WEBVTT - Week 13 Recap, Winners, Losers, EHHH

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Listen Donnity Yeah as welcome Bait Happy your host Friday

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>from Mane spun yours by Guy Bro Say Francis Frank

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>stand ball ladies and tell them in your ps and

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with that we want are you inside of Studio thirty four.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. Here's Frank Snaffle, I am Greg

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Saucepan Fras on Happy Monday to you. Buddy's eaving a

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>chair there if Chris Fenther wants to join us. Everyone

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>wants to join us as our holiday party, people coming

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in and out, so we put a chair there just

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in just in case. Man Happy things given to you, buddy,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>how was it? I? Thanks Hippy with solid man, watch

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of football was here, of course, as I

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>am Everythingksgiving producing programmers here all weekend. Frank, you were

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>basically five ft away from the parades. Picture nice. Yeah,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you could have been here if you wanted to. I

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't see you Thursday, Friday or Sunday here, Frank, you didn't. Sorry, man, Okay,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's always this weekend. You're You're not wrong, all right, man?

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>How's your Thanksgiving? My Thanksgiving was a good one. It

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was fun. I love Thanksgiving, as I said, uh before

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>we went into the weekend, one of my favorite holidays.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Just a day filled with eating, drinking, family, football. What

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>more can you ask for? Black Friday the next day,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>went out shopping a little bit great. It was great.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It was a good weekend. That's great, man. I watched

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>The Irishman over the weekends. Say yeah, you texted me

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. I just talked to my plan. I watched

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it on Friday morning. It was great. It's pretty good.

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed it. It was good. I very much enjoyed

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it as well. Great cash, great acting. It was fun.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It was fun. It was funny. I've caught up on

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>watched me other than last night, so I accomplished with

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two things TV wise, and I wanted to watch pomplish

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>your both solid solid. How did you sleep last night? Great?

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Really well? My my mom is over so um. We

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>stayed up late hanging out with her, and then I

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was very tired, went to bed and next thing I

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>knew when the alarm went off in the morning, touch

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>should be every night. Greg could not agree more. Frank,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a full day of football yesterday. Here, a lot to

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>go over. Where should we start? I mean, there's lot

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of places I want to start, and I don't know

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the right answer. I guess we can start. It's subjective.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there is a right answer, like

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>right answer right. I think the Dolphins rights is in general,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins the biggest winners in every way. His story

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>today yesterday, Miami Dolphins as they should be down to

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>touch has affilly. They scored five straight times and they

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>made the helmet over here. Let's get the Dolphins helmets

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>right here on the show, right now, on the set,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg's gonna attempt to put Oh my god, it's like

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna end up hurting yourself very severely. There. Greg

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is loaded up with the Dolphins. Let's go Dolphins. All

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you need is some facial hair and it's basically Ryan

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick go over to gumming up my wedding ring one.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, play, I'm good. Dolphins were probably the

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>biggest winners literally figuratively, for real life for fantasy football.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker basically when anybody who started him this week

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>helped a lot of people get into the fantasy football playoffs.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>He helped Eric Young beat us a game that decided

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>who was going to get to buy heading into the

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>pit League playoffs. So we'll talk a little bit about that.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But Devanta Parker was awesome. Greg right, I fitz Patrick

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was very good. I think that he is a stream

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>next week as well. That special teams play was doncs Gregg.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.559
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome. It obviously reminded me of the Colts

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>play that Chuck mcgano drew up so terribly previously on

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth down. But the same thing, right, Like all

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the linement are out wide, there's a kicker and a

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>punter in the middle, Like what that's happening, I'm sorry,

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>snapper in a punter in the middle, and then the

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 1>punter down. I would say it's a little bit easier

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to pull off on the goal line than in the

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field. But it was awesome all the

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>way around. Patrick Laird, I think, is a winner from

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked about Patrick Laird on the hurry

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of hows Worth running back to the Dolphins. I realized

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not easy fifth running back. We've talked about picking

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>up on the Dolphins this year, all right, we spoke

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about Myles gas Gasking, but no, it's all about Patrick Laird,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the dominator as I termed him. Why wouldn't it be

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Laird, Patrick Layard, that's the thing, now, huh why not?

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Kind of? I mean, look, it's hard for the Dolphins

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to run his official nickname the Intern, right. I saw

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about that on the broadcast sesterday. They

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>called them the intern and then they're like, oh, well,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess now he has a full time job. Oh

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.559
<v Speaker 1>you heard it, Yes, indeed, but he still carries five

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>yards average dominantor average half a yard per carry. Look,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this team cannot run the football because their offensive line

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is very bad. They trail in a lot of games.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>As amazing to me that you have a straight faceball

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talking why look at me? It's perfectly fine. I feel

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like you should do every show with a helmet on you.

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We want to get this off. No, you're definitely like

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that for the rest of this show and probably going

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>into our holiday party tonight. He was bad. I love it,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think everyone else will too. Patrick Leard will

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>never be able to run efficiently, but he is a

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>good pass catcher in perceptions over his last two years

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>at cal and considering they can't run the football, I

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're probably just gonna throw him a lot of

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>shot passes moving forward. I don't feel good about calumballage

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>non contract, non contact leg injury, so I don't don't

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be out there. One of a couple

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of non contact injuries we saw running backs. We'll get

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to that in just a moment. DeVante Parker has been amazing.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>The breakout is real with Rayan Fitzpatrick and Shadows Shake

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>calling the plays out there in Miami. Uh, that's reel.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Miles Sanders Dominus carries as we

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>expected here, seventeen carriers for eighty three yards. A good

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>game or Miles Sanders j H. I didn't doo much

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of anything. And the receiving wise, you put alshon Jeffrey

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in worked out very very well, as did your boy

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Gotter. Yeah, definitely. We'll start with Alshon Jeffrey. His

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sixteen targets were the highest in his Philadelphia Eagles tenure, Greg, So,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>massive workload for him yesterday. We knew it was a

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. We spoke about that on Wednesday when we

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>were talking, you know, jumping around to a few of

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these games and what to expect, and we said, look,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if Alston Jeffrey is active, you have to start him

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup against the Eagles. He was great, nine

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>catches over a hundred yards, a touchdown as well. He

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>has another good matchup next week against the New York Giants.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So I like Alston Jeffrey as a low end wide

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>receiver two, high end wide receiver three in that matchup.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You spoke about Miles Sanders. In the games Jordan Howard

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>has missed. He has been treated like the workhorse running backs,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing a ton of snaps being used as a receiver

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>being used as you know, seeing a ton of rushing

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>attempts as well. Even Carson Wentz bounced back yesterday. Greg.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So it was in the Miami Dolphins defense that it

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was a good game for the Eagles fantasy wise. I

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that i'd call them all winners. They might

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be winners going into next week against the Giants. Giants

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>very bad. I don't know, man, I don't know if

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you could trust the Eagles defense because I like them

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as a stream against the Giants, I mean against the

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Dolphins, they didn't work Man's magic. Yeah, we

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>got all fings. Oh sorry, if I hurt your ears?

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Does turn out the Hall of Famers turn Yeah, she

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>certaly does. He's got like twenty one turnovers. I think

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it sounds bad. It sounds accurate as bad as I said.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't the contact injury calein Bellage was not the

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>only non contact injury um on the day yesterday. We

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>saw that in the Kansas City Oakland game as well.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of take out of there when it comes

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to their running back situation. As we get you ready

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for the playoffs, So we'll get in the case and

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into Oakland, Frank Uh at AFC BATTLEFC West Battle,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>which went pretty much as predicted. We'll get into Baltimore

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco. We're gonna take you through all the

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers, Um, can you take it? Because I

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:52.719
<v Speaker 1>really had to get this off my head. It really

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>hurts Greg Susan attempting to remove the helmet and then

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>again its perfectly fine, all right. That was really hurting

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>my head out, all right with that? Is your head

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>too big or helmet too small? No? No, I don't know,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but it really hurt my head. O. Let's take a break.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna need a few minutes to recover, so

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break here. We'll come back. We're getting

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all these games, your winners, your losers in here. They

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>need some water. We're back after this. I want to

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on winning

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal

0:09:49.280 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash Dunk to learn more. Welcome back to

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy BFS Live on the Sportscreen TV Network Frank

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Stanford joined by Greg Susman. He's going to grab some water.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Had a little difficulty with that Miami Dolphins helmet, of course.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>One of the big winners from yesterday, your Miami Dolphins,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>including Ryan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Laird, DeVante Parker out here winning

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>people weeks and getting them into the Fantasy football playoffs

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>all by himself. He has been one of the most

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>surprising players in fantasy football this season. I would say

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>so if you grabbed any Vantay Parker late in your

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Bestball drafts, or you picked him up throughout the course

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the season, you were likely headed to the playoffs

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>with a wide receiver two of your own. That's right.

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It took a while, but Devanta Parker is a legitimate

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too for fantasy football. Before we hit the break,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg mentioned that a f C West battle between the

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers, not the Los Angeles Chargs, the Kansas

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Each Chiefs and the Oakland Raiders. I had the right division, Greg,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I had the right division with the a f C West,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not the right teams. But as you mentioned, Kan City

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs really annihilated the Oakland Raiders yesterday and Patrick Mahomes

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't even need to have a monster game on just

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards and one touchdown rushing touchdown that also, that's

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>true rushing touchdown. Throw that in there. But it wasn't

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Patrick Mahomes game we were hoping for. I think

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a little weather that had to do with

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>him not having the game. We all hope. I don't know, man,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>he sure the win was bad. He missed Travis Kelsey

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>by this much, we would have a buy right now.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He connected it was that much, which cost us a

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>buy in the pit league. But Patrick Mahomes and the

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs get the job done in a big division matchup

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>against the Oakland Raiders. But's me, the big story of

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this game is a non contact injury for Daryl Williams.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Lashaw McCoy being managed over the last four weeks, a

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of Darwin Thompson now before the season starts, Frank,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you remember it. Everybody drive the Darwin Thompson.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You have the Dea Singletary and like these two guys

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and Miles Sanders, these three guys are league winners, come

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy playoffs. Miles Standers with Jordan Howard out well he's

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>been he's been the primary ball carrier. Devin Singletary. Yeah,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore is still a thing, but Devin Siglary has

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>been really, really good taking over as essentially the starter

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo. Is it Darwin Thompson time. I'm not sure exactly.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>We gotta see what's going on with Damian Williams as well,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because there's a chance that he returns. But as you mentioned,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Darwin Thompson did lead this team in carries yesterday with

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Levin lead them with forty four rushing yards a touchdown.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that they don't want to give Lea. Shawn

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>McCoy a big workload. Just five carries yesterday he was

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>saved with a touchdown. In fact, all three of the

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>running backs out were featured yesterday. Between Darwin Thompson, Darryl

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Williams and Shawn McCoy, all score touchdowns. They were playing

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>with the lead for a large majority of this game. Obviously,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we want exposure to this Chief's team anyway we can

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get it anyone that has a role on this team.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems in the past game, you know, a lot

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of things are concentrated amongst Travis Kelsey and Tyreek Hill.

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe a little bit of Sammy Watkins sprinkled

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.599
<v Speaker 1>in there, but you don't want anything to do with that.

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>With the running backs, We're trying to figure this out,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think when it comes to setting your waivers

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this week, you should have some interest in Darwin Thompson.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>If we had interests in Darryl Williams. We've been trying

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk ourselves in and out of Damien Williams and

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Lashawn McCoy all season long. If he is part of

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a three headed backfield in one of the best offenses

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and I think we do have to

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>have some interests in Darwin Thompson. So I think the

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>question becomes is what's the role of Darwen Thompson? Right Like,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. Obviously he played the majority of the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>second half yesterday, but cooy was in and out of

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the game. Um, we also know the really status Damie

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams didn't really seemed that close to playing this week,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know, for all we know, he could be

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>back next week with dary Williams unavailable, right Like, That's

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>how often things changed. So well, I'm not great great

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>spending every time I have left on Darwin Thompson. Yet

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously of all of a sudden, Darryln Damian are both

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on i R tomorrow. That's a different conversation where waivers run.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But Darwin Thompson could be somebody that's we're looking at.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that on our Waivers show tomorrow. But

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we we're getting more winners and losers. And in order

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that, you need to hear this. The BFFs

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>presents winners. I one losers. You suck. You are one

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>pathetical loser, and I have no idea what's going That's right,

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Winners and losers in four week number thirteen are on

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on the NFL. Frank hit on all all those Kansas,

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and he choose let me go on to the other

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>side of the Oakland Raiders. I was a little bit

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nervous about Josh Jacobs and it was a great matchup,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but it was very, very concerned that game flow get

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>him out over hundred yards rushing. And that's all Tony

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Ron want to talk about yesterday, was he has a hundred,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>he lost hundred, He has a hundred, he lost Audren

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not it. He's very good, yes, and that I was

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring that up as well. I found it very annoying,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>equally as annoying as you. I was in the process

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of driving to my parents house. I go to my

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>parents house every Sunday for dinner, Greg and I'm driving

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and all I keep hearing was, oh, while he is

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>back under a hundred yards, He's back over a hundred yards.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we got it. Josh Jacobs is very good.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He is matchup proof. He's going to run efficiently. You know,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>people talk a lot more about Josh Jacobs throughout the

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>course of the season than they have Derrick Henry, and

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they are that dissimilar. Josh Jacobs

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was not targeted a single time in this game, despite

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland Raiders playing from behind for a large majority

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of that still saw a decent workload. Obviously, seventeen carriers

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and four yards. They have a very

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good offensive line. I think that he is a very

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>good running back in terms of running between the tackles,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>bouncing things to the outside. I think he has some shiftiness.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he can make opposing defenders miss. But he's

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>not used enough as a pass catcher, and we have

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>seen at times this season when they fall behind Josh

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs does suffer from you know, negative game script, whereas

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>other workhorse running backs are still used as pass catchers

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>when they are behind in games. Derek Carr and his

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Raiders offense greg over the past three games, are all losers.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>They are averaging under ten points per game over their

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>last three. We'll see if they could get it back

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on track next week at home against the Tennessee Titans.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I would say that this Oakland Raiders offense

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>recently are just complete losers. H Josh Jacobs yesterday was

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because he was still solid, But you don't like to

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>see the lack of pass game usage. You know, It's

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>funny because everyone was so quick to crown Oakland and

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>say they got Oakland wrong two weeks ago. I'm not

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really feeling that way anymore. No. I remember about a

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>month ago this time, after they beat the Chargers on

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night Football, it was John Gruden is in the

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>running for the Coach of the Year. And you know,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at that point he probably was because this team had

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>no expectations coming into this season. But since then, as

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, this offense has just completely sputtered. I do

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that John Gruden has at least taken accountability. Greg.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, whenever this team doesn't show up, he says,

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's on me. I've got to do a better job of,

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting this offense going. So he holds himself accountable.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. He's not going anywhere obviously, signed for like

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the next eight years with Oakland soon to be Las Vegas.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see what they do. But my guess is

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they probably draft another quarterbacks sooner rather than later. John

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Gruden wants to be his guy. I don't know that

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Derek Hars like Derrek Corey's this guy. I don't know.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Derrek car is a problem. They got loads of other problems,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically defensive very bad. It's very bad. You know what

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they could use? Probably Blio Mac might help. Oh really, yeah,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of that guy. They can get them pretty

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good pass rusher mad you know, maybe they can,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, give the Bears two first round picks

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for him. You know, it's funny because everyone thought the

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Raiders were were certainly back, and they were looking past

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, which is why they lost the Jets. But

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>they lost to a Jets team that was riding a

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>three game winning stream Whites since NATI team in football,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>honest seam in football. Who knows what they could be?

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I know what they could be. The ads are terrible, Frank.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The answer is the Jets. Greg. They lost the two

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>winless teams this year, Frank, not one. Look too. We're

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about a historic franchise right now in the New

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>York Jets. They are breaking history. They're making history week

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in week out by losing. This is the first time

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a team has lost to two winless teams that are

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at least o N seven in the same season in

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. Pretty that is historic. So there you go,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>your New York Jets. Apologies everybody for telling you to

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>ride the hot Street Jets because someone pointed out pointed

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>this out to me on Twitter that the Cincinnati Bengals

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>defense over the past couple of weeks, I know, don't laugh,

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They've actually played better. So I'm not making excuses for

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Day did not show up whatsoever. They couldn't

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>get anything going on offense. Robbie Anderson dropped a touchdown yesterday.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Still like the targets and the usage for Robbie Anderson

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from yesterday. Finally starting to see from volume some volume

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>for him, but that has come at the expense of

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder It's just for whatever reason, they haven't been

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>able to get everybody going in the same game, and

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that falls on Adam Gates. Obviously. There has not been

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a game all season where Crowder, Ryan Griffin, Robbie Anderson,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and Levion Bell have all been able to have success

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in the same game. And you thought yesterday could have

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been one of those times against the Cincinnati Bengals. Next

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>week should be one of those games against the Miami Dolphins,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately it looks like somebody is going to let

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you down. So the Jets were big losers. Levian Bell

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>great matchup, huge loser. The only winner from this game

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is Robby Anderson. Great Robbie Anderson obviously a winner. Jamison

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Crowder Man is destroyed people over the last couple of weeks,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>really really brutal, brutal start for him. On the other side,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boy did winner for Cincinnati five or fifty nine

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. Andy Dalton back in the saddle, gets

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>his big receiver of the ball, Joe Mixon not a

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as well, So the school position players score Cincinnati

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>any going around the NFL when we return here at

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the VFS, I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Don't go on your b A DFS competition with Daily

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, late swap support, and much more

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash dunk to

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>learn more on the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Then dunk

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition, Daily order dot Com and

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>dominated on Fandulan draft kings this season. To be with

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Roder dot Com Optimized. Are the

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>most accurate rejections in all of NBA DFS plus line

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of alerts, breaking news, late swamp support, and more temper

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>on winning NBA DFS advice with the promo code dunk.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it Daily Roder dot com slash dunks to learn more.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Daily Roder dot com slash dunk, Daily Order dot Com.

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm really in airs are made thanks for watching us.

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Wherever you're watching US Pluto TV channel five seventeen, maybe

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you're on Zoo channel seven nine, team watching on YouTube,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to the podcast. We appreciate wherever you are tuning

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>into the Sports Screen network and remember you on the

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>edge and get on the grid. Sports grad is where

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you can always find us. All right, Frank, Let's continue

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>diving into these NFL games again to day. Yesterday is

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a potential Super Bowl preview between the Baltimore Ravens and

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco four Niners, and rarely doesn't live up

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>to the building this one, dude, it was good. It

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was a solid game. We saw some scoring all around

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>early on in this game, Greg, and then came to

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a screeching Hall, but still a very good game, very

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>competitive game. Back and fourth Lamar Jackson throwing four hundred

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>yards and rushing for a hundred yards again continuing to

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>show off that RB one as a QB one upside

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>here even against one of the tougher defenses in the NFL,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in the San Francisco forty Niners. Greg, I think one

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>of the clear storylines of this game is Kevin Coleman

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wound up being one of the biggest losers weekend of

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the weekend yesterday, and the usage in this game was

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just baffling. Rohan Mostard thirty five snaps, nineteen carries, a

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty six yards a touchdown, also had two targets.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman just eleven snaps, five carries, six yards, one target.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>He just wasn't good, essentially benched in his game, Greg

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and Rahee Mostert has flashed some upside. Do you think

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>once they get met Breeda back, which with me next

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>week sounds like it should be week fourteen, because they

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>said he's close, but will hold him out for one

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>more week. We want him good to go against the

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints, mainly because again the Ravens game matters, Yes,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but they could beat in the New Orleans Saints there

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>in prime position, the number one overall seed in the

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Do you think both of these running backs

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>from nowould be ahead of Tevin Coleman in the pecking

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>order or is it just purely a hot hand approach? Yeah,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.719
<v Speaker 1>so I think what it is. No, most has had

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a hot hand for a while. Right. He looks real,

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>He's good, He's a very explosive running back. He looks

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>snifically better than Tevin Coleman for the last few games.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Um, I don't know if this is matchup.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. They feel that certain running backs are

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>better in certain spots, right, like Jeff Wilson's had his

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>spot on the goal line for whatever reason. I don't know.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's hard, like you could want to say that, right,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>he most are after what he did, this guy could

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>be a league winner. I have no idea. I had

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no idea, And it's so hard. If Rita, Coleman

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and most are all active next week, it is so

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to start. Don't know any of them. He won't

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know they're gonna rolling the football. You know,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if you get it right, you very well could get

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself fifteen twenty fantasy points. But you don't know which one,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>and it makes it's so damn hard. Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you look so I don't want to say

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a winner. It's like Coleman's a loser. But this

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>whole situation is such an enemy. Yeah, I agree. I

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't label he Moster as a winner, which is weird

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>because he was dominant yesterday. He was awesome seven point

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry against a good Baltimore Ravens deep fense.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, this is an a situation because it's just

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>one that's very modeled. It's hard to figure out right now,

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they are going to be in

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the flex discussion. I would say that, you know, at

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>this point in the season, Greg met Brita and Raheem

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Most are probably the most explosive of the three running backs.

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman has a role and you know, wouldn't surprise

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>me if he randomly comes back out next week and

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>scores two touchdowns. But I think the way things are trending,

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to trust Matt bred and Raheem Most ahead

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of Tevin Coleman. The way that Tevin Coleman has played recently. Yeah, absolutely,

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this amazing. Like two weeks ago, Bred ago, three weeks ago,

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Brida goes downright Wow, Tevin Coleman already one, you're feeling

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>great and four touchdown game was years ago. So long

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>as wild um other winners from the San Francisco side,

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have any because I don't. I wouldn't call

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel winner. I think that he's a great player,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but again, his target share is still so low. I mean,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily his target share, so he saw four target

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's on twenty one past attempt for Jimmy Garoppolo. But

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when the San Francisco forty Niners are at

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>their best, they don't want to throw the ball that much.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They want to run the football as many times as

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they did with Forhee most or yesterday and get other

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>players involved as well. So I think Deebo Samuel is

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a good player. We saw that yesterday. He is not

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just a yak receiver. We saw him, you know, body

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters and make a contested catch and score a

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>touchdown on that play. I think he's a very good player.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But until his targets are a little bit more consistent,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we could trust him as anything

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>more than a solid wide receiver three greg So I

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't consider Deebo Samuel a winner myself. Yeah, I said

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no winners. Like I said, there's not a single one.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Manuel Sanders did lead this team in targets with six,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which made me feel good as a Sanders owner. That's

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of back. This is a good Sanders game. I

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it was the right matchup. I thought for him,

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a safety valut he's a reliable wide receiver. That's it.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 1>George could have a huge loser yesterday. That sucks. Yeah, definitely.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you need him to show up in these big spots?

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I know there's so much riding on this week for

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>people to get into the fantasy football playoffs. Just four

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>targets for him, two receptions, seventeen yards and if you

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>were watching that game, it seemed like Baltimore. You know

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that that was there. That's what they were trying to do.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That was their game plan, is that they were trying

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to take George Kittle away from the San Francisco forty

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Niners and just take him out of that game and

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>let everyone else beat them. And that's exactly what they

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>were ready to do yesterday, Greg And unfortunately it came

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of his owners that really needed a

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>big game. Yeah, no doubt about it. On the other side,

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, Well, it wasn't the biggest Lamar Jackson game

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for a passive perspective, but why is the best playering

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy andrew yards rushing yesterday for Lamar Jackson. Touchdown

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, touchdown through the air, there's no better

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>player than him. Mark Andrews scores the only touchdown of

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the day through the air for Baltimore. He's a big winner.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, you couldn't rely on any of these wide receivers.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ingram bit of a losing yesterday and mark Ingram

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>still saw a big workload here, right, So they had

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty two running back carries and he saw fifteen of them,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so he actually saw a large majority of their running

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>back carriage from yesterday. It's it was just again, it

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>was a tougher matchup against San Francisco, and I'm not

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>really you know, it doesn't change how I view marketing room.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I still think easy high end RB two that's gonna

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of scoring opportunities because this team gets

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>inside the reds on a lot. They are the best

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>offense in the NFL right now, and when they get

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>into that area of the field, they tend to rely

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Lamar Jackson and mark Ingram. So down

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>game from yesterday, but doesn't really change how I view

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree marketing from somebody that I want for

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy playoffs, somebody that I will be on next

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>year as well. Email that one Frank. Uh, well, I

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was obviously not on marketing doesn't happen often. So it

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>happens often, just you know, not as often as we

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>would like. It seems fair we don't go Ryan downe

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>ul Now you know what we're really not We we

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of glossed over Mike Kasecki. We didn't talk about

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>him enough. Should we Should we go back to Mike Gasecki? Right?

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we need to do that because I'm

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure I have some text in my phone of

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you saying that Mike Kasecki stinks. Uh, probably emphatic. I

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>probably had a bunch words about beside sinks. Back to

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>back games in a touchdown, Greg, Yes, Mike Sey very

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>very good. He's a winner. Yes, he's a winner. That's

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all I wanted to hear that, like a second is

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a winner. I got it wrong. He's been good, he's

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a been reliable. So when he does get the Jets

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>next week with Ryan Fitzpatrick back in the saddle, he's

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>undeniably been good in a winner. Let's go use Mica

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Ski against the Jets. Run downhill now, sure, sure, Ryan Tannehill,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>let the time to do a thirty one seventeen victory

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>yesterday for the time game they were winners. Ryan tadne Hill, Yeah, yeah,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it was an at performance. He wasn't great from a

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, put up right around thirteen fourteen fantasy points.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I apologize Greg because I told you to use him

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>over Matt Ryan. It's okay, Frank and listen. Well that's there,

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you go, that's what That's what you're supposed to do. Right.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So we do this a lot where we are we

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just tell people, Okay, we like Ryan Tannehill this week.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to listen to us. Are advice what we say,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that we break it down. But ultimately you

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>make your own decision. If you have a feeling like

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, you know Tannehill has been solid, but I'm

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>still gonna trust Matt Ryan, then go with that feeling.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So Greg, you you ultimately played it the right way.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Titans didn't really need Tannehill to

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do much in his game. It was the Derrick Henry

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>show once again. You know, over the past three weeks,

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy is averaging right around a hundred and forty

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game, scoring a ton of touchdowns. Again,

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we look, we said this about Derrick Henry last week.

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems like we could just put it on repeat

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point, Greig, where you know he doesn't catch

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>passy and come in throughout the day he has repeat

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as it's it's very excited about the Titans, very excited

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>about Derrick Henry. Derrick Henry doesn't catch passes, but fantasy

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>points are fantasy points, and this guy sees so many

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>carries and he runs so efficiently and he sees so

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>much work in the red zone that he can you know,

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>outweigh not catching passes from a fantasy perspective. So Derrick

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Henry has been also him Uh not really the game

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we were hoping for obviously from A. J. Brown. But

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>good matchup next week against Okland Raiders. So I will

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>go back to the well with Tannehill and A J.

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Brown again next week. But yeah, they weren't great from

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective. They were not on the other side

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>without t Y Hilton, without very Ibron. You asked you

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>actually last week and he started Jack passially, like here

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>did that? If you're desperate, Yes, I asked you gonna

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>start Jack Doyle. Absolutely, he's a top ten tight end.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.479
<v Speaker 1>He was. Zack Pascal was great seven for one on nine.

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle was great six for seventy three and a

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as we saw in New England on Sunday night.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that code after the break. Quarterbacks rely

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on who they know and who they can trust. Right

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>now in the Indianapolis offense, that he's Jack Doyle and

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>then his Zack Pascal. Yeah, absolutely, And I was on

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Doyle receiving prop from yesterday. He hit his

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>receiving and reception prop in course half of that game yesterday.

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And the targets share just massive for Jack Toyal here

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>eleven targets, six receptions, seventy three yards and a touchdown.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We knew, we know that Jakobe Risset likes to toward

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of the tie end. Now there's basically now just one

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Yes, mo Ali Cox is on the team,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but Jack Doyle is the go to guy. And if

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton cannot suit up heading into Week fourteen,

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>then Zach Pascal makes for a very very good pickup

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's going up against the Tampa Bay Bucks. In

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen. He had ten targets himself, led this team

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>with seven receptions and a hundred and nine yards. Jack

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Doyle and Zack Pascal big winners from week thirteen. Greg

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on the coat side of things, one of the biggest

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>losers from Yesser Williams Man. What happened yesterday was not

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>running efficiently and they basically just turned it over to

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. Jordan Wilcolm Wilkins eleven carries, forty seven yards.

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Nahem Hines even had a few carriers scored a goal

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>line touchdown. You know, there's so many running back by

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>committees in the NFL. Right now, we just spoke about

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners. The Colts are another one without Marlon Mack.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if he's good to go heading into week fourteen,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but if he's not, Greg, it seems like this is

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just another one of those modeled situations. Really, really, the

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>matchup isn't great against Tampa. The run defense is not

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>as good as it was earlier in the year, and

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not very good. But it's not certainly not cakewalk

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. So tough spot ready Colts running

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>backs not named Marlin Back next week when we were starting,

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get into something night football between the Texas and

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots where another game that we head wrong and

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get everything else we missed for Thanksgiving weekend. I

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>also have an update on my league which is nuts.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you about it next. I want to be

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>support and much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot

0:32:49.080 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>com backslash dunk to learn more. All right, so we will,

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so we will get into some of night football in

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. I remember I told you on off

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the air and on the air, how not throwing a

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>game manipulating in a way when we get to Monday

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>night could be something interested in doing. Right, we talked

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. We see how the chips felt. As I

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the top two teams in my league we're playing

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>each other. The winner had the winner gets the first

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>overall seed. They both have buys and when it gets

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the first overall seed makes some money. UM, and all

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all four teams from three to six, we're all tied

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of seven and five. As it turns out, all four

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>teams that are at seven five, including me, we're protected

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to lose this week through all teams out of the playoffs.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just kind of injury is kind of cool. I mean,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing, but maybe when if David Cook has a

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>big game, I could win. Fine. So, as I said

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to you off the air with Dane, then there was

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one teams stifically I wanted to play in the next round.

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really have a huge lean in the first round.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>If it is what it is, I'll let the trips

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>fallow they made. But it was definitely a team that

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to play if possible UM in the second round,

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'm in the position where I could I'm either

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going to come if I win my matchup, I'll come

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>in third. If I lose my matchup by coming to fourth,

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that. That is what it is now. So I

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>can manipulate which side of the bracket I want to

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>be on and I can do something, but I don't

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have to do any of that. Why because the two

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>teams that have to buy one of them. Forgot that

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you make money for first place overall. And despite not

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>knowing who was going to be seated where because again

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>all teams three through six or seven and five, god

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>knows whether they're gonn finish. Who would win this week,

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>who would lose this week? He benched his entire team

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. I've never seen anything like this, and I

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 1>want to kick him out of the league. That's where

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm at with us. He wanted the two seed rather

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>than one seed because he wanted to play certain teams

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>even though nothing was set. It seems a little contradictory here, Greig,

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>because isn't this is something that you are trying to

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>do it yourself and to manipulate the seating benching the

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>entire year entires. Okay, Greg, So let me ask you this.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>If you had a chance to by playing Dalvin Cook tonight,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>win and face the seed that you don't want to face,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>or you can bench Dalvin Cook and lose to face

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the team you do want to face, what would you do?

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I would bendin Cook. Okay, So it's the same exact thing,

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>being the same thing. Your entire thing this is contradictory.

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You don't think your entire team is different than benjing

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>one player Whenday Night football. It's the same thing you're

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to You are benching your best player in Dalvin Cook,

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to manipulate seating for fantasy football purposes. I

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that what he did is any different than

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what you are proposing yourself. Okay, and now you will

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>take it back. No, I mean just because I say

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that it's gospel. It doesn't mean that

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>it's the right answer. You're just saying. In my eyes,

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it seems okay. I just thought very I just thought

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>bending your entire team was different. Like he got a

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>zero this week. I mean, that is it's quite ridiculous.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of that myself ever. It's crazy. It's

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:24.479
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crazy. I don't I don't know that I would

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>kick the guy out of the league because of it,

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>because then I think you'd probably have to kick yourself

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the league. I have done anything, but I mean,

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you did propose that you would do something like that.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>As turns out, this is why I said to you

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>last week, like there are so many things that are

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>going to change, like you're gonna try and predict things

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna happen, and in time you get to

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this point and it is now on Monday, I can

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>predict it, right, I have all the information just to me.

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe it's I'm just a traditionalist of

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. You like Ryan Tannehill is the daughter. No,

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like I would just play my best players

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and try and finish as the highest seat as I

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly can. And these things have a way of working

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>themselves out. Man, I'm telling you, fantasy karma is real, dude.

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Like there's no data behind that, but it's real. You

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>try and manipulate these things, these things, and the next

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>thing you know, you end up screwing yourself. Man, your

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lead is kind of crazy. Man. It's crazy, buddy, it's wild.

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>It was also crazy last night Sunday Night Football. The

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Texans and the Patriots, Bill Brian Shaw Watson, they thrashed this. Damn.

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It's about time. It's about time Bill O'Brien got off

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the schneide and gets his first win against Bill Belichick

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and the New England Patriots. While we're talking about getting

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rankings wrong, Greg, sorry about the Shawn Watson, everybody.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I think everyone that you asked would

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>not have expected a game like this. Two thirty four

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>passing here, that's fine, not great. Nine point four yards

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>per attempt, that's very good. Three passing touchdowns against this

0:37:56.400 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriots secondary. Thrashing is the right word, because that's exactly

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>what they did. Shawn Watson also had a receiving touchdown

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>from DeAndre Hopkins that was actually a really awesome play too.

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Weren't so awesome it didn't work by the way, Bill O'Brien,

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have been so awesome and only should have

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>saved that for the playoffs. Just you know, he didn't

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with that, right, who did? DeAndre Hopkins and

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Watson amongst them. They went over to Bill O'Brien

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>during the bio. He was like, hey, look at this, Well,

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty impressive. It was because it worked. It was

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a little spin on the Philly special, right, not at

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>all ended off to running back. And then and then

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in an option play. Right, that's not a Philly special.

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>That's an option. It's pretty cool. It's got a really

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 1>dumb If it doesn't work, sure, but at that point

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're like, that's a luxury that you have, right,

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>because they're playing with the lead. At that point they

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 1>were up big ready, I don't think they're on big.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was like it was fourteen three. It's

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not huge. I mean they could come back from that.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't this last touchdown last might have been up

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and then the last night shown was Kenny Stills. Now

0:38:57.920 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be wrong either way. I could be wrong too, obviously,

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, no, I thought it was a creative play.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Was cool. I think a clear winner in this game

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>greg was Duke Johnson. Yes, because he ran way more

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>efficiently than Carlos Hide. And you know, there are a

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of underlying metrics. I've tweeted about them all season long.

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Drink about how Duke Johnson is in more drinking, not

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>because he tweeted we're drinking because underlying metrics continue. Is

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that true? Yes, I said to drink because of I

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned tweeting we're drinking. Underlying metrics. Well, Duke Johnson has

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 1>been a more efficient runner, higher yards after contact per attempt.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He is a better elusive running back than Carlos Hide.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I've been begging for this to happen all season long.

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit too late, unless, of course, you're

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>still alive in the playoffs. But you love the target

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 1>share here. Five receptions, fifty four yards and a touchdown.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>They nearly had the same amount of carries, and the

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>broadcast was talking about how Bill O'Brien wants to get

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson more involved. So it took a while. Maybe

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he was saving him for this time of the year, Greg,

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but whatever it is, Duke Johnson is a clear winner here.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We were not sure what to expect him. DeAndre Hopkins

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>on on Sunday night. Ye, Hopkins was fine and Kenny

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Stills was great thanks to a call back Will Fuller touchdown. Uh,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>John Wasson has all of his wide receivers last night,

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and this is as bad as Texas look last week

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>against Baltimore. It was really good last night. Yeah, and

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this is some of the the boom bust that we

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>see out of out of Will Fuller, you know, because

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>one week, from one week to the next, we see

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a monster game against the Indianapolis Colts and then this

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one he ends up dropping eight touchdown. I mean he

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>should have caught, he was open. It was a perfect throw.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>He was in position to make that play, ended up

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>dropping it. But ultimately, yes, Will Fuller has a big upside, Greig,

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>but also a huge downside. He was a big loser

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from yesterday. On the other side for the New England Patriots,

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady has been very honest and said, listen, the

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>shength of our teams, our defense, and our special teams.

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Special teams almost say the game with an honest kick

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>recovery last night that went right off Brandon Bolton's hands.

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>This offense not great, Bob. I talked about earlier, um,

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just a few moments ago, that when your entire team

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>is decimated, you go to who you rely on, right

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>and that was Jack Doyle and Zach Pascal in the

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts. The case that he was in the Patriots

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>all the time Brady has to rely on right now,

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that's because his name is injured, because they stink. Is

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman and James White. And that's all this offense

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is Frank Julian Edelman and James White. Yeah, it's exactly right,

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>man and James White. He saw all the work on

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the ground as well, fourteen carries. While you were talking,

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to look up when the last time

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>James White had fourteen carries in a game there and

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>come back without the entire games so he was the

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.439
<v Speaker 1>field the entire second half that that's actually a career high.

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That is a career high in Russian attempts with four teen.

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're right, I mean they were playing from behind

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were just running this hurry up. The Patriots

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are playing from behind all games. Yeah, and James White

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was just on the field and you know, much like

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>well Fuller. This is why you know, we recommend Patriots

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.800
<v Speaker 1>running back Moore as best ball options because trying to

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>predict this on a weekly basis. You know, we bench

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>James White in the league yesterday is this there's no

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.399
<v Speaker 1>way to know on paper. Good match we to Texans

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because they struggle against pass catching running backs. But it

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was a good matchup last week for James White as well,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't come through. He scored less than one

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy point. This week he has over thirty Fantasy points.

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So this comes with the territory of the Patriots and

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>their running backs. Julian Edelman very good, twelve targets, six catches,

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards of touchdown that pitch and catch at

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the game, one of the easiest touchdown

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>catches I've seen in a long time. So you continue

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to trust Julian Edelman whether or not he's questionable, it

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. He has to go to guy for Tom Brady.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg I will now bring something up and you will

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>tell me how ridiculous I am. Oh, I can't wait.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>What are the chances that with this offense playing as

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>bad as they are, there are in the locker room.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>In the locker room, there's not amongst management because they're

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not gonna want to bring back Antonio Brown. But this

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.959
<v Speaker 1>offense as is right now, can they trust them going

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs as is the way that they have

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>played the past couple of weeks. That question is fair,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and should we pick up Antonio Brown? No, I just

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>thought I would bring it up, read about it somewhere,

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>not having the conversation. But I don't think that it's

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>completely ludicrous because you can't bring Antonio Brown. Patriots offense

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is bad, it's not good, Josh Gordon, if you wanted to,

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they could have, But Josh Gordon's not making a difference

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with Seattle. You could give Rob Gun county ten million

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars to come back to Brown could still play. That

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.479
<v Speaker 1>we know Greg Josh Gordon. I think that's a little

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that's in question. We don't know actually how good Josh

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Gordon is at this point. I understand that and why

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown could play. He's got way more off field

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>issues right now. They are more important that football. Okay, Yeah,

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean look that I am not disagreeing with whatsoever.

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy's got a lot going on, clearly, clearly,

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying there have been times where teams

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>don't really care about morals and ethics and what's going

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on off the field. They want to win. I get it.

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So I get just thought that this time they cut

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>bring it up, they cut him because those issues are

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>serious enough, right It's just how how desperate are they,

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, to try and improve this offense. And that's

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that's going on in my mind, because

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this offense is bad, and I think you cannot They

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>might see the writing on the wall here that as

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>great as their defense has been, starting to show some

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some cracks in the armor, this offense is not something

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be able to carry this team. But maybe

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with Antonio Brown, it might be able. I don't know,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not an option, all right. You want to talk

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about decimation, right, and that the Patriots got decimated last night,

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but the Los Angeles Rams also had some decimation. A

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.280
<v Speaker 1>big comeback performance for the Rams against the Arizona Cardinals

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>um very obviously get me right game for Jared Goff, who,

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>along with Robert Woods and Gooper Cup did everything they

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 1>damn well pleased Robert Wood's nineteen targets, thirteen receptions a

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy two yards. He is firmly back in

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that wide receiver to wide receiver three discussion based on

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that worklood from yesterday. Obviously, it was a good matchup,

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and we said that know last week we were talking

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>about golf, that this is gonna be a get right

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>spot for this offense. Patrick Peterson not the player that

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 1>he wants was. This Cardinal secondary even with him, has

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>been one of the worst in the NFL all season

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>long golf throws over four hundred yards, nearly ten yards

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>per attempt, two passing touchdowns, no turnovers. I'm not ready

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Rams offenses back because it was

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup, but I'm ready to say that I

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think Jared Goff is close to the QB one discussion

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>heading into next week's matchup with Seattle. I understand it's

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a big game, divisional game, but I'm not really worried

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about Seattle secondary. I don't think that they are a

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>very good defense. Um, I'm gonna trust Robert Woods in

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that game. You're gonna trust Cooper Cup. Everybody was great

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game, Greg, except one random Cooks. Man. It's

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>over for Brandon Cooks, at least for this season. You know,

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna completely right right off. I think he's

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a good football player, but for this season, I think

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 1>it's probably over. I agree with you. I agree. It's

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for them to put up thirty four points

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>and this one's offense and him to you absolutely nothing,

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>it's over. Any interesting Tyler Higbee or is this just

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a Cardinals are that bad against tight ends? Because if

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett is out again next week, the Seattle Seahawks

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have struggled against tight ends, which means Tyler Higbee could

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be back in the streaming discussion. It's possible, but again

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the Cardinals, so it's like whatever, Um, I

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 1>don't take that. I don't think it's a streaming tight end.

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think whoever the Cardinals face, did you stream their

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of Vance McDonald next week, Greig, I really don

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>duck Steelers. How about the Steelers big winners? I got

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a Pittsburgh Steelers playoff ticket, Greggy, So let's go duck.

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's go duck, baby, Let's go duck. All right, we'll

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>hit the waiver wire tomorrow. He is Frank Saville. I

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Sausen. Thank you so much for watching, listening

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to VFS at the window and wait your talk or

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>next we'll do it all in tomorrow, we hope. I

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.800
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rotal Duncan and dominate

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and Draft Kings this season. Compete with the

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pros with daily rodo dot Com optimizer and the most

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news,

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more safe ten percent on

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com backslash Dunk to learn more. I'm gonna

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>miss you. Here's what you missed on Fantasy Football Frenzy.

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want it to shout out to Sherm in

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Goon squad, who put up one sixty five this week.

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I personally asked him to take down Jurassic Forest for

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>your boy so I could get the boy. And he

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>put up one sixty five. So well done. Count the money?

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>How did I do that? I win? I think you're winning, man,

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you're you got a good shot to get

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in here. You put up like one sixties something too.

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh damn, it's like my best week of the year. Yeah,

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you get me. And I think I needed. I think

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I needed to win. I needed. It's certain I'm gonna

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>point or someone else to lose. I think I might

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have need a you're playing the guy that George needs

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose. I think you can thank me later. Man,

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we gotta see what happens tonight. Obviously tonight you have

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Lice Davis who made a great run. Now in

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the good squad league. I mean, here's what you missed

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on the BFS. Where should we start? I mean the

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>place I want to start, and I don't know the

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>right answer. I guess we can start. It's subjective. I

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think that there is a right as there like

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.479
<v Speaker 1>right answer right. I think it Dolphins right is in general,

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.839
<v Speaker 1>but the biggest winners in every way A story today

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday Milami Dolphins as they should be down to touchdowns affilately.

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>They scored five straight times and they need they passed

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that helmet over here. Let's get the Dolphins helmets right

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>here on the show, right now, on the set, Greg's

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna attempt to put Oh my god, it's like you're

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to end up hurting yourself very severely there. Greg is

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>loaded up with the Dolphin. Let's go Dolphins. All you

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>need is some facial hair and it's basically Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>over at to gumming out my wedding ring. One. I

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was a play. I'm good. Dolphins were probably the biggest

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>literally figuratively for real life for fantasy football. DeVante Parker

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>basically when anybody who started him this week helped a

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people get into the fantasy football playoffs. He

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>helped Eric Young beat us a game that decided who

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to get to buy heading into the pit

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>League playoffs. So we'll talk a little bit about that.

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But Davanta Parker was awesome. Greg right, Fitzpatrick was very good.

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that he is a stream next week as well.

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>That special teams play was dancle is, Greg. That was awesome.

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously reminded me of the Colts play that Chuck

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>mcgano's You're up so terribly previously on fourth down. But

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, right, like all the line that are

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>out wide, there's a kicker and a punzer in the middle,

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:52.320
<v Speaker 1>like what's happening, I'm sorry, snapper in a punzer in

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle, and then the punts down. I would say

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit easier to pull off on the

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>goal line than in the middle of the fiord. But

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it was awesome all the way around. Patrick Laird, I

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>think is a winner from me. Were talking about Patrick

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Laird in the on the hurry of how he's worth

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>running back to the Dolphins. I realized he's not easy

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>fifth running back. We've talked about picking up on Dolphins

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. Al right, we spoke about moles gassing, but no,

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's all about Patrick Laird, the dominator, as I termed him.

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't it be Patrick Layer? Patrick Layard? What's the

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:24.919
<v Speaker 1>thing now? Huh? Why not? Kind of I mean, look,

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for the Dolphins to his official nickname the intern.

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I saw they were talking about that on

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast sesterday. They called them the intern and then

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, well, I guess now he has a

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>full time job. Oh you heard it. Yes, indeed, but

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>he still carries five yards of the average dominantor the

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>average half a yard per carry. Look, this team cannot

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>run the football because their offensive line is very bad.

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>They trail in a lot of games. Actually amazing to

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>me that you have a straight face while talking to me.

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Why look at me? It's probally fine. I feel you

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>should do every show with a helmet on. You don't

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:00.360
<v Speaker 1>go to get this off. No, you're deaf onally like

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that for the rest of this show and probably going

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>into our holiday party tonight. He was bad. I love it,

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think everyone else will too. Patrick Leard will

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>never be able to run efficiently, but he is a

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>good pass catcher at ninety six perceptions over his last

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>two years at Cal and considering they can't run the football,

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably just gonna throw him a lot

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of short passes moving forward. I don't feel good about

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Calumballage non contract, non contact leg injury, So I don't

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's gonna be out there next