WEBVTT - The Automated Highway Concept

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? You know, we've been

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about driverless cars for quite a few years now,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Even on this show and in previous episodes of tech Stuff,

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about the various levels of autonomy, which range

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from zero, which means the vehicle in question really has

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>no driver assist features at all, and the human behind

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>the wheel is responsible for everything, you know, barring some

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of mechanical issue at any rate, and then you

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>go all the way up to level five autonomy, which

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>is a car that's so smart you could enroll it

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in Harvard. No. But seriously, a level five autonomous vehicle

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>would have no need for human accessible controls. It would

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>just transport people and our cargo wherever, under any driving conditions,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at any time of day or night. Where currently hovering

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>around levels two and three at the moment, mostly there

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are pushes to get to level four, but as it

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>has turned out, the technology necessary to create truly autonomous

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that can operate anywhere at any time is harder

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>than some of us myself included, initially thought and most

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of our discussions about driverless cars treat the vehicles as

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, self contained computing systems that just happened to

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>be on the go. So by that, I mean the

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>car mostly is relying on its own sensors to understand

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what is going on around it. The car's decision making

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>systems are fully contained within the vehicle itself. And you

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can think of a highway filled with those types of

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles being kind of similar to a room filled

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>with computers that are not connected to each other, so

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they are not network. They're all individ jewel computers. Each

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>machine is sophisticated and it's capable, but it's also independent

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of all the others. Other visions of a driverless future

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>involved cars that can communicate with one another directly or

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>even potentially with roads and infrastructure. These cars would depend

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>not just on their own sensors, but those are the

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>vehicles around it. They would remain in constant communication to

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>provide the smoothest, safest, and most efficient ride from point

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>A to point B, so they would be kind of

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>part of a mesh network. And to get to that future,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we would need to agree upon a standardized protocol for

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>these cars to follow. Otherwise you could have a world

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>where Toyotas wouldn't talk to Fords, they would only talk

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to other Toyota's, and that kind of thing. That would

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be a nightmare, that would not be helpful. Anyway, That's

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not the direction that most companies are going in right now,

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>though I suspect some companies that are more focusing on

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>creating autonomous transportation vehicles for stuff like cargo, or at

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>least looking at this from a fleetwide perspective that could

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>serve a similar purpose, but specifically for this particular you know,

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>business model. But today I wanted to talk about a

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly different approach. Uh And I've talked about this a

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the past when I've talked about autonomous cars.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So this one has had several different incarnations over the years,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a cool idea on the surface, but

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the least practical for driver lest vehicles or

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles insofar as the amount of work we would

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>need to do on an infrastructure level and the amount

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of consensus we would have to have across all parties

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in the space but this is the concept of the

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>automated highway system. With this kind of system, you would

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>have embedded networks that are along or under or above highways,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and these systems would provide guidance to the vehicles on

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the road, perhaps even to the extent of controlling all

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles on the road. So and that kind of

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a system, the road would be the one doing the driving.

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it would send commands to all the

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicles traveling on the lanes, which would follow those commands.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And it would be kind of like an automated air

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>traffic control system, with the automated highway guiding vehicles on

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and off the highway seamlessly in a way to avoid

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>traffic congestion and to avoid accidents. And it's a neat idea.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just I won't I won't say impossible, but about

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as close to impossible as you can get without it

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>being impossible to do. But that doesn't mean that folks

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't tried. The idea itself is actually coming up on

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>being a century old. I mean, okay, we still have

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years to go, and yees, seventeen years for for

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>many of you will seem like a really long time.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But the older I get, the less the less long.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen years sounds to me, but we are getting close

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to a century of following alone this idea. So back

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 1>in nine GM sponsored a pavilion at the World's Fair

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York. I've talked about this in past Tech

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Stuff episodes too, but it's one of my favorite historical

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>examples of futuristic thinking. So GM had a pavilion that

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was called the Highways and Horizons Pavilion, and the centerpiece

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of this pavilion was an exhibit called Futurama. Bum bum

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bum bum bum. That's all I can hum of that

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>before I get a d m C A strike. Anyway, Futurama,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in this case was this massive model of what a

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>landscape of the future could look like, and it included,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, city scapes and rural areas, included farms and

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>hydro electric facilities like it was expansive. It was huge

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and incredible and included some moving components to A theatrical

