WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 19, 2024

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Gargy Shawdry of Black

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Rock writing this mid term volatility aside, this will create

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a fabulous opportunity for investors to move out from cash

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and lock in yield and the belly of the curve

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>for equities. A brief pullback is likely, but eventually a

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>rake Cunning cycle that ends without a recession tends to

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>bode well for stocks. Gage joined us for more. Gargiy,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Good monic, Good morning. Imagine you've had tons of cours.

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting in cash, the cup fifty on where they're

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>going again and again, again and again?

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>What do I take? What do I take?

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 4>You step out of cash? I think that the signs

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 4>that this FED meeting showed us all beyond the twenty

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 4>five to fifty debate hawkish not hawkish, et cetera. Once

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 4>we go past all of that, I think one thing

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 4>is clear. This is a FED that is going to

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>that is willing to surprise the market, that is going

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>to do what it thinks it needs to do to

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>make sure that the labor market and the broader economy

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>remains strong. And they will cut fifty basis points and

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe another fifty more or perhaps even more than that

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>if they need to while growth remains solid. Right, while

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 4>growth remains at two percent, And that is an amazing

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to own risk assets. So own risk assets in

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>the fixingcume markets, own fixed assets or risk assets in

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 4>the equity markets. I think seasonalities can get a little

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 4>bit tough, but this is a great time to step

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 4>out of cash.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's break cut the asset classes. To start with bonds.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll move to stocks in fixed income. When you say

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 2>take risk in fixed in cup and bonds, what do

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you mean?

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 4>So, first of all, I think making sure that you're

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 4>very precise about where you want to target your interest

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 4>rates sensitive at your duration risk. That's really important. We've

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>been here before and talked about owning the belly of

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the curve. What we've meant by that is really looking

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 4>at that three to seven year part of the curve

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 4>and not just owning treasuries, but owning high yield, owning

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>securitized assets, owning income, really taking this opportunity of still

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 4>locking in yields, especially when cashields are dropping fast, and

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>earning income in the fixed income markets. And there are

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>products that allow you to do that in an active manner,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>in an index manner. But the time is here, the

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>time has been here, but you're not too late.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a therapy session because a lot of people

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>are feeling like they missed it, and a lot of

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>people feel like you know, they're watching as valuations get

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that much more expensive, in stocks, in bands and working

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, credit spreads tightening even more, and the heels

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of this decision, how do you convince people after discussions

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the things have gotten so frothy and so expensive that

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>now as things are even more expensive, it's the right

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>time to buy.

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 4>So okay, separating out bonds and stocks again, I think

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 4>for equity markets, this is a seasonally week period, we're

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>going to have a couple of risk events. We're obviously

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>going to have the election in a couple in six

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 4>weeks or so, but more importantly before that, we're going

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 4>to have earning season, and I think it could maybe

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 4>make sense for equities to pull back just a little bit.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you're supposed to step away. I think

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 4>you're supposed to add downside protection with buffer strategies. That's

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>what we're telling investors, or move a little bit further

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>up in quality. We've sort of told investors to stay

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 4>away from the small cap trade. Obviously that's doing very well.

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 4>It's hard for me to imagine that does well sustainably

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>for the next eight to twelve weeks. Having said that,

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>in the FIXTIONCME market, Pleace, I hear you. Yes, spreads

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>are very very tight, but I think what investors have

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 4>gravitated towards. If we look at fixed and come flows

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>this year, it is around yields that are available. So

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>when we compare the yields today to what we were

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 4>getting ten years ago, yes it's come down, but it's

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 4>still very positive, and I think investors do want to

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 4>lock that in, especially if we slow down even slightly

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 4>from here.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You talked about some risk events, including the politics, and

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I know Emory is going to go there a bit

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in a second. There is this issue that every candidate

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to promise more and more and more to

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>increase the deficit more and more and more. Does this

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>create something of a risk event that is longer term,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly for the long end of.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 4>A I think it does. You've hit the nail right

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 4>on the head. I think that's why being very precise

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 4>about where you want to own duration is really important.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 4>So regardless of what happens in November, regardless of who's

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 4>president in January, I think one thing that we can

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 4>be sure of is that deficits aren't coming down in

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>a rapid manner. And one of the ways in which

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 4>that can play out in our markets, in the bond

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 4>market is really in the very long end of the curve.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 4>So I was saying earlier to on about you know,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>owning duration in that three to seven year part of

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 4>the curve. You kind of want to stay away from

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 4>them a very long and for now you're not getting

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>that additional pickup and yield, So stick in the value

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 4>of the curve and harvest some of the income that

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 4>you're getting, and frankly, that's where investors are moving to

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 4>as well. I mean, when I have client conversations, people

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>want to hear about the agg people want to hear

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 4>about bank people want to hear about, you know, quality equities.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 4>That's what we're telling them to do because that's the

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 4>regime for this.

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Henrietta was just talking about how investors she's talking to you,

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 5>especially those in the fixed income space, we're or interested

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 5>to see what happens in Washington based on the timeline.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>If you get some of these.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Tax cuts three four years out or if they go

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 5>for say ten years, do you think it makes a difference.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 4>For bond markets And I think it all makes a

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 4>difference absolutely. I think we're in this period for the

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>next six to eight weeks where we just won't know

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 4>too much. We obviously won't know the outcome, and I

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 4>think markets like certainty the most they want, which is

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 4>why I feel like over the next couple of weeks,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I think a little bit of a pullback despite this

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 4>fifty basis point cut could come. And I think that's fine.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>You're supposed to stay invested, protect your downside. But I think,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 4>of course it matters in the long term. Will it

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>matter whether we get something for four years or ten years. Absolutely,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I think the market can only pay attention to recruitter

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 4>who's you know, as you guys know likes to say this,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 4>markets pay attention to one thing at a time. Right now,

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 4>we're paying attention to all of the amazing opportunities that

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 4>the FED cut has brought you.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, I know, but next we're going to be focused

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 5>on the election and this idea of fiscal sustainability. Henriette

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 5>also brought up the fact that maybe we'll see another

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Simpson Bowls commission. Does the market care about that or

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 5>is that just all noise and talk for now?

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the market won't really focus too much on that.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I think we're going to focus a little bit more on,

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, what is the data telling us. What are

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 4>some of the policies that we're going to get. What

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 4>are some of the ways in which the earning seasons

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 4>go to play out. I think that's going to be

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 4>something that we're not talking about yet. We did see earnings, okay,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>we didn't see you know, there were companies weren't doing

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>as well on revenue. So I think we have to

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>see where the companies can still find ways to cut expenses,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 4>and that's something we're going to be looking at. So

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 4>for the near term, I think all of that is

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 4>going to be much more important than if we get

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 4>a commission, you know, twelve weeks down or twenty weeks

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>down the lane.

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we say that for now more Strata's sake of

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>talking of the FED.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I think so.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm really excited that we can now focus

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 4>on what's really important, which is the election. No, actually,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>because the opportunities that exist in the market for our

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 4>investors to be invested and have a better financial outcome.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Katie, thank you one of the best the US. Enjoy it.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Kuki Chantry of blank.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Rod, John Varlet now, John, it's going to see you,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be here.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. What does that right cut today?

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>For this mark it?

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think look, rates are down ninety basis

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 6>points from when Lennard last reported earnings in mid June.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 6>We know that demand has picked up. Toll Brothers reported

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 6>in August that July was this is their may through

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 6>a July quarter, that July was the strongest month, with

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 6>strength continuing into August. Other builders have said the same

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 6>our private builder channel checks have been very bullish. Demand

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 6>is better than seasonal averages at this point.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Things are moving in the right direction.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think that you know that, coupled with think

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 6>about new home sales in July up eleven percent month

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 6>over month to seven hundred and thirty nine thousand single

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 6>family starts yesterday nine hundred and ninety two thousand, up

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 6>sixteen percent. Activity is picking up and that's a good thing.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 6>So I think demand is moving in the right direction.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Tell Brothers is for the fancy payper.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>They don't need mortgages.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>That's so cash. Can we talk about who this already helps?

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Which build is does this ready help?

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it helps all.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 6>You're right now thirty percent of TOLD tolls buyers pay

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 6>all cash, So you could argue perhaps a little bit

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 6>less of stimulus there. The lower end probably benefits the most.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Drhort in lenar companies that really focus on that probably

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 6>dart in the most on that entry level first time,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>those buyers are going to have more dollars in their pocket.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 6>But keep in mind that the builders have been buying

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 6>down mortgage rates all along, and so demand has been

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 6>pretty good for the public builders all throughout this kind

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 6>of interest rate volatility.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where I wanted to go.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't get this market.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Basically, you have high rates, and that's good for home

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>builders because nobody can move, no one wants to sell,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if anyone actually wants to buy a home,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to build it from scratch. Lower rates help

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>them too, because lower rates are better and people can

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>borrow money.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Which is it at what point is it just price

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 3>go up period?

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 6>Lower rates are good for housing lease of regardless. I

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 6>mean I think that that's kind of where we sit now.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 6>Your point's well taken, though, right. I think the lock

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 6>in effect that has kept people from moving in reduced

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 6>existing home.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Turnover has helped the builders, no question about it.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 6>Now, lower rates are going to bring some more inventory

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 6>back to the market, but keep in mind eighty percent

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 6>of mortgages are below five percent, sixty percent of below

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 6>four so there is still a lock in effect.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>There's this question about if lower rates unlock a great

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.479
<v Speaker 1>deal of supply from existing homes but also from potentially

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>home builders, won't that cause prices to potentially go down,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not up, especially if mortgage rates are still well above

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the average that people are paying. Right now in their homes.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 6>I think it would take an economic shock to bring

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 6>back a glutt of inventory. I think the inventory return

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 6>is going to be more sort of orderly, if you will,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 6>just given that lock and effect that I talked about.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Now there will be more existing home inventory. But you

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 6>know what, that also opens the pool of potential buyers,

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 6>and so we think the supply demand from that standpoint

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 6>will still remain strong enough where prices are not going

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 6>to drop dramatically.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 5>Jumpry, I was going to say, what do you make

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>of all this being discussed on the campaign trail, potentially

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 5>supply coming because of policy in Washington.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>It's an interesting question. I think.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 6>I think the Harris campaign's head is in the right

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 6>spot that we need more supply, we need more housing.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 6>The actual execution of that is very challenging because it

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 6>can't be done at the federal level. It's really the

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 6>municipal and state and local you know kind of supply

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 6>constraints in terms of land development, you know, entitlement, zoning, permitting,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 6>things of that nature that just can't be controlled at

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 6>the federal level.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>That that's where the real problem is.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, while they're you know, it's a

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 6>good idea, very hard to execute a mole.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 2>So some of these incentives you hit on the campaign

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>trail you just believe ultimately going to lead to hut prices.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair?

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think, you know, putting more money in

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 6>people's pockets. So twenty five thousand dollars tax incentive, it

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 6>will help demand, couldn't push up prices a bit? Perhaps

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 6>I just don't see anything on the supply side really

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 6>moving the needle.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>At this point. What are you looking for in terms

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of taxes as well? We talk about the salt tax

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and what that does to property buying in places in

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast. We saw people leave the Northeast in response

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>to that. Do you get the sense that if that

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>salt cap was removed that you'd actually get more buying

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in those regions?

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that that would certainly help.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 6>That said, the offset is that there's just an in

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 6>migration trend in the US that's occurring because that's where

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 6>job growth is happening.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>And think about the sun belop right, that's where the

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 3>employment growth is.

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 6>The weather's a little bit better, folks are moving in

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 6>that direction anyway. I like seasons, but going so I

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 6>think yes, it would certainly, it would certainly help, But

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>I think that the trend is still well ingrained.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 5>So what's the number one market right now and to

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 5>start building.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 6>It's you know, I think, look, there's great markets in Florida,

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 6>the Carolinas are very strong. Texas, most parts of Texas

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 6>are very good.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>So really the.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Traditional kind of you know, golden horseshoe states are still

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 6>really positive.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 6>It is market by market within each of those states,

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 6>but I would say generally speaking that hasn't changed. Where

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 6>those are where you want to be, and that's where

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 6>the public builders are.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Just to wrap things up, the Voet's get a Mulke's

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>right now thirty six around six percent effective mulke It's rights.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>So the average right on the which is out there

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>right now, it's just short of four percent, still quite

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 2>a big spread there of about two hundred basis points.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>How much of a difference does six make to the

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>unlocking the lock in effect that we've seen grip this

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>housing market over the last few years.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it moves the needle all that much

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 6>in the existing home side. It will help, for sure,

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 6>but I think you know what the builders have talked

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 6>about is five five and a half percent kind of

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 6>being the sweet spot of where they're buying rates down to.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 6>So there's no magic number, but I think that that's

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 6>probably a fairly good indication of where of where you

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 6>have to be.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly for people who an't formiliar when you say

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>buying rates down to, what do you mean?

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>What is that?

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 6>So the public builders are actually going out into the

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 6>mortgage market securing forward commitments to buy down mortgages are

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 6>below mortgage or average rates, which is allowing buyers to

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 6>step into homes at much more affordable levels.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 2>They've been working around this for the last couple of

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 2>years then they've been very successful. Yeah, I know, John,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Seth. It's going to see you extra. I

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Johnavala, the of ubs On, relates to the

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 2>housing market. Jot to us now to discuss this, Mark

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Sandy of Moody's Analytics Mark looking forward to getting into

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>this with you.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So let's get to it.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>How strong is this job's market still even with that

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>rate cup?

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Was it even needed? Oh?

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, it was needed. I mean the job market's good,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 8>no doubt about it.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 7>Recruiting well, a lot of jobs unemployment is very low,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 7>but all the trend lines were showing softness. I mean

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 7>hiring us off, hours worked are down, tempt jobs are down.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, the only thing that's really kept the job

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 7>market together is those lay low layoffs. As you point out,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 7>the UI claim suggests that continue. So that's good news,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 7>but the trend lines here we are still a bit disconcerting.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 7>So I think, you know, every sense in the world

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 7>for the Fed to start cutting interest rates now, I

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 7>mean more fundamentally, the Fed did what it needed to do.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 7>It got us back to full employment with inflation effectively

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 7>at target. So if that they've hit their mandate, then

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 7>why a five and a half percent fund rate target?

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think everyone can agree. You know, a

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of debate, reasonable debate about you know, what is

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 7>the so called neutral rate, that rate where policies neither

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 7>restraining or supporting growth.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 8>But it's not five and a half percent.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 7>So time to get that down and get that normalized

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 7>as fast as possible, because you know, if you keep

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 7>it there, something could break, and when something breaks, very

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 7>difficult to get that back together.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is the reason why recalibrate, recalibrating and recalibrated

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>were the words of the day yesterday when we heard j.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Powell take the stand. A real question when you say,

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>concerning trend lines in the labor market, do they fly

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on the face those trends of some of the enthusiasm

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're seeing in certain risk markets. Is people project

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this strength to the future, regardless of some of the

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>clouds that maybe the FED is responding to.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, the markets investors are doing what they do. They forecast,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 7>they're forecasting, and they're saying, hey, look, you know, before

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 7>the FED started cutting.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 8>Rates, before the Jackson Hole speech and j Pell telling.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 7>Us that he was going to cut rates, it felt disconcerting,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 7>and the forecast wasn't quite as good as it is today.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 8>Today forecast is much better. You know, We've got fifty

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 8>base point.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 7>Rate cut behind us, and clearly a string of rate

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 7>cuts ahead of us.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 8>So you do the forecast, it feels like a soft landing.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>Therefore, I'm going to go buy stocks and going to

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 7>buy bond So, you know, I think it's a rational response.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, at the end of the.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Day, just think about this for a second. The economy

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 7>is really fundamentally in a pretty good spot, and therefore,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 7>the stock market should be in a pretty good spot.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 7>So it's not surprising where a record highs and moving higher.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 7>So I think they're consistent. I don't think they're inconsistent.

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>The one note of concern, perhaps you could argue in

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>markets right now is this idea that maybe we are

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>underpricing or under considering inflation. When you take a look

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>at gold prices just hovering near those all time highs,

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and you take a look at the long end of

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve continuing to increase, particularly in the thirty

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>year sector this morning, this idea that maybe we are

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>going to see some uptick in inflation. Mark, are there

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>signs to you, and I'm looking at housing in particular

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>as well as potentially other sectors, are there signs to

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you where you could start to see that inflation start

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to tick up?

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 7>No gold, Lisa, Gold, Really, that's that's what your pointing

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 7>to do.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 8>Come on, No inflation is back in the bottle.

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean.

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 7>The thing that I think the most important to look

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 7>at inflation expectations, and there's lots of different ways of

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 7>looking at that. You can look at the bond market

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 7>and what the implied expectations are go look at the

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 7>surveys that are being done by the New York Fed,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 7>the Conference Board, inflation.

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 8>Expectations are all the way back in.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 7>So, you know, as long as that remains the case,

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 7>and I don't see the reason why that's going to change.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm not worried about inflation and housing, absolutely not. You know,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that's going to be the issue here

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 7>going forward. I mean, if anything, in the next twelve

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 7>eighteen months, we should see further acceleration and the growth

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 7>of the cost of housing services because there's such a

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 7>long lag between what's going on in the rental markets

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 7>and when that actually shows up in the inflation measures.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 7>So the next six twelve eighteen months, I think we're

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 7>going to see, you know, further deceleration. And you know,

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 7>in terms of setting monetary policy and interest rates, I

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 7>think you shouldn't even be focused on particularly owner's equivalent rent.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 7>That's the cost, the policy cost of home ownership. Lots

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 7>of good research coming out of the FED saying that's,

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, probably something you shouldn't be focused on when

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 7>trying to set policy, and I totally agree with that.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 8>So set that aside.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 7>You know, what inflation is CPI Core Inflation PCEE Cusumer

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 7>Exponditi of inflation. It's it's well below too. It's kind

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 7>of like one and a half to one point six

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 7>one point seven percent, and it's been that way for

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 7>more than a year. So that feels like to me

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 7>the more salient, you know, measure of inflation, and that

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 7>says not only are we you know, at target, where

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 7>we could be beyond target.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 8>So no, I'm not worried about mark.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 5>Inflation back in the bottle. As you say, mission accomplished

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 5>basically is what Jerome Powell didn't say, but basically alluded

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 5>to yesterday. The President's going to come out and speak

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 5>tonight at the Economic.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 3>Club in Washington, d C.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 5>He can't say that the real economy people are not

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 5>feeling the inflation that you're talking about.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, absolutely.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, people are still still remember the

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 7>run up in price back in second half of twenty

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty one, twenty two into twenty three.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 8>I feel like for for staples.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 7>You know, for for groceries, for ranness, you know, for

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 7>for gasoline prices, and it's very hard to get buy

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 7>that psychologically. In fact, it's very interesting you talk to

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 7>folks and you say, you know, how you feel about

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 7>the economy, seeing not so good? You go, why, It's

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 7>almost like everyone has this one food item that they

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 7>buy on a regular basis that's the litmus test for everything.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 7>So I was talking to one the social worker, my

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 7>niece the other day, and she's not feeling good about

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 7>the connie Go. Why she's paying a lot more for

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 7>kubacha tea. I think it's called kubatcha tea, so you know,

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 7>or you know it's but yeah, sorry about that.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I knew I got that.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 7>Obviously I don't drink it, but you know, it's talking

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 7>about words I teach, of course in classic Wharton and

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 7>talking to this young man and he's saying rom and

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 7>noodle prices. So it's it's like everyone's got this thing

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 7>and I get it. I get it, and so you

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 7>have to be sensitive to that. You can't deny that.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 7>But I think the way to respond to that is say, hey, look,

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 7>I hear you, and these are the kinds of things

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 7>that we're doing to address, you know, to try to

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 7>get the you know, the.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 8>Cost of living down for you.

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's what the president has to do,

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 7>and that's what you know, the candidates have to do.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Max Sante, thank you, sir, with an old time clip

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that I'll be replying repeatedly over the next several years

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 2>at LISTA.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Gould really really.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Max Sandy Mark appreciate it, buddy, Thank you very much.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloombergs Events podcast, bringing you the best

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gio politics. You can watch the

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.