1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane along 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jaily, we bring you 3 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, sun Cloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Michael McKee whether 6 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:32,879 Speaker 1: wearing many hats this morning and right now we're going 7 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 1: to rapidly digress here to a gentleman like Paul Booker 8 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: from New Jersey, Raphael Bostick. What an interesting path out 9 00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 1: of Harvard and Stanford, really first rate academics and a 10 00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:47,479 Speaker 1: different fed president Michael indeed, and now the president of 11 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:51,239 Speaker 1: the Atlanta Federal Reserve, Rafael Bostick, and we welcome you 12 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: to Surveillance this morning. At you're in Atlanta, where it's 13 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: gonna be a lot warmer. I looked this morning, Rafael, 14 00:00:57,360 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: and it was thirty seven degrees out on the back 15 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 1: lawn of the Jackson Lake Lodge. So in some ways 16 00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:05,959 Speaker 1: we're better off. It's not as it's not as beautiful, 17 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:09,119 Speaker 1: but in subways we're better off. Uh, let me ask 18 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: you first about the numbers that we just got four 19 00:01:11,319 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 1: point two percent on the year over year headline PC 20 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 1: three point six percent for the core. Is that out 21 00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: of line at all with what you were anticipating? And 22 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:25,080 Speaker 1: does that maybe put more pressure on you to decide 23 00:01:25,120 --> 00:01:29,840 Speaker 1: you would like to see sooner taper? Well, Mike, first 24 00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 1: of all, I'm glad we're not sitting out in thirty 25 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:35,800 Speaker 1: degree weather. Uh. That makes for a much less comfortable interview. Uh, 26 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 1: you know. And and for the numbers that came out today, 27 00:01:38,319 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 1: you know, I've I've been in studio, so I have 28 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:44,120 Speaker 1: not a chance to look at the numbers, UM more deeply. 29 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 1: But I would say this sort of number is not 30 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: a It's not a huge surprise for me. We know 31 00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 1: that there have been a lot of price pressures, UM, 32 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:56,600 Speaker 1: and those have continued. UM. I heard you guys talking 33 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: before about the notion of transitory and you know when 34 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 1: I to businesses, but they've told me is that, UM, 35 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 1: this is episodic. They do believe that this is really 36 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 1: driven by the pandemic circumstance. But what it also become 37 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 1: clear is that this episode is gonna last longer than 38 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:15,280 Speaker 1: people expected. So UM, we're trying, We're going to figure 39 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: out how to incorporate that into our modeling. I would say, 40 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:22,520 Speaker 1: for me, what I'm seeing is really consistent with the 41 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,520 Speaker 1: outlook that I had before. So I'm still comfortable that 42 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 1: we're on a good trajectory with the economy and we 43 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:31,880 Speaker 1: should still see fairly robust growth. Llow, we put you 44 00:02:31,880 --> 00:02:34,400 Speaker 1: on the other side of that big mahogany table at 45 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:38,040 Speaker 1: the FED and those who might argue for a delay, 46 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,640 Speaker 1: is there an argument there because what seems to be 47 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: happening is a problem on the supply side, and you 48 00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 1: guys address the demand side. Well, it's certainly true that 49 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 1: there are supply side challenges, and you know, you've, I've 50 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: we've all heard many stories about supply chain issues and 51 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:58,160 Speaker 1: trying to get goods to product to meet the robust 52 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:01,240 Speaker 1: demand that's out there. I definitely worried about that and 53 00:03:01,280 --> 00:03:04,000 Speaker 1: thinking about that. What I would also say, though, is 54 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:07,799 Speaker 1: that what we have seen and businesses consistently tell me 55 00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:13,160 Speaker 1: they're getting having record volumes, the demand is super strong, uh, 56 00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:15,959 Speaker 1: And so I don't think that pushes in a different 57 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,040 Speaker 1: direction than the types of things that we're thinking about 58 00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:22,520 Speaker 1: in terms of removing some of the accommodation. I think 59 00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:25,359 Speaker 1: the economy is performing extremely strong, and any weakness that 60 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 1: we're going to see is just pulling us off of 61 00:03:27,360 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 1: very high numbers. Initially, there seems to be a feeling 62 00:03:30,520 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 1: on Wall Street that if you end tapering, and particularly 63 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:36,600 Speaker 1: if you do it quickly, that that will remove us 64 00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:39,600 Speaker 1: support from the equity markets. Uh. The FED has been 65 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 1: contributing to the big rise we have seen in the 66 00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 1: indexes and maybe even to inflation with QUWI purchases. How 67 00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 1: much do you worry about financial market stability with this 68 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: switch in policy coming up? Well, you know, I always 69 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: worry about financial stability. I think it's important that we 70 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: make sure that our financial system remains wrong and resilient 71 00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 1: so they can provide the services that are needed for 72 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: our economy. Uh. What I do think though, in terms 73 00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:10,680 Speaker 1: of our policies is that we're really aimed at two 74 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 1: other things. We're looking at maximum employment and stable prices. 75 00:04:14,960 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 1: I think that we're doing a pretty well, uh, making 76 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 1: good progress in both, which suggests that we should be 77 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,279 Speaker 1: trying to get our our our policies back into a 78 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 1: more normal situation. You know, we've been at a very 79 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,120 Speaker 1: extreme level accommodation, and I think that the strength of 80 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:33,839 Speaker 1: the economy calls for us to pull off of that 81 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:36,280 Speaker 1: a little bit and let the economy stand on his own. Uh. 82 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: We still have a fair amount of energy momentum. I 83 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 1: think that we can do our tapering faster than we 84 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:48,000 Speaker 1: have in previous episodes because of that momentum and my 85 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:51,600 Speaker 1: expectations the economy will continue to operate in a strong way. 86 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:56,159 Speaker 1: We were talking earlier about whether the inflation impulse that 87 00:04:56,200 --> 00:05:00,440 Speaker 1: we're seeing now will less longer than you anticipated. Is 88 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 1: the idea of getting the taper underway, and uh, you 89 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,840 Speaker 1: have said, get it done fairly quickly, so that you 90 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:10,559 Speaker 1: have some freedom to be able to address interest rates 91 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:15,320 Speaker 1: if you need to. Well, I mean, certainly, I think 92 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:18,360 Speaker 1: it's important that we move one tool, one lever at 93 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:22,480 Speaker 1: a time. Uh. It's much more complicated to communicate what 94 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 1: we're trying to accost with policy if we're moving interest 95 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:28,239 Speaker 1: rates and doing things and asset purchases at the same time. So, 96 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: you know, getting the asset purchases done is going to 97 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: be an important thing, uh, in terms of the sequencing 98 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: of our policy. But I do really think about them 99 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:39,720 Speaker 1: in very different ways. UM. I think about a lot 100 00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 1: of the asset purchase impetus coming out of the deep 101 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:46,840 Speaker 1: recession that was triggered through the pandemic. UH. And as 102 00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:49,679 Speaker 1: the economy has moved further and further away from those 103 00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 1: those lows, I think the need for the type that 104 00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 1: uh those purchases starts to decline. UH. And at that point, 105 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,160 Speaker 1: I think we should move on to other things. US 106 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: that's done. I think what I'm going to do is 107 00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:05,320 Speaker 1: really look at the data and have the data inform 108 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: me as to how I should be thinking about when 109 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:11,520 Speaker 1: we should do lift off with interest rates. Right now, 110 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 1: I have the that projected as the end of two. 111 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: But you know, as I always say, a lot's going 112 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:18,840 Speaker 1: to happen between now and then, UH, and that will 113 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:23,799 Speaker 1: really inform the actual decision that we make in terms 114 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 1: of when we start to move interest rates. Well, when 115 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:29,599 Speaker 1: you talk to CEOs in your district, or even the 116 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:32,840 Speaker 1: mom and pop stores in your district, what are they 117 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:39,480 Speaker 1: telling you about how long they think this inflation will last? Well? Yeah, 118 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:42,440 Speaker 1: they actually don't talk about it usually in terms of inflation. 119 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:45,320 Speaker 1: They talk about it in their ability to meet product demand. 120 00:06:45,360 --> 00:06:48,680 Speaker 1: And so business leaders UH that I talked to UH 121 00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:52,640 Speaker 1: tell me that the supply chain challenges are significant. What 122 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:54,479 Speaker 1: we thought were going to be or what they thought 123 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:57,279 Speaker 1: were going to be short term challenges are starting to 124 00:06:57,320 --> 00:07:01,080 Speaker 1: look like they're gonna last a bit longer into too UH, 125 00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:03,680 Speaker 1: and that has implications for what's going to happen in 126 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,440 Speaker 1: terms of prices. But I do think and I think 127 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:08,840 Speaker 1: it's important for everyone to keep this in mind. This 128 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 1: is all part of an episode, and so I've I've 129 00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:14,880 Speaker 1: moved away from transitory or permanent and really try to 130 00:07:14,920 --> 00:07:18,880 Speaker 1: talk about this as an episodic uh period of inflation. 131 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 1: And for me, with a long episode, the thing that 132 00:07:23,200 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 1: I'm going to be most concerned about is whether people 133 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 1: start to take the length of the episode as a 134 00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:31,160 Speaker 1: signal that they need to start doing things fundamentally differently. 135 00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:34,080 Speaker 1: Because if that's true, then a lot of the relationships 136 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:37,480 Speaker 1: that we've seen historically may not hold any longer, and 137 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:39,680 Speaker 1: we may do to think about our policies differently. So 138 00:07:39,720 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 1: a lot of the surveys that we're going to be 139 00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:45,200 Speaker 1: doing on inflation expectations and the like, um, those are 140 00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: going to be the things that will inform what makes 141 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: the best sense for for policy moving forward. Raphail. The 142 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 1: theme of this conference the title is Macroeconomic Policy in 143 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 1: an uneven economy at this point. Do you think that 144 00:07:57,320 --> 00:07:59,960 Speaker 1: there one and twenty billion dollars of monthly bond purchase 145 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: is helps even out the unequal recovery or do you 146 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,560 Speaker 1: think it exacerbates at this point given the recovery and 147 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:09,960 Speaker 1: the labor market some of the inequalities, given the fact 148 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:13,720 Speaker 1: that lower rates and better financial conditions tends to help 149 00:08:13,760 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 1: wealthier individuals more because of their assets. Well, you know, 150 00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:20,680 Speaker 1: I think of the purchases, the goal is really to 151 00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 1: make sure that the economy stays robust so that people 152 00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 1: come and get employed, because if you don't have a job, 153 00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:29,800 Speaker 1: then you're going to have a higher level of precariousness, 154 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:35,599 Speaker 1: and that precariousness could trigger and translate into uh, significant hardships. 155 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:38,319 Speaker 1: And I think so what I'm trying to weigh is 156 00:08:38,640 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 1: sort of, uh, the hardships or the potential for hardships 157 00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:45,079 Speaker 1: that many at the lower end of the wealth distribution 158 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 1: could could face without a strong economy versus some of 159 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 1: the benefits that are going to accrue to those at 160 00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:55,240 Speaker 1: the top because we have a strong economy. Uh. And 161 00:08:55,360 --> 00:09:00,439 Speaker 1: for me right now, the precariousness side is of more concern, uh, 162 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 1: in part because of how the pandemic has played out. 163 00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:07,560 Speaker 1: We know that in this pandemic, jobs at the lower 164 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 1: end of the wate retributionn't have been hit much harder, 165 00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 1: and so there is an imperative that we make sure 166 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 1: our policies are in position so they can come back 167 00:09:16,840 --> 00:09:19,760 Speaker 1: more quickly. Uh. That is starting to happen now, and 168 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 1: and for me, I found it heartening that a lot 169 00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 1: of those gaps in terms of job losses and categories 170 00:09:26,040 --> 00:09:29,000 Speaker 1: are starting to narrow, and that gives me some comfort 171 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 1: that the policies have been effective. Mike McKie, why don't 172 00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 1: you drop in here for one final question with the 173 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,680 Speaker 1: good President from Atlanta. Well, let me point out that 174 00:09:38,760 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 1: the Good President from Atlanta is one of the voting 175 00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 1: members of the Open Market Committee this year, So what 176 00:09:45,400 --> 00:09:48,439 Speaker 1: you say really matters. And I'm wondering, I'm sitting here 177 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 1: listening to what you're saying, and I'm thinking of the 178 00:09:50,600 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 1: how the print headlines are gonna say. You know, Bostick 179 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,160 Speaker 1: joins group of hawks. I'm wonder if this is really 180 00:09:56,200 --> 00:10:00,320 Speaker 1: hawkish or if it's just time? Um is there? At 181 00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: some point would anybody notice in terms of market interest 182 00:10:03,960 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 1: rates if you start cutting back on QUEWI purchases. So 183 00:10:09,520 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 1: I actually think that the markets will not respond very 184 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 1: strongly to this UM. The economy is in a very 185 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:20,600 Speaker 1: strong way and strong position, and I think the UH 186 00:10:21,040 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: asset purchases at this point have been something of an 187 00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:27,920 Speaker 1: insurance policy. I think that we don't need that insurance 188 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:31,319 Speaker 1: nearly as much as we have in previous episodes. Because 189 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:34,320 Speaker 1: of that, I think the markets are going to really 190 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:37,760 Speaker 1: absorb this pretty smoothly. And UH, we'll we'll see the 191 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 1: economy continues to just roll on. Raphael Bostick, You more 192 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:45,080 Speaker 1: than anyone I know inside the Beltway has thought harder 193 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:49,839 Speaker 1: and harder about our nation's social policy, our fabric, your 194 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: CV out of USC, etcetera. Is extraordinary. You talk years 195 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:59,120 Speaker 1: ago about trying to get the doors wider in America, 196 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 1: having you do with housing in the black experience in America. 197 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:08,160 Speaker 1: Where are we right now? Can our institutions and particularly 198 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:13,840 Speaker 1: this FED get the doors open wider? Well, you know, 199 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:16,720 Speaker 1: I think we're definitely gonna try. And let me step 200 00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: back and start by saying, you know, the gaps in 201 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: homeownership or as large as they've ever been since we 202 00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:24,120 Speaker 1: started tracking this, UH, and that means that there is 203 00:11:24,440 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 1: a challenge that we face in terms of UM families 204 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:32,600 Speaker 1: of of African, American and Latino backgrounds UM getting assets 205 00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 1: that allow them to accrue wealth. What I'll tell you 206 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:38,439 Speaker 1: is for the FED, our monetary policy and the policy 207 00:11:38,520 --> 00:11:41,360 Speaker 1: framework that we announced last year is really designed to 208 00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 1: make sure that the employment market, the labor markets work 209 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:47,920 Speaker 1: better for all UH. And we are also advancing a 210 00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:50,319 Speaker 1: number of other things we're convening. So we have a 211 00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:52,560 Speaker 1: Racism in the Economy series to highlight a number of 212 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:56,600 Speaker 1: the barriers and potential solutions. We're working for, solutions in 213 00:11:56,679 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 1: communities to try to make those differences to really change 214 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:03,439 Speaker 1: how the economy works for people UH and make sure 215 00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 1: their institutions are well positioned to succeed. So I think 216 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 1: there's progress that can be made and I'm gonna work 217 00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:12,840 Speaker 1: hard with my colleagues to a push to make that happen. 218 00:12:13,040 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: Dr Boston, thank you so much for joining us today. 219 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 1: What I love about this, folks, is everybody has a 220 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 1: different path to their economic excellence. And Michael McKee, I 221 00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:33,120 Speaker 1: don't think I've ever said this to see someone of 222 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 1: interesting business academics and then took the toughest job in 223 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 1: the country no, not the chairman of the FED. The 224 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:44,720 Speaker 1: president of the University of Delaware. That's a tough job. 225 00:12:45,360 --> 00:12:47,800 Speaker 1: That was a tough job. And Pat Harker just totally 226 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:52,960 Speaker 1: bailed on that. Excuse me, the president of the Philadelphia Fed, 227 00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 1: and he joins us. Now, thank you very much for 228 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 1: joining us. Pat, And as I mentioned Roba El earlier, 229 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:01,400 Speaker 1: we are a lot warmer here in the studio, and 230 00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:03,720 Speaker 1: I'm sure you are in Philadelphia, then we would be 231 00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:05,720 Speaker 1: on the back lawn at Jackson Lake Lodge where it 232 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:09,199 Speaker 1: was thirty seven degrees a short time ago. Uh, I'm 233 00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:12,880 Speaker 1: wondering about heat. In terms of inflation, we got inflation 234 00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:17,000 Speaker 1: numbers today. The headline PCE goes up to four point 235 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 1: two percent, faster than you had anticipated and higher than 236 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 1: had been anticipated by the Fed. Does that suggest to 237 00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 1: you that we might need to see uh, and I 238 00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: know taper comes first, but that we might need to 239 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: see interest rates rise sooner than the market has been expecting. First. 240 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 1: Good morning. Yeah, we're a little warmer, although I do 241 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:42,760 Speaker 1: miss the view. The view from my my office is 242 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:46,440 Speaker 1: my home office is a lot different. And go fighting 243 00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:51,199 Speaker 1: blue hands, go University of Dolaware. So yeah, so on inflation. 244 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 1: I mean, clearly it is a concern. Um. The word 245 00:13:55,200 --> 00:13:58,440 Speaker 1: transitory I think has been used probably in some ways 246 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:03,840 Speaker 1: too much. Uh. But there are clearly sectors of the 247 00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:07,800 Speaker 1: economy which are accelerating faster than others. That's always the case. 248 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:12,320 Speaker 1: The question in my mind to watch on inflation is 249 00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:18,320 Speaker 1: are we seeing spillover from these COVID infected sectors to 250 00:14:18,400 --> 00:14:23,720 Speaker 1: the non COVID infected sectors and our expectations becoming unanchored 251 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:26,480 Speaker 1: so far on the latter point, the answer is no, 252 00:14:27,240 --> 00:14:29,960 Speaker 1: but it is clearly something we need to watch. And 253 00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:32,800 Speaker 1: what we're hearing from our business contacts is that this 254 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 1: may be longer lasting than we had expected they had expected, 255 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 1: So is clearly a risk that we have to be 256 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 1: cognizant of with respect to policy. Are those people telling 257 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:49,080 Speaker 1: you that they're going to have to keep raising prices 258 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 1: in order to make up their margins? R I hear 259 00:14:53,000 --> 00:14:55,880 Speaker 1: from our contacts business contexts they're working very hard not 260 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 1: to raise prices. They are seeing some increase in productivity. 261 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:03,520 Speaker 1: Good news. This We are seeing across the economy and 262 00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 1: in individual sectors increases in productivity, which helps to mitigate 263 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 1: some of the challenges they're facing but that doesn't completely 264 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:16,080 Speaker 1: get rid of them. So yeah, they're they're concerned about 265 00:15:16,080 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 1: this right now. I think generally they're very concerned. One 266 00:15:18,800 --> 00:15:21,920 Speaker 1: major national homebuilder I was talking to you recently said, 267 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 1: you know, the supply chain disruptions we taught were temporary. 268 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:28,960 Speaker 1: It looks as temporary as we thought. They will eventually 269 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:32,280 Speaker 1: solve themselves, like appliances, But right now they're putting in 270 00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 1: used appliances and the new homes and promising to deliver 271 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:38,119 Speaker 1: a new appliance because they simply can't get the appliances 272 00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:41,840 Speaker 1: in that case because of chips. To a large extent, 273 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:44,720 Speaker 1: we think about cars and chips, Well, there are chips 274 00:15:44,760 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 1: in your dishwasher, and sometimes they don't work in my dishwasher. 275 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:54,480 Speaker 1: If if the rest of the Open Market Committee follows 276 00:15:54,480 --> 00:15:57,960 Speaker 1: your advice and decides to start tapering fairly soon, what 277 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,200 Speaker 1: kind of message does that send at a time time 278 00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 1: when people are very unsure about the impact of COVID 279 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:07,880 Speaker 1: on the economy. So delta is clearly a problem, and 280 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 1: the next one. It's not just going to be delta. 281 00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:13,360 Speaker 1: First and foremost. We've got to get this endemic under 282 00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:16,200 Speaker 1: control under way. To do that is get people vaccinated. 283 00:16:16,640 --> 00:16:19,840 Speaker 1: It started with a health crisis. It's going to end 284 00:16:19,960 --> 00:16:23,680 Speaker 1: by solving the health crisis, not by raising rates or 285 00:16:23,680 --> 00:16:26,840 Speaker 1: lowering rates. So we need to keep that first and 286 00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:29,600 Speaker 1: foremost right in front of our mind, and we need 287 00:16:29,640 --> 00:16:35,360 Speaker 1: to tell everybody. So yeah, I mean, given that, given 288 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: that this is a health crisis, I think we need 289 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:41,680 Speaker 1: to follow. As our colleagues and Raphael was just on 290 00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:44,680 Speaker 1: have said, we really need to follow the data and 291 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 1: see how things turn out over the next couple of months. 292 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:53,560 Speaker 1: We put these systems in place. We put this accommodation 293 00:16:53,560 --> 00:16:56,360 Speaker 1: in place because of the health crisis, and we will 294 00:16:56,400 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 1: be able to remove it now because we are slowly careful. 295 00:17:00,040 --> 00:17:02,520 Speaker 1: We chipping away at the health crisis, but we're not 296 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:06,440 Speaker 1: there yet. We talked a lot about inflation this morning, 297 00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:09,720 Speaker 1: but what about the labor market? Of the committee and 298 00:17:09,800 --> 00:17:13,400 Speaker 1: it's minutes of the last meeting suggested you've made progress, 299 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:15,520 Speaker 1: but not nearly enough. And even if we get a 300 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:19,160 Speaker 1: similar jobs report next Friday to what we had, you're 301 00:17:19,160 --> 00:17:23,320 Speaker 1: still gonna be about six million short. I'm wondering if 302 00:17:23,400 --> 00:17:28,040 Speaker 1: you expect to make up that difference very quickly, or 303 00:17:28,080 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 1: if the participation rate is going to stay low and 304 00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:35,400 Speaker 1: that might change your thought about the proper path for policy. 305 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 1: To separate two things there, it's a good question. One 306 00:17:38,920 --> 00:17:42,520 Speaker 1: is the path of policy, but also, uh, what is 307 00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:47,040 Speaker 1: causing this? Uh, what's causing this? It's not a lack 308 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: of demand. It's clearly not a lack of demand. We 309 00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:52,719 Speaker 1: see that in the JULT data, lots of open jobs. 310 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:57,520 Speaker 1: People are still concerned about coming back to work. People 311 00:17:57,520 --> 00:18:00,680 Speaker 1: are concerned about getting on transit thing city like Philadelphia 312 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:04,520 Speaker 1: to get to the workplace. People are concerned about going 313 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 1: to the restaurant with the delta variant, etcetera, etcetera. And 314 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:11,719 Speaker 1: so again. Until we solve those problems and childcare and 315 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:15,919 Speaker 1: all the other things holding people back from entering the workforce, 316 00:18:17,080 --> 00:18:20,359 Speaker 1: that's going to be an issue. Unemployment insurance is rolling off, 317 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:23,919 Speaker 1: I mean the expanded unemployment insurance. We are starting to 318 00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:27,720 Speaker 1: see some of those early early results from some states 319 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:33,040 Speaker 1: that removed the federal unemployment early. Yeah, you know, it 320 00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: doesn't seem like that's having a huge impact on getting 321 00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:39,359 Speaker 1: more people into the labor force. It's these other factors life, 322 00:18:39,800 --> 00:18:43,240 Speaker 1: but simply as life right, taking care of kids, taking 323 00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:47,560 Speaker 1: care of elderly parents, getting to and from work, it's 324 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,640 Speaker 1: causing us. So what does that mean for policy? If that, 325 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:55,080 Speaker 1: if what I just said is true, then adding accommodation 326 00:18:55,160 --> 00:18:58,800 Speaker 1: or keeping highly accommodative policy is not going to solve 327 00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:01,160 Speaker 1: that problem. It's not going to close back gap. It's 328 00:19:01,280 --> 00:19:04,640 Speaker 1: not a demand problem, it's a supply problem. Well within 329 00:19:04,680 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: the Patrick Carker, I think you're best situated of anybody 330 00:19:07,600 --> 00:19:10,280 Speaker 1: within the FED. I note that the Philadelphia FED was 331 00:19:10,400 --> 00:19:13,480 Speaker 1: four or five of the American population sitting on one 332 00:19:13,520 --> 00:19:16,840 Speaker 1: percent of the land. It's a micro cosm of this nation. 333 00:19:16,960 --> 00:19:23,960 Speaker 1: The manufacturing index back great. What do you hear from 334 00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 1: the small, the mid and the large business people of 335 00:19:27,240 --> 00:19:32,000 Speaker 1: your district? So they're nervous. I mean, I think generally 336 00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 1: people are nervous and about what the future holds. But 337 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:39,199 Speaker 1: that said, they are seeing lots of demand. I mean, 338 00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:43,000 Speaker 1: our manufacturing contacts are manufacturing business Outlook survey. Although it's 339 00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:45,920 Speaker 1: ticked down a little bit in terms of future activity, 340 00:19:46,400 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 1: it's still an expansionary territory. Their biggest problem, and you 341 00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:53,040 Speaker 1: know this is getting skilled labor. And by the way, 342 00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:54,840 Speaker 1: we should put this in context and some of the 343 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:57,800 Speaker 1: work we're doing in the Philly FED. This problem of 344 00:19:57,880 --> 00:20:02,360 Speaker 1: skilled labor and labor generally with us before the pandemic hit. 345 00:20:02,920 --> 00:20:06,880 Speaker 1: The pandemic has just exascerbated the problem, it hasn't created 346 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:12,159 Speaker 1: the problem. We still need long term structural solutions to 347 00:20:12,359 --> 00:20:15,400 Speaker 1: solving our labor woes, and that's kind of work we're 348 00:20:15,400 --> 00:20:18,240 Speaker 1: doing in our community development function at the Philly Fed 349 00:20:18,280 --> 00:20:20,679 Speaker 1: and really across the federal reserve system. Well. At the 350 00:20:20,680 --> 00:20:22,520 Speaker 1: Philly Fed, you said something that I think is just 351 00:20:22,560 --> 00:20:25,440 Speaker 1: fascinating Patrick, that some of the supply side issues that 352 00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:28,560 Speaker 1: we're seeing in the labor market, the frictions there are 353 00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 1: not solved by monetary policy. This isn't something that holding 354 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 1: rates low for a longer period of time or even 355 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,520 Speaker 1: up trying a hundred twenty billion dollars of bonds every 356 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:40,160 Speaker 1: month is going to solve in its own right. So 357 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:43,679 Speaker 1: how do you determine the potential negative ramifications from the 358 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,960 Speaker 1: ongoing a hundred twenty billion dollars of purchases with the 359 00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 1: lack of influence, frankly on solving these labor market dynamics. 360 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:54,200 Speaker 1: So I have been on record and I continue to 361 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:56,720 Speaker 1: be on record that I would like to start papering 362 00:20:56,800 --> 00:20:59,240 Speaker 1: sooner rather than later. I'd like to start it sooner 363 00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:01,639 Speaker 1: rather than later. And I like to keep keep it 364 00:21:01,640 --> 00:21:04,400 Speaker 1: as simple as possible. The old engineer, and I'm trained 365 00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:06,880 Speaker 1: as an engineer, you know, the old kiss principal, keep 366 00:21:06,880 --> 00:21:09,960 Speaker 1: it simple, stupid. Let's just start this process. Let's get 367 00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:12,520 Speaker 1: that over with and then we can start to think 368 00:21:12,520 --> 00:21:16,959 Speaker 1: about the FED funds rate and normalizing the FED fundry. 369 00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: We're not there yet. I'm still forecasting late probably twenty 370 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 1: three before we do lift off. But let's get the 371 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: capering process underway. Mike, let's engineer this Jackson hole right now? 372 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:32,000 Speaker 1: Is this the Jackson hole? A complexity or simplicity? As 373 00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:34,880 Speaker 1: a president speaks of, Well, it depends on whether you're 374 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:38,160 Speaker 1: reading the papers which are complex, or whether you are 375 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: talking about raising interest rates or starting to taper. I'm wondering, Pat, 376 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:46,840 Speaker 1: if you think that starting to taper is going to 377 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:52,560 Speaker 1: have an impact uh this soon on the whole FED, 378 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,160 Speaker 1: the new framework. Uh, the idea that you're waiting. Will 379 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: people take that the wrong way and think that you're 380 00:21:59,280 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: giving up too soon? They might, But again I don't 381 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:08,760 Speaker 1: think that's that's appropriate. Uh. We have achieved our inflation 382 00:22:08,800 --> 00:22:12,720 Speaker 1: goal essentially, I mean we're above two again. Good news, 383 00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:17,080 Speaker 1: is explications have not become an anchored But we are 384 00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:22,440 Speaker 1: averaging about two percent and keeping this accommodation through tapering 385 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:26,040 Speaker 1: there for a long period of time. Uh. And it's 386 00:22:26,080 --> 00:22:28,520 Speaker 1: not solving the labor problem. That's not the problem. Just 387 00:22:28,560 --> 00:22:31,360 Speaker 1: look at how many jobs are open in the US economy, 388 00:22:31,400 --> 00:22:35,320 Speaker 1: the jokes data. I just think it's the proven thing 389 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:39,120 Speaker 1: to do to just take this first move and then 390 00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 1: let's see how things play out before we think about 391 00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:45,120 Speaker 1: any change in At that country, we talked about whether 392 00:22:45,200 --> 00:22:49,000 Speaker 1: or not the FED has contributed to inflation by propping 393 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:51,520 Speaker 1: up asset prices. A lot of people have said fiscal 394 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:54,440 Speaker 1: policy is contributing to inflation by putting a lot of 395 00:22:54,480 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 1: money into the economy and now down and watching in 396 00:22:56,840 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 1: their debating hundreds of billions more. Are you worried that that? 397 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:03,960 Speaker 1: Leaving aside the political merits of this, are you worried 398 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:08,200 Speaker 1: it could be inflationary? Let's start with what we know 399 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,760 Speaker 1: almost exists, not done yet, but the infrastructure bill. As 400 00:23:12,760 --> 00:23:15,880 Speaker 1: an old civil engineer, I'm all for fixing our infrastructure. 401 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:18,720 Speaker 1: It's in woeful shape across our economy. We need to 402 00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:22,760 Speaker 1: fix it. So what's the implication, what impact will that 403 00:23:22,840 --> 00:23:26,520 Speaker 1: have on the economy. Well, I mean the evidence I've seen, 404 00:23:26,560 --> 00:23:29,879 Speaker 1: at least the modeling i've seen, you know that chillion 405 00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:33,680 Speaker 1: dollars will have maybe one two tenths of a percent 406 00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:36,959 Speaker 1: impact on GDP. So we're not talking about a huge 407 00:23:37,160 --> 00:23:41,440 Speaker 1: overall impact in certain sectors, absolutely, but not overall. My 408 00:23:41,520 --> 00:23:44,600 Speaker 1: biggest concern right now is not that it's going to 409 00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:48,360 Speaker 1: overstand that bill itself is going to overstimulate the economy, 410 00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:50,240 Speaker 1: is that where are we going to get the labor, 411 00:23:50,320 --> 00:23:52,800 Speaker 1: the skilled labor, to fix the roads, to do the 412 00:23:52,880 --> 00:23:56,240 Speaker 1: broad bad work, and so forth. That we need a 413 00:23:56,359 --> 00:24:01,000 Speaker 1: really intensive effort to get people into the labor force 414 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:04,680 Speaker 1: with those skills. Now, the broader issue of the three 415 00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:08,480 Speaker 1: three and a half trillion that is right now, I 416 00:24:08,600 --> 00:24:11,679 Speaker 1: don't have picks opinion on that because really that's a 417 00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:15,640 Speaker 1: moving target every single day, and it's very hard to model, uh, 418 00:24:16,000 --> 00:24:20,000 Speaker 1: such a moving target. All right, very quickly, pat next Thursday, 419 00:24:20,119 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 1: September two, Delaware Blue Hens versus the Black Bears of Maine. Winner. Well, 420 00:24:26,840 --> 00:24:28,760 Speaker 1: I'm always going to go with the blue Hens. Come on, 421 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:33,919 Speaker 1: everyone will be fully vaccinated. Petrick Harker, thank you so much, greatly, 422 00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:44,600 Speaker 1: greatly appreciated this morning. The voice of Philadelphia. This is wonderful, folks, 423 00:24:44,640 --> 00:24:47,280 Speaker 1: because it's a changeable feast of what the FED invented, 424 00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:50,760 Speaker 1: the geography of the nation, and Michael McKee, it's pretty 425 00:24:50,760 --> 00:24:54,119 Speaker 1: simple to say the culture of the fabric of Philadelphia 426 00:24:54,760 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 1: radically different what capital holds court in in Dallas. Yes, 427 00:24:59,359 --> 00:25:02,240 Speaker 1: certainly the lture is a little bit different. Robert Kaplan 428 00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:06,160 Speaker 1: much more likely to be wearing cowboy boots than Pat Harker. 429 00:25:06,240 --> 00:25:09,240 Speaker 1: Robert Kaplan is the president of the Dallas Federal Reserve. 430 00:25:09,280 --> 00:25:11,639 Speaker 1: And this is, I guess, uh, Rob a little bit like, Uh, 431 00:25:11,960 --> 00:25:14,680 Speaker 1: we're all sitting around the table at the FED meeting, 432 00:25:14,720 --> 00:25:16,879 Speaker 1: the Open Market Committee meeting, because each one of you 433 00:25:17,040 --> 00:25:20,439 Speaker 1: is getting, in turn your chance to describe the economy. Uh. 434 00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:24,119 Speaker 1: Let's let's ask you, um in Dallas, in the in 435 00:25:24,160 --> 00:25:29,000 Speaker 1: your region, what are CEOs and company officials saying about 436 00:25:29,280 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 1: whether this inflationary spike that we've seen is going to 437 00:25:33,119 --> 00:25:37,160 Speaker 1: continue because maybe COVID is going to disrupt supply lines 438 00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:42,359 Speaker 1: even longer. What they're gonna what they're saying is the 439 00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:46,840 Speaker 1: materials supply demand balances are gonna last longer than people 440 00:25:46,880 --> 00:25:52,280 Speaker 1: may be expecting. Now certain material imbalances are going to 441 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:56,760 Speaker 1: get resolved. That semiconductors. My contexts are telling me it 442 00:25:56,800 --> 00:26:01,640 Speaker 1: could take much longer to see those balances resolved. One 443 00:26:01,640 --> 00:26:04,360 Speaker 1: of the reasons is a lot of the changes we're 444 00:26:04,400 --> 00:26:07,880 Speaker 1: making to the economy. Electrification of the auto grid, for example, 445 00:26:08,160 --> 00:26:11,239 Speaker 1: takes a lot of semi conductors, and so we're going 446 00:26:11,280 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 1: to produce more semi conductors, but demand is growing. So 447 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:19,400 Speaker 1: that's the that's the materials. The one that I think 448 00:26:19,520 --> 00:26:22,679 Speaker 1: is gonna be even more persistent is the labor supply 449 00:26:22,840 --> 00:26:28,080 Speaker 1: demanding balances and that we've had three million retirements since February. 450 00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:30,199 Speaker 1: We have a million a quarter million half people who 451 00:26:30,240 --> 00:26:32,480 Speaker 1: have left the workforce to be caregivers. You have a 452 00:26:32,520 --> 00:26:38,159 Speaker 1: fear of infection, and broadly, businesses are becoming resolved to 453 00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: the idea it's gonna be hard to attract labor. They're 454 00:26:42,800 --> 00:26:46,040 Speaker 1: gonna pay more. The wage increases are are certainly for 455 00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:50,160 Speaker 1: labor welcome. But I think businesses are actively thinking about 456 00:26:50,280 --> 00:26:53,760 Speaker 1: how to manage their business, and if they're a big business, 457 00:26:54,000 --> 00:26:57,040 Speaker 1: they're going to use more technology more scale. Small mid 458 00:26:57,119 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 1: sized businesses, the only thing they option they have is 459 00:27:01,040 --> 00:27:04,960 Speaker 1: to raise prices. UH and they're doing that, and they're 460 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:08,679 Speaker 1: more confident that they can raise prices and have them stick. Well, 461 00:27:08,720 --> 00:27:10,920 Speaker 1: I'm sure you've probably heard Pat Harker just a moment 462 00:27:10,960 --> 00:27:13,280 Speaker 1: ago talking about if we get this stimulus bill, the 463 00:27:13,320 --> 00:27:17,359 Speaker 1: infrastructure bill, we could see inflationary impacts because there aren't 464 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:20,639 Speaker 1: enough workers. How much do you worry that inflation is 465 00:27:20,680 --> 00:27:25,439 Speaker 1: going to be embedded in these companies thoughts going forward 466 00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:30,200 Speaker 1: because they can't find workers. Uh. I think these labor 467 00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:32,600 Speaker 1: supply demand and balances will be with us for an 468 00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 1: extended period. So so do I worry about I think. 469 00:27:35,800 --> 00:27:38,000 Speaker 1: I think it's going to be part of our economy, 470 00:27:38,040 --> 00:27:44,160 Speaker 1: a feature of our economy. And uh I think that 471 00:27:44,560 --> 00:27:47,399 Speaker 1: as a result of that. Are our year end at 472 00:27:47,400 --> 00:27:51,199 Speaker 1: the Dallas FT, our year end PC inflation forecast is 473 00:27:51,240 --> 00:27:54,160 Speaker 1: three point a three point nine percent. I could see 474 00:27:54,160 --> 00:27:56,760 Speaker 1: affirming even to four percent by the end of the year. 475 00:27:57,320 --> 00:28:01,560 Speaker 1: We think the extreme moves will moderate, like used car prices, 476 00:28:01,840 --> 00:28:04,720 Speaker 1: some of those extreme moves from the reopening will moderate, 477 00:28:05,119 --> 00:28:09,240 Speaker 1: but we we think price pressures will broaden because of 478 00:28:09,280 --> 00:28:13,080 Speaker 1: these some of these persistent imbalances, particularly on labor. So 479 00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:15,320 Speaker 1: headline for next year we think right now is in 480 00:28:15,359 --> 00:28:17,520 Speaker 1: the range of two and a half percent, and I 481 00:28:17,560 --> 00:28:21,640 Speaker 1: could see us, you know, revising that up versus down 482 00:28:21,720 --> 00:28:24,160 Speaker 1: as we go through the next few months. So I'm 483 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:26,840 Speaker 1: watching it carefully. And we've got a commitment at the 484 00:28:26,880 --> 00:28:30,560 Speaker 1: FED to anchoring average inflation at two percent. We're willing 485 00:28:30,560 --> 00:28:33,399 Speaker 1: to run moderately above. We've also got a commitment to 486 00:28:33,440 --> 00:28:37,720 Speaker 1: anchor it. And low moderate income communities I'm talking to 487 00:28:37,880 --> 00:28:41,840 Speaker 1: actively are seeing a greater share of their wallet going 488 00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 1: to to uh, you know, gasoline, food, rents, autos, and 489 00:28:47,360 --> 00:28:52,240 Speaker 1: they're they're, they're, they're they're feeling that those effects. Well, 490 00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:55,840 Speaker 1: I know your two thousand twenty two guy for raising 491 00:28:55,880 --> 00:28:58,000 Speaker 1: interest rates, and you also want to get the taper 492 00:28:58,120 --> 00:29:01,880 Speaker 1: over with. Is it possible that, uh, we see the 493 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:05,640 Speaker 1: Fed have to move up the date of liftoff for 494 00:29:06,160 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 1: the Fed funds rate. Uh. I've been very careful with 495 00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:16,640 Speaker 1: emphasize that decisions on the asset purchases should be separated 496 00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:19,760 Speaker 1: from decisions on the Fed funds rate. We've got a 497 00:29:19,840 --> 00:29:23,080 Speaker 1: number of months and into next year to assess how 498 00:29:23,080 --> 00:29:26,840 Speaker 1: the economy unfolds, how these dynamics unfold. Will make that 499 00:29:26,920 --> 00:29:29,880 Speaker 1: judgment next year. I do believe we should start the 500 00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:35,520 Speaker 1: asset persons adjustment process soon. I mean literally as soon 501 00:29:35,560 --> 00:29:38,240 Speaker 1: as possible. And I would like to see us move 502 00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:43,880 Speaker 1: do that process gradually over stay eight months. Uh, And 503 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:46,320 Speaker 1: I think we've got to get started on that, and 504 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:49,400 Speaker 1: I think the extent we get moving on that, it 505 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:53,120 Speaker 1: may actually give us more flexibility down the road on 506 00:29:53,200 --> 00:29:55,440 Speaker 1: our decisions on the FED funds. Right if you're just 507 00:29:55,520 --> 00:29:57,719 Speaker 1: joining us, Robert Kepit of the Dallas Fed with us 508 00:29:57,720 --> 00:30:00,920 Speaker 1: on radio and television worldwide as we elebrate what we 509 00:30:01,000 --> 00:30:05,160 Speaker 1: do at Bloomberg and all of Bloomberg surveillance is economics. 510 00:30:05,200 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: Michael McKee leading our coverage in this hour as we 511 00:30:08,120 --> 00:30:10,160 Speaker 1: go to the speech of the Chairman of the Federal 512 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:14,880 Speaker 1: Reserve System and we see show you worldwide the geography 513 00:30:14,920 --> 00:30:18,800 Speaker 1: of this nation, from Philadelphia to Caplan's Dallas and on 514 00:30:19,200 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 1: to Bullard St. Louis as well. Robert Caplan, good morning 515 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:26,120 Speaker 1: to you. You know, I bust your chops about Dallas 516 00:30:26,200 --> 00:30:29,760 Speaker 1: research because you're the only Fed president that actually reads 517 00:30:29,800 --> 00:30:36,360 Speaker 1: his research. You have a spectacular research piece linking surging 518 00:30:36,520 --> 00:30:41,080 Speaker 1: home prices into rent inflation and buried in Jim Dolmus's 519 00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:46,280 Speaker 1: peace is six point nine percent rent increases in two 520 00:30:46,360 --> 00:30:52,160 Speaker 1: thousand twenty three. Is your FED ready for that? Uh? 521 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:56,000 Speaker 1: I think low modern income communities are not ready for that, 522 00:30:56,240 --> 00:30:59,880 Speaker 1: and they're they're very cognizant of having to deal with it. 523 00:31:00,320 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 1: And I think while I think what we're saying, uh, 524 00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:07,880 Speaker 1: part of our two and a half percent plus forecast 525 00:31:07,960 --> 00:31:11,840 Speaker 1: for next year is we need to anticipate this appreciation 526 00:31:11,880 --> 00:31:15,080 Speaker 1: at home prices is gonna is going to translate into 527 00:31:15,160 --> 00:31:18,080 Speaker 1: higher rents down the road, and that's got to be 528 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:21,640 Speaker 1: part of our thinking. It's been highly publicized rob that 529 00:31:21,840 --> 00:31:23,720 Speaker 1: and FED Chair J. Powell seems to be a little 530 00:31:23,720 --> 00:31:26,240 Speaker 1: bit more dubbish or a little bit more patient when 531 00:31:26,280 --> 00:31:28,360 Speaker 1: it comes to the taper, when it comes to the 532 00:31:28,440 --> 00:31:31,800 Speaker 1: rate hiking cycle. Where do you guys disagree most? I mean, 533 00:31:31,800 --> 00:31:34,280 Speaker 1: where do you see him wrong in his thinking in 534 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:37,600 Speaker 1: terms of being patient at a time of rents going 535 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:42,560 Speaker 1: up that quickly. Well, I actually reframe, uh what you 536 00:31:42,600 --> 00:31:46,200 Speaker 1: as slightly. I think the role of the chair is 537 00:31:46,280 --> 00:31:50,680 Speaker 1: to encourage a process of debate and disagreement. This is 538 00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:52,800 Speaker 1: why I thought it was so important to get asset 539 00:31:52,840 --> 00:31:56,120 Speaker 1: purchases on the table. But his job is to I 540 00:31:56,160 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 1: believe the chair's job is to encourage debate and disagreement, 541 00:32:00,280 --> 00:32:04,200 Speaker 1: try to forge a consensus and understand views in order 542 00:32:04,200 --> 00:32:06,800 Speaker 1: to come up with policy and have a good process. 543 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:09,719 Speaker 1: And I think j Pal does a superb job at that. 544 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:14,400 Speaker 1: Are you expecting him to make any kind of announcement 545 00:32:14,440 --> 00:32:18,880 Speaker 1: today in terms of paper timing? I would not go 546 00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 1: near commenting on what j Pal is going to say 547 00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:24,440 Speaker 1: in his speech. I don't I don't think it'd be 548 00:32:24,480 --> 00:32:29,400 Speaker 1: appropriate to captain doesn't expect that from you? You know, 549 00:32:29,600 --> 00:32:34,520 Speaker 1: I had to try right anywhere near there? All right? 550 00:32:34,560 --> 00:32:38,560 Speaker 1: Would you? Would you expect that the Open Market Committee 551 00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:43,400 Speaker 1: on September two would announce the beginning of paper or 552 00:32:43,440 --> 00:32:46,320 Speaker 1: that it would come at the next couple of meetings. 553 00:32:46,760 --> 00:32:52,160 Speaker 1: So right now I'll speak to my own process, and 554 00:32:52,520 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 1: that may reflect on what others are doing. Um when 555 00:32:56,520 --> 00:33:00,480 Speaker 1: we've seen we've I've been talking pre research and I 556 00:33:00,520 --> 00:33:03,480 Speaker 1: thought we ought to be moving soon on asset purchases 557 00:33:03,920 --> 00:33:07,640 Speaker 1: and beginning that process. With the resurgence, we've gone back 558 00:33:07,680 --> 00:33:11,280 Speaker 1: at the Dallas fit and redoubled our efforts over the 559 00:33:11,360 --> 00:33:14,640 Speaker 1: last X number of weeks and intensively over the last 560 00:33:14,640 --> 00:33:18,160 Speaker 1: ten days, even to look at high frequency data, real 561 00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:23,280 Speaker 1: time surveys, stepping up, talking to contacts and what I'm 562 00:33:23,320 --> 00:33:26,800 Speaker 1: seeing and what I think we're gonna see up until 563 00:33:26,840 --> 00:33:30,560 Speaker 1: the meeting. But I'm gonna keep reconfirming this is resiliency. 564 00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:33,920 Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that you won't see some slowing and 565 00:33:34,040 --> 00:33:37,320 Speaker 1: say the August jobs numbers because the matching process will 566 00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 1: slow because of fear of infection. It won't be because 567 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:43,160 Speaker 1: a lack of demand for jobs. You might see a 568 00:33:43,160 --> 00:33:46,120 Speaker 1: little near term slowing in g d P, but I 569 00:33:46,160 --> 00:33:47,800 Speaker 1: don't think. I don't think what we're seeing is going 570 00:33:47,840 --> 00:33:51,240 Speaker 1: to change the outlook. And that's the process I'm going 571 00:33:51,280 --> 00:33:54,000 Speaker 1: through leading up to the meeting, and I would guess 572 00:33:54,040 --> 00:33:57,400 Speaker 1: others are doing the same process. Robert Caplen, thank you 573 00:33:57,440 --> 00:34:00,440 Speaker 1: so much, greatly, greatly appreciated this morning. With the Dallas 574 00:34:00,880 --> 00:34:09,080 Speaker 1: FED as well, we have spoken with the Harker of Philadelphia. 575 00:34:09,840 --> 00:34:12,440 Speaker 1: It is rather different in Dallas. And then there's the 576 00:34:12,600 --> 00:34:16,960 Speaker 1: absolute unique characteristics of St. Louis FED. If you think 577 00:34:17,000 --> 00:34:22,160 Speaker 1: of modern economic research, guess what St. Louis invented it 578 00:34:22,320 --> 00:34:26,399 Speaker 1: years ago. And they have Mike the chart service, they 579 00:34:26,400 --> 00:34:30,080 Speaker 1: have the facts service, they have the only one I 580 00:34:30,080 --> 00:34:32,879 Speaker 1: know that can actually use the thing. It's so wonderfully complicated, 581 00:34:33,120 --> 00:34:36,160 Speaker 1: is James Bullard. I was using Frasier the other day, 582 00:34:36,160 --> 00:34:40,719 Speaker 1: which comes from Minnesota, which I mean all this historical stuff. Uh. 583 00:34:40,920 --> 00:34:43,160 Speaker 1: Jim Bullard is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank 584 00:34:43,160 --> 00:34:45,719 Speaker 1: of St. Louis, And I guess, uh, we could ask 585 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:48,640 Speaker 1: have you ever seen anything like this before in the economy, 586 00:34:48,640 --> 00:34:51,560 Speaker 1: but I kind of know the answer. This is a 587 00:34:51,680 --> 00:34:56,520 Speaker 1: unique experience. You were among the first to say that 588 00:34:56,600 --> 00:34:59,960 Speaker 1: the FED should start tapering, and I'm wondering if that's 589 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:04,080 Speaker 1: because you are afraid of inflation hanging around and may 590 00:35:04,160 --> 00:35:09,799 Speaker 1: need to raise rates sooner than the markets anticipate. Yeah, 591 00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:14,080 Speaker 1: I think we do Fraser as well, uh in St. Louis. 592 00:35:14,120 --> 00:35:16,960 Speaker 1: So just to set the record straight on that one. 593 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:23,359 Speaker 1: UM uh so yeah, I think, um. The key word 594 00:35:23,440 --> 00:35:28,640 Speaker 1: is optionality for we want to or I would like 595 00:35:28,719 --> 00:35:31,960 Speaker 1: to anyway taper now and and get it finished by 596 00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:34,719 Speaker 1: the end of the first quarter, and then at that 597 00:35:34,760 --> 00:35:40,000 Speaker 1: point I think we could assess what's happening in the 598 00:35:40,080 --> 00:35:43,279 Speaker 1: economy with respect to inflation. By that time, we'll have 599 00:35:43,760 --> 00:35:47,360 Speaker 1: many more jobs reports, and you know, it certainly looks 600 00:35:47,400 --> 00:35:53,200 Speaker 1: like they'll all be strong to varying degrees. Um. Unemployment 601 00:35:53,239 --> 00:35:56,800 Speaker 1: will tick down with a fore handle at that point, 602 00:35:57,000 --> 00:35:59,360 Speaker 1: and then we'll be able to see in the first 603 00:35:59,400 --> 00:36:05,240 Speaker 1: half of two if inflation is moderating or not. And 604 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:08,279 Speaker 1: if it's moderating, then we're in great shape. And if 605 00:36:08,320 --> 00:36:11,399 Speaker 1: it's not moderating, uh, then we might have to be 606 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:15,000 Speaker 1: more aggressive. So I think that optionality has a lot 607 00:36:15,040 --> 00:36:19,479 Speaker 1: of value right now. Um. I think the purchases don't 608 00:36:19,520 --> 00:36:22,719 Speaker 1: have much value right now. So um, it seems like 609 00:36:22,760 --> 00:36:26,399 Speaker 1: the tradeoff is just right to me. Let's phase out 610 00:36:26,440 --> 00:36:31,480 Speaker 1: the purchases and let's give ourselves some breathing room. In well, 611 00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:34,560 Speaker 1: as you look over the forecast horizon, do you think 612 00:36:34,600 --> 00:36:40,879 Speaker 1: that inflation sticks around? Yeah? I think, uh, right now 613 00:36:40,920 --> 00:36:43,520 Speaker 1: I'm sitting here today, I'd say two and a half 614 00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:50,439 Speaker 1: percent or higher in core PC inflation. Uh, so we're all, 615 00:36:50,719 --> 00:36:52,800 Speaker 1: you know, right now, we're at three and a half 616 00:36:52,880 --> 00:36:58,160 Speaker 1: on core PC inflation. That's the committees preferred smooth measure 617 00:36:59,080 --> 00:37:03,719 Speaker 1: of inflation, the one that's enshrined in the sep TO 618 00:37:03,880 --> 00:37:07,279 Speaker 1: Summary of Economic Projections. So it looks like we're going 619 00:37:07,320 --> 00:37:09,239 Speaker 1: to have quite a bit of inflation this year. That 620 00:37:09,320 --> 00:37:11,640 Speaker 1: three and a half percent number of measures from one 621 00:37:11,719 --> 00:37:15,320 Speaker 1: year ago is higher than it's been in thirty years, 622 00:37:16,360 --> 00:37:18,839 Speaker 1: and it is enough to bring the average inflation rate, 623 00:37:18,920 --> 00:37:22,279 Speaker 1: however you want to calculate it on that measure over 624 00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:25,760 Speaker 1: any five year period, either looking back or looking forward 625 00:37:25,880 --> 00:37:31,120 Speaker 1: up to two percent. So UM, then in the question 626 00:37:31,200 --> 00:37:34,880 Speaker 1: is how how fast is inflation going to moderate? UM. 627 00:37:34,920 --> 00:37:38,080 Speaker 1: If it moderates quickly, then then we're fine. But if 628 00:37:38,120 --> 00:37:41,359 Speaker 1: if it doesn't moderate, and I'm right and we're two 629 00:37:41,400 --> 00:37:44,000 Speaker 1: and a half percent or higher, then the Fed might 630 00:37:44,040 --> 00:37:46,360 Speaker 1: have to start to try to put downward pressure on 631 00:37:46,400 --> 00:37:48,720 Speaker 1: inflation in order to keep it at the right level. 632 00:37:49,280 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 1: Do you worry that interrupts the new framework? The idea 633 00:37:53,040 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 1: that you could have to raise rates because inflation is 634 00:37:56,680 --> 00:38:01,239 Speaker 1: higher than new anticipated, but you don't get the unemployment 635 00:38:01,320 --> 00:38:03,000 Speaker 1: rate down as far as you would like to, or 636 00:38:03,040 --> 00:38:06,080 Speaker 1: at least in terms of the diverse and inclusive unemployment rates. 637 00:38:07,200 --> 00:38:11,120 Speaker 1: Now we'd be hitting the new framework exactly. Uh. You know, 638 00:38:11,520 --> 00:38:16,360 Speaker 1: beautiful monetary policy under what I'm describing, because we would 639 00:38:16,480 --> 00:38:21,160 Speaker 1: have at that point had UH inflation above the two 640 00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:25,560 Speaker 1: percent targets for some time, and then inflation on a 641 00:38:25,600 --> 00:38:29,200 Speaker 1: core PC basis would be averaging two over some kind 642 00:38:29,239 --> 00:38:33,400 Speaker 1: of five year window either backward looking or or centered 643 00:38:34,480 --> 00:38:38,399 Speaker 1: and forward looking, and so you'd be you'd be hitting 644 00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:41,680 Speaker 1: it on that dimension. And then I think on the jobs, 645 00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:44,520 Speaker 1: you know, you've got to think about not exactly where 646 00:38:44,560 --> 00:38:46,640 Speaker 1: we are today, but where we're gonna be at the 647 00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:48,839 Speaker 1: end of the taper. The key thing here is when 648 00:38:48,920 --> 00:38:53,960 Speaker 1: is the taper going to end? And uh it certainly 649 00:38:54,000 --> 00:38:56,719 Speaker 1: looks like you're gonna have a very strong jobs from 650 00:38:56,760 --> 00:38:58,560 Speaker 1: market at that point. I mean, you can make the 651 00:38:58,680 --> 00:39:01,560 Speaker 1: argument today that this is one of the tightest job 652 00:39:01,640 --> 00:39:06,640 Speaker 1: markets we've seen, UH in in recent decades, because the 653 00:39:06,719 --> 00:39:10,560 Speaker 1: unemployment of vacancies ratio has gone down below one, so 654 00:39:10,719 --> 00:39:15,440 Speaker 1: more than one job opening for every unemployed worker. If 655 00:39:15,520 --> 00:39:18,040 Speaker 1: you want a broad measure of labor market performance, you 656 00:39:18,040 --> 00:39:21,520 Speaker 1: can look at the Kansas City FEDS Labor Market Conditions 657 00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:26,400 Speaker 1: Index that's moved up into positive territory and is headed 658 00:39:26,400 --> 00:39:31,879 Speaker 1: toward very high numbers, which will be again indicating one 659 00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:35,600 Speaker 1: of the strongest job markets that we've seen in recent decades. 660 00:39:35,680 --> 00:39:40,120 Speaker 1: So I think you know, all of that corroborates what 661 00:39:40,160 --> 00:39:43,840 Speaker 1: you're hearing on this show and everywhere across the economy 662 00:39:43,920 --> 00:39:47,760 Speaker 1: about jobs, which is that firms are having a really 663 00:39:47,800 --> 00:39:53,680 Speaker 1: tough time hiring. They're offering wage increases, are offering bonuses, 664 00:39:53,719 --> 00:39:58,319 Speaker 1: are offering retention signing bonuses, retention bonuses. Uh, they have 665 00:39:58,440 --> 00:40:02,280 Speaker 1: job affairs where going shows up. So lots of things, 666 00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:05,000 Speaker 1: uh seem to be pointing to a very strong jobs 667 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:08,080 Speaker 1: market right now. And if you're gonna have six percent 668 00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:10,799 Speaker 1: growth in the US economy over the second half this 669 00:40:10,880 --> 00:40:14,120 Speaker 1: year and four percent growth next year, that's just going 670 00:40:14,160 --> 00:40:16,719 Speaker 1: to improve all that much more. So I think we'll 671 00:40:16,760 --> 00:40:19,520 Speaker 1: be in great shape in uh in the first half 672 00:40:19,520 --> 00:40:23,799 Speaker 1: of two, but we have to have some optionality there 673 00:40:23,800 --> 00:40:27,440 Speaker 1: in case inflation doesn't moderate. Well, what are companies telling 674 00:40:27,480 --> 00:40:29,719 Speaker 1: you about what they're having to pay and how long 675 00:40:29,760 --> 00:40:31,239 Speaker 1: they think they're gonna have to pay it, both for 676 00:40:31,680 --> 00:40:34,759 Speaker 1: input goods and for labor. Is this going to be 677 00:40:35,200 --> 00:40:38,279 Speaker 1: something that at this point they're anticipating a bit of 678 00:40:38,280 --> 00:40:42,279 Speaker 1: a cycle. Well, one of my top concerns, and I've 679 00:40:42,280 --> 00:40:45,879 Speaker 1: heard it on listening to you guys, is CEOs will 680 00:40:45,880 --> 00:40:50,440 Speaker 1: come in and they'll say, yeah, my input costs are 681 00:40:50,520 --> 00:40:52,880 Speaker 1: way up, but we don't think this is a problem. 682 00:40:52,920 --> 00:40:58,040 Speaker 1: We're gonna pass that right on in raise prices and uh, 683 00:40:58,120 --> 00:40:59,880 Speaker 1: you know, my labor costs are up, but we're going 684 00:40:59,920 --> 00:41:03,000 Speaker 1: to pass that on into prices. That sounds like a 685 00:41:03,360 --> 00:41:07,600 Speaker 1: worrisome dynamic to me, and one that you know. We 686 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:12,040 Speaker 1: certainly want real wages to go up, but for everyone. 687 00:41:12,520 --> 00:41:15,760 Speaker 1: I want those to be as high as possible. But um, 688 00:41:16,200 --> 00:41:18,600 Speaker 1: we don't want to get into a cycle where that 689 00:41:18,680 --> 00:41:22,480 Speaker 1: just feeds through to the inflation process in the economy. 690 00:41:22,600 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 1: Jim Bowler toom Keenan good morning to your thrilled to 691 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,160 Speaker 1: speak to you before Chairman Pal Jim Boward, I want 692 00:41:28,160 --> 00:41:30,480 Speaker 1: to go back five years to two big things of 693 00:41:30,560 --> 00:41:33,600 Speaker 1: two thousand and sixteen. One of them was Marvin good 694 00:41:33,640 --> 00:41:36,759 Speaker 1: Friend in the uproar over his paper at Jackson all 695 00:41:37,080 --> 00:41:39,920 Speaker 1: the late Marvin good Friend folks of Carnegie Mellon on 696 00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:43,200 Speaker 1: zero interest in the negative rates. Well, guess what, Jim 697 00:41:43,239 --> 00:41:46,560 Speaker 1: Bollard good Friend was right. Negative rates up, up, up, 698 00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:49,880 Speaker 1: up worldwide as well. And also you may recall in 699 00:41:49,960 --> 00:41:53,920 Speaker 1: two thousand and sixteen somebody in St. Louis said, forget 700 00:41:53,960 --> 00:41:57,080 Speaker 1: about a single point outcome. We are going to have 701 00:41:57,200 --> 00:42:02,720 Speaker 1: the different states of a regime chain dovetail what happened 702 00:42:02,760 --> 00:42:06,640 Speaker 1: five years ago and take us out ten years. Can 703 00:42:06,719 --> 00:42:11,680 Speaker 1: we get to a constructive different state given them huge 704 00:42:11,920 --> 00:42:19,680 Speaker 1: negative interest rates worldwide. Yeah, I think uh after Professor 705 00:42:19,760 --> 00:42:23,439 Speaker 1: good Friends paper h. Central banks around the world did 706 00:42:23,480 --> 00:42:27,439 Speaker 1: experiment with negative rates, I think with very mixed success, 707 00:42:28,239 --> 00:42:30,640 Speaker 1: and I think that's why we've tried to avoid that 708 00:42:30,800 --> 00:42:35,160 Speaker 1: outcome in the US. UM With respect to the regime, 709 00:42:35,280 --> 00:42:38,840 Speaker 1: I mean I did switch in sixteen to saying that 710 00:42:39,320 --> 00:42:41,600 Speaker 1: I thought we were just in a low inflation low 711 00:42:42,200 --> 00:42:46,120 Speaker 1: now anal interest rate low real interest rate environment, uh, 712 00:42:46,239 --> 00:42:51,480 Speaker 1: slow growth, and that that wasn't gonna change very readily, 713 00:42:51,800 --> 00:42:54,759 Speaker 1: and that meant that monetary policy didn't have to be 714 00:42:54,800 --> 00:42:57,840 Speaker 1: as aggressive as we had previously been. So I was 715 00:42:57,920 --> 00:43:00,120 Speaker 1: kind of on the Davers side at that point. But 716 00:43:00,239 --> 00:43:06,319 Speaker 1: now we're coming through this pandemic um and policy has 717 00:43:06,360 --> 00:43:10,640 Speaker 1: been a human tragedy of course, of unimaginable dimensions, but 718 00:43:11,200 --> 00:43:13,560 Speaker 1: from the economy's point of view, have played it very 719 00:43:13,600 --> 00:43:16,160 Speaker 1: well as a nation with the fiscal policy and the 720 00:43:16,200 --> 00:43:19,120 Speaker 1: monetary policy. And now we're coming out of the pandemic 721 00:43:19,160 --> 00:43:22,959 Speaker 1: with a very strong economy, and I think it's very 722 00:43:23,120 --> 00:43:27,800 Speaker 1: possible that we're switching into a high productivity growth regime 723 00:43:28,320 --> 00:43:31,960 Speaker 1: and that means somewhat higher interest rates than you'd otherwise 724 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:36,959 Speaker 1: have seen. It means faster growth than you otherwise would 725 00:43:36,960 --> 00:43:41,880 Speaker 1: have seen, and I'm hopeful that all of that occurs. 726 00:43:41,920 --> 00:43:46,759 Speaker 1: The last time we had a faster growth, higher productivity 727 00:43:46,760 --> 00:43:50,240 Speaker 1: growth economy was the late ninety nineties where we boomed 728 00:43:50,280 --> 00:43:52,920 Speaker 1: for four years and started talking about paying off the 729 00:43:53,040 --> 00:43:56,400 Speaker 1: entire national debt. Well, and Jim, you're talking about nap 730 00:43:57,040 --> 00:44:01,399 Speaker 1: that didn't happen. But Jim, you're talking about negative interest 731 00:44:01,480 --> 00:44:03,759 Speaker 1: rates and how that's been problematic in certain ways, and 732 00:44:03,800 --> 00:44:06,200 Speaker 1: certainly in the United States it wouldn't be as as 733 00:44:06,320 --> 00:44:08,799 Speaker 1: smooth as it has been other places, for the money 734 00:44:08,840 --> 00:44:11,520 Speaker 1: market fund and a variety of other reasons. But you've 735 00:44:11,560 --> 00:44:14,120 Speaker 1: talked about the need to get interest rates up so 736 00:44:14,160 --> 00:44:17,400 Speaker 1: that we can use that in combat the next downturn, 737 00:44:17,520 --> 00:44:21,600 Speaker 1: have some ammunition. If we cannot get rates substantially higher, 738 00:44:21,680 --> 00:44:25,360 Speaker 1: how important How do you foresee us IT purchases factoring 739 00:44:25,440 --> 00:44:31,200 Speaker 1: into future stimulus. Yeah. They've become a standard part of 740 00:44:31,200 --> 00:44:35,400 Speaker 1: the toolkit, and we used it after the global financial crisis, 741 00:44:35,520 --> 00:44:40,799 Speaker 1: pioneered by uh former chairman Bernanke and kudos to him 742 00:44:40,880 --> 00:44:44,280 Speaker 1: for that. And then uh, you know, when this crisis 743 00:44:44,320 --> 00:44:48,040 Speaker 1: came along, we went right back to it with considerable success, 744 00:44:48,080 --> 00:44:52,640 Speaker 1: I would say, in the March April period where we 745 00:44:52,719 --> 00:44:58,640 Speaker 1: really were staring at possible depression and a possible financial crisis, 746 00:44:58,680 --> 00:45:02,959 Speaker 1: and I thought Chaire Powell did a excellent job during 747 00:45:03,000 --> 00:45:05,920 Speaker 1: that time frame in getting us into a policy that 748 00:45:05,960 --> 00:45:09,160 Speaker 1: avoided the financial crisis that could have occurred on top 749 00:45:09,920 --> 00:45:15,920 Speaker 1: of the pandemic and put us on very good footing. 750 00:45:16,080 --> 00:45:20,880 Speaker 1: It wasn't too long after UH March April that financial 751 00:45:20,880 --> 00:45:24,880 Speaker 1: stress measures came way down from from very high levels 752 00:45:25,000 --> 00:45:28,919 Speaker 1: and we got back to UH normality, at least with 753 00:45:28,960 --> 00:45:33,919 Speaker 1: respect to financial markets. So UM, asset purchases are part 754 00:45:33,920 --> 00:45:36,520 Speaker 1: of the toolkit and they're here to stay. But right now, 755 00:45:36,760 --> 00:45:39,200 Speaker 1: I don't think they're helping us that much, and they 756 00:45:39,239 --> 00:45:44,800 Speaker 1: may be causing harm, especially in housing, where we don't 757 00:45:44,840 --> 00:45:49,400 Speaker 1: want to feed into an incipient UH housing bubble. We 758 00:45:49,480 --> 00:45:51,439 Speaker 1: got into a lot of trouble in the mid two 759 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:55,399 Speaker 1: thousands with housing, and I'm not too anxious to try 760 00:45:55,440 --> 00:45:59,160 Speaker 1: to UH to see that happen again. So UM, I 761 00:45:59,200 --> 00:46:03,279 Speaker 1: think that just time has come to end these purchases 762 00:46:03,520 --> 00:46:07,959 Speaker 1: and get the Committee and the nation some optionality for 763 00:46:08,080 --> 00:46:11,279 Speaker 1: what we may have to do in two But we're not. 764 00:46:12,239 --> 00:46:15,600 Speaker 1: We're certainly going to keep sharp control over our our 765 00:46:15,640 --> 00:46:18,440 Speaker 1: interest rate decisions. We're not gonna be on any kind 766 00:46:18,440 --> 00:46:21,600 Speaker 1: of mechanical path, but we're going to want to assess 767 00:46:21,760 --> 00:46:25,479 Speaker 1: where we are in the spring of two to see 768 00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:28,239 Speaker 1: what the what course we want to chart U to 769 00:46:28,360 --> 00:46:33,440 Speaker 1: keep inflation under control. Uh. From that point forward to 770 00:46:33,760 --> 00:46:35,880 Speaker 1: let me ask you one last question, and that's about 771 00:46:36,000 --> 00:46:38,840 Speaker 1: how you think the Wall Street folks are going to 772 00:46:38,880 --> 00:46:42,200 Speaker 1: react to this. Uh. There's been a feeling that you 773 00:46:42,280 --> 00:46:45,040 Speaker 1: guys are propping up the big gains that we've seen 774 00:46:45,040 --> 00:46:48,680 Speaker 1: in the indexes, and the fact that the bond market 775 00:46:48,719 --> 00:46:53,279 Speaker 1: has kept rates so low indicates they believe that we're 776 00:46:53,280 --> 00:46:55,200 Speaker 1: not going to have an inflation problem. If if you 777 00:46:55,200 --> 00:46:57,839 Speaker 1: send a message that maybe we will and it's time 778 00:46:57,880 --> 00:47:02,520 Speaker 1: to stop giving you guys support, we're gonna have a problem. 779 00:47:02,880 --> 00:47:05,560 Speaker 1: I don't think so. I mean you you talked to 780 00:47:05,640 --> 00:47:08,880 Speaker 1: pretty much everybody in the markets, and my sense is 781 00:47:08,920 --> 00:47:12,359 Speaker 1: that you know, at some level the tapering process has 782 00:47:12,440 --> 00:47:16,160 Speaker 1: already been priced in. Maybe not that all the details 783 00:47:16,200 --> 00:47:21,359 Speaker 1: around it or exactly h exactly how long fold and 784 00:47:21,400 --> 00:47:24,840 Speaker 1: so there's a little bit more there, But certainly seems 785 00:47:24,920 --> 00:47:29,640 Speaker 1: like commentators and traders are well aware that UH there 786 00:47:29,640 --> 00:47:33,560 Speaker 1: will be a tapering process, and and that it makes 787 00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:38,120 Speaker 1: sense at this point given how well the economy has done. 788 00:47:38,160 --> 00:47:41,279 Speaker 1: This economy is producing more national income than the one 789 00:47:41,760 --> 00:47:46,400 Speaker 1: that existed before the pandemic. The pre pandemic economy didn't 790 00:47:46,400 --> 00:47:50,160 Speaker 1: have zero interest rates, by the way, UH, So I 791 00:47:50,200 --> 00:47:56,040 Speaker 1: think UM, I think markets would UH react, you know, 792 00:47:56,120 --> 00:47:58,800 Speaker 1: in some broad sense, they'd react well to this because 793 00:47:58,800 --> 00:48:02,160 Speaker 1: it would mean that the Fed is going to stay 794 00:48:02,239 --> 00:48:05,600 Speaker 1: in good position to handle all the possibilities that might 795 00:48:05,640 --> 00:48:09,279 Speaker 1: come if inflation all rates in two and a great 796 00:48:09,320 --> 00:48:12,040 Speaker 1: position for that, and if we get the tabor out 797 00:48:12,040 --> 00:48:14,560 Speaker 1: of the way, UH, then we'll also be a good 798 00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:18,080 Speaker 1: position if we have to tamp down a little bit 799 00:48:18,120 --> 00:48:20,840 Speaker 1: on inflation pressure in the economy. Dr Bullard, thank you 800 00:48:20,880 --> 00:48:24,280 Speaker 1: so much for joining us today from St. Louis. Jim Bullard. 801 00:48:30,280 --> 00:48:33,160 Speaker 1: Right now, get to Gopinath with us with the International 802 00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:36,720 Speaker 1: Monetary Fund and their chief economists. Their director of research 803 00:48:36,800 --> 00:48:41,399 Speaker 1: Maurice Hobsfeld, will be on the UH podium later at 804 00:48:41,480 --> 00:48:44,640 Speaker 1: Jackson Old today someone else who has held that position 805 00:48:44,760 --> 00:48:46,800 Speaker 1: over the years. Gita, thank you so much for joining 806 00:48:46,920 --> 00:48:49,880 Speaker 1: us UH this morning. Before we get to the affairs 807 00:48:49,880 --> 00:48:54,360 Speaker 1: of Jackson Hole, Gita, I am required to address a 808 00:48:54,440 --> 00:48:58,640 Speaker 1: bit outside your remit at the International Monetary Fund and 809 00:48:58,680 --> 00:49:00,960 Speaker 1: that is what all are why ching, which is how 810 00:49:01,000 --> 00:49:04,840 Speaker 1: the i m F will adapt and adjust to Afghanistan 811 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:09,520 Speaker 1: and the Taliban. This has to do with special drawing rights. 812 00:49:09,960 --> 00:49:14,000 Speaker 1: Explain to our audience the choice set that the Managing 813 00:49:14,040 --> 00:49:16,200 Speaker 1: Director and all of you at the i m F 814 00:49:16,400 --> 00:49:22,239 Speaker 1: have with these unusual events in Afghanistan. HI tell them 815 00:49:22,239 --> 00:49:25,440 Speaker 1: it's a pleasure to join your show. Now a SDRs 816 00:49:25,560 --> 00:49:29,840 Speaker 1: are allocated to all the member countries. Now, which countries 817 00:49:29,880 --> 00:49:34,800 Speaker 1: can actually use the SDRs depends upon whether the government 818 00:49:34,840 --> 00:49:39,000 Speaker 1: in that country is being recognized by the membership off 819 00:49:39,480 --> 00:49:41,960 Speaker 1: the i m F. And at this point, with the 820 00:49:41,960 --> 00:49:47,239 Speaker 1: recent developments that we've seen, which is a heartbreaking, there 821 00:49:47,440 --> 00:49:50,560 Speaker 1: is no recognition. So at this point, uh, you know, 822 00:49:50,600 --> 00:49:54,920 Speaker 1: the SDRs will not be available to be used by Afghanistan. 823 00:49:55,440 --> 00:49:57,279 Speaker 1: If we can look at your panel today with a 824 00:49:57,360 --> 00:50:00,880 Speaker 1: former Vice Channel and Alan Blinder also were leaper of 825 00:50:00,960 --> 00:50:04,040 Speaker 1: Virginia as well, it is to me the most interesting 826 00:50:04,080 --> 00:50:06,880 Speaker 1: event at Jackson Hall. And I'm gonna be honest Kit too, 827 00:50:07,000 --> 00:50:09,879 Speaker 1: It's more interesting than what the Chairman's gonna say, we 828 00:50:09,960 --> 00:50:13,040 Speaker 1: live in a time where we've never seen linkages of 829 00:50:13,160 --> 00:50:18,440 Speaker 1: fiscal and monetary policy. It's literally, we're doing MMT within 830 00:50:18,520 --> 00:50:23,480 Speaker 1: your panel, Will you people discuss modern monetary theory? Are 831 00:50:23,520 --> 00:50:29,279 Speaker 1: we doing MMT in two thousand twenty two? So I'm 832 00:50:29,320 --> 00:50:33,080 Speaker 1: now I don't believe we are doing MMT. Oh, you know, 833 00:50:33,280 --> 00:50:37,400 Speaker 1: it's a decade before the COVID crisis was one where 834 00:50:37,440 --> 00:50:40,759 Speaker 1: everybody was complaining that monitored policy cannot be the only 835 00:50:40,800 --> 00:50:44,360 Speaker 1: game in town, and that was appropriate. And then COVID 836 00:50:44,400 --> 00:50:48,040 Speaker 1: struck and fiscal policy came to town in a big way. 837 00:50:48,080 --> 00:50:51,160 Speaker 1: So we've seen interaction of the kind that we've never 838 00:50:51,280 --> 00:50:55,560 Speaker 1: seen before. But it was necessary. It was needed for 839 00:50:55,600 --> 00:50:58,680 Speaker 1: the kind of challenge the world economy was facing, and 840 00:50:58,719 --> 00:51:01,359 Speaker 1: it helped to prevent a much deeper recession. I mean, 841 00:51:01,400 --> 00:51:04,360 Speaker 1: our estimates that the recession would have been three times 842 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:08,480 Speaker 1: worse last year had it not been for both fiscal 843 00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:11,680 Speaker 1: and monitary policy support. Now that said, would be very 844 00:51:11,680 --> 00:51:16,760 Speaker 1: clear why this is good policy, because ultimately decision making, 845 00:51:16,840 --> 00:51:19,680 Speaker 1: central bank decision making has to be controlled by central 846 00:51:19,680 --> 00:51:23,719 Speaker 1: bank priority, central bank goals uh and so central like 847 00:51:23,800 --> 00:51:28,440 Speaker 1: independence has served countries very well, and it makes sense 848 00:51:28,480 --> 00:51:31,920 Speaker 1: to do quantitative easing and asset purchases as long as 849 00:51:31,920 --> 00:51:35,800 Speaker 1: you're doing this independently. This is not about being pressured 850 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:39,040 Speaker 1: by governments to the monetary financing. You're meeting your goals, 851 00:51:39,320 --> 00:51:42,719 Speaker 1: You're keeping inflation expectations anchored, and that's what the difference is. 852 00:51:43,040 --> 00:51:45,239 Speaker 1: Get this is such a delicate dance. How do you 853 00:51:45,280 --> 00:51:48,839 Speaker 1: avoid politicizing at the central banking community at a time 854 00:51:49,080 --> 00:51:52,880 Speaker 1: when low interest rates that they're helping continue really is 855 00:51:52,920 --> 00:51:55,400 Speaker 1: what is allowing some of the fiscal impulse that we 856 00:51:55,480 --> 00:51:59,320 Speaker 1: see in Washington, d C. How fraught does this become, 857 00:51:59,680 --> 00:52:02,520 Speaker 1: as with inequality as a focus for the Federal reserve 858 00:52:02,719 --> 00:52:05,239 Speaker 1: for central banks at a time when that really is 859 00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:10,640 Speaker 1: the purview of fiscal policy and not monetary policy. There 860 00:52:10,719 --> 00:52:14,759 Speaker 1: are some things indeed that fiscal policy is just much 861 00:52:14,800 --> 00:52:17,800 Speaker 1: a better place to address. And again issues of inequality 862 00:52:18,239 --> 00:52:21,759 Speaker 1: is a great example of that. Now, what we when 863 00:52:21,760 --> 00:52:24,919 Speaker 1: we look at which countries are able to do large 864 00:52:24,960 --> 00:52:28,799 Speaker 1: scale asset purchases, it is countries that have built up 865 00:52:29,440 --> 00:52:34,040 Speaker 1: very credible central banks, very transparent central banks, with good 866 00:52:34,239 --> 00:52:37,200 Speaker 1: rules based policy making. So we have to keep that 867 00:52:37,280 --> 00:52:40,120 Speaker 1: in mind. I mean, the exception doesn't make the rule. 868 00:52:40,440 --> 00:52:43,919 Speaker 1: You have to maintain your reputation for keeping your eye 869 00:52:43,960 --> 00:52:47,080 Speaker 1: on inflation and inflation expectations, and if you do that 870 00:52:47,200 --> 00:52:49,520 Speaker 1: in good times, and then when you have hit by 871 00:52:49,560 --> 00:52:52,680 Speaker 1: a crisis, you can do exceptional measures. So you know, 872 00:52:52,760 --> 00:52:55,120 Speaker 1: we are living in times of low interest rates, and 873 00:52:55,160 --> 00:52:58,360 Speaker 1: I suspect that will be the case going forward for 874 00:52:58,400 --> 00:53:01,400 Speaker 1: many years. So this is a challenge that both fiscal 875 00:53:01,480 --> 00:53:03,560 Speaker 1: and monetary policy has to deal with. And I would 876 00:53:03,560 --> 00:53:06,200 Speaker 1: bring in there what's happening in financial markets because what 877 00:53:06,360 --> 00:53:10,359 Speaker 1: we are seeing, of course is very high valuations and 878 00:53:10,400 --> 00:53:14,160 Speaker 1: frankly complacency in financial markets. So there's very little room 879 00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:17,359 Speaker 1: for surprises at this time. And this is exactly going 880 00:53:17,400 --> 00:53:19,560 Speaker 1: to be the challenge which is what we will see 881 00:53:19,560 --> 00:53:22,239 Speaker 1: in Jackson all which is how do you communicate you're 882 00:53:22,320 --> 00:53:24,360 Speaker 1: very clear of it when you're going to move without 883 00:53:24,480 --> 00:53:27,920 Speaker 1: creating tantrums GA. There's also the flip side of this 884 00:53:28,280 --> 00:53:32,080 Speaker 1: that easy monetary conditions can plug a hole and actually 885 00:53:32,080 --> 00:53:35,160 Speaker 1: take the pressure off fiscal policymakers from actually putting through 886 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:38,239 Speaker 1: some of the policies necessary to bridge some of the 887 00:53:38,360 --> 00:53:42,280 Speaker 1: issues in society that FED policy is increasingly becoming aware 888 00:53:42,280 --> 00:53:44,680 Speaker 1: of how do you sort of view that the idea 889 00:53:44,760 --> 00:53:48,440 Speaker 1: that when the Fed creates this calm, creates the stasis 890 00:53:48,440 --> 00:53:51,239 Speaker 1: in markets, it can make people, at least in Washington, 891 00:53:51,320 --> 00:53:54,520 Speaker 1: d C. Feel like there isn't as much of a problem. 892 00:53:54,560 --> 00:53:57,839 Speaker 1: I mean that exactly was the problem before this crisis, right, 893 00:53:57,880 --> 00:54:00,600 Speaker 1: I mean everything was left to monitory polity and fiscal 894 00:54:00,600 --> 00:54:03,480 Speaker 1: policy wasn't doing anything. This time around, at least in 895 00:54:03,520 --> 00:54:06,920 Speaker 1: the advanced economies, we have seen the recognition that montreal 896 00:54:06,960 --> 00:54:10,800 Speaker 1: policy cannot do it all. And uh, you know that 897 00:54:11,040 --> 00:54:13,000 Speaker 1: the one of the messages I will make is to 898 00:54:13,080 --> 00:54:15,680 Speaker 1: make sure this continues and this is not a one off, 899 00:54:17,000 --> 00:54:19,840 Speaker 1: you know, intervention that happened with fiscal policy, That this 900 00:54:20,200 --> 00:54:23,440 Speaker 1: is durable and this continues because one of policy cannot 901 00:54:23,600 --> 00:54:27,600 Speaker 1: solve kinds of problems. You're talking about the one final question. 902 00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:30,360 Speaker 1: I'm gonna get you in trouble here. My my apologies 903 00:54:30,520 --> 00:54:33,840 Speaker 1: up front as well. We have had a wonderful set 904 00:54:33,920 --> 00:54:37,319 Speaker 1: of Federal Reserve chairman's, including a guy named Bernanky, who 905 00:54:37,320 --> 00:54:40,520 Speaker 1: I think you have a nodding acquaintance with. We've got 906 00:54:40,560 --> 00:54:45,799 Speaker 1: clarative Columbia holding Ford on monetary theory, and others. Talk 907 00:54:45,920 --> 00:54:50,000 Speaker 1: to me about the reappointment of a non PhD economists 908 00:54:50,200 --> 00:54:53,120 Speaker 1: Chairman of the Fed. Do you care that your own 909 00:54:53,200 --> 00:54:59,839 Speaker 1: Powell isn't a PhD economist? I didn't share. Powell has 910 00:54:59,840 --> 00:55:04,480 Speaker 1: been in doing a great job in very difficult times, 911 00:55:05,120 --> 00:55:07,480 Speaker 1: and no, I don't care whether he has a PhD 912 00:55:07,640 --> 00:55:11,759 Speaker 1: or not. I think it's important to get the right 913 00:55:12,080 --> 00:55:15,520 Speaker 1: inputs from all kinds of people, with all kinds of backgrounds, 914 00:55:15,719 --> 00:55:18,279 Speaker 1: and and he's been very clear about that, and he's 915 00:55:19,200 --> 00:55:21,600 Speaker 1: been reacting very well to the kinds of advice he's 916 00:55:21,600 --> 00:55:24,400 Speaker 1: been getting. To Dr Copeneff, thank you so much for 917 00:55:24,480 --> 00:55:27,120 Speaker 1: joining us today. Get to go open at the International 918 00:55:27,640 --> 00:55:36,719 Speaker 1: Monetary Fund right now. Lisa Brandma's Taylor Rigs and I 919 00:55:36,760 --> 00:55:40,680 Speaker 1: are honored to present to you Mark Kimmitt, Brigadier General, 920 00:55:40,800 --> 00:55:44,279 Speaker 1: retired Brigadier General, former Assistant Secretary of State for the 921 00:55:44,320 --> 00:55:47,600 Speaker 1: Bush Administration. General Kimmit, thank you so much. You came 922 00:55:47,600 --> 00:55:50,120 Speaker 1: out of West Point and you had to wander up 923 00:55:50,120 --> 00:55:53,640 Speaker 1: to Camp Stanley and Korea, which wasn't a Hollywood TV 924 00:55:53,800 --> 00:55:57,000 Speaker 1: set of mash but it was the real deal back 925 00:55:57,040 --> 00:56:01,600 Speaker 1: in nineteen fifty four with real day. We face real 926 00:56:01,719 --> 00:56:04,839 Speaker 1: danger today in cobble. How do we in adapt an 927 00:56:04,840 --> 00:56:10,120 Speaker 1: adjust on this Friday afternoon in Afghanistan. Well, I think 928 00:56:10,120 --> 00:56:12,880 Speaker 1: the two issues, one of the near term issues and 929 00:56:12,960 --> 00:56:15,560 Speaker 1: the long term issues. The near term issue, we tighten 930 00:56:15,640 --> 00:56:19,399 Speaker 1: up the security, We push out the perimeter UH so 931 00:56:19,480 --> 00:56:23,919 Speaker 1: that the screening is done further out by fewer people UH, 932 00:56:23,960 --> 00:56:28,239 Speaker 1: and candidly we quit UH asking permission of the Taliban 933 00:56:28,320 --> 00:56:31,359 Speaker 1: to protect our troops. In the long term, we've got 934 00:56:31,360 --> 00:56:35,880 Speaker 1: to understand the implications of the Cobble bombing and understand 935 00:56:35,920 --> 00:56:40,759 Speaker 1: that that's a recruiting poster for every terrorist outfit in 936 00:56:40,840 --> 00:56:43,560 Speaker 1: the world. And we better start getting ready to adapt 937 00:56:44,480 --> 00:56:47,719 Speaker 1: to this new pre nine eleven period that we're going 938 00:56:47,760 --> 00:56:51,000 Speaker 1: to be going through. Lisa and Taylor have some important questions. 939 00:56:51,040 --> 00:56:53,960 Speaker 1: I have to ask a difficult question which alludes to 940 00:56:54,080 --> 00:56:58,560 Speaker 1: section sixty at Arlington Cemetery. How do we defend people 941 00:56:58,640 --> 00:57:03,959 Speaker 1: like you against suicide attack? Well, the most important issue 942 00:57:04,000 --> 00:57:06,920 Speaker 1: is how do we defend America against suicide attacks? And 943 00:57:06,960 --> 00:57:10,759 Speaker 1: that is continue the policies that we've had, which is 944 00:57:11,000 --> 00:57:16,160 Speaker 1: unflinching offensive operations, fight them forward, don't wait for them 945 00:57:16,160 --> 00:57:21,920 Speaker 1: to come to us, general commit going forward. How concerned 946 00:57:21,960 --> 00:57:25,400 Speaker 1: are you about the strategic importance of Afghanistan and the 947 00:57:25,560 --> 00:57:28,800 Speaker 1: US not having a footprint there at a time of 948 00:57:28,880 --> 00:57:32,440 Speaker 1: increasing chaos. Yeah, I don't think we have a strategic 949 00:57:32,560 --> 00:57:36,560 Speaker 1: interest in Afghanistan except to prevent it from becoming yet 950 00:57:36,560 --> 00:57:40,360 Speaker 1: again another safe haven and sanctuary for terrorism as it 951 00:57:40,440 --> 00:57:44,840 Speaker 1: had been pre nine eleven. We're already seeing indications that 952 00:57:44,960 --> 00:57:48,840 Speaker 1: it is that everybody's now coming back to this ungoverned 953 00:57:48,920 --> 00:57:52,240 Speaker 1: space and they're suiting up. For lack of a better term, 954 00:57:52,440 --> 00:57:55,240 Speaker 1: we need to not have the pre nine eleven view 955 00:57:55,280 --> 00:57:58,000 Speaker 1: of just keeping an eye on things there. But as 956 00:57:58,040 --> 00:58:01,320 Speaker 1: we see these terrorist training camp and we see these 957 00:58:01,640 --> 00:58:05,440 Speaker 1: activities and hear these activities being planned, we've got to 958 00:58:05,480 --> 00:58:10,000 Speaker 1: take action against these camps through air strikes and candidly, 959 00:58:10,120 --> 00:58:12,080 Speaker 1: sometimes we're gonna have to put our people on the 960 00:58:12,160 --> 00:58:14,880 Speaker 1: ground to make sure that these people never have a 961 00:58:14,960 --> 00:58:18,080 Speaker 1: chance to achieve a critical mass to attack us again, 962 00:58:18,440 --> 00:58:20,840 Speaker 1: because they look at what's happening at Kabbal and they 963 00:58:20,840 --> 00:58:23,720 Speaker 1: say it's time to go after the Americans again. We've 964 00:58:23,720 --> 00:58:27,360 Speaker 1: shown weakness and we can't show weakness going forward. In general. 965 00:58:27,440 --> 00:58:29,320 Speaker 1: Is their political capital to do that At a time 966 00:58:29,600 --> 00:58:32,400 Speaker 1: when most people in the United States were for withdrawing 967 00:58:32,400 --> 00:58:34,720 Speaker 1: the troops and when frankly, the allies of the United 968 00:58:34,720 --> 00:58:38,080 Speaker 1: States perhaps don't trust the commitment to go in and 969 00:58:38,120 --> 00:58:41,840 Speaker 1: to have their backs. Well, first of all, I don't 970 00:58:41,840 --> 00:58:44,560 Speaker 1: want to talk about political capital. The fact remains most 971 00:58:44,600 --> 00:58:49,160 Speaker 1: Americans agreed with the withdrawal, but they have not agreed 972 00:58:49,200 --> 00:58:51,800 Speaker 1: with this debacle that we're seeing over the last couple 973 00:58:51,840 --> 00:58:54,600 Speaker 1: of weeks. Uh, those of us that have watched this 974 00:58:54,640 --> 00:58:57,600 Speaker 1: for a long time had policy positions focused on this. 975 00:58:58,360 --> 00:59:00,400 Speaker 1: I believe that we should have done us at a 976 00:59:00,440 --> 00:59:04,440 Speaker 1: longer pace, during the winter, not the fighting season, and 977 00:59:04,480 --> 00:59:07,120 Speaker 1: we should have left the commitment on the ground to 978 00:59:07,200 --> 00:59:10,440 Speaker 1: continue to put some backbone into the Afghan army. The 979 00:59:10,560 --> 00:59:14,040 Speaker 1: sloppy way we did it, this shambolic way we did it, 980 00:59:14,080 --> 00:59:18,200 Speaker 1: I think is directly demonstrated by what happened yesterday and 981 00:59:18,280 --> 00:59:20,520 Speaker 1: as of yesterday, I mean, what do you think of 982 00:59:20,600 --> 00:59:27,120 Speaker 1: we're asking terrorists to support us in fighting the other terrorists? 983 00:59:27,120 --> 00:59:30,680 Speaker 1: In general? Mackenzie yesterday said the Taliban was our front 984 00:59:30,760 --> 00:59:34,720 Speaker 1: line of security. Somehow that suicide bomber got through to 985 00:59:34,840 --> 00:59:38,920 Speaker 1: the US forces as that second line of security. Unfortunately, 986 00:59:38,960 --> 00:59:41,400 Speaker 1: the suicide been went off and thank god it didn't 987 00:59:41,440 --> 00:59:44,800 Speaker 1: get on the airplane. Are we trusting the Taliban enough 988 00:59:44,880 --> 00:59:49,800 Speaker 1: to stop those suicide bombers from getting through to American forces? Well, 989 00:59:49,840 --> 00:59:52,280 Speaker 1: we shouldn't be trusting the Taliban at all. Since the 990 00:59:52,360 --> 00:59:55,720 Speaker 1: Doha Talks, they have demonstrated their unwillingness to abide by 991 00:59:55,800 --> 00:59:59,000 Speaker 1: any agreement or commitment that they've made. Look, this isn't 992 00:59:59,000 --> 01:00:02,880 Speaker 1: an evacuation. This is a hostage situation. We're not doing 993 01:00:02,960 --> 01:00:07,120 Speaker 1: aid evacuation. We're asking the Taliban to release these hostages. 994 01:00:08,320 --> 01:00:10,840 Speaker 1: I don't know who's kidding who, but the Taliban can't 995 01:00:10,840 --> 01:00:14,800 Speaker 1: be trusted, shouldn't be trusted. And this and this uh 996 01:00:15,240 --> 01:00:20,400 Speaker 1: this uh uh strategic communications campaign, their wrning seems to 997 01:00:20,480 --> 01:00:23,040 Speaker 1: have a lot of people fooled. General kimmen, we have 998 01:00:23,320 --> 01:00:25,920 Speaker 1: had a lot of academic experts on and they really 999 01:00:25,960 --> 01:00:30,080 Speaker 1: emphasize the tribal nature of society among Sunni and she 1000 01:00:30,600 --> 01:00:34,840 Speaker 1: You are truly expert at tribal tensions from the Levant 1001 01:00:34,960 --> 01:00:40,040 Speaker 1: all the way over east into Afghanistan and indeed to Pakistan. 1002 01:00:40,640 --> 01:00:44,560 Speaker 1: Please advise us on the new relationship America will have 1003 01:00:45,120 --> 01:00:50,120 Speaker 1: with the fractured Pakistan. Well, first of all, this this 1004 01:00:50,240 --> 01:00:53,640 Speaker 1: is less about the shoe Sunni Shia divide UH, and 1005 01:00:53,680 --> 01:00:57,640 Speaker 1: it's more about tribal politics, and candidly, it's about Pakistan's 1006 01:00:58,320 --> 01:01:04,200 Speaker 1: UH supposed national security concerns where they want to use Afghanistan. 1007 01:01:04,280 --> 01:01:07,280 Speaker 1: It's sort of a ford border between them and India. 1008 01:01:07,360 --> 01:01:11,760 Speaker 1: They don't want to be surrounded UH. Candidly, even though 1009 01:01:11,880 --> 01:01:15,840 Speaker 1: Pakistan is expressing grief and sorrow for what happened yesterday, 1010 01:01:16,720 --> 01:01:20,360 Speaker 1: we know the Pakistani fingerprints all over the support of 1011 01:01:20,400 --> 01:01:24,480 Speaker 1: the Taliban, and candidly could very well be UH their 1012 01:01:24,560 --> 01:01:27,640 Speaker 1: support for isis K. This is a country that harbored 1013 01:01:28,040 --> 01:01:32,240 Speaker 1: Osama bin Laden for years UM and the relationship that 1014 01:01:32,280 --> 01:01:36,600 Speaker 1: we have with them is somewhat questionable. But they have 1015 01:01:36,680 --> 01:01:39,600 Speaker 1: forty nuclear weapons and we certainly don't want to have 1016 01:01:39,840 --> 01:01:43,479 Speaker 1: their government overturned and taken over by a bunch of 1017 01:01:44,200 --> 01:01:47,440 Speaker 1: tribal types inside of Pakistan. General Kibet, before we let 1018 01:01:47,440 --> 01:01:50,120 Speaker 1: you go, you were talking about the messiness of the operation, 1019 01:01:50,160 --> 01:01:51,920 Speaker 1: and I want to talk about some of the strategy. 1020 01:01:52,720 --> 01:01:56,280 Speaker 1: What would the rationale be for abandoning the Bagram air 1021 01:01:56,400 --> 01:02:00,880 Speaker 1: base and not just in focusing resources on the Kabbal Airport. Yeah, look, 1022 01:02:00,920 --> 01:02:05,080 Speaker 1: I'm I'm a little bit UH conflicted about that issue 1023 01:02:05,120 --> 01:02:09,400 Speaker 1: with Bagram Airport. Yeah, it's more secure, but it's also 1024 01:02:09,600 --> 01:02:12,280 Speaker 1: much further out in the Taliban would have set up 1025 01:02:12,360 --> 01:02:18,320 Speaker 1: checkpoints um for anybody to get to the Bagram airfield. 1026 01:02:18,400 --> 01:02:23,840 Speaker 1: So yeah, I think it's convenient excuse, but Bogram, while 1027 01:02:23,880 --> 01:02:26,240 Speaker 1: it was easier to defend, it would have been harder 1028 01:02:26,280 --> 01:02:29,360 Speaker 1: for people to evacuate too, because it's so far away 1029 01:02:29,360 --> 01:02:32,120 Speaker 1: from the city of Kabul. General Kimmitt, what do you 1030 01:02:32,160 --> 01:02:35,400 Speaker 1: tell the man the woman coming out of the class 1031 01:02:35,440 --> 01:02:40,560 Speaker 1: of two thousand twenty one at West Point Um. This 1032 01:02:40,640 --> 01:02:42,840 Speaker 1: is a long war. It's been going on since the 1033 01:02:42,920 --> 01:02:47,200 Speaker 1: nine eleven and it's not going to stop anytime soon. 1034 01:02:47,680 --> 01:02:49,720 Speaker 1: You need to look at what your predecessors from the 1035 01:02:49,800 --> 01:02:52,600 Speaker 1: last twenty years have done to defend this country and 1036 01:02:52,640 --> 01:02:54,960 Speaker 1: you better rock up and be ready to defend it 1037 01:02:54,960 --> 01:02:57,240 Speaker 1: as well. Mark Kimmitt, we look forward to speaking to 1038 01:02:57,320 --> 01:03:00,560 Speaker 1: you again. Mark Kimmitt, I retired Brigadier General and of 1039 01:03:00,600 --> 01:03:03,880 Speaker 1: course working with the Bush administration as Assistant Deputy Assistant 1040 01:03:04,080 --> 01:03:07,160 Speaker 1: Director of Defense for the Middle East. This is the 1041 01:03:07,200 --> 01:03:11,880 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays 1042 01:03:11,920 --> 01:03:15,360 Speaker 1: from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and 1043 01:03:15,480 --> 01:03:19,760 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am 1044 01:03:19,800 --> 01:03:23,560 Speaker 1: for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and 1045 01:03:23,680 --> 01:03:30,200 Speaker 1: international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 1046 01:03:30,360 --> 01:03:33,959 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm 1047 01:03:34,000 --> 01:03:36,680 Speaker 1: Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg