WEBVTT - James Chanos Discusses Investment-Driven Models

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Radio this week on the podcast What Can I Say?

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chanos is a legend in the world of shorting

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and hedge funds, UH and institutional investing. And this is

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just a tour to force if if you are at

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all interested in running a two sided book as opposed

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to a long only book, If you want to know

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to be a short seller, how to

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>uncover financial fraud, what it was like to uncover some

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest frauds of the past fifty years, whether

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it was Enron or Tycho or just go down the list. Uh,

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna love this conversation. And rather than have

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>me babel incessantly about how much fun it was, I'm

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say, with no further ado, my conversation with

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chanos. I'm Barry Ritults. You're listening to Masters in

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chanos. He is the founder and managing partner of

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Kinakos Associates, the largest exclusive short selling investment firm in

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States. It was launched in n He is

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a celebrated short seller, who was known perhaps best for

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>his short sale on Enron about a year before the

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>company collapsed to zero. He is a lecturer at and

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a Beckton Fellow at the Yale School of Management, where

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he teaches graduate students about financial fraud. Jim Chanos, Welcome

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. It is I've been looking forward to this

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a while, and I have to begin by pointing out

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know if this is true. You have

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to confirm this. Kinakos is Greek for sync Is this right? Yeah,

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it means literally dog like. But the the Kinkasts were

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a group of philosophers who lived outside of Athens in

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Age um and they basically, uh were searching

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for the ultimate truth. They believed in an independence of

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>thought and self discipline, and Diogenes was their philosophical leader.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's the root of the word cynic in English,

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and and you're obviously referring to the Golden Age of philosophy.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the philosophy that led to both

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>cynicism and short selling. You began your career as a

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>financial analyst at Pain Webber and then Guilford Securities and

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank. These tend to be long only firms or

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>their clients are long only. What what was it like

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>then when there was a heretic in their midst? Well,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>when I got onto Wall Street, the first gentleman hired

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 1>me um in night was completely puzzled as to why

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>anyone would want to work on Street because in it

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was not a lucrative field. It was we were at

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the tail end. We didn't know it of a sixteen

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>year bear market and so uh and in fact, from

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty six eighty two in real terms, that Dow

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>dropped as much as it did in in two, so

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>flat in nominal terms. But it was Yeah, it was

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>basically peaked at a thousand in nineteen sixty six and

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bottomed out of seven seven hundred something in in eighty two.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But as you say, in real terms, it was a

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>disaster and so um so I got a job as

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a as a as an analyst doing deal books. Um

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but I was fascinated with the market and uh and

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>always had had invested whatever speremoney I had in the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>market in college my dad had pushed me to sort

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of learn about it, and the head of the head

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of retail sales was down the hall, so I used

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to spend my lunch hours and after work talking to him,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately he hired me in nine needy two UH

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to come work at a small firm that he was forming,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>UM leaving Blithe Eastman, Pain Webber and and forming Guilford Security.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So I went there as a securities analyst and that

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic. UM. He gave me latitude to do whatever

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to short. My first recommendation was a short sailor,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin United. So so let's we'll talk a little more

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about bold when United um in in a few minutes.

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>What was the reaction in the community, be it analyst

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>community or or typically mostly long only investment community that

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>here's this young whipper snapper and their first report is

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>not just hold or neutral or sell, but sell short. Yeah.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't received very well as you can imagine, uh,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly since the big brokerage firms who were recommending stock

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were also making a fortune selling their annuities, and so

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a double payer. So not only

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>were they placing the stock, they were also placing they

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>were Baldwin was an insurance company. They're selling annuities single

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>premium deferred and neuis. They were all Baldwin Piano by

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the right, which then more that's sort of like iced

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tea companies morphing into blockchain company. Well, their CEO was

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a charismatic guy, and he made his market the company

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>selling pianos door to door. And I've always said, if

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you can sell pianos door to door, you're a pretty

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>good salesman. Yeah. So and uh and Baldwin was was

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the the fastest growing financial services company in the United

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>States in UM and it was you know, for fortunes,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>most admired, blah blah blah blah blah. A lot of

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>things that we would see later twenty years later in

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>the end run story were uh, we're basically uh indicative

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of Baldwin back. So, so what alerted you that not

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>things were not all kosher at Baldwin Piano slash Insurance?

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>As if that alone wasn't enough. So I was. I

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 1>was as a young analyst. I had no insurance analytical experience,

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so I had to sort of start it at ground zero,

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>which I think at the end of the day was

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was helpful for me because I had to learn basically,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>um it was from scratch, and it was while I was.

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I was making phone calls and trying to understand how

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it was that Baldwin could use insurance company money to

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do acquisitions. That was sort of the game that they

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were playing. I got a phone call um one night,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I was working late at the office, and it was

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it was someone who wouldn't give me their name and said,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand you're you're asking questions about Baldwin United and uh.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I said, yeah, who's this? And he said, it's not

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>important who this is, but you should be aware that

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there are insurance files at the State of Arkansas insurance

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Department that are public that you should get and you know,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>click and uh and so in Arkansas. And so the

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>next morning I told my boss that and he of

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>course asked if I had been drinking and said, I said,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, no, I got an anonymous call and we

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>should check it out. We hired a local law firm

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was a treasure trove. It was letters going

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in the state regulators to Baldwin basically

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>saying they were insolvent and that they needed to raise

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>capital immediately and that they would no longer be allowed

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to use insurance company money to make acquisitions. And blah

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. It was the whole story laid out

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in public documents and and so Yeah. Then years later

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I was at an insurance conference and I heard the

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>same voice from behind me, and uh it was It

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was a well known insurance analyst who at the time

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was in Chicago, and um, he could not cover Baldwin.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>His firm would not let him because he looked at

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it and saw it was a house of cards and

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the firm had sold annuities, so they told him to

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>shut up. And uh, I've always kept him anonymous ever since.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But it was that that tip that helped that that

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>set you off. Let's talk a little bit about some

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fascinating fang stocks Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Apple, Google. Uh.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>What doesn't get mentioned in that list is Tesla. And

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>some people have said Tesla may not be worth as

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>much as its current market cap. You have a slightly

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>different view. What's your perspective on Tesla? Well, I think

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock might not be worth anything, um on a

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pure financial analysis basis. It is to us, it's one

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the bellweathers of this market. It is it is

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a hopes and dream stock that investors have pinned. You know, really,

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever their expectations are on a future, a green future globally,

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they have they have put it on this stock and

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on this CEO, who has done a really good job

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in promoting that very vision. The problem, of course, is

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>is that it's an automobile company, and it's it's increasingly

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>having problems making automobiles, and soon it's going to be

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>facing much more competition from people who do know how

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to make automobiles. In fact, every major automobile manufacturer around

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the world, Europe, Japan, the United States has come out

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and said we will have some form of an electric

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>or hybrid vehicle either throughout our line or that's what

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>our entire line will consist of. So the question is

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Tesla an actual paradigm shift, or they a game changer

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world of automotives, or are they a stock

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that simply, you know, came up with an idea that

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody else has adopted, but there's nothing unique to the

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>company other than a very charismatic leader. I think it's

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Berry. I think they were a paradigm

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>shift six or seven years ago when they introduced the Models,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and I have always said the Models was an important

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>car because Musk made E vs electric vehicle sexy. Right

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Prior to that, any type of green vehicle was a

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>compromise the Nile exactly. And I know you're a car guy,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Berry and and so you know that. And and suddenly

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you had this Models which was a car that was

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>aspirational car you wanted to drive up to the country

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>club or two, you know, the restaurant valet, and and

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody wanted one. And the problem is, of course, the

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>model Lesque now is seven years old. And finally, finally

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Europeans and and Detroit and ultimately Japan are coming

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>with their vehicles. We have Audi and Jaguar coming this

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>year with very good looking sexy crossover cars. And then

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>um near and dear to your heart, we have Porsche

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>coming out next year. Miche a handsome car which is

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a gorgeous car and it's coming out next year and

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>and is a sports car designed from the bottom up

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>from I believe their Lamon's team, and uh, you know.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>And so now Tesla is in is in a scrum.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be competing with well financed operations with

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>good R and D whose technology is is probably well

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead of theirs at this point. They can't fund themselves

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>by selling flamethrowers every couple of months. Flamethrowers and hats. Um, yeah,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean and and and but we're laughing. But that's

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of problem them, right, because you have a CEO

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of all over the place. Um. We believe

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>actually his passion is space X. So I think he's

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going to actually hand over the reins as CEO at

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some point in the next few years. Um, and and

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and move full time over to to space X. Plus

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the hyper loop and the boring. Oh yeah, they forgot

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>about the hyper loop. Yeah, that's enough. And supposedly they're

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>really exploring doing something with that boring company is testing

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>boring equipment and and so there's a lot going on there.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And and that's part of I think that's part of

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the allure of the of the company. It's valuation is

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the CEO. The problem again is that he's he's up

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>against serious competitors in his core business. And and then

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>finally on that we track executive departures. We have this

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>list we put out and it is stunning as to

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>how many senior executives have left this company in the

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>last two years. The only two companies that we've seen

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in our history with a similar executive departure pattern, where

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Valiant Pharmaceuticals a couple of years ago and a little

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>company in Houston call En Round. And it is never

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>a good sign when almost all your senior executives are

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>leading at the stock price at at a high. That's

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>telling you there's something wrong. And I and I don't

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. But but almost all the senior

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>executives at Test, let's see something and are leaving stock

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>option packages on the table. What about the idea that

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>some big company, maybe it's a GM, comes along and

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>buys them as a rescue package and jump starts their

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>own um e V program. Well, the problem with that

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is is the GM, for example, the reason you would

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>buy Test ostensibly is because of technology, not because of

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing process. Right. Their manufacturing process is actually pretty poor.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the model three is their new car appears to

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have lots of issues upon production, so you would be

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>buying them for for Elon's vision or their technology. Little

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>brand Halo also a little make your little hipper than

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you General Motors might be just using them as an example.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It might be, but the problem is, of course that

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that GM's cruise software is now better than Tesla's autopilot,

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and their product is out and their manufacturing exactly and

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and so um, and you have to be careful because

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>again most of this mystique of Tesla is based on

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>one car, the models right, which is still a beautiful

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>car seven years old, but it's Yeah, but the Model

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>X was was was just was lukewarm. It was too

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>expensive for what essentially is a mid size van. And

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and and now the Model three is is maybe problematic

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and and so you've got to got an issue here

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where you've got basically a fifty billion dollar market gap,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, is almost the same as GMS,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it exceeds forwards. Uh, you'd be buying

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a company just as big as yourself off to basically

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lose money and and have a little cache. I don't

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>see it makes perfect sense. Um. So the other side

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of them, let me push back a little bit on Tesla.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>They've completely changed the game. They've forced everybody else in

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that somebody, maybe Toyota does a joint venture with them,

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other Chinese or Korean manufacturer comes along and says,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we want a toe hold in the US and elsewhere.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>What what is the company worth in a takeover or

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>do you end up in a take under situation? Well,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a little late, because Toad and Diameler did

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>do joint ventures with Tesla ten years ago and sold

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all their stock. They did, yes, and they did in

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>fact both Interestingly, both of those both those companies sent

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>teams of engineers to help Ellen get the models out.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that that we've already seen this,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and and the problem is is we we just discussed,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the valuation of the company, which is a

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion, fifty billion dollars in equity cap and then

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>by the time West plus debt, you're talking about a

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty plus billion dollar total enterprise value. This would sink

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>almost anybody but the very largest companies who would have

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to finance not only the sixty billion costs but the

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>operating losses. So you you would destroy the earnings of

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>almost any auto O E M by buying Tesla. Fascinating.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about hedge funds and how

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they've changed over the years. The last time you and

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I sat down for a conversation was about three years ago,

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>or a recorded conversation. I should say you mentioned that

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, uh, there were a few hundred

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and and out of those, twenty or thirty

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>were reliable alpha generators. Today there's eleven thousand or so

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. How many? And probably is it that? Is

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it still that smaller percentage of regular You know, it's

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit of advantage UM advantage point

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because not only am I a manager, but I also

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sit on some investment committees, so reasonably large investment committees.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So I get to see the pitches. I get to

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>see the pitches, and I get to see the results

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of people in the industry as as

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as someone who allocates capital. And I have to tell you,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the industry is wanting UM, and it's wanting

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>across the board, and alpha's have dropped, including our own

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>UM over time UM, whether they've been competed away UM. Now,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>another theory I have, of course, being on the short side,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is that lower interest rates, particularly for short sellers, have

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>reduced rebate income. And so when I started, UM, if

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw the stock short before anything happened, we are

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in six or seven percent annually on the cash proceeds

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and we split that with the prime broker, and now

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that number more recently was zero, and that's that was

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a significant source of returns. UM. So I think that

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that um that's one aspect, particularly for fundamental short sellers.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But look, I mean, markets have gotten more and more efficient.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>The more you have smart people pursuing something, the tougher

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be to beat the market. That's just

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a given. I think paradox of skill is what And

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>then and of course the size, right, I mean, you know,

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot easier to to beat the market if

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you're running fifteen million than than a few billion, even

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred million, there's still some some opportunity. But

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these funds are five and ten and twenty

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. That's tough to move. Swing that around. Well.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is that, of course, you stop managing

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio and you start managing a business as well.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm always mystified by my peers who who been

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>very successful and they're now running you know, as you say,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty billion dollars but have two hundred three

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred employees, and I just I mean, that just blows

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>my mind. That's reasonably large business. How big is can

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a coast these days? We're probably we're the same as

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we've been for years and years and years basically about

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty people, um, which is still work to manage. But

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a full time just not it's not it's

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's that's it's a it's a magnitude of difference. So,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>given your perspective as both a fund manager and an

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>asset allocator, when you're reviewing a hedge fund and deciding

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you're gonna give them capital, what are

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you actually looking for? What? What would make you say

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a place I could park some money. So

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some you know, Julian Robertson said it best, Um, and

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to some extents why the Tiger cubs have

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>been so successful is what is your edge? And he always,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he always, when when having a bear and a bull

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>discuss debate a stock at his shop, Um, we ran

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.479
<v Speaker 1>money for him, and he would have us come in

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and talk about one of his shorts are shorts because

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>someone in the shop may have liked it on alongside,

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and he would constantly say, what is your edge? What

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 1>do you know that the market doesn't and and and

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that applies I think the fund managers generally, what is

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in your process that gives you an edge, whether it's

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>trading wise, whether it's research wise, that that basically sets

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you aside, that that you see things differently, and you

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>see you see the reality versus the perception of reality.

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And and so what I found is that numbers can

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>be very misleading because um, very smart people can struggle, um,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and very very uh uh mediocre people can excel for

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>periods of time. Um. It's just not where you want

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to place your bets. And so if if as an allocator,

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if we see someone who we think is not only

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>smart and hard working, but has a define herble and

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sustainable edge, um, that's someone that you might want to consider,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly if they're struggling, um to be allocating capital. Because

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>reversion to the mean is also a pretty powerful process.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So when you say struggling, you mean struggling running the fund,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or struggling in terms of their performance. You know, maybe

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>they're not generating the alpha they're they're they're matching the

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>market and or slightly behind the market. But but yet

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a have a pretty superior long term

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>track record. Same people doing it, same process, um and

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and so sometimes you see sometimes you see an opportunity

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that. What most people do, of course, is

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they just simply look at performance and and it's it's

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that alone will not do it for you, because you're

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>always going to chase that which has been hot. And

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's so hard to to say, well, this guy is

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>not doing well, we should be allocating some capital because

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna come back into favor and and by the way,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they're still doing what they've always done well. Um, very

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>very tough. And then of course you have to you

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have to disaggregate the beta from managers, and that's that's essential. Um.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>You have to take out the market because we can

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>buy the market for ten basis points, right, So paying

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>big fees to people who are who are either matching

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the market with no no edge or or leveraging the

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>market to get out performance is the fools earned. You know.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I read somewhere that past performance is no guarantee of

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>future returns. I think I saw that on some documents somewhere.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about some of those Conseco, Tycho, Commodore, coll

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Eco Integrated. I think I don't think your listeners were

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>alive when most of those who were done there were

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more recent more recent there were more recent ones. So

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so so let me ask a different question. Then, tell

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>us about something that in hindsight you looked at and said,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>why don't we short that? That's right in our strike zone?

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Any anything that you looked at and didn't I think

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest, the biggest, the biggest whiff uh that that

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we had done work on and took a pass on

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was Japan in the late eighties. No, I was sure

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commercial real estate stocks in the US

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighties, the tax law had changed. Everyone

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>had levered up in the commercial real estate to sell

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it to the Japanese um. The tax shelter business was

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was kneecapped by the tough by the a Tax Act

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of eight six And when we looked at what the

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Japanese were doing, we saw them doing all kinds of

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>dumb things. And I began looking at the Japanese banks,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which at the time were the largest in the world,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and some of the Japanese conglomerates which were the largest

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and the numbers didn't make any sense.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But I felt that I had my hands full in

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the US, and what I really missed was a twenty

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>year bear market in in these heavily leveraged Japanese companies,

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and compared to even the dot com NASDAC, the Japanese

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>market was far more expensive, far more overstretched. And then

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>NASDAK even got at the peak and two things right,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>it was and and and of course it got to

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>it got to just insane heights that it's still not

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>scaled um. And and so I think that that that was,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of our greatest our greatest missus um

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally so from Japan. Let's just hop across the China

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Sea and talk about China. You were very negative on

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>China for a long time before they had a little

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a hiccup. Tell us about the China trade

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think of the Chinese economy here

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and that region as a area to invest in. Well,

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's funny that we talked about Japan, because the analog

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that China eight years ago, when we started talking about it,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>most most resembled was actually actually Japan of the late eighties.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>If you think about it, it was a state driven

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>capitalist model that was a better model, some thought than

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the US of the Western model. It was heavily relied

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on debt, it was heavily relied on a domestic real

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>estate bubble. It was very trade oriented, export oriented. Um.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It had a protected currency, it had its own culture.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the similarities between Japan in in oh nine

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>two tho ten and China and nine two thousand ten

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in Japan were actually somewhat significant that, of course everything

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is different and and um. But when we started looking

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at China, the f x I, which is the eighth

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>share you know, et F was trading around forty one dollars.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just forty six now, so it's up about it's

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more than ten percent in eight years.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the markets that we were looking at,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, have doubled and tripled um. So China has

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>been one of the better places to be short for

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the past eight years if you're a short seller. I

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think that what's really interesting about China is how little

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>has changed in the eight years. Shishingping is basically now

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the emperor, but the whole concept of all the stuff

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you've heard in the last eight years, Oh, they're going

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to become a consumer driven economy that hasn't happened. They're

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>going to reduce investment as a percent of GDP. That

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened. Uh, you know, the currency is going to

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>either go up a lot or down a lot. That

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened. Um. What's really interesting about China is that

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much status quo and the model, the the

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>economic model that is China is still the same. It

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>relies heavily on debt, and so debt is still growing. Uh,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not growing as fast as it was eight years ago,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>when it was growing twenty percent a year. It's now

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>growing ten to fifteen percent a year. But it's still

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>growing at twice GDP growth. And they can't get off

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the the stimulus or the steroids, if you will, of

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just constant debt injections to build new airports, roads, high rises.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>It's still what's driving the economy. So what's the end

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>game for China? I wish I knew. Um, it's it's

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to watch because everybody sees it now. When

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we started talking about eight years ago, it's a controversial viewpoint.

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You know now now it's not right. It's hard to

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the debt levels have doubled and tripled since then. That's

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes um segment on the ghost Cities of China.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I as I was watching that, I'm thinking Jim Chanos

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>has to be turning cart wheels over this. What's fascinating

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>about that, of course, is is that the cities that

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they showed have, as the bulls have said, mostly filled up.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>The problem, of course is is there's new empty cities.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And then this is the inherent problem, right and so

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that that any any time you've got

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a model that's credit driven based on a property bubble

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and investment, now that that is not needed.

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I always joked that Hainan, the island of Hainan, their

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tropical island in the South China Sea, when when we

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>started looking at China, it had one international airport. Um

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about three or four years later they completed the second

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>international airport, which is not fully utilized today. And now

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>they've begun work on a third international airport which is

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>just folly on that little island in the little island.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So so this is the problem with an investment driven model.

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>All three of those have contributed to GDP construction. You know,

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars go right into GDP. But of course the economic

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>returns and each one will have dropped. I'm going to

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>mangle this data point. I believe it was you who

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>had either said or written China over the past three

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>years used as much cement as United States used in

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the entire twentieth century. I think it was. It was

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not us, it was it was somebody else at Bill Gates,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, pointed out I don't know who the originator

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the data point was, but I think it was.

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>China in the last ten years has has used uh

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as much concrete as the US did in the last

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus UM. And they is true. Um, it's remarkable

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at what China since it entered the w

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>t O in two thousand one has done. UM. And

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it is done so. It has done so, and it

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is and it is literally transformed a country in less

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>than twenty years. The problem again, of course, that that

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the bears will keep pointing to, is you've pulled a

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of it forward. Anytime you use debt to fuel

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to fuel your growth, you're basically pulling forward consumption and

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's just in the economic identity, and so there

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>will be a reckoning at some point. The deaths do

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be serviced or inflated away and and one

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the two will happen. So let's let's talk about

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a few other UM topics that I really enjoy your

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective on. We talked about hedge funds earlier. I've been

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>reading a decent amount about private equity, and they're being

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>challenged in terms of are they really generating the sort

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of above market returns they claim they're They're doing a

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of um, let's just call it creativity. So

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>when you for those who are unfamiliar, when you make

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>an investment in private equity, you're committing capital, but you're

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not actually giving them capital, so you have more or

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>less after sequester that they calculate their performance based on

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>literally when the money hits, which could be two, three

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>or four years later. That you're sitting with capital tied

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>up that's not yet working theoretically, it's in a short

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>term fixed income fund. What what's your perspective on what's

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>going on with private equity. I assume you allocate on

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the boards you sit UM money instil We do,

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of my best friends and clients are in

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>private equity. So you know, look, I I always tell

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>them I'm jealous of them. You know, they have a

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>great business model, um and and and they're one of

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the two areas in in investment management where nobody's questioning

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.719
<v Speaker 1>fees and or returns or venture capital and private equity.

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And remember bain Ca Capital and Mitt Romney. There was

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reports about have did Bayne exaggerate its returns?

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of what started this whole cascade over

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the PAIL. I think that the issue is a broader one,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>which is if you're investing in venture capital in private equity,

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I would just tell investors understand that in the case

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital, you are investing in high beta, high beta,

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>high risk, high return situations. So a venture capital fund

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>should be measured not against the SMP but against some

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some high beta you know whatever. Yeah, and a small cap,

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>high high beta fund. Private equity is a little bit different, right,

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because all the private equity funds are are different, but

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they do lever, and so at the end of the day,

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a private equity fund should have multiples of return of

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the SMP if you're using leverage. UM, I believe they don't.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And and so that's that examination and hedge funds began

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this You and I both know, people began kind of

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>wondering about hedge funds after oh eight. The golden age

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds was two thousand to O two. That's

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>when the markets went down. And let's let's not forget

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand oh two was worse than oh eight

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for the stock market. The SMP went down, the NASTAC

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>went down where forty it was basically forty for everything,

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and peaked to trot. The SMP was down about fifty seven.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But NASTAC didn't get nearly as she lacked in O

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>eight as it did. Yeah, that was a concentrated and

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like collapse. Yeah, I was. And that's where retail investors were.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And and hedge funds missed that, right. They in fact,

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>some a lot of them made money in that period.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>They were short the garbage and long value and value

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>actually and and and that that performance ushered in the

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>golden era of lows from oh three to oh eight.

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And and then hedge funds didn't. They didn't basically hedge

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they didn't protect you in oh seven oh eight, And

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>from there on end people began to look at them

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>differently and scrutinize them and look at the alpha's and

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of disaggregate the results. And and you know, hedge

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>funds have had a basically rough goal of it ever

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>since of justifying their existence. Private equity has not had that. So,

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to be fair to hedge funds, I think the pizza

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>troth returns according to some of some of the pizza

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>troth returns for some of the UM indices or something

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like down twenty in a year when the markets were

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>down thirty, which is good on a relative basis, but

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sure as hell is an absolute retire well, and then

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they underperformed on their way back up. That's the problem.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the giant up six percent and when the

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>markets and so you know, stay for the you know,

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, come for the come for the ips and losses,

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and then stay for the under performance on the snappack.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get a nickel every time somebody says that,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating. But but but you get my point.

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think private equity, which has seen these short,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sharp recessions, you know, and and and then and easing

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way of monetary policy over their life, private

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>equity really see nothing but lower rates over over its

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>golden era. Here, Um, what happens if if asset prices

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere and rates go higher for the next generation.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to guess they're in trouble. I would guess that, well,

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess that they may not be in trouble. Will

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>be the hope for returns that the pension funds and

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>endowments and sovereign wealth funds who just constantly just assume

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>private equity is going to earn them ten to twelve

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>percent um somewhat uncorrelated sort of boggles my mind. It's

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate correlated asset theoretically. Can you stick around a

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit, I have a bunch more questions for you.

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I can stick around as long as you'd like. We

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking to kinda Coast associates Jim Chainos. If

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this conversation, sure and check out our podcast

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Extra is where we keep the tape rolling and continued

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to discuss all things short selling. We love your comments,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. You can check out my daily

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>column on Bloomberg View dot com. Follow me on Twitter

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at rid Holts. I'm Barry Riholts. You're listening to my

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast, Jim,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for doing this. I've been looking

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.479
<v Speaker 1>forward to this for a while. I have so many

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>questions we didn't get to, and I have only a

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>finite amount of time, and I want to get to

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>my favorite questions. I asked all of my guests. UM,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but let me just go through one or two questions

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that I have to ask. So you're a fundamental guy.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>You you do not engage in technical shorting. You're not

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at trend breaks or support failures or any of

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that sort of chart chart reading. I've never been able

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to to to make any money by looking at charts,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't think it's I don't think it's

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a strength. I don't think I have any edge. No

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>edge it comes back, so I I you know, and

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>what about the quantitative side? Um. I know you've talked

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of data, but do you guys use

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>data At Can of Coast, we we let everybody you

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>know are looking at factor based uh investing and what

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>factors are driving our stocks when we or another UM.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>The problem of course with with using using factor based

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>data on price performance and not on research. We'll get

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to that in a second is that, of course, by

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the time you analyze the factors, they become self defeating.

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And we had a quantitative um hedged version of our

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>short fund back in the mid nineties, and we really

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>license even back then that all the factors we were

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>extracting from the portfolio, they didn't last that long. And

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet you now, I don't know for a fact,

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think that that these factor based observations canceled

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>canceled themselves out even faster. And if we look at

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the returns for some of the algorithmic funds in the

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>last few years, I think that bears it out. So

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned earlier and ron Um you have had a

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>very good relationship with reporters and media. Have to mention

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Bethany McClain, who whose work I've always loved and who

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was right there in the middle of enron How has

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the media worked with you over the years. How have

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>have people reached out to you, whether it's an analyst

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>um sort of calling late at night. What is your

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the press? Well, I mean I think that

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that reporters generally like talking to short sellers because they're

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get they're going to get the opposing point

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of view, typic be on a situation. Um, well, look,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>there's there's thousands of people gainfully employed, making a lot

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of money who are there to promote promote stories, right,

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>whether whether it's pr firms, whether it's analysts, whether it's

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>bankers who are always going to tell you why why

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>something is fantastic. Um, there's only a handful of people

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>who are economically motivated to say, you know, wait a minute, hey,

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know this class might be half empty,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not half full. And so you know, most journalists I

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>know that, um that we talked to, have been talking

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to short sellers for years and and just understand they're

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get the other side of the story. It

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>might not be right, by the way, but at least

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they will hear a reasoned opinion as to why maybe

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock is overpriced not underpriced. And and a couple

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of quotes of yours. I would be remiss if I

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>did not mention quote in investing, you can be really

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>right or and but temporarily quite wrong. What does that

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>experience can't be fun? It's it's it's not only not fun,

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it's constant. I mean, we'll keep in mind, I mean

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We started our fund when the DOT was are original

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>short only fund. So um this has been basically thirty

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>years of not only up equity markets, but lower interest rates.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think people kind of appreciate just what

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>an amazing tailwind most investors have had for the past

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty years. It is. It is unlike almost

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>anything we've seen in American financial history. And so this

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is people have gotten very very used to this. If

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you're a short seller, you've gotten very very used to

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>basically coming in every day and struggling. I mean just

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>that that that before anything happens, more likely than not

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the stocks you're short are going to be up, and

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so you had better be right. You had better be

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>right in your fundamentals, and you can often be early.

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And often the things that the short sellers see that

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that become really important nobody cares about until the company

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges itself that it's a problem. So take a look

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at Valley and Pharmaceuticals, one of our celebrated shorts from

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. We started shorting that at a

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty dollars before it doubled to two sixty,

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and then it went down a lot, and it went

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>down fast. But but the things we saw back in

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't come to the fort and and and late and

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and then the company finally had to realize admit

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that it had had some real issues. Um, that's that

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>could be pretty maddening and painful. I remember the Enron peaking.

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing this from memory, so six or somewhere in

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that range on it might have been the Bethanie McClain article.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>It took a year for the stock to collapse. It

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it fell so slowly. It's it looks like a binary outcome. Hey,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>either this company is a fraud or it's not. That

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it goes from eighty six to seventy five

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>to sixty. It should be zero or eighty six, not

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>anything in between. It was a full year to collapse.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I hate to burst your bulpa. Barry and Round was

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the easiest shorts we ever had. Really, Yeah,

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we started shorting it in in the sixties. It did run

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to eighty in January of oh one, on the Blockbuster

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>announcement that that the Blockbuster they were getting into business

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with Blockbuster video to stream video. No, it was a

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wonderful announcement. The problem was they booked profits instantly on

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the announcement. I mean they kind of got the technology right.

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's now of course Netflix, but well there, but there

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't streaming Netflix for another dozen years, so it looked

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like a like a fun announcement. Um

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>there was no real technology that it didn't exist yet,

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and and so it was still on the drawing boards,

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and then Bethany's story came out in February

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>about one um at the stock basedly kind of went

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty to zero in the next nine months. But but

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it but it there were some of course, gut wrenching

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>rallies along the way. Along the way. Alright, so let's

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>jump into some of our favorite questions that we ask

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>all of our guests. Tell us the most important thing

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>people don't know about your background? Um, well I was.

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I was pre med in college for about three days. Um,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and so that got me, got me moving towards the

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>world of finance. Who were some of your early mentors?

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So I was lucky when I when I when I

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>got into the business. The fellow that that hired me

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>away from Blathe Eastman pain Weber, guy named Bob Holmes,

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>was was not only a mentor, but he stood behind me.

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It kind of the darkest days of bald when the

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>stock had doubled, the New York partner was it was

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was screaming from my head on a plate. I was

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>all of h I was all of twenty five years old,

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and um, and he stood behind me. Had seen the work,

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>he'd seen the documents. Um, he said, you know, kid,

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right, You're right, go ahead and publish again. We

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>put a second report out after after it doubled, and

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and just reaffirming everything we had, laying out all the

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>documents we had, all the case we had, and and

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he was a guy who kind of taught me about

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 1>courage and and you know, courage your convictions. But he

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was my boss as well, So it was an important

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of lesson. When I moved to New York in

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>three I had I had a number of wonderful, wonderful

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>mentors who sort of introduced this Midwestern kid to New

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>York City and Low Street itself. You know, people like

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>like Stephen Peck um Wiss Peck and Career who was

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>passed on a few years ago, and and just kind

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>of took me under his wing, and you know, a

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 1>right kid, were going to Rio's on Tuesday night and

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do set to everybody in town. And

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and um, he was. He was tremendously tremendously important man

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in in my growth on Wall Street, you know. And

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>then they were sort of my contemporaries. An old friend, uh,

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Jim Grant who was on the journalistic side, who who

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of course his ancient. He's much much older than I am,

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like thirty or forty year or something like that. Right,

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.439
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna he's gonna kill me. He's about he's about

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>he's about ten years older than uh. But but he

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>started his his his firm in eighty four. I started

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>mining eighty five. So we both were kind of struggling,

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, entrepreneurs trying to get our businesses off the

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ground in the mid eighties. Both of us as sort

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of skeptics. You know. He had a pen in his

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>hand and I had had clients money. And um, I

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>think we commiserated a lot and learned a lot from

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>each other way back way back then. So I think

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>bow ties age people. Um, a lot of folks don't know.

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene is twenty nine. That's uh, that's what a

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bow tie will do to you, UM, tell us about

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the investors who influenced your approach to investing too short. Yeah,

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so probably the the investors to stand out. Again, both

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>both people I met early in my career. UM one

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of course was the legendary Julian Robertson Who's Who's Who's

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of course still around, still investing, and his approach was

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>something that sort of really galvanized me. You know when

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I when I ran money for him and and he

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>called me up and he say, Jim, see we're short

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>x y Z corps. You know some guys in my

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>shop like that. Why don't you come over for lunch

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about it. And so it was always like

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>going into the lions Den, right, because that Julian would

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be a one end of the table, and and there'd

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be a bunch of of his investors, his his analysts,

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>many of whom are now legendary investors in their own right,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting around the table, and we'd argue back and forth

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>over whatever whatever stock it was, and and you know,

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>what about this? What about this? And you had better

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>know your story because they they they knew their story.

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Often they agreed with me, by the way, but sometimes

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. But but you had to hone your craft

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty well to understand again, what is your edge? What

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't investors know? And then another one who is no

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>longer with us, who was also a bit of a

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>mentor about New York as well, was was the legendary

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>short seller Bob Wilson. Bob and I would have lunch

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>from time to time every few months, and then he

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 1>had these wonderful dinners with Dick gilder Um, you know,

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of every few months as well, and I was

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>privileged to attend those. But Bob, Bob also had one

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest quotes of all time that I never

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>forget um about about investing. And I was grumbling about

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who I worked with at Deutsche Bank at the time,

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and this guy was one of the world's worst investors.

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Everything he touched went down, and he was a long investor.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And I was always grumbling because the guy was always

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just making a complete fool of himself at research meetings

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and internal meetings. And Bob looked up at me over

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>over his his cup of coffee or tea and just smiled.

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He has great, little sort of devilish smile, he said.

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Jim just Remember, someone who is always wrong is just

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as valuable as someone who's always right. Just take the

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>other side of the trade. That's fantastic. Let's talk. Let's

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>talk a little about books. This is everybody's favorite question.

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of your favorite books. What fiction, nonfiction?

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Market related not so, I read a lot. I read

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of history. Um. It's it's my thing. Um,

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not just financial history, but but broad history. So there's

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>always there's a handful of books. UM. I always recommend

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to people if they haven't read them. Um. One of

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorites, and one of my favorite historians is William Manchester.

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And everybody remembers his his MacArthur biography and his his Churchill,

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>his unfinished Churchill uh trilogy. I think his daughter may

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have finished it for him. But the book that that

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is utterly one of those game changer books. If you

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>read history is a world lit only by five here,

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the story of the late Late Middle Ages

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and the early Renaissance and Reformation, um, and written through

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this prism of great people like Magellan and Martin Luther

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Borgia popes and and and Guttenberg and and

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>basically it just sort of sets the stage for modernity

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and and he and he tells the tale in a

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>way as only he can. And it's just wonderful history.

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But I recommended highly up to the world only by

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>fire right. And then in business books, Um, I've always

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been in my class, always loves um my fraud history

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of fraud class. We love The Match King by Frank Partner,

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which was the voted best business book I think in

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>oh nine. Um. And it's just the wonderful story of

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest fraud stir of the nineteen twenties, Ivar Krueger

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Um who built this enormous empire on the back of

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 1>raising money for European countries on the back of a

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:01.479
<v Speaker 1>match monopoly, and and how he became greater than JP

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Morgan by and basically dragged down most of the European

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>banking system with his collapse in two Huh, that's fascinating.

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I love partners work he did. Uh, infectious screens he did.

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And then he did wait, which is a fascinating psychological study. Uh.

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about a time you failed and what you

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>learned from the experience. Well, I mean we we we've

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>failed in all kinds of things. Um. And and whether

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it's whether it's single stock ideas. I mean, like anybody else,

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we're wrong. We're wrong a lot of times in the

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>short side. You have to be, of course mindful of this.

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So whether it's Valiant doubling on you or or America

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Online which which went up eight fold on us from

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ten to eighty. And then of course we got out

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh and then Time Warner bought them, and uh

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we never got back in UM, which was a really

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>good lesson because it was lesson not only in humility

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and timing, but it was a lesson on risk. Man

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>In that case, it didn't carry us out because we

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kept the position very very small over the course of

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to three years. UM. So you know, I learned a lot. Uh,

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot, a lot of painful lessons in

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the nineties as uh as as the fantastic years we

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>had in our first five six years, as as hedgehope

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>managers became a struggle and it just the early nineties

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to mid nineties were just a terrible time on the

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>short side, and and and just you know, whether it

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:33.319
<v Speaker 1>was paying people out of my own pocket or or

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 1>or having to know to really go and search hard

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for investors you know, it was it was. It was

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a time. Uh. We got through it, and I got

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>through it with great partners and great employees. But you know,

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a little adversity sometimes is a good life lesson. That's

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>how you hard and steal. UM tell us what you

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>do for fun? What do you do to relax when

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you're out of the office. So I travel a fair amount. UM.

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy that. UM, I read fair amount. And I

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do teach. I mean the teaching has been over the

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.799
<v Speaker 1>last eight years. I teach up at Yale at s O.

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>M and also every other year at the University Wisconsin,

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>which is my family alma mater on Wisconsin. And UH

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and UH it's been a lot of fun. It's been enjoyable.

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy interacting with the students. UM. It's a fun course.

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>We teach starting in the sixteen nineties all the way

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>up to today. UM. And we teach teach about some

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the great episodes of of financial market fraud, from

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the Mississippi Scheme and South Sea Bubble all the way

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to UH to Donald Trump's hotel and resorts and uh

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and some of the more recent things. UM and and

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and and do so in a thematic and systematic way. So,

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of of students in in college, a grad student,

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if one of them, or a millennial came up to

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you and said, I'm looking um for some career guards

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm considering a job and finance, what what sort

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of advice would you give them. One of the things

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I tell my students and and and young people who

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>come up to me to ask for that kind of

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>advice is I sort of asked them, you know, are

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you this is something you you feel you want to

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>do as a career in a big institution, do you

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>want to do you feel you want to go out

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and do something on your own? Entrepreneurial and if it's

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the latter, I try to impress upon them that, unlike

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what they might consider conventional wisdom, I tell them that

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the time to take risks is when their youngest. Yes,

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you need certain skills, of course, but it's very very

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hard once you're in your forties and fifties and you've

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:47.320
<v Speaker 1>got the obligations of life, financial, family, you know, education,

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>call it too then up and say I'm gonna go

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>do this on my own and and and by the way,

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you do and it doesn't work out, you've kind

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>of that's it, right And and and on the other hand,

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're twenty five, twenty six and you have a

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>great idea and you have a backer, go for it.

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>If you fail, nobody's going to hold it against you.

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:12.919
<v Speaker 1>You you know you you you you were. In fact,

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they might even admire you for it. And and so

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I always tell people if they're going to go do

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>something with with with a small group of people, or

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do it when you're youngest, not when you're not when

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:26.879
<v Speaker 1>you're twenty years or thirty years into it, because you're

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to do it as easily then.

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And if if it fails, and by the way most

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>things do, um, you just dust yourself off and pick

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:38.839
<v Speaker 1>yourself help and dust yourself off, and you know, go

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 1>do something else. It's not the end of the world

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for you. Very interesting, very interesting advice. Our final question,

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you know about short selling today

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that you wish you knew thirty years ago when you

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>first launched Kinnicus not to do it? Is that true? No?

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But I say again, my sense of timing isn't exactly fantastic, right. Um,

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So you launched the launched a short fund just as

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year bullmarket was Yeah, pretty much exactly. So again,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>timing is not there for a day. Uh. Look, it's

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of lessons I've learned along the way, UM on

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:21.919
<v Speaker 1>managing risk both in a portfolio career um and and

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>uh sadly, however, in our business you sort of have

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>to learn them yourselves. It's it's hard to impart them.

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>You can, you can speak all you want, but the

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>market is is is a cruel mistress, and uh, she

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>tends to uh, she tends to impart her lessons on

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone singularly and individually. We have been speaking with Cana

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Coast Associates Jim Chainos. If you enjoy this conversation, be

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sure and look up an inch or down an inch.

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You can see any of our other two hundred or

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 1>so conversations on Apple iTunes, Bloomberg Overcast, wherever your final

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts are sold. Check out my daily column on Bloomberg

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>View dot com. You can follow me on Twitter at Ridholts.

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank our

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:10.720
<v Speaker 1>crack staff who helps put together, uh these conversations. Medina

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Parwana is our producer slash audio engineer. Taylor Riggs is

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>our booker. Mike bat Nick is our head of research.

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Risholts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.