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>designer named Norman Bell get Is masterminded this exhibit and

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get his he was a real forward thinker. You can

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>actually watch a full film that details the Futurama model

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. It's about five minutes long. And you can

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>even tell that this film inspired lots of later attractions,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly the ones that opened with the debut of EPCOT

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>way back when at Walt Disney World. If you've ever

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>been on any of those old EPCOT rides, or you

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>watched videos of those old epp cut rides, they owe

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot to this particular film of the Futurama exhibit

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>from way back in. Anyway, the film covers a lot

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>of different bits, but the part we're interested in is

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this idea of automated highways. Now, keep in mind this,

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>this blue sky automated highway concept came at a time

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>when highways themselves, we're really new. In the United States,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the US was in the process of laying out highways

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen thirty nine to connect major cities together, even

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as get as his exhibit suggested a revolutionary approach. Also,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to add a note here. While the view

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the future was very forward thinking, if you watch

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this film, you're like, wow, this was, you know, really imaginative,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the social concepts definitely were not forward thinking. The film.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Um that's about the Futurama exhibit. It pretty much outright

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>says that men are behind all the progress. It just

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>uses men as the default, and clearly that ignores the

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that countless others besides men made significant contributions up

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to ninety nine and and since and uh yeah, I

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just want to call that out because you know we should.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's It's certainly not a perfect film by any

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the imagination. However, the exhibit gives us a

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>view of the far off future of nineteen sixty. Keep

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in mind that was twenty years away when this exhibit

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was being shown, and the motorways in this exhibit allow

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cars to travel at designated speeds. The accompanying film says

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that those speeds are fifty miles per hour and they

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>will maintain proper distance from other cars through quote unquote

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>radio control. So presumably the motorway itself is the transmitter

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and the cars are receivers. Alternatively, the cars could be

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>both transmitters and receivers and be communicating with each other.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not entirely clear. Now, you could argue that the

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>nine exhibit was marketing and it was just overly optimistic

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>projections about the future for the purposes of marketing for GM,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think you would have a pretty solid argument

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>if you said that, I'm not or anyone involved really

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>believed that this particular vision of the future was what

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen by nineteen sixty. But then it's

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>always hard to protect the future, even if it's just

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a short ways out. Also, the US of nineteen nine

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>was entering into very uncertain territory. It was recovering from

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression, which was finally coming to an end

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>after a decade of economic turmoil, and the US had

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>not yet entered into World War Two, And obviously the

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>experience of World War Two would affect the American point

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of view significantly. It would really boost xenophobia for one thing.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But let's skip on ahead while get us his vision

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen sixty did not manifest in reality. We did

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not get these automated highways by nineteen sixty. There were

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>folks who were working on the concept of automated highways,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.239
<v Speaker 1>at least researching ways where perhaps it could be possible,

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was mostly focusing on mechanical systems and radio

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>control systems. And over time, as computers began to evolve

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and become more commonplace, there was a transition toward looking

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>at computer controlled systems, the hope that maybe a computer

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>would be sophisticated enough to handle the complex operations that

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would be required to have a truly automated highway system.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But computers themselves were really large and limited early on.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>As they evolved, there was also another big shift, and

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about that after we come back from this

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay, before the break, I was talking about

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how as computer systems were starting to get more sophisticated

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and smaller, mentorization being a big part of this, we

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>started to see a shift, and that shift would end

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>up being a really significant one as far as the

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>concept and plausibility of automated highway systems are concerned. And

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that was that car companies were starting to design and

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>integrate driver's safety features in vehicles, and these features bordered

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes overlapped the autonomous car concept. So, for example,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>cruise control. The actual idea of cruise control is almost

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as old as the car itself. It's essentially a way

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of having a car maintain a set speed. In some cases,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a set speed that the driver couldn't choose,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like it was either full throttle or not. But then

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>later you had more sophisticated systems that let you set

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>cruise control at a speed of your choosing, and your

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>vehicle would just maintain that speed. Now, that was just

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>one tiny step toward creating systems that would augment a

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>driver's ability to navigate the roads safely and more over,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>service kind of building block toward autonomous cars. Obviously, a

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more systems would be needed in order to even

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>remotely consider a car to be autonomous, but these were

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the steps that we're leading in that direction, and we

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>would see that trend continue over time. Cars would get

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>more systems that would make them safer and be able

