WEBVTT - Week 8 Trade Show, Buying Or Selling, Giants Tanking! 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840 and type in you guess Dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160 find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. 0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.800 You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best 0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.280 Friends Forever, M Do Do Do? Dude? Did it? Dude? 0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.200 Do Do? Do? Dude? Do it? Dude? Dude? Do Dude? 0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:03.760 Did it do? Yeah? This is the Fantasy Best Friends 0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.960 Forever here on the Fantasy Sports and Radio Network, soon 0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.200 to be alongside Frankie Standfeld. I am Greg Sussman. We'll 0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:16.160 get to Frankie in just a moment. Today on the program, 0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.800 we'll give you everything you need to know about who 0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.319 you should trade for, who you should trade away, and 0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.479 of course we'll go over the waiver wire and let 0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.520 you know who we got and how much they went. Four. 0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.760 We'll also getting to the Giants tanking, what the Raiders 0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.200 are doing, and a whole lot more around the NFL. 0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.520 With that, I gotta ask Frankie what's going on. I'm sorry, Greg, 0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.080 I mismanaged my time. I had to go. Uh let's 0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.039 go train the main vein. I didn't didn't tell anybody. 0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.000 I'd like to be honest with the viewers. Here we 0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.640 are on a Wednesday, It's hump day trade show. I 0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.480 got a few players that we want to talk about. Uh, 0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.120 room on the rundown if you want to check those out. Hey, 0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.720 look at the run out of last night and actually 0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.120 do work. It's like, holy crap, right, did this ready? 0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.800 Is your microphone? Yeah? All right? I think my headphones 0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.160 are doing that thing again, doing that thing again. They 0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.399 don't work? All right? Um, So yeah, we'll get into 0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.480 some of those players. Got some news that came out, obviously, 0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.560 the balal pal news, so we can talk about that. 0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.919 But first, yeah, sure, I do have later on the show. 0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.160 I have like a niche type question for like keeper leagues, 0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.160 and I bring it up every single year because I 0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.320 don't know how to fix it. There's like a fire 0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.800 sale period in my keeper leagues every single year, and 0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.320 a crazy trade just went down in my home league, 0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.480 which I'm the commissioner for and people get angry about 0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.959 these trades, but I'm like, I don't know how else 0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.200 to block it. I feel like you've brought up like, 0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.120 all right, if you trade away a keeper, you can 0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.200 only get two good players in return from the keeper. 0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.679 So it's like when was this? So it's in this 0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.880 trade happened in my league, So may I ask if 0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.200 this was yesterday afternoon around like three pm or so. 0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.280 I will bring that up as well, because it's all 0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.560 kind of tied him together. This trade happened in my 0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.120 league for a team that's going for this year. They 0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:08.560 acquire Aaron Jones, Tyreek Hill, Jared Goff, Travis Kelsey, Philip Lindsay, 0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:14.120 and Jarvis Landry. They gave up O. J. Howard, Derrick Henry, a, 0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.399 Marty Cooper, Marcus Marriott all trash. But the main piece 0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.239 of the trade is Patrick Mahomes, who's an eighth round 0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.600 keeper the next year. And it's a super flex league. 0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:29.280 So essentially six seven good players traded for Patrick Mahomes, 0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.359 O J. Howard and a bunch of trash. So I 0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.560 gotta you know, like, if anyone else has issues like 0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.880 this in their keeper league, We're like there's fire sales 0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.360 that take place because, as you know, obviously the team 0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.080 that's tanking is like one in six. They're trying to 0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.080 get Patrick Mahomes as their keeper for next year. A 0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.040 four four, four, three, six seven nine. You know, maybe 0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.080 I should just limit it, like all right, I just 0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.440 think two players take, you know, Jarvis Landry and Travis Kelsey. 0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.680 You get those two players that give up Patrick Mahomes, 0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.240 that player that opposing owner gets Patrick Mahomes next year 0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.000 as a keeper. And then, because we never spoke about it, 0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.360 this is our first year doing super Flex. Throughout the day, 0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.240 I brought up as the commissioner because I thought it 0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.600 was fair. We never spoke about should you be allowed 0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.880 to keep one quarterback or two quarterbacks because it's a 0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.599 super flex league and the quarterback market for fantasy is 0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.920 obviously limited. You only have as many quarterbacks as there 0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.480 are starting for teams for the running back position and 0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.840 stuff like, there are obviously two or three wide receivers 0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.400 on every team that you might be able to start. 0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.920 So I brought that up throughout the day and are 0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:36.600 esteemed colleague Michael Florio got very angry with me because 0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.200 he's like, how can you change rules mid season. I'm like, dude, 0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.960 we never established a rule. Maybe that's my fault as 0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.920 the commissioner. Like I don't even like being commissioner next year, 0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.640 I'm just gonna say, like, all right, scrulously, I don't 0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.320 want to be commissioned anymore. What do I get it 0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.120 to being a commissioner. I don't get money. I don't 0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.200 even get a thank you, Greg, do you get a 0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.680 thank you? That's not being commissioner. I don't want to 0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.359 do this. Like if you're a commissioner in your league, 0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.839 God bless you, because I hate it. That was my 0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.240 Wednesday yesterday, so I mean Tuesday, today's Wednesday. Greg saw 0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.320 me very angry yesterday. I mean there's about three o'clock 0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.120 yesterday normal, and he was going off. I was like, oh, man, 0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.000 I hope is not good with his fiancee. I hope 0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.080 nothing serious. And then I saw so Then I walked 0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.920 up stairs to do stupid stuff like being a commissioner 0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.760 for a parent. Then I walked up stairs to do 0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.800 some Vanduel hurry at with Maria and she goes, why 0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.320 is frank Man at Floria? I'm like, what are you 0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.000 talking about? You're not you knowing this, like, I have 0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.159 no idea what you're talking about. I just know Frank 0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.400 had a little grouchy all of a sudden, and then 0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.159 Frank I go back down stairs or prase like muttering 0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.400 and his breath. I hate being commissioner. I hate being commissioner. 0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.800 I hate to a commissioner. Yeah, it sucks. There's nothing 0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.840 good at that. That's why I stopped out of it. 0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.839 That's why I stopped it sucks. It's yeah, if you 0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.040 know how to solve my I do know. I told 0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.680 you how. I will bring that up during the off season. 0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.200 I should have brought up this pass office. We talked 0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.039 about it last year. If anyone else, I you know, 0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.880 I think it's a good discussion, if anyone wants to 0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.479 trade in and talk about it. We were waivers, allright, Cool, 0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:08.520 So now the um my waivers just went through in ESPN, 0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.359 I always needs a good ramin like for whatever reason, 0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.760 and maybe it's actually, do know the reason that I 0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.279 look at this league during the show is because waivers 0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:17.760 go through at noon, So it's like, oh, it's like 0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.760 the most recent one I have, and I'm also doing 0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.599 much better than this and then in my other league, 0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.400 so might have something to do. That all right? So 0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.240 do you wanna do you want to play? See how 0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.680 much the guys went for? Alright, we're starting with I 0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.800 told you mar Tavis Briant. I got him. He went 0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.560 for six bucks fair price. You thought that was cool? Yeah, 0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.800 the INESTI highest bit of more Tavis Bryant was one dollar. 0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.599 Oh not so bad. I mean five bucks difference. If 0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.320 you want have done the like the eleven or twelve, 0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.800 I would I would have I would have another I 0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.800 would have upset. I originally had it at four dollars. 0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.680 I bumped it up to six. But okay with that. 0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.479 I picked him up off waivers in one of my 0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.760 home leagues last night, where we don't run fab just 0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:59.680 classic waivers. That's weird that that's a BIPs of commissioner there, 0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.400 so you know he doesn't care. I alright. The highest 0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:10.040 priced player this week was Danny Amondola. One one dollars. 0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:16.880 Wasn't Max wrong league next highest bid eight, It's twenty dollars. 0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.920 It's a lot, man, It's it could be a short 0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.320 term team with the worst record in the league. It's 0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.640 hometown Heller, hometown Heller, do he he probably drafted a 0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.160 bunch of Jaguars. That's why his team sucks, right, Jaguars fan, 0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.240 did you get Lenny four Nette? He did? Did you 0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.720 have a Leonard four Nett? Indeed? Yeah, Yeah, that's that's 0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.160 that's not gonna get it. So we were all we 0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.880 were all excited in the draft because he drafted his guy, 0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.760 Letard Fournett, and I drafted my guy and take k 0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.080 Barklay worked out a little bit better. For it's a 0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:47.120 little bit better. It was a little like side side discussion, 0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:53.520 side bar bar uh. According to Football Outsiders, right to 0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.320 have these offensive line metrics, Giants, I mean, as you 0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.360 would guess people, are the worst offensive run blocking offensive 0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:05.440 line in football, still RB four overall this season and 0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.400 is averaging four point nine yards for terry. He's just ridiculous, 0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.680 so ridiculous. But back to dani ammondl he went for 0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.000 three dollars in my league, so you can see the juxtaps, 0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.320 the twenty one dollars in year league. Three dollars in 0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.240 my league, and I think he's more of a short 0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:19.760 term play. I kind of like him this week going 0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.080 up against Houston, assuming he's healthy. He did practice yesterday 0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.960 on a limited basis, that's the short week. That game 0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.000 is on Thursday night. As of right now, the Texans 0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.000 are favored by seven and a half points, which I 0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.160 know it's bro October, but it seems like a lot 0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.320 of points regardless. Um the Dolphins might be playing from behind. 0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.280 Dannie Mandole just had a big game. I like him 0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.640 for this week. I just worry about his potential for 0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.320 the long term because he is so injury prone. I 0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.800 think Jachim Grant has more long term upside for this team. 0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.640 And of course, like we mentioned downstairs, when we're talking Greg, 0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.600 no one, no one's bringing up Vante Parker. They're they're 0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.400 writing him off for dead. He's going to be the 0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.240 guy that goes off this week. Watch did he get 0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.360 picked up in your league? But neither did you keep Grant? 0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:06.559 How much did you ken Grant? One? For um, he 0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.800 did not get picked up, which is annoying because I 0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.040 guess I had didn't get picked up in Miley do 0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:13.600 you know what happened? And I can't pick him up 0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.760 now because our next waiver run is Sunday, So my 0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.280 next waiver run, my next waveror one is tomorrow. So 0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.080 I had the same person, meaning dropped for Grant, my 0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.559 back Grant was my backup bids Martek's Bryant. I was 0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.040 stupid and not making the backup bids Avendola as well, 0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.000 so I didn't get them. I don't know if that's 0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.440 stupid though, because I think Martavis Bryant and Jachem Grant similar. 0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.280 That's why I did that. They're very like Boomer Busty. 0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.480 Neither matchup, Like, both matchups are fine, They're like all right, 0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.040 Like the Texans are whatever against the past, the Colts are, 0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.760 you know, their secondary is not great, They're not bad either, 0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.640 So like I don't know, I feel like both guys 0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.240 are in similar positions this week, between Martavis Bryant and 0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.920 Jachiem Grant. Yeah, that's that. That's why I did it. 0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.080 Of a surprise. Do you know who got this is 0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.679 the craziest one I've seen yet this week? In all 0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.199 honest day. You know Chris Ivory is the backup named 0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.839 Macilashaw McCoy. Yes. Do you know Chris Ivory's backup is 0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.240 Marcus Murphy? Yes? He went for a lot in my 0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.560 league too. What what I'm missing here? I don't know, 0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.920 do we miss something? Remember fifteen bucks? I feel like 0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.440 Chris Ivory. I think got banged up towards the end 0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.440 of that game too, what it was, But still, isn't 0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.560 he going to be the guy? I don't know what 0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.680 this Marcus Murphy thing is. Like, dude, wonder fifteen dollars 0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.080 in my league too. I'm trying to figure out what 0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.680 I'm missing here. He came on, all right, here's his 0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.720 world World blurb. He came on in relief of Tom McCoy, 0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.280 who left with a head injury in the first quarter. 0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.600 I re handled most of the Bill's backfield responsibilities after that, 0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.360 though he did leave briefly during the third quarter after 0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.240 Colt's cornerback Pierre de Seer came down awkwardly on his 0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.520 left foot. Nine year vet broke out, broke have a 0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.160 couple of big runs in Buffalo blah blah blah. Um. 0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.000 It doesn't seem like he's not going to be ready 0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.720 to play on Monday night. I don't know. And he 0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.400 dominated the work too in that game. Yeah, I don't know, man, 0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.320 I don't know what I'm missing with this one. I 0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.800 think people are just taking uh, fifteen dollars worth. Yeah, 0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:05.360 I don't know. I think they're just like looking at 0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.120 him as like the upside shot. He played very well 0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.560 in the preseason, He's played well in the limited touches 0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.720 he's gotten this season. He's first snaps in a month. Yeah, 0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.760 I mean I wouldn't have done it, obviously, I didn't. 0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.520 I only have twenty five dollars left in my home league, 0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.760 so my only bid was the Patriots defense for two dollars. 0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.840 But the Patriots defense went for eight dollars. I would 0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.800 say they're probably the top stream defense. This week Monday 0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.120 Night against the Buffalo Bills, I went to middle Patriots. 0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.640 They went for seven dollars in seven in year league. 0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.959 There you go seven dollars for the Patriots. I'm still 0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.160 riding the airriaz on a Cardinal one more time. Um, 0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.360 do you have leagues where you still have like a 0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.640 first waiver run? Is that the first waiver run of 0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.839 the week Wednesdays, but you do it every day at noon? 0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.280 Do you have any leagues where you do it overnight? Still? Yeah? 0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.720 Is that Tuesday and Wednesday or Wednesday and Thursday? Tuesday Wednesday? 0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.520 That's what I always thought. It was Tuesday to Wednesday. 0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.640 Like now I don't know. Maybe fantasy football is like evolving, 0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.199 but more and more people are doing waivers when day 0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.240 night and Wednesday into Thursday morning that I don't know. 0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.719 I'm gonna be hosting the Frenzy up next. I was 0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.480 gonna ask him Day about it, because obviously, you know, 0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.760 he's a Fantasy football veteran. I wanted to ask him, like, 0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.079 when did this change happen? Because as long as I've 0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.600 been playing Fantasy, it's been the first way to run. 0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.960 It's Tuesday night into Wednesday forever. You know, you wake 0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.880 up Wednesday morning, you're excited to see, you know, rolling 0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.840 around in your bed. Who who did I get? In Fantasy? 0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:25.960 It used to be like the highlight of my Wednesday morning. 0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:27.880 I mean, what else are you're excited about on Wednesday night? 0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.760 It's a hump day, you see, I get excited about 0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.400 looking at my waivings. I don't. I don't know why. 0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.239 It's like maybe it's too many people are still recapping 0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.800 the week before because like the Monday night football game 0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.880 just ended, so we're like still kind of gathering all 0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.560 the information for Tuesday. So they pushed it back from 0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.679 Wednesday and to Thursday. I like Tuesday night waivers into 0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:55.440 Wednesday morning. I agree, Um Devant Parking for eight bucks 0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.280 eight bucks, and again jam Grant undrafted. Seems Bryan was 0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.640 already owned in my league, so well had so my 0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.000 league Martin and Jalen Roscharver Bull owned already. Lante Parker. 0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.199 Is kind of feel like there's a bad job, Frank. 0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.160 I should have picked one of Parker or Grant up 0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.880 just to see if they went off in that Thursday 0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.600 night game. But I'll pose this question to you, Greg. 0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:20.800 I know that my thinking was who the hell am 0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.079 I going to drop? So this is my bench right now. 0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.760 Like the two names that pop out are Mike Williams 0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.240 and Jamaine Curse. Would you have dropped one of those 0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.320 guys for a Dolphins wide receiver? I think I would 0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.240 see what had I think I would have dropped keeper 0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:34.800 league too. So that's why I don't know if I 0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.599 want to drop Mike Williams. Aren't they on a by 0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.959 keeper league? Mad, because if if it was not a 0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.920 keeper league, I would have dropped Mike Williams for one 0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:44.920 of them. You know, maybe Tyroll Williams is gone next 0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.520 here and Mike Williams. You know what, I completely get 0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.920 that I would have dropped my Williams. I would have 0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.200 dropped Mike Williams on the bye for one of the 0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.000 redraft in a redraft, not a keeper. Keeper. Do you 0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.760 have dropped me in curse? I just spent nine dollars 0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.839 on him last week. Yeah, so I didn't. I didn't 0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.560 off Jermaine Cares for you. Um, other names here, Trenton Cannon. 0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.640 Trenton Canning five dollars. I think that's a fair price. 0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.720 Leading receiver last week, sixty nine yards. Nice. I do 0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.720 think that he will be in the mix this week. 0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.520 We've we kind of touched on the news, but Lal 0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.680 Powell headed to i R with this neck injury. I 0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:22.320 don't think we've see him for the rest of the season. 0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.600 He is eligible to return, but again, I don't think 0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.920 we see him. Um. And also I've referenced this multiple 0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.840 time this week. The Jets are not going to give 0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.400 Crowell this huge workload just because law Powell is out. 0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.320 Trenton Cannon is going to have a role on this team. 0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.040 So kind of similar to like that Jalen Richard role 0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.640 for the Oakland Raiders. That's what we'll see out of 0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.720 Trenton Cannon. He's very explosive. This was an explosive player 0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.640 coming out of college. This is something, this is These 0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.720 are the ways that he's been used before. We saw 0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.000 that in the preseason as well. He can catch passes, 0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.000 make plays happen after the catch. Um. So if you 0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.720 need a flex in the PPR League this week, I 0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.560 think Trenton Cannon's in play. But we should also get 0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.560 into right now, I don't know how much long term 0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.600 value Trent Cannon has because Elijah McGuire is eligible to 0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.840 return in week nine, which is next week, and I 0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.360 do think that he will take on that Balal Powell 0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.960 role once he returns. The Jets like him a lot. 0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.920 Jets like him a lot. All Right, there you go. Um, 0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.120 Elijah McGuire went for four in my league, so Trent 0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:23.920 Cannon went for more than McGuire, which is a little bit. 0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.840 Which is a little bit frustrating because when we were 0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.280 talking about the players downstairs in the order that I 0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.560 had them ranked, I told you Martavis Bryant was one, 0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.400 and then I said to me the number one pick, 0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.280 the next pickup would be Elijah McGuire. I spent three dollars. 0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.440 Think about it. Come week nine and on, you could 0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.960 potentially have a running back who's filling that Bald Powell rolling. 0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.160 It's not like Powell was lighting the world on fire, 0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.840 understand that. But Elijah McGuire has some upside. He made 0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.960 some big plays last year, and he could be a 0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.440 running back who's getting twelve to fourteen touches from week 0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.040 nine on. So I think anytime there's a running back 0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.640 like that available, you're somewhat treat Yeah. I I spent 0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.600 three dollars on him. He would went. I'm just happy 0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.720 because I was only gonna bed four and I think 0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.120 I took it down to three. And the person also 0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.520 been four has are tied with the same record, but 0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.040 he has less points than me, so he would on 0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.480 the tiebreakers. I feel better, alright, I feel a little 0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:22.160 bit better. Were you dropping from aguire the same two guys? Man? 0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.960 I think I think I'm only dropping, only dropping Teami 0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:29.080 and Ratley and Josh Reynolds. So he's still on your team. 0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:30.520 So the rat still on my team for now. But 0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.360 I'm gonna put another claim in for him to get 0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.920 rid of him right now. Greg, we mentioned and I 0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.800 think it's important. I'm sorry it is important because ESPN 0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.680 doesn't do this. Look, we both look at the auction 0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.400 report on ESPN in our basketball legue, for instance. But 0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.480 when you look at the free agent auction report and 0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.440 not the transaction list, it doesn't tell you who gets dropped. 0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.640 It just tells you who gets added in from how much. 0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.640 So I was looking at the players I got dropped 0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.400 just because I do have waivers to go in every day. 0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.600 Um at noon, Nelson Aghiler was dropped, and I'm like, 0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.640 I dropped him in in for mar Tavios Barnet, Yeah, 0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.440 pick him up. And the rat probably dropped the rat 0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.040 trying to have Nelson al Keem Grant, Uh, probably to 0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.040 Keem Grant has more upside of him at this appartments 0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.440 is crazy. We're gonna take a break here. More the waivers, 0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.679 more on some trades. I got really interesting trade off 0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.520 for yesterday. I want to run to buy you when 0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.280 we come back to the round. Most of the vffs 0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:27.679 right after US Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the 0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.760 game's best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice. 0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.840 We play every day, all major sports, all year round. 0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.320 We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections, 0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.320 and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimize that in minutes, 0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.120 building optimized line up for cash games and turneys learned 0:17:49.119 --> 0:18:07.480 from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Roado dot Com. 0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.720 Back with you. Here are the Fantasy best Friends Forever, 0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.800 Frank Stanfeld and any other waiver guys. Do you want 0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.760 to bring up Frank before we move on? I did 0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.600 just want to touch on Courtland Sutton a little bit 0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.760 because we had a report just before we came on 0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.919 out of Mike Bliss in Denver that he does not 0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.439 expect to Marrius Thomas to be traded again. Anything can 0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.400 happen at the drop of a dime, Like you get 0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.919 traded tomorrow, you can be traded after this week. The 0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:35.120 trade deadline is next Tuesday. But from all indications coming 0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.960 out of Denver, he does not expect marys Thomas to 0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.200 be traded. So yesterday we spoke about Courtland Sutton, seemed 0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.479 a little bit more likely that he was gonna get 0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.480 traded and that Courtland Suton would step into that wide 0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.520 receiver two roll. But maybe now it's it's not so 0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.080 likely to happen. Greg. We'll see you any standards were 0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.480 likely to be traded? Yeah, so, uh no, I don't 0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.040 think I mean his value is higher, but he's also younger, 0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.600 like I can't see him training him. I think the 0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.840 offense is kind of built around Emmanuel Sanders in those 0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.000 young running backs in Philip Lindsay and Royce Freeman. Uh. 0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.920 I actually picked up Courtland Sutton in one of my 0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.120 leagues yesterday. I I think I dropped that's a redraft league. 0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.520 I dropped Mike Williams, I dropped Nelson Aghilar. I picked 0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.320 up Mark Tavis Bryant and Courtland Sutton opening that to 0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.320 marry Thomas would get traded. So we'll see what happens there. Okay, 0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:26.600 so there you go. Um, all right, the trade off 0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.240 for that my buddy got yesterday, I don't do with me, 0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:29.760 but he asked me his opinion that it was really 0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.760 my opinion that it was really really good trade. It 0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:43.520 is Sony Michelle and George Kittle for David Johnson. Wow. Uh, 0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.399 good question, right. This is the trade shows why I 0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.919 bring it up. Yeah, it is a good one. We 0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.360 don't really know what's going on with Tony Michelle. Uh. 0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.560 The m R. I revealed that it doesn't look like 0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.159 it's going to be a long term injury. But I 0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.240 think they all kind of expect him to miss this 0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.639 week at least. It's just tough because this game is 0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.679 on a mon to day. So if you pick up 0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.360 Sony Michell, you're also gonna have to pick up Kenya 0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.879 and Barner and just I don't know man runing Michelle 0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:12.000 and George Kittle or David Johnson. What what format? Half PBR? 0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.920 I believe it's it's not my league, but I believe 0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.320 it's half PPR. Yes, So in half PPR, I can 0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.199 tell you his other tight end which I asked that 0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.720 question if you lose Kiddo's other head ends David and Joko, 0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.720 which I think was okay, um his rby want to 0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.040 say on Barkley the other running backs on his team 0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.160 right now other than Sony Michelle, who's hurt, Doug Martin, 0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:37.280 Nahem Hines, Alfred Morris. So what's the thinking in this trade? 0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.119 Just trying to get any type of value for Sony 0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.359 Michelle before he potentially goes down with this knee injury. 0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:43.800 Right so we know he has a knee injury, we 0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.160 don't know how long he's out. He has PPR he's 0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.560 had aside from this week because he left early, he's 0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.680 had eight teen Fantasy points. Are more three games he's 0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.080 been fantastic, But I think it's getting out in front 0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.199 of the injury beforehand. Obviously, the Arizona schedule is pretty nice. 0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.000 New offensive coordinators Byron Left. But you heard Gavin Corey 0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.440 talking about that a few moments go. You're buying David 0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.680 Johnson one last time, one last chance in on d J. 0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:10.399 That's the thought. Yeah, I understand what he's trying to do, 0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.959 and I do think Byron Left, which is gonna like 0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.040 it can't get worse than what Mike McCoy is doing, 0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.080 Like it can it can only go up or David Johnson. 0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.399 And you mentioned the upcoming schedule going up against the 0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.000 forty niners. Then a week nine by you get the Chiefs, 0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.399 the Raiders, the Chargers, Packers, Lions, uh and the Falcons. 0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.119 So it is a very good schedule. On think I 0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:37.120 do it, Okay, I said, I said, yes, that you're 0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.879 you're that worried about Yeah, I'm just worried, like I 0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.560 know the m R. I said, But it would just 0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:43.800 it would just scare me that all of a sudden 0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.960 he doesn't play and then you have nothing, because you 0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.440 know you you you know, for the most part, even 0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.240 if you don't know. Actually, this is definitely a risky 0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.600 move though, Like, this is a risky move because either 0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.480 way the Cardinals offensive line. It's not like Byron Left, 0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.680 which is gonna make the Cardinals offensive line automatically. They're not. 0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.440 I know, I understand. That's just what you're hoping on 0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.320 is that he gets the more involved in the pass game. 0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.679 It doesn't run him straight into the back of his 0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.159 centers the game. Correct. So here's my insurance, though, all right, 0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.720 Sony Michelle plays Monday. Are you gonna wait that out? 0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.160 If you own Sony Michelle, you have to own Kenya 0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.680 on Barner right now. I have to. Okay, So you're waiting, 0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.200 So you're gonna have to wait that out. They're gonna 0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.560 start Keny on Barner. I wouldn't be surprised if by 0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.080 Friday we get a few inactives already revealed by Friday's time, 0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.239 or even Saturday name. I wouldn't be surprised if two 0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.879 or three days earlier we get the notice Sony Michelle's 0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.400 out when the Patriots by it has not happened yet. 0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:44.480 That pulling it up for you right now? Thank you? Actually, 0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.359 I have it all right. We got the pages of 0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.320 a week eleven by if it's possible they hold him 0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.600 out through that. This is week eight, so because we 0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:01.000 eight nine and ten, potentially it's possible. So we I mean, yeah, 0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.800 anything is possible, but a the chances that means we 0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.000 have do we have dr A or and we've talked 0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.080 we have somebody tomorrow. I have a feeling that they 0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.879 will be very pessimistic, So I agree with you. The 0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.000 thing is, if Sony Michelle doesn't play this week, any 0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.560 of the short week against the Packers, maybe he goes 0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.280 back before the bye with the Titans. But like there's 0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.480 a lot of guesses here obviously, David Johnson, you know 0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:24.960 how you have a vibe. You also know he's healthy. 0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.360 You also know that schedule looks good. I don't want 0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.040 to I don't want the risk of Somendy Michelle thing. 0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.240 I'm just nervous. I'm really really nervous. Comes down to 0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.040 how risk averse are you? Like? What is like, I'm 0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.919 not injury optimistic. I told you that already, and that 0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.639 makes sense. I just I think I'm just buying. You 0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.879 know what we've seen out of Sony Michelle, his upside 0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.200 when he's healthy, playing in that Patriots offense. It's just 0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.639 so much better than what we've seen out of David Johnson. 0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.560 And you know, I got a tweet or no, I 0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.359 saw a YouTube commedist Fay and one of our videos. 0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.600 Why do you guys keep bashing David Johnson because he's 0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.960 actually RB eleven on the season, which is true, it's factual, 0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.000 But that has been a lot of touchdown dependent, Like 0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.200 how often do we expect the Cardinals get inside the 0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.840 red zones on scoring opportunities for this team? We're really 0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.800 just buying in on hoping that Byron left which is 0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.560 better than Mike McCay, which he absolutely should be. We 0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.640 still don't know that to be true. So there there. 0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.880 I think there's risk on both sides here, like, yeah, 0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.600 you're getting the running back who's actually going to give 0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.199 you a floor of points every single week. The thing is, 0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.159 when both guys are healthy in our plane, sonysel upside 0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.840 is unquestionably better. In my opinion, it's a close trade. 0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.760 I would I would, I would keep sowing your show. Okay, 0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.639 so there you go. I agree with the upside with you. 0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.040 I'm with you on the upside for sure. I just 0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.360 un there's about the injury. Yeah, okay at eight four 0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.160 or four A four, three, six seven. Now we're gonna 0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.440 have your calls. Went to your trade questions as well, 0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.600 Frank and Ain that you wrote in the rundown this 0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.560 morning last night was about Christian McCaffrey, and I think 0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.000 it was a good one. We brought him up earlier 0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.520 in the week that the rushing number is significantly down. 0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.120 Now he's gotten a job done for the most part 0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.080 in the passing game. But it seems like all has 0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.760 gone quiet. And Christian McCaffrey, before the season began, we 0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.000 believe Christian McCaffrey had the best chance, and this is 0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.920 before he stuck in the first round, had the best 0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.480 chance to be this year's Todd Gurley. Ultimately, we don't 0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.399 really have one. I think it's you know, it's Melvin 0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.960 Gordon has been say Kwon Barkley. Those guys were locked 0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.800 in first rounders. Christian McCaffrey was on that borderline. We 0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.600 thought McCaffrey. I even threw a Davante Freeman. Obviously it 0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.320 did not work out. Um, Christian McAffrey was certainly in 0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.679 the conversation. But like I said, it's been quite a 0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.800 few weeks for Christian McCaffrey. If you're a Christian McCaffrey owner, 0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:24.639 what are you thinking right now? Well, if I'm a 0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.080 McCaffrey owner, I'm holding. But I brought him up on 0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.040 this I put him on this list because as a 0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.720 as a potential by low candidate, just because what we 0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.880 brought up earlier in the week is that he only 0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.440 has one touchdown on the year. And I know touchdowns 0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.480 are never gonna be a big thing for Christian McCaffrey 0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.440 because the way he's used. Yes, I mean this guy plays. 0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.680 He's played of the snaps this year for the Carolina Panthers. 0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.600 He is on the field, there's no doubt about that. 0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.040 But once you get inside that red zone, it is 0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.120 a lot of Cam Newton and we've seen that time 0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.280 and time again. Uh, they run that read option, Cam 0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.320 Newton fakes it, just runs it in for a touchdown. 0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.680 So that's not gonna change. Christian McCaffrey doesn't have a 0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.720 rushing touchdown this year. His only touchdown is a receiving touchdown. 0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.800 What I'm hoping for here is owners who are panicking 0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.119 and looking at oh he had He hasn't had more 0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.480 than twenty nine rushing yards. Each of the past two weeks, 0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.320 he hasn't scored a rushing touchdown. He's had you know, 0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.720 four point one yards per carry or less in three 0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.680 straight games. Um, the passing work is still there, and look, 0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.320 Christian McCaffrey is still getting the job done because he's 0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.760 RB nine right now and half PPR leagues in terms 0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.199 of points per games, So that's right around where he 0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.480 was drafted. He was drafted as like no. Top eight, 0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.880 top ten running back on that you know that round 0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.560 one round to swing. So he's given you what you wanted. 0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.480 I am just looking for the fantasy owner who maybe 0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.560 they've lost a couple of games in a row, maybe 0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.800 they're three and four, maybe they're two and five, and 0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.040 they've seen the past couple of weeks what McCaffrey has 0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.080 done and they're just trying to get whatever they can 0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.919 get for him. So that's where I think, you know, 0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.800 if you have a positive record, if you're four and 0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.879 three or better, even if you're three and four, I 0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:54.359 think this is a risk that you can take because 0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.119 I think better days are coming for Christian McCaffrey. Okay, 0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.480 better days hopefully coming for Christian McCaffrey. Frankie willing to 0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.440 take the risk on CMC. Maybe you wait after this 0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.480 week because the Ravens are the number one defense against 0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.040 the run. Uh, they've been very stingy against running backs. 0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.879 And then after that you get the bind the Steelers. 0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.560 You have a buy in there too, though, so oh no, 0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.200 he's already had I'm sorry, I've already had their bye. 0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.560 So that's even another reason if you can go out 0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.600 and acquire Christian McCaffrey, you don't have to worry about 0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.040 the by after this week. Maybe he sucks again this 0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.400 week against the Ravens because it's a tough matchup. There's 0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.760 a number one defense against running backs this year. After 0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.400 this you get the Bucks, the Steelers, the Lions, the Seahawks, 0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.800 the Bucks again, the Browns. You still have the Falcons 0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.000 in your championship week in week sixteen. So I know, 0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.639 normally we say you don't look that far ahead. We 0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.159 have enough of us handle sized now to know that 0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.520 the Falcons are really, really bad. I guess passed against 0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.440 pass catching running backs. So I like buying Christi McCaffrey 0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.600 right now, or maybe even waiting a week if he 0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.439 has a bad game against the Ravens. You get him 0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.720 at even lower value. Speaking of the Ravens and bring 0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.200 up Alex Collins. You does will have his by to come. 0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:06.280 Uh Collins seymore goal line and red zone work. Finally here, Frank, 0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.880 that's a good thing. Yeah. Over the last two games, 0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.680 Alex Collins has four red zone carries to Buck Allen's one. 0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.320 The snaps are still in that forty range. I kind 0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.880 of just wish that the Baltimore Ravens would just hand 0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.040 it over to him and really, you know, let's get 0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.080 this guy on this feet on the field over fifty 0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.440 percent at a time, sixty percent at a time. Throw 0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.400 him the ball. We saw in that one Thursday night 0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.760 game against the Bengals where they actually threw him the ball. 0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.879 It looked like a very competent receiver. And Alex Collins, 0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.639 you know, people look at him, he's kind of like 0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.600 a Marshawn Lynch mold right. He's a very hard runner. 0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.680 You look at him and you realize you think, all right, 0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.520 you know, he's more of like a between the tackles runner. 0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.240 He's a downhill runner kind of guy. Um, you know, 0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:46.920 he's never gonna do much in the past game. In 0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.080 that game he showed that if you get him out 0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.200 in space, he can make people miss in the open field. 0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.080 So I kind of just wish that the Ravens would 0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.040 get him more involved there. But I do like the 0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.560 usage in the red zone over the last two weeks again, 0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.280 four red zone carries to one for Buck Allen. We 0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.320 do someone have to worry about Lamar Jackson getting involved 0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.120 now on the goal line. They've been using running plays 0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.800 with him, which I get from a fantasy like an 0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.640 NFL perspective, it makes sense because it gives defenses another 0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.600 look that they're not expecting. But like the Ravens using 0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.960 Lamar Jackson the Saints using Taysom Hill, it's like, all right, guys, 0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.400 like we get it. But I I like buying in 0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.120 on Alex Collins because the red zone usage that's coming 0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.160 around and again after that week tend by greg great 0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.240 matchups here the Bengals, who have allowed the fifth most 0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.640 fantasy points of running backs, the Raiders have allowed the 0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.400 eighth most, the Falcons have allowed the fourth most. That 0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.040 the Chiefs have allowed the second most fantasy points. We 0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.440 have a great, great schedule for Alex Collins and overall 0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.360 of the Baltimore Ravens coming out of that week tend By. 0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.960 I like Alex Collins. I've he's grown on me as 0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.360 the season has gone on. When there's honestly fantasy production 0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.240 has still been fine. It's been frustrating. No, honestly, it 0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.760 hasn't been fine. Frustrating because he's he's RB thirty in 0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.800 terms of points per games. Greg There's a guy that 0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.760 I had what RB fifteen as a mid range RB two. 0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.360 Now there's been some inconstence. See there's been games where 0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.640 he does pay off that RB two value, that top 0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.720 twenty running back value that we expected. But a lot 0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.320 of it is out of his hands. It's you know, 0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.320 it's in the coaching staff. But the more that he 0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.520 gets work in the red zone and actually converts, the 0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.000 more they'll trust him and continue to give him that work. 0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.800 That's what we saw over the second half of last 0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.440 season where they just kind of handed it over to 0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.840 Alex Collins and he produced. And that's why I liked 0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.440 Alex Collins a lot. Coming into this season. I think 0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.040 we could see another big second half out of Alex Collins. 0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.160 It's just dependent on them giving him the work. I 0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:35.840 can see, I can see it happening. I can see 0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.760 it happening. I think the work the workload is there. 0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.560 You read the schedule that's there. I like Alex Collins 0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.160 and hey that we can buy. If you have someone 0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.480 that has Alex Collins as toward the bottom of the standings, 0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.200 that's fighting for a playoff spot, you go out and 0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.240 get him. Now. This is your opportunity because you can. 0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.680 If you're hiring the standings, you have the ability to 0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.840 sit through it. How do you feel about Marlon mac 0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.400 right now? Because he's really I'm getting a lot of questions. 0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.240 People are really overvaluing Marlin Mack. We just had a 0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.200 question in the YouTube chat, what do you like better 0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.160 rest of season Marlon Mack or Christian mccaffreyaffre like this 0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.880 is this is how high people are putting Marlon Mack 0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.080 on that pedestal because of what he did this past 0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.920 week against the Bills. It looked very good against the Jets, 0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.640 And you know, I was diving into these these run 0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.840 blocking analytics from football outsiders. Do you realize that the 0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.080 Indianapolis Colts are fifth in run blocking this year and 0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.440 fifth in pass blocking? Like their offensive line is actually 0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.760 getting the job done this year. They invested a lot 0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.440 in their offensive line. They used very early draft picks 0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.040 on that offensive line. Uh. They signed a few guys 0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.240 for depth in the off season. So it's nice to see. 0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.720 And I'm you, you know, more than anyone great a 0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.280 team investing in offensive line and it actually working out 0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.160 for them. The Indianapolis Colts have done that. Uh, Andrew 0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.920 Luck has looked great for fantasy purposes. Marlon Mack the 0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.080 past two games has looked great. But I do bring 0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.440 him up because this is the trade show. Should we 0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.320 be trying to sell Marlin Mack high? Like would you 0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.479 try and turn Marlon Mack into Alex Collins right now? 0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.959 If that's something could do? I would? I would? I 0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.280 get hell explosive. Morlon Mack has looked he He's looked awesome, 0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.880 There's no doubt about that, dude. But isn't sustainable. The 0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.760 Colts have had a couple of good games here. I 0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.680 think fantasy owners value him as a high end RB 0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.560 two right now. Which is crazy is that? I mean 0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.000 it could definitely, like there's always a talented he's talented 0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:23.800 based on the way that this team is run blocking, 0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.200 like that could be his value. Sure, but what if 0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.560 we said about the Colts typically you don't go to 0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.800 Indianapolis to find your fantasy running backs. Maybe he bucks 0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.920 the trend, Yes, exactly, Maybe we're wrong about that team 0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.120 carries this past week, touches over a hundred fifty total yards, 0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.640 two touchdowns. It was against the Bill's defense, a Bill's 0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.720 defense that had been playing better, albeit but that Bill's 0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.480 defense was on the field a lot in that game. 0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.160 So that's why you know Marlon Mack was able to 0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.760 run those guys down. I think if you can find 0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.560 someone in your league who values Marlon Mack is a 0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.400 high end RB two right now I'm trying to sell. 0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.240 I don't know that I trust I do it straight up. 0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.440 For Alex Collins, I don't know that I do that either. Okay, 0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.800 did you do that? I think I would Marlin Max 0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.880 to get out Collins. I think I would buying the 0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.880 Alex Collins thing. All in mag I'm gonna look at 0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.600 the upcoming schedule. The Raiders this week, great matchup. You 0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.440 get the buy in Week nine out of the body, 0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.360 you get the Jaguars, the Titans, who have been good 0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.720 against the run, the Dolphins have not been good against 0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.280 the run, and then you get the Jaguars again. The Texans. 0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.440 So it's kind of a mixed bag schedule coming out 0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.840 of the by but more bad than good. I'm trying 0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.800 to sell him on mac. Okay, all fun, call other 0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.880 players that you said you were buying before we get 0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.000 to the your calls on the other side of the break, 0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.600 Will Fuller. You buying Willfuller right now? Yeah? I like 0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.840 QUT's hurt. That's that's a big part of it because 0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.280 Kiki QT was taking away from Will Fuller. That was 0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.000 QT q T q T. I don't say he's good, 0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.240 q T. That's what we're doing. He KEQ. Now he's 0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.800 not going to miss the rest of the season, but 0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.600 this is a hamstring injury. That's that's lingering. And we 0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.080 just saw this past week with Will Fuller in a 0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.600 tough matchup against the Jacksonville Jaguars, in a game where 0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:14.120 Kiki QT left. He had he had a very solid game. 0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.000 He was back to that eight targets, six receptions, sixty 0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.319 eight yards. And I saw what he did those first 0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.279 three games back. And remember Greg, I was telling you 0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.560 I was buying high on will Fuller. Now he needs 0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.080 to be passed this hamstring injury. It looks like he 0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.640 was healthy for this game against the Jaguars. If Kiki 0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.759 Qt is out and it's just DeAndre Hopkins and it's 0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.040 just Will Fuller, I'm not trusting the Texans running game. 0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.640 This is still a team that's going to pass a lot. 0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.600 If you can get Will Fuller for you know, his 0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.399 wide receiver three value. I think this is a this 0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.560 is a move that can pay off big for fantasy purposes. 0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.799 Why it's risky is Deshaun Watson. Does he make it 0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.799 through the season. The guy has a punctured lung right now? 0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.560 So does that worry you? Because I'm mean, if it's 0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:02.880 Brandon Weed and throwing Will full of the ball, how 0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.239 do you feel about Will Fuller? Event I just think 0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.280 that when we see his when we saw his upside 0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.640 earlier on in the season, I want to take a 0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.480 shot on trying to get back to that upside, especially 0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.920 if he's healthy. Okay, I do you worry? It's a 0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.920 risking move. He called Shaun Watson's health right. He just 0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:20.920 needs to get to the bye right like that, that's 0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.960 what he needs to get to. Which it's the Dolphins 0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:25.440 this week on the short week, and then we get 0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:26.920 Denver in Week nine, and then we get that by, 0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.560 but it's the short week mini by. You have ten 0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.759 days off then another bye. I think it's worth pulling 0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.600 the trigger for will Fuller. I think it makes sense 0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.440 because I think I I think even if Shaun Watson's 0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.200 banged up, he'll gut through this week and you have 0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.160 him for a while. I like will Fuller. He's coming back, 0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.440 He's coming back. Do they play a threat? A red 0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.320 zone threat, which is surprisingly is what will Fuller is? 0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.759 Is well worth taking the shot on right now, take 0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.480 a break, come back with your telephone calls right after this. 0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.399 If you're someone that needs fantasy sports advice every day, 0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.080 the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered. When you 0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.319 download the n T S Y Sports Radio Network GAP, 0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.759 you get the top fantasy advice every single day right 0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.840 through the weekend. Be sure to listen to our weekend 0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.759 warriors like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today 0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.279 weekend fantasy updates. They call me the Fantasy Jesus in 0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.239 this league is never short of exciting at I T 0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.160 L and so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio 0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:20.399 Network GAP in the iTunes and Google Play store now 0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:22.600 and keep the best fantasy experts right in your pocket 0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:35.480 all day long and all week long. Back with you 0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.480 if you're on the Fantasy best Friends Forever. Let's remind 0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:44.440 people Frankie, a Daily Rodo NBA lot of optimizer is 0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.480 now available and that means you can use the same 0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.520 jewels and projections at Daily rotor dot com NFL Premium 0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:53.560 subscribers are using to win each week for NBA DFS contest. 0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.880 You've heard a lot about Daily Rotor dot com NFL 0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.960 df DFS authorizer here on the Fantasy Sports Network and 0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.480 how it subscribers or win tournament prizes on Fandel and 0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.080 Draft Kings in the thousands, the hundreds, thousands and even 0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:09.000 seven million dollar winners. Well, now you can double your 0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:13.120 pleasure and cash in on NBA Daily Fantasy as well. 0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.319 You watch us the fan on NBA Tip Drill where 0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.319 we interview somebody from the DFS community from Daily Roder 0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.720 dot com each and every day they help set your lineup. 0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.640 I cash last night with three hundred and nine points 0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.799 on FANDEL thanks to the optimizer we cash Greg. Well, 0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.920 you can use the optimizer. Well, I didn't use an 0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.960 optimized lineup, but I obviously use the optimizer to find 0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.560 the players who have the most value according to Daily Rhodo. 0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:41.319 And then definitely, Well, I mean, you know, look what 0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.759 we always say about the optimizer is yes, you run 0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:47.520 the optimizer and you take their suggestions, but you also, 0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.600 you know, use some of your own intuition as well, 0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.640 and you try and at least I do, I try 0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.480 to mix and match you. You can definitely just take 0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.880 the optimizer if you want to. I was eliminated like 0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:57.960 one player who I didn't like. If I get who was, 0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.279 it might have been Montrez Harrold, who actually had a 0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.000 decent game he did, but whatever, okay eight four four 0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:08.560 four three seven nine. Well, Michael Carter Williams popping up 0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:13.359 on the optimizer, Chris paul is, Chris paul Is suspended. 0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.000 Michael Carter Williams is the thing. Now. You could also 0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.520 see more t J McConnell tonight at ndred Dollars. If 0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.200 Ben Simmons is not to go back. JJ Redick's the 0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.160 guy man that was screwed up last night. Well here's 0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:26.960 the thing, Greg that that's the public perception, right, Like 0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.000 that's what everyone's gonna think, like, oh, you know, J. J. 0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:30.719 Reddick was the guy last night. I gotta jump back 0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.480 in on J. J Reddick, Right, doesn't necessarily happen that way. Man, 0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:35.920 Like he had forty six fantasy points last night, but 0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.279 these are one of those things. Were like, all right, 0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.240 they're gonna they're gonna bump up his his salary. Everyone's 0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.120 gonna think, all right. J. J J. Reddick went off last night. 0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:43.799 He's gonna do the same thing. He had a ton 0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.640 of rebounds and a ton of assists last night. That's 0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.920 not normally part of J. J. Reddick's game. I wouldn't 0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.040 be surprised if markul folds to the guy who bounces 0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.320 back tonight and everyone's gonna be off of him. J. J. 0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.960 Reddick is fifty two dollars tonight, and he was what 0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.520 he was like four thousand something yesterday. I don't remember 0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:04.680 what was not right price? Not bad price? All right? Uh? 0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.120 Daily dot com promo codes F and G S Y 0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.560 I usually optimizer. You'll get lost in this. That's what 0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.560 Frank and I do every day. We just get completely 0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.120 lost in this thing. Probably just do work instead. Highest 0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:19.080 value on the board tonight, Frank, what Kevin Love Evan Love? 0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.319 Oh yeah? Against the Brooklyn nets two Because the nets 0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.480 typically going back to last year, two cannot guard the 0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.560 big man. They give up a ton of rebounds. Um. 0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.960 Last week. One thing we love about DFS is efficiency 0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.680 doesn't matter. Kevin loves shooting is like thirty percent from 0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.880 the field right now. But he's also taking like twenty 0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.680 shots of games. So he's getting a ton of shooting 0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.839 opportunities and he's getting a ton of rebounds too. So 0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.960 I like that there at starting the lot of Kevin 0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.279 Love Tonight, the question will be Janice or Lebron for me. 0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.600 That's what I will have to figure out later on 0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.160 eight four or four eight four, three six, eight seven nine. 0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.480 It's gonna the phone lines and begin with Darren in Philly. 0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.839 What's going on? Darren's how you doing it? Doing? Great? Man? 0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:02.319 What's happening great? So I got three questions for you guys. 0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.480 They're kind of quick though. UM. One is I have 0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:11.479 to pick one running back between Alan's, Kinnon's, Carlos Hide 0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:18.600 and jay L Richard. Pick one for that PPR full 0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:24.359 point PPR. The Ravens are going up against of course, 0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.160 you know I'm trying to pull it up. My page 0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:34.239 is loading Ravens, Ravens Carolina. You know in PPR it 0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.320 actually used Janalan Richard. I used Jalan Schard against the Colts. 0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.400 That's one of six games this week that have an 0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.560 over under total of fifty points or more, so Vegas 0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.719 is expecting points. They also have the Raiders as home 0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.680 dogs in this game, so they could be playing from behind. 0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.919 Any time. We've seen that, We've seen a very safe 0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.239 floor of Jalon Chard in PPR. No, Marshall Lynch, I'm 0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.879 taking Chard there. Okay, there you go. I Losten Sard. 0:40:55.920 --> 0:41:01.160 He has another question though, Yeah, um, is it time 0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.680 to drop Jordan Read for something on the waiver wire? 0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.480 That's a great question because I have Jordan Read in 0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.520 mind as well, and it depends who and I looked 0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.560 at the free agents in my league. I haven't actually 0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.920 up right now as well. Here's the one. Here's the 0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.280 one that everyone's gonna ask, Greg give him Chris Hendon. 0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.400 Do you dropped Jordan Read for Chris Hendon back to 0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.640 back games with a touchdown. He's playing more snaps now 0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:23.239 for the Jets. They use a draft pick on him. 0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.240 This past year season high in both targets and receptions, 0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:28.520 had seven targets, four receptions. This past week. Should have 0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:30.800 had two touchdowns, but his foot was out of bounds 0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.160 on the one yard line if he has two touchdowns. 0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.400 I think you're thinking a little bit more about this, Greg, 0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.600 I'm not doing it. Would you do Force McDonald? You 0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.240 got so Vans McDonald, evern do it for Vance McDonald. 0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:49.280 I would do it for so not Ben Watson, because 0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:50.560 I was the one I have been watching my way. 0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:53.680 I'm not doing everybody watching the feed in New Orleans. 0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:55.799 I'm doing it for Vance McDonald. I'm not doing for 0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.800 Ben Watson. I think I do it for Chris Herndon. 0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:00.400 I don't know if that's just me buying in on 0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.000 the Jets, but I like the rookie connection here. I 0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.279 think these guys are growing together. What was your third 0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.279 question man before we let you go? And the third 0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.520 question is Carlos Hire? Will he be a mustarting game? 0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.280 Or guy? Feel about Carlos It's a really good question 0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:17.400 as well a U the Jaguars of the Week nine 0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:20.560 by we tend by I can look home on the 0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.400 I will I will say this if he I believe 0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.840 he will be acting this week. He's gonna check in 0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.320 as a high inflexible. So you haven't done my running 0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.200 back rankings yet, but he's going to be in the FLEXI. 0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.359 So here's the here's the thing they face. They face 0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:35.839 Filly this week, they face Philly this week. It's tough. 0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.319 The tough match up they have the Week nine by 0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.600 and then everyone thinks Leonard point has come back week ten. 0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.799 What are you training for, Carlos Hide for if you're 0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:44.799 not going to use him heavily in week nine? We 0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:48.520 eight rather tough matchup, man, But I think he's a 0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.000 I think he's good. I think I want to play 0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.799 this week. He's he's still gonna be in the flex 0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:57.120 discussion for me. But it's very tough match up against 0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.920 the Philadelphia Eagles. You know, going back to last season, 0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.960 his team has just been very very stout against the run, 0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:06.120 very strong defensive line the Philadelphia Eagles. I don't know, man. 0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.160 I still think there's a chance that Leonard Fournette gets 0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.160 shut down, Like we're gonna give him off by, You're 0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.319 gonna try and he's gonna try and start practicing after 0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.920 that by. But I think if there's anything there that's 0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:18.960 still lingering, I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up 0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.040 on the I R. Some we're gonna have questions, you 0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:22.520 know what do I do with Carlos Hide? Should I 0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:24.480 drop him? Because we don't know what his value is 0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.080 gonna be. I can't drop Carlos Hide yet because if 0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:29.960 if for Net actually does land on the I R, 0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.520 then we're right back where we started with Carlos Hyde 0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:36.120 as an RB two for fantasy purposes. I don't I'd 0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.480 probably try and avoid starting him this week, but I 0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:42.560 can't drop him yet. That fair. I think it's okay. 0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:44.800 I'm okay with that. Let me let me get to 0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:54.399 Zack in Houston. What's up, Zack, Zackie boy? Hey, what's up? Um? 0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.279 Let's see? Uh this guy you got chubbed? You want 0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:03.360 Chubb and Marwin for my and Roger and Aaron Jones? 0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.640 All right? So what would your quarterback? If you trade Rogers? 0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:09.840 I got my home. That's why I'm not going to 0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.440 use Roger. That's why you do this trade, all right? 0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.560 You give away Aaron Rodgers, give away Aaron Jones. I 0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.760 mean honestly, even if you told me your next quarterback 0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:21.800 up was like Baker Mayfield, I'm probably still making this trade. Yeah, 0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.000 I I yeah, you have to be actually thinking about 0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.319 this great, No, I'm not, well, Yes I am. I 0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.000 am thinking about it. I wanted to get more. Mick 0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:31.759 Chubb is an RB two right now. Bog Baldwin is 0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:36.600 my opinion of high and wide receiver. Three. Aaron Jones 0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.120 what is he? He's barely a flex running back. He's nothing. 0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:43.440 You don't need Aaron Rodgers. You have Patrick By coming up, 0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.759 stop saying you're making this trade and you're laughing all 0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:51.439 the way to the yeah press. Except um, so we'll 0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.040 see what happened the twin seven. But I got one 0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:59.400 more question. I got the same same question, um, Joan Reid, Um, 0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:05.120 well my it in. There's Evan Ingram, Yes, yes, him up? 0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.239 Him better than Jordan Read though they're kind of in 0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.520 the same boat, aren't they know? Evan was the first 0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:15.160 game back. Man, he's good. Jordan, Jordan Reid's playing, not 0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:17.800 doing anything. Evan ingers more talented. If you have an Ingram, absolutely, 0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.600 he's probably more talented. But there's still like similar to Washington, 0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.200 there's a lot of mounts to feed in. But there's 0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.760 say Kwon, there's o B I understanding Shepherd will be involved. 0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.200 I'm telling me more targets this week for you have 0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:35.400 two receptions for sixteen yards? Great? Yeah, great, good thing 0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:37.880 you had to carry there. I mean someone asked me 0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:39.960 this on Twitter today too, and I'm like, what's the 0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.160 difference between Jordan Read and Evan Ingram? Right now? There? 0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:46.320 It's a wash and you know has actually been better? No, 0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:49.279 I mean you're the same guy like I'm doing. They 0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:53.000 both have upside and hurt. Jordan Read is more likely 0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.400 to get targets with Washington than Evan Ingram is with 0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.000 the Giants. There just too many months. I'll keep Jordan Read. 0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:04.359 That's just me, alright. So we agree to disagree. Four 0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.480 six seven nine. Jake and Dallas, you're up next. What's up, Jake? 0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:13.080 Are we going? Gentlemen? It's going very well. Let's happened now? 0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.360 A couple of questions. I know, um, Frank, I know 0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:20.760 how much you like slot receivers. But um is Sterling 0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.160 Shepherd and Dreke Cohen for Christian McCaffrey giving up way 0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:32.160 too much Shepherd and Cohen for McCaffrey. Um Sterling Shepherd 0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:36.440 a weekly wide receiver starter for you. No, he's actually 0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:40.240 on my bench. I have Michael Thomas, t Y Helen 0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:44.960 and Edelman. And the thing is, I like what Terrik 0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.279 Cohen has done. Se four two, especially the past couple 0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.440 of weeks, like his usage is trading in the right direction. 0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.719 The Bears offense also trending in the right direction. It 0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:57.800 seems like a lot to give up for Christians, Austin Ekeler, 0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:02.799 Isaiah Croel, ados Man's some Latavius Murray on my He's 0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.319 got a lot of running back depth, so this is 0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.680 a classic. He's got good depth. He's turning his depth 0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.080 into the better player. Who could be the better player 0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:10.800 rest of the season. I would make the trade to 0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.120 get Christian McCaffrey. Yeah, you give up Sheppard and Cohen 0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:15.439 to get Christian McCaffrey. I would do that. I would 0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:20.680 make that trade, all right? Cool? Yeah? Absolutely? Eight four 0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:22.960 four A four three six eight seven nine. Gave in 0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.240 poor Chester. You're up next. Hey, what's going on? Fellas? 0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.640 Not much? Man? Yeah? I got two little quick questions 0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:32.959 for you. The first one is who sud I start 0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.560 my running back? I got Alex Collins Ingram from New 0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:43.600 Orleans and Marlon Mack Choose one. Choose one yet full PPR, 0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:50.920 full PPR. The Colts are facing the Raiders, ing the Vikings, 0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.200 the Ravens and Panthers. I'm using Marlon Mack. I haven't 0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.200 done Running back rankings yet, and I know I just 0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.600 went off about how I'm trying to trade Marlon Mack 0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.040 and he and he's been viewed as an RB two 0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.279 high end RB two right now this week in this 0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:06.760 match up against Oakland based on the way he's being used, 0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.040 he is a hard high end RB two. I agree, 0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.040 But he's like the worst one of these guys, I think. 0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:14.200 But he also has the best matchup he does for sure. 0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.280 Ingram has to contend with Alvin Kamara in the Vikings. 0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:19.960 I think we get a lot of passing volume in 0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.960 that game. To me, it would be MC or Collins 0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:23.439 and all. Honestly, Ingram would be the one I would 0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:25.040 bench here and I like Collins, but he doesn't do 0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:27.200 a lot in the passing game. All Right, the full 0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:29.840 PVR makes go to Mac. What's your second question, buddy? 0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.800 The second one is is a trade that got accepted 0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:34.960 in my lead? See what your good opinion is on that? 0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.640 The A two wins five team is getting yelled in 0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:43.480 and Gronkowski while our commissioner who's struggling at four and 0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.000 three is getting tomorrow. What do you guys think about that? 0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:50.080 Is that fair not fair one, the one that Canny 0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:55.560 Kamara is by far let's rather have and the fact 0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:57.359 that he is the commissioner, I mean maybe that brings 0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.600 it into question. But what I would do if you're 0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:04.200 the two and five owner, I mean, it's hard to 0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:06.120 know what people are thinking, Like if he likes that trade, 0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.160 if he wants to get what he thinks is an 0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.040 elite tight end and grong and is looking at oh 0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:12.960 what has t J yelled and done so far this 0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.279 year instead of projecting forward? Then maybe they could talk 0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:18.960 themselves into thinking this is a fair trade. It's kind 0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:23.000 of bogus. But unless your team, I mean, unless your 0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.240 league has vetos like and you can prove that there's 0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:31.399 some kind of uh, you know, foul play involved here, 0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:35.120 I don't know how you can veto it. Yeah, yeah, 0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:37.000 I don't think it. It doesn't seem like a foul 0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.200 play trade. It just seems like a bad room. It 0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.840 seems like two and five needs to go home and study, 0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:46.000 and uh, you don't get ready for next year? All right, 0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.080 And with that we say goodbye to you on YouTube. 0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.320 Make sure before you go you hit the leg button. 0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:56.400 Frank wants legs. Yes, of course, I do give thumbs up. 0:49:56.440 --> 0:50:00.480 Thumbs up. Frenzi's up next, Corey Parson be around for 0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.960 a little while. Jim Day and Chris Venture Franklin fillin 0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:04.920 at one point as well. If you're listening on the podcast, 0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.000 we appreciate it. Subscribe to the podcast rates five stars 0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.600 and make sure you leave a comment. I also, Frankie, 0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.640 want to remind you, will we go another five minutes 0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:21.160 live on the radio, SOO radio. Okay, what do you you 0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.520 think the Giants panking taking some trades. I think it's 0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.600 I think it's smart, right, I mean, try and get 0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:31.120 whatever you can for, you know, the talent that you 0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.440 have around you. The thing is like a couple of 0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.120 my Giants fans friends were asking me, you know, do 0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:39.080 you even do you bring up the possibility of trading 0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.640 Landing Colngs right, because I mean, it's just another guy 0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:43.560 at some point, I don't I don't think that they've 0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:45.359 paid land In Collins yet, have they Have they given 0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:47.719 him like a big extension or anything. Greg, I know 0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:49.719 he's a free agent after this season. At some point 0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:51.520 you're gonna have to sign land In Collins. And if 0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:53.480 he's not part of the future plans, then maybe you 0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:55.960 try and dangle him out there. See, I mean he's 0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.000 one of the most talented, maybe the most talented player 0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.640 on that defense. Um, you might be able to get 0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:03.959 like a third round pick for landing college or something 0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:06.040 like that. I know there's been some there's been some 0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.640 talk on Twitter about like, you know, turning Eli Apple 0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:12.840 and Damon Harrison into you know, round day three picks. 0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.640 I mean, it's like low probability, you're not necessarily going 0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.920 to hit on around four, around five, or round seven picks. 0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.320 But from a Johnet's perspective, it's all about gaining assets 0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:24.120 and try and get as many draft resources as you 0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:28.600 possibly can. And um, you know, you get Damon Harrison's 0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.799 contract off the books too. So I think it makes sense. 0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:34.040 I think what they're doing makes sense. Great, Okay, so 0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:36.279 that's so. That's that's good. I don't like it, you know, 0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:38.520 I like it. It's just late. You just you came 0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:40.719 into this season thinking you had something when everybody knew 0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:42.920 he didn't. I mean, when else were they get You 0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:45.120 can't trade before the season because then you're telling your 0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:47.280 fan base that you already giving up he shouldn't trade 0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.360 a fourth round pick away? Now trade you shouldn't go 0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.480 out and signed Jonathan or maybe they like Alex Ogiltree 0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:54.239 for the future, like being part of the team. He's 0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:56.799 not the future, he's not. So the team is just 0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.239 gonna continue to have bad linebackers until the end of time, 0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:03.319 I would assume. So, yeah, all right, yeah, that's probably true. Yeah. 0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.239 The Jets are kind of the opposite right now, right 0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.560 like they the Giants always have pass rushers, right, the 0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:11.759 Jets never have pass rushers, like they always have good 0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.759 defensive lineman, they have good run stoppers. Leonard Williams does 0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.400 his thing, um, but you know, the Jets lineback and 0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:19.880 true is actually uh was actually playing pretty well this here, 0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:25.759 Avery Williamson and Darren Lee, who's all right, Darren Lee, 0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.160 who's stepped up? And you know, maybe there a trade 0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:30.920 there in the future. Giants, probably not. You guys are 0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:33.480 good at drafting pass rushers. We are not. Probably not. 0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:37.840 This week, by the way, you had Adrian Peterson on 0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:42.560 the rundown the Giants that Damon Harrison love Adrian Peterson, 0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.640 and that's you know, that's gonna be great, and that's 0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:46.680 I think it's a really good point bringing up what 0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.440 the Giants are doing tanking right now. Is that not 0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.440 that we've feared their defense all that much, but I 0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:54.799 mean they were a competent defense. Now they're getting rid 0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:56.759 of everybody. They're getting rid of Eli Apple. I mean 0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:00.560 apparently they're floating theirs out there to So if they're 0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.839 playing with you know, second and third string cornerbacks and 0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:06.440 defensive lineman and they're not stopping the run, this is 0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.319 going to be a team to target every single week, 0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:11.080 whether it's a DFS or season long as a defense 0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:13.960 that you know you want to start your offensive players against. 0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:17.440 Absolutely um. You also wrote quickly with a minute remaining, 0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:20.240 Frank al Shan Jeffrey and t Y Hilton, you're selling 0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:23.759 both of them. Yeah, I'm not selling just for the 0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:25.680 sake of selling him. But he has performed like a 0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:27.759 top ten wide receiver in terms of points per games. 0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:30.560 So if anyone's buying into him being a wide receiver 0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:32.920 one or high end wide receiver two, that's something I 0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.160 would just store out there. Again, I'm not selling Jeffrey 0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.080 just for the sake of selling him. T Y Hilton, 0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:39.520 he's been banged up. He is not catching a lot 0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.120 of passes down the field. He's been very touchdown dependent. Actually, 0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.040 uh so again, if someone's willing to give you wide 0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:46.960 receiver one value for t Y Hilton, it's something I 0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.840 would look into. Greg. We that the whole show. I 0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.160 didn't get to talk about my guy, MIKEL Crabtree in 0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:57.160 the stand of the Day, which he had at least 0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.480 eight targets in six strade games. He's had an incredibly 0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.520 safe double digits in PPR in every game but one. 0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:04.960 If someone in your league just it's just like, all right, 0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:07.480 they're not starting micro Crabtreem. I think he's a very 0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.160 very reliable wide perceiver three. It's something I'm actually looking 0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:11.960 to do in some of my league's for Franks Snapville. 0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:14.000 My name is Greg Selsen. The Frenzy's up next. We'll 0:54:14.000 --> 0:54:15.880 do it all again tomorrow, we hope,