WEBVTT - Benghazi: Episode 5 - Greatest Hits

0:00:16.271 --> 0:00:32.871
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin previously on fiasco. A number of conservative media outlets

0:00:33.111 --> 0:00:34.631
<v Speaker 1>were particularly genda.

0:00:34.791 --> 0:00:36.671
<v Speaker 2>This is a political cover up of some kind of

0:00:36.831 --> 0:00:40.191
<v Speaker 2>intelligence officials acknowledged they originally got it wrong.

0:00:40.471 --> 0:00:45.551
<v Speaker 3>I know the Ghazi Annex chief personally, and he's a

0:00:45.591 --> 0:00:46.391
<v Speaker 3>decent man.

0:00:46.591 --> 0:00:49.870
<v Speaker 4>The House Foreign Affairs Committee on Benghazi kicks off at

0:00:49.911 --> 0:00:50.791
<v Speaker 4>the top of the hour.

0:00:50.951 --> 0:00:53.711
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's painted apparently hit her head and had that concussion.

0:00:53.791 --> 0:00:56.871
<v Speaker 5>I bet that we might never hear her testimony. She

0:00:56.871 --> 0:00:57.951
<v Speaker 5>doesn't want to answer the question.

0:01:01.831 --> 0:01:05.431
<v Speaker 1>When Alison Camarada was an anchor on Fox News, she

0:01:05.551 --> 0:01:07.431
<v Speaker 1>talked about Benghazi a lot.

0:01:07.351 --> 0:01:10.950
<v Speaker 5>For what's been called Benghazi Gate. There was a lack

0:01:10.991 --> 0:01:13.591
<v Speaker 5>of security at the US consulate in Benghazi, but who

0:01:13.631 --> 0:01:16.031
<v Speaker 5>is to blame for not beefing it up? Was the

0:01:16.071 --> 0:01:18.671
<v Speaker 5>administration just clueless or was there a cover up?

0:01:18.791 --> 0:01:21.551
<v Speaker 1>Joining us among other things, it was just a good,

0:01:21.751 --> 0:01:25.431
<v Speaker 1>rich story with a seemingly endless stream of angles to explore.

0:01:26.591 --> 0:01:30.551
<v Speaker 5>There were some mysteries embedded in Benghazi that needed to

0:01:30.551 --> 0:01:33.071
<v Speaker 5>be answered, so that gave it legs for sure.

0:01:33.631 --> 0:01:34.871
<v Speaker 6>There were four dead.

0:01:34.711 --> 0:01:40.791
<v Speaker 5>Americans and that is obviously something that resonated with our viewers,

0:01:40.991 --> 0:01:43.631
<v Speaker 5>and they wanted justice, and we could beat the drum

0:01:43.671 --> 0:01:44.471
<v Speaker 5>of justice.

0:01:45.231 --> 0:01:48.031
<v Speaker 1>At the time, Camarada was one of the co hosts

0:01:48.071 --> 0:01:50.991
<v Speaker 1>of Fox and Friends Weekend. She ended up leaving the

0:01:51.031 --> 0:01:54.111
<v Speaker 1>network in twenty fourteen, and she's been public with her

0:01:54.151 --> 0:01:57.511
<v Speaker 1>criticisms of Fox News in the years since. But during

0:01:57.551 --> 0:02:01.471
<v Speaker 1>the months after the Benghazi attack, Camarada spent her weekend

0:02:01.471 --> 0:02:05.831
<v Speaker 1>mornings dutifully beating the drums of justice alongside her Fox colleagues.

0:02:06.071 --> 0:02:09.391
<v Speaker 5>That Chris Stevens was saying, we're under attack, We're under attack,

0:02:09.511 --> 0:02:13.631
<v Speaker 5>please help, And of course nothing was done to help them.

0:02:14.431 --> 0:02:17.711
<v Speaker 5>Four Americans dead, and we need justice for this, so

0:02:17.911 --> 0:02:18.431
<v Speaker 5>on wins.

0:02:18.511 --> 0:02:22.631
<v Speaker 1>According to Camarata, Fox's relentless emphasis on ben Ghazi came

0:02:22.671 --> 0:02:26.391
<v Speaker 1>directly from the network's founder and chief executive, Roger Ales.

0:02:27.231 --> 0:02:29.911
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes at Fox, Roger got to be in his bonnet

0:02:30.071 --> 0:02:33.591
<v Speaker 5>over certain stories, and we would do them time and

0:02:33.631 --> 0:02:36.990
<v Speaker 5>again and again and again. Ben Gazzi's right at the

0:02:36.991 --> 0:02:39.431
<v Speaker 5>top of that list. I don't know that it was

0:02:39.991 --> 0:02:43.671
<v Speaker 5>some grand strategy from the get go, but I just

0:02:43.751 --> 0:02:48.711
<v Speaker 5>think that he did naturally lean towards outrage.

0:02:48.991 --> 0:02:52.991
<v Speaker 1>Ales didn't personally dictate Fox's coverage at all times, but

0:02:53.031 --> 0:02:56.151
<v Speaker 1>he didn't need to because his producers knew what he wanted.

0:02:56.511 --> 0:02:59.831
<v Speaker 6>By the time you became an executive producer at Fox,

0:03:00.671 --> 0:03:05.071
<v Speaker 6>you could channel Roger. It wasn't hard Obama, bad Muslims,

0:03:05.111 --> 0:03:09.951
<v Speaker 6>bad Hillary, bad Republicans, good Democrats, crazy like it wasn't

0:03:10.111 --> 0:03:10.751
<v Speaker 6>rocket science.

0:03:11.231 --> 0:03:15.191
<v Speaker 1>Before he created Fox News in nineteen ninety six, Ayles

0:03:15.271 --> 0:03:19.151
<v Speaker 1>spent decades in conservative politics, serving as a campaign advisor

0:03:19.231 --> 0:03:24.311
<v Speaker 1>to Richard Nixon, Mitch McConnell, and George H. W. Bush. Later,

0:03:24.551 --> 0:03:27.071
<v Speaker 1>he was the executive producer of a short lived TV

0:03:27.191 --> 0:03:31.831
<v Speaker 1>talk show starring Rush limbar Ardys and gentleman Best Rush

0:03:32.431 --> 0:03:37.991
<v Speaker 1>bar From the beginning, Ayle's positioned Fox News as a

0:03:38.031 --> 0:03:41.991
<v Speaker 1>counterbalance to what he called the communist broadcasting system CBS

0:03:42.311 --> 0:03:44.231
<v Speaker 1>and the Clinton News Network CNN.

0:03:44.391 --> 0:03:47.951
<v Speaker 7>Fox News channel fair and balanced, where news is going,

0:03:48.111 --> 0:03:49.191
<v Speaker 7>where news should be.

0:03:50.031 --> 0:03:53.311
<v Speaker 1>But in its early days, Fox's conservative opinion shows like

0:03:53.351 --> 0:03:55.911
<v Speaker 1>The O'Reilly Factor were kept at arm's length from its

0:03:55.951 --> 0:03:56.551
<v Speaker 1>news division.

0:03:56.711 --> 0:03:59.871
<v Speaker 7>Few broadcasts take any chances these days, and most are

0:03:59.991 --> 0:04:04.071
<v Speaker 7>very politically correct. Well, We're going to try to be different,

0:04:04.151 --> 0:04:05.751
<v Speaker 7>stimulating and a bit daring.

0:04:06.591 --> 0:04:09.591
<v Speaker 1>It was only gradually that Fox's identity as a platform

0:04:09.631 --> 0:04:12.991
<v Speaker 1>for the right became more holistic By the time the

0:04:12.991 --> 0:04:17.871
<v Speaker 1>Bengazi attack happened, the network was producing a mix of commentary, activism,

0:04:17.991 --> 0:04:24.871
<v Speaker 1>and propaganda.

0:04:26.031 --> 0:04:27.271
<v Speaker 8>Welcome into Fox and Friends.

0:04:27.511 --> 0:04:31.031
<v Speaker 1>Fox and Friends Weekend, where Camarato worked, aired every Saturday

0:04:31.071 --> 0:04:33.071
<v Speaker 1>and Sunday from six to ten am.

0:04:33.431 --> 0:04:37.190
<v Speaker 6>Well, I always saw Fox and Friends' Weekend as quite

0:04:37.231 --> 0:04:42.271
<v Speaker 6>of a morning zoo of political talk. I mean, I

0:04:42.351 --> 0:04:46.391
<v Speaker 6>sometimes called it talk radio in a skirt. I mean,

0:04:46.591 --> 0:04:49.471
<v Speaker 6>it was a variety show. It was mixing in the

0:04:50.671 --> 0:04:55.831
<v Speaker 6>really incendiary political stuff, but not for too long. We

0:04:55.911 --> 0:05:00.951
<v Speaker 6>would immediately in a toss, turn to and coming up

0:05:01.391 --> 0:05:05.711
<v Speaker 6>breaking news. Subway sandwiches. Foot long subs are only eleven

0:05:05.831 --> 0:05:07.270
<v Speaker 6>and a half inches long.

0:05:07.791 --> 0:05:12.231
<v Speaker 5>Subway sandwiches foot long subs are only eleven and a

0:05:12.311 --> 0:05:13.991
<v Speaker 5>half inches long.

0:05:14.991 --> 0:05:17.871
<v Speaker 6>I know, everyone, I fill your outage.

0:05:18.111 --> 0:05:21.351
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be Camarata says that despite being an anchor,

0:05:21.631 --> 0:05:24.551
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have much control over the actual content of

0:05:24.591 --> 0:05:28.071
<v Speaker 1>Fox and Friends. Because it aired so early in the morning,

0:05:28.511 --> 0:05:31.231
<v Speaker 1>a small team of producers would always work overnight to

0:05:31.271 --> 0:05:32.431
<v Speaker 1>build the next day's show.

0:05:33.631 --> 0:05:36.351
<v Speaker 6>By the time I got in, there was already a rundown.

0:05:36.471 --> 0:05:39.711
<v Speaker 6>It was a built show. When I came in, I

0:05:39.751 --> 0:05:41.111
<v Speaker 6>was busy. You know, I was going and I was

0:05:41.151 --> 0:05:44.071
<v Speaker 6>getting into my outfit. I was getting into hair and makeup,

0:05:44.351 --> 0:05:49.751
<v Speaker 6>and then I had like probably from five fifteen till

0:05:50.431 --> 0:05:52.431
<v Speaker 6>I had to run to the set at five point

0:05:52.431 --> 0:05:56.111
<v Speaker 6>fifty to get miked up to dive in and study.

0:05:56.191 --> 0:05:59.351
<v Speaker 6>You know, that's not enough time. It just wasn't built

0:05:59.831 --> 0:06:04.671
<v Speaker 6>to ever do real research. It was basically headlines, talking points,

0:06:04.711 --> 0:06:06.511
<v Speaker 6>and you know, mixing it up.

0:06:07.551 --> 0:06:11.591
<v Speaker 1>In January of twenty Thirteenillary Clinton was set to testify

0:06:11.671 --> 0:06:16.151
<v Speaker 1>before Congress about Benghazi for the first time. As it happened,

0:06:16.191 --> 0:06:18.991
<v Speaker 1>she was planning to leave the Obama administration about a

0:06:18.991 --> 0:06:22.671
<v Speaker 1>week later, which meant that her Benghazi testimony would be

0:06:22.751 --> 0:06:25.710
<v Speaker 1>one of her last public appearances as Secretary of State.

0:06:26.191 --> 0:06:28.391
<v Speaker 5>While the White House preparing today for Secretary of State

0:06:28.471 --> 0:06:32.431
<v Speaker 5>Hillary Clinton to testify tomorrow regarding the deadly September eleventh

0:06:32.431 --> 0:06:35.311
<v Speaker 5>attack on our consulate in Libya, Secretary.

0:06:34.911 --> 0:06:36.791
<v Speaker 1>Clinton was there was there a lot of anticipation for

0:06:36.831 --> 0:06:37.671
<v Speaker 1>her appearance?

0:06:38.311 --> 0:06:42.031
<v Speaker 6>Oh god, yes, I mean part of the Fox model

0:06:42.631 --> 0:06:45.631
<v Speaker 6>is just constant build up. It's teasing.

0:06:45.791 --> 0:06:48.991
<v Speaker 5>Republicans are expected to grill her about what she knew

0:06:49.031 --> 0:06:51.431
<v Speaker 5>about the attack and when she knew it. Some have

0:06:51.591 --> 0:06:54.471
<v Speaker 5>charged that the administration deliberately tried to hide that the

0:06:54.511 --> 0:06:57.551
<v Speaker 5>ambush was the work of terrorists linked to al Qaeda.

0:06:57.711 --> 0:07:01.671
<v Speaker 6>It's teasing what's going to happen tomorrow. It's teasing what's

0:07:01.671 --> 0:07:05.031
<v Speaker 6>going to happen this week in front of committee. It's

0:07:05.071 --> 0:07:10.951
<v Speaker 6>teasing Hillary Clinton's appearance. And that's not new what.

0:07:11.111 --> 0:07:12.631
<v Speaker 8>She knew when she knew it.

0:07:12.711 --> 0:07:14.311
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to get answered today?

0:07:14.511 --> 0:07:16.271
<v Speaker 2>She has had time to prepare, but she has an

0:07:16.271 --> 0:07:17.391
<v Speaker 2>awful lot to answer for.

0:07:17.591 --> 0:07:20.191
<v Speaker 3>She's one of the top candidates for president in twenty sixteen,

0:07:20.391 --> 0:07:22.831
<v Speaker 3>so she can either help move on or she could

0:07:22.871 --> 0:07:24.791
<v Speaker 3>have a Susan roy Sunday Show moment.

0:07:24.551 --> 0:07:24.751
<v Speaker 9>And not.

0:07:28.951 --> 0:07:31.911
<v Speaker 1>The committee will come to order. Clinton appeared in front

0:07:31.951 --> 0:07:34.111
<v Speaker 1>of both the Senate and the House back to back.

0:07:35.151 --> 0:07:37.671
<v Speaker 1>She started her day shortly after nine am with a

0:07:37.671 --> 0:07:41.031
<v Speaker 1>prepared statement in which she took responsibility for making changes

0:07:41.031 --> 0:07:43.351
<v Speaker 1>of the State Department to prevent another tragedy.

0:07:43.511 --> 0:07:43.991
<v Speaker 6>As I have.

0:07:43.991 --> 0:07:47.911
<v Speaker 10>Said many times, I take responsibility, and nobody is more

0:07:47.951 --> 0:07:49.751
<v Speaker 10>committed to getting this right.

0:07:50.191 --> 0:07:53.231
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, Clinton's questioners were fairly cordial.

0:07:53.511 --> 0:07:57.191
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, Adam, Secretary, and wonderful to see you in

0:07:57.231 --> 0:08:00.071
<v Speaker 8>good health, and as combative as ever.

0:08:01.431 --> 0:08:03.911
<v Speaker 1>There were two points that kept coming up over and

0:08:03.951 --> 0:08:07.511
<v Speaker 1>over again, and they generated the most intense moments of

0:08:07.551 --> 0:08:10.031
<v Speaker 1>the day. The first had to do with a case

0:08:10.071 --> 0:08:13.311
<v Speaker 1>cable sent to the State Department with Ambassador Stevens's approval

0:08:13.391 --> 0:08:17.071
<v Speaker 1>about a month before the attack. The cable had warned

0:08:17.071 --> 0:08:20.311
<v Speaker 1>about an increase in violent incidents in Benghazi and the

0:08:20.431 --> 0:08:25.071
<v Speaker 1>rise of anti American militias. Republicans wanted to know why

0:08:25.111 --> 0:08:28.231
<v Speaker 1>Clinton hadn't personally reviewed the cable and weighed in that

0:08:28.711 --> 0:08:31.431
<v Speaker 1>had I been president at the time and I found

0:08:31.511 --> 0:08:34.191
<v Speaker 1>that you did not read the cables from Benghazi, you

0:08:34.231 --> 0:08:36.671
<v Speaker 1>did not read the cables from bessaror Stevens, I would

0:08:36.711 --> 0:08:37.871
<v Speaker 1>have relieved you of your post.

0:08:38.071 --> 0:08:39.430
<v Speaker 6>I think it's inexcusable.

0:08:39.951 --> 0:08:40.550
<v Speaker 3>The thing is.

0:08:40.751 --> 0:08:43.590
<v Speaker 1>The second point of focus was on the Obama administration's

0:08:43.590 --> 0:08:47.271
<v Speaker 1>original explanation of the Bengazi attack as a protest gone wrong.

0:08:47.991 --> 0:08:51.391
<v Speaker 1>A Republican senator from Wisconsin wanted to know why Clinton

0:08:51.471 --> 0:08:54.511
<v Speaker 1>hadn't immediately called the survivors of the attack to find

0:08:54.550 --> 0:08:57.030
<v Speaker 1>out whether or not there really had been a protest

0:08:57.030 --> 0:08:57.351
<v Speaker 1>that night.

0:08:57.471 --> 0:09:00.391
<v Speaker 10>We were misled that there was supposedly protests, and then something

0:09:00.511 --> 0:09:03.391
<v Speaker 10>sprang out of that, and assault sprang out of that.

0:09:03.511 --> 0:09:06.470
<v Speaker 1>Clinton, who up to this point had appeared even keeled

0:09:06.511 --> 0:09:10.030
<v Speaker 1>and in decent spirits, suddenly changed her tones, and they didn't.

0:09:10.391 --> 0:09:12.950
<v Speaker 10>With all due respect, the fact is we had four

0:09:13.111 --> 0:09:14.111
<v Speaker 10>dead Americans.

0:09:14.190 --> 0:09:15.511
<v Speaker 6>Was it because of a protest?

0:09:15.590 --> 0:09:17.271
<v Speaker 10>Or was it because of guys out for a walk

0:09:17.310 --> 0:09:19.430
<v Speaker 10>when night, or decide they'd go kill some Americans?

0:09:19.910 --> 0:09:22.430
<v Speaker 6>What difference at this point does it make?

0:09:22.751 --> 0:09:25.591
<v Speaker 10>It is our job to figure out what happened and

0:09:25.631 --> 0:09:28.751
<v Speaker 10>do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again.

0:09:28.871 --> 0:09:33.030
<v Speaker 1>Senator Now, honestly, this became the SoundBite of the day.

0:09:33.710 --> 0:09:37.590
<v Speaker 1>On the big broadcast networks, Clinton's testimony was described as

0:09:37.670 --> 0:09:38.871
<v Speaker 1>fiery and riveting.

0:09:38.991 --> 0:09:42.550
<v Speaker 7>Today, this woman who has traveled the world as America's

0:09:42.590 --> 0:09:46.070
<v Speaker 7>top diplomat, came to the Hill ready for a fight,

0:09:46.471 --> 0:09:46.951
<v Speaker 7>and her.

0:09:46.830 --> 0:09:49.670
<v Speaker 11>Long awaited appearance before Congress was remarkable.

0:09:49.830 --> 0:09:51.631
<v Speaker 1>Harrying Hasso questions all day.

0:09:51.950 --> 0:09:56.550
<v Speaker 12>Clinton was also the political pro massaging big egos, sidestepping

0:09:56.590 --> 0:09:59.791
<v Speaker 12>attacks when she could when she couldn't, giving as good.

0:09:59.670 --> 0:10:00.231
<v Speaker 3>As she got.

0:10:01.030 --> 0:10:04.351
<v Speaker 1>But on Fox News, the clip of Clinton saying what

0:10:04.391 --> 0:10:07.631
<v Speaker 1>difference does it make? Was played as callous indifference toward

0:10:07.710 --> 0:10:09.670
<v Speaker 1>those who lost their lives in Bengazi.

0:10:10.070 --> 0:10:13.951
<v Speaker 7>Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's monumental gaff that may haunt

0:10:13.991 --> 0:10:15.831
<v Speaker 7>her for the rest of her political career.

0:10:16.351 --> 0:10:19.631
<v Speaker 1>Allison Camarada covered Quinton's testimony as a fill in host

0:10:19.631 --> 0:10:21.750
<v Speaker 1>on the regular weekday edition of Fox and.

0:10:21.710 --> 0:10:23.431
<v Speaker 6>Friends mad As Hill.

0:10:23.871 --> 0:10:26.751
<v Speaker 5>Secretary Clinton fires back at Congress in a battle over

0:10:26.830 --> 0:10:27.430
<v Speaker 5>ben Ghazi.

0:10:27.991 --> 0:10:30.550
<v Speaker 10>What difference at this point does itn't make?

0:10:31.351 --> 0:10:33.070
<v Speaker 5>Well, this morning, we may have an answer for what

0:10:33.070 --> 0:10:36.871
<v Speaker 5>difference it makes, and it may include three more dead Americans.

0:10:36.871 --> 0:10:38.311
<v Speaker 5>You're going to want to hear this, all right.

0:10:38.991 --> 0:10:45.231
<v Speaker 6>Fox really was good at sloganeering and catchphrases and coming

0:10:45.310 --> 0:10:49.231
<v Speaker 6>up with a little outrage nugget to send viewers on

0:10:49.271 --> 0:10:53.070
<v Speaker 6>their way, So that one just came, you know, ready made.

0:10:53.471 --> 0:10:56.990
<v Speaker 6>They just zeroed in for days and days and weeks

0:10:56.991 --> 0:10:58.910
<v Speaker 6>and weeks on what difference does it make? As though

0:10:58.991 --> 0:11:02.991
<v Speaker 6>she was being callous, as though she was being cavalier. Basically,

0:11:02.991 --> 0:11:05.070
<v Speaker 6>they were trying to make it sound synonymous with who cares?

0:11:05.310 --> 0:11:07.790
<v Speaker 10>What difference at this point does itn't make?

0:11:08.271 --> 0:11:09.471
<v Speaker 13>It makes a lot of difference.

0:11:10.111 --> 0:11:13.030
<v Speaker 1>You may notice Camarata uses the word they when talking

0:11:13.111 --> 0:11:16.030
<v Speaker 1>about Fox News. Part of the reason it might just

0:11:16.070 --> 0:11:18.790
<v Speaker 1>be that she doesn't work there anymore. But even at

0:11:18.790 --> 0:11:21.951
<v Speaker 1>the time, Camarada says she felt separate from the network

0:11:22.151 --> 0:11:25.470
<v Speaker 1>and not fully bought in, which I admit reminds me

0:11:25.550 --> 0:11:27.591
<v Speaker 1>of coming home in high school and telling my mom

0:11:27.631 --> 0:11:29.431
<v Speaker 1>it was my friends who had been smoking, not me.

0:11:30.430 --> 0:11:33.391
<v Speaker 1>But Camarada told me that she was never comfortable with

0:11:33.430 --> 0:11:37.030
<v Speaker 1>how her producers and co hosts talked about Bengazi, and

0:11:37.070 --> 0:11:41.271
<v Speaker 1>in particular, how they presented the Clinton sound bite. Over

0:11:41.310 --> 0:11:44.551
<v Speaker 1>the coming weeks. Camarada bristled at Fox's framing of what

0:11:44.631 --> 0:11:47.350
<v Speaker 1>she thought was an uncontroversial comment if she listened to

0:11:47.391 --> 0:11:51.030
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, But Fox's producers often cut out right

0:11:51.070 --> 0:11:53.311
<v Speaker 1>after what difference at this point does it make?

0:11:53.590 --> 0:11:56.111
<v Speaker 6>So they would end it right there instead of it

0:11:56.231 --> 0:11:58.790
<v Speaker 6>is our job to figure out what happened and do

0:11:58.871 --> 0:12:01.191
<v Speaker 6>everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again,

0:12:01.391 --> 0:12:05.030
<v Speaker 6>that's her next sentence, and they wouldn't always play that part.

0:12:05.310 --> 0:12:07.951
<v Speaker 1>Camarata decided to push back on air.

0:12:08.471 --> 0:12:10.591
<v Speaker 5>Her point is that what is the label? What difference

0:12:10.631 --> 0:12:13.111
<v Speaker 5>does the label make? And her point, which then she

0:12:13.231 --> 0:12:17.070
<v Speaker 5>didn't answer, is where's the justice? Why hasn't it even

0:12:17.111 --> 0:12:22.230
<v Speaker 5>been prosecuted? We are our American was killed. They were

0:12:22.391 --> 0:12:23.871
<v Speaker 5>terrorists and had we gone.

0:12:23.950 --> 0:12:27.151
<v Speaker 1>It was a quiet rebellion and pretty easy to miss

0:12:27.190 --> 0:12:29.951
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't looking for it. But Camarada told me

0:12:30.030 --> 0:12:32.431
<v Speaker 1>that every time she departed from the party line in

0:12:32.430 --> 0:12:35.151
<v Speaker 1>this way, she felt like she was risking her job.

0:12:35.590 --> 0:12:39.910
<v Speaker 5>There was no winning that conversation with Roger. He had

0:12:39.950 --> 0:12:42.910
<v Speaker 5>his opinion, and you were supposed to sort of reflect

0:12:42.910 --> 0:12:43.470
<v Speaker 5>his opinion.

0:12:43.790 --> 0:12:48.111
<v Speaker 1>Looking back, Camarata describes Fox's Bengazi coverage as a kind

0:12:48.111 --> 0:12:48.991
<v Speaker 1>of feedback loop.

0:12:50.471 --> 0:12:53.071
<v Speaker 5>There is a certain kind of self fulfilling prophecy when

0:12:53.111 --> 0:12:56.511
<v Speaker 5>it comes to outrage. We did train the audience to

0:12:56.590 --> 0:12:57.510
<v Speaker 5>become outraged.

0:12:57.950 --> 0:12:59.151
<v Speaker 6>Often the scripts.

0:12:58.790 --> 0:13:02.271
<v Speaker 5>Would say you'll be outraged right after a commercial. We

0:13:02.351 --> 0:13:04.030
<v Speaker 5>told people stick around for the outrage.

0:13:04.231 --> 0:13:05.950
<v Speaker 6>We told them they would be outraged.

0:13:06.151 --> 0:13:08.951
<v Speaker 5>We told them afterwards, were sure they are outraged, and

0:13:09.111 --> 0:13:10.751
<v Speaker 5>lo and behold, they came outraged.

0:13:10.950 --> 0:13:14.391
<v Speaker 1>The right wing outrage machine was not invented by Fox News.

0:13:14.991 --> 0:13:17.991
<v Speaker 1>It had been around in various forms for decades, and

0:13:18.111 --> 0:13:22.550
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton had long been one of its favorite targets. Now,

0:13:22.790 --> 0:13:26.191
<v Speaker 1>in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack, the machine was

0:13:26.231 --> 0:13:31.151
<v Speaker 1>about to kick into high gear. I'm Leon Nafok from

0:13:31.231 --> 0:13:36.271
<v Speaker 1>Prolog Projects and Pushkin Industries. This is fiasco Bengazi.

0:13:36.751 --> 0:13:40.230
<v Speaker 4>He said, the government is lying to you. What they're

0:13:40.271 --> 0:13:41.910
<v Speaker 4>saying happened did not happen.

0:13:42.190 --> 0:13:45.590
<v Speaker 5>Is the Obama administrations threatened Benghazi whistleblowers.

0:13:45.751 --> 0:13:47.391
<v Speaker 13>I was literally afraid from my life.

0:13:47.550 --> 0:13:48.830
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean, stand down?

0:13:48.830 --> 0:13:51.310
<v Speaker 12>They're invading the place. Yeah. I think there's a direct

0:13:51.310 --> 0:13:55.871
<v Speaker 12>line from what happened in the nineteen nineties to twenty sixteen.

0:13:56.590 --> 0:14:01.471
<v Speaker 1>Episode five Greatest Hits, in which Benghazi transforms from an

0:14:01.471 --> 0:14:05.431
<v Speaker 1>Obama scandal into the ultimate Clinton scandal, as decades of

0:14:05.471 --> 0:14:08.910
<v Speaker 1>built up Clinton lore provide all parties with a roadmap,

0:14:09.231 --> 0:14:19.511
<v Speaker 1>a backstory, and a cudgel. We'll be right back. When

0:14:19.551 --> 0:14:23.031
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton testified before Congress in January of twenty thirteen,

0:14:23.671 --> 0:14:26.350
<v Speaker 1>it was not her first time having to publicly address

0:14:26.391 --> 0:14:29.951
<v Speaker 1>a scandal. She had been fighting off various allegations ever

0:14:29.991 --> 0:14:32.631
<v Speaker 1>since her husband Bill first ran for president in nineteen

0:14:32.671 --> 0:14:37.071
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, long before Fox News even existed. The din

0:14:37.151 --> 0:14:39.511
<v Speaker 1>of controversy was a fact of life for the Clintons

0:14:40.031 --> 0:14:41.870
<v Speaker 1>and a source of endless frustration.

0:14:42.351 --> 0:14:47.351
<v Speaker 12>Clinton was elected, and there were people in the right

0:14:47.391 --> 0:14:50.390
<v Speaker 12>wing who didn't accept that election as legitimate.

0:14:51.151 --> 0:14:54.631
<v Speaker 1>This is David Brock. During the early days of Bill

0:14:54.671 --> 0:14:57.791
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's presidency. He was a young journalist working at a

0:14:57.791 --> 0:15:00.991
<v Speaker 1>conservative magazine called The American Spectator.

0:15:00.751 --> 0:15:03.871
<v Speaker 12>And you know, in circles that I was in, they

0:15:03.911 --> 0:15:08.191
<v Speaker 12>were talking about impeaching him literally before he was even

0:15:08.231 --> 0:15:11.671
<v Speaker 12>sworn into office. So there was a machinery in place

0:15:11.791 --> 0:15:14.151
<v Speaker 12>to try to make that happen.

0:15:14.830 --> 0:15:17.031
<v Speaker 1>As Brock tells it, the writing he did for The

0:15:17.031 --> 0:15:20.230
<v Speaker 1>American Spectator was part of an effort known internally as

0:15:20.271 --> 0:15:24.071
<v Speaker 1>the Arkansas Project. It was funded by a conservative billionaire

0:15:24.151 --> 0:15:27.351
<v Speaker 1>named Richard Mellen'scaife, and its purpose was to dig up

0:15:27.391 --> 0:15:29.671
<v Speaker 1>dirt on the Clintons from before they moved into the

0:15:29.671 --> 0:15:30.191
<v Speaker 1>White House.

0:15:30.471 --> 0:15:32.551
<v Speaker 12>Anything was fair game. They were looking for anything they

0:15:32.551 --> 0:15:37.231
<v Speaker 12>could find that could help, at first to cause problems

0:15:37.271 --> 0:15:41.071
<v Speaker 12>for Clinton, and then it became more explicit mission to

0:15:41.071 --> 0:15:41.991
<v Speaker 12>get him out office.

0:15:42.671 --> 0:15:45.711
<v Speaker 1>Brock told me that at the time he genuinely thought

0:15:45.751 --> 0:15:49.511
<v Speaker 1>he was doing journalism, but he realized pretty quickly that

0:15:49.590 --> 0:15:53.111
<v Speaker 1>his patrons saw him more as a political operative, and

0:15:53.271 --> 0:15:56.710
<v Speaker 1>he embraced it. The outgoing message on Brock's answering machine

0:15:56.791 --> 0:15:59.751
<v Speaker 1>during Clinton's first term was I'm out trying to bring

0:15:59.791 --> 0:16:00.511
<v Speaker 1>down the president.

0:16:00.791 --> 0:16:03.711
<v Speaker 12>That was the intention of the Arkansas project. It used

0:16:04.151 --> 0:16:07.671
<v Speaker 12>tactics of journalism, but it was more like political opposition

0:16:07.791 --> 0:16:12.111
<v Speaker 12>research without any scruples at all. It had no fealty

0:16:12.191 --> 0:16:15.271
<v Speaker 12>to facts or truth. If it was a myth that

0:16:15.311 --> 0:16:19.271
<v Speaker 12>could stick, that was fine. It was just to create

0:16:19.511 --> 0:16:22.951
<v Speaker 12>an atmosphere in which it was difficult for Clinton to

0:16:23.071 --> 0:16:26.951
<v Speaker 12>govern and to throw sand in the gears of any

0:16:26.991 --> 0:16:28.711
<v Speaker 12>progress that would be made under Clinton.

0:16:29.871 --> 0:16:32.831
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety three, Brock got a tip from a

0:16:32.871 --> 0:16:37.791
<v Speaker 1>major Republican donor. Apparently there were some Arkansas State troopers

0:16:37.830 --> 0:16:40.511
<v Speaker 1>who had served on Bill Clinton's security detail while he

0:16:40.551 --> 0:16:43.791
<v Speaker 1>was governor, and they had some salacious stories to tell

0:16:43.830 --> 0:16:44.791
<v Speaker 1>about what they'd seen.

0:16:45.911 --> 0:16:49.511
<v Speaker 12>I went down to Arkansas. I spent hours and hours

0:16:50.151 --> 0:16:54.511
<v Speaker 12>debriefing the troopers. They were seemingly first hand witnesses to

0:16:54.551 --> 0:16:55.191
<v Speaker 12>these events.

0:16:55.551 --> 0:16:58.231
<v Speaker 1>The troopers told Brock that they had helped then Governor

0:16:58.271 --> 0:17:01.791
<v Speaker 1>Clinton coordinate and cover up his extramarital.

0:17:01.231 --> 0:17:05.590
<v Speaker 12>Affairs, basically being part of a political movement that wanted

0:17:05.631 --> 0:17:08.391
<v Speaker 12>to do damage to the Clintons. You know, I took

0:17:08.391 --> 0:17:11.031
<v Speaker 12>them at their word. I did not do a lot

0:17:11.071 --> 0:17:14.870
<v Speaker 12>of like checking beyond what they said.

0:17:15.870 --> 0:17:18.630
<v Speaker 1>As Brock explained it to me, the main goal of

0:17:18.671 --> 0:17:21.750
<v Speaker 1>the story was to conjure the width of scandal so

0:17:21.791 --> 0:17:24.551
<v Speaker 1>that journalists in the mainstream media could pick up the scent.

0:17:25.630 --> 0:17:29.191
<v Speaker 1>The Spectator had a relatively modest circulation and they were

0:17:29.231 --> 0:17:32.791
<v Speaker 1>known to have an anti Clinton slant. But if they

0:17:32.830 --> 0:17:35.071
<v Speaker 1>could get coverage of the State Trooper story into a

0:17:35.110 --> 0:17:38.830
<v Speaker 1>more mainstream outlet, it would remove the air of bias

0:17:38.911 --> 0:17:42.751
<v Speaker 1>from the allegations and amplify the scandal to a massive audience.

0:17:43.751 --> 0:17:46.830
<v Speaker 1>Brock came to think of this process as scandal laundering.

0:17:47.511 --> 0:17:51.231
<v Speaker 12>One of the goals that the Spectator was to try

0:17:51.271 --> 0:17:55.951
<v Speaker 12>to hook more established media onto some of our narratives.

0:17:56.110 --> 0:18:00.871
<v Speaker 12>You'd plant a seed and then it kind of grows

0:18:00.911 --> 0:18:03.990
<v Speaker 12>on all sorts of places, and by the time you're done,

0:18:04.150 --> 0:18:05.390
<v Speaker 12>it's on the evening news.

0:18:06.991 --> 0:18:08.430
<v Speaker 4>This is CNN.

0:18:09.191 --> 0:18:11.430
<v Speaker 1>When Brock was ready to go to press with his story,

0:18:11.471 --> 0:18:14.670
<v Speaker 1>but the State Troopers, the American Spectator made a point

0:18:14.671 --> 0:18:16.471
<v Speaker 1>of giving CNN a sneak peek.

0:18:16.991 --> 0:18:20.511
<v Speaker 12>They went for it. They interviewed the troopers themselves the

0:18:20.590 --> 0:18:23.910
<v Speaker 12>day the piece was published, and the troopers were on

0:18:24.191 --> 0:18:26.911
<v Speaker 12>six o'clock evening news on CNN on a particular day

0:18:26.951 --> 0:18:28.711
<v Speaker 12>the story broke, Hilary Sawer.

0:18:29.110 --> 0:18:31.110
<v Speaker 7>She told me, she said, I know who she is,

0:18:31.191 --> 0:18:33.911
<v Speaker 7>I know what she is here for get the whole

0:18:34.031 --> 0:18:34.551
<v Speaker 7>out of here.

0:18:34.711 --> 0:18:38.071
<v Speaker 12>So it very quickly got into the bloodstream of the

0:18:38.110 --> 0:18:40.150
<v Speaker 12>mainstream media, which is what our goal was.

0:18:40.511 --> 0:18:43.390
<v Speaker 1>The troopers say they helped Clinton pick up women up

0:18:43.431 --> 0:18:46.191
<v Speaker 1>to the day he left for Washington to become president.

0:18:46.590 --> 0:18:50.710
<v Speaker 1>The story became known as Troopergate. The scandal had been

0:18:50.791 --> 0:18:51.631
<v Speaker 1>duly laundered.

0:18:51.911 --> 0:18:55.271
<v Speaker 2>One senior administration official complained that every time they have

0:18:55.350 --> 0:18:58.311
<v Speaker 2>to deny a new round of these kinds of allegations,

0:18:58.830 --> 0:18:59.551
<v Speaker 2>it gets harder.

0:19:00.471 --> 0:19:03.911
<v Speaker 1>Over the next few years, the American Spectator printed one

0:19:03.991 --> 0:19:07.191
<v Speaker 1>story after another suggesting that the Clintons were nothing less

0:19:07.231 --> 0:19:08.710
<v Speaker 1>than criminal masterminds.

0:19:08.991 --> 0:19:12.510
<v Speaker 12>There were stories about Clinton being involved in drug grinning

0:19:12.590 --> 0:19:16.071
<v Speaker 12>out of an airport in Arkansas. There was some speculation

0:19:16.191 --> 0:19:20.511
<v Speaker 12>that the Clintons somehow were implicated in Vincent Foster's death,

0:19:20.630 --> 0:19:23.791
<v Speaker 12>which was a suicide, but was said to be something else.

0:19:24.751 --> 0:19:27.271
<v Speaker 1>What Brock is referring to here is the so called

0:19:27.390 --> 0:19:31.190
<v Speaker 1>Clinton body count, a darkly absurd rumor alleging that the

0:19:31.231 --> 0:19:35.631
<v Speaker 1>Clintons have had multiple close associates murdered the best known

0:19:35.711 --> 0:19:39.150
<v Speaker 1>data point in this fantasy was always Vince Foster, a

0:19:39.231 --> 0:19:41.870
<v Speaker 1>longtime friend and colleague of the Clintons who worked in

0:19:41.870 --> 0:19:44.150
<v Speaker 1>the White House before taking his own life in nineteen

0:19:44.231 --> 0:19:49.471
<v Speaker 1>ninety three. After Foster's death, the allegation that the Clintons

0:19:49.471 --> 0:19:52.071
<v Speaker 1>had something to do with it gained so much traction

0:19:52.231 --> 0:19:56.071
<v Speaker 1>that it was discussed in congressional hearings. One of the

0:19:56.071 --> 0:19:58.950
<v Speaker 1>theories that sprouted from Foster's death was that he and

0:19:59.071 --> 0:20:01.750
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton have been having an affair, but there were

0:20:01.791 --> 0:20:05.350
<v Speaker 1>many other theories too, and between nineteen ninety three and

0:20:05.431 --> 0:20:09.791
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven, at least five official investigations looked into them.

0:20:10.751 --> 0:20:14.551
<v Speaker 1>Each one came to the same conclusion, including one led

0:20:14.551 --> 0:20:16.271
<v Speaker 1>by independent counsel Ken Starr.

0:20:17.791 --> 0:20:21.430
<v Speaker 7>The Whitewater Special prosecutor. Kenneth Starr issued his final report

0:20:21.511 --> 0:20:24.150
<v Speaker 7>today on the death of former White House Deputy Council

0:20:24.271 --> 0:20:29.671
<v Speaker 7>Vince Foster and reaffirmed that Foster was depressed and committed suicide.

0:20:29.830 --> 0:20:32.830
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton had famously bragged on the campaign trail that

0:20:32.911 --> 0:20:35.191
<v Speaker 1>a vote for him was a vote for Hillary too.

0:20:35.630 --> 0:20:37.751
<v Speaker 11>I always say that that my slogan might well be

0:20:37.870 --> 0:20:39.351
<v Speaker 11>a buy one, get one free.

0:20:39.870 --> 0:20:42.630
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for Hillary that seemed to mean that when it

0:20:42.671 --> 0:20:45.271
<v Speaker 1>came to scandal, she and her husband would also be

0:20:45.311 --> 0:20:49.870
<v Speaker 1>treated as a pair. During just the first two years

0:20:49.870 --> 0:20:53.591
<v Speaker 1>of Clinton's presidency, Hillary was implicated in Troopergate, which you've

0:20:53.590 --> 0:20:56.951
<v Speaker 1>heard about, Travelgate, in which Hillary was accused of funneling

0:20:56.991 --> 0:21:01.031
<v Speaker 1>government business to a travel agent friend, and Whitewater, which

0:21:01.031 --> 0:21:03.830
<v Speaker 1>concerned an Arkansas real estate deal for which she spent

0:21:03.951 --> 0:21:05.991
<v Speaker 1>four hours in front of a federal grand jury.

