WEBVTT - The Targeting of Trump with Andy McCarthy

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer had this to say

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on Fox News recently.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>No one believes this was a coincidence that on the

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 2>same day the FBI produced a document that showed they've

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>been sitting on allegations of a Biden bribery for years.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 2>That Donald Trump just happened to be indicted by the

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Special Council for mishandling and classified documents when Joe Biden

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>himself mishandled classified documents on a much greater scale than

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>what Donald Trump did, and we haven't heard a thing

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>from that Special Council.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So is that what this is all about. We know

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats have been trying to get Donald Trump from

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>day one. The latest is thirty seven phony charges from

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the federal government ranging from the wilful retention of national

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>defense information to conspiracy to obstruct justice. We're going to

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>dig into those charges and get to the bottom of it.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>What you need to know, where this is going and

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what it means. I'm sure you've heard a lot about

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the Presidential Records Act. What is it and how does

0:00:58.000 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it play into this case. We're going to get into

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>all of this with former Chief Assistant US Attorney Andy

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy's also a senior fellow at the National Review Institute

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and a Fox News contributor. Stay tuned for Annie McCarthy. Well,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Andy McCarthy, I appreciate you taking the time to come on.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You've joined us before, and I feel like, in such

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a thoughtful manner, really took us through the New York

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>City indictment against Donald Trump. So I appreciate you making

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the time this time.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 3>It's my pleasure. Lisa. Thanks.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And then of course that gets to, you know, sort

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the frustration of where we are now. We've now

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>had two unprecedented indictments against a former president. Obviously, this

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>has never happened before in American history. Is this the

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>right direction for the country.

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a terrible direction. And I wish we could

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>say the half of it was over. But I think,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, in August, we're going to get yet another

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>indictment from Fulton County, Georgia, in connection with the with

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the election stuff from twenty twenty. In October, Lisa, I

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>feel like everybody's going to sleep on this one. But

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>in October, the civil trial that was brought by Letitia James,

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the Attorney General in New York who ran on using

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>her power to go after Trump. That trial starts on

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 3>October third. That's going to be a major fraud trial

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that's going to take a number of weeks. And as

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>we just saw with the last civil trial that Trump

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 3>had with Egene Carroll, it's tough being a defendant in

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 3>a civil case. There's a lot of disadvantages that litigation wise,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>that are where you lack the protections you have as

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a defendant in a criminal case. So I think that

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>could be that could be worse than people are focused on.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>We have this new case with Smith, and what I

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>have started to try to remind people is that Smith

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>is a special counsel like Muller was and like so

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>at some point, I don't think he's going to charge

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Trump with January sixth stuff. But I do think he's

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>going to write a report like Muller did and like

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Durham did, and they will drop that some you know,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 3>it's some advantageous moment for them during the election cycle.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>So no, it's a terrible you know, we've had now

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 3>how many presidential election cycles in a row where we

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>have law enforcement pervasively involved in electoral politics. It's terrible

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 3>for the country.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Looking at this case that he is going to be

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>facing in the Southern District of Florida where I live.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I live in Miami. In South Florida thirty seven felon

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>accounts ranging from things like will for retention of national

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>defense information to conspiracy to obstruct justice. After reading the indictment,

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of it?

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not quite the indictment that I thought it was

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be. In two ways. I thought number one,

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>that if he really wanted to get to trial quickly,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>he would have indicted it lean and mean and just

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 3>done the obstruction stuff, because I think it's the obstruction

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>stuff that their political messaging is that what distinguishes Trump

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 3>from say Biden, who also illegally retained classified information, is

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that Biden supposedly cooperated to the utmost with the investigation,

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 3>while Trump obstructed the investigation and lied to the grand jury.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>So I would have expected that that was what he

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 3>was going to front, and I thought that maybe it

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>would be the only charges he brought. The problem Lisa

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>was bringing the espionage Jack counts from a from a

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 3>prosecution perspective, as if you're trying to get the trial

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the case to trial quickly, which he claims he is

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to do. That opens up a lot of litigation

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>issues about what classified information is going to be admitted

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 3>at the trial. I was really surprised reading the indictment

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>at how descriptive it was about the thirty one classified

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>documents that they've made the heart of the case. Usually

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 3>the government takes the position that we can't even whisper

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 3>or anything about this stuff because it would harm national

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>security for any of it to be public. Here, they

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>were pretty descriptive about the kind of information that was involved,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the classification levels that were involved, the duration of time

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>that Trump is alleged to have retained these things. And

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I think by doing that, you invite Trump to say

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 3>that in his defense, he needs to give the jury

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 3>a more expansive idea of what's in these documents, which

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>is typically what defendants do in these national security classified

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 3>information cases. Not so much because the documents necessarily helped

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>them in the sense of being exculpatory, because they know

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the government doesn't want to reveal the contents of the documents,

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>so it puts the government in a position of blocking

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>the defense from making what they argue is their defense,

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>which creates a big issue on appeal, and also because

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>this all has to be litigated pre trial into something

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>that's called SIPA, which is the Classified Information Procedures Act,

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>those proceed those litigations proceed at a glacial pace. I

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>had one in a terrorism case in the nineties. At

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of it, I think I read toward the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>end of our trial, I read like a nine line

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 3>stipulation to the jury, but it took a year and

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>a half of litigation to get there.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The part where I'm confused is, Okay, if you take

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the instance of Joe Biden, he allegedly has documents from

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>his time in the Senate, and if that would be

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the case, you have to enter a skiff you're signing

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>documents in it out like you would basically have to

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>have like stuffed it in, you know what I mean,

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Like to remove documents in that instance, right, would show

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like absolute malice and intent. Whereas with this Donald Trump case,

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like a reasonable person could say that there is

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>some ambiguity in the sense that like a president does

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have ultimate authority to declassify or classify documents, and so,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it is reasonable to believe that

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there could be ambiguity about is he allowed to keep

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know what I mean, like, whereas if you're

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>taking documents out of the Senate, it's like, dude, you're

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, you're really trying here, right, And

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's where there's a lot of confusion

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe doubt or a perception of bias.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say that, you know, having been in these

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>kinds of positions, the big difference between the executive branch

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and the legislative branch in this regard is that national

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>security officials and the executive branch are on duty twenty

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>four to seven, and consequently arrangements are made so that

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 3>they can review classified information at home and in other locations,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>whereas members of Congress are not in that position and

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 3>they have to review if they want to review, they

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 3>have to review national security information in a skiff on

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Capitol Hill and they're not allowed to take it out.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>So I quite agree with you that if Biden had

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>information from the time he was in the Senate, he

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>had to have willfully taken this, and to me, that

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>undermines a lot of his a lot of the points

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>he gets for being cooperative with the FBI's investigation. I

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>do give him some credit for that. You know, he

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>allowed them to search his homes. I don't think he

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 3>did it rapidly enough. I mean, to me, I think

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>that Merrick Garland, you know, basically sat on his hands

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 3>and let Biden handle this thing, which was irresponsible on

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Garland's part. But look, he did let the FBI come

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 3>in and search his places and all that stuff, whereas

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 3>with Trump he was a national security official. But you know,

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to the extent they had arrangements in mar A Lago

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>while he was president to allow him to review you know,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I assume they had a skiff down there while he

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>was president so that you know, he could review those

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 3>documents under those conditions. You know, when he wasn't president anymore.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>If he didn't have a skiff, he wasn't supposed to

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 3>have that stuff down there, and he would have known that.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>But so you know, there's there's obviously problems. But you're

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 3>right that as president, he would have had the power

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 3>to look at this stuff, or the authority look at

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>this stuff in locations other than a skiff in the

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 3>White House. And you know, we're seeing the same thing

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>with Pence, right he ended up with documents in his

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 3>House because he was allowed to review stuff there too,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 3>and he said that it was typical that after he

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>reviewed it, he would give it to his military attache

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>who brought it and they put it in the burn

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 3>bag or do whatever they do with it. And at

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 3>least on a few occasions it sounds like that didn't happen.

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 3>But you could see, as you're saying, you know, how

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 3>there could be something inadvertent that happened in that kind

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 3>of situation.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it just feels like everybody does it. But then

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the one guy they're trying to get is the guy

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they've been trying to get since day one. So it's

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's a feeling of unfairness. And I say

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this as someone who is unsure about, you know, Donald

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump being the strongest Republican nominee, right, but it just

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a feeling of unfairness and also just concerned about

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the weaponization of the law. You know, there's been a

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>lot discussed about the Presidential Records Act and it's a

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>little confusing, you know. I read there as an op

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>ed in the Wall Street Journal by Michael Bakesha I

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>think is his name. I'm probably butchering his last name

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>who lost the Clinton socktorre case, and he wrote that

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the Presidential Records Act allows the president to decide what

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>records to return and what records to keep at the

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>end of a presidency, and the National Archives and Records

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Administration can't do anything about it. What are your thoughts

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about that? You know, what are your thoughts about the

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Presidential Records Act? And you know, using it as you know, hey,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do anything wrong here.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't agree with it, and I think, you know,

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 3>in the op ed and in the commentary about the

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Presidential Records Act, they're leaving out something that's like the

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 3>most critical, straightforward fact, and that is it doesn't apply

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>to agency records. It explicitly, the Presidential Records Act explicitly

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 3>excludes agency records from coverage. So, in other words, they're

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>saying agency records are not presidential records. What's an issue

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 3>in President Trump's case is agency records specifically are national

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>security agencies, and they're classified reporting about various threats to

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the United States and military situations and the like. They're

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 3>not covered by the Presidential Records Act. That act is

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 3>basically what it covers is things that are generated by

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the president and his staff or given to him for

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 3>purposes of carrying out his day to day activities. And

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>what he's allowed to keep as opposed to archive is

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>things that are in the nature of say diaries or journals.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>And what was at stake in what the op ed

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 3>today in the Wall Street Journal is about were tape

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>recordings that Clinton when he was president, created in conjunction

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>with a historian who he was working with to compile

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>what they helped would be a published history of the

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Clinton presidency. So these were documents that were created by Clinton,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and they're more in the nature of presidential records than

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 3>agency reports, which is what it's set at stake in

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 3>Trump's case. So I really don't think it's obviously caused

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 3>a lot of confusion, and it's going to give the

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 3>the Trump defenders some things to play with, but you know,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>ultimately an don't think they're going to get very far

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 3>with it.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick commercial break more with Andy McCarthy

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. You know, one could argue that,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, destroying evidence with the hammer or using bleach

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>bit to delete emails would be obstruction of justice. You know,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Yet Hillary Clinton's been unscathed.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 3>That's a political problem of the discretion that you have

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>in law enforcement to bring charges has been politicized, and

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>it is totally unfair that she got a pass and

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>he gets charged. But I guess the problem for him, Lisa,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>is that selective prosecution as a as a piece of

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>political rhetoric is very effective. I think, you know, on

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the stump, Trump is going to have a lot of

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 3>fun comparing his case to Hillary's case and comparing you know,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>to Biden's case and to everyone else who got a

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>pass Petraeus Deutsch. You can go down the list of

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>people who either didn't get prosecuted at all or got

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to slap on the wrist over stuff that was arguably

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 3>at least as serious as what Trump did. The problem

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 3>with it as a legal strategy is if Trump were

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>to argue selective prosecution to try to get his case

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>knocked out, the legal test is not going to compare

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump to Clinton. It's not like a one on one thing.

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>It will be it will be to compare Trump to

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>everyone else who gets prosecuted under the Espiona jacked or

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to everyone else who gets prosecuted on obstruction. And he's

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>just not going to be able to argue that no

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>one gets prosecuted under those provisions. Obstruction cases are very common,

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and when we're dealing with people who are not you know,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>high level celebrity politicians like Trump and Clinton and you know,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Petraeus and Pence and Biden and the rest of them,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 3>if you're dealing with just like the normal military officer,

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>intelligence officer, defense contractor, those people get prosecuted when they

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>when they possess an unlawfully retain classified information that's a

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>lot less serious than you know, a lot of the

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 3>stuff we're talking about in these high level cases, and

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>it's totally not fair to them either. You know. On

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 3>the one hand, I think Trump is right to say,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>like how come Hillary gets a pass and I don't.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 3>But you know, if you're a military guy who's who's

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 3>like doing a two year sentence for keeping some stuff

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 3>that you shouldn't have kept in your house, you know,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 3>you've got a pretty good argument that you know, it's

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>likely that Trump may end up being treated better than

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 3>you are, you know.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So, but it also sends a different message to go

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>after that military guy than it does a former president.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the leading contender for Republicans in the

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>presidential election.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 3>One could argue with the message it sends is a

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 3>terrible message. It's that the two tier justice system is

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>just what your part is, an affiliation is, it's how

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 3>connected you are.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, this all stemmed from the National Archives and Records

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>administrations seeking documents. If this was anyone but Trump, would

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they have been given more deference.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, although I think it's fair to say that they

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 3>also gave Trump deference for a long time. And one

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 3>of the things that bothers me about this case is

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the way that people tend to Some of the people

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>who will argue about the case tend to collapse the

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the timeline of what happened here. The National

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Archives pleaded with Trump for months to return his stuff,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and they didn't get the Justice Department involved until almost

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>a year after they started asking Trump to give his

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>stuff back, when he returned grudgingly fifteen of the boxes,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 3>which he only did, by the way, because they said that.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 3>The National Archives said, you know, look, if you're not

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>going to give us our stuff back, we're going to

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 3>have to go to the Congressional Committee, the oversight committee

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that deals with this kind of stuff, which was controlled

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 3>by a you know, a portisan Democrat, of course. So

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Trump was angry about that, but he realized that, you know,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>he didn't want that mess. So what they did was

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>they gave fifteen boxes, which I think, in the greatest

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>scheme of things, is probably less than half of what

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 3>he had down at Mar A Lago. And the only

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 3>reason the Justice Department got involved is when they went

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 3>through those boxes, they found I think it was like

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty four or something classified document. Some

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 3>of them were highly classified. So at that point the

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Inspector General of the National Archives referred it to the

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department, and even they didn't want to touch it

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 3>because Biden understood the implications of you know, taking enforcement

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 3>action against a guy he was going to be running

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 3>against in the election, or at least it was a

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 3>very high probability of it. So the FBI and the

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department didthered for about three months before they did anything,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 3>And there were messages that were sent to Trump basically saying,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, let's just give us the stuff back and

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 3>then we can call it a day, when he wouldn't

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>do it. They didn't leap to like, you know, the harshest,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 3>most intrusive measure they could have done. They gave him

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>a grand jury subpoena, which meant that he could go

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>through his own stuff and give them back what they

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>were asking for. And at that point they didn't ask

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 3>for every single government document he had. They asked for

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 3>the classified documents, and even then when they asked him

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 3>for that, he didn't. You know, they realized pretty quickly

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>that what he gave them, which was thirty eight documents,

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 3>was not everything that he had left, and that was

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 3>why ultimately they did the search warrant. Now, I think, interestingly,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the FBI didn't want to do the search warrant. You know,

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of criticism, which a lot of it's

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 3>very valid against the FBI, but I think this, I

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>think the search warrant was more driven by the Biden

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department than the FBI. What the FBI wanted to

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>do was ask Trump to consent to search tomorrow Lago

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to search his home, rather than get a warrant. And

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 3>if they had done that, I don't know if Trump

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>would have agreed to this, but at least you would

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 3>have had a situation where, you know, Trump could have

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 3>been present, he could have had his lawyers present, they

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>could have accompanied the Bureau and it would have been

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 3>done by agreement, and it probably could have been done

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>quietly and without fan fear. The Justice Department didn't want

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 3>to do that, and it's hard to I'm like a

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 3>major critic of the Biden Justice Department, but it's hard

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>to criticize them under circumstances where you know, you have

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>one government official after another for over eighteen months who's

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>asking Trump please just give us our stuff back, and

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>he wouldn't do it. Point you know, they don't like

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 3>them to begin with, but I think their patients was

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 3>run out.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Facing a jury in the southern district of Florida looks

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot different than facing a jury in liberal New

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>York City. How hard is it going to be for

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors to win in South Florida, where you do have

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporters, where you do have Republicans.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I like to think, Lisa, because I you know, I

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 3>tried cases in New York for twenty years now. Politically,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 3>fraud cases are a little different from other cases. But

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>in my experience, juries tend to you know, they they

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 3>tend to check their politics at the door. In fact,

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really think that was a phenomenon until recently.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, when I was when I was a prosecutor

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 3>in New York, you know, I was a liberal. I

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 3>was a conservative lawyer in New York. All my best

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>friends in the office were Democrats, you know, and it

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a big deal because the job was more you know,

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 3>clinical than political. And I found that most of the time,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, you can get a crazy jury here or there,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 3>but for the most part, juries are pretty good at

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>listening to what the court tells them and you know,

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>applying the law that the judge instructs them on to

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the only the facts that they learn in court. Judges

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 3>in federal court in particular, do a very good job

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 3>of vetting a jury and visiting on them the obligation

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 3>to decide the case based solely on the law and

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the facts and not extraneous concerns. They do a good

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 3>job of weeding out people who are so political they

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 3>don't belong on a case like that. So I have

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 3>confidence because I've seen the system work. I have confidence

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 3>that the system will work and that President Trump will

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>get a fair trial, and I hope it'll be decided

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 3>based on, you know, whatever the facts are, rather than

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the politics. But I feel like we're talking a little

0:21:54.480 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 3>bit of a fantasy or a fiction because the way

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I see it, I don't see how this case gets

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to trial before the election, and depending on how the

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 3>election comes out, I don't know, it may never get

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to trial. I mean if Trump obviously, if Trump were

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the if the Republicans win the election, forget about you know,

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Trump, I don't think this case would ever

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 3>go forward. I think that, you know, there's enough anger

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 3>on the Republican side over the two tiers of justice.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't think people want to defend Trump's actions, but

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 3>they do want to defend the principle that everybody should

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 3>be treated the same. So I think it will be

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 3>a thing for whoever the Republican nominee is, whether it's

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump or somebody else, that if that case hasn't been

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 3>disposed of before the election, the Justice Department will drop

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 3>it in the next administration. And whether the Democrats are

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>actually going to pursue it, I guess they will. You know,

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 3>if the Democrats win the election, I suppose then it

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>could go to trial. But I just don't see how

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 3>how it gets to trial because I think these classified

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>information issues are going to be so hard to work through.

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump's got to get lawyers who are cleared for national

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>security information. That takes time. There's a million things that

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 3>could be appealed in this case. In the normal criminal case,

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, the judge decides the issues, and then you

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 3>have a trial, and then there's a conviction, and only

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 3>then do you get to appeal. But because of Trump's status,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 3>and because of a number of the complicated issues that

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 3>are going to arise because of his status, and because

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 3>we're dealing with classified information, there could be appeals before

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the trial, which would delay things. And then I don't

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>mean to go on and on, but the other thing

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I would just say about it is if this were

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 3>the only thing on Trump's dance card, I think it

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>would be hard, if not impossible, to get this case

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>to trial before the next election. But it's not the

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 3>only thing. He's going to have, like four or five

0:23:58.680 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 3>other cases going.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer blasted the timing of

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the FBI finally producing its FD ten twenty three form

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that alleges a criminal bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and a foreign national. He says, no one believes this

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>was a coincidence that on the same day the FBI

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>produced a document that showed they've been sitting on allegations

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of a Biden bribery for years. That Donald Trump just

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>happened to be indicted by the Special Council for the

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>mishandling of classified documents. Is that what this is about,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is this the Department of Justice in the FBI trying

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to create a distraction from what their guy is facing,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're at all unhappy that they can

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>exploit that, but it just seems to me that they

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I wrote something, Lisa, I want to say it was

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 3>like September, probably two or three weeks after those search

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>at mar A Lagos, So maybe it's early September where

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I said it was virtually guaranteed that Trump was going

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to be charged in connection with mar A Lago. And

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the reason I said that was not so much the

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 3>potential seriousness of the charges. It was that the prosecutors,

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 3>and this was two months or three months before Smith

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 3>was named as a Special counsel. This was the Biden

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Justice Department. But they were doing all the things that

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>prosecutors do when they're very serious about building a case,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 3>including giving people immunity, which the Justice Department only does

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 3>that when they're trying to move up the chain and

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 3>make a case against somebody who's bigger than the person

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 3>they're giving immunity to. So I wouldn't say that they

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 3>decided to prosecute this case because of the need to

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:51.239
<v Speaker 3>have a distraction from the Biden bribery stuff, because at

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the time it looked to me like they were pretty

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>certainly trying to make a case. They wouldn't have known

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 3>about that the bribery thing would be a scandal at

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 3>this point. But I'm sure they're going to, you know,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>given that the table is set the way it's set,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 3>obviously they're going to use what they can use to

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>their advantage.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else you'd like to leave us with

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>before we go?

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 3>I would say about the FBI investigation, I'm more disturbed

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>about that than anything else. I'm obviously I'm disturbed, as

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I think we all are, about the bribery allegations, but

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm much more disturbed about what I think is the

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 3>growing mountain of evidence that the FBI conspired with Democrats

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 3>and had an arrangement with social media in order to

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>basically put its thumb on the scale in connection with

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 3>the twenty twenty election. And to me, that's the biggest

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 3>scandal we have going now, the Biden, the Biden bribery thing. Actually,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously you ought to be investigated to the ground.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 3>And what's going to happen with Trump is going to

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 3>happen with Trump, right, These things are going to play out,

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>These cases are going to play out, But it's really

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>dangerous for the country to have what I think we have,

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 3>which is a lot of evidence that the FBI worked

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 3>with Congressional Democrats in order to discredit the financial information

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson and the Senate were

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>compiling with respect to Biden, the Biden's getting millions of

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>dollars from corrupt and anti American regimes. We've heard a

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>lot about, like the letter of the fifty one former

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:43.239
<v Speaker 3>intelligence officials who discredited or tried to discredit the New

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 3>York Post's reporting. What I don't think we've paid enough

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 3>attention to is that those fifty one officials were basically

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 3>working off a template that the FBI had already developed

0:27:55.760 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 3>in conjunction with Congressional Democrats in trying to discredit what

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Johnson and Grassley were doing on the on the financial investigation,

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think the FBI systematically went to the social

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 3>media companies and in a nod in a wing kind

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 3>of way, told them that if there were derogatory information

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 3>to come out about the Bidens, the chances were that

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>that was a reflection of Russia once again trying to

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 3>interfere in our election. So I think the FBI worked

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 3>very hard to defeat Trump and to get Biden elected.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Andy, I appreciate your sober analysis. I appreciate you taking

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the time and walking us through all this. Obviously it's complex, complicated,

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of opinions, so I appreciate you

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>giving yours and you know your outlook on the law.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much for taking the time. Thanks

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>so much, Lisa, So as Andy McCarthy, I appreciate a

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>sober analysis. I do really believe that he is looking

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at them as objectively as possible, and that's really what

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to accomplish with this episode, of just getting

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a real look at what's going on, what we need

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to know and where this is going.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate you home.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>For listening every Monday and Thursday, but of course you

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>can listen throughout the week. Please leave us for a review,

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>give us a rating on Apple podcast. I love reading those.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank John Cassio and my producer for

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>putting the show together. Until next time,