WEBVTT - Investment Trusts May Be the Right Place for Your Money

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>John, ma'am. What was the most Exactually, I'm not even

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going to argue that. I'm going to start with the

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>most exciting bit of the budget for me yesterday I

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>thought it was the British ISA, or what I'm going

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to call the BISA, because I've been looking for that

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.159
<v Speaker 1>for so long, waiting for it, very keen on it.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't exactly how I wanted it. It was still exciting.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to that. Most exciting bit was a

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>bunk to the Space center in Shetland. Yes, you know

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the space a lot on this podcast

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that the government are behind the idea

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of Shetland being a center for satellite launches, and I

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>thought was really something. It's finiche but kind of exciting.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I was very surprised that you didn't tweeked on it

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>as soon as it came out, But then I realized

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>it obviously missed it amid the flood of other exciting

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>things that came out in that that section of the project.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I didn't miss it. I was just so excited

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>by britt Iss or Bises or Bisas or Brices. I

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We'll figure out where we going with this one?

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>That I kept all my excitement about the space center

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to myself, But then, of course, the day after the

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>budget had suddenly realized how exciting it wasn't also realized

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm probably and someone let me know if I'm wrong,

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably one of the very few, maybe the only

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>UK journalists who has visited visited the Saxford Space Center

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on the island of or Is it yell, yell, yell,

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of ioland to go through on the

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>way affects this one thoroughly recommended? Is it? Yeah? I'll

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>look it up.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>The thing is with Shetland is yeah, I'm sure a

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>lovely place. But I can imagine that most journalists with

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the more luck getting a trip to Australia didn't kind

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>of get the expenses to go up to share and

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the days off the John, Yeah.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>The flight cancelations and flights to Shatland are super expensive,

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>way more expensive than going to Australia to be right,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Moving on from that, because most people aren't interested in

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>space sessions in Chatland. They are interested is John? And

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what you thought was the most interesting part of the budget.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 2>You know what if this had been the first budget

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of a five year term or you know, the second budget.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I would actually be quite exciting now because the Chancellor

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>basically turned around and put the idea of getting rid

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 2>of National Insurance and merging it with income tax I

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>sualy very funly on the table. You know, he not

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>only cut it by another two percentage points, but he

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>also said in the long run it would be nice

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of this problem is of course he

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the long run. He's probably got about kind

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of six months and then that is not going to

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>be kind of maintained by the next government. I wouldn't

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 2>have thought unless there's a very big surprise. So I

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>think from my point view that was the most disappointing element,

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and that this would have been a good budget to

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 2>do about three years ago, and the things That also

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 2>feeds into a problem with the British ISA because they're

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 2>having to consult on it. The consultation doesn't end until June.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Half of the people who are going to be you know, talking,

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>are going to be asked about in this consultation, so

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the investment platforms et cetera. Certainly from the

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 2>points on Twitter, seem to be kind of thinking, well,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>chances are this isn't going to happen before the next election,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 2>and so it's never going to harm So I think

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that's probably the big disappointment. That's would actually been a

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty good budget if they had any room left to run,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>but they don't.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you. I mean, you know, I've

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been you and I have been calling for the merger

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of national insurance and income tax for a long long time.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is a really interesting way to do it,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to gradually cut national insurance down, desiri abolishing it. It's

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just making it kind of disappear, and income tax goes

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>up at the same time to compensate. And what would

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have been absolutely amazing. You know, I know I bang

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on about this a lot, but here you have riches,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Unak and Hunt. They haven't got much time left. And

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind, they haven't got much time left.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>We know they've got nothing to lose. They're very probably

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>going to lose. It is miracle to win, right, So

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they have this one off chance, one off chance to

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>do a couple of things that would really move the

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>dial for the UK, really change things. And one of

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>those things would have been actually to go all the

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>way with National Insurance yesterday. You got to got that

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>through before April if you'd really pushed it or had

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been done and dusted, And what a gift to the

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>nation it would have been.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And if they felt like really going for it,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>they could have offset it by in poison capital gains

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>tax or in residential property and getting a distamp duty

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>at the same time.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've been calling for that, you and I again

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of decades, haven't We never happened, but again.

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Incredibly politically unpopular, but would be really great for the economy,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 3>for the housing market, for everything, But impossible to do

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 3>unless like this too, you've got nothing left to loose.

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, so I think this is the one.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Well again, it's the other slightly disappointing thing is like,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>this is your one chance to grasp a political natal

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>that no one else is going to be able to

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>go in the year, and you let's it go, presumably

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 2>because you don't want the back being trobellions and things

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 2>like that that we've come about.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and let's go back to the British I said briefly,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things I found interesting about that

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is that you and I agree it's a good idea.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Lots of people agree it's a good idea. It didn't

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>come out in quite the form we would have expected.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's only a consultation, but it doesn't if it

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>comes into play as it is at the moment, it

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take up part of the existing allowance. It's a

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>new allowance on top of which means that as most

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people don't use their full allowance anyway. I think it's

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>between ten and fifteen percent of people use their full

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>allowance depending on the year. In a way, it's more

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>simpbolic than anything else in that you know, anyone who's

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>going to invest in UKCUI can easily do so within

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the within the twenty thousand, So there aren't that many

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>people who are going to use that five thousands who

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are not expecting, you know, tens of billions of pounds

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to suddenly flow into the UK market. And then we

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>got lots of people going straight down into the weeds

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of what is a UK company? Why would a company

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>with foreign operations count? How we're going to divide this up?

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't investment trust? It invests a broad count. Does this count?

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Does that count?

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I think completely missing the point, which is not about

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>specific companies and where their operations are. It's about the popularity,

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and valuations inside the UK market. So to me,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>even the symbolism of it is enough, a symbolism of

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>showing that the government is aware of this problem, prepared

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to put in place incentives to move into the UK market.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's about the efficiency and efficacy of the UK

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>market as a whole, not about wibbling away about whether

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you know one company counts as a UK company or

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>another company doesn't count as the UK company. It's about

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>our capital markets. Am I missing something? No?

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's exactly right. And the things a lot

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of people wibbling about that are the same people who

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>are wibbling about ARM not listing in the UK and

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, well, Arms a UK company but was

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>not listed here and we were all moaning about that

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>when it happened. Now this is about addressing that it's

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 2>not actually a book, and of boosting British business as

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>in businesses that are in Britain. And also but the

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>other thing I thought was important is that idea of

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>getting DC pension schemes to explicitly say where they are.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>The auto enrollment schemes basically say explicitly how much of

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>their portfolio is in UK equities. So it's that whole

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>nudge towards a market that is clearly being neglected for

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>reasons that are not related to the actual companies that

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>are listed on it. And that's what I think is

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>really interesting is that today's guest kind of delves into

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>something very very similar because you talk about the investment

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 2>trust market and a lot of the issues surrounded investment

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>trusts and have come desk going so purely to do

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>with market structure and nothing to do with the underlying

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>companies and the UK market as a wholeways basically get

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the same problem. So addressing that is what we're doing.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I mean they should have got read the

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>stamp duty when shares. That would have been good that

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>with the course of money, So at least this is

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a start.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is a hint and actually I've written about

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this week. There is a hint in here of the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>return of financial oppression. Though isn't there a hint of

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the direction of capital and directions that the state wants

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it to go in? And I was looking back to

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the end, you know, or the last gasps of financial

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>oppression last time around, financial oppression, by the way being

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just a it'sually complicated. Look it up, look it up.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>We haven't got time to run through financial oppression. Here

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways to help governments run down their

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>debt without explicitly taking extra money from people to do so.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But looking at the last gasp of financial oppression in

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies, in late nineteen seventy nine, when capital

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>controls were removed, and at that point the point which

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we went allowed to send money abroad or investor broad.

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>At that point, UK penton funds have pretty much all

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>their money in UK equities. Right the day that capital

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>controls were removed, the FT index fell by about three percent,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and it did so because everyone immediately believed that people

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>would stop sending their money in broad investing in foreign markets.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And do you know what they expected absolute tiptop max.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They expected that UK pension funds would allocate about ten

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of their equity allocations abroad. In fact it ended

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>up being closer to one hundred percent. That's fascinating. So

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a little pullback, isn't that. It's a little

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pullback saying you know, come on to take here. Let's

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>go back a little. Let's go back a little, son,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I sense the beginning of a pullback towards the repression

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the post war period.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, on that point, where I thought was interesting is

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that as part of the consultation these sort of noddy

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>to the idea or should guilts be allowed to be

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>held as part of your five grand UK only allowance?

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought that's quite interesting. You know, this nigsty Ward

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 2>is getting retail investors buying more government io use basically

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and having a specific allowance that allows them to do so.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So effectively, you're kind of saying it's a cash iSER,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>but a cash isser that can hold guilts or uk

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>O westate the equities.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And do you know what I think, John, I think

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's quite likely that over time it wouldn't be you

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>can hold gilts if you want, it'll be, oh, do

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you have to hold guilts? You have

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to hold guilts. And that's classic financial oppression, directing people's

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>capital such that they are forced obliged to help finance

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the government whether they want to or not. And that's

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the hint that I think we saw in this budget,

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the reasons that I found it searched.

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Merin Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who know the markets explain the markets. I'm mere and

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>sumset web. This week it's all about investment trusts for

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>those who might not know. And investment trust is that

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it is simplest just to company the business of which

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is to buy other companies. So it's a quoted company,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's listed on the Stock Exchange and in the main

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you will only find the structure in the UK. So

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to walk us through everything there is to know about

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>investment trust and to tell us why we should be

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>buying them right now, I spoke with Nick greenwot he

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>co manages the Migo Opportunities Trusted as a Value Partners

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>and before that he was at Premier My investor. Nick, Hi,

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a pleasure listen.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to start Nick by talking about the structure

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of investment trust. You and I are both great fans

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of investment trusts and both think of them as being

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the greatest of investment vehicles for the retail

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>investor in particular, and I wondered if we could just

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>start with you explaining what exactly it is. We're talking about,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what is an investment trust as opposed to any other

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of collective investment vehicle, and what makes it, to

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>your mind superior in some ways to other types of

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>investment vehicle.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, investment trusts are peculiarly British thing. They don't really

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 4>exist elsewhere in the world. There are pockets in various places,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 4>but the most collectives are open ended funds. So you

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 4>put your money in, you take money out on a

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 4>daily basis, and if you redeem you want your money back.

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 4>The fund manager has to sell stuff in the portfolio

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 4>to hand it back to you, which means that you

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 4>have to run any really works if you have quite

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 4>a liquid portfolio. Where an investment trust is structured a

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 4>bit like an industrial company, a fixed number of shares

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 4>in the market, and you want to buy or sell,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 4>you've got to go to the stock market to get

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>an order, just as if you were buying or selling

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Marks and Spencer, and it's a bit fiddly, But what

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>that means is the fund manager doesn't have to buy

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 4>or sell from the underlying portfolio, which means they can

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 4>put a lot more conviction into the portfolio and really

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 4>focus on their strongest views and not worry too much

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 4>about having an investment that they couldn't sell instantly. I

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 4>run both, and the differences are really that in some

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 4>of some really interesting stocks that aren't particularly liquid, I

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 4>might have four percent of the portfolio in it. In

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>the open ended fund, where I've always got to know

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 4>where a few million is going to come from by

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 4>twelve o'clock the following day, that might only be a

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 4>two percent position because the liquidity isn't there to be

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>certain that you can sell there's a run on your fund.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 4>And therefore what you find is investment trusts with the

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 4>same managers tend to outperform their equivalent TOIG.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what you effectively have in most cases not all,

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, because will come later maybe to buybacks in

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>discounts and redemptions and windings up, etc. But in essence,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>what you've got is a permanent portfolio.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, permanent capital is one way of describing it.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Which is very different to having a portfolio that constantly

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fluctuates in size. And that's the key difference.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you don't have to obsess about the liquidity, which

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 4>is important. It gives you more stocks and more companies

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 4>and more investments to choose from than the rivals who

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 4>are running open ended funds.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And the other differences are that an investment trust will

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>have or should have a fairy engaged board of directors

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>whose job it is to look out for the shareholder,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that's quite important. And of course an

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>investment trust can borrow money to try and improve returns overall,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that most open ended funds can't.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 4>Do indeed, all right.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that's very important when you're talking

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about investment trust is the idea of discounts and premiums.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So because an investment trust is effectively a listed company,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the business of which is to invest in other assets,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be they shares in other companies or be they a

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>stake in a renewable energy project or something like that,

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it is possible for the shares and investment trust to

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>trade add a discount to the nests aut of value

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or at a premium to the ness aut of value.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's a very important part of investment trust investing

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is to understand how that works. Is that fair?

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's fair because as when you go into the

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 4>stock market and the price you pay is not decided

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>by the value of the underlying port Foilio. Well, there

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 4>are obviously influences that the price where the balance of

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 4>buyers and sellers comes and when you get periods of

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 4>oversupply and lack of interest, that the share price that

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 4>you can pay can be a substantial discount to the

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 4>value of the underlying portfolio. And we'll touch on it later,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure, but that's the number of what we're looking for.

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 4>We're looking for things that are just effectively trading at

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 4>the wrong price just because nobody cares about them at

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 4>the moment.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And this is where we come back to what

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier. Whereas in the main and investment

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>trust has a sort of permanent portfolio in the cash

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>under management doesn't change all the time with people coming

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in out. But if there's a very big discount, the

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>directors may decide to buy back shares, which of course

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>shrinks the size of the trust, or if it's trading

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at a premium, they may decide to issue more shairs,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>which enhances the size of the trust. So it's not

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>necessarily always a portfolio that isn't changing, but it's the

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>discretion of the directors.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 4>But the interesting point on buybacks is, unlike with an

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 4>open ended fund where you just get an email at

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 4>half past eleven saying please give me x million by

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 4>two twelve o'clock, if we find on the investment trust

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 4>there's no supply that if not dealt with it is

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 4>going to lead to a discount, then that then the

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 4>actual trigger is in our hands and therefore we can

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 4>make certain that we've got the money in the portfolio

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to do a buyback before we actually push the button.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 4>And where so we have control where in the OIK

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 4>it's the unit holder that has controlled of the timing.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Right. Okay, so I think we've established what an investment

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>trust is. Now we've established how they work. Let's talk

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>about where we are in the UK investment trust market

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. And as you say, the UK investment

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>trust market pretty much being the only investment trust market

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, it's not looking that great. Is We've

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about how these wonderful attributes that investment trusts have

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and we've said that over the very long term or

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the medium term, investment trusts have historically outperformed. Are the

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>types of collective vehicle in the UK, but right now

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not looking good. Now.

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 4>The trust sector has suffered a near death experience that bad.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting you to say it was that bad.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 4>In October, it did feel that this perfect storm of

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 4>events could be enough, particularly the cost disclosure, but we

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 4>had a lot of things all happening at once, and

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 4>it's still not bounced back at The average discount is

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 4>around seventeen eighteen percent, which is pretty well the widest

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 4>ever apart from briefly during the credit crunch. It's definitely

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 4>our touching widest discount of all time in normal conditions.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 4>And what's caused all that We've had an absolute perfect

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 4>storm and there was a new issue boom in ste

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty twenty twenty one of high yielding trusts

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 4>because as you remember, deposit rates were effectively zero for

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 4>a long period of time and a number of trust

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 4>particularly things like renewables or shipping or whatever, were structured

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 4>with quite a high yield and a way of advisors

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 4>getting their customers at a decent return demand for those

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 4>and there was an enormous amount of issuance and supply,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 4>but recently with guilts at one point getting up to

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 4>five point four percent. Why would you want to own

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 4>an infrastructure fund yielding six say, when you could get

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 4>in theory risk three, a short dated guilt yielding five

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 4>point four which killed demand for a whole raft of

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 4>investment trust and ken as I said before, if you've

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 4>got limited demand and plenty of supply, share prices will

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 4>just keep falling till the balance of buyers and sellers

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 4>gets into equilibrium. So that was one of the factors too.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 4>Traditionally the natural buyer of investment trust were the old

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 4>private client stockbrokers, and in the last decade or so

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 4>they've all been merged into these vast wealth management chains

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 4>and we've seen Vestic and rack bones being put together.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 4>That's going to be one hundred billion pound pot, and

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing quite a lot of standardization of portfolios simply

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 4>because of the size. The direction of travel is standardization.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 4>You've got one hundred billion pound pot there. If you

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>say that you need one percent in an investment to

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 4>move the needle to make it worthwhile the manager actually

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 4>taking a position, you need a billion pounds worth of

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>stock and that would be difficult to achieve even in

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Scottish mortgage, one of the largest investment trusts that natural

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 4>buyer will steadily disappear over the years, and that's an

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 4>ongoing challenge now, particularly more for the larger trust rather

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 4>than the smaller ones, because the smaller ones have been

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 4>off the buy list for some time. Just to running

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 4>down the list. We've had a bizarre situation with the

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 4>cost disclosure and the methodologies, which mean that you end

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 4>up with vastly higher figures theoretical figures for an investment

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>trusting you do. For annoy there was at one point,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>as I said before, I run both that the EUT version,

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 4>same managers, same sixty five basis point annual fee. But

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 4>at one point the open ended fund had an OCF

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 4>or the cost disclosure of eighty nine basis points and

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 4>the investment trust three hundred and nine basis points for

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>us virtually the same portfolio, and that right the way

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 4>across means that for a number of trusts that come

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 4>up with very high figures and very strange results on

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 4>the methodology become almost unbiable for some investors who have

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 4>to add those costs to their product costs and disclose

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 4>it to their clients and very often don't get the

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to actually explain to their clients what's going on.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Can I stop you there, sorry and ask you to

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>explain what that methodology is? What are we talking about here?

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>How can the same portfolio be eighty nine basis points

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred and nine basis points, so under one

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>percent and over three percent at the same time.

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are some reasons for that. You've got the

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 4>cost of the board. You're a listed company on the

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 4>stock market, and they are to a certain extent, they

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 4>are generally more expensive. You looked at our funder genuine

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 4>figure might be one hundred and forty, so still a

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 4>lot higher than the EU version, But you get all

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 4>the benefits of being an investment trust and it's a

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 4>better portfolio, etc. But probably the big change is that

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 4>you now have to add all the costs of anything

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 4>you invest in on top of your own costs. So

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 4>that's almost like if you invested in Glaxo, reflecting all

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 4>the costs of running Glaxo, but none of the income,

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 4>and you get some And because of the investment trust

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 4>sectors specializes in some specialist asset classes, for example second

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 4>hand life policies. For example, there the methodology means that

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 4>you have to the premiums, which is part of the

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 4>investment function, get added to the costs. So it might

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 4>work on a long only equity fund, but once you

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 4>get into the world of the renewable energy, or shipping

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 4>lines or second hand life policies, the equity is a

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>big example. These costs are more kin to businesses and

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 4>it gives a very strange figure which is misleading. To

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 4>be honest to investors who are looking to use these funds.

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Just be absolutely clear, Nick, What you mean is that,

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>let's say, for example, the fees on one investment trust

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>would be one percent, and then the fees of investing

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in other things would be two or three percent, whatever

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, and you have to add them all together,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>so you've got effectively a double fee, whereas on an

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>open ended fund you don't have to do that.

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 4>You don't although you're investing in the same stuff.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we are expecting this to be resolved right

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>very much under conversation.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Director of Travel has changed for the better. Yeah,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 4>there's I think that the chance to exchequer in the

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 4>notes to his autumn statement reflected or acknowledged the problem.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 4>It's just the bureaucracy to try and get this sorted,

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 4>and you could have it carrying on like this for

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 4>another year or so. There is the risk. Certainly, when

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 4>I was talking about the near death experience before this

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>change of direction, it did feel like the regulator is

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 4>going to accidentally kill the investment trust movement. Something that

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 4>survived two World wars could just get accidentally shot. Because

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think any regulator has set out to kill

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 4>the investment trust sector. It's just it comes back the

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 4>trust sector because it's so different. And they said it's

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 4>purely British thing that every time you try and standardize something,

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 4>you just get very strange results. And the investment trusts

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 4>don't cope very well with standardization because they are different.

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I just take you back then to the second

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>problem that you mentioned, which is the size issue, with

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the wealth managers getting bigger and bigger and therefore not

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to invest in smaller trusts anymore because they

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>can't get a large enough percent into their portfolio for

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it to make sense. What sort of size then makes

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a trust viable?

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they used to say one hundred and two hundred

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and four hundred, but the figure keeps going higher. Is

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>these portfolios become ever larger but if you think about it,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 4>even a billion pound trust, I don't think it may

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 4>be fine today, But the area that's most vulnerable is

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 4>probably around the five hundred to the billion pound mark,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 4>which until recently would have been large enough for the

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 4>wealth managers to use. But as they merge and they

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 4>get ever bigger, a billion pounds is relatively small. As

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 4>I said, the Investigo Raftbats combination will be one hundred billion.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 4>We're not there yet, but that's the direction of travel.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 4>They might need a billion pound ticket each time they

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 4>invest in something. If you can't buy into a billion

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 4>pound investment trust, you need to buy one hundred percent

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 4>of all shares an issue. So I think that the

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 4>problem is actually the medium and larger size trust. At

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 4>the moment, the trust like the one I run have

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 4>been off their buy lists for seven or eight years,

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 4>and therefore it's less of an issue. So it's not

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 4>small trust that they're struggling. Because the small trusts that

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 4>exist they've found a reason for existing. They've they found

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 4>an audience to play to, and I think probably size

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 4>isn't simply if you've got a one hundred million pound

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>investment trust owned by high networth individuals wealth managers are

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 4>splintered away from the chains and retail investors that can

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 4>live quite healthily. But if you're a two hundred and

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty million pound trust purely owned by the wealth management chains,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 4>you've got a problem. So the one hundred million pound

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 4>trust in that example is healthy. The two hundred fift

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 4>million pound trust in that situation is doomed.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked about the cost of closures, to size, etcetera.

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>You were about to offer me yet another problem, I think,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 1>what is it?

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Certainly, when we were well, we were touring the

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>North thirty recently, a lot of people were making the

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 4>point that a lot of the advisors are not coming

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 4>anywhere near their benchmarks because you've got these six or

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 4>seven of the Magnificent seven I think they called them,

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 4>the big tech companies in the States, dominating the gains

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>in the stock market. And therefore some of these investment

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>trusts that have fallen in too big discounts look particularly bad,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.479
<v Speaker 4>and the knee jerk reaction has been to sell them

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 4>to get them off the register. So the whole event

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 4>of the perfect store was then triggered. Another type of seller.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 4>It's what I used to call the killing the dog

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 4>trade in the back in the distant past, in the

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 4>early eighties, I was a private clans stockbroker, and if

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 4>you had a dog in the portfolio and say fifteen stocks,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 4>and your clant's coming in, you know that stock is

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 4>still in the portfolio fifty five minutes of your one hour,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 4>the cloud is going to be talking about that stock.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 4>So you kill the dog before the meeting. It's a

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>term from many years ago, and I think that's what

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing in trust as well, in that if you've

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 4>got a trust you've paid a pound for and it's

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 4>trading at sixty p because it's trading at a big discount,

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 4>you really want to sell.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, get rid of it so you don't have

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to explain.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 4>It, right, exactly, That's exactly it.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Brilliant or not brilliant, that's how you look at it.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The plus side here, right, assuming have you got to

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the litany of problems? Nick?

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Yep, that's enough?

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, good. That is the deprising bit of this

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation over because the next bit is about I hope,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and I hope you're not going to correct me on this.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope. The next bit is about these really are

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>still great investment vehicles. All these problems exist. We've talked

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>about how one of them may be resolved, but they exist.

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's fair. I'm not going to deny that, but that

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>might provide some absolutely fantastic opportunities for the value orientated

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>retail investor who would like to look at what they

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>can buy out of what been great discount to it

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>net asset value.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, discounts are pretty well as wide as they've ever been.

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 4>But whenever we've had discounts this wide with normally in

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the middle of a financial crisis, which clearly is not

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 4>happening at the moment. There are for all sorts of

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 4>reasons the trust trade on why discounts at the moment,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 4>as we've discussed, But basically the point is the market,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 4>for internal reasons, can't value assets properly, then the real

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 4>world will come and take them. So we've got trust

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 4>sitting on a fifty discount. Maybe the real world comes

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in and pays twenty five discount to take the decent

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 4>assets and leave. So, yeah, the odds are stacked in

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 4>your favor if you buy into the trust sector at

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 4>the moment.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and possibly something of an opportunity for retail investors.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>If professional investors can't buy, particularly the smaller trusts and size,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they're leaving them there. For us, a.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 4>Lot of professional investors have been frightened off by the sector.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 4>They've taken some losses on some things they didn't expect

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 4>to and they've lost their confidence, which is part of

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the reason why discounts are so wide at the moment.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Now. One of the other things I noticed when I

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>look at your portfolio is that there's pretty much no

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>home bias there. Everyone often talks about it. You will

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have a natural home bias when it comes to investing,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely do not. Do you notice, for example, there's

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>even a trust investing in Georgia.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we've probably got slightly more in Georgia than we

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 4>have in the UK. Having said that, I think the

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 4>institutional benchmarks in the UK is about four and we're about seven. Actually,

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 4>you could say we've got nearly twice the exposure of

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the UK than some of the benchmarks. But it's all

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 4>focused on very small companies, and what's happening in microcaps

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 4>is exactly what's happening investment trusts. For slightly different reasons.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 4>The institutional investors become so large that they really need

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 4>to be investing a few hundred million at a time.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 4>And therefore, if you invest in a company with a

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 4>market value of fifteen million or one hundred million, even

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 4>thought doubles of travels, you just don't move the needle.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 4>So there's no point in them doing it. So these

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 4>listed companies trade ever cheaper, but they're real companies in

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the real world, generating real cash, real profits, and there's

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>a great opportunity for retail investors, and it's one that

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 4>we're taking in the in the fund. Basically, it's like

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 4>a Russian doal of discounts than the microcaps because the

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 4>UK trades are a big discount to the rest of

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the world. Small caps trade on a discount to large caps,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 4>microcaps even bigger discount, And every now and again you

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 4>can actually buy a perfectly good portfolio of microcaps in

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 4>it within an investment trust, trading on a twenty percent discount. So,

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 4>as I said, it's the sort of Russian doll type situation.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Institutions aren't coming back to smaller there's a structural problem,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 4>but the real world, the individual companies will get taken out,

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>will find a new way of ownership at a reasonable

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 4>premium to where they're languishing in the stock market at

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 4>the moment.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick, let's just move around the world a little bit.

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got you're holding two I think you're holding two

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>investment trusts with investments in India. Right.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 4>We're optimistic on India in the longer term. It's not

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 4>massive position. We've certainly seen small and medium sized companies

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 4>perform extremely well. India is another very big beneficient of

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 4>the change in the world order there. We equities are

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 4>quite expensive at the moment, but times you can be

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 4>too clever and just they're too expensive this week, and

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 4>then sell and they drift down ten percent. Then then

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 4>define the level and start going up again, and you

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 4>never get around to jumping back on board. So more

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 4>of a long term macro view there. There's not really

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 4>that much speciation in Indie capital growth welthough there is

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 4>a little bit in JP Morgan India because it has

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 4>investment windows every five years and if it's underperformed over

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 4>that period of time then they have to give twenty

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 4>five percent of the money back at nav and it

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 4>has at times traded on a twenty discount in the

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 4>not too recent past. There was a change of manager

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 4>a year or two ago and it's a stronger trust

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 4>than it's been in the past. But when they took over,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 4>they were a long way away behind in the current

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 4>performance window. Although they've made up quite a bit of ground,

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 4>but they don't make up all the ground. Then they've

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 4>got to give twenty five percent of the money back

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>at par and yeah, that's obviously where we brought in

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>a sort of around eighty pence in the pound getting

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 4>a twenty percent movement on that. The pork failio is

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 4>quite a big percentage for no movement in the underlying

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 4>portk foilio. There is an element and that's more of

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 4>a large cap exposure in what you find with investment

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 4>trusts is that when there's a change of manager where

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 4>or a trust that's underperformed for a number of years,

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 4>such as Japie Morgan India, they carry on training on

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 4>the track record of the vehicle rather than who's running

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 4>it now and maybe takes a year or two to

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 4>catch up with the current reality. So you do get

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that arbor charge free perception reality with things like Japie

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Morgan India.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but let's look at where Some of the really

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>big discounts are which is in the private equity sector

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the trust a hold private companies Chrystalis for example, or

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>billy Gifford Trust. You have fairly big holdings in those.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Talk about that a bit.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Our biggest is is Oakley. We've also got nb

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 4>private Equity in the.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Private equity area and Hallie and the Bailly Gifford one.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the area has been particularly hard by this cost

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 4>disclosure because private equity is quite quite an expensive mandate. Now,

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>if this issue with the cost disclosures and the methodologies

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 4>gets resolved, private equity is going to be a big

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 4>beneficiary because some of these trusts get up to declaring

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 4>those of seven hundred bases points and that means that

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 4>they're uninvestable to maybe models being run by IFA and

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 4>wealth managers, because you've got to declare that figure on

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 4>top of your own costs, and it just looks all

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 4>your clant seedes is the seven percent from the private

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 4>equity done plus the one percent perhaps that the wealth

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 4>manager is charging. They think they're being charged eight percent,

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 4>and therefore it's impossible for a number of investors to

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 4>actually own this sector.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So Nick, you think that The biggest problem with the

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>private equity trusts is not so much allows the investments

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>or investments that are valued incorrectly, but a cost structure

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes them uninvestable for wealth managers.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's that's the main problem. There were in the

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 4>past that those have also been problems in that people

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 4>didn't trust the valuations. But we've gone through a couple

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 4>of years, big four accountants will have crawled all over

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 4>those valuations and signed them off and they will be

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 4>parent at the moment, so I think that issue has passed.

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 4>And also you have more visibility on where the winners

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 4>and losers are a couple of years on from the

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 4>big sell off in that area. So that was those

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 4>were concerns, but I think you don't need to worry

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 4>about those now. The big concern is supplied demand in

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 4>the market. And let's say when these rules came in

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 4>that fifteen percent of some of these private equity trusts

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 4>were owned by people who would have to clear or

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 4>add these underlying cost to their own product details. They

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 4>really need to get out, and probably half of that's

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>already been sold. But it's that selling pressure that's triggering

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 4>the very, very wide discounts. Of sort of twenty five

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 4>to thirty maybe forty percent in some areas. As Again,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of this just boils down.

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Life out of all that you hold, quite a few

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. Out of the ones that you hold, which

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is your favorite?

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 4>I think Oakley Capital is the is the favorite long term.

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Just very good at what they do and have created

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 4>some amazing businesses and that's that's been a great one

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 4>for us. Recent ones that have gone in tend to

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 4>be the more early stage type unlisted that say, Shahllian

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Chrysalis and Seraphim Space.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a bit about Seraphim Space that's popped up

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast before, and we've had a couple of

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast where we've talked about nothing but space. What's the

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting holdings inside Saraphim. Did it get a little pop

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>from that landing on the moon recently, etc.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 4>No, it sounds quite outlandish at first, but when you

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 4>actually start looking at some of the business models, they

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 4>are becoming more mature. It's amazing how much you know,

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 4>how much is done in the space and just things

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 4>like mapping and insurance claims, for example. You can check

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 4>with everything's been photographed all the time, and you can

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 4>check out insurance claims by just looking at images from space.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 4>So it's much more mature than pact. You thinking we're

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 4>much closer to profitability. And it just got to a

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 4>point where it was trading on about sixty five discoun

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 4>I think we paid thirty three pence for our holding,

0:33:58.240 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 4>and they bounced quite sharply in there. So it was

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 4>just really a case of when the market was really

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 4>nervous in October, there was almost no price for these

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 4>that people were completely averse to risk and perceive this

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 4>as risky, and therefore the shares spiked down to a

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 4>very low level and literally, I think again sixty sixty

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 4>five discounts. We used to think twenty percent discount was

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 4>pretty wide. The extremes of discounts we've seen with the

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>last year or two, it is something I've not seen before,

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 4>and I've been doing investment trusts since since the late eighties.

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Sixty five you wouldn't even dream of. So when you think,

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 4>when you can see that, the portfoilio is quite interesting

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>as well, and it does give you the special situation

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 4>to exploit.

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah's certainly fun. There were a couple two more that

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about. Particularly because I find

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>them rather interesting. The first is the ground Rents Fund,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating, isn't it, Because we've been through this

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>whole cycle in the UK of discussing quite rightly the

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>appallingness of our leasehold system and how bizarre it is

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that people get caught up in these huge service charges

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and difficulties of having a leasehold. And then of course

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's ground rents. Ground rents, which is how any people

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for nothing. There is there to lease a piece

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of land that most people rather believe that they already owned,

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out that they don't. And ground rents

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>on olderlase holds are very low peppercorn stuff, but on

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>newer lease holds we found that they can be very expensive.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So as this conversation has become increasingly political, and there's

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>been conversation about positively a polishing the lease hold system altogether,

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which apparently my go now tells us is quit too complicated.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>The ground rent as share price of the grounds Rent

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Trust genuinely collapsed, didn't it.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think still the nethactic values in the nineties,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 4>the shares are training around thirty odd. I think we've

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 4>paid a bit more than where we are at the moment.

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 4>I think most of the shares we've bought for sort

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of thirty seven to thirty eight pence. I think that

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 4>ground rents has work perfectly wealthy as in years, but

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 4>going back five or ten years, there were excesses, particularly

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 4>introduction by the housebuilders of ground rents on houses, because

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 4>that makes no sense whatsoever. The point of a ground

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 4>rent is if you've got a block of flats, you

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 4>don't want the person who owns the ground floor not

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 4>looking up the foundations, for example, and therefore it's practical

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 4>that there is a three holder and you lease from them.

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 4>That's a practical reason. But a house there isn't that need,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 4>and therefore they should never have ground rents, And it

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 4>was the excesses a few years back has then created

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a backlash. But if you wanted to

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think ground rents will exist in the

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 4>future in the way and there won't be an asset

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 4>class of owning ground rents. But what's going to happen

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 4>to the existing ones is what we're looking at. And

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 4>if the effectively they were abolished and the owner's asset

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 4>was wiped out, I think it would all end up

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 4>in the courts because the law lords have said it's

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 4>people's human rights to actually retain what they're actually purchased.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 4>There will be a compromise somewhere down the road which

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 4>ground rents won't be effectively confiscated, but these things won't

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 4>exist in the future. There won't be new ground rents

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 4>or there'll be a new system for it. So basically

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 4>it's a call that there will be a compromise. You

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 4>might get fifty or sixty pence a share for your

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 4>ground rents, but it's kind of grind on for a

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 4>long period of time there. God was talking about it

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 4>last night and clearly the bits and piece I saw

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 4>just from the from the news is he's backing off

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 4>a long way from his previous position, which is which

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 4>should inferior be very positive for Grammar Rents income Trust.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>But I haven't had a look to see this morning.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's been any change in the share price,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 4>but then they probably wouldn't even if there were dramatically

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 4>good news. Nobody would notice because nobody cares. And that

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 4>cuts back to a lot of the opportunities that we exploited,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 4>just overlooked and unloved rather than.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's at a whopping great discount and that will

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>probably come good over time.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Massive discount, but obviously bear in mind, yeah, the NAV,

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like in the low nineties, but there

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 4>is a material uncertainty crawls in there from Sevil's because

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 4>nobody really knows what they're worth. You have to treat

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 4>the NAV figure with extreme caution. But even if it

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 4>was even if it was halved, that would still be

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 4>a reasonable gain from where the share price is today.

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Now there has been there is a catalyst coming into

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the maked in the form of a few activist investors

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>right who are looking at some of the investment trusts

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on Discounts Center, attempting to push the directors and the

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>management to do buy bags to merge this kind of thing.

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And the one we hear the most about is Saba,

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.399
<v Speaker 1>which is an American activist investor that has been quite

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>active in the investment trust market recently, and that to

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>a degree is a beginning of a catalyst, right.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes. Now, ever, it comes back to the point I

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 4>was making earlier that you know that if the stock

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 4>market can't value these things properly, if they leave them

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 4>trading at wide discounts because of an oversupply situation, because

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 4>of at the moment the cost disclosure problem. For example,

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't affect the quality of the underlying assets. So

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 4>if all these trusts sit trading at sixty seventy pens

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:47.479
<v Speaker 4>in the pound, somebody likes SABA or the others coming

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 4>behind them will will come and take those assets. Because

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 4>if you if an investment trust trades on a massive discount,

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 4>in theory, there's nothing stopping you buying lots and lots

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 4>of shares and forcing it into wind down, which is

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 4>what SABA. That's their gameplay, and therefore that as you said,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the next catalyst coming along. If these things stay

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 4>where they are trading at the moment, then it will

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 4>be m and A that narrows the discount.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as John and I keep saying over and over

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>again about cheap things, if you don't buy them, somebody

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>else will and then you'll be sorry. Nick, are there

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.959
<v Speaker 1>any investment trusts in your portfolio that we haven't talked

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>about that you feel there and absolutely must mention?

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh, let's have a look a couple of final ones,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:36.320
<v Speaker 4>one sort of two or three I think one recent

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 4>acquisition is Ship, which is effectively a shipping line. Ship

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 4>is the ticker. Its actual name is tough To Oceanic.

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 4>But we think that's an interesting one in that they've

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.479
<v Speaker 4>put a date on the fund that they will start

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 4>winding down after twenty eighteen or sort of not eighteen

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty eight, so you know that there's a trust

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.439
<v Speaker 4>they're trading on a big discount, where the discount will

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 4>narrow and you will get an exit if you stick

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 4>around for three or four years at a time, where

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, environmental pressures means that regulations dictate that ships

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 4>or commercial shipping has to travel much slower to be

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>more green, which effectively removing capacity, which will help pricing.

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that's removing capacity is that there's been

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 4>a booming building container ships, and Toughan doesn't own that

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 4>that sector, but that's blocked out all the boat yards

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 4>and the construction yards for many years. Hence, again it's

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 4>coming back to the point, you've got increasing demand and

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 4>you've got shrinking supply, and therefore shipping rates are likely

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to increase, and therefore buying into a shipping trust on

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 4>a big discount seemed to a rather attractive route. One

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 4>that slightly amusing one was Eco fin Us Renewables, which

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 4>had as a solar farm wiped out in South Texas

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>at a place called Whirlwind, And maybe we should have

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 4>been asked questions about why the name of Whirlwind, But

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 4>then that asset was wiped out by a tornado and

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the share price absolutely tanked. But of course it was

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 4>all covered by insurance, and therefore that was an opportunity.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 4>And also we have exposure to the UK small caps,

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 4>and we don't think institutions will ever come back to

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 4>buying UK small camps, but the ratings are just so

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 4>low that the UK trades are the much at a

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 4>big discount of the world mid and small caps tried

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 4>at a trade at the big discount to large caps

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.760
<v Speaker 4>and microcaps trade at the bigger discount. All it's almost

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 4>like a sort of a Russian doll of discounts. You

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 4>then say, you can actually buy these assets within an

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 4>investment trust at a twenty percent discount to these bond

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 4>out levels. So as I said, and again that's very

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 4>similar to what's happening into the trust world, that these

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 4>things are very lowly rated because the institutions can't buy

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 4>them because the institutions, institutional traders now so large and

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 4>even all of one hundred million bound companies just wouldn't

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 4>move the needle, so they're not coming back. But these

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 4>are the companies chatting out decent profits in the real

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 4>world and somebody will come and take them. And if

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 4>you can buy into that world on a twenty discount,

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 4>then over time, that's the value is going to be extracted.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And which trust is it you hold to reflect that?

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Is that River Mercantile.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 4>We've got ryver working on microcapitters the largest, but we've

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 4>also got rights and issues. We've got downing for a

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 4>little bit longer because that's being weighn down, so it's

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 4>more of a package really, but working on microcapures is

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 4>the largest one.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, brilliant Nick, thank you so much. I think I've

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>taken up enough of your time and that was really

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting and lots of fascinating trusts as well. But before

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you go, I have to ask you the final question

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that I always ask everybody on this podcast, and you

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>do have to answer it, whether you want to or not.

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Although I was told by a listener the other day

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's getting boring and I need to add something

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>else to the question. But I'm not going to do

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that today. If I asked you to choose between gold

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin over a ten year period, which we you choose.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I think I understand gold. I'm not sure I'm the

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 4>generation understands bitcoin, and I'm just concerned that one day

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 4>we find out it's worthless, which isn't going to happen

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 4>on gold. But that's probably an answer typical of my generation.

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid it is. I'm afraid it is. It's the

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>normal answer that we get on this poddle that we

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have had a couple of surprises along the way, a

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of surprises along the way, and I always come

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>down on the side of gold. And we have a

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of listeners and a lot of readers who are

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>constantly explaining to me why I'm wrong. So one day

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll understand why I'm wrong and why you're wrong

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. But we'll wait for that to happen. Nick,

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today.

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Wrong Thanks Nick, brilliant.

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, John. I thought that was pretty interesting.

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I tell you what, Nick really knows what he's talking

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about when it comes to investment trust. He's always my

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite investment trust guest, what did you learn from this?

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, next fascinating and I think that he really

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 2>does get into the weeds or in the structural benefits,

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 2>but also they should structural problems that can investment trust

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>face right now. And I just think it's interesting because

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 2>again sort of seeing this weird deck over the UK

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 2>market as a whole, where you've got perfectly decent kind

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 2>of companies that are being essentially undervalued because there are

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 2>flaws in the regulatory regime and also because of consolidation

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>within the wealth management area. Means that a lot of

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 2>these trusts and a lot of these companies are just

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>not big enough for any of these kind of big

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 2>managers to want to put their money in because they

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 2>won't make a difference to their portfolios overall, so I.

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Thought, and liquidity, they can't get in an out when

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>they're too small.

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 2>I know, I mean, but yeah, because that's the other thing.

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Even whenever I've been writing about investment trusts, you know,

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>on an on and off basis for years obviously, and

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that you notice particularly now is

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>whenever if I'm writing about for Bloomberg is you start

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 2>to say, oh, wait, a minute. If you know, the

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 2>bid offer spread on that one, as in, the gap

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 2>between the price of which you can buy today and

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 2>then immediately sell is so big that you can't realistically

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 2>tell a private investor that that's a good idea because

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 2>they have to make ten percent before they've even you know,

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 2>got back to zero. So I do think I mean,

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was like really interesting and also it's

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 2>really good to have someone out there who is basically

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 2>an investment trust, a treasure that normal people can get

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 2>access to. You know, he's because a lot of this

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 2>is just activism that he's talking about. I mean, the

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan India Trust is a good one. You know,

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of he's done, he's done the details, read

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the paperwork, and has kind of said, well, actually, wait

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 2>a minute, if if this trust, you know, has to

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 2>follow its rules, then it means that I'm going to

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>be up because you know, this amount of it is

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be redeemed at par and so yeah, that

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of I just I really like they can away

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 2>thinks about trust.

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I was found attractive. But

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the so many things I find attractive. Listen and Nick

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about this, but one of the things

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that that we wrote as nown is that and longer term,

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:05.240
<v Speaker 1>investment trusts have tended to outperform open ended funds particularly

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>often have an open ended fund and a closed ended

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fund closed ending another way of saying, investment trust run

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 1>by the same investment house, by the same fund management group,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and historically have found that the investment trust outperforms the other. Now,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know is if that's going to keep

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>happening going forward, because one of the reasons for it

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>historically has been that investment trust has been cheaper than

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>open ended funds, and I kind of not anymore because

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the cost of open ended funds has come down so much,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>partially thanks by the way, to you and me, John,

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all the years we've spent agitating for reduced fees, we

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have managed to get a lot of these fund management

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>houses to push down their management fees, and that has

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>had the effect of making investment trust not quite as

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>cheap as they used to be. So now we get

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to find out. We get to find out whether the

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>other great things about investment trusts having bores that are

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>beholden absolutely to the shareholder, having the ability to use

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>some leverage, etc. Whether these things are enough to keep

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the app performance going over the longer term. I personally

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>believe that they are, because I think that the in

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>particular the idea of having a pool of permanent capital

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is very attractive to a manager and should make a

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 1>difference to the way they operate. But it's not a given,

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's an interesting time. The only other thing to

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>say about that, of course, is that the discounts at

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment are phenomenally high relative to history, or that

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they've closed a better over the last six months, and

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>whenever discounts are at this kind of level, you end

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to see very good performance afterwards. The AIC and we

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>might put a link to the a C and the

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>show notes because they've done some excellent work on this

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and everything you need to know about investment trusts of

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>any kind as on the AIC website. Or are there

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>any of the trust that we talked about in particular

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>John that you thought, oh, we aren't going to go

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and buy that one? Not financial advice obviously.

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 2>So the ones are more interested in at moments though.

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Are the plavate equity points? Yeah? I just think here's

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 2>point about they have been particularly widely hurt by the

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 2>feed this closure screw up basically, and then on top

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of that, you've got the concerns about what the underlying

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 2>valuations are. But if you look at I mean, like

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 2>rec Capital came out the other day and their private

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 2>assets had kind of nudged a bit higher, and when

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you look at stock markets, stock markets have all gone higher,

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to believe that the underlying value of these businesses,

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>assuming that they generate cash flows, which a lot of

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 2>them do, are not basically what they say on the NAV.

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 2>And even if they're a bit below that, there's still

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 2>a massive discount. So I do I'm still reluctant. I

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 2>don't know why I'm reluctive, but I sort of feel

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 2>as if there's I'm not high conviction about it. But

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the private equity is probably the most interesting

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 2>area at the moment.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Still all right, to capital that has been so disappointing.

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That has been one of the most disappointing trusts. I

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>think I remember thinking even fifteen years ago, this was

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a great, solid, long term trust to hold, and it

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of hasn't been. If that private equity stuff came good,

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be great, but that would be great for

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of our listeners. I'm sure. Anyway, I commend thiscast

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to you because it really is very good, and then

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have a look at next Fund, have a look at

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the trust that he talks about, and have a look

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at the AIC website. The investment trust market is really interesting.

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in any of these niche areas in

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the market, there aren't very many ways to get access

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to them, and the investment trust sector is probably the

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>place to look. Thanks for listening to this week's Marin

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Talks Money. We'll be back next week. In the meantime,

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.720
<v Speaker 1>If you like us, show rate, review, and subscribe wherever

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your podcast, and of course do tell

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your friends. This episode was hosted by me Maren Sunset Web.

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It was produced by some Mesidi and cam Grave. Additional

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>editing by Rushi B J. Cole and special thanks to

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Groomed and to John Staff.