1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,160 Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you 2 00:00:02,200 --> 00:00:05,120 Speaker 1: by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from 3 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:10,360 Speaker 1: Frozen subscription box for our teasonal breads, seasonal pastries, and 4 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: fresh pastas, plus all items conveniently bake in twenty five 5 00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:18,000 Speaker 1: minutes or less. Unlike many store bought options, Wild Grain 6 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:21,880 Speaker 1: uses simple ingredients you can pronounce and a slow fermentation 7 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: process that can be easier on your belly and richer 8 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 1: in nutrients and antioxidants. Wildgrain's boxes are fully customizable. They're 9 00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:33,160 Speaker 1: constantly adding seasonal and limited tiding products for you to enjoy. 10 00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 1: In addition to their classic box, they now feature a 11 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 1: gluten free box and a plant based box. I checked 12 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: out the gluten free box, and let me tell you, 13 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:44,360 Speaker 1: they have a gluten free sour dough bread. 14 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:45,360 Speaker 2: It is. 15 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:47,639 Speaker 1: We got two loads of it and we've done one 16 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:51,400 Speaker 1: loaf already. It's a cranberry and almond sour dough bread. 17 00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 1: It's like the best raisin bread you've ever had, except 18 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 1: it's not raisin. It's great. You're gonna love this. You 19 00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: know it's in or miss if you mess around in 20 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: the gluten free bread world. This is a hit. Seriously, 21 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:06,640 Speaker 1: I was impressed, so look for a limited time, Wildgrain 22 00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 1: is offering our listeners thirty dollars off your first box 23 00:01:09,480 --> 00:01:12,000 Speaker 1: plus free croissants in every box when you go to 24 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:16,559 Speaker 1: wildgrain dot com slash podcast. To start your subscription, follow 25 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,720 Speaker 1: these instructions. Free crossants in every box, thirty dollars off 26 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:22,000 Speaker 1: your first box when you go to wildgrain dot com 27 00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:26,360 Speaker 1: slash podcast. That's wildgrain dot com slash podcast. Or simply 28 00:01:26,440 --> 00:01:30,679 Speaker 1: use the promo code toodcast at checkout. Always use the 29 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 1: code get the discount. I'm telling you it's excellent, excellent bread. 30 00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 2: Well. 31 00:01:38,319 --> 00:01:41,480 Speaker 1: Joining me now is someone who I've known forever, which 32 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:45,240 Speaker 1: means all of the twenty first century. I first got 33 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:50,360 Speaker 1: to know him when he was an blogger, and I 34 00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:52,600 Speaker 1: believe correct me if I'm wrong. What did we call those? 35 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 1: What was the DC version of that thing that predated 36 00:01:55,720 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 1: TV newser fishfol DC, fishfowl D see you? Is it 37 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 1: fair to say that that's how you feel like you 38 00:02:04,680 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 1: cut your teeth in the Washington ecosphere with Fishbowl DC. 39 00:02:09,480 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 2: That is exactly where I got myself started in journalism 40 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:17,239 Speaker 2: in Washington. As you remember, this was two thousand and five, 41 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:21,640 Speaker 2: Brian Stelter was writing TV newser out of at a 42 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:26,720 Speaker 2: Towson student at Towson University, also for Media Bistro, and 43 00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 2: I was writing Fishbowl d C covering Washington politics, all 44 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,799 Speaker 2: under the pseudonym. 45 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:38,040 Speaker 1: Right, was it in a pseudonym for a while? Were 46 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 1: you a pseudonym? You didn't release? 47 00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:43,239 Speaker 2: No, no, no, no, you might you might be thinking of 48 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,800 Speaker 2: want at at the time, the pseudonym. 49 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 1: Right, she did the pseudonym for a while. Right, Well, 50 00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,359 Speaker 1: look you have taken that, and in some ways you've 51 00:02:53,360 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 1: always been an entrepreneurial journalist, meaning that you're very comfort 52 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:04,080 Speaker 1: trouble going off on your own. You've dabbled in establishment journalists, 53 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 1: and you ran the Washingtonian for a bit. You certainly 54 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:12,000 Speaker 1: contribute to plenty. But uh, look it's in you know 55 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:15,919 Speaker 1: now you're I think one of our better historian writers 56 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:19,919 Speaker 1: of of I guess recent history is probably how you 57 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,240 Speaker 1: would describe it, right, You specialize sort of in looking 58 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 1: back at recent history. I think you've carved a carved 59 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 1: a great franchise there, because, as we now know, with 60 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,720 Speaker 1: with so much information being thrown at us all the time, 61 00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:37,880 Speaker 1: we forget look at it, look at look at the 62 00:03:37,960 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 1: killing Netflix is making, just doing nineties bs history, right, 63 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:46,640 Speaker 1: pop culture history like missing kids and balloons and planes 64 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 1: and stuff to do actual interesting political and government stories. Uh, 65 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 1: is going to be pretty uh, a pretty interesting way 66 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: to go what uh what made you stumble into that franchise? 67 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:06,400 Speaker 2: So I've always been on the magazine writing side of journalism, 68 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:11,720 Speaker 2: as you know, was at Washingtonian, as you mentioned, an 69 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,840 Speaker 2: editor of political magazine, and then after I left there, 70 00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 2: spent the better part of a decade as a contributor 71 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:26,080 Speaker 2: it Wired. And I've always been fascinated at returning to 72 00:04:26,320 --> 00:04:32,599 Speaker 2: stories a couple of years after the sort of daily 73 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:37,160 Speaker 2: media has moved on to try to understand what actually 74 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 2: takes place, because you know, you know this as a 75 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:45,400 Speaker 2: student of history, so much of what we think about 76 00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:49,240 Speaker 2: an event as it flows by us in the on 77 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:53,120 Speaker 2: rushing tide of daily news turns out to either be 78 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 2: sort of slightly mistaken or not the full picture, or 79 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:04,800 Speaker 2: sort of otherwise not fully understood. And so I've spent 80 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:10,760 Speaker 2: a lot of my career as a writer, as an author, historian, 81 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:16,440 Speaker 2: and now as the host of this podcast series Long Shadow, 82 00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:21,200 Speaker 2: returning to events you know, five, ten, fifteen, twenty five 83 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 2: years later to try to put them in better context 84 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 2: and help use that history to tell the story of today. 85 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:35,480 Speaker 2: That I think sort of all of the work that 86 00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 2: I do is really aimed at trying to make sure 87 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 2: that we understand why the world is the way that 88 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:50,279 Speaker 2: it is today, because I think so much of so 89 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,719 Speaker 2: much of sort of what Russia's passed us in the 90 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:57,839 Speaker 2: news today feels unconnected. And you know, journalists love to 91 00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 2: throw around this is unprecedented, but it's unprecedented too much. 92 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 2: But the truth is like, nothing is really unprecedented, and 93 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 2: that what's really fun to me in understanding history and 94 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 2: studying history is going back and looking at how the 95 00:06:17,440 --> 00:06:22,800 Speaker 2: way that the world is today is the often very 96 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:28,440 Speaker 2: deliberate choice of a small group of people during identifiable moments. 97 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:32,560 Speaker 1: I'm obsessed with butterfly effects, so I do a series 98 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:35,000 Speaker 1: every year where I just simply call it what if. 99 00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:41,960 Speaker 1: Where it takes you take one specific thing that didn't happen, 100 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: and what if this had happened, how everything else would 101 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: have changed? And you know, it's as as small as 102 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:51,600 Speaker 1: what if Hillary Clinton had run for president in two 103 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:54,159 Speaker 1: thousand and four. I think it's the only time she 104 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:56,120 Speaker 1: would have won. It's the only time or last name 105 00:06:56,120 --> 00:06:57,680 Speaker 1: would have been an asset. It's the only time like 106 00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:00,919 Speaker 1: so it's sort of a way, you know. So that's 107 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 1: sort of my way of trying to tackle recent history. 108 00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 1: What if Bill Clint had resigned in nineteen ninety eight 109 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 1: when his own party kind of wanted him to, we're 110 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 1: kind of opening, he'd read the room, he chose not to. Well, 111 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 1: you know what that would have meant. Al Gore would 112 00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:18,160 Speaker 1: have been president during nine to eleven yep. And do 113 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,080 Speaker 1: you know how much different politics would be because of that, 114 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,120 Speaker 1: Because then you would have had twelve years of democratic, 115 00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:26,720 Speaker 1: straight democratic running of the government. There would have been 116 00:07:26,760 --> 00:07:30,320 Speaker 1: a more partisan reaction to nine to eleven, and who 117 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:33,320 Speaker 1: knows how everything we have today might have been accelerated forward. 118 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 1: But the point is is that it is always it 119 00:07:36,840 --> 00:07:40,000 Speaker 1: strikes me, you know, this is why I love your work, 120 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:42,360 Speaker 1: and that this is how you think you're like looking 121 00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: for these pivotable pivotabal listen to me, pivotal moments that 122 00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 1: were the fork in the road yep, you know, and I. 123 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:54,320 Speaker 2: Think it often takes a long time to put that 124 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:55,240 Speaker 2: framework together. 125 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:58,520 Speaker 1: Well, that's what's going to be my next question. It's 126 00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 1: like a piece of fruit, you know, you cut a 127 00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,200 Speaker 1: peach too soon, and it sucks. You cut a peach 128 00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:07,640 Speaker 1: too late, and it sucks. Right, I'm obsessed with peaches, 129 00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:09,600 Speaker 1: and it bugs the crap out of me that it's 130 00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:12,440 Speaker 1: so hard for me to figure out the perfect time 131 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 1: to eat a peach. 132 00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:13,760 Speaker 2: Right. 133 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 1: That is way when peeling back this, how do you 134 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:23,920 Speaker 1: know when an event in history is ready for your 135 00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 1: deep dive where the eyewitnesses are ready to talk but 136 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:34,320 Speaker 1: not performatively and stuff like that, Like is there a 137 00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 1: specific thing you look for to know? I think that 138 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:41,680 Speaker 1: that's a right piece of fruit, historical fruit. I can 139 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 1: it's time to eat it. 140 00:08:43,880 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 2: So there are a couple of different answers to that, 141 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:53,840 Speaker 2: because I sort of think about this in different epochs 142 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:58,559 Speaker 2: of sort of returning to a story. You know. Probably 143 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:04,360 Speaker 2: the most famous piece I ever did, as you know, 144 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 2: was in twenty sixteen, for the fifteenth anniversary of nine 145 00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:10,360 Speaker 2: to eleven, I went back and did an oral history 146 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:15,120 Speaker 2: of being a board Air Force one with President Bush. 147 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:20,760 Speaker 2: Ten years later, or not ten years later, for the 148 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:24,320 Speaker 2: tenth anniversary of the killing of Bin Laden, I went 149 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 2: back and did a similar oral history of the killing 150 00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 2: of Bin Laden and sort of what it was like 151 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:35,079 Speaker 2: to be part of the Obama White House at that time, 152 00:09:36,800 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 2: and that ten to fifteen year window I think often 153 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:47,839 Speaker 2: ends up being really fruitful because you'll find that the 154 00:09:47,880 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 2: major players are out of the. 155 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:53,240 Speaker 1: Job at that point but still alive. 156 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:56,199 Speaker 2: But still alive, and their memories are still pretty good 157 00:09:56,440 --> 00:10:00,680 Speaker 2: that they you know that they'll be able to sort 158 00:10:00,679 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 2: of talk more freely in off. Usually at the sort 159 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 2: of ten or fifteen year mark, they have sort of 160 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:14,200 Speaker 2: achieved in their career something meaningfully different, so that they 161 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:19,800 Speaker 2: are more comfortable talking about a moment in the past 162 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:22,800 Speaker 2: when they you know, their legacy might sort of still 163 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:26,680 Speaker 2: be in shape. But it can also take a lot longer. 164 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:32,320 Speaker 2: I wrote a book about Watergate actually that came out 165 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:33,560 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two. 166 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 1: I thought that was a brave decision you made to 167 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 1: do that one. Well, thank you, because you know, especially 168 00:10:40,160 --> 00:10:42,720 Speaker 1: with Woodward still alive, right, are any of us allowed 169 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:44,920 Speaker 1: to write about Watergate while Bob's still alive? 170 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 2: Right? 171 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,839 Speaker 1: So this was you know, that's why I found you brave. 172 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 2: Right the fiftieth anniversary of the burglary in nineteen seventy two, 173 00:10:55,160 --> 00:11:01,599 Speaker 2: and yet it had taken most of those fifty years 174 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 2: to answer two of the central questions of Watergate, who 175 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:12,200 Speaker 2: is deep throat? And sort of why did Nixon launch 176 00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:18,160 Speaker 2: the Watergate cover up? And so when I I. 177 00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:21,160 Speaker 1: Think there's a third question that we've never pursued well enough, 178 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:23,320 Speaker 1: by the way, not to go down a rabbit hole, 179 00:11:23,440 --> 00:11:29,760 Speaker 1: all right, what actionable intelligence did they learn from the 180 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:30,440 Speaker 1: phone tapping? 181 00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:38,400 Speaker 2: We have the phone tapping of the DNC. 182 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: Now I've talked to sources who have given I've gone 183 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 1: down this rabbit hole, and I've talked to people that 184 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,720 Speaker 1: were you know, that were convinced that John Connolly sold 185 00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:54,240 Speaker 1: them out for a variety of reasons. And but that 186 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 1: part of Watergate doesn't get told very well. Right, it's 187 00:11:57,000 --> 00:12:01,439 Speaker 1: always through the prism of Nixon. But the manipulation of 188 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 1: the nomination was real, you know, the the what Nixon 189 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 1: did with the Texas delegation to make sure McGovern was 190 00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:12,440 Speaker 1: going to get was gonna was to make sure nobody 191 00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 1: could have basically so that McGovern could win it at 192 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 1: the convention. I think was the intelligence they got over 193 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,160 Speaker 1: the over the over what they learned from the DNC. 194 00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 2: But you know, when I sat down in to write 195 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:28,720 Speaker 2: that book to come out in twenty twenty two, no 196 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:33,120 Speaker 2: one had ever been able to tell the story of Watergate, 197 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:37,040 Speaker 2: knowing the identity of deep Throat as we now know 198 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 2: FBI Deputy Director Mark Felt, and no one had ever 199 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:47,079 Speaker 2: been able to write it knowing the sort of original sin. 200 00:12:47,080 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 1: That kicked off the Nixon Well, Woodward and Bernstein and 201 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 1: Theory knew, No, they they. 202 00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:57,480 Speaker 2: Definitely didn't the documents. So the original sin of Watergate, 203 00:12:58,120 --> 00:13:02,200 Speaker 2: the reason that Nixon doesn't sort of launches the cover 204 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:05,280 Speaker 2: up and doesn't hang the burglars out to dry, is 205 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 2: the way that it traces all the way back through 206 00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:15,240 Speaker 2: the Pentagon papers and to the Nalta Fair in nineteen 207 00:13:15,280 --> 00:13:15,800 Speaker 2: sixty eight. 208 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: Well, that this was a whole but he's been doing 209 00:13:17,920 --> 00:13:20,320 Speaker 1: this in multiple ways, and this was part of a 210 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:25,439 Speaker 1: larger operation where the Democratic nomination fight was just the 211 00:13:25,559 --> 00:13:27,400 Speaker 1: latest operation that he was running. 212 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:32,959 Speaker 2: Yes, but what no one understood until the documents were 213 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:38,079 Speaker 2: declassified from the Lyndon Johnson Presidential Library in twenty eleven 214 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 2: was the extent of Nixon's treachery in the sixty eight 215 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:49,000 Speaker 2: campaign and how he had been exposed by Johnson, confronted 216 00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:52,440 Speaker 2: by Johnson, and that this sart is over the South 217 00:13:52,480 --> 00:13:57,320 Speaker 2: Vietnamese right the South Vietnamese treachery where Nixon is interfering 218 00:13:57,360 --> 00:14:01,800 Speaker 2: in the Paris peace talks, and that this becomes sort 219 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:06,439 Speaker 2: of the Edgar Allen Poe telltale heart beating away at 220 00:14:06,480 --> 00:14:09,839 Speaker 2: the center of the Nixon presidency that he is then 221 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:15,560 Speaker 2: desperate to cover up in when the Pentagon papers start 222 00:14:15,600 --> 00:14:18,800 Speaker 2: to come out in seventy one, which brings him to 223 00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 2: hire the plumbers in the first place to sort of 224 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 2: set and sets g Gordon Liddy sort of at loose 225 00:14:28,680 --> 00:14:32,200 Speaker 2: inside the Nixon white House. But you know, until you 226 00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 2: understand sort of those two central parts of the narrative 227 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 2: of Watergate, you know, identity of deep throat and the 228 00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:42,920 Speaker 2: sort of original sin of the Nixon administration, you know, 229 00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:46,920 Speaker 2: we've never really understood Watergate, and it took us forty 230 00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 2: forty five years to actually begin to piece together the 231 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:53,000 Speaker 2: totality of what that story actually was. 232 00:14:54,240 --> 00:14:58,560 Speaker 1: You know, the one of the unintended consequences of Watergate 233 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:04,080 Speaker 1: was was the destruction of the White House taping system. 234 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:07,800 Speaker 1: I don't know if you watch, if you've seen the 235 00:15:07,840 --> 00:15:10,120 Speaker 1: Apple television show for All Mankind. 236 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 2: I'm aware of it. 237 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, So they it's an alternative history, and they do 238 00:15:17,840 --> 00:15:21,000 Speaker 1: have this sort of American politics in real life. Back 239 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 1: they don't, it's not part of the show. It's sort 240 00:15:23,360 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 1: of in the backdrop. They do a fun little like 241 00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 1: little vignettes to sort of And in this scenario, because 242 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:32,360 Speaker 1: Nixon loses the race, Nixon's president when we lose the 243 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:34,600 Speaker 1: race to the moon, he's of course a one termer, 244 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:37,760 Speaker 1: not a two termer. Well, what does that mean? The 245 00:15:37,800 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: White House taping system never gets discovered by the public, 246 00:15:42,080 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: nor by Congress or anything like this, and it doesn't happen. 247 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,400 Speaker 1: And in the way this TV show worked, it makes 248 00:15:47,400 --> 00:15:49,280 Speaker 1: it all the way to the nineties before people find 249 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 1: out there's a White House taping system, and each president 250 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:56,200 Speaker 1: subsequently anyway, but it's made me like I remember when 251 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:59,080 Speaker 1: I saw it. I remember thinking, can you imagine how 252 00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: much richer are knowledge of presidents would be if we 253 00:16:01,920 --> 00:16:05,520 Speaker 1: always had this information like this eventually available to us? 254 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, And I actually I really worry about that as 255 00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:15,680 Speaker 2: a modern historian, in the extent to which you know, 256 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 2: the future historians of the White House and you know, 257 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:23,240 Speaker 2: US government, and really. 258 00:16:23,320 --> 00:16:25,600 Speaker 1: Look at this White House. You know we already we 259 00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:31,480 Speaker 1: already have caught Donald Trump meaning to direct message his 260 00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:36,320 Speaker 1: attorney general on truth social he ends up making a 261 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 1: public the infamous you know, what are you doing? Go 262 00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:42,200 Speaker 1: get Camy, Go get you know, James, go get Shift. 263 00:16:43,240 --> 00:16:46,480 Speaker 1: And we learned it's intended to be a direct message. 264 00:16:46,480 --> 00:16:50,840 Speaker 1: And now you're thinking, think about Presidential Records Act? How 265 00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 1: many direct messages? What are we not seeing? What don't 266 00:16:55,120 --> 00:16:58,520 Speaker 1: we know? And we know this president has had no 267 00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:01,800 Speaker 1: interest in seeing records percent served for history's sake. 268 00:17:02,760 --> 00:17:05,879 Speaker 2: Yeah, and you and so so much of that conversation 269 00:17:06,040 --> 00:17:10,880 Speaker 2: is now taking place, you know, over text message, over 270 00:17:10,960 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 2: direct messages, over encrypted signal chats which may or may 271 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:23,800 Speaker 2: not be being properly maintained for Presidential Records Acts. And 272 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:26,840 Speaker 2: I really do worry about how hard it's going to 273 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:32,320 Speaker 2: be to recreate some of what we are used to seeing. 274 00:17:33,160 --> 00:17:37,520 Speaker 2: And you know, everyone one of their first questions about 275 00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:40,520 Speaker 2: Watergate ends up being you know, well, if it took 276 00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:43,000 Speaker 2: us forty years to figure out the truth about Watergate, 277 00:17:44,359 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 2: you know, what are we going to learn about Trump's 278 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:51,840 Speaker 2: presidency in forty years, fifty years? You know, what do 279 00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 2: we not know now about what is going on? And 280 00:17:55,880 --> 00:18:00,240 Speaker 2: I don't know, there's clearly a lot that we don't 281 00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:03,360 Speaker 2: know about what's going on behind the scenes that we'll 282 00:18:03,359 --> 00:18:09,520 Speaker 2: have to wait for memoirs or future declassified documents. But 283 00:18:09,560 --> 00:18:13,480 Speaker 2: I would like to think that this administration is we 284 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 2: sort of know more, at least of what's transpiring in 285 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:17,080 Speaker 2: real time. 286 00:18:19,720 --> 00:18:22,800 Speaker 1: There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like 287 00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:25,960 Speaker 1: there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury 288 00:18:26,040 --> 00:18:28,760 Speaker 1: law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered 289 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:32,040 Speaker 1: twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients. 290 00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:36,199 Speaker 1: It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing, 291 00:18:36,480 --> 00:18:39,240 Speaker 1: just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible. 292 00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:42,400 Speaker 1: Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, 293 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, 294 00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:49,119 Speaker 1: which was a staggering forty times the amount that the 295 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:52,399 Speaker 1: insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and 296 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:56,000 Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred fifty thousand dollars. 297 00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:58,200 Speaker 1: So with more than one thousand lawyers across the country, 298 00:18:58,359 --> 00:19:00,959 Speaker 1: they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured, 299 00:19:01,080 --> 00:19:03,640 Speaker 1: you need a lawyer, you need somebody to get your back, 300 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:06,840 Speaker 1: check out for the People dot Com, Slash podcast or 301 00:19:07,240 --> 00:19:12,440 Speaker 1: now Pound Law, Pound five two nine law on your 302 00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 1: cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same. 303 00:19:15,119 --> 00:19:17,280 Speaker 1: So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free 304 00:19:17,560 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 1: unless they win. Well, that's funny you say that. I 305 00:19:23,880 --> 00:19:29,440 Speaker 1: don't disagree like I think i've I find it fascinating 306 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 1: how often what you think is the case is the case. 307 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:35,400 Speaker 2: Yes? 308 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:36,119 Speaker 1: Have you noticed that? 309 00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:36,920 Speaker 2: Yeah? 310 00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 1: And now part of it is I joke that, you know, 311 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:42,800 Speaker 1: if I'm not a great poker player, but I'm a 312 00:19:42,800 --> 00:19:45,680 Speaker 1: better poker player than Donald Trump. I'd love to play 313 00:19:45,720 --> 00:19:48,560 Speaker 1: poker with him because he shows his cards constantly, right, 314 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 1: you don't have to work very hard to figure out 315 00:19:50,440 --> 00:19:57,639 Speaker 1: what he's holding. I actually think that's what what is 316 00:19:57,680 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 1: some of his appeal as I I think people think, well, 317 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:03,920 Speaker 1: I know exactly what he's doing and thinking I don't 318 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:06,199 Speaker 1: love it either, But he's pretty you know, it's the 319 00:20:06,359 --> 00:20:10,399 Speaker 1: what's it's the It's one of my favorite things that 320 00:20:10,440 --> 00:20:13,480 Speaker 1: Mike Johnson likes to try to use as a rationale. 321 00:20:14,000 --> 00:20:16,680 Speaker 1: You know, well, Donald Trump's very transparent about what he's doing. 322 00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:21,120 Speaker 1: He doesn't say whether it should be should be happening? 323 00:20:21,920 --> 00:20:23,960 Speaker 1: You know, you always know what he's doing, you know, 324 00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:26,399 Speaker 1: when you ask him about crypto or the or a 325 00:20:26,600 --> 00:20:30,199 Speaker 1: you know, an insider trading deal or a pardon. You know, 326 00:20:30,280 --> 00:20:33,399 Speaker 1: he's a very transparent president. Well that's kind of true. 327 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:38,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah. Mike Johnson to me is always fascinating as 328 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:42,960 Speaker 2: the world's least informed human being. Like you can sort 329 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:46,120 Speaker 2: of walk up to him with any Trump story and 330 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:48,120 Speaker 2: he's like, ah, never heard of it. 331 00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:49,760 Speaker 1: That's first I've heard. 332 00:20:49,840 --> 00:20:52,280 Speaker 2: First I first time. I'm really gonna have to look 333 00:20:52,280 --> 00:20:54,679 Speaker 2: at I just heard about that as I was walking 334 00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 2: into this room. 335 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:58,679 Speaker 1: Well doesn't it though, Like weirdly, you know it is. 336 00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:01,080 Speaker 1: But then it's it's funny to be that Mike Johnson 337 00:21:01,160 --> 00:21:03,040 Speaker 1: saying well I don't think he can serve a third 338 00:21:03,119 --> 00:21:07,520 Speaker 1: term was a headline, right because you're like, Mike Johnson 339 00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: never says anything definitive, so what he does take it 340 00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 1: to the bank. 341 00:21:11,560 --> 00:21:15,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, But just sort of the idea that like, 342 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:18,480 Speaker 2: you're Speaker of the House and you appear to have 343 00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:22,399 Speaker 2: no access to news information on a daily basis. 344 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 1: So let's take your theory of ten to fifteen years 345 00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:30,240 Speaker 1: maybe as far back as we're right at the we're 346 00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 1: just past fifty with Watergate. Now Watergate, as you noted, 347 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: there was a specific thing to get released, yep, that helped. 348 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:43,320 Speaker 1: So the Iran hostage crisis, have you thought about that? 349 00:21:45,040 --> 00:21:46,960 Speaker 1: You know, there's allegations. You know, there's a couple of 350 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:49,639 Speaker 1: books that were written at the time right about you know, 351 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:53,159 Speaker 1: the EA that's where October Surprise sort of got mainstream 352 00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,760 Speaker 1: back in the day. And there certainly were plenty of 353 00:21:56,920 --> 00:22:00,359 Speaker 1: sort of you know, conspiracy theorists about what did the 354 00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:03,080 Speaker 1: Reagan campaign know about the hostages and when did they 355 00:22:03,080 --> 00:22:06,320 Speaker 1: know it, et cetera, which has always had a little 356 00:22:06,359 --> 00:22:09,080 Speaker 1: bit of echo to the South Vietnamese allegation with Nixon. 357 00:22:09,960 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, I actually would love to do a book on 358 00:22:13,080 --> 00:22:17,880 Speaker 2: Iran contra. I have noodled that. I've got a big 359 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:23,159 Speaker 2: stack of research materials here in my office to that 360 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:26,880 Speaker 2: I've been saving over the years, assembling it. I think 361 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:34,520 Speaker 2: it is something that we don't understand how fundamentally it 362 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 2: reshaped American politics thereafter. Of course, you've got Bill Barr 363 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:41,840 Speaker 2: right there in the midst of it, you know, Oliver 364 00:22:41,920 --> 00:22:45,440 Speaker 2: North infamously a huge part of that. 365 00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:49,920 Speaker 1: But like Watergate, you know, you described how the burglary 366 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: was actually you know, there was a whole other you know, 367 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:56,840 Speaker 1: this all began in sixty eight. Like Iron Contra as 368 00:22:56,880 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 1: the way some people may remember it, they may think 369 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:01,960 Speaker 1: of it as a late Ay scandal, Arguably it started 370 00:23:01,960 --> 00:23:03,560 Speaker 1: before Reagan became president, right. 371 00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:11,160 Speaker 2: Yes, And I actually just read Jonathan Blitzer's amazing book 372 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 2: on immigration that I think came out last year. Everyone 373 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:20,760 Speaker 2: here is Gone, Everyone who is gone is here. Couldn't 374 00:23:20,880 --> 00:23:23,440 Speaker 2: couldn't recommend it more sort of history of US policy 375 00:23:23,480 --> 00:23:29,760 Speaker 2: in Latin America. And it's fascinating to sort of realize 376 00:23:29,800 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 2: how much of Iran Contra and the sort of Reagan era, 377 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:42,280 Speaker 2: Bush era efforts to you know, destabilize Central American politics 378 00:23:42,560 --> 00:23:48,960 Speaker 2: are what kicks off downstream the immigration crisis that we 379 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:51,800 Speaker 2: are now living with today. And like you know, I'm 380 00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:54,320 Speaker 2: scribbling in the margins of this book as I'm reading, 381 00:23:54,880 --> 00:23:58,159 Speaker 2: like Iran Contra in some ways is what gives us 382 00:23:58,240 --> 00:23:58,919 Speaker 2: Donald Trump. 383 00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:05,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's an interesting through line. Look, I constantly so 384 00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:09,920 Speaker 1: let me run a theory by you. I have thought 385 00:24:09,920 --> 00:24:12,680 Speaker 1: that one of the reasons why the CIA just won't 386 00:24:12,960 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 1: come clean about what it knew about Oswald is not 387 00:24:17,480 --> 00:24:21,119 Speaker 1: because they were involved. It's just the opposite, right, it 388 00:24:21,240 --> 00:24:23,880 Speaker 1: was the fear that everybody would think they were involved, 389 00:24:24,720 --> 00:24:28,920 Speaker 1: but more importantly that he was simply a thread into 390 00:24:28,960 --> 00:24:32,120 Speaker 1: a larger what they were doing in the Western hemisphere, 391 00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:37,480 Speaker 1: and that copping to Oswald could be a string that 392 00:24:37,560 --> 00:24:40,639 Speaker 1: you start to pull that unravels a whole lot of 393 00:24:40,680 --> 00:24:43,439 Speaker 1: bad shit that we did in Latin America in the 394 00:24:43,440 --> 00:24:48,600 Speaker 1: fifties that could actually be problematic today. Because here's why 395 00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:51,760 Speaker 1: I think about it this way, Garrett, how is it 396 00:24:51,800 --> 00:24:56,120 Speaker 1: that we've had back to back presidents Biden and Trump 397 00:24:57,440 --> 00:25:00,359 Speaker 1: who have had CIA directors, one of whom Trump appointed, 398 00:25:00,480 --> 00:25:03,560 Speaker 1: one of whom Biden appointed, who when the laws said 399 00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:08,000 Speaker 1: you got to release it, all the CIA directors is no, no, no, no, 400 00:25:08,800 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 1: you can't let this happen, and somehow both Trump and 401 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:16,720 Speaker 1: Biden agreed to it. I've always wondered, what do these 402 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:19,400 Speaker 1: CIA directors say to these presidents to make them say, 403 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:22,760 Speaker 1: got it, Okay, I won't do it, I'll figure it, 404 00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:27,280 Speaker 1: I'll shut this down. My thesis has been that, yeah, 405 00:25:27,320 --> 00:25:30,840 Speaker 1: and that because it would only extend like our playing 406 00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 1: around with Latin America has sort of like bid us 407 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:36,879 Speaker 1: in the ass on multiple times in our sort of 408 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,560 Speaker 1: recent history. And if you told me that was the 409 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:44,360 Speaker 1: reason why Oswald gets this special, weird, special treatment. It's 410 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:47,880 Speaker 1: less about Oswald's person and Kennedy the assassination, and more 411 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,479 Speaker 1: about what bad shit we were doing in Latin America. 412 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:53,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, but Chuck, don't worry what we're doing in Venezuela 413 00:25:53,880 --> 00:25:56,320 Speaker 2: right now, it's going to go great. This is the 414 00:25:56,400 --> 00:26:00,639 Speaker 2: time when the US meddling in the foreign politics of 415 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:02,879 Speaker 2: Latin America will go great. 416 00:26:03,240 --> 00:26:06,359 Speaker 1: Garrett, I speak as a Miamian. I want to see 417 00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:09,800 Speaker 1: Chavez and Maduro, that entire regime out of there. I 418 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:15,879 Speaker 1: have plenty of friends, I get it, right. I be 419 00:26:16,160 --> 00:26:19,800 Speaker 1: more honest with us, mister president, right, like, tell us 420 00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:21,520 Speaker 1: the truth about what you're up to, and you might 421 00:26:21,560 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 1: actually get some support for supporting democracy in Venezuela. But 422 00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:30,680 Speaker 1: to do it this backhanded way, the unintended consequence could 423 00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:33,200 Speaker 1: be what if Maduro is popular? 424 00:26:35,400 --> 00:26:42,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, to answer your real question about the Oswald stuff, 425 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:46,120 Speaker 2: you know, I don't know whether your thesis is right, 426 00:26:46,200 --> 00:26:49,239 Speaker 2: but you get at what to me is sort of 427 00:26:49,280 --> 00:26:57,439 Speaker 2: my central organizing principle of understanding conspiracies, which is my 428 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:02,000 Speaker 2: challenge as someone who has covered government for twenty years. 429 00:27:02,119 --> 00:27:05,719 Speaker 1: And usually debunk conspiracies. Yes, is you're pretty good at 430 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:07,000 Speaker 1: debunking them. Yeah. 431 00:27:07,480 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 2: Is that government conspiracies presuppose a level of competence, foresight, 432 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:15,840 Speaker 2: and strategy that is not on display in the rest 433 00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:19,640 Speaker 2: of the work that the government does. And it's only 434 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:26,840 Speaker 2: cya right, right, And that the government is sort of 435 00:27:26,920 --> 00:27:32,480 Speaker 2: able to keep two kinds of secrets. They're able to 436 00:27:32,560 --> 00:27:36,040 Speaker 2: keep big secrets for a short period of time. 437 00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:40,600 Speaker 1: This is the Lodden's you know, beIN Laden's whereabouts. 438 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:46,000 Speaker 2: No, I'm talking about something different actually, like the Manhattan 439 00:27:46,040 --> 00:27:50,919 Speaker 2: Project or the D Day invasion. Okay, something that is 440 00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:55,440 Speaker 2: thousands of people, but we only need to keep this 441 00:27:55,840 --> 00:28:02,000 Speaker 2: for a period of months or weeks. Or they can 442 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:06,080 Speaker 2: keep sort of small secrets for a long period of time. 443 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:10,119 Speaker 2: And this is where you get in into sort of 444 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:18,119 Speaker 2: secrets that the you know, the Argo plot, you know, 445 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:23,280 Speaker 2: sort of things that the intelligence agencies are able to 446 00:28:23,440 --> 00:28:28,480 Speaker 2: keep for a very extended period of time. The challenge 447 00:28:28,520 --> 00:28:36,560 Speaker 2: for me with something like the Kennedy assassination, UFOs and Roswell, 448 00:28:37,359 --> 00:28:40,720 Speaker 2: which as you know I wrote a book about, or 449 00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 2: or you know, nine to eleven Truthers is sort of 450 00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:50,280 Speaker 2: you're asking us to believe that the government is able 451 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:52,600 Speaker 2: to keep big secrets for a long period of time, 452 00:28:52,720 --> 00:28:57,040 Speaker 2: that sort of secrets that encompass sort of hundreds or 453 00:28:57,120 --> 00:29:02,880 Speaker 2: thousands of people for de aids with no meaningful. 454 00:29:04,040 --> 00:29:08,280 Speaker 1: Compromise, and that the idea that area fifty one could 455 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:11,080 Speaker 1: be what people what the conspiracy theorists think it is, 456 00:29:11,160 --> 00:29:13,840 Speaker 1: and somehow it would be the secret that we could 457 00:29:13,920 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 1: keep for fifty years, that there wouldn't be some cleaning service, 458 00:29:18,920 --> 00:29:26,920 Speaker 1: some spouse, some kid, right, some disgruntled fired employee who 459 00:29:27,040 --> 00:29:28,680 Speaker 1: who didn't have the goods right. 460 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:32,520 Speaker 2: Exactly so, And that's where I think that you know, 461 00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:37,680 Speaker 2: sort of whatever is sort of left at the core 462 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:43,480 Speaker 2: of the Kennedy records, I think to your point has 463 00:29:43,560 --> 00:29:45,200 Speaker 2: nothing to do with Kennedy anymore. 464 00:29:45,960 --> 00:29:50,080 Speaker 1: That it has to be about CIA workflow of some sort, right, 465 00:29:50,400 --> 00:29:55,320 Speaker 1: And I you know, I it's it's my version of 466 00:29:55,360 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 1: Okham's razor. I cannot imagine they weren't, Like, I don't 467 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:01,400 Speaker 1: buy the idea that that they didn't have them under surveillance. 468 00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:04,840 Speaker 1: You're telling me a marine who defected to the Soviet 469 00:30:04,920 --> 00:30:07,200 Speaker 1: Union wasn't a known person to the CIA. 470 00:30:07,520 --> 00:30:12,840 Speaker 2: Is that a believable fact? Absolutely not at least in 471 00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:13,520 Speaker 2: that era. 472 00:30:13,720 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, but the idea that the CIA would somehow 473 00:30:19,760 --> 00:30:25,040 Speaker 1: create this Patsy through this entires program, like our our 474 00:30:25,120 --> 00:30:28,479 Speaker 1: version of a reverse Americans, right, Like that also seems 475 00:30:29,320 --> 00:30:41,240 Speaker 1: kind of out there. Absolutely, So there's iron contra. Is 476 00:30:41,280 --> 00:30:43,400 Speaker 1: there more to be done on Monica Lewinsky in the 477 00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:45,200 Speaker 1: first and the first modern impeachment? 478 00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:53,040 Speaker 2: I think I think so in part because again that's 479 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:54,840 Speaker 2: and this is a little bit of what you were 480 00:30:54,840 --> 00:30:59,320 Speaker 2: talking about with you know, Bill Clinton resigning hypothetical, right, 481 00:31:00,800 --> 00:31:05,280 Speaker 2: I don't know that that history has been meaningfully revisited 482 00:31:06,480 --> 00:31:11,640 Speaker 2: sort of post me Too, which I think would be. 483 00:31:11,600 --> 00:31:13,920 Speaker 1: It's an interesting way put it. We were kind of, look, 484 00:31:14,240 --> 00:31:18,920 Speaker 1: it's funny Bill Clinton's reputation went into the shitter the 485 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:21,200 Speaker 1: height of Me Too, Right, it was sort of like, hey, 486 00:31:21,560 --> 00:31:23,920 Speaker 1: what about all that? And everybody's like, yeah, you're right, 487 00:31:23,960 --> 00:31:26,400 Speaker 1: we shouldn't have been toleranted that, and then everybody just 488 00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:26,720 Speaker 1: moved on. 489 00:31:27,360 --> 00:31:30,480 Speaker 2: Well, and I think that the reputation has changed on 490 00:31:30,520 --> 00:31:35,080 Speaker 2: both sides, Bill Clinton's, but then Monica Lewinsky that I 491 00:31:35,120 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 2: think we as a country have really revisited the you know, stereotypes, 492 00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:47,560 Speaker 2: if that's what you want to call it about how 493 00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 2: we viewed Monica Lewinsky in the nineteen nineties as this 494 00:31:50,640 --> 00:31:56,480 Speaker 2: scandal was unfolding, and that she has done such an 495 00:31:56,520 --> 00:32:03,800 Speaker 2: impressive job of not just rebuilding, but I think changing 496 00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:06,160 Speaker 2: the way that America thinks about her. 497 00:32:07,920 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 1: There is no greater victim and a scandal that we've had. 498 00:32:12,920 --> 00:32:18,400 Speaker 1: And I remember, I've always felt that boy that Clinton's 499 00:32:18,440 --> 00:32:25,000 Speaker 1: never never fully could ever apologize enough. Yep. 500 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:32,240 Speaker 2: And I think that, you know, one of the things 501 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:40,880 Speaker 2: that I sort of came to think about Watergate is 502 00:32:42,760 --> 00:32:47,680 Speaker 2: Watergate is best understood not as an event, but as 503 00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:52,000 Speaker 2: a mindset, and that really Watergate is this umbrella for 504 00:32:52,240 --> 00:32:58,920 Speaker 2: like thirteen to fifteen distinct but overlapping scandals that sort 505 00:32:58,960 --> 00:33:05,600 Speaker 2: of all merge from the paranoid, conspiratorial mindset of Richard 506 00:33:05,680 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 2: Dixon that sort of he brings in and. 507 00:33:10,880 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 1: That really date back to. 508 00:33:14,240 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 2: Me. 509 00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:16,640 Speaker 1: Shoot, one of my favorite Nixon books is one about 510 00:33:16,640 --> 00:33:17,920 Speaker 1: his California Senate race. 511 00:33:17,960 --> 00:33:22,120 Speaker 2: I mean, exactly like his parent is exactly who he's 512 00:33:22,160 --> 00:33:23,720 Speaker 2: he is straight through his career. 513 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:26,720 Speaker 1: Nineteen fifty Richard Dixon running for the US Senate against 514 00:33:26,720 --> 00:33:32,680 Speaker 1: Helen Kahagen Douglas nineteen fifty two, Checkers speech Nixon nineteen sixty. Right, 515 00:33:32,720 --> 00:33:39,240 Speaker 1: it's the same guy, except every loss or grievance fuels him. 516 00:33:39,680 --> 00:33:46,040 Speaker 2: Yes, and that he I don't know that we have 517 00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:54,240 Speaker 2: ever sort of reappraised Bill Clinton's presidency through that lens. 518 00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:57,960 Speaker 1: That It's funny you say that, because you're right, because 519 00:33:58,080 --> 00:34:04,160 Speaker 1: Monica Lewinsky was the Coleman Nation in exactly of what 520 00:34:04,280 --> 00:34:08,080 Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton called a vast right wing conspiracy. My only 521 00:34:08,160 --> 00:34:11,839 Speaker 1: criticism of her, of her comment was the word conspiracy. 522 00:34:12,719 --> 00:34:17,440 Speaker 1: It wasn't being done underground, right, it was we were 523 00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:20,200 Speaker 1: all watching it and playing. It started with Trooper game. 524 00:34:20,560 --> 00:34:24,440 Speaker 1: It started with Whitewater and Vince Foster and and Travel 525 00:34:24,480 --> 00:34:27,799 Speaker 1: Office and you know, the stocks and you know all 526 00:34:27,880 --> 00:34:32,160 Speaker 1: of this, you know, attempt until they finally got him 527 00:34:32,160 --> 00:34:32,600 Speaker 1: on something. 528 00:34:32,880 --> 00:34:38,719 Speaker 2: Yep. And that I think we would look very differently 529 00:34:38,840 --> 00:34:40,920 Speaker 2: at all of that. I mean, remember, like this is 530 00:34:40,960 --> 00:34:44,440 Speaker 2: where a lot of the modern Supreme Court ends up 531 00:34:44,480 --> 00:34:49,960 Speaker 2: sort of getting their start in the right. Yeah, you know, 532 00:34:50,040 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 2: this is where Rod Rosenstein gets his start, and that 533 00:34:55,840 --> 00:35:00,040 Speaker 2: sort of there's a long shadow to a lot of 534 00:35:00,040 --> 00:35:04,920 Speaker 2: of what transpires during impeachment there and the ken Starr 535 00:35:04,920 --> 00:35:07,279 Speaker 2: investigation that I. 536 00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:10,160 Speaker 1: See what you did there, by the way, mister longshadow. 537 00:35:09,760 --> 00:35:13,840 Speaker 2: That I think we would look very differently at now. 538 00:35:14,520 --> 00:35:17,400 Speaker 2: You know, I think one one of the things, and 539 00:35:17,520 --> 00:35:22,600 Speaker 2: this is just not an impeachment thing. There's going to 540 00:35:22,719 --> 00:35:27,960 Speaker 2: be a big biography written at some point about Bill 541 00:35:28,000 --> 00:35:34,040 Speaker 2: Clinton that has not been done yet, and I don't 542 00:35:34,040 --> 00:35:37,239 Speaker 2: know whether it will be done during his lifetime, that 543 00:35:37,320 --> 00:35:45,359 Speaker 2: I think will dramatically rewrite his his presidency as viewed 544 00:35:45,360 --> 00:35:51,040 Speaker 2: by history, you know, I think, and you understand this, Presidents, 545 00:35:51,080 --> 00:35:55,200 Speaker 2: the view of presidents changes dramatically across decades. 546 00:35:55,560 --> 00:35:58,000 Speaker 1: Harry Truman is a great example, right. It's one of 547 00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:02,040 Speaker 1: the the easiest ones for people to grasp because he 548 00:36:02,200 --> 00:36:05,520 Speaker 1: was an unpopular president when he left. In fact, he 549 00:36:05,719 --> 00:36:08,799 Speaker 1: was a punching He was a punchline for Republicans for 550 00:36:08,840 --> 00:36:12,920 Speaker 1: a long time. In fact, it was Ronald Reagan that 551 00:36:13,400 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 1: arguably revitalized Truman's brand before any Democrat did, and before 552 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:19,719 Speaker 1: David McCullough did. And then David McCullough comes out, and 553 00:36:20,200 --> 00:36:24,319 Speaker 1: everything changes, right, and Harry Truman is now a top 554 00:36:24,560 --> 00:36:27,760 Speaker 1: fifteen president in many historians' minds because. 555 00:36:27,680 --> 00:36:31,880 Speaker 2: It and Dwight Eisenhower sort of I think undergoing that 556 00:36:32,040 --> 00:36:35,600 Speaker 2: same change, right, now we're living in you know, this 557 00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:37,960 Speaker 2: is sort of someone who there was sort of you know, 558 00:36:38,120 --> 00:36:42,680 Speaker 2: he's a doddering old golfer for you know, much of 559 00:36:42,719 --> 00:36:45,120 Speaker 2: his and then you've seen sort of work by Evan 560 00:36:45,160 --> 00:36:47,839 Speaker 2: Thomas and others that have really made us sort of 561 00:36:47,880 --> 00:36:51,480 Speaker 2: rethink that this was a much smarter and more strategic 562 00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:54,440 Speaker 2: and more consequential president than we've given him credit for. 563 00:36:56,000 --> 00:36:59,600 Speaker 1: Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from 564 00:36:59,640 --> 00:37:02,759 Speaker 1: personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away. 565 00:37:02,800 --> 00:37:05,200 Speaker 1: We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in 566 00:37:05,239 --> 00:37:09,600 Speaker 1: the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself 567 00:37:09,680 --> 00:37:11,480 Speaker 1: sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to 568 00:37:11,520 --> 00:37:14,680 Speaker 1: pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had 569 00:37:14,719 --> 00:37:17,880 Speaker 1: one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot, 570 00:37:18,239 --> 00:37:20,959 Speaker 1: but it was important at the time, and it's why 571 00:37:21,080 --> 00:37:24,319 Speaker 1: I was able to go to college. Little did he 572 00:37:24,400 --> 00:37:28,160 Speaker 1: know how important that would be in that moment. Well, 573 00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:30,360 Speaker 1: guess what. That's why I am here to tell you 574 00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:33,319 Speaker 1: about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of 575 00:37:33,360 --> 00:37:36,760 Speaker 1: mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst 576 00:37:36,800 --> 00:37:39,759 Speaker 1: comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes 577 00:37:39,800 --> 00:37:43,400 Speaker 1: getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect 578 00:37:43,440 --> 00:37:47,480 Speaker 1: your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, 579 00:37:47,560 --> 00:37:51,240 Speaker 1: and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam 580 00:37:51,280 --> 00:37:54,440 Speaker 1: require you just answer a few health questions online. You 581 00:37:54,480 --> 00:37:56,240 Speaker 1: can get a quote in as little as ten minutes, 582 00:37:56,280 --> 00:37:59,360 Speaker 1: and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving 583 00:37:59,480 --> 00:38:02,360 Speaker 1: your home. You can get up to three million dollars 584 00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:04,560 Speaker 1: in coverage, and some policies start as low as two 585 00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:07,719 Speaker 1: dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of 586 00:38:07,719 --> 00:38:10,839 Speaker 1: March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number 587 00:38:10,920 --> 00:38:15,280 Speaker 1: one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect 588 00:38:15,280 --> 00:38:18,680 Speaker 1: your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free 589 00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:23,040 Speaker 1: quoted ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos 590 00:38:23,080 --> 00:38:27,680 Speaker 1: dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary, and the 591 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:30,919 Speaker 1: rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life 592 00:38:30,960 --> 00:38:34,160 Speaker 1: insurance is something you should really think about, especially if 593 00:38:34,200 --> 00:38:39,960 Speaker 1: you've got a growing family. Okay, while I count myself 594 00:38:40,000 --> 00:38:43,160 Speaker 1: among those, I think there's only been two, and I 595 00:38:43,160 --> 00:38:46,000 Speaker 1: think we've had two presidents who of who have been independent, 596 00:38:46,280 --> 00:38:49,520 Speaker 1: truly less, the least partisan presidents we ever had, and 597 00:38:49,560 --> 00:38:52,000 Speaker 1: both of them were commanders, and both of them were 598 00:38:52,040 --> 00:38:55,880 Speaker 1: supreme Allied commanders in the army right. One was General 599 00:38:55,880 --> 00:38:58,120 Speaker 1: George Washington and the other one was General Dwite Eyesedewer. 600 00:38:58,480 --> 00:39:04,080 Speaker 1: So I I want to associate myself with that historical 601 00:39:04,120 --> 00:39:10,680 Speaker 1: line of thinking about Ike. However, how much is Eisenhower's 602 00:39:10,840 --> 00:39:17,560 Speaker 1: this renewal of this sort of renewed positive look at 603 00:39:17,560 --> 00:39:22,120 Speaker 1: Eisenhower a reflection of how crappy our leaders are today, 604 00:39:23,120 --> 00:39:26,440 Speaker 1: and that we're actually judging Eisenhower not through the prism 605 00:39:26,480 --> 00:39:29,399 Speaker 1: of what he did in the fifties, but through the 606 00:39:29,400 --> 00:39:32,640 Speaker 1: prism of looking back and going, wow, he wasn't what 607 00:39:32,680 --> 00:39:33,560 Speaker 1: we have today. 608 00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:44,719 Speaker 2: I think that the revisionism around him is something that 609 00:39:45,239 --> 00:39:49,799 Speaker 2: started before we fell into our current age of poor 610 00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:54,040 Speaker 2: leadership in America. I think the example you're looking for 611 00:39:55,400 --> 00:39:59,640 Speaker 2: is George H. W. Bush, where I think you see 612 00:39:59,680 --> 00:40:05,440 Speaker 2: a lot of celebration of George H. W. Bush as 613 00:40:05,680 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 2: sort of the upstanding, you know, president, dedicated in a 614 00:40:11,719 --> 00:40:15,720 Speaker 2: life of public service, you know, sort of not of this, 615 00:40:16,080 --> 00:40:18,600 Speaker 2: you know, not of this time anymore like that. That 616 00:40:18,760 --> 00:40:21,120 Speaker 2: to me is a big part of the gloss that 617 00:40:21,160 --> 00:40:23,239 Speaker 2: we put over George H. W. Bush these days. 618 00:40:23,320 --> 00:40:27,759 Speaker 1: Oh interesting Okay, I just it's always you know, I 619 00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:29,799 Speaker 1: have found myself and I'm curious if you do this. 620 00:40:31,000 --> 00:40:32,879 Speaker 1: There are more and more history books I read where 621 00:40:32,880 --> 00:40:35,920 Speaker 1: I realize when the book was written is very important 622 00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:38,759 Speaker 1: to understand before you dive into the interpretation of the 623 00:40:38,960 --> 00:40:41,200 Speaker 1: of the history that the book is attempting to interpret. 624 00:40:41,920 --> 00:40:46,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely absolutely, And I think, by the way, as 625 00:40:46,040 --> 00:40:49,560 Speaker 2: a historian, that's one of the things that is always 626 00:40:49,600 --> 00:40:58,040 Speaker 2: incredibly humbling is you never understand a topic more than 627 00:40:58,080 --> 00:41:01,200 Speaker 2: when you've only read one book about it, and it's 628 00:41:01,239 --> 00:41:06,319 Speaker 2: sort of every book thereafter only makes life more complicated. 629 00:41:06,400 --> 00:41:08,400 Speaker 1: I'll give you an example of where I think this 630 00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:10,560 Speaker 1: is the most, where I have run into it the most, 631 00:41:10,600 --> 00:41:13,200 Speaker 1: because I spent a lot, I read a bunch about it. 632 00:41:13,680 --> 00:41:20,840 Speaker 1: I'm obsessed with the essentially the post Grant politics of 633 00:41:20,880 --> 00:41:25,480 Speaker 1: America yep. Eighteen seventy six. I've probably read four or 634 00:41:25,520 --> 00:41:29,719 Speaker 1: five different books on the eighteen seventy six election, and 635 00:41:30,040 --> 00:41:32,799 Speaker 1: I would argue that the politics of the author are 636 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:37,799 Speaker 1: what distinguishes each of the books, not the information. The 637 00:41:37,840 --> 00:41:41,040 Speaker 1: information is mostly the same. The interpretation of the information 638 00:41:41,960 --> 00:41:46,480 Speaker 1: is what's different. And that is one that I find 639 00:41:46,520 --> 00:41:50,120 Speaker 1: myself pulling my hair out sometimes reading these various accounts 640 00:41:50,160 --> 00:41:54,080 Speaker 1: because they're this similar, but they're not the same, and 641 00:41:54,120 --> 00:41:59,239 Speaker 1: they really are more about how the author perceives Republicans 642 00:41:59,320 --> 00:42:03,280 Speaker 1: versus Democrats in the twenty first century or late twentieth 643 00:42:03,280 --> 00:42:07,359 Speaker 1: century when one of them was written versus versus in 644 00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:08,520 Speaker 1: that moment in time. 645 00:42:09,000 --> 00:42:11,920 Speaker 2: Yep, yeah, no, I think that's very true, and I 646 00:42:11,920 --> 00:42:16,200 Speaker 2: think that that's a challenge across a lot of the 647 00:42:16,239 --> 00:42:20,960 Speaker 2: way that narrative history ends up getting written, you know, 648 00:42:21,160 --> 00:42:24,279 Speaker 2: as you know, I spend a lot of time doing 649 00:42:24,400 --> 00:42:29,719 Speaker 2: oral history. And to me, part of the power of 650 00:42:31,480 --> 00:42:33,360 Speaker 2: oral history and why I think it's sort of so 651 00:42:33,480 --> 00:42:37,360 Speaker 2: important as a tradition and a writing form is the 652 00:42:37,400 --> 00:42:43,719 Speaker 2: way that it puts you back in moments when the 653 00:42:43,880 --> 00:42:48,799 Speaker 2: participants are living them, are experiencing them before they know 654 00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:51,200 Speaker 2: the outcome. That I think sort of one of the 655 00:42:51,320 --> 00:42:56,720 Speaker 2: drawbacks of a lot of narrative history is it makes 656 00:42:56,840 --> 00:43:02,520 Speaker 2: events seem neater, cleaner, simpler, and more preordained than they 657 00:43:02,560 --> 00:43:05,440 Speaker 2: felt to anyone who was living through them at the time. 658 00:43:05,719 --> 00:43:11,120 Speaker 2: That you know, you and I, you know, think about 659 00:43:11,160 --> 00:43:13,239 Speaker 2: where we are right now, like none of us know 660 00:43:13,320 --> 00:43:16,200 Speaker 2: where we are in the arc of the American story 661 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:19,560 Speaker 2: right now. And if you if we sit down someday 662 00:43:19,920 --> 00:43:23,040 Speaker 2: ten years, fifteen years, fifty years later to write the 663 00:43:23,080 --> 00:43:26,080 Speaker 2: story of today, like, we'll know exactly how it goes, 664 00:43:26,280 --> 00:43:29,440 Speaker 2: and we'll be able to, you know, sort of plot 665 00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:34,480 Speaker 2: our story. But if you're interviewing you and me about 666 00:43:34,560 --> 00:43:37,720 Speaker 2: you know, well, what did you feel in September twenty five, 667 00:43:39,080 --> 00:43:42,799 Speaker 2: you know, October twenty five, November twenty five, you know, 668 00:43:42,840 --> 00:43:45,440 Speaker 2: we're going to give you very different answers. 669 00:43:46,280 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 1: On the oral history front, it seems that a great 670 00:43:51,120 --> 00:43:54,000 Speaker 1: January sixth is going to be a terrific oral history 671 00:43:54,200 --> 00:43:58,880 Speaker 1: at some point. But I'm gonna I don't feel like 672 00:43:58,920 --> 00:44:02,040 Speaker 1: it's ripe yet. I assume you don't think it's ripe yet. 673 00:44:04,000 --> 00:44:06,320 Speaker 1: My gut is that's not ripe until Trump dies. 674 00:44:07,520 --> 00:44:14,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, so they're actually you know, January, this January twenty 675 00:44:14,080 --> 00:44:18,399 Speaker 2: six will be five years. There are actually two good 676 00:44:18,600 --> 00:44:23,640 Speaker 2: oral histories that are coming out, one by Nora Noose 677 00:44:24,280 --> 00:44:31,920 Speaker 2: who wrote an oral history of of Charlottesville, and then 678 00:44:31,960 --> 00:44:34,960 Speaker 2: the other by Mary Claire Jolanic, who you probably know 679 00:44:35,040 --> 00:44:40,279 Speaker 2: from the AP And I think that they are you know, 680 00:44:40,560 --> 00:44:46,280 Speaker 2: very solid, good sort of first drafts of oral histories, 681 00:44:46,320 --> 00:44:50,920 Speaker 2: you know. Part of the challenge with the January sixth 682 00:44:51,840 --> 00:44:57,440 Speaker 2: oral histories, I think forever is going to be untangling 683 00:44:59,360 --> 00:45:03,520 Speaker 2: the truth because there are so many villains in that 684 00:45:03,680 --> 00:45:07,800 Speaker 2: story whose voices need to be in there that and 685 00:45:07,840 --> 00:45:08,480 Speaker 2: they're tough. You know. 686 00:45:08,480 --> 00:45:14,200 Speaker 1: It's funny. I've interviewed Roger Stone a lot for various projects. 687 00:45:16,080 --> 00:45:18,200 Speaker 1: I think I know when he's bullshitting, and I think 688 00:45:18,239 --> 00:45:23,440 Speaker 1: I know when he's telling me the truth. But I Garrett, 689 00:45:23,440 --> 00:45:25,960 Speaker 1: you have to take my word for it. Yep, he's not. 690 00:45:26,320 --> 00:45:28,160 Speaker 1: I also know he's not a reliable narrator. 691 00:45:29,440 --> 00:45:35,080 Speaker 2: And my trustee, Roger Stone mug here where I said 692 00:45:35,160 --> 00:45:37,720 Speaker 2: I wrote a history of Watergate that was a finalist 693 00:45:37,800 --> 00:45:40,080 Speaker 2: for the Pulitzer Prize last year. And let me tell 694 00:45:40,120 --> 00:45:42,719 Speaker 2: you when Nixon said, if the president does it, it's 695 00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:46,359 Speaker 2: not illegal, no one believes that was true, to which 696 00:45:46,440 --> 00:45:50,440 Speaker 2: Roger Stone replies, your book is laughable fiction, Pullet serprize, 697 00:45:50,560 --> 00:45:54,560 Speaker 2: My ass, get the truth now, my coffee mug. 698 00:45:58,160 --> 00:46:02,200 Speaker 1: That's fun. Roger has this. Roger and I have a 699 00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:05,920 Speaker 1: love hate relationship. I think he loves to hate me, 700 00:46:06,880 --> 00:46:10,759 Speaker 1: and yet he can't quit. He's obsessed with because he 701 00:46:10,800 --> 00:46:12,759 Speaker 1: was obsessed with the hotline back in the day, and 702 00:46:12,760 --> 00:46:15,360 Speaker 1: that was you know, we covered back when he was 703 00:46:15,400 --> 00:46:22,759 Speaker 1: a relevant political consultant and things like that. But you 704 00:46:22,960 --> 00:46:26,120 Speaker 1: kind of I'm curious how you we all develop our 705 00:46:26,120 --> 00:46:29,840 Speaker 1: bullshit detectors with people that are serial liars, right, you know, 706 00:46:31,040 --> 00:46:35,440 Speaker 1: And and I do feel like there are ways to 707 00:46:35,480 --> 00:46:38,280 Speaker 1: figure that out. I mean, you know, do you feel 708 00:46:38,320 --> 00:46:41,080 Speaker 1: I mean, you've had to I don't know, did you 709 00:46:41,120 --> 00:46:43,280 Speaker 1: ever interview g. Gordon Letty for anything? 710 00:46:43,320 --> 00:46:49,000 Speaker 2: No here on his radio show, but never actually interviewed him. 711 00:46:49,520 --> 00:46:51,560 Speaker 1: Do you feel like you've interviewed a serial liar and 712 00:46:51,600 --> 00:46:53,200 Speaker 1: you knew it going in, and how did you deal 713 00:46:53,239 --> 00:46:53,520 Speaker 1: with it? 714 00:46:54,520 --> 00:46:59,759 Speaker 2: Yeah? I absolutely have. You know, a lot of my 715 00:47:00,239 --> 00:47:06,360 Speaker 2: has been with in covering federal law enforcement, and so 716 00:47:06,640 --> 00:47:13,719 Speaker 2: you know, I've interviewed a fair number of criminals over 717 00:47:13,760 --> 00:47:16,560 Speaker 2: the years in one form or another. You know, when 718 00:47:16,560 --> 00:47:20,120 Speaker 2: I was doing the Watergate book, you know, I actually joked. 719 00:47:20,360 --> 00:47:20,600 Speaker 2: You know. 720 00:47:20,640 --> 00:47:21,400 Speaker 1: The core. 721 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:30,680 Speaker 2: Primary sources for that are about three dozen memoirs, all 722 00:47:30,760 --> 00:47:35,600 Speaker 2: of which were written by people who were later convicted 723 00:47:35,640 --> 00:47:38,000 Speaker 2: of perjury or obstruction of justice, and so they are 724 00:47:38,040 --> 00:47:41,080 Speaker 2: sort of the most unreliable sets of memoirs you could 725 00:47:41,120 --> 00:47:45,759 Speaker 2: ever possibly imagine. And I dealt with it in my 726 00:47:46,920 --> 00:47:49,520 Speaker 2: book with a whole lot of footnotes that are like, 727 00:47:50,080 --> 00:47:53,600 Speaker 2: you know, it's also possible this meeting never happened because 728 00:47:53,760 --> 00:47:56,560 Speaker 2: all three of the participants in this meeting you know 729 00:47:56,640 --> 00:48:00,160 Speaker 2: who wrote about it, denied that they said anything in it. 730 00:48:01,080 --> 00:48:09,200 Speaker 1: That's funny. I'm enjoying that sort of going through. But 731 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:11,759 Speaker 1: answer the other question, do you think it'll be easier 732 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:15,480 Speaker 1: to get more truthful answers of the people that were 733 00:48:15,480 --> 00:48:18,920 Speaker 1: in and around Trump after Trump is gone? And that 734 00:48:18,920 --> 00:48:21,239 Speaker 1: that would be my concern about an oral history of 735 00:48:21,360 --> 00:48:22,000 Speaker 1: January six? 736 00:48:22,200 --> 00:48:28,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, yes, I don't think we're I actually I talked 737 00:48:28,840 --> 00:48:34,200 Speaker 2: a very prominent Washington journalist, or helped to talk a 738 00:48:34,280 --> 00:48:37,880 Speaker 2: very prominent Washington journalist out of doing an oral history 739 00:48:37,880 --> 00:48:41,600 Speaker 2: of Trump's first term for sort of exactly that first 740 00:48:41,719 --> 00:48:43,799 Speaker 2: That reason was, I was like, the only reason there 741 00:48:43,800 --> 00:48:46,920 Speaker 2: has been any good journalism about Trump is anonymous sources, 742 00:48:46,960 --> 00:48:50,640 Speaker 2: and you can't do an anonymously sourced oral history. 743 00:48:51,200 --> 00:48:55,239 Speaker 1: So I've done a few Q and a's with Bryan 744 00:48:55,280 --> 00:49:00,560 Speaker 1: to previous recently work over at US. He's got a 745 00:49:00,600 --> 00:49:03,640 Speaker 1: kid at USC, so are doing a little something for USC. 746 00:49:04,600 --> 00:49:07,400 Speaker 1: And he is this great line because he told me 747 00:49:07,440 --> 00:49:09,080 Speaker 1: the story, so I've used it as a way to 748 00:49:09,719 --> 00:49:11,399 Speaker 1: He said, so, why haven't you written a book about 749 00:49:11,440 --> 00:49:13,880 Speaker 1: your time in the Trump White House? And he says 750 00:49:13,920 --> 00:49:16,400 Speaker 1: that Trump will ask him that how come you have 751 00:49:16,480 --> 00:49:20,759 Speaker 1: written a book? Right, And he says, mister President, I 752 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:24,560 Speaker 1: can't tell the truth and I won't lie. Yeah, so 753 00:49:25,360 --> 00:49:28,759 Speaker 1: I say that in that you know, there are plenty 754 00:49:28,800 --> 00:49:30,960 Speaker 1: of people in this town that have a living to 755 00:49:31,000 --> 00:49:32,719 Speaker 1: make in their minds, and they're just not going to 756 00:49:32,760 --> 00:49:35,360 Speaker 1: do it. It's not worth it, right Yeah. 757 00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:38,919 Speaker 2: Well, well, and by the way, what you're talking about 758 00:49:39,000 --> 00:49:44,879 Speaker 2: right now is not unrelated to the unraveling and backsliding 759 00:49:44,920 --> 00:49:48,879 Speaker 2: of American democracy, which is a whole lot of very 760 00:49:48,920 --> 00:49:52,080 Speaker 2: powerful people in Washington and elsewhere in the country, and 761 00:49:52,120 --> 00:49:56,440 Speaker 2: a whole lot of powerful institutions making a very cynical 762 00:49:56,520 --> 00:50:00,600 Speaker 2: choice that it is not worth their own person cost 763 00:50:00,880 --> 00:50:05,600 Speaker 2: to stand up and you know, speak the truth or 764 00:50:05,680 --> 00:50:11,759 Speaker 2: object or you know, to be the person who the 765 00:50:11,760 --> 00:50:14,319 Speaker 2: Trump administration ends up zeroing in their fire. 766 00:50:18,440 --> 00:50:20,160 Speaker 1: I don't want to assume where your head is at 767 00:50:20,239 --> 00:50:24,520 Speaker 1: when it comes to how could what you know on 768 00:50:24,560 --> 00:50:26,560 Speaker 1: the defcon scale? Where are you when it comes to 769 00:50:26,600 --> 00:50:29,799 Speaker 1: the future of our democracy. I use a phrase that 770 00:50:29,920 --> 00:50:32,879 Speaker 1: says I'm long term, I'm short term pessimistic, the long 771 00:50:32,960 --> 00:50:37,399 Speaker 1: term optimistic. And I often joke that in nineteen thirty 772 00:50:37,480 --> 00:50:40,279 Speaker 1: nine I would have said I was short term pessimistic 773 00:50:40,280 --> 00:50:43,080 Speaker 1: and long term optimistic, and by nineteen forty six I'd 774 00:50:43,080 --> 00:50:46,439 Speaker 1: have been correct. A lot of bad shit happened between 775 00:50:46,480 --> 00:50:52,520 Speaker 1: nineteen thirty nine and nineteen forty six. I get the 776 00:50:52,560 --> 00:50:56,719 Speaker 1: impression you're more alarmed at times than maybe you think 777 00:50:56,800 --> 00:50:59,520 Speaker 1: the rest of us are. And yet at the same time, 778 00:51:00,600 --> 00:51:02,239 Speaker 1: I also notice every once in a while you take 779 00:51:02,280 --> 00:51:05,200 Speaker 1: a step back the other way, where Yeah, I think 780 00:51:05,239 --> 00:51:05,840 Speaker 1: that's accurate. 781 00:51:05,880 --> 00:51:11,000 Speaker 2: I think we are underestimating how bad things are right 782 00:51:11,040 --> 00:51:18,319 Speaker 2: now and the trajectory of where we are, you know, 783 00:51:19,840 --> 00:51:24,239 Speaker 2: nine ish months into this administration, and sort of how 784 00:51:24,320 --> 00:51:27,480 Speaker 2: much worse it can get, because I think we are 785 00:51:27,520 --> 00:51:33,760 Speaker 2: still as Americans trapped in a it can't happen here. 786 00:51:33,880 --> 00:51:40,279 Speaker 2: We're America. You know this is you know, I think, Chuck, 787 00:51:40,360 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 2: too many of our colleagues and friends are not speaking 788 00:51:45,080 --> 00:51:51,000 Speaker 2: clear eyed in the media about sort of what what 789 00:51:51,200 --> 00:51:53,239 Speaker 2: is actually happening that we sort of continue to you. 790 00:51:53,600 --> 00:51:55,359 Speaker 2: The more you speak clear eyed. The more you don't 791 00:51:55,400 --> 00:51:59,080 Speaker 2: have a job in that well, yes, which is you know, 792 00:51:59,160 --> 00:52:02,840 Speaker 2: which which is not not an accident, right, but the 793 00:52:03,760 --> 00:52:05,680 Speaker 2: you know, the the way that we sort of still 794 00:52:05,760 --> 00:52:09,839 Speaker 2: use a lot of euphemisms of you know, Trump is 795 00:52:09,840 --> 00:52:13,320 Speaker 2: pushing the bounds of presidential power. 796 00:52:15,160 --> 00:52:19,319 Speaker 1: Uh, but that's editing. That's editing, that's editing, that's not 797 00:52:19,360 --> 00:52:22,000 Speaker 1: coming from the journalists. Yes, yeah, just so you know, 798 00:52:22,160 --> 00:52:24,440 Speaker 1: I mean, unfortunately, but. 799 00:52:24,640 --> 00:52:27,959 Speaker 2: I do agree with you, and I actually I sat 800 00:52:28,000 --> 00:52:33,560 Speaker 2: down at a little bit ago this fault and tried 801 00:52:33,600 --> 00:52:40,799 Speaker 2: to organize my sense of hope into sort of three buckets, 802 00:52:42,760 --> 00:52:48,320 Speaker 2: because I do I think have long term hope for America. 803 00:52:48,360 --> 00:52:51,200 Speaker 2: We will never be the country that we were before, 804 00:52:53,120 --> 00:52:57,520 Speaker 2: because we can now never say this didn't happen here. 805 00:52:57,560 --> 00:53:04,280 Speaker 2: But I do think we are in a moment where, uh, 806 00:53:04,320 --> 00:53:09,200 Speaker 2: there is more reason for long term hope or long 807 00:53:09,280 --> 00:53:12,759 Speaker 2: term optimism, as you say. And and the sort of 808 00:53:12,800 --> 00:53:16,640 Speaker 2: three reasons that I ended up sort of organizing my 809 00:53:16,680 --> 00:53:24,560 Speaker 2: thoughts around were one, uh and and this is all 810 00:53:24,760 --> 00:53:29,080 Speaker 2: me speaking for myself and not necessarily associating you, uh 811 00:53:29,120 --> 00:53:33,200 Speaker 2: with with with any of this is you know, there 812 00:53:33,200 --> 00:53:35,359 Speaker 2: are more of us than there are of them that 813 00:53:36,239 --> 00:53:42,160 Speaker 2: Trump is actually a historically unpopular figure. You know that 814 00:53:43,120 --> 00:53:47,160 Speaker 2: there two thirds of America did not vote for Donald Trump. 815 00:53:48,080 --> 00:53:54,040 Speaker 2: He is institutionally and politically much weaker than I think 816 00:53:54,719 --> 00:53:58,640 Speaker 2: many journalists and institutions sort of think that he is 817 00:53:58,840 --> 00:54:02,879 Speaker 2: day to day and that. 818 00:54:04,719 --> 00:54:08,160 Speaker 1: You know, we's got a strong grip on a weekend. 819 00:54:08,480 --> 00:54:12,759 Speaker 2: Yes, exactly. The second is and this is exactly I 820 00:54:12,760 --> 00:54:16,040 Speaker 2: think the what what you were talking about and what 821 00:54:16,080 --> 00:54:17,719 Speaker 2: we've talked about a little bit over the course of 822 00:54:17,760 --> 00:54:22,680 Speaker 2: this episode is for me, history is a source of hope, 823 00:54:22,840 --> 00:54:29,279 Speaker 2: which is America has had dark chapters before. Sometimes those 824 00:54:29,400 --> 00:54:37,000 Speaker 2: chapters are long, but that there are many stories of America, 825 00:54:37,080 --> 00:54:44,120 Speaker 2: and the one that I choose to believe is that 826 00:54:44,200 --> 00:54:47,640 Speaker 2: we are a country that strives to get better. That 827 00:54:47,800 --> 00:54:52,440 Speaker 2: sort of decade by decade, generation to generation, we are 828 00:54:52,440 --> 00:54:58,799 Speaker 2: a country that tries to get closer to living up 829 00:54:58,920 --> 00:55:03,120 Speaker 2: to the very imperfect creed that we were founded upon, 830 00:55:03,440 --> 00:55:06,919 Speaker 2: of all men are created equal. That at that point 831 00:55:07,200 --> 00:55:09,600 Speaker 2: was a creed that you know, not only excluded women 832 00:55:09,840 --> 00:55:15,600 Speaker 2: and minorities and Native Americans, but also you know, white 833 00:55:15,640 --> 00:55:20,760 Speaker 2: men who didn't own property. And that sort of decade 834 00:55:20,800 --> 00:55:23,759 Speaker 2: by decade, generation by generation, we are a country that 835 00:55:23,840 --> 00:55:31,680 Speaker 2: has sort of been generally moving towards progress. And then 836 00:55:31,719 --> 00:55:37,480 Speaker 2: the third for me is actuarial, which is, I don't 837 00:55:37,520 --> 00:55:39,759 Speaker 2: know where we are in the Donald Trump story. I 838 00:55:39,800 --> 00:55:43,200 Speaker 2: don't know whether we are in the beginning, the middle, 839 00:55:43,360 --> 00:55:47,239 Speaker 2: or the end. I don't know whether Donald Trump will 840 00:55:47,280 --> 00:55:51,360 Speaker 2: figure out a way to hold on for a third term, 841 00:55:51,400 --> 00:55:57,440 Speaker 2: maybe a fourth term. But I do know that, you know, actuarily, 842 00:55:58,080 --> 00:56:01,480 Speaker 2: Donald Trump's reign over ar in politics is going to 843 00:56:01,560 --> 00:56:05,120 Speaker 2: be measured in years and not decades. That this is 844 00:56:05,200 --> 00:56:05,560 Speaker 2: not a. 845 00:56:05,520 --> 00:56:07,680 Speaker 1: Situation closer to the end than the beginning. 846 00:56:07,960 --> 00:56:13,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, that this is not him as America's Franco who 847 00:56:13,760 --> 00:56:16,680 Speaker 2: reigned in Spain from nineteen thirty nine right through the 848 00:56:16,760 --> 00:56:23,640 Speaker 2: nineteen seventies. And that I think whenever Donald Trump exits 849 00:56:23,680 --> 00:56:27,520 Speaker 2: the stage, however that happens, and I'm not I have 850 00:56:27,600 --> 00:56:31,840 Speaker 2: no medical conspiracies to offer you. I have no predictions 851 00:56:31,880 --> 00:56:35,560 Speaker 2: about how or when that happens, whether it's noon on 852 00:56:35,760 --> 00:56:40,600 Speaker 2: January twentieth of twenty twenty nine, or before or after. 853 00:56:42,320 --> 00:56:50,440 Speaker 2: But he has failed to build an actual movement in Mada. 854 00:56:50,520 --> 00:56:51,120 Speaker 2: He has hearted. 855 00:56:51,520 --> 00:56:54,680 Speaker 1: I talk about this. He's too lazy to be Hitler right. 856 00:56:54,800 --> 00:56:56,920 Speaker 2: That he I mean, I'm sorry, I don't dials to 857 00:56:56,920 --> 00:57:02,680 Speaker 2: put it. He has sort of a setumbled, a weird 858 00:57:03,320 --> 00:57:10,759 Speaker 2: coalition of a personality cult of white nationalists and conspiracists 859 00:57:10,880 --> 00:57:16,360 Speaker 2: and anti government extremists and crypto bros and couple of grifters, 860 00:57:16,920 --> 00:57:21,160 Speaker 2: and then a whole bunch of grifters and a group 861 00:57:21,200 --> 00:57:26,600 Speaker 2: of people who are genuinely correct in their belief that 862 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:29,520 Speaker 2: they have been you know that the era of sort 863 00:57:29,560 --> 00:57:34,600 Speaker 2: of neoliberal Larry Summer's globalization has not worked out very 864 00:57:34,640 --> 00:57:38,000 Speaker 2: well for them as workers and citizens and a whole 865 00:57:38,000 --> 00:57:41,680 Speaker 2: bunch of people whose brains have been rotted by Fox 866 00:57:41,760 --> 00:57:47,000 Speaker 2: News and Facebook. And that the moment Trump exits, that 867 00:57:47,200 --> 00:57:52,800 Speaker 2: coalition fractures, and that you know, this is not a 868 00:57:52,800 --> 00:57:57,000 Speaker 2: coalition that sort of immediately transfers its loyalty to jd Vance. 869 00:57:57,640 --> 00:58:01,320 Speaker 2: It doesn't immediately go to Don Junior, it doesn't immediately 870 00:58:01,360 --> 00:58:05,120 Speaker 2: go to Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. And that there 871 00:58:05,120 --> 00:58:10,280 Speaker 2: will be a moment at that fracturing where sort of 872 00:58:10,560 --> 00:58:14,120 Speaker 2: people in history can begin to try to reassert itself. 873 00:58:21,320 --> 00:58:24,520 Speaker 1: You have, You've given voice to why. I just think 874 00:58:24,600 --> 00:58:26,960 Speaker 1: that we're gonna turn a corner. Now. It's gonna be 875 00:58:27,000 --> 00:58:34,200 Speaker 1: uneven and I don't know, you know, the Democratic Party 876 00:58:34,240 --> 00:58:36,880 Speaker 1: still had you know that there. They still think they're 877 00:58:36,880 --> 00:58:39,840 Speaker 1: just going to benefit from a seesaw effect, and until 878 00:58:39,880 --> 00:58:44,040 Speaker 1: they sort of come up with a better theory of 879 00:58:44,040 --> 00:58:46,920 Speaker 1: the case, we could be living in this sort of 880 00:58:47,000 --> 00:58:49,320 Speaker 1: uneven period for for some time. 881 00:58:50,120 --> 00:58:52,600 Speaker 2: And by the way, there's there's an there's a point 882 00:58:52,640 --> 00:58:58,320 Speaker 2: there that I think is important, Chuck, which is I 883 00:58:58,320 --> 00:59:06,240 Speaker 2: think Democrats have still not appropriately admitted that Trump voters 884 00:59:06,280 --> 00:59:07,000 Speaker 2: aren't wrong. 885 00:59:07,840 --> 00:59:11,040 Speaker 1: That's well, until they get there. I wrote this couple 886 00:59:11,080 --> 00:59:19,240 Speaker 1: substecs ago. The Democrats don't don't recover until they admit 887 00:59:19,480 --> 00:59:23,760 Speaker 1: Trump voters were right about some things. Yes, And because 888 00:59:23,800 --> 00:59:26,040 Speaker 1: they have to go win those voters, and you're not 889 00:59:26,160 --> 00:59:28,440 Speaker 1: going to win them by telling them how wrong they 890 00:59:28,440 --> 00:59:32,160 Speaker 1: were about Trump, that the best shot you have at 891 00:59:32,200 --> 00:59:34,160 Speaker 1: them is to say you were right, and Trump lets 892 00:59:34,200 --> 00:59:34,600 Speaker 1: you down. 893 00:59:36,320 --> 00:59:38,920 Speaker 2: Yes, And then I think Democrats have done this weird 894 00:59:39,040 --> 00:59:42,800 Speaker 2: thing where the two times Donald Trump has beat them, 895 00:59:44,920 --> 00:59:49,120 Speaker 2: they have just put an asterisk next to that election 896 00:59:50,120 --> 00:59:55,760 Speaker 2: and been like, oh, you know, twenty sixteen Russia, Hillary's emails, 897 00:59:56,440 --> 01:00:02,080 Speaker 2: that'll never happen again. Oh, twenty twenty four Biden was 898 01:00:04,080 --> 01:00:08,640 Speaker 2: too old. We shouldn't have nominated Kamala. There were only 899 01:00:08,640 --> 01:00:13,040 Speaker 2: one hundred and seven days. You know, that'll never happen again, 900 01:00:13,200 --> 01:00:15,720 Speaker 2: and that sort of We're only. 901 01:00:16,200 --> 01:00:19,320 Speaker 1: One white male. 902 01:00:20,720 --> 01:00:27,720 Speaker 2: Away from running a totally normal election that we can win. 903 01:00:29,120 --> 01:00:32,760 Speaker 2: And I think it's a lot deeper than that. 904 01:00:34,600 --> 01:00:38,919 Speaker 1: No, I don't think Democrats have lost enough yet. It's 905 01:00:38,920 --> 01:00:41,080 Speaker 1: not lost in me that they needed a second kick 906 01:00:41,200 --> 01:00:45,280 Speaker 1: to the head after eighty four. You know, eighty four 907 01:00:45,360 --> 01:00:47,120 Speaker 1: was supposed to be the all time low for them, 908 01:00:48,520 --> 01:00:52,800 Speaker 1: and then they went and nominated a technocrat, not a 909 01:00:52,840 --> 01:00:55,960 Speaker 1: total liberal, but a technocrat, and that didn't work either, right, 910 01:00:56,040 --> 01:00:59,040 Speaker 1: because he was a cultural This is sort of culturally 911 01:00:59,040 --> 01:01:02,520 Speaker 1: out of touch, and it just was a you know, 912 01:01:03,800 --> 01:01:06,120 Speaker 1: that's when they realized they had to have a cultural makeover. 913 01:01:06,520 --> 01:01:09,160 Speaker 1: It wasn't just a policy makeover they need to because 914 01:01:09,280 --> 01:01:13,960 Speaker 1: do Coccus's policies were fine for the electorate. What it 915 01:01:14,000 --> 01:01:17,680 Speaker 1: really was was cultural issues. And that's what Bill Clinton understood. 916 01:01:19,280 --> 01:01:22,360 Speaker 2: I would like to have to live in the country 917 01:01:23,320 --> 01:01:28,560 Speaker 2: where Mike Docaucus's rail policies kicked in. Starting in nineteen 918 01:01:28,600 --> 01:01:33,720 Speaker 2: eighty nine. 919 01:01:32,160 --> 01:01:34,480 Speaker 1: I had somebody say something made myself I had somebody 920 01:01:34,480 --> 01:01:36,680 Speaker 1: who made me feel better about our rail policy when 921 01:01:36,720 --> 01:01:39,560 Speaker 1: he noted, because you know, I did, you know, over 922 01:01:39,720 --> 01:01:42,240 Speaker 1: a couple holidays ago, did a family did the family 923 01:01:42,360 --> 01:01:44,680 Speaker 1: did a family trip to Germany and did the whole thing, 924 01:01:44,920 --> 01:01:47,600 Speaker 1: the whole German history thing, which is just amazing. And 925 01:01:47,640 --> 01:01:52,600 Speaker 1: we took the train from Berlinda Munich and it's unbelievable, right, 926 01:01:52,760 --> 01:01:56,760 Speaker 1: unbelievable ride, beautiful train. And as somebody said to me, 927 01:01:56,800 --> 01:02:01,120 Speaker 1: he says, because you're a prioritized their trains for people 928 01:02:01,600 --> 01:02:05,160 Speaker 1: and their roads for freight, and America prioritize their trains 929 01:02:05,160 --> 01:02:09,200 Speaker 1: for freight and their roads for people. And then this 930 01:02:09,240 --> 01:02:13,360 Speaker 1: person argues, and you may not love it, but whose 931 01:02:13,360 --> 01:02:18,400 Speaker 1: GDP is bigger? And I just thought it was somebody 932 01:02:18,400 --> 01:02:20,400 Speaker 1: that when this person framed it that way, and they 933 01:02:20,400 --> 01:02:23,840 Speaker 1: weren't a lobbyist for CSX for what it's worth, Okay, 934 01:02:23,920 --> 01:02:26,640 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna that wasn't like it was more of 935 01:02:26,680 --> 01:02:30,160 Speaker 1: an economic economist. And I thought, huh, I hadn't thought 936 01:02:30,200 --> 01:02:33,040 Speaker 1: of it that way. That. Look, it's true, and had 937 01:02:33,040 --> 01:02:36,840 Speaker 1: we prioritized trains for people instead of freight, we would 938 01:02:36,840 --> 01:02:37,320 Speaker 1: have better. 939 01:02:37,240 --> 01:02:40,919 Speaker 2: Rout I believe that certainly, has some truth to it. 940 01:02:41,640 --> 01:02:43,480 Speaker 2: I would like to think in a country with as 941 01:02:43,560 --> 01:02:45,880 Speaker 2: much space as the United States has, we could have 942 01:02:45,880 --> 01:02:46,480 Speaker 2: gotten both. 943 01:02:46,760 --> 01:02:49,280 Speaker 1: We could have done both that too, right and had 944 01:02:49,280 --> 01:02:54,160 Speaker 1: a nice, nice, comfortable rail system. Yeah, and with that, 945 01:02:56,000 --> 01:03:01,240 Speaker 1: you ever thought about dabbling outside of politics and government. No, 946 01:03:03,560 --> 01:03:05,720 Speaker 1: you're not going to get suckered in like Woodward did 947 01:03:05,720 --> 01:03:06,560 Speaker 1: with John Belushi. 948 01:03:07,240 --> 01:03:12,080 Speaker 2: Uh, very very boring. Uh answer I because OJ. 949 01:03:12,440 --> 01:03:14,560 Speaker 1: Here's what Here's the only thing I would love to 950 01:03:14,600 --> 01:03:18,480 Speaker 1: see us do when I say us somebody of your 951 01:03:19,080 --> 01:03:23,720 Speaker 1: historical because I do think OJ is a story we 952 01:03:23,760 --> 01:03:25,080 Speaker 1: haven't revisited correctly. 953 01:03:25,520 --> 01:03:25,880 Speaker 2: Mm hmm. 954 01:03:26,720 --> 01:03:31,040 Speaker 1: I think we got close with the We got close 955 01:03:31,320 --> 01:03:34,560 Speaker 1: with at least explaining why LA responded the way they 956 01:03:34,560 --> 01:03:39,479 Speaker 1: did to OJ, and that's what the ESPN, But we've 957 01:03:39,560 --> 01:03:43,440 Speaker 1: never fully explained how. You know. I'm I'm one of 958 01:03:43,440 --> 01:03:47,000 Speaker 1: those who says, without OJ, you don't get Trump. M hmm. 959 01:03:47,760 --> 01:03:53,920 Speaker 1: Because OJ fundamentally changed the TV news business. Before OJ, 960 01:03:54,560 --> 01:03:56,840 Speaker 1: it was not you know, there there's always been this 961 01:03:57,160 --> 01:04:01,280 Speaker 1: obsession that it's a ratings driven business, but it actually 962 01:04:01,360 --> 01:04:06,479 Speaker 1: wasn't until OJ. Because that was the moment when news 963 01:04:06,520 --> 01:04:09,760 Speaker 1: divisions decided, Hey, why don't we give people what they 964 01:04:09,800 --> 01:04:13,120 Speaker 1: want to watch as a newscast rather than what they 965 01:04:13,160 --> 01:04:16,280 Speaker 1: need to watch. Mh. We didn't do that pre OJ, 966 01:04:17,680 --> 01:04:20,120 Speaker 1: but OJ was the first time, Hey, this was this 967 01:04:20,280 --> 01:04:22,720 Speaker 1: was an event we wanted treated like a news story, 968 01:04:22,920 --> 01:04:26,440 Speaker 1: and the audience asked for that, and CNN said okay. 969 01:04:27,280 --> 01:04:29,880 Speaker 1: And CNN made a boatload of money and they made 970 01:04:29,960 --> 01:04:32,439 Speaker 1: so much money doing it. Then NBC and Fox said, 971 01:04:32,560 --> 01:04:35,480 Speaker 1: wait a minute, we want a piece of this cable business. 972 01:04:36,120 --> 01:04:40,640 Speaker 1: You guys can't have it alone. So if I were 973 01:04:40,640 --> 01:04:44,400 Speaker 1: to throw an eye, if I were throwing pitches at 974 01:04:44,440 --> 01:04:52,480 Speaker 1: you for what you should tackle, how OJ changed you 975 01:04:52,520 --> 01:04:56,920 Speaker 1: know how? I do think the OJ aification of the 976 01:04:56,920 --> 01:05:00,920 Speaker 1: news business set us on this course. Yeah, that we 977 01:05:01,040 --> 01:05:04,360 Speaker 1: are that we of the algorithmic. You know, before we 978 01:05:04,360 --> 01:05:08,640 Speaker 1: had algorithms deciding what we wanted to see. We told, 979 01:05:08,800 --> 01:05:11,280 Speaker 1: you know, we told CNN no, no, no, no no, we're 980 01:05:11,280 --> 01:05:13,680 Speaker 1: going to watch court TV if you don't cover OJA. 981 01:05:14,640 --> 01:05:17,920 Speaker 1: And they said, okay, we'll cover OJ. We'll stop covering news, 982 01:05:18,240 --> 01:05:21,600 Speaker 1: We'll just do OJ twenty four seven. It's a great 983 01:05:21,600 --> 01:05:26,040 Speaker 1: business decision. It changed journalism forever. 984 01:05:26,440 --> 01:05:28,320 Speaker 2: And it gave us the Kardashians. 985 01:05:28,640 --> 01:05:32,200 Speaker 1: I love to remind people of this. You will love this. Garrett. 986 01:05:32,200 --> 01:05:36,440 Speaker 1: I teach a class at USC. OJ died on the 987 01:05:36,560 --> 01:05:39,680 Speaker 1: day that I was teaching, So I thought, oh, at 988 01:05:39,800 --> 01:05:43,880 Speaker 1: USC students, I've got to do OJ. So I said, 989 01:05:43,880 --> 01:05:45,760 Speaker 1: all right, we're scrapping what the lecture is going to be. 990 01:05:45,760 --> 01:05:47,600 Speaker 1: We're going to do OJ. You know, this is USC 991 01:05:47,760 --> 01:05:50,440 Speaker 1: you guys, you know, and before I got there, this 992 01:05:50,520 --> 01:05:52,760 Speaker 1: is whatever he died last year, I think it was. 993 01:05:53,440 --> 01:05:55,600 Speaker 1: So I do a quick ask, you know, what do 994 01:05:55,600 --> 01:05:58,240 Speaker 1: you guys know about OJ? The first thing someone says 995 01:05:58,280 --> 01:05:59,960 Speaker 1: is isn't he Chloe Kardashian's file? 996 01:06:02,920 --> 01:06:03,439 Speaker 2: And I knew. 997 01:06:03,440 --> 01:06:06,160 Speaker 1: I was like, oh man, this is going to be 998 01:06:06,200 --> 01:06:12,439 Speaker 1: a long couple of hours. I just throw that out there. 999 01:06:12,480 --> 01:06:14,480 Speaker 1: I think it's the one pop culture event that had 1000 01:06:14,520 --> 01:06:17,480 Speaker 1: true political ramification. Yeah, but I think you're right because 1001 01:06:17,520 --> 01:06:19,280 Speaker 1: of what it did to the news media, and I 1002 01:06:19,720 --> 01:06:21,640 Speaker 1: don't think we've fully reckoned with it. I've had this 1003 01:06:21,680 --> 01:06:24,320 Speaker 1: conversation with my friend Andy Lack, who was head of 1004 01:06:24,320 --> 01:06:26,520 Speaker 1: the NBC at the time, and he pushes back on 1005 01:06:26,560 --> 01:06:28,480 Speaker 1: me a little bit, and you know, he says, oh, 1006 01:06:28,560 --> 01:06:30,280 Speaker 1: the news business has always covered a little bit of 1007 01:06:30,280 --> 01:06:32,400 Speaker 1: what people want and a little bit of what people need, 1008 01:06:32,480 --> 01:06:34,960 Speaker 1: and it's like, yeah, but we used to have a balance. 1009 01:06:35,480 --> 01:06:38,520 Speaker 1: Yeah the minute we had a metric every fifteen minutes 1010 01:06:38,560 --> 01:06:41,800 Speaker 1: of what people were thinking. Then all of a sudden 1011 01:06:41,840 --> 01:06:45,800 Speaker 1: we changed. We let the audience be the managing editor. Yeah, 1012 01:06:46,520 --> 01:06:48,040 Speaker 1: that's an interesting theory. 1013 01:06:48,240 --> 01:06:48,720 Speaker 2: I like it. 1014 01:06:50,280 --> 01:06:51,920 Speaker 1: What do you got going on with Long Shadow? Before 1015 01:06:51,920 --> 01:06:54,240 Speaker 1: I let you go? People come in and subscribe, what 1016 01:06:54,280 --> 01:06:55,080 Speaker 1: do they get. 1017 01:06:55,160 --> 01:07:01,200 Speaker 2: So Long Shadow? We are just out with our fourth season. 1018 01:07:02,200 --> 01:07:07,680 Speaker 2: This is the story of every season. We try to 1019 01:07:07,760 --> 01:07:11,959 Speaker 2: do a as I was saying at the top, sort 1020 01:07:11,960 --> 01:07:15,040 Speaker 2: of pick us story in the news today and tell 1021 01:07:15,120 --> 01:07:18,920 Speaker 2: us how we got to today. And this year's season 1022 01:07:19,520 --> 01:07:24,760 Speaker 2: available wherever you get your podcasts, is the breaking of 1023 01:07:24,840 --> 01:07:28,200 Speaker 2: the Internet, sort of how a tool that was supposed 1024 01:07:28,240 --> 01:07:31,880 Speaker 2: to bring us together ended up driving us all apart. 1025 01:07:32,240 --> 01:07:36,640 Speaker 2: And it was, as I was talking about earlier, I think, 1026 01:07:36,680 --> 01:07:38,840 Speaker 2: a fascinating example. I lived a lot of the story. 1027 01:07:38,880 --> 01:07:40,280 Speaker 2: You lived a lot of the story, you know. I 1028 01:07:40,280 --> 01:07:44,200 Speaker 2: think one of the hardest things that we struggled with 1029 01:07:44,240 --> 01:07:49,960 Speaker 2: in this season was to take people back to the 1030 01:07:49,960 --> 01:07:53,200 Speaker 2: early two thousands and sort of how promising and exciting 1031 01:07:53,240 --> 01:07:55,800 Speaker 2: the Internet seemed before we sort of all realized it 1032 01:07:55,840 --> 01:08:01,360 Speaker 2: was going to ruin our politics and our world was 1033 01:08:01,400 --> 01:08:08,640 Speaker 2: sort of just how exciting the Internet was, and that 1034 01:08:08,880 --> 01:08:14,560 Speaker 2: trajectory from there to you know, the manosphere and the 1035 01:08:14,600 --> 01:08:19,840 Speaker 2: red Pill today, you know, turns out to be a 1036 01:08:19,920 --> 01:08:26,000 Speaker 2: much more linear story of individuals making important decisions along 1037 01:08:26,040 --> 01:08:31,439 Speaker 2: the way that seemed relatively inconsequential at the time, but 1038 01:08:31,680 --> 01:08:36,240 Speaker 2: really altered the trajectory of the way that we consume information. 1039 01:08:37,040 --> 01:08:40,080 Speaker 1: What is the fork in the road moment on algorithms. 1040 01:08:40,680 --> 01:08:46,760 Speaker 2: The fork in the road algorithms is Facebook choosing to 1041 01:08:46,840 --> 01:08:52,200 Speaker 2: be advertiser driven. That's what changes the whole Internet, because 1042 01:08:53,080 --> 01:08:55,880 Speaker 2: the moment that they decide that they are going to 1043 01:08:55,960 --> 01:08:58,000 Speaker 2: be advertiser driven. 1044 01:08:59,680 --> 01:09:02,639 Speaker 1: Max basically driven by shareholders or investors. 1045 01:09:02,720 --> 01:09:06,920 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that was you know, Facebook going public and 1046 01:09:07,000 --> 01:09:09,280 Speaker 2: you know, needing to make a lot of money really quickly, 1047 01:09:10,240 --> 01:09:16,960 Speaker 2: and Facebook deciding that begins to optimize the whole site 1048 01:09:17,120 --> 01:09:20,720 Speaker 2: for how long they can keep users engaged. And what 1049 01:09:21,240 --> 01:09:27,439 Speaker 2: Facebook figures out pretty quickly with its newsfeed algorithm, followed 1050 01:09:28,200 --> 01:09:31,200 Speaker 2: later by Twitter and you know almost every other social 1051 01:09:31,240 --> 01:09:37,120 Speaker 2: media site since is that things that make people angry 1052 01:09:38,080 --> 01:09:42,519 Speaker 2: make them engage, And so if you want engagement, you 1053 01:09:42,640 --> 01:09:49,920 Speaker 2: want enragement and that sort of they begin to very 1054 01:09:50,000 --> 01:09:54,400 Speaker 2: carefully tweak that algorithm so that what you see in 1055 01:09:54,439 --> 01:09:58,880 Speaker 2: your news feed is the story of things that make 1056 01:09:58,960 --> 01:10:03,840 Speaker 2: you mad prize us, and that we now sort of 1057 01:10:03,920 --> 01:10:12,920 Speaker 2: understand from internal Facebook documents that Facebook weights prioritizes the 1058 01:10:13,160 --> 01:10:19,240 Speaker 2: equivalent of its dislike button five times more strongly than 1059 01:10:19,840 --> 01:10:23,600 Speaker 2: the like button. And so you know, whatever you're scrolling 1060 01:10:23,640 --> 01:10:28,599 Speaker 2: through chuck that makes you personally angry, you get five 1061 01:10:28,680 --> 01:10:31,439 Speaker 2: times more that content than that which you actually like, 1062 01:10:31,640 --> 01:10:35,120 Speaker 2: and that that it becomes the backdrop of so much 1063 01:10:35,360 --> 01:10:39,759 Speaker 2: of the backlash to the Arab Spring, you know, literal 1064 01:10:40,400 --> 01:10:45,680 Speaker 2: genocide in Me and mar the Russian interference in the 1065 01:10:45,720 --> 01:10:51,400 Speaker 2: twenty sixteen campaign, and then of course you know COVID 1066 01:10:51,640 --> 01:10:59,320 Speaker 2: and anti vaccine conspiracies and sort of the the big 1067 01:10:59,360 --> 01:11:01,080 Speaker 2: lie leading up to January sixth. 1068 01:11:02,520 --> 01:11:06,240 Speaker 1: I love what you're doing. There's a similar there's a 1069 01:11:06,280 --> 01:11:09,439 Speaker 1: business podcast. Do you you ever done the Acquired series? 1070 01:11:09,720 --> 01:11:09,920 Speaker 2: Yeah? 1071 01:11:10,000 --> 01:11:14,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, there they do very it's sort of episodic, big long, 1072 01:11:14,800 --> 01:11:18,320 Speaker 1: deep dive, slightly different, but like on a company, How 1073 01:11:18,320 --> 01:11:22,519 Speaker 1: did Google become Google? That sort of thing. It's a 1074 01:11:23,800 --> 01:11:27,000 Speaker 1: I think it's the best of podcasting yeah, you know, 1075 01:11:27,360 --> 01:11:31,519 Speaker 1: so I am. I'm glad it's there. Do you do 1076 01:11:31,560 --> 01:11:35,640 Speaker 1: you think it's that I don't think books are getting replaced, 1077 01:11:35,640 --> 01:11:40,800 Speaker 1: but do you Is this a because these are all 1078 01:11:40,840 --> 01:11:43,080 Speaker 1: things you could have done as a book, but you're 1079 01:11:43,120 --> 01:11:47,679 Speaker 1: doing it as a podcast. Is that simply a choice 1080 01:11:47,880 --> 01:11:50,479 Speaker 1: or it could be in either or and right now 1081 01:11:50,560 --> 01:11:53,559 Speaker 1: the podcast makes more sense to be. 1082 01:11:53,560 --> 01:11:56,800 Speaker 2: There a little bit of either or. You know, podcasts 1083 01:11:56,840 --> 01:12:01,800 Speaker 2: reach a different audience, which you know is U has 1084 01:12:01,840 --> 01:12:09,320 Speaker 2: its strengths and from a production standpoint, they're also sort 1085 01:12:09,360 --> 01:12:12,040 Speaker 2: of slightly different stories that you can sort of tell 1086 01:12:12,120 --> 01:12:16,799 Speaker 2: and in a podcast where you have good archival sound, 1087 01:12:16,920 --> 01:12:22,200 Speaker 2: where you have you know, good interviews that you can 1088 01:12:22,240 --> 01:12:25,320 Speaker 2: do that sort of make these stories more come alive 1089 01:12:25,560 --> 01:12:27,160 Speaker 2: than I think they can on the page. 1090 01:12:28,439 --> 01:12:31,599 Speaker 1: Well, look, it's what you're what you were built to do. 1091 01:12:32,680 --> 01:12:36,360 Speaker 1: So it's now it's like you don't you know, usually 1092 01:12:36,520 --> 01:12:38,760 Speaker 1: big historical book authors they do a big book, they 1093 01:12:38,840 --> 01:12:41,080 Speaker 1: take a break and they do you're just now you've 1094 01:12:41,479 --> 01:12:44,799 Speaker 1: I'm guessing you always have how many projects, live projects 1095 01:12:44,840 --> 01:12:45,920 Speaker 1: do you have going at one time? 1096 01:12:46,840 --> 01:12:49,920 Speaker 2: Oh? I love the mix of sort of the short 1097 01:12:50,000 --> 01:12:55,639 Speaker 2: term magazine newsletter writing, the you know, sort of mid 1098 01:12:55,760 --> 01:12:59,920 Speaker 2: term mid length podcast writing and the long term book writing. 1099 01:13:00,479 --> 01:13:04,240 Speaker 2: You know, I try to do a book every year 1100 01:13:04,840 --> 01:13:08,160 Speaker 2: or eighteen months, depending on what the topic is, and 1101 01:13:08,200 --> 01:13:11,599 Speaker 2: then one podcast season a year, and then try to write, 1102 01:13:11,960 --> 01:13:14,080 Speaker 2: you know, more or less weekly for my newsletter. 1103 01:13:14,120 --> 01:13:18,720 Speaker 1: It's wonderful, seems very simple, but I'm well aware of 1104 01:13:20,160 --> 01:13:23,720 Speaker 1: that that you fall behind very quickly, exactly matter what, 1105 01:13:24,000 --> 01:13:27,120 Speaker 1: no matter what, no matter how well you think your scheduleding. Garrett, 1106 01:13:27,120 --> 01:13:28,800 Speaker 1: thanks for humoring me. I went a little longer than 1107 01:13:28,800 --> 01:13:30,720 Speaker 1: I planned to, but you know, you're too good of 1108 01:13:30,720 --> 01:13:33,320 Speaker 1: a conversationalist. I'm just too into this stuff. 1109 01:13:33,720 --> 01:13:35,400 Speaker 2: Well, it's always a pleasure to talk to you, and 1110 01:13:35,479 --> 01:13:38,880 Speaker 2: I've appreciated our friendship across a lot of different chapters 1111 01:13:38,920 --> 01:13:40,200 Speaker 2: of our respective lives. 1112 01:13:40,680 --> 01:13:45,240 Speaker 1: No, and at a minimum, I enjoyed the history brainstorming here. Yes, 1113 01:13:45,600 --> 01:13:47,920 Speaker 1: you know of different ways to tackle different things, and 1114 01:13:48,920 --> 01:13:54,520 Speaker 1: I have a feeling you would be an interesting candidate. 1115 01:13:54,200 --> 01:13:58,000 Speaker 2: On Bill clin I have considered it. 1116 01:13:58,400 --> 01:14:01,600 Speaker 1: Yes, well, I I hope you pursue it, and I 1117 01:14:01,640 --> 01:14:08,120 Speaker 1: totally agree. I think it's it. Probably it probably needs 1118 01:14:08,160 --> 01:14:12,400 Speaker 1: to wait until there's there's a un till all the 1119 01:14:12,439 --> 01:14:16,680 Speaker 1: actuary tables have kicked in yep. So well, I know 1120 01:14:16,760 --> 01:14:19,720 Speaker 1: we all are interested. We're all interested in what Hillary Clinton. 1121 01:14:19,360 --> 01:14:24,599 Speaker 2: Has to say, and I will look forward to crediting 1122 01:14:24,640 --> 01:14:27,080 Speaker 2: you on the first line of the acknowledgments of the 1123 01:14:27,080 --> 01:14:29,080 Speaker 2: OJ book. There you go. 1124 01:14:29,560 --> 01:14:32,040 Speaker 1: Well, there's more to be done here. I keep trying 1125 01:14:32,080 --> 01:14:33,479 Speaker 1: to look for a better way to do it. 1126 01:14:33,600 --> 01:14:34,000 Speaker 2: I know. 1127 01:14:37,000 --> 01:14:40,640 Speaker 1: When I spend time. Let's just say, I wrote an 1128 01:14:40,760 --> 01:14:44,439 Speaker 1: entire essay and my former company begged me not to 1129 01:14:44,520 --> 01:14:51,080 Speaker 1: have it air, and they had that right, but I 1130 01:14:51,120 --> 01:14:54,559 Speaker 1: do think it's it's our it's case, it's television news 1131 01:14:54,680 --> 01:14:59,000 Speaker 1: is original sin? Anyway, all right, my friend, thanks for 1132 01:14:59,040 --> 01:14:59,280 Speaker 1: the time. 1133 01:14:59,920 --> 01:15:02,720 Speaker 2: I Hey,