Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow Buck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: and Twitter. One of my big concerns is that we
Speaker 1: don't actually get to see people that are representing ideas
Speaker 1: that are incredibly important and that are very politicized. We
Speaker 1: don't get to see them debate. We don't get to
Speaker 1: see anybody actually have to defend what they're saying anymore.
Speaker 1: It's all just echo chambers. You saw this recently with
Speaker 1: doctor fauci and I want to get into some of
Speaker 1: that and also the ways that if we allow the
Speaker 1: narrative to continue as it is right now from the
Speaker 1: Fauciite perspective, we are in for a very rough year
Speaker 1: in terms of individual liberty and economically. So this fight
Speaker 1: is not yet over, not even close really, even though
Speaker 1: the vaccines are out there. But there is another fight
Speaker 1: that you have to be in these days, and it's
Speaker 1: the fight for your privacy. This is absolutely essential. This
Speaker 1: is a must. You need to protect your activity online
Speaker 1: because everything you search for, watch, or click can be
Speaker 1: tracked by the big tech companies. They can match your
Speaker 1: activity to your true identity using your device's unique IP address.
Speaker 1: This is standard, okay, this is what the big tech
Speaker 1: companies do. But when I switch on Express VPN on
Speaker 1: my computer and phone, I have the app on my phone.
Speaker 1: It's so easy. My IP address is masked by a
Speaker 1: secure VPN server, makes it harder for websites to identify me.
Speaker 1: Express VPN also encrypts my network data to protect my
Speaker 1: sensitive information. You know, credit card, social security numbers, stuff
Speaker 1: like that. This is something you've got to have. Stop
Speaker 1: handing over your data to the big tech companies. All right,
Speaker 1: they're looking at this all the time. Who knows what
Speaker 1: they're going to do with it down the line. Go
Speaker 1: with the VPN that I trust for online protection. Visit
Speaker 1: Express vpn dot com slash buck. Go right now and
Speaker 1: just go sign up. Trust me Express vpn dot com
Speaker 1: slash Buck. I've got this on my phone, My family
Speaker 1: has it on their devices. Now I insist that people
Speaker 1: have this. It's it's necessary Express vpn dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck to get three extra months free. That's Express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck, and you'll get three months free
Speaker 1: extra when you go right now. Fauci is a petty tyrant.
Speaker 1: I've told you that many many times, and it's increasingly
Speaker 1: clear because here we are at a place where we
Speaker 1: should have a willingness to just allow people and allow
Speaker 1: states and allow individuals to have much more control, much
Speaker 1: more autonomy over their lives. And Fauci is fighting it
Speaker 1: at every step of the way. He does not want
Speaker 1: people to be able to just say I've gotten vaccinated,
Speaker 1: I've had enough, I now want to just go about
Speaker 1: my life and make my own decisions. No, the public
Speaker 1: health bureaucrats, the consensus locked down left. They aren't letting
Speaker 1: go of their little grip on power. And I want
Speaker 1: to remind you we are now in the one year
Speaker 1: month anniversary. A year ago to this month, we had
Speaker 1: the beginning of lockdown, the beginning of this whole new
Speaker 1: change in approach to public health. And it's absolutely atrocious
Speaker 1: that here we are arguing with public health authorities, unelected
Speaker 1: bureaucrats about whether after vaccination we should be able to
Speaker 1: return to normal activity. They won't allow it. And it's
Speaker 1: not based on the science. This is a judgment call
Speaker 1: that they're making. And here's at the heart. Here's what's
Speaker 1: at the heart of it. They don't want people to
Speaker 1: be able to start living their lives again as they
Speaker 1: see fit, because then everybody will say, well, Hold on
Speaker 1: a second. They're okay, they're not dying of the virus.
Speaker 1: They've gotten vaccinated. They're fine. Why can't I do that?
Speaker 1: If they really wanted everybody to get vaccinated as well,
Speaker 1: there's an incentive to issue here. I mean, what they're
Speaker 1: telling us. The sales pitch from the fauciites is get vaccinated,
Speaker 1: but you still got a distance. You still gotta wear
Speaker 1: two masks, not one mask. Two masks, one mask not enough,
Speaker 1: maybe goggles too, gloves, goggles, two masks. It's not that uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: It's not that much to ask. Look at the numbers.
Speaker 1: You know, they tell you, go get vaccinated. Deal with
Speaker 1: all the hassle of getting a vaccine appointment. Depending on
Speaker 1: where you are, it can be really onerous. Some places
Speaker 1: are better about it than others. And afterwards you still
Speaker 1: you still must do all of the things you did,
Speaker 1: all the mitigation measures that you were doing before you
Speaker 1: got vaccine. This is absurd. Doctor Rand Paul, you know
Speaker 1: Duke University Medical School. The guy's an MD. It's amazing
Speaker 1: to see how many people think that he's a Jill
Speaker 1: Biden fake doctor on the left. Because I've been tweeting
Speaker 1: about this I've been trying to make the case publicly,
Speaker 1: and of course poke the liberals over this because they
Speaker 1: deserve it. The poke the leftists I don't like. I've
Speaker 1: never liked the term liberal for the left. Those of
Speaker 1: you who have listened to my show now for going
Speaker 1: on ten years, know that I've always said that they
Speaker 1: are They intentionally use that. That's a misnomer, that's a
Speaker 1: misleading term for them. They are anti liberal, they're authoritarians,
Speaker 1: they are statists, they are leftists, they're collectivists. They are
Speaker 1: not liberal. But anyway, there was an exchange on Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill yesterday where doctor rand Paul gave, oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: you could say something of an on air enema to
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, because we wanted to see what this guy
Speaker 1: has really got going on, want to see what his
Speaker 1: arguments really are, and doctor Faucci is full of it,
Speaker 1: absolutely full of it. Here's how I want to play
Speaker 1: this for you, and I want you to hear the
Speaker 1: back and forth, because it's so rare that this guy
Speaker 1: is subjected to anybody who really knows the data and
Speaker 1: understands the science. He's every bit as smart. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell this right now, Doctor Rampaul is every bit as
Speaker 1: smart as doctor Fauci. He's smarter than doctor Fauci. All right,
Speaker 1: so I don't want to hear anything. Oh, he's not
Speaker 1: a scientist. Actually, he's an MD two. It has been
Speaker 1: practicing medicine for a long time. Doctor Faucci has been
Speaker 1: a bureaucrat. He's been sitting around in conference rooms at
Speaker 1: the cd AT, down at the CDC, at the National
Speaker 1: Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. I just wish it
Speaker 1: had an easier acronym. CDC is easy to say, here's
Speaker 1: how some of this went. What study shows significant reinfection,
Speaker 1: hospitalization and death after either natural infection or the vaccine.
Speaker 1: It doesn't exist. There is no evidence that there are
Speaker 1: significant reinfections after a vaccine. In fact, I don't think
Speaker 1: we have a hospitalization in the United States after the
Speaker 1: two week period after the second vaccination. Yeah, you have
Speaker 1: a death in the United States. You're not hearing what
Speaker 1: I'm saying about variants. We're talking about wild type versus
Speaker 1: variance and now variant. There what proof is there that
Speaker 1: they're significant reinfections with hospitalizations and death from the variants?
Speaker 1: None in our country. Zero, Well, because we don't have
Speaker 1: a prevalent of a variant yet we're having one. Can
Speaker 1: I finish, we're having one one seven that's becoming more
Speaker 1: dominant policy based on conjecture. No, you have It isn't
Speaker 1: based on conjecture. It absolutely is based on conjecture. What
Speaker 1: we know about other similar viruses and how vaccination works
Speaker 1: is that. And also what we've seen so far in
Speaker 1: the numbers is that the vaccinations are highly effective against
Speaker 1: even the variants, as Fauci calls them. No, isn't it fascinating? Also,
Speaker 1: and hat tip the federalists for this one. The variant
Speaker 1: you can call them, the Brazil variant, the South African variant,
Speaker 1: the you know, uh, you know whatever variants. There's some
Speaker 1: that have these numbers. But if you call it the
Speaker 1: the Wuhan coronavirus, you're causing hate crimes. That's that's amazing,
Speaker 1: is it? So's it can be a Brazil variant that's
Speaker 1: super dangerous and deadly and kills people. That's well, although
Speaker 1: that's actually not true. By the way. It's it's slightly
Speaker 1: more contagious, they think, But it isn't more deadly based
Speaker 1: on what we've seen, or you could say that about
Speaker 1: South Africa, but if you call it the Wuhan coronavirus,
Speaker 1: you're causing hate crimes. Interesting double standard that we see
Speaker 1: there um. But variants are always going to exist, and
Speaker 1: there's always the possibility of more variants. So you see
Speaker 1: what Faucci is telling you is you have to wait
Speaker 1: and we have to see if it's possible that there's
Speaker 1: a much higher reinfection rate with the variants than they're
Speaker 1: currently is. Because here's here's the debate. He doesn't want
Speaker 1: to have. Hold on a minute. You're telling us that
Speaker 1: people that are ninety five percent safe against this virus
Speaker 1: are aren't able to go out now without all these
Speaker 1: restrictions in place and live and live their lives. What
Speaker 1: is safe? Is it one hundred percent? What's the number?
Speaker 1: When do we get our lives back? When does this
Speaker 1: actually stop? They don't want to answer that. You'll notice
Speaker 1: they don't want to tell you. People are starting to
Speaker 1: pick up on this. In fact, out in Oregon there
Speaker 1: are state health officials who are advocating for forever mask policy.
Speaker 1: This has happened now in the state of Oregon that
Speaker 1: the health officials there are are lobbying or are pushing
Speaker 1: for we should just wear masks forever. Guys, this is
Speaker 1: a good idea. These people are insane. They're insane, they're experts,
Speaker 1: but it's so refreshing to see Rand Paul slap around
Speaker 1: this little totalitarian smurf doctor f. This is how it goes. Brands.
Speaker 1: So you some you want people to wear a mask
Speaker 1: for another couple of years. You've been vaccinated, and you
Speaker 1: parade around in two masks for show, No, you can't
Speaker 1: get it again. There's almost there's virtually zero percent chance
Speaker 1: you're gonna get it. And you're telling people with them
Speaker 1: that have had the vaccine who have immunity. You're defying
Speaker 1: everything we know about immunity by telling people to wear
Speaker 1: a mask who have been vaccinated. Instead, you should be
Speaker 1: saying there is no science to say we're going to
Speaker 1: have a problem from the large number of people willing vaccinated.
Speaker 1: You want to get rid of vaccine hesitancy. Tell them
Speaker 1: wearing their mask after they get the vaccine. You want
Speaker 1: people to get the vaccine, give them a reward instead
Speaker 1: of telling them that the nanny state's going to be
Speaker 1: there for three more years and you got to wear
Speaker 1: a mask forever. Amen. Oh, rand Paul God, what a
Speaker 1: what a breath of fresh air on this ship on
Speaker 1: this issue. They also there's there's some some exchange before
Speaker 1: the one I played for you, where he just he
Speaker 1: cites major scientific studies about reinfection and about what happens
Speaker 1: after vaccination to show that they're a successful vaccine is
Speaker 1: not one where people worry about reinfection. Reinfection is possible.
Speaker 1: Anything is possible. But when you're talking about public health,
Speaker 1: that has to be based upon risks. It has to
Speaker 1: be based upon the numbers, as Fauci says, and they're
Speaker 1: just making stuff up now when they say, well, yes,
Speaker 1: the numbers show you should be able to go back
Speaker 1: to your normal life. The numbers show that everything should
Speaker 1: be fine. But there's this possibility of a variant. There's
Speaker 1: this chance that maybe this thing is different than all
Speaker 1: the other things we've seen. We don't know that yet,
Speaker 1: but you will continue to suffer from our dumbass lockdown
Speaker 1: policies until we have proof, beyond any doubt, any doubt,
Speaker 1: that this isn't some aberrant situation. That's how they're making
Speaker 1: health policy now, my friends, that's what they're doing, saying, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: the numbers suggest that you should be fine. But until
Speaker 1: we're satisfied that this isn't the different thing from all
Speaker 1: the other situations like this before it, we're not allowing
Speaker 1: you to stop with our measures, our restrictions. This has
Speaker 1: all been a campaign to force you to obey, to
Speaker 1: bend the knee to the dictates and the anxieties of
Speaker 1: the leftist lockdown mob, and we are starting to push
Speaker 1: back effectively enough that they are losing their grip on
Speaker 1: our faces. Continuing on with the Paul versus Fauci throwdown
Speaker 1: here on Capitol Hill yesterday. Man, I loved watching doctor
Speaker 1: Rand Paul smack this smug little Fauci. The words I
Speaker 1: want to use I can't say on the radio. People
Speaker 1: don't want to hear it. There's no science behind it. Well,
Speaker 1: let me just state for the record that mans are
Speaker 1: not theater. Masks are protective, and we have community there theater.
Speaker 1: If you already have immunity, you're wearing a mask to
Speaker 1: give comfort to others. You're not wearing a mask because
Speaker 1: of any sign. I totally disagree with you. I totally disagree.
Speaker 1: You have like a one in a bazillion chance of
Speaker 1: getting reinfected, so you got to wear a mask. That's
Speaker 1: where this this little health fascist comes down on this.
Speaker 1: He's double masking now. He wasn't double masking three months ago.
Speaker 1: He's such a scientist, he's so smart that he just
Speaker 1: figured this out. Now, does anybody believe this crap? Does
Speaker 1: anyone really think that that's that's what's going on here?
Speaker 1: They just figured out Now the two masks are so
Speaker 1: much more important than one know. What happened is that
Speaker 1: the mask mandates across the country failed, and instead of
Speaker 1: admitting and the CDC's own data, fact check me, media matters,
Speaker 1: go for it instead of the seat looking at the
Speaker 1: CDC's own data and being honest about it, which is
Speaker 1: that a mask mandate is so worth list that it's
Speaker 1: within the art, within the margin of error, for being
Speaker 1: a complete nothing, not that it helps even a little bit.
Speaker 1: I've been saying, you can go back and listen to earlier,
Speaker 1: earlier shows. I've been saying since June. Yeah, maybe masks
Speaker 1: help a little bit, But is it one percent? Ten percent?
Speaker 1: And is that worth it? Is it worth harassing everybody
Speaker 1: and doing all this for slowing down, not stopping slowing
Speaker 1: down one percent of cases over sixty to day period. Remember,
Speaker 1: it was always about slowing the spread. There was no
Speaker 1: stopping the spread. This transformed though, in the public consciousness
Speaker 1: because of people like Fauci. But Rampaul's absolutely right, double masking,
Speaker 1: double masking after he's already been Foucci's been vaccinated. Why
Speaker 1: is he double masking? Someone try to explain this one
Speaker 1: to me. Someone tell me what the rationale behind this is.
Speaker 1: And he's absolutely right. Rampaul's right when he says, this
Speaker 1: is actually all about the it's about showing people, showing
Speaker 1: people that you need to wear a mask, which is
Speaker 1: not actually science. Now Faucci. Fauci had to go out
Speaker 1: on CNN last night and tell everybody, I promise, I promise,
Speaker 1: We're not gonna do this forever. You know, there's going
Speaker 1: to come a time when you're so sick of my
Speaker 1: stupid face that you don't listen anymore. Even the dumb
Speaker 1: libs that watch MSNBC and think they're so smart, they're
Speaker 1: going to figure out, oh wait, like everyone that was
Speaker 1: going to get infected pretty much has gotten infected at
Speaker 1: this point, and the masks didn't stop it. But in
Speaker 1: the meantime, let me say, we're not going to do
Speaker 1: it forever Play six. You know, like I said, there's
Speaker 1: always a bit of a kernel of truth in what
Speaker 1: people like Senator Paul says. The kernel of truth is
Speaker 1: that people are tired of the constraints that you have
Speaker 1: the types of things that we as scientists recommend. We're
Speaker 1: not saying doing this indefinitely. We're not saying this is
Speaker 1: the way it's going to have to be all the time.
Speaker 1: We're saying that if you look at the data and
Speaker 1: look at the science, there is a chance that you
Speaker 1: could get in trouble if you pull back too prematurely.
Speaker 1: That's what we're saying. We're not saying that it is
Speaker 1: not difficult to maintain public health measures when you're doing
Speaker 1: it for so long. On that, we agree. But the
Speaker 1: fact is, you know, when you look Chris historically at
Speaker 1: pulling back on mitigation, we look at the different surges
Speaker 1: that we had, it was always at a time when
Speaker 1: the cases came down, then they plateaued, and then they
Speaker 1: started going up again. That's a lie. He's lying to you. No,
Speaker 1: we didn't. We didn't have a big pullback before the
Speaker 1: before the winter on mitigation measures. That's not true. But
Speaker 1: here we are. We saw that the numbers were Has
Speaker 1: Fauci ever even tried to explain California versus Florida? Has
Speaker 1: he ever tried to explain that? Now, of course not.
Speaker 1: Why hasn't he asked about that? Why doesn't someone say,
Speaker 1: I'm sure he'd say, well, the data, it's complicated, you know.
Speaker 1: Whenever he doesn't have an answer, it's complicated to science,
Speaker 1: he goes into the usual nonsense. This comes with real consequences.
Speaker 1: You don't see it because the people that work at CNN,
Speaker 1: they love this. They love this. They they got to
Speaker 1: defeat Trump. Put the coronavirus ticker at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the screen. Look at all the death in their minds.
Speaker 1: It justified all the lies, all the smears, all the
Speaker 1: stuff that they did against Donald Trump. He is the
Speaker 1: monster they said he was because look, he didn't take
Speaker 1: the virus seriously. And they got to work from home
Speaker 1: and their salaries stayed the same. In fact, they had
Speaker 1: a big ratings boost in the election year. Everything was
Speaker 1: fine for them. You don't hear from the people that
Speaker 1: have been self medicating with alcohol and opioids because they're
Speaker 1: under inhuman amounts of stress, because they're just watching their
Speaker 1: life's work, their business evaporate over months and months, watching
Speaker 1: their life savings go down to zero, watching their children
Speaker 1: develop anxiety disorders and real behavioral problems from being in
Speaker 1: this form of at home detention. You know, the virtual
Speaker 1: learning that does not work, that that experiment has been
Speaker 1: tried and failed. You don't see that, no, No, All
Speaker 1: you see is the weaponization of the body count of
Speaker 1: seeing your citizens from COVID nineteen by CNN and other
Speaker 1: bad faith actors to attack their political opponents. That's what's
Speaker 1: really gone on here, all right. This is a virus
Speaker 1: that is dangerous for the elderly and those with serious
Speaker 1: health conditions. And what CNN has done is use that
Speaker 1: as a weapon to bludge in their political opponent. Not
Speaker 1: to see in New York Times, I mean the whole,
Speaker 1: the whole lib media apparatus has done this and allowed
Speaker 1: no dissent, and the social media companies have been awful.
Speaker 1: I'm still targeted by Facebook and Twitter and can't reach
Speaker 1: my audience. I'm thank god I can talk to you
Speaker 1: on radio, and they haven't figured out how to censor
Speaker 1: my podcast, although they don't feature my podcast in the
Speaker 1: Apple Store the way that they should, based on the
Speaker 1: actual downloads because I'm not connected, and you know the
Speaker 1: whole thing. But the fact of the matter is they
Speaker 1: didn't even allow open debate and discussion about these things.
Speaker 1: I mean, what's really going on now is is Fauci,
Speaker 1: the little health fascist, is running around telling you you
Speaker 1: have to keep wearing double masking now because we have
Speaker 1: to wait for the whole country to get vaccinated. The
Speaker 1: whole country is not gonna get vaccinated. It's never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: A lot of people aren't going to do it. A
Speaker 1: lot of people are gonna say, why should I do this,
Speaker 1: especially if they're young and healthiness. I'm not gonna do this.
Speaker 1: What are you gonna have the government mandate it. This
Speaker 1: is gonna stretch on for months and months and months more.
Speaker 1: The CDC just came out and said, you know, yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe the six feet of distancing in schools isn't necessary.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's three three feet in distancing is basically no distancing.
Speaker 1: We're not idiots, we can see this. The CDC was
Speaker 1: just making this crap up. Next week I'll anounce our
Speaker 1: next goal to put shots in arms. This is a
Speaker 1: time for optimism, but it's not a time for relaxation.
Speaker 1: I need all Americans. I need all of you to
Speaker 1: do your part, wash your hands, stay socially distanced, keep
Speaker 1: masking up as recommended by the CDC, and get vaccinated
Speaker 1: when it's your turn. Now, it's not the time to
Speaker 1: let down our guard. And the last week we've seen
Speaker 1: increases the number of cases in several states, scientists have
Speaker 1: made clear that things may get worse as new variants
Speaker 1: of this virus spread. Getting vaccinated is the best thing
Speaker 1: we can do to fight back against these variants. Well,
Speaker 1: millions of people are vaccinated. We need millions more to
Speaker 1: be vaccinated. And again, I need you to get vaccinated.
Speaker 1: When it comes and knits your term and you're able
Speaker 1: to do that, I need your help. I need you
Speaker 1: to help not just the country, but your family, your friends,
Speaker 1: your neighbors, get them vaccinated as well. This declining fool
Speaker 1: that we're told is the great leader the country needs.
Speaker 1: Right now, I'm gonna look the American people right in
Speaker 1: the eye and I'm gonna tell him, Hey, the science,
Speaker 1: this is what the science says. And they're all going
Speaker 1: to listen, because when Joe Biden says science, you know
Speaker 1: he's a really smart guy. The variance, we're supposed to
Speaker 1: now be held hostage to the variance. We don't know
Speaker 1: if the variants are going to get around the vaccination.
Speaker 1: We don't know if the variants are going to continue
Speaker 1: to mutate and change anyway, but we still have to
Speaker 1: live our lives in fear of them. If I had
Speaker 1: told you a year ago, if we were having this
Speaker 1: debate a year ago, and you know that this is true,
Speaker 1: you know that I'm right. If I had told you
Speaker 1: that the Democrat position would morph over time and this
Speaker 1: is a very much a political, impartisan thing now, that
Speaker 1: is absolutely what it has become. It's been that way
Speaker 1: for a long time. The Democrat position on this would be,
Speaker 1: we need to double mask after getting vaccinated. As individuals,
Speaker 1: you will be wearing two masks after you get a
Speaker 1: vaccine that all of the data says has a ninety
Speaker 1: five percent depending on the vaccine I know, but the
Speaker 1: main one that people are getting a ninety five percent
Speaker 1: effectiveness against serious disease, against a serious infection of COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: You would say, oh, okay, so the Democrats have lost
Speaker 1: their minds, and I would say that is correct. That's
Speaker 1: where we are. We have the end of this now
Speaker 1: it is in our hands. They never want to allow
Speaker 1: this to be the end. They haven't gotten enough. Biden's
Speaker 1: only been in office for two months. The complacent American people,
Speaker 1: the masked up, knee bending, terrified American people have not
Speaker 1: been abused enough. I mean, they've been molded into a
Speaker 1: place now where they can be forced into these things.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats haven't gotten the full political mileage out
Speaker 1: of this. We've got a world to say from climate change.
Speaker 1: And you know, if they can force you to wear
Speaker 1: a mask, maybe they can force cows to stop farting.
Speaker 1: I mean, who knows, who knows what we're going to
Speaker 1: see in our future here. They're not willing to give
Speaker 1: this up. They can tell you to stay in your home.
Speaker 1: They can shut down your church, they can shut down
Speaker 1: your business. This was the original open excuse for social
Speaker 1: media censorship. Don't you see that It wasn't actually the
Speaker 1: election dispute. They started going after COVID misinformation at Facebook
Speaker 1: and Twitter and Google and YouTube. That was their first move.
Speaker 1: That was the first time that the social media platforms
Speaker 1: showed us, told us, we have picked a side in
Speaker 1: public debate. You are not allowed to take the other side. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's a big change in society. You know, this would
Speaker 1: be the equivalent of the in the nineteen you know,
Speaker 1: let's say in the nineteen eighties, all the newspapers in
Speaker 1: the country said, we refuse to publish conservative opinion on
Speaker 1: the economy. We refuse. It is a wrong thing. You're
Speaker 1: forcing people into poverty if you believe that lowering taxes
Speaker 1: and allowing for more growth and prosperity is a better
Speaker 1: economic plan. You know, if you believe in Reaganomics, you're
Speaker 1: a bad person. And so we cannot publish that anywhere.
Speaker 1: In fact, we will suppress it openly. That's what we've
Speaker 1: seen with the social media companies, and it started over
Speaker 1: COVID lockdowns. I have been telling you this all along.
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people were running around just
Speaker 1: with their you know, Maga, Maga, maga all the time
Speaker 1: and oh my gosh, Hunter Biden. And that does tie
Speaker 1: into the censorship issue, which is important. But there are
Speaker 1: people that were that should have been fighting this fight
Speaker 1: with me, and instead we're just just gripping onto the
Speaker 1: maga train because it was what was easiest and best
Speaker 1: for their careers. This was the central fight all along.
Speaker 1: This is why Trump lost the election. This issue. I
Speaker 1: mean when I spoke to senior people on the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign and they, you know, without attribution, but I talked
Speaker 1: to them pretty recently and they were telling me that,
Speaker 1: Really all you had to know is did somebody really
Speaker 1: believe Fauci. If they really believe Faucci, they voted for
Speaker 1: Joe by I mean, I'm really believed in him. If
Speaker 1: they were a big Faucci, they voted Biden irrespective of
Speaker 1: everything else. If they had questions about Faucci, they voted
Speaker 1: for Trump. I mean with over like a nine accuracy
Speaker 1: on that. So that's really all you had to know.
Speaker 1: This was the central issue and it ties into everything else.
Speaker 1: Don't you think the American people would be a little
Speaker 1: bit more, a little bit more engaged if we could
Speaker 1: actually have, oh, I don't know, rallies about the immigration
Speaker 1: crisis right now? How did the Tea Party get going?
Speaker 1: What was it? Really? It wasn't so much an online movement.
Speaker 1: There was some online organization. It was people showing up.
Speaker 1: And when people see a lot of other people showing up,
Speaker 1: when they see that that act of solidarity, when they
Speaker 1: see that mobilization, then they realized Wow, maybe I should
Speaker 1: show up too, and I should tell other people, we
Speaker 1: should have our voices heard by the government. They wouldn't
Speaker 1: even allow that. In the early stages of the locked
Speaker 1: and you remember this, they were dispersing lockdown protesters based
Speaker 1: on the lockdown orders. And now here we are with
Speaker 1: a bid administration that is everybody's left wing, more left wing.
Speaker 1: You are now seeing an administration that is more progressive
Speaker 1: and more left wing than the Obama administration. That's just reality.
Speaker 1: And where is the counter movement? Where are we? Well,
Speaker 1: we're so busy making sure that we have some filthy,
Speaker 1: you know, soiled cloth to put over our mouth, loosely
Speaker 1: fitted while we're going to the grocery store. Because some
Speaker 1: people in the country have just been brainwashed into this,
Speaker 1: this lunacy of all you have to do is wear
Speaker 1: a mask and we're going to stop this thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: how'd that work out for us? We're all wearing masks. Okay,
Speaker 1: I live here in New York City. Everybody was masking
Speaker 1: the whole time. The virus ripped through. While the mask
Speaker 1: mandates were in effect, didn't make a difference. The CDC's
Speaker 1: own data tells you the mandate did not make a
Speaker 1: substantive difference. But people don't want to think that they're
Speaker 1: not that smart, or that they have bad judgment, or
Speaker 1: that they can be fooled that they're the sheep. Never
Speaker 1: want to believe they're sheep. Sheep think they're lions. That's
Speaker 1: the problem and our politics. That's always the way this goes.
Speaker 1: The people that are most easily led by the mob,
Speaker 1: by the crowd, believe that they're brave. That's in fact,
Speaker 1: one of the great appeals of being a member of
Speaker 1: the sheep is that you get to be safe and
Speaker 1: warm and fed and think that you're a hero. You
Speaker 1: get to have the state take care of you. You
Speaker 1: do what you're told, and that's a mark of bravery
Speaker 1: in this instance, that's how the left sees it. That's
Speaker 1: how the collectivists set all this up. But this left
Speaker 1: wing Biden administration, that's exactly what it is, no concession
Speaker 1: whatsoever on the issue of lockdowns and what the data
Speaker 1: actually shows us. You'll notice the Biden mysteries. They're terrified
Speaker 1: of people figuring out what a miracle Florida has been
Speaker 1: in comparison everywhere else. They're terrified of people really understanding
Speaker 1: that more broadly than they already do. I mean, you
Speaker 1: see the way that this keeps getting reported on. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's remarkable stuff you have. You have, for example, Politico.
Speaker 1: Here's a headline from Politico. Ron de santists is very
Speaker 1: pleased with himself. And I just tell everyone that you
Speaker 1: should note the thinly veiled, seething contempt that the journals
Speaker 1: have for Ron de Santis for saving millions of Floridians
Speaker 1: from absurd and worthless lockdowns that direct economies and ruined lives.
Speaker 1: The journals are mad at him for this because he
Speaker 1: makes them look like fools, because they were all cheerleaders
Speaker 1: for lockdown. You're saving lives, You're saving lives. Not true.
Speaker 1: Look at the data. Look at states with mask mandates
Speaker 1: and without. Great data just came out on schools that
Speaker 1: had masks required, mixed mask policy, and masked optional. Who
Speaker 1: wants to guess what that showed for transmission specifically in schools.
Speaker 1: This is a controlled environment. Did schools with mask mandates
Speaker 1: fair any better than schools without mask mandates? This is
Speaker 1: in the US. This is now the most recent data
Speaker 1: set on this. Any want to date? Guess no difference?
Speaker 1: Rise and fall the infections right in line with each other,
Speaker 1: same thing, didn't change a thing. How much more of
Speaker 1: this is it going to take? Well, it's not about
Speaker 1: the numbers anymore, as you see, it's about all these
Speaker 1: other things. It's not about keeping you safe, it's about
Speaker 1: controlling you. It's not about speaking the truth. It's about
Speaker 1: people feeling like they're smarter than they are, feeling like
Speaker 1: they're better than they are. That's what's at the center
Speaker 1: of all of this. And then you have this progressive
Speaker 1: Biden administration, all the handlers around Biden who are really
Speaker 1: controlling everything, and the recognition that they're just beginning to
Speaker 1: show you what they've really got planned. You know, we
Speaker 1: were left in a very weakened political position after Trump's
Speaker 1: first four years. I mean, this virus, the devastation of
Speaker 1: the virus and the lockdowns has put us in a
Speaker 1: place where there's not a lot of effective Republican pushback
Speaker 1: against what's happening right now. The Democrats know they smell
Speaker 1: blood in the water, and they're in the midst of
Speaker 1: a political frenzy right now. They're trying to get everything
Speaker 1: they trying to get everything they've dreamed of getting done
Speaker 1: as quickly as possible before the American people can wake
Speaker 1: up and say, hold on a second, this isn't what
Speaker 1: we were promised. This isn't the Biden administration. The media
Speaker 1: told us we're going to have. We'd have this dudley
Speaker 1: old grandpa, we could all count on, who you know,
Speaker 1: would just get it done the way that we needed
Speaker 1: him to get it done, and all this stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, they call him a moderate politically before this,
Speaker 1: he wasn't. Joe Biden wasn't a moderate. He was a mediocrity.
Speaker 1: He was a go along, to get along guy from
Speaker 1: Delaware who's been in politics longer than I've been alive.
Speaker 1: It's not impressive. And what's happened now is they're using
Speaker 1: this guy in order to get what they want politically.
Speaker 1: The left is doing that must be matched with fairness
Speaker 1: and equity. On President Harrison, I took a virtual tour
Speaker 1: of a vaccination center in Arizona not long ago. Presiden
Speaker 1: and President Harrison, I, I know that they're just say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's just a little little slip, slip of the tongue,
Speaker 1: you know, A slip of the tongue from Biden, a
Speaker 1: sniff of the head from Biden, A creepy grasping of
Speaker 1: the shoulders from behind by Biden. You know, all those
Speaker 1: things that he does. I know that there's there's going
Speaker 1: to say that that's just what maybe a senior moment,
Speaker 1: is that what we would call it, to be gentle
Speaker 1: about it. But notice that he says it and then
Speaker 1: doesn't even stop himself. Now, I understand that many of
Speaker 1: us on the right have been predicting for a long
Speaker 1: time now that it is only a matter of time
Speaker 1: before the Biden administration turns into the Harris administration. And
Speaker 1: this is this isn't some long shot conspiracy theory thing.
Speaker 1: This is the guy's almost eighty. The rigors of the
Speaker 1: presidency are substantial. I mean, look at George W. Bush,
Speaker 1: look at Barack Obama when they came into office, when
Speaker 1: they left, I mean they the presidency aged both of
Speaker 1: them dramatically, particularly I think you say Bush, I mean
Speaker 1: Bush was like a different human being at the end
Speaker 1: of it. And Joe Biden is not up for this.
Speaker 1: I mean, we've seen this, we've we've it's been very
Speaker 1: clear all along that this was going to be an issue.
Speaker 1: And when he says things like this, the media will
Speaker 1: just push it aside. But they're living in an alternate reality.
Speaker 1: It's like when I told you about the the Matt
Speaker 1: Taiebe piece on the Sovietization of the American media. There
Speaker 1: are now there comedians are bemoaning the fact that there's
Speaker 1: nothing to make fun of with Joe Biden. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a guy who says absurd and dumb things
Speaker 1: on a regular basis, and who is like, is like
Speaker 1: mister McGoo walking around here as a president of the
Speaker 1: United States, you know, going up to a dump truck
Speaker 1: and petting it because he thinks it's a cow. I mean,
Speaker 1: he has no idea what the hell is going on sometimes,
Speaker 1: and they can't make fun of him, right because Trump
Speaker 1: is so scary. Oh my gosh, Trump is so scary.
Speaker 1: Who's really running this administration? Who's really calling the shots?
Speaker 1: We know? Doesn't look like it's Joe Biden. I mean
Speaker 1: to say that this guy is a leader in any
Speaker 1: meaningful sense. Also, I hate this thing when he walks out,
Speaker 1: he's by himself and the White House walks out wearing
Speaker 1: his mask until he gets up to the podium. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is theater. This is this is like the definition
Speaker 1: of theatrics and it's exactly what we're seeing here over
Speaker 1: and over again. But people want to believe. People want
Speaker 1: to believe what they want to believe. And you know,
Speaker 1: for example, here CNN zone Don Lemon, who Trump very
Speaker 1: famously referred to as I think the dumbest person. I
Speaker 1: think Trump called Don Lemon the dumbest person on TV,
Speaker 1: which is almost I think for for news media. That's
Speaker 1: not quite true. There there are dumber there are dumber people.
Speaker 1: I tell you Don Lemon is no genius, but there
Speaker 1: are dumber people who are who have big forms and
Speaker 1: who go on TV. But here's the Don Lemon assessment,
Speaker 1: which is the CNN assessment, which is just let's just
Speaker 1: talk about how great Joe Biden is, even though it's absurd.
Speaker 1: Play twelve. Why don't you be a patriot? Why don't
Speaker 1: you just be a decent human being and stop trying
Speaker 1: to be so negative and get doctor foulch here Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Guess what, here's the thing. Here's the thing. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is doing a fantastic job when it comes to the pandemic.
Speaker 1: He's saying all the right things, he's doing all the
Speaker 1: right things. He's getting shots in people's arms he's following
Speaker 1: the science. He's not giving you lies. He's not telling
Speaker 1: you that light and bleach and disinfectin is going to
Speaker 1: help you when you injected inside of your body. So
Speaker 1: stop it on the right because the guy you had
Speaker 1: in the office did really dumb stuff and told you
Speaker 1: crazy things alight about you, gaslighted you, and you fell
Speaker 1: for it and you believe it. And now you're walking
Speaker 1: around and you don't want to get the vaccine. Why
Speaker 1: because you say you don't trust it, but you really
Speaker 1: don't want to get it because Joe Biden is doing
Speaker 1: a great job with it. And that is the truth.
Speaker 1: Now take that to the bank. Oh, CNN really does
Speaker 1: put morons on TV all the time. Biden versus putin
Speaker 1: Round one. This is showing you just what we've got
Speaker 1: with this for the foreign policy expectations that we should
Speaker 1: all have for the Biden administration. Remember Joe Biden, the
Speaker 1: way they sold him early on when when he was
Speaker 1: picked as the vice president, when he was picked as
Speaker 1: the vice president for Barack Obama, was that he had
Speaker 1: great foreign policy experience and he was so knowledgeable about
Speaker 1: the foreign about foreign policy the United States. And then
Speaker 1: the one area I think of the Obama administration that
Speaker 1: was the most universally understood to be unsuccessful in disastrous
Speaker 1: by by anyone who's honest. I mean, I know that.
Speaker 1: You know, you Ben Rhodes going on MSNBC. We were great,
Speaker 1: We're so smart. Yeah. Ben Rhodes was like the foreign
Speaker 1: policy architect of the Obama administration. I mean, the people
Speaker 1: they put in charge of things. You look at me, say,
Speaker 1: are you guys serious? Now see, I actually tell you
Speaker 1: the truth, and that some of the people that were
Speaker 1: in very senior positions in the Trump administration were very
Speaker 1: bad choices too. And Trump admits that now. So people
Speaker 1: who are very mad at me when I said things
Speaker 1: like this is a bad pick. He shouldn't have his
Speaker 1: kids as his top advisors. He shouldn't have you know,
Speaker 1: Rex Tillerson as a Secretary of State or whatever the
Speaker 1: case may be, and they should buck Trump knows what
Speaker 1: he's doing. Actually, no, on some of those things, he didn't.
Speaker 1: And that's okay. No one's perfect. I get it easy
Speaker 1: for me to sit outside the White House and call
Speaker 1: it out, but I will say sometimes it was obvious.
Speaker 1: But I think Trump's hart was in the right place
Speaker 1: with most of those picks. I understand the family issue
Speaker 1: is I think that was That's really the one that
Speaker 1: I just find the most the most inexplicable and indefensible.
Speaker 1: But anyway, but Biden just put dumb asses in charge
Speaker 1: of things. I'm sorry. The Obama administration see it all
Speaker 1: now starts to starts to come together in your head.
Speaker 1: The Obama administration just put people in charge of a
Speaker 1: lot of things that you'd say, wow, you know, like
Speaker 1: John Kerry, for example, Secretary of State. But though one
Speaker 1: of the most overrated intellects on the planet is Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: where we're told that she's so impressive based on what,
Speaker 1: based on what, based on being ruthless, based on being
Speaker 1: cunning and completely you know, a moral that makes her
Speaker 1: really smart. Hello, sure, have you ever heard her say something?
Speaker 1: He said, Wow, that was really astute, that was really good. No,
Speaker 1: she's a Russia collusion truther. She lost the election when asked,
Speaker 1: I mean famously, when they asked about her foreign policy,
Speaker 1: when there were discussions about what she had accomplished a
Speaker 1: secretary of State, her then spokesperson started stammering and said
Speaker 1: something about how she's flown so many miles on the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State's playing all over the world. It was
Speaker 1: like a million miles or some crazy number, and we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to be impressed by that. Oh, so she
Speaker 1: went on a lot of a lot of taxpayer funded
Speaker 1: boondoggles on a big fancy jet to go to basically
Speaker 1: have parties in foreign embassies as Secretary of State. Yeah,
Speaker 1: real challenging stuff, you know, for Hillary Clinton. But let's
Speaker 1: dive into the what we're seeing so far from the
Speaker 1: Putin administrate I'm sorry, the Biden administration on foreign policy
Speaker 1: when it comes to Putin and also China. I mean,
Speaker 1: our two major geopolitical opponents are Russia and China. But
Speaker 1: Russia is an irritation, you know, Russia can be a
Speaker 1: problem for US. Russia is like the snake that can
Speaker 1: bite you. China is the snake that has venom that
Speaker 1: can kill you. There's a difference, right, one of them
Speaker 1: hurts and can slow you down. The other one can
Speaker 1: can end you. And and China is just a graver,
Speaker 1: more serious threat across the board to US long term
Speaker 1: geopolitical interests. You look at the size of the Chinese economy,
Speaker 1: the Chinese population, just everything is trending in their direction
Speaker 1: right now. Russia has got a fraction of the US population,
Speaker 1: a fraction of the economy, of all kinds of problems,
Speaker 1: but already causing problems for the Biden administration. Here is
Speaker 1: here's this story up on CNN quote. The Kremlin has
Speaker 1: reacted angrily to US President Joe Biden's remarks that Russian
Speaker 1: leader Vladimir Putin is a killer, calling the comment unprecedented
Speaker 1: and describing the relationship between the two countries as very bad.
Speaker 1: Putin on Thursday nevertheless invited Biden to hold open open
Speaker 1: talks in the wake of the remarks. In an interview
Speaker 1: with ABC that Are Wednesday, Biden said Putin will pay
Speaker 1: a price for his efforts to undermine the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: US election, following a landmark and intelligence assessment in America
Speaker 1: that found the Russian government meddled in the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: election with the aim of denigrating Biden's candidacy. When interviewer
Speaker 1: George Stephanopolis asked Biden if he thought Putin was a killer,
Speaker 1: the president said, m I do. Responding to the comments,
Speaker 1: Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov told reporters on Thursday that there
Speaker 1: hasn't been anything like this in history. He said it
Speaker 1: was clear that Biden definitely does not want to improve
Speaker 1: relations with Russia and the relationship between the two countries
Speaker 1: is very bad. When asked how it can affect relations,
Speaker 1: Peskov said it is absolutely clear how, but refused to elaborate.
Speaker 1: These are very bad statements by the president of the
Speaker 1: United States. He definitely does not want improve relations with US.
Speaker 1: Will continue to proceed from this. And then Prutent responded
Speaker 1: Thursday by saying, I'd like to offer President Biden the
Speaker 1: opportunity to continue our discussion, but on condition that he'll
Speaker 1: will do so. What is called live online without anything prerecorded,
Speaker 1: in an open and honest discussion. Putin is calling out
Speaker 1: Biden saying, let's have an online live chat, old man,
Speaker 1: let's let's do this. Let's have a discussion here. Now,
Speaker 1: this would be fascinating. I mean you can just sort
Speaker 1: of picture this in your head. It would be on
Speaker 1: one end, Putin being like, Oh, you're too old for this.
Speaker 1: Why are you even having this conversation with me right now?
Speaker 1: I don't even know. Why are we having this stuff
Speaker 1: with the old man who he's looking like he is
Speaker 1: speaking up, he's apple sauce. I don't want more of
Speaker 1: these apple sauce men's chewing with the face that looked
Speaker 1: like he's asleep. Why am I having this? And then
Speaker 1: and then Biden saying, you know you're hanybuddy. I'm staring
Speaker 1: you down, and I'm looking you're right in the face
Speaker 1: and starting to fade a little bit, starting to get
Speaker 1: a little foggy up here. But you know, hey man,
Speaker 1: there are was, you know, looking at some my CBMs
Speaker 1: twenty years ago. And then all of a sudden, out
Speaker 1: of nowhere, this guy Cornpop arrives and Cornpop is saying,
Speaker 1: hey man, why those are inter intercontinental ballistic missiles. Those
Speaker 1: are big, Let's make a big boom. And I said,
Speaker 1: you're right, Cornpop, maybe I shall make you chief of
Speaker 1: my National security? And what was I saying? Again? And
Speaker 1: then Putin's gonna look and be like, so this is
Speaker 1: what the Medica America elect? These are stupid the old
Speaker 1: man and mix comments about me and why do we
Speaker 1: think America will be able to beat China? I think
Speaker 1: I need to be about the friends with the China.
Speaker 1: And speaking of which you also have a little bit
Speaker 1: of a diplomatic dust up with the Chinese. So so
Speaker 1: Putin challenges Biden to an on air debate, on air discussion,
Speaker 1: and no surprise, Biden says, you know, that's not that's
Speaker 1: not happening, which would be fascinating that Putin's English is
Speaker 1: not that good, so it had to be through a
Speaker 1: tran later, but it would still would have been worth
Speaker 1: worth checking that one out. Um. And I'm I'm sure
Speaker 1: I have some idea the things that I have some
Speaker 1: guesses that the things that Putin would say, and that
Speaker 1: might trip up Biden a little bit. The best thing
Speaker 1: he could do is be like, why are you guys
Speaker 1: so crazy? Why are the Democrats pretending like Russia is
Speaker 1: changing the course of your elections and stuff? This is delusional,
Speaker 1: This is really unhelpful. You shouldn't be doing this. This
Speaker 1: shouldn't be happening. Um, but but it is. Anyway. The
Speaker 1: Chinese also had had an exchange here. I think they've
Speaker 1: got talks going on in is in An, Alaska, and
Speaker 1: so there's a there's a sit down. First US China
Speaker 1: meeting under Biden gets off to a rocky start. That's
Speaker 1: what That's what it says on CNBC. Here the two
Speaker 1: day talks UH conclude today and you had where was this, Yeah, Anchorage, Alaska.
Speaker 1: I was right, Okay, up up at Anchorage. I've been
Speaker 1: at Anchorage. Nice town. Nice town doesn't really feel like
Speaker 1: a city, but it feels like a nice town. And
Speaker 1: I know we're we actually have some great team buck
Speaker 1: listeners up there. So here's where we get from the Chinese,
Speaker 1: when faced with the overwhelming intellectual heft of the Biden
Speaker 1: foreign policy team, this is the way that they're they're
Speaker 1: staring at Tony Blinkin and Tony Blinken is a is
Speaker 1: an elitist Democrats version of what a secretary of state
Speaker 1: should be. A guy who looks comfortable at a suit
Speaker 1: and you know, has some tufts of gray in his
Speaker 1: hair and speaks in a kind of you know, soft
Speaker 1: monotone and uses fancy words. It never gets anything done.
Speaker 1: A really suave, worthless bureaucrat is that's their ideal. That's
Speaker 1: what I mean. A lot of diplomats are exactly that,
Speaker 1: but Tony blink Can definitely fits into that category. You know,
Speaker 1: we go went to all the right schools, checked all
Speaker 1: those boxes on the way. Here's how the Chinese Communist
Speaker 1: Party Foreign Affairs chief Yang ji Chi reacts to this
Speaker 1: brilliant Biden foreign policy team play too. We'll also discuss
Speaker 1: our deep concerns with actions by China, including in Shenjong,
Speaker 1: Hong Kong, Taiwan, cyber attacks on the United States, economic
Speaker 1: coersion toward our allies. Each of these actions threaten the
Speaker 1: rules spaced order that maintains global stability. Daubaubis, Well, you
Speaker 1: can't blame this problem on somebody else. I have to
Speaker 1: tell you what I'm hearing is very different from what
Speaker 1: you described. I'm hearing deep satisfaction that the United States
Speaker 1: is back, that we're re engaged with our allies and partners.
Speaker 1: I'm also hearing deep concern about some of the actions
Speaker 1: your government is taking, you know, when it's so cheapened. Well,
Speaker 1: I think we thought too well of the United States.
Speaker 1: We thought that the US side will follow the necessary
Speaker 1: diplomatic protocols. So Woman concert b shies timing Woman da Lisa.
Speaker 1: So for China, it was necessary that we make our
Speaker 1: position clear. What's n mayo tain so niemen song siliitya faa.
Speaker 1: So let me say here that in front of the
Speaker 1: Chinese side, the United States does not have the qualification
Speaker 1: to say that it wants to speak to China from
Speaker 1: a position of strength. The US does not have the
Speaker 1: qualifications to speak to China from a position of strength,
Speaker 1: that is, from their foreign affairs chief. I just want
Speaker 1: to know, did you ever hear anything like that from
Speaker 1: the Chinese, the Trump directly the press conference like this,
Speaker 1: or the Trump Secretary of State. I don't remember anything
Speaker 1: like that. Let's put that out there. They're basically saying,
Speaker 1: all right, all right, you Biden jerks. Now you know
Speaker 1: there's a new sheriff in town. Let's see how this
Speaker 1: goes for you. China is going to do donuts in
Speaker 1: the White House's front yard for the next four years
Speaker 1: while Biden gets, you know, run over by his German shepherd.
Speaker 1: I mean, the whole thing is just going to be absurd.
Speaker 1: That's what That's what we're facing. That's what's going to
Speaker 1: end up happening here. The part is an issue when
Speaker 1: it shouldn't be. There ought to be a by person
Speaker 1: consensus to fight terrorism wherever it comes from, and particularly
Speaker 1: when it comes from within. But you know, sadly, the
Speaker 1: GOP is no longer a party of an ideology. It's
Speaker 1: a party of Donald Trump. And Trump has made that
Speaker 1: party about as you pointed out, vilifying the other. It
Speaker 1: is the party of agrievement and increasingly a party of
Speaker 1: white agreement against everyone else, and so speaking out about
Speaker 1: this domestic violence threat from white nationalism. You know, some
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party in Congress feel they're speaking out
Speaker 1: against their base and the president's base. You know, I
Speaker 1: would like to think that's not the majority of their base.
Speaker 1: But they are building a party around disenfranchising people of color,
Speaker 1: and they're unwilling to confront their demons, and that leaves
Speaker 1: us very vulnerable. Look it Slimy Shift moving around here.
Speaker 1: On the one hand, you know, you need to hear
Speaker 1: what people like Shifts say. You need to hear what
Speaker 1: these Democrats are telling their constituents and saying on national
Speaker 1: TV to understand just how much disdain they really have
Speaker 1: for you, how they view you, and also how disconnected
Speaker 1: from reality they are. We're the problem with this unity
Speaker 1: that the people that just we just lost the presidency,
Speaker 1: we just lost control of the Senate. We've we're still
Speaker 1: in the minority in the House. Democrats are ramming through
Speaker 1: multi trillion dollars spending packages without without you know, Republican votes.
Speaker 1: It's a totally one party show here, and we're supposed
Speaker 1: to what speak out against domestic Notice notice the way
Speaker 1: he frames us. Why can't people just speak out against
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism, you know, white nationalist domestic terrorism. You know,
Speaker 1: it shouldn't be hard because Trump's base aren't white, white
Speaker 1: nationalist domestic terrorists. Oh but maybe they are actually white
Speaker 1: nationalist domestic terrorists. He takes you through this, this full
Speaker 1: this full circle of oh yeah, no, I I they're
Speaker 1: not actually that. No, no, they are that, but just
Speaker 1: smearing them, hitting them from both sides, lying about It's
Speaker 1: awful what these democrats do. And you know they they
Speaker 1: control these institutions. They're trying to stamp out conservative ideology
Speaker 1: and beliefs wherever. And they're also telling us that we
Speaker 1: need to just abandon everything. Why won't we just abandon
Speaker 1: all the things that we believe. Why won't we just
Speaker 1: change our minds on everything? You know, what's the problem.
Speaker 1: Why do we obstruct? Why do we stand in their way?
Speaker 1: They just want to help us, man, They just want
Speaker 1: to be friends by making us do everything they want.
Speaker 1: Obstructionism is a Democrat word for Republicans. Still believe stuff,
Speaker 1: stop believing things, stop having things that are important to
Speaker 1: you where you disagree with us, that's what obstruction is
Speaker 1: a means. Or you could take advice from I don't
Speaker 1: know Governor Cuomo's brother about what the Republican Party should do,
Speaker 1: because he's really got our best interests at hard Play thirteen. Please,
Speaker 1: Representative McCarthy come on the show. I'll give you half
Speaker 1: an hour. Let's talk it out. I don't want to
Speaker 1: yell at you, don't yell at me. Let's go through it.
Speaker 1: Make the case, because the way you say it here
Speaker 1: in light of the facts would make orwell blush. They
Speaker 1: are literally saying that they didn't say what they said
Speaker 1: and for you to believe them over your lying eyes.
Speaker 1: How can any real Republican go for this? Not when
Speaker 1: the US intelligencies are telling us narratives of fraud in
Speaker 1: the recent general election, The Big Lie had the emboldening
Speaker 1: impact of the violent breach of the US Capitol, the
Speaker 1: infamy of January sixth, and that it will almost certainly
Speaker 1: spur domestic violent extremists to try and engage in more
Speaker 1: attacks this year. When you learn that where are you
Speaker 1: real Republicans? You need to d trumpify your ranks. Now
Speaker 1: that takes us to another big problem that the right
Speaker 1: is pretending to care about de trumpify your ranks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so so we can just submit and get steamrolled more
Speaker 1: by the Democrats. Right. There are a few lessons that
Speaker 1: Trump showed us in politics today that are invaluable. A
Speaker 1: few lessons. One of them is they don't seek to
Speaker 1: convert you. That the left is not trying. They're not
Speaker 1: trying to be your friend. They want to destroy and
Speaker 1: or control you. That's what the real purpose. They're not
Speaker 1: looking to make you feel okay and bring us all together.
Speaker 1: Has there been any unity from the Biden administration once whoever? No? None.
Speaker 1: It's just one big spitting in the face of Republicans,
Speaker 1: and they're pretty proud of it, really, they don't even
Speaker 1: try to hide it. But we're going to take advice
Speaker 1: on what to do with the Republican Party from Chris
Speaker 1: Cuomo really, or from any Democrat for that matter, who
Speaker 1: has been a part of all the efforts to tear
Speaker 1: down everything about conservatives, to talk about this threat of
Speaker 1: white oh, the white nationalist terrorists. So they're gonna get
Speaker 1: us any moment, get a grip, Libs, get a grip.
Speaker 1: I am going to say something that President Biden refuses
Speaker 1: to say there is a crisis on our southern border.
Speaker 1: It's humanity humanitarian crisis, it's a public health crisis, a
Speaker 1: national security crisis. It is a Biden border crisis, and
Speaker 1: it is spiraling out of control with no signs of ending.
Speaker 1: When candidate Biden told migrants in June, immediately surge to
Speaker 1: the border, I knew his immigration policies would be bad,
Speaker 1: but I did not think it would be this bad.
Speaker 1: I did not think that would mean thirteen thousand unaccompanied
Speaker 1: minors in the US custody. I did not think it
Speaker 1: would mean moving them from border facilities across the country,
Speaker 1: one thousand of them to Midland, Texas, three thousand to Dallas,
Speaker 1: and likely to more cities tomorrow. They've been focusing on
Speaker 1: the on the child attention issue at the border because
Speaker 1: that number is so huge and so out of control,
Speaker 1: thirteen thousand unaccompanied miners and just understand this, I mean,
Speaker 1: their parents are making the decision here to send their
Speaker 1: children into this situation. I'm sorry. That's it's reckless and
Speaker 1: it's dangerous. They're they're putting kids at risk here. So
Speaker 1: you know, I understand people can make they can say, oh,
Speaker 1: but it's because they're fleeing such a desperate circumstance or
Speaker 1: you know whatever. But we also are allowed to say
Speaker 1: this needs to stop. This is dangerous for the kids,
Speaker 1: and parents are putting their kids in this situations. It's
Speaker 1: not the US government that's dropping off, you know, fourteen
Speaker 1: year olds and twelve year olds at the border. That's
Speaker 1: not what's happening. But it's not only kids. It's not
Speaker 1: only kids. And what we're finding out is that this
Speaker 1: is now exactly as I've been telling you, as close
Speaker 1: to an open borders you can really get because if
Speaker 1: you have a family unit that shows up, they're going
Speaker 1: to be They're going to be let in the United States.
Speaker 1: They're not being turned away, they're not being told to stop.
Speaker 1: And the fundamental problem here is that the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: what they really don't want people to know is what
Speaker 1: the percentage is of the people who are showing up
Speaker 1: with the border who are let into the United States.
Speaker 1: They're very focused on the conditions. They're very focused on
Speaker 1: things like what's going on in custody and insure. I mean,
Speaker 1: here's a piece from ABC News from today that gives
Speaker 1: you a sense of what the media's focus as very
Speaker 1: much on the this is a humanitarian crisis, as in
Speaker 1: the people showing up of the border are in a
Speaker 1: rough circumstance, being trafficked in many cases, but also when
Speaker 1: they're in custody. Here you go early last year quote,
Speaker 1: as border agents in Texas escorted an international news crew
Speaker 1: into what authorities say is the most remote area along
Speaker 1: the entire Suthwest border, someone in the group noticed a
Speaker 1: man sitting in a ravine hidden behind brush. Pedro Diego Francisco,
Speaker 1: a Guatemalan migrant, had been there for three days with
Speaker 1: no way to call for help as he suffered through
Speaker 1: temperatures that fell to eighteen degrees at night. A smuggler
Speaker 1: brought him and other migrants to the desolate piece of
Speaker 1: land on their way in the United States, but the
Speaker 1: entire group abandoned Diego Francisco after he injured his leg.
Speaker 1: He was wearing every piece of clothing he possessed to
Speaker 1: try and keep warm. According to Border patrol statement, when
Speaker 1: agents carried Diego Francisco to safety, he declared in Spanish,
Speaker 1: they have saved my life. God repay them. I thought
Speaker 1: I was going to die. Stories like that are becoming
Speaker 1: more common as the US braces for what Homeland Security
Speaker 1: Alejandro Majorcas said this week would be the highest number
Speaker 1: of individuals stopped by border patrol along the Southwest border
Speaker 1: in twenty years. National attention recently has focused more on
Speaker 1: the record numbers of unaccompanied children detained along the Southwest border,
Speaker 1: but that's only part of the increasingly grimm story. As
Speaker 1: current and former law enforcement officials described it to ABC News,
Speaker 1: these people are desperate. A recently retired Board of Patrol
Speaker 1: agents said, I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing. Okay,
Speaker 1: So this is all end of the end of the
Speaker 1: quote there. This is all about the focus. The media
Speaker 1: attention is all on telling you know, they're trying to
Speaker 1: find a way to to they have to cover this.
Speaker 1: We all know this is a huge story, really the
Speaker 1: biggest story going on in the country right now. Maybe
Speaker 1: after I mean lockdowns is a continuing huge story, but
Speaker 1: this is the biggest news item in many ways, and
Speaker 1: they want the focus to be entirely on people who
Speaker 1: are suffering and their circumstances, creating an emotional appeal for
Speaker 1: these migrants. That's what the focus is. What they don't
Speaker 1: want to talk about. It and by the way, I'm
Speaker 1: not I'm not I'm not saying it's that's bad. I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not opposed to, you know, sympathy for the people.
Speaker 1: And I mean, I'm very happy that border patrol saved
Speaker 1: the life of this man in this ABC News piece,
Speaker 1: and border prol saves a lot of lives, you know,
Speaker 1: when they're not saying border patrol is evil and racist
Speaker 1: or abolished ice, you know, Democrats occasionally should take note
Speaker 1: of the fact that our law enforce and personnel along
Speaker 1: the southern border actively save lives. They give life saving medicine,
Speaker 1: medical assistance to people who are coming to the border,
Speaker 1: who are showing up illegally. They give food to them,
Speaker 1: they take care of them. I mean, I'll never forget
Speaker 1: being at the at the border, in the border in
Speaker 1: El Paso and border patrol agents they're telling me about
Speaker 1: how when they were migrant children showing up, these guys
Speaker 1: were going and border patrol agents do not make a
Speaker 1: lot of money. They were going and buying with their
Speaker 1: own money, buying diapers and formula and toys and blankets
Speaker 1: to bring so that any kids who are part of
Speaker 1: these family units who are showing up We're gonna be
Speaker 1: fair and warm and be pretty, you know, in reasonable circumstances,
Speaker 1: at least safe and nourished circumstances. While they were held
Speaker 1: intention re member, they're being held in detention usually is
Speaker 1: in those cases for two days, three days, something like that.
Speaker 1: And that's where we are again. Now they're often being
Speaker 1: held for less than seventy two hours. And you know,
Speaker 1: but that that story doesn't really get told very much
Speaker 1: about what the men and women in boarder patrol are
Speaker 1: doing to try to help people on the boarder try
Speaker 1: to keep everybody safe here. You know, they're trying to
Speaker 1: enforce the laws of the United States while also being
Speaker 1: being decent and humane people. And I think they do
Speaker 1: a very good job of that. But the big problem here,
Speaker 1: and this is what doesn't get the attention. This is
Speaker 1: what you won't hear from the Biden administration people. The
Speaker 1: big focus and all this should be on. Does the
Speaker 1: Bide administration want to shut down this surge of migrants
Speaker 1: from coming into the United States? Are they seeking to
Speaker 1: prevent this? This is the big issue. Do they want
Speaker 1: to stop one hundred thousand people a month from coming
Speaker 1: into the United States? Yes? Or no? Now what they'll say,
Speaker 1: is oh, but they have they have a right to asylum.
Speaker 1: We've been through this before. This is a fraud. They
Speaker 1: the reason they started coming again is because they got
Speaker 1: rid of the checks in the system of you could say,
Speaker 1: the asylum integrity measures in the system like remain in Mexico.
Speaker 1: They got rid of those, and that meant that migrants
Speaker 1: and the cartels that bring them realized, Okay, now we
Speaker 1: can pull the scam off again and everyone starts showing
Speaker 1: up again. Biden administration needs to answer the question do
Speaker 1: they do they fundamentally want this to stop, and I
Speaker 1: think we all would know very quickly the answer is no.
Speaker 1: They do not want this too and they do not
Speaker 1: want this to be all over. And that's because, as
Speaker 1: I've said to you so many times, they are creating
Speaker 1: future Democrat voters in their minds and they and they
Speaker 1: largely are, I mean a vast majority. Think about this.
Speaker 1: If you're a migrant who arrived, or you you're if
Speaker 1: you're a migrant arrived, or you're you have family members
Speaker 1: or they are family members of migrants who have arrived
Speaker 1: during this period of the Democrat administration, I think it
Speaker 1: is pretty clear that you know I think it's pretty
Speaker 1: clear that you're going to vote Democrat, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: you you owe your status in the United States, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party the bide administration. So they know that, so
Speaker 1: they don't want it to stop. And what this all
Speaker 1: really is turning on at this point, what's making all
Speaker 1: the difference is whether or not whether or not there
Speaker 1: are some Democrats who are going to stand in the
Speaker 1: way of the amnesty bills that are already making their
Speaker 1: way through the House. They're already they're already in process.
Speaker 1: Are there some Democrats who say, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: we're not We're not out of place, or we're going
Speaker 1: to vote for a full scale ambassy. We're out of place.
Speaker 1: We're even going to we're even gonna give ambassy to
Speaker 1: a few million people. I disagree with some of my
Speaker 1: Republican friends on this. I know people on the geop
Speaker 1: side who say that Mansion and Cinema and some others
Speaker 1: are just unwilling to go along with any real amnesty plan.
Speaker 1: I think they're I think they're giving them way too
Speaker 1: much credit for backbone. I'm not sure I would go
Speaker 1: to that place. I'm not sure I believe that at all.
Speaker 1: Because the pressure that will mount as a result of
Speaker 1: this crisis, and of the Democrats recognizing the progressive left
Speaker 1: recognizing what an opportunity this is. They're they're going to
Speaker 1: twist a lot of arms and there's gonna be a
Speaker 1: whole lot. I mean, it's it's going to turn into
Speaker 1: really Joe Mansion. You're not going to vote for amnesty,
Speaker 1: You're a racist, and that's going to be amplified across
Speaker 1: all the media. And remember, what do politicians care about
Speaker 1: more than anything else? What is the single most important
Speaker 1: thing to politician in America today? Themselves? Their reputations, their prospects,
Speaker 1: their wealth. That is what motivates them. Don't and it's
Speaker 1: true of both parties. Don't never forget that Team Vogue
Speaker 1: is a a dumb publication and uh, you know Anna
Speaker 1: Winter and the people that are behind these these uh
Speaker 1: these fashion slash celebrity rags that are out there inter
Speaker 1: she's the the editor in chief of Vogue. I think
Speaker 1: that they're damaging to culture and society. I think that
Speaker 1: their acts they're actually really just the they're almost like
Speaker 1: the paparazzi. I mean, they're they're just feed off of things,
Speaker 1: off of insecurities, and celebrity obsession in society, and I
Speaker 1: think the whole thing is just kind of me not
Speaker 1: not a fan. I know, I don't read Vogue. I
Speaker 1: don't know about fashion. I wear sweatshirts whenever I can. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's all true, that's all you know. I'll take it.
Speaker 1: I'll take the hits. I'm not a fashion guy, and
Speaker 1: I'm not somebody who can speak with with knowledge about
Speaker 1: out this stuff. I've only released. I've only really watched
Speaker 1: The Devil Wears Products, So I get a lot from
Speaker 1: from that movie. Producer, Mark, have you seen that? One?
Speaker 1: Who hasn't? Right? Every guy has seen that movie. I
Speaker 1: don't know why we've all seen it. A lot of
Speaker 1: you were saying, I haven't seen it, buck, Yeah, really
Speaker 1: though the missus didn't say, oh, look what's on TV,
Speaker 1: and you were like, oh, I don't want to look
Speaker 1: at that. I mean, you know, I don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I'm just saying it's possible. It's possible. You
Speaker 1: you saw it. Um, But here, here's what's going on.
Speaker 1: You got a big to do about a cancelation of
Speaker 1: a young minority writer, editor or whatever. Alexei mccammond. Now
Speaker 1: you may recall the name because Alexeiy mccammond. She hasn't
Speaker 1: been in the game for very long. She's twenty seven.
Speaker 1: But she is telegenic, I think, right, I'm allowed to
Speaker 1: I'm allowed to say that and not get like me too.
Speaker 1: You're allowed to say telegenic, I think. And she's you know,
Speaker 1: she's twenty seven years old. She was brought up in
Speaker 1: the whole in the whole situation with that guy t J.
Speaker 1: Ducklow who got fired from the White House or resigned
Speaker 1: before getting fired, who called Tara Paul Mary, a journalist
Speaker 1: for Politico, and threatened her career if if she wrote
Speaker 1: a piece about t J. Ducklow's relationship sexual relationship with
Speaker 1: Alexei mcgammond. So she's covering the White House. He works
Speaker 1: in the White House, and they were, you know, doing
Speaker 1: the things that people do and right family safe, Right
Speaker 1: family Family show producer, Mark, that's the way I gotta
Speaker 1: say it. Special fun fun time. There we go. I
Speaker 1: hadn't I hadn't remembered that I said that, But that's
Speaker 1: that's a that's another way of putting it special special
Speaker 1: fun fun time. So they had some of that, and anyway,
Speaker 1: he got fired from the White House. This was recent.
Speaker 1: I remember this was a whole gossip kind of story,
Speaker 1: and you got fired from the White House. She now
Speaker 1: has been fired. This is the reason she's in the
Speaker 1: headlines today. Alexi McCammon, teen Vogue editor resigns I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: resigns because of racist tweets. She wrote when she was seventeen,
Speaker 1: and I gotta tell you, I had to look around
Speaker 1: to find the racist tweets. I said, well, where are they?
Speaker 1: And this is what was written up. But this was
Speaker 1: from I think it might have been The Daily Beast.
Speaker 1: But don't don't quote me on the quote because I'm
Speaker 1: the quote is real. I forget what my sourcing is here,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't really matter. I think this is correct quote.
Speaker 1: According to social media post, mccammon's old tweets, dating back
Speaker 1: to twenty eleven included quote, now googling how to wake
Speaker 1: up I'm sorry, now googling how to not wake up
Speaker 1: with swollen Asian eyes, and quote, give me a two
Speaker 1: out of ten on my kem problem. Cross out all
Speaker 1: of my work and don't explain what I did wrong.
Speaker 1: Thanks a lot, stupid Asian tea. You're great. End quote.
Speaker 1: Those are the only tweets that I that I was
Speaker 1: able to find of her, and I'm there may be more.
Speaker 1: Im Look, I'm not an Alexia Mcammon expert, so there's that,
Speaker 1: but those are the only ones that I was able
Speaker 1: to find, and she was she was pushed out of
Speaker 1: her job at Team. She's the editor in chief at
Speaker 1: teen Vote. She was pushed out of her job there
Speaker 1: because of those tweets from ten years ago. And what's
Speaker 1: fascinating to see is is the the reaction among conservatives
Speaker 1: really varies because on the one hand, on the one
Speaker 1: side of it, you have people who are saying, you know,
Speaker 1: you get what you deserve. On the left, the left
Speaker 1: eats its own and they have to suffer the consequences
Speaker 1: or else this will never stop. And I appreciate that
Speaker 1: point of view. I think that's true. But on the
Speaker 1: other side, and I come down I believe in this
Speaker 1: as well. This just showed first of all, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is madness. This is madness. They would absolutely do
Speaker 1: it to a conservative much faster and much more viciously.
Speaker 1: I mean, they fired Kevin Williamson from the Atlantic or
Speaker 1: you know, I keep saying fired that you know, asked
Speaker 1: resign whatever. They got rid of Kevin Williamson for The
Speaker 1: Atlantic for a tweet he made about abortion where he
Speaker 1: was trying to be a little bit provocative, and they
Speaker 1: fired him for that. You know, they keep doing these things,
Speaker 1: and you just have to wonder at what point does
Speaker 1: the left understand that they're ruining everything? They really they
Speaker 1: ruin everything. I mean, the left is a moral, ideological,
Speaker 1: spiritual cancer on American society. Now. They're just destroying everything,
Speaker 1: and they're in control of a lot. So it's getting
Speaker 1: We're more aware of it now, we're more able to
Speaker 1: see the kind of destruction they could do, and they're
Speaker 1: making America worse for everybody, including people who are leftists.
Speaker 1: It's just a question of when the crocodile eats them, right.
Speaker 1: Churchill said, you know that that Chamberlain was feeding the crocodile,
Speaker 1: hoping that at eight the UK last. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: what leftists are all doing. They cheer and they're gleeful
Speaker 1: when conservatives get ripped up, destroyed, ruined for the most
Speaker 1: minor infraction or even sometimes no infraction. But they can
Speaker 1: create a narrative of one and then sometimes in the
Speaker 1: left they get fed into them. You know, they get
Speaker 1: fed into the machinery two and they just say, Okay,
Speaker 1: well it's not me. So this is this is the
Speaker 1: price we pay for wokeness. This is the price we
Speaker 1: pay for wokeness. They won't stop. This is central to
Speaker 1: their ideology, destroying people as shows of purity and public
Speaker 1: and the virtue signaling and the vanity and the sense
Speaker 1: of of of joy that leftists get from this stuff
Speaker 1: is unfortunately very powerful, and the only way to stop
Speaker 1: this is to defeat them, to take power from them.
Speaker 1: That's the only way this ends. As promised. We have
Speaker 1: our friend and culter joining us now. Always insightful, always
Speaker 1: worth hearing from and thirteenth time New York Times bestselling author,
Speaker 1: and go to andcultor dot com for latest and great
Speaker 1: to have you. Good to talk to you, Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: So my favorite thing from this week is all all
Speaker 1: the Jensaki sake bomb moments where she keeps doing the
Speaker 1: it's not a crisis, it's not a crisis, and then
Speaker 1: finally people started pointing out, well, it's definitely an emergency
Speaker 1: because you are literally sending the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Speaker 1: to go help. No, they really wish Americans would not
Speaker 1: notice what's happening at the border, because of course many
Speaker 1: many liberals, not all, some are just stupid and don't
Speaker 1: realize what liberalism stands. We're really just hate America, hate Americans,
Speaker 1: and they want to bring all of Latin America here
Speaker 1: so that we're not America anymore. We can be, we
Speaker 1: can be ill Talador. Mexico is closest, that's clearly the easiest,
Speaker 1: and so all of Latin America is pouring in, and
Speaker 1: they give little speeches saying, well, there was that funny
Speaker 1: one last week where at first she's the spokesman, said
Speaker 1: the border is not closed, and then in Spanish the
Speaker 1: border is not closed, and then someone speaks to her
Speaker 1: and she says, oh, no, no, no, I'm sorry, the
Speaker 1: border is closed. Sorry. When I speak in English, I'm
Speaker 1: supposed to say it's closed. When I speak in Spanish,
Speaker 1: I'm supposed to say wide open. Come, come sign up
Speaker 1: for welfare. I mean, And if you were, if you
Speaker 1: were scripting this out and you've been on the immigration
Speaker 1: issue for a long time, I was telling everybody right
Speaker 1: before you came on to join us, and I think
Speaker 1: folks should be reminded that you with Audios America your points,
Speaker 1: your argument, the notion of a wall. Donald Trump read
Speaker 1: that book before he became president of the United States.
Speaker 1: This used to be something that was known and talked about.
Speaker 1: So you've been a on this one. But if you
Speaker 1: were scripting this out, we have we have people who
Speaker 1: are actually showing up to the southern border right now
Speaker 1: with Biden let us in T shirts on. I mean, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I think this is where it really does make a
Speaker 1: difference that Biden is a senile dementia patience. I don't
Speaker 1: think if if he knew what was going on, he
Speaker 1: would be so in favor of this. Um. It's funny
Speaker 1: we had, you know, for the Trump administration or president
Speaker 1: was Jared Kushner. For the Biden administration or president is
Speaker 1: Ron Klaine. And so we have, you know, very progressive
Speaker 1: Democrats who are getting just going through the wish list
Speaker 1: UM and Biden, who does have you know, forty year
Speaker 1: fifty year history as a moderate Democrat. This is not
Speaker 1: moderate at all. I'm not sure how much U how
Speaker 1: much solace we can take in the fact that this
Speaker 1: is going to make, I suspect, make it very difficult
Speaker 1: for the Democrats in midterm elections and very difficult four
Speaker 1: years from now. Americans over and over again for twenty
Speaker 1: years in polls have said they want they do not
Speaker 1: want more immigration, forget illegal immigration. Know that they absolutely
Speaker 1: won't stop. As I noted in this week's column, I'm
Speaker 1: surprised anyone even took a poll on this or admitted
Speaker 1: it publicly. But of Biden's twenty eight executive orders in
Speaker 1: the first few weeks he was in office, five are
Speaker 1: on immigration, and those five on immigration are among the
Speaker 1: seven least popular of all of Biden's executive orders. This
Speaker 1: isn't popular. I mean, we just put this preposterous creature,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in the White House because he ran on
Speaker 1: the issue that Americans have been begging politicians to deal with.
Speaker 1: There's never been such a gigantic divide where the public
Speaker 1: is on one side and the politicians on the other.
Speaker 1: And why is that Democrats think they're going to get
Speaker 1: the votes. They might not be so confident about that
Speaker 1: after the twenty twenty election, when Hispanics, you know, it's
Speaker 1: still a majority for the Democrats, but gigantic moves to
Speaker 1: the Republicans. I don't think. I don't think Hispanics are
Speaker 1: down with the whole black lives matter, and then burned
Speaker 1: down my store, beat me up, and steal my money,
Speaker 1: then release more criminals. I'm not sure they're they're down
Speaker 1: with that part of the Democratic progressive philosophy. And then
Speaker 1: the Republicans want just ever, ever more foreign immigration because
Speaker 1: their donors want the cheap labor. And so the objective
Speaker 1: of politicians has always been, which the media has generally
Speaker 1: complied with, don't talk about immigration. Do this in the
Speaker 1: dark of night. Don't tell the American people what we're doing.
Speaker 1: They'll thank us later. They did it, and I mean
Speaker 1: not to this extent, but very much during the Quentin administration,
Speaker 1: right before the nineteen ninety six election. UM. This was
Speaker 1: finally exposed by the Washington vost after the nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: six election. UM they kept the was the ions back then,
Speaker 1: they kept it open twenty four seven, the processing applications,
Speaker 1: processing applications. It was a specific plan get a million
Speaker 1: new Democratic voters in time for the nineteen ninety sixth election.
Speaker 1: They they made citizens of convicted felons, convicted murders. They
Speaker 1: just blew off all of the all of the cannot
Speaker 1: be a convicted felon requirements twenty four seven the processing, processing,
Speaker 1: processing immigration applications. It was it was just so so
Speaker 1: Quentin would have another million Democratic voters in nineteen ninety six. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And I've been speaking to people that I know in
Speaker 1: Ice and contacts in border patrol, and I've been saying,
Speaker 1: so we keep getting told that that not that they
Speaker 1: turned people away, said who who gets turned away? So
Speaker 1: if you arrive as a family unit, what are the
Speaker 1: chances that you will be processed and led into the
Speaker 1: interior of the United States with a please show up
Speaker 1: at a court hearing maybe in two years. We don't
Speaker 1: even know the backlog. People forget the backlog got to
Speaker 1: be about nine hundred thousand cases. That was back in
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen. This is happening even faster. The backlog is
Speaker 1: going to be absolutely enormous. They're gonna have five years
Speaker 1: at least before someone we're gonna actually have to show
Speaker 1: up for these hearings based on previous history. Let's say
Speaker 1: they show up for the hearing for one thing, they're
Speaker 1: endless hearing. Those go on and on. At that point,
Speaker 1: they've had seventeen Anglo babies, they've married a quote American citizen,
Speaker 1: another angler baby. But let's just say, I'll take the
Speaker 1: one in a million case where there's finally an order
Speaker 1: of deportation they get to stay anyway. Yeah, they they
Speaker 1: don't even actually get high enough on the list of
Speaker 1: deportation for no matter. We're speaking to a Culter everybody
Speaker 1: and culter dot Com for her latest column. Obviously best
Speaker 1: selling author Audio Samerica, her book on immigration very prescient
Speaker 1: for this moment if you want to check that one out.
Speaker 1: GOP moves to save Biden and in your column we
Speaker 1: want amnesty too. What the heck are these Republicans doing.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. It's like it's a Flora's disease for just
Speaker 1: you know, for a short recent history. Why so many
Speaker 1: of us m low than to test Marco Rubio he
Speaker 1: had been not very good on immigration in the Florida legislature.
Speaker 1: When he ran for the United States Senate in Florida,
Speaker 1: many you know, local talk radio hosts like Joyce Coffin
Speaker 1: got him on the record he would not push amnesty
Speaker 1: when he got to the Senate. On the Joyce Coffin Show,
Speaker 1: he swore on his mother's life, his big his big
Speaker 1: pitch was no, no, I've learned my lesson no amnesty.
Speaker 1: So okay, fine, fine, where will you elect you to
Speaker 1: the Senate? Marco Rubio gets to the United States Senate.
Speaker 1: My first bill, amnesty, which was of course at the
Speaker 1: time supported by Fox News and most of the major
Speaker 1: talk radi host is very dark time for America. Now
Speaker 1: we have Rick Scott, the other zenz or from Florida.
Speaker 1: And by the way, if you're thinking, oh, Florida, maybe
Speaker 1: it's because there are a lot of Hispanics number one
Speaker 1: Spanish who are here legally do not want amnesty. They
Speaker 1: don't want their their deadbeat brother in law sleeping on
Speaker 1: the couch. They don't want their wages to go down.
Speaker 1: Quite obviously, immigration is not a big issue for Hispanics wages,
Speaker 1: you know, increasing various government benefits that sort of saying safety,
Speaker 1: keeping their neighborhood. Say that's point one point two. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: But the Hispanics and Florida are the largest. Two groups
Speaker 1: are Cubans and Puerto Ricans. Guests who doesn't need amnesty
Speaker 1: Cubans and Puerto Ricans. So I think it's just Republicans
Speaker 1: are the stupid party for a reason. And Rick Scott
Speaker 1: is floating this bill that will offer amnesty. Of course
Speaker 1: his is limited in a completely fake way. Do not
Speaker 1: fall for it just for the dreamers, just for the
Speaker 1: people who the kids, they were brought here as children.
Speaker 1: We don't punish children. No, no no, no. Once you have
Speaker 1: an amnesty, as I describe in the column, Um, nobody's
Speaker 1: going to check when you came here. Nobody's going to
Speaker 1: check what your age is. Nobody's going to check as
Speaker 1: europe convicted felon, as we found out during the Cointent administration,
Speaker 1: and on the alleged requirement must have high school degree
Speaker 1: or or ged Um, I promise you that will be
Speaker 1: waived in every case. Um. And yeah, I mean, and
Speaker 1: if anybody is going to get deported the quickest thing,
Speaker 1: and this the word does get out among among groups.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is why when I was down at
Speaker 1: the border during the first crisis like this, it was
Speaker 1: all I am fleeing credible fear in my country. People
Speaker 1: are all saying the exact saying, or rather I'm I'm
Speaker 1: fleeing a credible threat of violence in my country. People
Speaker 1: are saying what they have been coached to say by
Speaker 1: the cartels. If you do get to any amnesty to
Speaker 1: your point, then when it comes time for someone to
Speaker 1: get deported, what do they say, Oh, I'm covered under
Speaker 1: the misty. I want I want my due process, I
Speaker 1: want to go into court. I mean, this is good.
Speaker 1: This is going to take twenty years. And we already
Speaker 1: saw the Obama administration. She was trying to give work
Speaker 1: permits not just for DACA, but for DAPPA, the parents
Speaker 1: of arrivals. I've been joking around with people saying, how
Speaker 1: long before it goes DACA than DAPPA and then you
Speaker 1: know DACA again, which should be the cousins of arrivals.
Speaker 1: And then you know, all of a sudden, you're at
Speaker 1: You're at millions and millions of people, which I think
Speaker 1: is the whole plan. Do you think they actually can
Speaker 1: get legislation through on this though? This is what I
Speaker 1: keep going back and forth with on people. I think
Speaker 1: if Democrats are smart, I mean, if they're evil and smart,
Speaker 1: and I think they're pretty evil, what they do is
Speaker 1: they break the filibuster on this one if they have to.
Speaker 1: I think this is where they do it. Um, I
Speaker 1: don't think they need to. I mean it is let's
Speaker 1: even more terrifying. Yeah's Biden's immigration that was so heinous.
Speaker 1: I think it would be very difficult for any Democrat
Speaker 1: to openly vote for this. But look, the head of
Speaker 1: hhs IS is very volantly anti American. UM. Would like
Speaker 1: to replace Americans with with people from another country, would
Speaker 1: like to destroy our history. Um. When asked about the cartels,
Speaker 1: um swarming and after Biden was elected, getting ready to
Speaker 1: just swarm the border by of all people, Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: during the hearing, what was myorcas h S secretary, or
Speaker 1: rather Homeland Security secretary. Thanks, that's an easier way of
Speaker 1: saying thank you, Department of Homeland Security. Um. He said,
Speaker 1: America is a nation of immigrants. So you have no
Speaker 1: history America, you have no founding fathers, you have no
Speaker 1: tradition of the rule of law. Nope, weren't replacing it.
Speaker 1: And it's going to be pedal to the medal. And
Speaker 1: so no, they don't. They don't need to pass any laws. Look,
Speaker 1: it's what's happening. You know, there's an expression of law.
Speaker 1: Possession is nine tenths of the law. Yet well, being
Speaker 1: here is nine tenths of our immigration policy. And they're
Speaker 1: just just dragging them in, dragging in, by the way,
Speaker 1: it's not just the cartel's coaching them it is and geos.
Speaker 1: There are NGOs that do this too. I know that well.
Speaker 1: But there are groups in America because again liberals either
Speaker 1: I'm stupid and don't realize what liberalism is about. Um.
Speaker 1: But but the core faith of liberalism is to hate
Speaker 1: the United States of America. And they have scripts. They
Speaker 1: will tell people. For example, it's been written up in
Speaker 1: the New Yorker, it's been written up in the New
Speaker 1: York Times. They have tape recordings they listen to. They
Speaker 1: will lie about what country they're from. They will lie
Speaker 1: about what whether they were raped and whether they were tortured,
Speaker 1: whether my father was shot, you know, their families or
Speaker 1: middle class, they've traveled around the world. I cover a
Speaker 1: number of these cases and site The New Yorker and
Speaker 1: the New York Times expose on it in Adios America. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I was out of the border and and they told
Speaker 1: me that a thirty three year old at first successfully
Speaker 1: claim to be seventeen, which is which is quite a move.
Speaker 1: That's that's quite a quite a thing to pull off
Speaker 1: and cult everybody go to and culter dot com for
Speaker 1: a column on this, and hopefully there'll still be a
Speaker 1: country left by the time we talk again, but thank
Speaker 1: you for joining us. Good to talking about the NYPD
Speaker 1: where I worked for a short while and people I
Speaker 1: was asking, how do you work the NYPD and work
Speaker 1: for the CIA. Well, I worked at the NYPD while
Speaker 1: I was still a CIA employees. It's how that actually works,
Speaker 1: so I kind of worked for both in a sense.
Speaker 1: It's a long story. But the NYPDUM should confront hatefull conduct,
Speaker 1: even if it's not a crime. This is according to
Speaker 1: build a Blasio. You you cannot make this stuff up now, folks,
Speaker 1: Now I understand there's a there's a moral panic now
Speaker 1: across the country where we're supposed to believe that there
Speaker 1: is a sudden Trump inspired white supremacist, white supremacist hatred
Speaker 1: wave for Asian Americans. It's going across the country. And
Speaker 1: if you actually look at the cases, if you look
Speaker 1: at what's really going on in many of these instances,
Speaker 1: it's actually non white offenders attacking Asian Americans. But we
Speaker 1: are still to believe that it's a white supremacist problem. Anyway,
Speaker 1: The Democrats, the Libs, they are doing what they always do,
Speaker 1: which is trying to find a way to make this
Speaker 1: fit into a political narrative. That benefits their side, but
Speaker 1: also to come up with an opportunity to make this
Speaker 1: about how they're the good people. And that's why build
Speaker 1: a Blasio. Now, who is the I mean, is he
Speaker 1: the second worst mayor in the country. I know our
Speaker 1: Portland audience. We've got a great Portland audience here on
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. Sometimes they write it and they
Speaker 1: tell us, guys, guys, look, you can have a lot.
Speaker 1: New York is the largest city. New York is the
Speaker 1: you know, the smelliest city, New York whatever. Right, you
Speaker 1: could have these different titles. But when Ted Wheeler is
Speaker 1: your mayor, as he is in the city of Portland,
Speaker 1: you don't get to say you got the worst mayor.
Speaker 1: And I can see that Ted Wheelers is almost in
Speaker 1: this special class of awful. It's it's hard to compete
Speaker 1: with Wheeler, but de Blasi is certainly up there. Here.
Speaker 1: Here's what he says. Here's what he said just yesterday.
Speaker 1: Let's from the New York Post quote, cops should confront
Speaker 1: people accused of hurtful behavior, even if the behavior doesn't
Speaker 1: rise to the level of a crime. Asked if the
Speaker 1: NYPD and city could be doing more to thwart the
Speaker 1: troubling surge in hate crimes. Deblasi suggested that there could
Speaker 1: be warnings given as a last resort. Plague clips seven. Please.
Speaker 1: One of things officers are trained to do is to
Speaker 1: give warnings. If someone has done some thing wrong but
Speaker 1: not rising to a criminal level, it's perfectly appropriate for
Speaker 1: an m YPD officer to talk to them to say
Speaker 1: that was not appropriate and if you did that on
Speaker 1: a higher level, that would be a crime. And I
Speaker 1: think that has an educating impact on people. I think
Speaker 1: it has a sobering impact that we need. That's why
Speaker 1: we need every report. By the way, if something might
Speaker 1: be a crime, if it's not one hundred percent clear,
Speaker 1: the NYPD has got to investigated. I assure you if
Speaker 1: an MYPD officer calls you or shows up in your
Speaker 1: door to ask about something you did, that makes people
Speaker 1: think twice and we need that. We're also in the
Speaker 1: reform reports we have put together in these last weeks
Speaker 1: based on hearing communities. We put in their new policy
Speaker 1: to widen the definition of what would qualify as hate
Speaker 1: crimes and to widen the tracking improve the tracking of
Speaker 1: hate crimes. This is a problem, and let's be blunt
Speaker 1: and honest, it's a problem that emerged, particularly in the
Speaker 1: last four years in this city and in this country.
Speaker 1: We all know that the forces of hatred were unleashed
Speaker 1: by Donald Trump. That is not a news flash. I mean,
Speaker 1: give me a break. Go go look at some of
Speaker 1: the hate crimes that he's talking about, and look at
Speaker 1: the perpetrator and tell me if you think this is
Speaker 1: really about Donald Trump. But this is amazing too. You're
Speaker 1: gonna have people, now Di Blasia thinks people that go
Speaker 1: up to the cops, um, excuse the officer. Someone said
Speaker 1: something that was really mean to me in the officer
Speaker 1: is gonna be like, all right, you come here, all right,
Speaker 1: get over here. Are you excuse me, sir? Did you
Speaker 1: say did you flip the birds? Did you extend a
Speaker 1: middle finger toward this other other person? That's not nice?
Speaker 1: I would like you that, please. I would like you
Speaker 1: now to shake hands and and be and please be
Speaker 1: nice to each other. Or you're gonna get a time out.
Speaker 1: I can't arrest you, but you're gonna get a time out.
Speaker 1: Is that really what we're gonna have the MYPD doing now?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is a city where people
Speaker 1: exchange explatives on the street for cutting each other off
Speaker 1: like they're exchanging a friendly greeting on their way to
Speaker 1: the grocery store. But we're gonna have people telling the
Speaker 1: cops when someone does something not criminal but kind of mean. Wow,
Speaker 1: Dublasio rock and roll, fellow patriots, it's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: It is time for the roll call, everybody, So thank
Speaker 1: you so much for writing in joining us here and
Speaker 1: being a part of the show. It's very easy to do.
Speaker 1: Just go to Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton or
Speaker 1: team buck at iHeartMedia dot com and let's see what
Speaker 1: else do we have for Oh, Instagram, you can send
Speaker 1: us a dray. If you're not following Buck Sexton on Instagram,
Speaker 1: please do. I am throttled on Twitter, so that means
Speaker 1: that I'm trying to use other platforms more my reach.
Speaker 1: On Twitter, I am targeted because I say I speak
Speaker 1: the truth about fauci and lockdowns. So now I'm essentially
Speaker 1: on an algorithm based list where people can actually reach
Speaker 1: their normal. The people that want to see my stuff
Speaker 1: on Twitter aren't seeing it because Twitter is a left
Speaker 1: wing as you know, a left wing organization that is
Speaker 1: trying to stack the deck in favor stack the deck
Speaker 1: in favor of the left by changing the political conversation
Speaker 1: surreptitiously too. They're not even they're not even honest about it.
Speaker 1: That's the other part of it that I think you
Speaker 1: always need to remember. They're not honest about what they're doing.
Speaker 1: It's not like this is just something that oh they're
Speaker 1: they're private companies. I mean really, they're engaged in a
Speaker 1: form in a form of fraud. So with that in mind, um, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: we want to just have a moment for you to
Speaker 1: tell everybody, what do you plan on this weekend? Big guy?
Speaker 1: What do you got going on? I think just more
Speaker 1: packing as usual. That's what my life is. When's the
Speaker 1: move date? I'm not sure yet. Sometime in May probably,
Speaker 1: so you're packing up like preemptively, get real early packs moving.
Speaker 1: It's just a matter of when. Got check God, but
Speaker 1: you have have you? You haven't closed yet? No, how's
Speaker 1: the how's the whole process coming on? Because you know,
Speaker 1: I saw snow Princess made me watch a show less
Speaker 1: and I mean made me like almost tied my hands
Speaker 1: behind my back and and like threatened to tickle me
Speaker 1: unless I agreed, kind of made me, you know, what
Speaker 1: I mean. Made me watch a show called Mortgage, Your Mortgage,
Speaker 1: Your Marriage or something like that. I think, Yeah, so
Speaker 1: the couples decide are they gonna get married or are
Speaker 1: they gonna buy with a wedding, or are they gonna
Speaker 1: buy a house? And I sit here and I'm like
Speaker 1: grumpy Buck says, Obviously, if the choice is between getting
Speaker 1: the house you want and having a wedding, that's some
Speaker 1: kind of a big, expensive celebration. I feel like that's
Speaker 1: an easy choice. Apparently I'm wrong. A lot of people
Speaker 1: choo choose the wedding. Yeah. I mean, if I had
Speaker 1: my choice, I would probably have chosen the house. But
Speaker 1: happy wife, happy life, Buck. I also understand this part
Speaker 1: of it, that that apparently there are a lot of
Speaker 1: ladies for whom the prospect of the big wedding with
Speaker 1: all the friends and family is a thing that they
Speaker 1: have been looking forward to for a long time, and
Speaker 1: if that thing does not happen, then there is there
Speaker 1: is no tickling in your future. It gets it's bet Oh,
Speaker 1: it's bad. It's bad. Listen, my wedding was the best
Speaker 1: day of my life. I don't regret it. But financially,
Speaker 1: what's the logical decision. If you had to choose, it
Speaker 1: would be the house. That's all I'm saying. Yeah here,
Speaker 1: if you had a good wedding though, so congrats on
Speaker 1: that one. I was at producing Mark's wedding. That wedding
Speaker 1: with that wedding was fun, good food, good music. Buck
Speaker 1: Buck was busting out the fancy dance moves. That's how
Speaker 1: we get down. Yes, yeah, Marky Mark one day. Marks,
Speaker 1: because because he's a good and loyal right hand man
Speaker 1: on the Buck Sexted show, we have not yet gone
Speaker 1: gone out with the the video of Buck busting out
Speaker 1: the funky moves. It does exist though, So if you
Speaker 1: guys are all, if team Buck is excellent about sharing
Speaker 1: the show, passing the buck to people, maybe like sometime
Speaker 1: this summer, just for kicks, we'll put it up on
Speaker 1: Instagram and Facebook and sus people can see. Because once
Speaker 1: you see, once they see those funky moves, producer Mark,
Speaker 1: they're they're not gonna know what hit him. Yeah, we'll
Speaker 1: put it that way, but I'm gonna leave that decision
Speaker 1: up to you because if I do it, you might
Speaker 1: get mad. That's correct. Yeah, No, we got we gotta
Speaker 1: we gotta wait on that one. This is like the
Speaker 1: rule the rule I have with with with snow Princess
Speaker 1: I have people have been asking one a, don't you
Speaker 1: know why haven't you put up more photos of her?
Speaker 1: People have seen I put put up a few recently. Um.
Speaker 1: One is that I tend to avoid putting up too
Speaker 1: much for my private life just because there are a
Speaker 1: lot of crazy people out there who don't like conservative
Speaker 1: comm taters. So that's a thing. Um. But also I
Speaker 1: have to get her. I have to get her approval
Speaker 1: and she you know what I mean, I have to
Speaker 1: get approval for photos, which but I'd completely understand that
Speaker 1: because I I hate it when people and this happens
Speaker 1: to me in media sometimes too. You know, there'll be uh,
Speaker 1: we'll do some kind of a promotional thing where there'll
Speaker 1: be a whole bunch of photos take it of me
Speaker 1: and other talented at a commedia company, and someone will
Speaker 1: just pick some random photo of you where you look
Speaker 1: like you know, you're you're passing out as you're standing up,
Speaker 1: and then they use that very annoying, very annoying or
Speaker 1: happens free photo what's up? Or a beard free photo
Speaker 1: from oh Man, there's still all these beard free photos
Speaker 1: that are floating out there, and there's you know, there's
Speaker 1: photos of like like skinny Buck, slightly chubby Buck, chubbiest Buck.
Speaker 1: Like you know, it's there's all there's all kinds of
Speaker 1: mishmash out there. I like to have one, you know,
Speaker 1: current presentation. You know, I like to keep brand, brand
Speaker 1: consistency out there. But anyway, um, so your your weekend
Speaker 1: is going to involve not watching marriage or Mortgage because
Speaker 1: I guess you already made that decision. Any fun plans
Speaker 1: to tell the folks about. Well, no, nothing really, but
Speaker 1: I do have a new reason to hate Governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: if he'd like, yeah, I mean obviously exactly. So yesterday
Speaker 1: that he did inexplicably is doing press conferences and just
Speaker 1: acting like everything is normal. And they announced that the
Speaker 1: Mets and Yankees are gonna to have twenty percent of
Speaker 1: the stadium. Fully a big celebration whatever. But the thing
Speaker 1: I got most angry at, and the reason I want
Speaker 1: him to be impeached more than anything, now he had
Speaker 1: a mask with a Met's logo on one side and
Speaker 1: a Yankees logo on the other side. Inexcusable. He should
Speaker 1: be out of office immediately. How did that. How does
Speaker 1: that even happen? I mean, I'm sure did they even
Speaker 1: sell that? Yeah, he must have constructed this, and he
Speaker 1: was like laughing about it and saying, oh, this is great. No,
Speaker 1: no baseball fan, no Met or Yankee fan is okay
Speaker 1: with that. And there are people who wear like half
Speaker 1: met half Yankee jerseys. They shouldn't even be allowed in
Speaker 1: the stadium. I mean something, I don't know. That's like
Speaker 1: mixing whole milk in your beer or something. It's just
Speaker 1: not done. I don't done. And he's the governor of
Speaker 1: New York. I mean, you'd think he would learn something,
Speaker 1: but clearly not. Well, he's he's in a desperate circumstance
Speaker 1: right now because he's in so much, so much trouble,
Speaker 1: so much going on here. So I guess he's he's
Speaker 1: at that point where there's no such thing as pandering
Speaker 1: that is too blatant. There's no such thing as as
Speaker 1: being too much of a politician. He's like, he's like,
Speaker 1: I like, I like both teams. I like the Mets
Speaker 1: and I like the Yankees because the Yankees win more,
Speaker 1: but the Mets are now won't buy a billionaire, you know,
Speaker 1: he's kind of he's playing at both sides. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be surprised if you know the next time he shows
Speaker 1: up and he's got a mask with with Mets, Yankees, Islanders, Rangers, Giants, Jets.
Speaker 1: You know, just go all in, just try to get
Speaker 1: all the sports fans on your side. But you know
Speaker 1: what's funny, as you point out producer Mark by doing so,
Speaker 1: he actually ticks off all the sports fans. Yeah. Now
Speaker 1: the words fans who don't really care about politics hate him.
Speaker 1: He makes Bill de Blasio look good. Yeah, this is
Speaker 1: what I've been saying. Bill de Blasio is the biggest
Speaker 1: beneficiary from the the Cuomo debacle. Um. So there you
Speaker 1: have it, man, Bill the Blasio, what a weirdo. All right,
Speaker 1: I do want to get to some of our well,
Speaker 1: by the way, way pretty simmar wedndesay. So there's there's
Speaker 1: outdoor games now, Oh yeah, April first, the Yankees open
Speaker 1: the season at home. The Mets open the same day,
Speaker 1: but they'll be in DC. And then first game, he's
Speaker 1: it feasible to get Mets tickets. Um. So the way
Speaker 1: they're doing it both teams, it seems like season ticket
Speaker 1: holders will have first crack um and then everyone else
Speaker 1: if there's enough available. So it really depends how many
Speaker 1: season ticket holders want to go to the games. If
Speaker 1: they decline, then they might have tickets available. There's always
Speaker 1: a secondary market as well. But they're requiring a PCR
Speaker 1: test before you're allowed a negative PCR test or proof
Speaker 1: of vaccination to get in the building. That's not the
Speaker 1: Mets Yankees that's doing it. Oh my gosh, because out
Speaker 1: of gonna say, I mean, I are you a sporting event?
Speaker 1: But since the weather is getting nice, maybe instead of
Speaker 1: hockey we do Mets. You never go to a Met
Speaker 1: game in April. It's right on the water there outdoor stadium, Buck,
Speaker 1: you'd be freezing, You freeze at least may alright, alright,
Speaker 1: so maybe we do the hockey. Okay, let's get into
Speaker 1: it here. How much more time do we have with hockey?
Speaker 1: Not that much time and it's only ten percent capacity.
Speaker 1: Maybe next year for hockey. I think baseball? All right?
Speaker 1: Fair enough? Richard writes in Buck Happy Friday. I really
Speaker 1: like Cocaine Mitch's filibuster speech. I wish the GOP Republicans
Speaker 1: would take it one step further. One day a week.
Speaker 1: The GOP should shut it all down. They should delay
Speaker 1: the opening quorum call as often as they can. Make
Speaker 1: Senate staff read the previous day's journal, make them read
Speaker 1: the full bills, perform roll call votes for every motion
Speaker 1: and every vote. Grind it all to a halt. Remind
Speaker 1: the DEM's what chaos will ensue if they give into
Speaker 1: the saying left. Our founders did not want a straight
Speaker 1: up democracy. Athens fell after three hundred and sixty two years.
Speaker 1: Sparta was more stable and lasted seven hundred and eight years.
Speaker 1: Sparta had two kings and an upper and lower house.
Speaker 1: Sounds familiar, right. The GOP needs to hold the line
Speaker 1: with their shields high, Richard, We got a lot going
Speaker 1: on here, man, Yeah. I mean direct democracy or absolute
Speaker 1: democracy is not. We don't have that. That has not
Speaker 1: been the history of democracies. In fact, in ancient Greece
Speaker 1: was a very small percentage of the population overall, or
Speaker 1: when you added in because ancient Greece was also a
Speaker 1: slave state, and women obviously couldn't vote, and only property
Speaker 1: holders of a certain class a certain echelon in Athens,
Speaker 1: for example, could vote. It was not It wasn't universal suffrage.
Speaker 1: So our notion of the cradle of Western civilization and
Speaker 1: ancient democracy is one man, one vote. Well not really
Speaker 1: within certain very very strict confines. It was one man,
Speaker 1: one vote. Alrighty, we get Dave. Hey Buck. I've been
Speaker 1: a fan since you started filling in for Glenn. It's
Speaker 1: been great to see your show evolve over the years.
Speaker 1: One of the favorite parts of the show is roll call,
Speaker 1: when new listeners chime in, it's great to hear your
Speaker 1: show is growing. You and produce and Producer Mark provide
Speaker 1: great content, even though he doesn't know about the talking heads.
Speaker 1: Then again, I'm not mistake. If I'm not mistaken, he's
Speaker 1: from New Jersey and those folks only know about Bruce
Speaker 1: Springsteen and bon Jovi. Dave, we love you, but I
Speaker 1: think Producer Mark is about to issue a couple of rejoinders.
Speaker 1: I think the most offensive thing you can say to
Speaker 1: somebody from New York is that they're from New Jersey.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark is from Queens slash Long Island, which if
Speaker 1: you're from New York City you can call Strong Island,
Speaker 1: which is kind of just poking the Long Island people
Speaker 1: a little bit. But I don't even like being called
Speaker 1: from Long Island because Queens and Long Island are a
Speaker 1: different place, true, But yeah, I'm not from New Jersey.
Speaker 1: Please never accuse me that. Get of that again. I
Speaker 1: only live here right now and then I'm going back.
Speaker 1: It was a very weird situation I'm in. How how
Speaker 1: would you describe your your exile in New Jersey overall? Well, basically,
Speaker 1: I try to leave Long Island and then the pandemic
Speaker 1: made it so I have to go back. That's the
Speaker 1: best way I can describe it. M Yeah. And as
Speaker 1: for as for Springsteen and bon Jovie, if you only
Speaker 1: get to keep one producer, Mark, that's the right call obviously.
Speaker 1: So I can't even begin to mess with that. Living
Speaker 1: on a prayer. If you're drunk, it's one o'clock in
Speaker 1: the morning and you want to sing at a crowded bar,
Speaker 1: I think the only competition for it is journeys. Don't
Speaker 1: stop believing for a song. That doesn't matter if you
Speaker 1: can't sing, doesn't matter how out of tune you are.
Speaker 1: It's a beautiful thing to let it rip with the
Speaker 1: smell of stale beer and Quervo silver all over the place,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. There's a couple of bon
Speaker 1: Jobe songs that you put them on at a bar
Speaker 1: late at night. Everyone's singing it totally true. Rocall continues,
Speaker 1: and if you want to send us your thoughts and
Speaker 1: be a part of the show, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton, or on Instagram, send us a message. The
Speaker 1: email is Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. Adam Rides
Speaker 1: deer Buck and producer angry Cat. I think he means
Speaker 1: grumpy cat, but maybe you know, maybe your producer, I
Speaker 1: get it. Yeah, Producer grumpy Cat will say he's not angry,
Speaker 1: little grumpy sometimes. Greetings from kf ab Omaha. Michigan is
Speaker 1: not the Midwest. If anything, it is the Northeast. Shield
Speaker 1: tie whoa Nebraska laying down the law here for kfab
Speaker 1: and saying, uh sorry, Michigan is basically a part of
Speaker 1: the Northeast. I mean, I think geographically that's not technically correct.
Speaker 1: But I know what he's I know what he's saying.
Speaker 1: You know, is there a word for no? But it
Speaker 1: was on this show that I learned that there's something
Speaker 1: called a yupper, like a yupper or upper or whatever
Speaker 1: or you yeah, I remember. It was like for the
Speaker 1: Upper Peninsula people in Michigan, which is basically Canada. So Yeah,
Speaker 1: why don't we call it Canada. I'm kidding. I'm kidding. Please,
Speaker 1: don't you know? Send send that He direct those emails
Speaker 1: to producer Mark. All right, Brian, here we go payback.
Speaker 1: A few quick things. First, it's really interesting to see
Speaker 1: Democrats calling for lower standards for PT tests for women
Speaker 1: in the military because they're biologically different, at the same
Speaker 1: time claim it's fine for biological males to compete in
Speaker 1: female sports for scholarships and other prizes. Second, I think
Speaker 1: you're wrong about Cuomo. I believe he's on his way
Speaker 1: out when Mayor Bill Deblasio spoke against him. I consider
Speaker 1: that a major tell as to where the party is headed.
Speaker 1: Cuomo is being left no safe quarter, and this works
Speaker 1: out for Democrats in the long run. First, they get
Speaker 1: to force him out due to sexual conduct instead of
Speaker 1: the nursing home scandal. And second, they get to pet them,
Speaker 1: pat themselves in the back, and tell the public how
Speaker 1: they don't tolerate that behavior regardless of party. Believe me,
Speaker 1: they'll cash that check in the future when calling in
Speaker 1: for Republican resignation. It's all the force. Of course, they
Speaker 1: don't actually care about sexual misconduct. They're just covering themselves
Speaker 1: and turning a liability into a future advantage. Well, Brian,
Speaker 1: I don't know if you heard this part of the show,
Speaker 1: but I've been saying your analysis in mind lines up
Speaker 1: on this insofar as I do think they're happy to
Speaker 1: toss him out over sexual misconduct as a means of
Speaker 1: getting some points for themselves, while while also avoiding the
Speaker 1: nursing home debacle, which the Democrat Party much more broadly
Speaker 1: has its fingerprints all over. And then, as for whether
Speaker 1: he'll be forced out or not, I was sure he
Speaker 1: wouldn't a couple of weeks ago. I can't say I'm
Speaker 1: sure anymore. So he may be going. I'd say at
Speaker 1: this point it's at this point it feels fifty fifty.
Speaker 1: But if you're asking me in a place of bet,
Speaker 1: I bet he stays. I still bet he stays. All Right,
Speaker 1: we got one more, Stephen. I know you've talked about
Speaker 1: the inevitability of leaving New York City for freer pastors elsewhere.
Speaker 1: I personally struggle with this in the San Francisco Bay Area,
Speaker 1: where recent years have given us the shadow of the
Speaker 1: Salesforce Tower, urban camping detritus everywhere, and the death of
Speaker 1: political diversity. Although it would be easier and maybe logical
Speaker 1: to just leave, my take now is you know what, No,
Speaker 1: I'm staying Shields High. My family has been here for
Speaker 1: a handful of generation, so I feel it's my duty
Speaker 1: to stick this one out. These problems all came within
Speaker 1: a few decades, so maybe they will pass if we
Speaker 1: stand against them. My question, do you ever feel that
Speaker 1: your own family's ties the big app will give you
Speaker 1: responsibility to stay and outlast the Looney's Stephen, Yes, answer
Speaker 1: your question is yes, I do have that feeling a
Speaker 1: lot of the time. I know my parents have that
Speaker 1: feeling still, and because they're still here, and I agree,
Speaker 1: there's a part of them that feels like I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be the last, the last conservative of trying to hold
Speaker 1: this place together as it collapses. But we'll see everybody.
Speaker 1: Do yourself a favor, do us all the favor. Have
Speaker 1: a great weekend, relax, chill out, take some time to reset,
Speaker 1: and we'll come back to you ready to rock on Monday.
Speaker 1: Shields High