WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Cauldron, Part 3

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. We're heading into

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the vault for an older episode of the show. This one,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>originally published June fourteenth, twenty twenty two, is part three

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of our exploration of the Cauldron. Let's ladele some out here.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And Hey, we were out

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit, but now we're back, and you

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 2>know what, we're back with more cauldrons. Our brains are

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>like pots, and those pots are full of pots, and

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the pots have pots in them, and it never stops.

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, my wife is still teasing me about this.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you guys are still doing episodes about cauldrons

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and soup, and I'm like, yeah, there's like we're probably

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>going to do three or four of these total, and

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're still not going to cover everything. And a lot

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of it comes down to the fact, and certainly go

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to those first two episodes if you

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't It comes down to the fact that we're talking

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about ancient technology, and since it we inevitably use technology

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>as a way of understanding ourselves, understanding the cosmos, et cetera.

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It ends up becoming a part of our not only

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are a discourse, but of course our religions and so forth.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And we see that with the cauldron for sure.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, though I have to say one of the big

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>examples we're going to talk about in this episode. I

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know if the whole episode will end up focusing

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on it, but it's a really interesting historical artifact that

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>is called a cauldron. Like it is called the Gunduestrup cauldron.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>But I was reading a paper on it, and the

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>very first sentence of the paper, this author insists that

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 2>it is not a cauldron, it is a ceremonial container.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean this is something that is kind of

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>under the surface of many of these discussions, right Like

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously not all of these people would have called this

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a cauldron, and then you get into discussions of Okay,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is it a cauldron or a pot, Is it a

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>cauldron or a bowl? Is it a cauldron or some

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>other kind you know, what exactly.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Is the sh will Daddy. Oh, Okay, this is a cauldron.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Come on, it's a big metal pot. I think we

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 2>can call it a cauldron.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So yeah. As we've discussed in previous episodes, we

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get into European traditions with a cauldron, and

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>cauldrons in Europe are sometimes uncovered in bogs places, as

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed in the show before, that had sacred connotations

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to the ancient people who visited them. They were a

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>place between land and water, and so they were also

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>seen as a place between life and death. So various

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>funeral rites seem to have been conducted its various bogs

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and peat bogs, and given the low oxygen city soil

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of bog environments, we often gain a great deal more

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>insight into what occurred there, especially when it comes to

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>organic materials that would have otherwise decayed. So bodies were

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>left in these bogs and teared in these bogs, and

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we also see examples of cauldrons and cauldron like artifacts.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>One notable bog retrieved cauldron is the Gundestrap cauldron, an

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>incomplete but very stunning silver artifact discovered in a bog

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in Himmelund, Denmark in eighteen ninety one. Now, while dating

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>has been a matter of some discussion here exact dating anyway,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's suspected to date back to between one fifty BCE

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and the dawn of the Common Era. It was evidently

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>given to the bog and an act of sacrifice, perhaps

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to a god or god's, but its origins don't seem

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to be quite Danish. It bears images that are generally

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>associated with more Southern cultures, lying d or griffins. There

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a hornet or antlered god on there,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>alongside other potential gods and goddesses. It contains scenes of

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>warriors falling in battle, and there is actually an image

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of a magic cauldron that is on this cauldron with

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a gigantic figure, perhaps a god or a goddess, about

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to dunk a smaller man into its depths.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, we got cauldrons on our cauldrons and I

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>want to come back to more interpretation of this panel

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>later on.

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely, as we're talking about the Gundestrup cauldron, look

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>up images of it. That's spelled g U n d

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>E S t r u P. There are a lot

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of images online that show the various panels here the

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>various the various images that we're going to be discussing here,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>including this one of what is clearly a giant of

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort taking a man and dunking him headfirst into

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a bucket or cauldron or vessel of some sort adjacent

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to this battle scene. So the exact origins of the

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>cauldron here are still a matter of debate, with some

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the Thracians or what is in these would

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>have been people from what is now Bulgaria and Romania.

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Yet there are also Celtic helmets and trumpets depicted on

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the cauldron, suggesting it might have been made in a

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>place in the aforementioned region where Thracians and Celts coexisted,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>though it's uncertain how this then wound up in Denmark.

