WEBVTT - Spooky EVPs

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Get in with Technology Textuff from dot Com. Hey there,

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to text Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland, and today

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the studio once again, I am joined by my

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Horrid Thinking co host, Joe mcclarmick. Joe Lokan, Hi, everybody,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>How you doing? I am just doing fantastic. My brain

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is full of bats and spirits from beyond. Well, it's

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's good that that happened this week, since we are

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>celebrating Halloween this week, and as part of our Halloween celebration,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe had come up with a suggestion for an episode

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. I said, Joe, what do you want

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to cover? And and you came up with a topic

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly, like spookily quickly. I wanted to talk about

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this for a while. In fact, I've been thinking, next

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>time I go on tech Stuff, I wanted to talk

0:00:55.160 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about electronic voice phenomena, right, e v P? E v P? Yeah,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>what is that? Well, first of all, for those of

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you who are long time listeners of tech Stuff, you

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>might think that sounds a little familiar, and that's because

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we touched on e v P. Chris Pallette and I

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>did back in an episode recorded way back in February two,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>thou ten called ghost Hunting Technology, and in that episode,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I opened up by saying, before we get into this,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta let you guys know I'm a skeptic. Well,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll be amazed to know that in the four years

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>since I recorded that episode, you have become a medium. No,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a skeptic. Okay, well I am a skeptic too.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I I don't suggest the topic of electronic voice phenomenon

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because I believe that there's something to this, But I

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>suggested because I believe it's fascinating. It is fascinating, and

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's also it's not just something that is uh very

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>popular topic on various Internet forums as well as YouTube videos.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also something that features heavily into ghost movies. Right,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>There's there's always that scene in a ghost film where

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>someone is going back over recording and hearing things that

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>were not heard during the initial investigation. Yeah, but wait,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>let's back up, because some people might not be familiar

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with this term. Well, why don't you paint a picture

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with your words, Joe? Okay, Yeah, what are we actually

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about when we say the words electronic voice phenomenon.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's one scenario you walk into a graveyard on a

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>cool autumn evening with your portable audio recording system as

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I do, which makes it a little bit less romantic,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. Your idea of what a romantic

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>evening is. Quick walk through the local graveyard tells me

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>more about you than I was prepared for. But pray continue.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I take after the tradition of Dr Septimus Pretorious in this.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>If that's I enjoy a midnight snack in a crypt okay,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and well you know I can get a little Victorian

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>every now and then. Let's let's continue on with your scenario. Okay,

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're bringing along some kind of audio recording system.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>This could be a digital audio recorder or just an

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>old cassette tape deck with a microphone, or even the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>built in mic on your video camera. And you placed

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the audio recording device near the grave of a famous

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>murderer or a Civil war general, or a reputed witch,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a reputed Civil War general witch who murdered people.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be a really cool grave to see. Well,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just need to go to Oakland Cemetery.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>There are some crazy graves in Atlanta. There are also

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Decatur cemetery is very cool anyway, So you set

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up the device, you press record, and you leave it alone.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Or you could record while you ask questions, an attempt

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to spirit into speaking, So you could sit

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there and just say, how did you die? Do you

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have anything to say? What's in your famous banana pudding recipe?

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They'll never tell The answer is I have banana newt

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And then later, when you come home, you play back

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the audio and lo and behold in the quiet moments

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>between your questions, or sort of just floating ambiently throughout

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the cemetery air while you're recording, our little rumblings of

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>static and bumps and creeks and mysterious tones, and they

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all seem to form words, maybe even words directly answering

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>your questions. So that is electronic voice phenomenon. It's the

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>discovery of some sort of voice, something with purpose, not

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>just random noise that is, at least in theory, trying

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with someone. Sure, And that's not the only

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>way you could discover an electronic voice. So you don't

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just have to record in a graveyard. You could record

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you think there might be something trying to communicate

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with you, or sometimes people record radio transmissions. They say, oh,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to you know, my radio, my HAM radio,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>or even just my FM receiver, and and here's what

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I caught in the static and in some frequency band

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that's supposedly not occupied. Uh well, well, have more to

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>say about that later in the episoite. Right, So, what

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do e v P enthusiasts typically seem to believe is

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Well, the most common claim I've seen

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is pretty straightforwardly what you'd expect. It's that there were spirits.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>They're attempting to communicate from the other side of the

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>wall between life and death, beyond the veil, as it's

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>often referred to. There you go. And so the web

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube have actually made it a lot easier to

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>experience this for yourself. So they're just a ton of

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube videos, their whole channels devoted to cataloging supposed e

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>v P and I really recommend going and listening to

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a few. If you're at a computer right now, you

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can just pause for a minute and go watch one

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of these or something. And for those of you really

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>curious about this phenomenon, we are going to include some

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>examples of the sort of things that you would normally

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be scouring if you were trying to find this. This

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning we are not necessarily going to be inserting messages.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're not necessarily not going to be inserting messages

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>really love. That's up to our audio producer NL Okay,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so that'll come up when it comes up. The question

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess for today is when you when you seem

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear words being formed in these strange audio anomalies,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is it really a transmission from beyond the grave? Are

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>angels and ghosts and other disembodied beings communicating to us

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>by leaving anomalies on our audio recording equipment? Or is

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>something else going on? Now? Just I mean not that

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Mr. Spoiler, but my own personal view is

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the second option that there's something else going on. Well

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>mine too, But I think we should explain why. Yeah, yeah,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And part of it would be, you know, a little

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>walk down memory lane to look at some of the

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>developments of what led to the E v P craze

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Right, Well, I can imagine that

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>when audio equipment was new, you know, the ability to

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>record audio and play it back, This must have been

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a strange world. For people, I mean, they've

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>never had anything like that before. Like once a sound

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was ephemeral before. Sure, once it happened, it was gone.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It was like a meal or something. You know. You

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>could try to imitate it by going back a second time,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but you couldn't perfectly capture it. It was like going

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to see a stage production. Right, You're going to see

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a stage production, and no matter how well rehearsed that

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>production is, no two performances are going to be identical,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and so the moment that you experience of watching a

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>stage production is a unique moment. By definition, It's never

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be exactly the same way again, which is

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I love theater so much.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>The same sort of thing was that, until the invention

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of devices that could actually record sound to a medium

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so it could be played back later, every sound was

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was You heard it that one time

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. Yeah. So what it suggests to me

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is that this very well could have been a creepy

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon to people. We grew up with it. I mean,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we're used to it, But I mean, might it back

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then have been inherently kind of spooky? Yeah, it certainly could.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Have been, and in fact it led people to ask

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions that to us may seem quaint, you know,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>since we have the benefit of hindsight, but at the

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>time you could really understand. You know, you're talking about

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>taking something that was viewed as non permanent and making

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it permanent. This is this is almost a kind of

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>magic when it first happens, right, I can see the

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>magical approach to it. Yeah, like Mr Edison, am I

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>going to hear a ghost talking on this wax phonograph?

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And someone in fact asked him that very question, essentially

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>saying did he think it would be possible to ever

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>invent something that would be capable of contacting the dead?

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And his response was, it is possible to construct an

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>apparatus which will be so del k that if there

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>are personalities in another existence or sphere who wished to

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us in this existence or sphere,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>this apparatus will at least give them a better opportunity

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>to express themselves than the tilting tables and wraps and

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Uiji boards and mediums and other crude methods now purported

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the only means of communication. So I thought

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the plural of medium was media. Well not for not

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>for the these kind of mediums. Did you hear about

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the tiny criminal psychic who escaped prison? She was a

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>small medium at large. That's great, thank you. Uh now

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that we I just had like fifty people and subscribe

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to my podcast. But that's okay. I I promised it's

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the last time I'm gonna make a terrible joke like

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that for this episode. Um, I can't make any grand promises.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's it's interesting that he was. He was

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>very clear, clearly stating that if such a thing does exist,

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>then there's no reason and why this wouldn't give them

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>another opportunity. That makes perfect sense. Sure, well, I mean

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I can see it too, Like, for example, if people

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>claim to hear ghost voices with their ears, I mean,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there is that there has to be

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>an actual sound that's exciting the Well maybe, I mean

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be that they're imagining the sound, but I

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>stipulated if people are actually hearing, of course, then again

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>what is actually hearing? Well, okay, now we're getting into

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>too many questions about perception versus reality. But if you

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have a recording instrument there you can at least find

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>out if there was in fact a phenomenon that could

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be perceived as opposed to one that was imagined to

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be perceived in the head of the person who claims it. So,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if I say, I keep hearing this

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>low moaning voice in my house, and I set up

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a recording device and I tell people I just heard it,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you listen back and there's nothing on the recording,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and that might suggest that the problem could be in

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>my head, not outside of my head. And of course,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if spirits could speak from beyond the grave, something like

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this might in theory be useful. For example, take the

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Houdini example. You know, before Harry Houdini died. He the

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>story goes that he and his wife set up a

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>system where he gave her a secret message and nobody

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>else knew the message, and he said, look, if I can,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's possible for me to return from beyond the

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>grave and let you know that there is an afterlife,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll come back and tell you the secret message, and

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that way you'll know it's really me. Uh. And so

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that she ever claimed that happened, but

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they did every Halloween. Yeah, But if she

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>set up a recording device and could even if you

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hear normally, she might be able to hear through

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>some kind of anomaly in the audio the secret message.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>If it was the message, well, okay, that'd be good evidence.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But no such thing had happened. Now to continue on

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>our timeline of e v P, because of course, Edison

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>just said that the devices he was making could potentially

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be used for such a purpose if in fact any

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>phenomena existed, right, So, uh, he was not coming out

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and saying there are ghosts. He was just saying that, well,

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>if ghosts exists, then there's no reason why I can't

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>record them. Um, well, you have a man by the

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>name of Friedrich Jorgenson who publishes a book titled Voices