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to take over certain operations. You know, cars would get

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>integrated cameras, which would help when you're backing out of

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the space for example. They'd get collision sensors, they get

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>lane detection sensors, and much more so. The cars were

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>evolving into smart machines that could operate on essentially a

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>dumb network. Right. You can think of the roads and

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>highway systems as a network, and the network itself is

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>fairly robust. I mean, if you drive in Atlanta, you

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>might question that with all the potholes, but you get

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. It's a robust system, but it's dumb.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>It does not have any real intelligent components itself. And

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the cars became the smart art components, smart devices that

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>could navigate dumb systems. Meanwhile, in research organizations such as

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways or PATH, which

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>originated out of the University of California, you had researchers

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>who were looking into various approaches for autonomous driving, which

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>included auto highway technologies. So not just you know, how

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>can we make an autonomous car, but would it be

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>possible to make a highway system that itself was intelligent

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>and remove the requirement of having intelligent vehicles instead. Now,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this was in the nineteen eighties, and it started to

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>take up some momentum because you know, in the nineteen

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>eighties we certainly were miles, no pun intended miles away

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>from the technologies that would allow a truly autonomous vehicle.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So by n things got shifted into a higher gear.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>To use another pun, I'm just gonna keep doing those

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't to, I honestly don't. But the

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>US government passed the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act or

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is T and that's often a question we ask here

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, Georgia, when someone hands us a drink, we

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>point to and say, is t anyway? This Act laid

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork for early testing of automated vehicles and roadways.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So the U. S Department of Transportation would then create

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the National Automated Highway System Research Program or in a

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>h s RP. This program's main purpose was to establish

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>specifications for an automated highway system. Again, because with so

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>many different players in the space, like all the different

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>law agencies across you know, federal and state and regional systems.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>You have all the different car companies that are involved,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Like there are a lot of different players who are

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>uh deeply concerned with things like highway technologies. You have

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to establish standards so that there is interoperability between the

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>system and all the vehicles. Right. Again, if you have

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a system that only communicates with one type of vehicle,

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then it's not really a good system, right for anything

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>other than that vehicle, it's a terrible system, or it

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>might as well not exist. In the Department of Transportation

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>created the National Automated Highway System Consortium, So this was

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a think tank that was made up of

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more around like a hundred different members across nine major categories.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Those categories included things like research organizations, government agencies again

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at different levels like federal, state, and local. It included

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>academic organizations like the University of California, and of course

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>representatives from the transportation industry. So the hope was that

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by including all of these groups in the conversation that

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone would be able to arrive at a consensus that

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would make the most viable, efficient, safe, and practical solution

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for automated highways. Um also hopefully most affordable, because you

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>would ultimately be turning to the US taxpayer to foot

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the bill for these kind of things. And I think

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a wise move in some ways, because it's

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>always good to get stakeholders involved. One just to make

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sure that the solutions you are designing actually solve real

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>world problems. There are a lot of times where we

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about an approach or a technology and we refer

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to it as a solution that's looking for a problem.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not ideal. Right, if you are if you have

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>identified what the problem is, then you can work to

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>solve it, but you have to make sure that your

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>solution actually does address the problem them. That's one reason

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>why you want to have lots of different stakeholders there.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You also want to have buy in across the entire

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>industry or else Again, interoperability becomes a problem. However, when

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>you include all these different voices, there's always the danger

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that projects descend into a designed by committee approach where

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>it feels like all the really progressive concepts have been

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>sanded down until they aren't really interesting anymore, or worse,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you fail to find any common ground and nothing gets done.

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So between and researchers poured some serious effort into conceptualizing

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and automated highway system. So the benefits of such a system,

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>if it worked, were obvious on the surface. Like, everyone

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>could agree this is a good idea insofar as what

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the goal is because you would reduce traffic congestion, which

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would improve traveled times. It would also reduce fuel consumptions

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that was an added benefit, and it would improve the

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>quality of life from motorists across the nation. They'd be

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>spending less time in transit and more time doing whatever

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it was they wanted to do. So like, those are

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious benefits of such a system. The reduction of

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>accidents would also be incredibly important. It could save tens

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of lives every year. It is impossible to

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>overstate how important that is. The impact of deaths due

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to traffic accidents is gargantuane. There's the personal impact on

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>all the friends and family of the people who are lost,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>there's the financial impact. There's the societal impact. You know,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we no longer have those people contributing to society. So yeah,

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those things where not only is it

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>great just the idea of saving these lives, we all

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>stand to benefit from that, right, we all stand to

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the fact that these people are still around

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and contributing to society. Not to mention, you save a

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and property in the process of reducing accidents.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>So the goal was clear. How to get to the

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>goal was the matter of debate. That debate largely ended

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in why, well, I mean, ultimately the easy answer is

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the money fell out. So in part the issue was

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that all those stakeholders were in fact having trouble agreeing

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>upon the right approach and the components that would have

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to go into an automated highway as well as into

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles that would be compatible with such highways. You know,

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the whole goal was to build consensus, but over the

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>years that just became impossible to do. You had too

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>many different voices with different agendas, and there was no

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>common ground to really solidify a path forward. So nothing

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was happening, and since the consortium was making very little headway,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty hard to justify continuing to fund it.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So in nineties seven, the US government passed another act.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>This one was the T twenty one Act t E

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>A one, and that pulled financial support from the Automated

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Highway Research programs to put it in other areas. The

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>d O T essentially made the decision to focus more

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on safety oriented technologies like the aforementioned lane detection technologies,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and essentially what the government was leaning toward was where

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the automotive industry was already headed, which would mean you

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would have these independent autonomous vehicles or increasingly autonomous vehicles

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that would navigate within an environment rather than an intelligent

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>environment that would guide vehicles to their respective destinations. Now,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>some say the technologies we're seeing evolving vehicles in general

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and autonomous vehicles in particular, could be a stepping stone

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>toward automated highways in the future. I'll talk more about

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that after we take this quick break. So could autonomous

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>vehicles be a step toward intelligent highways? You know, maybe

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we will see autonomous vehicle technologies converge with intelligent highways

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>and that the true future of motoring will be a

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>combination of both intelligent infrastructure and intelligent vehicles working together.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You could imagine, you know, highways that are able to

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>meter traffic onto them with autonomous cars so that there

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are no bottlenecks on entrances and exits to the highway

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for example. Right, that's a possibility. However, for all of

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that to work out, we again have to create an

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>agree upon standards that work across all parties, all the

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>intelligent highway systems whenever we would design and implement those,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the different vehicles, or else you have cars

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that won't know how to talk to highways, or cars

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that don't know how to talk to each other, and

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so on, and you just end up again with individual

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>smart vehicles and the same effect of an overall dumb system. Also,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to consider some of the massive challenges that

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>come along with building and implementing an automated highway system. So,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, doing so would require massive investment in infrastructure.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>That is always a tough thing to get going in

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States for multiple reasons. Like we did see

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a national infrastructure bill this year, but it did not

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>go easily, and it turns out like folks are not

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>super jazzed about having to pay more in taxes, which

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is kind of understandable. Um, And without massive investment, it

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>would not be possible to build out a smart infrastructure,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we had had one that was designed and

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ready to go and everyone had agreed upon this is

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the right approach. Even if that were the case, and

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it would still be really hard to sell

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that to the American public and say this is worth

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>paying for. So that's one hurdle just getting the money

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay for the rollout of such a system, let

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>alone the continued maintenance and operation of that system. Also

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>building out that kind of a system would take a

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of time. You get into a lot of

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>real world issues with this one. I mean, like like

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>finding the right contractors to do the work is it's

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a boring thing to talk about, but it's

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>realistically one of the big challenges. I mean, hopefully the

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>government ends up finding contractors who don't end up having

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>suspicious links to the people who hold the purse strings,

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because that happens all the time and it's never good.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Um do. You also have to deal with unexpected problems

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>as you're deploying systems. This happens in any system, doesn't

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>matter how big or how complicated it is. It will happen,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and with something this huge, it will happen a lot. Uh. Also,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just building out the system so it reaches all the

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>areas necessary. I mean, the broadband initiatives in this country

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>show that's very easy to underserve or even not serve

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>at all certain regions. That would be a huge disadvantage

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to people who live, in work in those regions. So

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a ton of work, and it's it's again,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not impossible, but it is very hard, and the

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>harder it is, the less likely we're going to see

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it happen. The actual technical requirements would be pretty darn

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>daunting too. You would need a system capable of detecting, controlling,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and coordinating every vehicle on the road, and the system

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>would have to have an exceptionally high reliability factor because Obviously,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>mistakes could lead to accidents, which could mean loss of

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>property and obviously much much worse. In some ways, the

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>system could be simpler than what you see with autonomous vehicles,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at least as long as you know conditions are normal.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But then we all know that driving conditions are paradoxically

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>rarely normal. All it takes is an animal running across

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the lane of traffic or pop up heavy thunderstorm to

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>turn a normal drive into a dangerous one, and automated

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>highway system would need to be able to detect and

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>cope with these sort of things in a safe and

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>reliable way that wouldn't affect the overall system operations. Right, So,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>let's say you've got a big old pop up thunderstorm

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>along one stretch of highway. While you would have to

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>have the highway deal with this all down the pathway

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the road so that you didn't have congestion and

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic jams, because while the vehicles moving through the very

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>heavy storm might have to reduce their speed, that means well,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>three miles back where there is no rain, you're gonna

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with that too. You're gonna have to

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>reduce speed there or else you're going to start encountering

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>traffic congestions, so like, these are really complicated systems. Right,

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then there are privacy concerns. So presumably an automated highway

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>system would have to differentiate against all the different vehicles

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>traveling on the lanes. Right. If you didn't differentiate all

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles, that would be disastrous because you wouldn't know

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that vehicle one and vehicle two are in fact two

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>different vehicles. So maybe the system would assign a unique

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>identifier to each vehicle as it entered the highway. Maybe

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers would include a unique identifier within a car's systems itself,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and the highway would detect that. But either way, the

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>highway will quote unquote no where each car is going

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>when it got on the highway, when it got off

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the highway. That means that each and every driver on

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that highway, at least every driver who has a compatible system.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>More on that in a second, will be tracked as

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>long as they are on that highway. That is a

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>major privacy concern, So that's another issue that has to

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be solved. Then that brings us to the other big hurdle,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>which is adoption. By that I mean cars won't magically

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to communicate with an automatic highway system. Let's

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine that you know, we've designed and built out

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredible intelligent highway system. Uh down this one particular highway. Well,

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to have cars that can interact with that system, right,

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's no there's no magical connection there. So

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the cars themselves have to have required systems in order

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to interoperate with the highways. Now, if you had taken

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a very collaborative approach along with like car manufacturing companies

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and you worked with them, well, potentially those car manufacturers

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>might have started to include compatible systems in their vehicles

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the years leading up to the deployment of the

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>intelligent system on the highway. So in other words, maybe

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got two or three years worth of vehicle models

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that already have those systems in place. They just you know,

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>weren't connecting to anything until the highway was ready to go.

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That would help a little bit, right, People who had

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>newer cars would be able to interact with this intelligent highway.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like you're going to convince every single

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>person to trade in their vehicle for a new one,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and that means you're automated highway system will still have

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>human operated vehicles on it. It will only be communicating

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>with certain cars on the highway, and everybody else will

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>still be regular or humans driving on on the roads.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>That adds in uncertainty, right, That's an uncontrolled variable in

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the system. So even if the system is working flawlessly,

0:28:55.240 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>these uncontrolled variables can cause problems. That's very dangerous and

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>there's not really an easy solution to that. In fact,

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if you have a system that works,

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're likely going to see is that the only

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the people who are buying the most expensive cars will

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>initially be able to interact with it, which will create

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>haves and have nuts on the highway. And that doesn't

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sound like it's a really good system either. Now, one

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>way you could potentially get around this, it's not a

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>practical solution, but it's it's kind of like a pie

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the sky sort of solution, is to incorporate something

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>similar to one of the many variations we've seen on

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the hyper loop concept, namely the sled. So one of

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's hyper loop concepts involved driving your vehicle onto

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a sled that in turn could navigate through the hyper

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 1>loop system. So with this concept, drivers would drive up

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and park their car or other vehicle on a sled,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and the sled would then navigate onto a track of

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>some sort like a highway, So the car remains parked,

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but the sleds zooms off to the destination, where upon

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the driver then pulls off of the sled in their

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>their vehicle and they drive the last mile or whatever.

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>An automated highway system that used something similar to this

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>could get around the fact that not all the vehicles

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on the road are compatible with the system. In fact,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>none of the vehicles would need to be compatible. It's

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the sleds that are compatible, not the vehicles. But in

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>order to do that, you would have to build out

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>these sled based highway systems like you'd essentially have to

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>recreate all the highways that exist or slowly convert them

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>over while also allowing for traditional traffic to pass through them.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>That is why it doesn't sound like a practical solution

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. It just sounds like it's too big of

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem to tackle. Even with an idealized implementation, you

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>still have concerns. The concept covers highways but not other

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>types of roads, which means whenever you're not on the highway,

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle will presumably be under human control. If it's

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous vehicle, well then the question is, well, why

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>do we need an automated highway? If all the vehicles

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>are autonomous anyway, then we don't need the automated highway.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>If the vehicle isn't autonomous, well then you still have issues.

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about entrances and exits to the highway,

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>those could become bottlenecks and congestion points. Sure, traffic along

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the highway itself is smooth, but getting onto the highway

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or getting off the highway, that could be a very

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>different situation. So it could create a new kind of headache.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of other issues as well.

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think people are more in favor of car companies

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>doing all the R and D work and the implementation

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of technologies to make cars smarter and safer. Then it's

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just up to the individual customer to decide if they

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>want to pay for a vehicle that has those features,

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of collectively supporting a national effort to transform the

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>actual highway system. Like when you leave it up to

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the individual, it's more palatable to people in the United States,

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because here in the US there's always been more of

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>an inclination toward supporting individual freedom over buying into a

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>larger program that, if it works, could benefit everyone. That's

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not a judgment on my part. I mean it kind

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of is a little bit, because you know, I do

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tend toward the more um collaborative spectrum. But we have

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>plenty of examples of government projects that failed somewhere along

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, So I wouldn't say that the inclination toward

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>individual freedom is entirely selfish. I think part of it

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat practical, simply because there are these examples of

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>big government programs that failed which show a massive sunk cost,

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible that on made highways could be in

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that category. So yeah, I think that's important to to

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>point out. Now there has really been a shift more

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>towards the concept of intelligent highways, which is sort of

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really just a horse of a different color. It's

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the same same animal, just as a different name. The

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>intelligent highways largely talk about embedded technology along highways that

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can communicate and interact on at least some level with

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the vehicles that are traveling along the highways. In some

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>cases we're talking about things like a dedicated lane for

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles, But again, the still brings up the challenge

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of having to create a standard that everyone agrees to

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>play by so that the technologies are compatible. Otherwise it

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>ends up working for just a tiny slice of the

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>population and represents a massive, uh inefficient approach to trying

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to solve a very difficult problem. So I find the

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of the automated highway system really attractive from the

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>end result, But the problem is getting to the end

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>result requires so many different pieces falling into place that

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it is, like I said, close to impossible. Uh you know,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>if you had buy in everywhere, then maybe, like I think,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>if we lived in a very different world, which would

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily be a world I'd want to live in,

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:29.959
<v Speaker 1>but if we lived in a very different world where

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you had state run everything like state essentially you're talking

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about like a truly socialist or maybe even communist kind

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of society, then you could have a system where everything

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>works together. But we've seen pure socialist and communist societies

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know, when you throw people into a system,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work as perfectly as the concept necessarily made

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it out to be, so I don't think it's practical.

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I wish that it were, because I definitely see issues

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with the way we are going. We're relying on the

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>smart vehicle and the dumb infrastructure. I see problems with

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that as well. It's not like all the problems disappear.

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just that they become a little more manageable, a

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>little more contained than we see when we try to

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>address the overall system. So there's no perfect approach I

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I do think that while I would love

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to see a more integrated system that allows for rich

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>communication between the infrastructure and vehicles, because I think that

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that would greatly boost effectiveness, I don't see it as

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>being something that we can realistically expect any time in

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future. Still, maybe that vision from way back

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in ninety nine, maybe it's still on the horizon, just

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like the pavilion was called. Maybe that horizon is still there.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we're still headed toward it. It's just that our

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>road is a little more long and winding than we

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>first anticipated. I hope you enjoyed this episode. If you

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for future topics, please reach out to me.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You can do that by downloading the i Heart Radio app,

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>navigating over to the tech Stuff podcast section, click on

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that little microphone icon. You can leave me a voice

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in length, or you can

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me on Twitter. The handle for the

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff h s W. I look forward

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to hearing from you, and I'll talk to you again

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production.

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows