WEBVTT - P&L: Be Skeptical of Eco Sentiment Data Before U.S. Election

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. All right, now,

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>someone that's going to make a smarter about the US

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>economy is Elena Shueteva, senior US economist to for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And well, okay, you can. It's always great to have you, Elena.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You know you're you're a little self deprecating yours. Yes,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about what it sounds like. You're not leaving,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are you alright? Because all right, tell me what happened.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>GDP two point nine print estimate was for two point

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>five big deal. Oh, these numbers are very encouraging in

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense that they do a highlight that growth has

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>rebounded in the second half of the year. So in

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that respect, it's it's very positive, but as always, you

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>need to look at the details, and the details to

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>us seem to be a little bit less encouraging. Although, um,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the bottom line from the report, let me

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just say that is that will provide comfort for the

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>FIT to raise rates in December, but the underlying details

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>might not necessarily mean that they will continue at a

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>very rapid pace in the next year, So they might

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have to continue only on a gradual pace next year.

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>The channet yell and send you an email. I mean

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that sounds earlier this year, right, we were talking about December. Correct, Well,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's take into some of those details that are

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>giving people comfort that the federal move for not too quickly.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at? So the details of the

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>reports showed considerable deceleration in consumer spending, which could be discouraging,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>could be encouraging. So it is discouraging because this is

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the biggest part of the economy and that is slowing

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>down considerably. On the other hand, that means less dependence

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>on consumer spending alone and some acceleration in other sectors

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. So diversification is always good, right. So

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you know, if you look at the details,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, you see that the inventories at its sixty

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>one basis points to growth in the third quarter, and

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the net exports at it eighties three basis points, so

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>together they account for half of that growth rate that

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the third quarter. But it's not good.

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't we want to be exporting more? And don't we

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>want to These numbers could be very volatile, and uh,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you really need to see several quarters of growth to

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>UM actually to see this is a sustainable kind of

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>growth in these sectors. Exports net exports could be distorted

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by the engine UM shipping company bankruptcy, so that could

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be something going on there and it might not be sustainable.

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Inventories is another wild card. We were talking about considerable

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>pickup in stockpiles and uh, you know this seems to

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>be UM not happening that inventories are going to contribute

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>uh quite a lot going forward, so to me it

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>seems unsustainable. So but overall for the year as a whole,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>h GDP needs to grow only by one point nine

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>percent in the fourth quarter to reach the fat target

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of one eight percent for for the years a whole,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So that seems to be attainable. Helena. We got new

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>home sales this week, we got durable goods orders, jobless claims, now,

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we got the g DP print is this up or

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>down week for the for the land of the economy.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So let me think it's always a always a mix.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We can say that everything's going along, everything is going

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on chug chugging along just fine. And next week we're

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get the payrolls report correct on Friday. Yes,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, not a big deal. But we care

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as the paces within the kind of the

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>same kind of range, it doesn't need to accelerate from here,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be fine. You know one fifty is

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>still fine. And you think that the market has already

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>baked in twenty five basis points that bonds, for example,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised. I was talking with Lisa earlier today

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>when we got the two point nine g d P report.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised that the bond market did not sell off.

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the same thing on the desk

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>actually earlier this morning. Um, well, as long as the

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>probability on the weird right uh days above. Yes, but

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think, I mean, we got the University of

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan survey of consumer confidence in this inflation expectation again

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we're back at that new low. Yes, but I tend

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to be very skeptical of the survey data ahead of

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the election. Okay, so any survey data ahead of the election,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you might want to wait until sentiment could be very

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>much distorted. Listen to the rhetoric that we're hearing Pale exactly.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's really like it happened before, Like the

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Michigan survey was distorted during the dead ceiling crisis back

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eleven, and so what nothing happened

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to consumer spending, So you have to be very careful

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>with sentiment numbers, both consumer and company sentiment. Elena Shugliatieva,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with a senior US

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>economist for Bloomberg Intelligence breaking down at the GDP report

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and why the bond market just doesn't seem to be

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>responding right now A tenure U S Treasury is pretty

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>much flat at one point eight five percent. This all right,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>let's solve the quandary of oil and the price of oil.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Joining us is our expert, yes, Vincent Piazza. He is

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the senior US oil and Gas analyst four Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure to see you. Thank you. I was

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at X on today stock is down more than

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent. I was looking at Chevron stock is up

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more than three percent. What's going on between these two companies. So,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the broad narrative today is that output growth

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>continues to be a challenge for both UM and today

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>it seems output growth is more of a challenge for

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>x On relative to Chevron. With the broader takeaway, the

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>broader narrative is output growth continues to be a challenge.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The cap X decline with the spending decline that we've

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>seen since the price decline from a couple of years ago,

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is impacting the ability for resource capture. So lower output, Yes,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>spending is down, but the the ability to book the

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>resource UH is challenging as well. The tailwind that refining

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>was during the price decline has now become a headwind.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So the outsized gains, the over earning from the refining business,

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the downstream business, the chemical business now becomes more of

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a tail wind for both entities. Now, Exxon did say

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that because of these lower prices UH, it may have

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at impairing some of these reserves

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in North America to the tune of roughly eighteen or

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>t UM and that is a headwind for them. For Chevron,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>UM sentiment coming into the quarter was somewhat murky. Uh.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>They came out with a modest uh level of output

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>UM year over year, and they did provide guidance for

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>December output. So for four Q output slightly higher relative

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to three Q UH so UM modestly more positive for Chevron,

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>less less so for Exxon. But remember what these businesses are, right,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they are integrated networks. Uh So they are more defensive.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>They are lower beta equities because of this, less volatile

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>earnings and cash flow stream. So during a price recovery,

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you want leverage to the upstream, the more direct exposure

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to the price recovery, and not these integrated platforms where

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they're downstream the chemicals and refining business tends to offset

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>any benefit from a higher price in the upstream piece.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go back to Chevron. I mean,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>they've posted their first profit in a year and seem

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more upbeat, and their shares are up almost

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>first is fourteen percent less than that thirteen percent gain

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>year to date for Exxon. What's Chevron doing to gain

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>investors confidence more than at least Exon. Well, I think

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's relative sentiment as well, right, So coming into

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the year better sentiment for Exxon relative to Chevron, and

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Chevron is outperforming that lower sentiment, right, so under promise

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over deliver in a sense. And for Chevron this quarter

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you had some issues with uh some downtime and Nigeria unrest,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so that hurt volume as well. UM. For Exxon, the

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one uh, the one item this quarter that probably has

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>longer near term effects is this issue of the reserve bookings,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>any potential impairments um come the close of the year. Okay,

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>So taking a bigger step back, X and Chevron, they

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>both delivered their earnings. Uh. Do they give a better

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>sense of what they expect as far as oil prices

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the year ahead. Well, I think everyone else. Uh,

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 1>they are perplexed. It's it's a challenging environment out there. Uh.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The the potential OPEC cuts UM also may impact them

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>because they are partners as well, and how much of

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that cut they would have to take on is uncertain. Uh.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Exxon said that on their call today. So, UM, there

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is as much uncertainty UM that they see as the

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the the upstream player here in the US. UM. And

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so we are in the midst of a younger recovery UM,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>there are still challenges ahead. UM. We're probably oversupplied by

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>roughly a million barrels. UM. We need to see that

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sustainable demand growth to sort of truncate those imbalances, but

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that remains to be seen. OPEC. We need to get

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>some clarity as to what type of agreement there really is.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>If there is an agreement, UM, and that will give

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>us some additional clarity, but that remains a very big

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>unknown and that will be the driver, uh for that

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>will forge any type of price recovery from from the

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>From this point, Vincent Piazza, you are not only just

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>an expert in terms of the macro oil stuff, but

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of balance sheet and understanding how companies work.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Can we just talk for about about a moment of

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow from these because these are dividend pairs right,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly, And you know we've been through this with BP,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with that terrible thing in the Gulf of Mexico, the

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a condo. Well, I mean, when you monkey with the

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what you changed rather the dividend, right, that's going to

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>change your investor base, right, And that's a very good point.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about shareholder engagement, So shareholder engaged engagement is

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>through the dividend and is also through shrry purchases. Okay,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and you fund those sherry purchases and that dividend through

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>your free cash flow, and it sometimes you borrow forward

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, the dividend yield for Chevron and Exxon

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is three and four percent. The average dividend yield for

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>an SMP company is around somewhere around two percent. You're

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>owning it for that capital repatriation um and for EXCEN

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll throw off somewhere around four or five billion or

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow this year um. Chevron will still be

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in a negative cash flow, so they're still they are

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>borrowing to pay that dividend UM. But in general that

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>remains the key that shareholder engagement because these are lower beta,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>less volatile investments relative to the capital appreciation you would

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>see from an upstream player. So real quick, I want

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the idea that XN may have

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to write its reserves off by why haven't they done

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>so yet? Well, you do that throughout the you do

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that from year to year. Once you once you have

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a full twelve year period and you're able to take

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the average of those individual twelve months to make that

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>final cut off for the for the for for that

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year period. So in other words, there could be

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of realized losses across the industry. Well, we've

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>seen this last year as well for the upstream players. UM,

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is not a new phenomenon. I think it's

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the size that has some UM concerned. UM and it

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>probably has led to some of the under underperformance relative

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to Chevron today. Thank you so much. Got it? Vincive Piazza,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>senior US oil and Gas analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, breaking

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>down the tail of two oil companies of Exxon which

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is losing value of versus Chevron, which is gaining an

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>oil certainly being one of the driving factors pim behind

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>expectations of inflation going forward, oil sort of hovering around

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>forty nine dollars a barrel, still in that fifty two

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar barrel range. I don't know what it will take

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for us to break out of this. Perhaps Vincent Piazza

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>knows in his his seat, uh, And Lisa bramwoits, I'm

0:13:45.040 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>here with pim Fox. This is Bloomberg. I would like

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about what to do with money, particularly

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy two billion dollars which is how much will Being

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can Trust overseas. And Tony Roth, chi's chief chief investment

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>officer at Willman can Trust, is responsible with coming up

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with a strategy. So Tony, I want to start with cash.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We're hearing a lot about people who are hoarding larger

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>stockpiles of cash to capitalize on the market. What it

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>turns is that what you're doing now, we we think

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that the market is already turning. Lisa, by the way,

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me today to you, and Tim Um

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's great to speak with you. We think the market

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually already in the process of turning, and we

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that cash is better put to work today

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>unless it's earmark for very short term purposes. We can

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>see that, UM, when we look at the global economy,

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at oil stability, inflation, stronger dollar change, in the

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>commodity supercycle. UM, there's a lot of opportunity in the

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>market right now. We're preconstructive, so we'd rather see that

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cash put to work. Where are you putting it to

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>work right now? Well, we like emerging markets, UM. So

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the commodity supercycle, and if you look at

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>UM measures like the CRB raw industrials and decks, for example,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>which moves very closely with the emerging markets UM. It's

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>been moving upwards UM since about February, and we think

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the merging markets are going to continue to see UM

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>an upward trend. UM credit and equity. Credit and equity

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>are just uh, how how exactly you're going about that? Yeah, yeah,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>credit and equity. So UM China for example, has been

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a real underperformer. And when you think about the two

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>draw downs that we had in the market over the

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen months, UM August and then uh January February

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, right, really triggered by China. And we think

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that China has really gotten ahead of its problems in

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of the credit bubble and in terms of its

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>management of its currency. So there's a good opportunity I

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think in the Chinese equity market right now, UM and

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>more broadly UM Partuity believe with respect of the consumed

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>commodity consumers which haven't had as big a rally as

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the commodity producers like Russia and Brazil, etcetera. Tony, I'm

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you feel that it's a small contradiction that

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies are venturing outside of China to acquire assets.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They seem to want to buy almost everything that is

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not nailed down. And particularly you had the purchase I

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>believe of insurance the Waldorf Historic Hotel group, and then

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>most recently you've had you know, Chinese investment in the

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>United States in a variety of industries, had the Genworth

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Financial deal this week. Absolutely listen to. China has a

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital, So why would that be wanting to

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>go out of the country if it's such a good

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>deal to have it in the country. Well, one of

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the things to remembers that the Chinese currency is clearly

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on a trajectory of appreciation. So if you're a Chinese company, right,

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can't a choir skills and capabilities UM that

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you can mirror inside China by buying foreign companies UM,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can head your currency exposure and diversify your

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>revenue streams. That can make a lot of sense from

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of the US based investor that's looking for appreciation. Certainly,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>UM to the extent we have the ability to hedge

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>currency exposure in China, UM, it's probably how we would

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>invest in today's market. Going back to the idea of

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>energy prices, and where they are currently. KKR Credit Co

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had nat Zeka spoke with Bloomberg's Eric Shasker yesterday and

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>basically said that KKR is selling a lot of its

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>distressed debt holdings and a lot of its energy related

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>holding salk in gains so far. Why are they wrong? Well,

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>if we look at what's happening, the US is now

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the spling energy producer in the world, right, So number one,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we see a trajectory where we're still um dropping in

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of US production. So production is down about eleven

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent from the peak, and while we've

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>seen a little bit of a rebound and recounts, we're

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>still massively down around se down from the peak and

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a big lag effect. So when we see that

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that US as a swing producer is still

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>dropping from a production standpoint, And on top of that,

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at the fact that ARAMCO write the big

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>spotty UM state Energy Enterprise oil enterprise is gonna have

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>an I p O sometime in the next twelve to

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months, and maybe a very strong incentive keeping the

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>oil price upward as well. UM those are all fairly

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>strong UM supports for the oil price. On top of that,

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the g d P number today, right two

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>point nine percent. So we see not just in the

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, but even in the US, we see strengthening

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>global global activity, which is going to be further aided

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and embedded by what I call step back from monetary insanity. Right, so,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had, you know, a broad practice of monetary insanity

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>across the globe. I think that UM, central banks are

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna start to step back from that in the next

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, much more quickly than we've anticipated, and that's

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going to help stabilize the environment as well. Is that

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be bullish for commodity stocks? And if so,

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>do you want to buy commodity stocks that do business

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world like Freeport mcmuran, or do you want

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:17.479
<v Speaker 1>to focus on domestic players. I do think that UM,

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be helpful for commodities. I do think

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've turned the cycle on commodities. UM it's going

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a slow process. UM We're not going to

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>see an aggressive growth trajectory for commodities. But I do

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think that materials, for example, in the US, has really

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not done well recently, and I think that there's a

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>mean reversion opportunity for commodities, domestic commodity stocks UM, So

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that either way to play, it is actually

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be UM, whether it be domestic companies or

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>UH emerging market companies, etcetera, foreign producers. I think they're

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>both going to do fairly well over the next two

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to three years. And again, it only can trust for

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>long term investors. So I'm not looking to trade, if

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you will, on the most recent data point, but we're

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for the the trend, and we do see this

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>trend in the commodity space. So Tony switching asset classes

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at bonds. If you think that stocks

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to do well broadly, is your sense that

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>developed market government bonds are going to do badly? And

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if so, how badly? We think they'll do badly on

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a relative basis. So if you think about where to

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>look for income, right, we think the dividend in today's environment, right,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which is right, bonds are still have significantly negative real

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>yields and so while we're not that concerned about the

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>credit side of the bond market, we are very concerned

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about the rate side, and so we would prefer pick

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>up income UM and MLPs dividends UM. To some degree,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the municipal bond market will always stay a little bit

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>underweight there UM today UM relative to our strategic acid allocation.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>But UM we would stay away from UM. You know,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>any kind of duration over five years in today's environment.

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>We don't expect to see a complete normalization of the

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>rate environment in the next year or two. Right. We

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to see clearly a hike now

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in December. I think that's pretty much consensus UM, but

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>also two hikes next year. UM. That'll leave us around

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>UM once a fee or so on the policy rate UM,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and it'll leave room for a little bit more rate

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>rate hiking. But we're not going to end up at

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a police rate of three percent or so anytime soon.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>So we don't see a huge shift UM in the

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>rate environment. UM. That's gonna crush bonds, but we don't

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think that they're particularly attractive with durations over five years.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony Roth, thank you, Chief investment officer, Wilmington's Trust, managing

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy two billion dollars. I'm pim Fox along with Lisa Abramowitz.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Well, it's not hard to imagine what

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>happens when you're in a business that is competing on

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>price and is also looking at record infant tory in

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>some cases, I want to bring in Mike Jackson. He

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is the chief executive of Auto Nation. He joins us now.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Jackson, thanks very much for being with us, My pleasure.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. All right. So, you know, if if I had,

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if I had a way to console you, I would

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you've been through a little bit of

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a trial by fire here. The stock is down I

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>believe about three and a half percent today, it's down

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. Uh, you're in a tough business

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to find new ways to invigorate the

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>automobile retail business. You're opening standalone used car outlets. Tell

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>me what's going on with the business and how you're surviving. Well.

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>We understand that the new vehicle business is cyclical, uh,

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in one of three phases, growth, plateau, and decline. Years ago,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we said we wanted to have a way to grow

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>when this marketplace plateau. So we launched the Auto Nation

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>brand from coast to coast. It's been very well accepted

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and trusted by consumers, and we launched the Auto Nation Express,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>our digital capability from which we get of our business today.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>So now we're spanning dramatically into the pre owned and

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>UH customer care business, building free center UH, freestanding service

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and sales centers UH within our markets, which will be

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>under the brand Auto Nation, and in order to have

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a compelling value story and a good experience for our

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>customers in those centers, UH, they will all be one

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>price on the pre owned vehicles, and we will launch

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto Nation parts and accessories in these centers and also

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>offer those parts and accessories in our franchise business. So

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as I look at it now, we're the largest retailer

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of premium luxury vehicles in the US, with almost a

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred premium luxury franchises including Mercedes, Ben's, BMW, Porsche across America.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>We have a very large franchise volume business, and now

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we will have freestanding pre owned sales and service centers

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>across our footprint. You know, we were talking to Bob

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Shanks yesterday UH CFO of Ford, and he was talking

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about how the cycle is maturing. UM. From your perspective,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about plateau ng in the auto industry, what's

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the risk and how can you measure it? Of a

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>potential significant downturn in auto values and in appetite for

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>new for new vehicles. So once the industry enters the

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>plateau phase, it can run many years. There. We've gone

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 1>five six years in plateau, and if I look at

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the availability of credit and the cost of money and

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the price of gasoline, we are in an extended period

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a plateau. But ultimately a declient will come, but that

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would take much higher rates or restriction of credit compared

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to what we have today. So but even in plateau,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a challenge to us as a company to have

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the ambition to still grow. And hence we've built a

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>brand and hence we've built this digital capability that we're

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>now extending a new business field. So we have the

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to continue to grow just quickly. Mike the as

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Lisa was saying, having to do with the fourth CFO,

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any area of the country that is a better or worse,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>any particular product that's better or worse, give you about

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seconds. Well, we can go right to what's the

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>most difficult part of the country, and that would be

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the energy markets, whether it's Colorado or Texas or up

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>into Oklahoma. While it's stabilized. It's stabilized at a lower level,

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and um, those are the most difficult markets. The two

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>coasts are doing fine. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.