WEBVTT - Microsoft CEO on Productivity and Dreamforce in San Francisco

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I met Ludlow in New York in Family

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Chang this is Bloomberg technology. Coming up in the next

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>hour Bloomberg's conversation with Microsoft's CEO Sacha Adela and Linkedin

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>CEO Ryan Ross Lanski, about monitoring productivity and why Nodela

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is so confident about approval from Microsoft's acquisition of activision.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard plus Mark Benioff is throwing dream force the biggest

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>convention to hit San Francisco since the pandemic began. The

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tech team was also on site and asked Benni

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>off about his future at salesforce and the economy and

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>impossible foods joins the climate pledge to reduce combon emissions

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to net zero by I'll ask CEO Pete McGuinness about

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the role his company's playing in the global warming battle.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that in a moment, but first let's

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>get a look at the markets. And we had a

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>tech tumble following Wednesday's fed rate rice. Joining us all

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to break it all down. Bloomberg's Katie Gryfeld. Hi Katie, hi,

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and well, I have good news and bad news. The

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>good news is that I think we're on set together

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever, so that's huge. The bad

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>news is that it was a terrible day in the

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>stock market. Like you said, that hangover from the Fed

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday continued. You could see it in the NAZAC

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one hundred, those big tech stocks at index falling over

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Chips also taking a beating out, underperforming down

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>almost three percent, and it was the riskier parts of

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the market that really took it on the chin the

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>most of you look at these unprofitable tech basket down

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>almost five percent today. All this coming in a backdrop

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of higher and getting higher treasury yields. You'll of the

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>two year treasury yield right there, raising another seven basis points.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Is traitor suggest to an ever more hawkish fed. And

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>let's look what that relationship looks like. If you look

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at the two year yield versus stocks, you're looking against

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred. You can see that. For a

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>while actually these two were rising together, but now is

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that two year treasury yield continues and continues to climb.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>You're starting to see that reevaluation going on in the

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>broader stock market and the SP five hundred nearing its

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>lows from earlier in the summer. But let's talk about

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the specific single names you have on the

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>board here. Some of the travel names taking a beating today.

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about expedia and AIRBNB, bulls falling as recession

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>fears continue to build. You did see alphabet shares rise

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and activision blizzard, like you were saying,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at Microsoft saying that they're still confident that that purchase

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>will go through. All right, let's walk a little bit

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about more about that now. Thanks, Katie. Employee say they're

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>productive at work, but leaders say they're not so sure.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>This according to new data released by Microsoft and linked in.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is also releasing a new suite of productivity tools

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to facilitate better interaction between workers and their bosses to

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>combat what Microsoft CEO sat in Adel Calls the productivity

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>paranoia paradox. Bloomberg's Emily Chang spoke with him about all

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this and more, along with Linkedin CEO Ryan Ross Lanski,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. Take listen to what they had to say.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>This productivity paranoia, as we describe it. It's one of

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that's emerging where the managers and the leaders

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think that their employees are not productive, as employees feel

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're being very productive and in many cases even

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>feel burned out. So I think one of the most

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>important things for us in this new world of work

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and hybrid work is to bridge this paradox in some sense,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because we have to figure out because both sides need

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Employees feel that they are thriving and

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they need to thrive. That means they need to really

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>feel a sense of empowerment, they need to have that

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of energy to do meaningful work. And, after all,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>as a leader and as a manager, what do you need?

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You need your employees to thrive. So I think we

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>need both new soft skills and managerial skills to make

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that happen, but you also absolutely need new tools. Now, Ryan, Microsoft,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of those tools, is offering several products. You've got

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>viva goals to help align workers with the business, Viva

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>pulse to get a better sense of how employees are feeling.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>There's engaged, there's amplified to encourage interaction and communication. How

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>do you think these tools, Ryan, are unique to the

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>products that are already out there. Well, I think you know,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>on on the via side, at the end of the day,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want the productive workforce, the most important thing,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost is that you empower the individual to

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be productive. Secondly, do you understand that an individ vidual

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work alone? They need to collaborate, so ensuring they

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have the tools to collaborate as well. And on the end,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>now a new really important skill managers need is to

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ensure the well being of their employees and I think

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Viva suite brings that together. Then

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're able to leverage a lot of what we

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>see on Linkedin to help inform that. There is a

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>ton of uncertainty obviously happening in the world. You know,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the last time, I think we spoke and maybe eighteen

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>months ago, we were seeing across the linkedin data an

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented amount of movement happening in the labor market. We

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>saw employees everywhere not only questioning how and where they work,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but why they work, and it was leading to what

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>we call the great reshuffle. We're actually seeing that now

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>start to come down a little bit. Actually, for the

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>first time in eighteen months, the year. Your trend and

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>people changing jobs on Linkedin is flat. So things are

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to settle right now, but it's entering into a

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>new period of uncertainty. SATIA, in the early days of

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, you expressed your concerns that we were burning

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>social capital by spending so much time away from the office.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you finding now, I'm curious about your personal experience,

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are you finding now that you were right, that that

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this has come at a cost to social capital and

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be rebuilt? Yeah, no, there's no question

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that Um, social capital needs to be rebuilt. But the

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing, emily, I think we all also learned is

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>how to build social capital in a variety of ways.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the things, even during the pandemic, I personally

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>learned is I met more people. For example, on a

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>team's call, I would click on the profile of every

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>person in the meeting learned so much more about them. Uh,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and now when I see them in person, I know

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like I know them much more deeply.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>So I think I picked up a new skill of

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how to build social capital and that's going to remain

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with us. But to your other point, even in fact,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the data points that in the work trends

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>index we talked about, is people come to work for

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>other people, not because of some policy, and so that,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, should teach us as leaders something which is you,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as a leader now should develop the soft skill to create,

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially those events which allow you to bring people together

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with other people in order to be able to accomplish

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are important for your workplace. So to me,

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that social capital will always be important and

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we have learned maybe some new skills and

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the old skills that were there. I think

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be really, really learned by all of

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>us and exercised in different ways about depending on the team.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a big debate happening right now about remote work surveillance,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least that's what the critics call it, satia.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>What's your point of view on companies that think they

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>need to track their employees through technology and whether Microsoft's

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>products or tools should enable that? No, first of all,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think any product, including all of our products, have

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to be built ensuring that privacy, privacy regulation, privacy laws

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>by country are all built right into the product. So

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>let's start with that. But if you sort of say

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what are all these tools for? Ultimately, for the business?

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>These tools are about really helping their employees thrive, because

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the only way of business is successful and productive is

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if employees feel that sense of empowerment, that sense of

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>energy and connection for the company's mission and are doing

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>meaningful work. And so to me it's not about surveillance,

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more about helping employees thrive. That needs to be

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the goal, goal of even using these tools. Satya, inflation

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is at a record high. We heard Ryan mentioned the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>word uncertainty several times. One of your executives recently at

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a Goldmen conference, said it's the most uncertain economic environment

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in decades. How would you describe the level

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty you are seeing right now and how that's

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>impacting your outlook? Yeah, I mean the constraints are real. Um,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, inflation, Um is definitely all around us, uh,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and different parts of the world have different type of

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, but the constraints, I think, are being felt

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>by everyone. So to me, I always go back emily

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to the point that in an uncertain time, in an

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>inflationary time, software is the deflationary force. So to me,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>staying super focused as a company ensuring that our customers

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are able to do more with less. I think is

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be the key thing that we have to

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>accomplish in the quarters ahead. So, in terms of outlook,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I am optimistic about Microsoft's value proposition helping our customers.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm optimistic about our share, but we're not immune from

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>anything that is a macroeconomic headwind. But we go into

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>this with knowing that fully well that the digital skills

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we have, the digital products we have and software fundamentally

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably going to be the most useful tool that

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>will help us tame inflation where because it's a deflationary force.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So Tim Cook told me apple is going to be

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more deliberate about spending as the macro economic crisis continues.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe Microsoft's strategy and if you are

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be more conservative, how much longer do you

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>plan to be more conservative? Yeah, I mean two points.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>One is we've grown a lot in the sense in

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>last year we grew seventy plus thousand people joined Microsoft.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So I do think we are going to be more deliberate.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>When I said what does that deliberate mean? It means

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>wherever we need to grow, we will grow. Where we

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>need to be more productive, which is everywhere, we will

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be also, in fact, taking the same medicine, which is

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>doing more with less. So I think it's a great opportunity,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, for us at Microsoft to practice what we preach,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>which is to be able to make sure that we

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>take the seventy people, make them feel part of Microsoft's

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>purpose and mission, really help us improve our culture because

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of all the things that they can contribute to our workplace.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, we have many businesses that are

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really doing super well and we'll continue to grow. But

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we will also be looking at what the macroeconomic situation is.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But I feel very confident that between the productivity gains

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as the growth we will have, we'll be

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>able to navigate the waters. Bryan, tech stocks have taken

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a beating. You know, Microsoft, as as Satia said, has

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not been immune to this. This is a key way

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that tech companies have retained their employees by the the

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the attraction of equity. How do you see Microsoft and

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>other companies coping with this? It's really about attracting people

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>who align with the mission and vision of what it

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is you're trying to build. You think about Linkedin when

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>we build great products, people get jobs, they start companies,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they learn new skills. We sit at the intersection of

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what I call doing good and doing well and that's

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a very empowering thing to our employees who want to

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>come and work on something like Linkedin that can have

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>such an amazing, uh and productive and, uh you know,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>valuable impact on professionals globally. So I see you know

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we recently just reiterated and revisited uh and enhanced our

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>culture and guys of our company to ensure that we

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>have the right foundation to attract the right employees moving forward.

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, I just really feel this strong move in

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the world towards uh culture and values being more important

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>than it ever has, especially to attract the right talent

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>your company. So, Satia, one more on this and then

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll move on. But you know, we know Microsoft won't

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be filling some open roles. You've already said that you're

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>eliminating some contractor positions, but give us a sense of

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the scope. Well, some of the key priorities like Azure

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>or security be impacted? No, I mean our core businesses

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>were of Microsoft cloud, whether security or our infrastructure, data

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and AI businesses, which is what predominantly is represented in

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Asia or Microsoft. Five, our dynamics. Six. Five. These are

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>massive growth businesses on a very large base. So there's

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be growth all around them, but it's all

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be about what roles have to grow. As

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, our job nuvel one is to make sure

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that the growth we've had is all sort of landing

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>in a very productive way to drive the business is

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Even when it comes to our consumer businesses,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we want we know that. You know with windows and

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>with our PC there was definitely a pull forward, but

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we just launched a new release of windows eleven because

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at some level now it's about being able to take

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that one plus billion installed base and making the experience better.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So we have some fantastic opportunities. There are browsers growing share,

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>our gamings growing share, so we're going to double down. Obviously,

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Ryan talked about Linkedin. Again, we're not immune to the

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomic headwinds, but in every one of the businesses there

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are pockets of growth and that's where we will double down.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, since you're joining us from London, on

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different topic, I have to ask you know,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft seemed to be expecting more regulatory scrutiny of the

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>activision deal in the UK, but they've just said they're

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going to escalate their investigation. Have you been surprised by

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the level of concern that regulators there have expressed? When

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at that, fundamentally we think that are sort

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of entry for us in gaming. We have one goal,

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which is to bring more games to more gamers on

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>all platforms and provide more choice for publishers everywhere and

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>developers everywhere. Uh, and so everything that we're doing with

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>our content, with our sub our cloud and community really

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is about driving that choice and that opportunity, and so

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we feel very, very confident. Of course, any acquisition of

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the size will go through scrutiny, but we feel very,

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>very confident that will come out. You know, we are

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>number four, number five, depending on how you count, in gaming.

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the number one player, in this case Sony,

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, even in this period, has acquired three companies.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So if this is about competition, let us have competition.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That was Microsoft CEO sat in Nodella and Linkedin CEO

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Ris Lanski, speaking with our very own Emily Chang

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Millions of people turned to twitch daily to

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>watch live stream videos. That includes predators exploiting kids through

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the site. Will share more that my colleagues investigation into

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which this is Bloomberg and eye opening. Bloomberg report is

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>shedding light on some dangers on the popular livestream platform twitch. Twitch,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>which is owned by Amazon and touts thirty one million

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>daily visitors, is one of the most popular platforms for Gamers.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg reported that a network of child predators have used

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the platform to track children. Bloomberg Cecilia Denastasio, covers the

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>video game industry and broke this story. Cecilia, what did

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you learn in the course of your reporting? Twitch says

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't allow children under thirteen to use the platform. However,

