WEBVTT - 1152 | MLB Trade Deadline Final Predictions + Weekend Preview 

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Times, Joy Cracker, bring we will see you.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>To's the Gunner. Welcome one, hang out, Welcome to the

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Just Baseball Show. It is Friday, July thirty first, and

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that's Jack McMullan. I'm Peter Rapple and today trade deadline predictions.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Jack's got three, I've got three, and we got five

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>bangers their user submitted from our discord. A lot of

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>mock trades. We're gonna dive in do all of them,

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll end it with a preview of the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>best games of the weekend. And it's all brought to

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you by bet MGM. Did your home run bet? Home

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>run bet come up short? What's wrong with me?

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Today?

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to this MLB No Sweat home run token, you

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have to worry if your bet didn't clear the fences.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Just activate your token when you bet on any player

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to at home run in any MLB game, and if

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that player fails to go yard, you're gonna get your

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>stake back in bonus bets. Keep the action in scoring

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>position with bet MGM, the King of the Big Swing,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and remember to use promo code Just Baseball to unlock

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>that new player offer, because if your first pick loses

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>after you use promo code just Baseball, you'll get it

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>all back in bonus up to fifteen hundred bucks. Jack

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>hopefully slurring over my words twice in the intro is

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the end of me slurring my words? And we could

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>just have smooth trade deadline predictions.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you thinks? It's okay?

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Heck of a start from you. I look forward to

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing how you can make it even better from a

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>great start. I like that.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>And you even you enunciated some of your words though.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>That sounded good. That sounded a much more professional than

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>my intron jab. Yeah, just a little jab your way,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 2>mumble man. So we can start with the AJ Mintor trade.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>But I kind of have a trade deadline prediction on

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 2>the Mets me too. I prefer to talk about it there,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and you do too, So we're definitely going to cover

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 2>that trade. But just first reaction, AJ Mintor to the

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 2>New York Mets, did you jump off your couch and

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>excitement that my Minnesota twins are officially hashtag buyers?

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>No, my first reaction was, well, Jeffers isn't going anywhere.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Catcher market gets even lighter. That was my honestly real

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>reaction to it mintor this is the start of a

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fire sale for the New York Mets and the Minnesota

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Twins capitalized in Benny Agbayani's son. I believe Bruin Agbayani

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he is. He's part of that trade return, which is

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Uh. And then the other guy involved in

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal is like a serious power threat Amy Billy

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Amick and swing it. So I don't know, it's an

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting return for aj Mintern. You feel like David Stearns

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>could be looking at an entirely revamped top twenty prospects

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the met system.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I agree, and we'll talk about that later with my

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline predictions. And when I mean later, I mean

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>right now. Let's get to my three trade deadline predictions.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Unless you got something off the.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Top, No, are we doing your discord first?

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh what do you think?

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You know? What do you and then let's do discord

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and then let's do me.

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I like that. I like that idea too. So I

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>have three Discord's got five, and then you have three.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's start with the most obvious trade deadline

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 2>prediction in the history of trade deadline predictions. But the

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>reason I bring it up is when you hear the

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>name Trek Scooble, you assume he's going to the Dodgers.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>But everyone else has their take. They think Milwaukee has

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the system. We were talking a bus are only yesterday

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and he said the Dodgers of the favorites, and the

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Brewers are number two. What about the Tampa Bay Rays

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>they got a new owner. We've talked about that at length.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>We've also heard the Cubs getting mixed in the Braves,

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the Phillies, potentially even the Yankees. Trek's scoople is heading

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to the Los Angeles Dodgers, folks, and it comes down

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>to this. I know it's very boring to start off,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>but it is Tarek'scooble, and it is my prediction. I'm

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to be right, not just trying to do mega

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 2>galaxy brain thinking. I want to get one right. And

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel good about this one because I think the

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers are up against it when they think to themselves,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>we got a three pet and what does bringing Terrek

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Scooble in do for you? Doesn't guarantee anything, but it

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 2>brings you a lot closer to three peeting before the lockout.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Because with this impending lockout, we're likely going to it's

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 2>going to lock out on December first. Now I don't

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>know if we're going to miss games, but it seems

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>increasingly likely. So if they're worried at all about twenty

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven, if they're worried at all about a salary

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>cap or any of that type of stuff, make the

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 2>move now. Trade from your glut of top outfield prospects.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Trade an MLB ready starter, and you're taking him away

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 2>from some other contenders, because if the Brewers go get

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Trek Scouoble, you might be in trouble. And reason number three,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 2>they actually need a starter they do. Snell, you have

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>no idea what he's gonna look like when he comes back.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>You assume he's gonna look good, but you have no idea.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 2>Tyler glasnow you have no idea. Shoheo Tani is still

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>dealing with anything. He was out of the lineup yesterday.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 2>For the Dodgers. They need a starter, Trek Scooble. They can.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>They could pay him the ten million dollars remaining. They

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>have the prospects to do it. Jeff Passen came out

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and said, I think a few days ago that Ryan

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Jeffers is preordained to the New York Yankees. I think

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the actual only preordained guy at this deadline is Trek

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 2>scoobl to the Dodgers.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can get behind that thought. I think that

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>there are other teams that will. You know, it's almost

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>like matching an offer sheet in the NBA. That's the

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>way that I want to describe this. There is no

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>such thing as restricted free agency in Major League Baseball,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but restricted free agency the way it works in the

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA is you have this offer sheet where the I

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many NBA teams are there, thirty or

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty two? Do you know, uh, thirty, I think whatever,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like every other NBA team doesn't matter, every other NBA

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>team and like, offer this contract to a restricted free agent,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and the team that currently employs them has a right

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>to match it and just hold them so like a

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, as DeAndre Ayton like. There are

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>way better examples of that where it's like, okay, submitting

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>an offer sheet and the team that has you as

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the right to match it. I almost view this trade

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>market for school ball as like restricted free agency in

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>favor of the Dodgers, where like Okay, the Brewers are

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>offering X, Y and Z and the Rays are offering

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>X Y. Dodgers, you want to do better And if

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they say yes, then they get them. If they say no,

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>then the other team gets them. So I do feel

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like they will have veto power because of the package

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they can put together and frankly may want to put

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>together for rental school.

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And one thing that we heard today, First of all,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I love that comparison number two. The Rays came out

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and said that they're not willing to part with THEO Gillen,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>their top prospect, and the Brewers came out and they

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.119
<v Speaker 2>said that we're not willing to part with heyesus midey.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 2>It makes sense. I'm not saying that those two would

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>have to be in a deal for Trek schoobl I

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>think they're too good at prospects, even for a rental school.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just a little bitt its no sense.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>However, I do feel like if there was a team

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to pry Schooble away from the Dodgers, it would be

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the Rays of the Brewers, and that would be the

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>piece that they dangle where it's like, well, now we

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>have to do it. So taking those two off the table.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just so lined up for the Dodgers to make

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a deal here.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is Detroit is ready to compete again

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>next year. Yep. And in terms of in terms of

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>like proximity, the Dodgers can put together the best package.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Emit Shean could be in that package, and she and

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>could be a mid rotation guy for the Detroit Tigers

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>next year. They can also, Like you're telling me that

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they present an offer of Shean and Mike Serota, who

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>could be in the Tiger outfield next year. You don't

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're saying yes to that? Like, I think it's

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>abundantly clear that they have the proximity and the talent

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to win out in any rental Schooble package.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Thousand percent agree. And I would even take it a

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 2>step further if the Tiger said, no, we need Robleski

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>instead of Shean. Do you think that's gonna stop the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers from ultimately making that deal? Of course not, so

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>they can keep inching up and get the best out

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Dodgers. Like, I think the Tigers are going

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to make a killing on this trade. You're gonna have

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to overpay if you want Trek Scooble, and you have

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers not only interested, but we're bordering on they

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>need a starter. It's I think it's the biggest lock

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of the deadline.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can get behind that.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Which means it ain't gonna happen because there are no

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>locks at the deadline. But if I were to call one,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that would be number one. Let's get to my second

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline prediction. Here's where we can start talking about

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the aj Minter deal. Trade deadline prediction. Number two. The

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>New York Mets have the best overall deadline. So I

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>think about this for a few reasons. Number One, I

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 2>look around Major League Baseball right now, and I ask myself,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>who are the solidified sellers who has been consistent with

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>their language the entire time? Because other teams have flip flopped.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>They want to buy, they want to sell. We aren't

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>totally sure. I guess I would throw that question over

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to you. When you think of teams that you have

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 2>known are going to sell for at least the last month,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>let's say.

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Name them the Giants their god awful assets. Yeah, the

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Angels and their god awful assets.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, hey, they have some good assets. But I also

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't really.

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Because Logan o'happy and a big league pitcher were moved

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for a guy that is opsing like seven to twenty

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in High A. But apparently Mozeylac thinks he's a top

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty prospect in the organization.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with you, because Mozaeylock is at the Helm,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that he's gonna get returns. And like

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>three weeks ago, Perry Bassi was at the Helm saying

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 2>they kind of want to buy, or at least they're

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>not giving up debt merges or Soriano, And now you

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 2>have front office turnover. I can't imagine John Mozaylock is

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>in the best spot in the world in order to

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>nail all of these deadline moves. Like I already think

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>he's over one. So I would agree with you the Giants,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of their assets are either Luisa Ryan.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 1>One hundred and eighty million dollars devs.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, So the Giants would be one, but the Mets

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>have better assets. I'm not even counting the Angels. Name

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>me another one.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Rockies and their subpar assets. The Mets

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>were built to compete this year and they just stink.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So like I, it is set up in a way

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for them to win the deadline. I hear you.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's reason number one. Reason number two. I don't

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>think Mets fans want to hear this, but I think

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 2>this is where David Stearns might be at his best

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>is identifying prospects, identifying young talent using his model enable

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>in order to trade away players to get prospects. Because

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have a lot of model wins. I almost guarantee,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>whatever your thoughts are about about aj Mintor, the Mets

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 2>feel that they are one to zero on trades already

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 2>because you look at the return two offensive pieces that

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>slot into their minor league system for aj Mintor, who's

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>only thrown twenty three innings this year, albeit to a

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>fantastic low two s ERA. However, he's not the aj

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Mintor that we saw in twenty twenty two with the

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>night Shift that aj Mincher was humming ninety seven miles

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>an hour at the top of this this Ajmncher throws

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety three with a really good cutter, and that cutter

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>is his bread and butter. But he doesn't have a

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of other pitches to go to. He's not an

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>eighth inning guy. He might not even be a seventh

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>inning guy. I think he's just a really solid middle

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 2>of the bullpen type guy. And the Mets already got

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 2>two offensive pieces. So I think David Sterns like this

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>is the deadline where he can really really capitalize on

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>all of these different pieces. And then reason number three

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>almost goes back to number one, where they've had now

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>this plan for a long time, Like you gave David

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Sterns enough time to basically gear his model in order

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>to get the most value out of all of these

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>different assets. You combine all of those different things, and

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the Mets are already active, like, we know what we're doing.

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the Mets are going to crush this deadline. Well,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a ton of buyers and some sellers, but you

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>don't really know what they're doing. When you call David Searns,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what you're doing, and those phone calls can

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 2>go quickly, which I think is going to help gms

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>make moves quickly, which again then will help David Sterns

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>get more value.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So you have a quality of deadline prediction. I have

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a quantity of deadline prediction for the New York Mets,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>But I will make you sit and wait, what's your third?

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 2>But do you agree with that? Like, who would you

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>say if you had to predict your winner of the deadline,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>would you agree?

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think winners of the deadline are guys

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that get big league pieces or teams that get big

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>league pieces. So I like, I can't sit here unless

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the White Sox and Rick Han's parting gift to

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that organization a few years ago. Like, I can't sit

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>here and say they won the deadline if they're moving

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so many guys like oh, yeah, you traded your entire

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bullpen you won the deadline. That's really hard. I guess

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we can have that conversation in the off season, or

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if it just blows you away, we can revisit this

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation next Tuesday after the deadline happens. But I view

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>deadline winners as teams that got better at the deadline.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of the sellers, I think the Mets

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are in a position to win among the sellers at

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>You kind of put me in my place there. I'm

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>with you. Yeah, no, I totally.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know what, the Rays got a rise

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in school but the Mets got so many assets.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 2>What I will say is, because we dive into both

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 2>sides on this podcast, this podcast is going to be

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>very pro Mets once the deadline is over, because we're

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about all the prospect value that they got.

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair?

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, So there we go.

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's move over to my third deadline prediction, and this

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>is a gut feeling. I think the Atlanta Braves are

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>going to have a really disappointing deadline. And here's what

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean by that. So the Brave system is better

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>than it has been. Right when we talked to Buster yesterday,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>he said that the system has been better over the

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>last couple of seasons. Arm has uttered the same sentiment.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>They have the most young talent in their minor leagues

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 2>that they've had in a good while. And I think

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>people are starting to push a lot of players to

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the Braves considering they have needs. But I look at

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the roster and I say, I don't know if they

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>have desperate needs, which makes me think Alexanthopolis is going

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to be very measured at the deadline, which he is already. Typically,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and typically the Braves don't do a lot. So here's

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>my thinking the Braves might get a dust in May,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's the deadline. Even Buster said yesterday the Braves

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to get somebody. I don't think it's going

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>to be anybody crazy because I look at their rotation

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's just enough. It's just good enough for alex

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Anthopolis to say, all right, we don't have to overpay

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>for a starter. Their corner aulefield situation is just good

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>enough where we don't have to pay for a corner

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>aulefield bat like a Taylor Ward or something, because they say, well,

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Kunya will be able to play right field more consistently

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>instead of Dahing, which moves Mike Yastremsky to the bench.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>And then we like Mauricio Dubon and left or Yastremsky

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and left, and that can be a pretty good platoon.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>And we're good on offense. We got Haste and Kim

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>coming back at shortstop. We're good, our catcher situation taken

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>care of. We have Matt Olson. And this is almost

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a testament to the Braves team. I think the Braves

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>have a really good team. My issue is that if

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>they don't overpay, if they don't really go for it,

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think you're going to beat the Dodgers.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're putting a lot of pressure on

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a pitcher like Spencer Schwellenbach coming back from injury, or

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you're putting a lot of pressure on some really young

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>pitchers who are also coming back from injury, like an

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>aj Smith Schauver, like a Hurston Waldrop, And I think

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be pretty disappointing for Braves fans. So

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I have my perceived winner, even though you kind of

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>put me in a blender. Is a winner a seller, No,

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>But I couldn't pick a buyer that's going to be

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>a winner because you know, it's all too complicated. Yeah,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right there here, though it is a

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>gut feeling the Braves, and it's also just based on

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>historical trends with Atlanta, Braves have a very disappointing deadline.

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So not one of my predictions, but I will offer

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a pushback and I will kind of give you a

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth celeb shot prediction here. I actually think the Braves

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>go big swinging, and I think they do it in

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty unorthodox way. And this is my outa left

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>field tinfoil hat one. A lot of people want to

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Red Sox and the Yankees being in

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the shortstop market, but I think Atlanta would be an

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>awesome spot for zach Netto to go. I think zach

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Netto with the Braves and a rental starter, maybe Gosman

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>making his return to Atlanta. If they go and get

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Gosman and zach Netto, they could win the deadline

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Netto in that lineup would be disgusting, and

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they have the prospect capital to do it. They're not

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>going to move Eric Hartman, There's no doubt about that.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But how many Tight South the Scene included Max have

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>we seen? How many Owen Murphy included mocks have we seen?

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what Mozaelac would want for Netto. It would

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>probably have to start with Tate South the Scene. I

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think that Netto and Atlanta would solve a lot of

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>problems because it has been impossible for them to find

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a short stop since Dansby, Swanson and Neto. I know

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the defense has taken a massive downturn this year, but

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's a level of stability that they

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't had since Dansby that could be there at shortstop

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>for the Atlanta Braves. They tried it with Arcia, they

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tried it with Von Grissom, they're trying with Hasung Kim.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Now Jim Jarvis is playing short every day for them.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick Allen played short every day for them last year.

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the curbing of all of the issues that

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta has had for the last five years. I think

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that they should swing big and go for a guy

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like Netto.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think in order to get Zach Netto they'll

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 2>have to quote unquote overpay.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, because the Angels are clearly signaling

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're open for business, and they're already moving o'hapi,

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and they're already listening on Solaer and Adell. And I

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>understand that Neto is three times the asset that any

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of those guys are, But Neto seems like the easier

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one to pry away based on the dialogue and the

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting over the last few days, then a Debtmers or

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a Sorana. For some reason, it seems like they're hugging

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>them tighter than Netto, which is crazy because you have

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a franchise shortstop.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. I think the dialogue is kind

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>of saying that I'm with you. I just think, and

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you know this is a guess at the end of

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the day, that to really pry away a twenty five

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>year old shortstop from a team that doesn't have a

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of good young assets, you will have to overpay.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And that brings me back to my original point, where

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the Braves are in a situation where they

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>don't want to overpay and they don't have to. I

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>think they should, and I think it's the best direction

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>for this team to go and compete and win a

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>World Series this year. But I just stand firm thinking

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 2>that they won't and I do think Nedo will require

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a quote unquote overpay. I think that these big time players,

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>you always kind of have to overpay for him at

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 2>the deadline kind of, no matter what the dialogue is

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>out of the teams, Like, we talk about that all

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the time, but we just don't freak out because the

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>player headed in return is always awesome, so we want

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to focus on that. Yeah, I just don't see Alex

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Vandopolos going away from it if he doesn't need a

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 2>short stop because Kim is coming back. Yeah, they would

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>want a short stop, not need The Braves have no

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>needs therefore, I stick to my original point.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's just acknowledge that Kim was very bad before he

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. Oh, I agree with you very bad. I

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>agree with you better than Kim. At this point, we

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are not disagreed. Yeah.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 2>The only thing we disagree on is whether the Braves

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to swig big or not. Everything else you've said,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally with you. So those are my trade deadline predictions.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Cool rank them, rank him? All right, let's see. Uh,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't put the Mets one three because I just

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with the Braves one. I disagree with the

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that they can win the deadline, So I go

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Mets it too. And then your first one Schooble Dodger

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like Chucky. So it's got to go in the top spot. Yeah.

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a bwhelming performance from you today. I know, I'm

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>used to Galaxy braining it. Yeah, but we've done these

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline prediction show for maybe what five years running.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm ozerover forty. Yeah. I tried to nail one.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to see one go through. You took a

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>mid range jumper today.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I did, and I yelled bank and it hit the bank.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>But it didn't go in, but like I hit the backboard.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but like that doesn't count because you need to

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>make the freaking shot.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, we get a shot. Yeah?

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing discord questions?

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Next, let's do discord, but let's hear a quick word

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>from our friends at Hampton Farms Peanuts. First, imagine you

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>take your seat at the ballpark, the smell of fresh

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 2>cut grass and ice, cold beer, peanuts, and the promise

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 2>of three hours of un interrupted baseball. What if you

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>could bring the ballpark home to you with Hampton Farms Peanuts.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>You can, America's number one in shell brand can be

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 2>found in your local produce aisle, or twenty five percent

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>off at Hamptonfarms dot com with code just Baseball. Bring

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the ballpark home to you with Hampton Farms Peanuts. I'm

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 2>self conscious now because of my lack of explosives for

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>my trade deadline predictions.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Elie de la Cruz to the Guardians and it's gonna

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be awesome.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I could have been better than that. Thankfully, our discord

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>was better than that. Five mocks, and all of them

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 2>are pretty damn cool, and I want to start at

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the top with one of the crazier ones.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 2>This comes to us from our friend Sean donnahue and Discord,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>and also shout out our Discord, the best baseball group

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 2>chat in the world. If you want to join it,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 2>talk Deadline with us, talking mocks, talking possibilities. After every

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>trade we break them down on the Discord in order

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>to find it. The link is in the episode description.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Discord Prediction Number one one Texas Rangers trade for Mason

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Miller with a package built around Sebastian Walcott. So the

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Rangers have basically came out and said Walcott is off

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the table. Makes sense. He's their top prospect. You look

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 2>at Arm's top one hundred prospects. He's one of the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>better ones in baseball, the heemuth of a man shortstop

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 2>their basement. He's the future for the Texas Rangers. The

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 2>only reason why I wanted to include this one is

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 2>number one. It utters the same sentiment that I've been

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 2>saying for a while. Do not forget about the Texas Rangers.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>This team has always been the oh. The Rangers made

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that move for Mackenzie Gore, the Rangers made that move

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>for de Grom, the Rangers made that deal for who,

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and they just do it all the time, and we

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>just forget about them. For whatever reason. They're leading the

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 2>division and they need a reliever. So I like the

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Texas being aggressive and taking a big swing. Thesis number two,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>they need a reliever. Number three, You dangle a prospect

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that good. The Padres will at least have to listen. Now,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 2>everything that basically we've heard, though, is Mason Miller is

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>off the table, and they would have to get wowed.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I saw a report earlier today that they need two

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>top one hundred guys and another top two in a

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>player's team system. Two top ten guys and two top

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred guys. It's a ridiculous package for a reliever. Yeah,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 2>rate this one one to five stars.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>One to five stars. I will go I'll go three

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>stars because I'm out on the half star thing, Like

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I could give it a two and a half and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just say it's right down the middle. But I'm gonna

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>say three because I love the idea, and I love

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the big swinging idea, and I love closing my eyes

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and seeing Lats throw the eighth to a Mason Miller

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>nine thing. But the problem is if they're tied one

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>one and you burn Lats and Miller and you go

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to the tenth tied at one. Then all of a sudden,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who you go into at this Junus the man he

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>could cover the next sexy? All right, fine, and then

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you go to the fifteenth and you're still tied at one.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>They can't really score. To be honest with you, like that,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>offense is not very good. You got pushback, I do

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a pushback.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>The Rangers are getting back Corey Seeker today. Why Langford's

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>having a good season, Brandon Nemo is having a good season,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 2>isekil Durant is having a good season. Jake Berger is

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 2>having a good season. Josh Peterson is having a good season.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not about offense. I'm not saying it's great. It's

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 2>not bad, though.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It ain't that I think. I don't think it's playoff caliber.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's CS caliber. I really don't.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>So you're talking about the winner of the Gauntlet American

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>League West right now?

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's coughing baby. That in the AL Central

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>are two coughing babies and it's unbelievable. But I don't know.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that they have bigger fish to fry than

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get another closer to pair with an All

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Star closer in Jacob Latt, So I think that they

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>could use that hoss in Walcott to go in a

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>different direction. But I don't think they want to give

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>up Walcott because we're looking at a Rangers offense that

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>could use an injection of Walcott next year. I think

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>that guy's a huge piece of what they want to

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do moving forward. And I don't know, like I think

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can do it in rental ways. I think

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that there are other really good relievers that are available

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at the deadline, and they're going to go grab guys

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like Brooks Raley and it's like, wow, Yeah, that Ranger

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>bullpen got way better. And I don't think you need

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to go do the top ten prospect in baseball for

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a Mason Miller thing to get an objectively better bullpen

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because you already have a bullpen Aceen Lats back there.

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>How good is the Rangers system compared to others? Like

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>could they even do this theoretically?

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they traded five guys for Gore like that

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of torpedoed their system coming into this year. Like

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they could do a Mason Miller thing, but it would

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>need to be a quantity thing. And Walcott would be

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so far and away the best prospect that would be moved.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it just doesn't seem if the Padrez were to

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>trade Miller, it would probably be to a team with

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 2>a better system, unless the Rangers are willing to overpay.

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>But do they even have a system where they can overpay?

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>That's I guess my question.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think so. I don't think that they

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>have that caliber system.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's almost it's got like probably a half

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 2>percent chance of happening. But I'm bumping it up to

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 2>two stars just because I love the idea of it.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I was too nice, you know, it's Shawn two stars.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's be a little mean to our awesome, awesome

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 2>discord people. All right, Discord prediction number two. And I

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 2>think this is going to get more than two stars

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>because it was from three hundred block White Sox send

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Billy Carlson, George Walcow, and Pierce George in exchange for

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Clay Holmes and Luke Weaver on the New York Mets.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 2>And I think someone saw that report that was posted.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 2>What was it, I think it was today. I sent

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it to both you and Hayton. Yes, podcast p would

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 2>you mind flashing that report. I think I texted it

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to you and we're looking at something about Freddie Peralta. Yeah,

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>do you remember that report off the top of your head, Jack.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got it. The initial report was ba ba bah.

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was yeah. Here, let me pull it up.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It was like George Walcow and maybe Boston Smith for

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver. Wasn't that It wasn't.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me find out who actually tweeted that

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and we'll give proper credit.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Perfect. So basically this comes to us from a

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>report that the Mets in the White Sox have stalled

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 2>because and here it is for Michael Marino. Sources say

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Mets in the White Sox discussed the trade that would

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 2>send Freddy Peralta to the White Sox for a package

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that included George Walcow and Boston Smith and Moore. But

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>those talks have stalled, with the Mets discussing Freddy with

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>it additional clubs today. So you see on Michael Marino's

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>tweet that George Walcow is the White sox eleventh ranked prospect,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Boston Smith is number fifteen. However, the White Sox ever

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 2>really solid systems. So those two reasonably would be top

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>ten prospects in a lot of people's systems. Were you

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 2>surprised to see that the Mets could still get that

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>much for Freddy Peralta.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>No, because Peralta is a sleeping giant, frontline guy, like

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>he's going to make his last start as a Met tonight,

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to tell you a lot. Frankly,

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you could throw the ball very well tonight

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because he knows he's auditioning for a caliber of contender

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like this start will change what the pursuit is of

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta, I think, and for the White Sox, Like

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not surprised by that report. It seems like

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot for ten starts of Freddy Parolta and a

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>guy that has a five RA so far this year.

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's tough to see Billy Carlson and Wolcow and

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>another top twenty prospect go for two effective rentals Like

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Weaver thing is interesting because you get the additional

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>year of control, But how long is the year?

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>We keep on coming back to the elephant in the room.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>What does twenty twenty seven control actually mean? Buster only

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>said that could be a big time, hang up, Joe, Ryan,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver kind of the poster boys of that right now.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I don't know. I think that may

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense. And if Billy Carlson goes

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for two rentals. Yesterday was the five year anniversary of

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Baias and Trevor Williams to the Mets for Pete Crow Armstrong. Like,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that Billy Carlson's PCA because PCA was

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a better prospect than Carlson is. There's no doubt about that.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like that could be one of those

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>where we look back in five years and it's like,

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Billy Carlson is really good, and you got Pardi per

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Alta for ten stars and Luke Weaver for a lockout

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>shortened season.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I think you make a lot of really good points.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 2>My next question to you is would you rather have

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Clay Holmes or Freddy parlto because I think you know,

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the eras, it's clear who you'd.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Rather have, Yeah, And if you're looking at the il currently, yeah,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Nudd's it big time. Yes.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's my question to you, who would you rather

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 2>have Clay Holmes or Freddy Pralta, because in this deal,

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>it'd be Clay Holmes instead of Freddy, and you get

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Luke Weaver on top of it, sweetening the deal. I

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if Holmes look good on his rehab and

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Holmes did on his rehab, but

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look good on his rehab assignment, I guess

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the answer would probably be Holmes. But frankly, I'm waiting

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>until after Freddy starts tonight. I want to see Freddy

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Pearl to make one more start.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, so podcast P could you mind pulling

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>up this deal again? And Jack will rate it on

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a scale of one to five stars. The White Sox

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>send Billy Carlson, George Walcow and Pierce George, and the

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Mets send Clay Holmes and Luke Weaver. I think we're

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>both alive. It's a little rich on the White Sox side.

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I'm gonna give this a three for effort.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree too, because I like, I don't know whether

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>three hundred block if he's a fan of either team

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 2>or if he's a fan of neither team and he's

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 2>just trying to find a good trade. But I think

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 2>it would just be a little bit too much for

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But a white Sox fan he might be he's a

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>White Sox fan that that's a reference three hundred blocks.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, there you go. I haven't lived in Chicago

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 2>long enough. But as a White Sox fan, he's willing

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 2>to give up that type of package in order to

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 2>get Clay Holmes and Luke Weaver. Does that say something?

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>M all right, let's get to discord question number two

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>or number three? Excuse me, another one from our discord.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>The Cubs get Casey Maize and Kyle Finnegan, and the

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Tigers get Matt Shaw. Now, Matt Shaw is not exactly

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>having a great year and he hasn't really shown a ton,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 2>but he does come with years of control. He is

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a former top prospect. You can play a bunch of

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 2>different positions, and you're hoping that he can be the

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.959
<v Speaker 2>hitter that a lot of people thought would be at

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 2>least near an all star level when he first came

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>up with the Cubs on the And then the Cubs

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 2>would be getting Casey Mice who can slot directly into

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>their rotation, and Kyle Finnigan, which actually comes with one

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and a half years of control. The thing is with

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Finnigan is the underlying numbers aren't great because he's

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>only striking out seven per nine.

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.479
<v Speaker 2>You look at all of the era predictors that are

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>all in the mid to high fours, even though he's

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>still rocking a low three zzra. But he does provide

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>some stability in that bullpen. A guy who's been around

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the block, has closing experience, and you get him for

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 2>more than just the rest of the season. You get

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>him for at least another year. He's got a mutual

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>option in twenty twenty eight. You can deal with that.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Then Casey Mies is going to be a free agent

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>after the season.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about Finnegan because not only is he

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not striking dudes out, but he's walked twenty six guys

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in forty six innings Like that concerns me. When I

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>look at relievers right now, I'm looking at punchouts and walks,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and usually I'm looking at k to bb and it's

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>awful for Kyle Finnegan, mas is I think one of

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the more underrated rental starters available at this deadline.

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I think he is I think he's number one most underrated.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 2>I think any team that gets Casey Maies is getting

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 2>a really solid pitcher right now.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Mes is a fascinating piece to me. Shaw

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because he's so clearly surplus for the Chicago Cubs,

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but the way that their contracts are kind of quickly expiring,

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>daw could be a piece for the Cubs moving forward.

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how good of a piece moving forward,

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but I do think Shaw is danglable. I think there

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 1>are ways around the rental idea, like I think Shaw

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>an Emerson Hancock is a perfect match where you know

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it's probably Shaw and another player for Hancock, or it's

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Hancock and another player for Shaw. I don't really know

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the concrete value there may's I really like in Chicago.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Detroit would entertain the idea of, instead

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of Finnegan, somebody else in that bullpen in a package,

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a round shot and maybe a prospect. Like I know

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been a not great year, but wouldn't Kenley Jansen

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>feel better? And he's a rental like Maes and Kenley

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Janssen at a steeper price for Mattshaw.

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it crazy that I'd rather have Kyle Finnigan. I've

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 2>been watching a lot of Kenley this season, and I

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 2>whenever he comes into the ballgame, I'm thinking about live

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 2>betting the other team. I mean it's his cutter is

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's floating some in there at this point.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And I love Kenley. I think he's a Hall of Famer.

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's one of the best closers of all time.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 2>But he's just at the end of his career. I

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>would because then, also with Kenley, if you're acquiring Kenley,

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 2>what is he going to be your sixth inning guy,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Like you would have quire Kenley theoretically to be your closer,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 2>your eighth inning guy. I do not.

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you're acquiring Kenley Jansen to just be a

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the bullpen. Like I don't. I think we're

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at the stage of his career where he doesn't have

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ninth inning. We got there with Kimberle

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope.

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>So I would just rather have Kyle finn again, like

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I would not want to bring in Kenley Jansen personally.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we disagree, Yeah, interesting, Yeah, I think Matt Shaw's

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too much for these two. I think

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you would need a better reliever than Kyle Finn again.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think they're going to dangle like a

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Holton or anything like that. Then I think you

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 2>could get the Cubs talking about Matt Shaw and maybe

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 2>even more. But that's how I see kind of that

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 2>ending up. I don't think I think Matt Shaw's too much.

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give you this one two stars because I

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 2>like the creativity. But you and also, Ir is a

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Tigers fan, so he wants Matt Shaw. By the way,

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Freddy Perolt to scratched from his Matt star. Oh, Trey Dead.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 1>My book is smart, I already wrote in my book,

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and Pen I'm smoked.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>You're smoked. All right. Let's get to discord question number

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 2>four prediction. Excuse me. The Angel sends zach Netto to

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees and they get back. Elmer Rodriguez, Cruz and

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Dax Kilby comes to us from Jets fan seventy eight.

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I know that Jets fans seventy eight and an other

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>discord do a lot of betting stuff together. He's a

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Mets fan, he is not a Yankees fan, so he's

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to find a fair deal on both sides. First,

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 2>before you even think about the fit in New York

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>with the Yankees. I don't want to be biased. What

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 2>do you think about Elma Rodriguez and Dax Kilby in

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 2>exchange for zach Netto?

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough? I kind of love it. I think

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's one more piece that needs to be added,

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But I really dig what the thought process is there.

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And Rodriguez has been very good with scramting.

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know he's already been called up. He'll

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 2>turn twenty three after the trade deadline. I dig this

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 2>trade a lot. Yeah, he's the top one hundred guy.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Dax Kilby is a top one hundred guy, you know,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 2>the Yankee. The Yankees' best prospect is George Lombard, but

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 2>arguably their second best prospect is Dax Kilby. He's just

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of a younger version of George Lombard that says

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 2>that he's a really good shortstop prospect. Yeah, and I

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 2>know he's I know, Arms a big fan of him

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 2>as well. I think I would do this trade if

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Yankees. I guess my thinking goes to, is

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>zach Neto then your short stop moving forward? Because I

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 2>will hand it to Volpi. Volpi is a better defender

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 2>than Zach Netto is.

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but okay, So for the sake of the exercise,

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Neto would pivot where second and Jazz would pivot to third.

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe Neto to third. Yeah, not that he hates third,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 2>It's just Jazz is a fantastic defensive second baseman, but

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 2>he also hates third. Yeah, you're just he might hate there.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 2>You're just moving too many guys out of position. So

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 2>if you move Jazz, then you're losing his defense second.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Then you're also moving Netto over to second. And he

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 2>might be a fine defensive second baseman, but it's not

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 2>like he's playing second base. I think I would rather

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 2>just put him at third base if I'm the Yankees,

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 2>keep Vulpia short almost and then is this kind of

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 2>like Jeter and a rod Folpia Netto.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is very Alex Rodriguez kard. Yeah, this is the

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sleepy version of that. Yeah. No, that's perfect.

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And I would like to see what Netto looks like

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 2>in a playoff race. Is he going to continue to

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 2>sell out for power and just not give a shit

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 2>that he's striking out thirty one percent of the time?

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Because I think Neto is supremely talented, and I want

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 2>to see him with a different organization. And I think

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 2>that's another reason why we're kind of pushing the Angels

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 2>to send him off and get a good prospect Hall

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is one. This is my favorite

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 2>deal that's been proposed of the ones we've gotten so far.

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving this five big booms. There's no doubt about that.

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Not only are you upgrading from five stars, you're also

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>giving a big booms.

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good for you. How are the Costco guys doing?

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Are they still around?

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what? What was it? The chicken? It

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>was like a sandwich. What was it called.

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 2>The chicken bake?

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>From the Chicken Bake? The chicken bake? Yeah, okay, because

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember the double chunk chocolate cookie. But then I

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, is it a chicken wrap? Is it a chicken?

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Did you lock it? But it's a chicken bake.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Did you see that recent clip from the Rizzler? I

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 2>think he's cooling on the Costco guys?

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Is he? So? The Costco guys they didn't have the

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>staying power the Rizzler did.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, enough of this brain Rodcat, let's go over

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 2>to the final prediction comes to us from Panthers, touchdown

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 2>gibzillaol George Springer to the Mariners, and the Jays will

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 2>get a better player than people think. So, first of all,

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 2>I do like the fit because have you seen Luke

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Raley hit in the second half. He's rocking a sixty

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 2>two WRC plus and I know that he can still

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 2>hit right handed pitching relatively well over a longer sample.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 2>But right now it's been bad. It's been real bad.

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 2>And right now you have dominic Canzone mostly in your

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 2>DH spot. I'd rather just put dominic Canzone out there

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 2>in an outfield position and let George Springer be my DH.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I would really like another right handed bat in this

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 2>lineup for Seattle. I would like a guy who's post

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 2>he's improven. And I would also like to just give

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a jolt to this Mariners offense that couldn't hit water

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 2>if they fell off a boat. They've lost five out

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of their last six series, got bum rushed by the

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers yesterday and it felt like it took their best

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 2>game of the season to beat him in Game one,

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and they barely beat him. I would love an injection

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 2>of offense, and George Springer is having an excellent second

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.879
<v Speaker 2>half so far, especially you know post All Star Break,

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 2>he's sitting close to three point fifty last time I checked, Like,

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I really love this piece. So my question to you

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 2>would be, because I assume you like to fit as well,

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 2>what would it take in order to get George Springer

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 2>again free each and after the season. He's just a rental,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 2>but it is George Springer, and.

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a designated hitter slash part time corner outfielder. So

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna take much, but to the

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to the point of better player than people would think,

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it could be a number ten prospect in the system,

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>It could be a number twelve prospect in the system.

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I say something, Yeah, I think it's gonna be

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 2>worse than people think.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>How much brand value does George Springer carry with his name?

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think as much as people would think. But

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I also don't want people to think that he's washed,

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or that I think that he's washed. Like I think

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Springer for the number twelve prospect in the Mariners system.

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Whichever way you slice it could make a lot of sense.

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it can make some sense too. I

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 2>just don't know who the Mariners would be willing to

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 2>part here. And I think that's the question. Can I

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 2>answer this quick and you can both answer this as well.

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>It comes to us from our YouTube live chat section.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 2>First of all, thank you everybody listening on YouTube. Smash

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 2>a light button and subscribe button if you're enjoyed the show. Yeah,

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Brett Jet five to five. Just catching up. And I'm

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a little confused as to why you guys think the

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Mets have better assets than the Giants. Forget Chapman, Adamas, Devers, Ariahs,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Ray Ramos, Eric Miller, bru Baker and Hentag's Jack.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we go player by player? Too expensive, too expensive,

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>too expensive, rental rental, probably not moving, Maybe not that

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>believer they have.

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I like Eric Miller, but he's the best reliever that

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 2>they have. If they tradeing, they're trading literally everybody. Would

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.959
<v Speaker 2>be the fifth best reliever in the met bullpen, would

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 2>be the sixth best reliever in the met bullpen, would

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 2>be the seventh best reliever in the met bullpen. Yeah,

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, Like Chapman is also hurt and expensive,

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Adamas is not having a good season and very expensive.

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Devers is expensive. And maybe I'm biased because I've always

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 2>loved Rafael Devers. I think he'd be worth it. But

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, you're bringing in an enormous contract

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 2>for a pretty much DH first baseman, So how many

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 2>teams really want to take that on? With an impending lockout?

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Ariahs again rental rob Ray rental. The Giants even came

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 2>out and said that they're willing to eat down some

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of Ray's contract on a rental. That goes to show

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of what the market is thinking about Robbie Ray

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>right now. And I actually think Eric Miller is a

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 2>very good asset, but the Mets have three or four

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 2>very good assets, so I think we stand by our

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 2>takes here.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Miller is as good an asset as

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people would expect. Eric Miller. Yeah, he's been a strikeout

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>artist this year, but this is like last year was

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.720
<v Speaker 1>very weird, thirty innings, twenty two punch outs, twenty walks,

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but this year, like he's still walking six hitters per

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>nine innings, Like that's not good at all.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not good at all. Like people were yelling

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 2>at me on the episode with Fink when I was saying,

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Chase Silseeth, I think is a really solid six inning reliever,

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and they we're calling him mid because he's walking five

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:48.959
<v Speaker 2>per nine. What is Eric Miller?

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Then? Yeah?

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, So that's where we're at on that. So we

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 2>still have Jack's predictions and we have a weekend preview.

0:44:57.640 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear our last word from our friends at Hampton.

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Just Baseball's number one ranked peanut prospect is none other

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 3>than the Hampton Farms in shell peanut hit tool plus

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 3>plus that crack of the shell is elite power easy

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 3>plus seven grams of protein per serving makeup great source

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 3>of fiber in America's number one in shell brand.

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 2>This is a five tool snack future value eighty grade.

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Get the top peanut prospect in the produce aisle or

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent off at Hamptonfarms dot com with code

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 3>just Baseball. That's one word, just Baseball for twenty five

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 3>percent off at Hamptonfarms dot Com.

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Lay them on me, Jack, Yay. Headline predictions.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm going to be much I don't think bolder.

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just going to be much more correct

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>than Peter. I like that first one. You had a

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>quality take on the Mets. I have a quantity take

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Mets. I think the Mets trade ten players

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. They have a all right, I'm already counting

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>David Peterson who went to the Cups. Is that a

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 1>fair count?

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 2>That's a fair count.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay Peterson one. Number two AJ Minter already in Minnesota, Twin,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you're off to a great start. Yeah. Number three Freddy

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Parolta just got scratched from his final start.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Number four, Wastcar bras Abon definitely on the move.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Number five, Luke Weaver definitely on the move. Number six

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Raley definitely on the move. Number seven Clay Holmes

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 2>probably on the move. Yeah, they're they're not extending him.

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 2>He's going to get traded. I just I worry if

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>he's actually injured. That's my only hang up. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm counting him.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Number eight Tyrone Taylor.

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people need right handed hitting outfield.

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And he's a rental yep. Number nine Luis Robert Jr.

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say no, no, he's got a club option at.

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Twenty million dollars next year. I know nobody's picking that up.

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 2>He's a rental, I know, and he's a right handed bat.

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Like it's just if you're the Mets, like you just

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 2>traded for Luis Roberts. It's like you're gonna give away

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 2>for nothing? Yeah nothing, Sure, I'll prospect. And then the

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 2>other one that I guess is the boldest one is Terrentz.

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 2>The catching market is so so light. I think Terrenz

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 2>could be on the move. I think they trade a catcher,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 2>might be Alvarez, So I think could they go any higher?

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Who else could we push? You could trade like a

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Biento's gone.

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Like Viento's Ronnie Mauricio Batty, like those guys jump out.

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 2>That's why I like this take because I don't think

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 2>you have to nail all ten of those guys.

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think just ten guys get traded.

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you? Are you coming back around? They might have

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:47.919
<v Speaker 2>such a successful cell deadline, and that was my thought

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:50.760
<v Speaker 2>that they actually do win the deadline. Yeah, coming back around.

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 2>That was a good take.

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't maybe maybe you know what, give me thirty

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes after the show and let me just stew on it.

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The Twins traded what eight guys last year?

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 2>Year?

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the Mets beat that. I think they trade ten.

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Can we get to fifteen?

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we could got.

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:09.479
<v Speaker 1>More than half the roster.

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 2>We already had four. You already had four audible mentions.

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 2>You know what, Jerry, what do you want to go to? Soto? Gone?

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:19.239
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I like this, I like this. I I think you're

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be one for one.

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, cool? You ready for my next one?

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's go two for two?

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.840
<v Speaker 1>H two for two? Is the Brewers acquire two starting pitchers?

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm? I think yeah. I think that they are

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>in the mix for Terrek schoobl And you laid it out.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If it's not the Dodgers, it could be Milwaukee, could

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be Tampa. I also think they could possibly do a

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>reunion with Freddy Peralta. I think they could be in

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the mix for Kevin Gosman. I think they could be

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in the mix for Casey Miz. I think they could

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be in the mix for Dustin May. Within the division,

0:48:57.680 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that they go and get two starters to

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>help them get through the rest of the regular season.

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>They're currently running with a six man rotation right now,

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's mis Rowski, sprote Logan Henderson, Thomas Pinon, Shane

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>drow and Robert Gasser. They need Harrison's gonna come back.

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But I don't feel good about five of the four

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. I really like Logan Henderson, but like

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they need help. And if you can push two of

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys back to triple A, or one or two

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of those guys in the bullpen, and you add a

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Mize and a Gosman, I mean, all of a sudden,

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at like miss Harrison Miz Gosman is a

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>playoff rotation, and I feel pretty good about that. Like

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go get the frontline guy like Schooble and

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Miz to go beat the Dodgers, but they have an

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>NLCS rotation there, and you don't know what happens when

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you get in and you've got four tried and true

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>starters and then Drowan is the five for the rest

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think it's awesome.

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I love it in theory, and I think it could

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 2>still happen. I just don't and see the Brewers trading

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 2>for rentals.

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I just think they could based on the price. The

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Brewers twenty fifth best prospect is a lot of team's

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve best prospect.

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 2>To be honest with you, I know, but they've had

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 2>great systems before and they've still never traded for rentals.

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I could see you being right, but it's almost none

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 2>of the guys that you named, you know what I mean.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>They're If they're not pushing the chips in right now,

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>when are they ever going to push the chips in to.

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Be I don't want the corpse of Kevin Goswin.

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Come on, man, I think Gosmin's going to make some

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>quality starts for a good team.

0:50:31.960 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I would love Kevin Gosmin in my playoff rotation like

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 2>that fastball and splitter, Like been there done That? Claim

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a corpse is crisy.

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I disagree.

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I think Hancock could be the guy because I think

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers are always going to be attracted to arms

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that they want to get their hands on and fiddle

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 2>with a little bit, and I think Hancock is a

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 2>perfect example of that. Young guy comes with years of control.

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the Brewers and the Mariners could make a

0:50:56.600 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 2>trade for a Kirby for a Bryce Miller. Even with

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 2>how good the Brewers farm system is, I think they

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 2>could go buck wild there. I just think it's like

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I gotta believe it. I gotta believe it.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I gotta see it to believe it. With the Brewers

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and rentals. I just I can't picture it. I get it.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think the price of a rental starter is

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be that bad because there are so

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>many available. And I'm not talking quality rental starter like

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>top five. I just think that there's a world that

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they go and get two starting pitchers to help them

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>get through the rest of the regular season.

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's any MLB for MLB type trades

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 2>out there? Like I'm thinking about the Emerson Hancock, Like,

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 2>who else comes to the top of your mind of

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a Connolly early type on a team where they're trading

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:47.719
<v Speaker 2>a big league or for a big leaguer That also

0:51:47.840 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 2>makes sense to me from Milwaukee. Is there anybody out

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 2>there that you could see besides Emerson Hancock?

0:51:56.120 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Not really like they would never take on the money

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of a Brian Bayo, but I'd be curious if they saw.

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, you know my favorite thing said in this podcast.

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 2>That's why except for the money, if the Red Sox

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 2>like paid all of it down and they got their

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 2>hands on that sinker slider guy, it just turned him

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 2>into a beast for no reason.

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 1>That's perfect. That is that's the Brewers move. You found it, Okay,

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Yeah, Brian Bayo for like, I just

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>got a bench back and you.

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 2>And he turns into a monster, A monster Bao and

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Emerson Hancock.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Look Bao would eat there. People are started. Our YouTube

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 2>comment section would be like, hell yeah, all right, next

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 2>your final one. I got one more, Adlee Rdchman gets

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>traded ooh toho.

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but there are like six teams that

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>need to catch her, and he would immediately be the

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>best catching asset available. Goodman's not available, like, I think

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies have made that abundantly clear that Hunter Goodman's

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere. Langaliers is hurt.

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Did you see what the Rockies asked for for Goodman?

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 2>They asked the Red Sox for Arius. I was like,

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 2>oh shit, no way he's getting traded then?

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're asking for a top three prospect

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 2>for Goodman, like which I respect from Colorado, of course

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't trade him if you're not going to get

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 2>of course overblown, but yeah, no one's going to do that.

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think this this catching market dissolved almost entirely

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 1>with Goodman being a non starter for them, it seemed,

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and Langoleier's getting hurt. Like again, I just floated the

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of EN's getting traded. I don't think Alvarez is

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 1>getting traded. I think the Mets would be silly to

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 1>trade Franciscuavaras, so then all of a sudden, Adli Ruchman

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes the best possible catching asset available the deadline. I

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:49.800
<v Speaker 1>think that he's a good fit and a lot of teams.

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good fit for a lot of

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 1>teams in the American League East. And I wonder who

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to pay the Inner Division tax for

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Adlie Rutchman, Like, you know, what he would do for

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the race is catching situation. They haven't had a good

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>catcher since like the Reagan administration. I don't think they

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 1>were a team in the Reagan administration. Yankees, Yeah, sure,

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like they're gonna have to pay a tax,

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but Adlie Rutchman is the Yankee catcher? Would be really juicy.

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 2>What prospect would I have to attach on top of

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a Ryan Weathers or Will Warren in order to get Adley?

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 2>How do I make that happen right here right now?

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Ben Hess, I like, you need more,

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you need more.

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Basically, I'm kind of I would. Yeah, they can have

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and they can have Ryan Weathers, and we will take

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Adlie Rutchman. Thank you podcast. You give me a thumbs

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 2>up or thumbs down? Would you do that if you're

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees, you just give me two hands up? I

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Yeah. Cool. So let's say it wasn't to

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 2>the American League East. Let's say they don't want to

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 2>trade in division. Where would you think Adley would be headed?

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Because this white friction, you gotta nail it white. Even

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 2>with Kyle Tiele still there or is Kiel coming back.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Teal's got injury issues at this point, but

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Teal can absolutely be the catcher. Adlee can't catch every

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 1>day at this point, so we can DH too. I

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:10.880
<v Speaker 1>love the idea of to switch hitting catchers.

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Edgar Carrow just rides the pine.

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's got like a negative point five war

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's not good this year.

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's interesting.

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So the White Sox, I think Adlie in Chicago could

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense. I like that. I like

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that a lot.

0:55:28.000 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Those are mine, those are your deadline predictions. I'll rank him.

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think Adley's going to get traded. Even

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 2>though I love the idea of it, I just think

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 2>at this point, like, I don't think Besiah is good

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 2>enough defensively to be your full time catcher, and I

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.760
<v Speaker 2>think you get more out of Besio's offense by basically

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 2>making him your DH, and you really, if the Oils

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 2>want to compete at all, the only reason they traded

0:55:57.239 --> 0:55:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Adley is if they are in full blown cell mode,

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 2>because the Orioles just don't have the luxury to trade

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 2>away bats unless I guess it's like a Taylor Ward

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.919
<v Speaker 2>who hasn't had the greatest season for him and he's

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 2>a rental. They got to add, like they gotta add

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 2>bats if they're going to buy. So it would be

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Orioles full blown cell and I just don't see that happening.

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 2>The Brewers one is interesting because I could see them

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 2>getting two pitchers. I just don't think the rental thing.

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I still gotta believe it to see it, see it

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to believe it. I've now messed that up twice in

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a row. Okay, you might have undersold how many guys

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the met cell that is my favorite. So that is

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 2>a crazy number, Yeah, Ted is an enormous number. Yeah,

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 2>and they might blow past it. Yeah, those are our

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:47.319
<v Speaker 2>deadline predictions. Hopefully everybody enjoyed. But we're not quite done yet.

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into a preview of the best games of

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the weekend.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, hold on, big voice, Peyton, do you have

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a prediction for us or no?

0:56:57.160 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 2>He's holding up his arms again. He doesn't got nothing.

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, before the recording he needed a prediction, He's like,

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:03.919
<v Speaker 1>all right, so he didn't do his homework. That's fine.

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 2>We dropped too many bars. He couldn't come up with one.

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 2>He didn't even give me any feedback on my on

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 2>my question either. It's just a classic. I don't know.

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a shame he's mailing it in. It's a Friday.

0:57:12.360 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He's probably wearing jeans of the office. Yeah, we're already

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.520
<v Speaker 1>were already getting for the visual Friday. He's not produced

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what twelve straight trade deadline episodes. He's probably like, let

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 1>us get through it and let's breview the best games

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend. Brought to you by the Picket Sports

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>app and Pickett. I'm telling you it is the best

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:36.280
<v Speaker 1>free bet tracker. Free emphasis on free because a lot

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of these different apps they don't load correctly. They don't

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>give you the best lines on any particular sportsbook, so

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you can always get the best price, and they don't

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:46.960
<v Speaker 1>go nearly as in depth as the Picket Sports app.

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Another reason I love Picket number one it tells you

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which teams you're really good at betting, right, So you

0:57:53.440 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>might be betting a bunch of football games, a bunch

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of baseball games, a bunch of basketball games, and they'll

0:57:57.960 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you your stats are not only teams, but specific players,

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can find out I might have a real

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:05.640
<v Speaker 1>edge on this player, I might have a real edge

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 1>on this team. So it does it all for you,

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 1>tracks all of your picks, and you can even make

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of money for yourself if you download

0:58:14.120 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the Picket Sports app and use promo Coach just Baseball.

0:58:16.840 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>When you sink your sports book, you'll win anywhere from

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:22.760
<v Speaker 1>three to one hundred bucks. Absolute no brainer.

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Even if you aren't much of a better you just

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 2>sink your sports book and they'll pay you a little

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 2>bit of money. It's a roulette system. You could win three,

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you could win eight, you could win ninety, you could

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 2>win one hundred, you could win seventeen. Absolute no brainer

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 2>to get involved with the best pick tracking app, and

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 2>that is the Picket Sports app. Also, i'llbe a picket

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.800
<v Speaker 2>at the park August eighth for the Yankee game. I

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 2>think they're taking on the braves if I'm not mistaken.

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So if you're gonna be there, come over to Billy

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Sports Bar at noon and I'll be there hanging out.

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's go over games for the weekend. You want to

0:58:54.680 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 2>introduce them.

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I got you. Let's start tonight. We've got a

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fun pictures. Dual Skis has been ticking up, Green has

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been ticking down. All those schemes. People are like slandering

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 1>skins right now. I think that's malpractice. The Skeen slander

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to stop, folks. Paul Skeen's Hunter Green Pirates Reds

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:13.000
<v Speaker 1>at six' ten Pm Eastern.

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Time so The reds played against The pirates yesterday and

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 2>took a hard fought. Game both bullpens are not necessarily

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 2>in a great, spot SO i know the pitching matchup

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 2>on the surface is, awesome But i'm actually going to

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:32.959
<v Speaker 2>lean towards the over on this. Game best price seven

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and a half at minus one point. FIFTEEN i think

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to get solid starts From skiens In Hunter,

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 2>green BUT i don't think they should be. Slandered but

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 2>at the same, time they aren't pitching at the top

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:47.000
<v Speaker 2>of their game right, now SO i think runs are

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:48.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be a, Plenty so that would be my

0:59:48.880 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 2>best bet from the. Game but on the weekend, preview

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 2>we like to pick a, winner AND i do think

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that The pirates end up bouncing. BACK i just Don't

0:59:55.920 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Hunter green's down a tick in velocity Right he's normally

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:01.920
<v Speaker 2>he's sitting ninety nine and a. Half he's sitting ninety

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>eight to three right, now with his sinker and his

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>fastballs like ninety eight, five his sliders down a full

1:00:07.600 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>miles an. Hour it's not the Same Hunter green that

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>we are used, to AND i think that's just enough

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>for The pirates offense to get to. Him AND i

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Think skeens pitches pretty, well but The pirates bullpen does

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>him no. Favors and we're talking about like a four

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to four game going into the eighth where The pirates. Win,

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>okay winner gets to keep the state Of texas tonight

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>between The astros and The.

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Rangers Nathan iavaldi gets the ball Opposite Hunter green at

1:00:32.400 --> 1:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>eight point fifteen P era seven fifteen Pm Eastern. Time

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a massive.

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>SERIES i, mean The astros are only a half game

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>back of The, rangers and they're really only separated by one.

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Loss because The rangers have just played one fewer game

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>than The. Astros The ashros can take control of this.

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Division but at the same, Time i'm gonna stick to my.

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>GUNS i still believe that The Texas rangers are the

1:00:57.040 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>best team in this. Division when we were going over

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the weekend, preview remember that huge series against The, MARINERS i,

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>SAID i think The rangers are going to win that.

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Series they ended up winning three or. FOUR i think

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. HERE i think The rangers declare themselves

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>as the best team in this, division AND i think

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they Win game. One.

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Tonight someone Said Hunter green instead Of Hunter. BROWN i

1:01:16.400 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think that might have been. Me But Hunter brown Against

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Nathan valdi In Astros. Rangers last TIME i, Checked Hunter

1:01:21.400 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>great is still A red And Hunter brown is still An, astro.

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Still same first, name and still both of them are

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>not looking quite as good as they did last year

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>off an. Injury so it's a very understandable mix. Up

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>brown had a good start last. Time, no, yeah he's still. Good,

1:01:34.040 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>again these guys are still? Good are they as good

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>as they were last? Year? THOUGH i would say, YEAH i.

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Understand. Okay two On saturday seven oh five Pm Eastern

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>time On saturday, Night Christopher sanchez in The Philadelphia phillies

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>In baltimore to take On Shane boz and The.

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Orioles so this isn't the greatest game in the, world

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>even though it's a really solid. Game you Got Christopher,

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>sanchez you, know going for The, phillies you Got Shane

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>boz going for The. Orioles but our friends at Ballpark

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>pal gave us these pers, again one of the best

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>models out. There make sure to go check them. Out.

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Jack they're making The orioles the favorites, here which shocked.

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Me and BECAUSE i respect our friends at Ballpark pal so,

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>much give me the. Upset give me the. Upset they

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 2>did the same thing Ballpark pal did saying that The

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>orioles should be favorites in That Brandon Young Raynaldo lopez

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>game ended up being different, starters but it was still

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>The orioles against The. Braves they made the oriole slight.

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Favorites orioles won that game three to. Two i'm trusting

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>her friends At Ballpark. PALLE i think The orioles give

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>The phillies the. Business and it's also understandable considering The.

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Phillies you're playing terrible baseball right. NOW i think you

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>got upset them this weekend and maybe started to kick

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>The phillies down the wild card.

1:02:43.520 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Standings philly can't do much at all over the course

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of or offensively over the course of the last few.

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Weeks all, right only other game On saturday that we

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>get to talk about nine to ten Pm Eastern time

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>In La Red sox And Dodgers Peyton totley Against Yoshi Nobu, yamamoto.

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Some starting pitching. Matchup i'm really excited to see what

1:03:04.560 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a good fastball hitting team and The dodgers does Against Peyton,

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>toley who has a dominant, fastball and then you Got

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>yamamoto on the other. Side but another reason WHY i

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to bring this game is look at how low

1:03:18.240 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the run projection is for this. Game if you're looking

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>at the model on ballpark pal they make the total

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>closer to, six which is extremely low for a baseball,

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>game and extremely low for A dodger game At Dodger,

1:03:32.680 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>stadium which has played more like a hitters park this,

1:03:35.440 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 2>year which is telling The Yoshinoba yamamoto might spin something

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>disgusting and. Dominate and if you're telling me, THAT i

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>have to go with The. Dodgers but this is one

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>THAT i will have eyes glued to the, television LIKE

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>i love this. Matchup this Whole Red Sox dodgers series

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is like the series of the weekend because you do

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>have a Hot Red sox team who has been even

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>when they were, bad they were still really good on the.

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Road and you have A dodger team that is not

1:04:02.920 --> 1:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>playing their best baseball right now per their. Standards SO

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>i wouldn't be surprised if The Red sox go in

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>there and make some noise or this is one where

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The dodgers go all, right you had your fun with

1:04:13.200 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the Freaking La. Dodgers can't wait to watch All.

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Right three On sunday to wrap us up at one

1:04:18.760 --> 1:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty five Pm Eastern, Times Zach wheeler and The phillies

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Against Kyle bradish and The Baltimore.

1:04:23.160 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Orioles maybe the best pitching matchup of the. Weekend this

1:04:26.000 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>one is. Awesome and now they're reverting back to making

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 2>The phillies slight, favorites AND i do think that The

1:04:31.680 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 2>orioles are going to steal that game With bos Against. Sanchez.

1:04:34.680 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 2>SOMEHOW i trust our friends At ballpark Pal philly bounces,

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Back Zach wheeler bounces. Back he just had his like

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:42.920
<v Speaker 2>worst start of the season in his last. START i

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>think The phillies take care of business. Here but, again

1:04:45.960 --> 1:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>just a great starting pitching.

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Matchup how About Brewers angels In. Anaheim the only reason

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you're highlighting this one is because it's miss Against Walbert,

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>urania And urania has been.

1:04:55.560 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Good upset, Alert upset Alert, Wahbert why boy Shows brewers,

1:05:02.480 --> 1:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>fans you don't got the best young pitcher In Major League?

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Baseball we, do my, Boy? Walbert you know what made me?

1:05:09.800 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Sad our friends At Ballpark pala give The brewers this

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>basically seventy percent chance of winning this. Game AND i was,

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>like could they Respect walbert a little? Bit BUT i

1:05:18.840 --> 1:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>understand we got the mis on the other. Side it's

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>hard to give them a high run. Projection But i'm telling, you,

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:26.120
<v Speaker 2>like this is another good UNDER i Think walbert is

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna give The brewers. Problems they're gonna be grounding out all.

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Day they're gonna take them, lightly and you can't take

1:05:31.200 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>my Boy walbert. Lightly you know? What fuck?

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It angel's that mel, cool, cool, last but not least

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>four to ten On sunday AFTERNOON. Todj, bradley who has

1:05:41.920 --> 1:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been ridiculous as of late Against George kirby And.

1:05:45.040 --> 1:05:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Seattle So i'm not gonna ask you for a winner

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of this. GAME i want to ask you who has

1:05:50.600 --> 1:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>been more impressive to you this, SEASON. Todj bradley Or George.

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Kirby just in a Vacuum.

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Bradley is that?

1:05:58.000 --> 1:06:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Wild imagine if we said that before the season, Started

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>LIKE i also Said bradley, definitely and like that's. Crazy

1:06:03.640 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a crazy thing that has developed this.

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Year the stuff has always been in. There and the

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>month Of july For Todd bradley has been. Ridiculous this

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>game thirty seven, innings has forty eight case in six.

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>STARTS i just think that's. Awesome AND i think sometimes

1:06:16.320 --> 1:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>we overlook and we not anoint these guys based on

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>what we've, seen but we don't talk about the evolution

1:06:20.880 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of these. Pitchers Like TODs bradley when he was on the,

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 2>race he was having major. Problems he was up and,

1:06:25.120 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Down he couldn't locate. Anything and he has landed with

1:06:27.560 --> 1:06:30.360
<v Speaker 2>The twins and developed into a really strong number two

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:32.640
<v Speaker 2>starter with a fastball that lives up on the, zone

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>with good breaking balls like he's starting to do a

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>really good. Pitcher AND i think The twins give The

1:06:36.560 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>mariners the business this. Weekend i'm going to pick The

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>twins to not only win the, series but win this.

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Game AND i think this will be the. Decider and

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>this week three's that's what we.

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>GOT i got a subway to catch to Watch Freddy

1:06:48.840 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pearl to not.

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Pitch go check it, out all, right, folks the best

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>way to support THE Jb Show like and subscribe on.

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 2>YouTube make sure to rate five stars whether it be On,

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Spotify apple, podcasts if you're listening to us on, audio

1:07:01.880 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and make sure to join the. Discord it is so much.

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Fun you could find the link in the episode. Description

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 2>even if you just joined for a, Week it's only

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>five bucks just for the. Deadline it's going to be

1:07:10.400 --> 1:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a ton of. Fun in their special shout out for

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>brilliant producing once again to podcast P thank you to

1:07:16.360 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>our audience watching us live here on. YouTube thank you

1:07:18.680 --> 1:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>To jack. McMullen I'm Peter, rapple we will see You

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>sunday at seven thirty pm meter not sure if it's

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be a round, up might be trade, deadline

1:07:27.320 --> 1:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll go over the. Moves not sure, yet but we'll

1:07:29.120 --> 1:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>see you then

1:07:29.520 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Regardless and with, that thank, you