WEBVTT - This Is How China Builds So Much Nuclear Power

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jolle Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, you know, we've been talking a lot about the

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>US energy system for obvious reasons, at least when it

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>comes to electricity. I don't know about you. I kind

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 2>of feel like the more we talk about it, the

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>less I understand it.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, absolutely, I think there are a couple problems here. So, like,

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>even beyond the actual different technologies for generating power, there's

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 3>the patchwork of like how different grids work in different states.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>There's the different regulations, the different like interoperability and all

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 3>of that. And then even if we look like beyond

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the US, it gets I guess even more different.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, I sort of wonder maybe we can learn

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>something about the US by a little compared and contrast. Right,

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>So if we look at the US and we still

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 2>don't totally get how it works, maybe, I don't know,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>just to thought, maybe we'll learn something about the US

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>by looking at some different system and then we have

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>something to compare it to. It might be a weigh

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>in by looking at the outside world.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan of doing this, by the way,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 3>just to identify like different choke points in a particular

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>domestic process. If you think that the US can't do

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>something for whatever unidentifiable reason or I don't know, cultural

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>like hold back, but if you look at a different

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>country and they're doing it at scale, very very quickly,

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 3>then I think you can learn a lot about yourself.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's exactly right. And so one of the things

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>again that comes up from time to time here in

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 2>our conversations is nuclear and this is just one example

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of a source of power that may or may not

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>be important in our future. But according to and I'm

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>looking at a story from the Economist, over the past decade,

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>China has added thirty seven nuclear reactors according to the

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 2>International Atomic Energy Agency. I don't know, maybe we've added

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>like two. I forget how many there are at that

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Georgia plant. A couple more maybe restarted. But you know,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>we talk all the time about nuclear and how hard

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>it is and how hard the financing is and the

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>labor force and the learning laws, and we forgot to

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we forgot how to build them for various reasons.

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's not and it's so expensive. There's all these

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 2>cost overruns every time. But apparently that is not the

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>case everywhere, and that there are other parts of the world,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>particularly China, where they just keep building its scale, and

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe we could learn a little bit of how they

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>do that, and how they finance it, and how they

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 2>avoid forgetting how to build them.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 3>I think this is so interesting, this particular approach that

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 3>compare and contrast, and it is absolutely true. I think

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the US has the most nuclear reactors out there, like

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 3>almost one hundred or something like that, but it took

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 3>us decades and now to build them, and as you

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 3>rightly point out, we haven't built many new ones that recently. Meanwhile,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>China is adding more and more, and they make it

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>look easy. I mean, I guess they are just like

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 3>giant things to boil water. But you know, China really

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 3>makes it look easy. So what can we learn from China?

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 2>We really do have the perfect guests. By the way,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>we've had this guest on in the past. We talked

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to him about something completely different.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this was during the depths of the COVID crisis, Yes,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and we were talking to this person. He was based

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>out in Shanghai, and we were talking basically about how

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>they were getting food into apartment buildings and staying alive

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>during that time.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that was an interesting sort of logistical story

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and its own right. If you're under complete lockdown in

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a Shanghai apartment building, how do you actually get food?

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>And anyway, I'm thrilled because now we're recording this December seventeenth,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, we are talking to him in completely

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 2>different times.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>He's been freed from lockdown.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>He is now here in studio with us, So we

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 2>are going to be speaking with David Fishman, senior manager

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Lantau Group. He's based in China typically where

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>he mostly focuses on the Chinese energy system. So literally

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest and a repeat guest. So, David, thank

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>you for coming on. Odd lads, welcome to New York City,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 2>welcome back.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for having me.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you do the only other time we talked

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>to you, The only thing we knew about you is

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>that you were figuring out how to get food into

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>your apartment. What do you do now when that's no

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 2>longer the pressing issue?

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Sure, So I work at a company called the

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Landau Group. We are an economic consultancy. We're doing power

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 4>and gas consulting across APAC and so I'm focused on China.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm in the China office. We're doing the business of electricity.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>So for me, that means either somebody who wants to

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 4>build an electricity generation asset, wants to sell one, wants

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 4>to sell a portfolio of assets, wants to invest in one,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 4>maybe through a fund or as some other type of

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 4>investment product. And then on the what we'd call our downstream,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>who uses the electric city, right, your major multinationals, your factories,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 4>anybody who uses electricity as an input to produce things.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 4>So we're working in the business of electricity, trying to

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 4>make buying and selling electricity more economic for everybody involved.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm just going to dive into the nuclear aspect

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>of this.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 4>Then.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, Joe gave us some contours around how much

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>China is currently building. When did China decide that it

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>was interested in nuclear and what was the sort of

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>like thought process the strategy about how nuclear would fit

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>into everything else, including the coal power that China is

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 3>famous for using.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the history of the Chinese civil nuclear

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 4>power industry goes back to stems back to the eighties.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 4>So looking at you know, the mid to late eighties

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>is when China was signing agreements to bring in its

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 4>first nuclear reactor technology. At the time, it was there

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>are two different paths that were pursuing. They signed an

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 4>agreement with Framatome, a French company, to bring over one reactor,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>and they developed domestic reactor with at the time the

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Soviet Union to have a domestic technology tree as well.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 4>So in the eighties, China was actually experiencing some pretty

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 4>rapid economic growth, especially in the late eighties, and looking

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to expand its power supply rapidly, and at the time

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 4>it was quite tight, and so nuclear was seen as

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 4>a potential way to expand the power supply and get

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 4>into a power generation for what was at the time

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>something very new for China. What did you so?