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>unlike streaming competitors, there are relatively few barriers preventing children

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from getting on the APP. Bloomberg found that there are

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people out there, over two thousand of them, who stramatically

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>follow accounts that seem to belong to children on the platform,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and around two dred and eighty thousand accounts that apparently

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>belong to children were targeted this way, according to our research.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Sec I want to bring up the statement from the company,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>from twitch, and I'll read it to you. Preventing child

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>harm is one of our most fundamental responsibilities as a society.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>We do not allow children under thirteen to use twitch

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and preventing our service from being used for harm is

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>one of our biggest priorities. We know that online platforms

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can be used to cause harm to children and we

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have made extensive investments over the last two years to

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>better stay ahead of bad actors and prevent any users

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>who maybe under thirteen from accessing twitch. So they underline

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the policy, which is no one under the age of

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>thirteen can use the platform. What do we know about

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how twitch moderates that monitors the use of the platform?

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Sure so. Twitch is a live streaming platform and, unlike

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>platforms like youtube, where videos are recorded, it's very challenging

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to moderate live video because it's happening in real time,

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>especially for child sexual abuse material Um. Twitch is figuring

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out solutions to a problem on the fly, and it's

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a problem that not a lot of other platforms face

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>at the scale that twitch does, and so twitch has

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>quadrupled its Law Enforcement Response Team over the last two years.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Twitch has done a lot of resources into preventing Um

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>children from getting on twitch and from streaming however, Bloomberg's

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>report has found that these solutions have fallen short and

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem has been exacerbated over the pandemic exaspected over

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic this this is an issue that we've covered

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in the show. Across the industry, social media platforms, online

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms generally speaking, what are regulators doing, I suppose at

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>federal level, to tackle this issue? It's a very challenging

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>issue to tackle. One thing that is being paid at

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>ten shoot attention to right now, of course, is advertising

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to children on these platforms. There's a lot of resources

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>being dedicated to preventing children from UM receiving messages from

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>companies when they are not age appropriate to receive those messages.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to moderation, it's a multi pronged issue

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that is highly technical and a lot of the time

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are the ones left in charge of moderating

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>their own platforms. Your pole is out. What happens next?

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the response? The response has been very large from

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the twitch community Um and from people who, you know,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>watch their favorite gamers livestream on the platform, and some

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of these gamers themselves have commented that this Um, that

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this is unacceptable for the company Um, through which they

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>make a living. However, twitch itself has not made a

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>move to change some of the features that have enabled

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>predators to find and target children on the platform, so

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's to be seen whether that will happen. All Right, Bloomberg,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Cecilia Denis Sassio, thank you. Meta platforms has been sued

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>for Skirting Apple Privacy rules in a proposed class action

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit filed in San Francisco Federal Court to facebook. Users

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>claim the company built a secret workaround two apples privacy

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>rules and violated state and federal laws limiting unauthorized collection

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of personal data. Bloombergs learned that the Securities and Exchange

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Commission is set to let Wall Street keep payment for

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>order flow deals. According to sources, the practice can involve

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>one brokerage routing retail stock trade orders to another firm

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for execution rather than onto a brokerage or exchange. Backers

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>say it's led to commission free trading, championed by Robin Hood,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>but critics question whether the trade is actually get the

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>best price. All this is part of an SEC overhaul

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of stock trading rules. Amazon's first Thursday night football game

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the season drew an audience of thirteen million viewers.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That's according to data from measure measurement firm Nielsen, which

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>suggests that NFL fans across the US could find the

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>game last Thursday. That's despite it not being available on

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>TV nationwide. Amazon's guaranteeing advertisers it's exclusive coverage will reach

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more than twelve million viewers per game, but that's down

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from the sixteen point four million tuning in on Thursday

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>nights last year across Fox, the NFL network and Amazon.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed Ludlow in New York.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Dream Force is back in San Francisco and it's the

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest convention to hit the tech capital since the pandemic era.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Thousands heading to the annual salesforce conference, including Bloomberg Technologies

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang. She sat down with salesforce chair and CO

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>CEO Mark Nil Stalk about his next steps. To have

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>forty folks here in San Francisco in the new mascony

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>center is beautiful. Every hotel is sold out from here

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to San Jose. Every AIRBNB is sold out. It's amazing

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're all having such a good time and and

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>learning about technology. And learning about how to connect with

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>our customers in a new way using sales worth. We're

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit about the state of the

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>city in a moment. At first, you announced new profitability

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>goals yesterday, long term profitability, aiming for adjusted operating margin

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in what makes you feel so ambitious in a downturn? Well,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you probably saw this quarter we delivered seven point seven billion.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>It was larger than in an S A P, a

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>company that you know we both admire so greatly. But

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>now we're the largest enterprise APPS company in the in

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the world. That's very exciting, and so we have the

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>highest revenue and now we want to have very strong

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>margins and we've taking a goal that when we get

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to fifty billion, which is right around the corner, we

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>will have operating margin. So you're also doing these carbon offsets,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>which is fairly unique, more net zero offerings. Do you

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>see this as philanthropy or do you see real revenue

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>generated from the carbon accounting market? Well, I think that

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>when you think about a modern business today, you have

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to have great revenue, you have to have a great margin.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You also have to look at your overall capital allocation.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>We're buying back ten billion dollars of our stock. We

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just promoted our lead director, Robin Washington. But when you

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the values of a company today, trust, customer success, Innovation, quality.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We've spoken about all of those emily for a decade

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>or more. Now we're talking about sustainability. Everybody has a

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>personal story about the environment. Everybody knows what's happening. So

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>every company needs to go net zero, and so we

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have a new net zero cloud, we have a net

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>zero market play, we have the ability to help all

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of our customers go net zero. This is extremely important

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and we even started, you know, our trillion tree program

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one t dot Org. We made phenomenal progresses. Is Very

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>important that we get a trillion trees. We need to

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sequester two gigatons of carbon and we need to energize

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>an EGO Preneura Revolution. And we can do all that

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and we are doing it here at dream. Worse meantime,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy is in a major slop. You've got record inflation,

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>rising rate hikes and ongoing war. How concerned are you

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>about the outlook and your level of uncertainty? What do

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you see? Well, what I see is that we just

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>went through a pandemic. Uh, and, I know we talked

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot during the pandemic for a couple of years

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was tough for a lot of folks, including

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>me and you were at home a lot of the

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>time trying to run our daily businesses and make things happen,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and the government invested a lot into the market. And

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>now we're coming out of the pandemic and I think

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>those e commerce charts that we see a lot are

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>great metaphors, you know, the ones that go like in

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, out of the pandemic. But if you connect

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>e commerce from ten years ago to today, the chart

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is still quite up until the right. It's just that

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you had two years in the pandemic. So I think

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy is normalizing, the world is normalizing, currencies are

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>quite aggressively fluctuating. We've been talking about that since May

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think, look, what do I know? This

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>is my first pandemic, but in the future I know

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that after a pandemic you're gonna have some adjustment period.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Meta and Google are just the latest companies cutting jobs.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Tim Cook. He said apple is going

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be more deliberate about spending. Adela just told me

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to do more with less. I know

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>sales force slowed hiring a bit earlier in the year,

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>but are you expecting any job cuts or cost cuts?

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>What's your strategy to navigate them? I think what you're

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing for all of these companies, including ours, as we

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all invested aggressively in the last two years and we

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>are absorbing those investments into our businesses now. So we

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have a lot online and moving forward and we need

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to enable that and energize it and motivate it. So

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we did slow slightly our hiring, but do

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I see other changes? You know, who knows what's going

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen? Is Not certainly not our intention. Our intention

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is to continue to get the fifty billion dollars in

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>revenue by F Y last year we did twenty six billion.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>This year we're gonna do thirty one billion and by

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year twenty six, we want to do fifty billion.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're Cocyo, Brett Taylor's chair of twitter. I know he's

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>probably been a living little busy with that. I saw

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>probably a little. I saw you in Brent on stage

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and bunny years. Yes, I want to know how it's

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going like? How is it going to have a co CEO?

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you spending a little less time on the day

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to day now that he's here? Well, as you know,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I love Brett. I've loved him for a long time.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>We've had a great relationship, a multi decade relationship. When

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>he's started his company, I invested in it. I always

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to acquire it. We're so lucky. We did acquire

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it and I moved him up slowly on the company,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Chief Product Officer, Chief Operating Officer, now co CEO. I

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think we've got a fantastic leader of the company. Look,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand these are big jobs. CEO, these CEOS,

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I know them all. There's no s under here. If

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I take my shirt off and I'm just skin and bones,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no s and I think that having a partner

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>like Brett Taylor to help me is incredible and I

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>could not be more grateful. Yeah, it's so much value

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's so impressive in a work are you going

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to be doing this co CEO thing? Well, as long

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>as you know. Everybody wants me to do it. So

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>far it seems to be working. You're giving another huge

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>education grant. This is the Tenth Year of it. I

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>actually interviewed you, I believe, the very first year. You

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>were very skeptical. You're like, there's no way you're going

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this for ten years, and we did it.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>We're given over a hundred million dollars toward San Francisco

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and Oakland public schools. This has been very important for them,

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>especially as our exiting the pandemic. They're getting another million.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>This is not the end of the program it's set

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up to go in perpetuity. Very exciting the state of

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the US education system right now and is the government

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>doing enough? I think that our public education system has

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to be at the top of every leader's mind and

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you cannot delegate it to the government. You as a

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>CEO or as a business leader or in another part

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of your organization. You need to go down to your

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>local public school three blocks away from your house. You

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>know where yours is, knock on the door, introduce yourself

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to the principle and say how can I help? I

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>built a new playground. Partner Harris painted the buildings. You know,

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we installed technology, we did volunteerism and mentorship. Everybody can

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do something. We cannot do everything. Companies have a lot

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of resources. We have some of the best, most exciting

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>companies in the country. These companies need to be supporting

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>our local public schools and also our local public hospitals.

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>You know we've done a lot with UCS AF here

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco and public parks as well. We just

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 1>open a massive, hundred million dollar public park called tunnel tops.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You know that my wife is the chairman of it.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible. These are the things that CEOS and companies

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>should have their eyes on, figure out how to put

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a light on it, bring their customers in and bring

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>all stakeholders together. That was salesforce chair and co CEO

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Benioff, along, of course, with Bloomberg's Emily Chang. You

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>can watch the full interview at Bloomberg Dot Com or

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on Youtube. Coming up with seeing an exodus of executives

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at crypto firms. More than that in a moment. This

0:29:46.120 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg, time for it to early CRYPTO report. A

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>number of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, and lingering near two year lows.

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the Fed's inflation fight takes a toll on risky assets.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld is here to discuss. How are you

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm so great being on set with you.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were a deep fake for the longest. Well,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's for context of the global audience. I'm visiting from

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but it's been a long week, the highlight

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>which has been the Fed. Yes, and digital assets essentially

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>did not escape the volatility that we saw across financial

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>markets post fed, not at all. So you actually saw

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin outperform traditional socks a little bit on Thursday. But

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if you zoom out, and people on twitter will always

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you to zoom out, it's just been a brutal

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>stretch for Bitcoin. Down Fifty eight percent, almost fifty year

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to date. You compare that to the NASTAC One d

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>these two tend to trade in lock step, but the

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of losses and Bitcoin so much greater. The NASAC

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred down only only in votes, or so y're

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to date. I'm going to ask you the most question

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I can. Whatever happened to bitcoin being an inflation hedge? Well,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a tortured answer that I'm going

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to give you because again, if you posted torturing me,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's torturing the audience. So if you posted a chart

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bitcoin. On twitter everyone will always tell you to

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>zoom out, and that's sort of the answer that I

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have to give about bitcoin as an inflation hedge. Advocates

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will still say in the grand fullness of time, it

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is an inflation hedge when you have central banks really

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>printing money. Is The answer you would get. I feel

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that right now we are at the test of that thesis,

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because now you have central banks around the globe removing stimulus,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tightening liquidity, hiking central bank rates. We haven't seen this

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>environment with Bitcoin as a mainstream asset. This has really

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>never happened before, so we're watching that experiment. It's kind

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of funny because it's the first time in our lifetime

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at least, where we've had a pandemic but we've also

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>had inflation. So been a lot, a lot volatility in

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies, digital assets, volatility in the industry. There's been

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of, you know, well known founders CEOS of

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the more well known crypto related startups departing

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely of course, the big headline, which this program covered

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>well yesterday, Jesse Palell, the crack and CEO and Co founder,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stepping down from the exchange, from that role of course

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>chief operating officer, David Ripley is going to succeed him,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're just that's just part of a trend that

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. To your point, of course, Michael Sailor stepping

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>down as micro strategy CEO in August really kicked this off.

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks later you had Michael Morrow from Genesis

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do the same. So it's this interesting moment in the

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>industry where you are seeing a lot of upheople in

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the C suite, a lot of transition ends. It seems

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like the face of WHO's actually leading the industry right

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>now is changing. Of course, we do have a lot

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of stalwarts such as Sam Bankman reads, such as Michael

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Novegrad's still in their positions. So it's not completely new,

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but definitely a time of transition. I'll go to my question,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, is somebody that's covered Silicon Valley startups forget,

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, necessarily crypto. A lot of this is like

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a changing of the God. Right. Sometimes they're pushed out exactly,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they've had enough, sometimes investors get involved. Right. This

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is a really critical time for the industry. Talk to

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>us kind of about that changing of the God and

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment. It falls in to your experience to put

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this in your world covering Silicon Valley. It's hard to

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>transition away from a founder leaving the company, and we

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>are seeing a little bit of that. Of course, it

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>will be really interesting to see where kracking goes from here,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because the founder has become really the identity of the company.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be interesting to see how the crypto

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>industry handles this moment. Who's going to step up to

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the plate and who ultimately continues to hang around in transition?

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Who becomes sort of the Mark Zuckerberg of the crypto

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>industry in just the sense that he's been there? Hey,

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>real quick, did the merge matter? Merge matter? That's a

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>really good question. It turned. It mattered in that it

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like it turned to sell the news event. Obviously

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>ether rallied so heavily into the merge. It doesn't much

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>matter for the end experience of your holder of ether.

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be important to see whether it does

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lead to this sort of influx of development in terms

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the APPs on the ethereum blockchain. Uh, and we

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>still have a few more tests to go through when

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the merge it's not completely over yet,

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but the bulk of it is out of the way.

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Did the merge matter? Bloom bows, Katie Roifeld, thank you

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>very much. At impossible foods to the list of nearly

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>four hundred organizations that pledge this week to make their

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>operations more sustainable. As part of climate week, impossible has

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>joined e commerce giant Amazon's the climate pledge. Each company

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that signs the pledge commits to taking responsibility for decarbonizing

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 1>their businesses and reaching net zero by twenty forty. Here

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with a Bloomberg exclusive interview is impossible food CEO, Peter McGinnis. Peter,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>welcome well, thanks to be here. It's a pledge, right,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a pledge. Fulfill the pledge. How do you make

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this happen in real, substantive steps? First of all, having

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the consciousness as a company. Secondly, your business practices. Thirdly,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>your business model. So for us, climate has been at

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the center of impossible from the very, very beginning and

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look, if we sold fifty million pounds of

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible beef um we would, we would avoid one point

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>three billion pounds of C O two, because you're doing

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>a light for like with animal beef with real beef, right, Um,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>four point five billion gallons of water, thirty seven million

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>trees of fifty million pounds of plant baste beef displacing

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the animal prod right. So we're unique in the sense

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's central and core to omission and the better

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the company does, the more good it does for the planet.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you put the comparatives to one side, forget

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>animal products, focus on plant how do you improve your

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>performance in that respect? Yeah, it's also how you run

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>your facilities and your distribution network and your supply chain network,

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and we all need to do better. Right, whether you're

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>business is inherently better for the planet or not, we

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>can all improve upon our operations over time. We've tech

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>with technology will enable that improvement. Always right. So I

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>always find it's fascinating one of your mission statements or

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>at your core you are a food technology company. What

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is the technology that makes impossible different from any competitor?

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of generic names out there now, right,

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>making a plant based meat products? Sure, I mean, in

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the end we have four hund intend patents around how

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we make our food and I'm not going to get

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>into all four tents, but no, no, no, no, but

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean technology enables us to make great food and

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we're biased, but we think we have the best plant

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>based food in the market and that is enabled by

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>technology and many, many patterns around that technology and some

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of our ingredients, like Hem. I want to know how

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you grow sales. If I walk down to starbucks, I can,

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm start in clients, try an impossible breakfast sandwich

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of alongside an animal based products breakfast sandwich.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you boost sales? Not just through distribution?

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you get those new products in the face

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of consumers? Yes, so we're tech enabled food company, right.

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So we also have to behave like a food company.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Were on grocery shelves, were on Menus at restaurants, and

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so consumers have to understand our food better and why

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's better for them and why it's better for the planet.

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>So one piece of it is distribution and accessibility, and

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of room to go. You know,

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we have four TDPS. We could go up to four thousand.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in forty locations. We could go up to well

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred thousand locations. So accessibility and distributions a

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>piece of it, but there's low awareness around plant based

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>meat and there's very low understanding of what it is,

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think the category in and of itself has

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>done a pretty lousy job of communicating it and we

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't done a great job either. So look to us

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to explain it to consumers so that they're more attracted

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to it. resums would say, actually, if you look at it,

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients, the caloric content, it's not healthy and you know,

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote. What would you say to those consumers? Say, well,

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this isn't not healthy? Yeah, I mean so you're get

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in that processed argument right, and to me process is

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a twinkie, okay, and it's artificial ingredients. So we do

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have many ingredients to improve texture, taste flavor so that

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it mirrors the animal product, but they're all plant based,

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>they're natural. So I think the definition of processed is

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>another thing that's misunderstood and there's a lot of myths

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>around it and that needs to be directly communicated and

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>cleared up. We talked about the relationship with starbucks. You

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have a relationship with Burger King and you've tried other

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>products kind of broader change. Yes, some of them have not.

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Stock what's your assessment of that? Now we've we haven't.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So the original whoppers still available nation. Right of Burger King.

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>We've added the King Burger and we've added a southwest

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seasonal burger and now we're testing a chicken patty. So

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in some marks we have four menu items. So we

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to expand burger. How will that go? How will

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that rollout go? Expansion go? Depending on the test results,

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it will go national and so so far, so good.

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So we feel great about the Burger King Um partnership

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's expanding. Inflation, how are you dealing with it? Listen,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think inflation is a really hard thing for most

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>businesses and certainly for consumers right Um, for us it

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really affected our business growing at we've had a

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of fixed cost absorption, a lot of operating leverage

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>off of that growth. That's the first thing. The second

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.439
<v Speaker 1>thing is we have long term contracts from with all

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of our key ingredient suppliers Um and so we haven't

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>had that pass cost to us and so therefore we

0:39:58.239 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>have not passed it on to the consumers. So we've

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>kept flat prices. As meat prices have gone up, depending

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on chicken beef pork anywhere from eighteen to so our

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>gap to the animal product has never been tighter and

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the history of our country cut prices to be more competitive.

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We could cut prices from well, we'll look at everything.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I think everything is on the table to make it

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>more available and more accessible and displace the animal product

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>so we can maximize our mission. A reverse and climate change.

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>You told about the messaging one of your competitors. Your

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>meat is facing a number of challenges. Do you kind

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of zero in on them? Do you take a wide

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of you you know, how do you get on top

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of a busy field? Yeah, I think. Look, I think

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that will be consolidation in our category. I see one

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>or two brands per press climate label moving forward. I

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>don't look at him beyond meats playbook. We have our

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>own playbook. Um and again, we're trying to displace the

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>animal we're not trying to displace other plant based meat companies.

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact we celebrate other plant based meat companies because

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we're doing right by the environment. So so our goal

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is not to steal share from other plant based meat

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>companies really quick. You don't seem in any hurry to

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I p o what are the conditions for that. We're

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in no hurry because we don't need to write because

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>our balance sheet is strong and our cast position is good, Um,

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and so we will I P O when we want

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to end or need to, and the market is better

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>than it is today. So we'll keep you posted on that.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>In a sentence. What will the next meat be? Plant

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>based meat? We already have chicken, beef pork, right. So

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of experimentation with seafood, where the be

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tuna or salmon? Right, Um. But we cover breakfast, lunch, dinner, chicken,

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>beef pork, so we're good. I cannot wait to see

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>impossible food. CEO, Pizza McGinnis, thank you so much for

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Thanks for having me. That does it

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technolog G. Friday we have

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Bain capital Global Tech Practice David Crawford. He'll discuss how

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>web three can rewrite the rules of digital user identity

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and disrupt some of today's largest tech platforms. So don't

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>get to check out our podcast. You can find it

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal as well as online on Apple, spotify.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is Bloomberg