WEBVTT - ESPN Head on Customizing Content for Younger Viewers

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. A bunch of headlines out there

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of COVID. We did see several countries moving

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>toward easing travel restrictions, so that's happening. We see, you know,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>mask mandates kind of coming off and we're moving forward.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Although I highly recommend you check at the Bloomberg Big

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Take from over the weekend, it's a reminder we're not

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the woods yet. We're not. Michelle Cortez, who's

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>covered it for us here at Bloomberg News, is just saying, sorry, guys,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there are more variants to come, and it's going to

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be more disruptions to things like supply chains and so on.

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I read it on the plane back last night and like, oh, Michelle,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come on alright, So let's bring in Dr John Abanson.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>He's lecturer of health care policy at Harvard Medical School.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got a new book out, Sickening, a Big Farma

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>broke American health care and how we can repair it.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Boston. Dr Abanson,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with Tim and myself. Let's

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>get right to it. Your book really strikes at big Pharma.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your mission here? My mission is too to explain

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to the American people that American healthcare is performing very poorly.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>We've ranked sixty eight in the world and healthy life expectancy,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and to achieve that lowly state of health, we're spending

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a trillion and a half dollars more than the other

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>wealthy countries as a percentage at GDP. So it's a disaster.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>We've known this for a while, so right like this

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has been out there, this stat I feel like whenever

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we talk about American healthcare systems for the last decade,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at least, you know, we talked about how much we

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>spend and how much is bad? UM? So so what

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do we do right? So what I have to contribute

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>is that UM as a family talk you know, was

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Robert W. Johnson Fellow and trained in research design and

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>epode theology and statistics. As my career went on, I

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>started to see the commercial influence coming and the missing piece.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We talk about these things all the time, Carol, and

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>people are aware of it. Um. It's hard to apprehend

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>how bad it is. But the missing piece in all

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I can contribute, which is that

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the commercial interests, doing their job to maximize the financial

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>returns that they delivered to their investors, have taken over

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge that even the best doctors trust about how

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>best to care for patients. And this extends from their

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>determining the research agenda of our new knowledge is about

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>drugs and devices, to controlling the conduct of the studies,

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the analysis of the studies. When the studies are completed

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and the manuscripts are sent into the journals, that the

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>peer reviewers and the medical journal editors don't even get

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to see the real data. They just get to see

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the data that's included in the manuscript. And when the

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>experts who write clinical practice guidelines set the standards for

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all doctors about what how to practice quality medicine. They

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't get to see the data either. So what we've

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>had is this quiet revolution in the control of our

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>medical knowledge over the last twenty or thirty years. And

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the docs are trying to practice evidence based medicine, but

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand that that evidence the fundamental purpose of

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that evidence now is to maximize returns to investors. Can

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you draw a line from what you're talking about here

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to the nearly one million Americans who have died as

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of covid um that is our health care system,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>our health care system, the health of the health of

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>American people, and to the is it billions now that

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>have gotten the vaccine or millions that have gotten the vaccine? Yes?

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Billions um yes uh? Part of the line uh. The

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID vaccines and are both the height of what farmer

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>can do for us. And it shows also that their

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>business model of maximizing their profits is not going to

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>work in the end, because what we've done is we

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>have these fabulous vaccines while we pay a lot, the

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>drug companies are making a lot. But fine, But what

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>happened is that there was no UH control on where

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>those vaccines were sold, so they're being sold where the

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>drug companies can make the most money, and the third

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>world is getting left out of this. So Africa has

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a vaccination rate of approximately I think now. And what's

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>happening is that Delta variant came from India when four

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of people were vaccinated. The O wrong variant came from

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>South Africa when ten percent of South Africans were vaccinated.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And the business model of the pharmaceutical companies, the vaccine

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers is to keep selling their drugs for top dollar.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's a global pandemic and until everybody's safe, nobody's stakes.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And these variants like Delta and omicron are going to

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to affect Americans and we're going to

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>keep having waves of this as your as Mitchelle, your

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter road. So who do we target? You know, I've

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>had a brother who is in pharmaceuticals for a long

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>time and we've had some great debates go round and round.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder how do we make it better.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned we spend so much, and I'm very grateful

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>having traveled and been exposed to sometimes healthcare systems outside

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I do know that we are privileged,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but not everybody is equally privileged, and yet the costs

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>are extreme and it's sometimes cumbersome and difficult to manage.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Just got about a minute left here, So what do

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we do? What's your top two things that you change

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that we make it better? Yeah, Carol, there are a

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that would would really improve it. One is,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>we in the United States do not have Health Technology Assessment.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So the FDA tells us what tells us doctors what

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>drugs we can prescribe, but it doesn't tell us what

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>drugs we should prescribe in terms of being most effective

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and most efficient. So we need an external body that

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can tell doctors what the data really show about whether

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>new therapies are better than older therapies, um, and what

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the most cost effective medicine is. The other thing that

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely need is transparency of clinical trial data. It's

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>craziness to be trusting journal articles because they're peer reviewed.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>When the peer reviewers don't have access to the data,

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes no sense. It takes us. Now forgive me,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>we're running out of time. Sounds like some things that

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to put front and center. I do hope

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll come back, because I think this is a converse

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>station that we've got to spend a bit more time

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>with us, and and not really even gracious with your

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>time today. Dr John grab Abramson over at Harvard Medical School.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Check out his book Sickening, How Big Farmer Brook American

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Healthcare and How we can repair It. You're listening to

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But in the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week, a

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>story about unicorns, you know, the startup companies worth about

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion or more. And as it turns out, Tim

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more being minted every day. In fact, some are being

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>their couple being minted every single day in two It's

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>almost like, Joel Weber, we need a new name for unicorn.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber is at her at Bloomberg Business Week. He's

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. The story

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we're referring to is by Ellen Hewitt, startups reporter for

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She joins us on the phone from San Francisco.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Check out her story. It's featured in the current issue

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week. It's available on the Bloomberg and

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at bloomberg dot com slash business Week. So what do

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you think, Joel um a new name for Unicorn because

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not all that rare. I don't know what name

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that would be. Uh So maybe Ellen hasn't. But Ellen

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sent up a flare uh a couple of weeks ago

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and basically said, we're about to hit an interesting threshold,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which is one thousand startups that will be worth a

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>billion or more UM, which I think is a really

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting moment to kind of look back at this, Like,

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the tech world, this has been a

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>trend that has really helped define where where companies go

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and increasingly where public markets go. Um. And it didn't

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>take that long for us to get there. Um. So, Ellen,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what was the thousand Unicorn? So there's arguably too because

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>there were actually two that became you know, We're born

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote on February second, which was happened to be

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the day that we hit the thousand number. We chose

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to profile one of them. It was a company called

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>produc Upboard, and I could not have come up with

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a more inside baseball Silicon Valley company had I tried.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They make software for product managers UM to help them

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>more effectively manage UM product development, which just means like

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>building a new app or a new feature or something

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. And it's it's just like, you know, pms

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are a big deal at tech companies and this is

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just a product made for them. They're based in San Francisco.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was like it was pretty funny, UM.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, they just it was a huge

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>deal for them, UM, But most people don't fat And

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I like, as reporters, if we get pitched a company

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>saying like hey we raised money and now our unicorn,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like that doesn't move the needle for us at all.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So if it wasn't called a unicorn, what would call well,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>what's funny is? I talked to um alien Lee, who

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is the VC who originally came up with the term,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and she said, when she was first writing the blog

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>post about unicorns, she was like, I was trying to

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think of a a term, and I thought of like

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>home run or monster hit or these things that were

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like pretty cheesy. And I told her, I was like,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I as a writer, I'm so glad that you picked

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>unicorn because there are a lot of fun metaphors you

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>can make with it. UM that helps us up, you know,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>any sort of article about improvided very memorable art for

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>magazine stories. Yeah, the arts spread is amazing. I really

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>encourage everyone to look at the at the print version.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>It's it's quite beautiful. Including Actually, I have actually wondered

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>when the unicorn really looks like, because I've never seen

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>one in the wildly. I have this Bloomberg Business Week

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>article in the art associated with it to show me.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey Ellen, I'm I'm wondering why these companies are staying

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>private longer. It's just something you explore in the piece um. Traditionally,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that have been worth so much they would have

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, I p o well. And if you look

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>at the uniform list, so at the time that the

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>term was first coined, which was the most valuable private

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>company that was on that list was Twitter? It was

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>worth ten billion dollars. Now, if you look at the list,

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the most valuable unicorns on the list are Bike Dance

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at a hundred forty billion dollars um, SpaceX that around

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion, and Stripe that I think and I mean,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is you know, an order of magnitude above what we

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>used to have less than a decade ago. And you

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of the big names that used to

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be on the Unicorn list are public, like Uber Lift,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Airbnb, We work all these companies. That being said,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's a lot more flexibility for companies to stay

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>private longer. And I think, you know, Stripe is a

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>good example. They've just their ability to raise money is

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>limitless in the private markets. Why would they go public?

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the same story that we've heard people worrying about

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for the last ten years. And and the reason you

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>see all these public market investors coming to the private markets,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies are not interested in going public if they

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. They really don't have to write there's

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so much money out there. So Ellen, what does it

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>take for a reporter who follows startups to get excited,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>especially when it's not so unusual for there to be

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar company? And I think about our audience,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>who is listening when we talk about these companies that

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hit that billion dollar status. What are the ones that

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they should be maybe paying more attention to. Is it

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that nineteen billion. What is it? Oh my gosh, Well

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because yeah, now as a result of how

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>many unicorns there are, you are seeing these ridiculous neologisms

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like umu decacorn a classic, right, so ten billion or more.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But somebody was telling me hecticorn is now in vogue

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's a hundred billion or more. I mean it's

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it's um or like mega. You know, people talking about

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>mega funding rounds now of like a hundred million or

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>more and funding I mean, the goal post just move farther.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I think as reporters, yeah, we are looking

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for companies that stand out for some other reason. Um

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think what's tough is like for the company's perspective,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like hitting a billion dollar valuation is a really good

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sign that you've built something very strong. This is what

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the PC's have told me. It's like, I means you

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a good product, but it's no longer enough

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>stand out on that alone own and especially these companies

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are really competing over recruiting, so that that tends to

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be a place where they hope that having this public

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>high or this high valuation that has made public through

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>news reports, that will help but it tends not to

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>help with recruiting. They need to show that they're special

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in some other way. And are we going to anticipate

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in any sort of slow down in these valuations or

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is the money free flowing right now in Silicon Valley.

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it feels like it's just been so many

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>years of people saying like, is there going to be

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in the private markets and there, and there

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been. Obviously. You see individual companies that maybe

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>were overvalued, like we work with airines or whatever, and

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you see them collapse. But I mean, the trend lines

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have only been going up, and even when there's been

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>volatility and the public markets, that hasn't usually shown up

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as strongly in the private markets. And look, covid was

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>actually really good for all these companies, which was kind

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of surprising too. I mean a lot of them make software,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the more digital our lives become, you know, the

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>more the more these become valuable. I gotta acorn. That's

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>what I would do, all right, Ellen Hughett, great stuff.

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Check it out online. It's really gorgeous in terms of

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>how it's laid out. She's our startups reporter at Bloomberg

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>News and our thanks to Joe Webber, editor of Business Week.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's in the current issue of the magazine. This is

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, on Friday, Bloomberg Live

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>hosting its Power Players Summit. Tim and I were there.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's bringing together folks in the sports world. And at

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the event, it caught up with Jimmy Pittaro, chairman ESPN

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and Sports content of the Disney Company. Also George Pine,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO Brewing Capital, talk about meeting sports fans

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever they are and that included the gambling world and

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>social media. Does what you do on social ultimately drive

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to other platforms. Maybe people get a snippet of something

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they all took ultimately want to see more.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's exactly the strategy. So well, so yes, it

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>does work. I will tell you that this is just

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>one little anecdope. I was speaking at a conference UH

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sales conference and we're having this exact discussion, and afterwards,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>an executive came up to me and said, I just

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.119
<v Speaker 1>want you to know I have I have two teenagers

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were both introduced to ESPN on Snap and

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>now they're watching first take and get up on traditional television.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So for me, that's the strategy. You know, we of

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>course want to be there and will continue to be

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there on those platforms, but it's a way to grow awareness.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a way to grow affinity and and and

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>get this younger generation just generally excited about ESPN. And

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know the other thing that's interesting now is gambling.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Well that's sports, right, I mean, thirty one million people

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to bet on the game Sunday. Eight billion

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars will be waged legally. By the way, up we

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have a company called Odds Schegar that it's kind of

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a kayak for betting in the UK. We're bringing it

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to America and in the first three days of New

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>York being live, we did of the budget revenue for

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, so obviously we budgeted it too low, but

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the gambling as sticky as well. So when you think

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about gambling, social media, digital media, understanding what people want,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the world's world's changing around us. Howes gambling

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>turn into somebody who ultimately goes to ESPN? Does it work?

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, look so here's wrong, guys. We're in it.

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>We are in the space. We've been in the space

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for for several years. Disney actually said this week he's

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bullish on sports, including betting. He is bullish on both. Um,

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you we've been in the space. We

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have content. We have dedicated segments on Sports Center. Scott

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Van pelt has has his Sports Center where he does

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a segment called Bad Beats. We have dedicated podcast, we

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have a dedicated area on ESPN dot com. We have

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a ESPN branded studio in Vegas on the Strip um

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that generates betting specific programming on on a regular basis.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We've done the research, and of course we were treading

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>carefully here over the past few years, still investing, but

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but really looking closely at the data. And what we

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>saw is that Number One, our fans are no longer

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>just okay with it. They're demanding it. They expect ESPN

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to be offering this betting experience within our environment. Number Two,

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is really interesting, we didn't see any negative

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on the Disney brand. I mean, for those of

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you that don't know, the Walt Disney Company owns ESPN.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>So we've wanted to be careful in that regard to

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing was it was neutral or positive

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>even on the Disney brand. So because I think people

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>thought family brand, how could you get into betting? Well,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you see, you see all the leagues now, in all

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the major leagues, In fact, every league you're in, nineteen

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>times more likely to watch a sporting event if you

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>make a bet. So if I'm a broadcaster sports, how

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>can I not do it? Like if they don't do it,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody else will. They'll be at a disadvantage. ESPN really doesn't.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I can say no, no, it's you don't have a choice.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They have to. They have, like he said, he has

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to be where the fans are, and he has to

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>give the fans what they want. Yeah, we're in a battle.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We're in a battle for people's time. We're and we're

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>not just competing against the traditional sports media companies. We

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all know this. We're competing against Instagram and Snap and

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Fortnite and Netflix, and so we have to be aggressive here.

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, my job is to protect the

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>brand at all costs. And if I saw any data

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that that that indicated to me that that this was

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous position to be taking we wouldn't do it.

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Even if there was financial upside, we wouldn't. We wouldn't

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. I have to protect the brand. But we're not.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We're just not seeing that um any worries about the

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>integrity of sports in general, especially as we know it's

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>teams getting in right, the league's getting in I mean,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody is really kind of all in when it comes

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to betting and gambling. Well, you know, around the world,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing it for a long time without really

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>any issue. I mean, there's always an inititive integrity. But

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I would argue you had that whether it was legal

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>or illegal. I mean, one of the things we're finding

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>is that legal bettings way up makes sense. I'd rather

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>make a legal bet than an illegal bet, right, So

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if I don't have the choice to make a legal bet,

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's probably better. But no, we I don't. I don't

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's any evidence that it's been a real issue.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in Europe they've been betting for quite a

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>long time. Yeah, And look, one of the somewhat connected

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to that. One of the things that we bring to

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the table, I think is is our brand, which represents

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>trust a certain level of credibility. So anyway, we see

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here, but of course we're going to do it responsibly,

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right and just tread carefully and go slowly. One of

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the things you see the leaves, which I think is

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>really smart to that point, is talking about doing advertising

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the NFL about responsible gaming. I think that's one of

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the learnings that wasn't done well around the world, and

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>you see some of the countries of increasing regulation, and

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the leagues here in the US they're trying

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to get ahead of it by initially bring up do

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this responsibly alright. That, of course was Jimmy Pittaro, he's

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>chairman of ESPN and sports content for the Walt Disney Company.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And George Pine, founder and CEO Brewing Capital, who has

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>three generations in his family who have been involved in

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. So I'm really cool individuals to talk about

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Not the first time I've heard that

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>engagement metric about the likelihood of you actually watching an event.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>It goes up significantly if you end up betting on it.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course the leagues are gonna want to get involved,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>But how do you keep it pure? Carol, integrity right,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>integrity of the game signs in locker rooms, videos, trainings.

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know. And I think of

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian Flores, the former of Miami coach head coach, his lawsuit. Uh.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>And part of the concerns, or at least claims or

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>allegations were that the owner you know, was offering money

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for him to lose games, right to improve other position

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. But so you just rose. I don't

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>know what to say. Um, but everybody is all in

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to gaming, and and these guys just

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about wanting to be wherever the fans are. Truly

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it means multiple, multiple platforms. Check out more, go to

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Live dot com. Yeah, but you let me drive? No? No,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, please level, I want to drive. It's a

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>good question. Drive drive to the globe. Dawn on radio?

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, just about ten minutes left in today's trading session,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>getting ready to wrap up this Valentine's Day of trading.

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Now a little love on Wall Street. In fact, it's

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a pretty volatile relationship. I like what you did there, Carol.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you been waiting a year to say that? What

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>would have happened if stocks are in the green today?

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>This is what happens when you get no sleep, Yeah, exactly.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to it with Michael Sheldon. He's

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>executive director and chief investment officer at High Tower r

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>d M Financial Group based in Westport, Connecticut, and that's

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>where we find him on the phone on this Monday. Michael,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how are you good? Thanks very much and happy Valentine

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>States everyone in our viewers. Yeah, no, absolutely, it's been

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a wacky day. I was just looking at some of

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the swings in the major averages, like two percent on

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the NAZACK one hundred, about one and a half percent

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the S and P five. Um hmm. How do

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you make sense of a day like today when we're

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>watching the tensions the geopolitical concerns involving Russia and Ukraine

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world. But we've also got

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some nervousness about how aggressive the Fed. Maybe, yeah, I

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>think from the markets unfortunately, we're probably going to be

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of trading range and markets are likely

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to remain unsettled for for the near term until we

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have more clarity on on the outlook for inflation shifting

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>FED policy and more recently the situation in Russia. Russia

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>and the Ukraine. What do you make of the situation

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in Russia and Ukraine. Because we had Christina Hooper from

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Investco on Quick take Stock earlier today and she mentioned

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that oftentimes geopolitical shocks like this are relatively short lived

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of effects to the markets, but she said

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this one could be different because of the impact on oil. Yeah,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's certainly a wild card. It's really tough

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what Putin's intentions are at this point. Um,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he could just be trying to cement his legacy as

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>as a dictator or leader of Russia. You know. We

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>look back also at a number of geopolitical events going

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>back as far back. Ash's looked at about twenty five

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of these and granted each one is different, but what

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had showed is that on average s D S and

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>P five hundred fell about one point one percent on

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the day of a j geo political event, and it

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fell a total of about five almost five percent over

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty days, but eventually recovered its losses over

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the next forty three days. So most of these events

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>have been fairly limited with the market rebounding, and of

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>course each period is different. Russia is a pretty big

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>player here. I think they supply about ten percent of

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the world's oil, and they also supply about one third

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of Europe's natural gas. So the implications of what happens

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>UH certainly could be far reaching, probably more so for

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Europe than for the US. What's more problematic the geo

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>political concerns, the reminder that the pandemic is far from over,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's a global pandemic and until the world is

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>out of it, none of us are out of it.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is it that fundamentally? As our Gina Martin Adams

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>reminded us that we are seeing analysts bring down their

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>expectations for earnings, but yet we're still looking for a

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>nine revenue growth, which, as she said, still fantastic. What

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is the thing investors really need to be focusing on, Well,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you left one thing off your lip, which is the FED.

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think at the top of the list is

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED right now. The you know, I think that

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>because of concerns about the level and stickiness of inflation,

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's put pressure on the FED to finally start raising

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and um a short term after that they're

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>likely to start QT. So I think there's a lot

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty about the pace and timing and ultimate destination

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen to the short term rates.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think importantly the Fed's aware that the yield

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>curve is narrowing. That's the that's the gap between two

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>year and ten year yields, so the yield curve is narrowing.

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Michigan Consumer Compidence Index, for example, which

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>came out last week, fell to an eleven year low.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think FED members are aware of the fact

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that if there are too many aggressive rate hikes, that

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can actually harm the economy. But they are also aware

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of that inflation is that at forty year high, So

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to address the inflation part. But

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably going to start off with quarter

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>point hikes and see how things go and remain some

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and and continue to have some flexibility as we go

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>through the year. So do you anticipate a quarter point

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>hike in March and then a quarter point hike at

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>each subsequent meeting. Well, we have seven more rate meetings

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, so I think a quarter point in March.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think not enough FED officials have signaled their um

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>likelihood or their need for that they're wanting to do

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points, so I think that's a little too

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressive at the first meeting. That could change, but I

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think a quarter point in March, probably a quarter point

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in May, a quarter point in June. That's seventy basis points,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't be surprised to see one or two

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>more in the second half of the year. But again,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think the economy could change as we shift

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and go through the year. So nothing is written in stone,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>but the Fed does have to start taking action, and

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they also definitely have to address their balance sheet,

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>which increased from about four trillion to nine trillion, so

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that to start running off as well

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as we get into the summer. So what do we

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>do as an investor? As you watch, especially markets kind

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of bounced back and forth. I mean, we went through

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a day earlier where travel stocks are rallying as a

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>as a whole on expectations of easing of attentions over

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in Russia and Ukraine, and then we saw them sell

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>off and then do just bouncing around. It's really you know,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>your day may start one way Michael and then end

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>another or go through several gyrations in uh, you know,

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one market day Yeah, they're challenging time to be an

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>investor for sure. We think this year in two thousand

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, markets are likely to be rotational in nature

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of a lot like we saw last year,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>where at some point people would be worried about too

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>much inflation as they are today, but down the road

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>they may be worried about not enough growth. So I

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think between growth and value. I think you want to

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have a balance between both growth and value, especially with

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates rising right now. We've been very much overweight

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>growth over the past decade or so and it's turned

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>out pretty well in terms of a tail and for portfolios,

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>but on the margin, we're starting to shift more, a

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit more to the middle between growth and value,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think you want to have a little bit

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of more, a little more more balance in your portfolios

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as we go through this year. So what does that

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>look like? What was it? What does balance look like?

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So balance means you want to have some technology in

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>your portfolios, because there's some exciting areas and artificial intelligence

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and five G and drive a less cars and all

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>those types of things. So you want to have that

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and that provides the growth for that that investors need

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to meet their long term investment objectives. But you also

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>need to have some exposure to areas like health care

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, which we call it sort of like garp

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or growth at a reasonable price, and then some energy

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and financial exposure as well. So the one areas were

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not sort of loading up on right now are consumer

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>staples and utilities because we think it's kind of too

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>early in the cycle to get ultra defensive at this point,

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a lot of attractive growth in those

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in those sectors. All Right, we gotta run. Hey, Michael,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Have a good week. Michael Sheldon.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He's executive director and chief investment officer at high Tower

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>r DM Financial Group, based in Westport, Connecticut, which is

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>where we found him on the phone on this Valentine's

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Day Monday. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News