WEBVTT - Investing In Space

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's talk space. Now,

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking outer space. Just in the last month we've

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>seen Sir Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos rocket into space,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>continuing the commercialization, if you will, of outer space. Let's

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of where we're going for John Wensby,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Allen b Levan NSU Broward Center

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>of Innovation, joins is John, give us a sense here.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, when I was a kid, it was all

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Apollo UH program and NASA, and you know

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the US government talk to us about is the future

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>space innovation? Is it no longer NASA? Is it with

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>billionaire entrepreneurs? Well, ga Marine, and thanks for having me.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually glad that you mentioned UH the Apollo program

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because we recently recruited Buzz Aldrin's son Andrew Aldrins, the

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>director of our new space program called Level five Space

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>dook to support these entrepreneurial opportunities. But to really answer

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>your question, there's never been a more opportune time for

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs to launch and scale companies in the space sector.

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's not the old government model of doing anything.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really moving into the privatization and the commercialization of

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>space through public private partnerships and more private sector um support.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And the barriers of entry are coming down, and the

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>technological advances that are creating expectations for the future are

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>much more cost effective than they've ever been. They're still high,

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're certainly coming down, which really leads to increased

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>private investment by investors who are ran new to the

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>space sector. And the recess successes as you mentioned with

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX and Version Galactic and Blue Origin are really great examples.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But the point is it's not just about it's not

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just about billionaires, right, because we talked to so many people,

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>some of them young, you know gen z startup people

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>who are getting into the space business because not everybody

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>has to do the launch, right, there's so many other aspects. Yeah,

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely correct, and the future of space isn't the

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>big names and brands that you know, it's it's the

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>people that are behind it. So you're these early stage

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs that are focused on technology development, whether it's the

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>hardware side or the software side, there are two evolving worlds.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And the hardware we often refer to as the vehicle

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and the satellites as an example that on the

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hardware side, it's all around data and how you use

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>data in space for the betterment of Earth or for

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>inner and outer space applications. And it's really provided opportunities

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for anybody no matter what your economic status is. If

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got a great idea that serving a need for

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>now in the future, this is the time to be

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>able to be focusing on that. Is there is there

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a profit angle here at all? John? I mean, you know,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I look at Sir Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos and

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they're really focused on making money here

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>given their status. Is there a belief that there is

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a profit model in the commercialization of space? Well, I

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>think when you're associating these these big names that are

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they're internationally known, they're making headlines, and what they're doing

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is they're bringing more awareness to the opportunities associated with space,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that profit is not the number

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>one objective. It's about breaking down the barriers so that

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we can get to that next level. The future of

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneur, though, is about the profit, and these start

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>these small companies that are creating concepts and inventions that

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>support the space sector, whether it's in the private or

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>public sector. Their goal at the end of the day

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is to be able to make money and scale these businesses,

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's more infrastructure that's now available to be able

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to do that than there's ever been before. But it's

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the it's the names that we're not aware of that

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to be successful. Are the ones that are

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>profiting as they support these bigger initiatives. And I think

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to focus on the big names like

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the Nassas of the world and the Branson's and the

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Bezos as examples. But what's happening is the space agencies

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>around the world are moving more to the private sector

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of support, where they're establishing very defined verticals

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of need and then you market those needs and you

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>find the smaller entrepreneur that can cater to the development

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of the inventions and technologies for those needs, and then

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're co funded. Um in many cases will be acquired

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>with into those space agencies, but they're they're generating a

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>profit at the end of the day. It's also I mean,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>there's so many other angles besides the launch. And I

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>said it already, but I think it's important to point out. Look,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Netflix is producing a documentary um where SpaceX is going

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to put four civilians into orbit and that's next month.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just blows my mind. I know that

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>media is not your wheelhouse. I bring it up because

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>it is Paul's wheelhouse. But what are the other business

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>lines you think, John that are going to be profitable soon? Well,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I think when you break it back down into the

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>hardware and the software side, the hardware is a little

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more difficult. That's the space vehicles and the satellites

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that are previously mentioned. That's very difficult because of the

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>high cost of putting that together. The profitable side of

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the business is the low hanging fruit, as I'm calling

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it is to software is the data. It's a it's

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a uniquely feasible space product, and if you know how

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to collect it and analyze it and integrate it, and

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>then distribute that into different forms of technologies. That's truly

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the future, and that can be done anywhere in the world.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't doesn't have to be in a in a

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>space environment, if you will. And there are multiple industries

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that are currently creating things that may not even recognize

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're directly supporting space or have the potential to

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>directly support space. But when you think about evolving themes

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and this in this emerging world in which we live

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>around acceleration and disruption, it's things like cybersecurity or agriculture,

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>marine industries, telecommunications, um manufacturing and dance manufacturing, even smart

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>city development and design for the future, as well as

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the creation of new space services that don't even exist today.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So we have to create a whole world that supports

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>everything that happens up in inner in outer space. So

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>there really isn't an industry that can't connect to space

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in a direct or indirect way. All right, John, great

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 1>having you. Um. John Bensfeen is I think internationally known

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>expert on air transport. He wrote Air Transportation and Management

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Perspective and Wheels Up Airline Business Plan Development, So he

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really knows, you know, not only how these businesses work,

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but how they can turn a profit. John, thanks very

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Let's get back to the markets

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, and specifically to Disney earnings coming out after

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the bell today. Kevin Near joins US Equity Research associated

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He is live, Are you live in the studio?

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>All right? Cool? So you're with I mean the two

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>guys at the company who probably know more about Disney

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>than anyone else save possibly David Weston because I think

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he used to work work there, work there. Um, what

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>do we expect? We've been talking a lot about the parks,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's also a lot going on in their media business.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you've got the TV, You've got the sports?

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>What what what the highlights? Definitely definitely thank you so

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>much again for having me. Uh so for us for

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Disney earnings, you know, we're looking at three key things.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>One is the update on this on the streaming subscriber story,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously Disney Plus being sort of the most important product

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on that side, but Hulu ESPN Plus also important. Uh. Next,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be looking for an update on the box

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>office on their distribution side. Uh. You know, Disney has

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been really holding their cards close to their chest as

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed to some of the other studios. UM. And then lastly,

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>as you as you mentioned, we're gonna be looking for

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>commentary on the theme parks business. We're expecting that this

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this past quarter fiscal three Q will be their first

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>profit in that business since last year, since obviously the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>virus shut down that side of the business. UM. But

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that said, you know rising delta cases, there's something that

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at very closely. And uh, and we're gonna

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be looking for commentary on their on their bookings going forward.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So what do we know on the theme park business

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's you know, it's a business that a lot

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of people overlook because they look at the streaming business

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and they look at ESPN. But the parks and resorts

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>quarter after quarter A it's a big business and be

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it grows double digit earnings every quarter. But I'm really

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about this delta variant an impact you could have

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, in California and their international things. Have they

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.679
<v Speaker 1>given any indication to how things maybe trending? Yeah, absolutely absolutely,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's exactly what we're gonna be looking for. And uh,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and again you bring up with great points. Um. You know,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>as far as the international side, there's still a little

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bit further behind than obviously on the domestic side. Uh,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they just had to reinstate obviously wearing masks in in

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>both those parks, Disney World and in Disneyland, Um, which

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know again you know that's that's that's writing on

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the wall. I think consumers really see that. Um. There's

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>been no mention on you know, you know, vaccine mandates

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>as far as that. We think it's unlikely that they

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>will mandate vats nations considering just how they're how their

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>clientele really excuse you know, much younger. Obviously the children

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>under twelve haven't been approved yet. Um. But that said,

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you're exactly to your point now, and you'd be turning

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>away so many people, so many Americans are vaccine hesitant,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the politically correct way to put it now,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but exactly anti vaxers, and you don't want to lose

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>those dollars, do you exactly exactly so that that remains

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a threat, you know, near term. It's it's just very

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>unclear at this point how how delta is going to

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>shake out. You know, we're still waiting on that f

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>t f D a mandate for for the vaccine, which

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>should theoretically change things. I guess either way, the streaming

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>business is good. I just wonder how you differentiate because

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you you mentioned they've got Disney Plus, Hulu, ESPN, and

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>there's so many other offerings out there with um Netflix

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and Apple TV, and I mean, so I'm subscribed to

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>p g A, I'm subscribed to MLB, Like the bills

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are higher than my cable box used to cost, right

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's that's the It's exactly right. And just

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to contextualize this a little bit, what we've seen so far,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, this past quarter was really a mixed bag

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on the streaming side. You know, this is domestic. International

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>again is a different story. But uh, you know, Netflix

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>posted really really some some weak result. They actually posted

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a loss domestically in the US and Canada. On the

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>subscriber side, Stars which is a premium spot service owned

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>by lions Gate, they saw a similar trend losing subscribers domestically,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's really all all based on weaker content slates.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, exactly to your point, some of those newer services,

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Plus, HBO, Max Discovery Plus, they're posting gains you know,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at or above expectations. And you know, part of that

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is is price promotions. Part of that is higher marketing

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>spence for those those newer services. UM. But what we're

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really seeing now is that you know, what we like

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to say is is the streaming wars have really started.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've really started now. We've been talking about

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the streaming wars for a while, UM, but it's it's

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>has gotten real just this pass quarter. And the expectation

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, Netflix, obviously they're the big dog,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>but Disney has established itself as a solid number two.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So of to we'll take a look at those earnings

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>coming out after the close tonight. Kevin Near joins his

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is equity research associate at Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us here

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. He works with the

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>great ether rung Onohan, who is also media analysts and

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>she covered some of the tech stuff as well. So

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>another generation men of equity research covering the media sector

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up for Bloomberg Intelligence. Kevin, you're joining us here.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to get over to Greg Hahn. He is

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the chief investment officer at Winthrop Capital Management and I

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>want to kick it off with an inflation question. Question,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jarrett was just talking about the price of oil.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We know the President wants the price at the pumps

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to come down, even if the I e A. Says

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>demand is going to get crimped. Are you a believer

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in UH continuous inflation or is it transitory? So right now,

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that monetary policy is working is we actually

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think that it's transitory whatever we define. However we define transitory,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>UH inflation is going to be here a little bit

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>longer than what FED would want us to think, just

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the supply chain dislocations and just corporate incentives

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep prices up. Um. But as long as excess

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>reserves are parked down, the balance shoes the FED. And

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not they're not leaking into the financial system. That

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Fed's got a good shot at controlling

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the rate of inflation. Hey, Greg, you know, I look

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at the ten year here trading at one point three,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta just step back and say, you know,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been an equity guy in my entire career in

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness, because I have no idea if I were

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a fixing co investor where I would go today. For

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>any yield or return. What are these people doing all day?

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you generate return with the tenure

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at one? Right? So it's it's pretty much known that

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>bond investors can suck the fun out of the room

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>faster than anybody. So the bond the bond world right now,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're investing in public, publicly traded bonds, it's a

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>very very difficult environment UM and institutional side. In the

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>private credit space, there are more opportunities to earn yield,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but those are coming down. Those would include clos and

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>commercial mortgage loans. But there are ways for individual investors

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to capture the c l O investment or the bank

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>through UM some mutual funds and EPF so those obviously

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>have a higher risk associated with them different liquidity issues.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But that is the one of the answers to where

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>do you get where do you get yield? And the

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>other is leverage and the closed and fund provides that.

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the other answer that Howard Marks gave us

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just tough. You know, it's not It's

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not easy, he said, um people are happy with three hundred.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>He's happy with three hundred basis points on high yield debt.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's enough. Um too, he thinks cover the costs

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are the risk of a default. And I thought that

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was amazingly told Eric Shasker that, Um, he said, people

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that need seven percent? He doesn't know what to do.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he's a distress guy. Um what about in stocks?

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Every time I think that we can't possibly run any

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>higher than this and valuations look pretty full, Um, we do,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and how much further can we go? So here's so.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So the general rule of thumb in our world, this

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is the Winthrop world, is that as long as we

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have aggressive monetary policy and we have aggressive fiscal policy,

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>which we have both right now. Um, there's a safety

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>net on on asset prices. So um, that's can be

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst for stocks to go higher. We are very,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about the market right now, and the reason

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is there's a there's kind of a crossroads that are

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>taking place. The Fed um is going to start to

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>remove its stimulus, which means that the interest rates naturally

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>will drift higher. And then the question becomes, how will

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock market handle that at a time when the

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings comparisons, earning comps year over year are going to

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to have disfavorable earnings comp coming out

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. They're gonna We're gonna see earnings growth

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>start too slow. So it's going to be a challenge

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for equity investors going forward. And Greg's interesting. Earlier this week,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keen and I had on Doug Cass from Seabree's

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Partners Legendary Investors, and he's at with a note, I

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think on Tuesday, basic and entitled sell stocks now, basically

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>taking some of the concerns that you just highlighted and

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>said they're more than concerns. They're coming and that's not

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>good for equity markets. But that is very much the

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>contrarian view out here as far as I can tell.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it is tough. I mean, we're ones to

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>stay invested, We're not ones to try to time the market.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But the the underlying theme here that the challenge that

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we have is that we we in our world, we

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize the structure of the capital markets has changed. And

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you sort of touched on it with this idea on

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income side is where do investors go? The

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>consequence of these said policies has been that US savers

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>people that are looking at retirement or in retirement, it's

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to earn a an income stream in retirement

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to support our lifestyle. We have to look at capital

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>games to do that. So it's it's a challenge that um,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just it's just a challenge. Thank goodness.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>We have social security right well, yeah and that. But

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but just being sarcastic, I don't know, sometimes my sarcasm

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't read on radio. Yeah, but I meant like it's

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not enough. Yeah. But in the in the equity markets,

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not ones that there are there are places to go.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm one of those that that is seriously a

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>China because of what's happened there is there's one. We

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's just a tremendous buy an opportunity. It is

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not a place to run from. It's a place to

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really study and look into that. Their form of capitalism

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>competing alongside Western capitalism, is going to be a survivor

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>over the next ten years. And there's some cheap stocks there.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But you look there just for do you look for

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a capital appreciation or do you for returns? Yeah, well

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that's its capital appreciation. The income stream is not not competitive, Yeah,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little scary. As Bloomberg had a story

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I think yesterday, just highlighting how many millions of people

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in America are going to be a turning sixty five

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if you retire at sixty five. My

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>parents are retiring their seventy and they're still gonna live

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>another twenty or thirty years, which I'm happy about. But

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's expensive, and especially if you get hit with something

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like Alzheimer's or you know, it's it's a horrible thing

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to think about, but it's just so expensive healthcare. Springing

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in a professionals or putting them in a home. It's

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just you've got to be prepared, and I think a

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are a little underprepared. Greg. Great having

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.239
<v Speaker 1>you on the program, Greg Han, chief investment officer at

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Winthrop Capital Management. Ernesta Ramo's chief investment officer for the

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>U S for bmo A Global Asset Management. He joins

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Chicago. Ernesta, we're basically through

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>this second quarter earning period. You've got Disney after the

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Clothes tonight, but really really impressive earnings growth. Was that

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>enough for those who feel like this market is expensive?

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's a reason to maybe be cautious. Well, there's

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly been incredible earnings growth, as you point out, Uh,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly all in the price as we speak. And

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the question is what's the earnings growth going to be

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 1>look looking like going forward? And that's a that's a

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>clear that's a question that doesn't have a clear answer.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that we think it's clear is that

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be as strong as it has been,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>uh for the last old months. I mean the earnings

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>over the last all months for the smp F. I

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>found it up. I don't think any analysts out there

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>has that kind of number for for the for the

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>next told months. So we think the market is a

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bit richly valued in might need to take a breather here,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we favor higher quality stocks are not

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>very very abriginally value top what we call quality value stocks. Yeah,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at UM on the Bloomberg an esto. You

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>can type an index and then gego, which allows you

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to graph a number of things. But I put up,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, trailing PE. Right now, we're at seven on

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the smp We were at the beginning of the year,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>UM up around thirty three so the earnings have done

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot to bring that down. But if you look

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>at um the forward PE estimates, we're trading around twenty

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>two and we had been at the high at the

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>end of last year up around twenty seven. What do

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you think fair value is well with the with the

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of monetary policy of the interest rates where they are.

0:19:55.880 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the market can handle to you know, but

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna need earning scurowth to to get further ahead.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>And right now, if you look at about the consensus,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they're pricing in about or they're looking for twenty earnings

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to come in and about plus nine percent for one

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>will come in. And so I think the market doesn't

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of room to go with nine percent

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>earning s growth maybe a couple of percent higher from

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>where it is now. So it's it's gonna be interesting

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to see what what gives. But specifically, what we're looking

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to do in our portfolis is tilt a little bit

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>away from from growth to value because we see the cycle,

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the economic cycle is really recovering strongly uh and uh

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and and and and also tilt a little bit towards

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller caps, so smaller cap value over large cap growth.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But we're not dramatically, just just a little bit, just

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>so that you get a little bit more exposure to

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>two sectors that are more uh tied to the economic cycle. Here,

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I tell you of the many reasons I like working

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Miller is his knowledge of Bloomark functionality is amazing.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>That function I did not know it and I've been

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>here twelve years. Thank you for that, Sernesto. You know,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the sectors that you guys are

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>working on these days? I mean again, we just came

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>through earnings. We've got some more information about how companies

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about their businesses going forward. Are there some

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sectors that you guys are doing some extra work on

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>these days? Well, we really are more focused on the

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>companies at the at the bottom, up the level, so

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that AutoZone, companies like Carl Ruf. The AutoZone is

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know, celebrate care type shop where people that

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>want to fix their own cards go by parts and whatnot.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>H card Rufi, which is tied to the recovery in

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in the housing sector and people um fixing their house

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is up. And also it's also tried te a little

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bit infrastructure growth and and UH companies like like all State,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which is an insurre not not too many people will

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>come on shows and talk about insurance, but it's a

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>company doing very well. And these are the one thing

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that characterizes them. For example, all State trades in like

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half times earnings, which is pretty pretty

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously cheap. But the thing that all of these companies

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have in common is that they don't trade at very

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>expensive valuations. And and that's the one thing we're making

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>sure in our portfolos, even in our growth portfolios, we're

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not overpaid for any one stock because at these levels

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of valuation, the biggest risk in the market right now

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is a valuation risk and that we have a correction

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just because the market is originally valued. What are the

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you think the best sectors where we can find how

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>do you screen for value stocks? Industrials is one, Financials

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is another, UH, Materials is another. UM. You know, those

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are the traditional value sectors. UH, But but there's companies

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in in in UH the consumer discretion area for example

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of auto zone, which which I mentioned already, that that

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are that are attractively valued. So you really have to

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>go sector by sector. Technology in general is going to

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>be richly valued, but you're gonna find companies here and

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>there that are doing very well and not trading at

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>very high valuations. So it's really a question of focusing

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on the company themselves and their individual prospects run to

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>make broad based sector or industry calls. It's just all

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about the companies, and our approach really measures the evaluation.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Of course it is very important, but profitability, quality, growth

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of every company, as well as market sentiment, and we

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>aggregate a bunch of metrics on all of these to

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>come up with a with a shortlisted. Then we do

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun the mode men. All right, Naste,

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much. Nasto Ramos from BMO. Thanks for listening

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Put on fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.