WEBVTT - Retail Sales Numbers Are Just Wrong: Craig Johnson

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. We got terrible December retail sales

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers that came in four weeks late due to the

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>government shutdown. But before you get all barished the way

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that many traders have, we have the economic advisor to

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, Larry Cudlow, saying this about the data. Take listen.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, you had ten days of government shutdown.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I regard that as a temporary glitch, as you know. Uh. Secondly,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>shoppers were very late. According to the National Retail Federation,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>shoppers came in very late. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>January was revised up because of that. That was Larry

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Cudlow speaking to a gaggle of reporters in Washington, d C.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining us here our Bloomberg Getta Active Broker Studios Coror

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Kadana Chief you as economist for Bloomberg Economics and joining

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>us by phone. Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth Partners, Carl,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. Was this data glitchy? I don't

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think there were glitches there in terms of a collection

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the data and whatnot. However, to the extent that

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we had a government shutdown, probably those government workers were

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of absentees in the later part of the holiday

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>shopping season, so that could have had an impact. I

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really buy into what a weather story there because

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the most weather sensitive categories tends to be

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>motor vehicle sales. If there's two feet of snow in

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the dealership lot, you tend to not go for a

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>test drive U. And actually that was the rare bright

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>spot in this report, with the motor vehicle sales up

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>one percent UH in the month h. The other factor there, obviously,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is the equity market and financial market turmoil that we

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>saw in you know, we we knew about in December,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not fully, but that was definitely scaring people away or

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>leading to some sense of, uh, you know, conservativism with

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>their back to spending habits. So in light of this report,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we have trimmed our GDP forecast for Q four. Right,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>consumers are very important part of that forecast. So we've

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>taken growth down from to nine to two and a

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter UH for the UH for that's a very substantial

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>revision that shows how bad this report actually was. UH. Nonetheless, UH,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not changing our outlook for consumers over

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the course of beware. I think there's some sticker shock

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>as people are getting smaller than expected tax refunds as

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they're filing. But the labor market is on very sound footing.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Personal income growth is strong. That means consumers will be

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.119
<v Speaker 1>back in the game, but maybe not until Q two.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So Craig Johnson love to bring you on in this discussion.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this retail number and does

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>it change your view of the consumer and for growth

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in well Answering the second question, first, no, we don't.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>We don't think it UH significantly affects the outlook now

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on SO two. The reason for that is is gets

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to the first question, is that we think there are

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>clear anomalies in the data here. UM. Overall retail works

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in a world of year of year sales and total

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sales growth in December per the report, and this is

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>excluding autos, gasoline, and restaurants normal exclusions, was up only

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>one point UM. But if you look at non store

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>retail for December UM, of which is with online sales,

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's up only three h That is the worst showing

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>since the native of the Great Recession uh in in

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight Quality two eight uh And yet

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at online year to d eight sales

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>through November, they were up two points ten ten. October

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and November, which is inclusive of the first half of holiday,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>online sales were up again using their data, was up

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point five And for the thought that suddenly this

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>ran up down from thirteen point five percent pace in

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>October November is only a three percent pace in December. Holds,

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are you basically saying that the numbers are inaccurate here? Yes? Okay,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so you don't believe the numbers. You think that they

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>are wrong, absolutely, because this would imply a deceleration from

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>October December of a of a growth rate of thirteen

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>point five percent, only a three percent growth rate in December,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>which has never happened. UM and other other the other

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>retail Amazon is almost half of all retail sales. Their

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Q four sales are up eighteen year of a year.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Wayfarers is which is the second biggest pure play, uh,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be up almost this quarter. And so anybody

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>who thinks the three percent growth rate for online in

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>December is living in a dream world. And and we're

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>certainly going to get some more earnings next week to

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>confirm or rebut some of this data. But Carl, what

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>gives you faith in this data enough to revise downward

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>your GDP estimate for this year. Well, the retail sale

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>are whether whether the data or right or not. And

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a valid case there that maybe there's some distortion. Uh.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The retail sales data, nonetheless are plucked and put plugged

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>into the GDP tabulation. So if there's a mistake in

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, that gets factored into the GDP numbers as well.

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's just really plugging in the actual arithmetic. What

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can happen here is you have sampling issues. So uh,

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>some retailers may not be counted in the retail sales survey.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's the case for Amazon or

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what not. Usually Census doesn't disclose who they're pulling but

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you if you have a lot of

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>retailers that were doing poorly at the end of the year,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly there were lots of headlines about you know, sears

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and and companies of that nature that could be feeding

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>some kind of distortion into the survey. So Craig, how

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about I mean, seriously, on the on the do you

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>sense that if the data is correct or incorrect, that

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're the consumers in a good position for Yeah, because

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the airline consumer fundamental. The reason we're sanguine about the

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year is that whether retail sales or

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending in general, retail is the biggest segment of

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer consumers sixty percented economy is is that the fundamentals

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>that drive retail sales is two biggest. The biggest fundamental

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is growth in disposable personal income, and right now that

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>depends that in turn is driven by two things. One

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>growth and employment, particularly full time employment, which has been

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>very robust, and secondly by growth in average wages, which

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are up three percent and change. Those two vectors combined

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a major driver, about a five percent driver

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, and that's why we're sticking with our forecast

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of about somewhere around five percent year of a year

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>retail sales growth four two. Craig Johnson, thank you so

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. President of Customer Growth Partners, Cardona,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>chief US economist for Bloomberg Economics. Just want to bring

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you this headline just crossing US and China trade teams

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are so to be far apart on reform demands. Looking

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>at the Dow, it is off its earlier highs on

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this news, uh, So we are going to keep an

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>eye on that as the day progressive we list. It

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>seems like you and I are spending more and more

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>time talking about gaming. Maybe that's just having met Cantraman

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>come in and talk about the big gaming companies and

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>their earnings. But one aspect of the gaming businesses e Sports,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that just fascinates me. This is the business where people

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>come to arenas and other public places to watch other

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>people game. This is a real business. It is a

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>growing business. This is a one billion dollar business four

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>million viewers, uh and growing. So to help us kind

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of dig deep into this business and the opportunities here,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple of gentlemen on our eleven three

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>year studios Ken d Q Bellis CEO of Black Ridge

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Acquisition Company that is a Nasdaq listed spack on a

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the symbol b r A C. And Frank frank Ing

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>c year of our Game International and Kennon Frank, I

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>guess your companies are are in the process emerging to

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>form what will be the new company would be Allied

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>E Sports Entertainment. So Frank, maybe if you could just

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of E sports. Why E sports?

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>What are the opportunities that you guys see in this business? Uh.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>E sports has been around for a long time, but

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>as the subset of gaming. But now it becomes an

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>industry because in the past few years, streaming becomes extremely

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>popular and that really support the growth of the sports,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and and the essence, the core element is

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the viewership. Viewership has grown to a very large number already.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, last year we had about four million on

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the global basis viewers regularly on the sports and it's

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>already bigger than many major sports. So um as as

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it develops right now, you know, we we see a

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of new business model that is emerging and we

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>we really believe this is at the very big getting

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>stage off the industry. You know, to monetize from the

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sports activities. So you two are coming together to form

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Allied E Sports Entertainment. Ken dicobilis joining us here as well.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>In your firm, black Ridge Acquisition Company. Didn't it focus

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on oil? That was part of the initial focus. But

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you when you have a spack, you

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>have a finite timeline that you have to get a

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>deal done. So it's all about deal flow. And for us,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>we're very fortunate in that a gentleman named Lyle Berman

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>took a company called World Poker Tour public in two

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four. He eventually sold that and then Frank's

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>company bought WPT three years ago. As Frank was looking

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at various ways to fund the sports initiative, he heard

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that Lyle had a spack, so he approached Lylan for

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>those who don't know his special acquisition company, correct, So

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they approached us, and I can tell you the opportunity

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with this business blows away any we were looking at

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in the energy space. So it's all about sure hold

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a return for us, and we think this is the

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>right bet. Okay, So what is the business plan for

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>your company and give us a sense of how that

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe mirrors what's going on in the sports business in general.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I would say this this is unique. Okay, if you're

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>looking to play the sports today, there's really two ways

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it. You are a video game publisher that

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>makes the games itself, or a lot of the traditional

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sports franchise owners are buying teams that compete against each other.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We're a game and team agnostic. The strategy is threefold.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>You hold a live event like at our lux or

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>arena in Las Vegas, produce content off of that, and

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>then drive viewers from the content piece to an online platform.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's the three pillar strategy that, by the way,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>has been deployed at the World Poker Tour for seventeen years.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's the play here to monetize. So, Frank, talk

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to me about the arena type play because this is

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>something I have not seen that much about me. We

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>know that watching competitive gamers, that's a very popular thing

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. People stream that. But you know what is

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the market like for in person events right now? Well,

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is growing very rapidly right now.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the bigger sports events today they're being

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>how that colosseum like you know, Candlestick Park for example. Um,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, but we we're trying to create a new format,

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated arena just for E sports. Basically, it's just

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like a studio or TV studio with live broadcast capabilities

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that can house a thousand people with those gas, your

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>show looks great, and I'll focus instead of you know,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>doing more like a proper organized league or teams. Instead,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we want to create shows entertainment for e sports that

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can be carried out on a frequent, regular basis, and

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as such, the commercial value that can be created will

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot bigger for our sponsors. So talk about

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>where you are in or how how you view the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>model sponsorship advertisers, how critical is that to kind of

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are thinking about. Well, I would say this,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the demographic in in the sports of the viewership is

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>primary L thirty five and under. That's a highly coveted demographic.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And the beauty of the ecosystem right now is they

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>are all online. So E sports is an online business.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The content that will be produced from the live events

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that the arenas will be distributed primarily online. So the

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>sponsors really covet that demographic and so they want to

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>get behind this business. As well. So, Ken, how big

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think this? How how how do you sort

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of monetize this in terms of ticket sales? Do you do? Uh? Gear?

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean just the practical aspects of this. Yeah, the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>two really big opportunities with this business model is with

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the content to sell sponsorship or spell sell the content

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to distribution networks. Okay number one. But thirdly, which really

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>meets up with what Frank's background is, is an online

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>subscription based service geared primarily towards gamers. That's what Frank

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has been doing his entire career. Yeah, thank you both

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here. Kenn D. Cabila's CEO of

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Black Ridge Acquisition Company, seem to be future CFO of

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>allied E Sports Entertainment. Frank Young, chief executive of our

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Game Internet National future CEO of allied E Sports Entertainment.

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Both of you here in our Interactive Broker studios. Thank

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here with us. Well, the

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>number of the day is one point two, as in

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a one point two percent decline in retail sales for

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the month of December just released this morning, certainly impacting

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the markets. To get us give us a sense of

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what this means for the consumer and for markets going forward.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We bring in Peter Anderson. Peter is the founder of

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Anderson Capital Management. He joins us right here in our

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>bloom Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So, Peter, this number was

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly a surprise for the market. Uh does it change

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>your view of the consumer and maybe how you're positioning

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio. The only thing it does is it really

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>reinforces my opinion that last order was such a crazy quarter.

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really had firm opinions as to what was happening,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, I think what you're seeing is

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer just recoiled back and said I'm out for

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>the month of December, simply because nobody is giving me

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>any pure advice. Nobody is telling me which way the

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>markets are going. Everybody seems confused, and when I'm confused,

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I go back into my bunker. Are you confused right now?

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I've never been confused? So so, so what's your take? Well,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that the market has, uh, it needs to

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>discount all the political policies that we're we're following. I mean,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly it's very important about the tariffs, the wall breaksit,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but let's just put it in perspective. You know that

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if you like US stocks, then I would suggest buying

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>US stocks based on the fundamentals and not whether the

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>tweet of the day by President Trump will actually change

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>your mind. Paul, can you believe this? If you like

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>US stocks, you should buy US stocks. I have to

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wonder on a day like today, when you see Coca

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Cola shares plunging the most in two thousand and eight,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>if you like the U S economy and you think

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>people will keep drinking stuff that doesn't just water, would

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you be a buyer of Coke shares? Well? I don't

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>own Coke shares because it's not in my universe of

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks that I own. I tend to own stocks are

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a little less followed, actually, because I think Coke is

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>followed to death, and in terms of advantages of information,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty tough because it's followed so much. But when

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at other stocks it might have missed their

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>earnings that are not followed such as closely. Then I

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think those are buying opportunities if you do have the

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence in your own analysis. So we've certainly seen a

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>tremendous rate or level of volatility, certainly in December and

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>even coming that snap back here we've seen this year

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to date. Do you use volatility as a buying opportunities

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that kind of how you're viewing it right now,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>or are using volatility as an excuse to step back? Well, know,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>volatility is probably the most frequently used word in our business,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I have to tell you I almost ignore the

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>total volatility. I just go ahead. I say to myself,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if this is a stock that I like, and I've

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>liked it for some time, and I still continue to

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like it. If a new client comes in, I don't

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>even market time. I usually just jump right into the

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>jump rope and don't wait for vall to pick up.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So I might pick up the stock at a little

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more cheaply than I normally would, because it's a

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>fool's errand to try to time that. So you'll hear

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in my side talking about how

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>scary the volatility is. But I'm not afraid of that

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think it's a major driver. If you're

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in this market for the long run. Sure you might

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pick up some stocks, uh during the high periods of volatility,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where you might get cheaper prices, but in the end,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it averages out and you should focus on more technical things.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, So if you are not afraid of making

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>statements and making opinions, what do you like? What shares

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>do you like? Well? I like, uh, hold your breath

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>now in video in video is reporting interesting talk about

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>little stock exactly, but he doesn't pay attention to that's right.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So let me just quickly talk to you about a video.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I grew up in the world of physics,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so I feel like I understand uh humbly a little

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>bit more than the street about in videos addressable market

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future, so certainly it will be lumpy around

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>along the way. And it was of course last quarter

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even this quarter because it's reporting aftermarket. But

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a tremendous stock that you can get at

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>now a pe of less than twenty times, and if

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you remember, it was trading at a much higher evaluation

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>as recently as six months ago. Anything else in tech?

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Does tech scary way? Or do you like? You like

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the growth and you can make the valuation call well,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>I love computer security. So for instance, Palo Alto Networks

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>cyber Arc just reported recently. Uh, those two companies will

0:17:55.040 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>never their addressable market. Unlike Coca Cola for instance, there

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>addressable market is growing undeniably and as we get more

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>complicated and communications and technology and hacking, it's UH an

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>arms race. So that will never end except with the

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>advent of quantum computing, which is far far away in

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the future. So what about the breakdown between stocks and

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>bonds and how are you allocating right now? UH? In

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of asset allocation, I would say that it is

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>well overdone in our industry to have people come in

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about a core satellite model which might

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>use ten to fifteen asset classes, and some of the

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>exposures are two to four per asset class. What does

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that get you It it gets you low conviction. I

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>advocate having if you're coming into on cash, for instance,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's UH suspend capital gains issues. If you came

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in on cash, I would advocate as little as three

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to four asset classes. For completely diversified portfolio, I would

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I would do away with the lexicon of tactical allocation

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and strategic allocation. There would be a core UH SMPI

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>et F very very cheap core e t F of

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>fixed income, and then my twenty stock portfolio which would

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>hopefully give you the alpha, and then you are done.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Your reports come out three line items basically. Yeah, so

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>ten seconds here, have you shifted the allocation between stocks

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and bonds or kept it sort of like a sixty

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for type model for most people. I keep it at

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty and I really don't switch that, and sometimes

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I even let that run, believe it or not, as

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>opposed to going back and tactically reallocating. Peter Anderson not

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>afraid to give some points of view. Really great having you,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Peter Anderson, founder of Anderson Capital Management, joining us here

0:19:50.480 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. Right now, let's focus

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on airplanes, in particular those that have staircases leading from

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one deck to another. They are going out of style

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and off the market. Joining us now to discuss George Ferguson,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. George, So,

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>air Bus is scrapping it's unprofitable a three eighty double

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>ducker jet. Why? Yeah, So, I mean it just wasn't

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the demand for the airplane. And that's been as you said,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same for all sort of four engineer

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>planes lately. Um, I mean it's a real move to

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two smaller wide bodies, so airplanes with to two aisles

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in them. You know, smaller airplanes can be deployed to

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more markets, different markets. You don't have to worry about,

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>um them being being too large that when you drop

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>them into a market you'll you'll hurt fair dramatically. The

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>A three eight really was just it was too big

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to fly to most markets. It would just dilute fares

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and her profitability. And I could say, Paul, he says,

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you can drop it into a market and people get hurt,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a very different image and what he's talking about. Have

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen one in land? It's amazing fly it

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>into Sarah. So I think that's just the challenge is

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>too big for most markets. He fled in there, and

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you really dilute fairs and Emirates profitability has been it's

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>deteriorated over the last bunch of years. There's a lot

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of competition out there, and they finally, I think, came

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to terms of the fact that it's just too big

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an airplane to operate most places. So, George, how rare

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is it for you know, an airplane manufacturer to cancel

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole line of of its plane, argue it's marquee

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>line of of a plane after such a short, short

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>shelf life. It seems like they really misread the market

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>here Airbus did. Yeah, you know, I think I think

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they did. You know, for Airbus, it's not as rare

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>as it should be. The A three forty was another

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>four engine airplane that had a pretty short lifespan. So, um,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they've got to sort of misses on the wide body front,

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say, in the last couple of decades. Um.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think you just have to stay

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>close to customers. I feel like, um, I feel like

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>some of their competitors that maybe been a little bit

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>close to customers and understand demand a little bit better.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, Boeing built the seven forty seven. It's what

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty years old now, right, They built it many many

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>many years ago. Um And and in those days, the

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>hub and spoke was more of the way airlines went

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about trying to do their business, and now we're doing

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>more point to point and I feel like Airbus sort

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of really missed that point to point trend. With the

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>three Airbus shares up for nearly four and a half

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 1>percent in Paris right now, I want to get your sons, George,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of just the fact that more than three thousand jobs

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>will get cut if this goes through. As this goes through,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do you have a sense of where those jobs are? Yeah,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the three is made into loose. Um. They

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of investment in too loose. So I

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine would share of jobs get hurt there? Uh you

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>know the rolls Royce to make engines, g makes some engines. UM.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>See you see some some losses away from toloose some

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of the suppliers and um and maybe you know some

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of the other Airbus facilities that supply the airplane. But

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the majority being to loose. I would note

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that Emirates placed orders for the three fifty and the

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>three thirty, and air Bus is in the process of

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>increasing production of the three twenty from fifty to sixty

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>airplanes this year. That's increase per month. And so I

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>think there are other opportunities and Airbus alluded to this,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>there are opportunities to find people places to move inside

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the air Bus uh um network, you know, as they

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>wind down the three. So, George, is this a good

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>day for Boeing? Is a loss for Airbus, good for Boeing. Well,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, look, I think, uh, you know,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I think from from sort of the PR stamp, and

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it might be it might be good because you know, again,

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Boeing sort of built the seven or designed to build

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the seven eight seven at the same time Airbus was

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>working the three eight, and the two airplanes were markedly different.

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>One was about point to point travel and the other

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one was about hub and spoke. And I feel like

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a win for point to point. But but

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the truth is, I mean, the three eight wasn't making

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>much money. I don't know that it adds much like

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to the seven forty seven. I think the seven forty

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>seven have got a freighter variant that helps carry it,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's really what's sort of saving the day for

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the seven four seven. So it's a PR victory, but

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not huge. George Ferguson, senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, Thank you so much. I

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, the kid in me is sad to see

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>these go, Paul, because uh, you know, where's the romance

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and where's the romance? No, they're just cramming us more

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and more people into these single aisle you know, aisle planes,

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we're the cocktail bars and the so on

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Pan am. The nostalgia, the running up

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>staircases that I never really experienced but I saw in television,

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>and what I experience when I go and wonder if

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to pay for my Coca Cola. Thank you

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>for Coca Cola shares down. Thanks for listening to the

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abramoy. It's I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram woits

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio