WEBVTT - Debating the Proposed PGA Tour Changes

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a frid Egg.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Friday egg, the dreaded Friday Friday, Frida Egg brid Egg fridagg.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 4>Bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 4>the hump. Welcome back to another edition of the Friday

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Golf Podcast. I am your host, Andy Johnson. Today I

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 4>am going to talk about the new PGA Tour changes,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>the proposed PGA Tour changes for the twenty twenty six season.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Long story short kind of what they entail a less

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 4>exempt to less exemptions across the tour, one hundred exemp

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>players down from one to twenty five, smaller fields, and

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 4>a host of other things. So to join me in

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 4>talking about this, I wanted to get some different perspectives,

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 4>so I had Ryan French of Monday Q. He is

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Monday Q, a popular Twitter account, website, podcast is podcast

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>is any Given Monday. Ryan is very kind of on

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 4>the side of there should be more pathways, more spots,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Monday qualifiers, so on, so forth for the PGA Tour.

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 4>On the other side kind of, I guess I would

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 4>describe myself in the middle as Joseph Lamania from Friday

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Golf regularly joins this podcast regularly writes in the Friday

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Golf newsletter. So we had a discussion kind of about

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 4>these proposed changes where we'd like to see it go

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>and and just kind of the state of men professional golf.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So enjoy.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Before we get to this discussion, let's talk about our sponsor, Stripe.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Stripe has been a partner of this podcast for a

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>long time, in the sense it's a silent partner really.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 4>They have been our payment you know, handled our payments

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 4>at Friday Golf forever. One of the hardest things about

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>being an entrepreneur is figuring out how to make everything work.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Stripe makes it really easy and makes it really easy

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 4>to do maybe the most important thing for a business

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>collect payment.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>So we've used Stripe forever. We've never had an issue.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 4>They work with companies like us, small on the smaller

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 4>side of things, also massive companies like hurt Alaska Airlines,

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 4>door Dash, you know, people that are processing tons and

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 4>tons of payments. They have a wide suite of solutions.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 4>They make it really easy for people to pay. They

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 4>accept all different types of and They also can handle

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 4>complex billing solutions such as like recurring usage based billing systems.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 4>So check out Stripe. If you want to learn more

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>about how you can work with Stripe, visit stripe dot com.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's get to this discussion with Joseph and

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Ryan French. All Right, we're going to talk about the

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>proposed twenty twenty six changes to the PGA Tour, which

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>was these are proposed, they are They're going to go

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 4>in front of the policy board in November. Some pretty

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 4>large changes, I would say on the PGA Tour. They

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>involve a general reduction in field size kind of across

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the board, full field events, then also kind of your

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>fall events where you have less daylight, those will be smaller.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 4>There are less tour cards going to one hundred exempt

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 4>players from one to twenty five. There's been a slight

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 4>change in some of the priority rankings. I'm not going

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 4>to get into the nitty gritty on every single change

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>in priority rankings. And then the final kind of piece,

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 4>the final piece of this news stump was a was

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.679
<v Speaker 4>a change in the slow play policy, which was maybe

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 4>my favorite part about it. A more lax slow play policy.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 4>So to break down these I am joined by mister

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 4>monday Q himself, Ryan French, as well as our Joseph Lamannia.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to put together a group here that might

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 4>have some differing opinions, differing viewpoints, and have a civil

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 4>discussion about these changes the direction that the tour is

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 4>heading in. Welcome on, Ryan, and welcome back Joseph.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>As always, thanks for having me on, Guys, I appreciate it.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I'm a big admirer of your work,

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 4>your your your golf forefront investigative journalists these days.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Ryan. And for those that don't know, my big break

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and that mean this seriously is Andy Hadman this podcast.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it was this one. I don't remember.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it was this one. You you left your backpack

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 4>at my old house. Yeah, you never came back to

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 4>get it, and that that backpack went when uh when

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 4>I think my wife sold in a garage sale for

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 4>perfect perfect.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, obviously been super helpful to me and

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Happy to be on.

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into it.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I think we'll get we'll touch on probably more of

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 4>than nitty gritty details. I wanted to kind of make

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 4>this a little bit of a round table discussion. Uh, Ryan,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna give you you first first stab of this.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Since we're all in this together, I wanted to start

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>with the positives. What is your favorite change that the

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 4>tour has proposed here?

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Man, I mean, okay, so I will say this as

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a without getting too deep. I'm not totally against the

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>field size being reduced. I think they went too drastic,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but there is a lot of like the past champions,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, category has been widely discussed by a lot

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of people. I'm in agreement with that, like you know,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>when guys who won, When Carlos Franco is getting into

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fields like we've lost the plot. So the change in

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>priority ranking is not I'm not totally against what's the

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>most positive obviously totally biased. I don't see a lot

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>positive in this change.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Joseph, what are your thoughts?

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>My favorite we're going here? Yeah, not overall thoughts, right, Yeah,

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think people have advocated for a simpler

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>priority ranking system, and like Ryan is mentioning, I think

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 3>there have been some ways to get into some of

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 3>these fields that needed to go out the door a

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit, and that the bottom of the PGA tour

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 3>has not always been the strongest, especially some of these

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 3>spots between one hundred and first and one hundred and

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifth and the FedEx Cup standings, which is basically

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the group of players that's going to bear the brunt

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>of these changes. So now when you look at on

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>paper at the priority ranking, you're gonna have spots one

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 3>through one hundred basically filled by the top finishers in

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>the FedEx Cup standings. I'm oversimplifying a little bit, but

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>then you're gonna have the top ten finishers on the

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 3>DP World Tour in the top twenty from the Corn

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Ferry Tour. That's one hundred and thirty players right there.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>That's basically a full field, and you'd start to expect

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>that those golfers are going to get into most of

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>these full field events. After that, it's Q School and

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>there's other categories that are going to round out the fields.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>But on paper, most of the open events, in the

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 3>full field events are going to be filled out in

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 3>a way that's clean now and the Corn Fairy Tour

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>guys are getting a much better priority ranking spot at

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the expense of some of the bottom of the PGA Tour,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 3>which I think is a step in the right direction,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 3>so on the whole that to me is the most

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>drastic change and by far the best.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm a big proponent in the idea of what you

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>just kind of laid out, Joseph. Like, I think the

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 4>last recent recent years where you're corn Faery Tour player,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I get my card in September and I get this,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 4>it's like the most excite Like you talk about the

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 4>most exciting moment of your life as a professional golfer.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I reached the top of the mountain, or I thought

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 4>I reached the top of the mountain. I got my

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour card. And then it's like, well, you kind

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 4>of have it. You're actually at the back of the

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 4>US and you're probably not gonna play golf until February,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 4>and you'll play once and then you might play in March,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>and then you might play in late April. And it

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 4>was like this this mishmash of like I don't know

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 4>when I'm starting, it's impossible to get in a rhythm.

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 4>There are still some like huge issues with I think

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the journey of a corn Fairy Tour player to getting

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 4>their PGA Tour card. I think they should immediately be

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 4>playing golf on the PGA Tour. That's like, it's they're

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 4>at a huge competitive disadvantage already that they miss fall,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 4>that all the other guys on tour get to play

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 4>through the fall for you know, seven million dollars per week,

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>and then they come in in January and are like,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, starting behind in a way like they've they've

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 4>missed three months straight of competitive golf. So like, to me,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 4>like this makes the corn Faery graduate more relevant, right,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 4>They are more a part of the tour because the

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 4>cleaner priority ranking. Now, like you could argue on the

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 4>other side, there's less spots, but if you I think

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 4>like the percentage wise, those twenty spots have a much

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 4>better chance at retaining PGA Tour status, which I think

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 4>is like one of the hardest things to do in

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>the world of golf right now, is graduate from the

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 4>corn Ferry in a you know, position less than tenth

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 4>on their priority ranking and retain your card. It is

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>you are you are as as your father probably told

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 4>you walking uphill both ways in that scenario. So that's

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 4>everybody's favorite, Ryan, what is your least favorite?

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You?

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 4>You indicated that you might not love some of these

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>changes and if you want to, you could take a

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 4>wide view or a narrow view. You could you know,

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 4>you could say that I don't like the general direction.

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, My here's the wide view is you can,

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>like back to your point, Andy, like when you get

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>your PGA Tour card, you kind of don't really get it.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's still going to be some of that,

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>even though I agree, you're going to get into a

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>lot more events, but you're still with the signature events.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you're going to get into any rhythm.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But agreed, they're going to get a better chance to

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>keep and retain their card. Here's my biggest issue overall

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is that it's become more closed door. Right. This brings

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>more protection to the top players. It makes it more

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>closed doors. Yes, it's less cards, but you're talking less

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>exempt cards, less corn ferry cards, special temporary membership as

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, as far as i've heard, is

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>going away, less Monday qualifiers. There's less pass to get

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>onto the PGA Tour than there was before. And that's

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>my biggest issue is this was already closed door, and

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>now it's becoming even more. You know, the top players

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>have built in a lot of protection. They have all

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the power. Understandably, they're protecting themselves. They've seen all of

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>their other playing their former playing partners get hundreds of

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. They have the power, they've taken it. It's

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a closed door tour that's becoming more closed door

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 4>Joseph, what's your least favorite part of that?

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I guess the only not that it needs

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to be a back like a rebuttal to everything. And

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure I agree with with Ryan on some of that.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>The part of the of the changes that probably went

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>under reported a little bit or didn't get as big

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>of a reaction is the way they're changing the FedEx

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 3>cut point distribution to actually make it a little bit

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>more so that your performance aligns better with the points

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you're given. So what it's actually going to do in

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 3>practice is make some of those non signature events a

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit closer if you finish somewhere between like tenth

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 3>and twentieth to the signature events. So I actually would

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 3>push back a little bit that the top players have

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>built in this huge layer of protections for themselves, and

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of ways, I think the PGA Tour

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>now there are fewer of those protections than that were

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>in the past, so I would counter that a little bit.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 3>My least favorite part of all of this is a

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 3>line that I found am using in the whole email

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 3>that went out two players. They're not expanding the field

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 3>size for signature events, and I have a problem with

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I think in general, the signature events have lacked some

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>buzz and none of this, None of these changes matter

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>if people aren't interested in the signature events, because that

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 3>is what the tour is anchoring itself to. If the

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>signature events are special, everything else feeds up to that

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>things are going well. If no one cares about the

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>signature events, the tours in a has a serious problem

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>on their hands, and the whole thing could fall apart.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 3>So in the email, the tour said that they explored

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>the possibility of expanding the field sizes slightly from anywhere.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 3>Right now they're generally around seventy five seventy six players.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>They explored the possibility of extending that to eighty to

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty players, and they're rationale for not

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>doing that is that the subcommittees, this is a quote,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>gained an understanding of how all aspects of the schedule

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 3>model are integrated to support the overall schedule and recognized

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>any modifications at this stage would be disruptive and could

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>increase fan confusion. That does not hold that fans ald

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 3>are going to be confused about what a ninety five

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>or one hundred player tournament means like now.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>They don't not even think.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>The fans don't understand the objective now of what's the

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>point of the tournament? Like that doesn't make sense, And

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>all the other changes are at least as disruptive as

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 3>potentially expanding the field side. So I think that the

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour seriously needs to consider expanding those fields to

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>like ninety to one hundred players, restoring the meaning of

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 3>making a cut on the PGA Tour, and leaning a

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit more into it being competitive. So that was

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>my least favorite part of all this announcement, that they

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 3>might not even be addressing their most valuable and like

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>the key to the success of the tour is the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>signature events being special, and they might be shooting themselves

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 3>in the foot by not addressing that.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So Joseph to that point, I asked this to Billy, Right,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is like the signature events last year and the signature

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>events in twenty twenty six are exactly the same, like

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the sponsor. That's what I don't understand about all these changes.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not changing the non signature events. It's not like

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>magically ten top guys are going to all of a

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sudden go like, oh, we have to support the three

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>M or the John Deere. Right, the signature events aren't

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>changing like the signature events last year. In twenty twenty five,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>all the top guys are gonna play. They're basically forced

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to play that there's enough money to play. So what

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>has these changes done to make the product better? You know,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like two sponsors and two fans and to me again

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>totally biased, I'm not sure what they are. The signature

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>events are basically going to be the same and the

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>other events are basically going to be the same. I

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know what difference is.

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 4>I think ay, like on one clear thing that's going

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 4>to make the tournament from a competition standpoint better is

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 4>the smaller feel by going to one hundred and twenty

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 4>players in the fall these fall and early year events.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Like when you think about the competition aspect of an event,

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 4>whoever is at the back of the bus is completely screwed.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>It's like you're gonna play twelve holes.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 4>And it's gonna be pitch by the time you finish,

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>it's gonna be dark, and then you have to come

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 4>back tomorrow morning it's six and finish like you're at

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 4>a competitive disadvantage if you have to, if you're at

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 4>the back of the bus. So that alone, now, like

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 4>the means of which you fix that competitive issue are

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 4>There are probably a few ways you could maybe enforce

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>some pace of play standards.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>They have gone the other way.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 4>For anybody wondering, my least favorite thing here is the

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 4>pace of play policy getting relaxed, less fines, more time.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's insane.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I think like every sport in the world is trying

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 4>to to push for faster play for they know that

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 4>the tension spans of fans is going down, and the

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour somehow thinks it's a good idea to relax

0:17:54.960 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 4>space and play policies. But anyways, sorry, go ahead.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like you look at Major League Baseball, the

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>shot clock has very literally changed the entire game, like

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's made it wildly more popular. It's by all accounts,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>there's literally no one who's like, man, this is a

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>bad change, and the PGA Tour what the complete opposite.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They're like, man, there's a like major League Baseball and

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>golf have very much like it's relatively boring sport, right

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like Major League Baseball is slow. There's not a lot

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>of ton going on, and so they're like, man, we

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>got to make this faster. Let's do a shot clock

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>pitch clock, and it's revolutionized the game. And the PGA

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Tour rolls out all these changes and they go the

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite way.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 4>PJ and I were talking, and PJ brought up a

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 4>point that nobody's talking about is the health issues that

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 4>are the pitchers are going through because of the pitch clock.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 4>But that's because like all the other advantages are outweighing

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 4>the one disadvantage. And I think, like, when you bring

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>up this this thing, and like, obviously people getting hurt

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 4>is an issue, PJ says that there are rumors that

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 4>golfers are saying they might get hurt, there might be

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 4>more entries if there's a shot clock, which I can't

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 4>contained myself, like that being a pushback, we're gonna get

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 4>injured if we have to play a shop.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Within forty five seconds.

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 4>But anyways, I'm sorry, I can't say that good faith.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that goes into like the pushback players

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 4>are like, well, the logistics are impossible. The logistics are impossible.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Like that's the one pushback that is constantly held and

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 4>it's like, guys, has already happened.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 5>They did this on the European Tour and it was

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 5>a smashing success. They had a shot clock they figured

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 5>out on this tour that doesn't have the funds that

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 5>the PGA Tour has, they figured out how to do

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 5>shot clock like and what they saw is players actually

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 5>played better, They played faster, rounds took less time. Like

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 5>it is a you know, I think like from that standpoint,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 5>for me, that's the issue. But from a competition standpoint,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I think people finishing rounds on the day that rounds

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 5>are set to tee off is like a very important

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 5>part of the competition. I don't want to dismiss that,

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 5>get it pulling this back, but you know, like from

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 5>the from the other standpoint, like I think that that

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 5>is like one of the things that you look at

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 5>with this and you just say, like to Joseph's point.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Like what what what are we even changing here?

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Like is there you know, we we've been in this

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of purgatory as a golf fan, and whether you're

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 4>on the on the fence of like there needs to

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 4>be more playing opportunities, more pathways, or you're on the

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 4>fence of there needs to be less pathways. I think

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>like everybody in golf use the declining ratings, the you know,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 4>diminished product, and it says like something has to change,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 4>and you look at this and it's like this is it.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 4>This is what rolling out like unless like I'm missing

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 4>something and like the twenty twenty seven is going to

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 4>introduce these sweeping changes, which I don't think is going

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 4>to be like like what we've seen is usually there

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 4>are changes and then it's like we aren't going to

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 4>do anything for five years and that maybe we'll change

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 4>something else. So it's like this is from this is

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 4>what golf's going to look like for the next five years, and.

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>And and what has what is going to be different

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about the product outside of a smaller field to the

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>casual golf fan which makes up of like we're in

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this little bubble, like what is going to change about

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the product? Like absolutely nothing that's the answer.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 3>That's where I'm with you, Ryan, is that I think

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 3>this reflects delusion of a lot of these players that

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>spent a ton of time in conference rooms coming up

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 3>with reinventing the tour, and this is what they landed on.

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Like to me, that's my issue with the changes is

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>this doesn't change virtually anything. And I guess where you

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 3>and I would probably disagree is like I think the

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>elimination of the Monday qualifiers and the slight reduction in

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>these field sizes to get these rounds in by daylight,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to have much of an

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>impact on any players or on the product pretty much

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 3>at all. And I also think the pathways are still

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty clear for how a player gets to the PGA Tour.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>So to me, like these changes are mostly negligible for

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 3>ninety nine percent of fans, and if again, like I

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 3>already said, if the signature events aren't popping for people,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>these are sweeping changes that don't change much of anything.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know how you take this change, but

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>again I agree with you Joseph in the most part

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that Monday qualifiers are not trying to pretend like they're

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of the PJA Tour as much as

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I love them and say that often on Twitter, like

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to pretend like they are a significant part. Obviously,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's very biased. I think they've been a part of

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the history of the PGA Tour. Andy said it on

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the Shotgun Start, I would love if they want seventy

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>player fields and the rest is filled by Monday qualifiers, right,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like that was it would be obviously biased. But my

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you sell this to AT and

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>T when you go and you're like, what are they

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>getting that's any different? Like, hey, here's all our changes. Okay,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what is it different to the AT and T Double

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Beach Pro Am? Nothing? Literally nothing.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 4>I think the signature events is something to zoom in

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>on a little bit obviously. I think Joseph makes a

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>great point about them being like if this isn't compelling,

0:23:58.600 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 4>what are we doing?

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Type situation, And.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 4>I think like the less player I think we've seen

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 4>this with with golf in general, is like kind of

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 4>like the less players overarching, Like obviously there's outliers. People

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 4>are gonna be like, well, the Masters is.

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>A small field, Like Okay, I got you, I got you.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 4>Bud, But just in general, when we reduce the number

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 4>of players, it generally gets less interesting across the board

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 4>because there's less storylines, there's less competition a And like

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen generally with this era of golf is

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 4>there's more parody than ever in golfers. The difference between

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 4>number one hundred and number fifteen has never been smaller

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 4>in the world of pro golf. And I think that's

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 4>like probably one of like the lynch pins and issues

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 4>with what's going on in the PGA Tour in general,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 4>is it's harder to be a great player than ever.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 4>And when you continue to reduce the size this scale

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 4>of those signature events, you are going to continue to

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 4>reduce the potential outcomes, right, And I just am a

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 4>general believer in more outcomes overarching better.

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Would you guys agree disagree with that?

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan? Go ahead? Yeah, I mean I would agree right,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Like and Andy, That's my point of more cards is

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like there is the parody is greater now on the

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour than ever. Again, back to Billy saying, like

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a more competitive tour. The difference between one

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty fifth player and the hundred player is

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>one tenth of a stroke, right, or whatever that number

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is is minuscule, and so that a more competitive tour

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't translate to anything for the fans or the product

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So I always think more is better. Obviously

0:25:55.480 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>again that's biased, but you know, no cut events have

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not worked in wgc's They just aren't compelling. Whether that's

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>because of the smaller fields or no cuts or whatever,

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they aren't can but they still continue to try to

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>shove it down our throat, and in very typical PGA

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to or fashion with decisions lately, it's let's have no

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>cut events because people want to see stars all four days,

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and then they added a ten person cut or whatever

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that is, right, Like, they just don't make a lot

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of sense, and so no one. I don't think many people.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some fans on the ground want to see Rory

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>shoot twenty over if he's struggling and they want to

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the genesis.

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>But that's what I.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Don't understand, actually, is like who wants Yeah, is are

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 4>there people that like wake up early to catch like

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 4>if Rory's in last, they wake up to catch his

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 4>eight ampty time?

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't think that's a guy with a Sunday ticket,

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Like he's got a Sunday ticket and Rory goes eighty one,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine to seventy eight, and he's like, man, we

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>got to leave at five am, kids, we gotta see

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Rory sweep and do he obviously is gonna shoot seventy eight.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>We gotta get out there, Like, what the hell? Who

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>does that? No one.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 3>The part I strongly disagree with is the idea that

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 3>these margins are minuscule. And that's something that we've talked

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 3>about a little bit on this pod in the past.

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 3>And not to use an example that might be sensitive, Ryan,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 3>but like TJ. Vogel, Monday qualified eight times in twenty

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 3>eighteen and made three cuts in those eight starts, once

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 3>was inside the top fifty. And then when he went

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 3>to the corn Fairy Tour the next couple of years,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 3>struggled on the corn Faery Tour. Like Mark Hubbard forgot

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to register for a tournament this fall on the PGA

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Tour swing, showed up to the qualifier and got out.

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 3>He immediately got These fields are vastly different in strength

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 3>of field. If a PGA Tour player shows up to

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>a Corn Fairy Tour event to qualifier chances are they

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 3>are getting out. If you don't belong on the PGA Tour,

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you're probably not going to have success. All due respect

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 3>to TJ Vogel, like when he got out to a

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 3>stronger field, he wasn't able to compete. I fully believe

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 3>with what the PGA Tour has done with their pipelines,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>if you are good enough, the opportunity is in front

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of you, and removing those Monday qualifiers is not preventing

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 3>players from getting to the top level. Where I think

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 3>we clearly agree is that expanding the field of the

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 3>signature events and restoring the meaning of a cut would

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 3>make things more competitive and compelling. So that would be

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 3>my rebuttal to you, Ryan. I agree with you on

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>some of that, but I think this talk of like

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a tenth of a shot it's a fifteen hundredths

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>of a shot doesn't always play out, and I would

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 3>challenge people to come up with examples where somebody's getting trapped.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Right now, all right, let's take a quick break from

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 4>this discussion and talk about our partner, True Golf. True

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Golf has launched a new product called launch Box. It

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 4>is an all new portable launch monitor and golf simulator.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>It seamlessly connects to your PC or iOS device and

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 4>makes it easy to play golf courses and improve your

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 4>game year round as a simple setup, instant shot registration,

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 4>accurate measured data, and an easy Wi Fi connection.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Neat thing about this.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 4>It can be used indoors and outdoors on range mats

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 4>and you can get just detailed feedback on your game.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking forward to using this over the Winner. I've

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 4>been playing a decent amount of golf this year and

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of want to stay sharp over the Winner. So

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 4>if you're interested in true golf, this is a way

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 4>you can play really great golf courses. They have a

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 4>ton of great golf courses. We can't mention their specific names.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 4>If you're interested in true golf away to you know,

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 4>have a launch monitor and also play golf. Check out

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 4>True golf dot com slash egg. That's the launch box

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 4>by True Golf, True Golf t r U golf dot

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 4>com slash egg. All right, let's get back to Joseph

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Lamannia and Ryan French. I've been looking a little bit

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 4>at uh at some data and just like what I've

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>found interesting is like how you know you have these

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 4>players and because of signature events, now their strokes gained

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 4>has like they aren't they aren't improved, They're almost they're

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 4>they're getting worse because on a strokes gain perspective, because

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>they're playing against better competition, right, your strokes gain And

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I think this, yeah, unadjusted. So if you are like

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 4>you're you know, like scoring average, like the scoring average

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.479
<v Speaker 4>of the three is a lot different than the scoring

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 4>average of playing at Riviera in February in bad weather, right, Like,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 4>there's all these different elements to it, and I do agree,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 4>just in totality is like the way that the tour

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 4>has set up with like the Corn Fairy Tour and

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour just in general, the you know, we

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 4>can quibble about like small things, but players that are

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 4>supposed to succeed succeed. Years ago, I had a conversation

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>with a tour player who like, you know, a level

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 4>of player who had played on the Corn Fairy Tour

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 4>but also who had played at Eastlake, right, and he's like, listen,

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 4>there's there's nobody that gets held down by the Corn

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 4>Fairy Tour that's not supposed to be there. And he's

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 4>like the thing that I would always pay attention to

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 4>if I were you, is watch the certified PGA Tour

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 4>players when they get relegated to the corn Ferry Tour.

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 4>How they immediately are right back up. And I think, like,

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, like listen, like I'm friends with him. But

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>like when Zach Blair a couple of years ago lost

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 4>his tour card, I was terrified because Zach, he'd be

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the first to tell you he's he's one of the

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 4>he's a bomber, you know. But if you go to

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 4>the bottom bottom of the driving distance, I'm like, man,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 4>like these scores are gonna be they're so low on

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 4>the corn Ferry Tour, he doesn't hit it that far,

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 4>like he may not get his card back. And sure

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 4>enough he went down and immediately came back up, and

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 4>he's been back up since. Like and now with like this,

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 4>I think, like what's interesting to be about this new four,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 4>this new I think like less cards, Like if we

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 4>want to talk about like where the tour is going

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 4>and where I'd like to see them go. We've talked

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 4>about the signature event. I think it's just time for

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.719
<v Speaker 4>them to acknowledge that there is a upper tier, like

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>that there's a different to and that what we're talking about,

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Like mainly this conversation is about the tour, the corn

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Ferry Tour and the PGA the bottom part of the

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour, And to me, like what needs to be acknowledged,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 4>like the if they could increase the field sizes of

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 4>the signature events while keeping the same small number of

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 4>exempt players into those, then you've created an interesting pathway

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 4>up and down right, and you could create this free

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 4>flowing system that allows a lot of pathways where somebody

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 4>that plays on that, Like I think like the number

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 4>one issue with the tour right now is that that

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 4>all the all the tours that they operate, so from

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour to the corn Ferry Tour to the

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 4>America's Tour, they all operate on different currencies like this currency, yeah,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 4>points currencies, Like there's no there's no relation to the

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 4>points I earn on the corn Ferry Tour or the

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 4>America's Tour. I'd love to see, like who is it

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 4>Dan McCarthy a couple of years ago, Ryan like years

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 4>ago that got like he won like five times on

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the on Canada or Latin America and he came up

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 4>he played one event on the PGA on corn Ferry

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Tour and he hurt his thumb. Like in by perfect

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 4>world he was he was beating the barn doors off

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 4>everybody on the America's Tour. Get over to the corn

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Ferry Tour or the PGA Tour corn Ferry Tour. If

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 4>he keeps playing hot, let him get up to the

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 4>top echelon of the game within the same year.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>We all like understand golf.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Golf is a game of like you see this as

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 4>like runs, It's very hard to sustain the same level

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 4>of play over a long period of time. The only

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 4>people that do that are the greatest players in the game.

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 4>So allow a little bit of a free flow, and

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 4>I think what happens is then you start to see

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>just more relegation and promotion throughout a period of time

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 4>and more interest because to me, outside of the superstars,

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 4>the most fascinating aspect of the sport is the promotion

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 4>and relegation.

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Uh, just one back to Joseph's point. You can

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about my wife, my kids, but TJ vocal is

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>completely off limit. I would have not agreed to come

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast if I had known that was going

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to be going to.

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Cut what is he from Indiana? Isn't he from Indiana?

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like, why would you do that?

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, well, Joseph's from Indiana, that's Indiana on Indiana crime.

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, talk about my wife, kids, that's fine,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but TJ Vogel, that is insane, that's slanderous. Uh yeah,

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 1>let me let me handle the Monday qualifier. I agree

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with you, Joseph. I again, I think it gets lost

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and I probably don't do a great job of it.

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not pretending that like a Monday que field is

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>like oh, they're all going to be PG winners or

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>even there's tons of guys who are just very good

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>players and could be a decent corn fairy player. But

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's plenty of examples. Peter Quest just did it,

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, JT posts guys changed their careers of Monday.

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely guys who have Monday qualified or in Monday

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers that could be a good part of the tour.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not trying to pretend like Monday qualifiers have

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 1>fields where everyone's going to be a PGA Tour winner.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I probably don't do a great job of saying that

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:40.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. But Andy, to your point about points, being Yeah,

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Like Matt McCarty is a great example, right, Like, how

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>do we get Matt McCarty up to the PGA Tour

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>faster than the three wins he did, because obviously he

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>proved it, he was one of the in that period

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of time, he was one of the best players in

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, obviously not playing against great competition, So how

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do we make that regulation that The point of vault

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to me all those changes is like, we don't have that.

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a lot of pathways in my opinion,

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to the PGA Tour.

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of pathos.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.720
<v Speaker 3>In a rare moment, I'm going to defend the PGA

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Tour a little bit on that. What they're saying is

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the path is through the corn Faery Tour, and you

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>have a full season to finish in the top twenty

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and if you do that, now we're pretty much guaranteeing

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 3>you spots into all of the non signature events. Could

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 3>they get Matt McCarty, I agree with you, Andy, they

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 3>should get him into the Fall faster. But like the

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 3>other example, Dan McCarty or McCarthy, McCarthy, maybe get him

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 3>up into the corn Faery Tour faster and let him

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 3>work his way into the top twenty and if he's

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 3>good enough, he will. If somebody's winning on a lower

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 3>tour than the Corn Faery Tour, like realistically they are

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 3>not even if they're winning, are not going to have

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of success on the PGA Tour until we've

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 3>seen that they can play well on the Corn Fairy Tour.

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think players like that are getting stuck. So

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 3>it seems fairly reasonable to me to say, hey, we're

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 3>giving you, Yes, it's gonna take you a full season

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Corn Fairy Tour, finish in the top twenty,

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 3>and then you're gonna get your starts now on the

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour and not be stuck behind cards one hundred

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 3>through one hundred and twenty five is a fairly reasonable

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 3>pipeline system.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I think like the probably the biggest pushback to like

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 4>a real free flowing almost market of golfers going up

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and down is the idea, like it's revolves around people

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 4>need to know where they're playing, like that's generally what

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 4>they what I think the pushback will say it would be,

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 4>and I would say that's that's a strictly player's perspective.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 4>You know from a stemblance of any other sport, like

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>you play where you were, where you are performing, You

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 4>get moved up moved down in all these sports. And

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 4>if you're a star, you know where you're going to

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 4>be for the most part, and that should be the

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 4>only people that really know where they're going to be

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 4>are the people that can are the players that could

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 4>go out and perform at a top twenty level year

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 4>in year out.

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, I.

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Think like I think like you've seen this like basically

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 4>year in year out with the PGA Tour and the

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 4>corn Ferry Tour is effectively one player from the corn

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 4>Ferry Tour at minimum comes up and is an immediate

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 4>like star in the making on the PGA Tour. You

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 4>think Scotti, Scheffler, Sung JM, who's been one of the

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 4>most consistent, like good players on the PGA Tour. Within

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 4>weeks of them being on the corn Ferry Tour, it

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 4>was very evident that they were they were going up

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 4>to the PGA Tour, And I think like one of

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 4>the issues with the way the structuring it, the way

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 4>they have it structured, where you have to be down

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 4>there for a year like out other winning three times,

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 4>which is you could finish second every single week.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 2>On the Cord Ferry Tour.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 4>You could be literally finished second every week, and it

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 4>does you know good? You could win twice and finish

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 4>second every I mean the greatest Cord Fairy Tour season ever,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 4>and you don't get moved up. Like there needs to

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 4>be point thresholds, like we're sirt through a certain time,

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna move this person up because like what you're

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 4>missing out on, especially in an era where where players

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 4>are younger, that are the primes are shorter.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing this like like there are there are.

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Real questions at age thirty one thirty two, what does

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 4>JT and Jordan Speece's next five years look like?

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Like what are they that was when they were twenty one?

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 4>We never fathomed that be or twenty two that being

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 4>like the reality. But like with this in mind, like

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 4>how do we get people like Skyte Scheffler up a

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.479
<v Speaker 4>half a year early and start to build the name

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 4>recognition of these young players and it has to become

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 4>a free system that allows people to go up and

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 4>down without like you know, I think I in recent years,

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I always find a humorous it's like the people are

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 4>low on the PGA Tour priority lists that are our

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 4>recent corn Faery grats. It's like they're in this purgatory.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like, I'm not in this PGA Tour field. Do

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I go play the corn Ferry event. It doesn't count

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 4>towards me keeping my PGA Tour card, But I'm not

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 4>playing the cord Fairy Tour enough to keep to be

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 4>to like be advantaged on the on the corn Faery card.

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 4>And then if you lose, if you if you finish

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 4>poorly enough on the PGA Tour card money list, you

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 4>go back to like first stage of corn Ferry Tour,

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 4>like like it doesn't make any sense that the the

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 4>the points don't match up, like to me, like this

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 4>is like actually the biggest problem with the PGA Tour

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 4>is that the currency. You have one state running everything

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 4>but using different money everywhere you turn.

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean agree totally with with that. Andy. I mean,

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Hale obviously was a Q School graduate, so even

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the corn Ferry guys, so even getting into less events,

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>really concentrated on the PGA Tour as much as he could.

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Then all of a sudden was like, oh hell, I

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>got to go start playing corn Ferry events and is

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>going to finish below outside of you know, the still

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>barring the three events that are left, it's gonna finish

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>below two hundredth and FedEx didn't do anything, didn't do

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:36.919
<v Speaker 1>well enough, made a few cuts on the corn Ferry Tour,

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so didn't keep his card in any way. There, I mean,

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going back to second stage and very literally is

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go from the PGA Tour to nothing like zero,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>not a single start on the corn Ferry, not America's status, nothing,

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I just there and those guys coming up, like,

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you play great on the Americas, you should have to

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like you should be able to go faster through the

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>system one hundred percent.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 3>To be fair, And I'm more just playing Devil's advocate here.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Blaine got like twenty four starts on the PGA Tour

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and it's almost all miscuts this year.

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh I said, I.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Can agree that that there should probably there should be

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>some point synchronization so that they're not starting back from

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:24.879
<v Speaker 3>square one and they have some level of Corn Fairy

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Tour status like that seems to be very reasonable, And

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's another exemption category to Andy where if you're

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 3>top five in the corn Fairy Tour points at a

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 3>certain point in the year, you get into some PGA

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Tour events like that seems like a priority worth pursuing.

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I would just only push back on the notion that

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 3>players are getting trapped in certain places within the golf

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem right now, because I really don't think that's happening.

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:47.439
<v Speaker 2>I see.

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 4>Like my point is like, if the points are all

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the same, you could be like you could be Blaine

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Hail and it's you know, it's it's March and I

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 4>haven't gotten anything going on the PGA Tour and I

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 4>don't have any started. The players is this week. I'm

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 4>not going to get into Honda or whatever is around it.

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, okay, Like i can go play the

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour or the corn Ferry Tour and at least

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 4>up my my standing on the PGA Tour because I'm

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 4>going down and I'm playing something and I'm trying to

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 4>play well, right, But I think, like that's that's the issue.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Is like to me, like everything you do within the

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour ecosystem shall relate to something, and it makes

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:32.760
<v Speaker 4>it easier.

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>For the fan.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 4>It makes it way more interesting all of a sudden. Also,

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 4>with this, like you could have multiple relegation and promotion

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 4>moments throughout the year. It doesn't have to be like,

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 4>you know what, it's August, we relegate for vote in

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 4>August and September. Those are the that's the time we

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.439
<v Speaker 4>do relegation and promotion. There could be points like where

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 4>it's like, okay, you're you're outside here, these guys are

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 4>up all of a sudden. It's like I have like

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I think like there's been this like belief that we

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 4>can get the PGA of the like the golf schedule,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Like there's this like fleet this belief that we could

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 4>get to a eight month calendar for the stars where

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 4>they get their they're off Seaton. I think that's like

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:17.479
<v Speaker 4>just like not possible. I don't think we could get

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 4>a golf schedule that everybody's happy with in under ten months.

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the reality is like we're going to

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 4>be running golf from January till October. That is just

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 4>like through October. That's the reality of it. So like

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 4>why why not have multiple relegations that make that keep

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 4>that interest in the sport going.

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and I think it helps with getting the

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>best players up there faster, Right Like if Matt McCarty

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>before his third win, gets up there because of some

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterly regulation or promotion, he gets up there faster and

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>proves that he can be a star again. Totally agree, Andy,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, how do we create turnover? That's again back

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to the main issue that I have with the PGA

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Tour in general and these changes. It's like, we're not

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>promoting that we're we're not We're not looking for ways

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to get the best players up the fastest. That's not

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the goal of the PGA Tour, or it seems like

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it to me. So why can't we do things like

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, quarterly promotions and then those ten that are

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>regulated know where they are playing, right Like they go

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>down to the corn Ferry and you're like, I have

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>for the next quarter. I got to kill it on

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the corn Ferry tour so I can get back up

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>again instead of the purgatory that you talk about, like

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>oh I should go here or there, Like you know

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 1>where you're playing, you know what the goal is.

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I think then you could get rid of Monday qualifiers too.

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Son of a bitch. I didn't know what I was

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>walking into but never coming on this podcast again, between

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the TJ Vogel and this, I just walked into a tread.

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I just think, like, I think one

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 4>of the challenges that golf has is the lack of

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 4>the lack of the other side of the table element

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 4>that every other sport has. Team sports in general have

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 4>have the owner and the owner the ownership. And I'm

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 4>not saying that owners are are great. I'm I'm a

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Chicago sports fan. The vast majority of the owners of

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 4>my sports teams are pretty much horrible. They are the worst,

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 4>some of the worst owners in all of sports. But like,

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 4>just in general, the owners represent like kind of the

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 4>idea of like, we need to make this, this product

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 4>good because I am trying to make money on the product.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 4>The players make money by playing this. And I think

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:05.479
<v Speaker 4>like one of the struggles that golf faces, and it's

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 4>very evident with this, is that the lack of the

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 4>other side of the table, saying like, let's really think

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 4>about how we make the most interesting television product, and like,

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you take the majors out of out

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 4>of golf, you know, what are the most fascinating events

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 4>over the course of the year.

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 2>What would you guys say, Joseph, you first.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I went through this in my head recently,

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and there's like ten events that seem to matter in

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 3>golf right now, like the players Matters, the Ryder Cup, obviously,

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 3>the Majors. We're just talking about the men's side of

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 3>the Olympics when it rolls around. And then honestly, I

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 3>think even events like Riviera Memorial have been diminished a

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit by the reduced fields, Like there aren't that

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 3>many golf tournaments that people really seem to care about,

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 3>so somewhere around ten.

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, Yeah, I agree. You know, I use I use

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy who used to read run the Edward Lower

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tracker like and he was very committed to an account

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that was like total ridiculous, right, But the point is is,

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's a golf nerd, right, Like that is you

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be an ultimate golf nerd to be really dedicated.

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't like some like this was before the trackers

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>were a thing, and he would like hook up with

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>his mom and like get pictures and let not hook

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>up with this month I did's it like get connected

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>with his mom and get pictures from the tournaments and

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>his wife and like he was like working at it, right,

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And that guy only watches four tournaments a year now

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the majors, right, And if we're losing that guy

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>who ran an Edward Lord tracker account dedicated, we have

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>lost the plot. And like, you know, he's not watching

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:01.479
<v Speaker 1>signature events, We're doing something wrong in golf because that

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who if he's not watching, we're in deep,

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>deep trouble.

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think like where I was going with

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 4>this is like what matters is when there's stakes, right.

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean you talk about like Joseph, you to talk

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 4>about Barboreal and Riviera being reduced, They're just another signature event.

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 4>I've watched this firsthand with like the Western Open, with

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 4>that was the first golf event I went to. It

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 4>used to be this massive, massive event. Now it's just

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 4>become part of the PGA tour machine. It's part of

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 4>the playoffs, and it's just like it doesn't have anything

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 4>that feels, you know, like a big event outside of

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 4>It's like this is where like what's interesting about the

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Western Open, which is now the BMW at this point,

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 4>do you know what the most interesting thing about it.

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Is the stakes of getting into the top fifty.

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 4>Is that what you're going relegation, right, Relegation like when

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.720
<v Speaker 4>there are stakes, Like that's the only the only events

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 4>outside of like to me, the majors are events that

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 4>have stakes in them, whether it's an Olympic gold medal, right,

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 4>I think the Players has has a certain you know,

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 4>mystique to it. The Ryder Cup obviously has the country aspect,

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 4>but then when you get past that, it's really relegation

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 4>and promotion moments are the are the ones that I

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 4>think stand out, like it's it's silly, but like the

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Windom the Transformation, the Windom had a couple of years

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 4>ago when they went to the top seventy out of

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 4>the Windom and you had JT trying to make it

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 4>into the top seventy, Like that's a real consequence when

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 4>you get down to seventy and I think, like I think,

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 4>like that's what Ryan likes about Monday Qualifiers is that

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 4>there is a promotion aspect of it, you know, and

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity to go up to the next next level.

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And that's what like, I think what golf just needs

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 4>more of a week in, week out basis.

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I you know, I think that golf. I

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>think they tried to make the stakes in these signature

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>events money and and and some like. This's just it

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of like when Live started, and you know,

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they would be like this puts for four million, Like

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the dude signed for two hundred and fifty. He doesn't

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>care that it is for four million, right, And now

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:34.799
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about this at signature events like this is

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for two million. There is no real stakes and it's

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>turned off. You know. Again, the seventy at Windham Is

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is important, right, and the fifty at BMW still had

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>some buzz to it Keegan and Tom Kim and those

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of things, But the consequences are just almost zero.

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Out side of those very few moments for the top players,

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>signature events don't have no I don't know what they

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can do to make the consequences significant enough for fans

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to care, you know, because they're the best players, they're

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>all rich. It's not money. The regulation is for players

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that don't really it's confusing, like who gets it's not

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just cut and dried. Who's not going to be in

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the next one and those kind of things. So I

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know how they create buzz and and again when

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you have too many signature events, like they're all the same.

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I can't name the signature events. If you said, Ryan,

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the signature events in twenty twenty five? No idea

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>at and T I know. And outside of that, I like, oh,

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the OBC Heritage because like, who the hell wants to

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:53.280
<v Speaker 1>play another important round after another after a major. It's like, I.

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Don't forget about the travelers after the US Open.

0:53:55.920 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Travelers, travelers as all, no one wants to be there.

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's play for twenty five million, Ryan, I.

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Think this is where I'm glad we found common ground.

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 3>And to me this week, I feel like I've been

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:11.280
<v Speaker 3>taking crazy pills a little bit and that the lead

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 3>has been buried in all this conversation about the changes

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:16.879
<v Speaker 3>that I think are fairly negligible and honestly a step

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 3>in the right direction is that we're running back the

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 3>same product now for the foreseeable future and pretending it's

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 3>some massive change when fans are actively rejecting it. And

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 3>so that to me, the walls can come crashing down

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.319
<v Speaker 3>pretty quickly here on the PGA tour if some more

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 3>sponsors start pulling the rug out a little bit and

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 3>that should be the there's no urgency from the PGA

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:42.040
<v Speaker 3>tour to do something truly innovative. It feels like they

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 3>think this is innovative. It's not, and we're about to

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 3>run back the same product and it should be. I

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 3>hope there's somebody in the organization sounding the alarm a

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit that twenty twenty five may not be exciting.

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 3>And if they think twenty twenty six is going to

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 3>be more exciting, I think it's pretty delusional.

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it again, Joseph. I think will disagree on the

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>on the EDD, but the overarching is, you know, my

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:06.319
<v Speaker 1>question is, no matter how you feel, if you think

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it's good or you think it's bad, or it doesn't

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>really matter in the scheme of things, how is the

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>product better? And there is no answer to that, because

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>there is. It's not. That's that's the thing. That's the thing.

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>One hundred players, one hundred and twenty five, hundred and fifty.

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what these changes have done to make

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it sellable to sponsors or fans going forward. Like to

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>your point, it's just it's not an exciting product right now,

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and none of this is super exciting that it's going

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to be that much better in twenty twenty six.

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 4>And I think I think like the back half of this,

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 4>when we talk about products, players talk about product a

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 4>ton and and I think, like that's been the talking

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 4>point we're got. We have to improve the product. I

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.960
<v Speaker 4>think like improving the product beyond just the schedule, the

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:02.240
<v Speaker 4>format goes to players raising their hand and being open

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 4>to doing things like just let's just say the walk

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.359
<v Speaker 4>and talks. And I think like the interest in that

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 4>has only dwindled over the since the inception, you know

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 4>that came out of the gates hot. And it seems

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 4>like to me that like the walk and talk is

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 4>is almost like pulling teeth to get players to do it.

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 4>And this is an example of where players like I

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:29.879
<v Speaker 4>don't think this is like an owner versus a player mentality.

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 4>Do you think the players and the managers in Major

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 4>League Baseball were like, yeah, we'd love to do in

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 4>dugout interviews during the World Series or during playoff games. No,

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 4>they don't want to do that. Nobody like the last

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.399
<v Speaker 4>thing they wanted to do. But you know who came

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 4>in and said we need to do this is like

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:50.880
<v Speaker 4>the owner, the people that are looking out for the

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 4>business and when the players are intertwined in in the

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:58.399
<v Speaker 4>ones looking out for the business, what you end up

0:56:58.400 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 4>with is just the players looking out for their own business.

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:04.719
<v Speaker 4>And that's the issue, the product issue with the PGA Tour.

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Andy, I agree. I also think there just needs to

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit more of a back to basics

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 3>with and this is talking to an echo chamber on

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 3>this podcast, but the equipment has the equipment and the

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 3>golf courses they play I think are going totally under

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the radar for how much that's holding the product back.

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think we need to focus on the gameplay itself,

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 3>because a good broadcast where you're not stuffing commercials, you're

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 3>showing the golf with equipment that doesn't de skill the

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 3>sport at great venues is a very good product. There's

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 3>so much we're talking about, so many other things, like

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.919
<v Speaker 3>I think getting back to the basics on that would

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 3>solve a lot of their problems, frankly, more than a

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 3>walk and talk, which like doesn't do a ton for

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:48.439
<v Speaker 3>me as a fan.

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean my pushback on the walk and talk

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is like, yeah, I mean, thank you for doing it.

0:57:56.320 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they wanted wanted from us, like,

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate it. But NBA coaches, to Andy's point, I

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just saw Aaron Boone do an interview. He's getting demolished.

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It was like four to nothing. Freeman's just hit a

0:58:11.360 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>blast for the fourth time in four games, and they're like, hey, Aaron,

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>how does it feel? You know, it'd be like going

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:21.959
<v Speaker 1>up to Jordan and hold twelve on Sunday and be like, man,

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you just pounded two into the rays Creek. How do

0:58:24.480 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel about this? And like the walk and talk

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday or on Friday at the you know, travelers,

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're like, this is some groundbreaking stuff, Like I mean,

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, every sport has done it. Coaches do

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it in timeouts during the game seven, so they don't

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>get a ton of credit for it. It's not revolutionary.

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And yet I mean, obviously, Joseph, you're right about equipment.

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of made everyone, to Andy's point, the much closer.

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to break out. He can't be a great player,

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or they're all together, whatever side of it you're on.

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I just don't know. I just don't know

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what what is going forward That there was nothing about

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:18.120
<v Speaker 1>fans in that proposal, right, Like, there's nothing like hey,

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we're willing to do this, or we should do this

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or anything. It's like, hey, how do we take care

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of ourselves? And here you go, this is what we're doing.

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:33.240
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting times for the PGA tour in this fans.

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 4>I think, like, you know, this is obviously something that's

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 4>being proposed to the pack.

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not locked in.

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 4>But do you guys have any you know, do you

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 4>think this is what will we'll get across the finish line?

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean from the people I've talked to, is

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a done deal. So there might be very slight adjustments,

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but I would be sho if there's anything that would

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>drastically change from what's being proposed. This has been kind

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of worked on for a long time. Let me say

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been worked on by a certain set

1:00:15.440 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of players on the pack. I don't think it's been

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been worked on by everyone. So yeah, I think

1:00:23.560 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a done deal.

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Sure you I trust that, Ryan, And frankly like, I

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:35.880
<v Speaker 3>think it should be passed mainly because I honestly think

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the only difference you're really going to feel for the

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 3>majority of people is that more corn fairy tour guys

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to get opportunities faster at the expense of

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the back end of the FedEx Cup, and that is

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>what should happen. So are these changes radical enough to

1:00:47.560 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>turn the product around now? Absolutely not, and that's my

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>issue with it. But I don't have a problem with

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the changes.

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I land somewhere as it's a small step in

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 4>the right direction, but overarching, there needs to be a

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 4>giant leap in the right direction in the in the

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 4>very near future for for the long term health of

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:16.040
<v Speaker 4>professional men's professional golf. And I think I think like

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of ways you could go about it,

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:20.200
<v Speaker 4>but like a lot of the thinking needs to be

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 4>outside the box that we're currently living in.

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Ryan, Do you have any parting thoughts?

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would be on the opposite end of Joseph

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're in the middle. But I think my closing

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>thoughts is this is a very selfish game, and I

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing a lot a lot of that reflected

1:01:44.400 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the changes. When players have control, it's a it's

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a notoriously selfish game, and it's hard to when you

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have control like that not see that this is the

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>result they're they're doing what is best for them at

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this time. So I mean, I hope I love the

1:02:06.400 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour and I've been a golf nerd my entire life.

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want the product to stink and whatever that is.

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>If this if in twenty at the end of twenty

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, I'm like, Man, I was super wrong and

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this is great. I hope that I'm wrong because I

1:02:24.840 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>want the PGA Tour to be successful and I hope

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that that's the case.

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:33.760
<v Speaker 4>I think at the end of twenty twenty six will

1:02:33.760 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>probably feel just about the same as you feel right now. Yeah,

1:02:38.800 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>So not to be not to be a Debbie downer,

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:46.760
<v Speaker 4>but that's I think the state of where the structure

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of the PGA Tour is at. And I think, you know,

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 4>this was a fun chat with some different opinions, but

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I think we all kind of land the same place,

1:02:57.360 --> 1:02:59.959
<v Speaker 4>which is probably not a good sign for the state

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 4>to the PGA Tour.

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>All right.

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Ry, you could read his work at monday q

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 4>dot com. And Joseph, who writes regularly for our newsletter,

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 4>as a regular guest on this podcast, Thank you guys

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:15.600
<v Speaker 4>for coming on.

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys, thanks for having me on.

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for listening to another edition of the Friday

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Golf Podcast. Today's episode was edited and produced by PJ Clark.

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Big thanks to PJ for grinding putting this together. If

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>you haven't yet, take a swing over to our pro shop.

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>We've got tons of stuff in that pro shop for fall.

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Temperatures are getting cold, cooler. I've noticed it even out

1:03:52.000 --> 1:03:55.760
<v Speaker 4>here in California. Get some fall in winter layers. We've

1:03:55.800 --> 1:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>got a bunch of different stuff in the pro Shop.

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I would recommend the American Needle Crew necks in there.

1:04:02.920 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 4>I saw those at a pro shop in the spring

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 4>and said immediately said Meg, we've got to get some

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>of these in our shop, so we have those for

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the fall. Meg's done an awesome job stocking the shop.

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:18.800
<v Speaker 4>It is Proshop dot Thefrida Egg dot com. Uh, go

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:21.840
<v Speaker 4>in there and get some get some Frida Egg golf swag.

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, Thanks, we'll be back next week. We've got

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 4>a golf architecture pod coming early next week. We'll be

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 4>back talking golf architecture early next week.

1:04:33.120 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening and have a great weekend.