0:21:06.311 --> 0:21:08.751
<v Speaker 10>The White House today had little comment on the first

0:21:08.791 --> 0:21:11.430
<v Speaker 10>lady's grand jury appear runs, other than to say she

0:21:11.511 --> 0:21:14.591
<v Speaker 10>answered all questions and was not told she'd have to return.

0:21:15.110 --> 0:21:17.711
<v Speaker 1>When reports first surfaced about her husband's affair with a

0:21:17.791 --> 0:21:21.671
<v Speaker 1>former White House intern, Hillary Clinton blamed a vast right

0:21:21.671 --> 0:21:22.711
<v Speaker 1>wing conspiracy.

0:21:22.791 --> 0:21:26.511
<v Speaker 14>I mean, look at the very people who were involved

0:21:26.511 --> 0:21:29.950
<v Speaker 14>in this. They have popped up in other settings. The

0:21:30.031 --> 0:21:33.430
<v Speaker 14>great story here for anybody willing to find it and

0:21:33.471 --> 0:21:36.631
<v Speaker 14>write about it and explain it is this vast right

0:21:36.671 --> 0:21:40.670
<v Speaker 14>wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since

0:21:40.791 --> 0:21:42.311
<v Speaker 14>the day he announced for president.

0:21:43.951 --> 0:21:47.870
<v Speaker 1>At the time, independent counsel Ken Starr dismissed the idea

0:21:47.991 --> 0:21:51.390
<v Speaker 1>as nonsense, while the media portrayed Clinton as the woman

0:21:51.431 --> 0:21:54.111
<v Speaker 1>who cried conspiracy won too many times.

0:21:54.590 --> 0:21:57.911
<v Speaker 8>The first lady salvo appears to be a favorite Clinton tactic,

0:21:58.311 --> 0:22:01.551
<v Speaker 8>fired off in almost every scandal, from Jennifer Flowers to

0:22:01.630 --> 0:22:03.191
<v Speaker 8>Paula Jones to Whitewater.

0:22:03.311 --> 0:22:07.190
<v Speaker 11>Instead of his Clinton raising her antenna and circling the

0:22:07.231 --> 0:22:10.551
<v Speaker 11>country to find the source of our problems, she can

0:22:11.031 --> 0:22:13.350
<v Speaker 11>look at her own family and she'll find them right there.

0:22:15.431 --> 0:22:17.791
<v Speaker 1>The problem for the Clintons was that some of what

0:22:17.830 --> 0:22:21.231
<v Speaker 1>they were accused of turned out to be true. No,

0:22:21.311 --> 0:22:24.390
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a kill list, but Bill Clinton did

0:22:24.431 --> 0:22:28.470
<v Speaker 1>have extramarital affairs that he consistently lied about. Also, the

0:22:28.511 --> 0:22:31.471
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's attempts to damage control in the face of scandal

0:22:31.951 --> 0:22:35.471
<v Speaker 1>often caused them to make decisions that looked suspicious and secretive.

0:22:35.671 --> 0:22:38.710
<v Speaker 12>I mean, both things ended up being true. There was

0:22:38.791 --> 0:22:41.031
<v Speaker 12>an affair with Monkolinsky, and there was a best right

0:22:41.031 --> 0:22:44.230
<v Speaker 12>wing conspiracy. So I think people said this is like

0:22:44.630 --> 0:22:49.111
<v Speaker 12>a delusional type of defense, and that she had possibly

0:22:49.150 --> 0:22:53.351
<v Speaker 12>deluded herself into thinking that the Lensky affair didn't happen.

0:22:53.511 --> 0:22:56.271
<v Speaker 12>But what got lost there was that both things were true.

0:22:56.590 --> 0:23:00.631
<v Speaker 12>Just because the allegations of the affair ended up being correct.

0:23:01.231 --> 0:23:04.631
<v Speaker 12>The way that all that was dug up was part

0:23:04.671 --> 0:23:05.670
<v Speaker 12>of the wrongful scheme.

0:23:06.511 --> 0:23:09.791
<v Speaker 1>Back in nineteen ninety four, Rockets started working on a

0:23:09.791 --> 0:23:13.871
<v Speaker 1>biography of Hillary Clinton. His friends all assumed it would

0:23:13.870 --> 0:23:17.830
<v Speaker 1>be a devastating takedown, but Brock found himself writing something

0:23:17.951 --> 0:23:22.471
<v Speaker 1>much milder. The book was almost generous to Clinton. Rock

0:23:22.551 --> 0:23:27.991
<v Speaker 1>called her intelligent, talented, ambitious, and very determined. After the

0:23:27.991 --> 0:23:31.511
<v Speaker 1>book was published, Brock found himself getting uninvited from dinner

0:23:31.511 --> 0:23:34.831
<v Speaker 1>parties and not getting booked by right wing radio hosts

0:23:34.870 --> 0:23:38.590
<v Speaker 1>like g Gordon Lyddy and Oliver North. This cold reception

0:23:38.830 --> 0:23:41.710
<v Speaker 1>wounded Brock and convinced him that his friends on the

0:23:41.791 --> 0:23:44.950
<v Speaker 1>right were just as unscrupulous about the truth as his

0:23:45.071 --> 0:23:49.511
<v Speaker 1>enemies on the left. Eventually, Brock came to regret his

0:23:49.630 --> 0:23:52.390
<v Speaker 1>work for the Arkansas Project, and in a piece for

0:23:52.511 --> 0:23:55.750
<v Speaker 1>Esquire magazine titled Confessions of a right Wing hit Man,

0:23:56.590 --> 0:23:59.271
<v Speaker 1>he described himself as having been bought and paid for

0:23:59.350 --> 0:24:02.791
<v Speaker 1>by the conservative movement. David Brock, the road warrior of

0:24:02.791 --> 0:24:04.590
<v Speaker 1>the right, is dead, he declared.

0:24:05.271 --> 0:24:08.551
<v Speaker 12>Part of what happened was I felt complicit in the lying,

0:24:09.071 --> 0:24:11.311
<v Speaker 12>the separation that I made from the right wing, and

0:24:11.350 --> 0:24:14.590
<v Speaker 12>the conversion that I had wasn't really around ideology, it

0:24:14.630 --> 0:24:15.471
<v Speaker 12>was around ethics.

0:24:16.350 --> 0:24:19.551
<v Speaker 1>In subsequent years, Brock made the most of his status

0:24:19.590 --> 0:24:23.191
<v Speaker 1>as an x right wing defector. In two thousand and four,

0:24:23.350 --> 0:24:27.431
<v Speaker 1>he founded Media Matters, a liberal watchdog group that scrutinized

0:24:27.431 --> 0:24:30.511
<v Speaker 1>the conservative media ecosystem. Brock had once been a part of.

0:24:31.551 --> 0:24:35.911
<v Speaker 1>That ecosystem had changed dramatically since the early nineties, mostly

0:24:35.991 --> 0:24:39.390
<v Speaker 1>due to the advent of Fox News. But when Hillary

0:24:39.431 --> 0:24:43.031
<v Speaker 1>Clinton became the focus of the Benghazi scandal, Brock got

0:24:43.071 --> 0:24:43.671
<v Speaker 1>deja vu.

0:24:44.671 --> 0:24:47.711
<v Speaker 12>The phrase that was used was Hillary lied, four died,

0:24:48.311 --> 0:24:51.991
<v Speaker 12>and so the idea that Hillary was a liar, she

0:24:52.110 --> 0:24:54.830
<v Speaker 12>covered things up. That was one of the through lines

0:24:54.830 --> 0:24:58.190
<v Speaker 12>in Benghazi. They were convinced that Hillary was hiding something,

0:24:58.751 --> 0:25:03.950
<v Speaker 12>going back to the Whitewater scandal and Vince Foster and

0:25:03.991 --> 0:25:06.430
<v Speaker 12>all the other things. It had those same themes. And

0:25:06.471 --> 0:25:10.631
<v Speaker 12>then the fact that every allegation kept getting knocked down, debunked,

0:25:10.671 --> 0:25:14.390
<v Speaker 12>and disproven didn't seem to slow it down. The facts

0:25:14.630 --> 0:25:16.670
<v Speaker 12>didn't matter, and it was hard to cut through the

0:25:16.711 --> 0:25:17.911
<v Speaker 12>fog of disinformation.

0:25:21.870 --> 0:25:25.350
<v Speaker 1>Brock was ready to deploy Media Matters as a countervailing force.

0:25:26.191 --> 0:25:29.590
<v Speaker 1>In twenty thirteen, the website dedicated a huge percentage of

0:25:29.590 --> 0:25:34.271
<v Speaker 1>its resources to monitoring Fox News' coverage of Benghazi. Their

0:25:34.311 --> 0:25:37.110
<v Speaker 1>goal was to delegitimize Fox's coverage in the eyes of

0:25:37.191 --> 0:25:40.710
<v Speaker 1>mainstream journalists who might otherwise feel compelled to match it

0:25:40.870 --> 0:25:41.951
<v Speaker 1>or amplify.

0:25:41.511 --> 0:25:46.031
<v Speaker 12>It, because you figure, you can't really change Fox itself,

0:25:46.590 --> 0:25:49.551
<v Speaker 12>but you could change how others viewed Fox so that

0:25:50.590 --> 0:25:53.670
<v Speaker 12>what happened with Whitewater didn't happen with Benghazi, that the

0:25:53.711 --> 0:25:56.390
<v Speaker 12>whole rest of the media became obsessed with it as well,

0:25:56.551 --> 0:25:59.071
<v Speaker 12>and then yeah, you'd never get out from under it.

0:26:00.231 --> 0:26:02.271
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember what your instructions were to your team

0:26:02.271 --> 0:26:05.190
<v Speaker 1>at Media Matters in terms of how to cover Benghazi.

0:26:05.671 --> 0:26:09.151
<v Speaker 12>The main thing was, there's nothing too small to address.

0:26:09.711 --> 0:26:18.190
<v Speaker 12>Every minor charge, any minor misrepresentation could end up mushrooming

0:26:18.511 --> 0:26:23.631
<v Speaker 12>and becoming quote a thing. So we had to be

0:26:24.110 --> 0:26:28.390
<v Speaker 12>very careful and listen very carefully, and be very attentive

0:26:28.511 --> 0:26:32.311
<v Speaker 12>to every sort of jot and tittle of what they

0:26:32.311 --> 0:26:35.230
<v Speaker 12>were saying, because you never knew what would get traction.

0:26:38.350 --> 0:26:42.631
<v Speaker 1>Just nine days after delivering her congressional testimony, Hillary Clinton said,

0:26:42.711 --> 0:26:44.671
<v Speaker 1>farewell to the State Department.

0:26:44.511 --> 0:26:49.471
<v Speaker 10>And I hope that you will continue to make yourselves,

0:26:50.350 --> 0:26:54.631
<v Speaker 10>make me and make our country proud. Thank you all,

0:26:54.671 --> 0:26:55.511
<v Speaker 10>and God bless you.

0:26:56.671 --> 0:26:59.350
<v Speaker 1>But no one expected her to leave the spotlight for long.

0:27:00.110 --> 0:27:03.351
<v Speaker 1>With the twenty sixteen election coming up, it was widely

0:27:03.431 --> 0:27:07.031
<v Speaker 1>understood that Clinton would soon start running for the Democratic nomination,

0:27:08.110 --> 0:27:11.430
<v Speaker 1>and so Clinton's handling of ben Gotta remained in the news,

0:27:12.031 --> 0:27:14.551
<v Speaker 1>where the scandal would go on to sprout yet another

0:27:14.671 --> 0:27:18.071
<v Speaker 1>new head, and this time there would be whistleblowers.

0:27:18.911 --> 0:27:22.750
<v Speaker 4>My husband and I were in Parpagnon, France. We were

0:27:22.830 --> 0:27:26.711
<v Speaker 4>right on the Mediterranean, and I awoke to my cell

0:27:26.751 --> 0:27:32.951
<v Speaker 4>phone with a big headline US ambassador murdered in Benghazi.

0:27:33.630 --> 0:27:37.271
<v Speaker 1>This is Victoria Tunsing. She's a lawyer who served in

0:27:37.271 --> 0:27:40.631
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department during the Reagan administration before going into

0:27:40.711 --> 0:27:44.071
<v Speaker 1>private practice and making herself the go to attorney for

0:27:44.191 --> 0:27:48.830
<v Speaker 1>various Republican causes. Tunsing and her husband, a fellow lawyer

0:27:48.911 --> 0:27:52.350
<v Speaker 1>named Joe Degeneva, became media stars during the nineties as

0:27:52.431 --> 0:27:57.111
<v Speaker 1>legal commentators. In nineteen ninety eight, the Washington Post reported

0:27:57.150 --> 0:27:59.551
<v Speaker 1>that the couple had appeared on TV or in news

0:27:59.551 --> 0:28:02.991
<v Speaker 1>stories talking about the Clinton Lewinsky scandal more than three

0:28:03.110 --> 0:28:04.630
<v Speaker 1>hundred times in one month.

0:28:05.191 --> 0:28:08.630
<v Speaker 4>We have tapes where her voice to Lynda Tripp is

0:28:08.711 --> 0:28:13.511
<v Speaker 4>saying I had a sexual relationship, and most importantly, people

0:28:13.511 --> 0:28:16.151
<v Speaker 4>asked me to lie about it. Here is one more

0:28:16.191 --> 0:28:18.670
<v Speaker 4>person saying the president lied to me.

0:28:19.671 --> 0:28:22.670
<v Speaker 1>After the Benghazi attack, Tunsen got a phone call that

0:28:22.791 --> 0:28:24.231
<v Speaker 1>made her want to get involved.

0:28:24.630 --> 0:28:27.951
<v Speaker 4>I got a call the next day from a good

0:28:27.991 --> 0:28:30.430
<v Speaker 4>friend who I was supposed to meet in Paris, and

0:28:30.431 --> 0:28:32.351
<v Speaker 4>he says, I can't do it. These are my friends

0:28:32.630 --> 0:28:34.711
<v Speaker 4>who were murdered in Benghazi.

0:28:35.191 --> 0:28:38.671
<v Speaker 1>According to Tunsing, her friend, a former lawyer. The CIA

0:28:39.071 --> 0:28:40.991
<v Speaker 1>then told her something she never forgot.

0:28:41.511 --> 0:28:44.991
<v Speaker 4>He said, the government is lying to you. What they're

0:28:45.071 --> 0:28:46.751
<v Speaker 4>saying happened did not happen.

0:28:47.511 --> 0:28:50.311
<v Speaker 1>When Tunsing got back to Washington, she put out a

0:28:50.311 --> 0:28:52.831
<v Speaker 1>call on Capitol Hill saying she was willing to work

0:28:52.911 --> 0:28:56.111
<v Speaker 1>pro bono on behalf of anyone involved in the Benghazi story.

0:28:56.591 --> 0:28:59.230
<v Speaker 4>About a week later, I get a phone call, we

0:28:59.311 --> 0:29:02.551
<v Speaker 4>have a client for you to represent, and I find

0:29:02.591 --> 0:29:06.831
<v Speaker 4>out the person that needed representation was the DCM, called

0:29:06.831 --> 0:29:10.190
<v Speaker 4>the Deputy Chief of Mission, the number two person in

0:29:10.671 --> 0:29:11.351
<v Speaker 4>the embassy.

0:29:12.071 --> 0:29:15.071
<v Speaker 1>The Deputy Chief of Mission in Tripoli was Greg Hicks.

0:29:15.631 --> 0:29:17.751
<v Speaker 1>You first heard from him in episode three when he

0:29:17.791 --> 0:29:20.190
<v Speaker 1>was trying to reach Chris Stevens by phone as the

0:29:20.231 --> 0:29:24.751
<v Speaker 1>attack in Benghazi was unfolding. Later, when Hicks returned to

0:29:24.791 --> 0:29:27.631
<v Speaker 1>the United States, he was asked to step down from

0:29:27.631 --> 0:29:31.111
<v Speaker 1>his position in Libya. He agreed, but when he started

0:29:31.151 --> 0:29:34.151
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job at the State Department, he found

0:29:34.231 --> 0:29:36.551
<v Speaker 1>that no one seemed interested in working with him.

0:29:37.351 --> 0:29:40.791
<v Speaker 3>I walked the halls of the State Department looking for

0:29:41.351 --> 0:29:44.071
<v Speaker 3>a job. I would get an interview and there would

0:29:44.071 --> 0:29:47.271
<v Speaker 3>always be sad eyes, and they would listen and say,

0:29:47.511 --> 0:29:49.751
<v Speaker 3>you really have a great career. You've done a lot

0:29:49.751 --> 0:29:51.911
<v Speaker 3>of good things, and we could certainly use you in

0:29:51.951 --> 0:29:56.271
<v Speaker 3>this job, but we have another candidate. I'm sorry, and

0:29:56.591 --> 0:29:58.271
<v Speaker 3>you know, a couple of months later, I would look

0:29:58.271 --> 0:30:00.591
<v Speaker 3>at the available jobs list and it would still be open.

0:30:01.791 --> 0:30:04.471
<v Speaker 1>Hicks suspected that higher ups in the State Department were

0:30:04.511 --> 0:30:07.071
<v Speaker 1>blocking him from getting the jobs he was applying for.

0:30:07.951 --> 0:30:10.151
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know why exactly, but as far as as

0:30:10.151 --> 0:30:12.791
<v Speaker 1>he could figure, his problems could be traced back to

0:30:12.831 --> 0:30:18.071
<v Speaker 1>an incident involving a Republican Congressman, Jason Chaffits. This gets

0:30:18.111 --> 0:30:22.831
<v Speaker 1>slightly convoluted, so bear with me. Chafits was investigating Benghazi

0:30:22.951 --> 0:30:26.270
<v Speaker 1>as a member of the House Oversight Committee. Roughly a

0:30:26.311 --> 0:30:29.190
<v Speaker 1>month after the attack, he traveled to Libya's capital to

0:30:29.231 --> 0:30:32.591
<v Speaker 1>see the US embassy with his own eyes. Because of

0:30:32.671 --> 0:30:36.431
<v Speaker 1>Chaefitz's role in the House investigation, the State Department sent

0:30:36.471 --> 0:30:38.311
<v Speaker 1>one of its lawyers to sit in on all of

0:30:38.311 --> 0:30:42.271
<v Speaker 1>his conversations with embassy officials, but when Hicks took chafits

0:30:42.311 --> 0:30:45.311
<v Speaker 1>to meet with the local CIA station chief, the State

0:30:45.311 --> 0:30:48.071
<v Speaker 1>Department lawyer was not allowed to join because he didn't

0:30:48.111 --> 0:30:52.831
<v Speaker 1>have the necessary security clearance. Afterwards, Hicks says he received

0:30:52.831 --> 0:30:55.871
<v Speaker 1>a phone call from Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills,

0:30:56.231 --> 0:30:59.071
<v Speaker 1>who was well known as a loyal, longtime associate of

0:30:59.111 --> 0:30:59.671
<v Speaker 1>the Clintons.

0:31:00.351 --> 0:31:07.230
<v Speaker 3>She spoke for This is Clinton in many circumstances, so

0:31:07.831 --> 0:31:13.111
<v Speaker 3>everyone in the department knew that if Cheryl Mills was calling,

0:31:13.151 --> 0:31:18.271
<v Speaker 3>you set up straight and listened very carefully, because something

0:31:18.351 --> 0:31:21.871
<v Speaker 3>is going to be imparted to you. I was shaking

0:31:21.951 --> 0:31:22.991
<v Speaker 3>in my boots.

0:31:23.751 --> 0:31:27.071
<v Speaker 1>According to Hicks, Mills wanted to know what had happened

0:31:27.151 --> 0:31:30.871
<v Speaker 1>during Chaefitz's briefing with the CIA station chief, and though

0:31:30.911 --> 0:31:33.470
<v Speaker 1>Hicks says she never explicitly said, she was angry at

0:31:33.551 --> 0:31:35.710
<v Speaker 1>him for allowing the briefing to take place without the

0:31:35.711 --> 0:31:39.391
<v Speaker 1>State Department. Lawyer Hicks had no doubt she was furious.

0:31:40.191 --> 0:31:43.191
<v Speaker 3>It was in the tone of her voice. She was very,

0:31:43.271 --> 0:31:47.431
<v Speaker 3>very upset, and so in my view, this was a

0:31:47.511 --> 0:31:55.351
<v Speaker 3>concern that Jason Chafitz may have gained information that would

0:31:56.351 --> 0:32:00.591
<v Speaker 3>be released into the public debate leading up to the

0:32:00.631 --> 0:32:07.911
<v Speaker 3>presidential election. That is my interpretation of what was going on.

0:32:09.711 --> 0:32:12.671
<v Speaker 1>Later, when Hicks was back in Washington and struggling to

0:32:12.711 --> 0:32:15.470
<v Speaker 1>find a new position in the State Department, he thought

0:32:15.511 --> 0:32:18.031
<v Speaker 1>back to that phone call with Clinton's chief of staff

0:32:18.551 --> 0:32:20.911
<v Speaker 1>and concluded that it was the reason he was now

0:32:20.991 --> 0:32:25.311
<v Speaker 1>being blacklisted. Hicks thought he had marked himself in Clinton's

0:32:25.351 --> 0:32:28.511
<v Speaker 1>mind as someone who wasn't a team player, someone who

0:32:28.551 --> 0:32:31.391
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be counted on to defend the administration when called

0:32:31.431 --> 0:32:31.911
<v Speaker 1>to do so.

0:32:33.431 --> 0:32:35.231
<v Speaker 3>I became to think that all of this was being

0:32:35.471 --> 0:32:38.391
<v Speaker 3>driven from Hillary Clinton's perspective, even though she was out

0:32:38.431 --> 0:32:41.470
<v Speaker 3>of the administration by then, but also by the Obama administration.

0:32:41.591 --> 0:32:45.271
<v Speaker 3>They were afraid of me, and then they were creating

0:32:45.471 --> 0:32:49.511
<v Speaker 3>even greater fears in my own mind that I was

0:32:49.711 --> 0:32:52.551
<v Speaker 3>a threat to them, and I felt they were a

0:32:52.551 --> 0:32:54.631
<v Speaker 3>threat to me. I absolutely felt they were a threat

0:32:54.631 --> 0:33:00.031
<v Speaker 3>to me. It just becomes so negative in your own

0:33:00.071 --> 0:33:04.751
<v Speaker 3>mind that what can I do? Everything I do, I'm

0:33:04.751 --> 0:33:08.311
<v Speaker 3>being squashed like a bug. And on top of that,

0:33:08.391 --> 0:33:10.791
<v Speaker 3>by this time, I also was beginning to believe that

0:33:10.911 --> 0:33:17.431
<v Speaker 3>I was under surveillance. Over time, as I was walking

0:33:17.471 --> 0:33:20.190
<v Speaker 3>my dog at night, I noticed that there was constantly

0:33:20.271 --> 0:33:22.151
<v Speaker 3>a truck park at the end of my cul de

0:33:22.231 --> 0:33:24.311
<v Speaker 3>sac with the lights on point that at my house,

0:33:25.711 --> 0:33:28.831
<v Speaker 3>and I was like, well, where did that truck come from?

0:33:29.111 --> 0:33:30.351
<v Speaker 13>And what's he doing here?

0:33:32.591 --> 0:33:36.191
<v Speaker 3>And so you begin to have tricks.

0:33:35.911 --> 0:33:36.711
<v Speaker 13>Played in your mind.

0:33:36.751 --> 0:33:40.190
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether that was surveillance or not, but

0:33:40.831 --> 0:33:41.471
<v Speaker 3>I came.

0:33:41.311 --> 0:33:43.351
<v Speaker 13>To believe that I was under surveillance.

0:33:44.271 --> 0:33:48.871
<v Speaker 1>Hicks's new lawyer, Victoria Tunsing, wasn't surprised by her client's experience.

0:33:49.431 --> 0:33:52.471
<v Speaker 4>This is what they do. Democrats have no problem doing

0:33:52.511 --> 0:33:55.991
<v Speaker 4>in a whistleblower. The whistleblower they don't like, they kill.

0:33:57.271 --> 0:34:01.470
<v Speaker 1>Tonsing could personally relate to Hicks's fears. Back in nineteen

0:34:01.551 --> 0:34:03.791
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, when she and her husband were appearing on

0:34:03.831 --> 0:34:07.271
<v Speaker 1>TV to talk about the Clinton Lewinsky scandal. They came

0:34:07.311 --> 0:34:09.551
<v Speaker 1>to believe the White House was targeting them.

0:34:09.471 --> 0:34:12.631
<v Speaker 4>To when my husband and I were speaking out a

0:34:12.631 --> 0:34:17.511
<v Speaker 4>lot about the Clintons. They hired a private detective to

0:34:17.631 --> 0:34:20.671
<v Speaker 4>find out anything about us, but they couldn't find anything.

0:34:21.511 --> 0:34:24.790
<v Speaker 1>At the time, Tunsing's husband made a similar claim during

0:34:24.831 --> 0:34:26.631
<v Speaker 1>an interview on Meet the Press.

0:34:26.230 --> 0:34:30.871
<v Speaker 7>Deputies, Republican attorney Joe Degeneva, a commentator who defends Starr,

0:34:31.071 --> 0:34:33.551
<v Speaker 7>says he was told he's being investigated too.

0:34:33.710 --> 0:34:36.790
<v Speaker 1>That is truly a frightening, frightening development. It was a

0:34:36.791 --> 0:34:40.391
<v Speaker 1>spectacular enough charge that the White House felt compelled to respond.

0:34:40.791 --> 0:34:45.710
<v Speaker 7>You don't retain private investigators that go Snooper ran about prosecutors,

0:34:45.750 --> 0:34:47.511
<v Speaker 7>reporters or Joe Dejenneva.

0:34:49.230 --> 0:34:53.031
<v Speaker 1>Now, at the height of the Bengazi scandal, Tunsing's client

0:34:53.190 --> 0:34:57.190
<v Speaker 1>Greg Hicks, also suspected he was being watched, and as

0:34:57.190 --> 0:35:00.071
<v Speaker 1>he explained to me, the person he was thinking about

0:35:00.351 --> 0:35:03.231
<v Speaker 1>was Vince Foster. Did you fear for your life?

0:35:04.031 --> 0:35:07.591
<v Speaker 13>I did when the surveillance started. I was very concerned.

0:35:08.671 --> 0:35:11.831
<v Speaker 3>The Vince Foss story was well known. I knew of

0:35:11.991 --> 0:35:16.831
<v Speaker 3>what had happened to him, and I was concerned that

0:35:16.831 --> 0:35:20.071
<v Speaker 3>that I might be on a list for elimination.

0:35:21.391 --> 0:35:23.991
<v Speaker 13>I was literally afraid from my life.

0:35:24.270 --> 0:35:27.431
<v Speaker 3>You get to a point where just you become desperate,

0:35:29.831 --> 0:35:33.790
<v Speaker 3>and so at this point I felt my only way

0:35:33.831 --> 0:35:37.310
<v Speaker 3>out was to come forward and testify.

0:35:37.351 --> 0:35:40.431
<v Speaker 1>And so in May of twenty thirteen, after more than

0:35:40.471 --> 0:35:43.270
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years as a State Department employee with no

0:35:43.391 --> 0:35:48.351
<v Speaker 1>public profile, Greg Hicks stepped into the spotlight. By this point,

0:35:48.511 --> 0:35:51.471
<v Speaker 1>Fox News had spent two weeks talking about the anonymous

0:35:51.511 --> 0:35:54.311
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers getting ready to come out against the State Department.

0:35:55.151 --> 0:35:59.991
<v Speaker 1>As Hicks's representative, Victoria Tunsing made the most of the anticipation.

0:35:59.951 --> 0:36:03.551
<v Speaker 15>Well, let me just tell you that, knowing the unclassified

0:36:03.591 --> 0:36:09.991
<v Speaker 15>information is, there are inconsistent facts with what the administer

0:36:10.431 --> 0:36:10.830
<v Speaker 15>has said.

0:36:10.991 --> 0:36:12.750
<v Speaker 13>Can you sure any one of those with us?

0:36:12.951 --> 0:36:13.750
<v Speaker 12>No, I can't be.

0:36:13.991 --> 0:36:16.471
<v Speaker 4>I just can't, you know, be glad to come back here.

0:36:16.591 --> 0:36:19.671
<v Speaker 1>But in early May it was announced that the House

0:36:19.710 --> 0:36:22.551
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Committee would hold a hearing to interview Hicks and

0:36:22.591 --> 0:36:25.951
<v Speaker 1>three others. Among them was a former marine in the

0:36:25.951 --> 0:36:29.790
<v Speaker 1>State Department's Bureau of Counter Terrorism, who conveniently was being

0:36:29.831 --> 0:36:34.431
<v Speaker 1>represented by Victoria Tunsing's husband. At Fox News, the emergence

0:36:34.431 --> 0:36:37.191
<v Speaker 1>of the whistleblowers was treated with unrestrained excitement.

0:36:37.270 --> 0:36:39.230
<v Speaker 6>Well, guess what, there's four whistleblowers now.

0:36:39.270 --> 0:36:42.031
<v Speaker 10>Who say that they have new information about Benghazi and

0:36:42.111 --> 0:36:45.511
<v Speaker 10>what exactly happened that night and the county is.

0:36:45.591 --> 0:36:48.390
<v Speaker 1>The big ticket items expected from Hicks centered on two

0:36:48.471 --> 0:36:52.831
<v Speaker 1>separate points. First that the US military didn't do everything

0:36:52.871 --> 0:36:56.711
<v Speaker 1>it could to help the Americans in Benghazi, and second

0:36:57.111 --> 0:37:00.671
<v Speaker 1>that Hicks knew it was a terrorist attack immediately, even

0:37:00.710 --> 0:37:03.351
<v Speaker 1>as the Obama administration was going on about an anti

0:37:03.471 --> 0:37:09.431
<v Speaker 1>Islamic video. Tunsing promised fireworks on heraldo at large, she

0:37:09.511 --> 0:37:11.911
<v Speaker 1>and her husband and delivered what was essentially a promo

0:37:12.071 --> 0:37:13.391
<v Speaker 1>for their client's testimony.

0:37:13.791 --> 0:37:18.631
<v Speaker 2>This purported testimony is a game changer. Is it fair

0:37:18.791 --> 0:37:23.830
<v Speaker 2>to say that your clients will debunk the notion that

0:37:23.951 --> 0:37:28.791
<v Speaker 2>the scurreless anti Muslim video is what precipitated the violence

0:37:28.831 --> 0:37:32.151
<v Speaker 2>in Benghazi without a doubt, without a doubt.

0:37:32.431 --> 0:37:35.310
<v Speaker 4>This is cover up, one oh one, without a doubt.

0:37:35.351 --> 0:37:36.391
<v Speaker 4>That's why we got involved.

0:37:38.351 --> 0:37:41.190
<v Speaker 1>Greg Hicks told me that having an advocate as aggressive

0:37:41.190 --> 0:37:43.831
<v Speaker 1>as Victoria Tunsing made him feel less afraid.

0:37:44.831 --> 0:37:47.271
<v Speaker 3>It was a big watershed when I made the decision

0:37:47.351 --> 0:37:50.591
<v Speaker 3>to go forward and be a whistleblower, and with Victoria

0:37:50.591 --> 0:37:56.710
<v Speaker 3>as my attorney. Victoria is such a confident person in

0:37:57.071 --> 0:38:01.031
<v Speaker 3>such an accomplished lawyer that I just began to feel safer,

0:38:01.551 --> 0:38:04.151
<v Speaker 3>and I began to feel better that I was on

0:38:04.230 --> 0:38:07.230
<v Speaker 3>the right track, that I was doing the right thing.

0:38:07.671 --> 0:38:13.671
<v Speaker 3>She was instrumental in respect during my own natural self confidence.

0:38:14.351 --> 0:38:17.031
<v Speaker 1>I asked Hicks if he ever worried that associating himself

0:38:17.031 --> 0:38:20.230
<v Speaker 1>with Tunsing, with her long record of anti Clinton activism,

0:38:20.431 --> 0:38:24.230
<v Speaker 1>would undermine his credibility as a witness. He told me

0:38:24.311 --> 0:38:26.631
<v Speaker 1>he had barely thought about it, even if others did.

0:38:26.750 --> 0:38:29.831
<v Speaker 9>To an extent, I am fascinated by the sudden appearance

0:38:29.871 --> 0:38:33.911
<v Speaker 9>in the Benghazi story of Joseph Degeneva and Victoria Tensing,

0:38:34.311 --> 0:38:36.471
<v Speaker 9>who were two of the real stars of the anti

0:38:36.511 --> 0:38:39.031
<v Speaker 9>Clinton legal community in the nineteen nineties. When you want

0:38:39.031 --> 0:38:41.071
<v Speaker 9>to keep a scandal ginned up, you go to the pros.

0:38:41.111 --> 0:38:44.111
<v Speaker 1>Eventually, in the days leading up to the whistleblower hearing,

0:38:44.591 --> 0:38:47.591
<v Speaker 1>Fox News built up the anticipation, much like they did

0:38:47.631 --> 0:38:49.591
<v Speaker 1>with Clinton's testimony in January.

0:38:49.831 --> 0:38:51.911
<v Speaker 5>It was a well guarded secret. But we now know

0:38:52.031 --> 0:38:55.871
<v Speaker 5>the identities of the ben Ghazi whistleblowers, So will we

0:38:55.951 --> 0:38:58.551
<v Speaker 5>finally get answers about what happened?

0:38:58.631 --> 0:39:01.951
<v Speaker 1>We have nuans Even Alison Camarada, the reluctant weekend host

0:39:01.991 --> 0:39:05.391
<v Speaker 1>of Fox and Friends was excited to hear the whistleblower's account.

0:39:05.631 --> 0:39:08.551
<v Speaker 6>I thought, ooh good, this will be interesting. Like now

0:39:08.591 --> 0:39:10.831
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to hear what happened.

0:39:11.031 --> 0:39:18.790
<v Speaker 1>Finally, the hearing had come to order. Greg Hicks test

0:39:18.791 --> 0:39:21.071
<v Speaker 1>to fight in front of the Oversight Committee on Wednesday,

0:39:21.151 --> 0:39:26.270
<v Speaker 1>May eighth, twenty thirteen. The hearing was titled Benghazi Exposing

0:39:26.311 --> 0:39:30.991
<v Speaker 1>Failure and Recognizing Courage. Hicks was billed as the star witness.

0:39:31.831 --> 0:39:34.511
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad my bladder was much stronger in those days

0:39:34.511 --> 0:39:37.870
<v Speaker 3>because I literally sat in the same chair for six

0:39:37.911 --> 0:39:39.430
<v Speaker 3>and a half hours.

0:39:40.071 --> 0:39:43.151
<v Speaker 1>In his opening statement, Hicks spent a full half hour

0:39:43.270 --> 0:39:47.471
<v Speaker 1>recounting his experience on the night of the attack. Under questioning,

0:39:47.591 --> 0:39:50.190
<v Speaker 1>he expressed his belief that if military planes had been

0:39:50.230 --> 0:39:53.111
<v Speaker 1>sent to Benghazi that night, it was possible they could

0:39:53.151 --> 0:39:57.111
<v Speaker 1>have deterred the mortar attack on the CIA annex. Hicks

0:39:57.151 --> 0:39:59.951
<v Speaker 1>also described his reaction when he saw Susan Rice on

0:39:59.991 --> 0:40:03.710
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday shows, saying the attack had grown spontaneously out

0:40:03.710 --> 0:40:04.431
<v Speaker 1>of a protest.

0:40:04.911 --> 0:40:11.631
<v Speaker 3>I was stunned, my jaw dropped, and I was embarrassed.

0:40:12.710 --> 0:40:15.111
<v Speaker 1>There was one detail that stood out from the rest

0:40:15.111 --> 0:40:18.230
<v Speaker 1>of Hicks's testimony. It had to do with a decision

0:40:18.391 --> 0:40:20.430
<v Speaker 1>made on the night of the attack by the US

0:40:20.551 --> 0:40:26.310
<v Speaker 1>military's Central Command for Africa AFRICAM for short. Hicks testified

0:40:26.311 --> 0:40:29.031
<v Speaker 1>that a team of four Special Forces officers based in

0:40:29.071 --> 0:40:31.951
<v Speaker 1>Tripoli had been ready to get on a plane to Benghazi,

0:40:32.151 --> 0:40:35.111
<v Speaker 1>only to be told by someone at AFRICAM not to go.

0:40:36.111 --> 0:40:36.310
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:40:36.391 --> 0:40:38.991
<v Speaker 1>Once again, this gets a little tricky, but as you

0:40:39.031 --> 0:40:42.551
<v Speaker 1>may recall, one team of agents from Tripoli did fly

0:40:42.671 --> 0:40:45.551
<v Speaker 1>to Benghazi during the attack. In fact, one of them

0:40:45.591 --> 0:40:48.871
<v Speaker 1>was killed at the CIA Annex. The team Hicks was

0:40:48.911 --> 0:40:52.351
<v Speaker 1>talking about in his testimony was separate. They were getting

0:40:52.391 --> 0:40:55.111
<v Speaker 1>ready to fly to Benghazi much later, closer to six

0:40:55.190 --> 0:40:59.991
<v Speaker 1>a m. After the attack was essentially over. But Hicks

0:40:59.991 --> 0:41:01.951
<v Speaker 1>saw the decision to keep them in Tripoli as a

0:41:01.951 --> 0:41:05.631
<v Speaker 1>grave mistake. As he put it, there was every reason

0:41:05.631 --> 0:41:08.271
<v Speaker 1>to continue to believe that our personnel were in danger.

0:41:10.270 --> 0:41:14.111
<v Speaker 1>Here's how Congressman Jason Chafitz asked about afrikam's decision to

0:41:14.151 --> 0:41:16.151
<v Speaker 1>hold back the Special Forces in Tripoli.

0:41:16.591 --> 0:41:19.671
<v Speaker 7>How did the personnel react at being told to stand down?

0:41:21.591 --> 0:41:26.071
<v Speaker 16>They were furious. Well, I will quote Lieutenant Colonel Gibson.

0:41:26.431 --> 0:41:29.951
<v Speaker 16>He said, this is the first time in my career

0:41:29.991 --> 0:41:32.831
<v Speaker 16>that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military.

0:41:33.671 --> 0:41:37.750
<v Speaker 1>Hicks himself never used the phrase stand down order, and

0:41:37.791 --> 0:41:40.431
<v Speaker 1>he told me that he never thought the term was accurate.

0:41:41.351 --> 0:41:45.071
<v Speaker 1>But during the hearing, Republicans used the phrase repeatedly.

0:41:44.911 --> 0:41:46.631
<v Speaker 3>Where'd the standown order come from?

0:41:46.911 --> 0:41:50.071
<v Speaker 1>I believe it came from, and Hicks did not correct them.

0:41:50.111 --> 0:41:53.430
<v Speaker 16>Either Africom or South Africa, now I understanding is a general.

0:41:53.551 --> 0:41:56.350
<v Speaker 1>When the hearing ended, Hicks felt like he had done

0:41:56.391 --> 0:41:59.271
<v Speaker 1>his part to bring the truth about Benghazi to the public.

0:41:59.391 --> 0:42:04.071
<v Speaker 12>So with that, this hearing is closed, but this investigation

0:42:04.230 --> 0:42:04.830
<v Speaker 12>is not over.

0:42:06.351 --> 0:42:09.391
<v Speaker 3>I remember walking out of the ray Burn Building feeling

0:42:09.471 --> 0:42:12.951
<v Speaker 3>like the weight of the world had lifted from my shoulders.

0:42:14.391 --> 0:42:17.151
<v Speaker 3>I felt very good about what I'd said and about

0:42:17.431 --> 0:42:18.910
<v Speaker 3>how the hearing had transpired.

0:42:19.750 --> 0:42:23.591
<v Speaker 1>On MSNBC, the verdict was that Hicks's testimony had not

0:42:23.750 --> 0:42:26.991
<v Speaker 1>revealed much in the way of new informations. Fox News

0:42:27.071 --> 0:42:30.631
<v Speaker 1>was all geared up today to really capture the outrage.

0:42:30.871 --> 0:42:34.671
<v Speaker 1>It's been endless politicization, and today this was their blockbuster,

0:42:34.750 --> 0:42:37.430
<v Speaker 1>this was their watergate, and by two o'clock people were

0:42:37.471 --> 0:42:40.790
<v Speaker 1>like changing the chance but on Fox News, the big

0:42:40.831 --> 0:42:42.750
<v Speaker 1>takeaway was stand down order.

0:42:43.031 --> 0:42:45.710
<v Speaker 3>They were told to stand down. What do you mean

0:42:45.791 --> 0:42:47.951
<v Speaker 3>stand down? They're invading the place.

0:42:47.951 --> 0:42:49.870
<v Speaker 10>Who told the military to stand down?

0:42:49.991 --> 0:42:51.310
<v Speaker 3>You're telling people to stand down?

0:42:51.351 --> 0:42:52.351
<v Speaker 12>You have no idea when.

0:42:52.230 --> 0:42:52.990
<v Speaker 3>The attack ends.

0:42:53.911 --> 0:42:57.191
<v Speaker 1>Media matters. David Brock's website found that in the weeks

0:42:57.230 --> 0:43:02.071
<v Speaker 1>after Hicks's testimony, Fox's primetime programming mentioned the standown order

0:43:02.151 --> 0:43:05.750
<v Speaker 1>at least eighty five times. It didn't matter that the

0:43:05.750 --> 0:43:08.270
<v Speaker 1>team of Special Forces officers that was held back in

0:43:08.311 --> 0:43:10.991
<v Speaker 1>Tripoli wouldn't have gotten to bend Gaussie and time to

0:43:11.031 --> 0:43:13.871
<v Speaker 1>stand up to anyone. The fact that they could have

0:43:13.911 --> 0:43:18.671
<v Speaker 1>been sent and weren't was enough. Hicks's testimony reinforced an

0:43:18.671 --> 0:43:21.230
<v Speaker 1>idea that had been circulating in various forms since the

0:43:21.270 --> 0:43:25.391
<v Speaker 1>attack that the Obama administration had made a deliberate decision

0:43:25.871 --> 0:43:31.831
<v Speaker 1>not to rescue Chris Stevens and the others. Among the

0:43:31.871 --> 0:43:34.911
<v Speaker 1>Fox News anchors who talked about the standdown order was

0:43:34.951 --> 0:43:37.071
<v Speaker 1>Allison Camarata.

0:43:36.431 --> 0:43:38.230
<v Speaker 5>Right, So, I mean a shocking revelation. That was a

0:43:38.270 --> 0:43:43.111
<v Speaker 5>particularly stunning moment on Wednesday at the hearings, because either

0:43:43.151 --> 0:43:45.511
<v Speaker 5>we don't have contingency plans in place, I mean, I

0:43:45.511 --> 0:43:48.511
<v Speaker 5>think it is an American's assumption that the reason that

0:43:48.591 --> 0:43:53.031
<v Speaker 5>we have military stationed around the world is for events

0:43:53.270 --> 0:43:56.671
<v Speaker 5>like this, that when something terrible is going down, that we,

0:43:56.871 --> 0:44:01.230
<v Speaker 5>in a moment's notice, can at least attempt a rescue

0:44:01.431 --> 0:44:02.791
<v Speaker 5>of our fellowtail.

0:44:03.151 --> 0:44:06.710
<v Speaker 1>This is Camarata on Fox and Friends Weekend, raising questions

0:44:06.710 --> 0:44:09.751
<v Speaker 1>about the standdown order the Sunday after Hicks's hearing.

0:44:10.351 --> 0:44:12.470
<v Speaker 5>Right now, the next question, of course, by the way,

0:44:12.631 --> 0:44:16.230
<v Speaker 5>should have been, or is now today, who gave that

0:44:16.551 --> 0:44:20.231
<v Speaker 5>order to stand down? Who was it that said don't

0:44:20.270 --> 0:44:22.991
<v Speaker 5>send help to our people who were under attack?

0:44:23.391 --> 0:44:29.350
<v Speaker 6>Of who gave the stand down order? Became the catchphrase

0:44:29.431 --> 0:44:32.830
<v Speaker 6>that just kept on giving. It embodied all of it,

0:44:32.951 --> 0:44:39.511
<v Speaker 6>the outrage, the tragedy, the mystery. It just had it all.

0:44:39.871 --> 0:44:43.310
<v Speaker 6>It never got old. And I was very interested in

0:44:43.351 --> 0:44:45.871
<v Speaker 6>who gave the standown order. That was something that really

0:44:46.671 --> 0:44:49.551
<v Speaker 6>intrigued me and piqued my interest, and I wanted to

0:44:49.551 --> 0:44:52.390
<v Speaker 6>get to the bottom of it. And then during the

0:44:52.431 --> 0:44:58.111
<v Speaker 6>testimony it's clear that there was no standdown order given,

0:44:58.391 --> 0:45:03.830
<v Speaker 6>and that comes up and people debunk it, but it

0:45:03.871 --> 0:45:09.031
<v Speaker 6>never went away. At Fox, it was too valuable to

0:45:09.071 --> 0:45:12.151
<v Speaker 6>get rid of because that kept the viewers watching.

0:45:14.190 --> 0:45:17.870
<v Speaker 1>The phrase standdown order went through a strange evolution over

0:45:17.911 --> 0:45:21.350
<v Speaker 1>the course of the Benghazi scandal. It was almost like

0:45:21.391 --> 0:45:24.991
<v Speaker 1>it got detached from any one specific situation and started

0:45:25.031 --> 0:45:27.871
<v Speaker 1>getting used to refer to a bunch of different decisions

0:45:27.871 --> 0:45:31.151
<v Speaker 1>that were made on the night of the attack. For instance,

0:45:31.351 --> 0:45:34.591
<v Speaker 1>you might recall from episode three that the Benghazi CIA

0:45:34.710 --> 0:45:37.671
<v Speaker 1>station chief hesitated to send his men to the diplomatic

0:45:37.710 --> 0:45:40.831
<v Speaker 1>compound when they first got the distress call, and that

0:45:40.951 --> 0:45:45.231
<v Speaker 1>eventually they overruled him and just took off. Fox News

0:45:45.311 --> 0:45:48.111
<v Speaker 1>was calling that a standdown order as early as October

0:45:48.111 --> 0:45:52.151
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twelve. Separately, there was the decision not to

0:45:52.190 --> 0:45:54.591
<v Speaker 1>send jets to Benghazi from Italy because it would have

0:45:54.631 --> 0:45:57.631
<v Speaker 1>taken them too long to get there. That was referred

0:45:57.631 --> 0:46:01.671
<v Speaker 1>to as a stand down order too. After Hicks's testimony,

0:46:01.911 --> 0:46:04.190
<v Speaker 1>the phrase started being used in reference to that six

0:46:04.270 --> 0:46:07.671
<v Speaker 1>a m decision in Tripoli, and against the backdrop of

0:46:07.710 --> 0:46:11.190
<v Speaker 1>the other stand down orders, it just kind of tract.

0:46:13.911 --> 0:46:14.750
<v Speaker 13>And I'm curistic.

0:46:14.991 --> 0:46:16.951
<v Speaker 1>Were you conscious of at the time that there was

0:46:16.991 --> 0:46:19.551
<v Speaker 1>a sort of conflation happening around this term stand doown order?

0:46:21.270 --> 0:46:26.031
<v Speaker 6>You are way overthinking this. Once you have a handy slogan,

0:46:26.831 --> 0:46:31.190
<v Speaker 6>don't try to dissect it too closely, Like, all you

0:46:31.351 --> 0:46:35.191
<v Speaker 6>need to know is that somebody gave a standown order.

0:46:35.591 --> 0:46:40.591
<v Speaker 6>And maybe it's the CIA, maybe it's Hillary Clinton, maybe

0:46:40.591 --> 0:46:44.430
<v Speaker 6>it was President Obama, maybe it was Africom. But there

0:46:44.511 --> 0:46:47.271
<v Speaker 6>was a standown order. So the fact that it morphed

0:46:47.270 --> 0:46:51.350
<v Speaker 6>from one to the other, that's just a little consequence.

0:46:52.190 --> 0:46:54.790
<v Speaker 6>You just got to keep repeating it and repeating it

0:46:54.831 --> 0:46:55.831
<v Speaker 6>and repeating it.

0:46:55.991 --> 0:46:58.031
<v Speaker 5>Right, There's still so many questions. I mean, who gave

0:46:58.071 --> 0:47:00.591
<v Speaker 5>the order to stand down instead of trying to help?

0:47:00.631 --> 0:47:05.031
<v Speaker 5>And now who is looking for the perpetrators? Why hasn't

0:47:05.071 --> 0:47:06.431
<v Speaker 5>anyone been prosecuted?

0:47:06.471 --> 0:47:07.511
<v Speaker 6>Where is the justice?

0:47:07.551 --> 0:47:10.310
<v Speaker 5>We allow this to happen without justice? Is that who

0:47:10.311 --> 0:47:12.671
<v Speaker 5>we are now as a country when we have this.

0:47:12.871 --> 0:47:16.471
<v Speaker 1>Camarata's first show after the hearing coincided with Mother's Day.

0:47:17.311 --> 0:47:20.270
<v Speaker 1>To mark the occasion, Camarada's producers played a clip from

0:47:20.311 --> 0:47:23.111
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Patricia Smith, the mother of the IT

0:47:23.431 --> 0:47:26.871
<v Speaker 1>specialist who was killed in Benghazi, alongside Ambassador Stevens.

0:47:27.631 --> 0:47:31.111
<v Speaker 8>I want to wish Hillary a happy Mother's Day. She's

0:47:31.190 --> 0:47:34.710
<v Speaker 8>got her child. I don't have mine because of her.

0:47:34.911 --> 0:47:35.750
<v Speaker 8>I know that In the.

0:47:35.710 --> 0:47:39.311
<v Speaker 1>Months after the attack, Smith appeared on Fox News multiple

0:47:39.351 --> 0:47:42.991
<v Speaker 1>times speaking out about her son and her frustration with

0:47:43.031 --> 0:47:45.391
<v Speaker 1>those she believed were responsible for his death.

0:47:45.591 --> 0:47:49.270
<v Speaker 8>But the government doesn't care. They don't care about us

0:47:49.311 --> 0:47:51.631
<v Speaker 8>people at all. All they have to do is tell

0:47:51.671 --> 0:47:54.071
<v Speaker 8>me what happened, and I would have gone away, but

0:47:54.111 --> 0:47:58.190
<v Speaker 8>they didn't even bother. I was an unimportant person and

0:47:58.230 --> 0:48:00.991
<v Speaker 8>now I'm an unimportant person that doesn't have a child

0:48:01.951 --> 0:48:05.471
<v Speaker 8>for Mother's Day, and I'm I feel it so deeply.

0:48:06.511 --> 0:48:09.231
<v Speaker 8>They cannot understand how I feel.

0:48:10.190 --> 0:48:13.951
<v Speaker 5>That's heartbreaking, heartbreaking to hear on Mother's Day. But obviously

0:48:13.991 --> 0:48:17.351
<v Speaker 5>the victims' families are not satisfied and they want more answers.

0:48:17.871 --> 0:48:20.071
<v Speaker 6>Her grief was raw. Her grief was raw, and it

0:48:20.111 --> 0:48:23.230
<v Speaker 6>never got less raw. She just became this kind of

0:48:23.351 --> 0:48:29.151
<v Speaker 6>go to victim. I guess that Fox could keep exploiting

0:48:29.951 --> 0:48:38.351
<v Speaker 6>and holding up as this personification of grief, and I

0:48:38.351 --> 0:48:43.431
<v Speaker 6>found it really uncomfortable. And I did hope that she

0:48:43.551 --> 0:48:46.111
<v Speaker 6>got answers, you know, I mean, I could never have

0:48:46.190 --> 0:48:49.071
<v Speaker 6>said on the air, Wow, we're really exploiting her. I

0:48:50.031 --> 0:48:53.350
<v Speaker 6>just think that I did the best I could.

0:48:57.190 --> 0:48:59.710
<v Speaker 3>Was there a distance for you internally about that? And

0:48:59.831 --> 0:49:01.551
<v Speaker 3>did that contribute to your decision to leave?

0:49:02.710 --> 0:49:02.910
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

0:49:02.951 --> 0:49:05.671
<v Speaker 6>Every day, every day, But I mean it wasn't just Benghazi.

0:49:05.750 --> 0:49:09.871
<v Speaker 6>I mean every day I wrestled with being at Fox,

0:49:09.871 --> 0:49:15.270
<v Speaker 6>and I tried to leave many times, and Roger blocked me,

0:49:15.591 --> 0:49:19.310
<v Speaker 6>and I felt trapped. I still needed my paycheck. I'm

0:49:19.351 --> 0:49:22.511
<v Speaker 6>tap dancing pretty hard on the air, and I'm trying

0:49:22.551 --> 0:49:26.031
<v Speaker 6>to preserve my integrity. But you know, some days were

0:49:26.031 --> 0:49:29.391
<v Speaker 6>harder than others. I mean, it's just really unpleasant to

0:49:29.431 --> 0:49:32.830
<v Speaker 6>be part of that outrage factory. I didn't like it,

0:49:33.431 --> 0:49:36.351
<v Speaker 6>and I tried in my own meager ways to either

0:49:36.391 --> 0:49:39.750
<v Speaker 6>make it not an outrage factory, or to present a

0:49:39.750 --> 0:49:42.431
<v Speaker 6>different position, or to be the voice of reason, or

0:49:42.471 --> 0:49:46.191
<v Speaker 6>to add levity. I tried to deploy lots of different

0:49:46.311 --> 0:49:49.991
<v Speaker 6>coping mechanisms, and then at some point right after this,

0:49:50.871 --> 0:49:51.750
<v Speaker 6>they just ran out.

0:49:54.471 --> 0:50:02.470
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Camarata left Fox News in March

0:50:02.511 --> 0:50:06.190
<v Speaker 1>of twenty fourteen. At her new job at CNN, she

0:50:06.230 --> 0:50:09.391
<v Speaker 1>doesn't remember being asked to do any Benghazi coverage. The

0:50:09.471 --> 0:50:12.111
<v Speaker 1>fact that re a broader reluctance on the part of

0:50:12.151 --> 0:50:14.791
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media to treat the attack as a scandal.

0:50:15.591 --> 0:50:17.871
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say that Fox was the only outlet

0:50:17.911 --> 0:50:20.951
<v Speaker 1>covering it. In just the month following the attack, The

0:50:20.991 --> 0:50:25.391
<v Speaker 1>New York Times put it on its front page eighteen times. Meanwhile,

0:50:25.431 --> 0:50:28.671
<v Speaker 1>two of the broadcast networks, CBS and ABC were so

0:50:28.831 --> 0:50:30.591
<v Speaker 1>eager to get in on the action that they ended

0:50:30.671 --> 0:50:33.951
<v Speaker 1>up airing stories that had to be retracted or substantially corrected.

0:50:34.911 --> 0:50:38.591
<v Speaker 15>The most important thing to every person at sixty minutes

0:50:39.071 --> 0:50:42.591
<v Speaker 15>is the truth, and the truth is we made a mistake.

0:50:43.671 --> 0:50:47.350
<v Speaker 1>Still, by far, the most expansive coverage of Benghazi came

0:50:47.391 --> 0:50:51.471
<v Speaker 1>from Fox News and other conservative outlets. According to David Brock,

0:50:51.710 --> 0:50:53.870
<v Speaker 1>this was a result of how much the media had

0:50:53.951 --> 0:50:57.111
<v Speaker 1>changed since the nineties and how much more awareness there

0:50:57.190 --> 0:50:59.991
<v Speaker 1>was and the part of mainstream journalists about how scandal

0:51:00.031 --> 0:51:00.831
<v Speaker 1>laundering worked.

0:51:01.831 --> 0:51:06.831
<v Speaker 12>My sense of it was by that point, because Fox

0:51:06.871 --> 0:51:09.671
<v Speaker 12>News was beating the drums so hard on it, it

0:51:10.311 --> 0:51:14.111
<v Speaker 12>had the inverse effect, and there was more skepticism in

0:51:14.151 --> 0:51:17.270
<v Speaker 12>the main media about picking it up because it had

0:51:17.270 --> 0:51:20.431
<v Speaker 12>been such a Fox phenomenon, And so I think it

0:51:20.511 --> 0:51:23.711
<v Speaker 12>was very different than what went on in the nineties,

0:51:23.750 --> 0:51:28.750
<v Speaker 12>when the path to getting something from a place like

0:51:28.791 --> 0:51:33.511
<v Speaker 12>The Spectator onto CNN was much easier.

0:51:34.951 --> 0:51:38.031
<v Speaker 1>Brock says that Benghazi was fueled by the same forces

0:51:38.311 --> 0:51:41.751
<v Speaker 1>and in many cases the same individuals that drove earlier

0:51:41.750 --> 0:51:44.270
<v Speaker 1>Clinton scandals like Whitewater and Troopergate.

0:51:45.671 --> 0:51:50.310
<v Speaker 12>The Clinton scandals, in the end, in my opinion, end

0:51:50.431 --> 0:51:54.511
<v Speaker 12>up having very little to do with the details. You know,

0:51:54.551 --> 0:51:57.111
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a direct line from what happened in

0:51:57.111 --> 0:52:02.190
<v Speaker 12>the nineteen nineties to twenty sixteen, and there was always

0:52:02.270 --> 0:52:07.910
<v Speaker 12>something that was beyond just normal politics about the way

0:52:07.951 --> 0:52:09.071
<v Speaker 12>they went after the Clintons.

0:52:10.071 --> 0:52:13.431
<v Speaker 1>What would you say was animating people like Victoria Tenzing.

0:52:14.031 --> 0:52:17.591
<v Speaker 12>I can't say for her exactly, but I can say

0:52:17.671 --> 0:52:21.471
<v Speaker 12>that there was kind of a joy in the hunt.

0:52:21.750 --> 0:52:25.350
<v Speaker 12>I guess you could see that too, that they were

0:52:26.831 --> 0:52:30.671
<v Speaker 12>in times of triumph, deliriously happy when they were able

0:52:30.671 --> 0:52:31.111
<v Speaker 12>to score.

0:52:32.991 --> 0:52:36.111
<v Speaker 1>It feels almost too pat to say the Bengazi scandal

0:52:36.230 --> 0:52:38.991
<v Speaker 1>was driven or propped up by a single news network,

0:52:39.791 --> 0:52:41.671
<v Speaker 1>like it shouldn't be possible for it to have been

0:52:41.791 --> 0:52:45.871
<v Speaker 1>so straightforward, And in fact, when Hillary Clinton was ensnared

0:52:45.911 --> 0:52:48.790
<v Speaker 1>in scandal much earlier in her career, it wasn't that

0:52:48.871 --> 0:52:52.911
<v Speaker 1>straightforward back then. In order for stories about Vince Foster

0:52:52.991 --> 0:52:56.471
<v Speaker 1>and Whitewater to gain traction, they needed to travel through

0:52:56.511 --> 0:53:01.071
<v Speaker 1>the media ecosystem from the margins into the mainstream. But

0:53:01.151 --> 0:53:05.671
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirteen that wasn't necessary anymore. People like Victoria

0:53:05.710 --> 0:53:08.631
<v Speaker 1>Tunsing didn't need to engage in scandal laundering to make

0:53:08.671 --> 0:53:11.671
<v Speaker 1>an impact. All they had to do was get on

0:53:11.750 --> 0:53:14.431
<v Speaker 1>Fox News and they would immediately be heard by millions

0:53:14.471 --> 0:53:17.271
<v Speaker 1>of people who would then post about it on social media,

0:53:18.591 --> 0:53:21.631
<v Speaker 1>and they would be heard by Republican congressmen, who, when

0:53:21.671 --> 0:53:24.710
<v Speaker 1>they weren't appearing on Fox News themselves, could turn the

0:53:24.750 --> 0:53:29.191
<v Speaker 1>network's outrage into official action. In my interview with Tunsing,

0:53:29.471 --> 0:53:32.071
<v Speaker 1>I asked her if she felt like her client, Greg Hicks,

0:53:32.151 --> 0:53:34.031
<v Speaker 1>had gotten what he wanted out of his time as

0:53:34.031 --> 0:53:34.790
<v Speaker 1>a whistleblower.

0:53:35.591 --> 0:53:38.270
<v Speaker 4>You often ask Greg how he feels, but that that's

0:53:38.311 --> 0:53:42.230
<v Speaker 4>not our practice of law. Really, So you know, is

0:53:42.831 --> 0:53:45.391
<v Speaker 4>your client still alive and is he working and is

0:53:45.391 --> 0:53:49.310
<v Speaker 4>he relatively happy? Is the criteria I use.

0:53:50.190 --> 0:53:52.710
<v Speaker 1>Well, but if your goal was to sort of help

0:53:52.871 --> 0:53:55.551
<v Speaker 1>chip away at this person that you felt was lying

0:53:55.591 --> 0:53:59.431
<v Speaker 1>and had done a terrible job and to keep them

0:53:59.431 --> 0:54:03.471
<v Speaker 1>from attaining more power, you guys did pretty well at that.

0:54:03.631 --> 0:54:07.951
<v Speaker 4>I thought, Yeah, Well, I mean, you know, if Greg

0:54:07.951 --> 0:54:10.471
<v Speaker 4>had really done a good job. He'd be vice president

0:54:10.511 --> 0:54:12.631
<v Speaker 4>is of company right now, and then you know that's

0:54:12.871 --> 0:54:15.111
<v Speaker 4>you can ask him how he feels about it. You know,

0:54:15.351 --> 0:54:18.551
<v Speaker 4>if he'd do it again, I think he'd say yes.

0:54:18.631 --> 0:54:22.111
<v Speaker 4>But you don't know. I found a patient, you know,

0:54:22.270 --> 0:54:24.711
<v Speaker 4>I was in the emergency room. I got a patient,

0:54:25.311 --> 0:54:28.790
<v Speaker 4>and he walked out of the emergency room. So that's

0:54:28.831 --> 0:54:30.671
<v Speaker 4>how I look at it.

0:54:30.671 --> 0:54:33.071
<v Speaker 1>It's true that Hicks is not the vice president of

0:54:33.151 --> 0:54:36.631
<v Speaker 1>a company, but after his testimony, he did manage to

0:54:36.631 --> 0:54:39.591
<v Speaker 1>get a job working for Devin Nunez, one of the

0:54:39.631 --> 0:54:44.190
<v Speaker 1>Republican congressmen who most voraciously chased the Bengazi scandal. As

0:54:44.230 --> 0:54:46.910
<v Speaker 1>Hicks told me, he knew his days of the State

0:54:46.951 --> 0:54:47.911
<v Speaker 1>Department were over.

0:54:48.391 --> 0:54:53.671
<v Speaker 3>I felt that I had faced pretty serious retaliation and pressure.

0:54:54.071 --> 0:54:58.230
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately that led to my retirement from the State Department,

0:54:58.431 --> 0:55:02.311
<v Speaker 3>and in August of twenty sixteen, when it looked quite

0:55:02.351 --> 0:55:05.151
<v Speaker 3>likely that missus Clinton was going to become president, and

0:55:05.270 --> 0:55:07.871
<v Speaker 3>I had no desire to ever work for her again.

0:55:09.111 --> 0:55:12.750
<v Speaker 1>And yet Hi says he never hated the Clintons, and that,

0:55:12.831 --> 0:55:16.071
<v Speaker 1>in fact, after his testimony, he stopped believing that they

0:55:16.071 --> 0:55:19.111
<v Speaker 1>had placed him under surveillance or that they were ever

0:55:19.230 --> 0:55:20.711
<v Speaker 1>considering having him killed.

0:55:21.351 --> 0:55:29.471
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to think that people are just evil. I

0:55:29.511 --> 0:55:34.391
<v Speaker 3>think that missus Clinton exercised very poor judgment in a

0:55:34.431 --> 0:55:39.631
<v Speaker 3>lot of instances over this incident. Beyond that, you know

0:55:39.750 --> 0:55:45.950
<v Speaker 3>Vince Foster, who knows kill lists. That seems far gone

0:55:45.991 --> 0:55:49.991
<v Speaker 3>to me. I've never actually seen a list of names.

0:55:51.391 --> 0:55:54.190
<v Speaker 3>Show me the names, give me the facts. Tell me

0:55:54.391 --> 0:55:58.191
<v Speaker 3>why why the Clintons would have had all these people killed.

0:55:58.671 --> 0:55:59.790
<v Speaker 13>Explain that to me. I don't.

0:55:59.831 --> 0:56:02.991
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand that there's a lot of hatred for

0:56:03.151 --> 0:56:05.631
<v Speaker 3>them out there from a lot of.

0:56:05.551 --> 0:56:09.031
<v Speaker 13>People that's not me.

0:56:24.431 --> 0:56:28.351
<v Speaker 1>On the next and final episode of Fiasco, the FBI

0:56:28.631 --> 0:56:32.191
<v Speaker 1>captures a Libyan man accused of helping plan the Bengazi attack,

0:56:32.991 --> 0:56:37.271
<v Speaker 1>while a congressional investigation surfaces a devastating revelation about Hillary

0:56:37.270 --> 0:56:39.191
<v Speaker 1>Clinton email gate.

0:56:39.710 --> 0:56:41.591
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Clinton has some explaining to do.

0:56:42.071 --> 0:56:46.671
<v Speaker 13>Hillary Clinton email mess This story is something for everyone.

0:56:47.710 --> 0:56:50.830
<v Speaker 1>For a list of books, articles, and documentaries we used

0:56:50.871 --> 0:56:53.631
<v Speaker 1>in our research, follow the link in our show notes.

0:56:54.551 --> 0:56:58.071
<v Speaker 1>Fiasco is a production of Prolog Projects, and it's distributed

0:56:58.111 --> 0:57:01.991
<v Speaker 1>by Pushkin Industries. The show is produced by Andrew Parsons,

0:57:02.190 --> 0:57:06.791
<v Speaker 1>Ulla Kulpa, Sam Lee and Me Leon Mayfock, with editorial

0:57:06.791 --> 0:57:10.991
<v Speaker 1>support from Sam Graham Felsen and Madelin Kaplan. Our researcher

0:57:11.111 --> 0:57:14.511
<v Speaker 1>was Francis Carr. Our score was composed by Dan English,

0:57:14.671 --> 0:57:18.231
<v Speaker 1>Joe Valley and Noah Hecht. Additional music by Nick Sylvester,

0:57:18.631 --> 0:57:22.391
<v Speaker 1>Billy Libby and Joel Saint Julian. Our theme song is

0:57:22.391 --> 0:57:26.711
<v Speaker 1>by Spatial Relations Audio mixed by Rob Buyers, Michael Raphael

0:57:26.871 --> 0:57:30.351
<v Speaker 1>and Johnny Vince Evans. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks

0:57:30.391 --> 0:57:33.991
<v Speaker 1>at Chips and y Copyright Council. Provided by Peter Yassi

0:57:34.191 --> 0:57:39.791
<v Speaker 1>at Yasi Butler PLC. Thanks to Archive dot Org, Hannah Groach, Begley,

0:57:40.391 --> 0:57:45.231
<v Speaker 1>Mark Thompson and Mark Zaid. Special thanks to Lubinari and

0:57:45.391 --> 0:57:59.231
<v Speaker 1>thank you for listening. Binge the entire season of Fiasco

0:57:59.351 --> 0:58:03.591
<v Speaker 1>Benghazi ad free by subscribing to Pushkin Plus sign up

0:58:03.591 --> 0:58:06.430
<v Speaker 1>on the Fiasco Show page on Apple Podcasts or at

0:58:06.431 --> 0:58:11.151
<v Speaker 1>pushkin dot fm, slash plus Pushkin pluss. Screibers can access

0:58:11.191 --> 0:58:15.431
<v Speaker 1>ad free episodes, full audiobooks, exclusive binges, and bonus content

0:58:15.511 --> 0:58:16.951
<v Speaker 1>for all Pushkin podcasts