WEBVTT - Week 5 rankings, TNF preview, Waivers for MVS, Inside Injuries with Dr. A, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever m Do do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Yo, says love Fantasy Best Friends Forever

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Stample.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg sum. What's going on Monday? Gregg A

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Week five kicks off tonight, got the Patriots and the

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Indian Apples Coats. Dr Ray Conan on the show a

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on talk some injuries, but we gets

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>all the football stuff. How about them Yankee pounded out? Nah?

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't have anything to gets Oakland whatever the Yankees.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>One Friday night? Do you know the pitching matchup Christal

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>versus Jay happen. Is that the assumption I'd imagine that

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna make my way aft to Jersey Friday night,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So obviously to get throw some shekels down for NFL

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Probably throw something down for Connor and cabib too.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll be watching UM and then you know what, I'll

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>probably put something on the Yankees too. But is that smart? No, don't,

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>don't bear with your heart. No, you don't think they

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>take the first game. I've already just taked over. Whatever

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it is makes sense. I can see that you have

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>fun last night. I did, man, you know I did.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It was great, it was. It was a very fun

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>game all around. I'm gonna be houest with you. I

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was never nervous, it really wasn't even the bases were loaded.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Was like, I don't really nervous. No, I was. I

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely was when it was whatever that was the fourth ending, right,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. We still only had a two

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>run lead. We as in you know, me being part

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Yankees. UM two run lead, bases loaded two outs,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a scary situation. And then the very

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>next ending, which you know, I was surprised that they

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>left several, you know, in to start the fifth because

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he was already at like eight plus pitches

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Gives up the first two hits, and

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>then here comes with Dances, who you know has been

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent at times, but god, he was awesome last night.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>He was great. Man, he was he was on fire.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>We're getting dead. I'm not happy, Frank, I'm really not happy.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>What's up? So and lead where waivers run every day

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at noon the day day noon, it's kind of weird

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday through Sunday. Well, it was like we used to

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have first come first, sir. This is a compromise. Waivers

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>will just run every day noon, okay, So like the

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>big waiver runs obviously on Wednesday at noon and then Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Cold people putting bids or cold the zero dollar bidsin

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in this league, could people putting mids whatever? So in

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this league I owned Davante Adams and Geronimo Allison. I

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>see that cav Allison and Adams not practicing today and

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Adams chefs are kind of alluded, like it could be

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>even longer, like what so anyway, I see that, I'm like,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>oh god, now I gotta go out and let me

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just get m v s. It doesn't really flow very well.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah vs vs m VS or if you did one

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of these m v s, it's a little bit better

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because r VD and in the middle. I like that,

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I got it all right, So I went to go

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and get m v s off of waivers more kez

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>vowed the scantling. His news breaks literally at and I'm

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>just like, my dollar bid in for him, not worry

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. So only one other person bid on m

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>VS other than myself. One other person, and I've been

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>one dollar again hometown Heller bien nine bucks on MVS,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, what are you doing? Why did you?

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Why did you do this? You only bid one dollar?

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>You can't kick yourself for I probably would have been

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>five if I had those guys, and I still would

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have got it, still have lost. There's no way I

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>would have been ten dollars. Maybe he really needs a

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver this week. So I asked him, like a

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars, Really, he just did it, am I go,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I just did it, and I don't even know why.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even have a claiman prior I tried to

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>switch you down to four right out of time. And

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>if you would have had the five or six dollar

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bid in like I said, if he if he would

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have lowered it here a lot of what's going on.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>The good news is Greggy, the Packers could potentially be

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>without all three of those wide receivers, their starting wide

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers in Davantae Adams, Jeronimo Allison, and Randall Cobb. And

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, they will be starting three different rookies.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Who's to say that MVS is the man like? It

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>could be more. It could be open to me a

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>st Brown if you really really are desperate and just

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>need a guy to like like play, I have a

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>pick up one of those guys. I have a plugging play,

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>don't you worry? And can we reel it? Now? Tell

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>me who are you playing? Welcome back to the starting lineup,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake. He's better than the other Hacker wide receivers

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and throwing he I don't know to know because the

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other player I could have plugged in, um Jordan Wilkins. Obviously.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The other player I could have plugged it working on

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that is is Chris Hogan and that would be an

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting he placed tonight and I can't do that yet.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling about Chris Hogans. I've got a feeling.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>So I was thinking about who I was gonna drop

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for MVS. Let me just drop Chris Hogan was like,

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what he plays tonight. I gotta weight on it.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta weight on it. So like am and I

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have MVS now if you were wondering, because I

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just looked this up. The Packers snapshare throughout the season

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receiver position, Mark has Valdes Scantling MVSY

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>has played percent of the snap so he's the fourth

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, which means he's the next man up if

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>all three of those can't go. The only other wide

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver who has played a snap for the Packers is

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Jamon Moore, who has fourteen percent of the snaps, which

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>he played all of last week without Randall com Yeah,

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and then probably the number two in terms of like

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>those are probably the starting wide receivers if all three

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>can't go and you're really struggling right now, MVS, Marcus

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Valdus Handling and Jama Moore are probably starters. That is

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all speculation, but it is not sounding good for the

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers wide receivers right now, the normal starters. That's all

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we have on a Thursday. Yeah again, that that Schefter's

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>tweet really scared me. Um about Cobb. It was the

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what I would really do these act tweeks.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get it wrong. Um, he said this.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Packers head coach Mike McCarthy's Dvante Adams won't practice today

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>doing like to to a calf injury. Neither Randall CoV

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hamstring or Geroni will Alison concussion. Packers down their top

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>three wide receivers today and maybe beyond. And when Schefter

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>says maybe beyond it, that hasn't hold his deal beyond today,

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe they're out tomorrow, doesn't mean they're out for

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like the rest of it. I'm being too nervous about that.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You think I think you're reading into that a little

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 1>bit too much. I would, personally, as the Davanta Adams

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>owner in multiple leagues, like I am nervous for sure,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Like there's definitely a chance that all three of those

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 1>guys missed this game this week. I wouldn't be shocked,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't freak out about beyond this week.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now, that seems very very spec not freaking out

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about about this week, as you should be and as

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all Davanta Adams owner should be. Unfortunately, we won't talk

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>DR about Davante Adams. Yeah, I mean, look rightfully, So

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we give we give DR a list of players and

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>those are the players that he researches. So we're you know,

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not just gonna spring this on him what not

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily fair to him. We will ask him about John Willison, Randall, Cob.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he'll give us up on Jamante Adams as well,

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>though that would be cool. Greg, My rankings are live.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>What did you want to call the high five thing?

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>You had like a really catchy nickname for it. It

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was like the best five. Well it's supposed to be

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>f yeah, but you had like an acronym for it,

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what was the acronym? It was like Frank's best

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy five something like that? Is that what it is?

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>The best Fantasy five? Maybe not Frank's just the best

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy five. That's Fantasy five. Run that by Scotty. It

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>sounded better last week. You don't like it as much now.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I may have had a better tune to it last week. Well,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>they're live on rdal Experts dot com. Right now you

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>can see my rankings for free bfs BF best Fantasy five.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what that was. That was what it was. It

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was definitely best Fantasy five. It's fantasy five. Alright, that's

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy confidence. Have you looked at it yet? All? That's

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not good? Do you want to reveal it yet? Other

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>news from today, Joe Nixon back at practice. This is

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>good news rather than some of the injury news we

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have with the Packers. Yeah, and Giovanni Bernard is not

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>practicing dealing with a knee injury, so that is UM

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>an interesting turn of events. I know that he's kind

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of this has kind of been his schedule of the

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks, Like he hasn't practiced, They've been

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>giving him maintenance days. UM, And ranking the Bengals running

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>backs this week is kind of hard because I think

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I have them both inside my top twenty four as

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of now. Because the over the last two weeks, the

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are allowing the most fantasy points to opposing running backs,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure last week has a lot to do

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>with that with James White going off and Sony Michelle

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>going off. UM, But the Dolphins are kind of reeling

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, so this could be a good matchup before

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. It's just obviously Joe Mixon will be a

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more valuable if Giovanni Bernard is out. But if

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they both play, let's say, they're probably both more like

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Loewend RB two's or high end flex options. They both

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if Giovanni Bernard is out, probably like a top fifteen

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>running back. I have more a little bit more competence

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in Joe Mixon than you do. I said the yesterday

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show that I go out and trade for him.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I trust them a little bit more. Evans tweeted this

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a little while ago, and that was a great tweet.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>He goes Bengals pass cashier update, Tyler Eiffert out for

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the year, John Ross growing questionable, Giovanni Bernard knee questionable,

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon leg questionable, A J Green, Xavian Howard, Tyler

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Boyd Yati he's going to eat Gregg. He's going to eat.

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So I will present this to you again. Should I

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>trade Mike Evans in my home league? Mike Evans Kenny Stills,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you say now? And Kenyan Drake for Mary Cooper. Tyler

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Boyd and Derrick Henry. Should I do it one and three?

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I need to win. No. The other trade to have

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on the table is Kareem Hunt and Kenny Stills. I

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>give that up to get David Johnson and Juliettel. Yeah.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I can do that deal. That's what

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you can do? Is that? Now? Are you you do?

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You do both trades the league? Yeah? That's crazy changing

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>my whole team. It's fun. Would you do both? No? Probably?

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Not all right? I kind of need to revamp team.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I have Sammy Watkins going up against the Jaguars.

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>If Keelan Cole, you don't know what to expect from

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Chris Hogan not playing him tonight. He's broadcast

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>score like three touchdowns and he stills. He sucks. Mike

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Williams doesn't play enough, snaps sucks man. I'm sorry, man.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>October it sucks. Rock October starts to what it? You know?

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Rocked over? Oh. Normally we have like some for lack

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of a better term, douche who gives us a thumbs

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>down to start the show every single day. It hasn't

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>happened today, Someone's probably gonna do it. Was stupid for

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioning that that wasn't your rightest decision. Well whatever, it

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just it gives me confidence that we're doing a good job.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen minutes into the show. You're gonna pull my rankings

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at any point? Probably not. I'm going to pull your ranking.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna do it after the break. We have

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>dr A coming up. We have a whole lot of

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>show left with preview Thursday Night Football. Are you excited

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about tonight's game? I'm not watching it actually, Oh it's uh,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what it is, Patriots Colts. It like a

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>baking show tonight. No, no, no, no, no, no, you

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>wanta know what I'm doing tonight? Sure? So I will

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be going to the Melrouse Ballroom in Long Island City.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, you're seeing some boogie hipster band or something.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Try again. Uh, let's see here, ball rooge hipster band again,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>not a hipster and probably like Billy Joel or something.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe's not playing the Melrose ball Room. Try again. Oh

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go watch something wrestling? Yeah, we want to

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>m l W tonight. M Major League Wrestling because that

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>one of their champions is my old camper, right right right,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>JF Maxwell, Jacob Friedman. He's wrestling tonight. I like that.

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We just do like three lettered things for everything. It's

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>his nickname now, it's not. I didn't make that up. No,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not. M JF is recently on Stone Colds podcast. Really. Yeah,

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's kind of a big deal. Kind of a

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>big deal now. So we're going to um Simon Dotts

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>wrestles there. A bunch of people wrestled there, like John

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Morrison might be there tonight potentially. Wow, good for you.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, maybe streaming the Colts game on your phone.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, probably not. Maybe. So he's my old caver

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and oddly enough one of my best friends I was

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>agree wasmen in his wedding. Um his wife's now it's

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>their first cousin. So they're like a family relation there.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So him and I are going to support my old

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>camper tonight and and check it out supporting independent wrestling.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>That's cool, man. I'm looking through the roster right now.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely some there's some interesting you know. I had

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>the last at the last taping I think in New York,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like Pentagon was there jor to night. Yeah, I think

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be there that I think they already

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>said he's not going to be that. The park is

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. There's probably like three people who

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>were watching or listening that know what we're talking about.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all right, man, we know they're talking about you.

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Asked as well, Jacob Friedman, Oh, this guy kind of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>has like an E C three things. Yes, exactly, he's

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>basically EC three but smaller. Yeah, he's like a cocky

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like he's wearing a Burberry scars. That's the look. That's

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a cool gimmick. I guess signature moved Southampton's plunge. Yes,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he's he's like a Long Island douche. That's the character.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So what made you the wrestling support? It will be

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on probably seen on TV. Actually about this because this

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>will is this a TV somewhere? It does on be

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in sports Okay, so lot of soccer on beings exactly.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So it airs on Friday evenings, So I don't know

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>when tonight's well tape um, but I'm obviously going to

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just like reading through the bio stuff like this is

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>so easy. Three pro wrestlings first, one per center. Yeah,

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like so easy. That's a little Ivy leaguer Maxwell

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Friedman enjoys the finer things in life. He did

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not go to Ivy League school. That's false, it's fake news.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Come on, dude, why are you crushing the I don't

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>even think he says it. Don't crush the cafe? Abe Sorry,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>man excited talk about injuries, doctor, Yeah, we have a

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries because it was doctor right. I want

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a preview Thursday Night football as well, and we'll's your rankings.

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, to Frank Cults, Patriots should be fun. Um yeah,

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's a hard game to kind of

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to handicap tonight ten and a half points spread. The

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Patriots always pick the crap out of the Colts. It's true.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw a few betting trends and your luck never

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>plays well. But like the Patriots defense is that rate

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>t y Hilton could be a let down game for

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the cold Sto. Like Andrew looks at that monster performance

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, I think they're gonna have rocked, do you

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think so? Yeah? Kind of leaning with you right now.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of money coming in on the under right now.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Actually look about down. We can look about that a

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on when we come back. Dr a

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>inside Injuries will join us. No more Major League wrestling

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>talk promise I was talking dr and injury update is

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>next here in the BFS. Daily Rodo dot Com learned

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stop industry leading DFS tools

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot com

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>optimize her in minutes building, optimize line up for cash

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>games and turneys. Learned from the game's best DFS players

0:16:53.880 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>joined Daily Roado dot com. Back with you here on

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network, and it's time to remind

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you that Fantasy Factor is the only DFS site with

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>exclusively single entry contest. It's a fun and recreational place

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to play with smaller leagues and splatter price pools. They

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have great free promos like Survivor, stuper Bowl Squares and

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>marchman Is Bracket contests. Are you out of your Survivor

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>pool A runny Yes, Fantasy Factor your second chance Survivor

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>contest is not registering, So sign up today and Fantasy

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>back there dot com. That's Fantasy back There dot com.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Probably you do that, Frank, Yes, you should and you

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>who oh to jump back in. Yes, oh, yeah, you're right.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it after this. Yeah, we've been out of

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the loop a little bit for the past couple of

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks for Survivor, because of course we took the vikings

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is so stupid. Dr A from incident injuries.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>He's not stupid. What's going on? Doc? Hey, guys, how's

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it gone? It's going all right? How about yourself? I'm

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>doing great. I'm doing great. That's fantastic. You know who's

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not doing eight? Green Bay where all of their wide

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>receivers now injured. Jeronimo Allison was concussed, Randall Colls got

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the hamstring all of a sudden today Davante Adams heard

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>his calf. What is the latest on the wide receivers

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay? So, Geronimo Allison, Uh, you know Grade

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>two concussions one, Yeah, So we don't think it's just

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a simple concussion. We feel like it's a grade two

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know it's his first of all, and

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a second documented concussion since entering the NFL, so

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>um he this is his actual second documented concussion. So

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, we don't think he should come back before

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks seven. Okay, So, and so if he does, he

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice Wednesday, not a good sign. Um, and so

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he's still in concussion protocol even if he is clear

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to start in week five. Um, we feel that he's

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>putting himself at risk on the data shows that. And

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, unfortunately, uh, he's still he's gonna remain at

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>elevated injury risk on the border of high injury risk

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to a week seven until in

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>our books, he'll be ready to go. So it's not

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>as simple as Uh, we feel that it's not as

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>simple as as many people are saying. So maybe you

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>should trade Geron Whileison for for mvs. Greggy Marquez Valdes

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Scanty who. You know, it's a very interesting wide receiver

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>prospect for the Packers because you might not know this.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>He's six ft four, he made some noise in the preseason.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>He's extremely fast, So the only thing with him is

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of raw. So I don't know take that

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>for what it is. But if you're gonna take a

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>raw wide receiver who's extremely big and fast, I guess

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want to take him with Aaron Rodgers, right,

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So that might make the most sense there. Uh, Dr,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about Leonard Fournett because as

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>usual fantasy owners when they see an injury like this

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>strike and they're sitting pretty at four and oh and

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>three and one, they like to have injury optimism. And

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we get a lot of questions, should I trade for

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Fournett now so I can have him for the

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>long haul? Now, I've seen reports that say Leonard four

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>net can be out as far as through their week

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>nine by so he wouldn't be back until week ten. Uh,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>And I have a feeling that you're probably going to

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>someone agree with that. How long is one four net

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out with? Well? So, first of all, it

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is a re aggravation of a hamstring injury, which is

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>always not good. Um. And uh, you know, even though

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the m r I what they're saying, showed that injury

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't worse than the initial hamstring injury, the fact that

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a trick and so when so the m

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>r I showed that the injury wasn't any worse than

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the initial hamstring injury. So when he had the initial

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury in week one, it did heal all the

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>way like it should have been, and now it's re

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>aggravated all the way back, so there's worsening from when

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it healed all the way back, which is

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually worse than the original injury because you've hit the

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>muscle twice now in the last five weeks with an injury,

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's for anything that's not really that good. So

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully I didn't confuse everybody, but he had elevated, he

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was elevated injury risk at before this uh injury reaggravation.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So we were watching him, we were watching and we

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>felt that he was at one in five chance of

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>actually reinjuring it, and he did, and now he's at

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk and pour HPF. His HTR that we're

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>projecting is week eight and with one caveat if he

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't reaggravate it or have a setback in practice or

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Otherwise you could see week nine, week ten,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>week eleven. Um, you know that sort of thing. So

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars do have a little bit of a luxury

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>here because of their record. So um, I would say

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>if anything before week it, I'd be very surprised, very surprised.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And I actually have t J Yelden ranked inside my

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>top ten this week, greggy at the running back position

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>basically because they're going up against the Kansas City Chiefs

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>who are allowing a ton of receptions and a ton

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of receiving yards and running backs and that's really where

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>t J. Yelden can excel. He's actually fit into this

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>offense quite seamlessly. T J. Yelden, that is so um.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're going to be cautious with Leonard Fournett.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>They need him for the long haul, they need him

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs, they need him, you know, to be

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>healthy for that part of the season. I think for

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the next three or four weeks, you have a borderline

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>RB one in your hands if you have t J. Yellen. Yeah,

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are hio on t J. Yelden

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not realizing or the mainstream has not realized. Ultimately, I

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>believe he's been a top twelve running back in number

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven overall in fantasy scoring. So they got the first

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>four weeks this season, so a top twelve PBR running back,

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>as we said, and without Leonard four Nett, that position

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna hold true, you know, but Leonard for a

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>t J. Yelding guy going all the back to all

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the way back to Alabama. It's happy for the kid.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Doctor, I want that's so old saying

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that happy for the kid. Mappy for the kid. Were

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like something like that. Dr. I want to ask you

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about your Atlanta Falcons and DeVante Freeman, who is back

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>at practice and expected back for week five. Um. Is

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this the date that he was expect to return according

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to Inside Injuries and we expect him to have a

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>full workload in his first game back. Yeah, week five

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>was the time preper we were sort of concordant with that,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and and so we're good. He We haven't heard any

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>reports of any setbacks during his recovery. So that's a

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>really good sign, you know. Um. You know, in that

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>same knee, he had an m c L and PCLS

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>brain last season. UM, and so he you know, he's recovered. Well,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he was limited in practice Wednesday, but I think that's

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>only from a precautionary standpoint, and so you know he

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>was he right now currently as high at high injury risk.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's at this moment, right up till game time. UM,

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that thing, you know, that number should drop down to elevated. UM. Again,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's DeVante Freeman. Um from this particular injury he did

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>heal from, but his injury risk will not be at low,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>It'll be at elevated. He's one, He's going to be

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>an elevated and peak guy, high risk, high reward um.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you have an insurance policy because um,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know he will still be at elevated injury risk

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>of likely eighteen to nine. Greggy, if you're a DeVonta

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Freeman owner, do you think now is it time to

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>try and strike and get Tevin Coleman because the value

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is lower than it was obviously the past couple of weeks. Yeah,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think it has to be. Yeah, I completely

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I completely, completely utterly agree with Coleman.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Now Devant Freeman back, this is the time to buy.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a choice about it. We're talking to

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dr Ay from Inside Injuries and doct tonight. We have

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and the Cults, a couple of major injury

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>issues for both sides here with Gronk being questionable and

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton being out. Will Gronk plate tonight and

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>how long do you think Hulton me out? So t

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton is you know Grade one hamstring. This is

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the he's got the hamstring injury reward for the last

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>four seasons because he's at it two thousand fourteen, fifteen, sixteen,

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen and now two thousand eighteen and so um.

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting thing is is that um t Y

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Hilton had did not have any hamstring issue over the offseason, preseason,

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, and so this is a very minor injury.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So the good news is that it hasn't been as

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>severe as previous hamstring injuries. So healthy to return right

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>now is week six, So yes, glad that he's sitting

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out Week five. He should be good to go week six.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He's at high injury risk right now. He likely will

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not get back down to low injuries. He'll stay at

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>elevated throughout the rest of the year, and if he

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>has one more injury, he will remain at high. So again,

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>this is like a DeVante Freeman type of strategy that

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys just talked about. You need an insurance policy

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with t Y Hilton. He plays through a lot of injuries,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>but that does not necessarily help fantasy players because he

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.479
<v Speaker 1>may play through them, but his performance may not be

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>He may be on the on the on the field,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but his performance may not be um, you know, at peak.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to ask you about Joe mixing dr

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>A because he's practicing again today. Giovanni Bernard has not

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>been practicing, so it seems like they just kind of

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>need a running back healthy at this point. I don't

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>know if it's just um scheduled days off for you've

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>don't even know. I feel like he hasn't been practicing

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks. But oh long, I'm pretty

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys have said that Joel makes you should

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>be out longer than week five. I don't have a

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>good feeling about this. What say you about Joe Mixon? Doctor,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>this is uh danger Joe Mixon danger if he comes

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>back before week eight, he has he's he's at twenty

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>six to twenty eight percent injury risk and re injury risk. So, um,

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a you know, way way too

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>soon if he's you know, I've expected to try to

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>come back week five. Um, you know, and this is

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where he's so far from the timeline.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh and you know, UM, it's such a disparity between

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when you know the team, when we think that the

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>team is saying he's going to come back versus what

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>our algorithm and data is showing. It's week eight, guys,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. It's basically that he'll stay here's at

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk until he gets to week eight. That's

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not good. That it's not good. No, we eat, that's crazy.

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>It's so far away. Yeah, I know, because all along

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they were saying two to three weeks, but inside injuries,

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when every week that we've had them on they're saying

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>four to six weeks. Right closer to that six weeks timetable. Yeah, great,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>three great. Three. Knee injury meniscus. It's a meniscus tears.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Running back putting a ton of pounding on those knees

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and ankles. I mean that is uh running back meniscus,

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>highly high chance of recurrence and re injury rate if

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get fully healed. We're talking to doctor from

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>inside Injuries. And although I didn't get m v S,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I did get Caerin Braid, who's on a buy. I

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>spent a dollar on him. James Winsteon is back and O. J.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Howard is out. How long should we expect O. J.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Howard to be out for the bucks. So grade two

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>m c L s brain UM not torn, which is great,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>but as optimal covery time is three weeks healthy to

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>return week seven, So he still needs a couple more

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks to get that completely done. The biggest thing about

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>tight ends is that lateral movement in blocking, and you know,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's such a big body that m c L needs

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to completely heal to have that stability at the knee level,

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and so any pain that he suffers, it's going to

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>really impact him. And so that's why we're recommending week seven,

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>UM not week six. You know, it's interesting, same injury

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I think doc as Evan Ingram. And is it the

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>same timeline there as well? Do you remember, UM, I

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>believe we gave UM. I'm trying to see what we

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>gave Evan Ingram. UM. Let me think here. I think

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we I think it is the same timeline. UM. I

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have the data in front of me, but I

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do believe it's the same time frame. Both both had

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sprain m c ls in that name of leave was

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>both green grade two U neither tore their m c L.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram working his way back, there would be a

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>second miss game. We'll see if he can um start

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>practicing next week ultimately come back a week later. So

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I feel like the timetable for Evan Ingram

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>was two to four weeks, right, and that sound is

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like kind of a similar timetable that doctor is giving

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>us here now for O. J. Howard, Uh, Doc, I

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you about Will Fuller. This actually just

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>came out eight minutes ago that his hamstring is quote

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not bothering him at this stage of the week. But

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this was something he dealt with in the preseason.

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's something that forced him to miss week one, and

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>then now he played. He's performed well in weeks two

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and three, and in this past week he actually reinjured

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it and didn't come back in the second half. They

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>said he could have returned, but they're being cautious with him. Uh.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It kind of seems like it's one of those situations

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>where maybe they should let him sit out until he's

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>completely healthy. And there are a lot of implications here

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because people picked up Kiki Kota, who was the next

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver up in Houston, So there are a lot

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of implications here for both him and the owners who

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>picked up Kiki, which we expect out of Will Fuller

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in week five. Yeah, We've always had Will Fuller at

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk? Who was before this injury and reaggravation

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>based on all the data that we have on him,

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he was high injury risk. Who's at who's at peak

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>health at the time, but he was at high injury

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>risk because he's a wide receiver, multiple previous hamstring and

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>knee injuries. And so the biggest thing here is is

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's a Grade one hamstring. It's not a great

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to thank God, but because it's he's a wide receiver,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a two week opteral more recovery time, so

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really an HTR week six. So if he does

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>play in week five, lookout for another one of these,

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, reaggravation of the hamstring um because high injury

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>risk right now. I don't even want to tell you

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>guys what we have on the percentage for high right now,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's for if he plays in week five. Yeah,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and that makes a lot of sense. While we're talking

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about wide receivers with hamstrings, We've had t Y Hilton,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we have Will Fuller, we also have Sammy Watkins. Doc.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this's like a two part question I'm gonna go

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>two different ways here, because why do wide receivers so

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>often pull their hamstring? Like, is there something that they

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>can do better to prep themselves so that we don't

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>get these hamstrings week in week out. It feels like

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>every single week we have five different wide receivers who

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are pulling their hamstrings coming up lane, leaving game because

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of a hamstring strain, missing games because of a hamstring train.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We expect Sammy Watkins this week because he left early

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in that game on Monday Night Football, a lot of

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>people were depending on him. Give us a zero. And

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>now this week he goes up against the Jacksonville Jaguars secondary,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a very very tough secondary. Even if he plays,

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be you know, all that valuable. Yeah,

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So answer your first question. I've always said, and Greg

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>knows this, um. You know, hamstring injuries for wide receivers

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are is the biggest, biggest issue. And it's there no

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pun intended achilles heel. The biggest reason why is because

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they go through they go to zero, they go zero

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>through sixty and initiate that movement. It's all hamstrings when

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you see them on the line, of scrimmage and the

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ball is snapped and they initiate that first movement. Guess

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what muscle is used. It's the hamstring muscles to to

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>lift the knee up and start going as fast as

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they can. They do a lot of running and then

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and that initial movement is all hamstring. And so in

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>cold weather, if they're a little bit injured, if they're

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not completely stressed, out stretched out, or just sometimes it

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just happens, you know. Uh, that's why it's it's the hamstring,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to come back from for wide receivers.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why, like, for example, Sammy Watkins grade one hamstrings

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>train just a Grade one, it's not a Grade two

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or three. It's fine. However, it is so sensitive to

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>our receiver. We have to have a two week optimal

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>recovery time. So week six is probably the way to go.

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But he's always been an elevated injury risk. You guys

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>know Sammy Watkins history, We know all of the wide

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>receivers and you know their data in the NFL. He's

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>at high injury risk right now and likely will stay

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>there now because this is probably the sixth or seventh

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>injuries had over the last twelve months, and you know

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just what our algorithm is saying. So week six

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>healthy to return, but he will remain at high injury risk.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So he's another one of these guys where you know

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you could you know, I keep kind of referencing Davante

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Freeman's strategy here, but it could be one of those things. Again.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's amazing we buy Sammy Watkins every year.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the He's gonna stay healthy, this is the

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>year the breakouts gonna happen. Was he was valuable, sure

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>putting up number and then the same thing happens that

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>those every year he gets hurt. It's not normally a

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hampsturing injury form, but I like everything else. Come on, dude,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's annoying in the week where in the league where

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm one than three and I own him, I might

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 1>just shop him just to see what I can get.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure everybody should do that, but based on

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>his name value, you might be able to get something

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from makes sense. Today, we last player to ask you

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>about Dr Adrian Peterson's the latest on him. Okay, so

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very quickly grade one ankle sprain. Um you know his

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>complete history. He didn't practice Wednesday, which is not a

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>good sign. He was high injury risk before this injury

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and now he's still at high injurisk forty nine percent,

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's two week optimal recovery time. He should be

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>back week five, but I would not. You know, we're

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>recommending that you should trade him because um, you know,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he's at a forty percent injury risk and he will

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>only go down to a forty to a thirty nine percent.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Always going to be high, high risk. Hiro were a

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>type of player now, And I think this sets up

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for a big Chris Thomps Thomps again because they're going

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>up against the Saints in the Dome. I believe Drew

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Brees is chasing history. The Saints are also big favorites

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game. It's gonna be a lot of back

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and forth. The Washington could be trailing, so I think

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it sets up for a big Chris Thompson week. Greet.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. I think it would be a massive,

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>massive Christ Thompson week. Adrian Peterson banged up again, They're

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be trailing and trying to come back and love

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson this week. Dr a inside injuries, Thank you

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We'll do it again next week.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys, have a good week you as well as

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>talk right from inside Injuries. We will take a break

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when we come back Thursday night Football preview, we'll diving

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to Frankie's rankings. It'll be fun the next one minutes

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>says stick around more. Right after this. There's only one

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>place to listen to the best fantasy advice, and that's

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. By downloading the N T

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>S Y Radio Network Gap, you'll be blessed with having

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the top fantasy experts right in your pocket. You'll get

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>award winning and entertaining programs like The Road to Experts,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's Cock a Doodle Do It, Fantasy Best Friends Forever,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Carton and Friends, Yeah Party, and so much more. To

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>feel what I'm saying, download the F and T S

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Y Sports Radio Network app now and take the most

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 1>trusted fantasy experts with you wherever you go. We're back

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>here with you on the Fantasy Best Friends Forever Fantasy

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network. Frank Stample, Grace Sausman hanging out. What

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is I don't know? What is it? Chick fat boys,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>slim weapon of choice? I only know one fat Boy

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Slimp song. That's probably the one that I do. Craze

0:35:54.360 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you like ashoo that one. Sure you're not a one.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I probably know it. I just don't. I can't recognize

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it based on how you're singing. Right. Praise you like

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a shoes sounds sounds familiar? Anything there it is? I

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>knew it was coming. Everyone knows this. How was the opening?

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now? Wait for it? That's great. You hit us

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with some car wash hands right now. We've come along

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a long waiting gather through the times and a good thursdays.

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Have to celebrate you, baby. I'm not a praise you

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like a shoot. There you go. Hand on open down

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>runner dot com is the industry is leading fantasy Dawn,

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy site that has produced seven separate fanuel and DraftKings.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Million dollar determining will turn a minute winners and millions

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>more in smaller prizes for CALLAS subscribers. Once there you

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>click on go Premium. You can use the same daily

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy line optimizer and just help deadloaded customers. Achieves such

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 1>remarkable success. And if it's sports waging that you're into,

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>click on the new sports betting tab. We'll be able

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to use the same tools that produce all those daily

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 1>fantasy winnings. For money, lamp pics, picks against the spread,

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>game totals, and player props. Go to Daily rotor dot

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>com and enter F and t s Y for special discounts.

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rotor dot Com the industry, the leading website where

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>millionaires are made. Literally. Rankings, Gregy, you want to rankings

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>four getting rankings, Let's do it. It is week five

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>here in the NFL, the National Football League, Frankie, when

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you're start quarterbacks that were normally start right, you want

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or you want to do the BF, the FSBF, whatever

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you want, I'm gonna do the quarterbacks. All right, We'll

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>start with the quarterbacks. You're number one quarterback. This week's

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>big Ben Roethlisberger. That's kind of where everybody has him

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in a hasty match up against Atlanta the first time

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in since Week one. I believe in the league where

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I have Patrick Mahomes and Ben Roethlisberger starting, I'm doing

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the same exact thing in a league where I have

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys. It's actually the Flex League. I

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think it makes sense. Patrick Mahomes going up against the Jaguars,

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I think we expect a big game out of the

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Steelers and Big Bandits is a borderline must win game

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for them. They're at home. We know the home road

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>splits at a big end. The Falcons defense has allowed

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the most fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks over the last

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Reggy, this game has a total of fifty

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half points. That is the highest total

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year to this point the National Football League.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So that makes my number two quarterback Ryan. Makes sense

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan, that game is going to be one you

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 1>want to stack in DFS and one that you want

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to just pour in and taking the overnight game. That's

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. I mean, you probably should. You

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>probably should, but that of course, that's the public perception

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and I probably I love Franks still against public perception

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>these days. It's like that's this new thing, but that's

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the big news thing because I mean, look, I consider

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:08.919
<v Speaker 1>myself part of the public. I'm not a professional better

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>by any means on any games. So you know, like

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to bet overs generally, of course, nobody wants nobody wants

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a route for un there. I mean I probably wouldn't

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:22.959
<v Speaker 1>touch it. I don't know that I touched the game.

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I think actually like the bet there in that game,

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to touch the game is I would

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>take the Falcons money line can win the game. I

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>can see the Steelers defense is bad as bad as

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it is right now. I can see that. I'm just

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a matter of do you think the Steelers back against

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the wall, their backs are against the wall so much

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that they just come out firing and they just like

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>trounced the Falcons. I don't know that that happens. It's

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>probably a close game regardless. Okay, Um, going back to

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>your rankings here, I'm trying to find something that's interesting.

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you have Aaron Rodgers at number ten and I

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>was reading something on with all of his wide receivers out?

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Is Aaron Rodgers a must start? Would you consider moving

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers down of all three wide receivers are out,

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I would. In the Detroit Lions secondary um and their

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>defense specifically has been very good in the past couple

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. Even in that first week, it looks on

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>paper like they gave up a lot of points, like

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>their defense played terribly, But that was really Matthew Stafford

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>turning the ball over a ton and putting their defense

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and bad positions on the field. Plus the Jets scored

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a ton um of points on defensive touchdowns and special

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>teams touchdowns, so you know the Lions defense has actually

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been pretty damn good. And if Aaron Rodgers is without

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>his top three receiving options, I have him at ten

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. If all three of those guys don't play,

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I could see moving him down to like moving Stafford,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins and Blake Portals all ahead of him. He

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't look at him, No, I have Andrew look at fourteen.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>He's right behind Blake Portles like he's done and he

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>did actually last week to like get back in my

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>good graces somewhat like I've moved him up. But again,

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how much can you like a guy when he's missing

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton. We think that this is kind of

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a trap game, like he's gonna be playing from behind

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and they can't run, so like he's gonna have to throw.

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's high end QB two. But I

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>just think those guys right ahead of him, like Lake Portals,

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>uh is in play for a great match up here

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs. We know that in games

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that Leonard Fournett doesn't play. Blake Bortles is fantasy gold

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and going up against secondary that obviously only helps

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins. You can't run the football against the Eagles defense.

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Like the way to attack the Eagles defenses through the air,

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings have great wide receivers. We just saw

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that a week ago on Thursday night when they played

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams defense, which is a very good defense,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and Kirk Cousins still managed to light them up with

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>his weapons. So Bortles, Cousins and then even Stafford, who

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>now the Packers secondary. I know they did better against

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>against Josh Allen, but I still overall don't trust him.

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And Stafford has enough weapons to the point where I

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like him, Like Kenny Golladay, Marvin Jones, and Golden Tape.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>I like all three of those quarterbacks better than Andrew Luck.

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very surprised. I guess not surprised. I was staring

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at it and see where pass him? Um is Blake

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Bortles right now that he's love right, he's number thirteen,

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But I thought he'd be wind up being a Q

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one this week because the tasties match and some people

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 1>rank rank Blake Bortles ahead of Patrick Mahomes. Yeah, so

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that was actually what I was comparing. And Mahomes still

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>makes your top six the toughest matchup we could possibly

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have interesting. Yeah, And and I'm higher on the consensus

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>than him. But if you look at the players that

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I have just behind him, right, Tom Brady, what has

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he done to really inspire confidence? DeShawn Watson. He's had

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a few big games, but he's been inconsistent, and the

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys defense is actually pretty damn good. Jared Goff, Like,

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the one that you can argue should be hiring.

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>My rankings, I have him ninth, but like in an

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>NFC West matchup against the Seahawks in Seattle where their

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>defense has played better this year at home obviously when

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>they have a fake twelfth man or whatever it is. Um,

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's adequately ranked at nine. So the only

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>guys that I like more than than Patrick Mahomes this

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>week our Rivers, Cam Newton, Breese, Ryan and Roethlisberger. And

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just based on the matchup do you have? Do

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you think I have my homes right to do? I do? Ultimately,

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>if you own Patrick Mahomes and Blake Portals, who would

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you start? I think they want to start Blake Man.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You're the one who just ranted to me earlier in

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the week. Don't start bad players in good matchups, you

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>went on rant. I'm saying you're right, I'm agreeing with

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm agreeing with you. That's a stupid thing. I'm being wrong. There,

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>good call, you're right, you're right. Let me in to

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends? Cool. Yes, let's say I usually see

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the runing backs of wider series for tomorrow and I

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>do half to them to do PPR standard. Uh, probably standard,

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't matter not to standard, nod to play standard. Um,

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go only we do an elite together. It's

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, we'll not my choice only. I was

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>inviting to um, well, we'll go to the PPR and

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Cooke a top three tight end in the consensus. Well,

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Frank has it and everybody has it. Why Jack Cook's

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>number one tight end and Fantasy football for the first

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>five weeks, first four weeks, number one number. You know

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he's the best and he has locked in that role

0:43:57.520 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>as being the number one or two options in the

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Oakland offense. You don't want to say you can trust

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>big foot, but it certainly seems like you can. Yeah,

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 1>he's the number one tight end. As you've mentioned, he's

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>top three this year in terms of tight end targets. Um,

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he has thirty five targets on the season. So yeah,

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point, look, if Gronk play tonight, if I

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>had both of these players like, I would still play Gronk.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>There's no way I'm playing Jared Cook over him. But

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think outside the top three tight ends Kelsey Earth

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and Gronk, Garret Cook is the next man up, which

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely crazy to say, but um, that's the way

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that John Gruden in the Raiders offense is choosing to

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>attack defenses right Amari Cooper. His usage has been inconsistent,

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.959
<v Speaker 1>his production has been inconsistent. Um, And I just feel

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like Jared Cook is going to continue to be the

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>target monster for the Oapen Raiders offense. So I trust

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>him in this matchup against the Chargers. I don't. I

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see why there's any reason not to, to be honest,

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which means he's probably gonna be like, yeah, three for twenty.

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I I just so I'd assume. So I have Jared

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Cook rank too high, No, I don't think so it's

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>reactionary totally. I think he moved Jimmy him. If none

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of these Packers play, Jimmy Graham's going to move up.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>You have a Gronk the highest of anyone I've seen

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this week. You have an inside your top five. I'm

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>sure people weren't sure he's going to play tonight. Um,

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's not in the big game if he does.

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>This is just the Gronk ranking, right, Like if he plays,

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.720
<v Speaker 1>where would you like, would you rank him any differently?

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I guess based on the information we have on

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the Packers right now, if you wanted to rank Jimmy

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Graham ahead of him, you could do that. But then

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like Jordan Read can have a fine game, Does he

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have as much upside as Rob Gronkowski? Probably not. Um,

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron I think can have again, can have a

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very good game tonight. He's my seventh frank tight end

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots, and you know the Colts are banged

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>up with t Y Hilton, So I think Eric Ebron's

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>in play for another night's game here. But it's just

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the Gronk franking. Like if you if you

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>own him, like you're not going to start any of

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>these guys over him. No, as long as he plays

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously not good Jordan read game. You mentioned Chris Thompson,

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>why could be good for him? We really like Jordan

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Read against New Orleans. I think it makes a lot

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Ron Tonight, no, Jack Doyle, George Kid getting

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 1>back in the circles, trust inside the top ten um

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the President. Van's McDonald only at number ten in the

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>great matchup against Atlanta. Yeah, it's just that his targets

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have been consistently five, Like that's the past three weeks,

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>every single week, So you know you're gonna get out

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of Vans McDonald that's actually gonna get five targets, especially

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>fact Vandaloria. So there you go. We're on. But that's

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, like, how much more can you like

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>him than that being the ten rank tight end? If

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>he's only going to get five targets. The way to

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>attack Atlanta obviously is passing the ball to the running

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>back a lot. So I think we see a lot

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of James Connor receptions in this game, and he's been

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>absolutely torched by wide receivers the past few weeks. Um

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they're lying the most fantasy points to wide receivers over

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. So I think we get a

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of Antonio Brown. I think we get a lot

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of juju and Vans McDonald's just gonna get his five targets.

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>What he does with those, hopefully a few of them

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>are inside the red zone. He can score a touchdown.

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what would make him a tight end one this week.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So I have n't at tenth and I can't see

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>him moving, moving him ahead of any of Kyle Rudolph,

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle or Eric Ebron, just because it seems like

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>those guys there, those players respective roles in their offense

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is more cemented than vansmingdownd makes sense, makes sense eight

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six eight seven. Now let's

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>do you get a call before the sign off YouTube?

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Frankie and that his friend in l A. It's off

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>freend Hey, greeting guys, how's it going? What's going on?

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Many question my for neet owner and uh I got

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>off from McCaffrey, but in the package steal so he

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>wants for net Edelman for McCaffrey. You I'm gonna run

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.959
<v Speaker 1>down my lineup or is that just keep? What would

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what would your wide receivers be if you trade away

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Edelman feeling Cooper Crowder and then you want to keep Edelman.

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think you have to make this. I think

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to make the deal. Whore your running back

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>now without Leonard Fournette, it would be uh hunt Brita

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and carry on. Yeah, I do it. Do it in PPR.

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey is a borderline top five running back. So

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you can just wash your hands and Leonard four Nette here.

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I know it kind of sucks because I've waited four

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>weeks to get Julian Edelman back, but I think you

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>have to make this trade. All right, Thank you so much.

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>That was meaning that towards that side, So that definitely

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I hit the button right now, do it good? Look

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>man eight four four eight four three eight four four

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>eight four three c S seven. Now we'll sign off

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube right now. The Fantasy Football Frenzy comes your way next,

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.919
<v Speaker 1>but we go top of the hour, no doubt about it.

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to the podcast, make sure you subscribe.

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Give us five stars, leave a comment. I read them

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>all and we appreciate it very very much. Five minutes ago,

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank Thursday, I Football Tonight, Colton Pats ten point favorite

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are the past. It seems too large and maybe that's

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the point. Yeah, ten and a half point favorites. It's

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you hear this from a lot of you know,

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening more so to Gabe Shows. He has

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the professional betters on obviously great great work from him

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and and all of his guests, and they it's something

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that they consistently say is it's hard to lay double

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>digit points in the National Football League. And that's how

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel right like, the Patriots can easily be up

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but you just always have to fear

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>for that that backdoor cover, scoring a field goal late,

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>scoring a touchdown late to make this game one, to

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>make this game one, something like that, just to to

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to to make that backdoor cover happen. With the Indianapolis Colts, uh,

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread has been actually bouncing between ten and a

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>half and ten, so you're you're seeing money come in

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on the on the Colts and then it goes down

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>tan and people are like, Okay, let's get it back

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>up and it's going to the Patriots side. Honestly, I

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want to touch a spread, Greggy if I if

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I had to choose something tonight, I would take the

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>under at four and a half points, which I know.

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>We've seen some big scoring games on Thursday Night football,

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>especially the past couple of weeks. But I could just

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>see this being like a trouncing like you know again,

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's twenty one like that gets you at forty

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 1>nine like right there, or like seventeen like I could

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>see a score like that tonight. So I'm taking the under.

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But to be perfectly honest, I don't like anything about

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>betting tonight's game, like the line, the total, I don't

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like it. I'm gonna take the Pats. I'm gonna take

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Patch to the ten point as the ten point favorite.

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I get it to a lot of points, and again

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's probably too many points. They always crushed the colds Man, Yeah,

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they know t Y Hilton tonight like this sets up

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for a big Pats tonight. I I just worry about

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that backdoor cover. If I had to choose one, I

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>would take the Pats, but I I don't feel I'm

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not very confident in that pick. I'm also not gonna

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>pole under something I don't like going on there alone

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>likes going on there. Sheep the public. You hate the public.

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing for someone who consider himself a man of

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the people, you hate the public, a man of the people,

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and the proms you like. Tonight's by the line, as

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of now, there's no there's no props. There's no there's

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no props on the FANDOL sports book. I'm sure you

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>could find problem atando sports book. Another guy's on a

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gardener friends of all about this morning, Corey all over

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Chester Rogers, Chester Rogers to score touchdown. Let's see what

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that is, because anytime Scorey started talking about it, the

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>odds went down. They said Chester Rogers plus three thirty.

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Tonight lay a little bit on that, a little little

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty piece on Chester Rogers. He's been all over. He

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>likes Chester Rogers more than he likes Ery Hebron and

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:21.839
<v Speaker 1>more than he likes Ryan gre Are two players that

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are favorites to score touch sounds tonight Rogronkowsky really um,

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle Nope, James plus two touchdown James White, James White.

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's very reactionary. James White and Sony Michelle. I

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>could see, Michelle makes sense. James White is very reactionary.

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he gets in the end zone

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with with Julian Edelman back. If Gronks out, maybe yeah,

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:48.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe James White could get in. But what's the Rock

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and Edelman play. I don't know if James White getting

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>let me ask us what's Chris Hogan line? So you're

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>still getting great Chester Rogers value is better than Julie

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>then Chris Hogan and Chris Hogan's asked me that the

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>bench tonight, shout out to Corey Parks and the Fantasy executive.

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather put money on trust and Rodgers scored the

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hogan, it's crazy as it's I agree with you.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Even Ryan Grant. I'd rather put money on Ryan Grant

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.439
<v Speaker 1>at plus two ninety to score rather than I would

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris right know you're talking about later. Are you going

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually bet on Chesse Rogers tonight? Yeah he is, Okay,

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm good put his money. I'd like to put put

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>put your money in your mouth. You put a couple

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of shackles on it, and you can come in and

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>make a rain this weekend. Nobody sent shackles anymore. Nobody

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>spend shackles. Maybe maybe you know whatever, maybe you go

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to Juventus. That's that those't the players to play for

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that team. That's who spends shackles. You see that on

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Carton Friends this morning. No, No, I didn't, but I can.

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting things together in my mind. Kenyan Barnard plus

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred. Score to night, Greggy, I'm out. The vantazy

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>football friendzies up next, No gym day to day. It's

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Corey Barson and Chris Ventstra four Frankie Standville. My name

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is Greg Sels, but thank you so much for watching

0:52:57.200 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and listening to the Fantasy best Friends Forever. We'll do

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it all. I get tomorrow, we hope