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, literally from just reading the first paragraph of

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a paywalled economist story that number of about thirty seven

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>new nuclears saw one just like I just google how

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>many new clear reactors are big built in China? Scrolled

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>down until I find something in the Google search. This

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>is how the research is done, folks. Well, why don't you,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>in your words give us a sense of the size

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and scale of Chinese civil nuclear generation and where it's going,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>and then sort of like the role it generally plays

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in the overall portfolio there, sure describe.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 4>It, Yeah, sure so. So nuclear in China has the

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 4>interesting status of being both relatively large and still somehow small.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Large in the sense that it's one of the largest

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>operating fleets in the world. Right, You've got you know,

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>fifty almost sixty reactors operating. We're talking about nearly sixty

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 4>gigawatts of generation capacity. But then in the context of

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 4>China's entire generation fleet, right, they've got well over one

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 4>thousand gigawatts of coal and then many more thousands of

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 4>gigawatts of wind and solar. So it's both large in

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 4>the context of the world, but also small. And that's

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the case for a lot of things in China. The

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 4>thing that can be large in China can also And what's.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 2>The ambition for you know, looking out, you know, in

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>a five year plant, I don't know how whether they

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>do that for energy? Two, where is nuclear potentially? How

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>much could nuclear be a thing? What's the size and scale.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Of the ambition?

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Sure so long term, I mean it depends on how

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 4>your energy planners and your economic planners and vision the

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 4>long term makeup of the grid. What type of power

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 4>are we using in twenty fifty. Is it going to

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 4>be a little bit or a medium amount or a

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of nuclear? So it's scenarios, right, and China has

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 4>scenarios too for a high end a low end. So

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the recent scenarios that I've seen. Originally it was saying

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 4>no less than three hundred gigawatts two hundred and fifty

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 4>three hundred gigawats, so two hundred and fifty or three

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred reactors, right, two hundred and fifty units. So the

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 4>United States has just about one hundred right now. So

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 4>if they got to that scenario, it would be about

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 4>two and a half times what the US has right now.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So what's the process by which a new nuclear reactor

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 3>gets built in China? And how much does it differ

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 3>from what goes on in the US.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Sure, well, the steps of the process are actually very similar.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 4>This is these are international best practices for how you

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 4>build these types of infrastructure. So you have to choose

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 4>a site, You're going through a sighting process, an environmental

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 4>impact report. Maybe you've got to make sure the local

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>sea life is not going to be affected by warm

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 4>water being discharged, there's no endangered species nearby. All those

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>different aspects. So you choose your site. That takes a

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 4>few years. You have consultation period. There's a period for

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the public to maybe express their dissatisfaction. This happens in

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 4>China too. And when the site is finally selected, then

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 4>you start pre construction. You can level the site, you

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 4>can connect communications utilities, you can do all your pre groundwork,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>and then we're waiting for a really key milestone called FCD.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 4>That's first concrete date, and that's when the first barrel

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 4>of safety related concrete is poured at the site, and

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 4>so that would be the beginning of your construction of

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 4>your containment building. And so from FCD to your full

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 4>construction period, you do civil construction, you do installation, you

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 4>have commissioning. Maybe you encounter some issues during commissioning, you

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 4>do troubleshooting right and eventually you fully connect, you connect it,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 4>you load your fuel, you have your first criticality the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 4>first time that you know fission starts in the reactor.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Then you connect it to the grid and then you

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 4>get up to one hundred percent power and you got

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 4>a nuclear power plant. If you do it, we're you

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 4>looking at ten to twelve years. See, if you do

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 4>it not so quick, you're looking a lot more than that.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 2>So it takes a long time in China too. So

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, we look at you as construction builders like,

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>oh can't we It's a log process anywhere you look.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask about the financing. So if there's

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>a new who's paying for this? And also how are

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>they selling this energy? Because one thing I get the

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>impression of is that setting aside the cost of building

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 2>a new nuclear reactor, which is an expensive, time consuming process.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 2>The electricity market structure also seems to matter a lot,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 2>because you need a certain amount of guaranteed off take,

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>you need a certain amount of price stability if the

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>price drops to zero for a long time, because there's

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>it's very sunny and windy in that area and suddenly

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you're that's screwing with the economics of it. And so

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>market structure and financing are both important. Talk to us

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>about how that works in China versus here.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Right? Sure, so the builders, right, the companies that are

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 4>constructing and eventually owning the assets are all state owned enterprises. Okay,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 4>so you've got these great big sos. Their job is

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 4>to own and operate nuclear power plants, and so when

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 4>they go out to secure financing, of course they're securing

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>financing from state owned banks as well. They're going to

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 4>be getting very preferential loan treatment, right, very low percentage

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 4>rates maybe two percent, one and a half percent, things

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>like that. For a huge infrastructure like that, we're talking

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 4>billions of rate.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Not the spread.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, keep going, so very very low rates because again

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 4>they have a mandate to build. This is state banks,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 4>state infrastructure, and state builders. They need to build these things.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 4>And then when they're going out to sell power right now,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 4>they're given a guaranteed on grid rate. So the grid

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 4>company and the power regulators say, when you complete your

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 4>plant and you start selling power, we will make sure

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 4>you receive this much for every kilo what hour of

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 4>power that you send into the grid. Long term, they

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.239
<v Speaker 4>want to marketize it. They want to have that exposed

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 4>to the vagaries of the markets the same way that

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 4>you would see maybe in the United States or Western Europe.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 4>And that will be an adjustment for China's nuclear industry.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 4>Historically they have only operated on this kind of fixed

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 4>feed and rate.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, that's a pretty big comparative advantage if

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>you're getting subsidized financing from a state owned enterprise or

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 3>something like that. Plus at the moment you have that

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 3>guaranteed off take, even though they might want to move

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to a market based system before. It also strikes me

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 3>that there are a few other potential comparative advantages, like

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>lots of ready labor, lots of manufacturing capacity presumably that's

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 3>able to make the stuff you need for these things.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Walk us through, like all the different advantages that China

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>has in this process.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure, So if you maybe you've seen before or not,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 4>if you look at one of those like stacked bar charts,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 4>that it compares all the cost components of you know,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 4>building one of these things in China versus Europe versus

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 4>the United States. It's not like you'd point to any

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 4>single component of the stacked bar and say, ah, that's it.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>That's the key. That's why they're so cheap. Every single

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 4>component is cheaper, right, You've got your cost of capital

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 4>is lower, You've got your construction timeline is so tightly managed.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, so you're saving on interest costs exactly.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>And the sooner you can connect to the grid and

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 4>start selling power. That's when you start making your money back. Right,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>So every day that you go over your construction schedule,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a hunt. We say in the US about a

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 4>million dollars of missed power sales and then also about

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 4>a million dollars of interest payments. So here you got

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>this two million dollars spread every day over your construction

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 4>schedule that was originally planned. Like, that's just mind boggling.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Then we look at the production capacity, right, China's incredible

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 4>industrial production capacity. We're talking about these heavy forged components,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 4>and maybe only a couple of companies in the whole

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 4>world can make things like the reactor pressure vessel, the

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 4>steam generators, the pressure risers, the primary piping, the reactor

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 4>cool and pump, all these things. And there's like three

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 4>companies in the world that can make these and now

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 4>at this point, several of them are in China. And

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 4>when they need to prototype, when they need to iterate,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>when they need to troubleshoot something, it's all in one

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 4>in industrial cluster. It's all a company and its subsidiaries

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 4>or its sister partner companies, right, and so they can

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 4>quickly trouble through things really quickly. So that's going to

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>be your industrial production component very strong. You've got you know,

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 4>people work longer hours, they'll work through weekends, they'll work

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 4>through holidays. China is really really competent at building very

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 4>large construction, very large infrastructure. Right it could be a dam,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 4>or a bridge, or a highway or a high speed railway,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.359
<v Speaker 4>or a nuclear reactor. When it comes to the construction

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 4>know how of being able to do it on time

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 4>and like an oiled machine, they're winning there too. And

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>then we talk about the actual way they're building the

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>nuclear power plants. There's something really interesting here. This was

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>actually pioneered by Westinghouse out of the United States, something

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 4>called modularized construction, where on site or off site you're

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 4>prefabricating large portions of the reactor, portions of the containment building,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 4>and so you can work on individual components at the

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 4>same time, bring it to site, and then you get

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the largest crane in the world that lifts this massive, massive,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 4>pre assembled component into place. When you're able to work

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 4>like that, you can cut down the construction schedule. Even

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 4>more interestingly, Westinghouse pioneered that that they haven't been really

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 4>successful in implementing it in their recent builds. China, on

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 4>the other hand, learned from Westinghouse and has been very

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 4>successful with this modulized construction approach.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk more about that, because it's very intuitive, right,

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the idea that the more you can build at the

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>factory and the less you have to build on site

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>makes it easy and a lot of the so far,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it seems like mostly hype about small modular reactors in

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the US is sort of on this idea, like why

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 2>don't start every project from scratch? Why is it apparently

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>hard even though in theory that seems very obvious because

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there actually are any modular reactors

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>in the US despite the sort of intuitive appeal.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 4>So I think I gotta clarify here, there's modularized construction,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>and there's small modular reactors. Okay, So SMRs or small

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 4>modular reactors, they refer to a situation where the entire

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 4>reactor is encased in a single unit.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, got it. Yeah, But it's still this idea

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that the lot of the fabrication process happens not at

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the site itself. Again, something that feels highly intuitive and

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>apparently easier so than time.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, so my understanding from the Westinghouse design approach when

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 4>they used this for the first time in designing the

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>AP one thousand technology that we're built here in Vocal

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 4>in the United States. Is one of the major barriers. Well,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 4>there's terveral. There's always going to be regulatory barriers, right,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a new way of doing things. Anytime it's a

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 4>new way of doing things, the regulator is going to

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 4>want you to jump through a million hoops to try

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 4>to clarify and justify that what you're doing is defensible

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 4>and safe. So you've got that one, of course, But

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 4>then the actual logistics of lifting these massive, massive, we're

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 4>talking thousands of tons of prefab components. They actually had

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>to design and then especially contract the world's largest heavy

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 4>lift crane. Westinghouse did just to be able to lift

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the first one. They worked with an American company to

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 4>design to custom design this giant fixed base ring crane

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that requires other cranes to build it. Then you have

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 4>this giant, giant crane that's in place and it swings around.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 4>It usually works for two different units to build two

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 4>reactors at the same site. Interestingly, they weren't able to

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>use this giant giant crane in China because of a

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 4>design miscommunication. The first AP one thousands that Westinghouse tried

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to build in China, they didn't leave space on the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 4>site to put the giant crane, so in the end

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 4>they had to use a very very large roller crane instead,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 4>which just about did the job, but it forced them

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 4>to change the way they built it. China has learned

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 4>from that though. So the newest you know, QUA long

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 4>one reactors that China builds, they use a giant ring crane.

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 4>I believe they use a zoom lion. It's a Chinese

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 4>brand has designed one of these, built one of these

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 4>massive ultra heavy lift cranes as well, and so now

0:17:55.480 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 4>that's you know, they're reaping those benefits.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I have a slightly random question, which is building nuclear reactors.

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 3>How customized do the components that go into these actually

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 3>have to be? Like how much does the design actually

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 3>vary site to site?

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, if they are the same series of reactors, right,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 4>you could say the AP one thousand, right, that's a

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 4>base unit. Now the ones that are built in vocal

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 4>and the ones that were being built at Summer in

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 4>South Carolina before that was canceled. Those were probably a

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 4>little bit different, right, but you know, largely part of

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 4>the same series. The ones that were built in China

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 4>were built on that same platform, but they would have

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 4>been modified a little bit for the Chinese context. They

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 4>called them Chinese AP one thousands CAP one thousands, but

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 4>you could say they're substantially the same reactor with with

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>small modifications. When we start talking about different series, though,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 4>if we say, like the French design versus the US

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 4>design versus what's being sold now in Korea or something

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 4>like that, you'll see more similarities to their predecessors that

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 4>they came up through different generations of technology. So like Korea,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 4>you'd see similarities to the old ge Hatachi reactors because

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>that's where they got their technology originally. Then you'd see

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 4>to say a modern EIGHTP one thousand. These are different

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 4>tech trees from different competitors.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm a guy on Twitter listening to this,

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and I am a guy on Twitter, except I'm talking

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 2>in this, but I'm just a guy on Twitter and

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm hearing you talk about, okay, they get preferential lending

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 2>from the state owned bank. The company is state owned.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Probably the crane company is state owned. There's probably a

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>few other state owned businesses, and I think, yeah, okay,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're really good at building reactors fast. But

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 2>there must be some sort of accumulated debts and inefficiencies

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that come with all of these all of these entities

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 2>that have something other than a profit motive. And you know,

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>probably you know, I don't know that my intuition or

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>my response to you, or my my dunk on you

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>is that there's going to be all these accumulated losses

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>that ripple through the systems on account of the fact

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that it's SOOE working with see after SOE. Do we

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>have any sense of how economic these projects actually are

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Because if these were private companies, you say, oh, they're

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>either making money, or if these were sort of strictly

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>for profit listed companies, you say, well, they're making money,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 2>they're not making money. Whatever. How do we think about

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>the actual economics of whether this is good investment? Because

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>it's cool, Yeah, you know, China's building dozens of reactors,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>How do we know these are good economic investments?

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 4>Well, unless I can crack open you know, China National

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Nuclear Corporations books like, I can't tell you for sure

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 4>these are good investments. Right, But when they build them

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 4>at that pace, when you look at it from the

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 4>outside and you say, all the conditions are in place

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to have surely built this according to the budget set

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 4>for yourself. Right, you declared that you would build it

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 4>with a certain budget and a certain time. You talk

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 4>about the budget, right, So you're looking at you know,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 4>your construction period of five years, your pre construction and

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 4>your commissioning. You add another five years or so, right.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 4>But then once they build it, they're saying, you know,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 4>we can build a single gigawatt unit reactor for five

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars four and a half billion, five billion. You

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 4>look at numbers out of the US and they're saying,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 4>we're going to build what Vogel cost was two units

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 4>for twenty eight billion dollars or something like that. You

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 4>do a little bit of Napkin math and you say

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 4>that reactor can't possibly make back how much money it

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 4>costs to build and it's operating lifetime, or maybe it

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 4>will just about get there after forty years. And that's

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 4>assuming that this plant operates in the spot markets really

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 4>really well and sells power so efficiently and never gets

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 4>curtailed and never has issues like that. Meanwhile, your napkin

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 4>math in China is saying, well, they're going to sell

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 4>power at this rate for the next forty, maybe sixty years.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they'll do double life extension, maybe eight eighty years.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>And you know, so many kiloot hours of power times

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 4>so much per kilo a lot hour. Yeah, it looks

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 4>like these things should be reasonably profitable. And keep in

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 4>mind the profit motive of Chinese soees is different, right,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 4>They're expected to try to be profitable so they have

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 4>cash flow to do things and you know, be functional.

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 4>But if they have to take a hit sometimes they will.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 4>They can be the lubricant in the system that causes

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 4>the inefficiencies to be okay. Because you've got you know,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 4>a major SOE that was okay, losing half a billion

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 4>dollars last year. They'll make it back later. It's okay.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 4>The system didn't fall apart. They were the lubricant.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 3>So one way we could potentially judge the success of

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Chinese nuclear reactors is you could look at whether or

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 3>not they are significantly changing the energy mix. And there

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 3>was a story out this week saying that China's domestic

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 3>coal production had reached an all time high and granted

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 3>that's production that's not necessarily coal use, but I don't know,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't seem like there's been a big impact just yet.

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Why is that?

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, and that's right, I saw that yesterday too.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm bummed about that because I'm on record saying back

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 4>in December twenty twenty three that I thought twenty twenty

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 4>four would be the peak year, and I thought structurally

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 4>we were in place to be able to peak coal

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 4>consumption in twenty twenty four, and I think we're going

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 4>to end up up one one point five percent year

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 4>on year something like that, which for China is a

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 4>huge amount of coal because they consume so much coal.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 4>But it's really close, which of course means if we're

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 4>up year on year and last year was the highest

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 4>year ever, than this year is the highest test year ever.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 4>And so what are we looking at though? We're looking

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 4>at a power sector that is still growing consumption every

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 4>year by seven percent year on year, six or seven

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 4>percent year on year, compared to the US, where a

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 4>good year is maybe like one percent or half a

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 4>percent year on year, and you talk about data center

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 4>demand growth is going to maybe rise that and everybody's

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 4>freaking out, how are we going to meet this new

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 4>consumption need. China's been growing like that seven percent eight

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 4>percent in the past. It was even higher for decades now.

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 4>So it to be the peak coal consumption, we have

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 4>to get to a single year where all of the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 4>incremental consumption growth is met by incremental generation from clean assets,

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 4>right from wind and water and solar and nuclear. If

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 4>we can't manage to do that in one year where

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 4>all the incremental growth is covered by new incremental clean generation,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>thermal generation has to go up. And so that's still

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 4>where we're at. We're real close. If it only grew

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 4>by one point five percent this year, that means that

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 4>seven percent of China's entire consumption mix was almost totally

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 4>covered by growth year on year of wind and water

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 4>and solar and nuclear. But it wasn't quite there. And

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 4>so that's where we stand at twenty twenty four. I'm

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 4>going to be made a liar of that statement I

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 4>made at the end of last year where I thought

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 4>coal consumption would peak this year.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Since you mentioned it, Data centers is obviously a huge

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>part of the story of the return of load growth

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 2>in the US. I mean, there's obviously just the general

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>modernization and country getting wealthier. But tell us about the

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 2>data center's story in China as you see it and

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 2>it's impact on the grid.

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's of course going to be a other growth driver.

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 4>The major difference here is that when China says, oh,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 4>we've got data centers coming in, so instead of six

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 4>point five percent growth, it's going to be seven point

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 4>five percent growth. Right, It's just what's a percentage point

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 4>among friends? Right, Whereas the United States going from half

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>a percentage point to one point five or two percent

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 4>is very different from how we've had to grow in

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 4>the past. So China's i think approaching this with much

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>more sanguinity, maybe that they're just saying, yeah, it's going

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 4>to be a driver of growth. Let's put them in

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>some of our parts of the country that have low

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 4>load and great renewable resources. Or we're gonna put them

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 4>in Inner Mongolia is what we're going to put them. We're

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 4>going to put growth demand centers in inner Mongolia. They

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 4>don't need to be close to the.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Is inner Mongolia.

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it's sparsely populated, it's got a lot of

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 4>great energy resources. The wind blows and the sunshines, all

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 4>day long and there's no load out there, so it

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have made so much sense maybe to cite you know,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 4>your heavy energy intensive industrial manufacturing so far from the

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 4>demand center, so far from the coasts where you could

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 4>get it to logistics. Oh, they put some stuff out there,

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 4>but it wasn't so intuitive to put energy intensive industry

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>out there. But data centers, Oh, that's great, right. They

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 4>don't need to be close to markets per se, you

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 4>just need to get be them close to the affordable energy.

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 4>So it's looking like inn Moongolia or places like that

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 4>will be a great match for China's data center growth.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>So one of the things that's been happening in the

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>US speaking of data centers is a lot of the

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 3>big tech companies have been signing off take agreements with

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 3>energy producers and they've been pushing them towards more renewable energy.

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 3>So they say, we want clean energy to power these things,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and you make it for us and we'll take it.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you see a similar dynamic taking place in China

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 3>or do people not care as much about the ultimate

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 3>cleanliness of their energy for data centers.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a major driver of how the power sector

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 4>offers power. Right, your customers demand a certain type of power,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 4>you should be able to meet their needs. Right now,

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>in China, you'd split, or in anywhere anywhere in the world,

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 4>not just in China, you'd split green power consumption on

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the end user end into voluntary and mandatory. So mandatory

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 4>says the government says you have to consume a certain

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 4>amount of electricity that is green. We call it a

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 4>renewable portfolio standard or an RPS. Right there's RPS and

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 4>US states, not all of them, but some of them,

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 4>and there's RPS in China. So from that perspective, you

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 4>could say the government mandates that you consume a certain

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 4>amount of renewable energy to meet the quota. Now. Right now,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 4>that applies to utilities in China, but it doesn't yet

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 4>apply to end users. Your aluminum smelter doesn't have that

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 4>man yet. But that's the next stage of RPS that's

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 4>being added right now. Data centers I think need to

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>be it's quite high. I think it's eighty percent renewable.

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 4>To build a new data center in China, you're going

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to need to have aluminum and steel and all these

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 4>heavy energy intensive industries need to consume renewable, so that's

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 4>your mandatory consumption, that's RPS driven, and then you've got

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 4>your voluntary consumption. So voluntary consumption, you know, corporate social

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 4>responsibility initiatives ESG companies say we want to go green.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 4>We want to put it in our CSR report that

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 4>we consumed x amount of renewables last year. We did

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 4>this on a voluntary basis. We joined ARE one hundred,

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 4>we joined the Science Based Targets initiative, and we want

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 4>to claim that we are green. Yet that's your consumer

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 4>tech brands, that's your luxury fashion and increasing. A lot

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 4>of European brands are very aggressive on their renewable energy consumption,

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 4>including in China. So if you're producing in China and

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 4>selling to the world, you want to be able to

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 4>say our production in China was also green. So that's

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 4>voluntary consumption of green power. But you demand your power

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 4>retailer to provide you with green electricity and they'll give

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 4>you a quote for green electricity.

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 2>We started on the nuclear side, we talked coal, but

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 2>then we're all, well, you know, there's all these charts

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 2>that are you know, great about all this solar being interstalled?

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Is the economics of that roughly the same in the

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>sense that it's probably an sooe getting money from an

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>so E bank, and talk to us about who's funding

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that and where does it make sense, like why in

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 2>some places is solar going to be a solar wind

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>part of the answer versus say nuclear.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, So when it comes to wind and solar, these

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 4>are being built differently from nuclear, right, they're not nearly

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 4>as capital intensive. Also, they can be smaller, they can

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 4>be more distributed. And so when you look at Chinese

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 4>wind and solar, of course you still see sooees playing

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>a big role, but there are as well IPPs independent

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 4>power producers or just non soees right, as well as

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 4>foreign players. So you as a you know, a foreign

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 4>investor who you know like black Rock, can come into

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 4>China and build a power plant if they want to,

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 4>a wind or a solar farm, no problem. And so

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 4>anyone can participate in that space if they do their

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 4>financial analysis and they see the way to attractive project economics.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 4>So for Chinese builders, they borrow from Chinese banks, as

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 4>will Chinese independent borrowers. Then international players they might borrow

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 4>from international banks. They might try to borrow from Chinese banks.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 4>They can do that as well. They will get you know,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>market competitive rates. This is a different kind of building

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>compared to nuclear, where it's instead of it's like a

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 4>national strategic priority. To build a rooftop solar facility, now

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 4>that's much more of a commercial market operation. However, there

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 4>are some projects in China that are national strategic priority.

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 4>We talk about those huge desert bases, you know, hundreds

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 4>of megawats, gigawats, hundreds of gigawats in the middle of

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 4>the Gobi desert, coal plants plus a wind farm, plus

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 4>a solar farm, plus a huge battery array, all financed

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 4>by a giant Chinese built by a Chinese soe. That's

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the kind of stuff that that kind of looks more

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 4>like a nuclear power plant in the way that they

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 4>finance and process that. But you know, rooftop solar facility

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 4>in eastern China, now that's very much just a commercial play.

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 4>If it makes money, if it makes sense, they'll build it.

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 3>So when we talk about China's energy landscape or its

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 3>energy mix, I mean a lot of what we're talking

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>about we're pulling in numbers from the Chinese government, right

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>like domestic production numbers, domestic usage numbers, and whenever you

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>do that, there's always a certain element of uncertainty or

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a question mark over them. And there are some people

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>who even if you were to say that China's coal

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 3>production was finally falling, which it isn't, as you know,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>people wouldn't necessarily believe it. They'd be like, oh, well,

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 3>China wants.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 4>You to think that.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>So I guess my question is like, how much should

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>we believe some of these stats?

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this is going to be always very subjective

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 4>about how much you want to believe or how much

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 4>you think is worthwhile believing. My take that I usually

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 4>go to is like, look at the top levels. You've

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 4>got your National Bureau of Statistics, You've got these you know,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 4>national level entities, who's their job mandate is to report

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>statistics as faithfully and as honestly as they can. All right, fine,

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 4>you know what, that's their job mandate. No latitude to

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 4>say I think they're doing their job dishonestly or something

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 4>like that. But I do believe there are many kind

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 4>of perverse incentives throughout the structure of the reporting economy

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 4>in China that would create opportunity for misreporting information. When

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you tie you know, the county governor's promotion or lack thereof,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 4>to his ability to grow GDP in that province or

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 4>in that county. You're creating the incentive for him to

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 4>cook the data when you're creating economic recovery. And you

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 4>announced to and this happened. This is a real story

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 4>when you announce to a certain city in twenty twenty

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>two that you're going to be evaluating how quickly they've

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 4>recovered from COVID conditions by seeing how quickly their factories

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 4>get back up to regular production. And you know that

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 4>they're measuring that by seeing how much electricity they consume.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 4>All all of a sudden, you have.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>A sent everyone starts plugging stuff in.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, So if you can say that people are trying

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 4>to do their jobs honestly, and then you also have

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 4>people that have been given perverse incentives to to misreport

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 4>did I think that's where a lot of the uncertainty.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is the core problem of Central Plan.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is it in a nutshell. And obviously

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the most egregious examples of this were, you know, during

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the Great Leap Forward and all of the ways that

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>either they you know, the steel production that was melting

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>down literally anything of steel and destroying the economy in

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, What are some of the techniques used

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 2>to avoid sort of egregious jerking of the stats so that, yeah,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>someone's promotion who is tied to electricity consumption can't be

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of egregiously abused like that.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I mean famously or perhaps infamously. So I

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 4>think it ended up it came out of like a

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 4>WikiLeaks something that that the former premier Leika Chung said

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 4>he didn't look at GDP data in certain prices, and

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 4>now that's on the terminal, Yeah, the le Ka Chug index,

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 4>and he said I prefer to look at I think

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 4>it was a rail cargo and electricity consumption and or

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 4>the third item two right, He said that these items,

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, the people in charge of reporting them, there's

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, My assumption is that his logic was there's

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 4>less incentives to misreport these, so that these are the

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 4>ones I want to look at, and you can maybe

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 4>come up with your own version of the modern day

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Leka Chang index. I think electricity consumption is still fine,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.959
<v Speaker 4>but maybe there's some other numbers that you say, look,

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 4>this is all very centralized reporting. The reason I like

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 4>electricity because it's all state grid, right, those numbers almost

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>all come from state grid, and state grid is just

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 4>a single unified entity. You're not gathering data points from

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>many different companies. Maybe other stuff like we talk about

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 4>cargo right again, China railways. Yeah, you have one centralized

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 4>company that would be able to report that information. So

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 4>if you want to modern you know, fashion your modern

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Leka Chang index, maybe try those types of indices.

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 2>So one other element obviously of the Chinese energy to man.

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>We've talked a lot about the grid obviously and the

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 2>power of the grid. Then there is the whole world

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of automobiles, which up until very recently was this totally

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 2>separate part of the energy system, but now it's around

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 2>the world, but in particular China, and we talk about

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Chinese EV's all the time being plugged into the grid.

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>How much do we see the electrification of the Chinese

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.280
<v Speaker 2>automobile fleet, Like A, how electrified is it right now?

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And B isn't moving the dial on oil consumption because

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 2>this is a pretty big question in the West, right,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 2>like at some point will EV's become big enough where

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 2>meaningfully starts to reduce our oil demand, and even in

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 2>countries like Norway, I think like it's still barely moving

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the dial despite mass of electrification. What are we seeing

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in China right now on that.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Front, Yeah, I mean in the major cities you say,

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 4>shen Jen, Shanghai, Beijing, in places like this, the EV

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 4>penetration rate is noticeably high, and you'll see that they're

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 4>easily identifiable. They have green license plates instead of the

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 4>regular blue license plates, so you can just kind of

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 4>look at them on the street. It's very expensive to

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 4>get a license plate in Shanghai. Just the license plate

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 4>itself is expensive, but EV's for a long time were free,

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 4>like a the license plate was free, so that was

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 4>a great perk for them to pursue those. And yeah, there,

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it was. New vehicle sales in Shanghai, for example,

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 4>was fifty percent electric vehicles in the last reporting session.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's really noticeable when you stand on a street

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 4>corner in Shanghai, and I guess it's noticeable by the

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 4>lack of the noise.

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 2>I heard that everyone goes to Shanghai and says it's

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>really quiet.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 4>That's you know. Look, I'm back in New York right

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 4>now for the first time in a year and I

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 4>stand on a street corner. It's so loud, and I

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 4>hadn't really noted the lack of the noise because I'm

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 4>just used to it now and it's it's I hear

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 4>the roar of petroleum based engines all around me. Yeah.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 4>So EV's in the large cities, penetration rates noticeably high.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 4>In the smaller cities still fairly high. When you go

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 4>out to the more rural areas, it's going to drop off.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Of course, there's more skepticism about the completeness of the

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 4>charging network, just maybe some more uncertainty about the technology itself.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 4>You'll hear people in the countryside say all batteries are dangerous,

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 4>heard that I saw a video once of an EV

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 4>on fire, things like that. Similar you know comments in

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 4>the United States too. But the long term, the EV

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 4>penetration rate will will only continue to rise.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>It's national oil consumption, I believe, so I think.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 4>I saw now. I'm not an oil specialist, but I

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 4>think I've seen and I've read recently that that Chinese

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 4>oil imports should have peaked right, that they should have

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 4>be ready to draw down. If you know, if I'm

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 4>lying here, May God smite me down. But I think

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 4>that that was the case, and that we see a

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 4>structural decline in petroleum because of the adoption of evs.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of EV's, there is a lot of Chinese

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 3>made clean tech that is here in the US, including

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 3>solar panels as well. And this has been one of

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the frictions of the past few years, which is, you know,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the US says it wants cleaner energy, and Chinese solar

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 3>panels and evs are probably the cheapest forms of that

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 3>technology around. And yes, there's a lot of I guess,

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 3>reluctance to import tons of those into the US, and

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 3>certainly with Trump coming in, it seems like tariffs are

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 3>on their way. How do you see all of that

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 3>shaking out into the new year.

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, in the United States, you're gonna decarbonize or

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna buy green tech at exactly the rate that

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 4>is economic. Yeah, And so if you have access to

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 4>very affordable green tech, you'll do it at a faster rate.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 4>If you have access to more expensive green tech, you'll

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 4>do it more slowly. And so I have to assume

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 4>that if those tariffs go in place, unless alternative producers

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 4>are able to offer similar quality goods at similar prices,

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 4>then you're going to slow down your green transition. It's

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 4>maybe a simple but obvious kind of answer there. On

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese side, of course, there will be some pain

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 4>for exporters, anyone exposed to the United States market. Some

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>solar panels, maybe some VS, some batteries I think are

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 4>pretty significant if those are target it. Yeah, you'd expect

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 4>to see some pain on the Chinese side there. It's

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 4>already an extremely extremely competitive environment in China. Most of

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 4>these producers are in very thin profit margins, hanging on

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 4>by a threat. It's good for consumers, it's not good

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 4>for if you're holding those stocks. So this would only

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 4>just be another bit of pain for them. Denial of

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 4>a potential revenue channel.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Since you mentioned EV charging stations, we have this sort

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of weird patchwork here, and there's a lot of I'm

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 2>a little ambiguity about the US government under Biden has

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>remarked a lot of money to build EV charging stations.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a little unclear how much actually got built Publicly.

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>There seems to be a view that it hasn't been

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 2>particularly successful on the public side. What is the structure

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of the buildout for charging stations in China. Is it

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 2>publicly owned? Is it what's the deal?

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 4>It's all of the above, I guess. So you've got

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, China State Grid or China Southern Grid. But

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 4>grid companies they build charging infrastructure. Some of the ev

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 4>acres themselves build their own charging infrastructure, maybe like a

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Tesla supercharger, right. Some of them also build their own

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 4>battery swap stations. I think Neo is quite famous for

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 4>having battery swap stations. You can go pretty much any

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 4>highway rest stop in China and you can find a

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Neo battery swap station.

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 2>So then there's no time you just swap.

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 4>It in and out. Yeah, I'm there's a line to

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 4>wait for the battery swap station if another Neo pulls

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 4>ahead of you. But besides that, I mean, I think

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the major thrust, at least the ones that I've seen

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 4>recently in the Southern Grid region have been by the

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 4>grid company itself. Right, So, China Southern Grid. I remember

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 4>reading last year they said, ah, you know, we're planning

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 4>to build one hundred thousand chargers this year. We're you know,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 4>three months in, we're seventeen thousand chargers in so far,

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 4>we're on track to finish our goal by the end

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 4>of the year. And you do see it when you

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 4>go to regions that have been targeted for those buildouts. Right.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 4>You can go to fairly rural areas in say Gwanboon

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Province down in the south and you'll find EV chargers

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 4>installed there by China Southern Grid in a village where

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there are necessarily any evs, but hey,

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 4>they got the infrastructure there because they said we're going

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 4>to build one hundred K, and so they built a

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 4>hundred K.

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 2>David Fisherman, so great to chat with you again, especially

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>in person, and I'm so glad you have other things

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to worry about besides figuring out how to get food

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 2>in your apartment. Really appreciate you coming back on odline.

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Thanks a lot for having you guys.

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 2>That was really helpful, Tracy, that I learned all the

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 2>things more or less that I wanted to know about.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>How they're building so much a nuclear.

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's that?

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 2>React?

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it does. It leaves me wondering how like replicable

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 3>it is in other countries, right, because obviously in places

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 3>like the US, we don't really have subsidized finance on

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the scale that China does. We don't have a lot

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 3>of cheap and skilled labor at the same time, and

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 3>we don't have some of the let's put it this way,

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>like regulatory hastiness maybe in approving these sites and these things.

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, like how replicable do you think it is?

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>No, this is the exact question, because you know there's

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>some subsidy the loan Program's office exists, but we don't

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 2>know the same gigantic state owned banks. Yeah, and then

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 2>even if you solve the financing problem, and even if

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 2>you solve the market off take problem, which is going

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to be very different, right because we have market grids

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of parts of the country and so

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to sort of make that forty year commitment

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that you will get this price. Then there's all the

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 2>logistics like, oh, you needed this gigantic crane that's the

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>biggest crane in the history of.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 3>Now you need a big crane to make the big

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 3>crane you.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Need to make. So this gets to I mean, this

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is a point that jigger Shaw makes all the time,

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 2>but this idea that we're never going to really do

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 2>this economically, And David just mentioned the sort of daunting

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 2>economics of Vogel. We're never gonna do this economically unless

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 2>we do it over and over and over and over again.

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.760
<v Speaker 2>And it feels like the components of what it would

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 2>actually take to do it over and over and over

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 2>again is this massive centralized commitment to doing lots of

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 2>different parts. And you know, it sounds like the regulatory

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 2>side or the permitting thing that seems about the same.

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that the public can complain about endangered

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 2>fish and all that, that's sort of similar. So people

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 2>complain about annoying local nimbi's. That doesn't really sound that

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>much different. It sounds like everything else that's different.

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I suspect the nimbiism is slightly different too, But point taken,

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and I do wonder, like, how do you even go

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 3>about beginning to redevelop that nuclear muscle memory in the States.

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 3>It seems really really hard, Like, Okay, we can reactivate

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 3>some nuclear reactors like we're planning to, but starting like

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 3>new ones from scratch. It just seems like there's such

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a limited pool of people who are cape of doing

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 3>that and then putting in place, As you rightly pointed out,

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 3>all the off take agreements and the network and everything

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 3>needed to kind of make those things financially viable. It

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 3>seems hard.

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I'm glad you asked that question about

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 2>coal consumption that because that was really helpful, because it's

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 2>one thing to say, well, another record year for coal consumption.

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 2>But I guess the way I think about it, at

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 2>least in the short term, we don't know when that's.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 3>Not coal consumption, it's production, just to be.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Coal production, but it's really going to be about like

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 2>if coal is in fact as a part of the

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, if it's only growing one percent, but electricity

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 2>demand is growing six to seven percent, that is a

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 2>good sign, right, even if it's not bending the curve

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>down yet.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 3>M hm. Anyway, it's funny I will always associate Beijing

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 3>with lots and lots of burning coal in the winter.

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I had heard that about how apparently

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the big cities now are really quiet, which is pretty cool,

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and once self driving cars are everywhere, there will be

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 2>no honking either, and so we can look forward to

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 2>a future maybe one day we very peaceful, peaceful, quiet

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 2>big cities.

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, something to hope for. Shall we leave it there?

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Authoughts podcast. I'm

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest David Fishman, He's at Pretentious What. Follow

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 2>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand dash Ol Bennett

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 2>at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you to our

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 2>producer Moses Ondam from our odlots content. Go to Bloomberg

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash outlots, where we have transcripts, a blog,

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 2>and a daily newsletter and you can chat about all

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 2>of these topics, including energy and China, where we have

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 2>two separate rooms in our discord discord dot gg slash

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 2>out Lots.

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy a thoughts, if you like it

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about nuclear power plants in China, then

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 3>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 3>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 3>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 3>you need to do is connect your Bloomberg account with

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts. In order to do that, just find the

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.439
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening,