WEBVTT - Housing Market, Apple Downgrade, Recession Impact on Minorities

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's bring

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a Nika Group that she's a director of macro economic

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>research at Wisdom Tree, and Nika loved it. You start,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about your economic call here, but how

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the housing market? Here? Matt and

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I are just talking about the you know, the mortgage

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>rate surging. What do you think what do you think

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the impact is on housing and housing market on the economy.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Yes, you know, you're you're hitting

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're you're you're really targeting one of the most

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>important sectors that showing signs of pain at this point

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in time. You know, higher rates have clearly been reflected

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the higher mortgage trades in the US, UH you know,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 1>which is at an extremely high rate right now and

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly impacting you know, the US average household UM

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've already seen signed the slowdown in Canada,

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Australian housing market, UM, and it's it's slowly

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>trickling down into United Kingdom as well. UM. You know,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and we and obviously you we've seen UM record stimulus

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>package that he's been UM unleashed in in UK and

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>at the same time you've got bank in England, you know,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how they're supposed to health the economy. UM.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Through this phase is you know, we've seen a big

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a clash with the sterling in response to the moves

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen from the government and UM, you know

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly Andrew Bailey's hands it tied. So far, all we've

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>seen is an intervention UM. And that's really the save

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the pension market. So I think broadly with rising weights, uh,

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the first pain is being felt by the

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>housing market, and I think it's really a squeezeably cudity

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that is impactingly invested globally. Well, what about Anika. Your

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're based in London. I know you studied

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>at Oxford for example. UM. How much of the U

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of self inflicted pain out of the UK is

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>spreading around the world. Are are we seeing even in

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>US treasury markets contagion um from what's being viewed as

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like the biggest policy policy mistake in a generation from

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>your government. Well, it's very much. Uh, you know, it's

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if we didn't see that intervention by the

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England yesterday, um, we could we could have seen,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, some widespread impact across financial markets. So I

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>think they did just about managed to save uh, you know,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the pension system here in the UK, uh, you know,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and and try to arrest those margin goals that the

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>pension sector was was being faced with. Uh. But you know,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they're they're very very There was a very high likelihood

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that this could have spread, uh you know, spread across

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to the US and globally. Um, if those margin calls

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>were not arrested, and if uh, you know, it's the

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>extension sounds just hit a hit a scenario where the

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, sell whatever you can to get

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that liquidity back back on board. But doesn't it look

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like we did see some margin calls. I mean, doesn't

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it look like we are seeing some just liquidation in

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these markets. I see on the S and P five hundred,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, only five stocks are rising, so fourde or down. Um.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>We saw you know, US rates to ten US tenure

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>one above four percent. So it wasn't just the guilt

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>market that went haywire. It was treasuries as well, I

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>guess because of low liquidity, but also surely um, British

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>pension companies had to sell treasuries to meet margins. Uh,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely right. I think you know, the psychology on

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the market right now is of extreme anxiousness um. And

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is that is why we we've been seeing

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this sharp sell off this week. But that that set

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>off really was triggered when the market started to take

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the send a lot more seriously for what they were

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>actually saying. You know, until this, until this, until the

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Said meeting took place, I think the market was expecting

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the SAID to pivot. We saw that mid rally take place,

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and especially essentially we were you know, what we were

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing um across equili markets was this brief turnaround of um,

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, hope that the SAID would pivot. Uh, you know,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>growth would come back into limelight and um, everything would

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 1>would be okay. But the Fed you know, has drawn

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the line and said we are going to quite fixed

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on raising great until uh, you know, we have the

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Insotian story under control and and I think with that

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in the background, in addition with Q three earning, UH

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>for us to look forward to UM, you know that

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>that I think that's that's opening up a lot of concerns,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>especially in the US because uh, you know everyone if

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone is now coming to terms with the fact that

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have this extremely strong dollar that is

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>reading have a cross risk asset. UM. If you look

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>at concerned to learning expectations for earnings, they you know,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they're still quite high. They are correcting, but they still

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>remain quite high. UM. And you know, the strong dollar

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly puts a lot of pressure for UH international US

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that are now not going to be that competitive.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So UM I think invested essentially bracing for a bit

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of bad news that that could be triggered in uh

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the Q three earning scenario where you could

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more companies being FedEx Right, all right,

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>A great stuff. Really appreciate you taking the time out

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of your busines schedule to check in with us. A.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Nika Gupta, director of macroeconomic research at Wisdom Tree, journey

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>US from London, where it has been a tumultuous week,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly in that uh English bond market there, the guilt

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>market there, just a crazy week there as they try

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of prevent uh you know, a real contagient

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in that market, and apparently fairly successful in some of

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the interventions this week. Dave Harden joins us. He's a

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>founder president of Summit Global Advisors. And initially I thought

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it was in Summit, New Jersey. You were hoping. I

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was hoping, but I wasn't even close. Bountiful, Utah. Dave,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>where is Bountiful Utah? Well, it's on the It's in

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the most beautiful place on earth. We're setten here in Utah,

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>right next to Salt Lake City just north and uh,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fall is amazing. You guys need to

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>come out here and experience it. Good stuff. I'm out there.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You know this. This is what happens with me and

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>my ski buddies in New Jersey. We all talk a

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>big game in like around September. Let's go to tell

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you ride. Let's go to like Montana, and then when

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>push comes to show, we say, a screw it, Let's

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>go out to Salt Lake and we'll ski all the

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>great places out there. That's what always happens. Well, that's right,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>that's a bounty of them right there is also you

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>could go to Park City and all that good stuff.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Like the canyon. You just have to pick your You

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just have to pick your canyon you want to go

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>up to. All right, Dave, are we are we capitulating?

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I used that correctly. Are we

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>seen a capitulation here? Or it's just just another day?

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Well so far in just another day, but we'd like

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to get it better. At the VIX up ten percent today,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we're getting closer thirty three. We want to see that

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>VIX about forty. That's real, true capitulation capitulation. So if

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you if you look back at the past corrections when

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>those bottoms hit, we gotta get that bickx up to forty.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So not quite there. We're getting closer, but I'm afraid

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there's still some more downside ahead. So why aren't we

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>pricing in a deeper, darker recession? Are people still sticking

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with the forecast for um short and shallow one? Well,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think there's still some hope out there. Right,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>We've been through COVID where the government build US out.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>We've been through COVID where the FED beld is out,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>We've been through pivot changes constantly throughout the year where

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's beild is out. So why can't they do

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it one more time? Dave, I'd noticed on some of

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the names that you guys are buying Lockheed Martin, simple

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>L M T. Is that just simply you know there's

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a big war on over in Europe and they need stuff.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the play there? Well, for certainly

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's a defensive nature. We absolutely know that

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the down markets, defensive plays tend to play better,

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and so you want to be defensive here in this

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in this situation. So it's also diversification. I think Blackey

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Martin is a great option that goes with a lot

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of people's tech stocks, It goes with a lot of

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>people's utilities, whatever they're buying, banks, financials, et cetera. But

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, locked themselves have solid rings, they have

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a low p they're cheap, and the war is not

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>going away anytime soon. It seems like as the US

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just told everybody to get out of Russia. So what

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>else do you like? Are your other plays? Defensive. I see,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for example, kind of o phillips here, is that a

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive play? Well, Conics a little bit of a defense

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it could be diversification. But I

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think energy stocks have pulled back throughout the summer. You

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>saw crude oil fall tremendously, and so I think a

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>lot was taken off the table there. But Conical has

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good exposure to supplies, natural gas, et cetera.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, those supplies issues create higher demand. We got

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Winner coming on. They have a great dividend yesterday, so

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and they were up more than four So you

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>love that. You love to get paid to have a dividend. Yeah.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>So in this studio, Dave, we are a meta and

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>alphabet free studio. So Facebook is one of the names

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or Meta that's the ticker. But Facebook's a name that

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you're avoiding. Why still, Well, I think I think, let's

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>face it, Facebook is going through a business model change

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they started a while back. They changed their ticker now

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>from you know, Facebook to Meta. They're trying to go

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>away from this social media and the negativeness. When Mark

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>would come before Congress, it just didn't work out very

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>good for him. So they've been trying to transition their

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>revenues from Instagram and Facebook to this metaverse, and it's

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna take some time. And over the last four consecutive quarters,

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they've missed journeys, they've missed estimates. Analysts aren't really getting

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>their arms around kind of where the money is coming

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from and how this business model is going to pan out.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think long term, if you've got twenty years, great,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a great business model to be into and

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>and the and the future, so to speak. But until

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they get there and create that space right now, I

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>would just say you need to avoid that until their

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>business model completely changes. Isn't there a certain point? I mean,

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trading for eleven times earnings. Isn't there a certain

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>point when it gets cheap enough? Well? I think so

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we've gotta be careful of those cheap traps, right in

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the sense that you think, wow, look how cheap this is,

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but you've got it continues to miss earnings, So how

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>cheap can it go? And so I think it can

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit cheaper. And with volatility in the market,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just some better things you can purchase

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for right now. Maybe maybe look at them in six

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>months or maybe look at them in about a year.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Dave talked to us about the Salt Lake. How's the

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>economy there? How, how are folks doing there? How how

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is it on the other end of this pandemic here. Well,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Utah has a lot of small business. It's

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of big players come in with silicon slopes.

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking the Apples and the Googles and the technologies

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world. And Adobe very big in Utah, so

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, it's Golden Sacks second biggest

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>employer area. So from an economy standpoint, I think we're

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>doing very very well. Housing is starting to soffer though

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at the six point you know whatever, it feels like

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ten percent interest rates on mortgages, and so I think

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing some of those investors kind of get nervous,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's making some people a little bit nervous. Definitely,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>recession is on the mind, even in the small towns. Yea,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, Dave, good stuff. Well we'll think snow certainly

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>at this time of year. For our good friends out West,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Dave Harden found their president in Summit Global Investments. I

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>mean he got his under grad from like, where is

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it Boston College? And then gets his masters from Boston

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>University and then he says, I'm not heck with this stuff.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm heading out west. You Yeah, I mean why not.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You can manage money any We can do a lot

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of things anywhere that We've proven that with the pandemic.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're bringing on a rock Rana. He covers all

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>things technology for Bloomberg Intelligence. Just give us your updated

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>view of Apple. Where are we here? Is this? How

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is the story holding up here? Because I know there

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was some concerns about the new iPhone and maybe the

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>demand wasn't there. What's what's your call right here? Yeah, So, Paul,

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we talked about over a month ago when we basically

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>said that iPhone putein is not going to move the

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>needle just because of two reasons. And the first is

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the economic backdrop of the global economy is fared worse

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>than it was a year ago. Second is that Europe

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in China makes up for total revenue for Apple, and

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that those two geographies up pretty much, you know, in

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really bad shape right now. And I would say the

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>third element would be that the iPhone puotein is not

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the hardware upgrade that you normally see on a three

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>year cycle. That's going to be next year. So we

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot more cautious than most people, I

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would say, for some time, and I think I would

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>say the rest of the street is catching up at

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this point. What more can an iPhone do? I mean,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't make me breakfast, like, I don't see

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>how it can get any more advanced than it already is.

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I said this last time. Also it does.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to find new users. They have an

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>installed bait of installed base of over eight hundred million users.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Every year they're gonna sell two twenty million bits, no

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>matter what that is plus a minus one to two.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>In good years they're going to sell a few more,

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and bad years they're going to sell a few less.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So next if you didn't upgrade this year, you may

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>upgrade the year after all the year after, but eventually

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you will upgrade. And the reason you're gonna upgrade is

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>battery life. When the battery life starts to bother you,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna say, you know what, I'm going to go

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>out and get another phone, keep it for three years

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and then go out and um, you know, upgrade at

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that time. Do they do They engineer them so that

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the battery starts to die right at the end of

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>your two year contract. It's not two years. It's usually

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a little more around three and a half to four years.

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean a lot of people upgrade two years.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I upgrade about two years. A lot of people upgrade

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>five years. But you take the average of it, it's

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>about three point seven, you know, three point six years

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or so. And that's all Apple cares about at any

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>given time. The reason why this company is so stable

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of free cash flow is because that installed

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>base is sacred. People do not it doesn't matter economies

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>go to bad. They're not going to get rid of

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>their iPhone and go buy a Nokia. But so what,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do we read into this bloomberg um scoop

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know they were going to upgrade. They were

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at least thinking about upgrading. They were telling their suppliers

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like an upgrade in terms of you know, producing more,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>selling more, and now they're not and they're gonna do

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>flat flat is very good, Matt. Flat flat revenues from

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this year the next year for Apple would be very good.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to generate in three cash flow. If they

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>go flat, that's not bad for me. Yeah, but the

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>stock is down four and a half percent today, so

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for somebody. It's bad for praatos. That's I mean,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this is again depending on who's the buyer of the stock,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have long term holders versus short term traados. Alright,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So when I hear you know, smart people like you

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who analyze Apple on a day to day basis and

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you speak to institutional investors on a day to day basis,

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that the story for here that

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess the delta for the Apple income statement and

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's stock is the services business? Is that is that

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>still something people focus on? Yeah, and again you know,

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>services has been very strong over the last two and

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a half years, and that's another area we think, you know,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be probably the first time next year

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to be in double digits, and

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that is not something that people are used to. People

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>started reading Apple like a growth stock over the last

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say three years or so, and I think

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are not coming to realization that

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this company is going to have a made too high

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>single digit growth rate. And I think that's a lot

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the market is digesting it. You know, we published

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>another note last week which says the delta that we

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>see between evaluation delta between Microsoft and Apple is not

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>fair enough of you. We think Microsoft is a far

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>more diversified business model than Apple, and yet Apple trades

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is a much higher multiple. What we are seeing over

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the last seven eight days is kind of a rerating

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. All right, So is there anything in the

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple story? And I think I already know the answer here,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But you look at all the cash on the bounty,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>look at all the free cash flow. Is there anything

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna say transformative, but something that would move

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the needle for this company. I don't know whether it's

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition, whether it's a change in, maybe a return

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>neck of capital shareholders a car. Is there anything out there? Yeah?

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So from a transformative fine, I don't think it is

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be anything. From a product point, I would

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hope that the company is going to be far more

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>aggressive of their buy backs. I mean, exactly speaking, they

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>can they can spend billion dollars a year on buy back.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>If they do that, our calculations say that EPs is

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go up anywhere from four to five, that's

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not bad. If you get flat earning the PLATFOM revenue growth,

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or let's say even a high single digit, a low

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 1>single digit revenue growth you add some buy backs to it,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that's ten percent EPs growth. That's not bad in a recession.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>That's actually very impressive in our you all right, So

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the across your universe? You got? You see everything

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>across the tech space where you know, given that the

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>economic backdrop we're in, when you as you talk to

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors, where are they putting their money these days

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in tech? I think they're all running away from tech

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>arctually because of inflation. And I think that is um

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>that is going to remain the same trend unless we

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>see a Regerson inflation. And I said this yesterday on

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the TV also that the delta over here is what's

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the discount rate. If the two year and the ten

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>year remain at these levels and we find out that

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>inflation is going down, then the Pick universe is going

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to have a blast. You're going to see a massive

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>reversal of trends here. But the problem is people don't

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>know which way inflation is going to go. If inflation

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>keeps the way it is, and we keep on raising grades,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>then the discount rate for growth sox gets hammered and

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the valuations remain where it is or even down. Let

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>me just ask quickly. We only have a minute left

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>about the car um It seems like you're kind of

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>poop pooing it, and in fact, nobody seems that pumped

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. But they do keep hiring people to work

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. So what's the deal. Yeah, it's our Our

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>thesis on that is it's going to really help their

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>market cap. Frankly speaking, just because tess Like is such

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a hot s it is coming. They're making their own car. Yeah,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do not know whether it's coming this year

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>or next year or the year after. I have no

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>way of figuring out when that's going to come. But

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>something is going to happen there there. You're right, they

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>hide a lot of people in that area. They're talking

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to portion about something. So something's gonna come, but I

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>have no way of figuring out when it is. In

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>my view, it's going to once again not be that

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>in her mental to the sales and bottom line, but

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to really help their market cap. All right,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on a rock, ran I thank you appreciate it as

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>always phoning it in from some remote location, which I note,

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>but he does come in, you know, regularly. But he

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he absconded from the metro New York region.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But during the pandemic, he's one of those smart guys. Rana.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He covers all things technology. Vince Wignarella. He does all

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the trading stuff for Bloomberg News and he has just

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>made working from home a science and art. But something

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>got him into the city today, so we we we

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>grabbed him and Vince, what a great day, I mean,

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>another rough day out in the markets here. I'd love

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for you to put in what we're seeing over the

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>last six seven weeks. Put it in the context here. Yeah,

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like like you said, tough, tough playing in the sandbox today,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>traders getting a little bit confused and spank. Today we

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a little bit of a bit in sterling, a

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a bid for UK gilts. That usually

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>spells positive for risk. And there was a hope that

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the downside we about today, which came from the data

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, um would turn a bit and and

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>markets would pick pack up. And that really hasn't happened.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the traders that I'm talking to are feeling

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more pain than normal because I think

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they got sucked in by the moves

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and that was supposed to lead to

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>something which it hasn't. So what do you think about

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the moves in the UK that we saw. It seemed

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>really dramatic, thirty year guilds moving, swinging a hundred basis

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>points in both directions after kind of a catastrophic economic

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>plan was announced and followed by intervention of the b

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>o E. How much did that move US markets? Move

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>US markets a lot? I think there was some sentiment

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>out there yesterday that maybe, uh, something similar could happen

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>here and the FED would have to pause a little bit,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that this, uh, the fiscal situation um, the little bit

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of an instability in the bond market over in the

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>UK might might pour into the US, and that the

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>central banks in general might have to say, wait a minute,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, and place it's really bad, but you know,

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stability is obviously far more important, and maybe move

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more towards this. They are not doing that.

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not saying it. Every every voice we've heard, I

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hear two more later today at least off

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>top of my head and Mr and daily Uh, and

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they are most likely they're gonna come off the top

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>rope and continue the preaching from the same hymno about

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>higher rates. So how high are they going to go?

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean four point six percent at one point Pal

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last press conference alluded to. But he also

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, mentioned five they could be headed at that

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>far and he just said they want to get real

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>rates up. Um, you know, two levels that would shock

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Um, how far do you think they're going

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to go? I personally think they have one more in them,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and then I think they're gonna shock the economy, and

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna be going into a recession and

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to pause. But they don't seem to care.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and it is troubling, to be perfectly

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, because I'm not really sure where it

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>says in the f O m C mandate. Uh, we're

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed to take out the paddle and old the economy,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and punish people just they have to keep procession

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation down. So well, you know, the inflation is coming down.

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, other than we saw the data this morning,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>But in general, the anecdotal evidence we're seeing from data

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is that inflation is coming down, just not coming down

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>fast enough for the FED. And the question is, you know,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is it is it legitimate that the FED should be

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>impatient and try and get it back to where they'd

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>like to see it in a very, very short They

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make an Arthur Burn's mistake, right. I

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>think they already have. Um, they made it in the

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pandemic by saying it was transitory. I mean,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that was the reverse Arthur Burns mistake. And I think

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>now it's almost more of an ego game where they're

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>so afraid of losing credibility that that that's what's really

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>driving them, not the economy. But they can't. I mean,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what what reason does Jerome Powell have to turn around?

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>He's he's got like a hundred fifty million dollars, right,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's doing well on his own. Um, he doesn't care.

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>He's been confirmed for this term. Um Uh. I just

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine anything that would convince him. You, Elizabeth Warren

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>can tweet all day long and he's going to continue

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>on this path. Yeah, they don't. They don't care what Jesus. Actually,

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>most of the street doesn't really carry you. So when

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you go out and and I'm assuming you're in a city,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna probably meet a couple of your trader

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>buddies and have a beverage of your choice. As Tom

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>would say, what do you think you hear from the

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>trader's day to day or we're in this market? Are

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they just kind of staying on the sidelines, trading around

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the edges? I mean, I can't imagine trying to catch

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a falling knife here. Yeah, no, they're they're trading around

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the edges. It's a little bit of stick and move

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. You know, they'll step in briefly, um,

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>look for look for a quick profit. Perhaps if lucky,

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>um quick quick stops. If if they're unlucky, and and

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they're just getting in and out, um, you know they

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>do keep asking The general question is when is it, like,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>when do we feel comfortable stepping in for a more

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>longer term play And that's just not there yet. That's

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks will say, Like as it relates

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to the VIX, for example, in the VIX today is

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>up about eight percent to just uh, just about thirty three.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You need to see a VIX up around forties. That

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>something that that you think about when you when you're

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to identify are we add or near close to

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a bottom or pass the bottom? Fix? Really isn't something

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I paid that close attention to. To be honest, I've

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>never really had UM. I think that the key thing

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to, you know that it is really

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be the data. And I think the data

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is starting to show inflation coming down. We need to

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>see it's coming down far more aggressively UH to get

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Powell off the gas pedal, but I think it will

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and certainly recession will do the trick. What do you

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>watch for in terms of UH volatility measures? I have

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to move up on my screen. It's you know, off

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the chart at this point. In terms of capitulation signs,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what what do you watch? I mean, I think we're

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just seeing it across the board. You know you mentioned

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but UK gilst did yesterday and that was just a

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>pure short covering, nasty move and we saw it with

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>equities following through yesterday. A lot of a lot of

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is driven by a smaller positions and

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what's causing the higher volatility. People not sticking and

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're not staying with what they have, They're they're

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>getting chased out easily, and a lot of that chase

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is machine driven. I mean, the the algos are really

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.239
<v Speaker 1>running the game at this point because the moves are

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so fierce. I mean, people have been saying the Algoes

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are running the game since I've been in this job,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's really true. I mean, it's it's totally true.

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things I think the s sc

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>SEC is blown in a major way by taking humans

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the picture and making it, you know, completely

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a machines driven and it feels like they're all they're

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>all written by the same programmer. Actually, it's it's kind

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of odd. Do we get parody on the pound? I

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's in the cards. Um we're not seeing

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal policy being altered in any way by the

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister. It runs at odds to monetary policy. Those

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>things usually uh and badly for our currency. I think

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, you know, again, a bit of a relief rally.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been sold off so aggressively, more short covering today

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>back on a one ten handle. But um as my

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>trader friend buddies would have say, better levels to sell, right,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, good stuff. Hey, Matt, I have to note

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that we got Vincent's studio, but I have to note

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>he has not taken off his coat. I don't think

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he plans on didn't take it off on TV either. Okay,

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>so sometimes I don't take off my jacket. You know,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it's can be a little chilly. Just I just take

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>away like he's got one eye on the door already. Yeah,

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's kind of was my take away. Great to

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>see my friend. Thanks for coming and give us sharing

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>some of your thoughts here on these marks another rough

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>day out there for the trader types as well. Jay

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryson joins us well as Fargo chief economists. Jay, thanks

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. I love to just

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>start off by saying, or just asking if this economy

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is either in a recession or goes into a recession

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in a in a time when we've got high inflation.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, you know, some of the some groups

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be that can't really afford to be hit

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>by this, are gonna be hit the heart. How do

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Well, that's that's true. I mean

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>when you go into into recession. I mean, obviously the

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate rises, and you know people who um are

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>are are working and who are particularly in particularly simply

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>called sensitive sort of industries that you see a lot,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where the layoffs tend to occur, and so um,

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know people who are working in those industries, and

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I would account Hispanics among that group could be hit

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>harder than other people. I was, I have a canned

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>question I've been asking this week. A viewers sent it

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to me and I thought a listeners send it to me,

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was good enough to save, so

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll pitch it to you as well. He says, I'm

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>curious to know last year's inflation is transitory, seems to

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be this year's short and shallow recession. What changes the

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:53.239
<v Speaker 1>short and shallow to uh, you know, longer and deeper. Well, so,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I guess it would be if inflation

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come down as much. And so you know, right

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>now the market is priced for terminal said funds rate

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of roughly four and a half percent. If inflation doesn't

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>come down, maybe it's six percent. And the more the

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>higher rates go, the more things are going to start

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to break, and the other thing would just be some

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hidden vulnerabilities that we don't really know about. I mean,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>looking for example, look what's happened in the UK this

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>week and right now that's causing a fair amount of

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dislocations in the treasury market here. Um, maybe there's more

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>things like the UK out there that we're not thinking

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>about right now that are deep beneath the surface. But

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>if those things start to break, then potentially, you know,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you could have a bunch of financial unwinding occurring other

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>places around the world. It could be could lead the

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>continent around the world. What do you worry about right now?

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I saw, um, the CarMax earnings come out

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier and the shares are down, But really across the

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>across the industry, those companies that are public, like Carbona

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>or On Automotive, they're all trading down big time, General

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Motors and Ford as well, because the concern is consumer

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is weakening and rates are rising hitting demand right

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as those car makers and manufacturers are finally getting supply

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>back up to speed. Yeah, I mean, so you know,

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in general kind of goes back to what I was

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about before in terms of cyclically sensitive interest rate

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sensitive sort of industries. You mentioned the car industry, you know,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously interest rate sensitive. Another industry that's really interest

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>rate sensitive is housing. I mean, we're already seeing housing

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>weakening significantly. You know, you mentioned earlier that the yield

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on the on the the you know, for the third

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>year sixth or eight mortgages up to six and three

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>quarters per cent. We haven't seen that in decades, um,

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and so you could see, you know, you could really

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>start to see the housing work is starting to weaken

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>here as well. So, J I know you and your

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>team are out with this report about you know, the

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>potential impact on Hispanic workers here in a potential recession.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Where are we just it just feels like for the

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>broader economy, we're at our near full employment here. Give

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>us the picture in the Hispanic community and maybe how

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that might play out if we do, in fact, you know,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have a material recession. Yeah. So you know, I've said

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a few times now already about cyclically sensitive sort of industries.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at where Hispanics are, I'll call

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>them overrepresented, um. And so keep in mind a Hispanics

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>account for a roughly ent or so of the workforce. Okay,

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at construction, Hispanics account for a third there.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Construction cyclically sensitive. If you look at transportation and warehousing, um,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know again Hispanics account for more than of the

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>workforce there. Non durable manufacturing account for more than These

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 1>are all cyclically sensitive sort of industries. And so if

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy were go into recession or if we see,

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a long period of weak economic growth, that's

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>where you're probably gonna get some more layoffs in those

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of industries. And I would expect to see the

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate among Hispanics, which is kind of close to

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the overall national rate right now, I would expect to

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>see that rise more. And we definitely have seen that

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last three cycles, where the Hispanic rate tends

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to go up more during the recession than what it

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>does for the overall population. All right, j let's talk hoops.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Is North Carolina even gonna be able to field a

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>basketball team this year? Are you kidding me? Carolina? You

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>know they have all these guys coming back, who are

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, seniors? You know the team that beat Duke

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>last year in the final in the final four, they're

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>all they're all back, And who does Douke have. I

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>mean they have a bunch of freshmen who have never

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>played together. So we have and we have a new

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>coach though, So that you have a new coach, you

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>can allow your players to drive stolen cars where Oh yes,

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a d u I right, there's a little d

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>o I issue for my for my dukeys. All right, Jake,

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Jay Brice and he's

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the chief economist for Wells Fargo and he is all

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in U n C. He's got the undergrad and economics

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>from UNC. Dr philosophy economics from the University of North Carolina.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>He lectures there. He's on the economic board. He is

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>all in tar heels. I'm sure he bleeds tar Heel blue.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And if God's not Atario, why is the sky Carolina blue?

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>See that's kind of I learned in my two years

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of Duke. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller V three pen on ball

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio