WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: #NYGvsDAL Predictions

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Friday, September fourteenth, twenty eighteen, Season

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>four episode and fourteen episode number fourty. Welcome to another

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>edition of The Break, live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Studios at the Star. But get it right or cannot

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be started over? Get it right, get it right, get

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it tight. I'm so excited about today's show because we're

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you guys ready for this game this weekend,

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys versus Giants. It is the first opportunity to Cowboys

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>have to rid us all of the images that we

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>saw last weekend and hopefully they can get themselves going here.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>After watching the game last night, the night Game, it

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>became clear to me that what you see in week

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one is not always what you see in week two.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>If you saw yeah, you watch that, If you saw

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens last week and then you saw the Ravens

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this week, You're like, Okay, yeah, that's how the NFL is,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And certainly that's how it is in the first few

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the NFL season. There's some validity to that.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>But I mean you're talking about, like I feel comfortable

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>betting a large sum of money right now that Buffalo

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be picking in the top five. I agree

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with that, and Cincinnati is probably gonna be a I mean,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they're at least going to be in the conversation for

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. I agree with that. So do you think

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're as good as they looked so far? Though they've

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>looked really good these first two games, Um, Cincinnati, I

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're a seven to nine win team, and now

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything that dispels that notion. So they're loves. Yeah,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they exactly mean, ain't nobody, no, no, no,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Luck's first game and two years that that might

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be the most talent poor roster in the entire NFL

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like, if you win down the line,

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you might take two cold players over anybody else. If

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you could just pick anyone you want it, right, watch

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>those well, maybe why the jury is still out like

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't. Is this is Andrew luck back? I don't

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>know t why the the Quentin Nelson, the Guard maybe

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Malie Cooker and then squad? Yeah yeah, sorry, what's up? Nick? Oh?

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So would you watch those games if it wasn't for

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football? I had no fantasy players playing list, I

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>watched you. I just like watching foots like football. I haven't.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I just was watching it like I don't really care.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Just as long as AJ Green makes a few catches up, fine,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But I wasn't watching like you care. Like it wasn't

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like I cared about the app watch football. I just

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like football. I just want to watch football, you know that.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy football is back. I know some die

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>hard football fans who really only want to watch if

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like the best of the best. Like I'm watching

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowling Green Toledo on next Wednesday night. On next Thursday's

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Jets and Browns. Yes, yeah, actually I will because I'm

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>both those teams are intriguing to me, so I will

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>watch that. I think the Browns do it one of

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting teams in the league. Yeah, I will

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely watch that. Yeah, no doubt. All right, so let's

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>get into this Let's talk about cowboys and giants. Let's

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>first start with the injury report. Let's talk about some

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that are on the injury report. Obviously,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Travis Frederick, Xavier Woods. They did not practice, the expectation

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>as there continue to be out Randy Gregory, Yes, did

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not practice. What are we seeing? What do we think

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just some today? Okay, he was out there today. We'll

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>see if it was limited or full. But he was

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.519
<v Speaker 1>out there in the portion that we were able to see.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Garrett had said earlier that he anticipated him doing stuff

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and that he was cleared. So it's a good sign.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>What I could have done a little bit better job

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually trying to find Daytona Jones and seeing what

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that status was. I still feel like Gregory's the type

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of guy and the type of player that if he

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is cleared to practice, he'll probably be cleared to play

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. We're talking about you know, we're not talking

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>about a noon game. We're talking about seven o'clock kickoff

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of those seven hours is his big So I think

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna play, honestly, and I think that

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that helps you. I kind of think he is too.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you would put him out there

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>today if you didn't think he was gonna play Sunday. Right, So,

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think unless he has any kind of setbacks, I

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>anticipate him playing would be good. Dayton Jones limited in

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>practice yesterday. What are you hearing about him? Now? You know?

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if Gregory is playing, I think that's your

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>eight lineman. And I think it would probably just make

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sense to say, all right, well, sign let's let's sit

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>him this week. And it doesn't I mean, he was limited,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't sound like he did a ton. He

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>needs to be full if you're going to meet missing

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that much time, especially because that means he's going to

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>probably take another guy spot out of the rotation, right right.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you what though Dayton is as the

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>type of I mean, hopefully he's a veteran, Hopefully he

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>sees the riding on the wall. He needs to get

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>back for week three, for sure week four because we

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know in week five David Irving's coming back on the

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>team and and yeah, you don't want to be that

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>tackle that it's not you know, good point producing. So

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Daytone, I would I would get back in

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there if if you could, and I bet you will.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting that they like him enough to keep him. Yeah, um,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about There were a couple of guys

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that were full participants yesterday. They all good Cavon Frasier

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Lawrence, Dak Prescott, good, good, good, awesome, good

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to go. All right, so let's go through an actus.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>What are we thinking for this week? Real Travis and

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Xavier real quick? Yeah, pretty big piece of injury news

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for the other team. All right, Olivier Vernon has been

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. Actually, that's good, it's great. That's their best

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher, right, their only pass rusher, at least the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>only they the only one that should scare you. I

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>literally tweeted that at me. I was like, I get it.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>The guys on the other side are good too, but

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you're going against a second game rookie and Lorenzo Carter,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Connor Barwin, who is not the guy. He's a solid guy.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He's solid, solid player, not a great pass rusher, solid player.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>This pass rush should not abused the Cowboys offensive line

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the way the Panthers did. Nobody, nobody on that group,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and no Barwin has faced them several times. Nobody on

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that group has given Tyrant Smith as much problems in

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a game as Olivia Vernon did one time with Dolphin Miami. Yeah,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're at home. It's easier at home, That's

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what they always say. At least I've never actually blocked

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the NFL. UM And I just if the

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys struggle to protect Dak in this game,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's way some problem. It's just way more concerning than

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>what happened in Carolina. Yeah, you talk about Olivia Vernon.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that the reason why he got that

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>contract with the Giant is because of what he did

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in that game against Tyrant in Miami. I'm sure they

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>were looking at that saying, hey, this is the guy

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we got her face twice a year we have problems with.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We need to bring that guy in because obviously he's

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>got something. With no doubt about that. Um, I'll tell

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you another in act of UM. If we're just gonna

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>put one out there, I would say Schultz over over yeah,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>week yeah, really yeah, I just feel no I say

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that week. I just know, but I we watched practice

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the yesterday, I mean sorry, last Friday and this Friday.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>One particular drill that I saw. Um, it was just

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it was right after special teams, which can't see anything

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on special teams because neither one of them are playing,

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so that doesn't give you anything. Um, there's a there's

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a drill that they do where Daks it's just Dak

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in the center and then it's like all of his

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>skill players and they run through first and second and

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess the third team. And last week Rico was

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>way back helmet off and Schultz was in there. This week,

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Rico's doing it. But don't rule out maybe two tight

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ends and they're both inactive. But I think if there's

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>three tight ends, I think Rico is the third tight end.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's put a tight end. But I would say

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Schultz I would love to see got two snaps last

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>week too. That's it. Two snaps. Now, where do you

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>want Rico to play the most red? Well, let's get there.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest issue that they You know, all this

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff about mar is a pretty good kickoff guy. Cool,

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do that. Although I will say this, like

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against the idea of creating some opportunities where

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you go down field Rico too. I mean the reason

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>why I say that is because they're probably going to

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have one guy on him, and even if it's a

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>jump ball type situation, like I love his opportunity downfield.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>In a jump ball situation with one guy on him,

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think most guys are gonna be able to

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>jump with him. So to me, I would love to

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>see him use him in a lot of different ways,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not just red zone, just to see what they can

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>get out of him. Now, of course, you always have

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the fact that there is this perception

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't know the offense. My personal belief, tell

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>him where he's got to go, just say run straight.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>The play that we've looked at a lot where a

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Dak did not throw the ball into Swain. Yeah, you know,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say that's Rico. You say he couldn't see him. Well,

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I think he could see him. I

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>thought he was looking at this. No, he would definitely

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>see Rico. And it's one of those plays where you

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>throw it up there at the at the you know,

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty five second clock and hope that he comes and

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>gets it. If not, then some guy in a yellow

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>jacket's got it exactly, especially if you're if you're wondering

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>if Dak is really seeing the feel well, which it

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you were kind of intimating yesterday. Maybe there

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of things going on in front of him.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You give him a big target, and there's not a

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>bigger target on this team than Rico Gathers. So I

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>just think all the way around, it gives him one

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>more piece that he can that he can use that

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is again easy for him to identify, easy for him

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball to and let him make a

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>play on it. I think it's worth doing. Yeah, and

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna die laughing if Freeco Gathers has like three

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>catches for sixty yards and a touchdown in this game,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>just yeah, it'll be very funny and like it's like

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a good stat line in a not funny kind of way. Yeah,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just thought of something though on the

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on the inactives when we talked about Gregory and Daytone

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones and all that, Um, you know, DeMarcus Lawrence. I

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's serious at all. He's on the list

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as with a growing injury, and Gregory is on there

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as knee and concussion coming back from it may not

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>be the worst thing to try to keep nine guys

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>active though, you know, like, let's say he is ready

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe they only want to do two tight ends.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That's possible. So I was I was thinking, why would

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to go three tight end? I'm only two

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and it could be because they need to go long

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>at another position in that position would probably be defensive end.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna say if they go three, I think

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's three go, but there's a possibility that they go

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to So right now, let's just put up Gott Travis,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got Xavier Um. We think it'll be at least

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>one tight end. Yeah, Mike White White, So now you're

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at four. Chris Covington was he active last week, so

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a guy that that's another inactive There was

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there another linebacker that was inactive last week. No, okay,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>so you're up to five. Could go the route of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends. That can give you six, but it's

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>some offensive linemen in there. Yeah, I'm trying to think

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Redmond or suet Philo. What do they do if Redman's inactive?

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>What do they do if Joe Looney goes down Zack Martin,

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he slides the center and then they slide in whatever

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>reserve guard they have. It was um last week was

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so it has to be the new guy, right, Yeah,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>now Redman is a guard center. Yeah, it'll just come

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>down to see if one of those two how ready

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he is. I would say they probably sit Sua Philo

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because they sat Redman because they didn't think he would

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be ready so quickly. So why would you put that

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sua. So one of those two Sua Philo or Redman,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I probably will be in. I go the other way.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he'll be ready, and you'll go

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and think sits just because I think sometimes when you

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>when you sign a player like that, that is a

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>question you've already answered of how ready are you? How

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>much will you be able to come in right away

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and do that? And so I think it's a you know,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd be ready to go first for a

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>second und thick. Yeah, I mean that doesn't mean anything

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but ago or five years ago. Yeah, all right, So

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys have to give me either you have to

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>make a choice, either a second tight end or give

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>me an other name to get your final seventh person

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on the inactive list. Did we already say Dayton Jones? No,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have a defense. Yeah, I'm probably Dayton Jones

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if I had to guess. All right, and I gets

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you to seven. So we got Travis Frederick, Xavier Woods,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Dayton Jones, Chris Covington, Mike White tight end if you're choosing,

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and then Suephila Flow or Redman. Yeah. And if they

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like, uh, you know, if they feel then they

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>need a little bit more depth a defensive line, then

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's tight endy. We do two tight ends. Yeah,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>inactive we'll see. Okay, good, that would be interesting because

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've ever done that before. But yeah, yeah,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't see that happening. I don't see

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they do so many things down there. Yeah,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>short yardage in situations. All right, let's take our first

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>break when we come back. I have a whole series

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of questions for these guys. I was gonna get you

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>guys ready for this Cowboys versus Giants game, uh, including

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>some keys to the game offensive and defensively. And I

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask the question Dave mentioned it a little

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>bit ago. Do you think that last week what we

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>saw with Dak as far as pressure was about the

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>scene that they faced, or about problems that you could

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>expect to continue to see. With this Cowboys offensive line,

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll ask I'll answer all those questions when we come back.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. It can be

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to find the right resource for learning about important

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>financial matters. You search how to build savings, you end

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>up reading about the one weird ingredient from supermarkets that

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>can make you taller. That's why Bank of America build

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Better Money Habits dot Com, a safe little corner of

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet for answering your financial questions. Full of simple

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>videos and tips, Better Money Habits can show you how

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to make the most of your money without resorting to

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>random searches that always seem to lead to unbelievable photos

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of childhood stars grown up. To learn more, visit Better

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Money Habits dot com. I definitely have an Instagram foody thing,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but the low light camera on my new Samsung Galaxy

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>S nine from ATNT is getting me a whole new

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>world of likes and shares, baskets of bread by candlelight,

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>colorful fruit plates, and fulls son. Even a dimly lit

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>cobb salad was recently hailed as a masterpiece. Come in

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>now and ask how to get half off the new

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Samsung Galaxy S nine from AT and T. AT and

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>T won't for your thing. That's our thing, limited time

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>home because store for details or att dot com slash

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Samsung fifty a dual lapierture supports F one five mode

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>neck two former du labiaturs installed on the veer camera. Oh,

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I am craving a doctor Pepper. I got some soda.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked nut for soda. I asked for ice cold,

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>cravable Doctor Pepper. Its flavor is more one of a kind,

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>been a foretold sloth with a thirst for speed. Stop

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>settling for soda and start demanding doctor Pepper. I love sloths.

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>When you crave a doctor Pepper, nothing else will do.

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Grab an ice cold twenty ounce of doctor Pepper today,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper, the one you crave. To work this big land.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>You need equipment with values rooted as deep in texts

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as soil as you are. Like John Dear compact tractors

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for the six year power training. Warrant to in big

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>features that help you work less so you have more

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>time to do what you love. John Deer was first

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Texas fields and we're proud to be on

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the field as the official agg and turf equipment for

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized deals if my John

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Deer Dealer dot com slash football terms, conditions, exclusions, and

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>warranty limitations apply, so you love for details. Back to

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the Break, Welcome back. It's the second second of the Break,

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>live from the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star. Got

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Nick got Dave Ambers out today. She's got some other

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on. She'll be back with us on next week,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll jump right in. Let's talk. Here's some

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>questions that I have for you guys about this game,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with the intention that we're gonna get some answers here

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that will allow people to have a good understanding of

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what they should expect to see this Sunday night, seven

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pm at State. I hope I can answer them. Well,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely on the fence. I've probably changed my pick already.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Twelve all we're about to nail you down. You're gonna

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be on record on all this stuff, so we're gonna

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>see all right, So let's start. First, give me a key,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>each one of you guys, give me a key. Offensively,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what's a key for the Cowboys offensively to be able

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to be successful in this game, don't use the same one.

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So whoever goes first probably gets that one. Dak needs

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to play better. Is that too obvious? I mean challenge accepted.

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>That's that's high brow and analysis right there. I know,

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like I really got into the weeds there and confused

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you with all the xs and ohs. But Dak has

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to play better, like he just has to in the

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>long run. But in this game especially, I mean I

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>said it, I've said it a million times this week,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Like Landon Collins is going to be down there in

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the box. They're going to try their best to have

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>more defenders than the Cowboys can block. And it's I mean,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is still gonna be Zeke. You know, he's had

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards against this team. He had seventy. He had

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety all purpose yards against Carolina, which if the other

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>half of the offense had picked up the slack, it

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>would have probably been enough to win. But I think

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to clog the box. They're gonna trust Genorris

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Jenkins and Eli Apple to do their job, and it's

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on these receivers to prove them wrong. And it's on

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Dak to get the ball there they do that. I'm

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you a very pointed question, and I know

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it might be a little unfair, but I'm going to

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>ask it anyway. Can Dak be better than what we

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>saw last week? Because well, no, no, let me ask

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you why. Let me tell you why. I'm asking the question,

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's now been a prolonged period of time with

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple games where what we saw last week has consistently

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>been what we've seen. He hits some of those short passes,

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he has a pretty decent percentage completion, but it's not

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>moving the offense. They're not scoring a bunch of points.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Back then, if they had a veteran quarterback, wasn't Cooper

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Rush who looked terrible in the preseason games. If they

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>had a veteran quarterback, would you make the switch this week?

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not if I'm trying to figure out what I have,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and I am still trying to figure out what I have,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't. I don't know that anybody knows yet

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what Dak Prescott really can do. I think I think

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they're still trying to figure that out. And that's why

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you have to keep playing him, because you got to

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. I think that there were some throws

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that he did not make it in the game. We

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have seen him make a lot more in other games,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore I think he can definitely play better

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>than that. I do. That's I said it. I think

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I said it on Monday, like I'm not which. Granted,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you want that in the long run. I get that,

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're going to give this guy a major contract.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not asking you to throw the post through

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>double coverage and anticipate the break and do some Aaron

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers stuff. I'm just asking you to hit the six

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.239
<v Speaker 1>yard crossing route that's not covered, or the you know,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cole Beasley slant against the bad one on one coverage.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Like the throws that he missed, some of them were

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>throws that we've seen him make a thousand times. And

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>that's for the time being. I said this yesterday, and

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I felt stupid saying it. He was so bad that

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it almost makes me feel good because it's like you

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>were so bad that that it's an aberration, Like you

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>can play better, yea, even even in the even in

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the stretch where they were bad last year. I think

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>uh that he made some plays like that I'd like

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was on another level from what we've

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seen from him, in my opinion, and I have to

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>think he can be better than The discouraging part for

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>me was that what we expected in the first game

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year, or a few times in that rookie season,

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that was what we kind of expected out of him,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that type of game, just missing some balls and stuff

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>like that. But what we had seen in the previous

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>two years, especially with Zeke in the lineup, is that

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a lot more comfortable. He just looked uncomfortable.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>But for my point, I'll say that I think would

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly help him. I think that they have got to

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>be better on first down because that will dictate the

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>whole series a little bit. And on if you can

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>get to second and four, second and five, then Zeke

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is still in the mix there you start at second

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and ten or worse. With these penalties on first down,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ye have no shot really with this. You know, Alan

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Hearns caught a twenty yard pass. It was the longest

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>pass of the game. So when you get a holding

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>penalty on first down first to twenty, it's hard to

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think that you're really going to get those twenty yards

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and so they've got to be playing ahead of the

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>chains there, I will it, you're right, But it is funny,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I mean, they have these meetings on

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Monday afternoon, Monday morning where they go through the game

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and talk about everything, and then you can see it

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>filter out, like you know, Jason talks about it on Monday,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and then Jerry talks about it on Tuesday, and then

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the players are talking about the rest of the week.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Is like, well, we we just got behind the chains

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and it just took us out of our rhythm and

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>took us out of everything we want to do, which

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like there's some validity to that, but it's not like

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not like there's nothing you can do about that,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like that's on you. You

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>made the mistakes. You got to fix it. And it's

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>disheartening to think that a pro offense can't come back

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from a second and twelve, you know what I mean.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I said earlier in the week, it reminds me

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of watching LSU, which is like, if you don't gain

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>three to five yards on first down, your chances of

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>success already plummet. And that's not I mean that's not

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>good enough, but it obviously would help, and they got

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to be better at that. They got to cut out

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the sloppiness for sure. Give me a key. Each want

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to give me a key defensively for the Cowboys tackle.

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no, you're bringing some fire today, guys. Check

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>check this out. Check this out. Everybody that's on this tour.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Dak has to play better and the defense has to tackle.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That's next level analysis right there. Um only here on

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys tack. No. I mean but I and I said,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and then no, I think they can hear. They didn't respond. No,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there was a guy point. He was like, yeah, yeah,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Oh god, you're right. Get him down. Not

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not just Odell Beckham too. Like I I have repeated

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>flashbacks of the play in New York two years ago,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the ten seven game, where like they had nothing going

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>O'Dell beat car on a slant and it's like it's

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an eight yard pass that went sixty for the game

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>deciding points, and that's that's what they can't have. Like

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>O'Dell's gonna make his plays. He did it. I mean

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>he had eleven catch us from one to eleven, but

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't they didn't let him have that kill. That's

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the difference. They did let him have that backbreaking play.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Sequon Barkley did break their back. Fortunately for Jacksonville it

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't cost him in the end. But you gotta limit

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the eight and twelve and fifteen yard games. You can't

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>let them turn into chunk plays. I think to me,

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Cavon Frasier is the guy that has to make the

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>play because we've seen how many games now with Eli thirty,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>probably he will float one over the middle to one

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of those safeties and they will it'll be an interception

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>waiting to happen. It'll be it'll be Frasier, it'll be Heath,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it'll be somebody like that. He will throw you the

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>football and you've got to catch it. You got to

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>make the play. You know. They did a nice job,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>was it Cheeto ripping the ball out, but nobody was

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>there to make it. Nobody was there to go get

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Heath didn't. He got his hands on the ball,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't catch it. That there's gonna be gifts

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that that Eli will put under the tree. You better

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>open them up because if you just don't take advantage

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, then they'll they'll keep moving and Barkeley will

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>get some yards and they'll probably have I don't know

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>who their kicker is, but Rosas, I don't know him.

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>He's actually Eldrick Rosas, like they've they he beat their

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>guy out last year and he's actually been pretty damn

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>good to him. One which along that line this I

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>actually just thought about this, but Miles Jack had to

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>pick six of Eli on a tipped pass, a tip

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>pass at the line, which we talked about how bad

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the protection is for the Giants, and we talk about

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>how disruptive this line is. Taco Charlton had a pass

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>break up at the line in Carolina. Maybe that could

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the way you can get yourself a turnover too,

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is collapse that pocket enough to affect his literally affect

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>his passes. Okay, um, all right, So here's the next question.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Last week we saw a lot of pressure on deck,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>he got six sacks, had people in his face a lot.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that was a result of just

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>facing a really good defensive front or do you think

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a really bad performance by the offensive line,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in which case you would think maybe they could remy

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>remedy that this week, and you would and see a

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>repeat of the same thing. I think that, um, I

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>think it was probably more about the line, the defensive line. Okay,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was probably the case. Now, I

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>mean the answer is both. You know, the fact that

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you didn't play well and you're not playing well against

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a really good defensive line, and it's gonna be it's

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be bad. But I think overall, you know, I

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think that the Giants won't be given

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as much problems for them. They'll they'll clean up some

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>things as well, and you know, there won't be six sacks,

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. But I mean doesn't matter if

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's pressure every play, it's gonna be tough. Because

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>he looked that looked very uncomfortable, and I think the

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line will do enough to make him a little

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more comfortable. I'm torn. I mean, anytime you give

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>up six sacks, there's blame enough to go around for everybody.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Connor Williams got beat a couple of times. You know,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a miscommunication on the blitz that Zeke didn't pick up,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but some of that goes on Dak too. I mean,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>he had throws where he held the ball for whatever reason,

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>he didn't feel comfortable letting it go. I'd say at

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>least one, if not more, of those sacks is just

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as much on him as it is on his protection.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's I wonder if even going back to last year,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean bring up the Atlantic game for the millionth time,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is you know, if it's bad for him early, which

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it was in Carolina, does that just affect him for

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the game where he maybe sees pressure

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>where there isn't any, or he feels pressure. That's he's

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>got more time than he thinks he does. And so

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>not only I mean they should be better against this front,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but they got to be better early. Again, I mean

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going back to the early downs and you remember, you know,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>every I think their first four series they had a

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>third and long, you know, like it's got to be cleaner, quicker,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that'll allow him to settle into a rhythm

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because yet, like the pressure was definitely there last week,

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot of it was in his

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>head too, and he was just at a point where

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I don't I don't have time to do

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>what I want to do back here. Assuming that it's

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>true that he was uncomfortable or was seeing things or

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.919
<v Speaker 1>just not just felt the pressure more than it even was.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that's a little bit concerning concerning

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint that when Dak first got here in

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the first part of that rookie year, and really from

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>most of that rookie year, what do we always hear

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>about him? He was unflappable. This was a guy that

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 1>just didn't like, you couldn't rattle him. He just he

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>always just kind of approached it and he just kind

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of went out and did what he was supposed to do.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And here since that Atlanta game, there's been a number

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of games I've heard people say, and on this show

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>being one of them, I've heard people say, he looked uncomfortable.

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He didn't look like he really he looked like there

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was more pressure than there was. He looked like he

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit, you know, flustered. Does that concern

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you that this is a different Dack than maybe what

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw in that first year, and that maybe it's

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>now gotten into his head. Well, you know, the one

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>game where I thought he really did a nice job

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>was was the Giants, you know, on the road after

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that Atlanta game, looked more comfortable. That was a game

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that they I think he had was miked up and

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you could kind of see a little bit more. It

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>took a while, though, to get going in that game Oakland.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>They they had a nice start but then they had

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 1>to kind of hang on if Philly was not really anything.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But but we shouldn't won that Oakland game. I mean

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that was a miracle play. I mean, yep, yeah, I

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>mean they were the better team that day. But but yeah,

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they almost lost it. But um, yeah, you know, he

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>has not looked looked good since the Kansas City game,

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of reasons for that. But if

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're the word is unflappable, but if you are rattled,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like are you flapped or are you flappable? Like what's

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard it used. I've never heard the inverse

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of that word. Yeah, I've heard unflappable a million times.

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>But like man, Dak looked real flappable back there on

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Sunday because he's he did. Yeah he doesn't. We're gonna

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>cooin it now. He doesn't look as he doesn't look

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as cool or calm, and that his rookie year. And

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I concern you though, Hell yeah, And yes, I mean,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>how could it not. Uh, it's and to go back

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to your point though, I mean you just gotta wait

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and see, because I honestly why, like what do you

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>stand to gain by sitting him down like this? And

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to do that. I mean, best case

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>scenario this season is you're trying to get to the

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and Dak's going to earn this big contract, but

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>also give me sixteen games so I know whether I

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>want to pay this guy next year, because like I

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>had this conversation with somebody the other day where they're like, well,

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they're in bed with him now, like you know, they

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>chose him over Romo there it's da. I'm like, no, No,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a fourth round quarterback who's got you know, fifteen

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>games this year and then one season left on his deal.

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Like fourth round picks get cut in training camp all

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, Like, yeah, which bound to this guy at all?

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If this season doesn't if it's if this season is terrible,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you can do whatever the hell you want. And what

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to do is you don't want to

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>get to the end of this year. He's got a

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one more year left on his deal and you have

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>no clue of who he is, right, Yeah, because then

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't make a move for the year after you

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have him. He's going to be the presumably he's going

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to be the starter here for the next two years

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>at least, right And so if you don't know, if

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what he is at the end of

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this season, you don't know whether you need to go

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and get that draft that young guy in the draft,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>because if he has a horrible year, you're probably gonna

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be drafting high enough to get a quarterback. So you

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you even need to get that guy.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know what he is at the end

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of this season. He needs to play and play a lot,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse, so that you know exactly

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking at when it's time to talk contract,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>draft pick free agents. Teddy Bridgewater has only got he's

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in a contract here. Yeah, I'm already, I mean quite frankly,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I still believe in Dak. I still believe Dak can

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be a great quarterback for this team. I just at

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this point I am concerned because I think it's been

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a now he's creating a history of these kinds of

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>games or the rect that's the problem. I believe in

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>dak and I'm gonna need to see more before I don't.

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's our job is to talk all these angles

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>out right. So okay, let's take our final break. When

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we're gonna talk a little bit more,

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have a few more questions for you. Guys. Are gonna

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>get into the over under part of our question answer session.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Over under on Zeke this week on a hundred yards

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>over under on sacks for Tank going up again, Eric Flowers.

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how that goes. We'll be right back. This

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot com. Radio. Cowboys fans know that

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the second best of anything simply won't cut it, and

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>your skincare should be no different. A long time locker

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>room favorite of the players and the official men's skincare

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Dallas based Jack Black is

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the number one best selling men's skincare brand in the

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>country because we make products that help guys look, smell,

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and feel better. Visit get Jack Black dot com. Slash

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys could get ten dollars off your first order of

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars or more. Jack Black look good, smell good,

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>feel good. Official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to talk

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>xs and os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>McClay and of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>At Cowboys Travel dot com to book your travel package today,

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>before there was a draft, you could size up a

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>cowboy by three simple factors. Decrease at his hat, the

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>bend of his brim, and his unbending attitude a man.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Stetson didn't just protect him from what life through at him,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It projected a rugged, unstoppable spirit. Stetson hats are still American,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>made with pride. Right here in Texas. There's still the

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>unofficial crowd of all self respecting Cowboys, and Stetson is

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field with America's team. Find

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a retailer nearest you at Stetson dot com. Slash Cowboys.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be a Dallas Cowboys fan?

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It means you've got the passion and the heart to

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 1>do your part supporting the boys no matter what. That's

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>why when the game's on the line, you're on your feet,

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>whether you're at home or in the stands. Actually, you're

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>more than a fan. You are a member of Cowboys Nation,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and so is AT and T doing their part to

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>keep you connected to America's team all season. Law At

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and T is a proud member of Cowboys Nation. Back

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Break, Welcome Back. It is the final segment

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of The Break live from the s WBC Mortar Studios.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Nick take it away. Here in Cowboys Country, we always

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>ride with our boys, but when it comes to your underwear,

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you definitely don't want them writing up on your boys. No,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why we always wear Tommy john the revolutionary brand

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of underwear with stay up waistbands that keep everything in place,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>no adjustment needed. Tommy John Shop Exclusive Cowboys Underwear, Tommy

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>john dot Com, Forward and Slash Cowboys. You get twenty

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>percent off your first order. You want your Tommy John's

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to be comfortable. I'm wearing Tommy Johns. I am so

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>am I right today we're all wearing Tommy John I'm,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I'm riding on the fence right now.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not very comfortable. Cowboys, Giants, Cowboys. Yeah, what do

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you think there's the time to do that pick? We're

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do at the end of the show. We always

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>do picks at the end of the show. What do

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we get? All right, So here's the next question for

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys over under hundred yards? Zeke, Oh man, I'm

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty under. I'm not even under that anymore. Yeah, well,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick went with Nick went for the fences, and we

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted he was swinging hard too, like he went all

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those check swings that barely got

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>back that does the catcher get it or does it?

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And I was I was seriously just like pointing at

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>your point, like I'm I'm calling my shot. I don't know,

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>yefty eight yards. I think he's gonna play better. I

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>think this team's gonna play better, but I don't know.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm leaning towards the Giants overall winning this game.

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So therefore, you know, that's a big question. If they're

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna win this game, it's probably under for Zeke. Yeah, Yeah,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if he goes over a hundred, did the likelihood I

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>would assume of them winning goes up significant? Yeah, I

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's he's gonna be right there. I think I

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna starts as disastrously, which I think it

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>won't be easy. I bet Zeke might not even average

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>four yards a carry in this game, but they're gonna

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be committed to him enough to where he'll be up

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>north of eighty, maybe not quite over one hundred, but

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in that neighborhood. And then factor in the factor in

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the twenty or thirty receiving yards, and I bet he

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>goes over all purpose at least all right over under

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>on tank one and a half sacks unders going up

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>against Eric Flowers, I feel like anytime, which it's important,

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong, and it's going to affect this game,

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but like anytime it's like this obvious matchup, like oh,

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Eric Flowers was terrible, Like it's never you know, nobody

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>ever has like five sacks and sintial accept except Adrian

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Clayborne and no. I was thinking the time when Scandrick

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was calling him out going John Wetzel's playing for them. Yeah,

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dlow, you better get like two or three.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>He did have three three. And that's the thing, Like,

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing about Tank like he is that

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>dog mentality I talked about earlier this week. So when

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes out to like if he sees that, to me,

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.479
<v Speaker 1>he's salivating, like, oh, I'm getting him, I say under

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because Eli doesn't really allow for that. He doesn't. He'll

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>get sacks some, but I mean he's gonna get that. Well,

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the deal. I went back and looked at the

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>games that Cowboys have played over the last three years,

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>had a significant number of secks. Like, they had a

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>game I think had two games where they had three sacks,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they had a couple, they had two. There was only

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>one where they didn't do He didn't get sacked at all. So,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>even though I agree with you overall, he tends to

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that doesn't get sacked a lot. Cowboys

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have had relatively decent games as far as sacks are

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>concerned against the Giants here in the last three years.

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think if there's a multiple, say a guy with

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple sacks in this game, it won't be him. I

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be someone else. I'll help him too much.

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyrone Crawford actually might have. I see a

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger game for him. Four as a team, four as

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a team, but I don't know it'd be a good day.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the best they've done in the last three

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>years against him. I don't know that Tank will get

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>north of one. I think, like Jalen or you know,

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a linebacker is gonna have one and hopefully Randy gets one.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I went speaking, I went all in on Randy and

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't finish the game this week and get alf

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come one one? Yeah, some four as a team, Yeah,

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Who's the bigger concern for the Cowboys

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or should be the bigger concern for the Cowboys Odell

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Beckham Junior or se Quon Barkley Odelle is yeah. And

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I say that because I don't think the tackling issues

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to be as bad this week. I trust

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee. I trust them to clean that up. And

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this team has traditionally done pretty well against the run.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that's because they have a lead, but

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they're there, and I know last week was a bad

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>indicator of that, but they are typically good at tackling

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have been good at limiting those just ridiculous

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>chunk plays. But Odell is another animal, entirely one. I

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>don't trust the back seven in terms of like having

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>seen them make those plays, um and on. And Odell's

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>just a crazy I mean, he's he's one of a kind.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that scares me is you don't even

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have to throw it forty yards down field. That's he's

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going to run an eight yard crossing route and if

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not on your p's and q's, he's gonna take

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it fifty yards. I think, I think, honestly, I'll change

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer. I mean, I think the guy you worry

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about the most is probably Barkley, because you know, he's

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna get his hands on the ball a little bit more.

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And if he's going for five for six, for nine,

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.359
<v Speaker 1>if he's if he has a steady game, that'll force

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys to play away that they don't really want

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to play. And that's where Odell Wilbur, you know, hurt him.

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Odell can hurt them more, but I think

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of you know, he's never had

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a running back like this. I'm still mad at Cleveland

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for doing this, because for not taking Barkley, because as

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>soon as they didn't. I've thought, man, that is a

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that is a dynamic pair right there that you're putting

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants. And Eli, you know, he's he might

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>be older, but he can still you know, get the

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>guy to his weapons. I just think this Giants off

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is not gonna bully the front, the Cowboys front,

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and so it's gonna be on Barkley again to have

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>those type of crazy all season. That's gonna be a season.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Well but and again, I know they tackle poorly in Carolina,

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>but I trust the Cowboys to tackle well enough to

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>keep that from happening. Like they can limit him to

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>five and six yards instead of sixty eight Odell, so

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that Odell doesn't need the offensive line. I mean, Eli

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to have time. But again, he can take bubble screens,

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>he can take slants. He can't they're away to be perfect.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>He just needs ways to get him the ball quickly

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>without bringing the cow at the Giants offensive line into it.

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's what scares me. Here's the part that really

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>concerns me. I feel pretty good about O'Dell on the outside.

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I really want to see how Barron Jones matches up,

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 1>how Cheeto batches up they're both gonna probably get opportunities

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to match up against him. How about Anthony Brown, That's

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>where I'm concerned. It's what happens when he goes into

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the slot and now he's having to face Anthony Brown.

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen from Anthony Brown has been highly

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent in my opinion, particularly in the preseason, even if

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you go back to last season, and so I'm alluded.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm very concerned about what happens when he gets into

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the slot and he's now matched up on Anthony Brown.

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Can he be the one that that actually can can

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>keep him contained? Or is that a situation with Cowboys?

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Better be smart and make sure he's always got help

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're in that situation, because otherwise that could be

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>your problem. Yep, right, all right, So let's let's go

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:26.439
<v Speaker 1>to the next question. Is this must win for the Cowboys? Yes? Why?

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Because well, I mean, the numbers are out there, the

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>stats are out there, Like eighteen percent of teams I

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>think we talked about this are eighteen percent of teams

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that go owen to make the playoffs. Not only are

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you owin too, but you're already in a division hole

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>and one of your division opponents would now have a

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>win up on you. Philly plays the Bucks this weekend.

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet they win that, So there are two games

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>up on you already on top of that. In recent history,

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>teams that dig out of that hole, like the Saints

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 1>last year. I mean, you're talking about dynamic teams, Hall

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of Fame quarterback rookie that you're running back. If this

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>team loses to the Giants at home, it's a further

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>indictment that they don't have the offense we thought they

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>did that Dak and the receivers can't get the job

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>done well enough to compliment Zeke, and I just don't

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>know that this is a team that has what it

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:13.959
<v Speaker 1>takes to dig out of that hole, because you're gonna,

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're gonna need Dak to play at like

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>an all pro level to do that, to go on

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that type of run where you're winning seven eight games

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in a row. And if they can't win this game,

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>then they're probably not that type of team, all right, Nick,

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's true. I mean I agree with that.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't you know, you can you can

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>argue all day if you want to be that type

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of guy that just argues that it's not must win

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because of course you can go fourteen and two if

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't win. We know that everybody Theoretically, what Dave

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>just said, it makes sense if you don't beat the

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Giants at home, who are you beating? Like, who really

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be? And the Giants might be a,

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a better team. We knew they were better

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>than they were last year and if they added a

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>dynamic player with a number two pick, they were going

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to be so they'll make a big jump. But still,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't beat the Giants, then you know who

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>who are you gonna beat to be a playoff team?

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>To beat be a playoff team, Yeah, I think I

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think you got to win this game. I was going

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to save this for my pick, but I mean, it

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>ain't getting easier. I mean, I know the Lions looked

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>bad on Monday Night Football, but they still have a

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>very good quarterback in Matt Stafford. In my opinion, you're

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>going on the road to Seattle to play an NFL

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>MVP candidate next week. They got Earl Thomas back. It

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>looks like he makes a bit of a difference. He

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>got a pick on like his third play of the season,

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you got two of the most loaded teams

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the entire league back to back in Houston and Jacksonville.

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the part. It's it's those two games because

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>even if you even if you give them these next

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>two games and they can get back to five hundred,

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>then they got to play those two teams and that's it.

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's a must win game because again,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anything can happen. I guess, like maybe they'll

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just catch fire. I don't think anybody in twenty fourteen

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>expected them to win six games in a row. But again,

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what did you have there? You had and the eventual

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL Offensive Player of the Year and a guy in

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Tony Romo who probably played the best season of his

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>entire career that year and was at least a candidate

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for NFL MVP. I don't think he even came close

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to winning it, but he was in the conversation. So

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to bounce back from an O two hole,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the type of play that you need. And I mean,

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>how could you have confidence that you're going to get

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that if they can't beat the Giants at home. Yeah,

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a whether it's a game that's a must

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>win or not. The factor matter is the reason why

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that stat stands up because most of the times when

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>teams go into they're not very good. Yeah, that may

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be the bigger in diatmone. If the Cowboys go into

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what we may be looking at is just the fact

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're just not that good. And so that's the

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>part that can can really be troublesome in a year.

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>We had much higher expectations than that for this team.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's get to the final part. Let's

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>get some picks for this game. Since Nick has already

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>intimated is I'm going to start with Dave. Dave, what's

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>your pick for the game? I Am actually going to

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pick them to win. And the main reason I'm doing

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that is just like kind of to piggyback off what

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, Like I still think that they're a pretty

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.959
<v Speaker 1>good team. Like there's too many there's too many good

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>pieces here for me to think that they're as bad

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as they looked on Sunday. Again, I've seen Dak play

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>better than that as last year. Not you don't even

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to twenty sixteen. Zeke is still Zeke.

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>This pass rush has a fantastic opportunity to wreck this

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>game against the Giants offensive line. We've seen the Cowboys

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>limit Odell Beckham before, and it's at home. It's in primetime,

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which if there's ever a time when At and T

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Stadium is actually a great home field advantage, it's usually

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a game like this. You don't see like the Giants

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>takeover At and T the way that some other fan

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>bases do. And it's a night game. So I just

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.240
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of factors working in their favor.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be like I mean, it's

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be pretty. Probably it's gonna be a nail

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>biter as Cowboys Giants typic is. Yeah, But I'm basically again,

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I just it's mainly just me choosing to believe that

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not that bad. Like I don't have this statistical

0:43:57.560 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>reasoning for it, but there's enough working for him that

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, all right, I'm gonna give you a

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>mulligan because I don't think you're as bad as you

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>looked on Sunday. Nick, I'm going to go with the Giants.

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the Giants will win. I'm gonna go seventeen

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen. It'll be a close one, and I you know,

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I definitely have seen the Cowboys bounce back a lot

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Week two. This is a bounce back type of game

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 1>for them. But I just I still see them having

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>some issues on offense, and I think that that Eli

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>will make some plays there just enough, and I think

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a tough one. I think they'll lose it,

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. I'm gonna say seventeen sixteen. All right. I

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys will win, and I think it'll be

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>very close. I think it'll be a field goal festival.

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be nineteen sixteen, way more field

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>goals and touchdowns. I think we come out of this

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>game feeling really good about mar and he has a

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>start to Dan Bailey, had you missed your first kick

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you're going to run and he's going to

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>turn into a really really nice kick. Did I turn

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>into the did I turn into the Sunshine Pumper on

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>this show? Somewhere along the line, that's trouble And now

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>purposefully you're about to flip that right now, I'll tell

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you this spoiler alert. If they can't beat the Giants,

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't see myself picking them for a while with

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the teams they have coming up. Although I will say this,

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not it's just me personally. I'm not as concerned

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>as I was when the schedule came out about the

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Saints game. Man, I'm sorry about the Seattle game.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Seattle's not I don't think Seattle's gonna be

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as good as people think they are. And they've just

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lost their main receiver. Now they got Brandon Marshall, but

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he's what seventy five like. I mean, I just think

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that when you when you look at Seattle, they're gonna

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>have some of the same problems with Cowboys are having.

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have a hard time offensively, being able to

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>move the ball. I think they're gonna be pretty good defensively,

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>getting ahead of ourselves. I know, I know, But I'm

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>just saying though, there still is some room even if

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they lose this game. My problem is beginning of October,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's when you start your murderous row and I don't

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>feel very good about any of those if you're losing

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this game to the Giants at home. All right, guys,

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you joining us with back Monday. We will let

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what went right and what went wrong for

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. So then for Nicky even to Dave Helm

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Derek eagleson. This has been the Break live

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.