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Could have been a tribute, it could have been spoils

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of war. Either way, it may be accurate to think

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Gundestrap Cauldron as not a product of a

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>single culture, a single place, or even a single time,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but something that was created by mingling cultures on the move,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>in part due to Roman expansion and conquest during this

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>time period, and ultimately constructed by different artisans over many years.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I didn't think about the Roman connection. But yeah,

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>so if this would have been in the first century BCE,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 2>and the middle of that century was when Julius Caesar

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>himself was waging a war of conquest in Gaul against

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Celtic tribes in that region, so yeah, that's an interesting possibility.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, Rob, you dug this thing up, not physically,

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>but yes, you had brought it into our outline. But

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 2>I got really obsessed with it, and I found I

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>find this artifact so interesting, specifically because of the different

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 2>mysteries about it its provenance, like you were just talking about,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 2>but also about what it's depicting, because there are tons

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of question you know, it clearly is showing scenes that

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 2>are part of a rich mythology that we apparently know

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 2>little to nothing about, and so there are a lot

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of attempts to try to understand what the different panels

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>are depicting and if and if so, how they connect

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to mythologies that we might know something about. But coming

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>back to that provenance question, Yeah, I think it's so

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting that there are at least three different distinct regional inputs. Now,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>as you already mentioned, based on physical characteristics of the cauldron,

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>like the silversmithing techniques that were used to create it,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>it seems to be a product of Southeastern Europe. Yes,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>but most scholars pointing to the metalworking techniques of the

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Thracians who live in as you said, what is today

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Bulgaria or Romania. And I was trying to figure out

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>what are some examples of this distinctive style that's so

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>strongly linked to Thracian culture. Well, I was reading about

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>this on the website for the National Museum of Denmark,

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>which has a lot of great materials about the Gundestrup cauldron,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and they compare the Gundestrup cauldron to the metalworking on

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a gilded silver pitcher from Bulgaria from roughly three hundred BCE,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and looking at it, I would agree, Yeah, the techniques

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and the artistic style look extremely similar, like the way

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the animal figures are in embossed. Remember that this is

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>not just like an illustration or a carving, but this

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 2>is like hammered and punched metal. So it has raised

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>animal figures with like textures that you could feel with

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>your fingers running over them. And those textures are very

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>similar between the two works. So like the animal figures

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>are embossed and punched with patterns of texture that seem

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to indicate hair or fur, and it's extremely distinctive. You

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>see some of the same patterns on the apparent herringbone

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>patterns on the clothing of the people on the Gunda

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>strip cauldron. So based on the techniques, it's pretty clear

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that it was created by an artisan who had been

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>trained in the traditions of Southeastern Europe. But as you

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>also said, the imagery depicts objects and motifs associated with

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the culture of the Celts who were in more kind

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>of western central Europe at the time, and a few

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>examples of this would be a Celtic musical instrument known

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>as the carnix, which we can discuss in more detail later,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>certain types of Celtic ceremonial jewelry such as an object

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>called a torque, which I can also get to in

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>a minute, and things like that. So those are your

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>two inputs. It's like Celtic subject matter done in the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>metal working style of the Thracians or of Southeastern Europe,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and then it's found in the territory of neither one.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>It's found up in Jutland in modern day Denmark in

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a bog. So yeah, you really have to wonder how

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>all this comes together. Did a Celtic person commission a

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Southeastern European silversmith to make a pot containing images from

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 2>their culture and mythology? Or maybe did it somehow arise

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>from a border region where these cultures came into contact,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 2>and then somehow this item ends up in the bogs

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>of Jutland.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It would be like finding what a Bulgarian band that

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>only does covers of Celtic music in modern Denmark and

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>wondering how they came to be there.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Ah, yes, the thrash metal polka bands of Canada. Now

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to mention just a little bit more about

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the state that this cauldron, the so called cauldron was

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>in when it was discovered. So altogether this object weighs

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>about nine kilograms or about twenty pounds, and it appears

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 2>to have been deposited in the bog deliberately, especially because

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it was disassembled when it was put into the bog.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>So this cauldron has many detachable features, so the rim

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>can be taken off, and the silver image panels which

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>line the sides of the pot, those can be taken off,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 2>and when it was found they were all removed and

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>placed inside the vessel, So I don't know, you see that,

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and that makes it sound like this wasn't just sort

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of like it wasn't like it fell off a wagon

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>or something. That sounds like somebody put it in there.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 2>There is no text anywhere on it, so it's not

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 2>like a political cartoon where everything's labeled so you know

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 2>what it means. It's you just have to infer from

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 2>the imagery. So that makes it difficult to identify things.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 2>But the imagery, as you already said, Rob, is fascinating.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 2>There are animals you would not expect to see. There

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>are lions, There are images of gods that we know

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>little or nothing about. In fact, there are even images

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 2>of elephants.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Ah, and yeah that should be surprising, especially like where

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are these images of elephants coming from?

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So at this point, I just want to

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>pick out a few of the individual plates and focus

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>on what's going on on them, one at a time.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 2>So the first one I wanted to look at, I've

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>got a picture for you to look at, Rob, but

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of course we will describe it for you out there,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the listener. So it shows a god or a mythic

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 2>figure that's mostly human in form, except it has antlers

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 2>like a stag growing from its head. And this figure

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>is sitting cross legged right next to an actual stag.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>And then on the other side of it, there are

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of other animals. There are four legged, predatory

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 2>looking animals that might be dogs or maybe lions, I

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>can't tell for sure. And then I love this a

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>tiny dude riding on the back of a fish. Yes,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>is it now compared to the god with the antlers,

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the dude is much smaller, But I don't know if

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a question of perspective. Maybe he's farther away, or

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe this is just separate imagery, or maybe the

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>god is supposed to be really big, or maybe the

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>dude's supposed to be really small. I can't tell what

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the deal with the size difference is. But if it

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>is a regular sized man on the fish's back that

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>is a very big fish, it's got to be like

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>dolphin or shark sized.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And there's also kind of a different flavor to

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>these two images. So the hornet or antlered God or

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever this being is supposed to be is in it

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>has a kind of a serene pose. His legs. His

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>or her legs are crossed, holding as what a serpent

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in one hand and I'm not sure what the implement

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is in the other hand.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, that is a Celtic object. Actually, I think

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>this is an object that is bigger than just Celtic culture,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 2>but it was big in Celtic culture called a torque,

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>which is a type of metal ring worn around the

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 2>neck that seems to have had significance for multiple Iron

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Age European cultures, symbolizing power. It's power or status or rank,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 2>sort of like a crown. So if somebody's wearing a torque,

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that would seem to indicate that they are a leader

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>or a high status person. So this figure with the

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>antlers has the torque in his right hand, and then

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in the other hand he's grasping, like you said, the

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>neck of a giant snake. But I just wanted to

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>point out that the snake has features on its head,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>which one scholar I was looking at identified as rams horns.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's a snake with ram horns.

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow. So there's clearly a lot going on here,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>as one often finds with depictions of powerful individuals or

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>da or demi gods and it's one of these images

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think it speaks across the ages. When you

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>look at this, you get a sense of power and

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>divinity from it. Meanwhile, the individual writing the fish or dolphin,

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks more comical to me, and it makes me

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there is in fact it is supposed to

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be comical on some level, like even if it is

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a god of some sort, maybe it is a tricks

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to God. Maybe it's something that is not supposed to

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be interpreted with the same air of reverence as we

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have with this central individual.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree, fish boy looks very funny, and I

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>think it's partly in the way his knees are bent

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and he's sort of reaching forward while riding the fish,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 2>almost as if you can imagine him kind of rocking

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and kicking back and forth and saying like, go faster,

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>come on.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Now. Obviously, another possible explanation for differences could also be

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>different authors over time. But as we alluded to earlier.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>But an interesting thing I wanted to point out again.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's a lot we don't know about what these

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>images are supposed to depict. But this antler headed god

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>who is holding a torque in one hand, is also

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>wearing a torque around his neck, so he appears to

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>be a leader or high status figure himself. But maybe

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>by holding a torque in one hand, I don't know,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>just speculating, but maybe it means he can also make

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>a king. He can also give the crown to another.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>But to go on to discuss another panel, Rob, I

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>wanted to come back to one you sort of mentioned earlier,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the panel that has the cauldron dunking on it, because

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.479
<v Speaker 2>this panel's really interesting and there was some good interpretive

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>material on the National Museum of Denmark website about it.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>So this is one of the interior wall panels. This

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>would be lining the inner wall of the cauldron, and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot going on on it, so let's try

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to break it down piece by piece. So one thing

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>is that there is a row of soldiers on the

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>bottom and they are on foot, they're holding spears and shields,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>and they are moving toward the left side of the panel.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>And then above them is a straight horizontal tree branch

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>with little leaves forking off of it. And then above

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the tree branch are soldiers on horseback moving in the

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>opposite direction of the procession. Below they are moving to

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the right side of the panel, and then on the

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>lower right side of the panel, there are three warriors

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>playing instruments that are known as carnisses. When I first

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>looked at these things, I had no idea what they were,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>but I looked them up, and these are a well

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>known type of artifact. Rob I've got a close up

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 2>for you to look at here. But the carnix was

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a wind instrument used by the Celts of the Iron Age.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>It is essentially a giant s shaped trumpet, but most

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>of the length of this trumpet is a vertical pipe

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 2>reaching far up above your head. So picture a kind

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of long periscope tube, except it's not going to your eye,

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>it's connecting to your mouth, and you blow through it,

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and then the sound comes out of this tube that

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>ends maybe a whole other person's height above your head.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>And so the bell part of this instrument, the part

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 2>where the sound comes out, would often be shaped to

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>look like an open jawed head of an animal such

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>as a dragon or a serpent, or maybe sometimes a bore.

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>The carnax was identified in ancient literary sources as associated

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>with warfare, so you might play it on the battlefield

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 2>for a coordination of tactics or for intimidation of the enemy.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Ah, long distance communication.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go. But what's going on with the warriors

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 2>on the bottom row of the panel, Well, they seem

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to be moving toward the left side, where one by

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>one they will face a god of some kind depicted

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>as a giant who is you know, at least twice

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 2>as big as probably three times as big as the warriors,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and the god or the giant will grasp a warrior

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>with both hands, turn him upside down, and then dunk

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 2>him headfirst into a cauldron. Now, I think there's plenty

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 2>of room to question the interpretation of these panels. Again,

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't come with words on them, so they don't explain,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 2>and they don't super clearly connect to mythology that we

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 2>know about. Connections that would be established have to be

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of inferred. They might be kind of tenuous. But

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>the curators of the National Museum of Denmark argue that

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 2>the warriors on foot in the bottom of this panel,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 2>they are being represented as probably in the underworld, meaning

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 2>that they were just killed in battle, and so they

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>are being depicted as I don't know, the dead forms

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of their former selves and you can tell they're in

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the underworld because they are underneath this horizontal tree bring branch. Apparently,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>the tree branch probably denotes the Earth itself and the

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>division between worlds. So if the tree branch is the earth,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>what's below it is the underworld, and what's above it

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>is some kind of heavenly afterlife. And from here the

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 2>interpretation goes on to say that as these figures are

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>dunked into the cauldron by the God, their fate is decided,

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 2>and this fate might include being resurrected or reincarnated in

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.239
<v Speaker 2>some exalted state, such as in this heavenly realm up

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 2>above on the top of the panel, and perhaps as

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a person of higher status or rank. Remember that the

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>soldiers shown above the branch were on horseback, so maybe

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>this means a fallen warrior could be resurrected as an

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>officer or as a member of the equestrian classes higher

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>socioeconomic class. And I thought it was really interesting how

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 2>this recalls the imagery of cauldrons used in visions of

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>hell in multiple very different Asian cultures that we talked

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 2>about in the previous part of this where the cauldrons

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>were not only an instrument of torture in the realms

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 2>of hell, but they were secondarily a symbol of transformation

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>into something more honorable and refined, if you could be

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 2>reincarnated as a sort of better being after the stint

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in hell. And it makes me think again, Like, seeing

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 2>this motif arise in multiple different cultures, separated greatly in

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 2>time and geography and language and all these different barriers,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 2>makes one wonder if there's not a common, universal human

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>experience underlying that theme, which would seem to me to

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>be very likely the transformation of raw food into cooked food,

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>or of dirty clothing into clean clothing, as would be

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>just you know, natural things where we see transformed by

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the work of the cauldron.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like the basic nature of cauldron technology and the

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>idea that it enables transformation, It does seem to be

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>something you just see in culture after culture after culture,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>just across vast distances on the planet. And the laundry

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>note God is important too. I've seen that pop up

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>in a few different sources, pointing to specific cauldrons of note,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and often discussions regarding that cauldron come back to cooking

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and the preparation of food, the transformation of organic matter

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>into some sort of delicious or hearty dish. But also

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes laundry is discussed as a possibility as well, And

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is a transformation. I think we tend

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to totally take for granted that you can have foul

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and soiled clothing, and yet here is this fabulous specialized

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>cauldron in your house or at the local laundry mat,

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or in the basement of your building that you put

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>these items into, and you come back later and behold,

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>they have been refreshed. They are new again.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Man, who doesn't love clean laundry, especially clean sheets.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a wonderful thing. Oh yeah, Okay, I got another

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.479
<v Speaker 2>panel I want to focus on. This one's very special

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 2>and it may be the most important of all of

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>them due to its place within the cauldron, and that

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is the panel that is in the bottom of the

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 2>cauldron bowl.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I might not have even noticed this one just by

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at pictures of the plates on the Internet, because

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the photography that's out there focuses on

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the side plates for good reason. But I actually saw

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>this one brought up in a curator's video feature from

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the British Museum that was focused on the Gundestrup cauldron.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.479
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe when they had it on loan or something.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>But it was by an archaeologist named Julia Farley, and

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 2>this was really interesting. So this panel is at the

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 2>bottom of the pot, so if you're looking down into

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the pot, it's what you'd see at the very bottom,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 2>assuming the pot's empty. And because of that feature, I

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>started to think about how if the pot had something

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in it, like soup or whatever. I don't know if

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 2>this was ever used to serve soup, probably not, actually

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>more of a ceremonial vessel, but I don't know. I

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 2>guess I couldn't rule that out. If it had anything

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>in it, this panel would be hidden and then it

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>would be revealed as the contents were taken out of

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the bowl. So what do you see in this panel, Well,

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>it depicts a gigantic bull reclining. When I first saw it,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>it looked to me like it was kind of, I

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know, lazily resting. But I've seen it written about

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 2>as if this bull is laying on the ground because

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>it has been wounded, but I couldn't tell that just

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>by looking at it. So for whatever reason, it's a

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>bull laying on its side, but then with its head

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 2>propped up, and the head of the bull is actually

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 2>a very prominently vertically raised three D feature. Technically, the

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 2>whole thing, like the other panels, is three D. It's

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>all hammered and stamped and embossed into three D textures,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 2>but the head of the bull is sort of more

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 2>three D than the rest, like it really rises into

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 2>prominence off the base. And then behind the back of

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the bull, we see a goddess or a female warrior

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>posed with sword raised and her legs are bent. They're

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of tucked up under her as if she were jumping,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>like as if she were in midair at the peak

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of a great leap, and she's going to come down

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>with the sword and strike and slay this giant bull.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's an action shot. There are also three dogs

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 2>in the image. It seems two of them seem to

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 2>be alive and helping this warrior or goddess slay the bull,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and the other dog appears to be dead. But something

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I noticed also about this bull. So it's got this

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 2>raised head coming up off of the body, turning at

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 2>an angle, and then the bull has what looked like

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 2>two holes behind its eyes exactly where the horns would

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 2>emerge from. And I wondered, does this mean that the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 2>bull at some point had some kind of horns I

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 2>don't know, maybe made of a different material coming out

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 2>of these holes that may be known. And if so,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't find anything about it, so I don't know.

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 2>But if so, I wonder what those horns were. And

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>again I don't know if this is significant, but if

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 2>you had anything opaque in the pot, as the pot

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 2>was emptied, you would first see the bull's raised head

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 2>coming up out of that opaque material. But then as

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>more and more was taken out of the pot, as

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the bottom was revealed, it would reveal the goddess or

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the female warrior, this person with the sword and her

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 2>three hounds surrounding the bull, ready to strike. And I

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 2>thought that was a kind of interesting. It's almost like

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 2>by taking the contents out of this bowl, it would

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>be pulling back the curtain on the dramatic aspect of

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the scene.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Yeah, that's a lot to unpack because on one hand,

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there's just sort of the I guess, the basic pleasure

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to be had, and this potential scene of the level

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of soup lowering and revealing horns and then head and

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>then beast, not unlike some of the novelty mugs you'll

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>find today, where there's some sort of a like I

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like a cartoon octopus on the bottom of

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the mug. You drink half of your hot cocoa and oop,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>there's an octopus peering up at you. And I mean

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that alone is fun. That alone transcends time and space.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, on top of it, to have this dramatic

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>action scene playing out and then the question arise as well,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>then is this a story that I mean? What did

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it take place beneath a liquid? Did it take place

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>within a cauldron? You know? What is the exact connection?

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>How does having it at the bottom of the cauldron?

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>What does that illustrate? What does that do? What is

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the function of that?

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I love this, though I want to be clear,

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I am not arguing that this was used to serve soup.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know of any evidence of that, So I

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>guess we don't know what went into this bowl. If anything,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 2>we don't know exactly how it was used. But another

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 2>question is what does the killing of this bowl symbolize?

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>So clearly this goddess is ready to bring the sword

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>down on its neck, but we don't know what that

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 2>act meant. And this is another one of the mysteries

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of the cauldron. The National of Denmark page it has

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 2>an interpretation that the bull may symbolize chaos, and the

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>woman who is fighting and killing the bull is doing

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 2>so in order to protect the cosmic order, though I'm

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>not sure exactly what supports that speculation, but I don't know. Yeah, Personally,

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm just intoxicated by the mysteries of like, what are

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the stories that are being told in these little metal

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>comic strip panels with no words on them, Like we

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the surrounding context is, and and I

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>really wish we could.

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, because I mean the context would have been

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>clear to someone at least a privileged few within the

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>given culture, if not everyone within the given culture. So yeah,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fascinating, fascinating mystery.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Now. I was looking up to see if there were

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>any good papers that were using clues in the images

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>to try to understand better what stories were being told

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 2>or what the significance of these gods and mythic figures were.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>One paper I found that caught my attention was by

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a scholar named David Alexander Nance called Plate F on

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the Gundestrup Cauldron Symbols of Spring and Fertility, published in

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a journal called Anthropozoologica in twenty nineteen. Anthropozoologica is a

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 2>journal put out by the French Museum of Natural History

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>that seems to be focusing on the role of non

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 2>human animals in the history of humankind. And I looked

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 2>up Nance. He is a scholar at the University of Aberdeen.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Now specifically, this paper adds it tries to do a

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>zoological identification of a bird species on one of the

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 2>plates in order to help elucidate what the mythic significance

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>may have been. So Nance notes that on this plate

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 2>called Plate F, which broadly I mean so, first of all,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 2>it shows this huge face of like a giant figure

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>with long hair, and then other depictions of what may

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 2>be the same figure in like smaller scenes around the

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>big head. And then the big figure with the long

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 2>hair is holding a bird in its hand. And then

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>there are also birds and I think cats and dogs

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>flanking it in different places. But Nance is specifically looking

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>at the birds and says, hey, wait a second, the

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 2>birds on this plate have a very distinctive morphological feature,

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 2>which is zygodactyly. Zygodactyly is a foot morphology where there

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>are two claws facing forward and two facing backward. And

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>given that characteristic, there are really only a few types

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of birds that could be it's obviously not most of them.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 2>So the only real candidate for this is the common

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>cuckoo or Cuculus canoris. And this is interesting because the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>cuckoo connects to a whole other known nexus of mythological significance,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>so Nance writes quote. This species is also identified on

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a number of other widespread European artifacts where it was

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>previously thought to be a bird of prey. The plate

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>depicts a goddess in triplicate flanked by two cuckoos releasing

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the first cuckoo of spring. The bird is an obligate

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>brood parasite, laying its eggs in other birds' nests, leading

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>to misconceptions of its life cycle, and the misconceptions about

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>cuckoos in antiquity were that there were no female cuckoos,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>that there were only males, and the male birds mated

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>with the host females of all the other bird species.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Now that's not true, but Apparently, Nance argues that that

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 2>was believed in the ancient world, and for this reason,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the cuckoo's symbolized male fertility across many different cultures in

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 2>its summer range. So during the summer months all across Eurasia,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 2>this bird would fly in and then it would be

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>associated with fertility, and sometimes with European fertility goddesses like

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the bird might sort of be its implied consort.

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's fascinating. I mean that reminds me of various

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>misinterpretations regarding spontaneous generation, or the idea that the scare

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of beetle, you know, the dung beetle emerges from the dung.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That it is that it is a thing that is

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>borne out of the dirt and of the waste, as

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>opposed to enough of life form that's making use of

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this material.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, that's interesting. So, but to be biologically precise,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>what is happening with the cuckoos is that they are

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 2>depositing their own So cuckoos are mating with cuckoos, and

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>then they're laying cuckoo eggs. They're just laying in the

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>nests of other birds, and so that's known as brood parasitism.

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>But because of the confusion of like not seeing them

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>with their own nests, they were just like, yeah, they're

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 2>only male cuckoos, and they're just they essentially said that

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>they were cooked colding the male birds of other species.

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, brute parasitism is a fascinating topic, and of course

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we see this in the insect world as well. Yeah,

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not certainly but not confined to just these birds.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating topic we could easily come back to because they're

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>also even with the cuckoo there, as I recall, there

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of ins and outs regarding the enforcement

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of this policy. Yes, both with actions that are sometimes

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>compared to almost mafia tactics, and also just like how

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>does the egg appear and how is there like a

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.479
<v Speaker 1>physical deception or mimicry going on?

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think there's widely believed to be like just

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>an ongoing evolutionary arms race between the host species ability

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to recognize cuckoo eggs and be like wait a minute, no,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and then the cuckoo's ability to adapt to that and

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 2>further blend in oh but sorry. The other thing about

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the cuckoo that would make it probably associated with fertility

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>would be its seasonal migratory patterns, because this is one

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 2>of the migratory birds that would show up in northern

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>stretches of Europe and Asia in the summer months, and

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 2>so it might show up in spring you would say like, oh,

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>there's the there's the first cuckoo of the of the

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>warm season. And so it would thus be associated also

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>with the regeneration of plants and things like that, having

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>fertility associations for that reason. Anyway, I guess we'll call

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>it there for the Gundestrup Cauldron. But I find this

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>such an intriguing artifact. I don't know. I like every

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>time there's a new paper providing some interpretation of what's

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 2>going on in these panels. I want to know.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And by all means, when you get a chance,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not driving a vehicle or something, look up images

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Gundestrup cauldron. And certainly, if you have access

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Gundestrup Cauldron, if you can go see it

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at a museum now or in the future, please do so.

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>If you can steal it, you know, tuck it into

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the breeches and get it out of there, and not.

0:33:54.760 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Steal the Gundestripe cauldron now cauldrons are are also found

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in rivers, which is interesting. Rivers also have of course

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have divine importance in many cultures, and one example is

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the Battersea cauldron that was found in the River Thames

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at Battersea in South London. It's a large riveted bronze

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>vessel with signs of maintenance over many years. Originally crafted

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>an estimated three thousand years ago, so this would have

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>been a highly advanced example of metalwork from this time period. Now.

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This cauldron is mentioned in a blog entry on the

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>British Museum website by Jennifer Wexler and Neil Wilkin titled

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Cauldrons and flesh Hooks between the Living and the Dead

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in Ancient Britain and Ireland and Yeah. They also point

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out an example of a three thousand year old flesh

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>hook found in a bog in Northern Ireland, and when complete,

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>when one piece, it would have been a long metal

0:34:56.000 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>and wood rod decorated with bronze birds. The hook would

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>have been used in ritual feasting for the purpose of

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pulling cooked meat from a cauldron, and such tools were

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>also used when working with hides and tanning pits and

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>so forth. But this particular artifact also had birds on it,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting. I'm going to read just a

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.959
<v Speaker 1>quote from that British Museum blog post quote. The two

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sets of birds may have represented opposing forces in the

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>world of ancient people. Swans are white birds of the water,

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but also associated with the sun and light, and the

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>family group suggests fertility because they're depicted in a family

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>group here. The ravens, on the other hand, are blackbirds

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of the air and divine communication, connected with wild uplands.

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Their dark color and gruesome dietary habits were connected with

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>war and death. These differences may have represented the competing

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>forces of good and evil in the world.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 2>But both of them will help get your meat out

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>of the pot.

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but again, remember the pot is no mere pot.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>There's no you know, there are no technologies. This is

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>central to human existence that don't take on all these

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>other meanings and metaphors and so forth. So the cauldron

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is it's where you're cooking your meat, it's where you

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>may be doing your laundry. But that cauldron is also

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe. That cauldron is also life itself. It is

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole experience of humanity.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's some profound fondue.

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we didn't even get into fondue. There you go,

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>another miniature cauldron.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Well wait, yeah we did. Come on flesh you this

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is basically fondue.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You're talking, Oh, that's right, get any I guess with fondue.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I have so little experience with it. I just instantly

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think of only cheese and bread, and yeah, I forget

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that there's a richer tradition of of fondue. I

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>mean there are also other, you know, wonderful traditions of

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, communal feasting from heated bowls, you know, Chinese

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>hot pot traditions and all so and and certainly that's

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.479
<v Speaker 1>a that's a fun experience if you get a chance

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to partake of that.

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever actually done that. But that's

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 2>usually with a not with like like an oil like

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you might use to cook in fondu, but that's like

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a highly flavored broth, broth.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And you can find you know, plenty of modern restaurants.

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I went to one, I want to say

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>this was in Florida, where not only were was there

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a hot pot at your table, but there was also

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a conveyor belt going through like a little sushi conveyor belt,

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>except instead of sushi, it contained various plated ingredients that

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you could add to the hot pot.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh that sounds awesome.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was. It was quite a parade of meats

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and vegetables. But that's another thing worth worth keeping in

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>mind too with these with these cauldrons, you know, it's like,

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the pot, is this this thing at the center,

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It is this thing on the fire. It is the

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that is then communally you, so you can you

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can easily imagine how it just becomes this hyper magnet

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for meaning, especially in the ancient world. You know.

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 2>I keep thinking back to this plate on the Gundestrup cauldron,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the one where the giant god is dunking the warriors

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 2>in from the underworld into the cauldron. And one thing

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell from the image is the warrior scared

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to be dunked or is the warrior excited like he's

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>going in head first. You can see he's got one

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 2>arm sort of raised up, but that it could be

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 2>like a oh no, oh no, please don't dunk, or

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 2>it could be like a wee arms up thing. It's

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>hard to tell.

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think if you're being manhandled by a god

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like this, and you're about to be dunked into a

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>cauldron or a vat of some sort like you should

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be afraid. I think a certain amount of fear is ideal.

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 2>But then again, if the interpretation is right, this warrior

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 2>is about to maybe be transformed into a higher state

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 2>of existence.

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah maybe so maybe so. Now one thing that sort

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of capping off our serious discussion here, And to be clear,

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we will be back in another episode on cauldrons. We

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>have a number of wonderful cauldron mythologies to discuss. We'll

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>also get into at least a little bit of Dante's Inferno.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But this also brings me back to a recent film

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we looked at on Weird House Cinema, Jason Takes Manhattan.

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:24.479
<v Speaker 1>There is a scene where Jason, who again can be

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at least loosely compared to various divine and semi divine

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>beings in history, he dunks somebody in this vat of

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like nasty New York water possible. I guess it's not

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>actually toxic sludge, but it looks gross. Kill somebody by

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>drowning them, holding them by the feet and dunking them.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's supposed to be toxic waste, and I

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 2>think that is part of the mythology of Jason Takes

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Manhattan is that New York is full of open steel

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 2>drums of toxic waste.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But don't lease lie on the street later that is

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly labeled toxic waste. That confuse this is the matter.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's one of the flavors of the soda

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 2>fountain machines.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you you.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Make you a mix, so you get some new grape

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and then you get some some diet Fanta, and then

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you get some some toxic waste manga.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough now to be clear that individual in this

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.439
<v Speaker 1>movie does not re emerge from the cauldron changed. He's

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just killed in the the the vat or the bucket

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it was, the barrel.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 2>But well, now hold on a second. I would say

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that the fact that they are in a Friday the

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Thirteenth movie, and that we will later see another Friday

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the thirteenth movie with an almost exactly the same stock

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>character may in fact mean that these characters are reincarnated

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 2>throughout each film and sort of attain new forms. You know,

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 2>you've always got your your jock hunk, You've always got

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>your nerd. You've always got your u you know, strict

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.959
<v Speaker 2>older gentleman. You know, they show up again and again.

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 2>So this may in fact be a well I guess

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't be a transformation.

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Well I guess you could argue that. I don't know.

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, I do have to ask, is

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>this a widely discussed theory or is it?

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm just riffing here, No, I see. Okay, maybe

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 2>a bad character gets dunked and then in the next

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 2>movie they're reincarnated as a final girl.

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, so they're moving up. There is a transformation. Yeah,

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and so you get it's that hierarchy of kill order

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>where you're going to either fall down or you ascend upwards.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Possibly.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, interesting. Interesting. You know, it's also interesting

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if you take this just context of immersion and rebirth,

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get into some more in our next episode.

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you see this in all sorts of films, Like

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking of the Star Wars films, like

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>what happens when a character is is terribly injured They

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>go into the Bacta tank And what is the Bacta

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>tank but a kind of magical space cauldron that heals

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>your wound and allows you to re emerge.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>I thought that scene was weird. Luke's all cut up

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and he's in that like weird white diaper.

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that I remember as a kid thinking that

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was funny. It really and it is still funny. But yeah,

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously there's a lot of a lot of

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this comes from also baptismal imagery, and we'll discuss that

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the future. I'm also in this

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>also reminded of a scene, particularly in the film adaptation,

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighty six adaptation of Umbertawecos and Name of

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the Rose, in which I believe the second murder has

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>been committed and the body is found immersed in a

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that of pigs blood, that the blood that is going

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to be processed into sausage. And of course that's a

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a wonderfully terrifying image I remember, especially from the

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>movie trailer that I watched as a child, because here's

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this cauldron of blood and two legs sticking out of it,

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and even that there's so much, so much going on there,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because here's the cauldron as a vessel of life and death,

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of food and transformation. But also just here an instrument

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of murder for some deranged individual who's causing chaos at

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the abbey.

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think we must cease cauldroning for today, but

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>there will be one more cauldron.

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and like I say, it should be a fun one.

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into some more mythologies, we'll discuss a little

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>bit of Dante and who knows what else. All right

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, Again, if you didn't listen to those

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 1>first two episodes on the Cauldron, go back and listen

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to those. A lot of good, good content there. Join

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>us for the next episode. Core episodes of Stuff to

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind published on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and the

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed on Mondays. We

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>usually do listener mail. On Wednesdays, we usually do a

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Monster Factor Artifact episode that's a short form episode, and

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then on Fridays we set aside most serious concerns and

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we just talk about a strange film.

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 2>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to suggest topic for the future, or us to say hello,

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you can email us at contact at Stuff to Blow

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Your Mind dot com.

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.