WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: U.S Inflation Data, Europe Chocolate Prices, BYD Preview

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg day

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend, our global look at the top stories in

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the coming week from our Daybreak anchors all around the world.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Straight ahead on the program, data on inflation and economic

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>growth this week, and we take a look at the

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>US cruise industry earnings from the world's biggest cruise operator.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm kunin Hepger here in London, where we're looking at

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>the chocolate industry faced with sour in coco prices.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curnis in Hong Kong. I'll take a look

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>at the upcoming results from YD the business, the expansion plans,

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and of course the geopolitics.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 4>E Loove Them three own New York, Bloomberg ninety nine

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 4>to one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 4>XM one nineteen and around the world on Bloomberg Radio

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 4>dot com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>today's program with the third and final reads out this

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>week on US economic growth and inflation, the core personal

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>consumption expenditures for the final quarter of twenty twenty three,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about what that means for the FED.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>For more, we welcome Annawong, chief US economist for Bloomberg Economics. Anna,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Hi, good to be here.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, before we talk about what you expect to see

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>from Q four GDP and Q four PCE, let's begin

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>with your reaction to what the Central Bank did this

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>past week, holding rates unchanged, that's the fifth meeting in

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a row, while maintaining the outlook for three rate cuts

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this year. What do you make of that?

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, that met our expectation because we thought that Powell

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 5>himself is the medium voter, and as long as Powell

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 5>is of the view that three rate cuts is still

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 5>appropriate for this year, I think he will carry most

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 5>of the FED board members with him. I thought more significantly, though,

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 5>is that they revised up their view of what FED

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 5>funds rate should be beyond twenty twenty four. And basically

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 5>the message there is that they believe that the underlying

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 5>neutral rates in the economy, for you know, for the layman.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 5>What that means is it's the interest rate that should

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 5>prevail in the long term consistent with two percent inflation.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 5>The SEP shows that the Committee believes the neutral rate

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 5>has risen and a lot of the dots in the

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 5>dot flot have moved up to about three percent for

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 5>the neutral rate. So I think that's significant because it

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 5>means that in the next year or two we would

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 5>see less rate cuts on the whole.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So, despite some disappointment about a recent rise in inflation, overall,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>this looks like a pretty upbeat outlook for economic growth,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>labor market, and inflation.

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think that the Fed still believes

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 5>mostly that inflation could return to two percent without generating

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 5>a lot of losses. On the employment side, they revised

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 5>down the unemployment forecast for this year from four point

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 5>one percent last December to four point zero percent, and

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 5>unemployment rate is already at three point nine percent. I

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 5>think they basically see just a very minor deterioration in

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 5>the stabilizing on that level.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, we heard from FED Chair J Powell last week

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>after Federal Reserve policymakers stuck to their path of interest

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts at least for now, after hitting a bump

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on the road to low and steady inflation.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 6>We believe that our policy rate is likely at its

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 6>peak for this tightening cycle, and that if the economy

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>evolves broadly as expected, it will likely be appropriate to

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 6>begin dialing back policy restraint at some point this year.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 6>The economic outlook is uncertain, however, and we remain highly

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 6>ten of two inflation risks.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>However, Bloomberg opinion columnst Mohammad l Arian said the Fed

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>should push out their rate cut timeline.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 7>We're living in a world where the supply side isn't

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 7>flexible enough, and you get almost every week you get

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 7>indication of changing supply chains, you get indication of the

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 7>label of the tightness of the labor market, you get

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 7>indication of an energy transition that's not going as well

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 7>as people want it. All these things mean the supply

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 7>side is less flexible, and the underlying inflation rate that

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 7>is consistent with the economic well being for now is

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 7>somewhat higher than two percent.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And former New York Fed President Bill Dudley says the

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Fed is sticking to its two percent target.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 8>We still think minetary policy is tight. We still think

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 8>we're going to get more confident about getting inflation down

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 8>to two percent, and so we still think we're going

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 8>to cut rates this year time. He's uncertain, and he

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 8>said over and over again, it depends on the data.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Fed always says it is all data dependent.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And right now, let's get back to the data we're

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see this week on fourth quarter GDP final

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>read and also PCE. What are you expecting to see?

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to be good news?

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, Tom, the GDP revisions does not

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 5>just end on the third revision. They go on for

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 5>years and years and years until it could be revised

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 5>even five years. But for the third revision, which we

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 5>are going to get next week, we're expecting the fourth

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.119
<v Speaker 5>quarter GDP to be little a little change at about

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 5>three percent. But more interestingly is that they are going

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 5>to be releasing the information the quarterly change for gd I.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 5>And in the past two years, gd I has been

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 5>running lower than GDP growth, even though theoretically they are

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 5>measuring the same things. So on a year over year basis,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 5>gross domestic income actually was running negative as of the

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 5>fourth quarter of last year in contrast to the pretty

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 5>robust increase in GDP growth. So I think we would

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 5>be paying a lot of attention to that because from

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 5>the perspective of the economists too, would be deciding on

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 5>the NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee on whether there is

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 5>a recession. It actually is the average of GDP and

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 5>GDI that matters.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The FED has six more policy meetings this year, the

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>next one and April thirtieth may first. Based on what

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we know now, and we won't know this latest figures

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for a few more days. Is it still too soon

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to expect one of those three rate cuts? I mean,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is June meeting a lot more likely for that?

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, June is our baseline, and I think June is

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 5>the baseline for the market as well. So I think

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 5>the crucial assumption of that is, as you said, if

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 5>things evolve as we see now, So if unemployment rate

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>barely rises, you know, stay in the three point nine

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 5>to four point zero zero range. If core PCE inflation

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 5>comes in, you know, at zero point two to zero

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 5>point three percent per month in the next couple of months,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 5>I think we will get a June rate cut.

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot to look forward to. Well, our thanks

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to Anawong, Chief US economist for Bloomberg Economics, We now

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>turn to the state of the cruising industry and the

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>latest earnings out this week from the biggest of them all,

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Carnival Cruise Lines. And for more we welcome Brian Egger,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Gaming and Lodging Analyst. Now, Brian, let's start.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>There has been a stunning turnaround in the cruise market

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>from the depths of the pandemic just a few years ago.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>How remarkable has this turnaround been.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 9>It's pretty remarkable. So the industry was basically in a

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 9>state of suspension from an operating perspective from during twenty

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 9>twenty and twenty twenty one. Now we are back to

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 9>essentially pre pandemic levels of both deployment and acmancy. So

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 9>we've kind of seen a full turnaround. And the revenue yields,

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 9>which are the key metric for Carnival, last year, they

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 9>were slightly above what they were in twenty nineteen, so

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 9>we're kind of gone full circle.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And what are the driving forces for this demand? I mean,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is the cruise industry? Is it pricing, is it just marketing?

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it the people just have got to get out

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on those ships.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 9>Certainly, we left the pandemic with a lot of pent

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 9>up demand. There were some of that revenge travel phenomenon

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 9>going on, but beyond that, you ei, there's still we've

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 9>seen this across the industry's recover which include lodging, a

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 9>strong sustain appetite among North American consumers and global consumers

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 9>for a leisure travel combined with a relatively moderate benign

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 9>pace of supply growth in the industry. And that is

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 9>a recipe for what has been a very nice pace

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 9>of yield growth recovery.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And how has the industry changed, How have the ships changed,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the procedures, the safety protocols.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 9>Safety protocols were big focus during the pandemic. A lot

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 9>of the voice civic restrictions, vaccines, masking, et cetera. Those

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 9>are now kind of in the past. But we're left

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 9>with an industry that's reattuned to some of these protocols.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 9>And at the same time, you know what's happened to

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 9>companies like Carnival, they also during the pandemic sold less

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 9>efficient ships have also since then introduced new capacity. So

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 9>the industry from a fleet perspective has fairly current stated

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 9>the art capacity and certainly you know, good operating efficiencies,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 9>cost efficiencies that really originated during.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>The pandemic, and these ships are bigger than they've ever been.

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They keep getting better, yes, more amenities, roller coasters and

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>surfing simulations I mean, and yet they're able to pack

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>these cruises in right.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so these ships are more efficient from a fuel

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 9>consumption and operating perspective when they run full. But we've

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 9>definitely seen the combination of strong bookings and moderate supply

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 9>growth low single digits for Carnival the next few years

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 9>translate into good book and you do have on the

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 9>cost side, of course, some pressures from cost inflation and

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 9>advertising dry dout costs, So there are some pressures. There's

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 9>always the geopolitical risk, for example, the conflict in the

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 9>Middle East, you know, removing some capacity from the Red

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Sea area, small part of their capacity, but generally speaking

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 9>they are now on a very attractive trajectory.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Also Haiti just very recently, Yeah, and they had redirect

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ships away from a popular port there. Well, then let's

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about Carnival and what you expect to see this Tuesday.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 9>Sure, so our overall forecast for this is actually going

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 9>to be for their first fiscal quarter which ended February

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 9>twenty ninth. That they're on a November fiscal year the

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 9>February quarter. You know, we kind of go by the

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 9>consensus thinking as a benchmark, which is for revenue up

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 9>twenty two percent. The components or that are the revenue

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 9>yield metric is up about sixteen seventeen percent based on

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 9>their guidance, and capacities at four percent. So you kind

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 9>of add that together. You've got you've got pricing, you've

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 9>got low twenties kind of revenue growth based on consensus guidance.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And how does Carnival compare to some of the other

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>big players. There's Norwegian, Royal Caribbean, Disney of course.

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I mean the way I kind of think

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 9>about how they compared to the rivals is when you

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 9>look at twenty twenty four overall, how does their revenue

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 9>yield growth expectation compared to those And you know, and

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 9>what we've seen right now is preliminarily Carnival expecting eight

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 9>and a half percent yuel growth. You know, that's pretty

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 9>similar to like Royal Caribbean actually just raise their guidance

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 9>for reals after they report of the quarter. So now

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 9>it's seven and a quarter percent roughly a midpoint. So

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 9>they're all kind of they're similarly looking for that mid

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 9>to high single digit rate of revenue yield improvement on

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 9>top of twenty three, which is a year where we

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 9>basically reverted back to pre pandemic levels of revenue yield.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 9>So it's growth on top of that, which is which

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 9>is very healthy.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And for Carnival now we have we're in Q two right,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>spring has sprung. Everyone's planning their trips for either spring

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>break or of course is this the time that they're

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to see their big bookings.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 9>So the key part of the booking season, it's called

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 9>the wave season and the cruise industry both as a

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 9>pun on oceanic pun, but also because that's like the

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 9>crest wave in bookings we see that typically happens between

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 9>years and kind of like January February, all indications from

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 9>other companies as well as that booking season has been robust.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow well Carnival Cruise Lines reporting this Tuesday and our

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Brian Egger, Senior Gaming and Lodging analysts at

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the challenges for Europe's chocolate industry just ahead of the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Easter holiday. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead at

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our program,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>earning this week from some of China's biggest banks and

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that nation's biggest ev maker. But first, it's one of

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest events of the year in the chocolate industry.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Easter means big business in the UK alone, Consumers will

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>spend as much as four hundred and fifteen million pounds

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on festive chocolate this season, but this year, soaring cocoa

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>prices are threatening to push prices even higher. So what

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>will this mean for Europe's confectionery sector. Well, for more,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak europe

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>banker Caroline hepgar Tom.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>A difficult harvest season for crucial West African farmers has

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 2>seen cocoa prices shoot up by more than one hundred

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 2>percent this year, raising costs for the world's chocolate makers

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that risk being passed on to consumers. The record breaking

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>rally has sent Coco's a fourteen day relative strength index

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>above seventy percent. This is a signal to some that

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 2>prices may have jumped too fast, but that has been

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the case several times since January, and cocoa prices are

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>still climbing higher now ahead of one of the biggest

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>days on the calendar for chocolate consumption. Global supplies are stretched,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>with farmers skeptical that incoming rain can make up for

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a season decimated by hot and dry weather in the

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>most important cocoa producing regions. Bloomberg's opinion columnist Javier blast

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 2>says that he's been stocking up on sweet treats in

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>anticipation of a shortage.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 10>I'm a stockpilings on chocolate because we eat quite a

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 10>lot at home, must confess that. And the price of

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 10>coco is app one hundred and fifty percent. You make

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 10>chocolate out of coco, a bit of sugar, a bit

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.359
<v Speaker 10>of milk. Prices of chocolate on the on the supermarket,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 10>it's gonna go up and go up quite significantly over

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 10>the next six months. The market for coco is facing

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 10>a structural deficit. Supply is well behind the demand. Probably

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 10>the gap between demand and production is going to be

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty four. The largacy has been at least

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 10>in sixty five years. So we have a problem and

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 10>the only cure for the market right now is higher prices,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 10>or we have going to see a bit of higher

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 10>prices in the supermarket. So I'm just anticipating from that.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 2>That was Bloomberg opinion columnist Javier Blast sharing his perspective

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 2>there now. He might just be right to suggest that

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>things will get even worse before they get better. In

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the Ivory Coast, the world's biggest cocoa producer in the world,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 2>cocoa farmers are busy cleaning their plantations, applying chemicals and

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>pruning trees in preparations for the mid crop harvest, clinging

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 2>onto the hope that better weather can make up for

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the losses that they've seen. We've been covering this story

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>closely at Bloomberg, and our analysis has shown that the

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>coco crisis is being felt the most here in Europe,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>which is also the world's biggest chocolate consuming region, because

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of new sustainability rules which are threatening to make the

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>shortage of beans even worse. EU regulations aimed at stopping

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>products which could harm forests iedforestation from being sold in

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>shops here could make it even harder for chocolate makers

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>to secure the supplies that they need, and it looks

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>like the jump in prices is here to stay. The

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>International Cocoa Organization projected that global cocoa supply deficits would

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>increase by four hundred and five percent in the years ahead.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>This as climate change only heightens the threat to cocoa production. Now,

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>all of these challenges in production are likely to have

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a knock on effect on consumers hoping to snag a

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>sweet treat this Easter. Manufacturers could be forced to increase

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>prices and shrink production, as well as diversify away from

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>chocolate products. In retail terms, there's set to be little

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>price difference actually between some of the luxury chocolate products

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and their traditionally more budget friendly counterparts. Is something I've

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>been talking to our Bloomberg Commodities reporter Mumbig Guitar About

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and retail reporter Helen Chandler wild Now. I began by

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>asking Mumbie how bad the situation is for coco producers

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 11>I think, let's first a later base here. In just

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 11>less than three months, cocoa futures have doubled. So we

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 11>started the year at four thousand dollars a ton, and

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 11>right now we are above eight thousand dollars a ton,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 11>and all this is because of the cocoa production issues

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 11>that we have in every Cost and Ghana. These are

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 11>the two biggest coco producers.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 3>In the world.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 11>They produced two thousand of global production, so any declines

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 11>in those two countries will be felt globally. Ghana alone

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 11>will have a drop of about twenty percent, and so

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 11>we livery cost and we are seeing that in the

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 11>export and arrivals data that we are getting. So production

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 11>has been pretty disappointing. I don't think the industry expected

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 11>it to be this disappointing, and that's why we are

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 11>seeing the market rally this much. Because of that, we

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 11>are going to have a third year of coco deficit.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 11>And we love our chocolate too much.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, Why have we seen such a radical move

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and prices? Is it all around weather?

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 11>Yes, it's all around weather and also diseases. But also

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 11>we know that farmers have not been well paid for

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 11>a really long time. If you're not well paid, then

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 11>you don't have the incentive to invest back into your farm,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 11>and so they've not pretty much taken care of their

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 11>farms or invested in fertilizers, Okay, because I needed to

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 11>keep the diseases at bay. But also the weather change

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 11>has made it incredibly difficult for those trees to remain resilient.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So that's the baseline that producer prices are going up,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>farmers prices are going up. How much more expensive do

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you think a chocolate is going to get for the consumer?

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 11>So the chocolate that you're currently seeing on the shelf

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 11>was probably manufactured sometime towards the end of last year

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 11>when prices were still very low. So we may see

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 11>some increments in chocolate prices given just the rally that

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 11>we saw last year. But I think more pain will

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 11>come towards the end of this year when you're buying

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 11>your hallow in chocolate, when you're buying your Christmas chocolate,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 11>and next year's Easter, because we have to take their

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 11>account the doubling of prices just between January and match.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 11>So as much as it will be expensive this time,

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 11>I think the pain will be felt much more towards

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 11>the end of the year.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>And then also you've written about how perhaps the effects

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 2>of the shortage are going to be more pronounced in

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Europe than elsewhere why.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 11>And Europe tends to be very responsible when it comes

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 11>to be to its imports. So they have this European

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 11>deforestation law that's going to make it difficult for Importance

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 11>to bring in coco. They have to make sure that

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 11>the cocoa that they bring in was not grown on

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 11>deforested land. Now, to make sure and to prove to

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 11>the ear that it wasn't grown on first that land,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 11>they need to map every single farmer. So every shipment

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 11>that arrives at the EU ports has to be traceable

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 11>back to the farm. If you can't trace it back

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 11>to the farm, you can't bring it to the EU.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So there's a price to that to consumers then,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't there? Yes, in terms of quality standards I suppose

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and traceability. Do you think the cocoa futures are likely

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to stay high?

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Then?

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>And if you say the feed through to consume prices

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 2>hasn't actually yet hit, what about the future's market.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 11>Because the future market actually looks at deliveries in the future.

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 11>I think we I wouldn't say whether we've picked or not.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 11>I don't have the crystal ball. It's had to see.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 11>But in such a volatile market will probably continue to

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 11>see the wild swings that we've been seeing, so we'll

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 11>see another shoot and then we might see a correction

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 11>at some point. But if these shortages persist, it's going

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 11>to take some time before these coco prices come down.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and then what does it mean. I suppose for

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 2>others in the manufacturing chain along.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 11>The line right now, they are trying to increase the

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 11>prices for your chocolate just so that they can absorb

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 11>that part of the cost, and consumers can absorb part

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 11>of that cost. But they're also paying so much for

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 11>coco lasts. Yesterday we ran a story about grinder in

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 11>Asia who's paying a premium just to get the cocoa beans.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 11>So there's a scramble among manufacturers for who can pay

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 11>more for cocoa, particularly in markets that are more liberalized.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 11>But you may start to see some manufacturers push to

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 11>you some white chocolates or chocolate, it's more nuts and

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 11>fruit so that they can try and bring down their

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 11>coco consumption.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Let me bring in Helen Chandler World now to

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>the conversation. So we've heard a little bit about the

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>cocoa issues and prices having sowed in recent months. How

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 2>expensive do you think chocolate is going to get for

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the end consumer, Helen See.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 12>I think, as we're just here, there will probably be

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 12>a slight delay on prices increasing just because of the

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 12>amount of time that takes actually make the chocolate, which

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 12>does take a little bit of time. But we have

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 12>seen that already. There was a bit of research in

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 12>the growser that showed that a lot of Easter eggs

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 12>at the lower end of the market were already fifty

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 12>percent more expensive than the work last year, which just

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 12>sort of rise almost about the same amount as Coto prices.

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 2>What do you think is going to happen then to

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the marketing of I mean, we started talking about chocolate

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>for Easter, so in terms of you know, affordable versus luxury,

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 2>what does the market look like then.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 12>This Easter well, and the price increases I think will

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 12>actually be predominantly in the lower end of the market

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 12>where there's like almost no profit margin in the first place.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 12>Whereas I spoke to some more luxury producers, no telling me.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 12>We've always paid our farmers a lot of money, so

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 12>there's always been that extra bit of margin there, so

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 12>the price increase won't be quite as much, but we're seeing,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 12>like you know, some Easter eggs and sort of lower

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 12>end of the market like Cadbury. I love it, it's delicious,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 12>but some of those eggsert now ten pounds, which is

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 12>quite a lot of money compared to what they used

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 12>to be, So then it might feel a bit worse

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 12>it to spash out twenty pounds and get something that's

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 12>about a thousand times nicer.

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So do you think a more expensive chocolate then is

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 2>now the new norm? As the industry accepted.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 12>That well, I was speaking to some people who are

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 12>making Easter eggs really at the top lux end of

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 12>market where they are charging eighty or ninety pounds for

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 12>an Easter egg, which might sound crazy, but if things

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 12>are generally more expensive anyway, then ninety pounds on the

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 12>Easter egg is much cheaper than going on holiday, which

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 12>might be totally out of your budget. But having that

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 12>little spurgeon an East egg might be just a nice

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 12>little treat.

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. How important then is that kind of marketing factor

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the coco producers and b the big

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 2>push I mean, is it all around certain dates in

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the calendar? Is obviously a hugely popular item in Europe.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 11>That's usually mainly on the manufacturer side of things, having

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 11>a calendar of events. So we started with Christmas, then

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 11>we had Valentine's, then we had Mother's Day, then we

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 11>had Easter. So the idea is to have chocolate for

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 11>every single event that we have across the ears. As

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 11>long as we have an event coming up, you're more

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 11>likely to buy chocolate as a gift.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Helen, what are you detecting then in the trends this

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 2>year for the chocolate distributors, Yeah.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 12>There definitely is a move towards kind of differentiating a

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 12>product a lot more. I see even in my own

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 12>local supermarket, there's fear of the traditional miniac or moltias

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 12>as Easter eggs. Now even Cabria has started doing slightly

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 12>fancier ones with different ones, and then higher up the

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 12>bracket they get extremely decorative and beautiful and it's always

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 12>a thing you know, you can take a picture of

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 12>and shout out social media which sort of does its

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 12>own marketing as well.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>So that was Bloomberg reporters Helen Chandler Wild and Mumbi

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Guitu speaking to me about the situation for cocoa farmers,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 2>producers and the retailers here in your my thanks to them.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hebge here in London. You can catch us

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak. Youre at beginning at

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 2>six am in London. That's one am on Wall Street. Tom.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Earnings this week from the biggest EV maker in the

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest EV market. Also earnings from China's megabanks. I'm

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. Good day to you.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend. I'm Tom Busby and

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>New York with your global look ahead at the top

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. Chinese megabanks set

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to release earnings this week amid sluggish borrowing demand, a

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>stalled property market, and a stagnant overall economy. We also

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>get the latest earnings from Chinese ev giant BYD this week,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and for more on what to expect, we turned to

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak co host Brian Curtis.

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Tom. The results come at a critical juncture in the

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 3>EV industry, both in China and around the rest of

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the world. BYD recently overtook Tesla as the number one

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>seller of EV's, but it's having to cut prices and

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>it's facing geopolitical challenges for its business outside of China.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 3>We thought it was a good time to crunch through

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 3>some of these issues as we look forward to Byde's

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 3>numbers and its commentary. Joining us now in our studios

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 3>in Hong Kong is Bloomberg reporter Linda lu who covers

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 3>China cars. So Linda B. White's stock is up more

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 3>than fifteen percent or so over the past month, but

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 3>it had declined for the previous six months. A lot

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 3>of factors are at play in this, but let's talk

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>first about what we might see in sales and profit numbers.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 8>In the next week.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah. Byde is actually doing really well in sales. They've

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 13>broken records, and that shows a trend of China's growing

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 13>EV markets. But the unfortunate thing is part of that

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 13>sales was probably propelled by discounts that bid has had

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 13>to do due to such an intense competition in this market.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 13>So despite a record sales in the fourth quarter of

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 13>last year, their net income actually fell compared to the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 13>quarter before that.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the price war seems to be hurting margins for

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 3>all of the EV makers in China. I'm curious in

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 3>a sense is that good or bad for BYD, particularly

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 3>from a standpoint of market share.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 13>So BYD is still very dominant in the market. They

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 13>probably account for around thirty percent of all of the

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 13>evs and plug and hybrids sold in this market. But

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 13>overall the growth is slowing. You've got a weakening economy

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 13>in China, and there's more than one hundred brands that's

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 13>all competing in this market, and some of them are

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 13>trying to differentiate themselves with better technology advanced assists. The

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 13>driving feature is that BIDS isn't so strong, and so

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 13>they're also investing a lot to catch up in technology features.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So this move to a mass market lineup, I'm curious

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the impact of that. That's lower retail prices. It might

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 3>suggest to some that the company is kind of shooting

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 3>for increasing its market share and just going for a

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of volume.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 13>That's exactly right. Some of these new lineups have pricing

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 13>that's probably half of what these models we're selling a

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 13>few or a couple of years before. Obviously, that's a

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 13>really good thing for consumers.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 13>If you're in the market today looking to buy a car.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 13>You're getting a great deal. But we've heard previous owners

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 13>that bought a BYD car a couple of years ago

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 13>complaining that, you know, they bought a car at a

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 13>higher pricing with features that are not as new and

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 13>flashy as the cars that's on the market now. So

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 13>I think BYD is having to consider the sustainability of

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 13>such a strategy over the long.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Bid has some presence in Europe, and the cost structure

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>there is kind of interesting, and it's been more or

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>less locked out of the US market. And we've been

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>reporting at Bloomberg that BYD is now looking into the

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 3>possibility of building a plant in Mexico and then perhaps

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 3>making cars there. It'll take some time for that to happen,

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and then be able to use the MCA to get

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 3>cars into the United States and avoid the high punishing

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>tariff levels. What do we know, if anything, about any

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 3>progress on finding a site and thinking about building a

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>factory in Mexico.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 13>That's a strategy that's taken by quite a few Chinese

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 13>manufacturers now, not just BYD. We've heard that Tesla is

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 13>also encouraging its Chinese suppliers to follow along to Mexico.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 13>When the plants is built there. I think BYD will

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 13>really have to consider quite a few factors over where

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 13>to set up a Mexico That will obviously have to

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 13>consider what kind of incentives the local government will give,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 13>whether it is a good supply chain that can be

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 13>also set up in the local area to make it

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 13>really cost efficient, and ultimately I think a lot will

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 13>depend on the US policy in the future. Trump has

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 13>talked about, you know, closing loopholes. A lot of things

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 13>to consider before they ultimately make that huge investment into

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 13>building a plant.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 3>On another front, the company is looking to introduce some

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 3>new models in Japan and will expand its dealership there,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 3>but that's very tough competition there. The market is saturated

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 3>by hybrids and domestic brands. What's the overall strategy for

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 3>BYD in Japan?

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 13>Japan is a very interesting market, especially challenging for BYD.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 13>Like you said, it's got a lot of strong incumbents.

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 13>You know, some of the world's biggest automakers are there,

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 13>like Toyota, and the market preference in Japan is for hybrids,

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 13>which BYD doesn't have that strong an offering. They're really

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 13>hoping to educate the customers in Japan, maybe hoping to

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 13>really tempt them to try out EV's and maybe plug

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 13>in hybrids to show that, you know, there are these

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 13>even more environmentally friendly cars that could be cheaper to

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.719
<v Speaker 13>run if you just power them on electricity rather than

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 13>hybrids which is still running on gasoline.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so maybe some tough sledding there. I mentioned Europe earlier.

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 3>We're still waiting on that probe looking at electric vehicles

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 3>coming from China. What do we know about when do you

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 3>expect that.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 13>There's a lot of questions about when the investigation may

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 13>wrap up and the result from that. I think the

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 13>consensus is that there will probably be higher tariffs against

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 13>auto imports from China, especially on evs. There's a whole

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 13>range of numbers, anything from another eight to fifteen percent

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 13>on top of the about ten percent now that Chinese

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 13>EV's face when going into the European market, which will

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 13>make it probably prohibitive for the Chinese manufacturers to enter

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 13>in the market. So we see in lbid as trying

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 13>to localize production and the EU, you know, setting up

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 13>factory and hungry to try to head off Linda.

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for joining us. Linda lu who covers

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 3>China cars for Bloomberg. I'm Brian Curtis, along with Doug Krisner.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 3>You can catch us every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 3>beginning at eight am in Hong Kong and eight pm

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street.

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 14>Doug, Thanks Brian. The big banks in China will be

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 14>reporting earnings in the coming week.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 14>We know that government has been struggling to revive borrowing demand.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 14>The property market keeps slumping, consumer confidence remains near a

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 14>record low. Needless to say, it's not a great environment

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 14>if you're a bank. For a closer look, now, let's

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 14>bring in Bloomberg's Greater China correspondent. He is John Liu,

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 14>and he joins us from our studios in Beijing. One

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 14>of the things that I think is important to begin

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 14>on John, is the conversation around loan demand. Even though

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 14>are at historically low levels in China, there just doesn't

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 14>seem to be a lot of demand for credit. What's

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 14>driving this? Do you think property?

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 15>There used to be a lot of demand for money

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 15>for mortgages. People are not buying homes, so that has

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 15>fallen way off. There used to be a lot of

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 15>demand from property developers for loans that they would use

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 15>not only to build their properties and their real estate,

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 15>but also to buy land that no longer exists because

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 15>many of those property developers are now struggling to pay

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 15>off their debt, and so they are not in an

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 15>expansionary mode. They are retrenching, and that has really hit

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 15>demand for loans.

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 14>Last week, we know that the big major banks in

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 14>China maintained their lending rates. These are the loan prime rates.

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 14>I think that represent kind of the real loan for

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 14>the real economy. Not a surprise that these loans were

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 14>held steady since the PBOC the central Bank decided to

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 14>hold steady some of the key policy rates that feed

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 14>into the loan prime rates. But I'm wondering, do you

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 14>think regulators feel as though they're pushing on a string

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 14>no matter how low they cut interest rates. There's really

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 14>not a way of addressing the problem with sentiment that

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 14>would then go to what we were just talking about

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 14>with demand.

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 15>I think that is part of the problem. You put

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 15>it very well in the sense that what can the

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 15>central bank do. The central bank can cut rates and

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 15>raise rates, and cut reserve requirements and raise reserve requirements.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 15>They can't really do much in terms of getting people

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 15>out and spending or borrowing or companies investing, and so

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 15>they are trying to do what they can. The other issue,

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 15>of course, is if you keep cutting interest rates, it

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 15>is going to affect the banks adversely in the sense

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 15>of their margins. The amount of money they make on

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 15>loans is going to shrink and compress, and there is

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 15>an element of having to consider the health of the

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 15>financial system as China is trying to do what it

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 15>can to get people spending companies investing in.

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 14>Well, I'm glad you bring up the subject of net

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 14>interest margin because when I look at analysis and from

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 14>Bloomberg Intelligence on the big banks in China, it's clear

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 14>the chief concern is margin, and I'm wondering whether or

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 14>not the government is equally concerned about how this may

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 14>be impacting the bank's balance sheets.

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 15>There was a report in the Financial News, which is

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 15>a newspaper that is published by the Central Bank. It

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 15>talked about how banks are really suffering and facing lots

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 15>of challenges because as the central government lowers interest rates,

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 15>they're making less on every loan that they make, and

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 15>that is making it a more difficult operating system or

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 15>environment for the banks, And you have to remember these

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 15>banks are state owned. The biggest banks in China are

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 15>all owned by the central government. Even the Central Bank

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 15>governor that we have today, Pungu Chang, he was the

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 15>chairman of Agricultural Bank back in the day, and so

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 15>there is a strong connection between the commercial side of

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 15>the banking system and the regulatory side.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 14>We also know that they have loan books, right and

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 14>when you think about the quality of loans, do we

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 14>have a sense of how well loans are performing right now? Okay,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 14>we know property is a problem, but more broadly, are

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 14>loans beginning to become an issue? Is there a question

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 14>around people's ability to service debt?

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 15>There is, and this is a reason why the non

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 15>performing loans number is going to be really closely scrutinized

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 15>when we get that from these earnings. In the third quarter,

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 15>we actually saw that number of the mpls come down

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 15>slightly for all the big commercial banks and more broadly

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 15>for the banking system. That was for the third quarter.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 15>Whether or not that continued in the fourth quarter, we

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 15>have to wait and see, but there is a lot

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 15>of concern. Anecdotally, there have been an increase in the

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 15>number of people not paying their mortgages. The number of

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 15>foreclosures we've had in China, it's starting from a low base,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 15>but it's growing fairly rapidly.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 14>What do we know about the level of deposits. I'm

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 14>wondering whether or not people are so fearful. Maybe that's

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 14>too strong a word, but they lack confidence in such

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 14>a way that they feel that there's no alternative except

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 14>just to keep the money in the bank, I mean,

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 14>and for that reason, our deposit levels fairly high.

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 15>Deposit levels have been rising after the pandemic, After China

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 15>lifted its zero COVID policies, we actually saw a big

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 15>increase in the amount of money individuals and companies were

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 15>keeping in the bank in terms of deposits. More recently

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 15>that seems to have slowed. It does, as you say,

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 15>show a lack of confidence or a lack of animal spirits,

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 15>as it were.

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 14>John, thank you so much for taking the time to

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 14>chat with us and helping us kind of set the

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 14>table for the earnings reports that we are expecting in

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 14>the coming week for the big banks in China. John

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 14>Louis is Bloomberg's Greater China correspondent, joining us from our

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 14>Studios in Beijing. I'm Doug Krisner. You can join Brian

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 14>Curtis and myself weekdays here from Bloomberg Daybreak Asia beginning

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 14>at eight am in Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street. Tom.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Doug, and also thank you Brian. And that

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>does it for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Join us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>time for the latest on markets overseas and the news

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you need to start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with us. Top stories and global business headlines are coming

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.280
<v Speaker 1>up right now