WEBVTT - The Dave Pasch Podcast - Mina Kimes

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It's time for episode four of the Dave Pash Podcast.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi everybody, I'm your host, Dave Pash, ESPN announcer and

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals play by play voice. If you've missed the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>three previous episodes, check out entertaining conversations with Pro Football

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer Kurt Warner, All Pro safety Buddha Baker,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cardinals head coach Cliff Kingsbury. We are presented by

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM, official sports betting partner of the Arizona Cardinals

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and Hila River Hotels and Casinos. You can follow along

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pash pod for information on future guests.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Today we talk with a groundbreaking broadcaster, Mina Kimes, full

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>time NFL analyst at ESPN. Mina has had a really

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting and unique path to ESPN. Her background includes playing

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>soccer at Mesquite High School in Gilbert, Arizona. There are

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>also parts of her life that have nothing to do

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with sports, particularly in her profession, and we'll get into that.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>We will, of course get into Mina's thoughts on the NFL,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFC West, and the Arizona Cardinals. Plus a tweet

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from Mina about Kyler Murray and Rondale Moore that went viral.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So here she is ESPN NFL analyst Mina Kimes. So, Mina,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, you have ties to Arizona. I'm curious

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about your journey here. You moved around a lot when

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you were young. How did you get to Arizona? What

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>did you think of it? When you lived here? You

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>went to high school in Gilbert, and then why'd you leave?

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So I moved to Arizona right before high school from Virginia.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Had not lived here, and it was because my dad

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>had retired from the military and got a job working

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for Lucky Martin in Arizona, so we moved here. I'd

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>lived in a sillion places on account of the military thing,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but I had never lived in the Southwest, and as

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I think I I liked it. It was

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>very different from Virginia, Michigan, Washington, Nebraska where I was born.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the desert isn't really unlike anywhere else. But

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but but I love it. And like you said, I

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>lived in Gilbert, went to Mesquite High School, which at

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the time was very new ago Wildcast has now been

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>around for a minute. I guess, however, a old I am.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, So when people ask me where I'm from.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I often tell them Arizona because m Davis where I

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lived the longest, and I only left to go to college,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't give away your age and say when

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you went there, were the Were the Cardinals good when

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you were in high school? Uh? Yeah, yeah, we were talking.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>My brother and I were talking about that with the

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Sun's success, because um, it had been so long since.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh we weren't Sweden grew up Suns fans, but we

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>were thinking back to kind of a different Arizona sports teams.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And there is also peaked Diamond back years while I

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was there. But yeah, you know, some ups and downs,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll put that way. Were you a Cardinal fan? Because

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I know now you're a Seahawk fan. Were you always

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a Seahawks fan or was there a time where you

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>rooted for the Cardinals when you lived here? Yeah? I

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was always Seattle fan. So that's not just Seahawks, Mariners,

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>University of Washington. My brother went to a sc by

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the way, but yeah, Sonics when I was very young

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and Seahawks from day one. Did you know when you

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>were young that you wanted a career in sports. We'll

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get into a little bit you know, the transition you

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>made from a non sports field to a sports field,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>still in journalism, but totally different things you were covering.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Were you a big sports fan, did you play sports?

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you want a career in sports when you're growing up? So?

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I played soccer growing up, and I played soccer at

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Mesquite High school actually, but now I never thought I

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would work in sports as an analyst or even a reporter.

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be a writer growing up, and that's

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>why I do. Out of college. You know, worked as

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a business journalist, but I had I'd never planned on

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>working in sports or even football. It was just a

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>hobby and a passion of mine. And I knew about

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>the business journalist background fortune in Bloomberg, right, that's where

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you work, that's right, prior to coming to ESPN. So

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>how did you like, How did that come about? Going

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from being a business journalist to not only being a

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>journalist in the sports field, but now being an analyst,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>being an ESPN NFL analyst. Yeah, so ESPN the magazine,

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the same more. But they approached

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>me and when I was at Bloomberg News an investigative reporter,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and asked if i'd be interested in kind of doing

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, writing features and calm, but writing about sports.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>They knew I had an interest in football because I

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>had written a personal essay about football and all my

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>social media was football football stuff, so I decided to

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>make the leap after they hit me up. And then

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years into writing about football, I started

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>doing podcasting and radio really about football, fantasy football, and

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of how I made the transition from writing

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to being also an opinionator at ESPN, panelists on Around

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the Horn and shows like that. And then I guess

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it was just a year ago switched full time from

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>doing a mixture of kind of everything to just doing

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL Live, which is our daily NFL show, and then

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>doing my own football podcast, which is which has been

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>around for a while, but you know, it's been a

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>focus of mine now since then. How was it received? Look,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>do I want to get in doors Burke in a

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>second is a great frint of word with her forever,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and in talking with her over the years, you know

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there's times where you know her success wasn't received well

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of people. I am curious because you're

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the first ESPN NFL analysts who happens to be a female.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>How was it received. I'm sure on social media you

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>get a mix, but you know, in terms of players coaches,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like what kind of feedback did you get? You know,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say this is a pretty big gap between players, coaches,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and people in the industry, and then social media people

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are geting their opinions, often without names and faces that

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've for the most part, really had great

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships and feedback because I find, especially covering football, you know,

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>most people in arnously are just excited to talk about

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the sport. And if you're passionate about hues and o's

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and learning about the game and talking about it beyond

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just you know, the hot takes, but kind of digging

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>into the game on a more granular level, I think

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people are really receptive to that, and that's always been

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>my approach to it and why I love talking about it.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's such a completed sport, there's always room to grow

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and learn, and I, yeah, the reception has been great

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>even and for me, you know, I've learned a lot

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fly, because not not just about the sport,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but about doing analysis on television, getting to do commentary.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I work with the Rams in the preseason. So I

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>guess I really am going all around the West these days.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, for me, a lot, a lot of the

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, a few years have been spent

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just learning those skills and not really learning the sport,

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>but learning how to talk about it in different ways.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>What was it like on social media for you? You know,

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I look at it sometimes, but I also am pretty

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>deliberate about not looking at it too much, which I

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>think is something a lot of people are in industry

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>have kind of. It's a process for all of us

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and also people who play the sport and play any

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>professional sport, but covering it is can be such a

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>time stuck, right if you spend a lot of time

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at it and I guess listening to it. So,

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, as i've I think my job has grown,

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and I guess the number of people tchirving has grown.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I actually can weirdly look at it less

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and less. The only times my social media blows up

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>two times working with Bill Walton for whatever reason, it

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just blows up. And then doing a college football game

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>either in the SEC or at Ohio State, Michigan or Clemson,

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like you get, I'm so much hate, I just try

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to ignore it. So I can only imagine, like what

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like when you're talking about the NFL, and you're

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about it every day, how many people on Twitter

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know just realize, Hey, I've got a free

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shot here at me. At times, I'm gonna take it

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's, you know, no repercussions. I think college football

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>fans are actually way more on the Internet and NFL

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that. That's the impression I get, but that

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of every sport, every and in a certain fan bases,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned a couple of them where they are

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>very I think active would be the nicest way to

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>put it online. So I mentioned Doris earlier. So I've

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>been with the Cardinals. Is my twentieth year and a

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ESPN for well two thousand and three. This will be

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>my eighteenth college football season coming up. Just finished my

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth year on the NBA and a lot of those

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>years doing NBA. Doris has been an analyst with me.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I've done games with her college basketball. We did WNBA together,

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>not just at ESPN, but I remember when I was

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>doing games at Syracuse, I would drive down to New

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>York City and do Liberty games on the radio for

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>MSG Radio and Doris was the analyst. And this was

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties. So I've known Doris for twenty

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>five years. I've kind of watched her ascension. We're really

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>good friends. I have so much respect for her. I've

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>always said this, and I said this, you know, fifteen

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, that I felt Doris is as good

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>an analyst as anybody on any sport in our business.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>What kind of an impact And I don't know if

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>you know Doris or have talked Doris at all, but

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious, you know, what kind of an impact

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>has she had on your career? Yeah, well, I think

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Doris has impacted a lot of women in our field

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter what you do, whether you know, because she's

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>also held a lot of different roles. But for me personally,

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the work she's done as an analyst has been not

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>only really inspiring and fun to watch and educational. I

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely love when whenever I tune into a game

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and hear her, I love I love it because I

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>know I'm gonna I'm gonna learn something, and she's such

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a good communicator. But you know, just kind of normalizing

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that role, I think for me. You asked a little

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about the feedback I get, and a lot of it.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes it's just surprised and people say, thinking

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know something. I hear a lot as people say,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>well who wrote that or where are you reading it?

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, I'm not a I'm not reading a

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>proptor to. But I think it's just an assumption people

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>make about especially in football, because, um, you know, Doris

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>covers a sport where I included. There's increasingly more than

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>ever female analysts in basketball, which is fantastic, especially at

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ESPN on the shows I'm on, We're we have so

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>many wonderful women covering basketball in up and comers like

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Cheney or blukay Monica mcnah. I mean, just it's wonderful

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>where in football, you know, I think we're still kind

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of having women in roles other than being a reporter

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or host is still pretty new. And yeah, you can

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously I see the impact that Doris has had on basketball,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we'll see that in football too soon. Yeah,

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a great point because you've got a lot of

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>different basketball analysts. You mentioned she came on an NBA

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>broadcast with us for a couple of segments during the season. Uh,

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've done games with La China Robinson, Malika

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>did some games with Malika during the during the playoffs,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and obviously you know she did a great job on

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>the finals when you know she was reporting, Uh in

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the finals, I thought she just did a phenomenal job.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, Football, you're the You're among the first,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if not the first, but hopefully, hopefully there'll be more.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about your your NFL Live crew because I've

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>known Laura for a long time, worked with Laura. She's

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>such a great talent. Orlovsky spears. You guys have great chemistry.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because I see you and Dan like you're

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on the air together, and then you guys just tweeted

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>each other all the time. What's the what's the dynamic like?

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems like you guys have great chemistry together

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all of you. Thank you so much. I truly love

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>them all. And it's funny you mentioned that's tweeting each

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>other because that's like one twentieth of the actual dialogue

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we have off air, which is you know, all of

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>us and then Ryan Clark as well, who's the regular show.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We just are constantly texting our thoughts and opinions about

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>things happening in football, and obviously goes crazy during the season.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We actually have football to talk about and not just storylines.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But I joke every morning during the season, I wake

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>up and I have like twenty clips from Dan and

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I try to watch some of them, just of tape

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's clipped off for me, and then I'll clip

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>something and send it to him. Just the other day,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I sent him something. It was a clip with Justin

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Herbert making a play and he gets the Raiders and

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, I already sent this to you. You

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it. I'm like, no, I don't. One of

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>your twenty clips that you sent me at six am,

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>now I missed it. But it's really just part of

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing conversation, like we're all really love the sport

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and love talking to each other about it. Frankly, and

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for me personally, the opportunity to talk to, you know,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys who are not only played the game, but

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>are specialists at you know, the position, like Dan asking

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>him questions about quarterback play is such a privilege for me.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Or if I have a question about like I don't

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>know a certain coverage shell. I can text Ryan or

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Dominique Fox for his and say what is this here?

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And how you know what's going on? And have you

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ever seen this team do this? And yeah, it's really

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>just wonderful. I feel like it is really just like

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to your friends every day, but having people watch

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it live on television. It's a lot of fun. The

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>only thing I could think of when you mentioned the clips,

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sending the clips is Mike Tariko. He would show me

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>clips that Gruden would send him, like Gruden would send

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>him like multiple texts every day with all these clips

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and Gruden narrating the clips, and you can imagine what

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like, right, not for air, not for air

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>clips And he just said it was hilarious, so that

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I could I could imagine. That's That's the thing that

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was going through my mind. You mentioned earlier about doing

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the RAMS games, doing games in the booth for the RAMS,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I work with on multiple sports people that do

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>games and studio. So you're doing studio for ESPN games

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for the RAMS. How do you like doing the game

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>broadcast first? And then tell me about the differences for

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you like studio and games. Well, you know, covering preseason.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's doing the preseason is very unique because it's just

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a very different animal from regular season commentary in terms

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of not only the players, but what you're watching, the stakes,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what you talk about during the game. You know, we're

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to get as dialed in. Perhaps it is

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>actually a little bit more almost like studios than in

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the regular game. Especially coach McBay doesn't play any of

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the starters, so it is kind of it gives us

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>room to have fun. And Andrew Ciciliana, who does play

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>by play for the Rams, was just wonderful. But I've

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed just kind of learning how to do it.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>The mechanics of it, as you know, are so different,

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the timing of it. Being on a studio show, it's

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a mixture of a conversation but also having kind of

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an internal clock of giving opinions, and the way you

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>get opinions, the length of time you talk, the nature

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of those opinions, whereas doing the games, it's so different

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of commentary that's relevant, how long you talk what.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So for me, it's really just been an educational process

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because I've been doing studio shows for a while now

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm pretty accustomed to it in different formats on ESPN,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm very new to working games. I went to

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>school with Andrew Siciliano. So oh okay, yeah, I mean

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that whole Syracuse thing, right, I mean, everybody seems like,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what's Syracuse. So it's probably though for an analyst,

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we're all kind of trained the same way.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It's good because really, you know, the analyst, our job

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is to set you guys up and to kind of

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>lead you certain places or follow up on something you

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>might say. So I'm sure Andrew's a great partner for you. Yeah,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>he's the best. Um, So, would you want to call

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>more games? Like? You're right? Pre season is different. It's

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>more like a studio show, more of a talk show.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You're talking more about the players. I mean, Ron Wolfley

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I do the radio in the regular season, but

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>we do you know TV in the preseason, and you know,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so we're not just breaking down plays. You're doing more storytelling,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, player. So would you want to

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>call more games where you are breaking down more plays?

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Regular season games, playoff games? You know, I'd like to

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>get good at it from Yeah, let's lee out his

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>free season guys, but it's a great learning experience. All right.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk NFC West because we talked about your

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>time with the Rams and you know, obviously being a

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>big Seahawk fan in your connection to Arizona. So have you,

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>guys made predictions yet? Have you made your predictions on

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what you think the NFC West will look like in

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one? Well, I did do an NFC West

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>preview pod on my football show, and I have the

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Rams taking the division. But you know, I joke all

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the time, this division is like a healthscape. I mean,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is unanimously viewed nationally as the

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>best division in football. And you look at a team

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Cardinals that you know, I think would be

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a surefire playoff team and other divisions, and because they're

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC West, it's going to be challenging, you know,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>And you have to really it's a challenging schedule, the

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>level of competition, some of the even a team that

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 1>has mate had some exciting offseason additions like Arizona. Hey,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's an uphill climb. So it's hard

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>for me. I feel like it's a division where like

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the four teams really could finish into any order, and

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be shocked. Like I said, I do have

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the Rams winning it, but I would not be surprised

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if they're on if another team comes out on top. Personally,

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel the Rams are better suited to win the

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>whole thing than they were last year. And obviously, you know,

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>golf got hurt. But to me, Matthew staff Effort is

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the most underrated quarterbacks in the league. And

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVay, the guy is brilliant. He is you know,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>being around him, he knows everything that's going on with

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the team, but when it comes to quarterbacks, he's the man.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that one of the reasons why you think the

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Rams are going to win the division because of the

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>addition of Stafford or is it something else in your mind? Yeah,

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think you know, that was sort of

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the single biggest issue with the team. I'm a little

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>bit wary of defensive regression with some of the losses

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that they've had, not just a defensive coordinator Brandon Staley,

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a cross town but losing John Johnson and

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Troy Hill, two of the more underrated dvs in particularly

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson in the NFL Brockers have become. These guys aren't

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>really big names, but when you've got a roster like that,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty top heavy, even though you have you know,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey, Aaron Donald, who are the best in the

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL with their respective positions. When you lose depths suddenly,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>when you pay those guys a lot of money and

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you start losing depths like they have, that can cause problems.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the addition of Stafford, you know, it

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>probably will make enough a big enough of the difference

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on offense to offset that. And it's no mystery why

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>McVay and less need went out and got him, which

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is they wanted a quarterback who was not only going

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to air the ball out downfield, which was I think

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you saw Jared Goss. The offense their area is kind

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of declining every year since the Super Bowl, but also

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>his second reaction ability, the fact that he can extend

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>plays and just work outside a structure is really you know,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping we'll take the offense to another level. So

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>let's move to Seattle. I want to hit Seattle and

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco before we get to the Cardinals. The Russell

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Drama What are your thoughts on that. Do you

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>think it impacts the Seahawks once we kick the ball

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>off in September. No, I think it's pretty much resolved

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, we'll see what happened next season.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But it has an interesting contrast with this Roger's story

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because with Wilson, I think the particular grievances, if you will,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we're actually are maybe not articulated by him, but we

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>knew what the source of the problem was back in

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the spring, and then Seattle went out and dressed it

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of augmenting the offensive line trade for Gabe Jackson,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>signing Gerald Everett was a free agent tight end was

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>left with the Rams, and then they drafted another wide

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver to place David Moore as the third and then

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>signed or hired Shane Waldron to be their offensive coordinator

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>from the Rams. So I think, you know that's this

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is an offense that really struggled in the second half

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of last season for a multitude of reasons, some of

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>which had to do with Wilson, some schematics, some personnel,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think the changes they've made should hopefully address

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>some of those issues. And you know, Wilson can get

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>back to playing at the high levels that he did

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of the year. I don't know.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>In the second half with him, it was hard to

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>tell if it was all the hits that just were

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a toll on him. What did you see because

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>he just didn't seem at times in the second half

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year to be anywhere near as sharp as

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>he was early on, when he looked like the MVP

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>through the first couple months of the season. Yeah, it's fine.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There's some parallels, and I think Arizona not in terms

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of why, but there I think there are questions about

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of, okay, well what happened at this offense with

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Arizona later on in the season, but a far Seattle goes.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, defenses started playing two eye safety coverage against

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>them a lot more, and watching Seattle, Wilson and the

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>offense in general, they were still kind of forcing the

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>ball downfield. This is an obviously deep passing game that

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>was super explosive and efficient the first half of the season,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and when defenses took that away from them, you kind

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of felt like Wilson was forcing it, not really taking

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the layups that were available to him. The team really

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>was not running the ball super efficiently as well. I

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>think the absence of a reliable tight end option. You know,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg Wilson was injured and not super effective. Will Disley

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>was coming back from injury, was a problem down the

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>stretch as well, so and then the offensive line and

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the interior in particular, there were some issues. Dwayne Brown

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>left tackle is still effective as ever, so I think

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to pin the blame on any one

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>thing schematic, Wilson or the personnelit. I think it was

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mixture of those things. But I think

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they are really hoping that with Waldron bringing an offense that,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>similar to the Ramps, has a more integrated run pass approach,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more tempo, they can address some of the

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>issues and be a little bit more I guess, responsive

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to what defenses are giving them. With San Francisco, I

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>always felt I was never sold that they were going

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to take mac Jones. I just felt they were gonna roll.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go with Trey Lance or maybe even Kyle

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Pitts and roll with Jimmy g for this year. I

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know where you stood on that, but as you

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the forty nine ers, now can they win

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy G or do they need to go to

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Tray Lance. I mean, I think they can win with Jimmy.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean deemed that did win with Jimmy and not

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a totally dissimilar roster, you know, during that Super Bowl

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>run season. But there's a reason why they traded the

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>world for Lance, and it's not just me. It's largely

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because Jimmy G's been so injury he has battled these

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>injuries in the last couple of years, but also I

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>think some of the limitations he brings in terms of

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>his inability to again make plays outside It really sounds

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like I'm talking about golf again, but plays outside a structure,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the problems he had reading and particularly the

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field, some of the turnovers. Um you know,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you could sense at times coach Shanahan wanted to move

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on and I think have a quarterback in that offense

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that could not only execute it, but elevated I think

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that's they're hoping for the Lance, who obviously in experience,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of passing restaurants in order to go

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to State, certainly not the highest level of competition, but

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>really had all of the tools you see not all

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the tools, but the physical tools and mental ones that

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you see I think in the elite quarterbacks right now,

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>where they're able to go above and beyond what they're

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what's it's not just about scheme with them like Kyler

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, and I think kash Hanahan really wanted that

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. I was going to ask you when you

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>when you started talking about the attributes the Trey Lance possesses,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>if you see those same things in Kyler, what do

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you think is the ceiling for Kyler Murray and how

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>much does that impact whether the Cardinals or a playoff

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>team this season? What ceiling is a great way to

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>put it, because I think his ceiling is guy high Kyler's. Actually,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's really closer to him and Lamar

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for Who's He's one of the deadliest run threats I've

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>ever seen in the league. And he has a beautiful

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>deep ball, beautiful arm. You know, his problems are or

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>when the offense is struggled, it's been you know, some

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the issues in the intermediate passing game. I think

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>at times the run game, which took a big leap

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>forward the prior year, sort of stagnated last season for

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>various reasons. Some of it has to do with the

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>run blocking um, which obviously the team went out and

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>addressed a bit. And then you know, I think skill

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>players and scheme, but the tools are just phenomenal. With Kyler.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so to me, it's it's he. He

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has it all. Like again, when you talk about the guys,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Allens, the mahomes Is, I think Kyler has those tools.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of whether him and coach Kingsbury

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>can harness them in a more efficient fashion. The addition

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that the Cardinals made the players as Steve Kind brought in,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think that that's enough for them to take

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the next step offensively where they're not doing it for

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight games, but they're doing it for seventeen games.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it's going to be a combination

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of those editions and then also the play calling. But

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I loved the Ronnie Hudson trade was probably one of

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>my I think the best moves of the entire offseason.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's one of the best centers in the NFL.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at the Arizona offense last year

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and some of the struggles down to stretch, you know,

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you saw Kyler's efficiency as a runner decline

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Some of that was health related, but I

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it has to do with what

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>how defenses were playing Arizona in the second half of

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the season, sort of anticipating that, and the absence of

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a power running game is kind of a CounterPunch was

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty I think telling. And to have again a center

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like Hudson in there is going to make a remarkable difference.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll be curious to see. Also, um, how like a

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>James Connor fits into that. I loved the drafting of

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>ron Dale. Moore is one of my favorite players in

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the draft, and um, he's another one where I think, like, okay, incredible.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean it does like a little lightning ball, you know,

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But again, it really comes down to utilization because incredible

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>physical skill set obviously hasn't played in a minute, not

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>your prototypical NFL wide receiver. But if they can figure

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>out how to use him and get him into space,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's much like Kyler. The tools are there,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just how are we going to use them and

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>how are you gonna get them open? What did you tweet?

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe you don't remember undraft Day about

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ron Dale Moore and Kyler Murray. Wasn't there something just

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's there, they go well together side.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was something to that. I think it

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was something like they're they're adorable. And then I think

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>af as Well said I then it as a positive

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this as an NFL show, I can't. I just can

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>only say, oh my god. Yeah, Frandell's like what five seven?

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, pop my head. He's little man, he is,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna look interesting out there and when he's not

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>doing that, pads on. But he's incredible guy. What his talent?

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All right? So, speaking of players maybe in stature that

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't the biggest you with ties to Seattle, I'm sure

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate Buddha Baker, how much do you think that we'll

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be talking about Buddha at all and the defensive Player

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Year discussion here this season? You know, I

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately don't think so. And that's not Buddha's fault. I

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think these kinds of awards tend to they tend to

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>reward units where the whole unit is elite, and then

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you're just kind of taking the best player, right or

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're looking at a secondary versus like a

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>edge rusher, where like you know Chandler Gubbins in the bath,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>where you're up huge numbers and they kind of speak

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to themselves, but with secondary play. Even though I think

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Buddha is by far the most talented player in that

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>group and does the omens work and frankly plays he

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I loved him in college, but he's better than I

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>thought he would be in the NFL. I think because

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of how those awards are given out, he might be overlooked.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But but he's just been so much. I mean, his versatility.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we knew he's a thumper, but the coverage.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think his coverage abilities have really surpassed my expectations.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And he is undoubtedly the heart and soul of the defense. Now,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, couple more and I know you get a role.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Brady ba and the Buccaneers repeating? Now

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm rolling with Kansas City, and I think they would

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have won if their entire offensive line wasn't Nash Unit. Yeah.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Does the Shaun Watson play at all in twenty twenty one?

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And if he does? Where? First question? I have no

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>IDEA Second question, not Houston? Yeah, well, listen. I really

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Mean, it was great talking to you. Um

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>your show, NFL Love and ESPN is one of my favorites.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I love the crew. I have to start getting in

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>more to the Mina Kimes show featuring Lenny. How did

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Lenny get the job? Because Lenny's a dog, right? You

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>know he worked for free? Okay, all right, that goes

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a long way. Yeah. Does he have an opinion on

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals in twenty twenty one? Have you had a

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to ask him? I have not. I have not,

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but I think he would be crow Kyler. I don't

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know why. He kind of runs like Kylie. I'll assume

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a compliment. Mina, thanks so much, great talking to you.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate the time by Dave. So great to

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>catch up with Mina. Full disclosure, that's the first time

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I've ever spoken to Mina Kimes people. Thank you. Both

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>work at ESPN. You must know each other, No, we

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>follow each other on social media. Reached out to Mina

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>as I've been a long admirer of her work, really

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get her as one of the first guests

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. That's the first time we've actually met

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in person, and it wasn't even in person, it was

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>over the phone. But man, did she deliver great stuff

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for Mina on the Cardinals, on her beloved Seahawks on

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. She like us pretty high on Los Angeles

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and she has close ties to that organization as a

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>member of their preseason television broadcast team. Also her time

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, spent several years here at Mesquite High School

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and Gilbert playing soccer, and then her very unique path

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to covering the National Football League for ESPN a big

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>part of her professional life not covering sports at all.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want more of Mina Kimes outside of what

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you get on ESPN, you can check out her very

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>entertaining podcast, The Meta Chimes Show featuring Lenny, which, as

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we found out, is Mina's dog all right. Some upcoming

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>guests that we have include Cardinals owner Michael Bidwill. Also

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>two members of the ESPN Monday Night Football crew, Brian

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Greasy and Steve Levy. Got a chance to catch up

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with them in person recently. You'll hear that podcast coming up. Also,

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>actor James road Day, we'll talk about his beloved Tennessee

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Titans preview the upcoming season of A Million Little Things,

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which airs on ABC, and we will of course relive

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the great moments in the hit TV show

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 1>psych where road Day starred as Sean Spencer. We are

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>presented by bet MGM, official sports betting partner of the

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals and Hila River Hotels and Casinos. You can

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>check us out on Twitter at Pash pod and don't

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>forget if you haven't had a chance to listen to

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the previous three podcasts, great stuff from Hall of Fame

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Kurt Warner, Hardinal safety Buddha Baker, and Cliff Kingsbury.

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for episode four of the Dave Pash Podcast.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to you next time.