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>from Space and in the late Sounds. In the late fifties,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he started recording sounds by setting up a microphone on

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>his windows sill for the purpose of recording bird song.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But he claimed that when listening to the recordings that

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>he had made, he was hearing voices saying things, um, nothing,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, huge or whatever. But he was picking up

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>little things, and he started to suspect that in fact,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the microphone was starting to pick up stuff that is uh,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>otherwise undetectable. So it was picking up things that were

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not perceivable in his environment, according to his story. He

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>also claimed in nine that he received a message about

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a central investigation station in space. So, um, there's there's

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>also some interesting You can't diagnose people obviously, right, especially

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with well, first of all, I am not qualified to

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>diagnose anybody in anything. Second into the past. Secondly, yeah,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>diagnosing into the past is always a mistake. But with

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>those caveats in mind, it doesn't sound on It sounds

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to me like a form of schizophrenia. Uh, people who

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that they have heard things from outside of themselves

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>saying stuff, whether that's you know, instructions to do things

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or just saying things that only they can hear. Uh,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds very similar to that. However, he was claiming

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that he was picking them up on a microphone, which

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly would be beyond that. Right that now, now it's

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>perceptible to other people, it's not something that's just in

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>his head necessarily. Uh. In the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>another man named Constantine rawd Ive, who was a student

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of Jurgenson's, begins to make e VP recordings of his own,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and he allegedly recorded more than one hundred thousand audio

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tapes worth of phenomena. He published in nineteen sixty eight

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>his findings under the title and herberaths vered Herbauer, which

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is what is innaudible becomes audible. The English title for

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the book was Breakthrough an Amazing Experiment in Electronic Communication

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Dead. So while I didn't see that Jurgensen

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was specifically stating that he was hearing messages from beyond

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the grave, that's that was rawd Eve's interpretation certainly that

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>these were spirits that were attempting to communicate. Uh. There

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of interesting stories, especially from psychologists who

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>looked into rod Ive's approach and try to use a

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>scientific methodology to test whether or not UM there were

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>some confirmation bias or other issues going on. We'll talk

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:10.479
<v Speaker 1>more about some of the psychological explanations for e VP phenomena.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's like a t M machine, but whatever, UM,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we'll talk about those towards the end. Two

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was when the Association trans Communication is founded. This is

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an actual nonprofit organization dedicated to the study of all

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>forms of trans communication, which is communication across the veil

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with an emphasis on instrumental transcommunication and its subset electronic

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>voice phenomena instrumental trans communication that sounds so legitimate. Yeah,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>well it sounds better than like Quiji board, right, So um,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, uh, there are people and there are

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>smart people who are really looking into this uh and

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to see what if anything of substance you know,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>ectoplasma or otherwise happens to actually be there. Okay, So

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we have the idea on one hand that there are

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>real voices that are coming from real agents that may

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be people in space or or are most often thought

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of as spirits or ghosts of some kind, communicating through

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>electronic media. What's the other side of the case. The

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>other side of the case is that there is no uh,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there is no supernatural source for this and from this stuff.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of natural sources that could explain many,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>if not all, of the e v P that are

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Right, The argument is not necessarily that it's

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not supernatural. It's just that you don't need to resort

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to that. There are plenty of things that could explain

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you seem to be hearing voices in

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>electronic media, which and the argument using the acam's razor

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>approach is saying, if you have an explanation that does

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not require something that is herefore too unknown to science

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in order for it to have happened, then chances are

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the more mundane explanation is in act correct. Okay, so

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what are those possible mundane explanations? I think we should

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>break it down sort of into three categories, which would

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>be the input, the output, and then the interpretation. That's

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the way I sort of see it. So let's start

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with the input. I think there are a lot of

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>different ways that the way you record audio in the

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>first place can create all sorts of anomalies, so that

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't just expect to hear blank, white noise. You

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>would expect to hear random noises, you know, strange things. Sure,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>what could influence that? Well, Uh, it depends on so

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>many things. For one, it depends on what medium you're using. Right,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're using magnetic tape, magnetic tape already has like

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a hiss associated to it, and that's before you've even

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>started to put anything to the tape. If you've ever

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>listened to magnetic tape and it's you know, a quiet

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>section where there was no sound being recorded, it's just

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the tape playing. You'll still hear that hiss noise, So

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that already has a base level there. Uh. Digital records

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. Of course, it all depends upon

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the quality and and sensitivity of the microphone. I've seen

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>some people on message boards at least advising against high

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>quality audio recording equipment, right like somehow the higher higher

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>quality the recording, the less likely ghosts are gonna talk

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to you. Or maybe it's the higher quality the audio,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the less likely you're going to get any artifacts that

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>can be misinterpreted to be messages from beyond the grave. Hey,

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's me editorializing a little. Um. There's also the

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of raising up the microphone sensitivity, just cranking it

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>up as high as you possibly can, in order to

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up any possible noises, and you don't. From from

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>one perspective, that makes sense. You're saying, oh, I want

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that if something is being uh communicated,

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>even if it's really really faint, I want to be

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>able to pick it up. And one of the one

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the widely held beliefs that I don't think it's

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ever adequately explained. Is that ghosts have a real hard

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>time speaking up. Yeah, you know that whatever whatever chance

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes. Yeah, that that is I almost

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>should have said that at the beginning, that this is

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a very common feature of this is it's not like

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hear really loud noises. You're gonna hear kind

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of faint variations in the static and and little tiny

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>things that that are barely making it through. They advise

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you to wear headphones and turn the volume way up, so,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in other words, uh, turning up that sensitivito the microphone.

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we did an episode not too long ago

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>about audio production and talked about microphone sensitivity and how

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to set it so that you can get

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a decent recording. This is ignoring all of those those messages,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>it's ignoring all of those tips in order for you

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to try and maximize the chance that you're going to

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>get a hit. Uh. The issue here is that by

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>turning up that sensitivity, you turn up what is called

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the noise floor. This is just the natural noise that

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices make. Um. You know the fact that you're

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>using electronics in the first place, means you do have

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this ground level of noise, and when you have the

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>microphone sensitivities at a certain level, you pretty much don't

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>pick up on it. But the higher you turn it up,

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the more likely you're gonna pick up some of that noise.

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it might be interesting for us to

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>do a little moment here where Noel's going to insert

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a segment where he just he turns the microphone sensitivity

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>way up. Uh, And so folks were gonna have that

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>play right now. Um, you can adjust the volume on

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>your on your various MP three players or whatever so

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that you don't go deaf in case there is a

0:20:43.720 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>loud noise. Well, Noel does this. So no just adjusted

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the the gain essentially on our microphones, and we sat

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>here and listen to it, and to us it sounds

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like white noise. I mean, obviously if we listened to

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it again and again, we might find something interesting there.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'll talk more about that towards the end of

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the episode. But that that's kind of an example, you know,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>just the idea of cranking that microphone sensitivity way up. Um.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Another issue using electronic media in the first place is

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of encountering a ground loop. So ground loops

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is that's when you've got a current connecting two points

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're supposed to be the same electric potential, but

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact they're different potentials. That is what creates hum

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and noise and interference. It can happen with just you know,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>if you're using that cheap audio recording equipment. This is

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of stuff that can happen. You're probably familiar

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with this if you play electric guitars. Yeah, you're essentially

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you're inviting artifacts and distortion and pops and whistles

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and hums to get into your recording, which you know.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I can see why people who are big into e

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>v P say we should be using this equipment because

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>otherwise you're not going to get stuff, and not getting

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff might be an indication that there's nothing there another

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that could be creating anomalies at the beginning, at

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the recording phase. This is sort of the most obvious,

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in the least interesting, but if you watch some of

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>these e VP videos on YouTube, you'll see that it

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>influences some of them. They're sometimes recorded in spaces that

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>are one currently full of people and too prone to

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>cause echoes. So unless it's at like a mind convention,

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>chances are there's gonna be some people talking. Even then,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be will moving around and making noise. But

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so a good example would be, say a recording taken

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in a church full of people worshiping or visiting the church,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and you told me that you actually saw a video

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that was this particular example, right, Yeah, And in these

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>cases there are constantly echoes of voices reverberating throughout the space,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the microphone will pick up little pieces of them

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with varying intensity and fidelity based on just all the

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>constantly changing variables that influenced the propagation of sound waves

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in a place with echoes like the church. Along the

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>same lines, when microphone sensitivity is high, think about all

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of the auditory anomalies created simply by the sound of

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>physical friction. Yeah, I think we've got a little example

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of that in our our own version there, right, So,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a slight wind or a breeze over the microphone, Uh,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the adjustment of the experimenter's hand or body or clothing

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>against the microphone or the base on which the microphone

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is held, or just the microphone moving against the surface

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sitting on. Yeah, all these things create different weird

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>little bumps and creeks and static. You may have heard

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in some of our podcasts where one of us accidentally,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like while shifting our weight, you know, gives the table

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>just a little kick and then you hear the thump

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that goes through. Noel's very good at taking most of

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>those out, but once in a while, I think one

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>slips through. So you know, that's one of those things

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>where it's an example of the sort of stuff that

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>could be you know, very much amplified with this sort

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of approach where you're specifically looking for an anomally so

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>anomaly hunting is a big problem with this. Actually, another

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is I mean, what about all of those radio

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>signals bouncing around out there. Yeah, so it turns out

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we're using radio for a lot of stuff. Walkie talkies,

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>actual radio broadcasts, cellular phones. So, uh, Joe, I don't know,

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>did you ever play with like toy walkie talkies when

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a kid. Did you ever pick up anything besides

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the actual other walkie talkie? Yes? I think I did. Yeah,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I would pick up CB radio like I could actually

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>occasionally hear truckers talking and I would freak out because

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, like, who the you know, Brian's voice sure

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>got deep shut really quickly, and apparently Smokey's on his

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tail or something. I don't know what's going on. Yeah.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, radio interference is a thing, and

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's obvious, and sometimes it can be really subtle.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh, here's another example, Joe. Have you ever been

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>driving someplace and listening to a radio station and then

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>start to encounter a second radio station on that same frequency. Yeah,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and you until you get to a frequency that is

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>obviously stronger than the other one, you get this kind

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of interference and competing noise. Same sort of thing can

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>happen you. You might think that you're tuned into an

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>unoccupied radio frequency, but it may be that you're just

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>enough in the range of a radio broadcast station that

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you can pick it up very faintly and there's a

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise, but there actually is some signal there too.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>The signal might not always be obvious, but occasionally you

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>might get a word or two, and that can be misleading.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>You might think that you're getting messages beyond the veil,

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but really you're getting messages three counties over. There's also

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenon called ion a spheric ducting. This is when

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>radio signals can actually travel through the iono sphere much

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>further than they normally would, when little pockets or ducts

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>form in the ionosphere. Now these don't these these aren't permanent.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you have this you know, incredible uh

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pathway from one point to another all the way across

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. But occasionally they can form. So it's possible

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that once in a while, if you're really listening out

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for something, that you might pick up radio signals that

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have traveled a really long distance to the point where

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you might get things in other languages that you weren't expecting.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And that can really be you know, freaky if you're

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not expecting it. Um, but know that's that's all a possibility.

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The recordings of Rawdive are really good examples of radio interference. UH.

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The one time that he agreed to make a recording

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in a room that was specifically screened from radio interference,

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he did not record any voices. So obviously the idea

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>of proving a negative is a tough one. You know,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't necessarily say that in every other case, UH,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>this was an example of radio interference. But the fact

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that in the one case where they they very methodically

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>blocked it out, nothing happened is problematic. Yeah, I want

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to introduce another stage of audio recording at which you

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>could be introducing strange anomalies and and undecipherable sounds, and

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be at the output stage, so after you've

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>done the recording. Obviously, recording doesn't just go straight from

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the microphone to your ears. A lot of times you're

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>going to run it through something sure before you finally

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to it. So it's possible to create strange sounds

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>inadvertently in a perfectly mundane recording just by putting it

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>through sound post processing software, especially if you're trying to

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>equalize volume or use any kind of automated subroutine that

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>did just the volume of the wave. And though it's

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>harder to see how this could happen by accident, you

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>can obviously create strange sounds by adding you know, the

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of music centered effects like compression or reverb or distortion.

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure well, yeah, and just just playing with equalizer settings

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>right like where you you think, oh, I want to

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>boost this particular frequency range because I want to have

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more base in this particular, or you know,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I need to I need to bring the trouble up, uh,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff occasionally that you know, what you're

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing is you're boosting the volume of the frequencies at

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that range, and sometimes you're you're recording will have stuff

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that at its settings when you were recording, there wasn't

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>anything perceptible. But as you start to boost that volume,

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you start to hear more of that noise, not just

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the signal, but the noise that's at that frequency, and

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where you start maybe picking out things that you

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know were there, and so therefore they seem like

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a purposeful communication, when in fact it may

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just be noise. It may just be random noise that

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was recorded but not perceptible at the levels that you

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>had said at at the time of recording. Right. But

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>everything we've said so far only gets us to the

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that these recordings aren't just blank, like the fact

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that they will have strange things that sound off. You know,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not just flat static sound, but you'll hear a

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>little anomalies, noises, creaks and cracks and bumps. The next

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>stage is how do you go from that towards why

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>why do you hear a little crack in a in

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of static and think I think it said

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>my name. Well, assuming that you're actually well, first of all,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you could have the radio interference, so you could actually

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have you could actually have real words on there. But

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying apart from that one, just the ones where

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they're all different kinds of anomalies and the sound recording gotcha.

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're listening. Let's say you're listening to something that's

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be white noise, but you're starting to pick

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>up on something that sounds like someone talking through the

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>white noise, and uh and it it's one of those

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:16.719
<v Speaker 1>things where you're you're having to listen to it over

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and over again. There's several things that are possibly at play,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and one is our good old buddy paradolia. Audio paradolia

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case, right, So, paradolia refers to something that

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you will immediately recognize as soon as we define it.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the human tendency to find patterns and significance in

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>random stimuli. So just looking at the grass you could

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>see a face, or looking at the clouds, the most

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>common example exactly you look at that one looks like

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a dog and yeah, um, you look at the knots

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in a tree and oh, there's a face in that tree. Yeah,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you write a book called Game of Thrones

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and does incredibly success full. Uh. Yeah, we're hardwired to

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>recognize patterns. Part of that is, you know, babies are

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>really good at recognizing human faces, and uh, when baby

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>see human face, they tend to react in a way

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that makes, uh, most humans feel protective of that baby. Sure,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so that's there's a possible survival instinct there. Well, I

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's not just that we're hardwired to recognize patterns,

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's that we're hardwired to beyond the

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>special lookout for intelligent agents. Well it's certain, Yeah, I

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>can see what you're saying. So on the lookout it's

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason you're very likely to see a face in

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the tree instead of see a mountain in the tree. Like,

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we're on the lookout for things that act independently and quickly,

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like animals and like other people, and potential threats that

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the big one. You can see an obvious advantage to this,

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>because if you see something in the bushes that could

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be a tiger, or it could be another person who

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to steal your stuff. Is it better to air

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on the side of and it's probably nothing, or is

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it better to air on the side of better get

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>away from that? Well, there's obviously a survival advantage to

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>airing on the side of I don't know what that is,

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but it could be something that wants to get me

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and and and in that case, it's when you're on

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for things that have agency. Yeah, there's definitely

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely playing a part in it. It's it's one

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of those things. And plus, if you're if you are

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for it, actively looking for it, you want to

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>find something, right, That's there's there's the desire if you're

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>actively looking for something, then that that is based upon

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you want to find whatever it is

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for, and so that desire can also definitely

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>feed into it. Right. But the examples we've talked about

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>so far are visual. If you translate the same thing

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to an auditory phenomena, then what you it is auditory paradolia.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you hear a sound calling out in the distance,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, is it the wind going through that tree,

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>or is it somebody warning me of danger. Right. Yeah,

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where again, if you're looking

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for it, you're more likely to hear it as being significant. Right.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 1>But even if you're not looking for it, we can

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be pretty susceptible to that sort of thing where we

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>start to we start to attribute significance where there may

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.479
<v Speaker 1>not be any there. Um and uh. A great example

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is the idea of backmasking, the idea of

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>putting in secret messages, recording them and then laying them

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>down backwards. In an audio track, you said putting in

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you should have meant interpreting, Well, well, they're

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>reading out there are The idea is that they've been

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>put in purposefully, whereas in rock record in reality, in reality,

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it very rarely happened. Occasionally it did happen. People would

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>put in messages backwards, but it was almost always a joke,

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like uh, weird Weird Al I think has backwards recordings

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on like half his albums, where if you play backwards

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it will say things like congratulations, you just screwed up

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 1>your record player. That kind of thing like that. That's

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of backwards messages that you might get. But um,

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but the idea of back masking really took off in

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the eighties the during the Satanic Panic. That was an

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>era where there was this huge concern that Satanists were

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>corrupting the youth and turning them to their wicked ways,

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and that pretty much everything that kids enjoyed was was

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>actually the the tool of the Satanist movements. So rock

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and roll music was a big one, and there was

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the this this idea that UH musicians have been putting

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in secret messages to get kids to do terrible things

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>if they listened to it. Somehow they shouldn't listen to

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those DeBie Gibson records. And you definitely shouldn't have listened

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to those Debbie Gibson records. I was a Tiffining fan myself.

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>The idea being that somehow we were subconsciously being able

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to interpret this backwards messaging, and therefore it would get

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>through to our subconscious and we would do terrible things.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you try and listen to backwards

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 1>messages and trying to figure out what is being said,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I pretty much guarantee you you're gonna be a percent wrong,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's really hard to tell. Well. But also

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I pretty much guarantee you you're you're going to find

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff that sounds like words in a funny way. Oh sure. Yeah.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>If if you were to play anything backwards, even if

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>there's there was never let's say that the stuff that

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 1>came out had no message in it at all. Right,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that even the lyrics didn't have a

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>message in some of these songs in the eighties. But

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say you play it backwards and you're just listening

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for something and mustering cat bail. We still you could

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>very easily start to imagine that you're hearing things that

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.959
<v Speaker 1>have significance even if there is no significance there. And

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it makes it way easier if someone else tells you

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what you should be listening for, especially if like on

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube video and has an example of this and

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>then has captions up well. In fact, a lot of

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 1>e VP videos that I found on YouTube actually do

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have captions. They come pre preloaded with the person who's

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>presenting this telling you what they think it says. And

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>when I was listening to it, I was like, huh,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I never would have arrived at

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>those words listening to it on my own. But now

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm watching them on the screen hearing it. Yeah,

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I can sort of hear that. Okay, So now we've

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of competing hypotheses. We've got we've got

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ghosts actually talking through audio recording equipment, and we've got

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>audio anomalies coupled with our tendency to see patterns and

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>especially like uh, intelligent or agency created patterns where they're

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not there. How do we test which one of them

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually the reality. Well, again, it's really hard to

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to prove a negative, right, It's hard to sit there

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, uh, there is no message in this recording.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>If one person is claiming up and down that yes,

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a message here, and someone else is saying, no,

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a message there, you're not really making any progress.

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>One thing you could do, if you wanted to be

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really clever, is you could create a test where you

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>present people with white noise. There's no message, it was

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>purely random white noise generation, nothing else of significance is

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in there. But tell people that it's actually a message

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and then asked them to write down anything they hear

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens. Because that's what David Ellis did. Now,

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>David ellis still a lot of investigation of e VP phenomena,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>again using the redundant phrase, but at any rate, he

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of investigation in this area, and he

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>held this test where he got a group of people

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.720
<v Speaker 1>together and he said, we're gonna play for you a lecture.

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It's an old lecture that's been recorded ages ago, and

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the qualities course, yeah, sort of like that, like it

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was some sort of lecture of that sense, and it

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>was a publicly given lecture, but the recording has degraded,

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>uh to the point where we can't recapture anything that's said.

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>We just want to you to write down any words

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or phrases that you do here so that we can

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>start to piece this back together. And don't worry about

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to get everything because it's not going to happen.

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you hear anything specific, write it down. And

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, the people who listened to this white noise

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that had no message in it started writing downwards and

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>phrases they thought they had heard, and there was no

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>real significance to the words or phrases except for whatever

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>happened to be on their mind at the time, suggesting

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, this was purely psychological, so showing that

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is in fact a possible Like if this is

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>possible to play people a recording that has no significance

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to it, but they find significance in it, Isn't that

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>more realistic a conclusion? And then to say something that

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't proven exists is communicating in unknown mechanism electronically.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Probably yeah. I mean if again, if you sit there

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, here's this, here's this real life situation we

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>can point to where real people who there was no

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>supernatural element to this experiment, right, he would be told

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it was an old recording. Well, unless they unless someone

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>would come along and say, well, the ghosts put messages

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in your white noise recording to throw off the experiment.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But that would only work if the group all wrote

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>down the same words and phrases, and they didn't. But

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of course people don't even do that with these supposed

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>e VP recordings, which is another If you were to

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>remove the captions, I can guarantee you people would come

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up with different messages from them. That comes up to

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the verbal transformation effect. That's another issue that's related to this.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That was a term coined by Richard M. Warren, who

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was a professor of psychology way back in one and

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he wrote about this tendency for listeners to perceive changes

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of distinct speech upon repetition. In other words, the more

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>often you listen to something, the more likely you would

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>perceive something that wasn't actually said. This ties into yet

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>another aspect common to the way these e VP recordings

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are presented, which is that they're looped all the time.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 1>If you go watch on YouTube, people will they'll play

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it once and then they'll have a caption or something

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that says listen, I think it said whatever, and then

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll play it five times in a row. He also

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>looked at rowd Ive's work and said that rod I've

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>when he was listening to stuff, Um would come up

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with certain words like Lenin was like l E n

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I n as in the name like Ladimir. Yes, he

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was coming up with the name Lenin with this one

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>selection of noise and saying that was definitely what was

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>being said, and he had been listening to it over

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again. But when presented to other

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>people who had not listened to it before and did

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>not know the interpretation, they were coming up with totally

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>different sounds, like boo doo or clue lu or you know,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't. It didn't sound remotely like linen to them.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And and part of that is because one they had

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not listened to it over and over and over again.

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And too they had not been told what to listen for.

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're not told what to listen for

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and you come up with a totally different interpretation, how

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can anyone be certain that the words they are perceiving

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are in fact actual words. I want to offer an

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>observation of my own about these recordings, just e VP recordings,

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>which is that very often the phrases that are interpreted

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>are not long sentences. They're very short. They're like one

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>to three words at a time. And also, I would

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>say that what is common among the interpretations is more

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>rhythmic than uh than what would be the opposite, like

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the vowel sound ones and stuff like that. So imagine

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got an audio anomaly and you ask ten different people,

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>assume this is a word, what does the words say?

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what will be very common to almost all

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of them is the number of syllables in the word.

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And then apart from that, it's going to be very different.

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it's something about the rhythm of the word

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be central and how people are interpreting things.

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And that makes a lot of sense to me, because

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're really not likely to hear something

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a vowel in an audio anomally, You're

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely to hear a little percussive elements that seem

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the beginnings and ends of hard consonance. If

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you filter through white noise, you can start to create

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>some some vowel sounds, depending on how you're filtering it.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But then that that's almost like an artificial like that's

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like trying to manufacture these kind of recordings. And again,

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's one of those where it's picking up little

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny snippets of radio communication one way or another, it

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>may be that you are actually hearing bits or entire

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>words or short phrases. But uh As, a lot of

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>researchers have pointed out that if the if the dearly

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>departed are trying to communicate with us, they are really

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>really bad at saying anything of significance, Like if they're

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>able to talk most of the most of the time,

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the phrases that are coming by have no real impact

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>or meaning to them, and so especially if it's the

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>ones where exactly so. And finally, I think another thing

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that's playing here in psychology is just if you again,

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the communication of spirits from beyond

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the grave, it already you know, that's built upon a

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>presumption that there is a thing beyond the grave to contact. Sure,

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that e VP phenomenon are probably not

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>real voices doesn't necessarily like disprove and after life or no. No,

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it just means that there's really no reason to assume

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that these are ghosts talking to you in the noises

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in your audio tape. And and it just it does

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>end up like if you pursue this, it does mean

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that you are, uh, you're you're normally hunting, just like

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we were saying, poor and when you when you hunt

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for anomalies, you will find them. I mean that that

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>does happen. But it doesn't mean that the anomalies are

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>significant in any way. And that's the issue there is

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that again, it doesn't mean that like even if no

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>e v P ever in the history of mankind was

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>truly significant, that doesn't That's not like the nail in

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the coffin of the afterlife for a terrible, terrible phrase,

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but it means that that potential avenue doesn't have any

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>real merit to it. And ultimately this is if this

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>is the foothold you're using on which to base your

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>belief afterlife, it might be an incentive for you to

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>really cling to it. Yeah, and it's it's again, it's

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where the mechanism for that communication

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>as always really shaky. I mean that that's the truth

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for any kind of paranormal research that I've found, because

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>since we don't have the scientific evidence to support whatever

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the claim is um yet. I mean, maybe one day

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>we will, but if we since we don't have it,

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>then it requires some fancy footwork on the part of

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking into it to try and explain

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>how their methodology is supposed to be effective. Like if

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>if I if I tell you, Joe, that there's an

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>invisible but still orange flying monkey that is constantly following

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you around, but you are unable to perceive it in

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>any way. But I tell you that this one little

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>needle will move when it comes close to it. Whenever

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the monkey is really close to you, the needle will move.

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't explain how that's supposed to happen or

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what the mech an is m there is. You know,

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I have to prove that something is there first to

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to show you that a tool can detect

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>its presence. You can't. You can't say that this tool

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>detects the presence of something you haven't proven to exist.

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's it's that made the same argument

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in our ghost Hunting episode years and years ago. And

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 1>uh again, it's not to say that these things don't exist.

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't believe in them, but it doesn't

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that I'm right. I just haven't seen any evidence

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for it. And if I were to see evidence that

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was very compelling, I mean, this would require extraordinary evidence.

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But if I did, then I would like to think

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say, oh, yeah, you know what, I was

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.439
<v Speaker 1>wrong and this is really exciting and I can't wait

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about how to study it. But so

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>far I have not seen that. I was just trying

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to think what would be really good evidence for the

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:58.800
<v Speaker 1>truth of spiritual basis for e VP Ghostbusters three, and

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Harold Ramos, that would be that would

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be it. I was trying to see if Harold Ramos

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 1>would contact us from beyond the grave and the silence

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>while I stared at you. Okay, No, So that just

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was really awkward as opposed to UH as as as

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.760
<v Speaker 1>opposed to enlightening. Um no, I mean I I think

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that it would have to be uh something that could

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>be uh replicable by different people using very strict approaches,

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so that they could all kind of come to the

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>same conclusion. So in other words, like even then, I

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>guess it would be hard to to be conclusive about

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>the source of it. Yeah, I mean to me, what

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.399
<v Speaker 1>would mean? Yeah, I guess you could do some kind

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of radio isolation thing. Well, yeah, let's let's like, here's

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical instance that I could imagine making me change

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>my mind. Let's say that you have multiple independent teams

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>who are from varying backgrounds. So you might have some

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>people who are ghost hunters, you might have some people

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>who are deeply skeptical, all using their whatever equipment there

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they want in order to pick up the phenomena uh,

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And they all pick something up, and they all interpret

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it to be a meaningful communication, and they are able

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate the possibility that was radio interference. Then I'd

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, that's that's really hard to argue away.

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I would have a hard time saying like this is

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing there. I would at least say there's

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>something they're worth looking into. Whether it ever turns out

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to be something significant still remains to be seen. But

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that would definitely get me thinking, yeah, I'm there with you.

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd be mostly convinced by that. And then

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>my question would be like, why are ghosts from a

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>few hundred years ago so tech savvy? Well they might.

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>They might just be saying, how do you work this thing?

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you skip? The next time

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't get out of the Yeah, exactly, you press information.

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It's asking me for my iTunes account. I don't have one. Yeah,

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, it's an interesting it's an interesting subject.

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think largely for the human factor, you know, the

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are really really invested in this, and uh,

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, who knows. Maybe one day they'll turn

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around and again present proof that makes me eat all

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>my words and I'll gladly say, let's really look into this.

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 1>But so far that has not happened, and uh, I

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 1>don't expect it to. But you know, never say never. Nevertheless,

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>they make some great YouTube videos. They do make some

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>great YouTube videos, and for that we are thankful. Uh guys,

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Happy Halloween. This was a fun topic to look into.

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have any suggestions for future topics of

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff or future guests, maybe there's somebody you've always

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear uh join on the show, or maybe

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>someone in the past that you want to have come back.

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me know. Send me an email. My email addresses

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>tex stuff at how stuff works dot com, or drop

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>me a line on Facebook, Twitter or Tumbler. The handle

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at all three is tech Stuff hs W and what

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>talp you again? Really soon for more on this and

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics because it has stuff works dot com.