Speaker 1: All right, News round up in information Overload hour eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one, Shawn is a number you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. Sixty nine
Speaker 1: days till the election day and only twenty days early
Speaker 1: voting begins in Pennsylvania, mail in ballots go out even
Speaker 1: sooner in North Carolina, and then it rolls out all
Speaker 1: around the country. Not enough time. Really, the media won't
Speaker 1: do their job. They won't vet Kamala Harris or Tim Walls.
Speaker 1: They are trying to run out the clock. The media
Speaker 1: is assisting, they're aiding their betting. You know, we learned
Speaker 1: from you know, a Zuckerberg earlier in this week about
Speaker 1: Meta and the pressure that they faced by the FBI
Speaker 1: and the lead up to the twenty twenty election. As
Speaker 1: we had told you, the FBI had on March the twentieth,
Speaker 1: they had verified the authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop. They
Speaker 1: also knew that Rudy Giuliani's attorney had a copy. They
Speaker 1: were very aware that that laptop was likely going to
Speaker 1: be leaked. It got leaked weak before the twenty twenty election,
Speaker 1: but in the ensuing time after they verified its authenticity,
Speaker 1: the FBI was meeting weekly in the summer of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: with every big tech company warning them they might be
Speaker 1: a victim of a Russian disinformation campaign. It might be
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden, it might be about Hunter Biden, it
Speaker 1: might be about Barisma. They were pre bunking what they
Speaker 1: knew was going to be made public, all in an
Speaker 1: effort to help the Biden campaign. That was their contribution.
Speaker 1: And then, of course you have fifty one former Intel
Speaker 1: officials that knew nothing about Hunter's very real laptop. This
Speaker 1: has all of the markings of Russian disinformation. None of
Speaker 1: them examined it. They were organized by Wink and Tony
Speaker 1: Blincoln to just sign off on a letter to give
Speaker 1: a talking point before the debate that was about to
Speaker 1: take place with Donald Trump. So we have powerful institutions
Speaker 1: that are are clearly putting cinder blocks on the scales
Speaker 1: of our elections in this country. Is it is corrupt,
Speaker 1: It is dangerous. It is a real threat to democracy,
Speaker 1: if you will, to use a phrase. And it just
Speaker 1: the weaponization just continues. We have a Supreme Court decision
Speaker 1: as it relates to presidential immunity that it seems a
Speaker 1: special prosecutor does not really care about and we had
Speaker 1: just yesterday. Now, usually there's what we considered it a
Speaker 1: ninety day rules. Some revererter is it a sixty day rule.
Speaker 1: And it's very simple, is that the DOJ would not
Speaker 1: take any action against the candidate this close to an election.
Speaker 1: We're only two weeks out of mail in ballots being
Speaker 1: sent to the American people in some states, we are
Speaker 1: twenty days away from early voting, beginning in Pennsylvania, and
Speaker 1: then this indictment comes down. Well, how is that not
Speaker 1: election interference? And based on the history of not only
Speaker 1: twenty twenty is I just outlined for you, you know, how
Speaker 1: do you not see this for what it is? And
Speaker 1: that is the weaponization of our Department of Justice. It
Speaker 1: should scare every single solitary American and most people, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: will not be aware of it. And it's our job
Speaker 1: to get this information out anyway, joining us not awigh
Speaker 1: in on this, and we have other issues and new
Speaker 1: tape has emerged when Nancy Pelosi takes responsibility for January
Speaker 1: the sixth. Is our friend David Shown, civil rights attorney,
Speaker 1: former counsel for President Trump, Well, whatever happened to the
Speaker 1: DOJ rule that you you don't take action like this
Speaker 1: before an election, and especially in light of what happened
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty when they knew that that laptop was
Speaker 1: very real, but they were pre bunking it with big Tech,
Speaker 1: And we heard from Zuckerberg this week admitting to all
Speaker 1: of this. And then when when the actual story came
Speaker 1: out in the New York Post, Zuckerberg and Facebook and
Speaker 1: Twitter at the time not owned by la Musk ask
Speaker 1: the FBI is this what you were warning us about?
Speaker 1: Or is this real? And they knew the answer and
Speaker 1: wouldn't tell them.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, as to the sixty day rule, the first question
Speaker 3: you have, they're clearly just ignoring it. They're honoring it
Speaker 3: in its breach, and everyone's scrambling to try to justify it.
Speaker 3: As an article in Forbes you right now that says well,
Speaker 3: it's actually outside the sixty day window. Well, that's not true,
Speaker 3: as you pointed out, and I agree with everything you said.
Speaker 3: Early elections, early voting is starting now. Every reason to
Speaker 3: not affect an election applies now to the early election,
Speaker 3: not just the date in November, a date in November.
Speaker 3: And they've also said, well that just applies to a
Speaker 3: new indictment. That's also not true. It's not just up
Speaker 3: to the court.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: Jack Smith made an affirmative effort to come up with
Speaker 3: a new indictment now time period when he was just
Speaker 3: supposed to be reporting to the court. As they had
Speaker 3: to proceed on parsing through the indictment, they had to
Speaker 3: see which our official acts, which aren't. That's the director
Speaker 3: of the United States Supreme Court case.
Speaker 1: So my question is, now, let's go back to the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decision here for a second, because the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court decision is very clear. And I think this because
Speaker 1: if you look at the new filing that they made,
Speaker 1: it's pretty much like the old filing, except they're just
Speaker 1: trying to get around the Supreme Court ruling, which is
Speaker 1: not surprising considering you know they don't they ignored the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court on the issue of student loan forgiveness, et cetera.
Speaker 1: But putting that aside, the issue of immunity seems to
Speaker 1: be very clear. But that would also impact the convictions
Speaker 1: in New York and we're expecting I guess the penalty
Speaker 1: phase to come up in just a few weeks. But
Speaker 1: in that case, we know that they admitted evidence in
Speaker 1: that case that was from the time that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was president, which I would think would compel Judge Bershawn
Speaker 1: if he cared about the law, and he showed every
Speaker 1: indication he just cares about politics to vacate the guilty
Speaker 1: verdicts and they'd opt to start all over again, and
Speaker 1: they would have they probably wouldn't even have a case
Speaker 1: to begin with.
Speaker 3: Right, You've made a very important point because people keep
Speaker 3: overlooking the immunity decision. Wasn't just that a president has
Speaker 3: immunity from official acts if official act evidence cannot be
Speaker 3: used before a grand jury to get an indictment or
Speaker 3: at trial even if he's not charged with the specific
Speaker 3: conduct was covered by the official acts. So in the
Speaker 3: New York case, you can be sure they used official
Speaker 3: act evidence from Donald Trump when he was president to
Speaker 3: both get the indictment and the trial. And that's the
Speaker 3: problem with this new indictment in DC. It still does
Speaker 3: that they include discussions and efforts with the Vice president Pence.
Speaker 3: The immunity decision says quite clearly whenever the president and
Speaker 3: vice president discussed their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct.
Speaker 3: Presiding over the January sixth Certification proceeding, which members of
Speaker 3: Congress County electoral votes is a constitutional and statutory duty
Speaker 3: of the vice president. That's very clear. More than that,
Speaker 3: in this case, they've continued to charge them with obstruction.
Speaker 3: The United States Supreme Court on June twenty eighth of
Speaker 3: this year, in the Fisher case, said that this specific
Speaker 3: charge eighteen Usc. Fifteen twelve c two only applies to
Speaker 3: using impairing the use of documents, records, or other objects
Speaker 3: with respect to an official proceeding. That's not what they
Speaker 3: said this case is all about. This was about supposedly
Speaker 3: his speeches and talking to Vice President Trump and calls
Speaker 3: to Georgia and so on. This case ought to be
Speaker 3: eliminated absolutely under the Fisher decision two of the charges
Speaker 3: of this obstruction statute. Because they wanted to get a
Speaker 3: twenty year count, they should have been thrown out immediately.
Speaker 3: But any event, the point is that you're making it
Speaker 3: is accurate. They're still going to have to parse through
Speaker 3: this for the judge to determine what are official acts,
Speaker 3: what are an official acts. You know, Smith is trying
Speaker 3: to say, well, this grand jury never heard the evidence.
Speaker 3: That's because he wants to try to say they're not
Speaker 3: tainted by the other material that went before.
Speaker 4: But you know what's.
Speaker 3: Also noteworthy for all of this talk about it. Donald
Speaker 3: Trump supposedly tried to affect the election and wouldn't permit
Speaker 3: the peaceful transfer of power. They still have never charged
Speaker 3: him with insurrection. The statue of twenty three eighty three,
Speaker 3: which was recommended in this model prosecution memo. People like
Speaker 3: Andrew Wiseman Normalizen are behind in several of the cases.
Speaker 3: So there's so much here, but the sixty day rules
Speaker 3: should have barred this. They're just tone deaf, and Donald
Speaker 3: trump ort to goes soaring up in the polls. One
Speaker 3: last issue is that you raise the appointments clause issue
Speaker 3: ta Jacksmith even the Special Council. You know, there are
Speaker 3: two brilliant issues that Judge Cannon identify. The appointments clause
Speaker 3: under Article two, Section two, as you mentioned in an
Speaker 3: Article one, section nine, the appropriation's clause that you can't
Speaker 3: spend money for a purpose that's not authorized by law,
Speaker 3: and his appointment wasn't authorized by law. The problem in
Speaker 3: the DC case is the lawyers never raised that issue
Speaker 3: and they had to acknowledge that before the Court of
Speaker 3: Appeals and the Court of Appeals wanted to hear from
Speaker 3: it and to Clarence Thomas, just as Thomas when he
Speaker 3: wanted to.
Speaker 4: Hear about it.
Speaker 3: But let's see, maybe they'll raise it now with the
Speaker 3: new indictment.
Speaker 1: All right, quick, Frank, we'll come right back for with
Speaker 1: David shown on the other side, and then we'll check
Speaker 1: in with our friend Dennis Quaid. He's got his new
Speaker 1: movie coming out this weekend. You definitely have to see that.
Speaker 1: He's phenomenal at it. It's called Reagan and Man. The
Speaker 1: parallels to what's going on in the world today versus
Speaker 1: what was happening in the late seventies early eighties are uncanny. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Dennis Quaid coming up after that, more with David Shoan
Speaker 1: on the other side, as we continue. All right, we
Speaker 1: continue now with David Shoon, civil liberties attorney, former counsel
Speaker 1: for President Donald J. Trump. Let me go back to
Speaker 1: another issue, and our friend John Solomon at justinnews dot
Speaker 1: Com actually has a tape.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: If you remember, on January sixth Nancy Pelosi's daughter was
Speaker 1: going around and taping her, and she said at one
Speaker 1: point she didn't even feel threatened, didn't want to be
Speaker 1: removed from the Capitol. At another point, he actually took
Speaker 1: full responsibility for what happened on January sixth and said,
Speaker 1: as she had done. You know, oh, they thought these
Speaker 1: people would act civilized.
Speaker 6: Listen, we have responsibility, Terry. We did not have any
Speaker 6: accountability for what was going on there, and we should have.
Speaker 6: This is ridiculous. Why weren't the National Guard there to
Speaker 6: begin with?
Speaker 4: They thought that they had sufficient Now.
Speaker 6: There's not a question of how they don't know. They
Speaker 6: clearly didn't know. And I take responsibility for not having
Speaker 6: them just prepare for more, because it's stupid that should
Speaker 6: be in a situation on this because they thought they
Speaker 6: had one. They thought these people would act civilized.
Speaker 3: They thought these people gave it.
Speaker 6: Damn.
Speaker 1: Now there's even more to the story. NBC Lester Holt
Speaker 1: reported that, in fact, they knew that there was actionable
Speaker 1: intelligence the days before January sixth. The Capitol Police chief
Speaker 1: sonned at the time, again, you know Liz Cheney and
Speaker 1: her you know January sixth committee that ignored the five
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy four riots in the summer at twenty
Speaker 1: twenty and the insurrection support of Kamala Harris and Tim Walls.
Speaker 1: You know, interestingly, interestingly kept all of this information away
Speaker 1: from the American people because they had a predetermined outcome
Speaker 1: to bludgeon Donald Trump. But it turned out the actionable
Speaker 1: intelligence and the request of the Capitol Police Chief when
Speaker 1: ignored again and again and again, and in the days
Speaker 1: leading up to January sixth, Donald Trump himself and five
Speaker 1: people combined in the Oval Office, including himself, I have
Speaker 1: interviewed four of the five of them all confirmed to me,
Speaker 1: including President Trump himself, that he authorized the National Guard
Speaker 1: to be called up, and in writing Muriel Bowser, the
Speaker 1: mayor refused to do so. And they never went after
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's text, They never went after Nancy Pelosi's communications,
Speaker 1: They never went after the Sergeant of Arms, They never
Speaker 1: brought in the Capitol Police Chief, and they never brought
Speaker 1: in any of these people to actually give their side
Speaker 1: of the story, which is Donald Trump did approve the Guard,
Speaker 1: and in writing Muriel Bowser didn't said no, listen.
Speaker 7: Did you authorize calling up the Guard? And then it
Speaker 7: became the chain of command went to Nancy Pelosi and
Speaker 7: to the Mayor of DC, Muriel Bowser, did you, as
Speaker 7: required by law, authorize that.
Speaker 2: One hundred percent?
Speaker 1: And attested to by many people, and they turned it down.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi turned it down.
Speaker 8: Mayor Bowser's written refusal the communications between the leader of
Speaker 8: the Capitol Police and their chain of command to the
Speaker 8: DoD refusing our request to allow National guardsmen and women
Speaker 8: to stage on January four and five before January sixth?
Speaker 7: Did you both ask for the National Guard to be called.
Speaker 2: Up without a doubt? Sean, We've made that very clear,
Speaker 2: not just once, but on numerous occasions. We wanted to
Speaker 2: make sure that there was plenty of National Guard on
Speaker 2: the ready in case there was some kind of violence.
Speaker 5: I had a meeting with President Trump on the third
Speaker 5: of January concerning some international threats, and at the very
Speaker 5: end he asked if there were any requests for National
Speaker 5: Guard support. What was the President's response to you with
Speaker 5: regard to the request made by Mayor Bowser? Phill it
Speaker 5: and do whatever was necessary to protect the demonstrators.
Speaker 1: Wow, I'll give you the last word. Obviously that was
Speaker 1: all a ruse and a lie and a setup. Great job,
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney.
Speaker 3: President Trump has been clear about this from day one,
Speaker 3: but nobody wants to hear it because it's not convenient
Speaker 3: to their narrative. It's one of the many reasons that
Speaker 3: the January sixth committee was a sham. It's not just
Speaker 3: the conflicts of interest for Chairman Thompson, who sued President
Speaker 3: Trump over January sixth then took on the leadership. Remember
Speaker 3: Nancy Belucy says in that tape she takes responsibility. And
Speaker 3: as she took responsibility by ensuring that there wasn't a
Speaker 3: single member on that committee who would investigate her conduct
Speaker 3: for misconduct in office or failings in office. That's why
Speaker 3: Jordan and Banks and other people McCarthy wanted on that
Speaker 3: committee weren't permitted on the committee. It was skewed from
Speaker 3: the beginning. It was a sham, and that's a terrible
Speaker 3: disservice to the American people.
Speaker 1: David Schowan, we appreciate you being with us. Thank you,
Speaker 1: my friend. Eight hundred and nine four one Shawn our
Speaker 1: number if you want to be a part of the
Speaker 1: program keeping Uncle Sam accountable to you every day. Hannity
Speaker 1: is on HI twenty five to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: Thank you for tuning in. Here's our toll free number
Speaker 1: on this Friday. It's eight hundred and nine four one
Speaker 1: seaw If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: We're going to talk to our friend dot us Quaid
Speaker 1: in just a moment. All right, summer, all sunshine and rainbows.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem with the Harris Biden economy. New cars
Speaker 1: are out of reach for so many Americans. There's so
Speaker 1: much more expensive with inflation as well. Even use cars
Speaker 1: are at a premium these days, and that means a
Speaker 1: lot of people are keeping their older cars longer. And
Speaker 1: if you have a costly repair, it's it's at a
Speaker 1: cost that is prohibitive to most families. I mean, you
Speaker 1: know what the cost of a new transmission, God forbid
Speaker 1: you need an engine rebuild, or even something small like
Speaker 1: you're broken AC or electric problems can cost a fortune.
Speaker 1: And that's where car Shield comes in because they'll ensure
Speaker 1: your car over five thousand parts in systems and they
Speaker 1: do it with a smile. They've been doing this for years.
Speaker 1: They've held hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people with
Speaker 1: expensive repair bills that they don't have to end up paying.
Speaker 1: But the time to call is now, before God forbid
Speaker 1: you have that breakdown or that expensive repair, and car
Speaker 1: Shield representatives will help you find the best option available.
Speaker 1: Whether you're far as five thousand miles on it or
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty thousand miles on it. And they
Speaker 1: also offer other great services like emergency roadside assistance and
Speaker 1: towing and you name it, they've got it. Anyway, you'll
Speaker 1: get twenty percent off your plan because you listen to
Speaker 1: this program. You can call toll free. It's eight hundred
Speaker 1: five eight seven five zero six zero. That's eight hundred
Speaker 1: five eight seven five zero six zero Carshield dot com
Speaker 1: slash Hannity eight hundred five eight seven five zero six
Speaker 1: zero Carshield dot com slash Hannity Today. You know, we
Speaker 1: always say that as conservatives, we want good movies and
Speaker 1: half the stuff that you I mean, that you watch
Speaker 1: in the movie theaters these days, it just is mindless problem.
Speaker 1: I just can't take it. I mean, I once had
Speaker 1: a little for ring into my one little movie that
Speaker 1: I ended up financing. I didn't make a lot of
Speaker 1: money on it, but I wasn't trying to make money
Speaker 1: on it. Let there be Light, and I'm very proud
Speaker 1: of how it came out, and you can still one
Speaker 1: day rent it if you're bored. I think it has
Speaker 1: a great message and it reinforces values that I like
Speaker 1: it Admyer and I did it because I got sick
Speaker 1: and tired of seeing movies that I couldn't stand and
Speaker 1: I thought were terrible. And now Hollywood has gotten worse
Speaker 1: than ever, and they've gotten more political than ever. And
Speaker 1: I was watching the coverage about Reagan the movie, and
Speaker 1: I got an early copy of this. I watched it.
Speaker 1: The movie is phenomenal. It's not just good, it is phenomenal.
Speaker 1: And it stars Dennis Quaid, who I think is one
Speaker 1: of the most talented, versatile actors I've ever seen in
Speaker 1: my life. Now you might remember him as the great
Speaker 1: Dad in The Parent Trap and then probably the meanest
Speaker 1: sob dad I've ever seen in my life. In the
Speaker 1: movie that I've watched probably eighty times, I can only imagine.
Speaker 1: It's about the hit song by Mercy Me. I can
Speaker 1: only imagine. And he's such a talented, gifted actor, and
Speaker 1: his ability to capture Reagan in this movie is uncanny.
Speaker 1: And I'm a person that you know, fell in love
Speaker 1: with politics because of Ronald Reagan, and I watched every
Speaker 1: moment of his presidency that I could possibly watch, and
Speaker 1: I mean, it just captured the man the spirit. Also,
Speaker 1: the times very similar to where we were in the
Speaker 1: late seventies and early eighties. The times we're living in today,
Speaker 1: and inflation and assassination attempts and you know, just out
Speaker 1: of control government and a weak president and here we are,
Speaker 1: we find ourselves, you know, a Cold war going on,
Speaker 1: a battle with Russia, and you know, craziness in the
Speaker 1: Middle East. I mean, the parallels are uncanny. The timing
Speaker 1: couldn't be any better. And then I'm reading that that
Speaker 1: there are many outlets that don't want to either carry
Speaker 1: the movie or they're boycotting the movie, or that people
Speaker 1: don't want to promote the movie. And I'm like, this
Speaker 1: is so wrong on so many different levels. Let me
Speaker 1: play the trailer them. We'll check him with Dennis Quaid.
Speaker 2: There's nothing a retired governor can do about the Soviets,
Speaker 2: but a president, now you can do a.
Speaker 4: Thing or two.
Speaker 6: Welcome to.
Speaker 9: I was a lifeguard on a river.
Speaker 7: There's no turn.
Speaker 9: And I learned how to read the currents, not just
Speaker 9: the ones on the surface, but also the ones team
Speaker 9: underneath the water.
Speaker 5: I am about to start the biggest war of this century,
Speaker 5: and I'm not gonna fire a second shot.
Speaker 6: You're gonna blow up eight years of diplomacy.
Speaker 1: Well, if you think that got there uneasent one, you
Speaker 1: just wait.
Speaker 3: What did the president know?
Speaker 4: And when did he know it?
Speaker 2: What would you have me do?
Speaker 1: I want you to fight after a herb shop tear.
Speaker 2: Down this wall?
Speaker 1: Our friend actor he stars in the movie ray In.
Speaker 1: It is in theaters as of Friday. You can get
Speaker 1: your tickets online. It's at reaganmovie dot Com. Now, if
Speaker 1: great movies like this aren't successful, you're not going to
Speaker 1: get more great movies like this. It's really that simple. Anyway,
Speaker 1: we welcome to the program. Dennis Quaid, Sir, how are you?
Speaker 1: You were phenomenal in this movie. I loved every aspect
Speaker 1: of it. How did you like doing it?
Speaker 4: Oh? Thank you, Sean, really thank you for having me on.
Speaker 4: I can't think of a better venue to promote Reagan
Speaker 4: and to get the word out for everybody to go
Speaker 4: see it. Yeah, yeah, you nailed it right there. About
Speaker 4: the times, back when Reagan was elected nineteen seventy nine,
Speaker 4: nineteen eighty, the times were so similar to today, high inflation,
Speaker 4: We have had hostages over there in the Middle East
Speaker 4: and Iran. We have hostages today that nobody's talking about it,
Speaker 4: not enough except on your program. Gas prices oil to
Speaker 4: so many similarities to a feeling of malaise in this country,
Speaker 4: and like who's in charge and what's getting done? And
Speaker 4: along came Reagan and said, we're not a nation in decline.
Speaker 4: We are going this way, and everybody followed him, and
Speaker 4: that Reagan governed and lived his wife on principles that
Speaker 4: I think is what everybody is missing today and what
Speaker 4: we can have here come November.
Speaker 1: I'm listening to you, and I'm listening tell me about
Speaker 1: the reason why and what you've had to endure. I mean,
Speaker 1: here's a movie about one of the greatest presidents I
Speaker 1: believe in American history, certainly in our lifetime. And why
Speaker 1: is there any reluctance or any resistance of anybody in
Speaker 1: the media or in Hollywood to not support this movie.
Speaker 1: Why is that?
Speaker 4: Well, it's Facebook mostly, and I was really glad of
Speaker 4: your program last night. You were really all over it,
Speaker 4: Like I wish I could see the other networks and
Speaker 4: news outlets as well. Facebook. About two weeks ago we
Speaker 4: discovered that Facebook has been censoring and outright banning and
Speaker 4: suspending accounts on advertising and promotion of Reagan. They censored
Speaker 4: a few of the podcasts that I had done, including
Speaker 4: with Joe Rogan and Jonathan Peterson as well and Reagan.
Speaker 4: The reason being was that it was an attempt to
Speaker 4: influence an election. Well, the last time I heard Reagan
Speaker 4: was on the ballot forty years ago, and even if
Speaker 4: it was, it would be he couldn't run because he
Speaker 4: completed his two terms of the term limits. So I
Speaker 4: wrote a letter to the News which wound up to
Speaker 4: be an article in Newsweek from our position, and which
Speaker 4: was basically that Facebook, by banning and censoring advertising of Reagan,
Speaker 4: that it was an attempt by them to influence an
Speaker 4: election by keeping information from the public. It's free speech
Speaker 4: in a free market, the way we see it. And
Speaker 4: Facebook apologized two hours later after the article came out
Speaker 4: in Newsweek and said it was their automatic systems that
Speaker 4: they blamed it on, you know, they were set up
Speaker 4: by I don't know what their algorithms are or whatever,
Speaker 4: but that it wouldn't happen again. And then three days
Speaker 4: later it was business as usual. The same thing is
Speaker 4: continued to happen and is happening even today. And so
Speaker 4: yesterday when the News broke about Mark Zuckerberg, you know,
Speaker 4: admitting coming clean as it were, about being coerced by
Speaker 4: the Biden administration. It a lot of things became clear,
Speaker 4: but I still think it's getting the run around. If
Speaker 4: you asked me, And this is a free county, free speech,
Speaker 4: and I'm really glad someone like you is getting the
Speaker 4: word out about it.
Speaker 1: Well, it's my pleasure. Look, I met you one time
Speaker 1: and I told you, I don't know how you do it.
Speaker 1: I watched you in The Parent Trap. You're the nicest
Speaker 1: dad in the entire world, although you didn't really exactly
Speaker 1: have the best fiance at the time. And you're in
Speaker 1: this great movie. Lindsay Lohan was phenomenal in that movie
Speaker 1: when she was younger. I mean I thought she was,
Speaker 1: And you do this great job. Then I've I all
Speaker 1: in love with the song I can only imagine. I
Speaker 1: was so glad they did a movie about it. It's
Speaker 1: by Mercy Me and it became one of the biggest
Speaker 1: selling songs of all time. And you played the mean
Speaker 1: sob dad. And how you go from being the nicest
Speaker 1: dad to the meanest sob in the world, I don't know,
Speaker 1: but you pulled it off and then I watch you
Speaker 1: in the Reagan movie. I think it's always very hard
Speaker 1: to play, you know, some historic figure like this, especially
Speaker 1: when the people are familiar with. But I mean, you
Speaker 1: nailed every aspect of the Reagan that I studied and
Speaker 1: knew my entire life.
Speaker 4: Well, I tell you, how do you do that?
Speaker 1: That is what I'm asking.
Speaker 4: Well, I tell every person over thirty you know that
Speaker 4: I was your babysitter because of a parent draft and
Speaker 4: they put it on like they were in the other
Speaker 4: room doing what they wanted to do. And thank you
Speaker 4: parent drafting gave me a second career. I can only
Speaker 4: imagine Barton Millard, who is you know who wrote I
Speaker 4: can only imagine was on the set just about it day.
Speaker 4: I'm glad for him to do it. It must have been
Speaker 4: difficult for him to watch all these traumatic season of
Speaker 4: his childhood being played out in front of him. And
Speaker 4: I really really thank God for that role.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, when you hit him over the head
Speaker 1: with the plate, I'm like, oh my gosh. Well when
Speaker 1: when your wife at the time and his mother moved
Speaker 1: out and he comes back from camp and and I
Speaker 1: just never saw such rage. Unfortunately, those those are real
Speaker 1: stories that was a real based on a true story, and.
Speaker 4: In this case, it was a horrible story with such
Speaker 4: a beautiful story of redemption in the end of it.
Speaker 4: And you know, that's how people come to Christ and
Speaker 4: sometimes and you know, it's like the impossible is possible.
Speaker 4: It can be done, as Reagan used to say. But
Speaker 4: that was offered Reagan and twenty eighteen, and at the
Speaker 4: time I had a shiver of fear go up my spine,
Speaker 4: which is usually a sign that I should do that
Speaker 4: because I'm out of my comfort zone. But with Reagan,
Speaker 4: it was I didn't say yes, and I didn't say no,
Speaker 4: but I didn't exactly see myself playing him at the time.
Speaker 4: And everybody knows what he's like, Muhammad Ali, you know,
Speaker 4: show a picture of Reagan to somebody anywhere in the
Speaker 4: world and they know who he is and what he
Speaker 4: sounds like, and he walks like. And so I wanted
Speaker 4: to get the person behind the public persona as a
Speaker 4: human being. And I was invited up to the Reagan
Speaker 4: ranch a couple of weeks later, and I went up
Speaker 4: went up there. It was the Western White House, you know,
Speaker 4: And after Reagan died, some friends bought it and kept
Speaker 4: it exactly as it was. He and Nancy's clothes are
Speaker 4: still on the all that they had a king sized bed,
Speaker 4: but it was two single beds that were zip tied together.
Speaker 4: And I wound up five miles of the worst road
Speaker 4: in California and came through the gates and I felt
Speaker 4: Ronald Reagan right there. Like I said, this place is
Speaker 4: not open to the public, but I could feel that
Speaker 4: Reagan was a humble man. He was not a rich man,
Speaker 4: and he was there and in the work that they
Speaker 4: said he did, he actually did on the property. Dug
Speaker 4: those ponds, made those senses, and I just feel his
Speaker 4: spirit permeated the entire place. And that's when I said yes.
Speaker 4: And we wound up actually shooting on the Reagan Rants
Speaker 4: for three weeks, and you're doing all those historical scenes
Speaker 4: that you know you're standing right there in that same spot,
Speaker 4: and it really did a lot to help.
Speaker 1: You did an amazing job. I got to also point
Speaker 1: out a dear friend of those programs, John Voyd, who
Speaker 1: we love. He's in the movie. Penelope Ann Miller plays
Speaker 1: Nancy Reagan. I thought she did a phenomenal job. Also. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it opens Friday. It's in if you want good movies.
Speaker 1: You gotta support good movies when they come out. This
Speaker 1: is one of them. It's Reagan.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: You can get your tickets online reaganmovie dot com or
Speaker 1: Reagan dot movie for ticket information. And I'm telling you
Speaker 1: right now, you're gonna love this movie. And it's gonna
Speaker 1: be the parallels between the events that today and the
Speaker 1: events back then. It just shows what I've always said
Speaker 1: that is conservative principles work, and I think all of
Speaker 1: it's in play in this election. It's been very nice
Speaker 1: to get to know you. You were very nice to
Speaker 1: me when we met, and I think you should be
Speaker 1: very proud of this movie, and I wish all the
Speaker 1: success with it. I'm sorry that you've had difficulty and
Speaker 1: some censorship and some politics behind all of it, but
Speaker 1: I wish I hope everyone in this audience goes to
Speaker 1: see it this weekend. Reaganmovie dot com or Reagant Movie
Speaker 1: for ticket information. And we appreciate Dennis You've been with us.
Speaker 1: Dennis Quaid, thank you.
Speaker 4: You bet anybody, anybody that was born before nineteen eighty five,
Speaker 4: you'll be able to see and remember how great this
Speaker 4: country was. Anybody born after nineteen eighty five, you'll get
Speaker 4: a glimpse of how great this country still can be.
Speaker 1: Amen Well, said Dennis quad. Appreciate it.