WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Deere, McDonalds Earnings 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough?

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Business, breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Window between the peak and cunt changing super.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Fast Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele and I'm normal Linda filling in for

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 4>On today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show. We're going to dig inside

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 4>the big business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies in one

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Today, we'll take a look at it TD Bank because

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 4>exiting it's in Charles Schwab.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we'll discuss why sales at the fast food giant

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's improved last quarter.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>But first we take a look at earnings from the

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 4>farm machinery leader Deer.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>This week, Deer said that North American sales are expected

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>to be down thirty percent this year for Maura.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 4>And Nora and I were joined by Christopher Chiolino, Bloomberg

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence Senior US machinery analyst, and we first asked Chris

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 4>for his take on this week's earnings report.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 5>We knew going into the quarter that was going to

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 5>be a pretty ugly print, but these results were really

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 5>well below even some of the most bearish expectations. The

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 5>company really continues to underproduce retail demand across the board

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 5>to bring down some of the excess inventories that the

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 5>industry has been plagued with. We also sounds like some

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 5>products there were some timing issues, so products got pushed

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 5>out to subsequent quarters, which which weighed on the one

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Q performance. Now, Deer did reaffirm its twenty twenty five

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 5>net income outlook, and it certainly seems that we are

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 5>approaching a cyclical trough this year.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 4>But just our.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Concern lies that you know, earnings may not be fully

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 5>de risked here. You continue to see further softness on

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 5>the largeag side used equipment inventories remain somewhat of an overhang.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Currency headwinds are going to be more pronounced in the

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 5>back half, and really we still have this uncertainty around

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 5>what the US trade policy is going to be and

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 5>what and what those retaliatory actions are going to be

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, I was going to say, if they sound relatively

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>confident they'll be at trough, but then you add on tariffs,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>how well does that confidence hold up?

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean that's the million dollar question, right, I mean,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 5>I would say that AG historically has had a tremendous

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 5>amount of pricing power and deer in particular, this is

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 5>a company in a market that even gets positive price

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 5>in down markets. You know, this quarterly sales were down

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 5>over thirty five percent, earnings down significantly, and we were

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 5>still up on pricing. It will add costs, but they

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>have a history and the track record of being able

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 5>to pass those through.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 3>What has really been concern for investors out of this

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 3>report as they're looking forward?

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think there's two big concerns here. One is,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 5>you know, the expectation is that yes, twenty five is

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 5>trough and that we should start to see that this

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 5>recovery build into twenty six. But I still think there's

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 5>a lot of uncertainty out there as to what the

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 5>recovery trajectory looks like, just given the uncertainty around trade

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 5>and tariffs, you know, I think we're probably looking at

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 5>a lower for longer type cycle. So maybe we don't

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 5>get that typical acceleration in the first year after a

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>cyclical trough. So I think investors are still trying to

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 5>digest that. And then too, you know, the costs side

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 5>of the equation. It certainly seems that costs are going

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 5>to go up. How are they going to mitigate that

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 5>through some of their you know, internal initiatives or even

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 5>from shifting some production around with their footprint.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>I also am wondering where we are in terms of

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the cyclicality of equipment, Like are are farmers operating on

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 4>older stuff that they're going to have to replace or

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 4>did they already do that during the pandemic. So they're

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 4>good for a while, and it's going to take like

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>really new high tech products to get them to fork

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>over that kind of cash.

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 5>I think we're good for a little bit a little

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>bit of time here. I mean, you have to remember,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 5>up we had you know, three four strong years of

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 5>growth up to the twenty twenty three peak. Yes, twenty

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 5>four was a down year. We were down, you know,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 5>fifteen sixteen percent in terms of units on high horsepower equipment.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 5>We're looking at somewhere of a twenty five to thirty

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 5>percent decline in volumes this year. So that's going to

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 5>put us, you know, att lows of you know, over

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>the last two decades where we haven't seen before. So

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 5>from these levels, we think there's probably limited downside risk.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 5>But you know, farmers still have the ability to you know,

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 5>push out some of these replacement purchases at least for

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 5>another few years, we think.

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Our Thanks to Christopherciellino, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior US Machinery analyst,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>we moved next.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 4>To the energy sector. This week's shares of the British

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>oil giant BP surge the most is twenty twenty.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>This came after news of the activist investor Elliott Investment

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Management said it built a stake in BP.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 4>And this comes as Elliott seeks to end years of

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>underperformance at BP by pushing for significant change for more.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Alex and I were joined by Will Harris, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 3>Global Energy analysts.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Will what all of the problems are

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 4>that Elliott wants to fix.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 6>I think there's too many to really go through, given

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 6>there our time constraints here, but I think they can

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 6>really boil down to a significant moment, which was the

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 6>original rollout of their twenty twenty energy transition strategy. This

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 6>is the quickest, most risky energy transition of all the

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 6>energy global energy majors, and it sort of it depicted

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 6>a pretty quick drop in their upstream hydrocarbon production, a

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 6>really rapid rollout of their renewables portfolio. And obviously this

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 6>has not been taken well by the market. It's undermined

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 6>the sustainability of their distribution, it's hit their returns, and

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 6>especially now when we are seeing a sort of backlash

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 6>against ESG, we're seeing a slowing of energy transition paces

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 6>across this sector. It hasn't gone down well for BP's

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 6>financial performance or share evaluation.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 4>So well, if we go back to that moment in

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty, and I was there when they laid out

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 4>this new strategy. Was that a bad strategy or is

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 4>it bad timing or some combination.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 6>There is some part of me that has a little

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 6>bit of sympathy for BP because because I think they

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 6>were trying to do the right thing, and then of

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 6>course Russia's invasion of Ukraine sort of up ended the

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 6>global energy sector pretty materially. I also think that they were, yes,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 6>trying to do the right thing, but doing the right

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 6>thing isn't isn't always what's best for investors, And I

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 6>think just comparing it to some of their their peers,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 6>particularly Shell, which has taken a much much more capital

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 6>discipline approach, they have a very high bar for acquisitions.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 6>They've been very prudent in their energy transition rollout, and

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 6>we can just see in the financial performance and how

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 6>the market is valuing them, which has been the more

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 6>successful strategy over the last four or five years.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>As we think about BP in particular, what really can

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 3>they do in this moment? What are investors really looking for?

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 6>So I think I think I'll touch on what Elliott

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 6>is I think going to try and do. There's four

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 6>levers that I think Elliott might try and pull here,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 6>and the first is transition business spin off, so this

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 6>can remove debt and capital intensity of these businesses off

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 6>the balance sheet. We think they'll push to focus on

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 6>growing their oil production. More, the current oil production is

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 6>supposed to be declining about ten percent to twenty thirty.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 6>We can hope to see that flatten or increase over

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 6>that same time period, and I think there could be

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 6>a push for a board change. The chairman of the board,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 6>helgat Lund, has overseen VP since twenty seventeen and compared

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 6>to peers, there's been pretty underwhelming performance there and then

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 6>finally a primary US listing. I think that this could

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 6>be a big game changer. It has not only been

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 6>discussed at BP, but amongst the other European majors. It's

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 6>seen as a major hurdle to starting to close that

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 6>valuation gap with Chevron and exon our thanks.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>To Will Harris, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Energy Analysts, we.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Move next to the leisure sector. Bloomberg Intelligence recently gave

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>his twenty twenty five outlook on cruises and theme parks.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>And for more. We were joined by Jody Lori, Bloomberg

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence Senior Credit Analysts.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Jody what she expects to perform well

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 4>for cruise lines this year.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 7>I will say that the most fascinating thing is the

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 7>momentum continues for the cruise lines. The booking rates continue

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 7>to be very high, and we're seeing that Royal Caribbean,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing that Carnival, and that's what management is communicating.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 7>Whether or not that continues into twenty six is the

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 7>question that we're grappling with. But at least for twenty five,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 7>it's very very positive moment.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Jody, it seems like demand out there for experiences is

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>still very strong. How about for a family that's thinking

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 2>about a theme park trip versus maybe a cruise, how

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>does that kind of shake out?

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, Paul, I think you hit on the major

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 7>issue is that we're seeing these sort of two sets

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 7>of consumers, right the lower end consumers that are pairing

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 7>back or they're still doing experiences, but maybe not as

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 7>lavish an experience. And then you have the high end

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 7>consumers that are still doing very well. High end hotels

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 7>are doing well, high end cruise lines are doing well,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 7>anything that's higher end. If you put that in the

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 7>perspective of theme parks, one thing that we saw in

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 7>our survey that we ran in November is that for

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 7>theme park vacations, the average consumers income level is a

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 7>little bit lower than the average consumer that's planning to

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 7>do a cruise vacation this year. So I think that's

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 7>pretty telling when you think about the cost of admission,

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 7>when you think about who the target audiences and what's

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 7>going to continue the cash flow generation for the cruise

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 7>lines versus what might be a little bit of a

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 7>sticking point for the theme parks.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Jody.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 8>One of the earliest memories I have of the very

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 8>earliest days of the pandemic was these cruise lines rushing

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 8>out to the bond market. They're raise cash because they

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 8>knew that their business was in for a tough haul there.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 8>How are the balance sheets of some of these big

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 8>cruise companies theme park companies, How are the balance sheets

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:25.599
<v Speaker 8>these days?

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 7>So we're going to break it out to the cruise

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 7>versus the theme parks in terms of their balance sheets.

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 7>So for the cruise lines, you know, particularly Carnival and

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 7>Royal Caribbean, they are dead set on getting to investment

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 7>grade level metrics. Norwegian says that they want to as well,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 7>They've never been investment grade rated. But Carnival and Royal

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 7>Caribbean are really set on keeping leverage very low. They're

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 7>focused on that. Carnival's targeting three point five times by

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 7>the end of next year, so twenty twenty six, Royal

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 7>is targeting below three times this year. What we've modeled

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 7>out is that they can both get there and their

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 7>relatively comfortably. I mean, they've been pretty aggressive in terms

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 7>of de leveraging bringing down the debt load. Viking is

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 7>pretty happy where it is, so we don't see them

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 7>improving much. But they also have a low leverage. Now,

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 7>if you think of the theme parks, they repaid their debt.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 7>They had this gravy of a year in twenty twenty two,

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 7>everybody rushed to theme parks, regional theme parks. Since then,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 7>it hasn't been as exciting twenty twenty two to twenty three,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 7>I should say, And what we're seeing there is a

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 7>little bit more problem now. SeaWorld really doesn't have that

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 7>much debt outstanding. So where we're concerned there is that

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 7>they start getting creative with their balance sheet again, particularly

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 7>if they're finding issues in the business as a whole

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 7>and they need to propel sort of. You know, the

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 7>equity value improving for six Flags. You know, they had

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 7>the merger between six Fags and cedar Fare and that

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 7>is resulting in much higher leverage. Management already bumped out

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 7>the target of when they're bringing down leverage, and we

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 7>already think that it might be a little bit harder

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 7>to achieve even pushing it out by a year and

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 7>a half.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Jody Laurie Bloomberg Intelligency, your credit analysts.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 4>All right, coming to have a conversation with the chief

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 4>financial officer over at Huntington National Bank on the firm's

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 4>outlook and opportunities ahead.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 3>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>b I go on the terminal. I'm Normal Linda, and

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele, and.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele and I'm Normal Linda. Filling in for

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 4>We move next to the banking sector and Huntington National Bank.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Co host Paul Sweeney and I were recently joined by

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Zach Wasserman, chief financial officer at Huntington National Bank.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>He discussed where the firm's focus has been and how

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 3>it's never been better positioned to benefit from significant organic

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 3>opportunities ahead.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 4>And Zach began this portion of the conversation by discussing

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 4>how the bank is now trying to expand beyond lending

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 4>to small businesses.

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 9>The business has been performing exceptionally well recently, and one

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 9>of the reasons is because we're driving expansion both geographically

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 9>and in our commercial business, expanding in a number of

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 9>special divertical areas and national business lines. Just this year,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 9>we've launched into three new states, North Carolina, South Carolina,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 9>and Texas, and we've also established eight new special verticals

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 9>that are national, for example of funds financed vertical that's

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 9>supporting private equity clients, one that's focused on the mortgage ecosystem,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 9>and other national commercial areas.

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 10>Talk to us about loan growth. What I do know

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 10>about the bank business. That's an important driver. So talk to.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Shot loan growth, where it's coming from, where you're seeing it,

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 2>and is it kind of in line.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 9>With what you were expecting You know, we've actually had

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 9>very strong loan growth of the last two years. If

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 9>you take a step back, much of the industry has

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 9>been in a pretty neutral position, not actually growing. Huntington

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 9>has grown outperformed that by about ten percentage points. And

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 9>for us, the growth is coming from both our core business,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 9>which is consumer small business and then mid corporate typically

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 9>private commercial clients, and then also these new initiatives that

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.599
<v Speaker 9>I just mentioned before launching into three New states, a

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 9>number of specialty businesses.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 10>So we're seeing a nice breadth of growth.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 9>Actually, one thing that's actually, you know, a nice indication

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 9>of the economic strength is we're seeing strong demand from

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 9>small businesses from our regional banking business, typically in the

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 9>kind of smaller middle market client sets. So it's a

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 9>it's been a healthy dynamic we've been.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Seeing before you were in this position. You also was

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 4>chief financial officer to Visa, and I know that Huntington

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 4>is trying to get into the payments business in a

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 4>particular way too. What's the what's the market for that

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 4>and how do you guys play and compete in that?

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, the market for payments is incredibly broad, and

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 9>if you think if you took a step back.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 4>To categorize it actually, like is that zell or like

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 4>what is that?

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 9>You know, it is so broad, the one that really

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 9>needs to zoom into it. You know, we have a

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 9>number of card based payment products, so think consumer cards,

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 9>commercial cards, but also importantly treasury management, and that's really

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 9>the biggest driver right now. We're seeing in payments growth

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 9>supporting commercial clients with the ability to accept payments and

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 9>then make payments in essentially every form you can imagine, Alex,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 9>so big big growth driver there. One of the things

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 9>that we've done recently is invest to expand our merchant

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 9>acquisition capability. Merchant acquiring is when a company accepts payments electronically,

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 9>and it's often the lynchpin of their business. Saw the

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 9>lifeblood of the company is how they accept payments. So

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 9>we launched a merchant acquiring business just in October and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 9>it's been going incredibly well. So, you know, kind of

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 9>almost every area there's growth in payments for sure, but

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 9>for us, treasury management and commercial payments in particular as

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 9>a major growth driver.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about your long portfolio, specifically your exposure to.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 9>Office, yeah, real estate, you know, office and commercial real

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 9>estate generally for Huntington is.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:01.479
<v Speaker 10>A very small exposure.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 9>Actually, typically for large regional banks, the average commercial real

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 9>estate within the loan portfolio might be fifteen or twenty

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 9>percent of the loan book.

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 10>For us, it's nine percent, so.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 9>We're relatively smaller and an office is only one percent

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 9>of that nine To give you a sense. With that

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 9>being said, you know what we're seeing in that commercial

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 9>real estate environment is this is gonna this is gonna

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 9>be a situation that.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 10>Plays out over multiple years.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 9>Thankfully, we are seeing a fairly orderly process of refinancing

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 9>and generally seeing pretty sound ability for our commercial real

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 9>estate developers to maintain their financing and to successfully.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 10>Roll through maturities. But it'll take a while to run through.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 9>To give you a sense, something like twenty percent of

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 9>the portfolio matures any given year, so this will be

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, on average, it'll take five years to really

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 9>roll through. So I think that's a kind of an

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 9>industry dynamic we're seeing, which this is a dynamic that

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 9>will play out over quite sometime.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 4>What part of this is encompasses any kind of m

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 4>and as is organic yees.

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, for us we're focused on organic growth m

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 9>and A. It can be a tool for banks to grow.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 9>Certainly we've seen m and A in the industry over time.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 9>With that being said, it can also be distracting to

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 9>the progress that the company is making on organic growth.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 9>And for US Alex, we're seeing so much progress on

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 9>our organic growth initiatives, both acquiring customers but also importantly

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 9>putting more and more focus around the value added fee

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 9>services that come around that come to them, namely payments,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 9>wealth management, and capital markets, and so, you know, just

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 9>the customer acquisition. We're seeing the success in those businesses.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 9>That's where our focus is. To give you a sense

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 9>in the fourth quarter just that we just closed a

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 9>ten percent year of year revenue growth, really driven by

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 9>those organic strategies.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 8>What's a typical corporate customer for you guys?

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 9>You know, often, Paul, they are middle market companies that

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 9>are private.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 10>That's the most typical company.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, the regional banks serve a really important niche

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 9>within the overall US economy because you know, the client

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 9>set that we are servicing are typically you know, focused

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 9>on their local market.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 10>They want a bank with a company that.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 9>Is deeply embedded in the community and knows them personally.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 9>But importantly can bring down to them the power of

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 9>a large bank in terms of specialized capabilities. It's actually

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 9>one of the reasons why we've been so successful in

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 9>these new geographic launches.

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 10>How about private credit?

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Is that a competitor to you?

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's funny we get this question all the time,

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 9>and the answer generally is no, okay.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 10>You know, private credit.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Is looking for the sort of you know, the kind

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 9>of loans that they finance are typically where there's more leverage,

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 9>where there's more yield to be had. Because of the risk,

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 9>that's not the core client for Huntington, and so our

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 9>head of Commercial Business mentioned that only in two cases

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 9>last year across our entire business did we see commercial

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 9>borrowers actually go to a price a credit facility away

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 9>from our own lending facility.

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Art thanks to Zach Wasserman, chief financial officer at Huntington

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>National Bank.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm staying in finance. This week, Canada's TD Banks that

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 4>it's offloading its entire ten point one percent stake in

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 4>the financial services firm Charles Schwab.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 3>And this comes as part of a corporate overhaul. In October,

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 3>TD Bank reached the settlement with the US Department of

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Justice and bank regulators over its failure to catch money

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>laundering at several American branches.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 4>For Moura and Nora and I were joined by Paul Goldberg,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity analyst.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Paul why TD Bank would offload it's

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 3>full stake in Charles Schwab.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's necessarily strategic Cox. I think it's

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 11>partially to simplify the business. Also, TD got hit with

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 11>AML investigation and was fine, then got an asset cap

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 11>in the US, so they can really grow in the

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 11>US much larger on the bank inside. Sounds like they

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 11>trying to simplify the business, having the ability to buy

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 11>back some stock, have some extra capital in handhand.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Where does TD's business currently if you were to give

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>us a broader perspective, how is it lining up against competitors?

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think that you have to look at it

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 11>in two different areas. One in Canada. So in Canada

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 11>with the one of the largest banks across personal and

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 11>commercial banking. In the US, they again one of the

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 11>largest banks, but they very much personally focused all over

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 11>the east coast of the US.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 4>So what is going to take for them to get

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 4>their asset cap raised in the US.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 11>I think it'll take a long time.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 4>But what's the problem that the FED highlighted, Well.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 11>The FEED highlighted is they mL deficiencies which they trying

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 11>to fix. It costs them a lot of money they

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 11>invested in it, but it can take years. So if

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 11>we'll look at what's happening to Wells farga we're in

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 11>eight years and they're still trying to get out from

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 11>under that.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it always seems like nebulous. It's like we

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 4>have an asset cap, but it's not like you check

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 4>these three boxes and it's gone. It's sort of like,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 4>at least for Wells Fargo, because it's like risk management.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 4>It's controls that's making sure that you know everyone's on

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 4>board doing the right thing at the right time, which

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 4>can be very difficult.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you take away from this idea of the

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 3>repurchasing of its for.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 11>TD or for swap. They both do so for TD.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 11>I think they repurchasing on the fraction of that. So

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 11>they's take in Canadian dollars is about twenty billions. That

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 11>fourteen billion they repurchasing only eight So the impact on

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 11>TV shares from this sale of from the sale of

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 11>Schwap shares is about seven percent of the earnings. They're

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 11>going to repurchase back six so mostly neutralize that kind

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 11>of impact. The rest is going to add a whole

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 11>point of capital to them so that they can be

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 11>invested in other sides of the business. But because they

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 11>kept in the US, which makes it very challenging because

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 11>they have they'll have to figure ways to invest adding

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 11>to capital markets, which they're doing right now, or domestically Schwab.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 11>They only bind one percent of the ten percent stake

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 11>that's being sold, but TD is still keeping the depository relationships,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 11>so I think it's strategic more on the TD's side

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 11>rather than having any impact on Schwap side.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Is this bad news for the Swap side of things?

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 11>I don't think, so that's what I'm saying. It's a

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 11>strategic decision on t D side to simplify their business.

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 11>They're still keeping the deposits relationship, which clearly says that

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 11>they're working well with Schwab and the TD is going

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 11>to put a decent gain on sale and this kind

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 11>of thing. So I think that's nothing wrong with the

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 11>schwab its, just big stake of the company's going up

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 11>in the open market, right.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Totally switching to TD and their actual Canadian business. How

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 4>are they doing there?

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 11>They're doing pretty well, right, So the second largest bank domestically,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 11>right after the RBC. They've been very consistent right on

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 11>the mortgage side, on their commercial operations and everywhere, so

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 11>they've been doing well. But it's an extremely competitive market.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 11>That's why the concern is that they're going to have

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 11>this all extra capital that they're going to try to

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 11>invest domestically into a super competitive.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Market and breakdown in Canada. There's fewer banks than we

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 3>have a million over here, so like, how do they

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 3>shake up in terms of their competition in Canada? How

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 3>do they line up the well.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 11>Their competition there are six largest banks, or some people

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 11>call it five plus one because National Bank is a

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 11>little bit smaller, even though they just finalize in the

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 11>closure of Canadian Western Bank, that's going to expand them

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 11>a little bit. But some people describe that market as

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 11>a competitive monopoly between these banks. So there's some smaller

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 11>banks and credit unions, but these banks control ninety plus

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 11>percent of deposits and loans in the country, so very

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 11>very concentrated, and they compete very aggressively against everything, so

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 11>the market shares when you see them shift. We're talking

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 11>about basis points here and there from period to period.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 4>All right, thanks to Paul Goldberg, Bloomberg Intelligence and your

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 4>equity analyst, you're.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 3>research and data on two thousand companies and one hundred

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I go on the terminal. I'm normal ind and I'm

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steele, and.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You were listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch the

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>program live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele and I'm normal Linda filling in for

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney. We move now to earnings from the fast

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 3>food giant McDonald's. This week, McDonald's reported that its sales

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 3>rose in the fourth quarter, and this comes after growth

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>in the chains international business made up for a decline

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 3>in the US.

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 4>For Maura Nora and I were dorma Michael hallon Bloomberg

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence and your Restaurant and food service Analyst, and we

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 4>first asked Michael for his broad read on these latest results.

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, the most important piece of the report really

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 12>is the US recovery post e Coli, and we got

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 12>some good news on that front. So traffic was actually

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 12>positive in December, so I think that was much better

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 12>than anyone had expected. They cited kind of a choppy

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 12>January here, but the only the only region still impacted

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 12>by ECOLI seems to be the Rocky Mountain region where

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 12>the outbreak occurred, and they expect a full US recovery

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 12>by the beginning of the second quarter, which is good news.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 4>What about the rest of the world versus the US,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 4>It was the rest of the world that really performed well.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, And a big part of that was just

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 12>lapping like pretty weak year ago results, right, so we

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 12>wrapped the start of the of the Israel Hamas war,

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 12>and so the Middle East was stronger. Countries with large

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 12>Muslim populations were also stronger. And then also China lapped

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 12>a very weak result last year, and management cited some

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 12>stabilization in that market, which is encouraging for them. So

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 12>the easy comps was what really fueled international sales. You know,

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 12>we're kind of more bullish on the US moving forward

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 12>than international, you know, because outside of the Middle East,

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 12>in China, Europe is we think is going to continue

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 12>to kind of be an issue for them. The Arizona

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 12>is experienced it's seeing much higher inflation than the US

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 12>and that's really crimping low income and family spending on

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 12>the continent.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Are people still buying the Big Mac.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 12>They don't break out Big Mac sales, but they cited

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 12>pretty strong results out of the Chicken Big Mac, which

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 12>I was kind of surprised about. You know, my associate

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 12>tried it, he was not a big fan. But but yeah,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 12>they cited, you know, pretty strong results out of the

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 12>Chicken Big Mac in the United States and other markets.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 12>I think France was who they called out specifically and

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 12>to the point where they're going to continue to you know,

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 12>bring it back as a limited time offerre.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 10>In the future.

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 4>So I was actually talking to an ib user, a

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg user about this. Why are McDonald's franchises elsewhere like

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 4>at rest of world so much better than in the

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 4>US and that like you can get like super good

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>food that doesn't taste like fast food. Why is that?

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Jonathan Farrowe asked me the same thing, said he

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 12>wants them all to be like the you know McDonald's

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 12>in Italy, you know. And the answer I had there

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 12>was just more discerning tastes, right, that.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Might be it, No, but really, like is it? I mean,

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 4>does it affect margins? Like what are the margins like

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 4>in the US versus the rest of the world.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 12>We don't We don't have that information, you know what

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 12>I mean. It's a franchise business, right, so.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 6>You know what I mean.

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 12>So, so we don't have a ton of color on

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 12>all the different franchise markets and what kind of margins

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 12>they pull in. You know, the US generally is a

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 12>lower margin for the franchise business, just because they have

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 12>a lot more franchisees and need a lot more oversight.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 12>The international franchise business tends to generate wider margins.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So I always used to think about McDonald's is a

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 3>really cheap place, a discount fast food place, but prices

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 3>are getting higher. Are we still seems demand from lower

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 3>income consumers for the brand.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 12>You know, it continues to be the weak spot at

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 12>McDonald's and for anyone that has a lot of exposure

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 12>to low income consumers. So the entire QSR space, right,

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 12>Jack in the Box, Wendy's, Burger King. You know, a

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 12>lot a lot of chains, you know, struggled last year

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 12>because of their inability to draw low income consumers. You know,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 12>they're impacted most by inflation.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 10>We've had four plus years.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 12>Of restaurant price hikes and higher costs across the board, right,

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.239
<v Speaker 12>and so you know, chains that are exposed to low

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 12>income consumers are going to continue to press on value

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 12>to try to bring them into the fold. You know,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 12>it seemed like it didn't seem like restaurants sales did

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 12>improve for a quick service in the fourth quarter, and

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 12>we think a big part of that is just a

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 12>re establishing of their value proposition.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 12>McDonald's early last year got a lot of shade about

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 12>the eighteen dollars big Mac meal in Connecticut, and so

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 12>they decided to push hard on value, and prior to

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 12>the E Coli outbreak, you know, October.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 10>Had some really good results.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 12>They were drawing customers in with that five dollars meal

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 12>deal and traffic was positive for the first time during

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 12>the year. So value pushing on value has been successful

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 12>for McDonald's. That's not good for their competitors because McDonald's

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 12>has the most scale, right, But we think this is

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 12>going to continue throughout twenty twenty five in the quick

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 12>service industry.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>So just to confirm, you're saying there was a meal

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that came up to eighteen dollars.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 4>She totally missed this. She totally missed this one.

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it was one franchisee in Connecticut. No comment, No,

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 12>fair enough, fair enough. But he was he was pushing

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 12>back because he, you know, he was dealing with a

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 12>lot of inflation and he was just, you know, he

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 12>wanted to make some money on the big McNeal. He

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 12>was trying to make a point.

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence senior Restaurant and

0:29:58.480 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>food service analysts.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg n EF

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 4>previously known as New Energy Finance. They're the team at

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 4>to power, transport, industries, buildings, and agricultural sectors.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>This week we looked at the energy sector and how

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 3>it's being impacted by Donald Trump's presidency in the United States.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 3>For more, Alex and I were joined by Derek Fletgall

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 3>b Any F lead US policy analysts.

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 4>We first asked Derek, where we stand today with the

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 4>energy transition.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 13>Where we stand today is at a point of uncertainty

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 13>and early consolidation. At this point, we've heard a variety

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 13>of conflicting reports about the release or lack thereof, of

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 13>obligated federal funding for climate grants. We've heard reports that

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 13>EPA has released some others that are implicated by some

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 13>of the presidents DEI related orders, anything with an environmental

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 13>justice or a community benefits component have been more affected.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 13>And meanwhile, at the executive level, we've seen some people

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 13>at Brook Rawlins the USDA, Doug Bergham at the Department

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 13>of Interior, and Chris Wright at the Department of Energy

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 13>get into place and put forward their formal priorities. So,

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 13>with that early staffing up in place and continued uncertainty

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 13>about the release of funds, we are kind of looking

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 13>at a wait and see period, seeing how things shake

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 13>out in the courts and in the executive branch itself.

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, it definitely has been a massive makeover that Trump

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 3>has been planning to do and it is continuing to

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>do right now in terms of federal agencies. But are

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 3>there any areas in particular that you're keeping an eye on.

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I know that there's things going on in terms of

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 3>EV charging funding right absolutely.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 13>I mean sectors that were specifically named in Trump's executive orders,

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 13>oil and gas. They're supposed to be four momentum on that,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 13>as well as electric vehicles and electricfical charging and offshor win.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 13>In particular, EV charging saw a pause on existing dispersements

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 13>of funds from the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program. That's

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 13>about five billion dollars if I recall correctly from the

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 13>Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, what about one billion dollars

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 13>if that had been allocated, So it's clearly a disruption

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 13>to those on going disbursements. Keep in mind that there's

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 13>also something called the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Program, which

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 13>was not as directly targeted by that, that's obligated rather

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 13>more funding. So there's still some full momentum so far

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 13>to the EV charging sector. But what this does is

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 13>throw a bit more sand in the gears that continued

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 13>forward movement.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Do we know what the Republican's energy plan consists of,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 4>versus just rolling back certain things, like I know, we

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 4>know that it's energy independence and we want more oil, Like,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I get that. But in terms of dismantling Democrat policies

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 4>versus their own support for different.

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 13>Industries, I don't think we do. And there's two different

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 13>reasons for that. Firstly, on the executive side, my sense

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 13>is that they are reviewing and looking to see which

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 13>aspects of existing policies are worth keeping in place for

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 13>goals like national security, energy independence, and so forth. Certainly,

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 13>we've seen emphasis that subsidies for nuclear critical minerals manufacturing

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 13>those should continue, and to the degree that renewables can

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 13>help meet new load for new factories for data centers

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 13>that might also be somewhat protected. We've seen these reversals

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 13>quite rapidly, even in the renewables permitting space. For example,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 13>within the same day our colleagues at Bloomberg News reported

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 13>that federal permitting was paused and then unpaused by the

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 13>US Army Corps of Engineers. That's just the federal side,

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 13>executive side. On the legislative side, we are still waiting

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 13>for the Senate and the House to come together on

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 13>one core plan for the big tax and reconciliation bill

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 13>that's going to come later this year. They need to

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 13>find a lot of pay force to extend Trump's tax

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 13>cuts from twenty seventeen. And other than being sure they

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 13>want to sell more oil and gas leases and cut

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 13>back taxes on methane, they're not really consolidated around one

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 13>common plan of movement. The House wants to do one

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 13>big beautiful bill. The Senate wants to have an early

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 13>energy measure, And of course, the earlier you move on

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 13>some of these big unifying factors like the border or

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 13>increasing supplies of fossil fuel energy, the harder it will

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 13>be to have consensus on doing some other, maybe more

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 13>controversial things like pulling back clean energy subsidies that have

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 13>mostly benefited Republican districts and states. So we're really waiting

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 13>to see where these negotiations land. And I think the

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 13>more that businesses can continue to engage with the Trump

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 13>administration to make the case with their priorities in Trump's

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 13>own terms, the more we'll see clarity around where this

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 13>administration will land.

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 10>Ultimately, so with a.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 3>New administration in power, where do things stand with Biden's

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Inflation Reduction Act, particularly tax credits.

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 13>Right, So, the key thing about tax credits is that

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 13>these are a bit more of a complicated instrument than

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 13>simple grants and loans. Right there's legal obligations that are

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 13>associated with those, but there's also a lot of sort

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 13>of intervention points to try and keep that money back

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 13>with taxes. That's a thing that you file to the IRS,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 13>the IRS eventually gives back to you. And further complicating this,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 13>the IRA created a sellable tax credit mark. So right

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 13>now there's a lot of businesses that effectively have anticipated

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 13>getting tax credits from the government later and use that

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 13>to sort of set up some transfers with other businesses

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 13>in advance. Everything is kind of moving along before tax

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 13>day comes and before IRS disbursement needs to come back.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 13>But because of all of that, there's a lot less

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 13>certainty right now about whether tax credits are affected by

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 13>this alleged funding freeze, and of course that it's sort

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 13>of like you know, the roadrunner running off of a

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 13>cliff in a cartoon. As long as you don't look down,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 13>maybe there's not as much fall as you would expect.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.479
<v Speaker 13>We're going to see later on what real implications this has. Now,

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 13>from what I've read of legal analysis, it's going to

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 13>be particularly hard to try and hold back tax credit funding,

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 13>even if you know there's a longer wait on that.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 13>But that level of uncertainty has yet to affect the market.

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 10>To my knowledge.

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 13>Later on though, we'll.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 3>See our thanks to Derek flake Hall be an eapp

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 3>lead US pol analysts.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal