WEBVTT - Intel's Results Fail to Convince Investors of Turnaround

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>live from Coast to Coast with Caroline Hyde in New

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>York and Vla Low in Sentrancisco.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Intel shares tumble after

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the CEO sparse concerns that he's more focused on cost

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>cutting than innovation class.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Tesla said to roll out it's robotaxi service in San

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Francisco this weekend, according to reports, But how robo is

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>it with a person in the driver's seat?

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>And the FCC approves Paramount's merger with sky Dance after

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a few concessions to appease the Trump administration.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>But first ed we check in on these markets after

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a week that has been a relatively turbulent one in

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the face of the micro that is the earnings story

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>and the macro that is Japan trade deal, and what

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we see in terms of the Federal Reserve, whether it

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>cuts or whether it doesn't, and that relationship between fedshare

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 3>pal and Trump as he visits, of course, the new

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 3>building site of the Federal Reserve. We're actually up eight

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 3>tenths of percent over the last five trading days because

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>big tech has managed to win out in the pot

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 3>of the AI action plan some semiconductor outperformance. Move on

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 3>to some of the individual names though, because some earnings

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 3>on the semiconductor front have not been pleasant. But I

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>also want to look what's happened in the world a

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>crypto for you before you get to the micro ed

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm down three percent on bitcoin. That's more about the

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Fed story. That's more about the fact that maybe the

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve won't be cutting in the near term with

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>pressure off of fedschare Pal's role. It seems Trump and

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>him meet over the course of the last day or so.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>We're down three percent.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>What if you've got Yeah, Intel, Intel's probably our top

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>tech story, and it's probably our top earning story. The

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 2>stocks down more than nine percent, on track for its

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>biggest drop since the first week of April. The print

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 2>was fine, and we'll get into that in just the moment.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But all it took was just a few words from

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 2>lit Boutan on the earnings call. Basically a focus on

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>cost cutting, not on the pro not an innovation. The

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>result is after ours pre marketing. Now in the session, tumble, Caroline,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 2>bring us the details.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's get all the results from Ian King, I

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 4>have to say this almost felt like an emission of defeat,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they're pulling back on their manufacturing, but

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 4>they're also pulling back on almost innovating in Yeah.

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 5>I mean this is the way that analysts have interpreted

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 5>what he said, which is that this future production technology,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 5>this you know, this key to them being more competitive.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Maybe we won't do it. Maybe we won't do it

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 5>if we don't get commitments from outside customers, and that

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 5>is not being taken well at Harbye analysts who have

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 5>been listening to the company telling them, Hey, this technology,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 5>there's fourteen A, this is the key to our future.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 5>This gets us back in the game. And now maybe

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to do it. So there's a lot

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 5>of a lot of like what's going on here sort

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 5>of reaction to them.

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>In the headline that's driving the stock lower is that

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the CEO is struggling to convince Wall Street that the

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>turnaround is intact. You had some time on the phone

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 2>with the CFO Daves Instare, and part of what you

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>guys discussed was where they will pull back, probably in Europe,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and where they'll continue to invest. What can you tell us?

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean they under pat Gelsinger had all of

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, laid out a map of basically covering the

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 5>world of all of these new projects that they were

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 5>going to do that you know that they were going

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 5>to make themselves this manufacturing powerhouse again Germany, Poland packaging

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 5>facilities here there and where all of those are going, right,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 5>And even the keystone project of Ohio, which we already

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 5>know has been delayed, is going to be delayed even further.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 5>So we're seeing a kind of a retreat on that building.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 5>And what they said was, look, we're not we're not

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 5>going to build ahead of demand. We're going to wait

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 5>until we get demand. And you know, they alerts a

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 5>quite good well done, that's sensible. But then when we

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 5>talk about future technology, then that's when things get tricky,

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 5>and that's when people get.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Concerned, concern that they're not going to build fourteen A

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>until they get the commitments in. But what I'm really

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>interested in is how this fits in the context of

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>security of supply chain here in the United States. How

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 3>can the federal government that wants an AI action plan

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>and manufacturing here in the US just let Intel delay

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Ohio back to at least twenty thirty.

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean probably more important than Ohio would be

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 5>fourteen A, which because if they don't go to fourteen A,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 5>there's new production technologies, and they're effectively saying that's it,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 5>we're done, We're.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Frozen in time.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 5>So US indigenous semiconductor leading edge capability grind, store, halt

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 5>and doesn't advance. So clearly that would be a massive

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 5>concern to the government were that scenario to unfold. And

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 5>that's something which is obviously people are going to focus

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 5>on very heavily.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergsy and King who leads our semiconducts of coverage. Thank

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>you very much. It's actually been a really busy week

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of tech earnings across the world of tech, software, hardware, chips,

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.559
<v Speaker 2>in some of the hyperscalers as well. Let's get out

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>to Brent Hill Jeffrey's analysts, and it's been a week

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>that's really interesting. I just got back from Washington, DC,

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>right Brent for the AI action Plan. I listened to

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the President. I appreciate that Intel is not actually on

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>your coverage list, but it was interesting that Intel wasn't

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>in the room there in DC. Alphabet wasn't either. They

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 2>had their earnings print. Would you say there's kind of

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>one core lesson right now about what's happening in infrastructure

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>in America and what the biggest result of this week

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>has been from the administration.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the key takeaway is that the AI

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 7>investment boom is still happening at a rapid rate.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 8>There's no slowdown.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 7>Google raised their entire CAPEX from seventy five to eighty

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 7>five billion on their cloud business, not their AD business.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 7>So that's selling Google Cloud to enterprises, and I think

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 7>it tells you that we're still in the infrastructure buildout.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 7>We continue to see the dirt, the energy, the power lines,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 7>the core servers. That's really been the focus. And the

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 7>AI trade has not come to applications. That has not

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 7>gone to Salesforce or Adobe, to many those names.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 8>They're not monetizing this.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Yet.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 7>We think that happens, and that has to happen for

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 7>AI to work. In our view, that we have to

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 7>go up through the infrastructural layer of the application layer.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 7>And so I think that's the next chapter. But I'd

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 7>say so far alive and kicking in doing very well

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 7>in AI infrastructure. There's been no signs of slowdown. You

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 7>heard Mark Zuckerberg talk about spending hundreds of billions of

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 7>dollars in CAPEX. Just a couple of weeks ago, Google

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 7>just raised their CAPEX by ten bill and then we've

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 7>got Microsoft Amazon on deck, and we think that ultimately

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 7>in our checks, the demand for hyperscale er infrastructure is accelerating.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 8>They we're seeing the terrifories starting to shake off.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Brent. The AI Action Plan largely focuses on deregulation and

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>expedited permitting. Of all of the companies that you cover,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>where that's relevant, how will it help them?

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think it should help the entire industry.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 7>If we have lower bars and lower regulation, we're going

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 7>to see hopefully a lot more consolidation. I think the

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 7>one thing we're seeing is there's a lot of companies

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 7>that say their AI first. We saw this movie and

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 7>the Internet boom in the nineties. We saw this in

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 7>the cloud boom. There's going to be massive consolidation. So

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 7>you're seeing already the beginning.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 8>Of an M and A wave.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 7>So I think it will help M and A, It

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 7>should help the buildout, It should help protect the US

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 7>in terms of what we're.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 8>Doing as a country in AI.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 7>So I think, you know, the President has this right,

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 7>and certainly you look at our allies and building this.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 7>It's a collection of different technology companies and I think

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 7>what we're we thought what happened at the beginning of

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 7>AI is that we consolidate power to a few, and

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 7>what we're finding is it's consolidating power to many, and

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 7>so there's just not enough capacity. Everyone's capacity cans train.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 7>Google said their capacity constrain. Microsoft said they were going

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 7>to be constrained. But what's happening now is that you're

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 7>seen demand gets spread all over and that's actually good

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 7>for the ecosystem and good for many vendors over time. Again,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 7>I think you're going to see a tremendous amount of

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 7>cleanup in M and A, and that needs to happen

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 7>because there's probably going to be too many comedies chasing

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 7>this long term. But short term, I think, you know,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 7>there's no question we're an AI boom, and it's really exciting.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's real.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't think this is this is fake like we've

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 7>seen in other tech trends.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting service now. Bill mcdermin yesterday saying this is

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>an existential issue for many in CRM who aren't on

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the AI bandwagon. I'm thinking about to IBM, and they

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 3>look like they're selling well in terms of consulting into AI.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>The software bit was a little bit woolly, and people

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>pulled back from what had been a ramp up in

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the stop Brent, just before we push forward to what's

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 3>next week?

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 8>What did you make of some of the.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 3>Weaker plays and how much do they get beaten.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 8>Up this week? I mean, IBM didn't have a phenomenal quarter.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 7>They introduced, you know, a new infrastructure cycle and that

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 7>kind of possum man. They also are integrated and Ashi,

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 7>which is a deal they did, and so the software

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 7>business decelerated the point you know, it wasn't it wasn't terrible,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 7>but the stock could run up and is almost sitting

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 7>at the same multiple that Microsoft was at. And I think,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 7>you know, IBM is a single digit grower. Microsoft is

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 7>a double digit grower. So I think the stock got mismarked.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 7>We don't have a buy on IBM. We like what

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 7>they're doing, We like Arvin's software centric strategy. So we're

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 7>we're fundamental fans with stock. Just had a big move

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 7>and it kind of didn't didn't make sense. Maybe where

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 7>it was at based on the results.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I don't.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 7>I went to look at IBM's results and say, you

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 7>know that they're a proxy.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 8>Actually, the CEO upgraded the overall.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 7>Economy from cautiously optimistic to optimistic, and I said, well,

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 7>what's next. Is there ludicrous feed or is there another

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 7>speed above optimistic? But you know, Arvin, you know, has

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 7>a pretty good lens and what he sees. And I

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 7>think that was probably the most interesting thing, which is

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 7>to us that that's a good telltale what's about happened

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 7>next week?

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Avin told me his he's really looking

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 3>at M and A at the moment, and also that

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 3>he's more optimistic about consulting for twenty twenty six in

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 3>years about twenty twenty five push forward then for next week,

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 3>and the optimism around what this means to Microsoft spend,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>what this means for Amazon spend, and how much their

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>cloud units are growing.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 7>So Microsoft, they're on acceleration path. They've said their capacity

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 7>can train. They're accelerating the guide to an acceleration. We're

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 7>now looking at a mid thirty percent Azure infrastructure build

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 7>for Amazon. Last quarter they put up twenty percent backlog

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 7>and that was up from fourteen, So their backlogs growing.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 8>Which is a sign of what was going to happen

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 8>with revenue.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 7>So we continue to see right now continued acceleration across

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 7>the board. And again I would highlight we haven't even

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 7>seen AI hit these numbers in a big way. I

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 7>mean for all those brand communies, it's less than five

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 7>percent this whole revenue.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, sorry to in trouble. We just have thirty second

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 2>steft by When to ask that is Capex still the

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>data point to watch or you want to see top

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 2>line growth as a result of Capex the prior.

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 7>Year booking bookings is number one revenue growth and then

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 7>are Capex in that order.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Brent Till Jeffrey, it's great to have you back on

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Tech. We really appreciate your time. Thank you very much.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.479
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, Tesla's reportedly set to expand its robotaxi

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>roll out this weekend to the city of San Francisco.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll find more on that next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Time now for Talking Tech and first up Lift and

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>it has pants to deploy autonomous shuffles in the United

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 3>States in late twenty twenty six. Because it tries to

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>catch up to Uber's driverless Rise. Now Lift will partner

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 3>with Austria based manufacturer has been Teller Group to test

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 3>its pull on electric shuffles in cities and airports. Plus

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet Cio Sunda pitch Eye is now worth over one

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Now the CEO

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 3>holds just zero point not two percent economic stake in

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the company. But how that has added more than eight

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollars in market value since twenty twenty three. ASPACEX

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 3>is starlink satellite internet service network. Well, it's been restored

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>over an hour's long outage. The Elon must lead unit

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>said in a post on x that the issues had

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 3>been resolved. We didn't say how widespread the issue was

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>or how many subscribers were affected.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Ed Okay, let's get to elsewhere. In Elon Inc. Tesla

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>is reportedly set to plan a rollout or expansion of

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 2>its robotaxi service to San Francisco beginning this weekend. That's

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>according to a report from Business Insider. I want to

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 2>bring in Bloomberg's Max Chaffkin, one of the Elon Inc. Team,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and I find this interesting. The specifics are that it's

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>planned for maybe today Friday. On the earnings call earlier

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in the week, which you participated in, Ashle Kelaswami, who's

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Robotaxi chief, said that they were doing this anyway.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 2>But there some bits that we don't know what was

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>in the Business Insider reports and what do you make

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>of it?

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 10>So the Business Insider report is based on a memo,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 10>an internal memo you know, within Tesla, promising a sort

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 10>of robotaxi service, albeit one with a driver in the

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 10>driver seed. So so I don't I'm not sure if

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 10>you can really call it a robotaxi if there is

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 10>a it's a driverless car that does have a driver.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 10>But you know, what they're saying is that they're testing this.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 10>The other thing I'll say is California has a pretty

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 10>robust permitting system for driverless cars. In fact, you know,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 10>this has been around since like twenty eighteen. I believe

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 10>the first company that had this permit was Zoukes, but Waimo, Cruz,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 10>lots and lots of companies for years have been operating

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 10>these services with permits. As anyone who lives in the

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 10>Bay Area knows, Tesla does not have any of these permits.

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 8>Yet what they have is.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Something called a TCP permit.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 10>This is basically a permit to operate a charter service

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 10>with human drivers, so effectively like a black car service,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 10>a chauffeur service or whatever.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And so my guess is that.

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 10>Is how they're they're going to justify this, which is

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 10>to say, you know, it's not really an autonomous car

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 10>as far as the law is concerned. Of course, Tesla

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 10>has blurred the lines between like what constitutes an autonomous

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 10>car for years and years.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 3>We were just seeing the Tesla VP of AI software

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>what he said about the rollout of robotaxing more broadly

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 3>on the earnings call, and I'm really interested ultimately here

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Max as to how you get to this vision that

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>by I think it's the second half of the year,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>half of Americans are meant to be able to access

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 3>a robotaxing, But at the moment they're but a handful

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>in Austin and maybe a few with a driver at

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 3>the well at least a person that the driver's seat

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 3>is starting to do San Francisco.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look, Tesla doesn't really have a robotaxi service today.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 10>Like what it has is, you know, eleven or so

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 10>cars in Austin that have a safety observer.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 8>And of course we know that there.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 10>As I said before, there are other companies that are

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 10>operating actual robotaxi service. WEIMO has something like fifteen hundred

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 10>vehicles in five cities without drivers. I think if it

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 10>just all depends on how you define it, my guess

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 10>is what they're going to say is they have these

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 10>testing vehicles, they have relatively wide ranges.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 8>Maybe you do.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 10>Some some math and and theoretically you can justify have

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 10>it saying that half the population is covered. But I

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 10>think by any normal person's definition that that just isn't

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 10>going to be true, just because technically we are not

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 10>that close to that being possible.

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>The other big story out today is about Ultimus in March.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>This is how Ela Musk outlined the plan for Optimists

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five. Listen to this Max.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 11>This year, we hopefully will be able to make about

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 11>five thousand Optimist robots. We're technically we're aiming for enough

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 11>parts to make ten maybe twelve thousand.

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 6>But since it's a.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 11>Totally new product with totally new you know, like everything

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 11>is totally new, I'll say like we're succeeding if we

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 11>get to half of the ten you know, half of

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 11>the ten thousand now, but even five thousand robots, that's

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 11>that's the size of a Roman legion. If I which

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 11>is like a little scary thought, like a whole legion

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 11>of robuts, I'd be like, WHOA, Okay, but I think

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 11>I think we'll literally both a legion at least one

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 11>legion of robots this year.

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a report from the Information out today that disputes

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 2>what Ela Musk outlined, that they actually nowhere near to

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>five thousand.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 10>What do we know, Max, Yeah, this Information report, it's

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 10>pretty it pours some cold water on the statements that

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 10>that Musk has made. It talks about, you know, real

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 10>difficulty manufacturing hearts of these robots, particularly the hands. I mean,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 10>one thing in that clip that's worth noting. Elon Musk

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 10>is right when he says this is new, and this

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 10>is hard, and so so you know, in a weird way,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 10>you know. Where whereas with robotaxis, there are lots of

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 10>other companies that have been doing what Tesla is doing

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 10>for for quite some time with optimists. If they were

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 10>actually able to make this work or really get close

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 10>to making it work. That would be amazing, that would

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 10>be really impressive. But from this information story, you know,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 10>it seems like they're just not progressing where they are.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 10>Must talked about what was it a legion? I think

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 10>where what the information said is they have something like

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 10>fifty optimists optimize, you know, kind of walking around and

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 10>picking stuff up and putting it down in the factory,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 10>not not doesn't sound like doing actual work yet. I

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 10>don't know how many fifty is, but definitely less thann

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 10>Allegian My.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what Musk is somebody who.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Is totally focused and his sort of expertise is getting

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 10>investors to look at the future, not to look at

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 10>the near here and now, but to look ahead. And

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 10>so I think if you look at the timing of

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 10>this robotaxi launch, one possible reason would be you have

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 10>this information report coming out that makes this other futuristic

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 10>thing look like it's much further out.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 8>So hey, let's let's speed up the robotaxis.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 10>Let's get investors excited about something.

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know what fifty is. Two soccer squads

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's match Chafkin, thanks so much, Brigade. Meanwhile, coming up

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 3>less about OPTIMI and more about the US and China

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>both pushing ahead to lead the global AI rights. We're

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 3>going to speak with Teresa Carlson of the General Catalyst

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Institute on a conversation on how governments can support cutting

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>edge check. This is Bloomberg Tech, Chinese tech leaders, government officials, investors. Well,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 3>they're headed to Shanghai this weekend for the World Ai Conference.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>It comes as Beijing looks to propel its AI ambitions

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>forward in the face of the new AI Action Plan

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 3>from Washington meant to cement US dominance in the space

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>for more. We're joined by Teresa Carlson Fanning, president of

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the General Catalyst Institute. And you've been applauding this AI

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Action Plan. Is there enough there for startups as well

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 3>as big tech?

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 12>It's definitely got an amazing basis for it. It was

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 12>it was broad, and it was reaching, and I've never

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 12>seen an administration access quickly. And I think one of

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 12>the biggest issues here is that we need to be

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 12>ahead of China and all aspects. And the only way

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 12>that this is going to occur if we have a

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 12>public private partnership where you have both government ensuring that

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 12>they're cutting all the regulatory tape, and you have private

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 12>sector both developing and providing capital into these markets.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Theresa, I've been trying to write down everything that I

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 2>learned from being in the room and speaking to all

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 2>those officials and CEOs, and the thing I keep writing

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>down is no software people on stage. There were none

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 2>of the frontier or model making names. Everything was about energy,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>chips and deregulation. Do you have a view on that?

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 8>Yes, it really stood out.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 12>I was in that room with you and it was

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 12>the one thing we were all talking about. But I

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 12>actually thought it was very energizing because we backed over

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 12>eight hundred startups at General Catalyst in all different areas

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 12>from energy to finance, to defense to healthcare, and a

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 12>lot of these companies now are way outside of their

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 12>not just doing software. A lot of them are doing rebuilding,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 12>wire harnessing new capabilities that we're seeing that are really required.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 12>So for me, it was actually very energizing from a

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 12>software you know, I've been doing software for twenty five years,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 12>so seeing more hardware capabilities and look, what do you

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 12>need for true AI? You need energy, right, you need chips,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 12>you need land, you need all these capabilities we've got

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 12>to rebuild American manufacturing in order to have AI dominance.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 12>So I believe that they did focus on the right

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 12>things from that event on Wednesday.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your expertise and experience is so important here

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 3>because you've led large businesses. I think is splunk. I

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>also think of the startups like Flexboot, but you've been

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 3>in house in Microsoft in AWS and I'm really interested as

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 3>to whether or not some of the startups that you

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 3>helped now back and invest in are going to be

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 3>able to get a direct line into federal government. Are

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 3>they going to be selling more easily in this environment.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 12>We actually just took We've had two what we call

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 12>fly ins at the General Kellos Institute. March, we took

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 12>six of our top healthcare AI companies in to both

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 12>meet government agencies, the White House and Congress. Two weeks ago,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 12>we took seven defense and industrial startups in to meet

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 12>DoD the White House and congressional leaders and it was fantastic.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 12>They were amazing. They are very commercial, very business like.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 12>They are getting the red tape. We do need them

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 12>to do more, especially ensuring that not just traditional partners

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 12>and vendors have access but the startups. But I can

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 12>see that they're working to make this connection and they

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 12>also yes, just.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Really quick, so we only have twenty seconds. Your assessment

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of the President and his handle on AI, just real quick.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, we were very excited to see him

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 12>take this stance. I think he made it very clear

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 12>this is top of mind for him. He also made

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 12>it clear by having all of his cabinet members on

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 12>stage and talking about this, and he was very direct

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 12>with everybody on Wednesday what needs to occur, and he

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 12>gave federal mandates for his agencies to get going. So

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 12>we are very excited about it.

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So, mister Zelden of the EPA, the most important guy

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in the room. Theresa Carlson, founding president of General Catalyst Institute,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much. Like coming up Meta stop selling

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 2>political ads in the EU. We're gonna have more in

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>that story next. Stay with us.

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 13>We will be right back.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. It's

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 2>been a good week in financial markets, particularly for technology investors.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Then as that one hundred up a percentage point, but

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Karen noted earlier in the show and has

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>all week then as that one hundred is kind of

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 2>my go to index because there's such a high concentration

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 2>ATTACH continuing to push record highs. Some single names also

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 2>continue to push record highs. Think about what's happened this

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 2>week in video in particular ending the week pushing a

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 2>fresh record high but front and center in the President's

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 2>speech in the AI action plan out of DC Wednesday,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>A and D also having a good session and a

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>strong week. Then we push ahead, right you know, Alphabet

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 2>was the earning story this week where we AI fueled

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 2>growth kind of story. Will Meta is also interesting, Like

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 2>there's been a lot of ad hoc talk from Mark

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerberg about what they're going to do in infrastructure with

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 2>a superintelligence group. But actually I get excited about earnings,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 2>as you know, Carora, and I think that there's a

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>really exciting in print around the corner.

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we wonder what happens in terms of capital expenditure.

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>But more on Meta elsewhere right now, because it's set

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to stop selling political and issue focused ads in the

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 3>EU now, the social media giant is citing new regulations

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 3>that create quote an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty.

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Meta is to just found the business. Beginning in early October,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 3>for more blue most kut Wagner joins US, and then

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>now it just seems again and again the EU regulation

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 3>is just in friction and combat with big tech here

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 14>This is just the latest Caroline. It's been a pretty

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 14>steady stream of combative, you know, back and forth between

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 14>Meta and regulators in the EU. Obviously, the latest, as

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 14>you mentioned, has to do with targeting.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 6>Of political ads.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 14>Meta there is no regulation I believe it's coming online

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 14>in October that makes it very difficult to target without

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 14>getting very direct data source from the user themselves with

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 14>permission to target.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 6>Them with political ads.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 14>And Meta has obviously decided that juice is not worth

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 14>the squeeze here.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 6>In that regard, and so they're going to just get

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 6>rid of that business entirely.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd like to ask a little bit more about that.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 2>More than four hundred and fifty million people in the

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 2>European Union, so on paper, it's a big market. But

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 2>I think that Meta and specifically the CFO Susan Lee,

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>have talked about how generally political advertising isn't that material

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 2>or contributed to revenue anyway.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you're absolutely right.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 14>At the beginning of last year or so At the

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 14>beginning of twenty twenty four, as we were heading into

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 14>the US election cycle, Susan Lee, the CFO of Meta,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 14>was asked on an earnings call about, you know, the

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 14>political ad business.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 6>She basically said, it's not material.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 14>I believe in twenty twenty it wasn't even in the

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 14>top ten categories in terms of advertising spend on.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 6>Various platforms.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 14>So you can see why they're willing to walk away

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 14>here from that business because it does not, you know,

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 14>it is not a material revenue growth driver for them anyways.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 3>What it all sets us up for KAT is also

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing how alphabet I think Google had already pulled away

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of their focus on political ads. But when

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>we're thinking in the context of the AI action Plan

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 3>in the US and what that means for EU regulation

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 3>and trying to lead the charge, it really feels as

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>though the US is just walking away from the EU

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in many ways, like they have done with their generative

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 3>AI offerings in the EU as well when it comes

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 3>to Meta.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 14>That's right, I think we're seeing, you know, two very

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 14>different paths between regulators and the US regulators in the EU.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 14>As you mentioned, Caroline in the beginning of this conversation

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 14>constantly in a combative mode with EU regulators.

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 6>Meta is not so much here in the US.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 14>Obviously they are still dealing with antitrust related stuff and

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 14>the FTC and all of that, but generally a much

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 14>more friendly regulatory environment in the US, a lot of self.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 6>Regulation from these tech companies.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 14>Europe is not really taking that same stance, and it

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 14>feels like it's getting wider and more dramatically different, you know,

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 14>by the month here.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Were we best kut Wagner on the latest side of

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Europe for Meta, thank you very much. Is stay on Meta.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 2>The biggest tech companies clashing with the social media giant

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 2>over ultimately who's responsible for age checks meant to protect

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 2>children online. Metas arguing that app stores from the likes

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>of Apple and Google should be the ones to verify

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 2>a user's age bloombergs Emily Bernbaum joins us, Now, this

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is something Caroline I were talking about before the show.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Has kind of been a thing for a while, but

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 2>clearly there is a point of difference on approach and

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 2>even philosophy between what Meta believes and what other big

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 2>tech company believes. Could you just explain the differences of opinion.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 13>Yes, absolutely so.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 15>Over the last year or so, we've seen this rise

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 15>of child safety bills. But in order to take care

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 15>of children online, to give them a different experience, you

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 15>need to verify that they are minors.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 13>So basically that's.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 15>The hurdle that all of these state legislatures are grappling with.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 15>And until very recently, the idea was social media platforms

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 15>themselves would be responsible for verifying children's ages.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 13>Now Meta has taken that debate.

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 15>Into its own hands, and it says, actually, the app

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 15>stores are better positioned to do this kind of age verification.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 13>And so there's a there's an analogy there's sort of

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 13>sparring over.

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 15>So Meta says that Apple and Google are analogous to

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 15>the liquor store, essentially that they should be responsible for

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 15>checking IDs. And then Apple and Google say the analogy

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 15>is a little off, and actually, you know, maybe Meta

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 15>is maybe Meta is just the mall and you know

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 15>Apples the mall.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love this. On analogy, the Apple is the

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 3>male and then metas the liquor store. And it just

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>depends on what point you're ideing people basically, but Meta

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>would respond saying, look, on average, young people have about

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>forty apps, and it's exhausting for parents and for children.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I like to permanently be getting signed off on each

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and every app. It's easier on an app store basis,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>But obviously Alphabet and Apple would dispute that. I'm just

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>interested em andy as to what this means the states.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Who is winning out in this argument, because there is

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of regulatory change going on from a state level.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 15>I think right now, when you look at the broader landscape,

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 15>there are more laws that would hold Meta accountable for

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 15>these kinds of age checks. But Meta has successfully convinced

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 15>three different states since the beginning of this year to

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 15>pass their vision of legislation putting the onus on app stores.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 15>So I think the debate is really shifting right now.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 15>So many of these laws are tied up in court.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 15>There is also a pending uh, there's something pending at

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 15>the Supreme Court asking the Supreme Court to weigh in

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 15>on the constitutionality of age verification at all. So they're

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 15>almost neck and neck right now, and I think Meta

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 15>has successfully created a big pivot in the conversation.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll see how that conversation continues. How many Van boun

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a great story. I urge people to go read it. Meanwhile,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 3>let's talk hardware because as Bloomberg Tech Asia took a

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 3>deep dive into South Korea's biggest conglomerate and it's also

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>the world's largest electronics empire, and it's Some Sung and

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 3>an exclusive interview with some Sung president and mobile division

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 3>chief would you enjoy well?

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>He weighed in on.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>The context of US Harris and talked about how some

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Sung thinks about competition in the smartphone market.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 16>You know, rather than focusing on competition, I think we

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 16>have been focusing on our consumers. What are the experience

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 16>that we can bring to the consumers and how complete

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 16>they are. So we've been focusing on those and I

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 16>think a healthy competition with other companies I think will

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 16>bring more innovations and then bring more venefies to consumers.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So we are welcoming.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 16>Others to join this category which we created back in

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 16>two thousand ninety.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 17>When we see the pressure on Samsung semiconductors and we

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 17>see the success in mobile, does that change you're thinking

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 17>about how heavy your shoulders are at this point.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 16>No, I mean our pressure has been there for all

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 16>the time. I mean nothing has changed, and I think

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 16>there's a you know, I think one of the someting

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 16>is one of the companies who has every aspect of

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 16>this supply chain, not only from I mean not only

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 16>from the components to all the way to the devices

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 16>and also application and services. So we believe there would

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 16>be a big synergy we can we can have across

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 16>all these differ different business units and that will continue

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 16>to kind of utilize this this complete ecosystem that we have.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 17>Let's talk a little bit about the tariff concerns around

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 17>the world, because President Trump says that potentially there could

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 17>be a twenty five percent tariff on some song zhones

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 17>not produced in the United States. How are you preparing

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 17>for that?

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 16>Very good question and tough fun. So some song has

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 16>long it's stabis, multiple manufacturing facilities in key regions around

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 16>the world that kind of give us US a flexibility

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 16>in dealing with or responding to any changes in other

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 16>countries kind of trade passes, not.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Just the US.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 16>So we heavy sturbis that kind of a flexible system.

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>That was Samsung President and Mobile division chief one June

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>choice along with Bloomberg's Sherry On and you can catch

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the full episode the Bloomberg Tech Asia online at Bloomberg

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 2>dot com. Okay, coming up, Steve Jenks and Kindred Benchers

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 2>joins us to talk about M and A and Meta's

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>recent deal for Kindred's portfolio company, play Ai. That's next.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. The USFCC approved Paramounts merger with

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 2>sky Dance after the Trump administration extracted concessions on the

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>company's political coverage and diversity practices for more and what

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 2>those concessions were, Bloombers. Chris Palmery, our entertainment editor, joins us. So, Yep,

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 2>it's happened. It's over the line. What did the parties

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 2>have to do to get us there?

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 18>Chris, Well, goodbye to all those diversity equity inclusion programs. Paramount,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 18>like a lot of companies, was trying to get more

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 18>people of color, more diverse people on screen behind the scenes.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 18>All of that effort is gone. Another big changes in

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 18>the newsroom at CBS. There's going to be an omboodsman

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 18>who's going to handle claims of media bias. This is

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 18>a company that just this month settled a sixteen million

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 18>dollar lawsuit which President Trump over alleged bias at sixty minutes.

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 13>So this will be a person sort of in.

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 18>The newsroom poking around for a couple of years to

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 18>come at least.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the fallout continues about the Late Show with

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Colbert. There's a lot that has been swallowed bitter

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 3>pills or not. Chris remind us of the prize, why

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 3>they're doing this and what the future looks like.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so end of an error for the Redstone family,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 18>which has controlled this media empire, is assembled by some

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 18>of the redsphone over decades.

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 13>So we're talking about.

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:34.479
<v Speaker 18>MTV, Nickelodeon, the CBS Network, Paramount Pictures, Film Studio, all

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 18>wonderful brands, but in trouble. And so there's a reason

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 18>the Redstones gave up. Essentially, David Ellison, who's injecting a

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 18>lot of his father's money and his own media assets

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 18>in here, has work to do from day one. The

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 18>traditional cable channels are shrinking in double digits, and the broadcast.

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 13>Network and as people switch to streaming.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 18>But their streaming business, Paramount Plus is still losing money.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 18>And their movie studio, as Gloria says it is, is

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 18>barely profitable and really and also ran compared to the Baggies,

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 18>Warner Brothers, Disney and Universal.

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 13>So he's going to have to deal with all this.

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 3>And buy some cloud from his father, Larry Ellison, it

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 3>seems Chris cal Mary, it's great to have some time

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 3>with you. Thanks for spelling it out.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's get more for you.

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 3>On the M and A space. But from the venture

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 3>capital perspective now, Steve Jang is the managing partner and

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 3>founder of kin Adventures, which has been backing early stage

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 3>AI startups since well twenty nineteen, long before Chatchibt. Steve,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 3>your investments also include uber Coinbase. But in the AI space,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 3>we think of Perplexity. We also think of Playai, and

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 3>let's just talk about that because it's recently been purchased

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 3>by Meta, which is on the hunt for deals. It's

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 3>on the hunt to lead in super intelligence.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to get more of that? Steve?

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 9>Sure, Yeah, good question, and thanks for having me on.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 19>You know, I think what's happening right now is, you know,

0:35:55.239 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 19>in Meta's case, is that they're looking to completely overhauled

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 19>all their AI research team and also their research engineering team,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 19>and so you know, I think with data centers on

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 19>the rise in terms of investment, you see some major hyperscalers, Amazon.

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 9>Azure and GCP Google's Cloud.

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 19>You also see Oracle, who was just mentioned prior on

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 19>the show, and then Meta and Meta is an interesting case.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 19>Meta has one of the largest data center networks, as

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 19>one of the largest buyers of GPUs and is expected

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 19>to be the largest buyer GPUs moving forward over the

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 19>next eighteen months. They are trying to also build the

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 19>largest AI front tier lab and they're competing with open

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 19>a on that front. And what I think you're going

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 19>to see not only from them, but from every other

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 19>private AI front tier lab like open Ai and Anthropic

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 19>is it's a talent war.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 9>And the Playai purchase means several things.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 19>So number one teams that have both a research scientist

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 19>aspect to it as well as a research engineering and

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 19>product engineering capability, they're going to be really sought after

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 19>in this market. And we're seeing a lot of that

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 19>already among our portfolio and outside our portfolio, and so

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 19>you're going to see continuous acquisition hunts. The second thing

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 19>that's really interesting about this acquisition of Playai is that

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 19>it's really it's really the leading signal in what's happening

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 19>in the space MULTIMODALBS. The inclusion of video and audio

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 19>and images on how lms work like cheat, GPT and

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 19>even applications like perplexity is super important. It's going to

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 19>be ever increasingly more important, especially with generative media models,

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 19>with video, generative video, generative images becoming more and more important.

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 19>So that wave of generative media is going to be,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 19>in our estimation, going to be as large and as

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 19>important in society and economy as elms. And so with

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 19>these two trends happening with voice AI in particular in

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 19>PLAYAIS case, this is going to be a harbinger of

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 19>a lot of things that are going to come down

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 19>the line over the next two years in terms of

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 19>multimodal as well as generative media and AI, and I.

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.959
<v Speaker 3>Think a foul in your portfolio companies. It's all about

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the ability to be making generative media now before we

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 3>get into the back clash as to whether this creates

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 3>slop and what that ultimately means also for a business case,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 3>so meta going forward, Steve, I just want to go

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>to another portfolio company that's been in the I for

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 3>M and A, and that's Perplexity.

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 17>That would you ever see perplexity.

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Being brought up by one of these big cloud players,

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 3>or even buy an Apple.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, I think you know, whenever there's a company that

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 19>creates a sort of singular space and name for themselves

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 19>in an important area in technology, there's always m and

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 19>a interest. You know, we've seen some rumors about that

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 19>in the news. I'm not describing anything new that you

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 19>don't know about there. But what you are seeing right

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 19>now at this moment is a switchover. And the switchover

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 19>is there are legacy companies with platforms and distribution and

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 19>great products, but the AI wave itself has sort of

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 19>left them flat footed. And I think a company like Perplexity,

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 19>you know, it started from AI answers right competing with

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 19>the legacy and traditional search and bringing AI search into

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 19>the consumer's eye. And now what you're seeing with their

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 19>new commt browser is saying, how do we create a

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 19>browser that not only brings in knowledge and answers, but

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 19>also lets you take actions. So an agentic browser that

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 19>allows you to create Spotify playlists, that allows you to

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 19>deeply research your Robinhood portfolio as you're surfing it on

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 19>the web, and really, if you think about it, browsers

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 19>and websites.

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 9>Those are old school terms.

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 19>All of your SaaS, all of your applications are coming

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 19>from through a web browser, and so perplexity is really

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 19>an interesting agentic browser.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Steve. Yeah, let me jump in there because because that's

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 2>what I found so interesting about your LinkedIn post when

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the play deal was announced, Perplexity evolved and it grew organically,

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 2>right and in the history that you outline in the

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>LinkedIn post about plai, you guys did the seed round

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>a year ago. They grew so quickly, but ultimately they

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 2>just got engulfed. They took their core tech and became

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 2>part of something else. And as somebody that backs founders

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and kind of instructs them on what to do, that

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems like the future in this domain.

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, I think the I think what you're seeing is

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 19>the multimodality is really important here. What you're seeing is

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 19>that you know, if you have voice, what you want

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 19>is you want that to be part of a lego

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:00.959
<v Speaker 19>block system with an m A language model, and that's

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 19>really the ultimate expression or the ultimate product there.

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 9>And so that's what was happening with play ai.

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 17>You know.

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 19>Play Ai was was hosted on foul and Foul was

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 19>providing the generative media inference for their speech models, and

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 19>you know, com merging that speech model technology with a

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 19>speech to speech model in their case, with something that

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 19>was really exciting for Meta and Meta.

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, metas push is to create very personal AI.

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 19>Mark Zuckerberg has talked about that publicly, and if you

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 19>think about what they're building, play Ai represented a really

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 19>interesting aspect of saying, how do we create multimodal ll ms,

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 19>how do we create voice AI in this personal AI

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 19>vision that Meta has. And so it's a really unique

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 19>purchase because most of the other things that most of

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 19>the other acquisitions that Mark is executed have been higher, right,

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 19>these one hundred million plus hires, but play Ai is

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 19>the one company acquisition where he is not only a

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 19>great team of researchers and engineers, but also of models,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.320
<v Speaker 19>and so I think that's a really big push to

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 19>multi model l for beta.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Regrettably, Steve Jang, we got to go. There's never enough time.

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Fly back from Hawaii, come to San Francisco, sit in

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the studio and we'll have at it. Managing partner and

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 2>founder who can revenge of Steve Jang? Thank you very much.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Coming up startups are spending really big on defense manufacturing

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in the US, but are they getting too far ahead

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of the demand. We have a deep dive next. This

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech. Silicon Valley investors are betting big on

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 2>the reindustrialization of the US defense space, and the startups

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>they're backing are spending billions to bring that vision to life.

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Bloombos Lazette Chapman has the reporting. There are a series

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of eos. You have the big beautiful bill now act

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and build, Baby Build, But it's the defense sector and

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 2>startups in that domain that are responding.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 20>There are a number of different responses, and to your point,

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 20>this is part of a much larger push to reindustrialize

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 20>many of the areas that the US offshore for decades.

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 20>So there's this big push now by private capital to

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 20>back the defense startups in expanding their manufacturing capacity. Now,

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 20>a lot of these have been around for about a decade,

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 20>but they're just getting to the point now where they're.

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 2>The leaders who are some of the big.

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 20>Names, andrel is building to one. They're investing over one

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 20>billion dollars into a new manufacturing facility in Ohio called

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.919
<v Speaker 20>Arsenal One. We've got Saronic that's looking to invest two

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 20>point seven billion total into a series of different projects

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 20>called Port Alpha, which is going to be a modernized

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 20>software defined shipyard to build massive autonomous ships.

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that the question is the demand that let's see

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>if it works out. Is that Chapman's great analysisco readas story. Meanwhile,

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Boomberg Tech End.

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't forget to check out the podcast. You know

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 2>where to find it from San Francisco and New York City.

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech