WEBVTT - It Ain't Over, Here Comes the Take Over

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that we're purpose driven platform, like we're

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance. How was that? Are you

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? And

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it really is? What's up? I'm Laura Curnti and I'm

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Alexa Kristen. Welcome back to Atlantia, episode sixteen. So we've

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>got a funny, smart guy coming in, Andrew Essex. He's

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to us about the end of advertising

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and what he's been doing over at Tribeca Enterprises for

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>the last year or two since he's been there. But

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get into that, you had fun at the

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>IB podcast up fronts. Yes, and did we get a

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of good reaction. I think a lot of people

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, you know, a lot of podcasts that

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they want to check out, at Landia being one of them.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're very excited. If you have friends that haven't

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>listened to Atlantia, tell them. But I think with this

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>year in the upfront different than especially year. Last year

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:06.279
<v Speaker 1>was very very focused on UM content and the inventory right.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>This year was really focused on measurement and data and UM,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.919
<v Speaker 1>there were things you know, folks were saying, like people

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast listeners have said that they would be open to

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts advertising. I love the fact that and I

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Panoply would hate me for saying this,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but I love the fact that there's actually not a

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ton of inventory in podcasts. And I also love the

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that hosts are the people UM hosting. They're very

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>well thought full producers. As I look at cam, UM

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to agree to do host reads and

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>have certain advertisers on their shows because I at the

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we are doing this because we

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>love it. We're doing it because ay weren't part of

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a community. But also we want to build a community

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>right around a genre or a certain topic. And I

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>think that ating more inventory into a podcast could be

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just clutter. You know, it's interesting. I totally agree with

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>your point as usual, UM, but I but I think, uh,

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, controlling the context might be the wrong way

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of saying it, but definitely protecting the context of the show,

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important. UM, it's interesting I was dabbling

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of top ten podcasts recently and came

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>across one where there were about for seven host reads

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and then many ad breaks in between the content, which

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a made the show very, very long, and understanding that

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the show is is a hot show and high demand,

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and so there was six minute show, an hour long show.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It was upwards of forty five minutes plus, but I

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>would say a good majority of that went the way

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of ads, and I just I felt like it was

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>too long, it was too muddied. I was like, I

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to fast forward through the ads and audio UM,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>which obviously, as a podcast host and somebody who's in

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the industry, I was curious to listen to them. But

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I was like, Okay, I just

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>want to get back into the interview. And so I

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a danger in saturation and as an industry,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to be really careful UM. Understanding that this

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is a very intimate medium. It's the only thing, UM

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>might be one of the only things I'm paying attention to,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and like, I don't want to feel aggravated and annoyed

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>before I even get to the show starting, So like,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>let's not create the pre role before the pre role,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>before the pre role. Let's like preserve the content experience

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and give people what they came for. I also think

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like we have the opportunity, and I have to say,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in meetings before, so I couldn't make it

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to the whole day, so I only got to the afternoon.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if people talked about this, but

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge opportunity I think in audio, to in

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>streaming audio or on demand audio UM to rethink how

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>advertising is done. You know, it's been typically kind of

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the radio model and applying it with UM, I

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>think more success because it is something that you download

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and something that you select right to listen to very specifically.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a huge opportunity to think about advertising

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and the personality and the talent together in a way

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that makes more sense. And there's you know, and I

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you monetize that, but we can. I

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>feel very confident that we can. And so, you know,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in a world where we're trying to standardize everything, and

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what you know, the i B does is like

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>create these great standards that the industry can kind of

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>march towards and monetize and be successful. Um. Both from

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>an advertiser perspective and a publisher perspective right supply side,

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>demand side, It's still a really niscent form of media

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, podcasting, and I think

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that right now is the time to start rethinking it.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not against standards. I'm all for standards, but

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>let's start. Let's start being really freaking imaginative with creating

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>something and then setting a standard. I think that a

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of brands are looking to figure out how they

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>get into this space. They know now that they probably

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>should get into the space people were talking about, you know,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of years ago, you know, ten percent

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of major brands said that podcasting was going to be

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a part of their media mix. Now it's like way

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>more than that, right. I think people know that they

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>should be in podcasting, I'm not sure they totally understand

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>yet why. And I think that we have to go

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>in and we have to educate people both on the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>agency side and on the brand side and let them

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>use this as a new playground for creativity UM and

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>work with hosts and do things like that. So yeah,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that UM, I was

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>following on Twitter from at Moss Appeal, who's somebody who

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>follows us at at Landia said some of the themes

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that she saw it this year's upfront included what she

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>felt was a maturity in terms of, like seeing the

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>platform growing. I think that's what you're saying, Like we've

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>moved past now the point of finding people to make content,

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Like there's definitely no shortage of content in the podcasting space,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're starting to think about now how we create

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>these prescriptive ways to measure and to advertise and all

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of these sorts of things. But you noticed that there

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>was a push UM for more branded content, a direct

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>appeal for title sponsors UM, and definitely a need for

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>case study stats. And so, you know, take it or

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>leave it. I think that what we're getting to is

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it is so ripe the time is now UM and

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>people need to recognize that. But before we destroy a

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>medium with seven pre rolls in a show, what are

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the limitations? And I gotta be honest, like that doesn't

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily just fall on the agency or the advertiser. The

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>show creators and the producers and the publishers also need

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to be respectful of the audience experience and and figuring

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out ways to monetize in a way where they're not

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>losing margin. So is it not coming up with five

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>pre rolls to pay your your host or you know,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is it coming up with the best two minute with

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a brand that owns, you know, a season. There was

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conversation about the scription shows and um

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>subscription services, and I think that we're going to see

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of that in this space, and I'm

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all for it. I just want someone to like package

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>up or give me an opportunity where I can pick

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a bundle because I'm not listening. I love Panoply. I

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to most of Panoply shows. I don't just listen

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to Panoply shows. I listen to w n i C shows.

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I love to listen to NPR shows. I let you right,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think that many many listeners are like that.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>They also right now because it's such a nissent industry,

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't even know, not always they do. If they've

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>been listeners for a while, or if they've somehow been

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, they're not paying attention typically to the network.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a time right now where networks

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>actually really interesting point. Yeah, they're not paying attention to

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the network. So the opportunity to think about subscription here

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in a different way as well, uh is right for

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>taking And if a network actually ends up doing that,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>right they actually strike a deal to do some kind

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of skinny skinny bundle. I mean that's right for media companies, right,

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Like who's to say in New York Times or fast

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Co or any of these thought leader publications couldn't come

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to the table and actually create that sort of same

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>offering our service or licensing content to do that. But

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree, yes, but I think that that's going to

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially change people's associations all of a sudden with networks,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least the awareness factor of networks. And I

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's really interesting. Um So, it was like it

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>does like w M I C become or a gimlet

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>become like the title of music, right, where like you

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have to subscribe the only place you can get these

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>shows and if you're craving the talent, which let's be honest,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>that's what people are rallying around in this industry. It's

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not like flipping a channel. It's about opting in to

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to a perspective, presumably, Yeah, why has an iTunes

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>done it? Why they're coming? I think so with all

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the original content and things that they're doing, I think

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that they that it makes the most sense for them.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So you think to move away from being the pipes

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to the actual No, they'll still be the pipe, but

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll be the tow on network. Interesting. Uh, panically, you

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>know Full Disclosure, who produces our podcast, had a great

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>presentation on their megaphone media platform UM, which is really

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the first one in the industry that truly does as

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>much tracking and measurement. I think that is possible. They're

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>really looking at demographics. They also put in place the

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>whole UM New marketplace, so the Megaphone marketplace where people

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>can buy audiences UM and that's the first time that's

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>been done. And then they have a partnership with Nielsen

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>also the first time that's been done. Also, the first

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>time that's been done. One thing I wish folks would

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about is okay, awesome, Then how do

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I start looking at that data and start applying those

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>audiences and started applying some of the insights on subscription

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>and what they're listening to outside of podcasting, outside of audio.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually, for me, I am a big believer that

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>podcasting is a gateway to a more psychographic view. And

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Save America is done with some of their I r

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>L events, you know what I mean. It's it's ways

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to maximize go to where the listeners are, figuring out

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>how you produce events around particular points in your show

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're seeing a high activation point or where you're

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing a low drop off and pivoting and figuring out

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how to backfill that content. So yeah, I think data

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be As a host, I'm super interested to

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>see and get access to, you know, what people are

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, how they're engaging with the product, and ultimately

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>where they are who they are. I mean, we know,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know who some of them are small batch in

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in our social following, but you know, outside of that,

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's much to be learned. And I would

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>also say, like I think there were a lot of

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, advertisers in the audience. I just I really

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked to some advertisers on this show, and

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we like so appreciate everyone that supports us. And I

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the advertisers on the show of written in

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>some cases a lot of work that we can read

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is personal to us, and I kind of

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>understand the brand, but I would say push that even further,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>work with your talent more. Um So I think that

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that's something that the you know, I'd love that to

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>see them talk about Diabe and the podcast upfront more

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>next year about the creativity side of this. So with that,

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Essex and the end of advertising, don't don't do.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. So we're back in the studio

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with the one and all name. We've like pod stalk

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to you. Andrew Essex. Welcome. So Andrew is the CEO

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of Tribeca Enterprises and a former admin. Do you consider

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself a former admin or just ad man? I think

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you are always an ad man once you've been an adman. Yeah,

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it goes deep, it goes deep. You've got those jazz hands.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>They don't come off for that just for the ad industry.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about your history because one thing that

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think is really interesting and put some of the

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>things that you've done recently into context, is you started

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as a journalist. Right started your career as a journalist

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>where at the New York Cooperator, where you may have

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>read my piece on what to do when your dormant

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.239
<v Speaker 1>is sleeping on the job. It was shortlisted for a Pulitzer.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not true, but actually that's where it worked. It

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was a shitty little trade publication and from there I

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>somehow got a job at The New Yorker. That was

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like the beginning of the end, the end of Dormant,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of Dormant. That's yeah, totally. So I want

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to get to your book, which is the end of

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>advertising and not the end of Dorman. But that's going

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the sequel. Um. But I want to talk

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>about your career because I think puting the book into

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>context of your career is really important. So you went

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>from journalism into advertising. How did you get into advertising? Well, frankly,

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>David Orga was a friend of mine and we had

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>just talked about working together in some way. He was

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the global creative chairman of Publicists, and I was at

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a magazine that I think was shut down in a

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>poker game, and we just thought, it's gotta be a

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>better way, and that was really it. It was just

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a crazed ambition and timing. Let's

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just start something. And he had a few other people

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there were already and we didn't have to reverse engineer anything.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>We were just built for the future and the timing

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was right. And so were you a part of the

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>five of dro Droka five? Were one of the original five.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to say that's true, or it was about

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>five principles, but that's actually a reference to the number

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that his mother stitched in the clothes because he's the

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fifth of five children. That's where the I never did

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Allien very Yeah, I didn't know that. Yeah,

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it was like the Jackson five, like I just or

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was it? Marlon? Definitely want to be if I were

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you Germaine. Okay, so you started Droka with David Droga

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you were there till recently two thousand and

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen to be exact, so ten years giver take an

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>incredible ride. When I was there, there were six people,

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and when I left there fifty people and it's probably

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>double since I left, which is telling signs and Global Global. Yeah. Yeah,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it was just an amazing run and incredible time in

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the business for a variety of obvious reasons, but people

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>who were committed to just making work that didn't suck,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>which was a fun thing to be associated with. Now,

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>did you start working on the book end of advertising

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>before you left Droca? Afterwards? After so the agency sold

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>William Morris, which has been well documented. And I left

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>after two years and was on what Amanda Robertson would

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>call gardening leave and had not thing to do. I know,

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine Andrew Robson gardening by the way, it's

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>an englishism, britishism. So I learned how to make composts

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and shuffered my kids to camp and thought, you know,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I should probably write something, And wanted to write a

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>story about the dual origin of heroin Naspirin, which is

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a story I'm obsessed with. But yeah, I couldn't sell

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that as a full on book. It's just really just

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the cocktail party anecdote. And the editor at a publishing

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>house said, why don't you write about advertising? What's up

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>with this ad blocking stuff? And I said, oh, all right, wow,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So what was the impetus of deciding to go on

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>gardening leave, Like, did you get to a place where

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you had grown into where you want to see what

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>makes somebody who is started something, to where it's at

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the point that you can step away middle age, honestly,

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So I was there for a decade, give or take,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was just tired, so burnt out, it's time

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to walk away. The circumstances were right, and I think

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if you get old, you start thinking of your life

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in chapters like this, this is the only thing I'm

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ever going to do. And you mentioned publishing, So I've

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been publishing. I wasted my teens in t when he's

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to play music. So from rock God to magazine

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>dude to add guy, and then you start thinking, do

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I have time for any more chapters? Madonna could do it,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>other people can do it. You can reinvent yourself, right.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I think she's done now now I'm kidding. So then Tribeca,

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Tribeca came along. Yeah, And what did that look like

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>when the opportunity came across your desk? Amazing? I mean,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not every day you find yourself sitting in a

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>room with Robert in your own Jane Rosenthal and talking

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about ways to improve what they did, which was incredible,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was also very familiar working with amazing creative people,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>working with brands, working with experiences, which are increasingly important

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, and I just felt very familiar. People always

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>said how do you go from magazines to advertising? But

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>same kind of vibe. Incredibly creative people in saying deadlines,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the search for relevance and audience. So I just see

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>these all at the intersection of media, marketing, entertainment and technology. Yeah, totally.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I have a question because I was thinking about this earlier.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys at Tribeca Enterprises do you look at

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a specific other brand or entity as a competitor? Uh? Ish,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of different players, but I don't

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>think anyone does exactly what Tribeca Enterprises does. Can you

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>explain because some people thought dolf I know, you know

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority special on the film festival and all

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that culture points us too and saying like

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a part of what you do, but can

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you kind of explain the breath of it? Okay, and

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying not to be boring here, but it's a

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>little complicated. So that you mentioned the film festival, that's

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the core, but even the phrase film festival increasingly out

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of tune to a lot of people's ears. What's film?

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point. The festival is really more about

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the live element and an event that becomes more eventful.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So film is always core, but we do r are gaming, talks, happenings,

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>And the fact of the matter is that this is

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>underwritten by brands. So we have to figure out a

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>way to help brands rethink their relationship to a live

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>event in a world in which sponsorship is just about

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the sexiest traditional advertising. So how do you take a

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>brand and God help me natively integrated into an experience.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the challenge. So Trepic Enterprises helps brands

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>think about live experiences in a relevant way, and we

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>also use our relationship with artists to make content with

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>brands that doesn't feel like advertising. So our product is experience, access,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and content all under one roof, and it's really hard

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to find anything that's like that. You can go directly

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to artists or talent agencies for access, you can go

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to other live events for experiences, and you can go

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to other players for content, but to get all three

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>and one under one roof is pretty tough. Now you

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have a disruption, like is it a studio? Is it

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>a lab? Everybody's got a lab. You gotta have that.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You must have a lab that's really just a place

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>for more to be two be conversation to put people

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on stage cmos next to filmmakers or showrunners. Okay, because

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about this and I was like, you know, really,

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Tribeca was, you know, the future of storytelling Fast. If

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I would see if a friendly competitor, I would see

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Fast as being your competitor of course, right, because they're

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>also pushing what's the future of storytelling? Which you guys

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>were doing starting back in two I have to think

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about the festivals was a response to No. Eleven and

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>then those years, those seventeen years have been the most

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>tumultuous in the history of media. So Tribeca was conceived

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>before Netflix, let alone Twitter. Yeah, and now the question

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is what's the role of the mobile device at a

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>film festival? How do you connect with the second screen

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to the first screen? Is the first screen now the

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>second screen? How do you create experiences that involves storytelling?

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>So there was a time when you might want to

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>go see the next Moonlight, but now you can see

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it on Netflix or iTunes. What's going to get you

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the house? And that's a real interesting existential question.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So experience has become key. How do you get people

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to experience something simultaneously. That's a really fun thing to

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>try to crack. Who do you think is doing that

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>well outside of Tribeca. I think Comic Con is interesting.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>When a Game of Thrones premieres a show at Barkley's Arena,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. So you talk about a football stadium and

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>all these people on their feet screaming. How do you

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>connect that to storytelling? And technology now enables that and

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the future of the live event. We

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>agree like how to present Mike dropt like we talk

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>about it all the time because there otherwise there's no

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>reason to leave the house if you can get everything

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you want with one click of the button. Except community.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was right, I mean the human touch.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And Laura and I have been talking about this a

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>lot lately, which is we're actually more into analog experience,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is right, It's the return of analog by the way,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that is I'm holding up the book right now, like

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more. I want to just draw a

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>parallel because something that you just said a little while

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>ago is really interesting to me, and that you know

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>why people love to see executives in the ad industry

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or why executives in the ad industry love to sit

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on stage next to filmmakers or Hollywood types, and because

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, we're going down this

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>parallel road where we're in the entertainment business in some way,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. We have to tell stories. We have

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to make people fall in love with our brands, we

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have to make them feel emotion and illicit reaction. To

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:41.239
<v Speaker 1>some degree, I do something right. But presumably technology and

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>community are bringing these things closer together. And now you're

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing people like William Morris take at stake in Droga.

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You're starting to see CIA become a partner at the

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>table in the mix of agencies, not because you want

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody to do an endorsement deal, because the way in

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>which they're thinking about production and storylines. You're seeing new

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rooms like T Brand and your friend Meredith's group over

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times have a table in the publishing

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>world but also a foot in the door and production.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think this is happening where worlds that

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>were completely separate and had nothing to do with one

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>another are now coming to this place where they're actually

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one and the same. That's a very big question. Robert

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kinsel I was mentioning. The chief business officer YouTube has

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a new book called Steampunks, and he talks about how

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube essentially got rid of the gatekeepers and democratized content.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So we were told for years and years what worked

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by five or six white guys, and now a quilting

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>person in Kentucky can generate a massive audience. So I

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think this fragmentation has produced a kind of new authenticity

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>where anything that's good finds an audience and anything goes.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>There are downsides of this too, but I'm trying to

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>avoid all the cliches that you know better than anyone,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but all the old rules are completely broken. Yeah, totally.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you were writing this book, where did you

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>intend to start and did that differ from where you

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>ended completely? Because just to say it again, I sincerely

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was obsessed with this origin story. I like unintended consequences,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>how do things happen? And there's an section of the

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>book that I'm very proud of which was based on

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some research about the origin of two of the most

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>bizarre products that are actually brother and brother siblings. In bear.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>The German pharmaceutical company launched this thing called aspirin, but

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the same three dudes, all in their thirties, invented heroin.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>It was a real product, This is not bullshit, and

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it was on the shelves for by eight years. And

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, that's an amazing story because one of

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>them is benign and one of them is evil, but

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they were both launched as medicine to make you feel better.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So it made me think, what is authentic? What's artifice?

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like a fantastic metaphor for the entire industry,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I started to do, and then I

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of built the rest of the book around that.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that, uh, the End of Advertising probably got

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people kind of riled up. Did you

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>have You said you got death threats? Yeah, I was

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just one or two, you know, some bomb in my mailbox.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Now I think, look, the real title is the End

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of Bad Advertising, rovertising. It's just less clickable, right, you

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have to have a little hyperbole. You asked me if

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm still an admin. So that's the cell side, but

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we all know that that, um, the paradigm is shifting.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So at Tribeca right now, what are the things that

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you're doing with brands that you're really excited about that

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you can tell us about or you can break it here.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're doing something. We just did a fantastic project

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>for Heineken, which is essentially a film about plus Pool,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>which is that water filtering. So this is a brand

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that's increasingly allergic to interruption. They want to talk about

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cool st they're doing when they don't want the beer featured.

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>They want the story told presented by the beer. So really,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at a high level we're doing is trying to bring

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>bands back to ge theater, which is again we we

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we We did a great initiative with a T and

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>T called Untold Stories. They wanted to see more diversity

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>in storytelling, found a hundred scripts by people of color

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and narrowed it down to ten. Ten people pitched, they

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>picked a winner, gave the winner a million dollars to

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>make a film that will premiere at Rebeca and then

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be broadcast on direct TV. So they got a fly

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>will effect. I think that's very cool just working with

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>IBM to crowdsource creativity with Watson, anytime that we can

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>invert the traditional sponsorship model and help brands make content,

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we went it was it fair to say you're an

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>agency that also has a distribution pipe. Well, you know

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what's funny is that my dear friend Meredith and my

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dear friend Justin have used the word You begin with

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the S words your studio, and you don't necessarily want

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to use the A words. So we have a studio

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that helps brands make authentic content. Agency implies advertising. So

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>our code is we do nine seconds to ninety minutes,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but never thirty seconds like that. Is that your tagline?

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>It's on my tattooed on my left I'm glad I

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't see it. So, but presumably you're able to own

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>them the distribution of that content you're creating, or at

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>least provide a platform, which is what Sebastian Tomas has

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>told us post Meredith Leving's interview here in a big

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>article that he um was featured in talking about at

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, like all signs for T

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Brand presumably point to becoming an independent shop. I think

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Meredith is brilliant. I think T Brand is brilliant because

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they have audience, they have editorial pedigree, and now they

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>can leverage that by telling stories for brands that are

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in keeping with the tradition. At the times we are

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>not a media company. We are an event, so we

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have a platform where we can premiere our content, but

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 1>we can be unapologetically agnostic about distribution and partner with

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has the audience that brand is trying to reach.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So I am everybody's best partner. As they used to

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>say in the Mafia. If you want to reach if

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to reach audience X, we partner with X.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>If you want to reach audience, Why we partnered with audience?

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Why you could become a media company. Well, I think

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the best device I ever got is only do what

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>only you can do. So let me give an example.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>At the Trebeka Film Festival, we closed with The Godfather

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one and two at Radio City. Now you could arguely

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>see that on Netflix or at Film Forum, which you

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>could not see anywhere else, was the entire cast on stage,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>De Niro, Puccino, Francis Ford, Coppola, Duval, James Cohn, all there,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Diane Keaton and then to take that live conversation and

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>stream it on Facebook Live was a game changer because

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>from a hundred and fifty thousand attendees to four point

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>five million viewer US in the streaming aspects. So we

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>achieve the digital dream. I mean, is there a platform

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that everybody's talking about Facebook? Everybody talks about Facebook, but

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is there are a platform that you are most interested

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in seeing do something different than it's doing direct TV?

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Now M read it. I think Reddit is going to

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. God when redd it pivots to video, the

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>inevitable pivots of the pivoting and other things that are genius.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're going to see them finally sort

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of live up to the potential massive audience they've already aggregated.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think those are two very interesting stories. I love

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are doing it um kindly, just this

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of building a network around this magnificent theater of

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the mind medium. Yes, that's exactly how we started. In fact,

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>someone asked us why didn't you start doing videos? Who

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, no, no, no, no no no, this is what

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we do and we do it well. There's a lot

0:28:58.400 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to be said and doesn't mean we're not going to

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>go into video. But having these types of conversations I

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>think allows people to really dream and think. When we

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>did g podcast theater that was the that was it

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't wasn't about when everyone was doing video

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>or like, no, we're going to go into that. I

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>also haven't been able to keep up with my spray

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to and so that's really another part of the reason

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're laughing, But that's actually true. That's what you

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>pivot a video exactly. So as you think, like, you know,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you're talking a lot about community and

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I r L. We had a fabulous episode UM Early

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Days in Atlantia, which is like a couple of months

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ago UM with our buddy David Pots over at Atlas

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Obscura and kind of tapping into this notion of what

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about cults and communities and this idea

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that analog presents an opportunity for us to engage with

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>one another. If there's not tech attached to that, what

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is the reason then for people to step outside of

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>their living rooms. What brands do you think have really

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>embraced that, UM and what are the ones where you're like,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you doing this the opportunity? I think complex

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>complex Con is a great example of that love. She

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>loves smart Echo like those guys hugely underestimate and disrespected,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but building taking a media company and then making an

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>event around a genuinely enthused audience. But I r L

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is such an important thing. You just said this idea

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that you take something, you create this concentrated moment of excitement,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you basically productize FOMO, and then you use new platforms

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to achieve scale. Yes, future of advertising, it's achieved scale,

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's also places where you can have meaningful interaction. Right. So,

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>platforms that I think have an opportunity to think about

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to interact off device, off screen right now,

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>stand to actually kill it. I totally agree. Right, what

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>would you tell people who are young in the industry

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>now over Oh, as the old guy who was once young,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that feeling of staring at the person sitting

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>get out of the way, ground pa, and you have

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand that this is a young person's industry. And um,

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we do not put enough people in positions of power,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly the agency business. But they have to have the confidence,

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the courage of their convictions. If there

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>were more people who were fluent in vertical video at

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>certain shops, they would be in better position. They'd be

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fighting back people who understand how to make something with

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the sound off, because that's what the audience wants just

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>go push someone out of the chair respectfully. Please respect,

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>don't break a hip. I love it. And on that note,

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on that note, it's time killed by d I y

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with andrew Essex. Alright, so let's would you kill? I

0:31:54.960 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>would kill the extended pa odd that happens when I'm

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the treadmill. So I the only time I watch

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>appointment television is six or seven o'clock in the morning,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>where I walk like a fucking gerbil on a on

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a wheel, and I watch cable news. And there's one

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>show that I like, Okay, Morning Joe host. I'm not

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going to name names, but I guess I like Donald Trump.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I just contradicted myself. And they have twenty minutes of

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>uninterrupted really cool stuff. And then there's a horror of endless,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>completely erroneous as we should have. You meet with Mika

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and Joe and talk about I just tell me where

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to show up, and I just want to record like

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But they don't probably even know because they're

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not watching it. They're in the studio. People are happy,

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and you probably know they're pretty And there now running

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a contest where you can actually win an opportunity to

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sit in the studio, So maybe you can actually then

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get behind the production camera and refuse to go to

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>commercial times, which makes me think about something else to kill. Sorry,

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I know you probably have run off time. But the

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that people can buy and add free experience and

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>others can't because it's too expensive, that's going to create problems.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Then what do you think about subscription services? I love

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>subscription services, but I don't like the fact that some

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>people can't and they're penalized ads. So you're creating another

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of divide that Linda bo said the same exact thing.

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>We totally agree. Yeah, yeah, she went like rogue and

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>listened to the free version and was like, funk this.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You mean it's better or it's expensive experience? And I yeah,

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>who would not choose the paid version? But some people

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can't afford it? Yeah, but what happens when everything starts

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>turning into a subscription service. Everything is turning into a

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>subscrit we have a Darwinian shakeout, like at the news stand? Right, yep,

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>totally correction as a big correction. That's terrifying. All right,

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>kill two things. You got to whit, didn't we just

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>kill something? Now you just killed two things you're killing

0:33:52.800 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>all over. What would you buy? I would buy into

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the glass? So why would you buy them? I just

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like media businesses built around verticals from the ground up,

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to reverse engineering for a char new world

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand. But why into the glass because you

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>could say that with a lot of okay, because that

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>category has some of the least imaginative. Totally respect to

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Penelope CRUs wonderful, but just actress plus lip glass is

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>not an idea, all right? So what would you do yourself?

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I would create a body waxing studio that didn't hurt that.

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>We know way too much about Andrew Essex right now.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Body waxing, I love it. Into the glass you're a

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>man with many many faces, I think. I think so,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>andrew Essex, the end of Advertising, CEO of Tribeca Enterprises,

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you for coming on the show. Where can people reach?

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay at andrew Essex on everything? Twitter is probably the best.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay you want to give up numbers or your waxing place,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Well that's that's competition. Okay, Andrew Essex, this has been

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>such an amazing conversation. Why don't you come back? I

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>need you to come back. Thank you so much for

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>having me, Thank you, thank you. Well, folks, we saw

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of advertising and now we're seeing the end

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of Atlantia. Just this episode, don't worry big Thanks to

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Drew's our producer as always, our family and friends

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>at Panically, including Matt Turk and Any Bowers. Don't forget

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to like us, follow us, comment on social Atlantia podcast.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone in Atlantia. We'll see you in two weeks.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Full disclosure. Our opinions are our own.