WEBVTT - The AI Genie Could Deliver on the Hype

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that pulls back the curtain non global business so you

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>can invest better across the Pacific realm. I'm Tom Corbett

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. Artificial intelligence, its rapid emergence has

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>shaken up the tech world with eye popping potential to

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>change the way we work, live, and do business.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>From chips to the cloud, and from data centers to chatbots.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>AI is already plowing ahead, opening up a world of possibilities,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but also prompting some to waive the caution flag.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Some estimates value AI's business opportunity in the billions and trillions,

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>But what are the risks and can the aigenie deliver

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>on the.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Hype As we start moving more towards AI processing worst

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>case scenario by twenty thirty, if things aren't done correctly

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and there aren't any energy efficiency bottles that are implemented,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>it could count ten percent of all of global energy production.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Woojin Ho, senior tech analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Woojin Welcome, Hey Tom, thanks for having me on, Hi, John,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 3>how are you? Hi?

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>With Jin which in chat GPT sparked off huge excitement

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 2>on artificial intelligence. Is this hype real and how big

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>is this market opportunity?

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I do think the hype is real. I think this

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>is very much unlike the metaverse. This is something that

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 3>can increase the productivity for people, and this is why

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>we're starting to see a lot of real investment going

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 3>in by the cloud providers like Microsoft, Google, Amazon and

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Meta on the US side.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And how big is a market opportunity do you believe?

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>It's still unclear right because we can look at it

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>in multiple different facets. There's an infrastructure side of the

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>ledger and there's also a services side the ledger. We

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.639
<v Speaker 3>do know that hundreds of millions of dollars have already

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 3>been invested in it right now not seeing much revenue.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But if they can start producing revenue or make it

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>into a revenue generating opportunity from a service aside, we're

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about the scopes of hundreds of billions and possibly

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>into trillions.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Wou jin Ho, you talked about how you believe the

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>hype around AI is real. Can we dive down a

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>little deeper into that. What are we overlooking or what

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are we underestimating in terms of the potential, the power,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and the risk.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So think about how we're using AI today. It's

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>more for efficiency gains, and I think we just started

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 3>to tap into what we can do with AI. Think

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>about what AI can do, what chat, GPT and other

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 3>AI engines can do like it. It can tap into

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>multiple different databases and come out with an output that

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>would probably happen and split seconds that could have happened

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 3>in hours, days or months. Right, So we're talking about

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>some massive productivity gains just from the use of AI,

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>if it's done and use properly.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it an overstatement to say that AI represents a

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum leap in the evolution of tech?

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Still unclear if that's going to be the case, right,

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>But it does seem as if it's a step function

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 3>change in terms of tech, much like what we saw

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Internet back in the early nineties. And once

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:24.279
<v Speaker 3>people learn how to use AI and the AI tools effectively,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 3>you'll see those productivity games potentially in.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Which companies do you believe stand to benefit from this trend?

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, we're already starting to see some of the early beneficiaries.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>It's right now, it's mainly hardware and video is the

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>first company that comes to mind.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Clearly they manufacture or.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Produce the GPUs, but there's also the compute processing side,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>which Intel as well as a MD and then you

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>have some of the networking players like Arrested Networks and

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>networking chip guys like Broadcom that produce chips to help

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>support the AI side.

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And how much computer power does AI require? For example,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>if we ask a question to Google search a traditional

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>search versus a say, an AI powered search like CHATGBT,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>can you give us some sense of how much data

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and searching is required.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>So if we think about the compute power that's needed

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 3>right now, you need the highest available processor and processor speed.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Now that there are two levels of compute that we

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>need to think about. First is actual on the compute

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>processing side, and that's where Intel and AMD come in,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 3>and think about it in the scope of ten to

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>one hundred times in compute power to process all of

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the information that's coming through those servers. Right now, we're

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about the GPUs which Nvidia offers. The cloud guys

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>just can't get their hands or enough GPUs to support

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 3>what they want to do on AI. We're talking about

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>thousands and tens of thousands of GPU chips and GP

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>aligned cars that they want to support. So we're talking

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>about a lot of processing power is necessary just to

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 3>do some high end AI functions relative to general cloud

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 3>computing functions.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And woujin ho. What constraints do those power concerns impose

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>upon AI and its potential.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a challenge here right when we're starting about

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>high power compute, we're talking about a lot of energy

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 3>that's being used an dissipated coming out of these servers

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and these data centers. Let me give you a stat

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>all the data centers owned by the clouds they generate

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>or use up roughly consumer about three percent of all

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>of the energy that's being produced globally. And as we

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 3>start moving more towards AI processing, because they are and

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 3>energy suck, that could potentially continue to increase the energy consumption.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Worst case scenario by twenty thirty, if things aren't done

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 3>correctly and there aren't any energy efficiency models that are implemented,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>it could account for ten percent of all of global

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>energy production.

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about the cloud guys.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Which think this sounds like a potential environmental nightmare.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, for some of the Bloomberg listeners who are very

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>ESG conscious it is really a potential nightmare for the

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 3>cloud guys.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Could you draw analogies to say cryptocurrency. I read this

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 2>stat that bitcoin usage consumes more power than some mid

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 2>sized countries in the world.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you think about the bitcoin ecosystem, it's still

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>a fairly.

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Concentrated ecosystem if you think about it.

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 3>There are some bitcoin farms that try to build out

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 3>their own servers, but now we're talking about larger cloud

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 3>guys that are trying to build AI farms at a

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 3>larger and grander scale than than a bigcoin server farm.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 3>We're not talking about thousands of people that are trying

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 3>to mine bitcoin. We're talking about millions and hundreds of

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>millions of people to billions of people trying to access

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 3>AI data coming out of the cloud, and the cloud

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>guys are trying to support that. I do believe that

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the hyperscale cloud providers are cognizant of that, and they

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>are trying to implement new methodologies to reduce the power consumption.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 4>But that's going to come over time.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And wou Jinho a lot of those questions about AI

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and chat GPT and the power that they require, the

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>US is not the only country that wants to pursue

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a piece of this technology. China is also very interested,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have enough power constraints in China right now

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where that could be an issue for them if they

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>go down this road.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>And China has two challenges. One for us is the

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>access to the latest generation of chips. And one of

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the advantages of getting the latest generation of chips is

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>less power consumption because the smaller geometry chips doesn't consume.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 4>As much power and it's much more efficient.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>And two you need fewer of those boxes as the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 3>AI engine becomes more efficient. The issue is is that

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>China will not have access to the latest generations of chips.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>There actually, and Video offers a China version of their GPUs,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>whether it's as an Apple eight hundred or the new

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>hs In Henry eight hundred, which is the China version

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of those chips, They're just not going to be as

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>efficient and power efficient as China. So to compensate, what

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>China may need to do is to build more of

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the server and these AI clusters, and that's just going

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 3>to consume much more power. The power needs are just

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 3>going to increase and grow. And to your point, Tom,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you know China has been a power starved We've seen

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 3>the blackouts during twenty one and twenty two, and if

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be an issue, the lights might go

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 3>out because they really want to push the AI engine.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>You can see a world of clashing imperatives emerging because

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>upwards of two thirds of China's power is generated today

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>by coal, which is of course a fossil fuel, so

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you have that factor coming in as well.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, And that's exactly the point, right, It's like you

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 3>have to pick the better of two evils. Do you

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>want to really start pushing the AI engine just to

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 3>compete with the rest of the world or the US

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 3>in this case, or do you want to manage and

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>conserve energy to support factories on a day to day basis.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Would you just continue from what you were saying. US

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>regulations are prohibiting certain chips to be exported to China, correct.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 4>That is correct.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>So there are some sanctions that the US imposed on

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>US technologies that they cannot ship to China, and Nvidia

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>is one of those companies and they actually line itemed

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>a couple of Nvidia chips, Nvidia AI chips, the A

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and above. So what the US is essentially

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>trying to do is slow down the progress of China's

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 3>AI development.

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 2>So China can still use certain invidio chips. I think

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned A eight hundred. Can you compare the eight

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred to say the most advanced of the A

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred or the H one hundred.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So some of the notes that I looked at

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 3>in preparation for this, and it just seems as if

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of it is the interconnect communications between the

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 3>graphics cards, right, that's one. So speed and latency is

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 3>very key for FURAI and also with the processing power

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>of those chips as well, so it's not going to

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 3>be as powerful, and that's one of the reasons why

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>China may need to have more servers and more GPUs

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>to compensate for the less processing power.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 2>So how many years of generations behind would China be

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of, you know, the usage of these Nvidia chips.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you want to add capacity, they'll try to

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>keep up as close as possible my senses, and if

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 3>we think about the power dynamic as well, the energy

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 3>consumption dynamic as well, they could be anywhere between three

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>to five years behind in terms of the chips itself.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. By the way,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>if you like what you hear, and we hope you do,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>please rate us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever you may be listening to us. Of course, more

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>stars are better. Your feedback matters, and we love hearing

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. Our guest is wu Jin Ho, senior

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>tech analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Wujin The Financial Times ran

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>an opinion piece in early May which rather boldly declared

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is a in their words, Chinese company. They

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>argue that Apple is so deeply embedded in China that

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>rapid decoupling becomes a rather tall order. How do you

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>see that unfolding? Is China going to let Apple just

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>go quietly? What are the risks to Apple of moving

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>out of China and moving their manufacturing to India and elsewhere.

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a fantastic question, tom So, if we think about

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 3>what's happening with Apple in particular, as well as some

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 3>of the geopolitical pressure that the US has started to

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 3>press US manufacturers, it seems as if Apple has.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Been moving along quite rapidly.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 3>We actually did a lot of work on the Chinese

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 3>supply chain prior to the ft, and initially we thought

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it was about over ninety nine percent of Apple smartphones

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 3>with manufacturing in China. Now I'm going to give a

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>nod to one of my colleagues, Stephen Saying, based out

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 3>of Taiwan. We did another layer of analysis on the

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 3>China supply chain and it seems as if the Chinese

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 3>manufacturers and the assemblers have really started to move out

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 3>of their operations to de risk their geographical exposure.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 4>It's just as if it's more like close to thirty.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Five percent of the factories are in China now and

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 3>they've started to move out to the Asian right, whether

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>it's Vietnam and Malaysia and as well as a little

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>bit more in India. Now, China is still going to

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 3>be a mainstay. I still argue that there's still a

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of manufacturing expectise in China because of their multiple

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 3>years of smartphone development and smartphone component development. But at

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, the assembly part of it

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and some of the component part of it, not only

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 3>by the US manufacturers, but the Chinese manufacturers have started

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to move things out as well because they recognize the

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical risk that some of the U S sanctions may

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 3>potentially hold going forward.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>So, currently ninety eight percent of iPhones are assembled in China.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 2>What's your expectations for say, like five years out.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, ninety eight percent of the smartphones have actually shifted more,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 3>has accelerated a lot faster, and it could be closer

0:13:56.080 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>to forty percent, you know, in twenty thirty or even

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent in twenty thirty in China as these assembly

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing sites move into Vietnam, Malaysia, in India. Now, I

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>know India has been a hot button topic recently because

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Apple has been propping up some manufacturing facilities out there

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>as well, and India has its advantages, but they still

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>have to ramp up in terms of the infrastructure.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Is India You're ready for that kind of a challenge technologically?

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Technologically there is engineering expertise. The one thing that India

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>still needs to build up that that China has and

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 3>India lacks is an ecosystem, right and that will take

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>multiple years to build up. The other thing is the infrastructure.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Where they lag in infrastructure is.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 4>On the communication side.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 3>If I look at the speed test, dot net or

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 3>UKULA data, they rank eighty eighth in the world in

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 3>terms terms of high speed fiber optic communications. But if

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 3>we compare it to where China and the US, they're

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 3>fourth and eighth in the world. And I want to

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>go back in history where how did China get to

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 3>where it is today as a major manufacturing hub. One

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>of the things that China did starting in twenty twenty

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 3>was to lay out the fiber optic networks, and they

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 3>represent roughly one third of all fiber optic investments globally,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>one third. And once you get the communication networks now down,

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 3>then you can start the digital transformation necessary for everything

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>else that is touched technologically, whether it's a manufacturing site,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 3>whether it's a consumer site, whether it's the Internet, and

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>so on and so forth. India has yet to be there,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 3>and India will not get there until twenty twenty five,

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So the fiber optic network's being laid down, that's the

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>tipping point for where China stands today. Would you say

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the case or is that an overstatement?

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that China made the playbook. I think Korea

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>made the playboat as well. India started to recognize that

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and I would even say that US lags from a

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 3>fiber rollout, and they're really started to lay out fiber

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>as well over the next three to five years to

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>really build up their digital infrastructure.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 4>And I do view fiber.

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I know that five G is touted as the communication

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>but you cannot have wireless unless you have a wire

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>to connect it back to a network. So fiber is

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the key tipping point for digital transformation success.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, jin can Apple effectively detangle from the China supply chain.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Is the certain parts of the manufacturing supply chain that

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>you just cannot get away from China.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>In terms of manufacturing, well, there are several parts. Quite frankly,

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 3>if you look at some of the components where China

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>leads in, they lead in LCD panel, screen panel. We

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>start to see that ship from Samsung and LG going into.

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 4>BOE and it's mainly manufactured in China.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 3>If you see the display glass that's manufactured in China,

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the acoustics components manufactured in China. And one

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 3>of the things that China smartly did over the last

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of years is to double down on legacy, more

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 3>mundane chips, whether it's power management chips, if they can't

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 3>get the advanced node chips that TSMC offers, they're going

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>to be the market winners for some of these legacy

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 3>node chips, and for every advanced NOE chip, you will

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 3>need quite a bit of legacy node content inside the iPhones,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>and Apples just can't get away from that either.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So the idea of Apple decoupling completely from China, you're saying,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not going to happen.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's not only an Apple statement. I

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>think that's a global electronics statement. I think the aspirations

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 3>are there, but I do think that China is going

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 3>to be a last thing manufacturing partner over the long term.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Was you if I could circle back to artificial intelligence

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 2>or AI, which Asian companies stand to benefit from this trend?

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start from the bottom up. It's going to

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 3>be the server companies predominantly. They will be getting the

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 3>large GPU line cards and chips from Nvidia and Intel

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>an AMD. But it will be a companies someone like

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>an Insper or a Lenovo or an H three C

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 3>those other companies. But if we start moving up the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>chain on the services side, it's going to be someone

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 3>like a buy Do or Tencent as they build out

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>those AI services and try to offer it to the

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 3>local economies and local regions.

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And what about on the hardware side, Well, on.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 3>The hardware side, it's going to be inspur Lenovo H

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>three C, as much as I want to say someone

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 3>like a Huawei.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>On the networking side.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>There's somewhat negatively impacted because of the US sanctions as well.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 3>They just don't have the access to the technologies on

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 3>the networking side as they hope. So if anyone's going

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>to benefit from the networking side, it's probably going to

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>be H three C.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 2>And what about the Asian cheap makers like Taiwan Semi,

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 2>TSMC or Samson Electronics or esk Heinex.

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 3>So if we think about it from the chip maker front,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 3>AI needs a lot of advanced process notes and TSMC

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to be the leading beneficiary right now because

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 3>they make the five nanometers seven animeter and in line

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 3>for the threes and the two animeters, and for AI workloads,

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>you actually ead a lot, a lot, a lot of memory.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 3>And if we think about ske Heinex and Samsung not

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>only the DRAM side, but also on the nan side,

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>they are going to be the biggest beneficiary among the

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Asian technology.

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Providers, wujin Hole. Could it be that we don't know

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what we don't know about AI and chat GPT and

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>its potential and how would you compare its emergence today

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with the way the Internet emerged in the early to

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen nineties.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot that we don't know, to your point,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>that we don't know going out twenty thirty years from now,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 3>sure in terms of what chet chipee can do, how

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>it'll evolve. If we think about what the early Internet

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>was in the nineteen nineties, it was basic email, right.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 4>And then it evolved.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>To very simple graphics to virtual.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Realities, a clunkier version then of what it is today.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 4>Exactly much clunkiler version.

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>But if you think about what the Internet actually provided

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>back in the early nineteen nineties, it created a whole

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 3>vast of news services. We could imagine a service like

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 3>an Amazon or an Uber, or food delivery services like delivery.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's just say back.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Then, it's not just the technology, it's the way it's

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>applied exactly.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how people are going to apply AI

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>going forward. There are some scary aspects of it in

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 3>terms of the productivity gains of AI will lead to

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:19.239
<v Speaker 3>potential job losses, but it might be productivity gains that

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>we can really leverage and there might be more jobs

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>created as a result of that.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 4>So it's just I don't know.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 3>What's going to happen in the next five, ten, twenty

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty years from now from the evolution of AI.

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But those productivity gains could also bring with them investment

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity exactly, economic growth, and all the things that go

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on with that exactly.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>It can actually be seeds to new industry. It could

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 3>be seeds to new technologies that AI was able to

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>discover in the speed of years which would have been decades.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>So it depends on how companies implement AI and how

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>they leverage the technology to really drive growth going forward.

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think every company. Look, I understand that the

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 3>cloud guys, whether it's either the US or the Chinese

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>on the China side, have gotten a lot of attention,

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>but I know that a lot of corporates are trying

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to figure out new ways or ways to leverage AI

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 3>for their own benefit and we'll see what.

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 4>They do with it.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Which there seems to be a lot of press on

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>how AI can help with the search functions like Google Microsoft.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you see a point where people actually pay to

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>have subscription to these services.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but not for a search function.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I do think that again, going back to how AI evolves,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I think there will be new services that may blossom

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>out of AI that will.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Be paying for GO going forward.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, That's one of the I guess unknowns over the

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 3>next three or five years on how to monetize AI

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 3>because there's a lot of investment that's going in. We're

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 3>talking about billions of dollars of investment, whether it's on

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the infrastructure side, of the software side, or development time.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>But if it's going to create the efficiencies for the

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 3>end user, they want to really monetize that investment. And

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>sooner or later it's going to come. I just don't

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 3>know what shape or form it's going to come in.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like you need a lot of investment to

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 2>build out AI, and a lot of these investments being

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 2>made by cloud providers. Can corporates get into the action

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>as well?

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 4>That's a fantastic question, Johnny.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 3>The way AI is structured, you just need a bunch

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 3>of servers, a lot of memory, some GPU, Right, that's

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>a fairly and software that sits on top of it.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 3>What the cloud guys are investing in right now is

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a large scale AI engine that could support millions of people.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the corporates can do this. I

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>think there's a lot of interest in corporates building in house.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Traditional hardware vendors will be beneficiaries of it, like a

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 3>Dell or an HPE on the US side, someone like

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 3>an IBM on the US side. Again, someone like an

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Inspirament Lenovo would be a beneficiary. Now, why would a

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 3>corporate want to build out their own AI infrastructure, Well,

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>they could do one or two things. They could outsource

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 3>it to the cloud guys, to the cloud providers, and

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the cloud providers offer it as AI as a service.

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>And going back to your question about how do they

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 3>monetize it, that would be one way of monetizing it, right,

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 3>But there's some challenges to that, and I think there

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>were some recent news about Samsung leaking some data because

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 3>some of their employees were using chat GPT. We've seen

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Apple band the use of chat GPT internally as part

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>of the development. So there are some inherent risks, especially

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to use AI with corporate IP and

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 3>they may want to build some of that in house.

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Would it be cost effective?

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 3>It may not be right, but the risks could be

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 3>far greater than the events smith itself, and then the

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>reward could be far greater by building it inside as well.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Woo Jen All this raises questions about regulation. The AI

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>genie is out of the bottle. How do we rain

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it in? How do we channel its power to constructive purposes?

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>How do you see that unfolding?

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 3>I think it's already started to happen, especially on the

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>US side. We're starting to see the regulatory environment try

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 3>to work with the cloud providers in terms of trying

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to rein it in. First of all, it's going to

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 3>take some time for the regulators to understand what it

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 3>is and what it may mean to do, and the

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 3>guidelines continue to change over time, primarily because the definition

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>of what AI can do continuous change daily as well.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the same thing is happening in Asia, but

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 3>it's still too early on what those guidelines may be,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably going to be on a region by

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 3>region basis, much like what we're seeing on how countries

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 3>are handling data privacy laws for users on the Internet.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Woo Jen Ho. It's been remarkable having you here. We

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot of ground talking AI chips, China investment,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and these are just the opening chapters in a story

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of exciting change and remarkable business opportunity. We look forward

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to staying in touch and hearing more of your insights.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, guys, Thanks for.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Jin I'm Tom Corbett in Hong Kong.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. This podcast was edited by Clara

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Chen and you've been listening to the Age Eccentric podcast