WEBVTT - Leave Brutalism Alone!

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio. Hey,

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh. There's Chuck Bence

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>here sitting in for Jerry, which we're all very happy about. Frankly,

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's our preference. And this is stuff I'm kidding, and

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>this is stuff you should know.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>It's been a while since you bagged on Jerry for

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 2>no reason.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I know things have felt weird. Now I just reset

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>them again.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about this one. This is another if you're

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 2>listening at home, we would really encourage you to try

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and follow along by looking up some photographs of some

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>of the things we mentioned, because obviously we're talking about

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>a design style of architecture, and those are always better

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>when you can see some of this stuff and do

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>so safely.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because it's really difficult to describe a building in

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>any really good terms, you know, or any way that

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you're just like, oh, I don't even need to see

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the picture of it. I totally got what you're saying.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>But we still try.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>We definitely still try, and probably of all the architecture

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>there is, brutalist might be the easiest to describe without

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at it.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe true, But then when you look at brutalist things,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 2>there's so much variety within that category.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And if you hadn't guessed by now we're

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about brutalism, if you didn't pick up from that

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>exchange we just had or the title of this episode

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and brutalist architecture, even if you don't know what it is,

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you have almost certainly witnessed it, maybe even been inside

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a brutalist building, because they're very often public buildings, as

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, And brutalism is probably the most reviled, misunderstood,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hated architecture of all time. It's just so easy to

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hate it, and so many people hate it for so

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.639
<v Speaker 1>many different, sometimes really weird reasons. But there also seems

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a renaissance and appreciating brutalism which is arriving

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>just in time, because brutalist buildings are in really grave

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>danger being torn down and erased from architectural history all

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>over the world.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I learned a cool thing today which I

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>never knew before. And I thought about this when I

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>was in Mexico City, which has a lot of great

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>brutalist architecture. Yeah, including I mean that airport's got to

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>be brutalist.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, as a matter of fact, it's got to be.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. I didn't see that. It didn't

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>come up in my research, but yes, Mexico City has

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>a ton of good brutalism.

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 2>But when I was there, I noticed some things and

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I was like, and I saw a couple like sort

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of that echoed sort of pyramid style brutalism, and I

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>was like, wait a minute. I was like, these look

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>like ancient mind temples, and if you look up like

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>an ancient Mayan temple or it goes visit one like

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a totally brutalist thing. But I learned that apparently,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 2>originally these temples were very ornate. I saw. I can't

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>remember where I got this, but I said, they were

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 2>as ornate as any neoclassical edifice in Europe. But they've

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>been stripped down over the years from war and looting

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and just time, and they became brutalist in the end.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Huh weird. That's fantastic and totally surprising.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they weren't originally built that way. But when

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 2>you look at a mine temple compared to like some

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of these other you know, like office buildings, I'm like,

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you say this was came around in like England in

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen fifties, and I say it came around long

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>before that.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So you hit upon something though that like these these

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>mine temples are brutalist now, but they weren't before because

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been stripped of their decoration or whatever. That is brutalism.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a type of architecture that from its outset, from

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the creation of the building, from design onward, it's meant

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to not have ornamentation. It's the it's the skeleton of

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the building, is the building. That's what brutalism is, or

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>at least in part.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And if you've ever and like we said, we'll

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>get into some of the variety within the style, but

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 2>if you've ever seen a like a huge concrete, unfinished

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 2>sort of concrete looking government building with the same little

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>tiny windows and it just looks like this blocky monolith, Yeah,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 2>that is brutalism staring you in the face.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. If you look at a building and suddenly Stalin

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>just comes into your head, you're looking at a brutalist

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>building almost certainly.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Or if you wonder what evil villains layer that is,

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a brutalist building.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, exactly. I also had a brutalist epiphany in Mexico

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>City recently. When we were down there. We went to

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the museums and they were having a brutalism exhibit,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and it completely reversed my feelings about brutalism. I walked

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>into that exhibit hating brutalism, and I walked out really

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciating it. And it turns out I didn't actually hate

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>brutalism all this time. I hate ugly buildings, ugly, thoughtless, dumb,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>boring buildings, and that is not Brutalism is not synonymous

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. It's gotten a bad name over the years,

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is even the name itself brutalism.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think that the whole term was

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>coined to describe like how the building makes you feel

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it. It's brutal, it's sharp, it's merciless,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>has zero compassion, it's dehumanizing. That's not what the term

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>brutalism means at all. It actually refers to a type

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of concrete that the French architect and designer the Corbussier

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>introduced called beton brute.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, beton brute. I think the exact English translation is

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>gross cement exactly.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But they call it raw concrete.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, which is to say, just a raw, unfinished,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>poored concrete. There are a lot of houses in our

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>surrounding neighborhoods in Atlanta now that are being built sort

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of in this style, these huge, big concrete, blocky houses

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>that are I think it's sort of a mishmash. It

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely echoes brutalism, but most of them still have a

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 2>polished sort of concrete look to them, and that is

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>not true true brutalism.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>No, And it's there's a lot of overlap between modernism

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and brutalism. They both were they both were going on

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. And some people say that brutalism

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>emerged out of modernism. There's a big old that's a

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hornousness that we're not going to get into. But just

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>using exposed unfinished concrete is not in and of itself

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a brutalist building. There's other elements as well that come

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>into Yeah.

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think an interesting thing is brutalism, isn't I mean,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, and you see it, but it's it's something

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that I saw this. I think it was a new

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>York Times article that said it has always sort of

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>lacked a really clear, well articulated set of principles.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw that. I didn't agree with that. I thought

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it was very articulated.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, I think the I think what it means

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 2>more is it there's there's so much variety within those principles.

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You can't say it's just this, because depending on what

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>region you are in the world, the brutalist architecture is

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>going to look different, whether it's you know, Soviet Russia

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>or postwar London, or in Brazil and Latin America. Brutalism

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>grew out of the modernist tradition, so stuff there looks

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit different than it does in other parts

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>of the world.

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It does. I think that they all share in common

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a core set of principles that is brutalism. That that's

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what I disagree with. I know that there's differences in

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>all that. I just I just I didn't agree with

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that statement that the New York Times got it wrong, wrong, wrong.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm with them. I'm down the paper record.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about where this came from.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Huh yeah, well, I mean, you know, it came out

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of the post war architectural rebuilding of so many cities

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>around the world that were completely destroyed into rubble, and

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in particular this one couple, Peter and Allison Smithson in England,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>saw bombed out London and instead of seeing you know,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a big bombed out mess where like, oh, we have

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to rebuild it, you know, more ornate and grander than before,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>they saw an opportunity and were inspired and said, why

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>don't we start using this rubble and build some sort

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of unfinished looking places.

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it's almost like they visually speaking they used

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the rubble as the material to build the new buildings

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't actually use that, but visually speaking they

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>did that, and it was, like you said, in an

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>acceptance of the current reality rather than a return to

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a previous reality, which is radical in and of itself,

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but that was the essentially. The Smithsons are credited with

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>establishing brutalism as an architectural movement very frequently there. A

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>critic named Rayner Banham is credited with coining the term

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>brutalism that's wrong. He popularized it in a review of

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the Smithson's work. The Smithson's used it a couple of

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>years before Bannam did, and a couple of years before that,

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>a Swedish architect named Hans Asplind used it to describe

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a home that he designed an Uppsala called Via goth

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty nine. So at least as far back

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as nineteen forty nine the term brutalism was being used.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But you kind of dug up and you had said

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at the outset evidence that brutalism was around before that

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>term was ever used.

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, I mean I think clearly they were inspired,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 2>inspired by stuff that came before them, maybe by mind

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>temples and things like that, but no one was calling

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>it brutalist obviously until then. And I don't think it

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 2>was like a bonafide, a bona fide architectural movement until

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the post war, you know, sort of rebuilding.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, and post war, because of all the rebuilding that

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was going on, brutalism was widely adopted across Europe, not

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just in the West but also in the Eastern Bloc

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>because World War two just ravaged that continent and so

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of countries had a lot of cities that

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>needed to be rebuilt largely, and not just in Europe

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, particularly in Okinawa. Supposedly ten to twenty percent

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the buildings that were around before World War Two

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>were still around after as much as ninety percent of

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the buildings were destroyed, so they had a lot of

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding to do, and it just so happened at the

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>time brutalism was this new kind of up coming, frankly

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>beloved style of architecture. So it happened to be in

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the right place at the right time to become adopted

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world because all this rebuilding was going on.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>But the timing isn't the full explanation of the whole thing,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>is it? Is it?

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it's not. Because it was also a time

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>where in the sort of the fifties through the seventies

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>where the European nations that had colonized the world, that

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 2>stuff started sort of going back the other way, and

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>these countries were even either given their country back or

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>they were flourishing. So in Latin America all of a

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>sudden there was sort of a new prosperity going on.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>In Africa, there was you know, some of them were

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>gaining independence, and so it all timed out with brutalism.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's why you'll see like brutalism in Africa and

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>brutalism in Latin America and brutalism in Japan. It's really interesting.

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, though, is we said that Modernism was

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in full swing same time, so you could say, well,

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>why didn't they just choose modernism instead, And you know,

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them did. A lot of Modernist buildings

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>were built in these same cities around the same time.

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But the reason brutalism truly became so ubiquitous around the

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>world is because it was cheap. It was really cheap

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a brutalist building because they were essentially poured

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>or slab concrete. There was no adornment to them. There.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They were as we'll see, Brutalism takes a single unit

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very often like a like the smallest unit like a

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Saint apartment, and then redoes it over and over and

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>over again. So there's a standardization of the process of

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the materials. So it just was. It was around the time,

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very cheap alternative to other much

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>more ornate types of buildings like modernist buildings at the time,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So that was one reason why it was so widely adopted.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and with that repeating thing, I mean, it can

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>even just be like, well, like that airport in Mexico

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>City with the circles, or what was the one the

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>French guy like his very the habitat.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The United Bitasion.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Look, yeah, I mean if you look at that, that's

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>another great example of these. You know, I guess they're windows.

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 2>What are they?

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think they're balconies or like patios.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, it's hard to tell from like a distance,

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>but it's just this repeated thing, and that's there's obviously

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 2>a building efficiency when you're not adorning things and we're

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of repeating the same design feature over and over

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>and over. Also, this is a time post war where

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>people really started moving to the cities a lot more,

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 2>especially in the Eastern Block. It's cheap. It was a

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>cheap way to house tons of people as far as

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the US goes. That's when the federal government really beefed

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 2>up and said, all right, we're going to be we're

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna take some steroids here and see what happens. And

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 2>so all of a udd and you had a much

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>larger bureaucracy and these they needed, you know, there were

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>more people, more employees, and say need of these big

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 2>federal government buildings. So you'll see a lot of some

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of the best brutalist architecture in American cities could be

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>like the City Library like here in Atlanta, or like

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the IRS building or something like these big government buildings.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Also, one of the reasons brutalism was such a great

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>idea for government buildings is because they're so stable and

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they're so just yeah, immovable, And so the designers were like, well,

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to remind people that the government is stable

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have to worry because the government's in control.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Just look at the buildings that they operate out of.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. DC has a lot of brutalist stuff.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, it's a brutalist town. If you want to

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>acquaint yourself with brutalist architecture, just walk around d C

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and look at the federal buildings. They are brutalists through

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and through.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Should we take a break, but I say we take

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>a break? Yeah, all right, because we need to go

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>to Washington, d C.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>And apologize.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Chuck, I didn't understand. Why do we have to

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>apologize to DC?

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It sounded like you were saying, I

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>know you appreciate brutalism now, but it sounded like you

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't have much love for the DC style of brutalism.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not that I've always appreciated DC because it's

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just so weird architecturally, isn't it that nothing can be

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>taller than the Washington Monument. That's why there's no skyscrapers

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in DC. I think I've heard that the Monument or

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol Building one of the two. So yeah, it's

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a very low slong city. But that also is ready

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>made for brutalist design too, because they're often like low, wide,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>hulking forms as well.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're never going to see a brutalist tower.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. There are some brutalist towers, but they're

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>very rare, very very rare.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean I've seen some skinnyish apartment buildings

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and things, but I guess I don't know. I'm thinking

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.479
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like skyscrapers.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, do they have those the skyscrapers that we think

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of when we think of the cities today, those kind

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of came along and replaced brutalism and starting around the eighties. Yeah,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>so no, you wouldn't have seen that as brutalist because

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just wasn't brutalist.

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's not all concrete all the time. It's obviously

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>a very big part that unfinished concrete of brutalism. But

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>you might see a little brick in there every now

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 2>and then, probably not going to be like some super

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>colorful thing. You'll probably see some steel, ill obviously some

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>glass I have seen, you know, and especially in Brazil

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>and Latin America out of the modernist movement incorporating wood,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 2>and I'm a big fan of of like combining like

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>cement and wood and natural things like that, natural elements

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 2>with unnatural elements.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's the new that's the new thing. That's brand

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>spanking new. They call it organic brutalism, which is combining

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like a brutalist space with like organic touches to it. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd love that. So even though it's I don't even

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>know if you can't say that it's not all concrete

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I think one of the basis of

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>brutalism is that it's got to be concrete, right Or

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>are you saying like other people have experimented with other

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff and still consider brutalist.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I just mean like that every square

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>inchoa gotch isn't concrete.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But that it features very, very prominently. One of the

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>things that, yeah, one of the things about this these

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>reinforced concrete buildings is because they were using just unfinished

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>concrete or you know, unadorned concrete, they figured out interesting

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.479
<v Speaker 1>ways to kind of play with the concrete so that

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>every building didn't look exactly alike. So you'll often see

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>like vertical ripples going down long tall columns that's a

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>type of concrete. They'll be like aggregate, like maybe pebbles

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that are on the surface of the concrete. There's all

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff they did. But if at the end

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of the day it's all reinforced concrete and there's not

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like drywall over it, there's not like a nice paint

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>job over it, there's no decorations or any kind of

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>like woodwork or anything like that. It's just right the

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>building itself. The point of brutalism is the building itself

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to stand on its own. And I saw

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that somebody said that if modernism is meant to

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>be honest, then brutalism is brutally honest. Like what you

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>see is what you get with the building.

0:18:59.000 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I like that.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I do too.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>They like you said, there's a uh, there's a sense

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 2>of permanence to a brutalist building. And I think that's

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>another reason why government buildings like them, because, like you mentioned,

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 2>they just sort of convey this thing of like, I

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 2>know you hate banger taxes, but look at this IRS building.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not going anywhere, right, It sends a message, it

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 2>says ts.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>There's some other like basic parts of the brutalist concept.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Chuck like that. The buildings tend to be angular, geometric, sculptural, blocky,

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>top heavy. The windows are very frequently deep set. They're

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>called fortress like. I don't know if you mentioned that

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one before, but it pops up almost everywhere when you're

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about what brutalism is. Fortress like seems to be

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like a very like just a common description. And then

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked about them being self repeating.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Right yeah, yeah, and that was you know the reason why,

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>because the efficiencies and the costs.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Right. So sometimes some brutalist buildings will take like the

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.239
<v Speaker 1>single unit, like say it's an apartment building, and they

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 1>will take the they'll design the one apartment building and

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they just repeat it over and over and over again,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the next row over and over and over again.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And by combining these modular units together, they it forms

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the building just through repetition. And so some people call

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it a fractal as far as architectural movements go, which

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense.

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know, I appreciate it a lot, and

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I always have. But I get why people don't like

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these buildings. And I think that maybe,

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>like you, previous to Mexico City only had in the

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>in the brain like sort of one thing, which is God,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 2>that ugly building downtown that I have to go to

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>get my driver's license or something exactly, and to expose

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>yourself to more. And you know, we're gonna talk about

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 2>some famous buildings, but you know, brutalism had a sort

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of a pre hatred going on before it even became

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 2>a thing. The people that were I believe that was

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 2>La Corbusier's how do you pronounce this building again?

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>The unite do pitasion? That's right, I think so my

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>high school friends can hold up.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>He designed this thing for working class families to house

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, which was the whole idea, but

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 2>no one wanted to live there. None of those people

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 2>wanted to live there, so the intelligentsia of Marseille was like,

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, they appreciated that architecture, and there.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Who moved in, right, they said sold.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I also think it's interesting that they have been used

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of as the one here that I

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>sent you in Georgia that is so cool looking, of

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>all places, Noon in Georgia was used, as I believe

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>in ant Man and the Wasp, as the evil villain's

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>layer from the outside and clockwork orange, and like just

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 2>this associate with evil villains or the bad guys or

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the communist Soviet block. It just sort of always had

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 2>this reputation of like, you should probably hate this architecture.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Also dystopian too, Like if you ever watch a movie

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or look at artwork set in a dystopia, if you

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the buildings, they are almost always brutalist in

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>some way should perform often very frankly brutalist, right, Yeah,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of makes sense because a lot of

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>times dystopian settings are well they're set in the future,

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or that maybe they're post apocalyptic. Yeah, yeah, And it

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that if any kind of buildings is going

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to survive a brutalist building would survive far into the

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>future or would survive in apocalypse, So it makes sense intuitively,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But also I think brutalism gets used in that because

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's so associated with things like dehumanization depersonalization, that the

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>scales that they're built on are inhuman scales. And that's

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>ironic because again, most of the brutalist buildings that were

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ever built were meant to be public buildings where you

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>bring a lot of people together to do things like

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoy a ballet or a show or performance, or to

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>live together as a community in like a tower or

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and yet they're The irony of it

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they're viewed as inhuman dehumanizing rather than humanizing,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>which is I think what they were after. But it

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just over time, it just became associated with the opposite

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of that.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And you know, if you have an

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>evil villain in your movie, you're not going to put

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>them in a in a quaint cottage.

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe if they're on vacation and it's like a rental.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite examples of brutalism as a bad

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 2>guy's place is in Karate Kid three, which I watched

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it when it came out, and I clearly hadn't watched

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 2>it since because I'd forgotten all about it, and we

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 2>watched it on vacation last year, and it is one

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of the most wonderfully awful movies I've ever seen. One

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>of those bad movies that's a lot of fun to watch.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one with Hillary Swank?

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>No? No, that is I think the next karate Kid.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Karate Kid three was the third of the you know,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Daniel and Mister Miagi tail where he battled the bad

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>guy Terry Silver, who was I think he was a

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Vietnam buddy of what's his name?

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember from the from the first one.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, yeah, So Terry Silver's place is the ultimate

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 2>brutalist bad guy lair, and it is the Ennis House

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in Los Angeles that was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright.

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that the Hell House or Hillhouse?

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean it's called the N's House.

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I've been at some Frank Lloyd Wright houses in

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles and they're pretty awesome.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he's He definitely was not known as

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the brutalist architect, but there are a handful of his

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 2>designs and if you look at Ennis House, it is

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>like like super brutalist. And then when I was in Tulsa, Oklahoma,

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I saw the the West Hope House in Tulsa. Frank

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Lloyd right, Also, I think, if not purely brutalist, fairly brutalist.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And then like you look at the Guggenheim, the Guggenheim

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>is sort of brutalist as well.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you could call it if you're

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>a brutalist purist, a purialist. Jeez, if you would count

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the Guggenheim, because it's the concrete is much more smooth,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's not not brutalist, you know.

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>No, And I was mistaken. It's not Hill House. It's

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the house on Haunted Hill is what that that Ennis

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>House stood in for. But it is super brutalist. And

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because you had mentioned that the Mayan architecture

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>seems brutalist now, but it wasn't originally. It very much echoes. Yeah,

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>some sort of mezzo American architecture, almost like a mishmash

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, but it's you know, this is sort

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of what I was getting at, Like all of these

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>reasons that people hate brutalism is why we are losing

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>so many great brutalist buildings in the world. It's not

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 2>a hard sell to tear these things down a lot

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>of times in a city.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>No, And I have to say one other thing, the

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hatred of brutalism also is sometimes associated, depending on your

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>political beliefs, it's associated with the welfare state, because so

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>many were built as public housing. And so if you were, say,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, right leaning, or probably very far to the right,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you hate brutalism for that very reason. And it also

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is no coincidence that the era of brutalism ended abruptly

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>at nineteen eighty, which is the time when Reagan and

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Thatcher came to power and the welfare state was like, nope,

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>no more welfare state, or we're going to cut it

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so early that we're certainly not going to invest in

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>any brutalist architecture any longer. And it became associated not

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>just with totalitarian governments of the Eastern Bloc here in

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States, it also became associated on the right

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with welfare. And the right doesn't really like welfare very much,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>so they don't like brutalist architecture. Isn't that interesting?

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, super like they were looked at as blits a

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of times.

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, they became that way too, and that's that's another

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>reason why that they're they're under such attack. They show

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>their age pretty pretty poorly.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, over the years because they're not adorned, because

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>they have that rough concrete finish, water damage can happen

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot to cake can be really more evident. I

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 2>think that Paul Rudolph, he's a and when you say,

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you know famous brutalist architect is you got to be

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 2>in the know to kind of know these names.

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not like a Frank Lloyd, right, But Paul Rudolph's

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Orange County Government Center in Gosha, New York was torn down.

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 2>If you look this thing up, it is amazing looking.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I became a fan of Paul Rudolph's researching this.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd never heard of him before, but he was good.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 2>That building is unbelievable. But they tore it down. And

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't just because like, oh look at this big

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 2>blockie thing, but apparently it leaked from day one. There

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 2>was constant mold, there were always water issues. They were

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>having to closed courtrooms and move them around. And they

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>just did a cost study and it was like, retrofitting

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and making this thing a workable government center isn't even feasible,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 2>so they tore it down.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So I had a hard time getting to the bottom

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of this because I saw plenty of places that it

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was torn down. I also saw that it was going

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to be torn down, but they decided to do a

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>retrofit or a rehab of it instead, and that the update,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the refresh of it was so faithless to the original

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's no longer a brutalist building. I saw it

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 1>described as disfigured.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but either way, Paul Rudolph seems to be I

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think arch mag called him the unluckiest architect ever. Arc

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>mag Is it arc or.

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Arch Is it architecture?

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, why don't you just call it arc mag? Then

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>why do you have to add the H and make

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>me look stupid in front of everybody.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, I think it's kind of an awkward name.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, anyway, arc Slash arch Mag called him the unluckiest

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>architect around because so many of Paul Rudolph's buildings are

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just being torn down left and right, and I don't

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>even know that it's a distinct dislike of Paul Rudolph's work.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just people are tearing brutalist buildings down,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and his happened to be being torn down at a

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>faster rate than other architects brutalist buildings.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>And I know we're going to get email from someone

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 2>who works at that magazine that's like Chuck didn't know

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 2>what he's talking about. We call it arc mag right exactly,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Chocha's right mag Other buildings. Architect named Bertrand Goldberg designed

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the Prentice Women's Hospital in Chicago that was torn down. Yeah,

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>it was gorgeous.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how are you going to look at that and

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be like that's an ugly building. It was a a

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>elevated clover made of concrete. It was. It was gorgeous

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, And at the very least, even if you

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think these buildings are gorgeous, I get that, but

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're admirable for sure, like they're they're amazing

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>achievements for sure. I just don't think that they're ugly

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board. I think there's plenty of amazing brutalist buildings.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Out there, oh totally. It also doesn't help that and

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you found stuff from Jessica Stewart in My

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Modern met and Bigonia BESCO's great name in Arca magazine.

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot easier that they both talked about the

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>fact that these are basically that they can be kind

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 2>of a symbol of human abandonment, as what they said

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>in Arkham magazine. And if it starts to decay, it's

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>got these big, open bear concrete walls, so like obviously vandalism,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just gonna be. It's a it's a perfect canvas

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>for something like that. And I think Jessica Stewart's the

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>one that said they you know, they basically symbolized urban

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>decay at one point, and economic economic hardship.

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, that failure of the welfare state. And because

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they show their neglects so readily, because they're unadorned, because

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they're exposed concrete, they stood as symbols of like, yeah, look,

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how look how what a bad idea welfare is? Like

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just like this building is like a symbol of that.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And by the way I've I've been pronouncing it ersa magazine.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh is that not right?

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, we should take a break. We're gonna call

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 2>these magazines up and get get the record set straight

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll be right back after this.

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So, Chuck, I'm glad you said Paul Rudolph's Orange County

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Government Center was in Goshen, New York, because I definitely

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>would have said, gosh and no joke. And just want

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to say one more thing about that it had. It

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was made of three buildings. It had eighty seven roofs.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Just wrap your head around that for a second, right exactly,

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's just just wonderful. Look up some of Paul

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph's work and you're gonna be like, this is super

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy's awesomeness. Like that guy was talented.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. I think a lot of Frankloyd writes stuff

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 2>leaked though as well.

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was very famous for like some guy he

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>designed a house for said the roof is leaking on

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>my desk, and Frank Floyd right, so move the desk

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me, these guys get way too much

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of a pass, like, because part of architecture is to

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>make a building that doesn't leak too In addition to

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>making it awesome, it's.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Got to function as a as a place to live

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in or work in.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Exactly when we were in Mexico City. We went with

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>our two friends Mitch and Patrick, who are architects and designers,

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was explaining that to them too, and they're like, yeah,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely true. I was expecting pushback or whatever. They're like, no, no,

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 1>like they people. People do give famous architects way too

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>much of a pass, especially former legendary ones. Hopefully I

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't just get Mitch and Patrick in trouble.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. So. Okay, they're out of the they're

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 2>out of the club now, right. So if you're as

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>far as brutalism coming back, it is coming back in

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 2>certain ways. They're they're definitely. Even if you don't have

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>like a let let's say you have like a modern house,

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>or even not a modern house, you can decorate interior

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>in a little bit more brutalish style, and you know,

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes just a touch or two of that kind of

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 2>thing can really give you what you're looking for.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big fan of that. Our house stuff

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Works office used to be I guess new brutalist interior design.

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>It kind of chucked the boxes. I was never comfortable

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>there now.

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, isn't every office that's got concrete walls and

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 2>exposed air ducts and edison bulbs, aren't they're all sort

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of new brutalists.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Right kind of Yeah. And also it seems like little

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>geometric pattern copper knickknacks on shelves that float that don't

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really serve that much of a purpose. They're just decorative.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that either.

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 2>We had that great mural though, really warmed that that

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>plays up it did.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what happened to that because we're not in

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that building anymore, but surely they preserve the mural in.

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 2>That question mark table. Where the heck is that thing?

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know in space? I think.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Here though, in the twenty twenties, brutalism as an actual

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 2>architectural style is making a bit of a comeback. Like

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I said, I've seen quite a few houses in the

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 2>neighboring neighborhoods that are Some are just sort of like,

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, Hi, we're a blocky house, so that's more modern.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 2>But there are a couple that are are true brutalist,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 2>like concrete layers.

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It looks like there was a triumphant brutalist refurbishment here

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta back in twenty eighteen. The Central Atlanta Library

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>in downtown was designed by Marcel Brewer. Amazing building, but

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>apparently that was the last work that Brewer completed before

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he died, and I guess some of the design and

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the actual construction didn't quite jibe, and some

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of his original intentions were covered up. Like there was

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>an elevator that had to be centrally placed. That just

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>screwed things up quite a bit. And then they came

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>along and they added more lights, they refurbished the place,

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>they got rid of that central elevator, they opened it up.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a there's like a zigzagging staircase that's amazing.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That's now much more prominent, And in doing so, they

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>actually made the building closer to Marcel Brewer's original intentions

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>with his design than it was when it was built

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when Marcel Brewer was still alive. So like, that's an

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>example of the ideal of what's being done with brutalist buildings.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The opposite end is that they're being torn down because

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>people vote them as like the ugliest building of all time?

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Right, should we rattle off some of these famous ones? Yes, well,

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 2>architecture architect wise, is it Lewis or Louis? I never know.

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Lewis, but Lewis Khan was usually the first

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 2>nam ial here. If people are kind of throwing the

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 2>brutalist architect name around.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I mean, like you can make a pretty

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>good case that brutalism. I don't know if it's because

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the buildings were meant to take center stage or whatever,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>but there aren't. It's just not household names compared to

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>other movements, you know what I mean. Lewis Khan is

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely far and away the most famous, but I saw

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>that he's technically not even a brutalist. He just used

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>brutalist elements. There are some like we talked about Paul

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph of Vegenza, Sleigh Richter, Marcel Brewer. There's a lot

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of other really great I think Erno Goldfinger people you

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just have never heard of. These are just random names.

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.919
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like that a writer made up. No, they're

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>actually legit architects. They just aren't. Like this movement didn't

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>have like star power like some of the other movements did.

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and like we said, like Frank Lloyd Wright has

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>done a thing or two, but he's not known for that.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I am pay has dabbled in it in New York city.

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>If you see kIPS Bay Plaza by impay, very much brutalist,

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 2>but that's not how you know his name was made.

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>No, no, but there are ones there like Nope, I'm

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>brutalists through and through. The Smithson's obviously were brutalists because

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they founded the movement and one of the things they

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>completed was robin Hood Gardens, which was a housing estate

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen seventy two and it was.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 2>It's okay, brutal as brutal as brutalism gets it is.

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And part of it was demolished, just part of it right,

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually acquired. Three stories of the building

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>were acquired by the Victorian Albert Museum to preserve it

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's just such a fine example of brutalist architecture,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>even though to me it's kind of ugly. But London,

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>because this was the epicenter of the brutalist movement, the

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>creation of it, it has a lot of good examples

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of really good brutalist buildings. What Prince Charles has to

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>say about them, notwithstanding.

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, King Charles, but he Prince when he said that

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the Royal National Theater of London was a quote clever

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 2>way of building a nuclear power station in the middle

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>of London without anyone objecting, right, I think it's cool looking.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was gonna say it's hilarious. But he's a

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>madman for saying that. I think he came up with

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a clever quip and was going to use it at

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all costs, because anyone who looks at the Royal National

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Theater it isn't like that's an amazing building, is wrong.

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Wrong.

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It was also at the time, Princess Charles's best

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 2>stab at it telling a joke.

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, he was apparently well known for being a mean

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 1>critic in the media about architecture in particular. I didn't

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 1>realize that, but that was like one of his greatest

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>hits from what I can tell. But the thing about

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the Royal National Theater, it had really great horizontal and

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>vertical lines that were harmonious, which can be unusual for

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>a brutalist building, but even more unusual, it fit the

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>site that it's it's on. It's not imposed like every

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>other brutalist building of all time. If there's ever been

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.479
<v Speaker 1>a brutalist building that fit the site that Royal National Theater,

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is it.

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure? For my money. If you want to

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 2>have your socks knocked off by a blocky architectural gym,

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>then you should go to Montreal and look at Safti's

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 2>habitat sixty seven. It was built for the nineteen sixty

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 2>seven World Spare there in Montreal, and it is super

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>cool looking. It looks like something a child might build

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 2>out of building blocks.

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I've got one. The Peace Center in Hiroshima. I really

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like every American should go there. It's amazing. The

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Japanese in the wake of Hiroshima and Nagasaki being bombed

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>by nuclear bombs, their response was to build this peace

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>center to preserve what happened for generations to come, so

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>that it never happened again. They turned peacenik rather than

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>retributive or vengeance. It's a pretty amazing response if you

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it. And so it's a pretty amazing center.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>And Kenzo Tonge, who was a student of like Corbusier,

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>started it in nineteen fifty and it's just a long

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>rectangular structure that seems to be kind of floating on

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the horizon. It's just a really amazing place, really amazing museum.

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It just has a it's just it gets you in

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>ways that like I'd never been gotten before.

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Just five years after the bomb was dropped too, so

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that like how heavy was that still in the air,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you know?

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I mean in Hiroshima, like it's I mean,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a part of the town. Oh, they preserved a

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>bank that was just completely wasted, but the frame was

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>still there. It's preserved. They build a fence around it

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and the blocks are still where they landed after the

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>bomb was dropped, like it they didn't touch it after that,

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>They just cording it. Often now it's part of this

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the museum. Parts of the city, entire parts of the

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>city have become part of this living outdoor museum. It's

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just amazing.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Japan. It's got to happen for me one day.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes it does. And seriously, go to Hiroshima. It's really something. Yeah,

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it's also a really cool town too. In addition to

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole museum segment on it.

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, if you go to Tunisia and tunis the hotel

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 2>do lack and if you look at the if you

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 2>look at that building and you say, man, if you

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 2>chopped off the back of that thing, that would be

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.839
<v Speaker 2>a sand crawler that the jaw was rolled around in

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in Star Wars, then you would probably not be surprised

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to know that and supposedly inspired George Lucas. I say

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 2>it had to have been, because when you look at

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.240
<v Speaker 2>that building, it looks just like that thing, that inverted pyramid.

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Four hundred and sixteen rooms over ten floors. It's really something,

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.439
<v Speaker 2>and inverted pyramids are sort of a brutalless thing as well.

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's a great example.

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean it was open in seventy three

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and he was there shooting in the like years later,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>so it was definitely there in Tuness while he was there,

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So I buy that totally. One of the most famous

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>brutalist buildings in the United States, if not in the world,

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Geyisol Library you see San Diego. It was

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>originally called the Central Library, but Ted Geisel, doctor Seuss's widow, Audrey,

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>donated twenty million dollars in the university said let's just

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>rename it in honor of you.

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 2>And Ted, well, she said ten million dollars and they

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 2>kept the name, and she was like fifteen, right, and

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 2>then she said, what do I gotta do to get

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>our name on the front of that thing?

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 2>This building is amazing. I mean, and this is again

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 2>as an example of how like just sort of the

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 2>variety that you can find in a brutalist building when

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 2>you look at this compared to the robin Hood Gardens

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>building in London.

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, this one really prominently makes use of glass,

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>which can be rare for a brutalist building. And yet

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it, you're like, that is a

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>brutalist building. It's just an amazing, beautiful brutalist building.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it. I can't wait go back to

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Mexico City and see some of that stuff for sure.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Also, I would strongly advise anyone not to make a

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>drinking game out of how often we say brutalist in

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this episode, because we said it a lot.

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>They already have drinking games of all that stuff on Reddit.

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, but don't do this one because you would die.

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Soone said I counted how many times you said like

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>in the like episode, and I was like, well, yeah.

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of the name of the episode.

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 2>How many times did we say lama in the Lama episode?

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Plus we had our additional likes because we talk

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 2>like regular people.

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>One other thing too, Chuck, if you want to see

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>cool post apocalyptic brutalist architecture used really adeptly an illustration.

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Go check out Eternal Dystopia's YouTube videos. Did I send

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you that one called Research Center? It's like drone music,

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's the video is like just this. It's like this,

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like a dystopian brutalist building, kind of set in the

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>haze and sometimes it's raining. I'll send it to you again.

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really amazing. But the drone music alone is pretty cool.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>So check that out.

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>You had the drone lately.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I am because it's not distracting. It helps you. Yeah,

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it helps me focus, you know, I like it. Well,

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>check said he likes it, which means everybody that it's

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>time for listener maw.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Oh boy, it's another correction. But Josh, this one

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 2>is on me.

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now you're talking.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 2>I think the first one may have been on us.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But in the Nuclear Boy Scott episode, we said USS

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Enterprise was a nuclear submarine. Yeah, it's in fact an

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 2>aircraft carrier. But the big one was when we had

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 2>our sort of brief debate about military discharge and I

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 2>was just wrong, wrong, wrong, because I thought if you

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>just served all your time, then they just called it

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>leaving the military.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you just stopped showing up one day.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 2>You just stop showing up, or you call it retirement

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.439
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. I didn't think it was. I thought any

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 2>time you left before your time was up was the

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 2>only time it was called the discharge. Sure not. So

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>we heard from a lot of our current service members

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and veterans, but this one's from Scott Oliver. He said, guys,

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 2>what Chuck said was not correct. Any way you leave

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the service is some form of discharge. And then he

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 2>goes over this was the most detailed one. So we're

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 2>going to read these discharges. You got the honorable discharge.

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 2>It's the highest level, given to those who complete their

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 2>service and are discharged or are discharged early for no

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 2>faults of their own, like a medical issue. That's what

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 2>you want to shoot for.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 2>General discharge lower level, but given to those who have

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 2>like a minor misconduct or a performance issue. I was

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 2>going to hazard a comical guess on what that might be,

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:01.880
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not gonna. Okay, there's other than honorable or

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 2>the ot H. That's a negative level. So now you've

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 2>crossed the rubicon and you're not good anymore. And it's

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>given to people who have serious misconduct or violations of regulations.

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Then there are two more. You've got the bad conduct

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 2>discharge or the BCD. This is actually punitive, and that

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 2>is if you were convicted by a court martial for

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 2>something like desertion or assault or there and then you

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 2>know we've got last, don't you. Yeah, dishonorable and that

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>is a punishment for a serious offense, like committing a felony.

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Sorry for being pedantic, guys, you weren't at all, Scott.

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 2>But as a veteran, I find myself particularly attuned to

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Roney's statements about military matters, and that's every veteran, Scott,

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 2>So you're in good company, and we heard from a

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of service members and all apologies for screwing that up.

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes when I say things off the dome without researching,

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 2>quite often in fact, i'm dead wrong.

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Man. Well, you really owned it, Chuck, like somebody with

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>an honorable discharge.

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thank you.

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It was Scott Scott Oliver. Thanks a lot, Scott. You

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't pedantic at all. Chuck's right. That was very nicely

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>put and we appreciate being schooled. And also, Chuck, thank

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>you for selecting one where you were wronging, not me.

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess we were military school.

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch of this like

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Scott did and school us and do it nicely. We

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>love that kind of thing, you can send it in

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>an email to stuff podcast at iHeartRadio dot com. Stuff

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.