WEBVTT - Stocks Hit Highs and Apple's EU Warning

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Technology and take it outperforms. The stocks jump on the

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>jumbo FED rate cut.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 3>We talk megacaps on the move.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Plus Apple gets an EU warning to open up its

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 4>iPhone operating system and Elon.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 3>Musk's X is back on in Brazil.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>How the platform bypassed a ban through a software update.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But first let's check in on these markets because risk

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>assets are up and to the right, we've finally found

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>that bid post the FED rate cut of some fifty

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>basis points and we raw high the best day in

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>at least a month for the Nasdaq one hundred up

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>almost two and a half percent, and Crypto two getting

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>its mojo on four and a half percent. If you're

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 2>looking at Bitcoin and ed, you're going to look at

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the megacaps.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the biggest percentage end points gainers on

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the NAZAQ one hundred are the megacaps. And a lot

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>of investors have come on this show and said when

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 4>it comes to tech, there will be a recalculation around valuation.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 4>But actually a lot of the conversation this morning is

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>we're going to avoid a recession, and that always comes

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 4>up in the context of megacaps.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 5>They're a very diverse group, particularly Tesla.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Right, how much is Elon Musk talks about the impact

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 4>of higher rates on EV sales? Not that Elon Musk

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 4>and Tesla are going to be focused on the business

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>of selling cars for much longer.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Carry That's the one thing that we've got to be

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>keeping an eye on when it comes to Tesla. When

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>it comes to cars, the robotax is the future. But

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>for the here and then now, should megacaps be roaring.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk to Zachary Hill, head of portfolio management and

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Horizon Investments eight million dollars in assets under management. We're

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>going to discuss first and foremost the rate cut. What

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>does it mean for these names that we've been so

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>used to leading the market higher?

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Carolin, thanks for having me.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's been quite twenty four hours, you know,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 6>after that supersized rate cut, which most people in the

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 6>market US included expected to be fifty basis points, although

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 6>economists were skewed more towards the twenty five camp.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, we saw some mixed price action and overnight it.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 6>Looked like we were going to get a biable dip,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 6>and coming in this morning, things look quite a bit different.

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 6>And so we do think that overall the trend is higher.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Kind of look through some of this short term noise

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 6>and as it relates to the top of the market,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 6>we do believe now for the first time in about

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 6>eighteen months, that the market could really broaden out in

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 6>a meaningful way. And so, you know, not giving up

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 6>on the AI theme in the megacaps in general, they're

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 6>outstanding companies, but I do think we have a little

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 6>bit of a window for the rest of the market to.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Catch up here.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, when you say broaden out, you mean small caps

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>more broadly, or is there a way to broaden out

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 2>the technology investment theme.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we like doing it across both vectors.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 6>Actually, you know, in terms of the expression of the

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 6>AI trade, kind of moving away from the semiconductor because

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 6>if you just look at the kind of the charred

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 6>patterns there and just the overall narrative, it seems a

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 6>little bit exhausted relative you know, to some other some

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 6>of the other players in the growth space. Also, I

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 6>do think, as you mentioned, small caps, you know, they

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 6>have a window here where they can work. Regional banks

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 6>is another part of the market that we like. That's

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 6>probably going to be more of a trade for us.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 6>But we do think, you know, the fact that rates

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 6>are coming down, growth is still strong, and the next

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 6>move by the FED is going to be a cut.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 6>We can quibble about that's twenty five or fifty when

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 6>that when that occurs, at the end of the day,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 6>we don't really think that matters as much for the

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 6>broader picture. So those are two different areas we're playing

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 6>that broadened out theme within US equity exposure.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>So, Zachary, with that in mind, why is it the

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor names and mega caps that are rallying hard this morning?

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's that's a great question, you know, and I

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 6>don't have a really spot on answer for you now.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I would just say, broadly speaking, over the

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 6>last three weeks, we've seen a lot of volatility in

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 6>these names, you know, speaking for the kind of the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 6>most popular stock in the world in video. You know,

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 6>we saw earnings they were really good, but not as

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 6>good as people have come to expect. We got kind

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 6>of a delayed reaction on that stock the following week,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 6>and then reverse the following week. So there's just been

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 6>a lot of back and forth, broadly speaking, and that's

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 6>another reason that we think broadening out makes sense, just

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 6>because the volatility of this trade has gotten higher, it's

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 6>gotten more difficult to hold, and so from a risk

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 6>adjusted perspective, you know, we think it makes sense to

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 6>look outside of just the tip of the spear that's

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 6>really been driving us for the last eighteen months.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Your second point earlier is that rates are going to

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>come down, and we can debate the increments going forward

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 4>and look at the dots through the end of next year.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 4>But a quite reasonable question for many technology investors is

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 4>what had actually changed between July and yesterday, Right, A

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty basis point cut yesterday and nothing through the summer,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>And that, for you guys in the markets must be

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>difficult to calculate.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is difficult, and you have to play a

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 6>little bit of criminology with what's going on, you know,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 6>within the FOMC, I mean, you know, our our read

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 6>of it is, I think Chair Pal, who's more dubvish

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 6>than the committee.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, he wanted to cut rates in July, but couldn't.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 6>Get anyone there, and so you know, the actions that

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 6>we saw in the blackout period to kind of move

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 6>the market towards a fifty basis pointcut, that that was

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 6>indicative of Chair Pal kind of trying to make up

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 6>for you know, what didn't happen in July. You know,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 6>I think one of the reasons that Stockston rally initially

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 6>yesterday after everything was released in the afternoon is that

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 6>it's pretty clear the committee is more split than we thought.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 6>And so, you know, the almost half the committee wrote

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 6>down only one further cut you know, this year, which

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 6>is quite a bit different than where the market is priced,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 6>and so, you know, I do think there'll be some

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 6>back and forth on that, but broadly speaking, you know,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 6>the messages if the labor market continues to slow down

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 6>into an area where we start to get concerned, the

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 6>FED will be more aggressive. And the fact that we

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 6>have that FED put back in scope, something we haven't

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 6>had for about two and a half three years, I

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 6>think that's really important thing that you can lose sight

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 6>of if you're you know, just in the day to

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 6>day trying to explain hour by hour.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Moves, Zachary.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>This isn't just the central Bank to the US, it's

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 2>the central bank to the world, and we're seeing risk

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>assets rally across the world. What about European tech ASML

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the best performer from a points perspective in Europe today?

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 3>What about Japanese tech?

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, we do continue to think the story

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>is better in the US than abroad. You know that

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 6>a lot of that just has to do with the

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 6>innate innovation and the structure of our capital markets versus

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 6>the rest of the world. But we do think there's

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>some opportunity in Japan. You know, that's more of a

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 6>medium term story in terms of structural reforms and a

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 6>really really cheap currency that can be a tailwind to

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 6>US investors. We're starting to see the end correct, you know,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 6>quite a bit over the last over the last few months,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 6>and we think that is a favorable trend that will

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 6>continue there. But broadly speaking, we do we do like

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 6>to express this theme more within the US, you know,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 6>talking about the European angle more more broadly. I do

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 6>think it's a little bit wild that there's only about

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 6>a twenty five percent chance that the ECB cuts rates

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 6>in October. You know, if you look at the growth trajectory,

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 6>you look at the inflation dynamics, I really think they've

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 6>been just waiting for some air cover from the FED,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 6>and so I think that's something the market may start

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 6>to think about, you know, over the next few weeks.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 6>And you know, from a currency perspective, certainly that wouldn't

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 6>be you know, beneficial for for European equities.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Zachary.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's conclude our conversation with an important question for technology

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 4>investors and the technology industry around the world.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Recession or no recession.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this this one's pretty clear, no recession.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 6>You know, our framework has long been do not bet

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 6>against the US consumer that is employed. So we've been focused,

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 6>laser focused on the labor market, and our read there

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 6>is we're just coming back to normal from a period

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 6>of extreme strength. Certainly, we're paying attention to the data

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 6>flow as they come in and marking that.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>To market, you know, every day.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 6>But you know, broadly speaking, that has been our view

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 6>and continues to be our view. And we think that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 6>plus the fact that the next move from the FED

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 6>and other global center banks are going to be cuts,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 6>is going to buy as equities higher into the end

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 6>of the year.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Zachary Hill from Horizon Investment. It's great to have you

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 4>here on bloom Bed Technology. Thank you very much. Like

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>coming up on the show, we joined by the Latvia

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 4>president Eggars Rinkovic about his visit to San Francisco Silicon

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Valley meetings with technology companies now in the markets carried.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 4>There are some single name moves that we've got to cover.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 3>We do in Intel, the Mobile I are among them.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Ed Intel oup almost three percent Mobile I as you'll

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>see jumping some fifteen percent. This is as it seems,

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Intel will not be currently planning to divest a majority

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 2>interest in the microsoftware and hardware tech for autos. They

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.119
<v Speaker 2>believe in the future of autonomous driving technology.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>This is brumot technology.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Apple it's been warned by the European Union to open

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.599
<v Speaker 2>up it's highly guarded iPhone and iPad operating systems to

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 2>rival technologies or eventually risk some significant finds under its

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>flagship digital antitrust rules. Plimos, jian Or Picelli joins us

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Now and John. How serious is this warning?

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 3>How likely our fines.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 7>Hil I mean, this is not an investigation yet. It's

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 7>something called specification proceedings, meaning that it is a step

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 7>shy of an actual investigation. In a statement, the Commissioner

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 7>for Competition, Margaret Vistaya, said that the intent is guiding

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 7>Apple on the way to interoperability, so there is still

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 7>some time for Apple to disconcerts. For sure. If nothing

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 7>changes over the next six months, there might be steps,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 7>there might be consequences, but right now it's not as

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 7>serious as it could be.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 4>Yet genders some misunderstanding about the technology side of this story.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 4>For example, in Europe, Apple is held back some of

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>its latest features due to compliance what it sees as

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 4>a compliance issue with the DMA. But the idea is

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 4>not that you take a Samsung phone or a Gaomi

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 4>phone and you suddenly have iOS on It just explain

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>the basics of what they want Apple to do.

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 7>But what I understand is a couple of things. It

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 7>is essentially allowing developers to access features of iOS that

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 7>right now work only with Apple software. I think for instance,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 7>of Siri, Siri is of course something that only works

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 7>with it in the Apple ecosystem. Technically, you could imagine

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 7>a developer wanting to access some features so sirey for

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 7>its own app on of course, the iOS ecosystem or

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 7>payment features. Some payment features only work within Apple apps,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 7>Apple software. And that's another thing. One thing that also

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 7>the Commission addresses is interoperability of devices against Some features,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 7>for instance of Siri only are accessible to, for instance,

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 7>devices such as the airports or other Apple types of gear.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 7>And so we want, I mean the European Union would

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 7>want ideally that to change and be accessible to other devices.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Gimbobicelli out of Brussels.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much. Now we have a visitor from

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 4>the European Union. Edgar Rinkovic, the president of Latvia, is

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco. He's meeting with tech companies like open Ai,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Meta and Google. He'll also meet with California Governor Gavin

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Newsom an investment firm Apollo. President Rikovich joins me here

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco. Good morning, President, Thank you for being here.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 4>You heard from our colleague in Brussels, the latest piece

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 4>of EU oversight of a large American technology company. There's

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 4>also sort of a personnel consideration. Hennah Verkinen will become

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 4>an important leader in Europe when it comes to tech.

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 5>What is Latvia's attitude to.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 4>The policy side, but also the new people at the top.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 8>Well, actually we have heard the proposal from the President

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 8>of the European Commission about the new commissioners. I do

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 8>believe that this is quite balanced proposal. But let's not

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 8>forget that European Parliament still needs to approve each and

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 8>every commissioner. There is going to be a grilling. But

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 8>I do hope that the new Commission is going to

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 8>be very much focused on competitiveness of the European Union.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 8>I think defense and security is going to play a

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 8>huge role also when it comes to the new budget.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 8>And then indeed, we have new issues. You already mentioned

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 8>about a couple of my meetings. Also we have those.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Well those meetings, Miss President meta open Ai.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Those are today.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm just starting from this morning meeting with others.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 5>What's your ambition for those meetings, mister President.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 8>There are actually two big issues. One latterly is striving

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 8>to become one of the i would say pioneers and

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 8>leaders of artificial intelligence in the European Union. We are

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 8>now creating our National Artificial Intelligence Center that is a

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 8>private public partnership. Actually the idea started from security concerns,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 8>but now we have expanded it not only to include

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 8>security like deep fakes, like interference intellections, but also in

0:13:54.200 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 8>order to create a competitive environment and two take let's

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 8>say lead in this matter. And one thing that I'm

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 8>going to discuss and look at is the way how

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 8>we can cooperate. We already have very good cooperation with

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 8>Google withri meta, and we very much hope to expand it.

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 8>So that's one second. Indeed, I do believe that it

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 8>is very important that we discuss how we are going

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 8>to address artificial intelligence social media. You know, all those

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 8>discussions whether we should view them as challenges or opportunities.

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm still trying to find a way how to find

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 8>a middle ground and being the part of the European Union,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 8>of course, to influence also the.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Discussion President, is more regulation necessary when it comes to

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>AI and social media?

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 8>A very tough question. I do believe that if we

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 8>look at some challenges have seen the use of social media,

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 8>artificial intelligence for this information de fakes, interference in elections,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 8>I think we need some framework. But at the same time,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 8>and this is sometimes a challenge for the European Union

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 8>and about the European Union. Let's face it, we sometimes

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 8>back in Europe get overly regulatory. Sometimes we believe that

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 8>here in the United States there is too much liberal approach.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 8>So from that point of view, I would say that

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 8>the balance to you some regulation, especially when it comes

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 8>to serious issues the crime, political interference. Yes, we do

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 8>need rules, but let's not overreact. Also here let's.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Talk about serious issues at the moment that the you

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and your country in particular faces when it comes to

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Russia and armed Russia. Understand and drone recently crashed in Latvia.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 2>How should NATO respond to this sort of technology two drones?

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Should they shoot them down? What is your view?

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, actually, this is a really very good question because

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 8>also as part of my visit I've been in NASA,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 8>we were talking about the corporation in Aronautics, in drone industry.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 8>My country also leads drone coalition that is supportive of Ukraine.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 8>But when we talk about defense, I do believe that

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 8>we currently lack common approach in NATO. We have already

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 8>three countries my country, Latvia, Romania, Poland where we have

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 8>seen drones crushed. Investigation is still ongoing, but there is

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 8>a great reason to suspect that Shahid type drone was

0:16:54.200 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 8>actually flowing applying from Ukraine. Seeing wellados sound simply crushed.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 8>My belief is, yes, we need to shut down those dronts.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 8>We need to give more air defense equipment to Ukraine.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 8>But also back in NATO, we are talking about the

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 8>need to increase also NATO presence when it comes to

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 8>air defense in so called eastern flanks. So yes, NATO

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 8>must adapt to the new reality and we must shot

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 8>down drones. We must protect the territory of the alliance.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Mister President, Latvia has has a role here because of

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 4>its location, it's geographic proximity to what's happening. A big

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 4>question asked of leaders across the European Union is what

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 4>to do next and weather. From a technology and weapons standpoint,

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 4>there is an argument to approve the use of sort

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 4>of longer range technology to go into Russia in support

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 4>of Ukraine doing such an action.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 5>What is your policy on.

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 8>That, well, I think it would be very surprising if

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 8>I would be saying that we have to be cautious. No,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 8>the longstanding view of Latin government, my personal view is

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 8>that when it comes to Ukraine, when it comes to

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 8>support for Ukraine, we must allow using all weapons, all

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 8>weapons systems, that we provide to Ukraine unconditionally. I don't

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 8>believe in that talk about escalation. Yes, we hear a

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 8>noise from Moscow, but if you look back at the

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 8>beginning of the invasion in February twenty twenty two, we

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 8>have heard that kind of messages from Moscow, and actually

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 8>what is happening. When Russia escalates, Ukraine is not able

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 8>to respond. But when Ukraine gets weapons and is able

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 8>to respond, actually Russia is not escalating, It actually de escalates.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 8>My own firm belief is that we must change the

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 8>narrative from we must help Ukraine deal or whatever it takes,

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 8>or how long it takes, two we must help Ukraine until.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>There no diplomatic breakthrough to the deadlock. We've got much

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of that being discussed in a presidential election race here

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>in the United States.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 8>I think that there is already some political process. We

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 8>had peace summit in Switzerland in June. President Zelenski is

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 8>talking about another peace summit, maybe somewhere in November, maybe

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 8>after US elections. But I do believe that diplomatic breaks

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 8>through or political process can start only when Russia sees

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 8>that it cannot move forward. That we are supporting Ukraine

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 8>and that it needs to sit at the table.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

0:19:55.720 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 8>For Ukrainians currently to call the first shot, it's actually

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 8>for Russia. But I also think that it's not going

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 8>to be any political process until yes elections. Most probably

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 8>we can talk about some kind of political process or

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 8>some kind of diplomatic efforts next year. But here I

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 8>think that we also should not make mistake. If we start,

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 8>let's say, putting some kind of limitations on Ukraine, then

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 8>we are not going to see Russia willing to sit

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 8>at the table. Just the opposite.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 4>This present, we have less than a minute. You'll meet

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 4>with Apollo, You'll meet with open Ai. I'm curious if

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 4>you want to attract investment infrastructure like data center talent

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 4>in your country.

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, that's one of the things that we are going

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 8>to talk about attracting investment. Yesterday I had the event

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 8>where some of our startups were pitching for investment. I

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 8>think they were doing great. There was quite an interest,

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 8>and yes, I will be doing my best bet also

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 8>to attract talents, investment. Get partnership is open AI and

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 8>other companies.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>We wish you well with those meetings.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 2>We thank a few of time today, President of Latvia

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>eggers Nkovic.

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 5>It's time for talking tech and first up.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Open Ai has hired former Corsera executive Leah Belski as

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 4>its first General Manager of Education, leading the AI startups

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 4>efforts in bringing its products to schools and classrooms. Belskuwer's

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 4>formerly chief revenue officer of Courserah Class. Microsoft president Brad

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Smith issues a warning of US election meddling, telling the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence Committee that foreign interference will likely surge in the

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>final forty eight hours before the election. The hearing comes

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 4>after a Microsoft report found Russian efforts to influence the

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 4>election and Germany's EV market plunges, with deliveries falling sixty

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 4>nine percent in August. Carmakers now calling on the European

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Commission for urgent relief and revisions to its fleet emission

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 4>targets that could have Europe's auto industry facing hefty fines.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 5>And I'm ed love Low in San Francisco.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Le's get a tech on these markets, said, because we

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 2>are powering higher on the back of that FED rate cut,

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>we are now having a very strong day, best since

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>in a month. Really for the Nasdaq one hundred. But

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 2>so too are global stocks feeling the risk on vibes.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 2>And we're looking at the European tech industry doing very well.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 2>They're closing up their training on the day, we're up

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>three point four percent for that part.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Of the stock six hundred.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Move on, look at the individual movers because look, we've

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 2>got the megacaps that we've known and loved and have

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>done so well even in a rate higher environment, still

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>doing well as rates get cut. We're up five percent

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>for Nvidia, where Ali Baba. Seeing Chinese names really rally too,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 2>and we're higher since May twenty twenty four for this

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 2>particular name. And I leave you with PayPal because there

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>are some individual news around as well. PayPal, that button

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 2>is going to be there if you're buying with crimes.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So then sealing a deal with Amazon Mazooho really standing

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>like that. They are so important to the broader payment ecosystem.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 5>What have you got ed? Let's head out to Latin America.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk's X has found a workaround to bypass its

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 4>suspension in Brazil and paying the price. X was suddenly

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 4>back online after a software update used cloudfare ip addresses

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 4>to gain access Brazil's top called band X last month

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 4>after it refused to abide by certain standards. Now the

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 4>same court is implementing a nine hundred and twenty thousand

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 4>daily fine for skirting the band. Bloomberg's Andrew Rizzardi joins

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>us from Rio de Janeiro.

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's start with the workaround. How does it work?

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 9>It should have been a providers X change the way

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 9>it routes traffic on the site, and it's now using

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 9>IP addresses that are shared with really popular Brazilian websites

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 9>like bands and even government banks and even government websites.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 9>So it's very hard for regulators to clamp down now

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 9>because if they do, that would imply that lots of

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 9>other popular websites would also be invertently blocked. So it's

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 9>really put many regulators in a difficult position here.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 2>X has responded a spokesperson saying was inadvertent and temporary

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 2>service restoration to Brazilian users and we expect the platform

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to be inaccessible again in Brazil soon. But this is

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>hest defines being laid down.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Is this usually the response from the Supreme Court.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 9>The Supreme Court has specifically one Supreme Court judge Alexander

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 9>Nimris has been locked in a month's long feud with

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 9>Excess owner Elon Musk. The Supreme Court judge is heading

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 9>this campaign here, which he says is needed to clean

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 9>up the Internet and really take down a lot of

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.719
<v Speaker 9>vitriol hate speech that has been really really spreading over

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 9>the last.

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 5>Few years in Brazil.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, Musk, for his part, has often referred to

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 9>himself as a free speech absolutists. So these are kind

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 9>of like two trains clashing with one in each other.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 9>And this is just the latest twist in this long

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 9>standing feud. The Supreme Court has applied fines and on

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 9>must companies already for over content moderation, and we're seeing

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 9>an increasingly harsher tone and more threats to apply of

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 9>initial finds that we're seeing today.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Andy, you're in Rio.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 4>How is this story being discussed in the local press?

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 4>What does social media use as a Brazil make of

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 4>all of it?

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 9>So yesterday or in late Tuesday or early Tuesday morning,

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 9>when these reports that XS coming back, you know, this

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 9>really stunned a lot of users in Brazil because the

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 9>band has been really widespread and for most aportutions, we

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 9>just simply not have access to the site anymore. So

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.959
<v Speaker 9>people were really shocked. And there result of this speculation

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 9>that you know, maybe the band had been revoked, maybe

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 9>maybe Elon Musk had you kind of started to obey

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 9>the court orders and that other perhaps the band had

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 9>been revoked. So this is you know, a lot of

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 9>people were excited when it's back, but now you know,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 9>we're kind of seeing that we're not may we may

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 9>not be any closer to seeing it come back. And

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 9>here in Brazil you.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Might be back with you soon, Andrew Rossatti, thank you

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>very much. Indeed, now Amazon has announced it's launching a

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 2>new AI assistant to online merchants's codenamed Project Emilia from

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Albany Mergs. Matt Day joins us Another Day, another female

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 2>name for an AI generative AI chat.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 3>But what is this going to do? Matt?

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 10>So this one is any of that Amazon sellers. That's

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 10>the you know, millions of people, you know, small businesses

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 10>in the US and Europe, a lot of manufacturers and

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 10>direct to consumer outfits out of China that sell on

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 10>Amazon's site. Right these folks account for most of the

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 10>sales Amazon makes around the world.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 5>And now there's a tool that.

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 10>You know, if a seller has a question about their

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 10>inventory or what might sell well for the holidays, they

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 10>can just you know, use the chat but interface we're

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 10>also familiar with by now after chat GPT Matt.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>We kind of take for granted how Amazon dot Com works, Right,

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 4>if you're a consumer, you're used to using the Prime app,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 4>then you might not ever think about the merchant or

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 4>the seller. How does Amazon kind of invest in them

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 4>try to keep them on side. My understanding is like,

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 4>if you're approaching a busy holiday season, you asked the

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 4>tool that was showing on the screen, like, tell me

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 4>how to prepare for this?

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 5>How do I run my business?

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, behind the scenes, Amazon is in sort of a

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 10>fever competition for sellers. And we all remember the rise

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 10>during the pandemic of Shopify and sort of direct to

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 10>consumer sites, brands selling on their own you know. Obviously

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 10>eBay is still out there, Walmart is courting independent merchants

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 10>that sell on its site, so it's target So there's

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 10>really a race right now to lock down folks who

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 10>just want online shelf space for lack of a better word,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 10>and so Amazon, you know, has clearly felt in the

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 10>last few years despite their leaders the largest online marketplace,

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 10>that they have to keep investing in tools for those

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 10>sellers or else they might go elsewhere. Right, if they're

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 10>seeing returns on shopifire returns on Walmart, you know, maybe

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 10>they put a little bit less effort into Amazon.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>That day for the latest We thank you.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, coming up, we're going to be hearing from Gary

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Gensler and the potential risks he sees arising from the

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>use of AI that's in finance. Meanwhile, talking of other

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 2>areas of finance risk on and the world of crypto.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Right now, Bitcoin currently up almost five percent. We're are

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 2>clips in sixty three thousand having a strong day post

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 2>those fed Ray cuts.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>This is blue meg technology.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 4>If too many brokers and money managers use the same

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 4>AI for work, it could set the stage for market turmoil.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 4>According to SEC chair Gary Gensler, who's fokes to Bloomberg's

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 4>remain boss stick and I still yesterday, I have listened

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 4>to this.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 11>We've been automating for a long time. I mean, I'm

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 11>told that well over one hundred years ago there were

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 11>debates on whether to let telephones.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>On the floor of the New York stock chain.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 11>So automation is a good thing overall, but you're absolutely right,

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 11>we have to also make sure that we still protect

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 11>the investing public. In terms of artificial intelligence, I think

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 11>it could bring greater access and promote markets, but at

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 11>the same time we have to guard against.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Fraud and frauds.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 11>Fraud, and whether you're using an algorithm to defraud the

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 11>market or your human is doing it, it's against the rules.

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 11>I do think that there's a challenge that the financial

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 11>crisis of the future might be that we say, oh,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 11>my gosh, we were all relying on the same model,

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 11>the same algorithm, the same data. That's a challenge that

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 11>is on this guy's mind is how we sure there's

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 11>still a diversity of views sort of amongst it, that

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 11>the algorithms compete with each other, rather than all relying

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 11>on one. You know, you know, if you ever saw

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 11>that movie two thousand and four and everything one hal

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 11>or one big computer, like Scarlett Johansson was that romantic

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 11>interest in her and then when she went offline, all

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 11>eighty three hundred and sixteen of her romantic partners were heartbroken.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 11>I don't want that to happen in the financial sector.

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Weaving romance into the world of regulation. Sec j Gary

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Genzer there speaking of AI and finance fintech style up

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Intelligent Alpha is launching is a new investment firm designed

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to capitalize on you guess it, artificial intelligence. Yesterday we

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that it is offering a chatbot powered ETF, promising

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to harness the brain power of the likes of Warren Buffett,

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 2>s dudyed Drcamilla, David Tepper, and Moore. Please to welcome

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Doug Clinton, founder and cy of Intelligent Alpha. So you

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>have an investment committee of chatbots claud chatchept and they're like,

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>what inputs have.

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 3>You been giving them? What have you been getting out

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 3>to design this ETF.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, we give them inputs to help them understand how

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 12>humans actually think about investing. And I can speak directly

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 12>to what we just heard Chairman Genzler say. I mean, Carolyn,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 12>this is a question that we get from investors, actually,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 12>won't AI just all do the same thing? And our research,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 12>our studying over the past year, is that the answers no,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 12>they don't, because our technology really depends on the inputs

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 12>and the philosophy that you try to give the AI

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 12>to act on its investments. With so you can make

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 12>it think like a Warren Buffett and be very value conscious,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 12>or you can make it think like an aggressive growth investor.

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 12>No matter what you want to do, AI can be adaptable,

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 12>and I think that's why we're not going to see

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 12>AI sort of do all the same thing. It's going

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 12>to be very different like human investors are.

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm assuming you've been testing this all in beta

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 2>before you offer the ETF to the world. This investment committee,

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you will come clean with didn't get the

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>FED cut right. Thought it would be a twenty five

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>basis point cut. Don't get me wrong. A lot of

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>people got it wrong. But what have they been getting right?

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 2>What output have you seen in terms of their stock

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>picking that's been interesting?

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 5>AI is fallible.

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 12>It did get the rate cut wrong. It did predict

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 12>that we'll get a skip in November, which I still

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 12>think is interesting. I mean, a fifty basis point cut.

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 12>Maybe the FED was actually kind of thinking there's a

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 12>chance where we just want to be aggressive and see

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 12>how things go and maybe they will skip to AI's prediction.

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 5>But in terms of what.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 12>We're seeing from AI right now in our first fund

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 12>that we just launched, yesterday, the Intelligent liver More ETF

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 12>the tickers livr. AI is focused on a few different areas,

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 12>so AI is actually one area it likes, It likes itself.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 12>It's also focused on Asia, Latin America and defensive stocks.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 12>And so what we've created, or what our committee has created,

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 12>really is a portfolio that's sort of balanced between offense

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 12>and defense. Offense with those AI names and then defense

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 12>with things like healthcare and consumer stables.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Hello, Doug, familiar face to the show, new name. What

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 4>does Warren Buffett, Stanley Drucamilla, and David Tepper think about this?

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Have you spoken to them? Good to see to ed.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 12>I have not spoken to any of those three, and

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 12>I'd be curious to hear what they do think of

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 12>AI as it pertains to affecting the investment markets. And

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 12>the reality is this, though, when we think about what

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 12>does the future look like, I mean, we're the first

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 12>form we think to use LMS to try to invest

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 12>completely with no human intervention. I think they would be

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.479
<v Speaker 12>interested to learn about how they do think like humans.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 12>And if you read the readings of a buffet, if

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 12>you read the readings of Stan Druckenmiller, a lot of

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 12>what they talk about is really managing emotion. That's one

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 12>of their secrets, and I think that's one of AI's superpowers.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 5>I actually really want to drin into the mechanics of it.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 4>I think about my own interaction with generative AI tools,

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 4>and they can only recall what's within the database that

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 4>they were trained on.

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Most of the time.

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:08.240
<v Speaker 4>It's like asking what the weather is to GBT voice assist,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 4>and it's saying, well, I can't tell you what it

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 4>is right now, only what it has been historically. How

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 4>does that work in an investment case, like how would

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Warren Buffett have approached one particular name.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Just explain the system.

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, There's two key pieces of information that we input

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 12>into the models that we use. One piece of information

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 12>is sort of an investment selection universe. So if we

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 12>want to build a portfolio around large cap US stocks,

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 12>we'll have that data set and will include things like

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 12>historical performance, will include forward estimates, and then in addition

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 12>to that, will also include a philosophy that we sort

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 12>of curate again going back to if we want an

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 12>AI to think like Warren Buffett, we curate a philosophy

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 12>around that based on his writings based on things he said,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 12>and when we combine those two pieces of information, which

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 12>can be current information, that's how we end up getting

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 12>our committee to act.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 2>That has been innovation going on at all of these

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>large language model providers. We think of one now happening

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 2>with open AI and the idea that they're going to think,

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 2>how will your own investment committee improve a just change

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 2>as innovations happen in the underlying large language models too.

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Caroline, I think that's one of the most exciting

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 12>parts of using AI as an investor. And I know

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 12>Sam Malton has this quote which is a little double

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 12>sided for us, which is the models you're using today

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 12>are the dumbest models you ever have to use. So

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 12>the disappointing thing is he's calling these models dumb. We

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 12>don't think they're dumb because our testing shows that they're

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 12>very effective as investors. But the upside to that is

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 12>that these models only get smarter from here. We think

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 12>about one advanced reasoning capabilities. I think as we see

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 12>that kind of permeate these other models that we use,

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 12>like Claude, like Gemini, I think the committee continues to

0:35:58.480 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 12>get smarter over time.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Doug very very quick, do you pay your license from

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 4>the LM providers.

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 12>We do use their APIs, so we do pay for

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 12>the usage of that technology.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Intelligent Alpha CEO Doug Clinton, good to see you again.

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for coming back on the show. Some more

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 4>news and Ampare, the chip startup back by Larry Ellison's Oracle,

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 4>is exploring a potential sale. This according to sources who

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 4>say the chip designer has been working with a financial

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 4>advisor in recent months to help field takeover interests, and

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the Ampare is open to talking with a larger industry

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 4>player about a possible transaction. John Collison co founded one

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 4>of the most valuable private companies in the country, Stripe.

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 4>Now Collison and his team are expanding the company its

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 4>offerings while continuing to shrug off the question of an IPO.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 4>He spoke about that on the David Rubens Sin Show.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 5>Listen to this.

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 13>Some tech companies. Maybe a lot of tech companies go

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 13>public a bit too early. And what I mean by

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 13>that is in Strip's case, I mean we still see

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 13>tons of opportunity to change and.

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 5>Grow the business quite a lot.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 13>We're still constantly inventing new products and developing new business lines.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 13>And also you can do that in the public markets.

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 13>But I think culturally we.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Have ended up.

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 13>You know, you look at analysts following public companies and

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 13>obsessing over guidance and what will be this quarter and

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 13>things like that.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Culturally we've ended up. I think in a bit more of.

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 13>A world where public companies are suited for the extract

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 13>stage of the sigmoid curve rather than the expand stage.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Stripe co founder or president John Collison. There you can

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 2>catch a full interview from the David Rubins sideshow at

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com. Let's talk elsewhere and venture because virtual

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>care clinic mini Health just finished its Series B funning

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>round back in April. If a sixty million dollars was

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>raised into Day's quick.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Growth is luring some really high profile.

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Investors, including the likes of actor Amy Schumer, designer Tory Birch,

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>not to mention a whole raft of tech names you

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 2>will know and we've had on the show. Mindiell CEO,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Joanna Struber joins us. Now it's a who's who in

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>what is a special purpose vehicle that was set up

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 2>for what reason? Why did you want these women, in

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 2>particular Johanna to be signing up to your to back

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 2>your company.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 14>So over seventy million women are in perimenopause and menopause,

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 14>and it is a massively underserved market and essentially women

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 14>don't get the care that they deserve to help them

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 14>to thrive as they age after they have children. So

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 14>what we really wanted to do is go out and

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 14>target the smartest women in the country in business, entertainment

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 14>athletes and get them to all help and join in

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 14>our cause. And we really do view this as a mission.

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 14>It is both a company that's expanding really rapidly, but

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 14>also a mission to serve women, and so we wanted

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 14>to have them to join us.

0:38:57.800 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 3>You've got an investor group.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, of course women a thirty five to sixty plus

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>forty percent people of color, You've got diversity. There is

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 2>this marketing. Are they going to go out and be

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 2>your biggest backers, Are they going to preach the world

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 2>of mini health or what are the reasons you go

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 2>to these particular people.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 14>Well, so part of it is marketing. They give us feedback.

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 14>There are patients. They give us feedback on what we're

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 14>doing well and what we're not. They give us suggestions

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 14>on AI and how we use AI.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 3>To better scale our product.

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 14>We're getting marketing advice from really amazing celebrities who know

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 14>how to build a brand. So really what we're doing

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 14>is getting their expertise as well as their support while

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 14>we're building the company.

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 4>John, it's almost a year to the day since you

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 4>actually announced your Series A and at that time, the

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 4>big focus for you guys was I guess onboarding clinicians

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 4>who had expertise in women's health. How much of that

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 4>is now the focus in growing the business or have

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 4>you moved on to the technology expansion.

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 14>So we have over two hundred providers, probably two hundred

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 14>and fifty providers right now who are providing care, and

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 14>now we are using technology to make sure that we

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 14>scale their care appropriately. We use AI to make sure

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 14>that we monitor them, to make sure that we give

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 14>them the right feedback. We add new protocols, so we

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 14>are using technology to scale the care. But essentially we

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 14>are fundamentally a care company. Our job is to talk

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 14>to people, to have those conversations and listen to women.

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So it is not just about technology.

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 14>The technology is enabling us to scale, but we really

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 14>focus on the care that we're providing, not solely on technology,

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 14>but instead on making sure that our providers are able

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 14>to best listen and take care of the women who

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 14>come to us.

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, increasingly in our household we have a digital relationship

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 4>with our healthcare providers, you know, either through an app,

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 4>but always the issue is the insurance component, particularly in

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 4>this country.

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 5>How do you manage that?

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 4>It can be a real frustration, particularly in the United States,

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 4>when people just want digital care.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 14>So we care deeply about democratizing access to great care

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 14>and the way we have to do that is through

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 14>insurance coverage. So by the end of this year, we

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 14>should have seventy percent of all women on PPO plans

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 14>covered under our platform.

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 3>And next year we will have Medicare.

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 14>So we just care deeply that women have access to

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 14>this care and insurance needs to pay for it. So

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 14>that is how the entire company is structured.

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Sixty three million Series B five million SPV. That's a

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of money where to allocate. Is it talent, is

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it actually getting out then lobbying, informing people that you

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>need to make these deals when it comes to insurance.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's all those things.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 14>I mean, it costs us millions of dollars just to

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 14>set up the platform, to get the insurance companies on board,

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 14>to set up the credentialing, and then to create our

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 14>care protocols and be sure that we have doctors who

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 14>are helping us to create new protocols. So as we

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 14>look at the longevity space, if we look at the

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 14>breask survivorship space, so we work on creating new care

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 14>protocols as women come to us and have new needs,

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 14>and then training our providers and making sure that they're

0:41:59.920 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 14>able to give expert care.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 3>So it is there's a lot.

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 14>That goes into scaling and that's really where most of

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 14>our money is going.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, keep us up to speed with the journey. We

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you coming on, Johanna Stroma of Mini Health. Meanwhile,

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology Ed.

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Once again we go from public to private and it's

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a big day for the markets.

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a massive day for the markets.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think people still now ask the next question,

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 4>what happens next, and it's hard to know in the

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 4>context of a recession for tech or the rate path

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 4>per tech. Really really tight pack show recap on the podcast.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You know exactly where to find it on the terminal

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 4>and online on all the platforms you recognize, Apple, Spotify,

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 4>and iHeart. From the team out in New York City,

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the team here in San Francisco.

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology.