WEBVTT - Invertebrate Emotions, Part 1

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stot to Blow Your Mind, production of by

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>today is going to be the first and a couple

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of episodes that we wanted to do on the subject

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of invertebrate emotions. And strangely enough, I got interested in

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this subject the other day after I was reading a poem,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not a scientific paper. I was reading a poem by

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the American modernist poet Marianne Moore, who I like a lot.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>She She writes a lot about like fish and you know,

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>marine organisms. She lived from eight seven to nineteen seventy two.

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, if it's okay with you, Robert, I wanted

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to start off this episode just by reading this poem

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that I encountered the other day. Okay. It is called

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:56.959
<v Speaker 1>the paper Nautilus for authorities whose hopes are shaped by mercenaries, writers,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and trapped by tea time, fame and by commuters comfort.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not for these. The paper Nautilus constructs her thin

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>glass shell, giving her perishable souvenir of hope, a dull

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>white outside and smooth edged inner surface. Glossy is the sea,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the watchful maker of it, guards it day and night.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>She scarcely eats until her eggs are hatched, buried eight

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>fold in her eight arms, for she is in a

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of devil fish. Her glass ram's horn, cradled freight,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is hid but not crushed, as hercules bitten by a

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>crab loyal to the hydra, was hindered to succeed. The

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>intensively watched eggs coming from the shell free it when

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they are freed, leaving its wasp nest flaws of white

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on white and close laid ionic kite enfolds, like the

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lines in the mane of a parthenon horse, round which

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the arms had wound themselves, as if they knew. Love

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is the only fortress strong enough to trust to. Oh

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. I like that last art, especially me too.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love the way it moves from um this,

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>uh this direct, almost clinical description of the actual biology

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the paper nautilus and how it builds its shell

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and all that, and goes from that to these classical illusions,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately ends on this powerfully emotional note that

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of gives me a shiver. Uh So, the late

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>American poet Anthony Hate, writing about More, said that one

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things he liked most about her poems was

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that they had quote a capacity for pure praise that

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely biblical awe in it, and I think you

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of see that here. I like that quality a

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lot too. It captures in language some of the overwhelming,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>almost religious kind of power I feel when looking at

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>some animals, especially animals that live in the ocean. But

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>also the poem really just has a very worthy subject.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>The paper nautilus, also known as the argonaut, is a

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>remarkable species, and the shell that has talked about in

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the poem, the egg case, is a genuinely gorgeous under

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of evolution. Yeah, this is quite a remarkable critter. So

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Argonaut, Uh, first, let's just talk about the name.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>This is of course a reference to Greek mythology, and

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we we recently talked about this on our other show Invention,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the myth of Jason and the Argonauts, Right, Yeah, because

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the argonaut just means sailors of the Argo, the Argo

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>being the ship built by Argus and the ship upon

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which Jason sails in his quest to find the Golden Fleece,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which itself was a sacred pelt of a winged ram.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But the argonaut we're talking about here is again the

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>paper nautilus, a member of the genus Argonata. So they're

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>octopods cephalopods, and there as many as fifty three species

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that have been described. They have this delicate calcite shell,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hence the nickname, and these shells were once thought to

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be pilfered like the shells of a hermit crab. There

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was a question of where did they acquire these things? Well,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they must have they must have stolen them. Uh, they

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>must be using them, right, And they wouldn't be the

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>only octopus that finds a shell or some kind of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a coconut or something and picks it up

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and uses it, right, Uh and uh. And this was

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>also another contributing factor to this interpretation is the fact

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that the the argonaut is not physically attached to the shell,

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>like when a specimen is examined. The creature can be

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>removed from the shell with ease, though it typically expires

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if that is done to it. So, um, we've known

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about them for these creatures for thousands of years. They

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>pop up an art from three thousand b C. According

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Carnal writing for The Guardian. But we did

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not know how they made their egg shells until the

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century. So this is what happens. The female and

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>only the female secretes the shells via specialized arms and

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the resulting shell it's essentially a floatation device that resembles

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the shell of extinct ammonites. They lay their eggs inside

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of these shells. They retreat inside. Sometimes you'll you'll you'll

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>find the detached reproductive arm of a male a hectocotalist,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and then she'll use she'll use the shell though, to

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>control her buoyancy in the water. There's so many interesting

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>things going on here. I mean, number one is just

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the implied history of mating that at some point a

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>male octopus came along and made it by what tearing

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>off one of its own arms and giving it to her. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>basically it is like a detachable sexual organ, uh, that

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>then she keeps. But yeah, the other thing about this

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>shell that's so fascinating is when we think of shells,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we think of just pure defense. We think of the

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>hard shelter that has grown out of the animal that

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the animal may retreat into. Right, But they're in the

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>common name the paper nautilus. It implies that the shell

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is very delicate. Yeah, it is not a defensive structure,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at least not in the same way that a true

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>shell is. I mean it is you can't argue that

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it is protected for the young that reside within it,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>because it is a very slim barrier between them in

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the open ocean, and you know, keeps them close to

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the female. But mainly it is the means by which

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this particular type of octopod returned to the open sea

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.799
<v Speaker 1>as its skin had largely evolved for sea floor life,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and left the open waters to the squid. Okay, so

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the octopus is generally going to be found, uh, I

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, along the bottom or maybe hiding along along

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>a reef or something like that. But this one just

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>takes out to the open waters with a flotation device

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of its own, making like one way. And this is

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, an elaborate and probably a little poetiquet to

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>think of it. But you can think of the squid

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as the angel, and the octopus is the fallen angels

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has lost its wings, but this particular octopod has I

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>guess Miltonian aspirations and or or is or is you know,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>lined up with the thinking of data lists and icarus,

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is building its own shell that will that

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in this case, we'll will allow it to ascend up

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in the water towards the surface. Now there's another thing

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw in as a when you get

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>into the sexual dimorphism here, the females are up to

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>six hundred times the weight of the males. Uh. And

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>again the males do not engage in this kind of

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>shell construction and growth. But a great deal of mystery

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>remains about how the argonaut lives its life and and

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>indeed how they even evolved. Uh Neil Monks and Sea

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Phil Palmer, authors of the two thousand two Smithsonian book Ammonites.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They have suggested that these ancient octopuses might have depended

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on the discarded shells of ammonites in prehistoric times and

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>use their abilities to mend the shells. So the idea

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might be that originally they stole shells from a now

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>extinct animal and then use these uh uh, these abilities

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to to patch them up and make them fit, to

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>customize them a little bit, but still largely depend on

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the stolen shell. Interesting, I mean, there is a physical similarity.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen ammonite shells that they tend to

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be spiral shaped there at some point in the past.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I talked about our recent trip to Lime Region us

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in uh in the UK, where on the beach you

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can find fossils of ammonites from you know, hundreds of

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>millions of years ago, and there are these colossal serial

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>killer spirals etched into the rocks. It's very very cool.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, at some point the ammonites disappeared, So they

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>went extinct in the Cretaceous Paleogene extinction event. And so

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>what what do you do if you depend upon that shell?

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is that the the ancient paper

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>nautilus is then had to use their mending skills to

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>just create a shell of their own in order to

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do the same sort of things that they did previously.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So what they what they once used to repair, they

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>had to create from scratch. Yes, that's that's at least

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>one one theory that's out there. It's also highly possible

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're just talking about covergent evolution here and the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>paper nautilus is eggshell just happens to resemble that of

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>an ammonite. Sure, but it really does look similar, but

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>then again you can see other signs of similar types

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of possible convergent evolution. I mean the nautilus, not the

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>paper nautilus, but the animal just normally called the nautilus

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is like the a marine mollusk has a shell that

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of resembles an m nite shell. Also, yeah, absolutely

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>still a fascinating creature and also definitely a creature worthy

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of poetic consideration. Speaking and speaking of poetry. They also

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>show up in in other works of literature, including twenty

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne. Uh, there's

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a there's a section in it where they are, uh

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there they are aboard the nautilus, the submarine, and uh

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they are They've come up to the surface and they

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>observe these creatures. They observed the paper nautilus, the argonaute

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in action. So here's a quote from the book. Quote. Now,

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a school of argonauts then voyaging on the

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>surface of the ocean. We could count several hundred of them.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>They belong to that species of argonauts, covered with protuberances

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and exclusive to the seas near India. These graceful mollusks

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>were swimming backwards by means of their locomotive tubes, sucking

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>water into these tubes and then expelling it. Six They're

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>eight tentacles were long, thin and floated on the water,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>while the other two were rounded into palms and spread

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to the wind like light sails. I could see perfectly.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>They're undulating spiral shaped shells, which Cuvier aptly compared to

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>an elegant cockle boat. It's an actual boat. Indeed, it

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>transports the animal that secretes it without the animal sticking

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. The Argonaut is free to leave its shell,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I told Consil, but it never does not, unlike Captain Nemo.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Conseil replied sage Lee, which is why he should have

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>christened it his ship, the Argonaut. Oh that's good, it's

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a shell of his own design. Yeah. So now they're

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>also referring in this passage to this um, this myth

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>or this outdated idea that they could use their arms

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>as sails and sail across the top of the water,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and that the shell is like actually a boat, and

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it really in some sense as it is, because it

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>aids the creature in it's in its buoyancy. But anyway,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that's just a fun little literary usage of the argonaut,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and it also alludes to that fact that yes, it can.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It can technically leave the shell, because it doesn't actually

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>grow that the shell. It kind of makes it. But

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>if if you were to remove the species from it,

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>shall it typically dies. This is such a cool animal,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And I like the idea that Jules Verne was like

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>halfway through writing twenty Leagues and he discovered this animal

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and He's like, oh, I should have gone back and

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>named it the argonaut from the beginning, but I'd take

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>too much revision. I'll just plow ahead and I'll have

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a character acknowledge, like it really would have been better

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was called this other thing. But anyway, I

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to come back to the ending of the poem

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>by Marianne Moore. This powerful ending is what got me

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>really thinking about the subject for today's episode and the

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>next one. This idea of this eight armed cephalopod clutching

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at its egg case, as if each of its arms

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>knew that love is the only fortress strong enough to

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>trust too. Does the paper nautilus feel love? Do the

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>coiled arms of the argonauts simply clutch or do they embrace?

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Do they hug? With all the emotional and you know,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the baggage that comes with that. I think most everyone

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>would probably I think the gut response that people are

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>generally gonna have is no, You're gonna think, no, a

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a paper nautilus is not going to be capable of

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of love. Love is what humans do. And you know,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe specific animals that we uh live closely with that

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we anthropomorphize enough into, but not the not the octopi,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not the not the the world of invertebrates. Well, I

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's I mean, people would I think you'd

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>encounter a lot of divergent opinion about that. On one hand,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you can say, yeah, I mean, of course you're gonna

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>have a problem of if you believe that an octopus

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can love? I mean, how could you prove that? Uh?

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And so? And we'll address questions like that as we

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>move on. But more broadly, I guess, can you can

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>you imagine invertebrates in general feeling anything analogous to the

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of plain, familiar emotions that we name in poems.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, does a does a crab feel fear? Does

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a bumblebee feel hate? Uh? Does a snail feel discussed

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>or jealousy? Or joy or you know, is it as

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of suggesting folly to meaningfully apply these words

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>outside of humans, and maybe they're more closely related vertebrate relatives. Well,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but then the other side to look at it, and

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this is something we'll continue to discuss as well, is

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that you bring up poetry, and poetry is very much

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a part of the and I love poetry, but it

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is part of the cult of human emotion indefinitely places

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>things like love on a golden pedestal. And and so

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of a push and pull here when we

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>look to the world of animals. We have to be

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to throw our emotions off of that golden pedestal

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and and look at what they really are from you know,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>psychological and even biological standpoint. And at the same time

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to be able to look to the animal

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>world and be willing to attribute these uh, these knockdown

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>emotions to them as well. Well, yeah, I mean that

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the other side of it. I mean, some people,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think would say you're being stingy if you say

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that that an argonaut can't love. But then I think

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there are also people who would say, like, you're really

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, degrading my feeling of my relationships and and

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>my love. If you say that, an octopus can do

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, right, So it gets it gets complicated,

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's plenty of room to be piste off on

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>both sides. So hopefully we'll piss everyone off as we

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>proceed here. Well, maybe we should take a break, and

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then when we come back we can try to address

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the thorny difficult question of what our emotions than. All right,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we're back, So to proceed here, we're going to have

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to take a quick stab an exceedingly huge and complicated question,

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which is what our emotions. Obviously this is something we

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can't answer adequately in a subsection of one episode, but

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll do our best to try to to hint at

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the broad picture of what this question entails. Yeah, it

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can be so tricky to even contemplate this because because

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and one of the big things is that emotions are

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the tumultuous, see that we're constantly immersed in that where

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we feel cast about in you know. And this is

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>again this gets into poetry as well, Right, how many

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>poems are about you know, the mail storm of emotion,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and and how we just feel like

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just a victim to them. Well, yeah, I mean

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we we often think of emotions as being something that's

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>inside us, but it's almost more apt to think of

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>us as being inside them. Like we can't see the

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, We don't have perspective. We're it's more like

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a c on which we are floating. I think that's

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a great metaphor. And yet at the same time we

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>are the sea, you know, Like we often fall into this, uh,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>into this model that I think is largely what you

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>see in the work of some of the you know,

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the classic philosophers of logic and emotion, and then like

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>logic is the domain of you know, logic and reason

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, and then they're the the enemies of

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>passion that uh that that tear us apart, the Apollo

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and Dionysus model exactly. Yeah, and so it's easy to

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>fall back on that. It's just baked into so much

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of our culture. Yeah, And and just in general, emotion

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is just something we're too close to. I sometimes feel,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel that emotion is like a cantalope, you know,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like when you buy a cantaloupe, when you cut, you

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it's gonna be you cut into it, though,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and when it's great, there's nothing else like it. It's amazing,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And when it's bad, it's just the worst. I don't

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>know if I feel this way about candle up, I

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>feel this way about tomatoes. Yeah, tomato. My favorite food

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world is a really good ripe summer tomato.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing worse than a meli off season tomato. Yes,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the tomato is also a great example of human emotion,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of our meditative and monastic

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>traditions are ultimately aimed at fostering as much as possible

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a dependable honeydew melon mental state, something where you know,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you cut into it and it's not gonna be just

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna knock your socks off, but it's also

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to discuss you. It's going to be a nice, pleasant,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>dependable experience right there in the middle, calming the seas,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>eliminating the highs and lows, creating equanimity. So this is

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this is where we are. You know, we're feeling creatures,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse. But we've always tried to figure

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>out emotions. We've tried to figure it out for for ages,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest thinkers, philosophers, artist, scientist sages. Uh, you know,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>religious leaders throughout history have contemplated their nature and formulated

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>various theories. And we could easily do a multi part

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>series on the question of human emotions. But the short

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>view is that we have basically three ways of considering them.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there's the idea of emotions as feelings.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The way they feel is what they are, so it's

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a subjective state. And in that sense, the only emotion

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you can ever really know is your own, Like you

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>cannot share in anybody else's. You can think you do,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>but you can't know for sure. I mean, does somebody

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>else's sadness feel like yours? Does to somebody else's happiness

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>feel like yours? Does you know it's it's you? You

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>are trapped with your subjectivity here, right, And then when

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you get into theory of mind, I mean, I mean,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole issue there and itself, like, to what

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what degree do we attribute the same level of emotional

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>investment to others? And in what cases are we attributing

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>too much emotion to this individual and less emotion to

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>this individual based on a whole host of reasons. Well so,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But if emotion is just subjectivity, it seems hopeless that

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you could ever try to study it in animals. Right,

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>If it's just a subjective experience, we have no access

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to it whatsoever, right, and and and that would be

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the danger, right if it was just perpetually tied up

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in the other human concepts of say like consciousness and

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>u uh in theory of mind, etcetera. But then we

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have these other two categories. First of all, emotions as evaluations.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Emotions are evaluations of the primary circumstances that we're dealing with. So,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a huge tie to the environmental stimuli, situational

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>stimuli all around us. So emotions are ways of reacting

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to the world that their internal states that signal a

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>certain response to what you're seeing or dealing with. Right,

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>go through a haunted attraction around Halloween, and you you

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>feel something like fear or that sort of related safe

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling of fear, whatever however you want to categorize it. Uh,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>That is a product of the environment you thrust yourself into,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, And if these are internal states that are

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>products of evaluating an environment, you could then start to

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>look at patterns about what the what the features of

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>those internal states are, what do they do to the brain?

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>What do they cause? How do they cause you to react?

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that would bring us to the next

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at it, right, Yes, emotions as motivations.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Emotions as primarily motivating states. So basically this would be

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a situation of where I am angry and therefore I

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>strike out at somebody. It causes you to act in

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a certain way. So there's a lot more to it

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>than this, but these are those sort of the three

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>basic pillars that are often discussed. So seemingly, you know,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we can strike because we are angry, we're angry because

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we strike, and then we also just feel angry, and

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it all becomes this kind of cat's cradle of um

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of physiology, behavior, and situational context. Another way to think

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of emotions is this UH. This is a definition that

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>is often used conscious mental reactions that we subjectively experience,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and these strong feelings are typically directed towards a specific

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>object or person, resulting in or caused by UH or

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly accompanied by physiological and behavioral change. However, as we'll

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>discussing these episodes, throwing consciousness into it rather complicates things

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>when we look to other animals, because while emotions are

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly tied up in the human conscious experience, is consciousness

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really required to have emotion? I think there's an extremely

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>strong argument that it is not. Well, you can certainly imagine, say,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>a robot that models emotional states without being conscious, right right,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and and so you don't know if that's the case

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for any other animals. You don't know to what extent

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they're subjectively feeling emotions like you and I do, or

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like you resumably do. The robot could still act angry,

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and it would still do all the things that an

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>angry person would do. Or a robot could act sad

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and still have all the reactions a sad person would have.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Like if again, if you're coming back to emotions as evaluations,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you could consider a screensaver on a This is a

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>very simple model of it, but a screensaver on a

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>computer screen is a response to um to what's going

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on in the world. Like nobody's using the keyboard right now,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody's away from the machine. Uh so a relaxed date

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>comes into place. There's a paper we're gonna look at

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>later in the episode. Well, we'll come back to it

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, But it's by a Clint J. Perry

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and Luigi Battia Donna that tried to put together all

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all of these disparate ways of looking at emotion into

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a single definition that could be used for objective research purposes,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and it comes out with something that will really make

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>your heart burn. Is just you know, full of feeling. Quote.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Emotions are transient central states comprising subjective, cognitive, behavioral, and

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>physiological phenomena that are triggered by appraisal of certain types

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of environmental stimuli. On one hand, I think that's great

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>because it really does capture all the things you'd be

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>looking for if you're trying to study emotions in a

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>scientific way. On the other hand, that just sounds hilarious.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that sentence is a great It is

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>a great example of why you need those three categories,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>because if you run it all together there it just

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds it's a little overwhelming. But if you break it

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>down into three definite, definite categories of consideration, I feel

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like it it makes a lot more sense, at least

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to me. Yeah, well, we'll come back to another pretty

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>similar way of breaking it down. When we actually look

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at the study. But first I wanted to come back

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to the eight armed world where we started, So we

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>started off talking about the paper Nautilus, the also known

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as the argonaut, this great octopus that the builds a

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>fortress of love. I think the octopus world is a

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>great place to start if we're looking for what would

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be the clearest, easiest examples to find of something that really,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>at least intuitively looks like emotions in the invertebrate world.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Because of course that's it's long been a debate about

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>whether thoughts and emotions can be said to exist in

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>animals other than humans. You know, a lot of scientists

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>would take issue with saying that there are emotions in

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>any non human animals because they would say, well, if

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.239
<v Speaker 1>we use human terms like happy and sad, that's just

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>anthropomorphic projection, there's no way to prove it, and so forth.

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But I really think intuitively, most people are comfortable with

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea that some analogs to human emotions exist in

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>other animals with complex brains, like mammals and birds. Yeah.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, I think part of the whole exercise

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>is is casting emotions down from that golden pedestal, casting

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>away the poetry and and thinking again about what they

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>actually are. And certainly it's I imagine that a duck

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is not it never finds itself feeling sad about being

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sad or something, so you know, conscious as the human model,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but something like sadness that we feel, you you can

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly imagine it in a duck or a cat or

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>or any of these. Certainly, these these higher organisms that

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>come to mind. I mean, it's really easy to see

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>things that at least really intuitively look like emotions, whether

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we're interpreting them right or not. In social animals like dogs,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard for me not to look at my

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>dog and think, my dog is happy right now, or

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>my dog is angry or something right. I mean, with

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>all the complexities that come with with with making those

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of statements about an animal, of course, because again

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>we can know we can never deny the power of

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>anthropomorphism exactly. But one of the first places I wanted

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to go here with invertebrates is that I think what

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I just said about my dog, this powerful intuitive sense

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of my you know, day to day experience with a canine,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that this animal does feel emotions that are in some

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>way similar to the emotions. I feel if you wanted

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to look for this pattern of intuition outside of our

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>relationships with mammals, I think the octopus is a great

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>place to start. So a couple of years ago, one

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the books that I recommended in our summer reading

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>episode was a book by an author named Psi Montgomery

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>called The Soul of an Octopus, which is sort of

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a cross between a zoology book about the octopus and

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a memoir about the author's personal experiences with octopus minds

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and the people who study and care for octopuses. And

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that book, really it still sticks with me today, and

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the main reasons is that she presents in

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it all of these anecdotes that look like genuinely powerful

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>emotional connections and interactions between humans and cephalopods. It reflects

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>this steady, unshakable sensation that many people who work with

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>octopuses get, which is, on one hand, they see this strange,

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 1>alien kind of intelligence, but on the other hand, they

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>see a very familiar human kind of intelligence and even

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>emotion at work. Of course, again with all the caveats

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that these impressions, you know, they could be anthropomorphic projection.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at least worth looking at the types

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of encounters that lead to this sort of thinking, whether

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the thinking is correct or not. Yeah, yeah, I agree

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that the octopus is a great example to look to

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because it checks off so many opposite boxes. You know.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It is uh, it is a it is a solitary

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>creature that that lives in in a different environment than

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>we do, that has as a totally different structure to

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>its body. It's it's like an alien compared to us.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Distributed intelligence. Also, I mean, the intelligence of an octopus

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>is not just central in its head. It's it's it

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>appears to be able to think with its arms in

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ways that you know, if we can do something like that,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's in a much more limited sense. So to cite

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the many anecdotes and examples that appear

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the book, the first one is that at one

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>point she's sharing a story from a biologist named Scott Dowd.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So Doubt is working in an aquarium where one of

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>his jobs is taking care of a dwarf Caribbean octopus

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>who lives in one of the small display tanks, and

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>one morning Dowd comes in to find this octopuss tank

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>overflowing onto the floor, and the octopus itself seems to

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>have vanished. It's not anywhere to be seen, and eventually

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>he finds it. He finds that it has managed to

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>squeeze itself into the tiny pipe that recirculates water in

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the tank. This pipe is only about half an inch wide.

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So obviously there's a problem because the water can't recirculate

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>because the octopus is clogging the pipe, and you need

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the octopus out of the pipe. So what

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>do you do? I have no idea what you'd even

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>begin to do to get something out of an aperture

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that's small without harming it. But Dowd in this moment

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he remembers having seen a National geographic special about fisherman

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in Greece who were catching octopuses by setting out in

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>four a pots in the ocean is traps, and the

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>octopuses would squeeze themselves into these pots, which seemed like

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect dens for them, only to then get hauled up

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to the surface by the fisherman. But how do you

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>get the octopus out of the pot without breaking the pot? Well,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a very simple solution. These octopuses were saltwater

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>creatures and the fishermen would pour fresh water into the pots.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>H So the octopus is obviously being, you know, evolved

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for a saltwater environment. They don't like this at all,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and they would immediately slither out of the pot and

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>be captured. All right, That that makes sense. So of

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>course dow didn't want to kill and eat the dwarf

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>octopus in the tank, but he figured that the same

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>process might work to get it out of the pipe,

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and it did. Uh. He flushed it with fresh water

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the octopus came out. Now years later, he tried

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the same trick to subdue a misbehaving female giant Pacific

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>octopus that he's working with. And a lot of the

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>emotional connections that people have with octopuses in this book

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are with these giant Pacific octopuses. They've they've got a

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of personality. But the story goes that dowd would

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was dealing with this octopus. He would

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>lift the top of the tank up to feed it,

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and and she would put her arms out and attach

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>herself to his hands, and he would be unable to

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get her to let go. And if he managed to

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>peel one of the creature's arms off, of him. She

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>would just instantly wrapped two or more, you know, around

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the same hand. Again, So like, how do you get

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this octopus off of you? Well, he remembered his earlier

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>experience with the tiny octopus in the fresh water, so

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he got the idea to repel the larger octopus the

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>same way. He filled up a picture in the sink

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and he poured it over the octopus clinging to his hand,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and again, at first it worked. The octopus let go

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of him and recoiled sharply, and Dowd said, for a

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>moment he was proud of himself for having rediscovered this

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>useful trick and outsmarted this crafty creature. But then to

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>read the next section from Montgomery's book, But the octopus

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was incensed. Quote she got scarlet red and really thorny.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a heated moment. What I didn't notice, he said,

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was she was blowing herself up. She siphoned up a

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>massive load of water and gushed a major surge of

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>salt water onto my face. As he stood there dripping,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Scott noticed the octopus had the same look on her

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>face as I must have had on mine when I

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thought I had outwitted her. Now, which part of the

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>octopus is the face? Now here? Here you may be

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>onto something. I don't know. How do you find the

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>octopus is face? I mean, it's got eyes, but they're

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>not really front facing, are they. I mean we can easily.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, our anthropomorphic powers are such that we

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>can easily devise one. I believe there was a wasn't

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there recently an issue with the masters of emoticons. They

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>made an octopus emoticon that rearranged the anatomy to make

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it look more face like, and I believe a biologist

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>corrected them on this. Oh wait a minute, though, I

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you find an octopus face sometimes when you

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>look into your environment, because when you see the forked

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>coat hook on the door, you see the boxer octopus. Yes,

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but I see a cartoon octopus, and cartoons are human

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and have faces. Cartoon animals are generally of animals that

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have been made human. Okay, I guess you're right about that.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But coming back to the story about about Scott doubt

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the octopus, that there is something about this kind

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of apparent anger and reciprocal vengeance that feels very much

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like an analog of complex human emotion. Again, maybe you know,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we're maybe we're just overreading into a single anecdote, but

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the book is full of anecdotes like this where people

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>really feel like they're having these emotionally charged interactions with

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>these eight armed critters. Yeah, Like a defensive display is

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially what we're talking about here, um and and like

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that does have an emotional resonance, Like if you see

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a cat with a defensive display, a horse, a dog,

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, Like you know what they're about, that there's

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a message they are sending. Then there is a presumed

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>emotional state behind it. And you know, we we we

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>get it. We don't even have to be able to

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>put it into words to to know what that state is. Yeah,

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and the really interesting part is not that it was

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a defensive display when something was about to happen that

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the octopus didn't like. It happened after like he poured

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the fresh water on it, then it went back in

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>its tank. Then it puffed up and got red and

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.239
<v Speaker 1>shot him back. Like isn't that much more interesting than

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>if he had been like coming at it with something

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't want. But there's another part of the book

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about real quick. That speaks of

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>how persuasive the octopus's behavior was in convincing the people

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>who worked with him that they had character, personality, and

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>something like an inner life quote. The students were supposed

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to refer to their animals by numbers in their research papers,

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but they ended up calling them by name jet Stream, Martha, Gertrude, Henry, Bob.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Some were so friendly. A researcher named Alexa said they

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>would lift their arms out of the water like a

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>dog jumps up to greet you, or like a child

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>who wants to be lifted up and hugged. And then

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's one more story from Alexa in there,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh where she says quote. And then there was Windy.

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Alexa used her as part of her thesis presentation. It

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was a formal event that was videotaped, for which Alexa

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>wore a nice suit. As soon as the camera started rolling,

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Wendy drenched the student with salt water. The octopus scurried

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of the tank, hid in the sand,

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and refused to come out. Alexa is convinced the whole

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>debacle occurred because the octopus realized in advance what was

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>going to happen and resolved to prevent its crafty. Now,

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I think we need to recognize

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that the subjective impressions of people who work directly with

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>animals are probably going to be prone to all kinds

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of biases. I mean, even people who work with robots

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tend to attribute lots of essentially human qualities of mind

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to those robots. They name the robots. They think of

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the robots as having personalities and intentions apart from their

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>explicit programming. You know, I often think Johnny the room

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>bas is being jive us. He's chasing me around the

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>house or around the kitchen right now. Uh, And yeah,

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not tempted to actually think those impressions are telling

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it telling us anything real about the emotions of robots. No,

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean to whatever extent it would be useful

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in dealing with robot or or more you know, realistically

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an animal. Uh. Then we see the usefulness of that anthropomorphism. Um,

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like the you know, the classic example being like, if

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with an animal that could be dangerous when

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, when it's in a defensive mood, you know, uh,

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's it's not so much about like the

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>detail of the emotion that you were you were imagining

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in its head. But but it's more about the degree

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to which it matches up with how it may act

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and then allowing you to respond appropriately or or to

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not respond at all. Like this, this animal is mad,

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this animal is aggressive. I should not get close to

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>it right now. But you know, it's it's one thing

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for a scientist, Tom, you know, to have to avoid

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>intentionally inserting their anthropomorphic feelings into a study. Uh, you know,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 1>but our but again, our theory of mind powers are

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>useful in our relationships with animals. And I think you can,

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you can, you can, you can state that they would

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be useful in interactions with animals even in a study,

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>provided that you could still separate those feelings from the data. Sure,

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say that they would be useful

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>insofar as they accurately predict outcomes, right, which sometimes they can.

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think it's it's important for us to

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to to take human emotions off of the pedestal,

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and and think more about what they are and

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and and stating that okay, um, you know the mind

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of an animal, the mind of an octopus or whatever.

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, their mind is a vessel that cannot hold

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the shape of our own emotional states. But our experience

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 1>plus theory of mind allows us to have this instantaneous,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost translate equal understanding of the basic properties

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of the other's emotional state. Yeah, I mean, I guess

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>anytime we're trying to study emotional states, whether that's in

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>animals or really even in other people, I mean, you

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>have to accept the subjective disconnect, that you're not necessarily

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about the same things in terms of subjective feelings,

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but that once you get into these subjective criteria that

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we alluded to earlier, and I guess what we're coming

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>back to now, um, you can start to look for

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>behavioral and cognitive analogies. Another way of thinking about it,

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to go back to my earlier metaphor of the cat's

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>cradle of you know, of getting some yarn and weaving

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it between your your fingers and creating a pattern. Right, uh,

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, criss crossing array of string casts between the

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>fingers of two hands. Ultimately, fewer or more fingers are

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to make it any less a cat's cradle. Right,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So if if you know, if five fingers are the

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>shape of human cognitive complexity. There's a certain emotional um

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>web that we can weave and that we're trapped in

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. But you know, animals say they

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just have the have three fingers to cast that web with.

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're still casting the web, and then we

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>might easily conceive what would it be like to to

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>cast a cat's cradle if you had seven fingers on

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>each hand. Uh, it would it would be more complex,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>It might be difficult for us to imagine what that

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>would be like cognitively, emotionally, or what have you, but

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it would still be something that is relatable to that experience. Well,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should take another break and then when we

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>come back we can discuss relating the human experience of

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>emotions to analogous uh, behaviors and cognition and animals. Than alright,

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we're back. We've been talking about emotion. We've been talking

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>about emotion in animals and what exactly we would be

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for in trying to find that emotion, especially emotion

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in invertebrates. Because people are generally, I think more comfortable

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>with the idea that we see something strongly analogous to

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>human emotions and other animals like say, you know, mammals

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with complex brains, social mammals and stuff, right like not

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not only is everyone, I think pretty on board with

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea to say dogs have emotions or even cats

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have emotions, it would be it would almost be socially

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dangerous to suggest otherwise. Are you saying you want to

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest otherwise? No, you're afraid No, no, I think, especially

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>again going back to the idea of taking the human

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>poetic idea of emotion and bringing it down to a

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>more realistic level, stripping the poetry away from it. I

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>think without a doubt dogs and cats and and other

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>organisms we might even sometimes not not wish to think

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>about having emotions, such as pigs and cows, um, you know,

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>they definitely have emotional states. Uh so yeah, I would

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not be the one to suggest that dogs don't have emotions,

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And I pity the person who does make that suggestion

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because they will be attacked on the street. Well, let's

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see if we can start some street fights about crowd ads. Okay,

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>so for the next for the rest of this episode

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and then for most of the next episode. Also, I

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to be looking mainly at this one paper.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It was A good paper I found published in seventeen

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Journal of Experimental Biology by Clint J. Perry

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and Luigi Battia Donna, called studying emotion in invertebrates what

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>has been done, what can be measured, and what they

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can provide uh. And so these two researchers I believe

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are both at Queen Mary University of London, and this

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is not a single study but large review of existing

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>research on invertebrate emotions. There actually aren't that many studies

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on invertebrate emotions. It's a fairly recent field, but what

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>is out there is, at least in my mind, very interesting. Now.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>The authors point out that invertebrates have long played a

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>role in the history of neuroscience. It was researching invertebrates

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that taught us

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what neurons were and how they were structured. UH. Insects

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are often believed to lack the structural neural complexity necessary

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to generate complex states like emotions. The people think their

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>brains are just too simple. You know, when you've got

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a brain that structurally simple, with you know, such a

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>few number of neurons, they just couldn't have a complex

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>state like a persistent emotional state. Uh, And their behavior

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is often characterized in terms of simple sense or emotor response.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So a snail or a spider might have an automatic

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>response that causes it to retreat from a hot match,

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but the animal isn't feeling anything that could reasonably be

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>called called, you know, anger or fear a persistent emotional state.

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That that's often the view. But the authors think this

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>old view is due for revision due to this growing

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>body of research showing various invertebrates, not just octopuses like

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about, being capable of mental phenomena

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>previously considered unthinkable, including all kinds of stuff concept learning,

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>numerical cause mission, cultural transmission, and so forth. So in

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>order to study emotion and animals, we need to land

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>on a definition that that makes emotions susceptible to external detection.

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's where that definition that I mentioned earlier in

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the episode comes in again. It is quote, emotions are

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>transient central states comprising subjective, cognitive, behavioral, and physiological phenomena

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that are triggered by appraisal of certain types of environmental stimuli.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So something in the environment causes it. The animals appraisal

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of that thing in the environment triggers an internal state.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And these internal states have subjective, cognitive, behavioral, and physiological effects.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you break it down like that, uh, I

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like you have a model then that you can.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You can you can certainly, you know, informally attribute to

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a wide variety of organisms. But more to the point,

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you can you can potentially test for it exactly. And well,

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you can definitely test for like three of the four effects.

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't test for subjective states. We don't get. That

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the three examples we had are earlier

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that feeling is what it feels like. Yeah, you can't

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>do that, but the other three you can. So emotions

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>are thought to have cognitive effects. Emotions affect how you

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think and how you perceive. They have behavioral effects. Emotions

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>affect what you do with your body, and they have

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>physiological effects. Emotions affect unconscious or involuntary reactions within the body.

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So just for example, to use fear, there is of

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>course the subjective experience of fear, and we can only

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>know this in the first person. You just assume by

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>analogy that everybody else feels a similar subjective experience when

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they're afraid. But external observers, you know, could document cognitive

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>changes during fear, such as increased awareness of sensory stimulized

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.439
<v Speaker 1>signaling danger. Maybe for example, when an animal is feeling fear,

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>it is more likely to notice movement and its peripheral

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>vision in the state. You could notice behavioral changes such

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>as threat displays or retreat behaviors. You could notice physiological

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>changes such as increased heart rate or the release of

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fight or flight hormones like epinefn or epernefer and and

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>all that. You can notice dilated pupils, relaxation of the bladder, etcetera. Yeah,

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've to to go back to episodes that

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we've we've done on human fear and like the nature

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 1>of fear. Uh, it's uh, it really change. It kind

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of changes who you are. It always makes me think

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of the hunter S. Thompson quote. You're a whole different

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>person when you're scared. Uh. You know, we think we

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>know how we're going to behave in in a situation

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of real fear, but we can't always be sure unless

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we have sort of you know, performed enough exercises and

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>fear if you will and even then there may be

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>unknowns well. Of course, so fear, like other emotions, has

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>cognitive and behavioral effects, in some cases very strong ones.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>What is who you are, It is your how you

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think and how you act. Yeah, I mean there are

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>studying again, these are human studies, but there, you know,

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>there are studies that have looked at how fear and

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty affect our politics, you know something, as you know,

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>generally we think of as very very complex and nuanced

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and based in ideas and very stable. Yeah, it's just

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>based on what we believe in a kind of permanent

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or semi permanent way. But no, I mean people's political

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>opinions appear to fluctuate based on their their emotional states

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 1>day to day, moment to moment. Yeah, which of course

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>should not come as a surprise if you're you know,

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>aware of the degree to which emotions are manipulated by politicians.

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But but but yeah, like you you add, you change

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the emotional state, you change how the animal behaves and

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>perceives the world. Right, So I think in the time

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we have left to in today's episode, we've got time

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to look at the first one of these, the cognitive

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.319
<v Speaker 1>tests for invertebrate emotions. And we'll have to save the

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>other types of tests for the next episode. But to

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the cognitive tests, one of the things that

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you can do to study emotions in UH, in humans,

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, but also in other animals is something known

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as a judgment bias test. So imagine what is meant

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>by a test phrase. Here's a test phrase, the doctor

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>examined little Emily's growth. Al Right, Well, that that just

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>brings to mind that the clear image of little Emily,

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and like a Norman Norman Rockwell painting, be exam being

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 1>examined by the doctor, and the doctor finding this grotesque

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 1>mass on the back of her neck. Well, it turns out,

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so this is an ambiguous phrase. People interpret it different ways,

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and at least in some studies, people with some conditions

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>negative emotional conditions like depression or generalized anxiety were more

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>likely on average to read this ambiguous statement as being like,

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about about some kind of disease growth,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>People with without anxiety or depression, or people who had

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>formerly had these conditions and are now considered cured or

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in remission, UH, we're more likely to interpret it as

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>measuring normal growth in childhood. He as in he measured

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>her height. Yeah. So um So, first of all, I

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>have to say, so, so the way that I answered

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it in the show here is also the way I

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>responded to the text when I read it for me

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to so, and it is it is is entirely possible

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that that it comes from me having just a generally

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>anxious a depressed state. However, I do have questions about

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to what degree this test phrase is weighted, because if

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you simply add and development to the end of this

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>test phrase, granted, it makes it more specific and it's

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>less ambiguous, but then but there also means there's no

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:40.280
<v Speaker 1>question if you say the doctor examined a little Emily's

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>growth in development, you're not going to say, oh, he

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he was the doctor was looking at not only the

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>weird thing on her neck, but also how she's developing.

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Oh, I feel like that would just

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>make it not ambiguous anymore. Yeah, it's true, but I

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>also just it just feels it feels manipulative that that

0:46:57.600 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>phrase to me. So I was looking around a little

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>bit about this to see if anybody else had any

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>problems with this. Uh, And it does seem as if

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the depression link negative interpretation bias findings are not without

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at least some criticism. Uh. Claire Lawson and Colin McLeod

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>bring it up in Depression in the Interpretation of Ambiguity

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in and they pointed out that we could be talking

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>about more about like a depression link response bias, reflecting

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>an elevated tendency for depressives to admit or endorse negatively

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>toned response options. So so under this model, it's possible

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that depression maybe just is affecting more like what you're

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>likely to say to other people rather than what you're

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>actually likely to represent internally. Yeah, and I guess in

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this we're getting into the complexity of of language and

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>social interaction on it, you know. Um. Also, others have

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>argued that interpretation biases and depression might be limited to

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>interpretations for the self. So unless you are little Emily, uh,

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there perhaps wouldn't be that much of an impact here. Um.

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You know. So it's in a way, it's kind of

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>like self deprecating humor, you know, like it's it's it's

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>more about how you were feeling, and it's about the

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in the world that's directly affecting you. Which

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because these emotional states are largely going to

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be connected to you or things of value to you,

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:21.319
<v Speaker 1>not some random little girl in a you know an

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>example phrase. Well, I wouldn't want to put too much

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>on that one example phrase. Maybe that's not a great example.

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Well it's it's probably the better. I found a couple

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of phrases as well that we're used in other studies,

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but that one was still the best and one that's

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>frequently cited um elsewhere. I found a two thousand seven

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>study published in Cognition and Emotion from Bison and Sears,

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and they found no negative interpretive bias in their studies.

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's not to say that an emotional state won't

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just generally influence how information or stimuli is received. A

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>loving touch may startle you and spin you around in

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a defensive stance, if you are primed for a hostile

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>physical encounter. Well yeah, I mean there there could be

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>very sale criticisms that I'm not aware of. I thought

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I understood like that, it's pretty well documented within humans

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and animals that yeah, that like negative mood does tend

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to bias perception. So when you encounter something ambiguous, if

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling angry or sad, you're more likely to interpret

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the ambiguous thing in a pessimistic way. Yeah, and I

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that is definitely the case. I guess the

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>main thing I wanted to drive home is I didn't

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>want anybody to engage in this sort of exercise with

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>us here and have the same knee jerk reaction that

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we did and then immediately assume that that means that

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they have an anxiety problem or or in a depressive state. Well,

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if you did react that way, and

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>even if the test is generally valid, it would just

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be like one answer, you'd have to like do an

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.359
<v Speaker 1>average of a bunch of different things to figure out

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what's you know, more likely the case. Yes, but you know,

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we're humans and we tend to jump to conclusions and

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>engage in I guess, um, what is the the X

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Men personality test that we've factor that we've discussed in

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the show before X Man, I don't remember this, well,

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the name is eluding me at the moment, but you know,

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>when you you engage it, like the fortune cookie scenario

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or the uh the astrological charts scenario where the future

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is read and it's just a little piece of paper

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>telling you something random, but you immediately identify things about

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself in that safe release the horror effects, yes, the

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Barnum effect also, yes, yes, a little something for everybody. Well,

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we we can certainly log possible criticisms of

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the judgment bias effect and keep them as an asterisk

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 1>over what we're about to read, which you know it

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>may in some ways be undercut by any weakness in

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the inherent paradigm. But in some existing research on animals,

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we people have tried to use judgment bias tests to

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>see if there is cognitive evidence of emotions and animals.

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>And you can do this in some animals, like if

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you take rats and you train them to distinguish between

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>two different tones, say a high pitch tone and a

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>low pitch tone, And then in the enclosure with the

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>rats is a lever that they can press. So if

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they press the lever when they hear the high pitch tone,

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they get a food pellet reward, but if they press

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the lever when they hear the low pitch tone, they

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>get an unpleasant blast of white noise. So they learn

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and they get good at telling the difference when the

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>high pitch tone plays, they are quick to press the

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>lever and get the food reward. When the low pitch

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.479
<v Speaker 1>tone plays, they hang back. They either take a long

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>time to press the lever or they don't press it

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>at all. And it turns out you can manipulate something

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like the rats mood or emotional state you know, asterisk

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with all the caveats that are implied there to bias

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>their judgments about new ambiguous stimuli. So what happens when

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you play a tone in between the two tones that

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the rats have been trained on? The studies show that, say,

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if you tilt the rats housing up at an angle,

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>or if you wet the rats betting or introduce an

0:51:56.880 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar rat to the group, when the ambiguous tone plays,

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the rats will be much more avoidant of the lever

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in response to this this ambiguous stimuli than rats in

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a control condition with normal stable housing conditions, which are

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 1>more likely to interpret the ambiguous tone optimistically and run

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and press the lever. So what this looks like again,

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And of course you know we could be overreading into it,

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like if you put rats in something

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 1>like a bad emotional state by making them uncomfortable and uneasy,

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to interpret unfamiliar information in a pessimistic way,

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>whereas quote, happy rats are more likely to interpret unfamiliar

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 1>information in an optimistic way. So it's an emotional state

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>based on experience that is preparing the rat to deal

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>with um, with with incoming stimuli or or incoming environmental situations. Yeah,

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it looks like a quote bad mood puts

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the animal in a kind of defensive posture, or it's

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 1>less likely to explore an experiment and it's less likely

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to to take a risk. It's more just kind of

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hunkered down, right, Yeah, So it's you know, it's like um.

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think this helps to demystify the human

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 1>experience of some of these emotions, even though these emotions

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>could arguably more complex when you bring in human language

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. But if every time in the past

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that I've gone to a specific fast food restaurant I

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have I've gotten ill, then in the future when I

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>go back, I am going to be on guard against

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>incoming illness of course. Yeah, I mean that's like classical

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>conditioning one totally. So I mean, really that's that's what

0:53:33.080 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here. Um, you know, and I do

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>think it does serve to demystify something like fear, but

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>really any of the emotions, even the you know, the

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>loftier emotions like uh, like you know, like love, uh,

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we need to to to take bring

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 1>them to bring them down a few steps anyway, so

0:53:49.880 --> 0:53:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can attribute these things to animals as well. Yeah. Now, obviously,

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, as you and I have discussed before, it's

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>more difficult to study some emotion than others. So you'll

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>find more studies on on invertebrates. We're about to get

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>into an invertebrate example on things like aversion and anxiety

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and fear than you will in invertebrate love. Though there

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are some with invertebrate positive emotions that I think are

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. We'll get to one and just it's generally

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to take an animal out of its natural habitat

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and study it by making it feel anxious and afraid

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to making it feel at home. I mean, really,

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that's one of one of the problems and some of

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>these studies that have been conducted with um specifically, I

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:37.439
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm thinking of rats and addiction, right, like are

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you are you testing for the response to these substances

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>under you know, ideal sort of ambiguous circumstances, or is

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it within the world of a rat prison that you've

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>created in a room somewhere, yeah, or is it unnatural

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 1>within the rat prison. But the results are useful to

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 1>us anyway, because the rats and the rat prison are

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:01.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of analogous to the way humans live. Now yeah, yeah,

0:55:01.560 --> 0:55:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like I said, it's it gets complicated. But anyway,

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to to move to invertebrates with the idea of the

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>judgment bias test, At least three studies so far have

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>shown possible evidence of the judgment bias effect in bees. Bees.

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is there's another example of an animal

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that we generally don't we don't attribute a lot of

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>personality to or certainly emotional states. But they are they're

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 1>complicated organisms. They're they're they're fascinating creatures. Yes, well, let's

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>take a look and see what we think. So the

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>authors here site two studies Bates and at All in

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven and Schloons at All in two thousand

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen that studied this effect the judgment bias effect in

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>honey bees or APIs mallifera. So bees were trained on

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 1>two different kinds of chemical odors that they sensed with

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>their antennae, which were associated with two different sugar solutions

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that they could extend their probosis to taste. So when

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>odor A was sensed, that was associated with a sweet

0:55:57.600 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sugar solution, and when odor B you was since, that

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:04.399
<v Speaker 1>was associated with a bitter quinine solution, which the bees

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>did not like tasting. So if you train them on this, right,

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>once they smell odor A, they're going to be like, oh, boy,

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sugars coming and that you know, that's the condition response.

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>When they smell odor bee, they're going to be like, oh,

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that's the bitter quinine and I don't want any of it.

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>They get conditioned like this. And then the manipulation came

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>when the researchers would go and shake the bees housing

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>vigorously for sixty seconds. And this was supposed to simulate

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a natural attack on the colony by a predator such

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as a honey badger and to quote here. After the

0:56:34.000 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 1>shaking manipulation, bees were tested with ambiguous odor mixtures intermediate

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two mixtures used for training in both studies.

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Honey bee subjected to the shaking were less likely to

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>respond to the ambiguous odor mixture closest in ratio to

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the oder mixture associated with quinine during training, suggesting that

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 1>shaking induces a negative cognitive bias to ambiguous odor cues.

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So when the the odor was somewhere between the other

0:57:02.760 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>two odors chemically, especially when it was closer to the

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 1>bad odor, the bees that had been shaken were more

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to say I don't want any of that. Again,

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this looks like a pessimistic bias. Yeah, clearly, and it

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like a clear case. Uh. Now, the authors do

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>offer an important caveat here. They say quote however, it

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has been argued that shaking may cause bees to become

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>better discriminators. Shaking increased hemolymph concentrations of octopamine, which can

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>modulate sensory function. And hemolymph again is like insect blood

0:57:34.560 --> 0:57:38.320
<v Speaker 1>than of blood. They have hemio lymph, this other circulatory fluid,

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and so it increased this uh, this thing called octopamine,

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which is similar I believe to nora adrenaline and in

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mammals and humans. Uh So, remember that the shaking really

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>seemed to make a difference when the odor was ambiguous

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but closer to the odor associated with the bitter food.

0:57:54.520 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So maybe shaken bees are just better at sensing that

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 1>closeness to the bad outcome because is of non emotional

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 1>physiological reasons. That's also possible. But this isn't the only

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>test of judgment bias effect in bees period. All In

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>also studied the same thing, but in the opposite direction,

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 1>optimistic bias created by pleasure or happiness, or at least

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what you might call an analog of pleasure or happiness

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in bumble bees. So again there was a similar type

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of setup. They would train bumble bees to respond to

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>two possible visual cues. There would be a green card

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on the left that has a cup of sugar water

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>solution underneath it. This is the reward cue, and then

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a blue card on the right that has a cup

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of regular water underneath it, and this is the control que.

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Trained bumble bees would learn to go straight to the

0:58:45.440 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 1>green card on the left when it was present to

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get the sugar they you know, they don't bother with

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the blue card on the right. Now, what happens when

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you put a bluish greenish card in the middle of

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the two positions, Well, the study showed that if you

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 1>give the bees a little bit of sugar reward before

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the test, they approached the ambiguous new stimulus the blue

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>green card in the middle position faster than if you

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 1>don't give them any sugar. And so the authors hearsay quote.

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Control experiments showed that after consumption of the small unexpected reward,

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>bees did not increase their flight speed and we're not

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 1>more likely to explore novel stimuli, suggesting that the small

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:28.919
<v Speaker 1>reward did not simply increase the bees general activity or exploration,

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but was indeed due to changes in their decision making

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:38.439
<v Speaker 1>processes under ambiguity, thus resembling optimism in humans. Uh So, again,

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there could be something wrong here that we're that we're missing,

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but at least it on the surface, it looks like

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the bees are just expecting better outcomes with ambiguous possibilities

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 1>when they've had a little bit of sugary treats. Right. So,

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the big takeoffs from this is

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that it is going you have to think of emotion

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is being tied to how we navigate the war world,

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and we are not the only organism that has to

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>navigate a world of changing circumstances. And and because clearly

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the bee has to do that as well, and it

1:00:10.000 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>has similar abilities that result or our and our and

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or are caused by emotional states. Yeah, but I think

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got to call it for this first episode, and

1:00:18.920 --> 1:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>we can come back and explore some more research along

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>these lines next time. In the meantime, if you want

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you can find us anywhere you get a podcast. These days,

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know all the places you get podcasts. Uh,

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we know a few of them. One of them is

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I heart and if you go to stuff to Blow

1:00:37.000 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com, that will shoot you over to

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart listing for this show. Wherever you get

1:00:42.880 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the show, just make sure you rate, review, and subscribe.

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are the actions you can take that help support

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the show huge thanks as always to our excellent audio

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get

1:00:55.520 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on this episode or

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>any other, to suggest a topic for the future, just

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to say hello, you can email us at contact at

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For more

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>app Apple podcasts, or wherever you listening to your favorite shows.