. We'll be right back back. In January,
Speaker 1: Team I wrote a piece for The Hill that went
Speaker 1: viral called only a matter of time before the social
Speaker 1: medium mob comes for you, And this was in reference
Speaker 1: to the Covington Catholic High School situation. Those young boys
Speaker 1: that came to DC, to the Swamp where I currently
Speaker 1: am doing the show, visiting from Kentucky and were alleged
Speaker 1: to have engaged by members of the media that didn't
Speaker 1: do any fact checking, didn't do any due diligence, were
Speaker 1: allegedly involved in some racist interaction with a Native American activist. Well,
Speaker 1: as we all know, as it turned out, that's not
Speaker 1: what happened. You had adults, including adults who were members
Speaker 1: of the true Israelites, who are insane and who are
Speaker 1: racists themselves and anti Semites. Strange because they're the true Israelites,
Speaker 1: but they that's what they call themselves. That the whole
Speaker 1: situation is not what we were led to believe from
Speaker 1: the initial reporting. But some of us, like myself, didn't
Speaker 1: jump on the lib media let's bash the quote privileged
Speaker 1: white kids bandwagon wanted to see what actually happened. Turned
Speaker 1: out the kids didn't do anything wrong and actually conducted
Speaker 1: themselves I think quite well under the circumstances. I think
Speaker 1: they actually did a did a good job of being
Speaker 1: really abated and harassed by these adults. These are just
Speaker 1: young teenagers, but the media wanted to ruin their lives.
Speaker 1: The point I was making in this piece, though, is
Speaker 1: that the social media mobs of our time are not
Speaker 1: just an issue, not just a concern for those among
Speaker 1: us who are public figures, people like me. It's not
Speaker 1: just those who have blue checks on Twitter or Instagram
Speaker 1: or Facebook who we should be, whom we should be concerned,
Speaker 1: or who should be concerned about this issue. Anyone can
Speaker 1: become the subject of a social media lynch mob that
Speaker 1: will destroy their livelihood, destroy their reputation, and ruin them
Speaker 1: That all said, people also need to be aware of
Speaker 1: the fact that their actions can be videoed and follow
Speaker 1: them around forever on the Internet. And they need to
Speaker 1: be cognizant of the fact that everyone now carries around
Speaker 1: their own all in one media distribution device for the
Speaker 1: and really collection and distribution so you can make your
Speaker 1: own little home video of whatever's going on the street,
Speaker 1: put it on social media, and millions and millions of
Speaker 1: people will see it. Well, there is one instance like
Speaker 1: this where I think you have a number of factors
Speaker 1: coming together. A software engineer named Wesley Michael has shared
Speaker 1: in the last few what was this was? This just
Speaker 1: went up today, last week it was shared, and now
Speaker 1: it's now it's really going truly viral. Here's the basics
Speaker 1: of the story. Over the fourth of July, a boy
Speaker 1: and his father in San Francisco. We're trying to leave
Speaker 1: an apartment building. In places like San Francisco, many apartment
Speaker 1: buildings this is similar to New York have a buzz
Speaker 1: up system where you have to buzz They say, hey,
Speaker 1: who's this? He say hey, it's Bob. He say hey, Bob,
Speaker 1: you bring the beer? And said, yeah, Bob brought the beer.
Speaker 1: All right, He buzzed them and the door opens, and
Speaker 1: it's in place of what are often referred to as
Speaker 1: a doorman, right, a person that's down there to be
Speaker 1: really a you know, take care of the building, provides
Speaker 1: some degree of security, open the door for people, et cetera,
Speaker 1: which is another thing they have in some major cities
Speaker 1: depending on the building. Right, But the buzzer, you guys
Speaker 1: all know what a doorman is. I don't need to
Speaker 1: explain that, but the buzzer system here. You know, you
Speaker 1: may or may not be that familiar with how this works.
Speaker 1: So actually you're probably all familiar with that. Forget that.
Speaker 1: I just went through buzzer versus doorman. I don't know
Speaker 1: why I thought that that was necessary, but sometimes sometimes
Speaker 1: I'd like to just bring you into the you know,
Speaker 1: into the guts of the story, bring you deep, and
Speaker 1: give you as much information as I can. And then
Speaker 1: I realized, yeah, all of you know that already, So sorry,
Speaker 1: that's going to happen. I'm so excited to try to
Speaker 1: pass on information that's stuck in my head that I
Speaker 1: forget that sometimes it's information all of you have. All Right,
Speaker 1: back to the story. Wesley Michael share this video and look,
Speaker 1: he's African American. He is according to the video. And
Speaker 1: this is all based on this video now, so we
Speaker 1: don't have any additional context. This was published on the
Speaker 1: Hill today, but it's viral all over the internet. According
Speaker 1: to what we see in the exchange between both individuals.
Speaker 1: It's pretty clear that that Michael, the software engineer who
Speaker 1: took the video posted the video, followed in when the
Speaker 1: guy was leaving, the father and the son. We don't
Speaker 1: know the father's name. I'm sure we're gonna find out soon.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he's probably gonna get fired. But he as
Speaker 1: as the guy was exiting, Michael entered the building. And
Speaker 1: then and this father, I don't know what else we call,
Speaker 1: I mean, this dude, this father, uh decides that he
Speaker 1: thinks that Michael could be a security risk, and so
Speaker 1: he wants he wants to He asks this guy, Wesley Michael,
Speaker 1: the one who posted the video, who he was going
Speaker 1: to see there, and can he buzz up his friend
Speaker 1: because he wants to prove that he's there for a
Speaker 1: legitimate purpose, that this guy didn't just go in the lobby,
Speaker 1: you know, for an illegitimate purpose, whatever that may be.
Speaker 1: Here's how some of the exchange went. Just so you
Speaker 1: can hear we're talking about. Play this is the father
Speaker 1: on the phone calling police on Wesley Michael. Play clip eighteen.
Speaker 1: I remember calling your friend on the call box and
Speaker 1: have them come back. Didn't have to do that. You
Speaker 1: could just walk away the police. Oh yes, yes, remember that.
Speaker 1: I remember this exactly happening when I used to live
Speaker 1: in my own kindo and then people used to call
Speaker 1: the police all the time. Sure, I'll hold the door
Speaker 1: here for you. That is okay, nobody's asking to hold
Speaker 1: the dirt. You could do whatever you went. But I'm
Speaker 1: recording you right now, and you're gonna be the next person.
Speaker 1: Look at this. You don't need to threaten you. I'm
Speaker 1: not throwing you. I'm not thinking you're going to be
Speaker 1: the next person one. You're gonna be the next person
Speaker 1: on TV. Just remember that. And you have your son
Speaker 1: with you. That's why I asked you. That's your son.
Speaker 1: It's better, I will I will delete this. Yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a trespasser in my belt. Listen to your son, ye
Speaker 1: standing on the Now you hear that's his son. That's
Speaker 1: the father's young son saying let's go. Let's not do this.
Speaker 1: I say, I think the son in this instance is correct.
Speaker 1: Um that this was this was ill advised. Now, before
Speaker 1: I get into this, especially because we started out talking
Speaker 1: about social media mobs and comington Catholic, there could be
Speaker 1: additional context not on these videos. The father here, I
Speaker 1: don't know if he is going to release a statement
Speaker 1: saying that this guy, you know, did he, you know,
Speaker 1: say anything menacing on the way into the building. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I can't speak to anything outside the video,
Speaker 1: but the video has gone completely viral and is now
Speaker 1: sparkling all these conversations online about these situations. And and
Speaker 1: here's what I will say from what we can see
Speaker 1: based in this video. You know, it is a problem
Speaker 1: in these buildings that people will follow others into the building,
Speaker 1: and that it essentially defeats the entire security of the
Speaker 1: building if someone can just wait by the door and
Speaker 1: wait for someone to come in and is not challenge.
Speaker 1: So there's there's a real concern there that that is
Speaker 1: not something that people should just completely ignore. This is
Speaker 1: not a made up This is not a fake concern.
Speaker 1: This is a real thing. And Ann Coulter has been
Speaker 1: you guys all know I love Van. She's been running
Speaker 1: around today on Twitter sharing story after story of you know,
Speaker 1: somebody going home in the East Village in New York
Speaker 1: stabbed by a stranger waiting in the lobby. Someone uh,
Speaker 1: you know, waiting in the lobby guns down the paramour
Speaker 1: of their of a girlfriend or something. I mean, you
Speaker 1: know the story after story and doesn't it's not hard
Speaker 1: to find them. And those are all cases of somebody
Speaker 1: who did not have a legitimate purpose in that building
Speaker 1: and therefore is trespassing and caused real harder people. Now,
Speaker 1: in the real life application of this, and if you go,
Speaker 1: we'll go on a little more detail here in this video,
Speaker 1: the real life application of this is you know this guy,
Speaker 1: this father, I could tell he gets his he gets
Speaker 1: his back up a little bit and he's getting a
Speaker 1: little a little hissy over the situation with this guy
Speaker 1: and this guy Michael who said, you know this used
Speaker 1: to happen to me McConnell at the time. He clearly
Speaker 1: is ready for this. He knows exactly what he's doing.
Speaker 1: He knows that this guy is gonna look horrible in
Speaker 1: this video, which he doesn't look good, and he knows
Speaker 1: that the longer he draws this out, the more the
Speaker 1: guy and you could tell the guys a little bit,
Speaker 1: he's kind of grasping, He's like, are you threatening me?
Speaker 1: And there's some and this is really just two people.
Speaker 1: I'll be honest with you, I think that this is
Speaker 1: two people having their egos collide. I don't think this
Speaker 1: was really motivated by racism necessarily. I can't. Maybe this
Speaker 1: guy has raises, maybe he's not. I don't know. But
Speaker 1: from the exchange, this guy sounds to me the father,
Speaker 1: Like he's the dude who also, you know, makes all
Speaker 1: the complaints at the condo Association meeting about you know,
Speaker 1: kids throwing like, you know, loud parties and someone didn't
Speaker 1: refill the water jug down in the way Roman, you know,
Speaker 1: I think he's that guy. I don't think that he
Speaker 1: saw this individual go in and thought, oh, here's an
Speaker 1: African American male. Therefore I'm worried. Therefore I'm going to
Speaker 1: call the police. But I don't know. And the problem
Speaker 1: in our in our current environment is that, you know,
Speaker 1: if you're going to call somebody out in this way,
Speaker 1: you better be darn sure that it doesn't look like
Speaker 1: you're just and and I would note that the the
Speaker 1: the Wesley the designer, he's wearing a pink polo shirt.
Speaker 1: You know, I do, I'm sorry, I do think that
Speaker 1: the clothing at some level matters, Like if somebody goes
Speaker 1: into a place and you know, they're wearing like a
Speaker 1: ski mask. I think you're allowed to think that that's
Speaker 1: of greater concern, you know, if some if some guy's
Speaker 1: wearing a pink polo shirt. Not a lot of burglars
Speaker 1: wear pink polo shirts. But you know, again, we're analyzing
Speaker 1: without all the facts. But I just wanted to use
Speaker 1: this as to illustrate the perils of the social media
Speaker 1: age we live in now, because I mean this father,
Speaker 1: he's now famous in the way you really don't want
Speaker 1: to be famous. And here's a little more of the exchange,
Speaker 1: playing nineteen. He appears to be African American, appears to
Speaker 1: be African American. Yeah, thirty five suffer engineering polo shirt
Speaker 1: and Yankees cap. I'll go, I'll go suffer engineer brother,
Speaker 1: pink polo's shirt and tennis shirts jeans. Yeah, you have
Speaker 1: to be here for when they call him. He's filming
Speaker 1: me in refusing to me. I'm saying, I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: the next person on TV. Yes, sir, you know that's
Speaker 1: illegal now, right, Yeah, that's that's illegal to call call
Speaker 1: cops on African Americans. He said he's waiting for a friend,
Speaker 1: and I, yes, I call box and he said he would,
Speaker 1: so I'd have no way to know. Actually here, yeah,
Speaker 1: so I'm here to just rob whatever, what a mailbox?
Speaker 1: I'm just asking for your friend's name. I don't know
Speaker 1: if I tell you. Now, See, this is an interesting
Speaker 1: point at the end there. I think this guy, at
Speaker 1: this guy, Wesley, this dad is clearly Look, maybe he
Speaker 1: just had a fight with his wife. You know, they
Speaker 1: always jumped to the oh, it must be racist conclusion
Speaker 1: in the media. I think Wesley obviously jumped to the
Speaker 1: guy who post the video to the racism conclusion. But
Speaker 1: maybe this guy is just in a bad boom. Maybe
Speaker 1: he's just a jerk by the way, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: he's not a very nice guy, or maybe he had
Speaker 1: a bad day, which we all can have. And Wesley
Speaker 1: clearly could have said, I'm going to see you know,
Speaker 1: Susie in five g and I think that probably would
Speaker 1: have ended this whole thing, but he decided because you know,
Speaker 1: maybe he's got Maybe Wesley has a little bit of
Speaker 1: a chip on a shoulder about this. He mentioned that
Speaker 1: there were previous instances of people calling police on him
Speaker 1: in the condo that he owned, so I think he does.
Speaker 1: I think it's fair to say the evidence point points
Speaker 1: to him being you know, having had negative experiences like
Speaker 1: this in the past, which then means he's got a
Speaker 1: hip on a shoulder about it. Now. He could have
Speaker 1: diffused the situation, Both of them could have diffused the situation.
Speaker 1: But it staid it allowed to escalate. And here's what
Speaker 1: I just say. If there's any additional facts that come
Speaker 1: out about this, I'll definitely address it on the air.
Speaker 1: It looks bad for this dad. He should have been
Speaker 1: and what I said, it looks bad. I'm just saying
Speaker 1: it looks bad. I'm not saying he's a bad guy.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying I can tell what's in his heart
Speaker 1: where these racists or not. But he's if they've you know,
Speaker 1: his job is probably in jeopardy right now, which is
Speaker 1: you know, which is a shame because didn't was anyone
Speaker 1: harmed in the making of this video. They didn't really happen. No,
Speaker 1: But the conclusion that the public will jump to is
Speaker 1: of racist intent, And you know, I think there was
Speaker 1: a little there was a little bit of escalation and
Speaker 1: bad faith on both sides here from what I can
Speaker 1: see in a video that's imperfect, that's out of context.
Speaker 1: You know, it doesn't show you everything that happened before
Speaker 1: or after, And I haven't seen much in his statements
Speaker 1: about this, but I do think that it's a reminder
Speaker 1: all of us. We all have to live our lives
Speaker 1: like we're being video pretty much all the time, because
Speaker 1: you just don't know. You can be walking down the
Speaker 1: street getting a bag of groceries and all of a
Speaker 1: sudden you're in the middle of some incident that can become.
Speaker 1: And this video has been seen millions of times, That's
Speaker 1: why I'm talking about on radio, millions of views, so
Speaker 1: obviously sparking a lot of conversation here, let me know
Speaker 1: what you think about this when Facebook dot com slashbuck
Speaker 1: Sexton is a great place for you to send your thoughts.
Speaker 1: I'm curious. You know the video. They have it up
Speaker 1: on the Hill dot com right now. You know what,
Speaker 1: I'll share it. I'll share it on my Facebook page.
Speaker 1: There you go. I'll share this on Facebook, guys, and
Speaker 1: we'll see what you think of it, and a team
Speaker 1: will be right back. So if you run, you're also
Speaker 1: sitting congressman right now. But if you decide to run
Speaker 1: for president cough cough, if you would, are you would
Speaker 1: you give up your seat in Congress? Yes, you would
Speaker 1: give it up. Yes, really, I think you have to.
Speaker 1: Why is that? Well, I think if you're, you know,
Speaker 1: seeking such a big job that would affect so many people,
Speaker 1: have to assure, you know, the people you're asking to
Speaker 1: vote for you, that you're not hedging and that you
Speaker 1: don't have, you know, a lifeboat. The boats burn the
Speaker 1: boats as Cortez did, you know, they stormed the land
Speaker 1: and he had them burned the ships behind them so
Speaker 1: that there was no looking back. And I and I
Speaker 1: would want to. I would want people to know I'm
Speaker 1: putting my all into this and I don't have a
Speaker 1: life insurance policy. The least charismatic and really least interesting
Speaker 1: of all the Democratic candidates. We talked about this yesterday.
Speaker 1: He's out Swallowell, but turns out somebody else is in.
Speaker 1: Before we get to that, though, I'm gonna keep you
Speaker 1: in suspense in case you don't know who is in.
Speaker 1: I thought this was kind of funny. Swallowell, who disappointed
Speaker 1: the point zero zero zero zero zero one percent of
Speaker 1: American voters by deciding he would no longer be running
Speaker 1: for president, he had to more or less admit, yeah,
Speaker 1: I was kind of lying about that place sixteen different. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't. I'd said that I wouldn't seek both. Our
Speaker 1: attorneys had told us that you could run for both,
Speaker 1: that decision wouldn't have to come until December, and that
Speaker 1: if we were still in it in December, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: seek both. But you know, the polls have had their way,
Speaker 1: so here we are in July. It's like, yeah, I
Speaker 1: gotta get out so I can still be a swamp
Speaker 1: creature with a job in Congress. And forget what I
Speaker 1: said before, But who's in? Who is in? M do do? Do? Do? Do?
Speaker 1: That was not exactly in tune, but Tom Stire, baby, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Someone said that Tom Stire, Hey, did you
Speaker 1: see this guy Squallow? That was the most unnecessary, uninspiring
Speaker 1: political campaign of the twenty twenty cycle, and Stires like,
Speaker 1: hold my beer, he's going in. This is a billionaire
Speaker 1: super left wing whose main talking point is that he
Speaker 1: wants to impeach Trump. That's his number one that's his
Speaker 1: number one reason for existing. It seems he really, really
Speaker 1: really wants to impeach President Trump, as if somehow that's
Speaker 1: going to make everything better for everyone. I just I
Speaker 1: don't know what this guy thinks he's going to accomplish
Speaker 1: I do, though, to have to admit this. At least
Speaker 1: now there's a true billionaire on that stage. So when
Speaker 1: you know who the millionaires and the billionaires, he's gonna
Speaker 1: Bernie's gonna be able to throw side eye at Tom
Speaker 1: sty or left right, he'd be like billionaire, like that
Speaker 1: guy three people over to my left. That's right. Bernie's
Speaker 1: gonna have a billionaire to yell at on stage when
Speaker 1: he yells about millionaires and billionaires now, so he's got
Speaker 1: that going for him, which is nice. It is nice. Indeed,
Speaker 1: I've got a passing to tell you about here in
Speaker 1: a moment, team somebody from the political realm that you'll
Speaker 1: all know and get into that in just a moment.
Speaker 1: It's a sad day in American politics. X ross Pero
Speaker 1: passed away. He was eighty nine years old. He had
Speaker 1: had a five month long battle with leukemia. I don't
Speaker 1: know as much about ross Perot's career as I think
Speaker 1: i'd like to. I remember him mostly from when I
Speaker 1: was very young, and he was a subject of some
Speaker 1: humor and pop culture send ups of him, particularly the
Speaker 1: way that he was depicted on Saturday Night Live. That
Speaker 1: was back when Saturday Night Live tried to be a
Speaker 1: show that was just funny and wasn't a show that
Speaker 1: was pushing a left wing political agenda all the time.
Speaker 1: But Pero had an incredible business career, right He became
Speaker 1: a billionaire back in eighty four when General Motors bought
Speaker 1: Eds for nearly two point six billion dollars. He had
Speaker 1: an incredible, incredible private sector career. He also went to
Speaker 1: the Naval Academy. And this is a guy who you know,
Speaker 1: I'll be honest with you, I wish I'd spent a
Speaker 1: little more time reading into the ways of Pero. He
Speaker 1: did pretty well as a third party candidate. I remember that.
Speaker 1: I forget what the exact percentage was, but he was
Speaker 1: a guy who definitely moved the needle on American politics,
Speaker 1: and he seemed to have some very interesting ideas. And
Speaker 1: I have a feeling we may find out of the
Speaker 1: long run that he was in fact a something of
Speaker 1: a profit on some issues, particularly on the FED and
Speaker 1: monetary policy and the economy. I mean, he's he had
Speaker 1: some of his ideas. I think we're going to find
Speaker 1: out down the line, Well, we're more correct than we realized.
Speaker 1: At the time here just to give you a sense.
Speaker 1: I mean, here are some and this is courtesy of
Speaker 1: Jack Pisobic over at One America News, just a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of Ross Pero quotes. I think this is probably
Speaker 1: the best way to honor the man here on the
Speaker 1: show for a couple of minutes. So here are Ross piroisms.
Speaker 1: The budget should be balanced, the treasury should be refilled,
Speaker 1: the public debt should be reduced, and the arrogance of
Speaker 1: public officials should be controlled. Sign me up for all
Speaker 1: of that. A weak currency is the sign of a
Speaker 1: weak economy, and a weak economy leads to a weak nation. Yep,
Speaker 1: there are but two things worth living for to do
Speaker 1: what is worthy of being written, and to write what
Speaker 1: is worthy of being read. We've shipped millions of jobs overseas,
Speaker 1: and we have a strange situation because we have a
Speaker 1: process in Washington where after you've served for a while,
Speaker 1: you cash in and become a foreign lobbyist. On NAFTA,
Speaker 1: Ross Perro said, quote, you've wrecked the country with these
Speaker 1: kinds of deals. Sounds like somebody else we all know.
Speaker 1: Ross said also, quote, I've had wonderful parents and have
Speaker 1: a magnificent wife, I have great children. That's real wealth.
Speaker 1: Young people who make money their god are inevitably in
Speaker 1: for a big disappointment. That's that's true. And I know
Speaker 1: I'm saying that a lot of your saying Buck, where's
Speaker 1: your wife and kids? I'm working on it. I'm working
Speaker 1: on it. It's gonna happen. You guys will be among
Speaker 1: the hundreds of thousands of you across the country will
Speaker 1: be among the first to know. I promise. Ross also
Speaker 1: said debt is like a crazy aunt we keep down
Speaker 1: in the basement. All the neighbors know she's there, but
Speaker 1: nobody wants to talk about her. What's the most important
Speaker 1: thing you can tell me about leadership, I'd say, just
Speaker 1: treat people the way you'd want to be treated. I
Speaker 1: am not a legend, but I am a myth. I
Speaker 1: kind of like that. I learned no matter how poor
Speaker 1: people are, they are good people. And those are things
Speaker 1: you can't learn at Harvard Business School. I like this
Speaker 1: Ross Pero guy, and a lot of his stuff is good.
Speaker 1: A lot of his stuff makes a lot of sense
Speaker 1: to me. I would like to spend a little more
Speaker 1: time digging into it. Perhaps, but he used to light
Speaker 1: people just like Trump did right. He was kind of
Speaker 1: a little bit of a precursor to Trump in some ways.
Speaker 1: A few people say that today, and that's after hearing
Speaker 1: some of those liners and seeing some of the other stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, it wasn't that far. He wasn't that much different. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, being being willing to break with consensus and
Speaker 1: just speak the truth, as you know, it is a
Speaker 1: very powerful thing. Powerful for Ross Pero, powerful for Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: for a lot of people out there. Just say what
Speaker 1: you really think and let the people decide if you're right.
Speaker 1: Don't worry about what everybody else wants you to say. Um.
Speaker 1: I think that's a lesson that Donald Trump certainly took
Speaker 1: on for his campaign. And Ross Perow a life well lived.
Speaker 1: May he rest in peace and be with the Lord.
Speaker 1: Ain't no party like a Team Buck party. Because a
Speaker 1: Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned
Speaker 1: up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Indeed it is.
Speaker 1: It is time for the roll call. And very much
Speaker 1: appreciate the opportunity to share roll call with all of
Speaker 1: you Facebook dot com. Slash Buck Sexton. That is our
Speaker 1: roll call rallying cry. That's where you go if you
Speaker 1: want to send in thoughts for the show. And with that,
Speaker 1: my friends, let's get right to it, shall we. Let's
Speaker 1: do our thing, Keith Buckets. Simple men watch the majority
Speaker 1: of sports on TV, including women's beach bikini volleyball. The
Speaker 1: ratings for this highly skilled are very good, better than
Speaker 1: women's soccer. Ask your buddy Jesse Kelly what he thinks.
Speaker 1: But I know I'd be much more inclined to watch
Speaker 1: women's soccer if they were wearing bathing suits. Just a thought,
Speaker 1: my sexist shield is hi. Well, Keith, I know you
Speaker 1: know that some of the ladies in the audience right
Speaker 1: now are shaking their heads in disapproval at you. But
Speaker 1: I can tell you that the basic premise of the
Speaker 1: audience gets to decide what the audience wants to watch
Speaker 1: when we're talking about televised sports is correct, And as
Speaker 1: much as people may not like what the masses want
Speaker 1: to see, that doesn't really matter, and it cannot really
Speaker 1: matter if this is going to continue to be a business,
Speaker 1: if televised sports are going to be a the multi
Speaker 1: billion dollar business they they currently are. But yes, the
Speaker 1: women of the women's US national soccer team are are
Speaker 1: in fact for what they do overpaid relative to the men,
Speaker 1: and their share of the revenue that they generate with
Speaker 1: their team, with their labor. This is all rather straightforward stuff,
Speaker 1: but people make it much more complicated. Michael, right book.
Speaker 1: I'm always a little confused when you say you want
Speaker 1: to start to take calls again. How would that work?
Speaker 1: I don't get it. Well, Michael, it really depends on
Speaker 1: a few things going forward, about the how do I
Speaker 1: put this, what we stream on the show, what we
Speaker 1: do in terms of stations that are live, stations that
Speaker 1: are delayed. I would like to find a way though,
Speaker 1: to get more interactive calling going on, and maybe what
Speaker 1: we'll do, and we've discussed this before, you to set
Speaker 1: up a well, a voicemail. It's not quite the same
Speaker 1: because people can call and leave a voicemail, but then
Speaker 1: we don't get to discuss with them in real time
Speaker 1: on air. So we're open to ideas, Michael, We're open
Speaker 1: to ideas. That's not really an answer, but it's the
Speaker 1: best answer I can give you right now, Caroline, right hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I agree with your point that women in sports are
Speaker 1: fairly compensated. There is one sport where women are not
Speaker 1: segregated from men. NASCAR racing. Since its inception, one hundred
Speaker 1: and nine women drivers have qualified in NASCAR races, most
Speaker 1: notably Janet Guthrie, who beat Dale Earnhardt in the nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy six World six hundred. Women drivers are commensated by
Speaker 1: how many fans they attract and how many sponsors they get.
Speaker 1: Pure and simple, we don't need to see sexim a
Speaker 1: sexism where it just isn't. In fact, when Guthrie first raced,
Speaker 1: the announcer said, with all due respect to Janet Guthrie, gentlemen,
Speaker 1: start your engines. Now that Dannika Patrick on the track,
Speaker 1: They say, drivers, start your engines. Women are welcomed to
Speaker 1: the sport and receive equal treatment, all right, Because there
Speaker 1: are some There are some activities where there is no
Speaker 1: inherent male physiological advantage. Driving, I think it's fair to
Speaker 1: say is one of them. Although I did speak recently
Speaker 1: to a young NASCAR driver randomly, was talking to one
Speaker 1: at a party, and he told me that physical fatigue
Speaker 1: isn't very much a part of being a world class
Speaker 1: NASCAR driver, meaning that you need to be in shape,
Speaker 1: you need to train, you need to think of yourself
Speaker 1: as a professional athlete and not just a professional driver.
Speaker 1: People would say, oh golf, Well, no golf, there's still
Speaker 1: the strength of hitting the ball. You know, the men's
Speaker 1: drive versus the women's drive off the tee is a
Speaker 1: big difference, and that's strength based at some level. But
Speaker 1: pool billiards, men have no advantage in billiards over women. Shooting,
Speaker 1: I think at a depending on the specific sport. I mean,
Speaker 1: I was just at the range last weekend and saw
Speaker 1: a fair amount of women there who were just dead
Speaker 1: eye on target all the time. And that's very much
Speaker 1: a precision and technique based pursuit and not a brute
Speaker 1: strength and speed pursuit. Right, So there are some places
Speaker 1: where you're going to see men and women able to
Speaker 1: compete on an even playing field. It look at this
Speaker 1: isn't that complicated, folks. No one's saying that, you know,
Speaker 1: one gender is better or smarter than the other. We
Speaker 1: are saying that one gender tends to be larger, stronger
Speaker 1: and faster than the other, which is just biology. That's
Speaker 1: all we're That's all we're talking about, and that's why. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the under fifteen men's national team, so we're talking about
Speaker 1: thirteen and fourteen year old kids really handily beat the
Speaker 1: women's national professional soccer team. So that's a you know
Speaker 1: that that tells you a lot about the and that's
Speaker 1: just a physical difference issue. It's not a slide against
Speaker 1: the skills and the work ethic and of the female athletes.
Speaker 1: It's just men and women are different folks. You know,
Speaker 1: our society is pushing and pushing for us to forget that,
Speaker 1: but we shouldn't forget it. We can't forget it because
Speaker 1: it's the truth. Men and women are different. We have
Speaker 1: different biologies, we have different advantages and disadvantages as a
Speaker 1: function of our biology. This is just all legit, this
Speaker 1: is all reality. Gen rights, great show. I've been checked
Speaker 1: out of politics. Oh this is an old, old one.
Speaker 1: Sorry about that, Angela Buck. My daughter is gen z.
Speaker 1: I am gen X. She has some different views than mind,
Speaker 1: even though she is still a conservative. Thankfully she is
Speaker 1: registered Republican, so am I. My point is she brought
Speaker 1: up an interesting idea for us to vote in the
Speaker 1: Democratic primary. The question is should we vote for the
Speaker 1: more extreme that has the lesser chance to win the
Speaker 1: general election or vote for the one that scares us
Speaker 1: the least. We can vote because Virginia has open primaries.
Speaker 1: That's a very good question, and this is I think
Speaker 1: you could make a very a very strong argument in
Speaker 1: either direction. Do you want to vote for the louneiest
Speaker 1: loon so that that person. Look, no, one person's vote
Speaker 1: really matters. We all know that. But if you vote
Speaker 1: for the louneiest loon, you are sent You're hoping that
Speaker 1: person gets through. And then the idea is that Trump
Speaker 1: would crush that loon. Or you could vote for the
Speaker 1: least scary person. I guess for some people maybe that
Speaker 1: would be Biden. And I think the least scary is
Speaker 1: actually Delaney out of Maryland. I'll be honest with Delaney
Speaker 1: is not a frightening ideologue. He's somewhat reasonable on certain
Speaker 1: things and you could have a conversation with them, and
Speaker 1: he doesn't. He's not like, oh my gosh, climate change,
Speaker 1: we need a green new deal, all this crazy stuff
Speaker 1: you hear from people all the time. He's he's not
Speaker 1: a Delaney is not a crazy person. So that puts
Speaker 1: him in a different category than a lot of the
Speaker 1: other Democrats. Here we go here, Matthew Rights quick technical
Speaker 1: note on the Grand Your gut instinct was correct. It
Speaker 1: is a clip, not a magazine. The magazine is part
Speaker 1: of the gun, and you're loading an eight round U
Speaker 1: M block clip into the gun as always shields high. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Matthew. Yeah, I had I had a feeling
Speaker 1: that Grand is correctly called the clip. But then I
Speaker 1: second guess myself because I was on air when I
Speaker 1: was saying it. Um, but yeah, that makes sense to me.
Speaker 1: It is. It is a it looks like a clip,
Speaker 1: and you insert the whole thing into the magazine and
Speaker 1: the rifle. But then Grand is a lot of fun, man.
Speaker 1: I think it's got that's got some kick to it,
Speaker 1: some power. I did. I did very much enjoy the
Speaker 1: experience of fire. I'd never fired a Grand before. I'd
Speaker 1: never had that, that experience of fire and Grand. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to think of the most interesting thing I've ever
Speaker 1: I've ever fired. I mean, I don't know. I'd have
Speaker 1: to give it. I'd have to give it some thought. Um,
Speaker 1: let's see what we have here. We can go to
Speaker 1: see the thing is also if I said whatever, the
Speaker 1: most interesting thing was that I've ever fired a lot
Speaker 1: of people like Bluck. I've got one of those under
Speaker 1: the couch cushions. Come on, buddy, you know, yeah, I
Speaker 1: know this audience. You got a lot of real gun
Speaker 1: people out there who know their firearms. You know, they're collectors,
Speaker 1: they're enthusiasts, their marksmen. Blah blah, You're all amazing. I know,
Speaker 1: I know. So I'm from New York City. I'm not
Speaker 1: even allowed to have a pea shooter. I'm not even
Speaker 1: allowed to have a slingshot. All right. So it's a different,
Speaker 1: different world I've been operating in. And ever since I
Speaker 1: haven't been with the agency, I no longer have a
Speaker 1: professional excuse to go to a range and fire whatever
Speaker 1: the heck I want, which I used to be able
Speaker 1: to basically do. Sarah, I just wrote in ha ha
Speaker 1: ha Okay, Sarah, I'll take it. Hopefully I said something funny.
Speaker 1: Thanks for writing. Let's see, hey Buck, I'm about halfway
Speaker 1: through ben Mesrics Bitcoin Billionaires, absolutely fascinating As an ECON major,
Speaker 1: It's making me change the way I think about money
Speaker 1: and how it works. Moving forward to take Caraman the
Speaker 1: show is always awesome. Thank you, David. I really try.
Speaker 1: I want to dig into bitcoin and ethereum and some
Speaker 1: of these cryptocurrencies a bit more on the show, just
Speaker 1: from a from an economic and philosophical perspective, not from
Speaker 1: an investor perspective. But you know, I spoke to a
Speaker 1: friend recently who's a real evangelist for blockchain technology ethereum,
Speaker 1: and she's very, very smart, and she's totally on board
Speaker 1: for all this. So I want to do more. I
Speaker 1: would like to look into more. McKenzie writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I've been listening for about three years. Love your show,
Speaker 1: Keep it up. PS. You do help me, You do
Speaker 1: help me sleep at night. So I am a twenty
Speaker 1: four year old male to female. Do I have a
Speaker 1: good chance running for praise? People are crazy? Man? Well, McKenzie,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for listening to the show, and
Speaker 1: I appreciate that I'm able to keep you safe and
Speaker 1: warm at night. That's the plan. That's my duty, and
Speaker 1: I do my duty here on the show. But as
Speaker 1: for you running for president, I'm pretty sure you gotta
Speaker 1: be a little older than twenty four, so that's going
Speaker 1: to be a stumbling block. Diane. All right, Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: listening to your show right now. Wondering if you can
Speaker 1: comment on this. One of the liabilities of having our
Speaker 1: free societies that we can have communists and Marxists running
Speaker 1: for president of the United States. Since when did these
Speaker 1: ideologies become acceptable? They're completely incompatible the Constitution. I don't care,
Speaker 1: and I don't understand why we are accepting these candidates.
Speaker 1: Since when is communism acceptable? Why are they're trying to
Speaker 1: distort the country. I'm waking up, Diane. Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: free ideas means the freedom to have bad ideas, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: and there's a lot of that going onto this country.
Speaker 1: But I'll have to return to this one another day
Speaker 1: because they're giving me the wrap it up sign team,
Speaker 1: you have your orders until tomorrow. Schill Ti