WEBVTT - March 4th, Hour 2: Shirt comparison, more mid-tier starting pitching, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guessed Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did we just

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>become best friends? Young Fantasy best friends forever? That was weird?

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Back with you the Fantasy Bests Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't think we're doing a great job? Was it

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job? I mean it's probably because you

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>have some scruff, you know, That's what it is. That's

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>why you're doing a great job. It's like the nicest

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>you've been to me in months. Yes, because the knock coincidental.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Once that goes, I mean, I'm gonna find something to

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>bash you about. You very dipper today. Greg. You have

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a little roll up action going on with your sweater.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Nice button down. I know, like this this is one

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite shirts. Actually, that's my favorite sweater wear

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that like a T shirt under here and that a lot.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>They fit very well. I would like to buy more,

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're just like really expense its republic sale republic

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like the polar stuff. We're pretty similar shirts. Yea, we

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>look good. One might say we both look like picnic tables.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I always is it weird? I have a shirt like

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this and a shirt very similar to this. I always

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>say it looks like Eastern when I wear them. Okay, yeah,

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I can see this, see that, especially this too. It's

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like per bowl. It's like, yeah, a pastel. That's the

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>term that they use, like these bright springy type colors.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of spring, a snow on the ground, Greg, how

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>about that? Oh god, the boots are packed. Had to

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be back to us, had to be back the male

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lugs the mugs wrong, I didn't even notice. Still right now,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have started off the show bashing you instead

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I had I had the scruff though, you know someone,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like a walking ad for Polo today. Actually, yeah,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a Polo boots. Polo boots. You are un jeans? No,

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>not jeans, sorry, Greg, I mean we're best friends. Don't

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>have to wear the same exact things. Well, I'm not

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna wear mugs, I'll tell you that much right now.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a steak by you. Do you want to try

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>them on after the show? Trying stinky male ugg boots, stinky,

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable try? How was that was your combine show

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>last week with venture? Jim Day? Was good? Are you

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>getting h You know something that I contemplated texting someone

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>today and I didn't. I don't know why. I probably

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>just forgot. What else is new? Right, Frank forgetting to

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>text someone? Um? This whole like NFL Combine Twitter, it's bad,

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like all the oh DK Metcalf, Oh he's gonna be

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Nick Tuleo Jones projections. Did you see him in

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a cone? The three cone drills? Worse than Tom Brady?

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god? Like stuff is crazy. I will say,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>someone like the defensive linemen who were wearing like sub

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>four fivelous what's ridiculous? So it's funny. I did see

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a tweet today, Umm, espn Jude's ran on who was saying, yeah,

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like you saw it doing Hassan's in the forty, which

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is bad. But like the most important thing is the

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>giants like their meeting with him, and that's all that matters.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>What was Daniel Jones is forty, Greg, that's the next quarterback,

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the next quarterback of the New York Giants are the Giants,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna make a trade here? Come on, Greg,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. And the Giants will sat I

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>mean they don't ever, Like when was the last time

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they moved up? I know, like they never did it

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with them and now that so they never traded down

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>with Reese, not in the first round, but they did

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>trade up. They traded up for Landing Collins. Actually that's correctly,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just let walk away. They're not gonna bring him back now.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>One's like they're deadline to franchise tag him this week.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>There right a few bodies of mine, you know them, Robin.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>They're big Giants fans, also big Landing Collins fans, of course,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 1>So if he leaves, very bad. So basically I wanted

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to say that his worst nightmare would be Landing Collins

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in a Cowboys uniform, which might happen because they need

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a safety. Greg. This is a disaster. I'm sorry that

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I opened up that possibility for you. So what's gonna ultimately,

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen is the Giants, and rightfully so, they

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>want a franchise tag him because he's hurt. They don't

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>want to make him one of the highest pace safeties

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in football. He wants to be one of the highest

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>pace safeties in football, so they says his franchise tag him.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>In a act of anger, he cleaned out his locker

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and think he used to get franch franchise tag and

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>said this and showing up you franchise to I mean,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not showing up to September and the Giants have

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>been like, yeah, we don't want to deal people that

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be here. I think you watch Giants

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Kings closer than I did last year. How did he perform?

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I didn't hear his name much. Listen.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he wasn't as good as he was in

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>his All Pro year the year before. But he's the

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>leader of the captain of the defense, and he's good.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's as good as any player the helle

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on the defense, which isn't much. All right, Well, sorry, Bud,

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully he doesn't end up in Dallas, Cowboy. How about them?

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Gabo Baseball, Greg Lesball, Do you do you want to

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>say anything else? On Paxton before you get to tie on,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>come on to hear more in taie On as well. Um, No,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>look the I think the home run stuff scares me

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. The hard hit rate was very high

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>last year for Paxton as well. It was just kind

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of a weird season, like pitched with three seventh six

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ear right, two hundred eight strikeouts and only underd and

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty and a third. It's pitched like that's phenomenal. If

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy could go one on eighty. I mean you're

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at like two twenty strikeouts from James Paxson, so

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I get that upside. I drafted him in the fourth

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>round of the Great Fantasy based Invitationals, that is, in

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team draft. I could let you know some

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>pictures that I took him over. I took James Paxson

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and and then the next two picks in this draft

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>were Stephen Stratford and jameson Tyon. Um. I will say

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if Clevinger was there, might have made the decision a

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more difficult. Have those guys ranked back to

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>back with with Paxiston and Clevinger, But I do have

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Paxson rank once about higher, so I like I like

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>him in this range. Do you ever lean toward the

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do you ever lean toward the National League? What are saying, hey,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thailands here obviously passion, you know, there's there's not really

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there was Actually I know there was members that came

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>out last year around this time when we were talking

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>about Garrett Cole Grant when everyone was saying, oh, well

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Cole going from Pittsburgh to Houston. Um, you know,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's much tougher in the A L. And I believe

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>it was Todd Zola who tweeted out the differences between

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>E R A in leading has like it's not a

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>thing anymore, Like it's actually very imparable. Ear ras between

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>National League pitchers and American League pictures. Well maybe, you know,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's just better pictures in the American League. I

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's necessarily the case. I think like

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>there's really good pictures on both sides because obviously Sergers

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the National League and de Groms in the National League.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, the e rais and both leagues are

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>actually quite comparable. So I don't think the A L

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>versael thing is uh is much of a myth. I

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>will I will say, you know, regarding Paxton leaving Safeco,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he has been much better in Safeco in his career

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>than he has been outside, so you see what happens.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But he is a super talented picture and um, you know,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees in terms of like analytics and and you know,

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>developing pictures, they've done a little bit better of a

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>job obviously with guys like Severino over the past couple

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of years. So I think that they'll be able to

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like mitigate Paxton's deficiencies, if that makes sense. I think

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I think that that makes Holly. That's

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not just a Yankee fan of me talking like who

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>would you like? Would you rather have Paxton? Or to me,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there's like this group of Clevinger I own, um Flaherty

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and Corbin who were all kind of going right around him,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>who might be safer for ending s pitched. But like

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>any basis, Packson will be better than those guys. Probably, yeah, probably.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's basically just like what do you want? Do you

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>want like a hundred ninety endings of Jamison Tyne giving

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you a three whatever three six e r A with

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a solid whip, like a one point one five whip,

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe a hundred and eighty strikeouts or

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>do you want a hundred and sixty maybe hundred seventy

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>pitched of James Paxson with maybe a little bit of

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a better e r A and way more strikeouts? Right?

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Like two strikeouts? So you just you kind of have

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to ask yourself, like what do you want? More strikeouts

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit harder to come by it, but

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of course you need help. You need healthy in the

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>rotation too, So why can't the answer to be Patrick

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn who's giving you the strikeouts? Right? Probably I just

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of let you inside the mind of Frank. Look

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>what Maddie Mos said. I can't really disagree with, right,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Like he's doing something differently, but like taking away the

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>fact like he's not using his fastball and his other

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>pitches as much and he's throwing a slider forty of

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the time, So maybe just throwing it more makes it

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that much better of a pitch hadn't been something that

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I really considered. I don't know, man, I just kind

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of feel it, like I feel like we're just paying

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for the career year from last year. He's good. He

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is good like he was he was awesome, Like every

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>metric was like second best in baseball behind Serzer. What

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>else he's looking for? You could have him, Greg, I'm

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have problem with that on the team that

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we share together. I don't really want him. Really, no

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>team will share together. I don't I don't really want Corman.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I did. I gotta feel it. Maybe

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not warranted. I don't know. Okay, okay, you

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Jack clar in this tier as well, and I

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>get the tie on thing right. We talk a lot

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about James Paxton here just now. James Flaherty is, without question,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>also were Jack Flarerty excuse me, is of course in

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this tier. Flowerty is the twenty three pitcher on the

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>ward right now, and we'll get to Zachary and and

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Clevinger as well. Flaherty and Irish last name, Yes, I

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like oh Flarherty's that's exactly. How like when

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're calling out Jackie, I just imagine like an

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Irish guy, like, hey, Jackie boy, JACKIEO Flaherty, what a

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>jack Jackie boy? I'm doing Like Canadians, we're both thereout

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that Irish jacton not so good Jack Flaherty, Jackie, You're

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>going off the board. So I imagine people say his

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>name though, big Jackie O Flaherty, Uh going back off

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the board. Um, and we just lost our Irish listening

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>audience that much of them. Um Back to back here,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Clevinger is like, I'm not from twenty three and me

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually very Irish grade. So you can say you

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>should have been people Irish. Would you like Jack Flaherty

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just flat out do you like Jack Flaherty? Um? I

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do like Jack Flaherty. I think he has the ability

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to turn into an ace based on some of the

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>underlying skills here. I mean a thirteen point four percent

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>swinging shrike rate. We're talking about that in the same

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>range as Luis cast again with with Noah Syndergard. Now,

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't go enough Annings last year to qualify as

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a qualified starting pitcher Jack Flaherty, that is, but a

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>strike out that was top ten among starting pitchers last

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>year as a rookie. That's pretty impressive. Tween strike rade

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is there pur with a sweeping slider. Both pitches were

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ranked inside the top twenty in fan grass in terms

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of pitch values. So he's not one of these guys

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>were like his fastball is really bad and he can

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>never use it like Luis Castillo Luise Castios fastball Greg

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>top ten worst pitches in baseball last off. I didn't

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>want more Decon to hate me too much, but it

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>was ranked in the top ten worst fastballs in baseball

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. Basically he throws a miles per hour, but

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's straight as an arrow, Greg, and it's getting squared up.

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And he actually saw Justin Bore over the weekend square

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>one up against Louise Castio. Yeah, to make sure. So

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>again we didn't bring it up all modecos here because

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't want him to hate us. But with Jack Flaherty,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the skills are there. The one thing I

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>worry about is the command, right. So I looked at

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>his month by month e r A and his two

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>worst months I believe were like July in September, and

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>those were the months where his walks per nine were

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>over four Greg. So that's the biggest bugaboo when it

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to Flaherty. And you know his first pitch strike

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>percentages fifty seven percent. It's something he needs to get

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>better at now. If he brings us up to like

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the over sixty percent range where he's kind of getting

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead and counts, and he's able to finish people off

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with with this fastball slider combination, he could like he can.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk about a guy who can make

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the next step, it's Jack Flaherty. He has big upside,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but in this range he also has more downside because

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>if if the lack, if the command comes back a

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and like he starts walking guys, then that's

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can see the whips start to balloon a

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and then guys are getting on base, and

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>then maybe he gives up a home run with you know,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>two or three guys on base rather than like it

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>being a solo home run because he's walking guys. Then

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>those are kind of like the subtle differences where we're

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>talking about the difference between him being like a low

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>three e r A and he being a high three

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>e r A with like a bad whip. So I

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>think he has higher upside than some people in this range,

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but he also has lower downside, So I kind of

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good range for him to be.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But he definitely definitely has the skills to be one

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of like the top twenty, maybe even like top fifteen.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Starting pitchers in baseball kind of reminds me of James

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Paxton last year and the Aaron Nola from a year

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or two ago as well. Where you're in this range.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>My issue with taking him is that you're not You're

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you're paying for that upside, right like you're this spot

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's going high end SP two at this spot.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm being honest, I don't really love any of the

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guys in this way. Like as much as I loved

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tie Own last year, I loved Corbin Like maybe that's

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what's just part of it is because I owned them

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at their discount last year and now I kind of

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like all the value has been sucked out of

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>him and pay a fourth round price tag. Definitely, that's

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>why I don't really want to do. It. Doesn't include

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Clev as well, because everyone loves Clev. Yeah, it's similar, right,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like he is going outside I think the top forty

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers last year. He started to creep up a

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit in spring training. But I'm a little more

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>apt to take Cleving jur And I'll tell you why,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Greg because of the where he plays with the Cleveland Indians.

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>This is what they do. They developed starting pitching they're

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so good at it, and I think that's why a

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are in on Shane Bieber as well

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>as because look at some of the starting pitchers that

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have come like have come into this organization. Corey Kluber

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was a late bloomer but has been amazing. Carlos Carrasco

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>picked up from the Phillies. He's come here. It took

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of years, but he's been amazing over

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of seasons. Trevor Bauer was traded for

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Arizona Diamondbacks. Took him a couple of years.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>He has turned into one of the best ten pitchers

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in baseball last year. This is what they do. And

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not really a terribly tough division either. In fact,

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough it's a division they want to target

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of opponents that they're gonna be facing. The

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>White Sox. Yeah, they're gonna get Eloy Jimenez. Still not

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a great lineup, right, Like, we're really worried about John

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>j leading off with the Chicago White Sox. This here.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I like the Twins line up a lot. Admittedly I

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do like that lineup, but the Royals, like, are we worried, Like, no,

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not worried about the Royals either. So Clevenger to me,

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't ranked just behind James Paxson. Have him ahead

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of Jamison ty one. I think I think we saw

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot last year. Uh. He's kind of similar to

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty in terms of the walks. He's got to

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>control the walks. He's got to have solid command here

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with Clevinger. But he was one of thirteen starting pitchers

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>last year to actually go two hundred innings, So he's

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>already has that in his back pocket. We've seen him

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>do it once. It doesn't you know, I'm not worried

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about him going to endings again because he's already done it, Greg,

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's probably the safest to get to that plateau

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>out of everyone that we're star talking about in this crew.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Patrick Corbin as well. But you know, he lowered

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the walks last year. Nine fastball, the slider and curve

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>both ranked inside the top ten in Fangrass in terms

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of pitch values last year. That's a big difference Gregg

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is that he has a second and third go to

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pitch outside of his fastball, which is already pretty good

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nine. That's the biggest difference between him and some

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other guys here is that he has that

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>second and third pitch, both being breaking pitches that are

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>very very good pitchers pitches with the slider and the curveball.

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that just puts him a little bit

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the competition. The fact that you know that

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go two under endings. He's gonna give you

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a strike out for any so the two hundred strikeouts

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be there. Twelve swinging shrike rate was top

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty amongst starting pitchers last year, right in line with

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Corey Klueber. I think he's a guy who's gonna go

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>three s e r A as well. With some of

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>these other names that we've mentioned. This is kind of

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like the projection we're expecting. But I like him a

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than Toyown because I know that he's

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like at least the fact that I've seen him go

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>two pitched matters for me, and I got it, and

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I get just pitching for the Cleveland Indians like that.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're known for developing these guys. They know

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how to do it. They've already done it with Clevinger.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that one of the reasons that you kind of

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>really right there that pitching coaches now ye Away, Callaway's

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>now with with the New York matter. And that's why

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I brought up stephen that's to you last night and

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the underlying numbers from man, he's gonna have to take

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like a step to do something you haven't really seen

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>him do before. Plus he has to say help with

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>stephen Nes not as good as I thought they were

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be when eight before I looked into it

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and get your righting of these guys creating this whole

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the fourth round group, Well do that

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I have it. I have a Clevinger Clevinger, Tye o

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty Corman. That's that's the four and passions ahead of all.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come back as your best

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>friends forever. Fantasy Sports right or never. Daily Rhodo dot

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just give you premier advice. We play every day, all

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry leading

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>DFS tosten custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Com optimized her in minutes building optimized line up for

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>cash games and turneys learned from the game's best DFS

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>players joined daily rohdo dot com. Hi, my name is Lily.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>My mom and dad. You used to fight about money

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Then one day I heard them talking

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>about this guy, some uncle I never knew, called Uncle Sam. Well,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they say, this Uncle Sam guy wanted them to pay

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>him like a gazillion dollars, and they didn't have a

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>gazillion dollars. So they called this company they heard on

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the radio called the tax Doctor. And the tax Doctor

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>worked with Uncle Sam's people. I think they're called the

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I R S. And they're able to work it out.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So my mom and dad didn't have to pay Uncle

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Sam very much money at all. So now mom and

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>dad are happy, and I'm happy to thanks Tax Doctor.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>If you owe ten thousand dollars or more to the

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I R S or state, call now and pay less

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred to one five one seven to seven, eight

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred to one five one, seven to seven. That's eight

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred one five seventeen seven In this leave. There are

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>already three percent of baseball players that are android humanoid

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>hybrids in baseball. You don't think Baseball wants to have Robot.

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have them because they're already playing baseball. Durn,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the last time I'm gonna do that. They are

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently going to have. It's two pm E start on

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast. Providers joined

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Experts live on the air every day by calling

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in at April four, seven nine to join in the

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network, Fantasy best Friends, Ribber, Fantasy Sports Radio,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and Helle. This is very like eighties nineties like opening

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>theme Saws. There is also the NFL Scouting Combine are

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in for serious fantasy football players. It's never too early

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>once you can't make her, is ever too early to start?

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>For Ferry With the twenty nine season, I thought like

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>said something wrong. Rhoto Experts has you covered with her

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>L three sixty five fantasy football package including the best

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis Maddick and the Rohato Experts providing dynasty season long betting,

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>best ball at NFL Draft content each and every day

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to give you the edge. You're gon more this and

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what type offenses? But will you play? Save temper cent? Right?

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Now when you go to Rohato Experts dot com and

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you use the road promo code f mc s Y,

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's tempers at all, the promo code f mc s Y.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the NFL three sixty five Fantasy football package. Only

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>available right now at Rhoto Experts dot com. And that's

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>our friends of Daily Rhoto and then all together for us.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're looking for baseball content, you can't go

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to Roado Experts dot com. You can go to Frank's

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Patreon page, which is available and up right now handed

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out of Frank's Patreon page, it's right open his Twitter

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>right now, and you'll get for free infield rankings of

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>every player. If you want the outfield, you want the

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, you want more, you gotta subscribe. Franks gotten

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of big time subscribers now that' get him

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>from prettybout out on a month, which is awesome. Uh.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>The moreier than I be very very helpful to Frank.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to spit a little bit lower

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>than that, that's okay too. They have other tiers. Ten

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, five dollars a month, even a dollar

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a month for the bare minimum. Don't do that it's

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>wasted money. So I was just subscribe to five, ten

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>or twenty five dollars here, depending on what you're interested in.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Sprank samples Patreon four baseball coverage the number three most

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>accurate ranker in all of fantasy baseball Twitter last year.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that guy right there, more accurate than the all

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in kid himself. I'm not getting involved. Is it accurate?

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that an accurate portrayal that that would be a

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>factual statement, Craig, I'm just dealing fact man. You are

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>my Paul Hayman, you are my there you go, you're

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>pumping me up. I I appreciate it. Number three Rancor

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. Unfortunately, we'll just behind Adam Ronus. I mean

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there must have been something that when wrong there. I

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>mean Adam Romas number two. I mean, there's just no way.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He's very good. Top five though, join me on Patreon.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually writing about these hyped up outfielders, Greggy, who

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are creeping up draft boards. Not really creeping, they're like flying.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So I've already wrote about Austin Meadows and Byron Buckston.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to write about Jackie Bradley, Jesse Winker

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and Domingo Santana. These guys are all climbing up draft

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>boards because of what they're doing in the spring. But

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more than that too. Like with

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buxton, he actually made um. He went back to

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the like drawing board this all season and changed out

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his workout regiment. He changed his batting stance, helimitated a

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>leg kick. And you're signing you're you're starting to see

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some of that payoff here in spring training early on.

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So you check it out on my Hatreon. I'll let

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know whether or not I am by rending the

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Buckston again. I'll leave the promo to you. I feel

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like I'm doing a good job where we're doing all right? Yeah, um,

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe it's plat you buy me beers. Mm hmm, Okay,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the deal is a deal. I'm going to buy you

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>beer right now. I mean you already you know this week? Sure,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>let me know what day not to bring much? Well,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to do a da Ko wasn't around because

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not making much here. She Friday Friday is the day. Friday,

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>cool Friday, Friday lunch. It is um, all right, So

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you asked me before the break how I rank this

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tier of guys, we're gonna get into the ones we

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't spoken about yet. But as you can tell, Number

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>one for me is Patrick Corbyn in this tier, I'm

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not you have a gut feeling that's cool, But everything

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at like he's really good. There's no sign

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that like head of James Paxton for me. Yeah, all right,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>so you can drift him in your home league. Oh,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I will keep him my home plea. Alright right, I'm

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>actually not keeping you don't like him for no reason,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just like you like I'm keeping. This is James Town

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for two dollar cheaper. This is literally just a gut

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>feeling which is so interesting to me. But I like it.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I like it, believe me. I Patrick Corvins number one

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 1>for me, and then I got James Paxton number two.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Then I have Steven Strasburg number three in this year

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>before James and ty On who goes number four? I

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>got Clevinger five, I got Jack Flaherty six, and then

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I got Zach Ranky seven. Did you say I did?

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I haven't right after Paxton before Cleve, so me waxing

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>poetic on Clevinger, didn't I like Cleve Man? I I

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's tears very tight. I can see you taking

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>cleb over toy own. Um, you have Zach. We learned this, tire, Greg,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of people do I don't

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>have zachar this. I'm sorry, I don't know if we

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>learned this tyre. But Zach Gernky is at the end

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of this year, and you were saying to me before

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>we um hit break, and then during the break that

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he was having agism and being a year early rather

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>than a year late. And I was sold, admittedly last

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>week at justin Burland here, I was all out of

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy until we kind of dove into the stats

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and I realized there's zero signs of slow going down

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for this human being. Well, Frank was telling me during

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the break, that's not exactly true when it comes to

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Zac Grinky. We're the signs that we're seeing when it

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>comes to Grinky. Yeah. So with Granky last year, you

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>saw the fastball velocity dipped all the way down to

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine point six miles per hour on average, which

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was a career low for him. Hard hit rate was

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth highest UM unqualified starting pitchers last year as well.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And then in the second half you see the strikeout

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>rate come down by three percent and the fifth go

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>up to four point zero zero Greg. So to me,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's enough to like lower him in his tier. I

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's a fourth round pitcher. You don't really

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>have to pay that price tag either. You can get

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>him in the fifth round. Again, this is a roster

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>construction thing where if you take guys who are a

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit more injury prone, but you want endings like Granky.

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is a safe guy for endings like That's

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what he's gonna give you over two pitched and four

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of the last five seasons, so I think he's pretty

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>safe for at at least two under endings. But I

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>do worry about the skills kind of declining a little

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bit back to back seasons. Oh A three twenty e

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>r A. As Frank said, he we're such a vision

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two like gotta face the Dodgers, gotta face the Rockies,

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>which he's always had to do. But you know, with

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a declining fastball, I just worry about that a little

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Yeah, tough, the wind is gonna be there,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like the run support with the Diamondbacks and they lose Goldschmidt,

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know how great the line up

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to mean. Now He's interesting. As the season

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>we're on, he did get worse. As I think you mentioned.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>What striking to me was the K numbers really came down.

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Although back in his best year of his career, got

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout rate barely eight strike up her nine rather

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>barely eight, which it was kind of interesting. Um, walks

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>went back up. But he used to walk a lot

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more guys he does now. So I don't like. I'm

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>not totally out, I would say on Zach Rinky, UM

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>not an active I just think that he has the

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>least amount of upside of the guys we've talked about

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Zach wield ranked ahead of himself. I don't agree with that. Um,

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I just think he has the least on the upside

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of this man. I don't like him. Again, a lot

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of people don't even realize the Zach Wheler pitched a

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred eight innings last he did about the years years

0:26:54.720 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>before that. Ye also, but you skipped a couple in

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it and I realized that. But he's not a concern

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that he would so many innings last year after not

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>pitching into the last two seasons for the most part, Well, Gregg,

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he actually got better as the season went on. So

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>again what I mentioned, how about this Greg, you know,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>his final eleven starts as great as he was, right,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he had like a sub two e r A. Were

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>spoke about the numbers a little bit earlier on the show,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like point eight one whip and you know, his his

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>expit was right around like three points, like three point

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>four seven, so was sub three point five. You know,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you keep your expectations realistic, I think that he

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can be a sub three point five year a guy

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with a near strike upper ending. And if he you know,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>if he continues this progress that he made last year

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of not walking people, because walks used to

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>be a big issue for him. It's not like he

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't walk anyone last year, but he was much better

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the command department. And you know, he

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't uh, you know, he wasn't walking as many guys.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So that again, what Mordice said about him is true.

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>If he can continue and build off the games that

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he made last year, then yes, he can jump into

0:27:59.960 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty. And that's what I'm expecting to do.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>In nine of those eleven final starts that he made.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>He went at least seven innings pitched nine times. I

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>mean seven innings nine different times over his final eleven starts.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. It's one of the It's one of those

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Japans of games. So they trusted him last year. They

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>pushed him and he responded well, So I'm trusting him listening.

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those. I own Zach Wheeler last year,

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so I know I recognize in the great fantasy based

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>momentational I won first in my league, I finished fourth

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the overall. Yeah, I was right there with you. Yeah.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the people that own Zach Wheeler last year

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>recognize how good he was. Can he continue? Can he

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>build on that? I think what's good is his ADP

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't around these guys right now, which is obviously a

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>great thing because he's still UM. You can still get

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>him an a decent value, not a fantastic value, but

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a decent enough value, I think, UM for Zach Wheeler.

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But will it uh will continue into his is a contract?

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Your fan, right, so will it continue into this contract year?

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible to bets fall out and he gets traded?

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>That's something you're interested. He becomes Patrick Corban level of good.

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he becomes Patrick Corban level of good. And Mike

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Flora has a lot to say on Zach Wheeler as well.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hand over there Mike Florio's Patreon page to learn more

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about Zach Wheeler. Um, we're like one of those strip

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>adapters where we just we're just plugging in everything you

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta do it. Look look for those that are wondering.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>We have gotten some questions about this. This is the

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>spot where Clayton Kershaw is now going pretty pretty normally.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say his a DPS about sixty two. He

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>has begun throwing pretty lightly. Again. Oh, I don't expect

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>him to be ready for the beginning of the regular season,

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but probably far a little bit after that. Are you

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 1>at this price at about two a d P? Are

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you in Clayton Kershaw? No. I actually had the opportunity

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to draft him in the Great Fantasy Basic Invitation. He

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>went pick eighty one. I passed him up in the

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>fifth round. In the fourth round as well. You guys

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have to ask yourself this question, Greg, why do you

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be in on this at this because of

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Kershaw? That's the theory, But the skills were already declining, right,

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is uh. We said this a

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot during the football season. Strip the name I'm off

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the back of the jersey here for Clayton Kershaw. And

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the basketball velocity was dipping last year. He's

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>been hurt the past couple of years with these crop

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>back injuries. The skills were starting to decline last season

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. And on top of that, he's hurt before

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the season already starts. You ask yourself the question why.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any reason to do it. Okay,

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I agree with you the that

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I'm not. I don't want to mess with this.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It only caused me more pain then reward. I would say,

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at what point do you draft him? Though? That's what

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to to me. Are you taking Are

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you taking Clinton Kershaw before you take Mike Fultonevitch? I

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>mean he's hurt too, well, he should be bad by now.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>He's like throwing today. Yeah, oh man, I don't want

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>either one of them. All right, I'll get another one.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you taking Clint Kershaw before you take Luis Castia? No, no,

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>let's takes you. Are you taking him before you take

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton like that. That's a range where I think

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I would take. I would start to like think about it,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like playing kershard David Price. I would take Price.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you're looking at the past? Pick one. I think

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have him. That's where he's gonna settle it.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Because I have Prices my thirtieth thirty picture. I have

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more than one, so I think it's right around that range.

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I bring up Clayton Kershaw. I gotta bring up Madison

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Bumgarner in this spot also because they've been around a

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>long time NLS Foe's a long time really good players.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Madison Bumgarner has broken down now the last couple of years,

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and a year ago at this time, I threw everything

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>out from twenties six freak injury threw it out. This

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is not this year doesn't count. Let's right here last year,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and I told you not to do it, sold you

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not to draft him. That's correct. We were starting to

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.239
<v Speaker 1>see the beginning of the end. Correct. I didn't get

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>him anywhere. You're a lot Jack was more correct than

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>my logic is, and I didn't listen to my own logic.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I drafted Yeah, Well that was before he got hurt.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Drafted like I like the two or three swing, and

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>then he got hurt. It's awful. Finished last year six

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and seven with an EARRA of three points two six

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is actually very good. He's fip an x fit obviously

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>much higher than that. Strikeout rate terrible, walk more guys

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>than ever, terrible a lot not to like the maze

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>with Bea mcgarner despite the ear a fifth and infitt

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the ear a rather yeah. And look it's it's the

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>decline of his fastball. You see it like the past

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.239
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, right, great isolated power. Isolated power is its

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>logging percentage minus batting average. Right, so I'm looking at

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the isolated power on hit on his pitches. His fastball

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>over the past three seasons has been two oh three

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>isolated power in sixteen up to two twenty six, all

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the way up to two seventy two last year. So

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>when people are getting his fastball, they're crushing it. And

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>his spring has been a mixed back to this point.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>He pitched one ending in his first starting and give

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>up like five or six runs, and then last week

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>he pitched over the weekend he pitched three endings. He

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>only give up one run. He gave up a leadoff

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>home or to Jesse Winker, who's one of these hyped

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up outfielders right now. But that's lefty on lefty right there.

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's concern. I think there's a legitimate

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>concern for Madison Bumgarner. You know, as good as he's been,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he's been a workhorse. He goes two hundred endings. You know,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who also went to under ning pitch and then just

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like fell off a cliff one year. That

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was Felix Hernandez. I don't know if it's fair to

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>say that, like it might be unfair to like make

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that direct comparison, but there's a lot of endings on

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that arm. Now. I don't know how much of his

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fastball declining has been due to all these like freak

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>accidents that he's been in, like over the past couple

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of years. Last year it was like the fractured hand

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in spring training, you know, trying to feel the line drive,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and then it was the dirt bike accident. How much

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of that has influenced his performance? I mean maybe there

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are you know, chronic lasting effects from those accidents that

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know are affecting him, and there are going to

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>continue to affect him. So I mean that there are

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>just too many question marks, And I get it once

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you get into like this range of pictures, there's gonna

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of question marks with a lot of

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys. But I'd rather take one of these, like

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>younger starting pitchers who has upside at this point, I

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I worry a lot about Madison bomb Garterer. I agree,

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have him ranked this outside of my top forty,

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy to say, so I don't know where

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have him ranked, but I agree with you

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that much like Clint Kershaw on the upside just isn't

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>what what it is for some of these younger guys,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Like yes, you want a reliable veteran, but like I

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think Felix fernand is a really good example because it's

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a young guy who've had a lot of innings on

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that shoulder for a very young age, and you look

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at the age like, oh, he's hold bounce back, he's

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>got a lot left. I get it. Last year and

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>again the ear it was fine, the indicators not nearly

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as fine. I'm gonna let someone else do manage mom Garner,

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Like wouldn't you rather take a shot on like Eduardo Rodriguez,

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Like, take a shot on one of these upside

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, Eduardo Rodriguez, Nick Pa Vetta, uh Nathan Vivaldi,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>who I think has upside, wouldn't rather take a shot

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on one of those guys rather than like I'm Garner.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It would. That's where I'm at. It would. That's what

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. That listens pose is anyone. We're

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>making good progress here. We get to have about her mom. Marquez,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>now that's up next, and we call him Matt Modiguebeck.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding, guys, don't do that down soon. Yeah.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Marquez is he's interesting man because in the in the

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>second half of US year he was otherworldly. First half

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:41.959
<v Speaker 1>not so good. I believe it pitched like a five

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>e r A, but his ERA indicators were much better

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>than that two point six one e r A in

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the second half that was thirteen best in baseball at

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one point zero zero, whip among starting pitchers was ninth best,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty three point nine percent strikeout rate, fourth best in baseball.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>His hey minus walk percentage point four percent that was

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth and best in baseball two point three zero x fip, Greg.

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>So you're wondering, oh, the two point six one e

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>r A, you know how good was that? Actually? Well,

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>his two point three three zero x fit pitching in

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Colorado half the time was third best in all of baseball.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Shrike Rey, I mean he was ridiculous. He was absolutely ridiculous.

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Si percent first pitch strike percentage. He's getting ahead of counts,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>near thirty five percent chase rate. People are chasing his pitches.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we talked about. He made a

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>tangible difference in his arsenal. He lowered the fastball usage

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>by seven percent in the second half, and he upped

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that slider percentage by seven percent. The whip percent for

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>his slider and his curveball are both over twenty percent.

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are nasty, nasty pitches. Here with her Man Marquez,

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the ear at home Greg four point seven four. Here's

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're at with her Man Marquez. It feels like

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's John Gray all over again. We're getting a monstrous

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>second half here where the strikeouts are great. He's getting

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you swinging strikes, he's limiting the walks. Everything. The ERA

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>indicators are right in line with him, but he sucks

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in corps Field, Force Fields undefeated, Greg her Man Marque

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>be on everyone else's team this year except I said

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it last week. I'll say it against the Corps is

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. It always ends up poorly for your After

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>college basketball has reached the climax of the two thousand

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen season, and the Fantasy Sports Network pass you covered

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for all the news and betting information for the conference

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 1>tournaments leading up to the Big Dance. Get the latest

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>wagering and propbad advice every day from V and TS

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>wyse top experts and analysts as they prepared you with

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the best advice in bracketology. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>app in iTunes and Google Play, and watched select programming

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in the V and T s y YouTube channel. The

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network your home for winning big in the

0:37:55.800 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>month of Madness. Rhodos, you get fishing fish Store. I mean,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic's life advice. You know that. You know this.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.959
<v Speaker 1>I've always been searching for fishing like it was twenty

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I've been doing wrong. That they look

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>at you kind of funny, right when you go up

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to the cannets looking at that salmon. Buddy, What do

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you mean we have baseball gloves here, no salmon. Well,

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I get this fishing rod right right, and you get

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a tool to get the fishing about the fish. Sundays,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>eight a m. Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Networking on

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast Providers. Morie Salad two thousand and fifteen,

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World number one. Me personally, I keep my

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker leaving the range or you're leaving the ports.

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? You go to game face grooming dot

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>com from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning after ze Horvid has actually done a study

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the Kardashian effect. I don't think you need to go

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard to know that dating a Kardashian is a

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>bad thing if you're an athlete. But let's be real,

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like who was there? Really? Like worked out well for him?

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like nearly ended up Dad, Bruce Jedder lost his penis.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Like he's not even a man anymore. He's not emmy

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>star on F and T s Y Radio and on

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers, not only going around the people

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going around the world. Frank, no no, no, no, no

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 1>no no no no no no no no no no.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>As soon as it hit you could ask Greg, I'm

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>just hearing oh great song. People know it's a great

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>vote rushing people. We've got you covered up that as

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the sports are Radio now working live programming from six am,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not eleven pm, eleven eleven pm Eastern each and every

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>week they cut up. Next from two to four it's

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Scout Fantasy without Amarona's Dr Rono, who is expected to

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be here by the way, this week next weekend to

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>cover the n FBCS next week, right, not this weekend,

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>that is next weekend. Great cool. From four to seven

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>pm e S Time, it's g T D Gave Brenzy

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>cam Stewart. Have you covered game time Decision? Seven pm,

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>NBA Takeaways with Welsh and Bogman seven thirty The Fantasy

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>News Desk with Dan Strafford. You get them, uh. Coming

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit later on tonight from h eleven

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time, it's called The Shots with Keith Irazari

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and tomorrow morning Bright and Early Weak up with the

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>guys on make it range over here e Dane Martinas, Well,

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have you covered from six and nine am the right

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>before us, as you know, nine to twelve, Joe sticks

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>round and teams up with a lunatic fringe. Gave maurenci

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on like that morning after that's from nine to twelve. Uh,

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>they'd actually hung out with dam Reset before and told

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>me some stories. Um. And then tomorrow, of course, at noon,

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Frank and I went back Fantasy BFFs. We go from

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to from twelve to two each and every day Monday

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>through Friday. Okay, we got through a lot of pictures today.

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're making a lot of progresses. I think

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna tap out right around our top

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty here. We'll see how many starting pictures top thirty

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>starting pictures here. Um, so I think we can kind

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of run through some of these guys here the rest

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of this tire. So I have this tier Tier four

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for me is that starts to a pick SP twenty two.

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>That's Jose Burrios Lea's Casto, her Man Marquez, Shane Bieber,

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Miles Michaelis, Chris Archer, to knacka, Robbie Ray, David Price.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into him let's do it. Um,

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get David Price first. How about that David Price?

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>How the good year when he wasn't facing the Yankees.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>When you're facing the Yankees and it went incredibly poorly.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's always a narrative when we laugh and we joke

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.720
<v Speaker 1>about as Yankee fans with this duty is terrible against

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees forever and ever and ever, pretty good against

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. I'm back in press this year. I don't

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 1>hate him. I actually have him ranked five spots lower

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>than the consensus. Like, I think he's fine. I think

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to realize there's still risk involved with this

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>elbow thing, like when when did it come out last year?

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Last spring? Right where like he has like a partially

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>torn U c L or you know, something in the

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>elbow right, but you can pitch through it like Tanaka

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 1>has done it for the past three seasons. It feels like, so,

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 1>David Price, you still have to realize there is some risk.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But um, he bounced back last year, Greg, I mean

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he still went a hundred and seventy six pits. He

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>gave you over a strikeout for ending the whip one

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>point one four, you know, one point one four whip

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred and seventy six endings. That is, Um,

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's nothing to sneeze that. That's that's that's pretty good here.

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 1>So a nice little bounceback performance here with David Price

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>doing it with less velocity to than ever before. I

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>need two point seven miles per hour. Uh, the swinging

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>strike rate did come down a little bit. Um. Actually

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit concerning. So you know, I do

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 1>have him some of these below, some of these other

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>guys here, Um, the nine swinging strike rate. You know

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what I find that interesting? Greg? Why frank so swingey

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>strike rate is below lea g average at nine point

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>six percent, and but his K per nine was nine

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>point zero five, right, so he's everything a strike up.

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Any Miles Michaels was also a swinging strike erate of

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>nine point six percent. Now these aren't direct correlation things,

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but it shouldn't be this big of a disparity. So

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Miles Michaels is K per nine last year, Greg, if

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you have to guess what it was, what would you say,

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 1>first year you're back in the majors seven and a half,

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it was six and a half six point five five

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>k per nine. David Price over nine case per nine

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>had the same swinging strike rate, and Miles michael Is

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>chase rate was six percent higher. Kind of super weird

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>David Prices. I don't think I'm gonna own shares of

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.479
<v Speaker 1>David Prices because I like players who are going around

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this range more right so over the past week and

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>NFBC ADP He's going pick like straight up. I'd rather

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have Miles Michaels more and he's going right around the

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>same range. Zach Wheeler is only going nine spots higher.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You know how I feel about Zach Wheeler, much rather

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to have him than David Price. And then even Luis

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Castillo is going he's going about fourteen picks later. I'd

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>rather have Castillo than David Price. I'd rather have Chris Archer,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>who's going thirty seven picks later. I'd rather have Tanaka,

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>who's going also thirty seven picks later. It's only I'm

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna own David Price because of the pictures who are

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going around him in this range. Yeah, I think there's again,

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>much like Kershaw and bub Garner, there is a lot

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of higher upside guys, and David Price, I think the

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>upside is seemingly gone. You talked a lot about Miles Michelis, like,

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is he somebody that can improve that strikeout rate? Like I?

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And he has really good command right one point three

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>zero walks Brian's actual look, the era indicators were much higher.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to pitch to a sub three ear right.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You give up as much contact as you do with

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Miles michael Is you know a two

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>point eight three e r a. I mean, that's fool's gold.

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But can he give you a three five six ear

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a with a good whip? Because he doesn't walk anybody

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and the strikeouts come up a little bit, maybe the

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>k per nine closer to like seven and a half,

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe even closer to eight. And he gets people to

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>chase a lot, and he Miles Michaels hays a really

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting arsenal of pitches. He there's a four steamer twenty

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent of the time, a sinker two percent of

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the time, a slider twenty six percent, and a curveball

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>one percent. So we have four different pitches that he

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>throws at least twenty one percent of the time. That's

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a diverse pitching arsenal. I'man I like I kind of

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>like Miles michael Is. If you draft him, you do

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have to realize this. You have to pair him with

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>someone who maybe it's gonna be a high whit pitcher,

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna give you a lot of strikeouts. And

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what I told Greg when I was, you know, thinking

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about drafting a guy like Michaels, is Haaren with Robbie Ray,

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that's so funny. Lot of like Rodriguez, It's not funny.

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna literally have to bring that up. But

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wait a minute, this is because you

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and I had this conversation exactly right. So you just

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have to temper expectations in terms of the strikeouts. If

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you get like two any pitch from Miles Michaelis again

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. Last season he gave you two hundred forty

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts, I think it's gonna come up from that.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I would expect, let's say, hundred and six hundred seventy

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts this year from Miles Michaels. If he goes two

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>dings pitched, you have to get someone who's gonna help

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you out a little bit more in strikeouts, right, So

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ropair him with Chris Archer even in that range. So

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray, we doesn't want to get to you next

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>in this tier for you, And I'm very interested to hear.

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Why so Ray's caper nine? You know it's ridiculous, right,

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's over twelve, which is crazy. The ear A slightly

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>under four ERA A indicators. Actually, you know, if you're

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>an expect guy like Modica, it seems better actually at

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>three point seven seven. Well, the FIPS is at four

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>point three one. Here's the very damaging part of Robbie

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Ray everything, specifically the walk rate over five over five

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>is the walk per nine. I don't know if there's

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>anybody worse in all Major League baseball then Robbie Ray

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>look at it also. But I mean I have it

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.479
<v Speaker 1>up right here, all right, Is there anybody worse among

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.879
<v Speaker 1>pitchers starting pitchers with a hundred and twenty innings pitch

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>last year he was nine is five point zero nine

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 1>walk for nine was the worst in baseball, worst than

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Loriano, Lucas Giolito and Sean Okay. So again, the

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>worst in baseball. But he's not actually that bad, like

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>he was picking through injury last year. And it's never

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's always been bad year prior a year prior seventeen

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>three point nine four. The walk great. This is a

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 1>guy that always walks in his career. The walk rates

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about four. He walks about four guys per ninenes. Considering

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't pitch nine in every start. He walks a

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys in every start. Now he combats out,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of course with a strikeout. But you look at that

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 1>um let the base percentage eighty and a half percent.

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 1>There's always guys on base for Robbie, right, it's can

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>he get them out? In the left the base percentage

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>was obviously higher with you know, he was better at

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty four and a half percent. Not a surprise there.

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you want Robbie Ray as SP three year later? Okay?

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean ideally, if you could start off your you're

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up using a lot of draft capital if

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to pull this off, though, like if you

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>want them as your SP four Just thinking about this,

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>say you draft two starting pitchers in the first four rounds,

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you get Miles Michaelis and like the eighth round and

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>then you get Robbie Ray in the ninth. That could

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>work out, but then again you're using you're using four

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of your top nine draft picks on starting pitchers. Then

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you don't even have a closer yet. So

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that you have to weigh. But

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think another picture that you can pare

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 1>um him with his Sinaka because Sanaka is a good

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>whip picture. So I'm you worry a little bit about

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the whip could blow up a little bit with Robbie

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>reik here, he doesn't give up a lot of hits. Again,

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the walks that are a huge issue. If

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.479
<v Speaker 1>we look over the past few seasons, his batting average

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>against has been one nineties seven and twenty seventeen when

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he was amazing, and then last year it was to fifteen.

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray doesn't give up a lot of hits. He's

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>got nasty stuff, there's no denying that. Like he's gonna

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of swings and missing but he yeah,

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know where the ball is going half the time.

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So interesting his e ar a at home in Arizona

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>four point seven three away from Arizona and Chase Field

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 1>three or five. So maybe the human door helps him

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit this year. Why didn't it last

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>year he was pitching through injury like it was kind

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of a mess of a season last year for Robbie Ray,

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it definitely was. And he's never gone more than a

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy four and a third innings pitch. But

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we know what his upside could be, Greg, You know

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>his upside if he if he pitches a hundred and

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he picks a hundred sixty two innings in twenty seventeen

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and gave owners two hundred eighteen strikeouts. Actually in seventeen

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he gave two hundred eighteen strikeouts and back to back seasons.

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He'll be hard. Has to find a guy at this

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 1>range of the draft, in the nine tenth round of draft,

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.279
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna give you close to twitter and twenty strikeouts, Greig,

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it just don't come around all that often. So I

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:10.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why people you know, want Robbie Ray. But you

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>just have to know that there's volatility here in terms

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:15.799
<v Speaker 1>of the whip and the ear a. So you're gonna

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have to pair him with someone else who's gonna bring

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>down those categories. You know, if you get him as

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>your SP four, that's awesome. I think realistically you get

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>him as like your SP three. I think pairing him

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with a guy like Miles michaelis actually makes a lot

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of sense, so to probably, like I'm trying to look

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>at right, it wasn't dissimilar like the ear A says

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he was better in the second half, Like wait, better

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>could be like a three point seven ear a picture

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with like a one point to five whip. But he's

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>also gonna give you like over twelve case per not

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 1>definitely is that making better for roto or points or neither?

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Definitely better for Rodo strikeouts matter so much? In my

0:50:51.760 --> 0:50:54.240
<v Speaker 1>points league? You only get half a point per picture strikeout,

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I'm more likely to take guy like

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Miles Michaels in the points league just because they're gonna

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the Endings and Paul Endings that you brought

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>up Chris Archer before. Chris Archers obviously a lightning rod

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of a name. There's some experts absolutely love him that

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 1>some expers absolutely hate him. And as Frank said, so

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting do you like Chris Archer this year? I'm more

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>apt to get in on Chris Archers this year than

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>ever before because no, not just that, it's I'm sorry, Well,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if Sandro one of our editors, he's not here today,

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but if you're home listening, Sandro don't hate me because

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>he does not. He does not buy anything. I am

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so excited for the Sandro attack. He does not. He

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>does not buy into like the race seriae effects um,

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>although I think you can argue against it. But Chris Archer,

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years you've had to use a

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:38.919
<v Speaker 1>fourth fifth round price tag on him. Now you're getting

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>even like the nine tenth round range, right, And I

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>know he's pitched too over a four e R A

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>three years in a row. It's been frustrating, but look

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at those underlying numbers, like every year, like is this

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just who he is? Like he's a four e R

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>A pitcher who's never going to picture his peripherals because

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the guy has a career three point four or five

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>x fit but he has a career three point seven

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 1>e L. Right, So it's like it's kind of like

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the John Gray thing too, right, Like everyone wants to

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>buy into the upside. To me, I think Chris Archer

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:11.399
<v Speaker 1>has upside. And you know, last year the strikeouts came down,

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>they were down to nine point eight case per nine,

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but in years past eleven case per nine, ten case

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>per nine with Chris Archer, Like you know, the strikeouts

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be there. Uh, he was a little bit

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 1>dinged up less. You're only pitched a hundred forty innings,

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but in the three years before that, two hundred innings pitched.

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never had shares of Chris Archer before because I

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>never liked that you have to pay fourth fifth round

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>price tag for a guy that was giving you an

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>e r A over four and a whip that was

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, one point to five. But now you're getting

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the similar the same upside that he's had in the

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>past in Pittsburgh where maybe they can figure him out

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's out of the A L East Yanel

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Central is still not a great division because he has

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to face the Brewers and the Cardinals and the Reds.

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But he doesn't have to pitch in the Al East anymore.

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And you're getting him in the nine tenth round. I

0:52:56.760 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>got him in the tenth round right as my you

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 1>know sp three read in a Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational.

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I like taking a stab at the outside there. I'm

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more likely to take him at that point.

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>He's always been a guy like he's. He has to

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>work on a change and hopefully the Pirates put some

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on that because the fastball we've known, it's always

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>been electric. Greg you know, he lives in the mid

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 1>nineties with the fastball, and he has a great slider,

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but he's really a fastball slider and that's what's got

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>him into trouble over the past couple of years. And

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 1>this is what I say, is that starting pitchers need

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a third pitch. That's what Chris Archer needs. So hopefully

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he works on that and figures it out. Like the

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate was still in line with his career

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. Swinging strike rate, that's why we like Louise Cassio.

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Giving you a thirteen percent scween strike rate, You've got

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>people to hate more than ever last year to so

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the strikeout rate should have been closer

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to what his career remarks are. Then he got a

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit unlucky in terms of the strikeouts last season.

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm Chris Archer man. I like Chris Archer

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:59.439
<v Speaker 1>two man. I find myself going back and forth because

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I like to not Ka too, and they're always in

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the same range. What do you like between Archer and Tanaka?

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Like the winds are probably gonna be there for Tanaka

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but the durability, Like I expect Chris Archer to go

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>closer to pitch and I would Tanaka. I think Tanaka

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is probably more like one six one seventy innings. They're

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>actually very very very similar. Do you need to because

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like Tanaka is a great whip Pitcher, Archer probably closer

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to like one point to five whip. I think the

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:27.840
<v Speaker 1>strike out upside is better for Archer. It's like, what

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do you want? What do you want of these guys?

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Because if you want whip, then I think you take Tanaka,

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and which I've learned is very hard to find later

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>on in draft. So you can get like sub one

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 1>point one five whip out of Tanaka in the nine

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>tenth round. That's very valuable Chris Archer. What he has

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is we have the peripherals. We're kind of being sold

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 1>on the promise again here, but again you're getting at

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a discount compared two years past. You know, the hope

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:56.800
<v Speaker 1>being like a three seven or better ear rate of

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer with at one point to five whip and

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>han or eleven case per nine, that would be pretty good.

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>If he goes two d any pitch and gives you

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>like two strikeouts with three seven e R and at

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>one point to five whip that would be a very

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very profitable picture that you're getting in the ninth or

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>tenth round. These guys are very similar to me man

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like Frank get both. You're trying to get both on

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>your team. They're like very solid, you know, they're not

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like But again, I like Archer because you don't have

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay pay the price tag now of a sudden,

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you're getting, you know, four or five rounds value compared

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 1>two years past, because he really changed as much as

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a starting pitcher. I don't think so. I don't think either.

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have these guys Robbing or Robbie Ray?

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I have both of these guys ranked hier than Rob.

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>You just think they're a little bit safer. Archer has

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>similar upside. Yeah, Rather these guys are Kyle Hendrix. I'm

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.279
<v Speaker 1>just kidding. Next question, would you rather have these guys

0:55:49.320 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are Charlie Morton the one starting pitcher I skipped according

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to the nfcc A d P. Yeah, I have Charlie

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Morton behind this tire. He's the start of the next

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 1>tier for me. Do you want to do that today

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that tomorrow? No, because we can do like outside the

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:04.239
<v Speaker 1>top thirty tomorrow. Okay, one guy that we didn't talk

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>about who is inside my top twenty five is Shane Bieber. Sure,

0:56:08.560 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but we we kind of mentioned him on Friday. The

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate was scary. He lived in the zone

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot last year. Um, he's got to learn that

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to throw some pitches outside the strike of the But

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sweney strike rate was there, the whiff rate on

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>his pitches, he's legitimate change Like, that's why people are

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:27.360
<v Speaker 1>buying into Shane Bieber, like legit control. Picture does not

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:29.440
<v Speaker 1>walk a lot of guys, but he can learn to

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nibble a little bit more and again I buy into

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Indians organization. They just developed Clevinger last year.

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Is it that crazy to imagine that Shane Bieber can

0:56:39.360 --> 0:56:41.840
<v Speaker 1>take some kind of Clevinger like leap this season? I

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:46.359
<v Speaker 1>don't even get that crazy. I don't think a lot

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons you like my Clevinger last year, you

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>have every rights like Shane Bieber. This year? Would you

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>rather have Bieber or this arch group? I think you

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>need right. I think you want to be safe to

0:56:57.239 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 1>take the archer Ka group. If you want to take

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a shot, probably would I think shaneber I'd rather take

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Shane Meaber all right tomorrow on the program The Angels,

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Heiny and Tyler Scaggs, Charlie Morton at Water Rotarriguez

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and more. For Frank Stanfel, I'm Greg Susman takes the

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Matte Modec and the guys downstairs. We'll do it all

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>go tomorrow, we hope,